In short
Podcast Episode Notes: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 200
Episode Overview Title: 200. The Israeli settler movement, Ukraine blockaded, and Putin's perpetual power Hosts: Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart Topics Discussed:
- The ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict
- UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's Rwanda immigration policy
- The blockade situation in Ukraine
- Vladimir Putin’s political power and strategies
---
Key Themes and Discussions
- Israel-Palestine Conflict
- Current Situation: The hosts discuss the escalating violence and humanitarian crisis in Gaza, noting that the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) are conducting substantial bombing campaigns.
- Civilian Impact: The conversation highlights the tragic reality of civilian casualties, with estimates indicating over 15,000 deaths, predominantly among women and children. The high casualty count raises ethical concerns about military strategies.
- Normalization of Horror: Alastair expresses concern about society's desensitization to the ongoing violence, questioning the lack of media coverage on the Israel-Palestine situation in recent weeks.
- Settler Movement: Rory mentions the steady encroachment of Israeli settlers in Palestinian territories, emphasizing the dire implications for a two-state solution.
- UK Government's Rwanda Immigration Policy
- Lawfulness of Policy: The episode examines Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's controversial Rwanda policy, intended to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda. The legality and ethicality of this approach are heavily debated among the hosts.
- Political Factions: Rory outlines the divided factions within the Conservative Party regarding the Rwanda bill, with some viewing it as too lenient and others considering it inhumane.
- Public and Political Pressure: The discussion includes how public sentiment and international law influence the government's stance, with comparisons made to past policies and UN resolutions.
- Ukraine Blockade and International Support
- Blockade Situation: The episode describes the blockade of trucks at the Ukrainian border, noting the economic repercussions for Ukraine amidst its ongoing war with Russia.
- U.S. Support for Ukraine: The hosts discuss the dwindling support for Ukraine among U.S. Republican voters, highlighting the need for continued international financial backing to maintain Ukraine's military efforts.
- Vladimir Putin’s Continued Power
- Political Maneuvering: Alastair and Rory analyze Putin's grip on power, noting his recent public appearances and the perception of his inevitable re-election.
- International Relations: The episode touches on Putin’s relationships with international leaders, particularly during his recent meeting with Saudi Arabia, raising questions about geopolitical alliances.
---
Key Takeaways
- Ethical Implications: The hosts stress the moral complexities surrounding military actions in conflict zones, cautioning against normalizing high civilian casualties.
- Political Fragmentation: The Conservative Party in the UK is depicted as sharply divided over immigration policy, reflecting broader societal and ethical dilemmas regarding asylum seekers.
- Geopolitical Context: The interplay between domestic politics and international relations is emphasized, particularly regarding the response to crises in Ukraine and the Middle East.
---
Conclusion This episode of "The Rest Is Politics" provides a deep dive into the critical issues affecting the UK and its role in international conflicts while also dissecting domestic political challenges. The conversation underscores the importance of navigating these complex topics with both nuance and sensitivity.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Thanks for listening to The Rest Is Politics. Sign up to The Rest Is Politics plus to enjoy ad -free listening and receive a weekly newsletter. Join our members' chat room again early access to live show tickets. Just go to TheRestisPolitics .com. That's TheRestisPolitics .com.
0:30Cut it again! How about sneakers for the kids? A plus brands and right on trend starting at 11 .99! Saving is now in session. Burlington deals, brands, wow! Stalls & Selection is very by location. Ryan Reynolds here from Midmobile. With the price of just about everything going up, we thought we'd bring our prices down. So to help us, we brought in a reverse auctioneer which is apparently a thing. Midmobile unlimited! Premier Wireless! Have it to get 30, 30, 30, 30, 30, 30, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 15, 15, 15, 15, just 15 bucks a month! So give it a try at Midmobile .com. Slash. Switch.
1:05Up front payment of $45 for three months, land equivalent to $15 per month required. New customer offer for first three months only. Speed slow after 35 gigabytes of networks busy. Taxes and fees extra. See Midmobile .com. Put us in a box. Go ahead. That just gives us something to break out of. Because the next generation 2025 GMC terrain elevation is raising the standard of what comes standard. As far as expectations go, why meet them when you can shatter them? What we choose to challenge, we challenge completely. We are professional grade. Visit GMC .com to learn more.
1:50Welcome to the rest of the politics. Me, Alistair Campbell and with me, Rory Stewart. Before we get going, if you happen to be coming to the Royal Albert Hall tomorrow, Thursday, ahead of that, go to our Instagram page this morning where we've got lots of polls running that we'd like you to vote in ahead of tomorrow night. And we will be having other events, weren't we? Next year? Absolutely. Which will start pop singing live events. People come to. They seem to be still selling out about six, seven minutes, but we promise to do more work and get out more around. We have promised we will go to Wales at some points.
2:25We have to do that. That is a promise. Now, as for today, we're going to talk Israel Palestine, lots to talk about on that. We're going to talk Rishi Sunak and he's rather tricky week. COVID inquiry and now the Rwanda votes. We're going to talk Ukraine. I know you're wrenched in this Polish truck blockade, but also there's on the bigger picture, can the Americans and can the European Union keep funding the Ukrainian effort. And then as cop, limps to what looks like a pretty unsatisfactory conclusion, Saudi Arabia and Putin. Very good. So where do you want to start? We start with Israel. Yeah, let's start with Israel.
3:05So what have you, I mean, we're now, I guess, two months in, is your mind beginning to shift? Are you changing your views? I mean, how are you thinking about it now? Compared how you think about it, couple months ago? I think it's very, very hard not to feel that this thing is just beyond anything that we imagine. We said, right, if you remember day one, we said, this is going to be unimaginably horrible. I was at an event last night, and I won't name her, but there was a very well -known war correspondent who was there who said that of all the wars, this has felt like the worst. And I think that through, right through the whole thing, I've had this sense that the Israelis have decided they're not really explaining the strategy.
3:51They're just doing the strategy. And what you're seeing is a level of horror, I think now, the normalization of which is quite frightening. Somebody actually pointed out last week that one of our listeners said, you know, they find it incredible that we didn't even talk about the Middle East last week. Now, it's true, you know, lots of other things that we were talking about. But I wonder if that's even within the context of this discussion, whether the normalization of the horror is such that, and just, and one of the problems is that it's very difficult to report on. Israel appears at the moment not to be allowing international journalists into Gaza.
4:31A lot of journalists are being killed, which means that it's very difficult to get reporting out. There was a very interesting analysis at young BBC and we can share the clip with people with an ex, a US defense specialist, who said that on single days, Israel was dropping more bombs than in Afghanistan an entire year, and that a lot of the bombs being dropped to 2 ,000 pound bombs, which are really, really big things. Now, they're laser guided, so they hit the precise target that the Israeli military wanted to hit, but the effect on the surrounding area is enormous. And he's really struggling to understand how all this works.
5:14So, in order to kill a mid -level Hamas commander, it appears as though they killed about 126 people, 126 civilians to get one mid -level commander. So, to take you from their perspective, they think they know where the Hamas commander is. They target him and take him out, but in so doing are taking out dozens of other people, many of whom will presumably have nothing to do with Hamas. Yeah, and it does, I mean, again, because of the controversies around the attack on the hospital, and because Hamas is clearly a terrorist organization that can be incredibly dishonest and devious when it wants to be, there's been a real tendency to hold back on taking their word for things, but the New York Times and others, I think, are now pretty confident of the numbers, which are pushing well into 15 ,000 people, and that the majority of those killed in the moment are women and children.
6:12And you can see in the aerial imagery what northern Gaza looks like. So, this is a very small strip of land Gaza with about 2 .3 million people, and of those, the vast majority of now being displaced from their houses, 80, 90%. Many of them several times. Many of them several times? I saw an interview on Al Jazeera, some of you in the situation's moved, she was weak paying, she was being moved for the fourth time, following instructions, following the social media campaigns from the Israelis and Jews moving. And the place that they've been told to move to now is literally the size of ETHRA airport.
6:49A lot of the concentration now is that a tiny strip along the Egyptian border, where there have been some very clear statements from the humanitarian agencies saying there's basically no water, there's no toilets, the world food program is saying that many people are not being managing to eat even once a day. And now the fighting is moving to Han Yunus, which is the population centric in the south, Gaza City, having been comprehensively bombed. And then we go back to your question, what's the objective here? And there are different reasons given by the IDF at different times for what they're doing.
7:28So, one of those is that this is designed to get the hostages returned. That's very unclear for me. I don't think any hostage negotiator or hostage specialist that I'm aware of thinks that killing over 10 ,000 people is the way to get hostages returned. I mean, hostage releases is a specialist thing normally done by special forces and people who've got real skills in hostage release. Yeah, and it's also raises a moral question, ethical question, because if what you're doing is suggesting, I don't know whether this is what they're suggesting, but it sounds a little bit like you're suggesting that you're just going to keep killing lots of women and children until the hostages release.
8:06There's a basic principle, which is very fundamental in the way that we think about law, which is that you don't kill innocent people to force the hand of the guilty party. The other thing I was interested in to talk about was the issues of the settlements. Don McIntire, who you may know, who was a journalist back in my day, we were political corresponds together, and he was Middle East correspondent for the independent years, and he's out there. He's the guy who wrote this book, Gaza, which I mentioned a few weeks ago, and he had a piece in the new European this week, which really, I thought I knew a little bit about the settlement issue, but he's out there now, and he's spending time out there, he's in the West Bank.
8:49And he was telling the story of how this has just been steadily happening well before October the 7th, and that bit by bit, he reported from this village called Zanuta, where literally everybody has now moved out, everybody, and then the settlers who've moved them out and out onto the next place, and he was equated, this guy was shepherd, who talked about these herding outposts, and you can see this, it's like it's almost like a sort of piecemeal battle that's going on, and including this detail, and Don does love his sort of colourful details, but where the sheep, the Israeli sheep have been fighting the Palestinian sheep for land, and the Palestinians have now taken their sheep to bring them inside, and he says as a result of that, normally the sheep would be grazing for 11 months of the year, and only need proper food one month of the year, they're now having to feed them for six months of the year, which means that it's utterly unviable, so their businesses are being destroyed, their homes are being destroyed, etc.
10:01And this is all happening, most of this is happening, and you've talked before about the sort of delineation of the West Bank, in Area C, which is 63 % of the West Bank, and that's where the two state solution would be, the Florida Palestinian state, and it's just, it's impossible to see how this now happens, and if you tie what Don's writing in the paper to his book, which obviously was published a few years ago, and this tracks the story of this, it's kind of been going on step -by -step, by step -by -step, and he's very critical of the international community, of the Palestinian leadership, and of the Israelis, for the fact that we've just sort of allowed this to happen.
10:39I remember it said, for enough, it's been a different minister, it's the different minister responsible for Israel -Palestine, and I'm sure like you, and like probably most ministers before and after me, I was taken by our diplomats up onto a hill and shown these settlements and made firm statements against the settlements, and then came back, and had a very techy conversation with the Israeli ambassador. And I remember thinking at the time how utterly muddled and confused the international policy was, on the one hand, we were making these statements about settlements, we were making statements about the occupied Palestinian territories, but in the other hands, we were very, very worried, it felt politically, about in any way, offending Israel, and so we were, I almost thought, pretending that the Netanyahi government was agreeing with us, and being in favor of a two -state solution, and that we all agreed that this was the occupied Palestinian territories, one, of course, they weren't.
11:43In fact, he doesn't believe in a two -state solution, and he's only once even begun to suggest he wasn't failing. And he'd say, he would probably say, to your face, two -state solution, blah, obviously, yes, and then meanwhile, back in Israel, he's doing deals with this smot -rich in the Ben Gavir, who are funding money and guns to the settlers. Now meanwhile, on the other side, and muddling this even more, is another really big story that's been happening over the last 10 days, which has dominated the US media, but also slightly the British Museum, is the heads of the University of Pennsylvania, Harvard, and MIT, who in a big public testimony were asked whether calling for genocide against Jews were harassment, completely failed to answer.
12:25They kept, well, there again, a real sign of the way in which obviously this is spreading into so many other areas of political life, polarizing, particularly US public opinion, almost more than anywhere. Did you watch that? I thought it was extraordinary that they were so bad at handling public questioning when they would have been trained. I mean, one of those resigned. Yeah, Liz McGill, University of Pennsylvania has now gone, partly triggered by Adona, who I think was talking about holding back $150 million gift to the university. But more fundamentally, if you're asked whether genocide, congenitized harassment, you have to say, yes, genocide is completely wrong.
