In short
Podcast Notes: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 287
Summary In this episode of *The Rest Is Politics*, Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart discuss recent developments in U.S. politics, the implications of a Labour government on UK-China relations, and the significance of the King's Speech in the UK. They focus on Donald Trump's recent ascent in the Republican Party, his choice of running mate JD Vance, and the potential ramifications of Labour's governance on international relations, particularly regarding China.
---
Key Topics Discussed
- Donald Trump's Political Landscape
- Trump's Return to Prominence: The episode opens with a discussion of Donald Trump, who has recently secured a running mate in JD Vance—once a vocal critic who called Trump “America's Hitler.”
- Impact of the Assassination Attempt:
- Trump’s image remains strong and defiant after surviving an assassination attempt.
- The political narrative surrounding the event lends to Trump’s martyrdom, which resonates with his base.
- JD Vance's Role:
- Vance is seen as part of a new generation of Republican leadership.
- His background as a populist voice may attract voters who feel alienated in the current political climate.
- Republican Party Unity
- The recent Republican convention demonstrated unprecedented unity and energy within the party.
- Trump's strategic maneuvering showcases his political acumen and adaptability, suggesting he remains a formidable candidate for the upcoming elections.
- Comparative Analysis: Trump vs. Biden
- Biden's Weakness:
- Discussion on Biden’s vulnerability and the diminishing appeal of the Democrats, particularly in swing states.
- Concerns regarding Biden's hesitance to address allegations of extremism attributed to Trump.
- Need for Democratic Strategy:
- Campbell and Stewart emphasize the necessity for the Democrats to create a cohesive and compelling narrative to counter Trump's influence.
- Implications for Labour and UK-China Relations
- Exploration of how a Labour government might navigate relations with China post-election.
- Discussion on the need for Labour to balance economic interests with diplomatic relations.
- Key Figures: Rachel Reeves (Chancellor) and David Lammy (Foreign Secretary) will play pivotal roles in shaping Labour's approach to China.
- The King's Speech
- The King's Speech serves as a critical moment for the incoming Labour government to outline its legislative agenda.
- The discussion emphasizes the importance of demonstrating clear, actionable goals, particularly in economic growth and public service improvements to avoid a populist backlash.
- China’s Global Role
- Insight into China’s economic standing and its dual role as a competitor and partner on the global stage.
- Concerns regarding China’s influence over economic policies and its involvement in international conflicts.
- The discussion also highlights China's recent diplomatic initiatives in the Middle East, including peace talks between Palestinian factions.
---
Key Takeaways
- Political Resilience of Trump: Despite past controversies, Trump’s recent actions and the Republican convention reflect a strong resurgence in his political standing.
- Importance of Voter Sentiment: The need for political parties to address the tangible concerns of voters, particularly those feeling neglected or disenfranchised.
- Strategic Governance for Labour: Labour’s success will depend on its ability to implement effective reforms and articulate a clear vision for the future amid changing economic and geopolitical landscapes.
- China’s Growing Influence: The discussion highlights the complexities of navigating relationships with China, emphasizing the necessity of a balanced approach that considers economic repercussions.
---
Additional Notes
- The episode serves as a call for reflection on current political dynamics within both the UK and the US, and the importance of addressing voter needs and global relationships in a rapidly changing world.
- Campbell and Stewart advocate for constructive discourse and a return to civility in political discussions, underscoring the significance of understanding differing perspectives.
---
Conclusion This episode of *The Rest Is Politics* provides a comprehensive analysis of pressing political issues, serving as a reminder of the complexities and interconnectedness of contemporary governance and international relations.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Thanks for listening to the Restus Politics, sign up to the Restus Politics Plus to enjoy ad -free listening and receive a weekly newsletter. Join our members' chat room again early access to live show tickets. Just go to therestuspolitics .com. That's therestuspolitics .com. At Blinds .com, it's not just about window treatments. It's about you. Your style, your space, your way. Whether you DIY or want the pros to handle it all, you'll have the confidence of knowing it's done right. From free expert design help to our 100 % satisfaction guarantee, everything we do is made to fit your life and your windows.
0:32Because at Blinds .com, the only thing we treat better than windows is you. Visit Blinds .com now for up to 40 % off site -wide, plus a professional measure at no cost. Rules and restrictions apply.
0:50Welcome to therestus Politics with me, Alistair Campbell. And with me, Rory Stewart. And Rory, we were going to kick off with the UK ahead of the King's speech. But I think we should start with the United States. Come back to the King's speech. And this very interesting European political community event that Kierstharmon will be chairing later in the week. And also we both want to look at China. But let's just start with the United States. We now have the former President Trump with a bandage on his ear. We have the convention opening in Milwaukee. We have JD Vance named as his runny mate, a man who once called Trump America's Hitler and who just referred to his politics as cultural heroine.
1:30And who I see all over social media this morning, a recent speech he made saying that we once thought that Iran and Pakistan might be the first Islamist power with a nuclear weapon, but now that labor and power, it's actually United Kingdom. Where I'd like to start, Rory, is actually just underlining the fundamentals of who and what Trump is and represents have not changed by the fact that he was somebody tried to kill him. That's right. That's right. Well, so just the background on this. So this is the beginning of the big convention for the Republicans. And the timing for Trump is extraordinary.
2:03It's a very, very good week for Donald Trump and his candidacy. He survived the assassination, came out of it looking with that extraordinary photograph of him looking defiant and unbout. He wasn't a badly injured. He's come into the convention. And at the moment at which the conventions announced the case that was held against him for illegally taking classified documents out of the White House has been dropped by the judge and astonishing everybody. I mean, this was just announced on Monday. So a judge that he appointed, judge that he appointed, but it was the case where people thought there was the highest chance of having him prosecuted on criminal grounds.
2:42And she's just thrown the whole thing out, claiming that the special counsel appointed was illegally appointed overturning 30 years or more of legal precedent. So he's been cleared of this big case or the case has been taken off his shoulders to be appealed. He's come onto the convention floor. And if you watch what's going on at that convention, you have never seen the Republican party so unified or so energized. And it's an extraordinary first day. And in some ways, it calls into question a lot of what we believe about Donald Trump. He's playing it very, very differently at the moment. So, you know, everybody will hopefully be listening to the incredibly good reporting from Anthony Scaramucci and Kathy Kay on the rest of his politics US.
3:24But one of the points the Mochoffen makes is to say that traditionally Trump loves to take the limelight, doesn't want any competition, doesn't want to share a stage with anyone, and would only want a well -known billionaire in his ticket. What's actually happened now is a very different Trump. He basically sat there beaming and listening to people through the whole day of the convention. And the day of the convention is going right into the Democratic heartland. Almost everybody's speaking was African -American. And it then finished with the head of the teamsters union and then a man from California with a seek prayer.
3:56You have never seen such extraordinary kind of unity and into into this picture comes the appointment of JD Vance, which is also unusual because he's 39 years old. We'll get into him a little bit. But it's a real sign that Trump is setting up the next generation of Magal Leadership over you. There's a German word in the city, which means it sort of means stage. It's not staging. It's a combination of staging and stage management. It's how you exploit situations. And what I think has been interesting is, you know, we talked on the other day in the immediate aftermath of the assassination attempt about how that amazing picture of Trump on the ground, you can see his face through the legs of the secret service people trying to protect him.
4:38You can sort of still see the mind worrying. And I think that's the moment where there's an instinct telling him, this is a massive opportunity. And he gets up, he does the fight fight fight thing, which has now become a kind of battle cry. That's what they were saying at the convention, they were pumping their fist fight fight fight. And you say that he tends to avoid others getting the limelight. But in a way, what he was doing by handing the limelight to others was actually in the knowledge that they were all going to be talking about him. And they were all going to be talking about how he's a martyr.
5:11He's sacrificed his own blood for us. He's taken the bullet for us. So it plays into that. And then at the same time, giving this sense of being a figure of unity, which is the last thing Donald Trump has ever been. And frankly, I think ever will be. And of course, because the Democrats are basically being pretty decent about it, they're all coming out and saying violence has no place, political violence has no place, get well, Donald and all this sort of stuff. But they know deep down that were the were the boot of the other foot. This would not be happening. In fact, I was I was on CNN the other day, Roy, and the on the Christian Alan Paures program was on with David from who was worked for George Bush as his speech writer and a very, very clever guy.
5:54And he now writes a lot for the Atlantic and, you know, amid this. So this is like within, you know, before we've even had a few days to pass, he has written this extraordinary piece. And actually, we've asked him onto the podcast and we're going to be talking to him in the next few weeks. I'll just read you the first couple of paragraphs. Well, I think it's instructive and interesting. When a madman hammered nearly to death, the husband of then how speaking Nancy Pelosi, Donald Trump, jeered and mocked one of Trump's sons and other close Trump supporters, avidly promoted false claims that poor Pelosi had brought the onslaught upon himself through a sexual misadventure.
6:26After authorities apprehended a right wing extremist plot to abduct Michigan governor, Gretchen Whitmer, Trump belittled the threat to rally. He disparaged Whitmer as a political enemy. His supporters chanted lock her up, Trump laughed and replied, lock them all up. Fascism says, from feasts on violence. In the years since his own supporters attacked the capital to overturn the 2020 election, many of them threatening harm to Pelosi and vice president might bence. Trump has championed the invaders, would be kidnappers and would be murderers as martyrs and hostages. He's vowed to pardon them if returned to office.
6:59His own staffers have testified to the glee with which Trump watched the mayhem in television. Now the blotcher that Trump has done so much to incite against others has touched him as well. And it goes on in that vein. It's a really, really powerful piece of writing. I think it's so easy to get caught up in this, is this sort of, you know, well, he's going to be changed. He'll be, he'll come back a different man. Everybody does when they survive a brush with death. I don't think he's changed in that sense. I just think he's very, very able politically. And I think the bruce will truth is that he's on a role.
7:32The Democrats are in real trouble. This is now his election to lose. So you're absolutely right. It's awful. Trump is an awful man. He is small -minded, nasty, unpleasant. I mean, his reaction to the assault on Pelosi's husband was unbelievably unpleasant. But that's the problem of running as liberal Democrats against a proto -fascist. I mean, yeah, we have to stand up for values that he completely rejects and undermines all the time. The problem, though, is that Biden has never looked weaker. And they need to get rid of him very, very quickly. There's very little time left now. And the Republican Party has never been so unified.
8:09I mean, that was an extraordinary convention. Everybody falling in behind. And a coalition that he's now forming around him that would have been almost unimaginable eight years ago. Yeah. So the Democrats are pumping out stuff that JD Vance has said about Trump. But it'll just be sort of brushed off. Oh, well, you know, he's, kind of, seen the light. So just a little bit on JD Vance. And love to get short your thoughts on him. So I first came across him, I guess, in 2016, when people reached out to me saying he was the future of American conservatism. So he had, he was then in his early 30s. He grew up in pretty extreme poverty.
8:47He wrote this book, Hillbilly, LG. Hillbilly, LG, yeah. Which is also quite a good Netflix film. I mean, it's, it's pretty remarkable. This was a big New York Times best setter. If you go on Amazon, it's got like 97 ,000 reviews. It was a New York Times best setter for almost two years. Well, it's going to sell a hell of a lot more now. Yep. Very unusual to have a vice president, such as with his own documentary, basically, on Netflix. So Angela Rainer's style backgrounds. And like Angela, very much that dissonance between the childhood that he grew up in, with a mother as a heroin addict and living in poverty to now being this big governor.
9:24He left high school, joined the Marines, served in Iraq in a public affairs role, came back, went to Ohio State University, but then got into Yale Law School. He's married to Usha, who is a woman, vice president, her parents come in a shift from the Indian subcontinent. And she clapped for Brett Kavanaugh, who's the man that Trump put very controversially onto the Supreme Court. They then worked, moved to California where he worked for Peter Teal, controversial, bench capitalist. And he then decided after the success of his book to run to be the senator in Ohio. And he was nowhere really in that race, despite the best selling book.
10:04He was somebody who was best known to sort of liberal intellectuals, who saw him as a man who was good at explaining the Trump base until Teal convinced Trump to get behind him. And when Trump endorsed him, he romped home to victory. And all these attacks that Democrats are now launching, they launched to no higher too. They spent a lot of money reminding people in Ohio that he heard attack Trump. But it didn't work then. And I don't think it's likely to work now. Yeah. I think the position that he holds that may work is he's very, very, very profoundly anti -abortion. And once we get back to more normal post assassination attempt debate, I think the abortion issue really was beginning to hurt Trump.
10:43And so that may be something that plays to advances disadvantage. It's also an injury. One of the few things that Donald Trump and I have in common, Roy's that we both dislike facial hair. And yet we just don't believe it, the sort of the beard philosophy. Yeah. Trump said that he's on the record of this. Yeah, he definitely is. He's not a fan of beards. I remember what's suggesting to Frank Dobson that he should shave his beard off. You tell him to shave my beard off. You can fuck off. So I guess he's allowed one of his kids to grow a beard. And now we've got JD back. Is that why Jeremy Corbyn won't come on our show at the moment?
11:20Listen, I had a very nice meeting with Jeremy Corbyn the other day. We're making progress. We're making progress. We opened a mental health residential unit together. I find this whole thing really, really worrying. You're right about the Biden situation being grim. And the thing is that what's happened here, there's been very little in the last few years, really to shift the dial. People like you and I, we thought that Trump losing and then provoking that riot and genuinely the Sikhs, we thought that would be the end of it. We were wrong about that. And not just us. Most of the Republicans, many of them, most the Republican congressmen and senators who refused to vote for his impeachment, were saying privately at the time, we don't need to do it.
12:02He's yesterday's news. That's not to mean ourselves by impeaching him. And as you say, now he's got complete control of the Republican party. He's got greater control of some of these judges that he's now looking to in this changed mood that he's trying to create to get rid of other cases as well. So there's been no kind of really change moment in the whole thing. We thought maybe the him being convicted would be a change moment. It turned out not to be. This assassination attempt has become particularly in light of Joe Biden's debate performance. And interestingly, in David Frums piece, he makes the point that there was something he found profoundly unsettling about the fact that Joe Biden felt he had to do the debate with Trump because Trump is actually against American institutions.
12:46He's an extremist, not somebody in the mainstream. Joe Biden took that decision because he felt he had to and it was a disaster. We've now had another game change moment. And it seems to me the only similar moment that can move the dial in a different direction now. Is I'm afraid for Joe Biden to step down and for the Democrats to find the candidate or the pair of candidates, the running ticket that can beat what we now know to be the Trump Vance combination. That shouldn't be impossible, but they seem to find it impossible. And let's be honest, the Republicans are going to come through this week, hire in the polls.
13:17It shouldn't affect the fundamentals, but it will. They'll come out hire in the polls. You'll have an amazing display of unity. Trump will try to project himself as a more unifying figure. Vance will become a really interesting character, not very well known to most Americans overnight. His book will become a best seller again. Meanwhile, the Democrats are completely on the back foot. Yeah, let's just for a second before we move back to the Democrats, just a little bit more on JD Vance. So 2016, as I say, he was seen as a conservative intellectual. And as you can imagine, those are pretty few and far between.
13:48So everybody gets very excited whenever you find a conservative intellectual. So, um, such as yourself, Roy. That's right. Exactly. And people said, you know, you've really got to meet him, Roy, because he's very interested in Scots, Irish, heritage, and American history and that's sort of more traditional vision of conservatism. And he is an interesting figure. I mean, if you go back to the 2016 article, which people talk about where he says that, you know, Trump's views range between the immoral and the absurd, you know, he's quoting Walt Whitman, but his argument essentially is that Trump is responding to people who are alienated by stagnant wages, you know, just the sense that the American economy is not delivering for the kind of working class by the Iraq war and by the fact that free trade has taken everybody's jobs by the opioid crisis by unemployment and by immigration.
14:39And that's his, his kind of vision of this whole thing. And I suppose, let me just throw this one back to you. There's, there's an interesting question here. So he's speaking for what he calls hillbillies. It's kind of what a really called kind of red necks. People in the whole appellation spine of America right away from Kentucky up to Ohio. He's speaking for people who often are struggling to graduate from high school, certainly not, not getting to university who are below the poverty line who've been affected horribly by the opioid crisis, who live in these rust belt towns or these rural areas.
15:13But it's an interesting base because I would guess that's only, I don't know, 10, 15 % of the American electorate. And I don't know how much they vote. So in fact, Trump's coalition has to be much broader than that. He can't win on the basis of those people he's got to get a more ethnic diverse vote. He's got to get suburban votes. He's got to get quite successful conservative Republicans. What's your sense on on how important that kind of group is? Because I guess in Britain, the equivalent would be people in the Northeast who attempted to vote for Boris after Brexit or something over you. I don't know the American electorate as well as I do the British, but there is without doubt part of the reason for picking him is although he became very wealthy through all this sort of venture capitalism stuff.
15:56And by the way, the Peter Till connection, I think, becomes an opportunity for the Democrats and it will go through that sort of that sort of big tech route to try to kind of undermine him. You couldn't call your own memoir Hillbilly Elegy unless you had a genuine place that you were coming from. If you were kind of middle class politician, if you were Nigel Varage who would share his politics, you couldn't talk about being a Hillbilly unless you were. So he's definitely got that kind of that sort of root in. And of course, one of the things that the Trumps of this world have done very, very well and Vance is good at this as well is to essentially be the elite but sort of pretend to be speaking up for the people.
16:36Can I just interrupt on the second? Because I think Trump is different. I mean, he came from a very, very wealthy veteran. But I guess JD Vance is probably more like some of the labor front bench, somebody who came from extreme poverty but then got to an Ivy League school or in the case, the labor front bench got to Oxford and us now in a much more comfortable position. The thing about the labor front bench is, as Lisa Nandy said, when they were being vetted for their outside financial interest, there was a price of how few they all had. I think that the difference here is that they've come from that poor background and gone way out to the right.
17:11And in Vance's case, since he was presenting himself, he was a never -trumper, he defined himself as a never -trumper, he was close to Mitt Romney. And then as you said earlier, once Trump got behind him and he worked out that Trump was the future of the Republican Party, whether they liked him a lot, he got close to the family. And look, I was talking to this American guy the other day who said he'd listen to our podcast when we're talking about Trump the other day. And he was saying, you've got to stop thinking of these people as normal politicians. You've got to think of them more as a kind of organized crime syndicate.
17:46These people don't care about anybody other than themselves. And that goes for Trump, that goes for his family, and that goes for a lot of their supporters. But where the political support comes from is from quotes, ordinary working people who have decided that he is on their side. And I know there'll be a lot of people who find that offensive, but I think it is a different way of thinking. And if that's why he is attracted to people like Putin, that's why he is attracted to these strong man leaders. And on Putin, Rory, this is IJD Vance, his views on Ukraine, he actually did an interview not long ago with Steve Bannon, where he said I couldn't care less about Ukraine one way or the other.
18:23Now that's his basic take. He thinks America is wasting billions. Exactly. So he's Vance's brutal on cutting support from Ukraine doesn't want any support going to Ukraine from the US. He's also, I mean, just to state the blinding obvious, but this is really important to understand for all of these Republicans. He of course believes that the election was stolen by Biden. And he supported what happened on January the 6th. And every single senior member of the Republican Party has been forced now to buy into Trump's big lie. And so the whole thing is toxically anti -democratic and it's very, very core.
19:02And you've got to ask yourself about JD Vance what's going on here. I mean, here's this guy that was the darling of the New York Times for a bit, quotes Walt Whitman, goes to Yale Law School, and is now out there saying that Biden stole the election, tried to undermine American democracy, getting behind this man, who as you pointed out, he referred to as America's Hitler. I mean, this is a form of kind of political opportunitism and cynicism, which is kind of beyond him. I mean, I'm struggling even with my slightly shambolic former party to think of anybody in mainstream elected British politics who's prepared to go that far.
19:40I mean, even this trust wasn't prepared to say that Trump won the election and that Biden stole it. I mean, this is really crazy stuff. And yet, JD Vance just represents so many of them. I also wonder whether, because if you remember, Trump had this sort of beauty parade of this possible running mate, picks when he got them all down to Mar -Elaugone, and he sort of made them parade in front of him and like a kind of reality TV show. And reading the American media, apparently Vance sort of made it through a final short list of three. And he didn't know that it was going to be him until a few minutes before it was announced on Trump's social media.
20:17And I wonder whether the clincher was the fact that after the guy shot at Trump, Vance was one of the first people out publicly to say this. The central premise of the Biden campaign is that President Donald Trump is an authoritarian fascist who must be stopped at all costs. This rhetoric led directly to President Trump's attempted assassination. No factual evidence, nothing to back it up is a straightforward kind of, well, it's a lie. The idea that Joe Biden sort of tried to get Trump killed is ridiculous. But that is the message that is now doing the rounds at the convention. One more thing that's maybe not been reported enough in the UK media, as part of this convention, the Republican manifesto is announced.
21:00And this is a pretty radical manifesto. So we can begin to see some of the policy ingredients of what's going in behind a new Trump presidency. And probably the most dramatic news on it is on free trade. So the Republicans basically completely given up. They don't talk about free trade at all. Instead, they're talking about 60 % tariffs on almost all goods from China. And we'll get to that in a bit. But we're only in a situation of over 100 % tariffs on Chinese vehicles. 10 % tariffs on basically all goods from elsewhere in the world. And this is not only going to be very damaging for the global economy, if Trump comes in.
21:34So we really need to think about what that means to move away from free trade protections, but also will drive up prices for ordinary Americans for a lot of Trump voters. Almost certainly. So there's a big economic story that needs to be on picks. And I don't know whether, well, maybe that's a question for you. Is that too complicated an economic story? Can the Democrats find a way of explaining to people that if Trump carries on his manifesto and puts these huge trade barriers up? I mean, China's exporting has a trade surplus of $30 billion a month to the US. If you put up tariffs on almost all Chinese goods to 60 % and all international goods to 10 % prices are going to skyrocket for ordinary Americans.
22:13Rory, one of the reasons why the Democrats are in a mess is because they haven't been able to tell properly the positive story about the positive state of the US economy under Biden. So if they can't tell a factual picture effectively and convincingly, a lot harder to give them a project fear type operation based upon what Trump say. And remind us of your trio. You have a trio, don't you? You talk about what you've done, what you're going to, what's the three things you think you got to do in election again? What you've done? Yeah. What you're going to do and the risk of your opponents? Okay. So in this case, you're saying the Democrats really got to find a way of explaining what they've achieved in the economy because it's positive.
22:54And people are better off than the economy is strong. You've then got to have a plan for the future. Second term. Yeah. Yeah. Which again, I think Biden needs to sharpen up on that. And then you've got to talk about the risk of your opponents. But the problem with Trump is the where do you take the language when you're talking about him being, you know, a threat to democracy, authoritarian, etc. Maybe they do need to bring it down to an economic place that says, have you actually thought through the consequences of what he's proposing? But I think with Trump now, his supporters just don't care.
23:26The only thing I'd say is that David Axelrod Obama's strategist, he always is a wonderful line. Conventional wisdom in American politics is always wrong. That's not necessarily true. But maybe there is a conventional wisdom growing here that this single event is going to make the election virtually unloosable for Trump. That's the conventional wisdom at the moment. It might be wrong. It might be wrong. It may be that the sort of people Trump needs to win over. I'm not going to come over whatever. But the problem is that Biden has lost people in the some of those swing states and is he who has to get them back.
24:02I suppose almost at the break, but at some point, we need to do a proper deep dive into the alternative democratic candidates. So there are these very strong governors, Gretchen Whitmer from Michigan, Governor Pritzker from Illinois, Gavin Newsom. I was actually very struck by Josh Shapiro. So he just gave a speech. He's the Governor of Pennsylvania, and he's a Democrat, Governor of Pennsylvania. Just gave a speech after the shooting, paying tribute to the firefighter who had lost his life, protecting his children. And I was really impressed. He really knows how to communicate. And he's so worth watching Josh Shapiro.
Read the full transcript
24:37What he did, and maybe that's a clue for one way of taking on Trump, he was absolutely straight and respectful about the assassination attempt on former President Trump. He acknowledged that the man who died was a big Trump supporter. He called the person who died. He said, I talked to his family and they said I could mention that I spoke to them and his wife asked me to say that a husband was a hero who died protecting us. But he was just human. He was emotional. He was clear. And there was so much more energy. It made Biden's speech seem very sort of one and kind of stiff by comparison. So anyway, we should get into them.
25:13And of course, Kamala Harris too. I thought it was odd, or maybe odd, maybe not odd, maybe in keeping. But if Trump really was the sort of political genius that people like to think he is, I think he might have visited the family of the person who was killed instead of going to play golf. But they were, Rory, before we take the break, because we're going to come back and talk about Kirstama, what do you think about the fact that Kirstama arranged a phone call with Donald Trump? Oh, gosh, I didn't realize that. That's very interesting. And I think probably the right thing to do, right? Do you? Yeah.
25:45As I understand it, most of his team was saying, the world and his wife will be sending messages. Shouldn't you just maybe drop him a line. But it ended up having a phone call. Oh, no, I think it's important. I think it's important because it shows that Kirstama is being generous in the aftermath of the assassination. I think it's also very important because Trump is now likely to be the president of the United States. And he's an extremely nasty, vindictive man. And it makes sense for the British Prime Minister to have a relationship with him. Okay. Rory Stewart, praises Kirstama. Take a break.
26:24This isn't ad from BetterHelp. At the moment, we're getting advice from everywhere. You just have to go on TikTok. Could be Alice's call plunges. Could be my attempts to meditate or the digital detox that I'm doing in Colombia. But of course, one of the things that we know is that it can be incredibly valuable to talk to another human being, somebody who's actually been trained as the therapist to work through these ideas, calmly objectively and professionally. And as the largest online therapy provider in the world, BetterHelp can provide access to mental health professionals with a very diverse variety of expertise.
27:00They've got over 5 ,000 therapists in the UK. They've helped more than five million people globally. And you can join a session literally at the click of a button. Change therapists anytime. It's obviously not about fixing you, but it's about hearing yourself clearly, maybe for the first time. So talk it out with BetterHelp. Our listeners get 10 % of their first month at BetterHelp .com slash rest politics. That's better, help .com slash rest politics.
27:33Welcome back to the rest of this politics with me, Rory Stewart. And me, Alice Campbell. So we've been talking about Trump's momentum. And now we're going to move on to talk about Kier Samas. So very interesting time. He's just coming to office with this incredible record number of seats. And he is about to introduce the King's speech, which for listeners is the moment where the government sets out its its program. It's legislative program going forward. It's the big reveal of the first priorities of the new government. And I guess many, many things going into the details of what they might be doing.
28:08But it's also we can connect it back to Trump because the question is, is Kier Samas going to be able to demonstrate the kind of changes improvements in Britain, which will mean that in five years time we're not going to find ourselves falling back like so many other countries into this kind of populist Trump as world of angry people feeling the government isn't delivering for them. Anyway, the King's speech, it is a remarkable how many people still think that the monarch writes these speeches. And in fact, in the book I've done for primary schools, I've explained what the role of the King is because it is an important role in our constitution.
28:46The Prime Minister is the King's Prime Minister, the ministers are the King's ministers. He, as you explained in our interview with Lisa Nandee, he has to agree to the appointments. Now, I can't remember the last time that the King a monarch disagrees to one of the appointments, but that is the formal position. And so you get all this extraordinary kind of pomp and ceremony, and he sits there and he will read out the list of bills. Yeah, just quickly for the sense that this is the moment that you will have seen where you have all it's the big sort of state -hopeing apparlament. You have all these carriages running down the mall.
29:21You have the King and his full gowns and crown. He reads it from the House of Lords and people like me who are in the House of Commons, we all walk down the corridor. I think this black frog comes and bangs on our door. We all walk down together talking to other people and then we stand at the back of the House of Lords looking at the King reading the speech. You, you talked about the importance this. I just was thinking about this. So he's the head of state and Kirsten was the head of government. And of course Kirsten has 99 % of the power in the country, but I wonder whether one of the reasons why in America they're finding it very difficult to move President Biden is that countries like the US and France, which have these sort of presidents who are heads of state and the most powerful people in the country, they take on some of the kind of aura of a kind of mini -King, whereas in Britain, one of the reasons we were able to get rid of Boris Johnson and List Trust very, very quickly, I think is that we have a more pragmatic relationship to our prime minister and I think the presence of the King maybe sort of psychologically helps that a bit.
30:23Well, look, Sir, if you look at the French situation at the moment, one of the criticisms level that Macron that has led to his sort of pretty stunning levels of unpopularity is the fact that, in a sense, he proclaimed himself as this sort of duper theory and figure, King like. Now, I don't think he does conduct himself like that, but that I'm afraid is the image and it's stuck, whereas in a sense, we do have a King and had for several decades a Queen who that was their role. And I was always conscious of this, whenever I saw the Queen with the prime ministers be that the prime minister of the day, or I remember the time when she was with all her living former prime ministers and Tony Blair at one of the Jubiles, you were always conscious of the fact that the prime minister, routine, the described as the most powerful person in the country, sort of felt very second fiddle, you know, that she was the most important person in the room.
31:16And I think you're right. I think that does mean that there's a clear separation between executive power and formal constitutional leadership power, which is what the King has. Yeah. And I think it can be quite healthy. I mean, I know we often disagree about this, but I do think when you see France and America getting very obsessed with that precedent, it's almost turning them into these semi sort of, you know, regal figures. I sometimes think it's quite useful that some of the symbolic weight is lifted off the prime minister's shoulders and it makes you kind of get on with it in a more pragmatic way.
31:47Anyway, back to you, King's speech. Sorry. Yeah. So this one, they're talking about, you know, over 30 bills. So this is where the bills get put forward. And these are the things that the government wants to turn into law in the next session of parliament. And what you tend to see for an opposition taking over, you have all the priorities that were set out during the campaign, and then they have to be turned into where legislation is required, turned into into legislation. So for example, they will, you know, they talked a lot about the need for more financial stability, greater powers, greater control for the office of budget responsibility, where you're making institutional change like that, there is likely to have to be legislation.
32:26So a bill is brought forward, goes through the parliamentary process and then eventually becomes an act. The sum down as to how far they're going to go on house of law reform. But if they do, let's say they say we're going to, you know, kick all the 80 year olds out, well, they're all going to be sitting there sort of grumbling and groaning as that gets announced. I know we have different views about this, Roy, but I find the whole spectacle ludicrous. You know, the women in their chisers and I mean, you know, all feels a bit ridiculous, but that's our system. But I think the big stuff that we can look to see is, is economic growth being the mission?
33:02What are the bills that they're going to bring forward to make that a reality? How big will the focus be on planning reform, on house building, and some of the changes that have to be made for that? This national well fund, what sort of approach on the legislative front does that require? Artificial intelligence, let's talk about an artificial intelligence bill. What will that look like? Is that about the opportunities or is about the threats? So I think this is where you get the manifesto turning into a government program. And then what happens is the king does his bit, goes off, and then you have a debate in the house of commons where Kierstam will set out the kind of political shape of it, and then Paul Ruggie -Soonach has to stand there and deliver the response for the opposition.
33:42To come back to this question of what it would need to really make Labour go into the next election strong, if you're thinking five years forward, to stop a kind of forage Trump populist response. I guess for two things, aren't the first see, they have to demonstrate in this speech and then very quickly going forward that they're going to make stuff better. The economy better, public services better, our democracy feel like it's working. And secondly, they've got to, along with all the practical stuff, they've got to work out where they are on these culture wars because as you pointed out, Biden has delivered economic cleaf for the American people, but it hasn't really helped him because Trump is still winning the culture war narrative.
34:23But in Britain, I really think, and this is where I'm looking at this a bit nervously because I think this is a real moment to be very, very bold. Kierstammer's got an enormous majority. I'd love to see this as the moment at which really radical reform for the NHS has announced that this is some Ken Clark always said this, that you've got to do the really unpopular unpleasant things in the first two years and then you see the benefit of them as you come into the election in five years time. So I'd like to see really radical, potentially unpopular reforms the NHS now with the hope that in five years time it's better.
34:56Really committing to sorting out transport railways, really thinking about democracy, I'd love to see, you know, this is the chance to bring in the citizens assemblies, maybe as the third chamber parliament. I mean, the really big staff that might mean that you can deal with what still feels to me like a kind of crisis in our democracy because this is still a party that only got just over a third of the day. I think you're going to be disappointed on some of those, Roy. I think there will be a transport bill and I think the rail will be at the heart of that. I share your disappointment at the lack of focus that there was during the campaign on the health of our democracy.
35:31I think in other places they will be bold. I mean, on health by the way, I don't know how they're going to handle this. It's very interesting to me that your hero or one of your two political heroes, David Gort being the other one, your Labour political hero, Alan Milburn, he's kind of advising on the health reform. So is Paul Corrigan and Paul Corrigan's a very interesting guy. He was part of our health advisory team and really does have this very, very strong view that if you just focus on money, you are not going to change things in the way they need to be changed. This is a big, big reformer.
36:03But whether that will come in an early bill, because as it happens, I was in hospital yesterday and talking to lots of doctors. And I think there's a huge release that the chore has gone. Real expectations about Labour. But the last thing they want is some kind of big legislative, landslty type reforms that come along and throw the whole thing up again. So I think what Paul Corrigan and Alan Milburn and people like that will be doing will actually be sort of starting to frame it maybe as a kind of second year type thing. But we'll see. Your health's okay, right? You just told us he went to hospital.
36:36My health's fine, Roy. Don't worry about me. If I'm a bit dope, I did require a general aesthetic. Oh my lord. So it's a great slide. I love these sleep, but it was all fine. They were very, very good. Yeah, don't worry. I'm fine. Goodness, okay. Well, we're thinking of you. Um, um, let's, um, are you a sort of surprise with me, Roy? I'm honestly fine. I'm absolutely fine. Good. Okay. Right. You're fine. I actually quite enjoyed having a day to do very, very, very little and just have lots of people come in and say, please, they were to be looking after me. You deserve that. Can I just push once more?
37:06Did you, when you were in office, buy into this Ken Clark idea that you do the difficult, unpleasant, unpopular things in the first two years, take a popularity hit and then hope that your reforms play through so that by year four, five, when you go to the next election, you've got something to show for it. Yes, I do, but at the same time, I think what a King speech does, and this is what you, I think you'll see in the, in the narrative that the ministers come out with is that you're trying to shape a narrative for the, for the term, but also for the home, oh, parliament. And when you were talking about how do they get into position where they might win again with the sort of numbers they've just, just one with.
37:40Yeah. I think that if you go back to all the polling that we looked at through the campaign, they'd be wise not to move that far away from cost of living, people feeling better off, the country feeling like it works again, that public services work. And above all, I think the big, big, big thing they're going to get judged on is NHS waiting lists. They have got to come down big time. And that is about reform. So I, I, I, I agree with you that, and the problem with it with the King's speech is that there'll be all sorts of things in there. This is where things like the King's foreign travel gets announced and certain bills that have to be done, you know, my, my government will bring forward a finance bill.
38:19They probably have to address some of the overhang issues such as the infected blood scandal and all sorts of post office possibly. So there's all sorts of things that, and it's how you try and turn it with a theme. And I think the theme will be, we've been elected with a mandate to make real change. And here's where we want to see the big change. And I think that is going to be a related to this mission of growth. How do we get the economy going? Yeah, pretty good. Okay. Now you want to talk about China? We haven't talked about China much recently. And we have to keep talking about China. I mean, China obviously is the second largest economy in dollar terms in the world, almost the largest economy in the world if you look at purchasing power parity.
38:53Yeah. I think it is the largest. Yeah. And it's, it's totally off the scale on so many things. You know, world's largest exporter, world's largest manufacturer, it's naval construction capacity, apparently 200 times out of the United States, controls 85 to 90 % of the key bits of the green energy sector from batteries through to the cobalt, the lithium, Chrissy dominating electric vehicles on the one hand, on the other hand, facing real economic headwinds because of the collapse of the property market, which made up 2025, cent of their economy. Lots of people are really struggling because many ordinary Chinese put 70 -80 % of their savings into apartments that are now worth a fraction of what they were when they bought them.
39:38Very little demand, people aren't spending in China, so China's raked up its exports. And it's trade balance is now in a very odd situation. So it's running a trade surplus of nearly a hundred billion dollars a month of which about 30 billions going to the US 20 billion to Europe. And it's just been challenged by NATO in the Washington meeting, which has accused China of supplying machine parts, which are very useful for Russia in its fight against Ukraine, and has also criticized it for cyber -espionage and disinformation. So yeah, I think worth worth raising China, and I think the question of how labor deals with China, how Britain deals with China is going to be important, because broadly speaking, you've got bipartisan agreement in the US to be very aggressive on China.
40:22So we talked about tariffs of over 100 % electric vehicles from China, 60 % tariffs threatened by Trump on all Chinese exports to the US. Europe, on the other hand, has to be very cautious, because 50 % of the profits of the European automobile and luxury goods industries made in China, so they can't afford a trade war. And so many of the component parts of German cars come in and out in China. Well, I was in Germany for the Euros, especially in Stuttgart, which is the home of Mercedes -Benz, there was a lot of angst and grief that the VIPs were all being driven around in BYD cars, because Chinese cars were one of the sponsors.
41:00You were point about how the British government deals them is very, very interesting, because on the one hand, I think they're probably as a feeling that David Cameron got too close, and then the Johnson sort of was a bit all over the place, and then Lystruss was much more in the kind of American Republican place, and then soon I wasn't quite sure of Soonach's position on China. He sounded softer than Lystruss, and Lystruss was very much like this is a Cold War with China, and I think Soonach was more trying to look at where he was trying to get growth off the ground, wasn't he? But if you think about the competing interests there will be, so Rachel Reeves is the chancellor, we're wanting to focus on the economy.
41:37David Lamy is for the Secretary, we're wanting to be focusing on diplomacy. And yet I read earlier today of George Robertson, who was defense secretary and then NATO's Secretary -General, during the New Labia years, he's part of this strategic defense review, and one of the first things he's talked about is this deadly quartet, he used this phrase, the deadly quartet, which was perilously close to George Bush's axis of evil, and this is China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea as a military threat. So managing those sort of different competing pressures within that relationship is going to be a very, very tricky balancing act.
42:15And one quick obvious example is that China can now produce reliable electric vehicles for a few thousand dollars, I mean, they're most low -budget ones, about eight thousand dollars. They're certainly producing for about half the cost of Europe. So if labor is going to achieve its energy transition and get people into electric vehicles by 2030, and it wants to do so in a way that doesn't put huge burdens on the poorest households, it would have to bring in these cheap Chinese vehicles because they're about half the cost. If on the other hand, they decide that financial security reasons and protecting British car industry, they want to put up the tariffs high in the way that you asked it.
42:52Then that transition is going to be much, much more expensive, and it gets even more complicated. You talked about that Mercedes conversation, but the German car industry is conflicted because on the one hand, the import of Chinese vehicles might mean that people are buying less European vehicles, but on the other hand, the biggest market for Mercedes is in China. So they can't afford to have a, well, certainly the biggest market in terms of profit margin is in China. So they can't afford a trade war. One other thing, just before we move to the end, China also, again, trying to flex its diplomatic muscle.
43:22It's hosting yet again a meeting of Hamas and Fata. So these are the two big Palestinian factions for peace talks in Beijing, including the Chinese foreign minister. And this is an attempt to try to define how Gaza could be governed in the future. Would Hamas step back? Would they disarm their armed groups? What role would Fata play in the government of Gaza? So here's China really inserting itself into something very, very central. Any thoughts on that? The first thought I had was that given that the leader of Hamas is Milanei, I presume is right up there on the target list of the Israelis as they go about their business of eliminating Hamas.
44:07I mean, that is quite a tricky logistical operation to get him to security Beijing. Or would they actually, for something like that, because the Chinese are involved with they think, you know, giving me free pass, I don't know. But look, it isn't, you're right that normally when we've had really big foreign policy crises in the past, the Chinese approach is tended to be to kind of sit them out. But this, as you say, is very much them putting themselves right at the center of something and playing a role that you might have expected the Americans to play in a previous incarnation? Well, Alistair, thank you.
44:37We've covered a lot of ground. And before we pat ourselves on the back too much for attacking China for its supply of machinery to Russia and the Russian Cremor, we shouldn't forget that Europe is still buying Russian gas, particularly liquefied natural gas, energy, as the pipelines have gone down and still sending billions of euros into Russia through buying that gas. And that's largely because Hungary, Austria, Slovakia is still very dependent on that gas. And the Ukraine front line is in a tricky situation. It looks like Russia just retook another settlement in the last couple of days. So, yeah, watch the space on Ukraine.
45:14We need to get into Ukraine again. You mentioned to Orbán there, final point for me. He turned up both of the football games I went to, even when one of them hadn't played. And he was also at the final. Oh goodness. England against Spain. What do you tell us about? And can you give us a little bit of your sense of that game? What is the allister view on that game? Spain won two won. My view of that game is that I didn't actually watch it. I did. I did. I did. What did you think? Well, I knowing absolutely nothing about it. It did seem as though Spain had the ball much more than England and we're passing it much better.
45:47That's what we call a great possession. Yeah. And though I think Spain was the best team in the tournament. I think England did very, very well to get to the final. England didn't really play to the best of their capacity, I don't think, through the tournament. So I think that although England fans will be very, very disappointed, I think you'd be hard pressed to say that the better team didn't work well. Were we supposed to be cheerful because we got a young team that could do well under a new manager and that we... Yeah, you definitely got some very, very good. I thought Maynu might have been the young player of the tournament, but the other, the Spanish youngster might have won the overall player of the tournament.
46:20No, I think he listened England can be very, very hopeful about the future. But it does seem remarkable. I can remember watching England winning the World Cup in 1966 as a nine -year -old, 58 years ago, in the police station in Longtown. Longtown was my... Because my dad was dropping us off to be picked up by other relatives. Politics and football were really... Yeah. There was a very interesting... So if you imagine being the the British ambassador to Germany, you said to be part of this thing through the whole time. At the final, she had to look after Prince William, Prince George, Keir Starmer, Lisa Nandie, and I don't know if you saw there were quite a lot of bilateral stuff going on.
47:00There was a very funny picture of... They all began with S, Starmer, Schultz and Sanchez and Steinmeier, the German president in the background as well. So I think quite a lot of diplomacy got done there. Very good. Final point, Rory. The German ambassador to the UK, Michael Berger, he posted a tweet at the end of the tournament. Picture of all the Scotland fans enjoying themselves in Munich, I think it was, being led down the street by bagpipes. And then a picture of this vast square, I think in Berlin, full of England fans. And 70 ,000 of them were something, I mean, incredible. You had tens of thousands of both were there.
47:37And he pointed out that, you know, there'd been next to no trouble, next to no violence. So when you think about historically what the reputation of England fans in particular is, I'm actually back in the day when I was growing up, Scotland fans weren't the best in the world, they're like they are now. But actually, I think that was a very, very interesting thing, that the violence that was expected wasn't there. So that's something positive we can all take. Thank you, Arissa. Just to finish with a thank you and a bit of a plug, we won't be doing a question time episode this week. But if people were interested, they can listen to my new BBC series on ignorance.
48:11I've made a six part series on the idea of ignorance and how ignorance, of course, very, very controversial when we think about Donald Trump and politics, but also how ignorance can be very powerful and creative in art, in love and relationships, in religion. So six part series, it'll be on BBC 930 in the morning, radio, four on Thursdays, but also available now on BBC sounds. Love to hear what you think, my programme on ignorance. Thank you, Arissa. Have a great break, bye -bye.
From the publisher
How has a man who once called Trump ‘America’s Hilter’ now become his running mate? What does a Labour government mean for UK-China relations? Will China define how Gaza will be governed in the future?
Join Rory Stewart and Alastair Campbell for the latest episode of The Rest Is Politics, where they answer all these questions and more.
TRIP Plus:
Become a member of The Rest Is Politics Plus to support the podcast, receive our exclusive newsletter, enjoy ad-free listening to both TRIP and Leading, benefit from discount book prices on titles mentioned on the pod, join our Discord chatroom, and receive early access to live show tickets and Question Time episodes.
Just head to therestispolitics.com to sign up, or start a free trial today on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/therestispolitics.
TRIP UK TOUR:
To buy tickets for our October Tour, just head to www.therestispolitics.com
🌏 Get our exclusive NordVPN deal here ➼ https://nordvpn.com/restispolitics It’s risk-free with Nord’s 30-day money-back guarantee! ✅
Instagram:
@restispolitics
Twitter:
@RestIsPolitics
Email:
restispolitics@gmail.com
Video Editor: Teo Ayodeji-Ansell
Social Producer: Jess Kidson
Assistant Producer: Fiona Douglas
Producer: Nicole Maslen
Senior Producer: Dom Johnson
Head of Content: Tom Whiter
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor + Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices




