263. TRIP US: Donald Trump, Silicon Valley and Wall Street: Big Money's Deal with the Devil

6 Jun 2024 · 42 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Summary: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 263

Episode Title 263. TRIP US: Donald Trump, Silicon Valley and Wall Street: Big Money's Deal with the Devil

Episode Description In this episode, hosts Katty Kay and Anthony Scaramucci delve into the recent support for Donald Trump from Wall Street and Silicon Valley figures, explore a reported confrontation between Joe Biden and Bill Ackman, and discuss current immigration issues at the US-Mexico border.

---

Key Themes and Discussions

  1. Donald Trump's Fundraising Surge
  2. Post-Indictment Fundraising: Trump's campaign reported a $200 million fundraising increase following his criminal indictment related to hush money payments.
  3. Fundraising Landscape:
  4. Small vs. Big Donors: Trump's funding largely comes from small donors, contrasting with prior fundraising strategies that included large donors.
  5. Misinformation in Fundraising Claims: Scaramucci expresses skepticism about the reported figures, suggesting they might include funds pulled from previous months and unconfirmed numbers.
  1. Support from Silicon Valley and Wall Street
  2. Return of High-Profile Donors: Notable investors, like David Sacks and Bill Ackman, are re-engaging with Trump after previously distancing themselves post-January 6th.
  3. Symbolism of Support: Their backing is seen as a significant signal for Trump's campaign, despite many billionaires still hesitating to invest heavily.
  1. Immigration Policy and Joe Biden's Executive Order
  2. Recent Executive Order: Biden's order seeks to restrict asylum for migrants crossing the US-Mexico border after a certain threshold is met.
  3. Internal Party Tension: The order has drawn criticism from progressive Democrats, indicating a potential rift within the party as Biden attempts to respond to public concerns about immigration.
  4. Economic Contributions of Immigrants: Kay emphasizes the positive impact of immigrants on the economy, countering the narrative that focuses on border control.
  1. The Republican Party's Evolving Stance on Immigration
  2. Shift in Party Support: Historically, the Republican Party supported immigration reform, but Trump's influence has shifted the focus towards stricter policies.
  3. Long-term Viability: Scaramucci raises concerns about whether the party's current anti-immigration stance will sustain its electoral success in the future.
  1. Reflection on Leadership and Historical Context
  2. D-Day Anniversary: The episode touches on the significance of D-Day, with reflections on leadership styles, historical sacrifices, and the importance of responding to current challenges.
  3. Camaraderie in the Military: Acknowledgment of how American culture honors veterans and military service, contrasting it with perceptions of historical events like the Vietnam War.

---

Conclusion In this informative episode of *The Rest Is Politics*, Kay and Scaramucci provide a comprehensive analysis of the political landscape surrounding Trump’s fundraising, the changing dynamics of immigration policy under Biden, and the evolving positions within the Republican Party. The discussions highlight the complexities of political financing, party unity, and historical context that shapes current American politics.

For further insights and discussions, listeners are encouraged to subscribe to *The Rest Is Politics Plus* for exclusive content.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Thanks for listening to the Restus Politics, sign up to the Restus Politics Plus to enjoy ad -free listening and receive a weekly newsletter. Join our members' chat room again early access to live show tickets. Just go to therestuspolitics .com. That's therestuspolitics .com. At Blinds .com, it's not just about window treatments. It's about you. Your style, your space, your way. Whether you DIY or want the pros to handle it all, you'll have the confidence of knowing it's done right. From free expert design help to our 100 % satisfaction guarantee, everything we do is made to fit your life and your windows.

0:32Because at Blinds .com, the only thing we treat better than windows is you. Visit Blinds .com now for up to 40 % off site -wide, plus a professional measure at no cost. Rules and restrictions apply.

0:49Hello and welcome to the Restus Politics US with me, Anthony Scaramucci. And me, Katie K. I'm good because I'm back in DC after my kind of travels around this enormous great country. And it's very nice to be home. On today's podcast, we're going to be looking at the big spike in Donald Trump's fundraising since that criminal indictment at the end of last week. As well as some of the biggest names in Silicon Valley, in finance, who had previously alienated themselves from Donald Trump after January the 6th, they're now jumping in and saying they're going to fund his campaign for a second presidency.

