In short
Podcast Summary: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 295
Episode Details
- Title: 295. Question Time: Israel vs. Hezbollah, legalising cannabis, and Kamala Harris' Middle East strategy
- Hosts: Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart
- Description: In this episode, Campbell and Stewart address pressing international topics, particularly focusing on escalating tensions in the Middle East and domestic policy discussions in the UK.
Key Topics and Discussions
- Israel vs. Hezbollah
- Recent Events:
- Discussion of a drone strike on the Golan Heights that resulted in the deaths of 12 people, predominantly children.
- Israel's military actions leading to significant tensions with Hezbollah.
- The strategic importance of the Golan Heights, originally part of Syria, now under Israeli control since the 1967 war.
- Potential Consequences:
- Concerns over the possibility of a full-scale war between Israel and Hezbollah.
- The role of Iran in supporting Hezbollah and its ramifications for regional stability.
- The immediate response from international leaders urging restraint to prevent further escalation.
- Kamala Harris' Middle East Strategy
- Comparison with Trump:
- Discussion on whether Harris' approach to the Middle East differs from that of former President Trump.
- Notable shifts in rhetoric from Vice President Harris advocating for humanitarian considerations regarding Palestinians, diverging slightly from Biden's stance.
- Political Implications:
- Analysis of how public perception and polling may influence Harris' strategies moving forward, particularly among younger, more progressive voters.
- Legalising Cannabis in the UK
- Current State of Medical Cannabis:
- A medical cannabis patient shares experiences of navigating the flawed UK system.
- Discussion on challenges including high prices, stock issues, and limited prescriptions leading to unmet medical needs.
- Broader Context:
- The notion that simply changing laws (like legalising cannabis) does not ensure effective implementation; the 'devil is in the details.'
- Consideration of the need for various medical advancements, especially in pediatric medicine and chronic conditions like migraines.
- Suspension of Labour MPs
- Context of Suspension:
- Discussion on the suspension of seven Labour MPs for voting against the two-child benefit cap.
- The implications for representation and how suspensions may affect constituents.
- Party Dynamics:
- Rory Stewart suggests this reflects Keir Starmer's attempt to assert authority in a more authoritarian manner than previous leaders.
- Historical context provided regarding rebellions within the Labour Party and how discipline has changed under Starmer's leadership.
- Authenticity in Political Communication
- Finding Balance:
- A question posed about how politicians can express their beliefs while managing public expectations.
- Importance of authenticity and personal touch in political messaging, avoiding robotic communication styles.
- Examples and Strategies:
- Discussion of how to navigate difficult questions while remaining true to personal beliefs, utilizing real-life examples from their experiences.
Key Takeaways
- Middle East Tensions: The situation remains volatile, with potential for escalation between Israel and Hezbollah due to recent military actions.
- Impact of Leadership: Harris' evolving stance may reflect broader shifts in public sentiment regarding U.S. involvement in the Middle East.
- Cannabis Legislation Challenges: Effective policy changes require careful implementation to address practical challenges faced by users.
- Political Discipline in Labour: Starmer's leadership style and the implications of suspending MPs indicate a shift in party discipline dynamics.
- Authenticity in Politics: Effective political communication hinges on balancing personal beliefs with audience expectations, fostering genuine connections with constituents.
Conclusion This episode of *The Rest Is Politics* offers a thought-provoking analysis of significant political issues, emphasizing the complexities and intricacies of both international relations and domestic governance. The discussions highlight the importance of nuanced perspectives and the evolving nature of public policy.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Thanks for listening to The Restus Politics. Sign up to The Restus Politics plus to enjoy ad -free listening and receive a weekly newsletter. Join our members' chat room and gain early access to live show tickets. Just go to TheRestusPolitics .com. That's TheRestusPolitics .com. Hi there, it's Alistair here. And in these fast -moving times, I just wanted to preface this week's Q &A by saying that though we focus in large part on the Middle East and in particular the death of 12 young people in the Golan Heights, hit by rocket fire from Lebanon to huge Adriatic events have taken place since we recorded on Monday.
0:32First, Israel announced that it killed a top Hizbola commander, Fouad Shukha, in an air strike on a southern suburb of the Lebanese capital Beirut. And second, even more dramatically, in a strike in Tehran, the capital of Iran, Hamas leader Ismail Hinai has also been killed. We've talked about him on the podcast before. He has been right at the top of the list of people Israel wanted to take out as part of their efforts to destroy Hamas, following the October 7 attacks. As to the consequences, that remains unclear, but it all goes to underline something we are going to discuss here, just how hard it will be for the US and its allies to achieve their stated goal of preventing the Israel Guards of War from spreading.
1:16So so much of this being the so -called silly season, where nothing much is supposed to happen, and of course closer to home, the horrifying, murderous knife assault in Southport, and the disgusting exploitation of it, to stoke hate, violence and attacks on the police. Doubtless will talk about that and more next week, but for now, here's this week's Q &A.
1:45Welcome to the restless politics question time with me, Alastair Campbell, and Mirari Stewart. And we said in the main episode that we would take a look at events in the Middle East in question time. So let's start with this one from Mark. Will the attack on the Golan Heights push Israel and Hezbollah into war? Well, they've already been to some extent fighting for a long, long time. I guess what Mark means is whether the attack the other night, the drone strike on the football field in which 12 mainly children were killed, whether that pushes this into a much more dangerous place. Let's do a little background on this.
2:18So the Golan Heights were originally part of Syria, and they were a part of Syria, which Israel took in the 1967 war. They're just next to the Sea of Galilee. They're an area actually that I was visiting just last year, and you can see still the Syrian trenches and encampments, and then the military, Israeli military positions laid over the top. It's a commanding position. You can see Damascus when you get to the top, and you can see why it's incredibly tactically vital, because when Syria controlled it, Israeli settlements on the edge of the Sea of Galilee were very vulnerable to it, and of course when Israel controls it, Syrian settlements were very vulnerable to it, and under international law, of course, this is a part that still belongs to Syria.
3:01It's under Israeli occupation. Hezbollah, we've described before, as a group, very powerful group, more powerful than Hamas located in Lebanon, where they effectively control a lot of the Lebanese government and are supported and financed by Iran. They have, to some extent, held back from getting fully involved in the conflict after the October, after the October Hamas attacks, but their rockets led to the Israelis having to relocate over 100 ,000 people who were up near the Syrian border, and people had been killed already, and that was already a big problem in Israeli politics, which is the sense of huge numbers of refugees and people being killed.
3:42But as you say, it's this latest event where a Hezbollah rocket attack has killed a dozen people that has really up to the ante, particularly given, as we were saying, two weeks ago, that parts of the Israeli government and Israeli society have been pushing for an attack on Hezbollah in Lebanon for a long time. What it did was somebody called Sarah Copsie, who are the Jews, so these were part of the Jews, which is an Arab sect, essentially, of around about a million people who mainly live between Israel, Lebanon, and Syria. There are about 20 ,000 of them living in the Golan Heights, and they are, although some of them serve in the Israeli militaries, I understand it, they have Israeli residency cards, but are not necessarily viewed as full Israeli citizens.
4:23The Jews became very relevant during the Lebanese Civil War, so as Lebanon disintegrated from 1980, which is why the local block and grief my hometown was traditionally known as Beirut, because when people were, when there was violence in the early 1980s, Beirut was the great symbol of violence. Sorry, sorry, Roy, you completely lost me here. Creep Beirut, I've lost the leg. Yeah, so I'm trying to point to the fact that in the early 1980s, Lebanon, Beirut was such a symbol of civil war and violence, that the slightly rough housing block built on the edge of grief in the early 1980s when things were getting a bit dicey around there, that it was then named Beirut, because this was seen as the kind of the great symbol I suppose at the time of violence.
5:06A name by whom all the posh people out there are states? No, no, no, I didn't think the posh people, no, I think I was a joke from within grief from within the housing of states of grief itself. So in the civil war, Lebanon, which is very, very religiously complicated, has a big Shia community, which is where Hisbalar is drawn from, a big Sunni community, a big Alloite community, and a big Druze community, and two different Christian communities. So an Orthodox Christian community, a Catholic Christian community, found itself dragged into civil war, and as Israel intervened in an ounce of Lebanon in the 1980s, many of the Druze found themselves on sides backed by Israel, and that's why some of these Druze ended up in Israel itself.
5:51And these are, there's a wonderful book by Gerard Russell, who we've talked about on the show before, who's written a book on the minority religions of the Middle East. They are completely fascinating. The Druze, the Alloite, the Yazidis, the Samaritans, these are religious groups which have roots back almost into the old testament. And some of them describe themselves as Muslims, some of them describe themselves as Christians, some of them don't really describe themselves as either. And many of their beliefs are esoteric. In other words, they don't reveal to the outside world what exactly their practices and beliefs are.
6:22I really, really hope I don't get any facts from because Gerard, I remember when he worked for me in Downey Street, is an absolute stickler. But I think I'm right in saying that the Druze don't allow marriage to people outside the Druze, and they don't allow converts, is that right? I think that probably would be right. A lot of these groups are very, very thematically sealed. But it's of course, not that uncommon. I mean, if you're a Muslim getting married, you'd expect your partner to convert to Islam. Yeah, but I understand with the Druze, you can't even do that. The other thing that was interesting was because this was such a big deal, Netanyahu cut shorties visit to America, a number of ministers went to the seat, including Smotrich, who was the hard right part of Netanyahu's very fragile coalition, and was given a very, very hard time by the people at the funeral of these children, essentially saying you never showed up when we've had problems before.
7:14What's all this about? So I think on the point about what you see from the diplomacy, led by the United States, Anthony Blinken was out there straight away. I saw David Lamy saying similar things, the French saying similar things, European Union saying similar things, essentially pleading with both sides not to allow this to escalate. Because I think I'm right, the Hezbollah has the biggest army in the world that is not run by a state. Well, over 25 ,000 trained people, and very, very many veterans because they were dominant in the Syria war. They are of all these Iranian proxies much more powerful than who the Hamas, all the militia groups in Iraq and Syria.
7:51He has a very significant group. And I think the fear there was that along with deep feeling of compassion towards these innocent people killed by the rockets was this fear that Israel has been building up, a justification for an attack on Lebanon for a long time. And so for Blinken and others, the fear was that this event would become the trigger that was used to justify that invasion. Another question here from Martin Lewis, is there a difference between the Middle East strategy of Joe Biden and Vice President Harris? Did you see, Brori, we're going to have to get an agreement on how to pronounce her first name.
8:26Either we call her Vice President Harris all the time, or we have to agree, because I got I got lots of messages saying that you pronounce it correctly, but I pronounce it incorrectly, but I thought I was pronounced it the same way as you, which is Kamala. So this is the great thing that's tripping up all the Brits and I keep talking to my wife about it who calls American. So what all the explainer says is that you have to pronounce it like Kamala. Kamala, these are Americans. Exactly. They say Kaba. Exactly. So it's Shashana's conclusion is that somewhere between an O and an A, then that's also interesting because of course it's a Hindi name that she was given by her mother.
9:03So again, there'll be a question of how it would have been pronounced by her mother, which I imagine would be different again. Do you think there's something a bit sexist in the fact that we have this urge to call her by her first name, rather than Harris or Biden or Trump or Suellac? But then vice president Harris. Okay. Okay. Until she comes on the podcast where we'll say please welcome vice president Kamala or president by that, hopefully. So anyway, the question was whether there's a difference in strategy. I thought her comments in the wake of her meeting with Netanyahu. So people will know Netanyahu went to Washington.
9:37He spoke to both thousands of Congress. I think it's the fourth time that he's done it. Fair number of Democrats didn't turn up, including Nancy Pelosi. You just thought that he shouldn't have been given the invitation, but she did seem to have gone from her from yes and how I would put it is that Joe Biden was yes and and vice president Harris seems to me to be more yes but I think that's possible. She's so difficult to read still there and there's been fascinating reporting on the fact that compared to Obama who by this stage in the electoral cycle, in other words, the July before his 2008 election was doing three events today.
10:13She still seems to be sticking to present Biden's pre -plan schedule, which was pretty modest because of his age. We haven't seen her out and about that much. She's still the incredible rise, you know, and she's now seems to be level pegging with Donald Trump and she's put 10 points on in her popularity is still largely a social media -driven thing. And I'm seeing bits of this because Shashana was invited by her friends at university to join a Zoom call, which I think broke the internet. I think they got two and a half million women on this Zoom call in favor of vice president Harris. So there's something quite remarkable going on, but she herself, vice president Harris, remains a bit of a mystery.
10:55We're still not fully seeing what she believes in and where she's going. But I did think on that that there was an emphasis from her on the need to help Palestinians who'd been very, very badly at by this war. I felt that she moved away in rhetoric, if not in the substance, a little bit from the Biden position. And I wonder whether one of the things that they've been reading is the fact that one of the reasons Joe Biden's popularity had fallen somewhat was actually because they felt he was just far too close to Israel. And Netanyahu, for all that he's a survivor, you know, we talk a lot about leaders' ratings.
11:30I mean, he's a right down there right now. And I suspect that will be with a lot of Americans as well as with Israelis. Well, she may also be looking at the polls, which suggests that she's doing much better than Joe Biden was doing with younger voters and Hispanic voters. And she's doing worse than Joe Biden with older voters and white voters. So and the younger voters tend to be more progressive. So we may see her leaning into that base. But final thing on this just to be wary of when we talk about vice president Harris is that we've got to remember that at this stage going into the elections, a jukakis was running against George W.
12:09Bush, a George H. W. Bush, sorry, he was 18 points ahead at the stage and he still managed to lose the election dramatically. He had one of those absolute horror moments in a TV debate, didn't they? When he was he was told about being against the death penalty and he was asked what he would do with, I think the question was somebody raped and murdered his wife. It was one of those awful sort of really shit you between the eyes. And he just went into a kind of sort of very technocratic exmenation and people just look, wait a minute, this guy's really not got it. You're just complete lacking in empathy.
12:40It connects with the Alistair great theory, which is never to overly believe the polls because the fact that you can have an 18 point lead in July and then lose the election is a real reminder that whatever the polls are showing now, things can change it a lot. Yeah, yeah. Now Rory, here's one that I wanted to come back to, Nancy Hillingdon, a week on from the just stop oil sentences, what are your thoughts now? And this is a really interesting example. So we get thousands of questions, okay? And we sometimes have a little chat beforehand, but quite often we don't, because we don't have time and we haven't read them and the producer please loads and we beat them.
13:11And you said to me last week, what's your instinctive reaction to these just stop oil protesters being sent down for five years and four years? And I said my instinctive reaction was that I thought it sounded very, very harsh and particularly at the time when we rightly are thinking that our prisons are a complete state and overcrowding, et cetera. And then a couple of baristas posted something, well, I think they were trying to be helpful. They said, look, you might want to read the judgment. So I went to often read the judgment and I have to say it did change my mind. What did you think reading the judgment?
13:40What I felt from reading the judgment is I hadn't quite realized just how big the operations were that they were engaged in and planning. I hadn't realized the record of some of them. I hadn't realized their behavior in court, where the judge was clearly not having loved at all. And I guess I hadn't realized the extent to which they basically thought that it didn't kind of matter, you know, they've gone from being, what the judge, but how the judge put it, they've gone from being legitimate protesters to absolute fanatics who could not accept that any BLs might have a reasonable opinion. When he listed all of the different people who had been affected, people get into hospital or people visiting their elderly parents and tying all this sort of stuff that, you know, you just don't necessarily think about.
14:24Now then I thought, well, hold on a minute, am I being sort of, am I being played here? Should I now go off and read every judgment that those judges ever made to see whether he kind of doesn't like the planet? But he did make a point of saying that he believed in man -made climate change and that he was a genuine crisis. But anyway, I can't remember the name of the barista who sent it to me, but I'm grateful that he did. And it was fascinating how exercised a group of people got. The very interesting example of, and I'm always reminded this on Twitter because it happens to politicians all the time and what happened to me in nine years in politics all the time.
14:57Suddenly, there is a flurry of, I guess, there were maybe half a dozen people attacking what we'd said about the judgment. I instantly still think it was too harsh. I still think that, but I think it was right there went to jail. Just to put it in context, right? Four -year sentences is being given to people, conducting some pretty horrible nasty robberies that involve trapping in people's houses, threatening them. And the judge has more latitude. And the baristas were running, he had no choice under the law. That's simply not true. Judges still, in almost every case, have much more latitude. However, that said, I suspect if we were to do a poll of our listeners, most of our listeners would still think that a four -year sentence for threatening to disrupt a motorway is too long.
15:42I still think on balance, the sentence was too harsh, but I definitely was moved from a place of this is over the top two. I completely get why they went to jail. Now, Rory Patrick wants to know this. I've asked this question a few times now. Please can you discuss the further legalisation of cannabis in the UK? I've been a medical cannabis patient since 2023 as I have an acquired brain injury and it is a fantastic life -changing service. Medical cannabis is currently leading the UK just, but the system is flawed and unreliable. There are many legal loopholes which cause stock issues, medication delays, other issues.
16:16On top of this, patients have to pay high prices when in some cases no other medication works. Now, again, at the risk of being completely ignorant, I am broadly in favour of Patrick having access to cannabis for medical treatment. Well, my sense is he's expressed the situation very well, which is something we see again and again in politics, which is it's all very well changing the law, but the problem is the devil's in the detail and how it's implemented. Those things he's talking about, stock issues, pricing issues, quality issues, supply issues, become very, very relevant. This is true with so many of the things.
16:54It's a perpetual world and I think the Labour government will find this again and again. They will be lobbied to change the law. They'll bring in a new law. They'll hope that they fix the problem and then not very long afterwards. People will come back and say, well, you think you fix the problem, but there's all these other things which aren't anything to do with the law, which are beginning to get in the way of us, actually getting in this case, our medicine. So, it was reclassified in 2018. Doctors are allowed to prescribe it under certain controls, but it's actually not being prescribed very widely at all.
17:26Clinical trials not been funded. So, it's still not with narcotic and it has to be regulated as a medicine. So, I think you're right. I think it's one of those issues where you think, yeah, that seems pretty sensible, but there are all sorts of tricky issues that flow from it. So, Patrick, I'm with you and I think from the sound of it, we're always half with you. The other thing he's got me going on is this question of what people choose to research and what they don't and where the focus is. I'm really interested because I hadn't realised, for example, that children's medicine is often not a big priority for pharmaceutical firms and the manufacturers of medical equipment.
18:01It's apparently particularly in the US, it's not where you make your money. So, there haven't been as many advances in pediatric stuff as you would have thought. And pediatric doctors in the US continue to be strangely underpaid. You would have thought people would be absolutely desperate when their children were ill. Actually, it's one of the only cases where US doctors were almost earning the same as British doctors. Then there were two other things I've come across. One of them, I'm a migraine sufferer and I'm now getting very, very regular, very unpleasant migraines. And although there's been a breakthrough with a class of drugs called triptans and there's a lot of people with migraines in the UK, probably one and a half million people.
18:36Again, for some reason, the pharmaceutical companies have never quite decided, nor is the NHS, that this is a number one priority. Some people say that this is a gendered, that traditionally it's quite chauvinistic, traditionally migraines are seen as something that women suffer from because it's a headache and it doesn't kill you. The doctors who are like, it's not that serious and you don't worry about it. So my life is pretty blighted by this and other people much worse. They can be knocked out for, you know, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten days a month with blinding headaches and orders and unable to function dark room.
19:09Final one, just in case some billionaires this seems to show and wants to do something to really change the world. My father was very deaf and the advances in hearing aids are nothing like what she would expect in a world of technological revolution. What you'll find if you begin losing your hearing is that there are hearing aid companies selling these things for six, seven thousand pounds and they're always claiming that this is the latest generation. It's much better. My father spent a fortune getting these things and now my father and Laura is being made spend thousands of dollars getting these things and they're always told that they're smarter than they've ever been and you go into labs.
19:43But the reality is we still have not fixed how to deal with it and consequently older people end up in a very, very lonely situation where they don't hear what people say, they ask people to repeat themselves, people get angry with them, they go to cocktail parties, they've got no idea what's happening, they're with their families, they've got no, it's very isolating. So something in error is listening, put the money behind technology for hearing aids because it'll make a difference to, you know, literally billions of people around the world but it's just not, it's not sexy. I'd love to know how many billionaires listen, I suspect Elon Musk isn't one of them after I said last week that he was a much bigger dick than Nick Clay but he's showing that several times again since some of his reposting of his own stuff on X's absurd, they must be horrible, I've had headaches, I've seen you when you've had a nightmare, but I find it quite useful because whenever you lose your rag with our guests on leading, I always say afterwards, oh, we had a bit of a week ready, it's fine.
20:34I find the JB Rubin, Jonathan Powell, David Davis upcoming, people can look forward to that one, very enjoyable, very enjoyable. And beginning to notice a pattern, they're usually friends of yours who are winding me up as far as I can see. Generally, I think you're old mates, I'm now beginning to wonder whether the thing isn't because they're friends of yours, you're letting me do the aggressive challenging which you're not doing. No, let's have a quick break.
21:04This isn't ad from BetterHelp. At the moment, we're getting advice from everywhere. You just have to go on TikTok, could be Alice's cold plunges, could be my attempts to meditate or the digital detox that I'm doing in Colombia. But of course, one of the things that we know is that it can be incredibly valuable to talk to another human being, somebody who's actually been trained as a therapist to work through these ideas calmly, objectively and professionally. And as the largest online therapy provider in the world, BetterHelp can provide access to mental health professionals with a very diverse variety of expertise.
21:40They've got over 5 ,000 therapists in the UK. They've helped more than five million people globally and you can join a session literally at the click of a button. Change therapists anytime. It's obviously not about fixing you, but it's about hearing yourself clearly, maybe for the first time. So talk it out with BetterHelp. Our listeners get 10 % of their first month at BetterHelp .com -restpolitics. That's better -h -e -l -p .com -restpolitics. Right now, with the Home Depot, you'll find storage solutions made to fit your needs. Grab an HDX tough tilt to protect your tools, or keep your sports equipment contained with reinforced snap -fit lids, or stack up and make better use of your space with bins and totes built to last.
22:28Whatever your story, we've got the gear to keep it organized and protected at the Home Depot. How doers get more done?
22:44Here we are, Jettendercance. In the light of seven labour MPs being suspended for voting against the two -char benefit cap, what does this mean in practice? Does that mean their constituents and no longer represent it? Do the weekly surgeries still go ahead? If a constituents' issue needs to be brought up in Parliament, is that recourse not available for the durations suspension? So quickly on that, none of that's true. You still remain a member of Parliament. You can't be thrown out of Parliament, but if the party takes the whip away and there's an election, you can't run as the candidate. So this happened to me.
23:16I was suspended by Boris Johnson for voting to try to block a hard Brexit along with 20 other colleagues, and he then triggered an election in which, unless we were prepared to apologise, change our position, appear publicly endorsing Boris Johnson, we weren't allowed to run in the election. And this is, effectively, what happened to Jeremy Corbyn. So he was a lost the whip because of the controversies around antisemitism of the Labour Party, a real antisemitism of Labour Party, but I think questions about the extent to which Jeremy Corbyn himself was antisemitic or whether there was just antisemitism out in the Labour Party.
23:50He was presiding over and somehow had created an environment full. So he was suspended, and he then ran, of course, as an independent and has been elected in Parliament, along with some very interesting other independence that we should talk about at some point. But now that group is now up to nearly 14 people. And as Jeremy Corbyn says, by the time you're 14 people in the House of Commons, you can begin creating quite a lot of trouble. That said, he's three times as many as there are reform party MPs. What was your take on the suspension? So this was an SNP amendment to the King's speech and Labour made clear in advance that if people voted with the SNP on this amendment, they would lose the whip.
Read the full transcript
24:29I think this is pretty brutal because this is part of a pattern of Kierstammer's setting his authority in a pretty authoritarian way. He's got quite a small court around him. It's very much his way or the highway. This was not normal in Parliament before. So when I was in, there were many, many occasions on which MPs in the Conservative Party voted against streamline whips. Including on the King's speech? Yeah, there was there was a rebellion, for example, famous around VAT on pasties, which came off the back of the King's speech in the Finance Bill. That was the Finance Bill, though. I can't recall rebellions on the King's speech itself.
25:05And also this other issue being an opposition day amendment. Yeah, basically until Boris Johnson started doing it over hard Brexit, the things for which he lost the whip tended to be corruption or sexual misbehavior. The assumption was that MPs were able to vote against the government. And that's quite important because British government is an elective dictatorship. It's not like the Senate where you're on the sort of 50 -50 balance. Effectively, the whips run the whole thing, the Prime Minister runs the whole thing. So you can't have a situation in which I think people are regularly threatened and bullied for voting against the government.
25:38But can I just come to you on this? Because I'm talking constitutional theory. There must have been many, many members of Labour Party who felt passionately that the two -child benefit cap is a bad thing because it's leading to a lot of poverty. And it was Labour Party policy only a year ago to get rid of this two -child benefit cap. So just tell me what this means. I'm not saying this as a mortal blow to Kia summer. In many ways, he seems to be strong underneath ever been in his popularized strong as ever been. But there must be some discontent with the Labour Party about this. Yeah, the fact that seven people rebelled.
26:12And I think Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell, I mean, then their rebellions against us when we were in power went well into three figures. Corbyn and McDonnell were the most rebellious MPs that we had. I did quite enjoy John McDonnell's comment where he said he was doing what Kia Starmer said they should, which is put the country before the party. John McDonnell was the runner -up in the competition for the biggest rebel against the Blair Brown government. And it was Jeremy Corbyn who rebelled four hundred and twenty -eight times. And yet you never removed the whip from them. Absolutely. Never.
26:43Never. Never. You never removed the whip from them. And I think you were right. I mean, I know you had authoritarian tendencies, but I think Kia Starmer is proving to be a more authoritarian Labour leader, actually, than Tony Blair. And certainly a much more authoritarian leader than David Cameron or Theresa May. Four hundred and twenty -eight, that's a pretty impressive record, isn't it? And now he's out. He's out. He's out. He's out. He's out. He's out. He's out. He's out. He's fully missing rebellion because every vote he can, you know, he's his own chief whip now. I think withdrawing the whip has got to be very much a kind of a last resort.
27:13What I think this is about is, is saying that, you know, when we talked in the main podcast about the Rachel Reeve stuff, I think they're signaling seriousness of intent about having to do some pretty difficult things as time goes on. They, and also they had been clear in the campaign and had paid a bit of a cap until they could afford to. They indicated they wanted to do it sometime in the future, but they were not going to be able to do it immediately. This is, I think, the thinking behind it is that, you know, we say we're going to be a serious government, we say we're going to do the things that we're going to get elected on.
27:47You all got elected on exactly the same ticket, and if you're going to step onto out of line on things like that, you're going to pay a price. Now, I think as time goes on, and as you have more and more very difficult situations where MPs come under massive pressure from their constituents and so forth, then you've got to be careful about just setting a bar for rebellion that is so low that you end up, people say, well, sue me. Why haven't you taken the Web of them? Why haven't you taken the Web of her? So I get the thinking behind it, but I think it's something that needs very careful party management.
28:21And presumably, in addition to the seven who rebel, there must have been a hundred MPs who sympathize with them and would have liked to rebel and think that actually the government's doing the wrong thing. Yeah, there was interesting how many of the new MPs I saw, actually saying, I'd love to vote it for that. I'd love it if we could do it, but given that the economy at the moment won't allow it, I voted against it. And I think there is something as well, you must have seen this loads of time in parliament, because, and we used to do it when we were in opposition, is that you use these opposition day, these opposition moments, opposition amendments, to try to cause the government as much internal friction as you can get going.
28:55And I think the other thinking behind the very tough line, the whips to it, was if people are going to play games of the opposition, we're going to call it out. Yeah, and what it will do is that these things are what created this thing called the voting record. So when I'm attacked on Twitter, the classic thing is you think Rory's a nice Tory, but have you looked at his voting record? And the voting record will say, you know, Rory voted to, for the two child cap on benefits or Rory voted for austerity or Rory voted in favor of killing small children in Syria. And these will be generally opposition database where emotion is put up saying, you know, the opposition calls on the government to, you know, not kill small children in Syria.
29:39I mean, you'll try to frame it in whatever you will. And the whips will then come in and say, we're not accepting that framing, we're whipping people against it. And then that provides the perfect thing, which is now going to be on the records of all these Labour MPs when the left of the Labour Party gets going, you know, absolutely. Young MP seems to be nice, but have you looked at their voting record? They voted for the two child benefit cats. Right, last question, your choice. Authenticity Rufus, how do you square what you believe and what your audience wants to hear? And I think if I can frame that for you in terms of political comms.
30:13So I found when I was running for leadership, when I was running for Mayor London, very strong pressure from campaign teams and posters saying things like, um, the number one issue in London is crime. And so you've just got to talk about nothing except, you know, make London safe again. And I believed that actually in some ways, London was safer than people acknowledged, and that there were other priorities in London that mattered more. So I wanted to talk more about trees or air quality. So what would be your advice on how a politician finds the way of harnessing who they are and what they believe, while also saying what the audience wants to hear, which I guess is a way of saying, saying things that are relevant to the audience, the win elections?
30:57Oh, I mean, this slightly relates to the previous question. One of the things I think the public really hate about politics is the sort of what I call the robotics of campaign communications, you know, where they've given lines to take. And I used to give politicians and lines to take all the time. And, you know, the line is this. Labour MPs at the moment will have a line essentially saying that the Tories misled us about the state of the public finances, and this means we have to make even more difficult decisions, whatever it might be. And if you use the same words again and again and again, it becomes very, very grating for people.
31:28We need to figure, give people advice. Look at the ones who do it quite well. Back in our day, we had Jack Cunningham, John Reed, Margaret Beckett. They possessed the lines to take, okay, but they could communicate them in a way that turned them into their own by expressing themselves in a way that was authentic to them. So if a John Reed, it might just be some sort of, you know, witnesses and with Jack Cunningham, it would be his tone. There was a sort of tone that people got used to. And when there was something interesting, how you took the question, when I saw the question, I thought they were directing that question to us today, whether the things that we think that they think maybe we trim, that I don't necessarily want to say nice things about Tories, or American Republicans, or, you know, that I want to be more supportive of people on the left than people on the right.
32:14I think we're in the blessed position of being able to say what we think. But I think politicians have more capacity to do that without rocking the boat as much as they think they rock the boat if they don't just deliver the straight line to take. It's about sounding authentic. And also taking the risk occasionally. I remember once on question time being asked, so quick question time again for for listeners who don't understand it. When a, when a my case, kind of back bench MP is put on question time, this is a big deal. And you're being sent out by the government and you're briefed. So you're given three, four hours of practice, question time briefing.
32:50And it's something that they tell you is really going to make your career. If you perform well on question times, the back bench show you could be promoted soon. So there's a lot of pressure. And I'm there. And somebody in the audience says, I've just discovered that to ring the benefits help line, if you're unemployed and you've got problems and benefits and you're living in poverty, costs you 55 pence a minute and you're made to hang on for 10 or 20 minutes on the phone. Can you possibly justify this? And I took a deep breath and said, no, that seems outrageous. It seems like a ridiculous thing and something that we need to sort out.
33:25Oh, well, shall I say what you should have said? I'm going to predict that somebody phoned you up, either from the whips office or central office and gave you a bottle of tea. I think what you should have said was, though, that's not something that I've heard. I get every sort of case comes into my constituencies. I've not heard that. What I will do is go back and explore that. And perhaps after the program, Fiona, if you can allow me, if I can spend a bit of time with the audience and get the ladies' name and address and all that out, that's what you should have done. Very good. And if they then turn around, Alistair, and say, okay, and I'll say, and if you find out, it is indeed true that there's spending 55 p a minute, would you agree that that is an outrage?
34:02I completely agree with it. I totally understand why she's so concerned about it, which is why I want to meet her after us and discuss it and take it back to government. And by next week, Fiona, you'll be talking lots of different things and you're very, very good at this. Actually, there was a happy ending to this. What happened, in fact, is that the government changed its position on it within a week, and I found that I was okay. So there you are. Imagine, just imagine, Rory, this just shows you. You've got so much to learn. Imagine if you'd have done it my way, and then got that change. It wouldn't be dot, dot, dot, thanks to Rory Stewart.
34:37They probably have had a question about it in the days. We I would have been on the panel. I said, we need more MPs like Rory Stewart, who go and reach the public. Never mind. Alistair, we can see why he's so successful. Anyway, thank you very, very much, and look forward to talking soon. See you next week. Bye -bye. See you next week. Bye -bye.
34:59Bye -bye.
From the publisher
Will the attack on the Golan Heights push Israel and Hezbollah into war? How does Harris’ approach to the Middle East differ from Trump's? How do Rory and Alastair square their beliefs with what people want to hear? And, was Starmer right to suspend seven MPs over the two child benefit cap?
TRIP Plus:
Become a member of The Rest Is Politics Plus to support the podcast, receive our exclusive newsletter, enjoy ad-free listening to both TRIP and Leading, benefit from discount book prices on titles mentioned on the pod, join our Discord chatroom, and receive early access to live show tickets and Question Time episodes.
Just head to therestispolitics.com to sign up, or start a free trial today on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/therestispolitics.
TRIP TOUR:
To buy tickets for our October Tour, just head to www.therestispolitics.com
Instagram:
@restispolitics
Twitter:
@RestIsPolitics
Email:
restispolitics@gmail.com
Podcast Editor: India Dunkley
Video Editor: Teo Ayodeji-Ansell
Social Producer: Jess Kidson
Assistant Producer: Fiona Douglas
Producer: Nicole Maslen
Senior Producer: Dom Johnson
Head of Content: Tom Whiter
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor + Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices




