221. The Killing of Alexei Navalny

21 Feb 2024 · 50 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Notes on Podcast Episode: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 221: The Killing of Alexei Navalny

Episode Overview In this episode, hosts Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart discuss several critical political topics, focusing on the recent events surrounding the killing of Alexei Navalny, the implications for Russian politics, and the ramifications for international relations, particularly concerning the United States and Europe.

---

Key Topics Discussed

  1. The Killing of Alexei Navalny
  2. Courage and Sacrifice: The conversation begins with reflections on the courage displayed by Navalny, who returned to Russia knowing the risks after surviving an assassination attempt.
  3. Personal Reflection: Alastair shares thoughts on personal courage and the limits individuals might have when faced with such extreme circumstances.
  4. Political Environment in Russia: The hosts highlight the dangers faced by opposition figures in Russia, drawing parallels with historical political assassinations.
  5. Response to Navalny’s Death:
  6. Alastair notes the lack of significant coverage of Navalny's death in Russian media, which continues to focus on state propaganda and military successes.
  7. Discussion of his mother and wife’s reactions, emphasizing the regime's efforts to suppress dissent and maintain control.
  1. Munich Security Conference
  2. International Reactions: The hosts examine the responses to Navalny's death at the Munich Security Conference, exploring the lack of urgency and effective leadership from Western nations.
  3. Calls for Action: There is a sense of disappointment regarding the responses from key international leaders and the need for more robust commitments to support democratic values.
  4. Russian Aggression: Conversations revolve around the potential for further Russian aggression in Europe, with emphasis on the need for strong defense strategies.
  1. Donald Trump and Legal Challenges
  2. Trump's Legal Troubles:
  3. Discussion of the financial implications of Trump's ongoing legal issues, estimating costs reaching hundreds of millions.
  4. Commentary on how Trump's legal battles may be used as political leverage, particularly how opposition figures in America are treated.
  5. Political Fallout: Alastair and Rory reflect on the political ramifications of Trump's legal challenges and how they may influence the upcoming presidential campaign.
  1. France and Marine Le Pen
  2. Political Dynamics: Rory brings attention to the current political climate in France, focusing on the rise of Marine Le Pen and her party's strategies.
  3. Legislative Changes: The discussion includes new policies regarding citizenship rights in Mayotte and comparisons to mainland France's immigration laws.
  4. Macron's Shifting Policies: Alastair discusses President Macron's shift to more conservative policies to counteract the influence of the far-right.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Courage in Politics: The episode underscores the theme of courage in political activism, especially in authoritarian regimes.
  • Importance of International Solidarity: There is a clear call for stronger international responses to human rights violations.
  • Political Competition: The dynamic between various political figures and parties in both Russia and Western democracies highlights the ongoing struggle for power and influence.
  • Future Leadership: The hosts consider the potential for new leaders, such as Keir Starmer in the UK, to emerge and shape future policies in response to global challenges.

---

Conclusion The episode provides an insightful analysis of critical political events and themes, emphasizing the intersections of courage, leadership, and the ongoing battle for democratic values in the face of authoritarianism. Both hosts bring their unique perspectives, enriching the discussion around these vital topics in contemporary politics.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Thanks for listening to the Restus Politics, sign up to the Restus Politics Plus to enjoy ad -free listening and receive a weekly newsletter. Join our members' chat room again early access to live show tickets. Just go to therestuspolitics .com. That's therestuspolitics .com. Right now, with the Home Depot, you'll find storage solutions made to fit your needs. Grab an HDX tough tilt to protect your tools, or keep your sports equipment contained with reinforced snap -fit lids, or stack up and make better use of your space with bins and totes built to last. Whatever your story, we've got the gear to keep it organized and protected at the Home Depot.

0:40How doers get more done? Gatorade is the number one proven electrolyte blend designed to hydrate better than water. So you can lose more sweat and raise your game. Gatorade, is it in you?

1:35Welcome to the Restus Politics with me, Alistair Campbell. And with me, Rory Stewart. Nice to see you, Alistair. Nice to see you. Talking to you from the United States, Yale University. I'm looking at you from the United Kingdom, University of Life. Just back from La Belle Thrange. Well, I think we can play out our positions. You can tell us a bit about what's happening with Marine Le Pen and Macrot, and maybe I can chip in a little bit on Trump and we can discuss France and America as well as other stuff, right? Well, actually, the thing I want to discuss is what's going on in a little place called Myot, which is a little known fully fledged French dip at the moment of the east of Africa.

2:14All sorts of stuff kicking off there, but it actually does relate to domestic politics as well. We're obviously going to have we should kick off with Navalny and Russia. Lots going on at the Munich Security Conference, which I think we should cover. And as you say, a bit of France and a bit of America. But first of all, shall we just thank the actually many thousands already who have bought tickets for our October, we think election tour. There's still some tour soon that might go for May. Just put himself out of his misery, but I think we're still banking on the autumn. It never seems to be that it's very plausible that the reason why a Prime Minister would call an election is to put themselves out of their misery and then it doesn't seem like a very likely reason to do something.

2:59No, what might be likely is if he thinks that for example, terrible local elections, assuming they are going to have terrible local elections, and then all this sort of rather low -level talk about, you know, shall we try and have a sixth Prime Minister before the next election that actually might kick off? It just doesn't make sense to me. I mean, I'm willing to. To Chile a lot of life. Did Listerus make sense? No, but did Listerus make sense? No, didn't. But put it this way, he is not going to be Prime Minister beyond the end of the year. This is his one shot in life to be Prime Minister. Why would he cut it short by six, seven months?

3:39When if he goes to an election in May, he is absolutely destined to lose. And the only way it would happen presumably is if he was under a massive rebellion and his party with huge numbers of MPs flooding and begging him to do a May election, but I'm not getting that sense. No, but you are getting quite more and more of them muttering that he can't do the job, and he's not very good, and he's not going down very well with the public, etc, etc. And that's they're more preparing a smith for leadership. I mean, we should get onto that at some point, but there's so much maneuvering going because they're all assuming that he'll lose the election, and so all these people are trying to position themselves to be the next leader, aren't they?

4:12Anyway, Roy, while we're drawing on about this, the producers are putting endless messages into the chat box saying, if you want to buy tickets, go to therestispolyzix .com. Yeah, and very central to this is that we're playing the O2 Arena. So it's going to be very, very exciting. It's going to be the biggest live podcast thing ever done in the world. So is he going on a limb? And so please come on, and hopefully he should be a lot of fun. So thank you. We've already sold more tickets than we did at the Albert Hall, but there are still some tickets to get us to come along, and it'll be really fun.

4:46Good. Okay. Now, shall we start with Alexi Navalny, RIP? Do you know where I want to start with this, Roy? Is the theme of courage? When we interviewed Anthony Scaramucci last week on leading, do you remember he had that line about John F. Kennedy wrote a book called Profiles in Political Courage? And he was asked why it was so short, and he said, because he didn't find many people who are real courage. I've been sort of, I've been thinking lots about Navalny and about what it means for Russia, and what it means for, you know, America, and all the sort of different facets that flow from it. But I sort of, one question I asked myself is, what would the limits of one's own courage be?

5:32So there's a guy who gets on a plane having been poisoned, having survived, is determined to leave his wife and two kids behind and go back to Russia when everybody is saying he will be arrested immediately and flung in jail on all sorts of trumped -up charges and is risking his life, but he was determined to do it. So I was thinking, is there any circumstances in which I might do something like that? And I think the answer is probably no, which is what makes him so rare. Do you think there were moments in your life when you would have been more likely to do it, maybe when you were younger? I guess this is, you know, we do at least live in a freedom as it were.

6:11So I've never, I've never known that feeling as to what that would be like to go somewhere where you will not feel free. So I don't know, I mean, I don't think any of us really know these things until we get properly tested. I mean, I think I've always had moral courage and physical courage up to a point. But I think the thought of leaving wife, kids into such uncertainty is, I think, you know, I think that's why people have been so moved and so touched by this. And, you know, because the fact is, I mean, we've mentioned John Sweeney before on the podcast and he wrote a book killer in the Kremlin.

6:46There have been a lot of assassinations. I mean, a lot of state -sponsored murders in different parts of the world. And so I don't know, I just think it is an incredible act of courage. It is incredible, isn't it? And it's part of a bigger theme of the sort of courage you need to be a politician in many countries in the world. I mean, if you think of, we were talking about Pakistan last week, we were talking about Imran Khan, who's now in jail and extended sentences. But remember that Billo Al -Butu, who was the Foreign Minister in Torisni, his mother was assassinated, his grandfather was executed, there were assassination attempts against Imran Khan.

7:22So there are those environments in which you really do feel that being a politician or I mean, obviously, if you go back in time, if you're an ancient Roman, the chance is pretty high that you were going to end up getting shot. But we're not, we're not used to that. And I think one of the reasons why I'm so full of contempt for the American senators in Congress from the Republican Party who did not come out against Trump is that the stakes in our society are so much lower. And what's the worst that could happen if you came out against Trump? You might, you know, lose your seat and go and get a lobbying job or something.

7:53And here we have an example of somebody who, yeah, went knowing there was a very, very good chance that he would be killed because, as you say, they had actually tried to kill him. I mean, he'd only just come out of a coma from the Russian security forces, putting this novice shock in his underwear on a plane. And when he was back in prison pretty quickly, they were subject to him to sleep deprivation again, depriving him of medical care, almost killed him a couple years ago in prison. So it's absolutely unbelievable. So why don't we talk about courage? So, you know, you and I can sit here and we can slug off Donald Trump.

8:28We can slug off Boris Johnson and Micheal Suneak and anybody we want. And although I do feel there are, there are sort of signs of, you know, really kind of anti -politics, anti -political thought and conduct in Britain at the moment. Nothing, nothing like happens in a dictatorship, like Russia. The day before Navalny was killed, I was reading a piece on, in an old foreign policy magazine by a guy called Alexi Min, M -I -N -I -A -I -L -O. I'm not sure how you pronounce that. And he founded something called Chronicles, which tries to do opinion polling in Russia. And I don't know how they do it, but they, they claim that it's a much more accurate form of polling.

9:13And he's an opposition figure. He's an activist. And so he runs this thing called Chronicles. And he wrote this really long piece about what it's like to be a figure of opposition in modern Russia. And it's very, very, very, very difficult and it's very, very, very scary. And it's kind of chilling at now. This was just written just, I think it was just for Christmas, this came out. So he's listing some of the people who've been killed, you know, journalists who've been killed, Boris Nemtsoff famously near the crime of the 2015, he mentions Vladimir Karamurtsa, who's, you know, well -known to quite a lot of people in Britain who's currently in jail.

9:46And he says, Alexey Navalny, Russia's most famous opposition leader, barely survived being poisoned by the FSB and today he's in prison. Well, of course that's now outdated. Today he's dead. And his mother, I don't know if you saw today Roy, his mother did a piece of camera outside the prison in this, or God awful part of the world, minus 26 degrees. She's not being given access to the body. And not being given access to body people believe because almost certainly it's still got toxic substances in it. I mean, it's another sort of, at least the regime is implying that they poisoned him by not allowing access to body.

10:21There's no other reason not to give access to body. I heard a review on German radio of how this has been reported in Russia. And of course, there's nothing about Navalny. The big story has been this sort of, you know, this advance that they're making in the war and the heroic soldiers who've just taken this place that they've been fighting over and very, very little about Navalny. But what they will then do is put out a statement saying that there's been a thorough investigation. And, you know, so what the three days will we do is about so as they can say there's been an investigation, and they'll give a cause of death, which goes beyond what they said on day while it was sudden death syndrome, which was announced by Peskov, by the way, Putin spokesman very, very, very soon after the death.

11:03So I think there's part of the Russian Putin establishment that once actually wants us to think they've done it and then they go out and deny it. But what it does is spread that fear. So it goes back to his point about courage. If you're an opposition figure in Russia today, does this make you more or less likely to campaign against Putin? Well, that would depend on what sort of personality you were. But then his wife, his widow Yulia, goes out. She was at the Munich Security Conference, she gets a standing evasion when she spoke on the day that his body was found, that the announced he was dead.

11:33She then did another piece to camera yesterday where she said she was going to carry on his work. She went on Twitter. I don't know what's going on there because it seems that her account was suspended today. Yeah, maybe a brief explainer on Navalny for lessons. I think people will have heard quite a lot about him, but he was a really fascinating character. So he half Ukrainian, half Russian, father was a military officer, went off to a university that's called the Patrice Lumumba universities, one of the best universities in Russia, but it was set up with a strong focus on training revolutionaries from the developing world in the 60s and 70s, became a lawyer.

12:09Joined the mainstream liberal party of the day, so he went into this party called Yabloko, which was led by Gregory Yavlinsky, who we could talk a little bit more, and then broke with him, flustered with nationalism, talked a lot about anti -immigration, and that's one of the reasons he broke with the liberal party. The liberal party in fact thought that he'd become a populist and didn't like the fact that he was attacking migrants and that Navalny was out there making comments attacking Georgians, and he was pretty ambivalent about Crimea. He didn't come out strongly against the Russian invasion of Crimea in 2014, and he went on these marches with far -right nationalists, so there was that phase in his life.

12:50But by 2011, he was really getting going as a very active politician and a very active politician driven by the use of the internet. I mean, he was one of the first real e -politicians, so he had this blog, which if people are interested in we can put a link up. You can read some of the English translations of the blog. Huge focus on anti -corruption, so a lot of what he did was around anti -corruption. Really smart use of video. He produced a video on Putin's Dacia, the one that you describe, actually, that you saw, which had about 120 million views, and Putin then denied that he lived in anything like that, so maybe we should get you out, testifying that he did indeed live in such a place.

13:27Well, I don't know if it was the one. It was one of the ones. People should watch, if they haven't already, they should watch the film because it is a brilliant piece of journalism. And because he, you know, very handsome guy, very very easy on the eye, very good sort of talking to camera without a script, but it was brilliant who researched, brilliantly presented. By the way, Rory, you talked about the lack of respect for Americans who sort of, you know, scared to stand up to Trump. But just before we started recording, I saw a thing on CNN, and it was an interview with the guy called Andrew Hitt, who's the ex -chairman of the Republican Party on Wisconsin, and he was being interviewed by CNN, and he basically said, he went along with this fake electors plot, and he said that he was worried that if he didn't go along with it, he was in fear of his life, because of the anger that Trump was whipping up at the time.

14:20And Trump, I don't know if he saw Trump's reaction to Navalny. I mean, Putin needless to say has said nothing, but I'll just read you Trump's reaction. The sudden death of Alexei Navalny, okay, get it? The sudden death has made me, let's talk about myself, more and more of where of what is happening in our country. It is a slow steady progression with crooked incaps, radical left politicians, prosecutors and judges, leading us down a path to destruction. Open borders, rigged elections, grossly unfair courtroom decisions are, or back into capital letters, destroying America, we are a nation in decline of failing nation, exclamation mark, MAGA 2024.

14:58This is something we've talked about before, and I think it's really important, which is that there is something Trump can exploit here. We've talked about how regimes up and down the world use law fair, use the courts as a way of going off their opponents. So, four weeks ago, we talked about how in Bangladesh, 1 .2 million members, the opposition party had tied up the courts. We talked about how in many Latin American countries, as soon as you're out of office, you're immediately prosecuted for corruption and the judges go after you. We talked about how in Pakistan, Imran Khan is currently in jail because the judges have gone after him and they went after his predecessors.

15:32And of course, Navalny, a very extreme example of this. I mean, he was 2011, they put out an arrest warrant, 2013, he was running for Moscow mayor and they sentenced him to prison, then the regime decided to let him out because they wanted to, it seems, they liked the idea of pluralism and the election and then they were horrified by how well he did. And then of course, they've put him, put him in jail again. In fact, he was due to serve an additional 19 years till 2038. Now, the problem with all of that is of course that if it becomes the norm that judges are used to go after your political opponents, that of course provides a huge opportunity for the Trumps this world when the judges go after them to say this whole thing is politically motivated, which is why I personally believe it's been a big mistake for the Democrats to put so much weight on these legal cases, particularly when there's like 97 of them.

16:21By the time there's 97 of them, most Trump voters quite understandably are going to say, this is ludicrous, how can he possibly have that number of cases against him? Yeah, but I think it's probably a bit... Yeah, Rory, you've just had one where he's been fined whatever it was, hundreds of millions of dollars because a court of law, I mean America's meant to be a country governed by the rule of law. I don't think we should be making direct comparisons with some of the countries that you talked about, least of all Russia. I absolutely agree. It's government of law, it's not anything like Russia, but it is just one of the reasons why, as you've pointed out, every time he appears in the number of these cases makes it feel to his base, as though this is politically motivated, and you can understand why it feels like that, because there's so many of these cases.

17:06You know there's a danger. You've been asked because that could be Rory, because he's a serial law breaker, and also because so much of the law in America is done state by state. So if you go through something as complicated as what happened after the election and the insurrection on the capital. So for example, I've just been mentioning Wisconsin. I don't know if there's a case going in Wisconsin, but there's one state where this guy is saying he was doing something which he knew was wrong, which he knew was not true, this fake electors plot. Now that's a crime. So surely, if you believe in the rule of law, prosecutors have to go after that.

17:41I suppose my point is that it's a bit more complicated than that. A lot of Democrats and a lot of Democrat donors have been funding these cases as a way of stopping him, and I've been to conferences in the US because I'm broadly on the Biden's, I'm I am. I'm on the Democrat side in this. So I go to a lot of meetings where the prosecutors stand up and it's shared and applauded and everyone loves the work that lawyers are doing to get Trump. I guess my point is though that it feels to me like a political mistake. They thought this was a real move of genius, which was going to guarantee the discrediting of Trump.

18:15And I think politically, actually, the results have been the opposite. It's still might though. I mean, you know, if we go back to the interview with Anthony Scaremucci when he gave his reasons why he thinks Trump is going to lose. He did say, he thinks the country will get the drip drip of these court cases. And we're talking, you know, the one that happened last week where he's been banned from running a business for three years. He's got to have this sort of supervisor overseeing all the that's going on within the Trump empire. His two sons have been banned for two years. All because he did what I think everybody always knew that Trump did was to sort of inflate his worth when it suited him and deflate his worth when it suited him.

18:51And by the way, the judgment, I don't know if you read it, but I mean, I was surprised. There was one sentence where he basically said that Trump was pathological. No, I think we both agree that it would be far better if you didn't have judges that were labeled politically. But that's the system that they have. Just to go back to Navalny, why did he take out Nemtsov because he was a leader? Why is he taking out Navalny because he was a leader? Where do leaders emerge from? Will his wife be able to to fill that gap? So I think Putin will be sitting there, not giving a damn what West, what world leaders are saying, knowing that people will move on pretty quickly because I'm afraid that's what they do.

19:29And meanwhile, people in Russia who do want to like the guy acquired from Chronicles who do want to sort of keep an opposition going, feeling I suspect more and more intimidated, more and more scared. There's nothing they can do into wait till Putin pops his clogs. It's also an interesting thing, isn't it, that the modern face of authoritarianism and populism is different from what it was in the past. So the way that Putin is doing it is by killing a few dozen people in very dramatic ways. He'll blow up an aeroplane, he'll put some amazing radioactive substance, which only security services can make into somebody's underpants or their drink.

20:06But what he's not doing, of course, is what silence doing. I mean, he's not going through mass terror, he's not rounding up a million people, he's not killing tens of thousands of people. We don't maybe talk enough about this, but it's also true with populists. I mean, Victor Orban again, in Hungary, it's a very nasty piece of work, but he's not mass jailing journalists. These regimes use different techniques now. I mean, they're more subtle, but you know, I think with Putin, for example, we have to put our hands up to this when he first came on the scene. When I mentioned John Sweeney, I've told you before about when Putin's very first visit, first press conference he ever did with Tony Blair, and John Sweeney saying, you have got no idea what you're dealing with here.

20:47And he's been proved right. I think there was a sense that people were sort of seeing the Putin and the Russia that we wanted to see. You know, maybe we should have just been taking him at face value, some of the things that he was saying and doing. Briefly, the guy in Spain is a guy, a Russian pilot, Maxim Kuzminov, who defected to the Ukrainian side, and he's been found dead in a car park in Spain. Yeah. And I think bringing together all the names of people who've been killed by Putin, reminding people as you say about Nepsov, but also Larissa Ubina, who was an investigative journalist back in 98, Yorish, Jekko Kutschichin, who was an MP, killed in 2003 with an apparent allergic reaction.

21:33And the problem that these parties have, I've been reading quite a lot by a man called Gregory Yavlinsky. Some people will have heard of him because he was a presidential candidate and was almost prime minister. And he was the big leader of this liberal party, Yablukov, and who then ended up in an argument with Navalny. And he represents another approach to Russian opposition, which is to try to hold up to these quite austere liberal values. He encourages people not to go on demonstrations because he thinks they're just going to be beaten up by the security services. And he's set out a platform trying to explain how he thinks Putin can be defeated.

22:07And the problem is when you look at it, he's saying we need 900 ,000 election observers. We need more members of our party. We need petitions with 20 million signatures. We need candidates. We need funding. Basically, he's betting the House on trying to play by the rules of a liberal democracy against the guy who's not a liberal Democrat. And he ends up looking entirely unrealistic. And you can see, in a sense, Winavalny, who was probably it's true, more populist, more nationalistic, took more risk. I was beginning to develop more momentum. And which is why he's taking them out. Just on this guy from this thing, Chronicles.

22:44And as I say, I don't know how they do his polls. But one of the findings they had, he said, according to our team's phone polls, more Russians want the state to prioritize social spending over military spending. 46 % would rather have money spent on social services in the military. 47 % empathize with people who try to dodge military service. 36 % condemn their behavior. Now, I don't know how you do those polls, but it's an interesting perspective. And also something like him, I mean, even as I was reading it, I was thinking, well, how does this cooperate? He builds himself as a critic, as an activist, as a critic of the government, as a critic of the war in Ukraine, where if you call it a war, rather than a special military operation, you can go to jail.

23:29And journalists have gone to jail for that. Yeah. The other thing I think that we've sometimes missed is we've got that Putin's Russian authoritarian regime and Xi Jinping's China is an authoritarian regime. But we're missing the extent to which they've got more closed, more repressive over the last couple of decades. That if you talk to journalists who were reporting in China 10 years ago, they were much freer. People are now much more frightened to talk to them. Again, Russia, people were much more outspoken. It's much easier to conduct proper opinion polls 10 years ago than it is today. And the final thing, there's a big picture of a lexene of only now up in I'm a Yale University at the moment teaching.

24:06And outside the classroom I was in yesterday, big picture of him because he was a fellow here at Yale in 2010. I'm very interestingly, along with the mayor of Bristol, Marvin Reese. And also a Lebanese politician, female politician who at some point I'd be interested in maybe getting them on. Maybe not so much to talk about Navalny, although Marvin became quite close to to a lexene of only, Marvin Mayor of Bristol was given the lifts by him. They spent many evenings together discussing how Navalny was going to campaign. So I think he is really mistier. And the sense that one gets is that he was just a very smart, charismatic, inspiring, funny guy.

24:47But what you said at the beginning, I think, is the most important thing. A man of complete EastJupendus courage. I mean, he essentially went to what was an almost certain martyrdom. Yeah. Now, the Munich Security Conference, we mentioned where his wife, Noido, spoke on the day that his death was announced. And I mean, Munich Security Conference is kind of interesting gathering. And I suppose this year, the main themes, I guess, there was a lot of kind of what do we do with Trump wins. There was obviously a lot about the Middle East and what is going to happen there. There was a lot about Ukraine.

25:20And there's been some interesting developments on Ukraine, not just the Russian advance. But I thought for me one of the most interesting things was the Danish government announcing that they were going to be giving all of their, I think it was all of their artillery to Ukraine. And there did seem to be a Munich, a sense of movement on this. Ursula Fondeline was talking about their perhaps the Neifer European Defense Commissioner. There's a big debate going on in Germany post Trump's speech about NATO, about whether the Germans should think about finally accepting Macron's offer for Germany as it were to come under the French nuclear umbrella.

Read the full transcript

25:57So that debate is going on. And the smaller Baltic countries, I think, really calling out the bigger ones in saying, do you do realize if Ukraine is allowed to lose this war, do not think that he stops there. He will not stop there. It's also, I think, been very disappointing. So Munich happens February every year, been going since 1963. And five, six years ago, it would have been talking about Iraq and Afghanistan. Now it's very, very focused on Russia and Ukraine. But people hoped when they turned up that this might be a turning point that Trump's comments about NATO, that the attack on Avdivka, the killing of Alexei Navalny, for which incident Biden had said that would be unprecedented consequences.

26:41He told Putin this in 2021 if Navalny was killed. So people thought, okay, now we're coming. This could be the moment where there's going to be a real sense of urgency. People are going to really step up and grip it. And you're right, there's been some stuff around the edges, but the fundamental story is Macron didn't turn up. Kamala Harris and Shorts were pretty unimpressive. And there's just a loss of chat, but there's not a real sense that Europe's remotely stepping up. I mean, they're all saying that it's going to take almost five years before they can get in a fighting state. Turns out that Germans promising to manufacture missiles very, very slow.

27:15A few thousand missiles are going to be produced over the next year. And I think a lot of people left it thinking, God, this is pathetic. Where is the leadership? Where is somebody actually saying, we're going to grip this, we're going to prioritize this. And it's completely odds with the fact that as you say the Danes are handing stuff over and saying they think that Russia could attack another European country within three to five years. You've got the Germans and Estonian saying maybe five to seven years. So you would have thought that really would wake people up. So one question I had, I guess, is now that I'm beginning to get you around on my point of view that Kierstrasse is inevitably the next prime minister.

27:51Do you think that if he turns up to the Munich Security Conference of February next year, he has the kind of personality and outlook to really play that kind of leadership role and galvanize and give the sense of urgency that people are lacking? You're absolutely right that we need it. There's a guy you probably know called Mutsch to Bert Raman who writes this very, very interesting analysis for something called Eurasia Group. And he actually in the one that is written this week, I hadn't seen anything about this in the in the UK media, but that's maybe because I've been away. But he said that quite a lot of the talk at Munich was about the possibility of a sort of EU UK defense partnership.

28:28Now Kierstrasse was at Munich with David Lamy and somebody published a list of all the people they'd seen him sort of meeting. President of Czech Republic, Ursula von der Leyen, President of the Commission, Alexander Stubb, the new President of the Lektor Finland, Leav Radka, Schultz, Chancellor of Germany, Stolzzenberg, General Secretary of NATO, US Secretary of State, Anthony Blinken, Prime Minister of Qatar, Foreign Minister of Saudi Arabia, and on and on it goes. So I think what that tells you is that the people who were there were thinking this guy is probably the next Prime Minister. I really hope that Labour, mate foreign policy and defence, a big thing because I think people understand that the world is more dangerous, more complicated, that a lot of this stuff can only be done internationally.

29:17And I think if we do get a change of government, and I'm by the way, I'm always going to say if, and I'm never going to say when, if and when we do get a Labour government, I think that this issue of sort of, you know, global security, our own security, defence in Europe, these big foreign policy alliances, I think they can become a big part of the agenda for a first -term Labour government. And it could be very interesting to really see Kierstahlma lean into the server next few months. I mean, there's no reason actually why he couldn't begin taking a big leadership position on this. Absolutely.

29:50Even before he became Prime Minister, I mean, in the way that, you know, famously Churchill from the back bench has led the whole shift in policy towards Germany without being, yeah, being in government. Listen, I hope they do. I can see there'll be some Labour strategist if they're listening to this thinking, oh, you know, we've got to focus on the cost of living on the health service, et cetera. But actually, one of the big things that will decide the extent to which people decide to give Labour a decent size majority is the whole thing about leadership. I've read this new book that's coming out about Kier, Tom Ball -Rinner's written.

30:20He was going to ghost a book by Kierstahlma. Your any experience in ghosting, I'm right, is that you were once approached to ghost Narendra Modi, is that right? The two ghost things that I thoroughly avoided. One was Narendra Modi and one was Roy Keen. Yeah, Roy Keen. I thought you were going to say Robert Maxwell. No, Roy Keen. The Roy Keen's lawyer approached me about that one, but neither of them got off the ground. But no, so Tom Ball -Rinner has written this book, Kierstahlma, the biography, which I've read twice now, full disclosure. Tom is a good friend of mine, and I've worked with him, you know, when we were in the People's Vote campaign together.

30:53But I think, you know, a lot of people say, well, I don't really know who Kierstahlma is. I don't know where it's coming from. I think this book will, for people like you and me that, you know, want to really get deep into stuff. I think people will find it very, very interesting, very interesting about his childhood. I mean, I know you're obsessed with father -son relationships and their impact upon people. It's hard to describe it, but very difficult relationship with his father, I would say. Tell us a bit about it. Give us an example. As Kiernevertisers tell you, his father was a toolbaker, but because his mother was so ill a lot of the time, his dad was really focused on that.

31:29And it's quite moving actually that when when he died, he just felt that he'd never, his dad only ever once said that he was proud of him. Also, he's got, you know, Tom's interviewed siblings and other relatives and friends going back to childhood. And, you know, I know Kier quite well, but I didn't know his brother has clearly got sort of special educational needs and was sort of picked on a strong kind of anti -bullying thing that keeps coming through. And the other thing that keeps coming through at sort of every stage of his life is just how utterly determined he is. So, you know, part of his childhood, determined to get away, goes to university, determined to become a lawyer, determined to become a top lawyer, determined to become a human rights lawyer, becomes DPP, determined to become an MP, becomes MP.

32:15And, you know, there's one bit which I'm surprised, I think at the times, I've been serialising it, but I thought they might have made more of the fact that even as the election, even as Corbin's leadership was sort of, he was still leader, but Kierne had a little group going where he was kind of quite busily planning to be the next leader. Yeah, yeah, yeah. And Corbin would go. Yeah. And by the way, Roy, there's two things in here, because as you know, you're determined to get me to say when Labour win, which I'm not going to do, and I'm determined to get you to say I will be voting Labour. Yeah.

32:46This book, here we are, two things popped up in the last few pages. One is where it talks favourably about the possibility of citizens, assemblies as a possible way of making politics exciting. Yeah. And the other is a new ethics commission with a beefed -up commitment to the Nolan principles enshrined in the new ministerial code. Well, music towards, I think if Kierne's summer is looking to play a really big international leadership role on defence, what he could do is take some of the script from Biden and Kamel Harris, which I think has got a great framing at the moment. They've talked about four things, wanting to be global instead of isolationist, international rules and norms instead of chaos, democratic instead of authoritarian, collective instead of unilateral.

33:33And it'd be lovely to see Kierne really leaning into that and championing those principles. The only really big speech he's made about foreign policy was about Israel -Garza, and I think we've said before it, it made me a little bit too late. And we're recording this on Tuesday, you've got the vote in the Combs tomorrow with the SMP and this motion, Labour of Naporkdown and Motion echoing the call for an immediate ceasefire. But I think, even including during the election campaign, I think a couple of big speeches about foreign policy, why it matters, the state of our defences, why we need to rethink the state of our defences.

34:11I think actually they're very big things for him. And those four principles that you put out there, they fit very much because what comes through, the other thing that comes through in Tom's book, is that Kierne Starnel was a human rights lawyer out of conviction. He did loads and loads and loads of cases for nothing, just because he wanted to help the little guy, whether it was the Donald's liable case, whether it was some of these guys on death row in different parts of the world. So I think that whole thing about rules and order and collectivism, I think he should maybe, as you say, into that a lot more.

34:45So, Alistair, I think maybe time for a break.

34:54This isn't ad from BetterHelp. At the moment, we're getting advice from everywhere. You just have to go on TikTok. Could be Alistair's coal plungers, could be my attempts to meditate or the digital detox that I'm doing in Colombia. But of course, one of the things that we know is that it can be incredibly valuable to talk to another human being, somebody who's actually been trained as a therapist, to work through these ideas, calmly objectively and professionally. And as the largest online therapy provider in the world, BetterHelp can provide access to mental health professionals with a very diverse variety of expertise.

35:29They've got over 5 ,000 therapists in the UK. They've helped more than five million people globally and you can join a session literally at the click of a button. Change therapists anytime. It's obviously not about fixing you, but it's about hearing yourself clearly, maybe for the first time. So, talk it out with BetterHelp. Our listeners get 10 % of their first month at BetterHelp .com -rest -politics. That's better -h -e -l -p .com -rest -politics.

36:08What about character backpacks? We've got them starting at 1299. Burlington's done it again. How about sneakers for the kids? A plus brands and right on trends starting at 1199. Saving is now in session. Burlington deals brands wow. Stalls and selections vary by location. It's the Smuckers Uncrustables podcast with your host Uncrustables. Okay, today's guest is Ruffer on the Edges. Please welcome Crust. Thanks for having me. Today's topic. He's round with Soft Pillar We Bread. Hey, filled with delicious PB &J. Are you talking about yourself? And you can take him anywhere. Why do you invite him?

36:48And we are out of time. Are you really cutting me off? Uncrustables are the best part of the sandwich. Sorry, Crust.

37:03Welcome back to the RESTAS Politics with Miroris Shirt. I'll be honest to camera more. Alistair, one of the things which your extraordinary colourful friend, Skaramucci, who's out on leading at the moment, just remind people you have to go to our separate feed RESTAS Politics leading to listen to. I mean, just an extraordinary lead. Are you getting the positive feedback I'm getting? I'd people really seem to have been taken with them. The Gaffer, Gary Linnica, Senator Messichain. I think this is the most extraordinary interview I've ever listened to. So, it is absolutely amazing. And then I was on the plane flying over here to the to the States just after we'd done that.

37:40And I was watching a really interesting documentary on Sam Bankman Freed. Sam Bankman Freed was the founder of this great crypto marketplace, who's just been listening to the Michael Lewis book. Right. Okay, it was about the sales. Exactly. And we talked a bit about him when he, Blue Out partly because he was an effective outstretched. And that connected to what I was doing with Gif Directly trying to raise money from his foundation and stuff. Anyway, the center of this whole story and interviewed again and again is your friend, Mr. Skaramucci, who was one of the earliest strongest investors with Sam Bankman Freed who flew out to the Bahamas and was with him as his entire business blew up.

38:17Wasn't Sam Bankman Freed and investor with him? I think it worked in both directions. But it was such a close relationship. Skaramucci flew out to the Bahamas to try to save the company in the last few hours. I think Skaramucci takes more care over his parents than Sam Bankman Freed. That's certainly true. But I also think that the odd thing about him, I mean, it was extraordinary. And he is so smart and his political judgment seems absolutely on the nail. But at the same time, his judgment in the people he associates with Donald Trump and Sam Bankman Freed is pretty questionable. So this is sort of a odd thing going on where he seems to be a really good political analyst but has pretty catastrophic judgment of people.

38:58Yeah, but he said he wasn't a politician. He sort of ended up in the White House, you know, as he said, so that Trump could eject the people who were already there. He got involved in interested in politics because he saw his way of networking. I mean, but it is pretty peculiar. I mean, I, yeah, and we should get him back on again. I think he's an amazing analyst, but the truth matter is it's unfurgettable working for Trump. It was patent the obvious to anyone by the time he came in that Trump was a bad and every time I think of what he said about when he went visit to view he go with sex and he had a 100 % inflammable suit.

39:35Back from Skyrimitching Trump, you were talking about Donald Trump's legal cases before the break. And one of the things that I wanted to look at is the spin some really interesting coverage, particularly in the New York Times, of this amazing eccentric introverted lawyer who's a junior lecturer at a university in Ireland, who's become the key to the Trump legal campaign. Some man called Seth Barrett Tillman and he's got, he looks actually a little bit like Robert Sapolsky, other amazing interview. He's got a big kind of beard. And a lot of the stuff that's central to this is of course that this case in Colorado, which is being heard by the Supreme Court is all about whether somebody can have office if they've been convicted of insurrection.

40:24And this man has been saying for 15 years that the president cannot be referred to as an officer. And this was a really marginal view. Everyone thought it was completely eccentric, nobody cared. But now Trump's lawyers have really seized on this because section three of the 14th amendment, the question of whether or not the president is an officer, it's going to determine a lot of the case. Wow. So what this guy's sort of done PhD style stuff on this? Yeah, we hit his 60 years old and he's he's what's called a sort of constitutional fundamentalist. He believes that every word in the constitution was very, very carefully chosen.

41:00And even though the common sense interpretation would be that obviously the president is one of the officers the United States are referring to. The fact that they don't explicitly say that means that they meant not to include the president as an officer and that there are you know, huge papers online. So Trump suddenly believes in the constitution again. Exactly. Trump is suddenly a massive constitutional fundamentalist. Now the other thing I say you want to talk about was simply the cost of the things that he's facing, the amount of money this is going to cost him. You know what's three three hundred million dollars plus he's got and that will go up the longer he tries to avoid paying it.

41:32This is sort of complicated bond arrangement that they have to do. So three hundred and fifty million dollars is what he already owes some legal bills? No, this would be he's been fined unbelievable. Yeah absolutely. Absolutely. So he's already up to four hundred million. Then we had the other one with the the woman that he liable over the sexual offense. This is one I had to go back to our early discussion. I don't agree with you that the legal authorities shouldn't go after these things where they think there has been a breach of the law. They know what he's going to say because this is what he's always done as the guy said.

42:02The judge said he's he's got no contrition. He's got no remorse and he's pathological. And I think over time I just don't believe that the I mean the court that the people who are you know serious legal figures. I can't believe they take kindly to the stuff he comes out with. And then I thought it was you know just to sort of add to the whole cartoon character feel of it. Literally the day after he gets you know fine for all this he goes out and starts selling these hideous gold sneakers. Trainers. Which I hope you didn't rush out to buy. Some guy paid eight thousand dollars. And tell me about the trainers.

42:40Do they have logos on them? What are they like mega trainers? They're gold. They've got a T on them T for Trump. Lovely. And he was sort of holding them. And actually it's really interesting that this goes back to the pathology of the guy. According to the people who were in the room there was a lot of booing and a lot of cheering. And he spent the whole time as he was holding these trainers basically talking about how everyone was so excited about his trainers and by him being there. And I wonder if he sort of believes that. Anybody that is in his orbit they're only there for him and there is something utterly pathological about him.

43:12And the bills the bills are unbelievable I mean you know he could sell Trump Tower which he obviously loves but he'd only get 56 million for it. Yeah. Even if he wasn't in debt up to his eyeballs which won't begin to touch the 350 million he's talking about. Can you imagine being this person who has to be in there as the sort of supervisor. Somebody some sort of public servant type person is going to go in there and say you can't do that Mr. Trump. But me well I think New York Times has been pointing out hasn't it that a lot of his legal bills are basically funded by his campaign donations. So if you're an ordinary American sending your $10 off to one of his political action committees turns out that you know temp said your money is going to pay for his legal bills.

43:54Now listen should we can we close off with a situation that I was not aware of until I was in a hotel in anisee in France and I noticed that going over breakfast the papers were there and they all had this story same story on the front page is the day before the valance was killed about me. And me. It's a French department. It's the 101st French department which that happened as a result of a referendum in 2009 it became a department in 2011. So it's to all intends and purpose it is part of France. Okay. Just as a small explainer to people this is what made France quite different from places like Britain that French Guiana which is in South America Guadeloupe and Martinique which are in the Caribbean and my alternate reunions which are off the coast of East Africa are they part more and regions of France.

44:44So they send I mean this goes back to the Boston Tea Party and no taxation without representation. These places are obviously not part of mainland France and they were obviously places colonized by the French Empire but they're treated as though they're actually parts of France in a way that Britain didn't treat its colonies so they have members of parliament. They all follow the French curriculum don't they so they the great joke used to be that they all had to read my ancestors of the Gauls despite the fact they had nothing to do with the Gauls at all and may also one of these back to you. So they they had this referendum to be a French department but the the reason why they're suddenly all over the French media is because Comeros which is formerly French colonies were population 820 ,000 they had a referendum in 1974 where on a massive turn out 93 % turn out 94 .5 % voted to be independent from France okay so you've got Comeros independent got Mayotte wants to be part of France and they by the way had a referendum back in the 70s where 99 .4 % voted to stay that's really weird how can how can these two places vote in completely different ways back in the current.

45:58Incredible now so what has happened now or since is that lots of people from Comeros which is bigger Comeros is 820 ,000 Mayotte's about 330 ,000 lots of people have been going to Comeros and having children there okay. Going from Comeros to Mayotte correct to turn them into French citizens so it's basically a way of it immigrating to France and getting all the benefits that you'd get of being French. So they have a small boats problem that makes hours look like you know nothing else so this problem has been growing and growing and growing as a result the interior minister Gérald Darmanne has announced that there will no longer be an automatic right to France citizenship simply by being what they're called D 'Oedhu Sol the right of being born there on that soil that is going to remove now that sounds straightforward.

46:54How are you? Well it's not straightforward is it because basically it's breaking the fundamental thing which is that Mayotte is a bit of France this should be treated exactly like the rest of France and the laws that apply in France should apply equally in Mayotte. So he's basically treating them as this department of France as though it was a second -class colony. Correct so what you you are coming straight in there Rory with the left -wing perspective on this and the marine lapen perspective on this is are well if we can remove the right to D 'Oedhu Sol from the people who arrive in Mayotte then why can't we do that to all these other people who are being born in mainland France?

47:38Right exactly so she's taking the other piece so she's she's she's agreeing that it's exactly the same as rest of France and using that to try to change everything in France. So part of the context of this is the way in which Macron who you're always reminding us was the master of this kind of on Mem -Ton this idea on the one hand on the other left right seems to be shifting to the right and this is partly the appointment of this new prime minister for a young 35 -year -old prime minister but it's also now that eight out of his 15 ministers come from La Republicae from this sort of centre -right party including the centering minister you've just been talking about jihad is also from this this right -wing party and in this enormous news conference that he did in January with huge chandeliers Macron was beginning to sound much more sort of like to gole he's talking all the time about order and respect talking about how the mace is that the national anthem needs to be taught in primary schools he wants people in school uniform again he wants mandatory community service for teenagers and doubling police presence on the streets and and he kept coming back to this word which I think is a kind of French revolution word from downtown he keeps talking about audacity oh l 'odasse l 'odasse sonco l 'odasse to j 'au re l 'odasse and so this presumably is him trying to deal with the rising threat of marine the pen which we're going to be looking at going into the European elections absolutely fun of when I was in France she was she was quite active because marine pen doesn't do much she's not like a she's she's she's not kind of out there all the time she sort of picks her moment she buys her time she she bounces in and out of sort of different issues but it was interesting to me that she she's sort of lept on this one and it's become a big debate now in parliament about whether this the waddu soul is going to be you know removed from non -French citizens as it were who are who happened to be born to get kids who happen to be born to non -French citizens on French soil and meanwhile maybe we were to close we should we talked earlier about you know legal cases against former politicians mr sarcozy has been found guilty of illegally funding his election campaign back in 2012 one year sentence six months suspended taken a long time hasn't it 12 years for that into country yeah amazing and listen just final one I noticed that ameli udea castella who's the education minister in macross government I wonder what she's all about this the check she's been appointed as education minister she's sending all her three children to a private school and then made a statement saying the reason she did it is that the state school where they were I was really rubbish and the teachers never bothered to turn up at which point the state schools got very angry and gone out on social media saying it's a complete lie their teachers very hard working in turn up I think it'd be fair to say that she is currently the friend who obsessed with the personality of pity of polls weat by week she's not very high up right now no brilliant well as to thank you for that covered a lot of ground see you soon see you soon

From the publisher

What happened at the Munich Security Conference? Will Putin ever be held accountable? How will Trump fund his legal problems and a presidential campaign?

Join Rory and Alastair as they answer all these questions and more on today's episode of The Rest Is Politics.

🌏 Get our exclusive NordVPN deal here ➼ https://nordvpn.com/restispolitics It’s risk-free with Nord’s 30-day money-back guarantee! ✅

TRIP Plus:
Become a member of The Rest Is Politics Plus to support the podcast, receive our exclusive newsletter, enjoy ad-free listening to both TRIP and Leading, benefit from discount book prices on titles mentioned on the pod, join our Discord chatroom, and receive early access to live show tickets and Question Time episodes.
Just head to therestispolitics.com to sign up, or start a free trial today on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/therestispolitics.

Instagram:
@restispolitics
Twitter:
@RestIsPolitics
Email:
restispolitics@gmail.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics

All 501 episodes
221. The Killing of Alexei NavalnyThe Rest Is Politics · 50 min
Listen in VO