13:05And it was very odd that they couldn't do that. Even if you then move on to say, however, within our campus, we question whether that was what was happening. It was a very, very odd, but very, a moment which for the Jewish community in the US and in Europe is just confirming the sense of anti -Semitism. So there are two narratives happening at the same time. There is the horror of what is happening on the ground in Gaza. The bombs being dropped by the IDF and on the other hand, a lot of the conversation in social media is about Jewish communities being very, very concerned by what they see as a rising tide of anti -Semitism.
13:38And on the same side, many of my friends who are concerned about the Palestinian cause are also reaching out to these American universities, thinking that the universities are not giving enough space to people on the pro -Palestinian side. We're back to the fundamental problem, which is that it appears to be even in places where you expect the leaders of those organized at the universities to be able to manage these difficult debates, where the polarization is such that they appear incapable of so doing. Now, I've heard a lot in recent years about this kind of whole woke thing on American campuses.
14:16And I've always assumed a bit like, because I think the woke debate is so absurd on so many levels. But when you see that level of reluctance to say something, which you know you have a constituency in your university is going to find difficult to hear, so you can't say it, it's sort of, it's a bit scary. It is very scary. And it's also interesting that, I mean, you and I instinctively know that sometimes giving a blunt clear answer is essential, that oddly, politicians are often accused of avoiding questions, but I don't think any politician asked whether genocide was a bad thing would waffle.
14:52I also think that you talk about woke on campuses. One of the things making it complicated is that there's a big social justice movement that is identifying Jews as being white and Palestinians as being black adjacent. So there's a lot of a lot of energy from social justice movement, take place, very strange, given that obviously, you know, Jews and Arabs are very, very closely related, definitely. I think the other thing maybe just to finish on before we move on to Rwanda is your thoughts on the British politics of this. So there was a resolution in the UN, which was supported by Russia China and critically France.
15:31So that's three out of the five security members calling for a ceasefire and the release of the hostages. And you would have thought that's a pretty uncontroversial thing, ceasefire release of hostages. But the US voted against and Britain abstained. And Britain abstained partly because going back to my time in the foreign office, I get joking about this. This is a ridiculous idea that you find out what the US are doing and do a little bit less. There was a reason why it did not like. Do not, but it is literally a convention in the British Foreign Service that if the Americans vote against the UK abstains.
16:04However, it was broken once and it was broken in 2009 where there was another war in Gaza. And that led eventually to a ceasefire. Absolutely. That was a war in Gaza in which during that war, 14 Israelis were killed and between 1114, 100 Palestinians were killed. The US wanted to vote against the resolution. Britain was going to abstain and at the very last minute overnight, Gordon Brown's government changed their position, decided to vote in favor and the US changed its position and abstained. Now, people would say 2009 is a bit different, maybe Israel in that situation was actually looking for a way out in a way that they're not now.
16:41US politics was different. But it does show that it can be done. And I would have thought that Kierstama and David Lamy need to now get out ahead of this and be calling clearly for ceasefire because if they wait until sooner, combined change reminds us too late. I mean, I do have sympathy for the Labour's position in that it strikes me as odd that here we are. We're going to talk about Rasputinak in the context of COVID and of Rwanda and the British government's position on Israel -Ghazar is coming under very little scrutiny, whereas the opposition is coming under massive attack. Lots of MPs say they're getting literally thousands of emails and messages and so forth.
17:22Just to go back to the point 2009 because Tom Fletcher who we both know who worked for us and worked for Cameron and Gordon and has been an ambassador and he had a very very interesting thread on social media the other day and it kind of saying what you're saying. I'll just go through it briefly. One, it is time for the UK to get off the fence and say unequivocally all violence against all civilians must stop. Two, this is your point. People say UN resolutions are powerless but we had a ceasefire within a week of Security Council resolution 1816 2009. The horror of civilian attacks by Hammerson, Israeli, cabinet are of a different scale but the fundamentals are the same.
18:08We must protect civilians in Israel and Palestine. Stop the bloodshed drowning the two state solution which is what's happening. And then the key point is this, prime minister's all face a choice on them at least. Either sit it out hoping the US put meaningful pressure on the closest ally or go for bold diplomacy aligned with UK interests and values or take a punt on somehow influencing Netanyahu through private persuasion. Now there's no doubt I've been talking to some of Joe Biden's people. Their approach has been absolute public support for Israel and in the meantime we try and influence the Israelis privately.
18:44And this is just a trial. This is the great cliche diplomacy. I mean you have heard it again and again. We're always solved when I was the young diplomat. We're quiet and public and then privately. We're pushing. And I think they are pushing them. However, the effect of that pushing does not seem very very strong. How's it going? And does Netanyahu listen more or less to Biden or to Smotrich Ben Giver and these guys? I assume, I mean not to be unfair but I assume that your closer and Tony Blair is also in this bind. He presumably thinks that what he's doing is putting on private pressure. Absolutely.
19:19And that is the classic bind as you say. But I think that it's very interesting with Tom's point because Tom's been both as an ambassador and as an advisor right in there. And I think he essentially is saying that the private persuasion bit, as far as any British influence is concerned, is having zero effect and a public statement might. I think that's what what do you say? Good. Okay. Well, I mean, we will keep following it. And it remains an astonishing, the horrible human tragedy, both the horror of what Hamas did to Israelis and those 1400 people who were killed and the nearly 15 ,000 who've now been killed in Gaza.
20:04But it's a very different conflict from ones we've seen in the past because the political context, social media particularly, new types, the social movement mean that it's charged in international rights in a way that you can't begin to imagine. And also it's like, you know, I think I thought I felt a little bit sorry for his guteras because there is, as there's Antonio Guterres, head of the UN. Now, he is being accused by the Israelis of being antisemitic. Why? Because he used this 99 procedure, which essentially is to declare this in emergency. They're saying, well, you didn't do it for Ukraine, you didn't do it for Sudan, you didn't do it for this, you didn't do it for that.
20:47So on the one hand, he's pressured from there. On the other hand, he's under massive pressure for people right around the world saying, for God's sake, can't the UN do something. And of course, as we saw from the vote, the UN can only do something if the UN Security Council agrees. And there is no fundamental agreement there. And of course, you then, we're going to talk about Ukraine later. You've got the fact that whether all of these things kind of hang together, Middle East, with Iran's involvement, you've got Russia, Ukraine, you've got all these different kind of conflicts going on that are frankly part of a very, very big battle between those bodies that are there split out the UN, you know, democracies or tockries and so forth.
21:30Which brings us to the news and British politics, which is very, very much dominated by two things, by Richie's new experience in the COVID inquiry. But what I'd like to talk about first, which is the Tory party falling pieces in its fight over the new Bill on Rwanda and immigration. So I'd love to do a little explainer on what's actually in this bill, because I noticed when I was reading the newspapers that none of them actually bothered to really explain what the details are. They tell you what Mark Francois thinks about it and Bill Cash thinks about it and Ian Duncan's with thinks about it, but they don't tell you what's in it.
22:06It's amazingly difficult to get to that. But give us the sense of what you think of the politics before I get into the substance to Bill. Well, I was trying to tot up, you've talked before about all these different factions. I've been trying to tot up all the different factions now. So apparently, Richie's soon, this morning is having breakfast with a group called the New Conservatives. This is the sort of Danny Krueger, Miriam Kate's... The Anderson. Oh, is he part of them? I thought, but he's not part of the Northern Research Group. He's also part of Northern Research Group. You've got one nation caucus, which is, I guess, your sort of a party.
22:36Yeah, you've got the European Research Group, which I thought was going to die with Brexit having that. That's Mark Francois, Ian, Bill Cash in that line. You've got the Common Sense Group, which has got nothing to do with estimate of A being the Minister for Common Sense. You've got the Conservative group. The Common Sense Group is a... John Hayes. It's real sort of much, much older, very senior backbenchers. Edward Lee, Sir John Hayes. These are guys who've been on these Euroskeptic ultra -conservative side for a very long time. And then you've got the Conservative Growth Group, which is the sort of Lestros mob.
23:10That's just half a dozen of the factions. Yeah, and that's before you got on to the cornerstone group. That's another key player. Yep. So we're recording this on Tuesday ahead of the vote and we're still trying to work our way through. And this is the version that on the main second reading of the bill. And one of the big questions that's been running is whether these groups are going to vote with Labour to bring down the bill, which is a sort of classic move. So they would be doing it for totally different reasons to let the Labour be voting it down, presumably because they think it maybe is inhumane or illegal to be sending people to Rwanda.
23:43The Tory right will be voting it down because they think it's not tough enough. Right. And this is obviously what we had again and again in Brexit, which is the Tory right voting with Labour to destroy Theresa May's compromised deals on Brexit. So are you looking at me? Yeah, exactly. Exactly. It says looking at me. So just quickly on these groups because I obviously know these groups quite well, they're not mutually exclusive. Now some of them like the ERG were these incredibly well -organised whipped groups and undermarked Francois and Steve Baker, they became really important during the Brexit votes because they actually ran their own whipping operations.
24:18They had serious money, they had lines to take, they briefed the press, they were also basically a party with another party. The Northern Research Group is run by a friend of mine called John Stevenson, who is the MP for colour and is very much in the centre of the party and is largely making arguments for more investment in Northern England. The common sense group on the other hand is much more a cultural group, it's much more about a sort of particular vision of conservatism. And the one I certainly found trying to use the one nation group and the way that the ERG was used, it completely fell to pieces.
24:55We had five different candidates in the leadership, nobody was prepared to take a single position on Brexit. So journalists trying to simplify the situation, I think they're now talking about the five families, isn't joke about Godfather, but basically what you're going to, it's going to come. So you've actually seen a Tony Soprano? Exactly. It's not working. So it's going to come down to a few grumpy right -wing conservatives whipped up by Suella Bravman and Robert Jenric. Before we go on, I'm really confused. How is Robert Jenric who strikes me of the many unimpressive politicians in the current conservative benches, as one of the most unimpressive in terms of, I see nothing there, am I missing something?
25:38I didn't think you were missing something. I'm feeling more loyal towards Rishi Sienaak on this. So Robert Jenric was the immigration minister. He sat in all those cabinet discussions. He knows in detail why it is impossible to do what he wants to do. He understands that it would be in contravention, the refugee convention of Article 13 of the ECHR, blah, blah, blah, blah. He's lucky in some sense to be in the government because he had a big scandal to do with Richard Desmond and a property deal. He's now come out and given an interview where he says, we're not sent to Parliament to be concerned about our reputations on the gilded international circuit.
26:18We're basically a way of saying, remember, the Parliament shouldn't care about international law. It's very odd. He's not a sexually state. He's not in charge of the Department. He's a junior minister. I see this as one I say I'm like an old Tories, deeply, deeply disloyal, as well as being horrified by the position he's taken. He's also like was I presume, or maybe still icebergs or close friend of Sienaak. Yeah. So Robert Jenric was one of these people who like Rishi Sienaak and Oli Douton came out very early for Boris Johnson. They were the young Turks of the 2015 intake whose endorsement to Boris Johnson was very important.
Read the full transcript
26:55So I never quite forgave the trio of them for doing that. But I think it's a sign of the way in which so many people in Parliament are behaving at the moment. I mean, they are extraordinary about stabbing each other back. Regardless of the rights or wrongs of the issue, there's a difference between quietly stepping down and going out on all the Sunday shows, trashing the Prime Minister. And also he's got this sort of smugness that I mean I just don't know where he comes from because the only time I've ever actually sort of met him properly was I think he was the 2019 election and we were on a panel together or something.
27:32And I can just remember think being overwhelmingly unimpressed by he had no presence. He had no I had no sense of him having a kind of world view. He was just like a sort of talking robot and he's now become this sort of I could even see that he sort of styled himself. If you saw when he was walking down the street the other day with his sort of he had a sort of blue jump on and genius and I could tell he sort of said to his wife or whoever's advising him, I think I need to look a bit sort of less stuffy than normal. I think I'll put on a jumper and jeans and he sort of walked out the street sort of forcing himself for the cameras to treat you.
28:07You could see and he said he's saying I must walk normally. I must walk normally. The problem I mean I so I know Robert Generick recently well and I knew him before he was an MP. He entertained me when he was the chairman of his local association when I was speaking in his constituency before the election. So he sort of come up through that route. Yeah he'd been active in his local party politics although he had a job before before parliament too. But one of the reasons it's difficult I find psychological criticising he's very amiable and actually it's a weird thing about Swelabravenman too. I'm horrified by what she doesn't public but in person whenever you meet her she's very sort of friendly and nice and modest.
