233. From peerages to Putin: the fight against corruption in politics

2 Apr 2024 · 1 h 1 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Notes: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 233: From Peerages to Putin: The Fight Against Corruption in Politics

Episode Overview In this episode of *The Rest Is Politics*, hosts Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart delve into various topics surrounding corruption in politics, both within the UK and internationally, including:

  • Corruption in the UK political system
  • The ongoing crisis in Israel related to its ultra-Orthodox population
  • The downfall of Sam Bankman-Fried, the former crypto mogul

Key Discussions

  1. Corruption in UK Politics
  2. Easter Honours List: Introduction of the "Easter Honours List" by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, seen as a means to reward political donors.
  3. Key figure: Mohammed Mansour, a significant Conservative party donor receiving a knighthood.
  4. Historical context: Comparison to previous patterns of awarding honours in exchange for political donations.
  5. Statistics: An 800% increase in the number of MPs given honours since 2010.
  • The British Honours System:
  • Originally a royal prerogative, it has increasingly been used by prime ministers to garner political support.
  • Historical mention of Lloyd George's era where honours were sold for financial contributions to political parties.
  • Need for Reform: Emphasis on the necessity of campaign finance reform to address the influence of money in politics.
  • Proposals from Dominic Grieve's governance project include:
  • Restoring powers to the Electoral Commission.
  • Establishing a statutory ministerial code to clarify the duties of MPs and ministers.
  • An independent commissioner for ministerial standards.
  1. The Crisis in Israel
  2. Current dynamics involving the ultra-Orthodox community, which has grown from 5% to nearly 13% of the population.
  3. Tensions between secular and ultra-Orthodox Israelis concerning military service exemptions.
  4. Netanyahu's government facing internal pressure as the coalition relies on ultra-Orthodox parties.
  1. The Case of Sam Bankman-Fried
  2. Former CEO of FTX sentenced to 25 years in prison for fraud, showcasing the consequences of unchecked ambition and mismanagement.
  3. Discussion about his ineffective defense strategy and the role of his associates in the case against him.
  1. International Corruption Scandals
  2. Overview of corruption in various countries, including Malaysia's notable scandals and comparisons with the UK.
  3. Mention of ongoing investigations and corruption within the European Parliament involving foreign influence.
  1. Implications of International Affairs
  2. The episode briefly touches on global political dynamics and how they intertwine with issues of corruption, particularly in the context of the Israel-Gaza conflict and Russian influence in European elections.

Key Takeaways

  • Corruption as a Common Thread: The discussion emphasizes that corruption exists in various forms globally, and the normalization of such practices can undermine public trust in political systems.
  • Reform Is Necessary: The need for structural changes in the political system to ensure accountability and integrity, especially in light of the scandals affecting public perception.
  • The Impact of Political Decisions: Decisions made by political leaders can have wide-ranging implications, not just domestically but also internationally, affecting relationships, economies, and public trust.

Conclusion This episode of *The Rest Is Politics* serves as a comprehensive analysis of contemporary issues of corruption in politics, reflecting on historical precedents and advocating for necessary reforms to restore integrity and trust in political institutions.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Thanks for listening to The Restus Politics, sign up to The Restus Politics Plus to enjoy ad -free listening and receive a weekly newsletter, join our members' chat room again early access to live show tickets. Just go to TheRestusPolitics .com, that's TheRestusPolitics .com. This episode is brought to you by eBay. We all have that piece. The one that's so you, you've basically become known for it. And if you don't yet, fashionistas, you'll find it on eBay. That meme you red -mother bomber, the Cousteau Barcelona Calboy Top, or that Patagonia fleece in the 2017 colorway. All these finds are all on eBay, along with millions of more main character pieces backed by authenticity guaranteed.

0:37eBay is the place for pre -loved and vintage fashion. eBay, things, people, love. It's the Smuckers Uncrustables Podcast, with your host Uncrustables. Okay, today's guest is Ruffer on the Edges. Please welcome Crust. Thanks for having me. Today's topic, he's round with Soft Pillowy Bread. Hey, filled with delicious PB &J. Are you talking about yourself? And you can take him anywhere. Why do you invite him? And we are out of time. Are you really cutting me off? Uncrustables are the best part of the sandwich. Sorry, Crust. Right now, with the Home Depot, you'll find stored solutions made to fit your needs.

1:18Grab an HDX Tough Tilt to protect your tools, or keep your sports equipment contained with reinforced snap fit lids, or stack up and make better use of your space with bins and totes built to last. Whatever your story, we've got the gear to keep it organized and protected at the Home Depot. How doers get more done?

1:51Welcome to the dresses' politics with me, Anastakambo, and me, Rory Stewart. And Rory, I think we're going to have to talk at some length this week about various elements of the Israel -Garza situation, which is flying off in all sorts of directions. And we also want to talk about Sam Bankman -Freed. But we're going to devote the whole of the first half of the podcast to various elements of, I think, what we have to call corruption. And it pains me to say that I think we have to start in the UK, because Rishi Soonak introduced a new phenomenon last week. There is now apparently something called the Easter oners list.

2:29We're used to the New Year's oners list. We're used to the Queen's now King's birthday oners list, but we now apparently have the Easter oners list, which seems to have been invented, so that the second biggest donor to the Conservative party, after the racist misogynist Frank Hester, who gave 15 million, the second biggest is this guy, Mohammed Mansour, who's given 5 million, who's now getting a knighthood. And number 10 gave a very weird explanation for all this. They said that because Vaughn Gething was the new First Minister of Wales, he had to be elevated to the Privy Council. And this meant they had to sort of bring in other honours, which is complete and at a bollocks.

3:08It's completely bizarre. As you say, I remember people being put in the Privy Council, for example, when the Labour put someone new into the shadow cabinet, they could be put in the Privy Council without having to be an honours list. Yeah, absolutely. And you know, so you're worried, one of the papers worked out that since 2010, when the Tories got back in, there have been 96 MPs who have been given a knighthood or a dayinboud, including Sir, we now have Sir Philip Davis, one of the most ludicrous last week in the Easter honours. During our entire time in office, 11 MPs were given knighthoods or dayinbouds.

3:45Now, as you know, I think the whole system is ridiculous, but that is an 800 % increase. In fact, Rory, you're now a very rare creature, an MP who former MP who is not called Sir Rory. I think you should feel very left out. Quick explainer for people who are not in the weeds of all this. So the British honours system is a system that was originally obviously controlled by the king or the queen. And it's what allowed people to get into the House of Lords, made them lords, made them knights, gave them medals. And then increasingly, as we became a constitutional monarchy, it fell into the hands of prime ministers.

4:24It was originally in the 18th century, there was a lot of crating people, lords and baronets in order to get political majorities in the House of Commons. Then in the early part of the 20th century, it became more and more common to basically use these as ways of raising money for parties. So Lloyd George of 1917 to 1922 created 120 hereditary periches. I mean, these are not just life periches, the registered periches. And he had an amazing list. He had a man called Monde Gregory, who was this to put it mildly very colorful character who'd been a theatrical impressario, who had a list where you could buy a knighthood by giving £10 ,000 the Liberals.

5:06I'd get a baronetsy for £40 ,000 and then a perich for a large amount of money. And this horrified people so much that eventually a law was passed banning this process. But it was such a catastrophic law that the only person they ever managed to prosecute was Monde Gregory himself, who in the 30s had gone so mad that he was beginning to sell the periches without any access to government. As we've just got through Easter, I take you, he has nothing to do with Monde Thursdays. He's not involved in incredible man. I mean, he was such an amazing notorious monster. I mean, one of his other great things is he, despite being very, very openly gay, he developed a relationship with an actress.

5:47Got her to sign over her entire fortune to him. And then she died mysteriously in his house three days later. He then, the police tried to exume the coffin, but found that he buried her basically in Tim's waters. They couldn't get any evidence of poisoning. So he was probably wetter. Well, we had clean Tim's water there. That's right. Exactly, probably a murder or two. Anyway, so this thing continued and it's basically become the standard practice for all the political parties to give honors to people who give them money. But they never managed to get prosecuted any of these parties because the law requires such a high burden of proof.

6:24And basically, unless there's a written contract saying, in exchange for your cash, I'm giving you a perich. The Crown Prosecution Service actually has determined that it's okay to give money expecting a perich and it's okay to give a perich or a knighthood in exchange for money provided there's no formal written contract. So the whole thing's completely out of control. And in honor of our trying to be objective and I've reminded all the parties have been up to it since the 1920s. Basically, if you give a huge amount of money to a political party, you end up with getting one of these things generally speaking.

6:56And it's a horrible practice that needs to stop. And it's part of what you've been talking about a lot, which is we need to stop the big money going into politics. We need campaign finance reform. I think the consequence of the of that, though, has been that it's now been normalized. So that actually, if you think about it, Frank has to give me 50 million pounds and then coming out with all that terrible stuff about dialogue. And yet that story's just gone away. If you remember, when we were under the Koch for so -called cash for honors and bizarrely, by the way, I didn't tell you this already.

7:23When I was in Australia recently, I literally bumped into the man who became Yates of the Yard, the police officer who was investigating labor for alleged cash for honors. Walking down the street in Sydney, we had a perfectly civil chat, unlike in previous times. Just explain that quickly for people. So this was an amazing moment where this guy literally arrested Lord Levy, who was Tony Blair's friend and the head of basically fundraising for the labor party. He interviewed Tony Blair under caution and he interviewed several other people in Downey Street. And a lot of this was because in those days, you could both parties, both labor and conservators were guessing around the rules on declaring money by taking loans instead of gifts of the 17 million pounds that labor spent in the 2005 election.

8:1013 .95 million was loaned and the conservatives, it was the same, they spent 15 .95 million of which 13 million was loaned. And this allowed both parties not to declare where their money was coming from. Yeah. Now, let's bring in a hero, Dominic Greve, KC, former MP. I don't if you're aware of this, Roy, he led a committee, which included people like Margaret Hodge and Lord Neuberger and Jonathan Jones, who is a government lawyer in the past. And he's produced this thing called the governance project, which is all about standards in public life and trying to clean up British policies. Now, I think he he's a former colleague of yours.

8:51He was among the group that was kicked out because you and he and others would not support Boris Johnson's hard Brexit plan. He's now done this this report, which I think we should put in the newsletter. It's quite long. It's very detailed. But I think there's a lot in it, which if we do get a labor government, I hope that labor will sign up to, for example, arguing that the electoral commission has been weakened and needs to be strengthened. They're calling for the elections act to be repealed, to allow the electoral commission to be able to undertake or direct criminal proceedings, that they should have investigatory powers akin to those in the National Crime Agency and massive increase in the fines for offences up to 500 ,000 pounds per offence or 4 % of total campaign spend.

9:37And I think that is an easy thing for labor to do to come in and say we accept that politics has got to be cleaned up. And this is one way to do it. But I think the really interesting stuff in their report relates to ministerial standards and ministerial code. And again, they're saying that it might require legislation because they want the ministerial code, particularly those parts related to integrity and ethics put on a statutory footing. And this should speak, this speaks to something that you've been talking about, where the role of MPs and ministers should be clarified what their duties are, given guidance into how avoid conflicts of interest and so forth.

10:15And they're also calling for an independent commissioner, the minister should take an oath to uphold the code when they take office. And really, really strong stuff on both House of Lords appointments, which they're saying should be taken away from the Prime Minister and put solely in charge of this House of Lords appointments commission and also big change to political honors. So as the Prime Minister's no longer make personal recommendations for honors. And I think these are all very sensible, very good ideas, which would go a long way to giving people the sense that labor understands politics needs to be cleaned up.

10:50Standards have to be improved and upheld. And this is a good way to do it. I mean, the House of Lords appointment commission thing, I think is really strong because as we've discussed in the past, I think you can make an argument for balancing an elected House with an appointed House. And the argument is the problem with two appointed House is you can have a gridlock like you do between the Congress and the Senate and the US. So you could imagine a second House, which was appointed, which was more, I don't know, gave a group of experts with big contributions to public life, who knew legislation.

11:20But for that to work, it would have to be done on proper grounds. And one of the good things in the grief report is that they say, as you say, that the commission should be completely independent the Prime Minister, how they're appointed. But also that they should be forced to publish the qualifications on the basis of which someone gets the job. So, you know, if Darren Bent became a member of the House of Lords or Charlotte or Charlotte and we'd explain, you know, Lord Bent got this job because of the following nine contributions made to public life, etc. The other things they've been getting at, I mean, I think it's really interesting that they're digging into a lot of the problems that we have in the British system.

11:56One of them is this revolving door issue. So, you know, you're a senior civil servant, you're a politician, you leave and you immediately get a job with companies that you have been supervising or you come in from those companies. And there, there's a challenge, which is, you know, we want people who've had private sector experience. We want to try to have some kind of exchange of ideas, but at the same time, we don't want conflicts of interest. And they've got quite a good line in the report where they say, you can't avoid conflicts of interests completely if you're going to have people coming out, but you've just got to be very clear about them.

