273. Question Time: Julian Assange, firing your friends, and why Labour should raise taxes

26 Jun 2024 · 43 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 273

Episode Details

  • Title: Question Time: Julian Assange, firing your friends, and why Labour should raise taxes
  • Hosts: Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart
  • Release Date: [Date of Release]
  • Podcast Link: [The Rest Is Politics](https://www.goalhanger.com)

Episode Overview In this episode, Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart discuss several pressing political issues in the UK and beyond, including the legacy of Julian Assange, the current state of the UK's tax burden, and the personal dynamics of loyalty and friendship in politics. The hosts engage with questions from listeners, providing insights into the complexities of political decision-making and public perception.

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Julian Assange's Legacy
  2. Public Perception: The hosts explore how history may remember Julian Assange, highlighting the divide in public opinion regarding his actions.
  3. Controversial Actions: Alastair expresses discomfort with Assange’s release, noting the potential risks his disclosures posed to individuals.
  4. Defining Journalism: Rory discusses the ethics of journalism and transparency, questioning whether Assange's actions align with journalistic standards.
  1. The UK's Tax Burden
  2. Historical Context: Rory addresses the misconceptions about the tax burden being historically low in the past compared to the current state.
  3. Demographic Changes: The discussion touches on how demographic shifts, particularly the aging population, impact public spending and health care costs in the UK.
  4. Taxation Trends: Rory shares data showing that while the overall tax burden has increased, the tax contributions of lower and middle-income individuals have decreased since 2010, raising questions about the fairness of the tax system.
  1. Loyalty and Friendship in Politics
  2. Friendship vs. Professional Duty: The conversation shifts to the complexities of maintaining friendships while engaging in political criticism. Alastair shares anecdotes about political loyalty and the potential fallout from criticizing friends in politics.
  3. Case Studies: They reference specific examples, including interactions with current and former political figures and their handling of criticism.
  1. Media's Role in Politics
  2. Public Trust: Rory raises concerns about the diminishing trust in politicians and media, highlighting the challenges of communicating factual information to the public.
  3. Accountability in Political Campaigns: The hosts discuss the need for electoral laws to ensure factual accuracy in campaign materials, reflecting on the current state of political advertising and its implications.
  1. Current Events and Political Climate
  2. Recent Scandals: The episode references recent political scandals, including betting scandals involving politicians, and the implications for leadership decisions.
  3. Comparative Analysis: Rory and Alastair compare the political climate in the UK with other countries, discussing differences in political accountability and public expectations of integrity.

Key Takeaways

  • Public Service vs. Personal Ethics: The discussion illustrates the tension between serving the public interest and adhering to personal ethics, particularly in the context of Assange’s actions.
  • Understanding Taxation Dynamics: The episode brings attention to complex taxation issues that challenge the notion of fairness and effectiveness in public spending.
  • Navigating Political Friendships: The conversation highlights the challenges politicians face when balancing personal relationships with their professional responsibilities.
  • Importance of Media Literacy: The hosts stress the significance of media literacy and accountability in political discourse, advocating for a more informed electorate.

Conclusion This episode of "The Rest Is Politics" provides a nuanced look at several critical issues affecting politics today, emphasizing the need for informed discussion and integrity within the political arena. Campbell and Stewart efficiently blend humor with serious insights, making for an engaging exploration of contemporary political challenges.

For a deeper dive, listeners are encouraged to subscribe to "The Rest Is Politics Plus" for exclusive content, ad-free episodes, and early access to live shows.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Thanks for listening to The Rest Is Politics. Sign up to The Rest Is Politics plus to enjoy Adfree Listening Receiver. Weakly Newsletter. Join our members' chat room again, early access to live show tickets. Just go to TheRestisPolitics .com. That's TheRestisPolitics .com. Let's play Burlington's Guess That Price! Back to school means Back to Saving. We're bringing new kids jeans starting at them. Hold on a minute, just 11 .99. Burlington's Acing This Test. What about character backpacks? We've got them starting at 12 .99. Burlington's Dutted Again. How about sneakers for the kids? A plus brands and right on trends starting at 11 .99.

0:37Saving is now in session. Burlington deals, brands, wow! Styles and selections vary by location. Your burger is served and this is our finest Pepsi Zero Sugar. It's sweet profile. Perfectly balanced is the savory notes of your burger. That is one perfect combination. Burgers, deserve Pepsi. At Blinds .com, it's not just about window treatments. It's about you. Your style, your space, your way. Whether you DIY or want the pros to handle it all, you'll have the confidence of knowing it's done right. From free expert design help to our 100 % satisfaction guarantee, everything we do is made to fit your life and your windows.

1:17Because at Blinds .com, the only thing we treat better than windows is you. Visit Blinds .com now for up to 40 % off Sy Y plus a professional measure at no cost. Rules and restrictions apply.

1:35Welcome to the RESTAS Politics Question Time with me, Roy Stewart. And me, Anastakamble. And Roy, let's get Roy in to the kind of guts of this campaign. A couple of questions here. Anne Robinson, can you give some thoughts about why the overall tax burn was lowest in the 80s and 90s yet we were not in the current state, i .e. poor NHS public services, etc. was wealth just better distributed. And one definitely for you from Rob, how does Roy Square's previous support of Cameron Osborne austerity with his current position that Labour aren't promising to spend enough? Well, I mean, these are wonderful, wonderful questions.