28:45So I feel it's an interesting thing. I think what Rob Generick's done is awful but I equally I know that when he's listening to this he'll feel really hurt. You know I I entertain Roy in my house. I've always been very nice to him. Why is he kicking me on on air? I've got a talking of kicking on air. I must give a shout out to Nick Robinson, BBC. He didn't interview with Swelabravenman which I spent most of the time saying for God's sake put the boot in. For God's sake we put the boot in. And anyway he was just he sort of let her speak and then at the end he did this he did this thing where he bases look isn't the truth that you come on here and you're all nice and immolient but the truth is you go around it's all about you.
29:22You spread hate. You're vile to your boss. I mean he really really really really really went for him. I think she was quite taken aback. No so I find the generic thing very very confusing but I think what I find more confusing is the fact that Rissi Sunak has I think made a terrible mistake of making this such a massive issue. Even if they get a plane off to Rwanda and I know they'll do the whole performative thing but it's going to be what a few dozen people. The figures for a asylum within the whole net migration picture are minuscule and so he's not putting the energy into tackling the things that really really really make this difficult and he's putting all his capital into this.
30:03Yeah well so the deal is that the just basic facts the government wants to move people who come over particularly people come over and boats claiming asylum in Britain wants to move them to Rwanda and argues that Rwanda country in Africa with about 10 million people is a safe third country and it began this commitment back in the spring of 2022 with Boris Johnson tried to put people on the planes to Rwanda was blocked by the courts and in a final ruling of the Supreme Court in November the Supreme Court says something quite interesting. What they said is there's no problem in theory with the idea that you can have a safe third country right that the point is that people need to be safe and provided they are not at risk of deaths, torture, persecution, a third country is fine.
30:57The principles find it. The principles find it but they had significant problems in practice with Rwanda. They even said that they think Rwanda was making a good faith effort to look after people but they said that actually the record was worrying and the record least because of the deal they had in the past with Israel. Correct. So they'd been a deal with Israel and in that deal up to 2018 they the court found that people who'd been resetful by Israel and Rwanda had then been secretly shipped back to the countries in which they came so they were at significant age. So courts said basically we can imagine a world in which Rwanda can be safe but it's going to take very significant capacity building to build up the skills their officials make sure they're assigned procedures right and basically make sure that you can be confident that people arrive in Rwanda properly treating Rwanda and not sent back to their own homes.
31:43The government then tried to respond to this by doing two things in parallel. James Clevverly, the former Foreign Secretary now himself, Secretary, Flute Rwanda and signed a treaty and actually that's the good bit of the story. He signed quite a good treaty in which very complicated conversations with Rwanda Rwanda standing up for itself saying it wants to follow international law. It doesn't want to break the refugee convention and it doesn't want to give up on its own sovereignty. Agreed a series of panels and courts which would provide oversight to reassure people and potentially reassure the Supreme Court that people arrive in Rwanda be properly dealt with.
32:16It was also, it was the Rwandans who insisted on this point that Generic is particularly angry about because that's the bit that he's basically saying well it means that we're losing sovereignty to them essentially because they've made an insistence about one of the factors in the treaty. Rwanda making two big points. One is that they were not prepared to accept a sort of British court making decisions over Rwanda law. What they have accepted is an appeal court which in Rwanda law which is a mixed court which can include a British judge, Commonwealth judges and Rwandan judges but they want to make sure that Rwanda has its own sovereignty here.
32:51And the second point is they want to be consistent with the refugee convention, European Convention on Human Rights and this kind of stuff. So they basically worry that Britain is less concerned about international law than Rwanda? Exactly. They're very keen to say they care about international law and their suffering. So this treaty was signed and there was a reasonable chance that you could then go back to the Supreme Court and make the legal argument in the Supreme Court that with all the package of measures that Britain brought in and they basically agreed that Rwanda will not be sent back to Rwanda that other people being sent back to Rwanda will be carefully looked after that even if they don't get assigned them they'll get permanent residents that the UK will pay for them for five years etc etc.
33:30But instead of doing that the government's done the second thing which is much much more controversial which is that they've passed the law saying that Rwanda is safe. So Lord Garnier, X -Tori MP, he advises the one nation caucus that we talked about and he has said this bill is nonsense is comparable with the ruling that all dogs are cows. So it's not wrong. You can't just sort of have a treaty that says this country is now safe and no court can ever challenge that. So the complication here is that you guys did it in 2004. So you declared in the Asylum and Immigration Act 2004 that European countries were safe.
34:14So Parliament can declare or has in the past declared the country safe. The difference. European Union fellow states. But yeah the difference. That's a bit different. No less Parliament declared they were safe. The difference here is that their declaring Rwanda safe after the Supreme Court has ruled that they're not safe without any change of evidence. Right so they are departing from the Supreme Court's judgment to the facts. Now they're arguing the treaty which I just talked about has changed the facts but the normal way to deal with that would be to go back to the court and make the legal argument to the court.
34:44The effect of this bill if it passes and it's going to pass this evening. If it passes it passes this evening would be to say that British courts can no longer block flights generically. They will be able to hear individual cases but they won't be able to delay the entire flight while they hear individual cases. And that's a bit generic so it's got to go. Absolutely and the government believes 1995 percent of these cases could be heard in a few days. But the government still wants to defend very strongly and this is what's annoying generic and this is vital to get over why the Tory right is completely wrong on this in every way.
35:20The government bill goes further than I and many lawyers would like but at least it makes sure that if you were in a late stage pregnancy you wouldn't be put on a plane. If you had throat cancer you wouldn't be put on a plane. If you were under threat from the run of government you wouldn't be put on the plane. Generic and the right of the Tory party is basically saying that everybody should just be sent out and care at all about any exceptions and the individual cases. If you was if you was still an MP would you vote for it? I suspect I'd abstain. I suspect I'd abstain. Show real leadership. Exactly.
35:52That's right. Do what we did at a noble abstention. Right. But the consequence of an abstention would be to contribute towards a soon 90 feet. So I think I think the bigger issue here though is this whole question about which Germany is looking at as well and the Netherlands are looking at as well which is dealing with these illegal cross -stimulated trainings. So the crossings of the channel are nothing like as horrifying and disturbing as well as happening in the Mediterranean. Mediterranean it's literally lethal well over 2 ,400 died this year across the Mediterranean. So Germany is looking very closely at this because they would like to have agreements in place like the British agreement with Rwanda and there's a very interesting proposal again from my favourite group the ESI which is suggesting that actually Germany and France should offer to take everybody who crosses the channel back and in return Britain will agree this is partly what Labour's been talking about taking a certain number of asylum seekers from Europe every year but also that this will then allow Germany to use the treaty with Rwanda to move some of the people crossing the Mediterranean to Rwanda.
36:59The argument being here that what should be happening is we should be taking asylum seekers on the basis of need thinking about how and then it should be accommodated take them from the countries themselves that's something that we've been talking about in previous interviews. In fact actually it was something we were talking about with the ex Belgian Prime Minister. Yeah, if I've started shortly coming out on a meeting where he said it's ridiculous that we can't take people who are persecuted from the countries in which their persecuted female judges from Afghanistan rather than waiting them to cross deadly crossing Mediterranean.
37:29So a lot is relying on this and many European countries are very frustrated that they feel that the Conservative government was almost there with the treaty with Rwanda but they're horrified that they've pushed so far and trying to declare the country's safe through law. Yeah, I mean I think they're going to struggle even if they get the vote through I think they're going to struggle and it feels to me like the politics of this within the Conservative Party I've just become so vicious. I know you don't mind me talking about my friendship with Alan Clark but I remember he once phoning me up and saying you're absolutely home and dry for a decade.
38:08So why does this because all the truth is we fucking hate each other far more than we hate you. I think that sort of feels like that's where it's at. And also the sort of the kind of the same people I mean Francois Duncan Smith, Bill Cash, the same people that we saw endlessly during the Brexit debate and this pomposity of the Star Chamber is reported and the Star Chamber is decided that this is I mean they just to just explain to us the Star Chamber is all this group of right wing MPs sitting around doing a legal analysis and trying to prove that the government's bill isn't tough enough to achieve what they want to know.
38:48Yeah, yeah. Well we haven't really covered the Covid inquiry but he's hypnotic soon. Do you know when the thing is really important in politics is the voice and he's got this suppressed pettulence all the time and he couldn't do it with the judge or the QC but he's sort of as I switched off after half an hour I just couldn't couldn't stay with it. Right well should we take a break? Take a break.
39:17This isn't ad from BetterHelp. At the moment we're getting advice from everywhere. You just have to go on TikTok. Could be Alice's cold plunges. Could be my attempts to meditate or the digital detox that I'm doing in Colombia. But of course one of the things that we know is that it can be incredibly valuable to talk to another human being somebody who's actually been trained as the therapist to work through these ideas calmly objectively and professionally. And as the largest online therapy provider in the world better help can provide access to mental health professionals with a very diverse variety of expertise.
39:53They've got over 5 ,000 therapists in the UK. They've helped more than five million people globally and you can join a session literally at the click of a button. Change therapists anytime. It's obviously not about fixing you but it's about hearing yourself clearly maybe for the first time. So talk it out with BetterHelp. Our listeners get 10 % of their first month at BetterHelp .com slash rest politics. That's better H -E -L -P .com slash rest politics.
40:35Credits go raises.
40:44Boring money moves make kind of lame songs but they sound pretty sweet dear wallet. BNC Bank brilliantly boring since 1865. Right now with the Home Depot you'll find stored solutions made to fit your needs. Grab an HDX tough tilt to protect your tools. Or keep your sports equipment contained with reinforced snap fit lids. Or stack up and make better use of your space with bins and totes built to last. Whatever your story we've got the gear to keep it organized and protected at the Home Depot. How doers get more done?
41:27Welcome back to the rest of politics with me Rory Stewart and me Alex Campbell. And Rory I think we should urge all of our listeners who have not so far done so to listen to the latest leading interview with Angela Rainer. I mean I thought I knew Angela Rainer quite well but sitting in the studio with her hearing her talk about her childhood and how she's become the person that she now is was pretty amazing. It was unbelievable. I mean if people do please listen to it. I mean it's it's extraordinary. So Angela Rainer as people who've listened to it will find out and hopefully many more of you will listen to it.
42:05I grew up in a family where her mother was one of 12. Her mother couldn't read or write. She was essentially a carer for her mother from a very very early age six. And I mean she really grew up in the most extreme form of deprivation and poverty imaginable in Britain. Left school at 16 with not a single GCSE. And is unbelievable. I mean she's very very bright. She's very tough. She's very thoughtful. I mean it sort of left me still with this question which I guess you know given that we're all told to work hard at school because it's really important for our life. You know what the secret of this is and she very correctly I think and modestly says a lot of it is lucky.
42:47She was lucky but she's also obviously a very very remarkable person. I also noticed that how much more fluent she's become. There wasn't a single question that she flinched from whether it's policy whether it was personal whether it was political. I think she could be a massive asset in the campaign for Labour and in government actually. And I think it used to be such an amazing aspirational message to say that you can come from a background that honestly is like anybody who's ever seen shameless it sort of feels like that. Yeah that kind of does and she's amazingly sort of frank about it and also hopefully somebody who will really stand up for that section of society who've been shamefully neglected by so many different parties over time because the sort of poorest I don't know half a million people in this country often don't vote aren't courted by either the Conservative Labour Party so somebody's speaking up for them will be huge important.
43:44Yeah I think Shorstar Rory was a very very very good very good party of austerity. Very good case for Shorstar she definitely did and how it transformed her ability to remember she's extraordinary she said she was never hugged once by her mother and she had to be taught by Shorstar to hug her grandchildren. So Ukraine might do on a start. Well I think the first thing is of course the obvious which is when a collecting Ukraine because we're talking a lot about Israel Gaza and Putin is feeling pretty pleased for themselves. He's now attempting assaults along the entire front line this massive front line between the Russian and Ukraine he's got 350 ,000 soldiers mobilized and Ukraine was supposed to break through as we've said in a counteroffensive this year it didn't instead it feels very much like I don't almost say the first world war trench trenches mines.
44:37There was a lot of talk about using tens of thousands of small drones to try to break through but it really does seem stuck and of course Ukraine is deeply dependent on money coming in particularly money from the US which provides 10 times as much as the nearest next nearest country and there's more than 50 billion dollars supposed to be coming from Biden that's frozen but the US population is increasingly skeptical particularly Republican voters overwhelming majority of Republican voters think too much money is going to Ukraine now. Trump clearly signaling that if he comes in it's going to give up on supporting Ukraine entirely so Putin's hang on for that.
45:16Interesting that Zelensky went to Milay's inauguration and made a big big show of support I don't know whether that was sort of saying I need the populist right as well. Very interesting isn't it you would have thought of all your priorities I mean Argentina is not a huge economy Milay is a pretty controversial man he's the man we've been talking about last three weeks with a with a wig and clone dogs and who calls the Pope a jackass. He had on the Argentine sash to the president whereas he had the five dogs pictures put onto the sash and they're actually because they're cloned they're actually one dog and they're like dolly the sheep.
45:54Oh they're all the same. Yeah they're all one dog but he knows which is different but I thought that was interesting that he went there he's going to see Biden. Biden really is holding out on very very firm positions some considerable cost to himself politically both on Israel. One of the people I talked to in Biden's team said that you know you've got to understand he really believes this. He's as determined as Netanyahu is that Hamas have to be defeated but he's paying a price on that politically and I think on Ukraine as you say because the Republican right has become very very iffy about the money.
46:29So there's there he is on that and then you've got you've also been looking at this situation with Poland and Ukraine and this blockade. Yeah so since November the 6th there have been these big blockades done by Polish truck drivers on the Ukrainian border and now it's happening with Slovakian and Hungarian truck drivers joining. So there are 2950 trucks stuck on the Ukrainian border and about 650 Slovakian 750 hungry. This is a very big problem. I mean some of those trucks have been sitting there for many many weeks. Why they're there? They're there because at the beginning of the war the EU said that Ukrainian drivers could come into Europe without having to have a special permit so they don't have to abide by European working time directives or any of the rules that other truck drivers have to abide by and basically they're undercutting Polish truck drivers.
47:18I was not about getting gray now to or was it was it just to help you get getting it was about two things I think it's about getting things in and out and also helping the Ukrainian economy and this is significant the Ukraine economy. These delays at the border have probably knocked 1 % off Ukraine's GDP at a time when it's already in the most horrible economic term. So it seems mad on the other hand to pay credit to the Poles they were the first country to open their arms. They took in million over a million Ukrainian refugees. They were the first country to back Ukraine but it's becoming a big big issue because lots of Polish truck drivers feel that their incomes and their jobs and their livelihoods are under threat and nobody's selling up them.
47:57It's very resolvable either you could return to a permitting situation which is probably too complicated but you could certainly provide compensation for the Polish check. So back in Hungarian truck drivers. And the hungry of course there you've got Orban. He's the one who seems to be foremost in trying to block the 50 billion euros that the European Union is set to contribute towards Ukraine. Almost using it as a pawn in this game where the European Union are blocking funding to him because of some of these breaches of rule of law provisions. Absolutely and this also leads into a much much bigger question which is the question about European Union accession.
48:40So Ukraine is now a moldover lined up to be counted at states for the EU and that's a very big issue for the EU because the people who supported Syria is absolutely critical for defending Ukraine and for the future geosucuity of Europe. But caught up in this are also the Balkan countries, Serbia, Kosovo who are also waiting for accession to the EU. Bosnia. Bosnia. Bosnia. Bosnia. Bosnia. Bosnia. Bosnia. Bosnia. Bosnia. All of which are at different stages. Now Orban is currently blocking almost all of these things and he's really whipping up in blocking North Macedonia and Kosovo. The idea that these are corrupt countries and a lot of the far right in European elections are going to pretty soon get on to this.
49:20So here is a proposal to solve this issue which we're going to try to push through the European capitals. These countries should all be allowed to come into the single market. So the single market is joining Europe in its freedoms so that allows freedom of trade, particularly important freedom of movement of people puts you into the economic integration but it doesn't bring you into the political institutions. You don't get involved in conversations about a European Parliament, Commission, you don't get involved in conversations about a joint European army. It's a position that Norway sent not in the European Union but in the single market and it actually also allows you to make trade deals around the world.
50:00So it's a very very good position to be in in terms of accessing this enormous market. The only thing that made it controversial in Britain is that it allows the European Union immigration and freedom of people back in front of the world. But you see I think that's where they are. You say this would be sort of way of countering the hard right. I think they would take that as a pretty big campaign issue for them. You know what we're bringing all these Albanians and Moldovaans and Georgians in. You mean across Europe? Yeah. So it's not just in Britain. Yeah. So I can see it being particularly quite difficult.
50:33But I like the big bold. I like the boldness of it. Big bold idea. Thank you. Yeah. So given the four freedoms, freedom movement of people and all this stuff, bring them in the single market the same way that Norway did, make sure they meet the single market rules and that way you can offer a deal that works for Ukraine, work Moldova, but also works for the market. Do you just sort of bypass all the normally negotiations before entering the single market? No, no, you need the normal single market negotiations but that is an easier path to go on than full EU membership and it will keep the momentum going, keep those countries engaged, achieve some of the geostrategic objectives and then park for later the question of full membership.
51:08Because I think if you push for full membership now, the far right in Europe will derail everything and these countries will end up. And as far as the rest of this politics diplomatic initiative, would the United Kingdom be invited to do the same? At the same time. Well, yeah, it's a very interesting thing. I mean, if the number of countries in the single market outside the European Union grows from Norway to quite a large number, then there's a very natural place for a country like United Kingdom to redock. Very good, very good. Just on the American politics of this, a poll asking people whether they support what the financial commitment America is making on Ukraine, 48 % think America is spending too much, 27 % about right, 11 % not enough, Republicans, 65 % too much, 52 % of independence, too much, 32 % of Democrats too much.
51:59So it's become a sort of left right thing, which again is not going to help the Democrats keep Trump at bay. Now, sort of you're sticking a little bit with Putin. He had a rare trip outside of Russia, went to Saudi and the Emirates, wasn't arrested for his alleged war crime. Because they're not signatures to the international protocol, but it's pretty controversial. So Mohammed bin Zayet, who's the dominant figure in UAE, referred to him as my dear friend, President Putin gave him a 21 gun salute. I mean, it's pretty extreme. Mohammed bin Zayet, the effect of ridder of Saudi Arabia. He saw Putin when there was talk at the same time, he should have been seeing Suna here, which Ian Duncan Smith, that great diplomat, said was a snob.
52:54Well, it's true that actually, Mohammed bin Zayet, foreign trips are notoriously unreliable. He keeps saying he's going to get an airplane to Britain and then he reschedules about every two weeks. He was all supposed to be flying to Moscow, one of the reasons that Putin went there is that he cancelled his trip to Moscow. He also cancelled his trip to the Jordanian Crown Prince's wedding, where he was supposed to turn up. So I think, Mohammed bin Zayet, obviously, doesn't quite like leaving Saudi Arabia. And meanwhile, COP, the conference of the parties, trying to save the planet, the future of the planet, it seems that Saudi, to a lesser extent, Russia, China, but certainly Saudi, to get a lot of the blame for making a deal at the moment look like he's impossible, because they won't agree to phasing out fossil fuels.
53:37It's had a phasing facing down, yeah. And of course, we got that signal, then, we from the present of the COP, from UAE, that he was against, that facing out language. Well, these countries, their entire economies are dependent on fossil fuels, they're sort of 18, 90 % of their revenue comes from fossil fuels. So why did, why did, won't we talk to Cristiano Friadas, for example? She seemed to think this was all going to be fine, and it would lead to some sort of conclusion, but they're all now very, very depressed. I was wondering as well whether we keep saying sports and politics shouldn't mix, but you've got this situation now where the Saudis are going to be hosting the World Cup at a time when they appear to be making moves that suggest the world might not be here.
54:19Apparently they were the only ones to bid. How on earth is it possible that they're the only ones to bid? Why does nobody want to host the World Cup? Well, you've got a situation at the moment with regard to the Commonwealth Games where there are no bits, they're all pulled out. Because these things are too expensive and complicated. Well, cost, buggeration. I don't know, I think there's, I think that where we were certainly when we were going for London 2012, you were initially reluctant, weren't you? Exactly, because we just do this wonderful on leading with Cebuco. Exactly. We should tell people about it.
54:48We've had lots of individuals. We've done some of the Andrew Rainer out this week, got Tim Peake coming out soon, really good Cebuco. And Gifah Hofstad, I've got to say, I saw he was brilliant, and he's so good. He's going to get up a lot of the right dose. The Peltrum Primacy, yes, yes, exactly. The more my end of the listeners may get more water. So just to finish and Putin's now announced as we imagine that he's running on the election. So he's... Did you win? Well, he's almost certain, not just to win, but to be in office now until 2030. He's going to be longer than the Stalin? Yeah, longer than anyone since I think Catherine the Grace or something.
55:25Came in in 1999. So it's a long old period, 31 years at the helm is a long period. That was the sort of, I was my first posting as a diplomat, was an Indonesian where Suharto had done 32 years, but that's really getting towards the city. That's the big authority. I watched the announcement, and he did it the same as the did it the last time, where he's at an event, and somebody, remember the public asks, will you be thinking about standing again in the next election? And he sort of gives the impression he's being dragged kicking, he's going, oh, God, if I have to do it again. Is that the idea that thought I wasn't going to do that?
56:02I know. But I think now the state of the world and so forth, and then they had a, they had a a few soldiers there and the mother of somebody being killed in Ukraine. I mean, the staging. And I don't know, do people, do Russian people look at it and just think, well, there's nothing we do about it and move on? Well, he's got, it looks like reasonably reliable, independent polls, that he's got nearly 58 % support. And I think it's a more extreme version of what we're seeing with Erdogan in Turkey, which is that there is a section of Russian and Turkish societies that are never going to vote for these men, more liberal, more progressive people are horrified by them, but they don't care about that section of society.
56:42They have a base that they're going to mobilize and and that base will keep voting for. Yeah, and most of his serious opponents are either dead or in jail. We mentioned Erdogan there. What do you think of this sort of David Cameron Hamza Yusuf spat? So just to remind people, what happened is that Hamza Yusuf had a bilateral with Erdogan and at COP, and the UK government wasn't informed and UK diplomats were not at the meeting. So I guess there is a principle, which is that if you're not an independent country, you're a devolved administration, you don't conduct independent foreign relations and that it's very important.
57:19It's not just important actually for Hamza Yusuf. That's what Pratel was forced, was sacked from the cabinet for doing, which is having a meeting as the cabinet minister without a position. I think you've been to these summits. If you're there, like let's say, let's take the personalist out of it, say you're a city can't, say you're Mark Drakeford, say you're a Northern Ireland politician, but you happen to go to COP because you're interested in the environment. If you're going to run into people, you're going to talk to people. I think he didn't just run into him. I think it was a step ahead of his workshop meeting because, and certainly, he claims that they told the FCDO it was happening.
57:51So in our system, you would have felt this, like if I'd been a junior minister at COP, and I scheduled a meeting with everyone, and I was like, well, I just bumped into him. You'd be like, what the F you doing, get back in your box, you do not get to have a meeting with everyone who on earth do you think you are? You might be right. Yes, you might. I hadn't talked to people like, but I guess it's the fact that Hamza Yusuf, he is the leader of Scotland and of a different politics to UK. I'm sure if they'd arranged it properly, they would have been prepared on stuff. I was surprised that David Cameron went, of course, so heavy in his, the panning of his letter.
58:26Hey Ho, that's it, Roy, for this week, back tomorrow in question time. Looking forward to it very much. Thank you.
From the publisher
Is the West moving to a more critical place concerning the Israel-Gaza war? Can Sunak's Rwanda policy be lawfully implemented? What is the relationship between Saudi Arabia and Russia?
Join Rory and Alastair as they answer all this and more on today's episode of The Rest Is Politics.
🌏 Get our exclusive NordVPN deal here ➼ https://nordvpn.com/restispolitics It’s risk-free with Nord’s 30-day money-back guarantee! ✅
TRIP Plus: Become a member of The Rest Is Politics Plus to support the podcast, receive our exclusive newsletter, enjoy ad-free listening to both TRIP and Leading, benefit from discount book prices on titles mentioned on the pod, join our Discord chatroom, and receive early access to live show tickets and Question Time episodes. Just head to therestispolitics.com to sign up, or start a free trial today on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/therestispolitics.
Instagram:
@restispolitics
Twitter:
@RestIsPolitics
Email:
restispolitics@gmail.com
Producers: Dom Johnson + Nicole Maslen
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor + Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices




