294. Labour’s defining moment and the next Tory leader

30 Jul 2024 · 57 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Notes: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 294: Labour’s Defining Moment and the Next Tory Leader

Episode Overview In this episode, hosts Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart discuss significant developments in UK politics, including Labour's financial strategy under Rachel Reeves, the Conservative leadership contest, and the influence of politics on the Olympic Games.

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Labour's Financial Strategy
  2. Rachel Reeves' Accusations:
  3. Reeves has accused the Conservative government of mismanaging public finances, claiming a substantial financial black hole.
  4. The narrative presented in The Sunday Times indicated that Labour plans to make cuts based on discovering overspending not previously accounted for.
  • Public Sector Challenges:
  • The NHS and other public services are under financial strain, with Labour's stance leading to potential austerity measures.
  • Concerns arise over Labour's commitment to avoid tax rises while addressing significant public debt.
  • Battle of Narratives:
  • The hosts emphasize the critical nature of narrative management in politics.
  • The historical context of Conservative narratives on financial mismanagement during previous governments is discussed as they anticipate similar challenges for Labour.
  1. Tory Leadership Contest
  2. Candidates:
  3. A total of six Conservative MPs are vying for leadership: Tom Tugendhat, Mel Stride, James Cleverly, Kemi Badenoch, Robert Jenrick, and Priti Patel.
  4. The conversation highlights their backgrounds, political alignments, and potential appeal to party members and the public.
  • Leadership Dynamics:
  • Discussion around how the leadership contenders are influenced by past Conservative governments and their attempts to reshape party narratives.
  • Kemi Badenoch emerges as a potential frontrunner, yet her experience and public appeal are scrutinized.
  • Political Climate:
  • The importance of addressing the economic situation and tax policies is underscored as critical for the next leader’s success.
  • The leadership contest comes at a time of significant political upheaval within the Conservative Party.
  1. Politics and the Olympics
  2. Discussion on the Olympics:
  3. Alastair shares his perspective on the Olympic opening ceremony, critiquing the presentation and execution.
  4. Discussion about the historical intersection of politics and the Olympics, referencing past events that had significant political implications (e.g., the 1936 Berlin Olympics and Black Power protests at the 1968 Games).
  • Cultural Reflection:
  • The hosts consider how the Olympics can reflect broader societal changes and tensions, particularly in relation to issues of national identity and representation.
  1. Global Affairs: Focus on Bangladesh
  2. Political Situation in Bangladesh:
  3. The hosts shed light on the authoritarian regime of Sheikh Hasina and the recent violent protests over job quotas that resulted in numerous fatalities.
  4. The discussion highlights the transition from a promising democratic trajectory in Bangladesh to a more authoritarian governance style.
  • Implications for Democracy:
  • The episode closes with a reflection on the critical state of democracy in various countries, including a comparison to Venezuela’s political situation.

Key Takeaways

  • Economic Narratives: The importance of narrative control in politics, particularly around economic issues, is crucial for both Labour and Conservative parties.
  • Leadership Challenges: The Conservative Party faces the challenge of selecting a leader who can effectively address public discontent while managing party dynamics.
  • Intersection of Politics and Sport: The Olympics serve as a lens through which political issues and national identities can be explored and critiqued.
  • Global Perspective: The political climate in Bangladesh serves as a cautionary tale for democratic principles in practice and governance.

Conclusion This episode of *The Rest Is Politics* offers insightful analysis on the current state of UK politics, the dynamics of leadership contests, the role of sports in political discourse, and the evolving situation in global democracies. The discussions reflect the complexity of political narratives and the inherent challenges faced by political leaders in navigating public perception and governance.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Thanks for listening to the Restus Politics, sign up to the Restus Politics Plus to enjoy ad -free listening and receive a weekly newsletter. Join our members' chat room again early access to live show tickets. Just go to therestuspolitics .com. That's therestuspolitics .com. At Blinds .com, it's not just about window treatments. It's about you. Your style, your space, your way. Whether you DIY or want the pros to handle it all, you'll have the confidence of knowing it's done right. From free expert design help to our 100 % satisfaction guarantee, everything we do is made to fit your life and your windows.

0:32Because at Blinds .com, the only thing we treat better than windows is you. Visit Blinds .com now for up to 40 % off site -wide, plus a professional measure at no cost. Rules and restrictions apply.

0:49Welcome to the Restus Politics with me, Rory Stewart. And me, Alex Camel. So, we're recording this Monday afternoon. We've just had what may turn out to be one of the defining moments of this Parliament. Because essentially, we're now into the battle of the narratives after Rachel Reeves has made all sorts of accusations against the Tories, management of public finances and all sorts of counter accusations have come back. We'll talk about that. We'll talk about the Tory leadership contest. I think we're up to six contenders, not including Swallow Bravenman. We both want to talk about what's going on in Bangladesh.

1:22We like to talk on this podcast about important things happening in the world, which most of the media seem not to bother with. And we're also going to talk, how could we not talk this week about the Olympic Games in the context of politics too? So, Rory, let's start with Rachel Reeves and the House of Commons earlier today. Yeah, so really tough, and as you say, this is the big question. So, the election was fought around growth and the economy. And as everybody pointed out during the election, neither the Labour nor the Conservative parties, nor in fact pretty much anyone else, was remotely honest about the economic problems the country faced.

2:00And both the major parties were completely tying themselves in knots, promising that they weren't going to erase any taxes. And leaving us with this big problem, which is that there's a public sector is creaking, NHS and trouble, schools and trouble, infrastructure and trouble, not much government revenue coming in, huge amount of debt. And all these parties saying they're not going to erase any taxes, so where are they going to get the money from? And Paul Johnson, the IFS, who we often talk about in this show, said, I bet what's going to happen is Labour are going to come in and say, oh, they looked at the books and it turned out to be worse than they thought.

2:34So, I'm saying, this is Paul Johnson, sort of six, seven weeks ago before the election, saying, can I just say before they say that, that that is not fair and that the OBR published just a lot of they should have a pretty good idea now that the country's bust and going in and saying the country's bust isn't going to, isn't going to wash. But sure enough, that is what Rachel Reese has done. And the first warning shot of this was a very remarkable. I just want to touch on this for a moment because it's something I'd love to know from you. The Sunday Times article by and Caroline Wheeler, Harry York and a guy called Nicholas Hessen possibly ran on Sunday with essentially the entire Rachel Reese narrative.

3:13She's found this massive black hole in the finances. This is what she said to her civil servants. This is the internal conversations in Labour. This is how it's going to sort it out. These are the things that she's going to cut. And it was the only newspaper that had it. The the observer didn't have it, you know, it's unexpressed, didn't have it. This was the Sunday Times and the narrative they were running was absolutely Rachel Reese narrative. It wasn't the Paul Johnson or Tory narrative. It wasn't. She says he says it was very much. She's come in. She's found this black hole and she's going to sort it out.

3:45Tell me a bit about this. Does this feel to you like an exclusive? What does this mean when people read the newspaper and they see a story like that? What do you think might have happened behind the scenes? Well, I'm a little bit blind on this because I'm in France and I spent the entire day watching the Olympics. And so I didn't I didn't read the Sunday newspapers yesterday as closely as you have. If what you were saying is right, then that does sound to me like the Sunday Times has been very, very closely briefed. And you know, sometimes you will get more favorable interpretation of the briefing if you are being told that this is not going anywhere else.

4:21So in effect, what the Sunday Times got to do was break the story in advance of a loss of what was going to be in this big Monday announcement that's just happened. And in exchange, they provide a pretty favorable view of what's about to happen. That's part of the deal, I guess. If that is what happened, then the other thing that it does is it means that you get the first shot at framing the narrative. And as I said in the introduction, this seems to me is going to be the defining battle of the narratives. Now, if you go back to when you first became an MP in 2010 and David Cameron became prime minister, this is what we talked about on leading for the last two episodes.

4:58The narrative was defined very successfully by the conservatives as we inherited a mess, Liam Bern left us this note saying there's no money left, which we are going to willfully visit a print for the rest of his life. And that is why we're going to have to make big, big spending cuts. And if you're going to blame us, don't blame us, blame them. And I always felt if you read my entire his volume, whatever is five, I was relentlessly rowing with Ed Miliband, saying he did not fight back hard enough against that narrative. Okay, what seems to me to be happening now is that the Labour Party, I suspect, Rachel Reeve said in the statement that some of these budgets that were overspent were not that the OBR were not aware, that we'll have to look into the detail of that, I don't know.

5:44But they basically come in and said there are things that were spent here, which we were not told were being spent, which were not budgeted for. And we have concluded there is this overspend of 20 billion plus. As a result of that, we're having to make some very difficult decisions. And then they're making these difficult decisions. You know, some of the, I know Boris Johnson's 14 new hospitals thing was always a scam, but there were there are elements of hospital building programs, which are now going to be cut. Yes, exactly, exactly. I mean, it was a scam in the sense that he claimed that he'd done 14 new hospitals when he actually launched a program for some new hospitals, but a lot of the repairs were in there.

6:23But the fact is it was a budget for fixing up hospitals that has not been cut. Exactly. And then the other thing, so we told last week, briefly on the podcast about how if it Cooper had gone in and said, we thought it was 350 million on the Wanderer. In fact, it was 700. So there's 200 million gone. What Jeremy Hunt seems to be doing as the shadow chancellor is coming back and saying, you knew everything about the finances. This is a complete, political game because what you tried to do is pressage very difficult decisions and bend the blame on us. Yeah, you've talked about battle narratives in Ed Miliband.

6:58So we'll need to talk about the spittas we get into the Tory leadership contenders, but I guess it would be smart for all the Tory leadership contenders from their points of you to very strongly try to fight back against the narrative that the Tories bust the country. Otherwise, they're going to face for the next 10, 15 years every time they go into an election. The narrative they bust the country just as I guess Labour felt, right, the way through to 2024 that they were fighting elections where the Tories were able to keep that narrative going from 2010. That's a really interesting question because of course, if you read what Kemi Badenock has been saying, she seems to me to be wanting to she wants to challenge the narrative of the past.

7:37She wants to be challenging the decisions that were taken by the last government. The piece that she wrote in the in the Times yet another one who was given very favorable coverage. I suspect Mr Goh may have oiled a bit of the sort of you know the plumbing in there to help her in there. So she's gone in there and she seems to me she wants to challenge the narrative. And likewise, don't forget the other thing that Labour will want to keep at front of public mind is Liz Truss. Now, I don't know the extent to which that figured in today, but at some point during the leadership election, though they presumably have to be confronted with what they thought of the various political and economic decisions made by predecessors.

8:15I mean, I always find with your old party Rory, well, I see David Gorker's rejoined it, which you talk about that. But what I always find is that your debates seem to me do get defined very much by the leaders and the budgets of the past. So Margaret Thatcher and Nigel Lawson still figure hugely in debates about the future of the Tories now is it not time that somebody came along and said, you know what, we've just got to accept it. We balls things up big style and here's a change conservatism that I'm going to bring forward. So I don't know whether they want to get too hooked on this. Let's soon act and undo it.

8:52Let's have another look at what we're getting out of rituries. So she has inherited a position in which growth has been inemic. Inflation has come down. So there's a big debate about, you know, is the economy in bad position or not. So if you're the conservatives, you're going to say the UK economy is actually in a good shape. Unemployment is now at 4 .4%, which is half of what it was in 2010. Inflation is at 2 % down from 11%. Real incomes are beginning to rise and living standards are beginning to rise. Actually, just as a footnote on that, one of the things you might say to the conservatives if they said that before you get into what the problems with that are, is why on earth did Rishi Sunak trigger the election for June given that those things were happening?

9:41Because actually there's a serious possibility that he could have gone into an election November where the unemployment figures, the inflation figures and the real incomes run an even better situation there in June. Now, the response from labor is, yeah, but we have very low growth in productivity. debt interest is very high. So, you know, when Cameron took over in 2010, it was about interest rates very low, kind of 0 .5%. So now 5 .1 % more and more in the government money is going on, on paying the debt, the pandemic. And of course, these big structural problems of an age in population, which means that Rachel Reeves went into this election effectively having to sign up to billions of pounds of Tory spending cuts.

10:26And in the statement she made today, she said she's going to do another 3 % of spending cuts against departments, going after what she calls back offices. And then I guess the next question is, if you're going to make savings, where are you going to save and where are you going to spend the money? Where are the priorities? She's decided that she has to accept the recommendations of public sector pay review body, which is putting up salaries for basic NHS workers and for teachers. So millions of people, over a million people, by I think 5 .5%. And junior doctors are, I think, by more than 20 % pay rise in order to try to stop the junior doctor's strike.

11:04So she's accepting salary rises, but she's cutting down on infrastructure investments. So money not going into doing up hospitals as we describe, money not going into roads, the stonehenge bypass, money not going into railways, money not going into a 300 million pound investment fund that Jeremy Hunt had. And that's, I guess, is going to be one of the big questions, because it's not true that she had to accept those public sector pay review bodies recommendations. It's a strong pressure to, but when I was in the Ministry of Justice, public sector pay review body came back, said they wanted to increase prison offers salaries by a certain amount.

11:38I thought, well, we're going to have to do this. And David Gort, my boss said, no, actually, we're not going to do this. I think we need more money to invest in the prison estate. I'm not going to let the salaries up. I wondered, well, I saw this. I carbo is used pay pretty was, but I saw recently there was a big thing briefed out about there are costs to not resolving this paid dispute with the doctors. And that said to me that they were looking towards doing this. And there's something in that, by the way, one of the reasons why the weightless have gone up is because the, there have been all these strikes.

12:12So that is going to cost more now to bring those weightless down, which is one of their big promises. So I think this is something they've decided to put the investment into getting that sorted. But what you were talking about is a parliament now, where unless and until the economy does start to grow, Rachel Rees is giving an awful lot of power to the Office of Budget Responsibility. She's also, as I understand it, says she have this new body, Office of Value for Money. She confirmed to parliament today this COVID Corruption Commissioner, which will be going after money. There will be a lot of public support for that.

12:45But whether, you know, once you get into the legal technicalities of big government contracts of procurement and some of the fast stuff that was done during the COVID crisis, we'll see where that ends. And of course, as part of this better the narrative, given Rachel Rees has given so much power to the Office of Budget Responsibility. It's interesting that shortly after she spoke up popped a letter from Rachel Hughes, the chair of the Office of Budget Responsibility to the Treasury Select Committee, indicating that he has found that there were things that he wished he could have been assessed the last time they were looking at the previous governments spending plans and that some of them they were only aware of to meeting this week.

13:26Interesting, you mentioned Paul Johnson there. He has pointed out that the 20 billion pound gap is almost quotes exactly the cost of the national insurance cuts that Jeremy Hunt introduced this year. So again, we're talking about choices all the time, we're talking about governance making choices. I guess the other thing Rachel Rees is trying to do is what Jeremy Hunt is trying to say is that this today is all about trying to prepare the ground. They're going to raise taxes in the autumn. That's where his big line was, which of course would go against the no tax rises on income if assuming that is where they go.

13:57The promises they made in the election, where they very much said they would take to no VAT and what was the other one? No national insurance. So that's how they're going to do. The Hunter's got a problem with that although he's going to be gone by November and the budget has been announced for late October. So that's just before we get the new Tory leader I think. So this battle is going to go right up to the budget as to whether the Tories have decided the line is they're going to put taxes up. They're going to get a lot of foxes shot if she doesn't. Yes, but on the other hand, if she doesn't, where's she going to get money from?

14:29So the assumption is that given she can't put up the taxes or assuming she doesn't put up the taxes, she's promised not to put up during the election. The assumption is it would have to come from capital gains tax and inheritance tax. And this is particularly, are you going to go after changing the rules? And this is also whether Tories are also going to have to make an argument that might be pretty difficult to make. So the argument that Tories would have to make, which I have some sympathy for, but I don't know how you make it, is that it's true that there are massive discrepancies of income and wealth.

15:04But it's also true that much of the revenue of the government comes from the very wealthy. So the top 1 % pay 28 % of the income tax. So 85 billion pounds a year comes from just the top 1%, which is three times the amount paid by the bottom half of the workforce. And the 37 ,000 non -doms are bringing about 6 .5 billion a year. And of course, what people are on the sort of Tory free market side are worried about is that if Labour decides to start doing things that hit non -doms more than already hitting them and goes after their inheritance tax on all their assets investment, most of these people on the Sunday Times richness will just leave the country because they may be prepared to pay more income tax.

15:49And this is about what they do with money. They earn outside the United Kingdom. If they have to pay inheritance tax on all the money they've accumulated outside the United Kingdom, they'll probably leave. And you can already see people moving to Milan, people moving to Portugal. So I think that it's this this goose and golden egg problem. Before we're going to Tories, you're you're you're triggering me there because you just mentioned Milan and Portugal, which are in the European Union. The other point about the wretched state of our public finances is the impact that Brexit has had upon them.

16:19And that seems to me was not figuring in either side of the debate, but there we are. I also think this strong possibility she may try to borrow more. That's probably the most if you're not going to put up taxes and you need revenue borrowing more money. And what do you think just sort of sorry, I'm unfurling. I keep asking you for a gut instinct views. But in terms of the promises and the tone of that election, do you think you could get away with the public with borrowing a bit more money more easily than putting up taxes? Yes, definitely. But I said earlier, she has given an awful lot of authority to the Office of Budget Responsibility.

16:56She's not necessarily a bad thing. But I think we're in exactly the same place that we were is that ultimately the economy is going to have to grow. And what you saw in the King's speech was them sort of setting out some of the first steps on that, particularly in relation to planning and housing and building. And then we're now going to have to see there's a lot of focus in this on public private partnership and investment coming through the private sector and so forth. So I think there is an element of a plan to this, but I still think what today really was about was setting the framework for the politics of the economy for the next bit, possibly for the entire parliament.

17:34And ultimately, if Labour get the economy growing, they will probably win the next election. If they don't, then they'll be in a bit of trouble. And I think that's where we are. Now, who are they going to be facing, Rory? Well, well, this is good. So the deadline has just passed. And I think about an hour before we recorded this podcast. So there are six MPs will be in the running for the three months long contest. And they are Tom Tuggenhardt, Mel Stride, James Clevverly, Kemi Badenock, Robert Jenric, Priti Patel. And it's a very interesting new method where they're going to try to get down to four MPs by September who are going to make their pitch at the Conservative Party conference in the weeks leading up to it.

18:16And then the MPs will narrow down the list to two candidates. So I suppose first thing to ask you is what do you think of this group? It's four men and Robert Jenric, Tom Tuggenhardt, Mel Stride, I guess, look like central casting, just very superficially white middle aged British men. It's very young. So these are MPs who are mostly in their 40s. They are all MPs who either joined with me or joined after me. So they haven't reached back before 2010. So none of these people were in the cabinet in 2015. Many of these people have never really made it into the cabinets at all. So as far as I know, Robert Jenric, Tom Tuggenhardt attend the cabinet, but were not sexually sustained, which is very, very unusual in a leadership race.

19:02So if you looked at the last six in the run against Boris Johnson, everybody was a sexually state running a department. The other thing is that traditionally the people who become leaders in the conservative party have often been from what's called Pompacy, the great officers of state. They're people who've been challenged as foreign secretaries, home secretaries. So, you know, Theresa May was home secretary, Boris Johnson was foreign secretary, Richie Suneck was chancellor, Liz Truss had been foreign secretary. In this case, James cleverly was home secretary, pretty Patel was home secretary. But Kemi Vadnock, who's the front runner, has never had any of those big offices.

19:41Anyway, what do you think about this as a group? Well, I think the first thing to say is that Swallow Bravenman is not there and she announced yesterday that she was pulling out and I want to announce I'm pulling out of the 100 meters final in Paris. I've decided I'm not taking part in that contest. And I think it's exactly the same reason, because I have absolutely no chance of winning. She said she was grateful to the 10 MPs who were nominating her. Do we see their names to she even get to 10? I suspect not. Given the noise that she's made in the last couple of years, do you not think if you were nominated, you were run?

20:17Oh, absolutely. I mean, because remember, everything can change. If you can get those 10 MPs and enter the race, things can change very rapidly. Favorites can fall over, they can et cetera. Yeah, in the next couple of weeks, our listeners will get the delight of hearing you and me talk to David Davis. David Davis was at one point the runaway favorite it seemed in the battle that led to David Cameron becoming leader of the Conservative Party and then went on to be prime minister. At the moment of this six, every time I read anything in the right wing papers, it tells me that Keny Badenock is the party favorite.

20:50Well, if that's right, then I wouldn't if I were labor, I wouldn't worry too much about Keny Badenock. I think she's my senses. She's somebody who has got support. It's back to the thing you've talked about before or about Pritchie Patel and Liss Truss had. They had friends in the media who would sort of big them up and talk them up. I don't find her impressive as a public performer. I don't find her impressive as speaker. I've seen nothing that she said that makes me think there's somebody coming along with a new different vision of the Conservative Party. Tom Tuganhat, I had some time for until he came out the other day and decided, yeah, do you know what this ECH arsling?

21:28Maybe it's not all this cracked out to be. He basically is going to try and play to the right. That's the European Conventional Human Rights. Correct. Yeah. I thought Mel Stride is interesting. Mel Stride, who I would never saw him coming up as a leadership contender, I thought he was one of the few conservatives who had a reasonably good election campaign because he went out and batted on difficult wickets all the time. But it's a pretty limited role. I don't have a sense that the Conservative membership again has much of a view of him. The two that I would look at and think they've got a better chance than maybe people think are pretty Patel and James cleverly.

22:01No, you I think at this stage, I think, are we too early and they could lead ship contest for you to do an impersonation of pretty Patel because people who've listened to your book tell me that it's really good. But I'm also I see very difficult to do. I might appeal to your musical air to see if you can give it a go. It's a sort of funny kind of Essex heart -future combination. It's an and the intonation is always on a very unexpected word. She always emphasizes the word that you're not expecting her to emphasize. I really I'm going to listen to her for this though. I'm really listening to her for this.

22:38Anyway, my sense is that she's got something that may be there looking for right now. Bit of experience, very kind of confident in her own skin and pretty tough performer. Well, it's a fascinating thing. So just to step back one thing, the election, of course, removed so many of the stalwarts the party, which is why it's an almost unrecognizable party. So if you think of the people who would have considered running for leadership, people who would talk about as future prime ministers, in that election Michael Gove left, Sergeant Javid left, Quasic, Quarcing left, Nudamsahar, we left, Dominic Rab left, and obviously Matt Hancock left.

23:17So all that generation, that's a good six people not around. They also lost a lot of the people that were, you know, I thought the hope of the kind of center right. So Alex Chalk lost his seat, Jynne Keegan lost his seat, Victoria Prince. Do you mean center left of the Tory party? Correct. Correct. The left left of the Tory party, Tabas Elwood lost his seat. But also leadership candidates, Grant Shaps, Penny Mordench lost their seats. And almost half the cabinet left, and two thirds the MPs. So this is a very odd competition. They're trying to choose six MPs with a very, very limited number of MPs voting for them.

24:02And many of the kind of core of the David Cameron Theresa May, Boris Johnson government have completely vanished already. They just don't exist anymore. Most of Boris Johnson's cabinet has gone, most David Cameron's cabinet has gone, most of his most comments, guys, very, very interesting. If you had to be money now, who do you think is the favourite? The favourite. And based upon the system, because the system, as you say, is down to four MPs, and then it's two. And then it's down to two. So the reason that Kimmy Badknock is the favourite at the moment will be because MPs believe, or many MPs believe that she's going to be the most popular with the party as a whole.

Read the full transcript

24:43So what they're going to think is we're going to produce two candidates, finally. And the party members, these sort of 120 ,000 party members who are older and more right -wing, the general population, will then have the choice of which to go with. And MPs are very, very anxious about their jobs, they're very anxious about getting the shadowed cabinet. So if they think one of these candidates is more likely to win with the members and therefore more likely to be leader, they will have a tendency to want to make nice with her early. That was basically the Boris Johnson phenomenon. How can you explain the fact that all these MPs thought that he was dishonest and incompetent and not good at his job, but they went for him?

25:20Well, it was because they thought the party members would go for him massively. But none of these people are that far out in the way that he was. No. So it's entirely possible that you could have a David Davis situation here. You could have somebody who has constantly been written up as the favourite who gets pulled in. I think first thing is it's a long race. It's very interesting. They've changed it to this final fourth thing, which actually would have been very helpful in previous races, which is it means it gives a few weeks for the country. You'd have got that. Exactly. Exactly. That's a purely self -interest that all these analyses.

25:52Let's just look at these candidates for a second. So, can we baton? Very likable. I mean, it's always very polite to everybody right across the party. One -on -one, one -on -one, she's very charming. But she was seen as deeply disloyal within Rishi -Sunei's cabinet. And there was a lot of reason against it. Exactly. And Rishi -Sunei, as cabinet, his lie -less would say that she wasn't competent. And she's very much the person who leans into culture wars. It's where she gets out on the front step, tries to pick culture war fights. Pretty Patel, I'm afraid. Again, very polite all the time to me.

26:30And I feel very mean putting the boot in. And actually, it's a theme, even with Liz Trust. Liz Trust was always very polite to everybody. Michael Gove always very polite to everybody. They're not people who ever make any efforts to make enemies with MPs. They're always scrupulously polite and charming to people from all parts of the party. But I just thought pretty Patel, I'm afraid, was the most hopeless section of state. I saw her as my boss in Diffid. I worked with her close -seed. She did not seem to me to have the mind to allow her to really master her brief, manage civil servants correctly.

27:04I think she's a charming media performer, but I'd be very worried to have her as primalster. If you'd listen to her talk, her speeches of a very, very eccentric. Although Liz Trust made it without being able to give up public speech. So who knows? And pretty Patel is a sort of, I think, a sort of Liz Trust -esque figure. Mel Stride is somebody who I've always liked. He is very much a loyalist. He's understated. He's quiet. He's good at his job. He's, I think, a good minister manages civil servants well. So in so far as I'm always trying to sell the David Gaute model, Mel Stride is probably the closest to the David Gaute model amongst these candidates.

27:40The question is, can a more introverted, hard -working, serious performer make it through and be reassuring? I think it'd be really encouraging if he did. I think it'd be an interesting thing to see. But he may not quite have the charisma. James Clevley, I think James is by far probably, along with Tom Tuganhart, one of the best media performers amongst this group. He's a good at taking risks. He can be funny. He often gets himself in trouble. I think he's likeable. He did a good job as home secretary. He's been liked as far as actually the diplomats have really got behind him. He tried to rule himself out of the race some months ago.

28:20I'm pleased to see he's back in because I think he could be a very interesting thing for the conservative party. The criticisms of in my suppose are that he's not a sort of gov -like intellect. He's not that kind of manager, but he's somebody who delegates well. He sees the big picture. He may be more of a willy white law figure for real political nerds. Tom Tuganhart, really interesting. I mean, Tom Tuganhart, I was just with some German politicians over a last weekend, who are very fond of him because Tom has made a real effort when he was chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee to make links in Europe.

28:55He speaks fluent French. He's married to a French woman. He has very good links with Germans, Spanish, European politicians. I've always noticed when I get here that people talk about Tom Tuganhart there much more than they do in Britain. He's somebody who was in Afghanistan and Iraq. He was very close to General Richards, who made him a colonel before anti -punament before that he was a journalist. He was very much seen as being on the remain one nation side of the conservative party. He is very good at cultivating journalists, which is a real asset in modern politics. He's getting a little right wing for me, but he'd probably be quite pleased to hear me say that because I don't think the thing he wants is somebody like me.

29:37I mean, I think it's very noticeable actually that these are candidates who calculate that people like me and the side of the conservative party I represent feels like the past for them. But is that his way? He's not a risk. What I thought when I heard him make this sort of I thought rather lame and opportunistic shift on the European Convention of Human Rights. I thought surely he's the one who could have carved out a position of his own, which is the only place from where you can show I think real leadership, where he actually says, I'm not going to be the same as all the rest. Well, this is interesting.

30:08I mean, I think this is, I mean, he sort of gently encouraged me to run in 2019. And I think his, I may be ventriloquizing for it. I think his reading of my run is I went too far in the direction of, you know, being against tax cuts, being too passionately in favour of the customs union and that you have to be more realistic if you're trying to win Tory members. So, you know, I've been disappointed that he didn't come along with me and support a customs union. He's very much wounded out. I'm very sad about the ECHR because that was something European Convention of Human Rights was created, signed to do with the European Union.

30:44It was created by conservatives. And it was something that we were very proud of as spreading rights and democracy through Europe. And I'm sad to see that our pro -Europeans doing this, but I guess he thinks you've got to probably, I don't know, I mean, he would obviously say he passionately believes he's positioned to do also things you've got to be pragmatic to win. Rob Jenric's the one that surprises me most because Rob Jenric has managed to establish himself as a contender over the last few months despite never running a government department. It's very unusual and despite not having been in Parliament very long, so I don't quite understand what's happened there.

31:18He's made a name for himself on immigration, isn't he? That's what he's done. Because he was the junior minister in the Home Office responsible for immigration and he was saying that we should be more radical about the Rwandan scene. Yeah. Anyway, it would be very, very interesting. We shall see. Let's just take a quick break. Absolutely. Let's take a break.

31:42This isn't ad from BetterHelp. At the moment, we're getting advice from everywhere. You just have to go on TikTok. Could be Alice's cold plunges. Could be my attempts to meditate or the digital detox that I'm doing in Colombia. But of course, one of the things that we know is that it can be incredibly valuable to talk to another human being, somebody who's actually been trained as the work through these ideas, calmly, objectively and professionally. And as the largest online therapy provider in the world, BetterHelp can provide access to mental health professionals with a very diverse variety of expertise.

32:18They've got over 5 ,000 therapists in the UK. They've helped more than 5 million people globally and you can join a session literally at the click of a button. Change therapist anytime. It's obviously not about fixing you, but it's about hearing yourself clearly, maybe for the first time. So talk it out with BetterHelp. Our listeners get 10 % off their first month at BetterHelp .com slash rest politics. That's better H -E -L -P .com slash rest politics.

32:49Welcome back to the rest of this politics with me, Rory Stewart. And me, Anastak Campbell. And did you get much feedback on Nick Clegg Park too, Rory? I got really good feedback on Nick Clegg. Of course, people on my side of the austerity debate are very pleased to see that he's so sort of unapologetic about the spending cuts and all that kind of stuff in 2010. People who are wrong love it when they can be wrong together, they love that. Exactly. And I presume on your side, there's everyone being like, why don't you give them a harder time? You let them get away with this austerity stuff. The best piece of feedback was from Miriam Gonzalez Durantes, who said, I think you saw as you posted on Instagram, this is totally unfair.

33:29Why did you give him two episodes and I only had one? And I said it was because he needed twice as long to be as half as good as she is. That's good. So there we are. I'm really pleased. I'm really pleased we got to do that. And I think really worth listening to because he's a major figure now in the world of tech. And he was deputy prime minister. And I think he took the Lib Dems to the most extraordinary victory. I mean, as he points out, they got more votes in 2010 than Rishi Sunek just managed with the Conservatives in the late election. So incredible. So really worth doing. Now, Alisa, I really want to get you on the Olympics because in this double act, you were very much the sports person.

34:09In the double act, you were very much the Frank Aphone. And in this double act, you were very much the person who's currently speaking to me from France. So tell us about the Olympics and what do you think? And then we might get a bit into the history of politics and Olympics and how it's worked. But give us a sense of how the Olympics looks to you and is going at the moment from your immediate vantage point. Did you watch the opening ceremony? I did watch the opening ceremony. In fact, you and I were were what's happening back and forth a little bit during the opening ceremony. There was a period during the first bit when I was I really was beginning to think that we needed to resurrect the Tory party campaign slogan stop the boats.

34:45There was just there was too much of that boat thing. As is the session. Sasha who was watching it with me pointed this out to me because we were in Paris a week ago and we took a boat down the sand and he pointed out they are unbelievably slow. I mean, to get from the Eiffel Tower to Notre Dame, you know, took us nearly an hour and he was like, what is going on? And every time we tune back in, we'd occasionally go away because the children would just be like, this is ridiculous. And we'd come back in and we'd get to Bhutan or just reach Chile. I mean, it was just sort of the alphabet was moving very, very slowly.

35:19Yeah, it was it was listen, the whole thing was was made for TV. Once the rain started pouring down, I really felt quite badly for those people who were just sitting there watching it because unless there were massive screens everywhere, which I couldn't see in the TV footage, then how on earth were you supposed to follow all these amazing pre filmed films, which I jumping from the pre filmed to the live was also for it because a pre filmed film, you think, well, why am I watching that? I'm trying to watch something live. Why am I watching something all the time? But one of the best things of London 2012 was the Queen walking around James Bond.

36:01And then jumping out of helicopter. That was beautiful. But that was as far as I know, the only bit wasn't it and it was right at the beginning. Whereas in this one, they kept cutting in and out. So I got very confused. Am I watching this live? It's a something pre filmed and generally you could tell by the weather, couldn't you? Yeah, there was a bit of the weather thing. But I will listen, once we got through all the countries being done, I thought the last hour was absolutely magnificent. I thought once they got to the Eiffel Tower light show, it was amazing. I loved that. And I do know the bit that because I'm a very I'm very emotional when it comes to sport or in the bit that got me was the guy in his wheelchair who was the oldest surviving French Olympic medalist.

36:39Was he their 100 year old cyclist? And he handed the flame the torch to the two who were the judo guy and the athlete, Mary Jo Pérek, who went up and lit the thing. And the flame itself was just utterly magnificent. And it's now hanging over Paris. It was amazing. So anyway, listen, the other thing is Celine Dion, what did you also love? She was fantastic. She was unbelievable. I mean, there's a woman who's got some incurable disease, hasn't been able to perform for years. And she sang that. I mean, I felt, you know what, literally just before she started singing, I was literally about to tweet why are we having a piaf in the background but without a voice?

37:24And then along comes Celine Dion. It was wonderful. So by the end of it, I loved it, the first three hours could have been truncated a bit. But what you do because every country has to have its moment in the sun. And we're going to talk about politics, Roy, the political moment, the only political issue that really two political issues arose. And when I was glad to see that Donald Trump Jr and the National Front, the last Somalum National attacked it because of what they call the sort of anti -Christian element of the, you know, satirizing the last supper, which is utter nonsense. They completely misunderstood what it was about.

37:56So we don't need to worry about them. The other political moment was when they got the wrong career. That's something to be avoided. That is to be avoided. And Willie Bach, who is the, shows you how political they are, Willie Bach, who is the head of the Olympics, the IOC, he actually had a meeting with the South Korean president to apologize for the fact that they mistook North and South Korea. There was a worse example of that in London, 2012, by the way. I don't even know this, Roy, because you probably weren't following sport quite as closely as you now do with my indoctrination. But there was in the football in London, 2012, there was a game played at Hamden Park in Glasgow, where South Korea were playing, but they played the North Korean national anthem.

38:37So that was even worse because that's forcing people. That's forcing it to be done, listen to your mortal enemies, national anthem. So that was, that was a bit tricky. But listen, it's going in France, it's going unbelievably well. They're winning quite a few medals. Just go back to this phenomenon though. So this was set up, the Olympics by a guy called Pierre de Koubertan, who's a French baron in the late, late 1800s. And he was really excited and inspired by the ancient Olympic games that, that happened in Greece and that ran for an incredibly long period from about 700 BC through to about 200 AD.

39:11And he was a Frenchman who was absolutely obsessed, unlike you, Alistair, with British private schools. He loved the fact that kind of British boarding schools produced these kind of muscular Christians. That's what he loved. No, Rory, I am obsessed with British private school. I share the obsession. It's just that I think they should be shot. Anyway, what he thought is that he could set up a games which would celebrate these kind of amazing Anglo -Saxon virtues of sportsmanship and healthy robust people. Getting out, he thought the French spent too much time studying books and not enough time being healthy and robust.

39:51And it was really a kind of slightly, well, like anything that you set up, initially, very difficult to be certain he could get it off the ground. Like the praise for this man, I mean, imagine if you were right, suddenly decided to try come up something of this scale. He did everything he could. He got a lot of very famous celebrities to endorse him. But the first two or three Olympics were a bit touch and go because it turned out, of course, they were unbelievably expensive. Lots of countries couldn't be bothered to turn up. The only way he could finance ministry was by tying them to these world exhibitions or world fairs and a slightly embarrassing way.

40:27So number three was in Lewis in Missouri for their world fair. And they insisted on stretching it out over about nine months. And it was completely unclear to most competitors whether they'd even won an Olympic medal or some other kind of medal called a World Fair. Some of them died without ever being aware they'd won an Olympic gold medal. And so, and he, of course, had problems. He was pretty opposed to women's participation. And this continued to be a theme right where through the 1940s, they were happy for women to do things like fencing, but they didn't want them to do things like shot putting.

41:01There was a long tradition through to the 30s where there was also awards for literary achievement at the Olympic Games. And town planning, you could get a gold medal in a Olympic town. I think I think I think Brynn Mons got a medal in town planning. Very good. Now, then we come into the modern day. And I guess the Olympics that we all remember are, I suppose, 1972, which was the Munich Olympics with the massacre of Israeli athletes. 1988, Ben Johnson doping, a 2002 sort like city, bribery, 2016, Rio corruption. And a sense, I think that the Olympics, this is my challenge to you where I'm going to sort of hand back to you.

41:42Though I don't think about the Olympics, there's not quite keeping up with the change in the world. We often talk about the fact that back in the 1970s, the G7 were 70 % of the world economy. And now the bricks are about the same size. So Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, the Olympics is not quite showing that change. So despite the fact that we weren't sore like city Athens, China got it in 2008, which you would have thought was the beginning of the new world of shifting away from the West. But it was then London 2012, Rio 2016, I guess, which is more bricks, but then Japan 2020 Paris 2024, US Los Angeles 2028, and Australia 2032.

42:19I mean, this is even worse than the permanent security council, isn't it? Well, a London Paris and next time Los Angeles will be the three cities that have had it three times. And it is such a big thing. I mean, look, when you look at the programme for the Olympic Games, I was just reading through it last night, when you look through the programme to pack this much into two weeks is absolutely extraordinary and very, very, very few cities can do it effectively. You're right, though, about the way that it's grown. The way it's grown is absolutely phenomenal. My favourite political story, I must tell you, Rory, goes back to Athens 1906.

42:56This was generated by the name of Peter O 'Connor. And that was the second second Athens Olympic. Second Athens, right? And this is a guy called Peter O 'Connor. He was Irish, but he gets to Athens and discovers that because Ireland doesn't have its own Olympic committee, he's not so allowed to represent Ireland. So this guy is still part of Great Britain, right? Yes, he's likely. Exactly. But he's not. He doesn't consider that, Rory. You know the history of this, don't you? You know, there's a deep history to this. So he's basically, so he's just for listless. Wait, wait, wait, wait, I just want to put, but before he tells the story, just for listless, in context, this is a good 16 years before Irish independence.

43:35So this is somebody who passionately believes in Irish independence, but it's a time when Ireland is fully part of the United Kingdom. So he is having to compete in the UK team and he's supposed to be wearing UK colours and blah, blah, blah. And he does. He does, he does, because the only way he can compete is to represent Great Britain. He does compete. And in his first event, he wins a silver medal. During the winners ceremony where they're presenting the medals, he removes from his kit an Irish flag and such a great athlete is he climbs the flag pole and he waves the Irish flag. And that is the wonderful way to celebrate.

44:15Amazing. He shins, shins 20 feet up in the air, doesn't he? Correct. And the Brits, of course, were absolutely furious, but it was an amazing propaganda for Irish independence. And he then went on to win a gold where he stayed, he just took the medal and went home after that. I'm not sure you're right about the way that they reflect things. So Antwerp 1920, lots of countries were banned from taking part because of the outcome of the First World War, Austria, Bulgaria, Germany, Hungary, they weren't allowed there. Soviet Union decided not to bother. The most famous political one probably is 1936 with this engine about the Olympic process.

44:53So Berlin, you mentioned that Australia is going to get them in 2032, whatever it is. Berlin was chosen in 1931 to reach the 1936 games. 1933 comes around and the Nazis are in power. And the efforts that the IOC had to go to to stop them using it even more than they did. Even so, lots of countries boycotted because of what the Nazis then represented, 49 countries attended. The IOC did insist, by the way, that there had to be at least one Jewish athlete on the German team. And somebody called Helena Meyer, we represent them as fencing, in fencing. And of course, Hitler's massive propaganda efforts were defeated really by Jesse Owens because he won four gold medals and he was black.

45:39And that being a black athlete, he was the most successful athlete in the games meant that it wasn't, you know, you can hardly say this is all about Aryan superiority. I think also before we get too smug about this, I believe it's true that FDR rose out the great American hero refused to receive Jesse Owens and shake his hand in the White House after he came back that racism was so embedded in American society as well. Wow, really? I didn't know that. German society at the time, yeah. Then you got the war. Here's one already, London 1948. That was the first athlete to defect from communism was a Czech gymnast by the name of Marie Provasnikova.

46:21She defected during London. Melbourne 1956, lots of boycotts. Mexico 1968, there was the, you know, you had the black power protests there. But the other thing that happened there, and here's a really interesting question. Do you think the Mexican army killed over 200 protesters and injured over a thousand when there was a protest in advance of the games about the student staged a protest because they didn't like the funding because it had led to social programs being cut. 200 protesters got killed. Do you think in a modern day, if an Olympic city killed 200 protesters shortly before the games that those games would go ahead?

47:03I'm not so sure. I'm not sure. I didn't know. But of course, remember, there were these huge questions around what Beijing tried to do to get ready for 2008 and all the attempts to hide a lot of the abuses and things. I mean, there's a book that I've been reading about the way that power and politics plays into all these Olympics. My favorite guy just to finish is Jim Thorpe, who's this amazing American athlete from the 1912 Stockholm Olympics. The absolute perfect, all -rounder, extraordinary native American who was a star football player, baseball player, who managed to win gold in both the pentathlon and the decathlon, and then had his medals stripped because he'd managed to take a small amount of money for, I think, an exhibition basketball match.

47:46And was therefore considered not an amateur. Not an amateur. And finally, God has medals back. His family got back in 1988 after he died. You say he was a native American? Native American, yeah. So I think politics can, a lot of the games, there are big political issues playing. I mean, obviously the Moscow boycott by America and then the Russians didn't go to Los Angeles and all that sort of thing. But if you look at Sydney, Sydney 2000, and Australia, massive sporting country. So Kathy Freeman was chosen to light the Olympic flame in Sydney. And that was a huge moment. And essentially, you sensed it was Australia trying to reconcile its history.

48:25And then, you know, 10 days later, she wins a gold medal in the 400 meters. And yet, 20 odd years later, they have the referendum on the voice. And you understand sometimes sport can sort of give you that sense of forward momentum, but it doesn't necessarily, doesn't necessarily last. And I think from our own games, the last time we had them in 2012, I do think it was the last time the country really felt kind of powerful and united. And I sort of feel the lot of that has dissipated. And partly, I think it's because we didn't necessarily cement the sporting legacy. Of course, the other thing was you mentioned with all about politics is that the Paralympic Games, which come a couple of weeks after the Olympic Games themselves, is that what the Paralympic Games have done to change attitudes and change policies around the world in relation to disability is absolutely brilliant.

49:13So anybody who says politics and sport don't make, sometimes they mix together very, very well. Let's finish on Bangladesh. So often in the podcast, we will introduce people to a country and an election. And then we won't necessarily follow up on what happens next. So to remind people, Bangladesh was a country that broke away from Pakistan in the 1970s, was famously described as a development basket case, one of poorest countries in the world, horrible flooding, went through periods of military rule and coup, became a democracy in the 1990s. And there was proper, peaceful exchange of government back and forth between the two main parties.

49:51Until 15 years ago, Sheikh Hasina, who runs the Awami League and who's the daughter of the great independence hero of Bangladesh, took over, female head of state, secular Muslim, been good at balancing India and China, taken millions out of poverty. There was a moment when the Bangladesh economy looked like it was, it was delivering GDP per capita better than India, amazing progress, the garment industry. But as we pointed out, has become more and more authoritarian. So 20 ,000 members of the opposition facing court cases and an election, which was boycotted by the opposition, which Sheikh Hasina walked, bringing her in effectively now as an authoritarian ruler, democracy is finished in this very large country, very important country, Bangladesh, and now over to you on what's happened recently.

50:34Yeah, I mean, the reason we're talking about it is because there have been these big protests that have been going on in recent weeks over job quotas, essentially that there was preferential treatment government imposed quotas, given to people that they've protest to say, essentially, is a scam to give jobs to people in who've supported their supported party. And it led to a lot of violence, 193 people killed, several police officers among them. And the UN Human Rights Chief, I call Volkerturk, he has been protesting as loudly as he can and been asking for great transparency about what's happened to a lot of people who've gone missing.

51:11The protests have subsided a little bit after the Supreme Court scrapped the quotas. Now, is that a sign of protest working, or is that a sign of protest that actually has failed because ultimately, you know, the protests have happened, but 193 people killed. And of course, this followed the election, as you say, where she won, yet another term with a very, very low turnout, because as you say, the opposition had boycotted it, over a thousand people injured last week. And another thing that Tuhaq has been asking for is to demand why people would deny medical care to journalists killed. So, you know, pretty horrific set of circumstances.

51:50She then made a visit, Shea Kucena made a visit to some of the people who have been affected by this, and she was filmed crying. So, what her critics were saying was that the tears were all because of a big piece of infrastructure that come crashing down in the riots, as opposed to the fact that they're all these people dead. On the parliament after the election Roy, the biggest, you talked about the independence that are in the UK parliament. The current opposition secured only 11 out of the 300 parliamentary seats, whereas independent candidate secured 63 seats. So, I mean, it's just, you just feel, as you said earlier, a country that felt like it was going in a pretty good direction democratically, now in a pretty bad way.

52:27Yeah. And the eighth most popular country in the world, so if countries, you know, if the G8 were done on population, Bangladesh should be right up there, 160 million people. And it's going to be an increasingly important security and economic player in the world. So, I think something we should keep coming back to, because it's right there as perhaps the kind of most dramatic symbol of countries that seemed in the 90s to be going in a positive democratic direction, have lurged back to authoritarianism, rulers trying to hold on by delivering economic benefits to people, and now facing inflation, cost living problems, unemployment problems, can they hold on?

53:06And of course, in some places, Iran, for example, my goodness, they can hold on. They can hold on for decades, but definitely worth coming back to Bangladesh. Thank you for raising it. And we should also close off, maybe a little bit, because we discussed last week Venezuela, Venezuela where the opinion poll suggested that Maduro was going to lose and hey, how the elections have happened and his friends at the electoral authorities announced that he's won, which reminded me of a situation at the elections in Bangladesh when Al Jazeera, they had seen a dashboard on the headquarters of the electoral commission suggesting that turnout was 28%, and then lo and behold, a bit later, it was up to 40%, and likewise, I suspect within what's going on in Venezuela, it's very, very hard to imagine.

53:52Nobody outside the Venezuelan ruling party seems to be believing the outcome of the election there. Yeah, and there's a quite a good New York Times article, which you can share, but there are a dozen different ways in which Maduro stole the vote. Some of them, just to do, were not handing out ballot papers in the right place, someone to do with controls and media. I mean, it isn't all about stuffing ballots. If you get into the mechanics of how people steal elections, there are lots of sort of cunning ways of tipping things in your direction, but a tragedy for Venezuela because it looks like, for the moment, another six years in Maduro, which just brings me to a small tribute to my friend, James C.

54:28Scott, who you would have loved. He was a Yale political scientist who began his working life as a pretty radical anthropologist in Malaysia. He wrote a book that we've recommended on the podcast called Seeing Like a State with a subtitle, How Certain Schemes To Improve The Human Condition Have Failed. Looking at kind of crazy ideas of central government from ground nuts and towns near to Prussian forestry. He's a beautiful funny writer. I was lucky enough to be able to infume on my BBC series on ignorance just before he died. He lived in an amazing farm driving a really crap -toupled tractor on the outskirts of Canoica.

55:09And it's a huge loss to anthropology and political science. Brave, funny, provocative, so very sad that he's gone. And thank you, for joining us today. See you soon. See you. Bye -bye.

From the publisher

Is Labour planning austerity 2.0? Who is in the running to be the next Conservative leader? Should politics play a role at the Olympics?

Join Rory and Alastair as they answer all this and more on today's episode of The Rest Is Politics.

TRIP Plus:
Become a member of The Rest Is Politics Plus to support the podcast, receive our exclusive newsletter, enjoy ad-free listening to both TRIP and Leading, benefit from discount book prices on titles mentioned on the pod, join our Discord chatroom, and receive early access to live show tickets and Question Time episodes.
Just head to therestispolitics.com to sign up, or start a free trial today on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/therestispolitics.

TRIP UK TOUR:
To buy tickets for our October Tour, just head to www.therestispolitics.com

🌏 Get our exclusive NordVPN deal here ➼ https://nordvpn.com/restispolitics It’s risk-free with Nord’s 30-day money-back guarantee! ✅

Instagram:
@restispolitics
Twitter:
@RestIsPolitics
Email:
restispolitics@gmail.com

Video Editor: Teo Ayodeji-Ansell

Assistant Producer: India Dunkley

Social Producer: Jess Kidson

Producer: Fiona Douglas

Producer: Nicole Maslen

Senior Producer: Dom Johnson

Head of Content: Tom Whiter

Exec Producers: Tony Pastor + Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics

All 501 episodes
294. Labour’s defining moment and the next Tory leaderThe Rest Is Politics · 57 min
Listen in VO