1:29In the second half of the program, we're going to take a look at Joe Biden's announcement of an executive order on immigration that would allow for the US Mexico border to be temporarily shut down to asylum seekers. And we'll get into why the president did that, how it's annoyed members of his own party on the progressive left. And look actually a bit more broadly, something I wanted to do for a while about the Republican party's relationship with immigration and how it used to be the party that was in favor of immigration reform. You had American business in favor of immigration. And now that's all being switched around in the Trump era.

2:07First though, Anthony, as you will always say, let's follow the money and talk about what's happened with Donald Trump's fundraising since that criminal indictment last week when he was found guilty of fiddling his books in order to cover up a hush money payment to the wonderful porn star, Stormy Daniels. It's just an incredible story. If we just stop and think about the story and the fact that he is immunized the American public from the story. And I want you to imagine 20 years ago, a 2004 campaign where this had erupted in one of the candidates or 30 years ago, the stuff that Bill Clinton was dealing with.

2:49It's just an amazing story that he is moving on. He's raised. He says $200 million. Now, I don't believe that number. I just want to provide some perspective on that. When we were working in 2016 for Donald Trump, he was not raising money. When Meduchin and I got together to build the protocol to raise money from the high network donors. And I had the Romney list. I had the George W list. And we were going out to those people. They're saying, no, we don't want to give money to Donald Trump. He's off his kilter and it's bad for our business. And so to Jared Kushner's credit and a few other people, they organized this small donor, send out ads on Facebook, Instagram, et cetera.

3:37And we were picking up tens of millions of dollars at an average clip of about $61. And that's worked for Mr. Trump. He got the big donors in 2020 as the sitting president. But he's not getting the big donors. If you look at the math, he's still getting the small donors. He's not getting the big donors. He closed several of what he calls his outreach offices in some of the swing states this past week. People are saying, okay, if you raise $200 million and you know you have to get out to vote exercise, why are you closing these? Okay, so there's a lot of misinformation happening in that campaign.

4:18And by the way, they do what corporations do is they pull from the month before and they pull from this thing, you know, a president Biden went to Radio City Music Hall a few months ago raised $25 million. So Trump had to say, well, I raised 50 at John Paulson's Ocean Front Mansion in Palm Beach, but he probably didn't. He pulled it from other places and took some of it from the small donor. So I just want to provide context to people to understand. Yes, he raised money. Yes, he probably raised money from new people. But I don't think he's raising the money he's saying. We won't know the final numbers.

4:59In America, of course, campaigns have to file what they raise with the government, with a FEC. And we won't know that until the next quarter. So there's no confirmation of the exact number that he's raised. But it's pretty clear that that criminal indictment did lead to a surge. I mean, even the Biden campaign is admitting this and they've told that it led to a surge in donations to Donald Trump. And he managed to go out there and say, listen, this is a sham trial, a sham verdict. And that resonated because I just keep going back to this number of how insane it is that he says he raised $53 million in the first 24 hours after the verdict came down.

5:46To put that in some kind of perspective for you, the kind of language that I understand. The biggest movie out in America this year so far was June 2, which I haven't seen yet. Actually, by the way, I loved June 1. So I want to see June 2. I haven't seen it yet. That didn't even make $53 million in the first 24 hours. So he is raising more from the Trump show is raising more than the June 2 show. You'll be glad to hear this because we like Kendall on this program that Barbie made $70 million in its first 24 hours. So Ken beats Don, which I think is some kind of retribution. But anyway, so I'm sure he's going to try and raise more.

6:22But the point is that verdict managed to get a lot of money for him. We'll forget the final numbers later. What do you think about the fact that all of these billionaires? And I know you're saying he's still getting, he's not getting all of those billionaires, but there have been a slew in the last couple of weeks, Anthony. And I'm sure you know half of them. There's been the Silicon Valley investor David Sacks, who said he's going to have a fundraiser for Donald Trump and San Francisco. Apparently attendees are being asked to contribute as much as $300 ,000. That's $300 ,000 just to go and get kind of shrimp cocktail and warm white wine.

6:58And then Bill Acman, the hedge fund manager, who I'm sure, who I know you know, also expected to throw his weight behind him. Nelson Peltz, the billionaire investor who after the Capitol riot on January the 6th said he regretted voting for Donald Trump. He has also said he's had a change of heart. I mean, there are a bunch of these quite high profile names who had been alienating themselves from Trump from Trump after January the 6th have now jumped on board. What are they looking for and how important are they to his campaign? So they are important to the campaign because of the symbolism. He's also speaking at the business round table this week.

7:34As you know, that's an elite group of CEOs and Mr. Trump is going to make his case there. Unfortunately, President Biden is not there because he is in France, the 80th anniversary of the Normandy invasion. But I'll just say a couple of things that I want you to think about our viewers and listeners to think about. Let's take out a Venn diagram and think like a Wall Streeter for a second or a billionaire. If I'm for trouble. I've never managed to do that and I wish I could because I would not be sitting here as a journalist. Okay, there's still time, though, Cady. I know this stuff. There's still time.

8:06Okay. As you say, we are the same vintage and we're running out. But anyway, there we go. No, no, not me. I'm in denial. You got to live in denial, Cady. Okay. We are the same vintage, but it's still a good year. It's still a good year. All right, but anyway. And by the way, thank you for making the Kendall Reffers the second one on the RESTAS Politics US, Kendall Reference. Now the official mascot of the RESTAS Politics, I think. Yeah, I think so. I need I need abs like Ken, but no other anatomy like Ken. We'll just leave it like that. Okay. So on the Venn diagram, if I support Donald Trump, he wins very good for me.

8:42If I support Donald Trump, he loses. It doesn't matter. Joe Biden is a traditionalist. He's not coming for me. If I support Joe Biden and Donald Trump wins very bad for me. So when these guys are looking at the Venn diagram Nash Game Theory analysis supporting Donald Trump to them, and it's 300 ,000, which is a tremendous sum of money, but to somebody that's worth millions and millions billions of dollars, it's not that big of a deal to them. And so they're going to put their money behind Donald Trump and they're going to put it there superficially with the first derivative analysis. I just want to tell a 30 second story, which I don't believe I've told on this podcast, but I think you'll appreciate this.

9:24I host a VIP dinner at my conferences every year. And in 2017, I had then former vice president Joe Biden as the guest of honor. Sitting right next in was Bill Ackman. And I had Lara Logan there, who was former 60 minutes correspondent, etc. David Patrace was there. It was a whole host of glitterati hedge fund managers, etc. Just briefly Anthony, audiences who don't know him, Bill Ackman, hedge fund billionaire, who has become sort of notorious in democratic circles in America, having been seen as a kind of liberal himself for being opposed to diversity initiatives in colleges and help it being behind the push to remove some of the presidents of American colleges who he didn't feel were there on their merits.

10:09Harvard graduate, Harvard Business School graduate, very bright guy. I put him next to the guest of honor, vice president Biden, now president Biden. Well, the conversation got started and the journalist at the table unfortunately went rogue on me. I wanted it to be pleasant. She started asking stuff about the Iraqi war. Joe Biden looked at her and said, Anthony invited me here. He said, this is a social event for me. And so I'm going to bite my tongue and not answer that question. And Bill Ackman leaned over to Joe Biden. He said, you're 72 years old. You've never bit your tongue before. Why start now?

10:46And so Joe Biden is an Irishman. He got red in the face. He looked over to Bill Ackman. He said, hey, listen, you little punk. I'm going to drag you outside and beat the daylights out of you. This is Scranton Joe. Okay. And that's literally what he said. Okay. Scranton Joe. Okay. And Steve Cohen, me, Dan Loeb, there was a whole collection of hedge fund guys. We looked at each other. I said, I think Joe Biden's going to beat the hell out of Bill Ackman. Okay. And that literally I calmed it down. I think we started talking about the weather. But there has been a rub there between Bill Ackman and Joe Biden since that moment.

11:24Okay. And by the way, the Biden people we met, I mean for saying this, I didn't leak that to anybody. But they leaked it. Okay. And why did the Biden people leak it? They leaked it because they wanted to show Joe Biden in his full glory of beating up on the punk billionaire hedge fund manager. Bill Ackman has denied it. He put out a tweet this January, actually discussing his side of it. But I was sitting right across from them. And I could see how the vice president took it as offensive. There was definitely a fracas at the table. So I want to just explain to our viewers and listeners the inside baseball tension that's going on with some of these people.

12:06And so I'll just say this and people will get this, yes, maybe Trump will be for lower taxes and maybe better for business regulation. That's the perception. But what he's not good for is the system. And he's not good for the predictability of the laws. And as a capitalist, I'll tell you that's what's made America so successful is the stability of our legal system, the common law, contract laws that allows capital to flow from the rest of the world into the United States. So anyway, yeah, I mean, look, we spoke about this the other day. His plans to increase tariffs on all imports into the United States by 10%, including imports from China by potentially 100 % is going to throw the global economy and the American financial markets into chaos potentially.

12:54So and is there actually any much room to have more tax cuts in the second Trump administration? It doesn't, tax cuts don't seem to feature very highly in the list of economic proposals that some of the people around Trump are coming up with. Although he has said, I mean, it's interesting when you look at the people that are donating to him. And I think he is kind of he's scurting the legality on campaign finance laws here by suggesting that he will implement policies in return for money. And he's certainly done that with the fossil fuel industry when he had all of those oil executives down to Mar -a -Lago.

13:28And he told them that he would implement policies in favor of the oil and gas industry if they donated a billion dollars to his campaign. So whether these people are doing this because they feel they will get direct policy results from from donating to Donald Trump, or are they doing this just because they hate Joe Biden? That's what I think is interesting is what do they think they're going to get out of this specifically? I mean, what will they get in return for the money that they're donating? Because these are people. I mean, Bill Atman said that Trump should apologize to all Americans in the wake of January the 6th.

14:06Oh, remember, but remember, these are all barometric pressure guys. They study the markets and Trump's stock was going down at that moment. So that tweet was celebrated. Trump's stock is up right now because Biden is perceived by these guys even though the stock markets at an all time high and the economy is in generally good shape as anti -business. So they're shifting. I remember, they're momentum guys. That's how you make your money. This is a call option. I can put $300 ,000 down on the Trump call option. He goes in the money as president. I get the windfall of having the relationship with him.

14:43If I lose the money on this call option, big deal. I chalked that up to my PNL and some other trades that I've lost money on. And so that's the approach that they're taking. And I think it's a dangerous approach, frankly, if you don't mind me saying so because it doesn't peel back what is really going on in the society under the surface of what Trump wants. And at some point, we'll get into this. This is project 2025. Under the surface of what Trump wants is he wants to deport 15 million people from the United States. And you and I both know that 15 million people that are here perhaps illegally are actually benefiting the economy.

15:23Believe it or not, they're paying so security taxes. That in the second half of the program. Yeah. So yeah. So I'm just saying it's just a nonsensical thing. But I get it. I've been there. I've done what they have done. Okay. And so I get it. I think it's a mistake, but I understand why they're doing it. Do you think he calls them personally to get the money? Is he calling up Bill Acman and saying, Hey, Bill, my friend. No, no, no. No, no. So this is the great. So let's face it. I think everybody knows this. Trump is only a billionaire in Zimbabwe where a billion dollars can get you like a cab ride from like half a mile.

15:58With due respect to all his losses in Bob. Yeah. Yeah. And I love you guys as in Bob. You probably fixed the money at this point. But I do. I do have a 10 billion dollar bill in my wallet because when people ask me if I'm a billionaire, yeah, I am a billionaire, but unfortunately, only in Zimbabwe. But and that's me and Trump have that in common. We're billionaires in Zimbabwe. Perhaps nowhere else. And so he perceives himself as a billionaire and he's so insecure. He'll never call the other billionaire and ask for money. Now if the billionaire has given him the money, then he'll call. He'll say something to Bill Acman like, my bill always says that or he says to General Milley, my general, how you doing or my Anthony when he was in good favor with him.

16:40And so he'll call you, but the money's got to be in the door. You see what I mean? A guy like Mitt Romney, no problem. You know, he get on the phone. He said, give me the list Anthony. Who is it? I mean, Cady Cays. He's a billionaire. Great. Hello, Cady. I need some dough for this campaign. How are you today? No problem, Bill. George W. Bush liked it. He liked it. He'd come up with nicknames for these people. He'd invite him in. Let's go get some barbecue. But Trump is trying to pretend he's in their pure group. You see the difference? So so that's that's the the Marose in security. One question I have about money generally in this campaign.

17:20And we've talked about this a little bit before, whether the whole social nature of social media advertising means that money that used to have to be raised to buy ads in television markets and television markets around America are not all equal. If you want to spend ads in television markets in California or Texas or the Dallas Fort Worth area, that's an expensive ad market. You have to you buy those ads a long time in advance. The Biden campaign feels a little bit reassured by the fact that it has already paid for ad space in the key swing states in say Phoenix, Arizona. They've already bought a whole of ads right through November the 6th.

18:01The earlier you buy the ad space, it's like buying tickets to the show, right? The cheaper that or tickets on an airplane, the cheaper that ad space is. And they say, well, the Trump campaign, they're coming in late with the money and so they're having to pay even higher amounts of money for that ad space. I wonder whether two things are happening this time around. One is that that you've got the social media effect. So actually a kind of 30 second slot on TikTok could do you as much as a traditional ad which costs you a whole load of money to buy in Phoenix. And is the money going to be as needed therefore?

18:33But also campaign finance spending on advertising generally part of the goal of it is to increase name recognition, right? Candidates who are not known and around the country need to introduce themselves in these TV ads around the country. There is nobody in this country who doesn't know who Donald Trump and Joe Biden is. So if they already have high name recognition, do they actually need as much money in terms of campaign financing or rather will campaign finances be as determinative of the outcome as they might be in a race where the candidates aren't well known? Having worked on these campaigns for 25 years, what will happen here is a crowd out.

19:13And let me explain what a crowd out is. If you get divorced in the United States, a cynical person will go out and they will disclose both of us have been there and we know that it's kind of expensive. Yeah, it's very painful. It's very painful. And then I'm never going there again. Let me just make the sign of the cross for people that really pray that that never happens again. But when you get divorced in the United States, you can go out and you can hire 15 lawyers and you give them their retainer and now you've blocked your soon to be expaus from using those lawyers. So you always pick the more sinister lawyers that your expaus going to put you on the tabloids in and you try to knock them out of the game.

19:54That's what the Biden people have done to Donald Trump. They've gone to TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, etc. And they've crowded him out. So the top ads and the top positioning, they've already purchased it. Okay, now he can still buy some because I always leave some for the end the way a restaurant does in terms of reservations at a table and so forth. But they've been crowded out and he has spent three to one. This is Joe Biden, President Biden, three to one to Donald Trump's campaign in the world of social media, which includes Facebook, TikTok, believe it or not Snapchat. Now you're asking a different question about name recognition.

20:32They are dropping issue ads. So if you like IVF and you like having choice as a woman, they're dropping that ad. They're reminding you that Joe Biden is for that. Donald Trump is proud that he revoked that. If you like a controlled border and less immigrants in the country, Donald Trump is dropping that ad. You see, so what they're trying to do right now is they're using those ads to force out the vote of the people that are issue voters. They say, oh my god, you're right. I've got to go vote for my rights as a woman and I'm going to show up at the election. I know the two entities, but they have reinforced for me the issues related to these two political candidates.

21:13Which is why the money still matters and the Trump campaign is so happy that they've managed to raise all that money out of the guilty verdict. I think we end with Ken Dolegant. $53 million in 24 hours, that is what the Trump campaign is saying that they raised after that guilty verdict. That is just a little short of what the entire UK election cycle will cost. In one day, I appreciate that that may not be the actual number, but it's still just to put it in perspective of how much the UK election campaign that is happening at the moment is going to cost Donald Trump raised almost that much in 24 hours.

21:48And we'll be back right after the break to talk more about immigration and Joe Biden's executive order, which is promises to shut down the southern border of the United States. If after a certain number of migrants are coming across, it is a play to show that he is being tough on immigration and a couple of final thoughts from both of us on D -Day and the ceremonies that are taking place as we're recording this.

22:18This isn't ad from BetterHelp. At the moment, we're getting advice from everywhere. You just have to go on TikTok. Could be Alice's coal plunges. Could be my attempts to meditate or the digital detox that I'm doing in Colombia. But of course, one of the things that we know is that it can be incredibly valuable to talk to another human being, somebody who's actually been trained as a therapist, to work through these ideas calmly, objectively and professionally. And as the largest online therapy provider in the world, BetterHelp can provide access to mental health professionals with a very diverse variety of expertise.

22:54They've got over 5 ,000 therapists in the UK. They've helped more than 5 million people globally and you can join a session literally at the click of a button. Change therapists anytime. It's obviously not about fixing you, but it's about hearing yourself clearly, maybe for the first time. So talk it out with BetterHelp. Our listeners get 10 % of their first month at BetterHelp .com slash rest politics. That's better H -E -L -P .com slash rest politics.

23:25Welcome back to the REST as politics US with me Katique. And I'm Anthony Scaramucci. In this half, Anthony, we want to look at the executive order that Joe Biden signed this week, trying to curb migrant arrivals into the United States from Mexico. Basically, the order will stop migrants who cross unlawfully from receiving asylum, but only after a daily threshold of 2 ,500 crossings have been recorded. This is being seen here as a very tough executive order on immigration. And Joe Biden's team are certainly trying to paint it as that. And it comes, of course, in response to all of the opinion polls showing that immigration is a big issue for voters in the United States.

24:14And the surge of migrants that we had crossing the border at the end of last year, which was showing up on all of the kind of Fox News channel, all of the right -wing media were picking it up a lot. Even the kind of mainstream media were covering this and all of these migrants being shipped around the country. So immigration has become a big issue in this campaign. And this is kind of Joe Biden's response to that trying to crack down on it. It's produced something of an uproar from liberals in his own party. He got a lot of pushback from progressives, people like the Congressional Progressive Caucus co -chair, Pramila Jaiapal, who said that they were trying to out -republican the Republicans and that never works.

24:50You've got the Texas Congressman Greg Caesar, also a Democratic Progressive saying that it was unfortunate that President Biden is responding to the kind of politics of the Republican Party. So he's getting flak from the left of his party. They've made a kind of cynical calculation, I think, in the White House that those progressives have nowhere else to go. And they're not that worried about that. In fact, I think they kind of think that helps them. If the left -their party beats up on them over immigration, that will probably only help them in swing states, where people say that they're concerned about migrants coming across the border.

Read the full transcript

25:23Three quick things. Biden did something January 20th of 2021, which was a big mistake. He revoked all the executive orders on the border that Donald Trump had in place. He claimed humanitarianism. He did something brilliant on January 20th as well. He kept the tariffs in place on China. So he didn't have to deal with the tariffs, right? He didn't have to have the political flak of the tariffs. He just left them in place. All he had to do was leave them in place. He didn't. Then he said, OK, I've got to fix this. Let's try to fix it through the House and send it. And Trump stopped them. So you have to think of the cynicism related to that.

26:01Trump calls his minions. They're all lackeys. And they say, hey, it's good for the country to slow down the flow of people at the border, but it's bad for my political campaign. So don't sign it. Now, what I don't understand and perhaps you could provide insight into this, when that happened, which was three and a half months ago, why didn't Joe Biden implement this executive order? Then why did he wait till now? That's what exactly what his Republican critics are saying at the moment, right? You've got people like Josh Hawley, Marco Rubio saying, why, you know, if he was going to do this, he should have done it earlier.

26:36I think that's a fairly weak argument because it makes it sound from the Republican side that they basically agree with what he's doing. They just wish they had done it earlier. It's not actually a criticism of the policy itself. It's just a criticism of the timing. The Biden campaign came in saying that it was going to have a more humane policy on the border and they didn't want to look like the Trump campaign and they were listening to the progressives in the party. I think the Biden campaign earlier in this election cycle were more confident about their chances for getting reelected. They really didn't think that they were going to be in this position in the polls.

27:14They see the polls are not moving. They're not ahead in the polls as quickly as they had said they were going to be. They've got to do something on a contentious issue. This is their response to that contentious issue. My bigger question is why there isn't more of a discussion here in America about the slew of economic data and studies that show that immigrants into the United States, illegal and legal immigrants into the United States boost the American economy. I mean 50 % of the labor market's growth came from foreign born workers between January of 2023 and January of 2024. That accounts for the fact that the US economy is booming.

28:01I mean why is the American economy recovered so much better from COVID than most other economies in the world? It's in large part because of the influx of migrants. So the counter -argument to both the White House and the Republican Party as hold on a second shouldn't we actually be looking at the benefit that all of these migrants bring into the country which every economist will tell you. I mean this is you know JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs. These are not touchy -feely economists. These are the ones coming out with the studies saying that the American economy is doing so well largely because of the immigrants that have come into the country.

28:34And that used to be the Republican Party's position but now they have run so far from that that it's an argument that's kind of disappeared and everybody's focused on you know let's build the wall, let's build the wall even the Biden White House is focused on let's build the wall and stop the migrants coming in but actually the American economy wouldn't be where it is today if it weren't for all those people coming across the border. So I totally agree with you on the decisions of change in policy because of the polls and that's the cynicism of being a politician but here's the other thing that I would say to you and I want to get you to react to this.

29:08I think Trump is off market. This anti -immigration strategy, this project 2025 which basically says they want to end immigration into the country, literally wall off the country, literally and figuratively to the rest of the world. And we'll do a whole podcast on that later on I think that's really worth us diving into. Yeah and we'll get there but I believe it's off market and I'm going to explain quickly why in 2012 we did a study at the Republican National Committee of why Mitt Romney lost okay he lost fairly by a wide margin and a lot of it was related to this immigration issue and it turns out that this beautiful colorful mosaic of a country is getting more beautiful and more colorful and the recommendation from the RNC was that the party reinvent itself and make itself look more like the mosaic of the of the country not be a party of elderly white people but to be a more inclusive party and to embrace these elements of the immigration.

30:09Of course Marco Rubio did respond to that remember that group of eight whatever they called it to try to come up with an immigration deal but Trump went out of the box on this and he reached into the last gas of the demography of whites who are generally nativists and don't want the immigration. And I think he's off market and I think this is one of the reasons why he's never gotten the popular vote. He's been up for election as president twice didn't get the popular vote in either time. The only way he can get there is through the tyranny of the minority caddy and that's through the electoral college.

30:44And so at some point when Trump breathes his last gasp as a politician the Republican party if they want to survive they've got to go back to that 2012 plan. There's clearly been a shift in the Republican party's attitude to immigration and Trump has partly caused that like you say he's kind of weaponized the issue. And if you look at Ronald Reagan used to talk about working out America's problems with Mexico. George as I said earlier George H .W. Bush back in 1980 was asked whether children in the country legally should be allowed to go to American public schools. And he immediately said he didn't want to think the six or eight year old should feel that they were living outside the law.

31:26And as recently as 2004 George W. Bush gave incredibly moving stories about the plight of people who were crossing the border saying that they'd walked through the heat of day and cold of the night to risk their lives. And they were only coming to America and shouldn't have to end up in the shadows of American life. That was the Republican president in 2004. And if you see what's happened now I wonder if it's not just Donald Trump weaponizing the issue and kind of inciting nativism. But immigration has lost the business community as a voice of support. So you used to get these powerful groups like the American Chamber of Commerce coming out very firmly in favor of immigration into the country recognizing that America had a labor shortage and that they needed these migrants to mow the lawns and paint the houses and pick the fruit and work in the poultry factories.

32:20But as more of those jobs have become mechanized I wonder whether the American business community in many districts now thinks actually you know what we don't need to speak out in favor of immigration as much. So it's partly nativism and partly the changing economy means that the cause of immigration but it's not just him that moved it. The economy moved it too right. I mean businesses don't need migrant workers perhaps in the same way that they used to or don't feel they need migrant workers in the same way that they used to because more of these jobs are done by automation. I don't I just wonder if it's just nativism or if it's also the reality of I think it's a combo.

32:52I think you're right that is a combo. Here's the thing I would say though we got to be careful because when we let immigrants in particularly legally and qualified you get Serge Brint who goes on to he comes in as a poor refugee, Jewish refugee from Eastern Europe. He goes on and builds one of the most successful companies in the world, Google. You let Albert Einstein in. I could list all the people that came in that were poor, that rose in the country, aspirationally and benefited the country. And so we can't forget that Lee Kwan Yu when he was interviewed by Graham Allison the dean of the Kennedy School of Government in the final days of his life he said well what are your thoughts on America?

33:33And so we got our says about America you you're drawing from the other 8 billion people. America is an idea it's a beacon. You can go to America and be a British American after five years an Italian American a Singaporean American. You can't go to Germany and become an American German. You can't go to Japan and be American Japanese but you can come to America and be Japanese American. So I I think we can't lose sight of that as a country how valuable it is and then just quick 10 seconds we used the fund through USAID projects in these poor countries 800 miles south of us down the Yucatan Peninsula, Guatemala Honduras etc.

34:17A couple billion dollars of preventative medicine there keeps people in their home country. We pulled the aid on that about 30 years ago and now everybody's running for the border. So it's you know an ounce of perfection prevention is worth a pound of cure. We got a 20 billion dollar problem at the border which could be resolved for a few billion dollars into those countries in terms of developmental aid. Yeah and that's that's something actually that the vice president Kamala Harris has been trying to work on and she's made quite a lot of efforts going around those countries trying to stop the source of this problem.

34:50I just think it is worth reminding people every year people who are in this country illegally and something like 90 billion dollars and they pay 10 billion dollars in taxes they contribute and I think that's that is you know the counterargument so we should stop everyone trying to come in which you're hearing increasingly. It's surprising the degree to which the business community has kind of ditched immigration as an issue they just don't seem to support it anymore. Before we go and now do you think it's worth a mention about what's happening as we're recording this Joe Biden is speaking in Normandy for the D day celebrations he's going there to speak he won't he is not going to show up obviously he did not show up in Normandy and talk directly about Donald Trump this is a very important sacred day in American history and he did he did however speak very clearly about the cause of democracy and needing to stand up for as he has already said needing to stand up for what soldiers died for in that first day of the D day invasions and democracy clearly very front and center of the Biden campaign and American politics does not stay within its borders anymore it has drifted across the Atlantic on the waves even to the shores of France.

36:08I agree with you I think is fascinating I think I've told you this story that my uncle who I'm named after was part of that battle was wounded later but stayed in the army didn't come back until after the war was over fought in the battle of the bulge but I did some digging because you like digging on me so I'm doing a little bit of digging on you and your family and Michelle Parities who's just wrote a brand new book best selling called the light of battle has your grandfather in law in the book and I'm going to tell a quick story before we exit here about a very famous British general Bernard Montgomery Montgomery was instrumental in doubling the size of the expedition and so when Churchill and Roosevelt met they decided on 80 ,000 men in terms of the deployment of course they were arguing about whether to do it in the first place Churchill wanted to come in through the Mediterranean but the Americans won out but Eisenhower looked at and said I can't do it with 80 ,000 I've got to double the size and he invited Bernard Montgomery for a smoke and a beer and a cigar and he talked to him about this and he gave him he empowered him I want you to think about real leadership the way you get power in leadership is you give it away so he went to general Montgomery said you run it but I need 160 not 80 and of course he went to the parliament he went to Churchill and he got it done and that was the game changer talk about the butterfly effect imagine 80 ,000 people on the beach and a failed expedition where we got 160 ,000 on the beach and we were there to repulse Nazism and authoritarianism it's just a great story about your family I thought I would share it today on the 80th anniversary of the Normandy invasion yeah Monty was my husband's grandfather and apparently Ike went up to him and gave him a big bear hug which anyone who knows anything about Monty would wonder at that scene because he was not the most touchy -feely let's say of people that we could imagine I think the other thing that was remarkable about that in terms of leadership and thinking of today and particularly looking at what some people in the Republican party are saying about the idea of retribution after the verdict of against Donald Trump Ike very clearly said if this does not work it is entirely my fault it is on me and that kind of leadership taking responsibility and realizing that the buck stops with you is something that we we don't see very much off in this day and ageful stop as politicians are desperate to pass the blame on to somebody else one thing that I would say that always impresses and amazes me about the United States I was it happened to me just the other day I was at the airport in Washington DC and suddenly everybody around me in terminal got up and started cheering and it was because a group of elderly veterans were coming off an airplane that is something you never see in Britain and there is there is a real reverence and affection for and honoring of people who have served in the armed forces in this country that is perhaps missing in some European countries but it always really touches me to see these old people walking off the plane and being cheered by the people in the airport terminal it moves me caddy but I think it is also worth mentioning that at the return of the veterans from the Vietnam war because that was not a war that was liked it was a different story I think 9 -11 bent the curve again and depend on swung back to reverence there was reverence after World War II in Korea there was no reverence after Vietnam but after 9 -11 and the sacrifices there the attack on the homeland the countries moved back into that reverence position which I'm happy about because I have family members that have served my dad was in the army two of my uncles were in the army and it's nice to see thank you so much for listening to the rest is politics us with me caddy K now I'm meant that he's got a moochie we will see you next Friday on the rest is politics us please tune in and thank you for joining us

From the publisher

Why are Wall Street and Silicon Valley weighing in behind Donald Trump? Is it true that Joe Biden and Bill Ackman almost got into a fist fight? What's going on at the Mexican border?

Join Katty Kay and Anthony Scaramucci as they answer all these questions and more on The Rest Is Politics US.

🌏 Get our exclusive NordVPN deal here ➼ https://nordvpn.com/restispolitics It’s risk-free with Nord’s 30-day money-back guarantee! ✅

Instagram:
@RestPoliticsUS
Twitter:
@RestPoliticsUS
Email:
restispolitics@gmail.com

Video Editor: Teo Ayodeji-Ansell
Social Producer: Jess Kidson
Assistant Producer: Fiona Douglas
Producer: Nicole Maslen
Senior Producer: Dom Johnson
Head of Content: Tom Whiter
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor + Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics

All 501 episodes
263. TRIP US: Donald Trump, Silicon Valley and Wall Street: Big Money's Deal with the DevilThe Rest Is Politics · 42 min
Listen in VO