12:31You've got to declare them. You've got to be able to recuse yourself, step back if you're making a decision that relates to this. They've also been very good on ministerial appointments. I mean, one of the controversies we've done a lot on on the podcast over the last couple years is this question of when ministers start interfering in the appointments of people in government. And what they've proposed, which again, it would be great to see Leibatake up, is a very clear list of who ministers responsible for appointing as opposed to the civil services responsible. And if the ministers choose to appoint somebody who goes against the recommendations, then the minister would have to appear before a committee, justify themselves and explain what they're doing.

13:08Because at the moment, the whole thing's very, very blurred. I mean, you get these, you know, we have this thing with Michelle Donnellan two, three weeks ago, where she was sort of influencing the process of appointing somebody unfairly at now turns out to a particular academic committee because she thought that they'd taken the wrong position on Palestine. And she does it through a tweet on social media and the department sort of scurrying around trying to do this. But there's no clear distinction saying this is or isn't one of the ministers's powers. There's also going to be a kind of problem for labor if they get in.

13:41And that is that because we've had this pretty substantial increase in conservatives being appointed to the House of Lords, not least through the ridiculous resignation on us, but also Sunak has put a fair few people in there as well, is that in order to get legislation through, there's a risk that labor without doing this. And remember they're going to have to get the votes of both the commons and the laws to be able to do this if it requires legislation. Labor will have to put a load into more new peers in there to restore the balance. And we've now got 800 peers in the House of Lords utterly ridiculous.

14:13So unless we get a grip of this, it's just going to get up and up and up, lose more and more of its credibility, lose more and more of its public support. So I actually think we had a question this week about what could labor do in the early days when it's going to take a while to sort the economy and so forth. I think this is something you could do straight away in a first Kings speech where you say we are going to have to make changes to the way politics is done. I hope they broaden it from this, but I think this is a good basis. And reform of the House of Lords get it done quickly. It will be very, very difficult because people will squeal and people will try to block it, but reform the House of Lords.

14:49And I think if GearsTime were to come out and say I am removing myself as Prime Minister and legislating so that future Prime Ministers will not be able to use the system in the way that it's been used in the past, particularly in recent years, I think he'd get a lot of political credit for that. And so I hope they read this report and act on it. We should someday I think do a leading interview with a couple of chief whips. We talk a lot about the whips and the way that works, if we can get them to be frank about it. One of the problems here which Labour will also face is the reason why the Tories have been doling out all these political honours.

15:22And Boris Johnson was particularly ridiculous. He's like Henry VIII trying to make his father a knight and his brother a lord and goodness knows what else. But the reason they partly do it is it's the way of the whips controlling their MPs and they used to have more patronage powers because they could make people chairman of select committees. They can't do that anymore. So I think the Tory chief whip, if he's being friendly to the Labour chief whip, is probably saying can we be pretty careful with this stuff about taking away the Prime Ministers? Oh sure. to give out lords and knighthoods. Otherwise, how are you going to control your flock?

15:54And listen though, will be people inside the Labour Party say we may not like it, but frankly, we may have to do some of the same stuff. But I think that change governments need to signal real change. And you know, we've talked about this so much. And I think, and I know this from going around the country, this would appeal to an awful lot of people. Just briefly, Rory, I'm I'm till later today. I'm off to Singapore, which is a place I know reasonably well. And you know, during the whole Brexit debate, we talked about, you know, this whole Singapore on Tim's thing, which is about the economy. But one thing where there is a big difference, the code of conduct for ministers in Singapore, which has been around since the 1950s, it is pretty rigorously followed.

16:35And just taking an example of the difference between the two countries, there was a situation recently where two ministers rented their very, very odd housing sector in Singapore, which is too complicated to explain here. But this is two government -owned bungalows that were rented by two ministers, okay? Now, it wouldn't even register of the level of scandals that we've seen, right? But because somebody raised a question as to whether this was above board, whether they were given favorable treatment, and so forth, this led to a probe by the main anti -corruption body, the corrupt practices investigation bureau.

17:10It led to the Prime Minister ordering a review. It led to a six -hour debate in Parliament. And the Prime Minister, we should put his speech in the in the newsletter, Lee Sien Long. He made this speech where he was clear that although the official inquiries had found there was no wrongdoing, that it was all done above board, he was absolutely emphatic. It is utterly imperative that ministers are cleaner than clean. And he actually referred, without naming Johnson, he referred to other countries where we've seen the damage that can be done when you have inquiries and you leave things to ethics advisors.

17:46And he made the point that part of the job of being Prime Minister is that you know the difference between right and wrong. It's incredible, isn't it, Singapore? I mean, it's one of the real achievements of of Lee Kuan Yew was to really focus on eliminating corruption. And one of the ways in which you can see how government policy makes a huge difference and how carefully you need to be is that Singapore, of course, was originally part of a federation with Malaysia. And only separated up after the Second World War. In Malaysia, the corruption scandals have been completely out of control. I mean, very famous thing, there's something called, if people are really interested in this stuff, the one MDB scandal, which involved the then Prime Minister Naji Berezak stealing literally billions of dollars into personal bank accounts.

18:31And he's just been back in court again today. Hong Kong was another example of this. I mean, Hong Kong was very, very corrupt. I was born in Hong Kong in the early 70s. Unbelievably corrupt, used to turn up to work. I remember talking to old Hong Kong police officers, used to turn up to work and you'd find $5 ,000 in your desk drawing your first day of work as a police officer. And if you didn't take the money, your colleagues would complete the cold shoulder you and you'd never get anywhere. They set up this amazing thing called the independent commission against corruption. And they sorted it out.

19:01And Hong Kong, like Singapore, became a very, very clean, non -corrupt country. And they're both places, I mean, Hong Kong has got this particular difficulties now in relation to Chinese rule. But they're during those periods where corruption was being actively cleaned up, economically, that became part of those places' strength. And that's definitely the case in Singapore. And that's why the Prime Minister was so clear. He said, if we don't keep our politics, we're absolutely clean, then we damage ourselves economically as well as politically. Now, what about, should we talk about Gibraltar because there's a huge...

19:33Yeah, one of the things that, obviously, you've been looking at as this corruption scandal in Gibraltar, which of course is this tiny, tiny territory. It's only about two and a half miles square, which is actually part of the land of Spain. I mean, sorry, that's, obviously, going to get me in trouble, but it's... That would get you a lot of trouble. That is a major diplomatic incident. Connected to the Spanish mainland. It's not an island. It's a little tip, which Britain conquered in the 1700s and has 32 ,000 people living in it. And was basically a British naval base, a little bit like... I'm not sure everyone quite understands that Guantanamo, the US base, is literally part of the land of Cuba.

20:12So this place, which 60 % of its economy was the British Navy, as recently as the 1980s, has now branched into many different things, financial services, e -gaming, etc. And is surprisingly, for a place of 32 ,000 people, I mean, it's the size of a very, very small district council in Britain. But of course, it has its own legislature and its own chief minister, and it passes laws. And it's... And along with the Isle of Man and Jersey, which are these other bits of the British setup, it is almost a kind of independent country, which has King Charles, as it's king, or despite being tiny. Anyway, over to you on the corruption scandal.

20:51Well, it's been going for some time, but it's going to come to a head later this April 8th, I think it is, when this hearing opens into something called... It's the McGregor inquiry. And McGregor was a guy called Ian McGregor, he was the head of police in Gibraltar. He retired in quotes halfway through his term four years ago, and claims that he was pressured to do so by the First Minister Fabian Picardo, because McGregor had carried out a search warrant against somebody at the law firm where Picardo used to work. And there's now a British judge, who's in charge of this inquiry, some pretty high -flying British King's councils are on their way to Gibraltar to take part in this inquiry.

21:38And I guess the basic allegation is that by McGregor is that he was forced out, because his legitimate work as a police commissioner was getting close to somebody who was close to the First Minister. And since then, there have been all sorts of charges and allegations flying around, allegations of sexual misconduct against him. Which have been knocked out. And also, allegations that police officers were given incentives to say things against him. It's all become a bit messy. And then into the mix, the government has brought forward new legislation to replace what was once the Commission's of Inquiry Act, and to bring in a new law which replicates the laws that we have in relation to inquiries, which was something that was brought in after the South Inquiry into bloody Sunday.

22:27Now, why is this caused the absolute who -haw? Because it gives the government powers over official inquiries, which it did not have before, up to and including stopping them. Now, they say that they would not apply it to this inquiry, but needless to say, because they've rushed it through, and they normally have six weeks between a bill being published in a debate, and that has been sidelineed. So it's quite a complicated story. And of course, Gibraltar does have issues with its reputation in relation to money laundering and so forth. So I think Gibraltar will be in the news more than usual in the coming weeks.

23:07One of the things I guess that I think, listening to all this, is part of the problems of these places which are so tiny. I mean, absolutely. In the obviously, in countries where are 30 ,000 people, everybody knows each other. Fabian Piccardo's wife worked with the Hassan law firm, and the Hassan himself was chief minister of etc before, and the man representing the government in the case was also the previous chief minister. I mean, it's tiny beyond imagining and how corruption gets going in these places is very interesting. Other end of the scale, I mean, we talked about corruption in Britain, and it's very difficult working out how you rank countries on how corrupt they are.

23:46We tend to think about Britain as pretty clean, but 80 % of the British public believes there's a lot or a fair amount of corruption in British politics, which is pretty, pretty shocking. Transparency International has a list that tries to rank countries on how corrupt they are, aren't they? Yeah, the scandals do. The scandal is always up there. Singapore up there. Britain down probably to make British depressed is about level with France. But it Britain's only just above the US in the list, and that's a pretty amazing too, because corruption in the US amongst senators and congressmen has consistently been sort of eye -watering.

24:21We've covered, finally, just in passing, but Bob Mnendez, who was a senator from New Jersey, who was literally the chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. I mean, incredibly senior senator, was found last year with $500 ,000 of cash stuffed into pockets and gold bars in his house, and had texted the full list of all the members of the US Embassy in Egypt to Egyptian officials. This money was coming. It seemed to be Egyptian intelligence service. And then we've had these incredible scandals in Europe, which are partly about a new form of corruption, or maybe it's one we're just becoming more aware of, where states buy MPs.

Read the full transcript

24:57I think it's a very old form of corruption. Yeah, well, in this one is Morocco, Qatar and Mauritania, and probably Kazakhstan, or certainly Azerbaijan, and certainly Russia. Basically, buying members of the European Parliament, different members of separate European Parliament, there's a British MP called Mike Hancock, who seemed to have been implicated in very close relationships with Azerbaijan to put it politely, and before again to liable cases, you can read the caviar diplomacy piece by ESI, which points out that he kept endorsing the Azerbaijan elections, and as I've read some election experts, I think you can confirm for us that the Azerbaijan elections are not famous for their transparency.

25:37No, I think he's, I think he's actually just one is fifth in a row. And also, rather sweetly, one of his opponents has stood in every election against him, and he's, I think he's risen from 0 .3 % of the vote to 3 % in his five terms. So, you know, the opposition's clearly doing very well. By the way, before we get into the European Union thing, when you were talking about transparency international there, I just quickly had a look at their website. The top story on transparency international website is as the UK score hits an all -time low, the time for action in corruption is now. And then, and the second story is when is modernizing Gibraltar's laws a bad idea?

26:16They're talking about that one as well. My final little anecdote is there was a man I indirectly knew who was a South Carolina congressman called John Genrette who was done by an FBI sting in the early 80s. And when the FBI agent who was a sort of fake shake went into see him offering cash in exchange for gambling contracts, John Genrette said, I've got larceny in my blood. I take the bribe and a goddamn minute. Well, this is recorded. A little bit, a little bit about Europe, because that is very interesting. We touched, I think, on a previous pod on how a Greek member of the European Parliament, Evakali, whose father, Alexandra, had also been a former politician.

26:57The father was stopped with hundreds of thousands of euros in a suitcase, an Italian former MP Antonio Panzeri, a Belgian MP, Marie Arena, and a lot of this seemed to be taking money from Rocco to get EU backing on trade agreements with EU fisheries, taking them off the human rights list. And then as a by jam, seem to be doing a lot of bribery of difference. I mean, incredible. They had someone called the Laundromat scandal, which I think you've mentioned in the past, where they literally laundered over a billion euro through paying people largely, I think, to back them on elections and human rights claims in the European Council.

27:30That's what it counts to Europe. Now, Rory, I think we should introduce somebody called Victor Medvedchuk to our discussions, because he is right at the heart of this European stuff. And he is a former Ukrainian national, former Ukrainian lawyer. He is Godfather to one of the two Putin daughters that we talked about recently who went on the London eye with my kids, and who your daughter tried to take shopping in Clark's shoes. Take shopping in Clark shoe shops? Correct. He now lives in exile in Russia. He's quite close to Putin. And he is the guy that both the Belgian Prime Minister and also the Czech authorities last week, named as being the heart of an attempt to influence the upcoming European Parliamentary elections.

28:17And it's quite interesting, if you think about it, there's the Belgian Prime Minister goes out and essentially says we are at risk of our elections being interfered with, and this is something we talked about with John Swarz and Eliza Manning -Buller on leading this week, being interfered with by these outside actors. And of course, when you've that background that you just described, straightforward naked corruption, then that basically says that, well, the Russians are probably thinking, well, we'll be able to find a few people that we can influence. Of course, a lot of this is about trying to influence the debate about Ukraine.

28:52So, John Swarz, when we talked to him, said, you know, you couldn't say that the Russians tipped the balance in Brexit or tipped the balance in the Trump Biden election of 2016, but that they are trying to have an impact upon the outcome of these elections is beyond dispute. Yeah, I didn't. When I was in Parliament, I'm at least only 2010 to 2019, here rumours, or see any signs that my colleagues were actually taking hundreds of thousands of pounds worth in cash from people. But the kind of thing that worried me more was how close people became at the end of their careers to companies and often companies that they were working with as ministers or they were meant to be scrutinising.

29:36And that, I think, is very worrying because one of the risks is that MPs don't radically call out and hold accountable things that are going wrong with companies. Let's say, I don't know that I was the... I was in fact, I was the water minister. And if you're looking for a job in the water industry afterwards, are you going to really call out and say these guys are a disgrace? You create too much trouble. You know, when I was chair of the Defence Select Committee, was I'm really going to call out the Defence contractors if I was going to be looking for a job. Other thing, honestly, finally, that if we're talking about cleaning up politics in all these countries is this very strange business of these friends of groups.

30:14So, you know, friends of Israel, friends of Palestine, friends of India, or in Britain, all party parliamentary groups on Pakistan or whatever it happens to be, or Cyprus, which end up often providing paid trips for MPs to visit other people's countries, sponsored by those countries' governments, gives them a very, very partial vision of those countries that reinforce the narrative of those governments, and then produces a series of members of parliament. I'm afraid it doesn't matter which side they're on. I could be on either side on Kashmir, either side on Palestine, either side on Cyprus, who end up taking incredibly strong partial positions where I used to get a bit anxious about this.

30:55I mean, when I was invited on these trips, I would say, look, I'm a British member of parliament, I'm not a member of parliament for some other country, and I'm not going on a paid trip. The difficulty with that is that if you're, you know, we both bemoan the fact that too few parliamentarians take a real genuine interest in a lot of the big foreign policy issues. How are they supposed to travel when the public get angry every time that expenses are published, and why should they be taking airplanes here than everywhere? And I guess what happens there. I think the Americans have it better. The American state, I think, the federal government does sponsor politicians who travel around the world, or they have organizations like they won't be spoke to recently, the Marshall Scholars, where they will fund people to go abroad.

31:43But I agree with you, that is one thing, that is a thing that countries do, don't they? They get parliamentarians there, and they try to get them to become effectively spokesman for their own government. I remember when I was a journalist, there was a Tory MP called John Carlisle, who I remember for two things, one that he was a very prominent supporter of the tobacco lobby, and the other was that he would never say a bad word about the South African apartheid government, and he would go on trips there and stuff, and be close to their government. Absolutely, and in so doing, would be able to claim that he was something of an expert, because I've actually visited this place, and I've seen what it's like, and this stuff in Europe, Decro, Alexander Decro, the Prime Minister of Belgium, he said in quotes, Russia has approached EU parliamentarians and paid them to promote Russian propaganda here.

32:30And on the same day, or the day before, the Czechs sanctioned this guy, Medvedchuk, and another associate, and also sanctioned this website called The Voice of Europe, which is based in Prague. So these are sort of very sophisticated influence operations that are targeted at our elections, or in this case the European elections. And I thought it was very, very interesting that essentially two European governments came out within 24 hours. That means that the intelligence services are telling them something quite serious is going on. And it's, boy, these operations are difficult. I mean, I guess we need to go to break, but it's fascinating when you watch.

33:06I mean, there's an article from about a year ago where Derspiegel tries to run through the investigations that were done against on some of these Morocco, Mauritania, Qatar allegations. But boy, it's difficult, because a lot of these members of parliament claim immunity, often it's their son or their father has the cash, or their husband has the cash. And pinning this all down seems to be really difficult. So well done, I guess, the police for tracking the stuff down. And it all adds grist to the mill to the argument that Labour needs to put restoring trust in politics and standards in public life at the heart of the manifesto and the campaign for government.

33:46Excellent. Take a break.

33:53This is an ad from BetterHelp. At the moment, we're getting advice from everywhere. You just have to go on TikTok. Could be Alice's cold plunges. Could be my attempts to meditate or the digital detox that I'm doing in Colombia. But of course, one of the things that we know is that it can be incredibly valuable to talk to another human being, somebody who's actually been trained as the therapist to work through these ideas calmly, objectively and professionally. And as the largest online therapy provider in the world, BetterHelp can provide access to mental health professionals with a very diverse variety of expertise.

34:28They've got over 5 ,000 therapists in the UK. They've helped more than five million people globally. And you can join a session literally at the click of a button, change therapists anytime. So it's not about fixing you, but it's about hearing yourself clearly, maybe for the first time. So talk it out with BetterHelp. Our listeners get 10 % off their first month at BetterHelp .com slash rest politics. That's better H -E -L -P .com slash rest politics. Gatorade is the number one proven electrolyte blend designed to hydrate better than water. So you can lose more sweat and raise your game. Gatorade, is it in you?

35:11Hey, it's Ryan Reynolds here for Mint Mobile. Now I was looking for fun ways to tell you that Mint's offer of unlimited premium wireless for $15 a month is back. So I thought it would be fun. If we made $15 bills, but it turns out that's very illegal. So there goes my big idea for the commercial. Give it a try at MintMobile .com slash switch up from payment of $45 for three month plan equivalent to $15 per month required. New customer offer for first three months only. Speed slow after 35 gigabytes of networks busy. Taxes and fees extra. See MintMobile .com.

35:45Welcome back to the rest of politics with me, Rory Stewart. And me, Alastair Campbell. And we got quite a coup thanks to you, which was John Sores and Eliza Manningham Bullis. So the X heads of MI6 and MI5 are foreign and domestic intelligence services did a double header on our separate feed leading, which people in lot listening to strongly encouraged to listen to. And I think some lovely ones recently are sort of some of them more, you know, straight down the line, like Angela Rainer, the deputy leader labor party, or such a javid, the veteran Tory cabinet minister, but also sculpt transny, gormly, baboon expert Robert Sapolsky.

36:20And now these two intelligence chiefs. They said a lot of interesting things. I mean, it was, it was difficult listening for me at times. I think it's fair to say that, well, Eliza Manningham Bullis, very critical of the Iraq war, full stop. And John Sores, not at all happy about the way that we handled the intelligence in the build up to that war. Both of them quite critical. I thought they in a sort of subdued way of Richard Deerlove, who was the head of MI6 at the time. I thought, Eliza, in particular, brutally frank and straightforward about what she saw as the dangerous to democracy and to NATO of a return of Trump.

36:56And fascinating, I thought on on the way they work. And both of them, I found this genuine interesting that both of them absolutely fixated on this idea that their services have improved because they are now subject to pretty clear legal conditions and constraints. And both of them emphasizing that in a way that quite surprised me. Yeah, I wonder if it was fascinating, wasn't it? Because, of course, there are a lot of people in their organizations, particularly the kind of old and the bold, who would disagree and felt that they now feel that they're completely what they want, hemmed in by lawyers and procedures.

37:32And they can't actually take the risks they could in the past and that Britain is less safe to result. I remember he's the one guy who was every time I met him, he was wearing a different sort of identity. And he was always like, he'd go one day from being a kind of boho, you know, scruffy hoodie jeans type. And then the next time you'd see him, he'd be wearing a pink earring and a three -piece tweed suit. Because he'd suddenly, he'd more from being a kind of, you know, infiltration of one organization to suddenly being a kind of banker or something. And I think he's probably one of those who felt that he should be allowed a lot more freedom.

38:08So just very quick, I remember the other thing that people used to go in for a lot. I don't know where they still do because I think it's getting more difficult with facial recognition and fingerprints. But disguises were a real thing. Dodgy glasses and obviously coats that turn around. But it's the wigs bits that's the funniest. You often see in the movies the coats turning around, but the wigs bit is hilarious. And there was particularly 30 years ago, we had a guy in one of our MCs incredibly famous for his wig collection. And was always walking out of the back door of an embassy with a different hairstyle on believing this would fool the surveillance teams into thinking it wasn't him.

38:40We're getting going to Israel, but both John Sores and the lies of Manning and Buller were pretty frank about that too and essentially saying to quote a lies of Manning and Buller, she said, look, any government who was attacked in the way that Israel was on October 7th would have to take action. But it's now reached the point where it is contrary to Israel's interests to be continuing in the way that they are. And likewise John Sores made the point that I think he had that extraordinary stat that he reckoned that 60 % of Hamas fighters were orphans. As he said, there's going to be a lot more orphans out of what's happening recently.

39:15So let's just go to Israel because there's a lot happening there. So overnight we've had this attack by Israel on the consulate of Iran in Damascus and they've taken out the commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and his deputy and others. And Iran are talking about what they call a harsh response. We've got these continuing massive protests against Netanyahu where families of hostages have come together with political voices that simply want elections and they want to get rid of Netanyahu. We've had Netanyahu overnight under general anesthetic with a herni operation. We've had the hospital in Raffa effectively reduced to the ground.

39:58And then we've also now had this tragic story including the death of a Brit in Australia, in the poll of the American Canadian amongst aid workers who have been killed in the Israeli strike which has gone wrong. And then this big debate going on inside the Israeli cabinet over the exemption of Orthodox Jews from military service. And this has the potential and Netanyahu is on the record of saying this could break the coalition. Really interesting as you because ultra orthodox Jews or in particular normally the Herady group of people who I think listeners will recognize as often being dressed in quite conservative clothes and who were quite a small part of the Israeli population when the State of Israel was found that only about 5 % in the 1940s have had much larger families and now represent nearly 13 % of the Israeli population.

40:56And on our own track it seems within the next 25 years or next 35 years potentially have more children than any other part of the Israeli population. So the growing part of the population. And the deal when Israel was set up was to allow the Herady communities to be able to continue their studies to the Torah and be exempt from military service and the Israeli government funded this education provision. And this exemption seems to be renewed regularly but the renewal did not go through this time on the 1st of April and the Supreme Court has now said that education funding should no longer be provided for people who don't attend military service and and back over to you on the political crisis this has formed.

41:41When it started by the way back in 1948 with David Bengurian I think there only about 400 that this actually covered and as you say the State paid for them in benefits and education and all the other things that they needed to do their religious studies is grown and grown and grown and grown as you say now somewhere between 12 and 13%. And this has always been a subject of considerable division inside the Israeli community because I think that the secular community who kind of accept some of them willingly some of them less so that they should do all do military service. There's been a real backlash from the ultra -orthodox community and of course the reason this is so difficult for Netanyahu is because his cabinet is reliant on some of these extreme religious groups and so he's the one who's asked to see the Supreme Court for an extension he's asked to be allowed to take a bit longer to deal with this he is on record as saying this could break apart the coalition and of course the protesters they'd be nothing happier than for them because they want to see general elections and they want to get rid of him but it's exposed the real divide within the war cabinet because gallant and gants the two members of the war cabinet they are worried about what they see as a manpower shortage certainly coming down the track and therefore they want to be able to call upon more of Israeli citizens to take part in the war.

43:04And this takes us back to the story we were covering last year which was the protests and tell if this is before the Gaza attacks which were about moves against the judiciary and part of the reason why Netanyahu was making moves against the judiciary is partly because the judges were seen as being on the side of compelling military service and therefore alienated the ultra -orthodox but also they were stopping some of the settlements and therefore alienating some of the settlement. The other thing that makes this quite difficult to understand I think for outsiders is that a lot of the ultra -orthodox community the Haredis are either non -sionists or anti -sionists so some of them actually think that it's a sin to have a state of Israel before the Messiahs come.

43:49Their parties are those that vote some of them don't vote but those that vote are an important part of his coalition so the Shaz under Arya Derry which has 11 seats and this united Tora Judea which has seven seats this is important because he's only got his majority is just from 64 seats but they are different I mean these ultra -orthodox communities so people who you know you'll recognize me the non -lithuanian communities for example wear these fur hats and these big silk caftans on the Sabbath very different from the parties of Ben Gavir and Smotrich so Smotrich religious sign this Ben Gavir which is this party Jewish power that's come out of cuss who are orthodox Jews but very very strongly connected with the settler movement and with the idea of expelling Palestinians so he's holding a coalition where the Zionists and the religious Zionists and the ultra -orthodox are sitting together but many of the ultra -orthodox paradoxically have tended to be more moderate on the Palestinian issue yeah it underlines how fragile his coalition is or could be and it will take something like this it could take something like this to break it apart and meanwhile of course there's been the shadow war going on between Israel and Iran for some time but I think once you start hitting consulates and taking out commanders of the revolutionary guard Iran probably does feel it will have to step up attacking a consulate is a very extreme thing to do because of this idea of diplomatic immunity I mean generally the idea is that in anybody's country however badly you behave an embassy is almost sovereign territories it's exempt to have this kind of stuff and interestingly there have been big criticisms this strike from Saudi and UAE which are traditionally very very opposed to Iran and in fact a lot of their relationships with Israel were because they thought Israel would back them against Iran but they've come out along with the usual suspects like Russia criticizing the tech and the fear is that there is a quite a large chunk of Israeli public opinion that now wants to take the war into Lebanon wants to take on Hisbalah I've had relatives and friends in Israel over the last two three weeks and the first thing they notice of course is that there are very few tourists to be seen the airport very very empty but many of the people they were meeting are beginning to say we made a mistake going after Hamas after the guards attacks we should have gone straight after Hisbalah which is the Iranian back shield groups in Lebanon who are much larger much better armed and pose a much greater threat to the Israeli state so and maybe we've you know part of the conversation where some of these Israeli businessmen in particular saying you know we've wasted a lot of international support going after Hamas well what we really needed was to support Gafteh as well as so there's a suggestion that when they attack the Iranians some parts of the Israeli government will be thinking we don't really mind if Iran responds because if Iran responds it's then our our excuse to go after Hisbalah Lebanon.

46:42A couple of quick final points we're going to your friend Sam Bankman Freed now I use the word friend very loosely there. Netanyahu we talked about corruption earlier he is still facing some very very serious corruption charges related to fraud and bribery and the other big development this this week which I haven't seen get much discussion here is the the other new law that they're bringing forward is one to block Al Jazeera inside Israel now that says to me and Netanyahu says very very very strong words I think he talked about them being actively involved in the events of October the 7th so on the one hand you've got Israel leaning on the Qataris to try to keep some sort of process going on on the other hand they're saying you run a kind of evil propaganda outfit and we're going to shut it down inside Israel because you basically become spokeswoman for Hamas and I wonder if that's about just creating another enemy.

47:38It's also very worrying because of course Israel's very very proud of being a strong democracy traditionally with an independent judiciary of free press and Al Jazeera has played a completely vital role in reporting on what's going on in Gaza they've been able to get far more reporting out on the ground they've had some very very courageous journalists yeah hardly anybody else is still there very very worrying to start doing things like shutting down independent media and and I think the final thing of course is that the big story still are all these trucks blocked at the border and there are you know hundreds of trucks loaded with supplies ready to go through again you know I I've been talking to friends in Jordan this week who are just horrified by it because they say that you know on a given day you're expecting to get a thousand through about 120 will be signed off and of those maybe only 30 or 40 actually crossed the border and they're being stopped again and again sometimes on security grounds but sometimes it's tiny grounds and it's very very difficult to understand why more of these humanitarian supplies are not being allowed through the Israeli government of course denying this but it's very difficult not to feel there it's a strong pattern of obstruction on these humanitarian supplies and it's not going to be fixed by the Americans opening a port if America was serious about it what they would be doing is doing what we do in in in other humanitarian emergencies around the world which is escorting those trucks in with UN peacekeepers or US soldiers and saying we're coming into deliver humanitarian supplies and overseeing that situation rather than trying to open this port which will never be able to take the number of supplies that people need and this comes back to the question of how much pressure America's prepared to put and you and I were looking at her an article earlier this week which was going in detail into what Bush senior did in 1991 where he came back a 10 billion dollar loan guarantee in order to free settlements it's very interesting how many things remain the same I mean this is 33 years ago but there you had an Israeli cabinet minister calling George Bush senior an anti -Semite and a liar Erhud Al -Mert calling him contemptible because of US attempts to put pressure on the settlement this year you're getting sort of mixed singles from the United States the moment in a way that you had the situation where they didn't veto the United Nations resolution on a ceasefire that was seen as quite a big move by the Israelis they came out straight away last night and criticized Israel over this move in Al Jazeera and they do keep banging the drum hard in relation to access for aid this charity world central kitchen that who've lost these these people overnight I mean I suppose the other thing you would know more about this than I but is there a worry that when you see things like this happening that some of the aid organizations think well this is just becoming so difficult it's harder to get people in there it's harder to get people to go and stay there when this kind of incident happens or do you think it just galvanizes people say right this underlines the importance of the work that we do no you're completely right I mean that this is terrifying I mean I've got a lot of friends working with organizations working in Gaza some trying to get into Gaza to work but this is really really scary stuff because normally as an international aid worker you are pretty exempt there are a few exceptions the Taliban killed Metsun Frontier workers in end of 2001 beginning 2002 in Afghanistan but that led to Metsun Frontier was drawing all its operations from Afghanistan that was a very shocking incident more than 20 years ago but you certainly do not expect one of the most technologically advanced sophisticated armies in the world to be mounting strikes against foreign aid workers I mean that's a totally different level and actually means that it feels now will feel for many aid workers one of the most very dangerous countries in the world to operate and it will begin to feel to people as it does operating in Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo maybe to end on a slightly lighter note if I told you this story about I was thinking about Netanyahu with his general anesthetic for his hernia operation I don't see what to do whether he had any thoughts he went under as to the politics of the people who he care and charge him because I had a I had a general anesthetic a few years ago for an operation on my nose when I had this problem with my breathing and when I came now the doctor was sadly by the bed and he said you were very very lucky so what you mean he said well the operation won't fight but I have to tell you the at least that this is a massive core but Easter she spent the whole time she spent the whole time saying I could be a hero I could be a hero I could take him out right now there we are there we are risk of anesthetics risk of anesthetics well finally sound back when free so the founder of the FTX crypto exchange this child prodigy who in his 20s became a multi billionaire who set up lavish operations in the Bahamas who invited Tony Blair and Bill Clinton to appear on stages with him and some of the greatest rock musicians in the world and was a particularly close friend of our new friend Scarimucci or your older friend Mr.

52:41Scarimucci who gave this interview on leading who again was one of his co -investors who was there on the Bahamas as the whole thing blew up yeah and and blew up in a way that lost 8 billion dollars worth of his depositors money and it now becomes clear because he's just been sentenced to 25 years in jail partly thanks the fact the people who ran the company with him who were other young people in their 20s and early 30s including his girlfriend testified against him and explain that he basically thought he was above all these laws and he borrowed money from customers accounts to try to deal with a run on the money has actually stole their money to try to bail himself out and then made the extraordinary mistake that many massive egotism make have tried to defend himself in court instead of having a lawyer so he stood there you know nitpicking with the judges lying seeming very very peculiar and and he did this amazing interview with an Asian American journalist who was actually quite an obscure and in her own description quite an obscure blogger who suddenly got called up to see him and he opened up in the most incredible and self incriminating way he managed to say oh yeah all the stuff about my trying to regulate crypto was just bullshit and I was pulling the wool over the eyes of the government so in some ways he's he's been convicted on his own on his own words yeah and it was pretty clear from the the judge the judge the judge did not like him did it he really didn't like his his demeanor and the way he dealt with the court I mean we at Fiona and I last time we were driving through France we listened to the Michael Lewis book on Sambatman Fried and even now having followed the court case a bit and also having listened to that book I can't quite work out whether he is a con man or whether he is just somebody who is I mean he's somebody who openly is on has autism spectrum disorder in fact he made that case in court that that was the reason why the judge should go easy on him because he would find prison a very very difficult place to be but he's somebody who just felt that he was always able because of the the power of his brain and and his ability to handle maths and deal with data which he realized was the kind of you know the most powerful thing in the world right now he felt that anything he did was allowable because he was he was sort of special in that field but was it a con even now I'm not convinced that he was conning people I think it's just that he thought whatever he got coming towards him he'd be able to deal with it you mentioned Tony Blair and and Bill Clinton I remember when they were the three of them were photographed together and their Sambatman Fried with these kind of wild hair I think he was wearing a t -shirt and shorts and sort of really scruffy kind of trainers and he just looked and I thought what Tony and Bill doing with this guy and and yet you know the book if I'm right I think it starts with Anna Winter who is you know a real kind of fashion guru and she runs this thing the Metropolitan Ball and she's desperate to get Sambatman Fried to sponsor it and to be there and he says yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah and he then just doesn't turn up because he sort of thinks well right now in this moment I can't be bothered so I won't do it doesn't care what people think doesn't care about upsetting people and yet where I think which is what I think might provoke your interest in him was was big on this whole thing of effective altruism sort of earning to give money away and and it's very difficult to know how much that was sincere and how much wasn't but yes he he very much believed in a fetched altruism which is connected to the work I was doing with gift directly and one of the reasons gift directly got going is because it was able to demonstrate that giving unconditional cash had more impact than other types of charitable activity when you measured it in terms of randomized controlled trials I mean also sort of scientifically like a medical trial effect vouchers was really about proving how far your dollar goes and he was a real pioneer in this work and therefore got some people like Peter Singer who's his very distinguished Australian philosopher to appear on stages with him and I think Peter Singer now regrets it deeply I I dealt with his foundation sound back with Fritz foundation it was very odd though dealing with them because on the one hand they were very generous and offering to give away billions on the other hand the call I had was extraordinary I called ahead of his foundation to see if I could interest them in a project helping the extreme poor in Africa and after about 15 minutes of my pitch the sky who was sitting in California in his hoodie said well you know I haven't had my lunch yet so I think I'm going to go and have my lunch and I said very honest say oh well yes of course you must have your lunch I don't want to keep you off your lunch but you know can we reschedule a call for a few weeks time because I think this is a really important issue and he said to me honest I'm not that interested in poverty and then he hung up and went off for his lunch and I thought my goodness this is pretty brutal stuff I mean somebody who can say that to me I mean I understand he does at least he could pretend right and that was ahead of his foundation you never met or spoke with bang for yourself no I was put in touch ahead of his foundation because someone put me in touch with Sam who pushed me on to the head of his foundation so what did they get what did they get money to a lot of the money didn't come through in the end but they were increasingly interested in sort of futureology they were interested in the risks posed by asteroid strikes and robot overlords they said we were underpricing so while I was saying you know we've got to concentrate on 700 million people in extreme poverty today they were saying no no no you're being too short term we need to put money into preventing the threats from 40, 50, 100 years in the future wow it is an amazing story though and he got so he got 25 years they were asking for 100 at one point one they yeah I think Bernie Maddoff or made off great name for a con man made off he got 150 years I don't know even whether he's still alive I don't know he's dead not I don't know I think he didn't last long so he's 25 years so I guess look he will get out at some point I suspect he will find prison quite a tough environment I don't know but the book it the book was very very interesting and it was one of those books where Michael Lewis and I wonder was an ego thing Michael Lewis is quite a big deal he got a lot of access and you've got the feeling of somebody who a bit like musk I think doesn't really give a toss about what anybody thinks or says about him yeah but he's probably utterly bewildered as to how he's ended up in jail having believed according to his girlfriend that he had a chance of becoming president of the United States just just a couple years ago anyone wants to follow up there are some great documentaries that have been produced on FTX including some starring are Francisco Amitchie BBC's down ones CNBC's down one Bloomberg's down one and for people interested in the ultra orthodox community in in Israel there's a lovely Netflix series that I'd really recommend called Shatisl I'm if I've obviously mispronounced it but but it's about a herady family living in Jerusalem and it's warm affectionate profoundly eccentric following the lives of a young man trying to adjust and a young woman trying to adjust or living in this community and Rory if anybody interested in the constitutional arrangements surrounding the Rock of Gibraltar which at one point I think you said the Lord of Spain I suggest they go read the Treaty of Utrecht oh very good I think it was 1713 I can't remember when Gordon Brown your friend Gordon Brown got me in to talk to him about Iraq in 2008 I spent I think an hour with him and during the hour he spoke I think for 56 minutes of that hour he told me a lot about the Treaty of Utrecht there you go why was he talking why was he talking about that oh well I think he was interested in the west phalian system and state sovereignty I thought given he got me in to talk about Iraq I was going to get a bit more in about Iraq but you know I was educated good you were polite you were polite um um sure we should we just for those you didn't see it should we remind people what our April fools were yeah gone then well I said what yours was way too far fetched well he didn't like it you didn't like it at all it really has a very sensitive note I sent out a mild announcement saying I'd been made head of product management and challenge a Burnley football club and Alistair was so outraged by my touching on this thing which is almost family for him I got him he destroyed my apples fool with an immediate reply saying ha ha bullshit for all the other ones so anyone going to my timeline yeah I probably was a bit I mean I should have just left let it sit there and then I should have separately I also did my April fool as a response to yours I thought mine was quite good those basically that eaten college it asked me to head up a committee to work out how to put their sporting and cultural facilities into public ownership that that that worked well right all right Rory see you soon see you soon bye bye

From the publisher

How can we root out corruption in politics, both at home and abroad? What’s caused the crisis in Israel around its ultra-Orthodox population? What really happened in the story of crypto’s former golden boy, Sam Bankman-Fried?

Join Rory and Alastair as they answer all these questions and more in today’s episode of The Rest Is Politics.

🌏 Get our exclusive NordVPN deal here ➼ https://nordvpn.com/restispolitics It’s risk-free with Nord’s 30-day money-back guarantee! ✅

TRIP ELECTION TOUR:
To buy tickets for our October Election Tour, just head to www.therestispolitics.com

TRIP Plus:
Become a member of The Rest Is Politics Plus to support the podcast, receive our exclusive newsletter, enjoy ad-free listening to both TRIP and Leading, benefit from discount book prices on titles mentioned on the pod, join our Discord chatroom, and receive early access to live show tickets and Question Time episodes.
Just head to therestispolitics.com to sign up, or start a free trial today on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/therestispolitics.

Instagram:
@restispolitics
Twitter:
@RestIsPolitics
Email:
restispolitics@gmail.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics

All 501 episodes
233. From peerages to Putin: the fight against corruption in politicsThe Rest Is Politics · 1 h 1 min
Listen in VO