2:12Quick apology for everybody, which I've just come out of dental surgery. So if I seem slightly demented, it's that I'm all all up on anesthetics and strange stuff. But so these are the big, big questions in the campaign. And I'm really pleased someone's asked them and nobody is really tackling them. So first question, we get this feeling that taxes were lower in the 80s, but public services were better. The truth matter is that actually we're spending four times as much on the NHS today in real terms, not including inflation as we were in 1979. And we're spending twice as much on the NHS as a proportion of our economy.

2:49So we're spending, you know, over 10 % of our economy on health. So how come we're spending all this money and it doesn't feel like anything's getting better? One big change is obviously demography. So the number of people over 85 has doubled since 1979. And the number of people aged in 18 and 25 has fallen. But people over 85 cost, guess how much more they cost than some of between 18 and 25 to the taxpayer to look after they get a hospital. I'm going factor of six. Ten times more. Ten times more. So you're almost there. But yeah, they cost ten times more. So as we all live longer, the costs get more and more and more.

3:25So that's first thing that the second thing is this question around the tax burdens really interesting because everyone's going to the election saying tax burdens never been so high and people are saying to me when I tweet out, you know, Labour needs to raise taxes. How dare you suggest we raise taxes because the tax burdens have never been so high. The truth of matter is that something very odd has happened. Again, wicked question to you. But who do you think is paying more tax? Do you think it's people on low and median incomes or wealthy people since 2010, since the evil Tories have been in?

3:56Who's actually increased their level of tax their paying? Well, in cash terms, people at the top. And not just in cash terms. Absolutely. What's actually happened since 2010 is really interesting. There's been a very reasonably dramatic drop in the amount of tax that people on low and median incomes pay in Britain. So over the last 50 years, obviously, the basic rates dropped from 35 % down to 20%. We're now paying, if you're on 35 ,000 pounds, so let's say a median income, you're paying 2 ,000 pounds a year less than you were in 2010. National insurance and income tax. If on the other hand, you are in the top 1%, and again, people struggle to work out what the top 1 % is.

4:39So I'm going to be mean to you. What do you think the top 1 % is roughly of incomes in Britain? Oh, is it 150? Good, good, good. Yeah. 200 ,000, 200 ,000, top 1%, they are currently paying 10 ,000 pounds a year more on average than they were in 2010. So oddly, this right wing conservative government has reduced the tax income tax national insurance on median incomes and increased it on high pay people. This is because obviously in 2010, the top red tax was 40%, it's now 45%, they've taken way a lot of the breaks on pensions. By the way, you've somehow changed your backdrop. Have you got one of those fancy machines?

5:16This is, yeah, what with what? It's just the drugs. My end of the drugs, the internet's collapsed. I'm now sitting on top of my Wi -Fi. The British tax burden is still in terms of developed economies pretty much in the middle. It's obviously much less than the US, but it's well below play site France. Yeah, yeah. That 1%, would that include those very, very bad people who pay no tax at all? The ones who literally are so good at it. I wonder whether they're picked up in the figures. I mean, that's 1 % of taxpayers, isn't it? Yeah, obviously there's criminals who don't declare their tax as people who have paid their tax.

5:51There is something very odd going on because the number of people who declare incomes over a million pounds is very small indeed. I think about in sort of tens of thousands if that. Yet, you walk around London, you see all these incredibly fancy cars, all these fancy houses. Most of the tax are not most tax, but a disproportionate amount of the tax that's coming in is coming from people in that over 200 ,000 pounds. Right. That's tax. Now, to go back to the beginning, Rob wants to know how you square your constant bleeding that Labour aren't promising to spend enough with your defence of austerity, which created this mess in the first place.

6:28Well, I suppose the point that I'm trying to make is that actually the current Labour policy, which is to reduce the debt, not increase taxes, and reduce spending by about 18 billion pounds, is a form of minic austerity. And I just think it's something that people need to focus on. And it's going to be very, very painful because as Paul Johnson from what I was about to call the IMF, but is in fact, as you're going to point out to me, the IFS, keeps pointing out that none of the parties, and I mean none of them, not Labour, not Conservative, not Lib Dems, not Greens, not SMP, not Pride, none of them, are being straight about the money.

7:11And it's a glimpse of the blinding obvious. Our public services are bits. There is a huge amount of bills that we need to pay if we're to get our services up scratch. And there's not enough money coming in. In fact, on current track, Labour, which I believe is going to be the next government, is going to have to implement some spending cuts. And the reason I'm a bit worried in the long term is that I don't think that's a very attractive offer of voters that this socially liberal, fiscally conservative model, which they seem to have adopted, which was source of the model of Clinton and Brae, was particularly the kind of model of David Cameron, seems a bit out of step with the time when we all think we need much more spending.

7:53No, people I mean think we need more spending. Right, very briefly, defend austerity. You still haven't done that. You keep avoiding the real question from wrong. But we've defended through this a lot. I think the defence is that I think that Britain wasn't in the position to borrow significantly more and spend significantly more. And if we had, we would have been in real trouble when Covid hit. Okay, other countries did and seemed too fine. Let's move on. Good. Now, Alistair, a question for you, much more jolly question for you, getting off, getting off the tough stuff you can ask. We have a question on Harry Kane.

8:25Andrew, given Harry Kane's response to a question about ex players criticising the efforts, the current crop, what's that? Is that your friend and my friend, Gary Linnocka, Chris? Yeah, I'll do a explainer. Okay, a minute. Do you have any misgivings about passing judgment on the performance of current politicians as they try to grapple with problems which may have perplexed you in the past? Alistair, this relates to the fact that Gary Linnocka on a very, very good podcast called the Restless Football, which may well be related to the restless politics, use the S word, which for Gary, SHIT, to describe the performance of England.

9:03I thought you were going to say splendid or stupendous. No, no, no, he said there was SHIT, which of course he wouldn't say how much of the day, because that would have to be bleeped. And Harry Kane, England captain, was asked about this. I've got to say, I thought Harry Kane's response was very, very good. It was very measured. He said that a lot of the players did listen to pundits and especially those pundits who were former players that they all respected. And he just said, you know, I think they should bear in mind that there was a time when, you know, they were on the receiving end of criticism and it's not nice, etc.

9:35But it really, really was a big deal. When I was in Paris yesterday, I picked up a copy of Leique, the French sports paper, and there it was, you know, Kane, the report, and I critique the Lini Care, and it was like, you know, it was, it's so quite, become quite a big story. But for internationalists, just help us here. I mean, was Gary Linnocka actually right before we get into the details of the response? The general view of England's performance was that they were not at their best. They were a long way off their best. The general view of the European media is that it is only because of our media that England gets talked up so much.

10:12So unless they be everybody 8 -0, it's kind of like it's all a terrible disappointment. But no, so I think Gary Linnocka had a point. I also think Harry Kane had a point. But the question to us, I don't feel at all bad about passing in judgement on the current government because it's like, it's like basically, Diego Maradona passing in judgement on players from Harley Paul United Youth team, you know, it's like, this law is so bad. But you, this is more a question for you because of your book, because of course you were very, very critical of people that you'd worked with, which I sort of try to avoid sometimes.

10:47Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, exactly. And I noticed I was on a stage in Oxford on Sunday being interviewed by front of us called Tom Flatshow, who was a diplomat in the West Corridor. And he, to be cheeky, he texted you to ask for a question to ask me and you asked me to name a player in the Bernley team. But he also texted David Cameron. And David Cameron immediately texted back saying, that's not one for me. And I think what's happened there is that I have really alienated David Cameron. That's why I won't come on the podcast. By the way, I've written about him. Yeah, he won't come on the podcast.

11:23By the way, I've written about him in the book. I mean, obviously, I think because politics matters to so much of our lives because with, you know, governments suspending that it's running pounds, they do our health and our education raise. And because it's democracy, people have a real right to actually know what's going on inside. But it's a difficult choice because there are also my colleagues and they will feel that I'm betraying conferences. And it's certainly true at this point, which you must have experienced a lot when you were in government, which is that it's very easy to criticize me outside.

11:52I was speaking to a, you know, a really amazing guy who's had an incredible record and grew up in poverty. But he gave me 45 minutes on the phone about everything the government's doing wrong and everything's labors doing wrong. And of course, it's very difficult for me not to bristle a bit and get the defensive and saying, well, you know, maybe it's not as easy as that. So you were like, you know, we need to completely abolish the treasury. We need to, you know, duel. You know, if only you spent more money stopping poverty and childhood than you would have spent. And I would say, and so it's that weird sense where someone's saying something which is true, but you're thinking it's much more difficult.

12:27And just come back to Harry Kane for a second. I guess what would be his, apart from the fact that he thinks Garry Leonard has being mean, he must also think that there's something that Garry Leonard couldn't quite get. And at some level that Garry Leonard couldn't be able to do much better a job if he was managing the England team. Well, he did, he did point out that the generation, Garry's generation didn't win anything. But he did very, very, very gently. No, I think what's happened? And, and friend of I had a call yesterday from the Daily Telegraph, who said they were doing a, a big piece about how podcasts in sports seem to be where the kind of, the mood is being created now, almost as much as the paper.

13:07So like, Gary, and obviously Gary, the Caralan Shire, and Michael Riches, their big pundits anyway, their voice kind of carries some weight. But I was struck in Germany when I was out there just how much when you're dealing, when you're talking to managers, whether they're managers, you know, who are currently involved or past managers, how many of the conversations sort of flow around what the pundits are saying? You know, Roy Keen, Roy Keen sort of says something and they all go, you know, do you see what Roy Keen said? He played for Manchester United and the Republic of Ireland, by the way, Roy just in case you'd never heard of him.

13:40So I say, and I think the other thing that happens, people always use this phrase about, you know, inside the Westminster Bubble, but those bubbles are the same in football squads as well. So they sort of take it very, very, very personally. But I find sometimes that I think in a way you are more outspoken about some of your colleagues than I am. I get sometimes get criticised, not least by Fiona saying, you're far too soft on the labour. You get a question every week from somebody saying, do you still think, Julian Keegan's great, because I think she's rubbish. And that I guess is about friendship.

14:16And fun enough, we both got involved in an interesting one. As you know, I've always had a pretty good relationship with Johnny Mercer, veterans minister. Last week I really lost it with him and went from social media because he did an I thought a very, very unfair attack on his labour opponent, Fred Thomas. Frankly, casting doubt over his, I think, his integrity as a soldier. And I think if you're the veterans minister, that is a wrong thing to do. So I called it out and he sent me some very unpleasant messages. And then you asked me to support you on this and I thought, okay, this is a tough one, but I agree with Alistair on this.

14:50And this is my friend and colleague, but I'll come out and say I passionately agree with Alistair on this. And Johnny was then unbelievably cross for me too. Yeah. So these things are, you do weigh them up. But ultimately, I thought in our interview with Alex Shaw, which I really recommend to people. I was a bit dubious about Alex Shaw, because he's not that well known. And as you said, he's a kind of a bit of a kind of central casting sort of Tory politician, but I actually thought it was a really interesting interview. And I thought the thing he said, I was really surprised. I think my first question was how many real friends do you have in politics?

15:24And he basically said maximum four or five. Yeah. And I thought that was very, very interesting. I think that, and it's true in politics, I think you, I think friendship, you have to be very, very careful. And ultimately, Johnny Mercer probably thinks that that is, that was unfair on him. But I think if, if I see, and obviously I am tribal and I am Labour, I see a Labour candidate being attacked unfairly. My instinct is to defend the Labour guy rather than the Tory guy. A lot of this is also because you're working very closely with people. I've seen Alex Shaw kind of pressure. And I saw him take a very brave line on trying to fight for the EU customs union when the whole party was against that and working with me on that.

16:04I've seen Julian Keegan under pressure and being forced to try to endorse Boris Johnson and holding off from that, sticking with me. So a lot of it is about, you know, what, what, what, what, you know, you're experiencing them and their integrity. And they hold the line. And, and I'm afraid often the people that I'm most brittle about. And this is part of the problem, sadly, with, with Johnny Mercer, who's got many, many virtues. But, you know, it was his decision to give a softball question to Boris Johnson at the key moment when Boris Johnson was about a four first question and primates as questions.

16:35When I felt he should have been standing up and saying, you are a disgraced resign. He bowled in a softball question and was made the veterans minister. And I thought, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, hold on a second. There's another thing going on though. I mean, you know, I don't, you know, given that Johnny's not decided he hates me and it's going to start staking me off. Let me, let me start another thing that I think is a theme that has been raised. And this is this question from Bob, which has come in, which is, do we think we should have more soldiers in politics? And this is a big issue in the US.

17:06There's huge political action campaigns, which are just about funding, getting more veterans into politics. And I'm a bit divided on this. There were 51, I think, members upon the conservative party when I was there, who had been in the army, even if they'd just been there for a very short period like me. We will turn up to remembrance day services together. But some of them like Bob Stewart was out full kernel, he'd spent an entire career in the military. But I'm not sure that it's always the answer. And I think there's a risk that if you've been in the military and you've seen combat, you begin to think that's the most important thing in the world.

17:45And it's the thing that really makes you better than other people. And there's a risk that you end up, you know, kind of looking down on other people purely on whether or not they happen to have been shot at or not. And I'm not sure that's a very good guarantee of how well you run the country. No, there are, I think Bob Stewart is a very good example. I had a seemer to have had a very good reputation in the military. But I don't think does have a very good reputation in politics. Labour have 14 ex -military candidates at this election. And that's obviously part of Kierstheim's sort of decarbonification of the party.

18:21Okay, Alice, quick break, there are more questions.

18:28This isn't ad from BetterHelp. At the moment, we're getting advice from everywhere. You just have to go on TikTok. Could be Alice's cold plunges, could be my attempts to meditate or the digital detox that I'm doing in Colombia. But of course, one of the things that we know is that it can be incredibly valuable to talk to another human being, somebody who's actually been trained as the therapist to work through these ideas calmly, objectively and professionally. And as the largest online therapy provider in the world, BetterHelp can provide access to mental health professionals with a very diverse variety of expertise.

19:04They've got over 5 ,000 therapists in the UK. They've helped more than five million people globally. And you can join a session literally at the click of a button, change therapists anytime. It's obviously not about fixing you, but it's about hearing yourself clearly, maybe for the first time. So talk it out with BetterHelp. Our listeners get 10 % of their first month at BetterHelp .com slash rest politics. That's better, help .com slash rest politics.

19:37So here's a question from somebody whose name you may recognise or are you called Joshua Dicum. And it's about sleep. What time? What time does a new Prime Minister get to bed the next day after they've been elected? Presumably, they stay up all night for the count. And then the next day, are they not seeing the Queen? What's the King now, Josh? And taking calls from presidents? Do they stay up all the way through to the next night? Well, I suppose it depends on them. I remember in 97, I think 2001, I think Tony Blair tried to have a nap during the day, pretty much failed. Yes, stayed up through the night, flew back to London, went to festival hall.

20:19I think he got home at about two hours sleep. And then the next day probably got to bed about, about midnight. So yeah, it's a long, long, long night. It's not a famous anecdote. I don't know, it's in your diaries of a rock star saying to Tony, you know, you stayed all the way through the night like me. And Tony saying, you remember? Yeah, it was little Gallagher. And it was it was it was saying, that you stay up through the night and Tony said, well, not using the same stuff that you do. Well, we're going to be doing the same thing because we're going to be doing channel four. By the way, I see they've announced today that they're having, I hope you this is you're on the run of set.

20:57I don't want you to fall if you share. Apparently, the ding dories is going to be one of our guests. It's going to be tough. Maybe we should take a break. Maybe we should take our nap. Oh, it's certainly though, somebody listening to the program, you know, I was making joke about ice baths. Somebody's actually offered to bring an ice bath into the channel for studio for you. Okay, not a lot. You make it. No, it's not a whole lot. I'm the only Israeli worry. Because I worry about every time I go on the television program, I worry about how down market are they going to try and take it, right? We are not taking our clothes off.

21:30Okay. We're not taking our clothes off. Peter, I had to take my clothes off. I went on Saturday to go swimming in the serpentine. Yeah. And of course, when I went swimming in the serpentine, the serpentine swimming club in high park, literally everybody came bubbling up to me and be like, oh, we're taking off after all ourselves. It's wonderful. That's true. So there we are. Now listen, Nikki Robson, how can we shift the focus in our media so that we become better informed about policies, data and evidence rather than the semi -sensationalist gotcha gossip? Now that does feel really like an invitation for me to plug my books for children, doesn't it?

22:02It does. Yeah. No, we were always looking for those opportunities. We are looking for those. But also, while you were in the dentist chair, yeah, I was talking to the new European who I'm pleased to announce have bought shed loads of both of my books. And they have got a new subscription offer. Both books will be signed by me. They will be given free of charge to new subscribers and you sign up for as little as a pound or week to the new European at thenewEuropean .co .uk slash trip. And if you use that as an opportunity to plug your bloody books, one of which is still at number one. And here we come.

22:36Okay. So I talked about this new series of four. So this is politics on the edge. Yeah, I read that one. Now for the first time, you can get all four of them. Same cover. So that's the marches. That's nice. Occupational hazards, which I like. I like the uniform, the uniform covers. I like. And the place in between. So it's now become a four volume series where if you want, you can go walk across Afghanistan, do it with Scotland, do Scotland and Cumbria. And then do and then do politics on the edge. Excellent, excellent. That's great. I wish somebody would do all eight volumes of my diaries in that way.

Read the full transcript

23:09But Trombies, I've got two publishers. They all different. They all sight you different covers. They're a bit different. Yeah. But anyway, we've sort of we've moved on from that. Should we start plugging and get back to yeah, yeah, let's give out that question about we had a good good question on facts and figures and politics. So I was really struck by the green party manifesto, which was the only one that really tried to concentrate on the media. So it's committed to the second stage of the levyson report, which we've talked about a little bit. Maybe we can touch on that for a second. There's a reforms that came in after the phone hacking scandal.

23:42And they've also brought in quite an interesting under and then manifesto limiting the holdings of anyone to only 25 % of a media company. So you can't have a controlling majority ownership. As individual isolated policies, I'd be happy with both. However, you cannot get away from the fact that the ecologic policies do not stand up. Okay, but but let's just take that as an individual isolated policies. I think it would be a great help. We talk a lot about the media. Is there any other things that we can do? I mean, obviously we had a slightly, I had a slightly longer boring bit at the beginning about the tax burden that he's paid so it but I think it's quite interesting sometimes facts and figures like that.

24:20The question is how does one really make them come alive? How do you sell newspapers while also communicating some slightly new stuff? Any thoughts on that? You talked about Paul Johnson of the IFS. He did a speech the other day. It shows how we had the debate has become that a speech by Paul Johnson of the IFS about how the parties weren't telling the truth about the economy was kind of covered like big news on the television. And the parties didn't even really bother the responding sound when he's going to say that but let's just ignore it because and so they all kind of know that there's a bit of a game going on.

24:53But here's a great question I thought from James Merkin. Why is there no requirement an electoral law that requires all election material to be factual and auditable? I send you a thing already, if you saw it, it was these adverts that the Tories are putting out on social media and sending to people on what's happened so far. But there are a bit like your books as a set of four and they're four labor will unless you vote Tories, labor will and then there are four statements which are factually untrue. Now if they were advertising, if that was Coke advertising the product, you know, the consequences of buying Pepsi, they would be subject to all sorts of punishment.

25:33If that was a car saying, you know, BMW, buy BMW because Volkswagen is unsafe. Why is politics exempt from this? And it only works, it only works if this freedom of speech thing is matched by people basically committing to tell the truth. You're absolutely right. We're going to have to tighten this up. I guess the thing that you've got a guard against when you tighten it up, so I'm not disagreeing with you, but the thing you've got a guard against is that when countries start putting more and more laws around this, you then end up with parties using the law against each other. So that's why Bangladesh 1 .2 million members, the opposition, as we said, are currently under judicial scrutiny.

26:12That's why, you know, Modi in India will go after his opponents judicial staff. You can see it in Latin America. So in Britain, the disadvantage of our system is that people can get away with lies. The advantage of the system is that you don't end up in this world in which parties very, very quickly start weaponizing these laws against each other. It's a way of getting each other locked up or taking each other's campaign finances away or disqualifying each other and watching the campaign. But you're right. Many of the things in Britain, we don't have laws about because we tended to depend on what Simon Cooper in his latest book calls the Good Chap Theory of Politics, which is increasing the unrestrained.

26:52Yeah. No, I think, but I've been surprised that we all knew Johnson was the liar. We all knew trust was useless, but I have been genuinely surprised at Rishi Sunak who gets these lines and he just keeps going. So again, last night, the 2 ,000 -pound tax thing, he's been refuted, rebutted, dismissed by experts, et cetera, but he just keeps going with it. And I think it's a problem. I think it's a real problem for our politics. I think it's one of the reasons that Turnuck probably is going to be low. The people just aren't trusting, they're less trusting than they were about staves. And it goes back to this thing about shamelessness.

27:25People are not ashamed now. Let's just take Nigel Farage and his recent statements. He's trying to finesse and rewrite things that he said because he realizes that this putin Ukraine stuff has become politically damaging to him for the current circumstance. And I just think it's, unless you can base it and let's face it, the thing that people say they like about it, but oh, it says what he thinks and why have you? Well, no, I think sometimes he doesn't because he's finishing. And soon I can't be genuinely surprised by how much he's willing to lie. And the terrible thing, of course, is that the worst that people behave, the more it becomes normalized.

28:04Absolutely. So I think this betting scandal, which has, of course, really shocked and angered people, but probably would have been even more shocking, kind of pre -Boris Johnson. But Rory, here's another one. The other day, there was a story about how the conservatives and lots of big name conservatives, including Truss, I think, that they'd used public money to set up websites that were there to serve them as party candidates. And also, there's this stuff about where you get data through your role as an MP, which is then transferred into, and I know John Mann has been big on this. Now, that is just wrong.

28:38That is wrong. And actually, conservatives may be poor offenders, but I've also seen other parties do it too. It was something that became obvious when we came in in 2010. So as an MP, you're in a very ambiguous relationship with your constituents. On the one hand, you're doing constituency surgeries, you're obviously receiving, you know, I would receive, I think, 25 ,000 emails a year. So you've got every email on their data and all this kind of stuff. And of course, you're given money to send letters to your constituents, correspond with them, ask some questions. But all these MPs, or not all of them, many, many of them start using that public money to do things which are pretty close to campaigning.

29:20And this line between which you would have come across again and again when you were in government, what's the line between what you can do in the government and what you can do. And I remember, you know, this sort of stuff that you and Richard Wilson would go head to head on. Yeah. And, you know, but I was always very, very careful, but every now and again, I would probably cross the line. I remember once he came in and after I'd done a briefing, and said, look, you said something there about Ken Livingston, which you shouldn't have said, because that was a totally a party matter. I had nothing to do with the government.

29:47And I, I correct, you know, I corrected them, accepted I shouldn't have done that. But now, it's almost like, well, the lines have become so blurred post, post Johnson. Now, Roy, we talked on the main podcast about this betting scandal. We've got a question literally about 10 minutes after we finish recording. And we've been saying, so you know, for heaven's sake, why hasn't he suspended these candidates? They then became suspended. So Mark has asked, can the Tories take the suspended candidates back into the party as MPs if they're related? And this is the mess that Soonak's got himself into.

30:17These people are on the ballot paper as conservative party candidates. They've had the whip with strong whatever that means, because there's no parlor sitting at the moment. If they win and they are proven to have done this betting stuff, which Soonak says he's absolutely furious about, then no, they'll have to sit as independence. You get this a really good question, because in Rochester, a bi -lection, the same thing happened. The Labour candidate who was on the ballot paper, and it was too late to remove him, made some very offensive comments. Kierstarma then said, this person's no longer in the Labour party.

30:47And if he'd been elected, Kierstarma would have had to work out what to do with him. But there's a, there's a sort of bigger question, which is, why given that Rishi Soonak's now done it, didn't he do it sooner? And this is a mistake that both he and Kierstarma have made in the past, which is Kierstarma's example was, was pretty clear that he needed to let Diane Abbott run. But he tried for many days to say, there's a process here as a system here I can't get involved, and then eventually he said, okay, Diane Abbott can run. And again, Rishi Soonak tried to say, there's a process here as a system here I can't suspend them, and then eventually he has to spend.

31:22What is it that stops them kind of grabbing the net will quickly enough, rather than eventually doing what they should have done all along? I think the Diane Abbott situation is slightly different. What was going on there was that Diane Abbott was in discussion with the Labour party and that somebody briefed something out that she took real offence to and that created the route which they then tried to come. I think, I think this one is just about, Soonak doesn't have good political instincts. And you know, let's be honest, the other thing I'd say for Labour, I think listen, they fought a pretty good campaign and they haven't really dropped a ball badly.

31:55It's all gone pretty well. But the thing that happens when you get in, if it's the case time becomes prime minister, I once remember saying that, you know, sometimes I would be sitting alongside Tony Blair and you feel like you're a batsman and you're facing like not one fast baller. You're facing about 20 fast ballers at the same time because so many things are coming at you and so many of them, you have to make a decision really, really quickly to stop something which may not be that important becoming a real issue. By the way, literally, we're talking about it. Just give us an example before we get the literally while we're talking.

32:29Well, I'll give you an example. During the middle of a build up to a military conflict when the big decision was about whether we were sending troops or not, we had the whole one of Peter Mandelson's resignation situations. And you know, Peter, I think to this day thinks that we were too brutal. But in a way, I think part of the thing is one way or the other, this has got to get off Tony Blair's desk so they can actually focus on the things that you really understood. And also presumably ask that you would have had an instinct that he's going to have to go anyway. So we might as well get rid of him now rather than letting it drag on for days as the witch hunt builds and the newspaper's gone.

33:09Well, it sort of went on a fair time anyway. But I think other times, you know, like for example, I can remember at European summits when suddenly stuff would break at home and you have to make a very quick decision. By the way, as we're speaking Roy, the BBC, we have just done breaking news. The gambling commission has told the Metropolitan Police five further police officers are alleged to have placed bets related at the time of the election. So it's not just Richie, Cinex and a circle. It's also the Metropolitan Police have nothing to do with the conservative party. Presumably, it's the diplomatic protection police who are the elite who are meant to be confident.

33:43But it's just such a sign. I mean, I don't care who's doing it. Just to ever think becoming kind of trivial. Without being really kind of pompous about it, you cannot imagine this happening. I just got an email from someone in Japan saying you literally cannot imagine this happening in Japan. And if they did, people would be resigning immediately. I mean, people would feel it was so dishonorable. Let's just get back to this betting theme though, because I was with you, Roy. On the day that you were trying to place a bet with an entire railway carriage. That's a bloody good job that you didn't.

34:16Yeah, because that is a bet against this. I know I could, I would have lost, I would have lost big time. You would try to do some outsider trading. At least the fact that I lost would have suggested I didn't have inside training yet. Listen, I did just finally on the on the mountainous and thing, because I think this may relate to what's happening with Richie, Cinex and Craig Williams. Probably if you were really brutal and an outsider, you would say actually you and Tony Blair held on to Peter Madison for longer than you should have done and let it play out in which hands, build press. And the reason you did it is that he was a close friend and you felt loyalty towards him.

34:46And if he hadn't been a close friend, you might have been able to see clearly and more objective. Absolutely. That's possible, and I'm sure the same is true here that this man, Craig Williams, has been Richie, Cinex, closest parliamentary aid. And therefore, I mean, it's very human, isn't it? Your loyalty, your friendships, cloud things and you can be more objective and more brutal with people that you know that's well. I think that's right. But this one, you know, you're in the middle of an election campaign, the minute this happened, Richie soon actually said, sorry, this is under no circumstances going to happen.

35:19It's not going to be tolerated. I'm sorry, even at the risk of losing that seat to an independent, even at the risk of that seat going to another candidate, you are not representing the conservative party. And even at the risk that you might actually be innocent, because this is one of the things some of these people say I didn't do it. Oh, that's not actually case for Craig Williams. He actually haven't admitted. But this is great line that Judith Caesar produces where he distances himself from his wife and his wife says, you know, I didn't actually cheat on you. And he says, even the suspicion to done it is enough for me to distance myself.

35:50I still think he was he was the author of the greatest ever sound bite. Gone what's that? And Fanny Vidi Vici. Did he say a lot? It's the best ever. It's the best. Okay. It's better than education education education. European pal, what are your takes? Or actually, I said, what is your take on the release of Julian Assange? Well, I was on breakfast television this morning and obviously this came up and I was on Good Morning Britain and Kevin McGuire from the mirror Andrew Pearce of the mail. And it was very interesting to watch because you got the two views. Andrew and Andrew Pearce basically this guy is awful.

36:27He's a friend of terrorists. He's a hater of the West. He's not a real journalist, etc. And Kevin McGuire, much more this guy exposed things that were wrong and that was that was an act of public service and that he's been very, very unfairly treated. I am not a fan of Julian Assange. I think that in dumping all the stuff that he did, he I think he did so without going through what I would would call proper journalist again, never. I think some of the newspapers he was working with might well have done so but I don't think that he did. And I also feel very uncomfortable that the sexual charges against similar relation to Sweden, one of which I believe was dropped because the time ran out which he's always denied, except he's always denied it.

37:14But it wasn't just that he was avoiding justice in America, the fact that he was avoiding justice in Sweden as well. And I think that the deal has been done, he's now on his way to freedom, I guess in Australia. But I feel very, very uncomfortable. Both were the fact that the I accept Kevin McGuire made this point that he did expose things that were very, very wrong, which might not otherwise have been exposed. That is true. And there is a public interest justification for that. There is not a public interest justification for some of the stuff that I think put people's lives at risk. Very good.

37:47Okay. What's your view? What's your view? I'm avoiding gender sounds. I find the whole thing really weird. But I think your correct framing is good. I think there is a public interest defense in revealing stuff. I do believe in transparency in government. But I think that a sound seems to have been often reckless, often not really motivated by trying to bring troops to government and appears to have had an anarchic destructive tendency to him. But I don't know enough about a sound. And I feel a bit out in the limps saying that political cartoons, James Butler, satirical cartoons have you or any members of your family kept any of yourselves?

38:23Have any particularly hurt you? I've got loads and I wish I had more. You like them. I've got a lot and have been given a lot of me and I hate them. I hide them. I don't really want people to see them because I don't know what to do with them because I think it's kind of either they're flattering in which case it looks like you've got a massive big head putting up in your loob pitches yourself in a flattering cartoon. So there's one of me when I was running for the leadership of me hopping over the heads of all the other candidates. There are others that are just sort of faintly humiliating. So there was one of me again during the leadership where I'm one of five tiny candidates on a desert island with Boris Johnson as his huge fat pink balloon ever expanding pushing us into the water.

39:05And then the one that really annoyed me when I was running for Merrivalundan was me on a camel in ridiculous kind of Lawrence for Arabia garb. And Boris Johnson sitting there like a sort of enormous sort of cliched passion with a Hubble bubble pipe saying something like I'm supposed to be the only entitled ridiculous only Tony and flancing off as I read off on my camel. That's quite good. Well I actually wish I had more. I've got about I've got lots and lots stashed away. I've got about 20 that hung in different parts of the house particularly bathrooms. People do like seeing them as they're sort of you know in the bathroom, remember the piggy or whatever.

39:53And they don't know me at all. I mean there was a guy or the guy in the Daily Mirror always used to do me as as Frankenstein with two bolts through my neck. There was another guy who used to do me as this kind of you know really evil manipulative looking rather haggard gunt character. I always found them quite funny. And there's another one another one that I've got downstairs where Tony who they always did this was Griffin, Charles Griffin. And he did Tony like really ugly massive bags under his eyes. His teeth were all kind of out in position in that place. And he's standing at the top of the plane steps and he goes here and this was just after the the the the the cost of a liberation.

40:36And he goes here I am landing in this benignated land. Everything reduced to rubble greeted as a hero. And I've had the background as a Dracula say boss this isn't pristine. This is middle square. One of the great ones that against me was Matt who's the Daily Telegraph cartoonist at a time when I was being portrayed in the newspapers as a kind of mini messiah who was going to become Prime Minister. My colleagues were beginning to think of me as a sort of massive narcissist. So it's it's an image of the house of common's terrorists and the river Thames. And all my colleagues are on the terrace looking over and I'm walking on the water down the central of the Thames with look it's Rory Stewart on his latest walk about.

41:27Well, Rory, I think on you as Jesus we should call a halt to another question time. And just to remind listeners and viewers we will be back later today after the soon act star on a debate. We will be doing one of our YouTube live streams and you just go to anyway you find us on social media and we'll be there. And let's see if we managed to get more than the 7 ,000 people who tuned in to watch Rishi's tuner can hear star in that a bit. I'll be very that was on the sun. I think we had I think they had more on my TV Rory. Very good. Lovely to see you and and thank you. Thank you for coming on. See you soon.

42:00Bye bye.

From the publisher

***TRIP post debate livestream - 9.30pm - Wednesday June 26th: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ya1K0WSvOAk***

How will history remember Julian Assange? Why is Britain’s tax burden so high? Does loyalty come back to bite you in politics?

Join Rory and Alastair as they answer all this and more on today’s episode of The Rest Is Politics: Question Time.

TRIP Plus:
Become a member of The Rest Is Politics Plus to support the podcast, receive our exclusive newsletter, enjoy ad-free listening to both TRIP and Leading, benefit from discount book prices on titles mentioned on the pod, join our Discord chatroom, and receive early access to live show tickets and Question Time episodes.
Just head to therestispolitics.com to sign up, or start a free trial today on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/therestispolitics.

TRIP UK TOUR:
To buy tickets for our October Tour, just head to www.therestispolitics.com

🌏 Get our exclusive NordVPN deal here ➼ https://nordvpn.com/restispolitics It’s risk-free with Nord’s 30-day money-back guarantee! ✅

Instagram:
@restispolitics
Twitter:
@RestIsPolitics
Email:
restispolitics@gmail.com

Video Editor: Teo Ayodeji-Ansell
Social Producer: Jess Kidson
Assistant Producer: Fiona Douglas
Producer: Nicole Maslen
Senior Producer: Dom Johnson
Head of Content: Tom Whiter
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor + Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics

All 501 episodes
273. Question Time: Julian Assange, firing your friends, and why Labour should raise taxesThe Rest Is Politics · 43 min
Listen in VO