In short
Podcast Episode Notes: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 307
Episode Overview Title: Starmer put to the test, Modi's visit to Ukraine, and tragedy unfolds in Sudan Hosts: Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart Date Recorded: Tuesday (exact date not specified) Main Topics:
- Keir Starmer's recent speech and its implications for Labour
- Modi's visit to Ukraine and its geopolitical significance
- The ongoing humanitarian crisis in Sudan
---
Key Discussions
- Keir Starmer's Speech
- Context and Importance:
- Starmer delivered a significant speech in the Rose Garden of Downing Street, marking a crucial moment in his tenure.
- The speech aimed to address economic challenges, with references to a £22 billion financial "black hole."
- Political Implications:
- The speech sought to distance Labour from the previous Conservative government's failures.
- Starmer emphasized that everyone would face challenges, indicating potential tax rises and spending cuts.
- The speech was contrasted with the more optimistic tone traditionally used by US politicians.
- Critiques of Starmer's Approach:
- Campbell and Stewart discussed the lack of a unifying message or big idea in Starmer's speech.
- The focus on "fixing the foundations" was seen as a process-oriented approach rather than a visionary one.
- Importance of showing quick results and a clear plan to gain public support.
- Modi's Visit to Ukraine
- Significance of the Visit:
- Modi's trip to Ukraine was scrutinized as he has historically maintained a neutral stance regarding Russia's invasion.
- The visit was seen as a balancing act, signaling to both Russia and Ukraine India's strategic interests.
- Geopolitical Considerations:
- Modi's relationship with Russia is complex, given India's substantial military dependence on Russian arms.
- Modi is positioning India as a significant player in the global south, advocating for a multipolar world.
- Economic Factors:
- India's growing economy is reshaping its foreign policy approach.
- Modi's strategy includes potential economic ties with Ukraine, focusing on rebuilding efforts post-conflict.
- Humanitarian Crisis in Sudan
- Current Situation:
- The ongoing conflict has led to 12 million displaced individuals and severe humanitarian crises.
- The situation is exacerbated by a lack of media coverage and international attention unlike other global crises.
- International Response:
- Recent events, such as rapper Macklemore canceling a show in Dubai due to the UAE's role in the conflict, highlighted the issue.
- Discussion on how smaller nations are influencing larger geopolitical conflicts, particularly through proxy support.
- Challenges and Opportunities:
- The crisis underscores the need for a renewed focus on Africa's potential and stability, moving beyond a narrative of victimhood.
- Emphasis on collaborative international efforts, particularly between Western countries and African nations.
---
Key Takeaways
- Starmer's Challenge: He faces the task of presenting Labour as a competent alternative while managing public expectations about austerity measures.
- Modi's Diplomatic Maneuvering: His balancing act between Ukraine and Russia highlights India's emerging role on the global stage.
- Sudan's Crisis: The dire humanitarian situation calls for increased media attention and international intervention, with potential lessons for future foreign policy.
---
Conclusion The episode highlights the complexities of current political landscapes in the UK, India, and Sudan, emphasizing the necessity of nuanced understanding and proactive engagement in global politics. The hosts advocate for clearer communication from political leaders and greater responsibility towards international crises.
---
For further discussion and insights, join The Rest Is Politics Plus for exclusive content and early access to episodes at [therestispolitics.com](http://therestispolitics.com).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Thanks for listening to the Restus Politics, sign up to the Restus Politics Plus to enjoy ad -free listening and receive a weekly newsletter. Join our members' chat room again early access to live show tickets. Just go to therestuspolitics .com. That's therestuspolitics .com. At Blinds .com, it's not just about window treatments. It's about you. Your style, your space, your way. Whether you DIY or want the pros to handle it all, you'll have the confidence of knowing it's done right. From free expert design help to our 100 % satisfaction Action Guarantee. Everything we do is made to fit your life and your windows.
0:32Because at Blinds .com, the only thing we treat better than Windows is you. Visit Blinds .com now for up to 40 % off site -wide, plus a professional measure at no cost. Rules and restrictions apply.
0:50Welcome to the rest of this politics with me, Rory Stewart. And me, Alistair Campbell, and Rory, we're recording this on Tuesday, shortly after Keir Starmer has given the big speech in the Rose Garden in Downing Street. We're going to talk about that. We're going to reflect a little bit on our time in the United States at the Democratic National Convention. We're going to talk about Modi, Prime Minister of India, and his visit to Ukraine, and just more generally about India foreign policy, which is really, really interesting. And then we're going to talk about, again, about Sudan, which gets so little attention, and more broadly about the whole, what we call the global south.
1:30So should we start with Kier? Starmer. Let's start with that one. So we've just watched him give us speech in the Rose Garden of Downing Street, which people remember is that little garden out the back, which I think came to prominence for many people because it's where David Cameron and Nick Clegg did their famous sort of romance announcement to the coalition. It's also had another bit of fame, I think, because Boris Johnson was accused, I think, of having parties there. And also because it's where ludicrously dominant Cummings did a press conference to explain this Barnard Castle trip. That's right.
2:02That's where Dominic Cummings during COVID had apparently tested his eyesight by driving up to Barnard Castle. And it's where Kier chose to give this speech. Now, give us a bit of a context. This is a big speech, trade. It's one of the biggest speeches he's given since he came in as Prime Minister. And I guess he's now been in for a couple of months. It's just over eight weeks in. Yeah, he's overtaken Listerus. He's now knocked the shortest -lived Prime Minister in our history. He's passed that. I think the context for this is this is a speech that I think he was going to make before. You had the Rachel Reeves speech where she talked about this 22 billion pound black hole.
2:40And of course, what that was about, as we said at the time, was that just as the Tories in the past try to establish labor legacy winter of discontent when Mrs Thatcher was around and then Cameron the mess we inherited the mess we inherited labor caused the crash and all that. Rachel Reeves' speech and this one is about trying to cement the conservative government's legacy as being absolutely awful and the reason why labor are going to have to do some difficult things. So I think this was going to be a speech made shortly after Rachel Reeves did that statement about the black hole and the OBR, the Office of Budget Responsibility not knowing about the figures etc.
3:20But then of course the riots came along and the south port killings of those three little girls and the riots that followed meant that Keir Starmer obviously had to spend all his time fixed on that, cancelled his holiday, just sort of you know focused on that. This speech I think is the speech that he was going to give back then, but has now added in the context of what he calls societal black hole as well because of the riots. Yeah, let's just give a little summary to try to be as objective as possible on this black hole from Paul Johnson at the IFS. So he says, frankly, nobody comes out of this smelling of races, not the conservatives who really did leave a lot for the new government to clean up and were not honest about the challenges ahead, not Labour, which knew the broad outline of these challenges, but refused to confront them in its manifesto and pre -election statements.
4:08And not our institutional framework, which meant that some of the immediate problems were allowed to fester and were obscured in the official data. So essentially, they're Paul Johnson trying to balance it. Yes, the Tories left to mess. Yes, basically, Labour knew about it. This wasn't an unexpected thing. And actually, the institutions allowed a lot of these problems to be hidden in the data. So regardless of whether or not labor knew about it. I suppose the politics of this is that it's important for labor to say that a lot of this is unexpected because that then justifies them bringing in tax rises that they potentially ruled out during the election.
4:43And broadly speaking, that's something that you, I think to be fair to you, I'll say expected to happen. I'm new hinted at that and you talked about how in Australia, what had happened as the PM had come in saying it wasn't a tax rise and you down tax rises. And it's a long established political technique to say, well, we arrived and the public finance is not as good as we thought. Yeah. And therefore, we're going to have to take more measures. And pretty much everybody, I think most of the professional commentators were predicting this before the election. There was just no way it was going to be possible to make the public finances balanced without either borrowing more or taxing more or cutting spending.
5:17And Labour will almost certainly have to do all three. Which of course then sets up real difficulties. So they've already made one very difficult choice when Rachel Reeves set out this, what she called this 22 billion pound black hole, where I think she did get considerable political cover from the fact that the officer budget responsibility came out and kind of echoed this sense that they didn't have a full picture of what was happening under the conservatives. But then as part of that, she announced that the universal Winterfuel payment was being stopped, that it would only be going to relatively small sections of the community is effectively being means tested.
5:53And as you said when we discussed it on the podcast a couple of weeks ago, that which a lot of conservatives frankly probably would deep down say it's a sensible thing to do anyway because why should multimillionaires get the winter fuel payment etc etc etc. But now that has become somewhere where both labour and conservatives have been attacking that. Yep and just quickly just to remind a bit of an explainer on that. So if you were born I think before 1958, you get between two and 300 pounds automatically, or you did as a pensioner to help. That includes me. Yep, to help towards your heating bills.
6:28And the problem was it is not means tested. Everybody got it, including, as you say, people at you or my mother who frankly didn't need that money. And you've had conservative MPs to buy a cell word, for example, conservative MP coming out very, very clearly saying he thinks this was the right decision. Certainly when I was running for leadership, this was one of the things I was suggesting doing because it costs the government an incredible amount of money. I mean one of the things is that the Winterfuel allowance alone was about three times the core budget of the foreign office when I was in when I was in government.
6:58Well, and what do you what Keir Starman has done in this speech? Yes, he's saying those with the broadest shoulders should pick up the most. He refers to the the crackdown that's going to be on non -doms and the VAT on private school fees, but then goes on to say that we're all going to have to pay a price. So the budget, when Rachel Reeves comes forward in a few weeks time with the budget, it is going to be one of the defining moments in this parliament. And I guess the risk for Labour is that the focus that Keir's time are wanted for this sort of positive change that a Labour government was going to bring in was to have this focus on the missions, the five missions of change, but the budget, he talks about the pain that people are going to feel.
7:39He talks about things are going to get a lot worse before they get better. That's politically pretty difficult. And can I just, if you put on your kind of communications hat for a moment? I guess there's a different way of doing this. We've just come from the Democratic National Convention and we've seen how US politicians from the left are playing things at the moment and they're basically going for the happy warrior thing. It's a pretty optimistic, cheerful, big, smiley thing. And paradoxically, Even when Biden took over from Trump, he didn't actually give the kind of speech that Kier Sam is given.
8:12Generally in American politician, even taking over a bad situation would put a positive spin on. And finally, if I think about British military commanders in Afghanistan as an example, they didn't come and take over and say, it's all a complete catastrophe. I've inherited all this mess. They did a little bit of that, but they moved very quickly onto. And I've got a new plan that's going to turn everything around and we're going to have So give me the pluses and minuses of going for the more optimistic happy warrior speech or alternatively going for what Kierstown has done. Which if I'm being cheeky sounds, I felt a little bit just looking at the image of him and his white shirt and great tie and suit a little bit like a sort of family solicitor setting you down after your parents died and said, I'm sorry to tell you, you know, your mum left stump.
9:00The finances and a lot of the mess and there's going to be much less money coming to you the new way. Of course, he was a fabulous historian, he was the director of public prosecutions. I mean, I thought about this a lot when we were in Chicago because there was this kind of joyous mood around the place and they were all yes attacking Trump and yes sort of you know, being up their own record and so forth. I think in a way it fits with the context of the campaign. If you remember during the campaign, we were we were saying why can't they've been up to, well, I can't be more promises of radical change, et cetera.
9:37So he's going from the campaign into government. I think they are genuine in saying you called it attacked it, but I think they are genuine in saying that actually when they looked at the public finances, they were worse than expected. I think that's genuine. But as a kind of central, I mean, yes, they were worse, but they knew they were absolutely better. The news were going to be terrible. Which is why they didn't vote. They would argue that's why they didn't over promise during the campaign. Yeah, and they must have had an 80 % probability that they were going to have to either raise taxes cut spending or raise borrowing.
10:10Yeah, and as you say that may end up doing a mix of all three, I guess there's an argument that in a sense they're playing up the expectations of a mix of all three and then they don't do a mix of all three or it's not quite as bad. But I think what he's talking about and what he talked about during the campaign and I noticed he's gone for the Rishi Sunak Boris Johnson three words on the lectern. and it was fixing the foundations. So it is trying to paint a long term picture. Now one of the points I made at an event I did last night here in Glasgow was that that is fine and I think people want long -termism and they want a sense of where they're going.
10:46But I'd think in the modern age, politicians get less time and less tolerance for lack of quick change. And it's why I think at the top of the speech, he did talk about growth remains the number one objective, that's why we set up the National Well Fund, that's why we're doing the planning stuff, that's why we're doing the great British energy. So he's trying to give those positive policies that are being brought forward. But at the same time, warning, there are going to have to be more very, very difficult choices and all of us are going to take a hit of some sort. One of the things that, again, this is none of my business, but I would have thought a single big idea holding the whole thing together, really running through that speech would have been very helpful.
11:30It could be, we're going to make it through through education, education, education, education, or it could have been tech, or we're going to reform the system, or this is going to be a government about infrastructure. But one big binding idea that we can all get our head around. You don't think fixing defundations does that? Well, it didn't really feel like it, because going through the speech, what he sort of says is, he does the conservatives have crapped everything up, it's all terrible. And then he says, a bit later on, well, Well, you know, and as I said during the election, we're going to build homes and we're going to get great British energy, which incidentally I still don't completely understand.
12:05And I imagine most of the people in that audience don't really understand what this thing is. And we're going to get some growth. But it would be nice if those things didn't sound like three sort of different things. If I think back to you guys when you came in, I increasingly think that your brand as New Labour was just a sense that you were going to make a new Britain, that it was about modernization, it wasn't about the past, it was about an optimistic vision of hence, I'd suppose people making jokes about cool Britannia. And I guess with Cameron Osborne, we sort of knew that it was about austerity, whatever you thought about it.
12:36And with Boris Johnson, it was a sort of, again, you know, whatever we think about it, you sort of get your head around the fact he was trying to level up was the thing he was talking about. I'm still struggling, and I think this is a challenge to really see what's he got in his back pocket that's really going to make things better. The event I did last night in Glasgow, I was with Tom Baldwin, who has written this rather good biography of Gears, and I was talking about my children's books, he was talking about that, and we had this audience of I presume mainly Scottish people, and Tom Baldwin was making the point that we're used to politicians like Tony Blair, with the big picture David Cameron, with again another sort of big picture, charisma politician Obama Clinton, I guess Kamala Harris is coming across a little bit in the same way.
13:28And what he said is that Keir's time was very much more about the step by step process. So fixing the foundations is, you know, it's a process thing. But what was really interesting about the event, there were people saying I want more on this, I want more on that and so forth. But at one point, I said, so Keir's talking about needing 10 years to do this. So that means he's got to win at least one more election, okay? So I asked the audience who thinks sitting here today right now and hearing that there's going to be this difficult stuff coming down the track, who thinks that Labour are going to win the next general election?
14:02And it was overwhelming, overwhelming. I think only one person put their hand up to say that they wouldn't. Now maybe he has a sense of that, now that could be very, very dangerous, okay? But maybe has a sense that he can do very difficult fixing the foundations, get to an installation, so much is going to hang on growth actually happening and then you know the Tories carry on sorting themselves out whatever. So I think it's about long term lasting change and where I agree with you is the bit that you need on the end of that is long term lasting change so is that Britain looks like this this this this this this.
14:39Also if you're running on fixing the foundations, we need to see very quickly what he's fixing, what are these foundations and how he's fixing them. So what we need to see, I think, for the strategy to work is some really radical detailed reforms of the NHS, really radical detailed reforms of the way that infrastructure's built out. All of which will take time, which fits in with the long term? Yeah, but we need to see him making tough decisions soon. I mean, if it was a Tory government coming in. They would demonstrate that they were fixing stuff because you'd see them confronting unions, you'd see them implementing cuts, you'd see them trying to drive through reforms.
15:18Yeah, but the cuts that they implemented far from fixing things, they created the problems that were now having to be fixed. But in his case, there's going to be cuts, aren't there? There's going to be a lot of cuts, but he needs to explain these cuts not just as well I've got to do them because they left the finances in a mess. He's got to find a way of explaining why they're helpful, why these are the right cuts and why they're going to lead to more productivity. And also the other place where they're going to need an argument is why that is different to what Cameron Osborne said about why austerity was so essential allegedly back in 2010.
15:51I guess you were saying when you talked about Ken Clark, you've got to do the really difficult stuff in the first year. This is part of that sort of approach. And it's going to be very, very interesting to see how it lands, I think that the Winterfuel payment thing is clearly causing some political turbulence already. That will continue, particularly as we get through to the winter. I think he's still in that place, though, where I thought it was very interesting that he, he in fact drew attention to the things that we mentioned earlier about Johnson having the parties and Dominic Cummings doing the press conference.
16:24And the audience at this speech were kind of people, there were firefighters, there were nurses, there were teachers. It was basically still got this message government back at the service of people. But I was struck last night by the, and I guess it would be a labor leaning audience that came out to hear me in Tom Baldwin. At the same time, talking to the mafter was the quite FUSMP supporters, there was at least one Tory that I met. I think they do have some time in the bank, and they will get some, there will be some support and acceptance of this, but I think you're right. The changes that people think they voted for I've got to come through pretty quickly.
17:00And finally, just before we move on to the States, I think what I'd like to see as the kind of floating voter, is the sense that he's really diagnosed what the problem was. And at the moment, it still sounds a little bit as though he thinks the problem was that the Tories were a bunch of nasty out of touch, tweets. But it's a bit generic. I think what he's saying is that the problem, and it's interesting how the Tories, I think this is projection, the Tories have called this speech performative. It's funny because that's something that Labour say about the Tories, that Boris Johnson was just all about performance.
17:33It wasn't about policy. I think he's saying that the problem was populism. I was pleased that he called that out, snake oil populism, short -termism, politics by gimmick, and that he is trying to establish this sense that you have to take difficult decisions for the long term. Then they've those difficult decisions have got to bear fruit. And we need to really see that. He needs to bring that alive because, of course, those first that were in conservative cabinets, obviously would feel that we did make difficult decisions, which we thought were in the long -term interest. Obviously, it didn't work.
18:05Many of these things didn't work, which is why we're in a mess. But the frustration would be if they thought that the only problem was that there were these sort of bad intentioned evil torries and that if nice people come in everything that we find, what we need to see is some One recognition of the fact that the real problems in this country are how do we run a country that is so dependent on hundreds of thousands of people coming in every year when there's mounting anti -immigration sentiment. How do we run a country which is getting older so quickly? How do we run a country where NHS inflation is well ahead of normal inflation and we're not keeping up?
18:46How do we run a country where we don't seem to be able to build any infrastructure where a road costs twice or three times as much to build as it does in France. How do we run a country where we don't have enough houses for people? And some of these things are quite structural. They go beyond parties. And that's why I wanted him to say, I've got something, a big idea that brings these problems together and solves them. Could be tech and AI, could be education, could be infrastructure, but something that tells us why it's going to be different. because at the moment it sounds like the big difference is you've got a new team in.
19:20But nothing we've seen yet. I mean as you've just point out the Winterfuel allowance cut is perfectly sensible but it's stuff that a lot of Tories were talking about anyway. Where's the fresh labour stuff? Tom made the point last night that you know he wants ask here is there such a thing or will there be such a thing as starmarism and here kind of almost wince at the thought? I think he is a different sort of politician to the ones that we are maybe used to and wanting. But I think it is about this sense of a long -term plan that at this stage is about, as they said on the lectern, fixing the foundations.
19:54And that means tackling what he called this economic black hole and societal black hole. Just as a piece of speech making and oratory and rhetoric, I think the passage of the speech that, as a speech, worked best for me, was when he drew together the people who cleared up the mess after the riots, as like the good people going out after the bad. And imagine the pride that we can feel if we all come together and clear up the mess that we're in now as a country. I think that was quite a sort of neat piece of oratory. So to transition back to the DNC and our time in Chicago, what he didn't do and what the DNC very much did is to say Britain is the most amazing country on earth.
20:34We have this incredible history, we can do anything only in Britain could we do this. And which is what the DNC was all about, right? They were all like only in the United States. This is America. We can solve every problem. We can address everyone. Now, objectively, the problems of poor people in the United States are actually much worse than they are in Britain, but they take a much more optimistic attitude towards their ability to fix those things that we do. I mean, you're actually right, by the way. The hotel that we were staying in, you know, one of the days I walked down there, I saw so many people that were sleeping under the bridges and yet as you say they all want to project this sense of you know America is the greatest country in the world.
21:11But I think one of the reasons why Boris Johnson was rejected was because of this constant maybe it's just an America it's more American to do that it feels a bit un -British constantly to be saying that we're the best in the world everything you know what was this phrase world beating we were world beating at this and world beating at that and I just don't think it's Keir Starmer's style and I don't think Keir this time is going to be one of those politicians who sort of gets pushed into being something of it differently. We'll obviously adapt. Of course, you'll adapt. Everybody does when they're in a job like that.
21:42But there's a language, isn't it? I mean, presumably there's a more muted British way of doing it. You could say, listen, it looks pretty grim, but this is the country at the end of the Second World War when our economy contracted by 40 % built the NHS. Yeah, and you can also do it. And, you know, as you know, I've always felt that excessive labour leaders have not defended the Labour Government to be fair to get a starma, he does defend the record of the last Labour Government. But you can say that in that 13 years, the country was transformed, it was modernised, things did change for the better and we can do that again.
22:14I mean, the emergency just to go back to the sense of what people want from their politicians. I did an event yesterday, I just took what one was with primary schools and one was senior schools and the 300th secondary school kids. I got nine of them to come up and make a speech and I gave them one minutes talk about something that they cared about and it was really, really, really interesting because they all making different sort of points of whether it was about climate, one was about galley language, one was about housing, one was about tax, one was about class and they were so passionate about this stuff but they didn't really feel that they were talking even about the same things that the politicians were at the moment and what I think you did get in America with some of those speeches and there were some extraordinarily good speeches as oratorical kind of events.
22:58I think they do speak in much simpler language. I think they do have an ability to connect. And it was interesting just how many young people were around that convention. Well, in the best of all, I think, is Tim Bals who is just extraordinary. I mean, if you want to see a credible communicator, his ability to turn around things that the opposition says and put it in language that destroys them. I mean his great one for example in his speech that we heard was when he says to the Republicans, get the hell out of our bedrooms. This is none of your business. Now that's normally would be very right winged speech but he was using it brilliantly to say, we want freedom to decide what we do with our own bodies, we want freedom to decide how we're going to love.
23:42That thing about freedom was very very interesting because if people haven't seen them, you and I did lots of interviews while we were there, we put them all out in a week, We've got one very, very good interview to come, which I'll talk about in a minute. So we did, just to go through them, we did John Anzaloni, Democrat pollster. We did Rosalora, who's a veteran congresswoman. We did a young guy called Josh Elliott, who's a kind of state congressman, like a kind of very big powerful. I really don't want to insult people with this, but for our context, sort of local councillor, type thing rather than, well, maybe an MSP would be a better way of putting it.
Read the full transcript
24:18we did this amazing veteran campaign of Bob Mulholland. We also had a chat with this guy, David Urban, who's a big Trump supporter. I wasn't present and I'm suspicious of your use the word chat. Would you describe yourself as disagreeing agreeably? I think we just about managed to disagree agreeably, but we disagreed a lot. The idea of Alice the Campbell sitting down with the Donald Trump supporter without me present fills me with psych kind of horror. It was, and then the one that we're going to put out soon with Frank Luntz, the pollster. And it's very, very interesting though, both, if I've written my new European column about this, David Urban, the Trump guy, and Frank Luntz.
24:57And Frank said to me, and as you heard, Frank who thinks that New Labour's the greatest campaign ever, blah, blah, blah, but he said to me on air that he felt that I was making a big mistake because I have full on Trump derangement syndrome. And David Urban said something similar, he said that, you know, unless you understand why people are voting Trump. You're never gonna win those people back. And I've thought about that a lot. And David Urban said in the interview, he said, look, yeah, this conference is great. And the convention's great. And people love Cowell of it. Try and put yourself in the mind of a guy in Wisconsin who's got a crap job.
25:32These kids are going to a crap school. He's worried about his next paycheck and so forth. Try and be them watching this convention and see what you're hearing. And I did that the next day. I tried to force myself to do that and it was a very very different experience. So look the other lasting impression for me from the convention was just the scale of it. The I think I told you the night of Kamala Harris's speech, watching this guy go round with a knife cutting the bags that were holding up the balloons. He was sort of walking up right at the top of the stadium at a hundred thousand balloons.
26:06He was way up there, going around his choppy these things and they're coming down and then Stevie Wonder pops in for one song and John Legend pops in for a song and you know... Did you get Beyonce? No she didn't come in then Rory. She decided that if you weren't gonna be there she wasn't gonna be there. We should just while we're on the culture and I know you were talking earlier about Cool Britannia, you must be very excited about the Oasis reunion. Credit bit excited. Listen I've been doing a bit of reunions. I'm gonna most I'd slightly sort of grim and disturbing experience. I want to hear a Beach Boys concert in Cape Cod.
26:41Well, the Beach Boys, the real Beach Boys. The real Beach Boys, or at least the remaining still standing Beach Boy, which was really like watching Joe Biden trying to belt out songs about surfing. So I hope my racist is not going to be like that. I don't think they will be. I don't think they will be. I still would guarantee that it's going to happen. I think that's simply rivalry runs very, very deep. Anyway, on you, the Beach Boys and Joe Biden, let's take a break.
27:09This isn't ad from BetterHelp. At the moment we're getting advice from everywhere. You just have to go on TikTok. Could be Alice's cold plunges. Could be my attempts to meditate or the digital detox that I'm doing in Colombia. But of course one of the things that we know is that it can be incredibly valuable to talk to another human being. somebody who's actually been trained as a therapist to work through these ideas calmly objectively and professionally. And as the largest online therapy provider in the world better help can provide access to mental health professionals with a very diverse variety of expertise.
27:45They've got over 5 ,000 therapists in the UK. They've helped more than 5 million people globally and you can join a session literally at the click of a button. Change therapists anytime. So obviously not about fixing you, but it's about hearing yourself clearly, maybe for the first time. So talk it out with BetterHelp. Our listeners get 10 % off their first month at BetterHelp .com slash Rest Politics. That's better H -E -L -P .com slash Rest Politics. Starting a business can seem like a daunting task. Unless you have a partner like Shopify. They have the tools you need to start and grow your business, From designing a website to marketing to selling and beyond, Shopify can help with everything you need.
28:27There's a reason millions of companies like Mattel, Hines and Allbirds continue to trust and use them. With Shopify on your site, turn your big business idea into... Sign up for your $1 per month trial at Shopify .com slash special offer.
28:48Welcome back to the rest of politics with me, Rory Stewart. And me, Aleister Campbell. And Aleister, you wanted to talk, I think, first about Indian foreign policy in a particular Modi's trip to Ukraine. So give us a sense of Modi's trip to Ukraine and then maybe we can expand it out. Well, so Nurendra Modi, long serving Prime Minister of India, just one another election, albeit with a very reduced mandate, has been under a lot of criticism over Ukraine from the West because he has not outright condemned the invasion. He's not been part of the sort of political alliance against Putin. His first big visit after winning his last election was to Moscow.
29:28On the day that, a hospital in Ukraine was being bombed and he was hugging Putin. We've talked before on the podcast about how I think that India still gets over 50 % of its arms from Russia. India is the biggest buyer of its energy, which she often refines and passes on there by helping people get around sanctions and so forth. So then he goes off, so he has his visit with Putin and the bear hugs and all that. Zelensky very, very angry about it and he goes and has a visit with Zelensky, which of course was seen in the context of Ukraine, but I think there is maybe a bigger thing going on here that this is partly about Modi signalling to Russia that he's not terribly happy about the way that Russia, Putin, is cuddling up so much to China.
30:17So on the one hand he's showing that yes, I do understand why Ukraine feels so strongly about this and I'm not kind of one side to about it, he's sort of facing both ways on that one. There's also the China element and I think the other thing to be absolutely frank and there's nothing wrong with this But I'm just making it as an observation is that there's an economic element to this too because at some point Ukraine is going to have to be rebuilt and I think Modi's putting himself into into that place as well when Tony Blair's Prime Minister and we you know we met several Indian Prime Ministers and I think there was a sense of India a bit like China in the past Sort of sitting out a lot of the big foreign policy situations.
30:54But I think Modi has tried over the last decade to turn India into something of a big player in foreign policy. Yeah, well just to, so I guess, begin with a sort of big context here. India is now one of the very, very largest economies in the world. On many ranks, it's now pulled ahead of the United Kingdom. So it's now the fifth largest economy in the world behind the US, China, Japan, and Germany. But it's still an economy roughly the size of the UK. And And the Chinese economy is still a good 5 or 6 times larger than the Indian economy. And I guess the challenge for the West, the US and its allies is the question of where the partnership is, both in Asia and with this phrase, the global South, which I guess we'll get to in a bit.
31:43So we know about Chinese foreign policy. We've talked quite a lot about Chinese foreign policy in the way in which China operates. India is an aside different position. China obviously has a seat on the UN Security Council. India would like one. India would like one, but doesn't have one yet. China is the world's largest manufacturer, the world's largest exporter, and has put the most incredible amounts of its 17 trillion dollar economy into things like the Dalton Road Initiative, which has absorbed literally trillions of dollars. And Modi, by the way, was one of the few leaders to quite aggressively criticize China for the scale of the Baltimore initiative.
32:20Right. And China, of course, very, very major player in Africa. And we'll come to that in a second, India, India much smaller. But India's got a different history. It, of course, was right at the heart of the non -aligned movement, which was this movement really got going in the 60s, which was about a separate vision from either the US or the Soviet Union. So neither capitalism nor communism was much more about decolonization, about challenging capitalism. And out of that, all these countries formed into groups, non -lined countries, something called the G77. And so India, which has also had some very, very impressive diplomats for a long time, inherited quite a lot of that mantle.
33:03But it's a little unclear where Modi has been taking this. And I suppose he's got three different possibilities. One of them is he really tries to become Chinese competitor as the champion of the global south of Pora developing countries. Or he allies himself strongly with the west and tries to reform institutions, gets onto the security council and just becomes a big player like a bigger version of Germany or something. Or the third is a regional player doing the politics of Bangladesh, Myanmar. Anyway, so what's your sense of where he's going on all this? Well, I sent you a, and we'll put in the newsletter a very interesting kind of, quite promodied, but it was a very long analysis of Indian foreign policy.
33:49The official title that they gave it in the early days was Neighborhood First, so that speaks to the third leg of what you were talking about. But I wonder like a lot of politicians who've been in power for a long time. There's a tendency to get a little bit bored with your own country, a little bit bored with your own region, at least sort of, you stretch out. So, for example, I read that he's visited the UAE seven times. His relations with China are very, very tense. His relations with Russia have got closer and closer. And because America, I think, has a view of India as being something of a counterweight to China, I think he knows he can probably get away with more.
34:28So for example, this stuff, you think about what they've done in relation to Ukraine and energy, where this energy that, you know, through sanctions is no longer able to go to lots of the Russian markets. He's getting crude oil, getting shipped to India, getting refined there so it suddenly becomes Indian oil. I think any sort of said different parts of the world. I mean, I think if that was pretty much any other country involved in that, I suspect that the West would be calling that out much more vigorously than they are. So he isn't quite a strong position. And the human rights and democracy staff, I mean, Indian critics point out that the United States talks a good game about human rights and democracy and anti -populism when they're complaining about Hungary, but they don't when they're complaining about India because they think they need India as an ally against China.
35:14Yeah, exactly. When he was in, seeing Zelensky, the bean this first peace summit in Switzerland where of course Russia not taking part, India were present but did not join in with the communique that talked about Ukraine's territorial integrity. Zelensky when he was there was saying that we need to have another one of these. And there was almost a sense of Modi kind of offering himself as a bit of a mediator. He was almost trying to say, well, because I haven't condemned that, and I haven't done this, and he was saying, hey, he was just a friend who was trying to push for peace, and this has got to be done through dialogue and diplomacy, and we should sit together and try and find a way out of this crisis.
35:55Now, you could argue, well, eventually, that's what is going to have to happen in some shape or form. But I guess he was using the criticisms that he's faced over Ukraine from the West, which have been quite sort of watching for the reason that you say in relation to the sort of, you know, ally against China. But I think he's conscious, even with his weakened mandate that we talked about a few weeks ago, he's conscious of just how much power he does have in foreign policy. Well, there's a very striking statistic I came across. So obviously after Russia invaded Ukraine in February of 2022, there were these enormous blanket sanctions imposed, including trying to exclude Russia from the global payment systems.
36:35Russian trade with Europe and the US collapsed. But since 2022, Turkey's trade with Russia has gone up by 87%. The UAE, so Dubai Abu Dhabi's trade with Russia has gone up by 67%. India's trade with Russia has gone up by 205 % since 2022. As you say, the US has been very relaxed and to impose secondary sanctions. So they've not been prepared to sanction these countries that are trading with Russia. And then they have these embarrassments. So that, as you say, maybe we'll hug Putin, he'll do stuff at the G20, which will kind of embarrass the US. India in some ways is sitting pretty because they're also an economic beneficiary of the trade war between China and the US.
37:18If you're an American company or big international European company looking to make investments now and you're trying to de -risk or decouple from China, India is more and more attractive. It's attractive because you've got a lot of very, very smart people there. It's attractive because Modi's tried to make a better business environment and it's attractive because it's got an enormous internal market. I'm in pushing towards a billion people who could buy your goods. No, it's not not easy, it's a sort of corruption and regulations and protection for Modi's businesses, but my goodness India's sitting pretty and their economic growth and stuff.
37:55All of that, and do you imagine how infuriating that is for Indian saying Modi is pursuing a popular tendu nationalist agenda. He's been brutal to his political opponents. He's taking a very unpleasant and dangerous attitude towards Muslims in India. And in the neighbourhood as you've talked about. He actually basically has been propping up pretty authoritarian governments. He was very close to Shaker Senor and Bangladesh. He's been toppled. I think she's still in. He pretty much cosied up to the Hunta in Myanmar, the military government that took over there. They've been not very condomatory if the Taliban and Afghanistan.
38:32So there's a sense that he's playing a bit of kind of strong man authoritarian politics and not awfully interested in supporting democracy worldwide either. And of course the other thing because of the size of the engine diaspora around the world. He also has this, it even though he didn't do as well in the election as a lot of this, he thought he wouldn't as a lot of other people. When he travels around the world and reading this document I send you, which sort of details all the sort of different visits he's made here there, he can pull in these vast crowds into sort of huge sports stadiums around the world of local Indian people in London, in Boston, in wherever it might be around the world, in Sydney, and give this sense of India as a real global power.
39:18And what I think his approach has been is try to strengthen India's position in the world, but do it whilst maintaining the sense of strategic autonomy, not being trapped into any particular camp, other than India's position. So they got to hand it to my map level. And I guess this brings us sort of the last bit of our chat today to the question of what this means for the way the world is run. So if broadly speaking in the 80s, we saw a world largely divided between kind of communist bloc and western liberal democracies and then maybe in the 90s and early 2000s, kind of US dominated world. We're now into a world which sometimes feels like it's a cold war between US and China, although I think that's overplayed, but much more feels like a world with many, many more players of which India is one of the most powerful and prominent.
40:09Yeah, and Modi talks about this now being a multipolar world. And he would argue that India is becoming one of those polls. A lot of this, you know, and I'm going to talk about Sudan in a minute, an Africa. I mean, the United Nations Security Council, you know, with the permanent five of America, China, Britain, France, and Russia, Africa thinks it should be on their India thinks it should be on their Germany, either as Germany or through the European Union, thinks it should be on there. It's hard to see how there won't be some sort of reform of that over time. And I think Guterius has said, hasn't the Antonia Guterius ahead of the U .S.
40:42has said that it's kind of absurd that Africa is not represented on that. And I suspect that one of the things that may be a game -changer is if a U .S. administration decides that the way to balance China is to strengthen its relationships with India, for example. and they really got behind this and said they think the Security Council just to disgrace then I think Countryside Britain and France that are slightly clinging on by their fingernails will find themselves un -sistered and will runnously boot it off. I mean I guess Kamala Harris administration coming and might be pretty tempted to think okay the Indian economy is big in the British and French economies now why don't we make the big bet and push for Security Council within you there.
41:20That would be a tough move against the special relationship wouldn't it? Now let's just, shall we talk about Sudan? Sudan actually did get into the new a little bit this week in the West. Do you know why Rory? Why? Because somebody by the name of Macklemore, who is a famous American rapper, cancelled his show in Dubai because of the role of the UAE in the Sudan War. And the Sudan War is, I think we're now up to 12 million people that have been displaced. We're up to 2 million, over 2 million that are actually displaced outside the country, and 10 million that it displaced internally. Lots of efforts to try and bring the thing to an end, including new peace talks in Switzerland, but the Armichei, who's essentially ruling Sudan at the moment, or trying to rule Sudan at the moment, said he wouldn't be joining the peace talks and said that the military will quote, fight for a hundred years to defeat the RSF, which is the Rappis support forces with whom they're engaged in this war.
42:22And they've now got the highest level of hunger that has ever been recorded. We're talking about half the population now in a state of chronic hunger. So, sit down, 48 million people. It's big chunk of territory below Egypt and the sort of upper Nile and it's surrounded by Eritrea, Ethiopia, Chad, Central African Republic, Libya. It's a country where this fight partly has its roots and other things. So people remember that The southern part of Sudan, South Sudan, became independent, and that was a huge change because that took away about three quarters of their oil revenue, had a huge economic impact on Sudan itself.
43:05People remember also Darfur and the horrible civil wars that were happening in West Sudan, out of which this thing called the RSF emerged because that was the Janger -Weed militia again that people may have heard of that were fighting in Darfur. Their dictator toppled in 2019, a civilian government in for a couple of years. Not really, I would argue, getting the support it should have done from the US, Europe and others to really help it. So it was toppled in the military coup. And then the two big military haunches, the commander of the army and the leader of the RSF, then broke up with each other.
43:39And have basically demolished Cartouin. And Cartouin looks horrifying. I mean, looks like sort of dressed them. I mean, it's an uninhabitable city now. That was the capital city. And everything else that comes out of that, you gave some of the statistics, but that also means that almost nobody's in school. Universities and hospitals are now occupied by armed groups, so people are not getting treatment or education. And the thing I think that connects the whole thing together to this guy that's refused to perform in Dubai and to this story about a multipolar world is that Sudan is a really striking example of how what we would call smaller or middle powers, much more than the kind of big traditional powers are stirring this up by funding other sides.
44:20So the UAE has been providing support to the RSF and this links back to gold and Yemen and amazing operations and Chad where they're pretending that they've got humanitarian facilities that are actually being used to bring in missiles and drones to help the RSF. And then on the other side you've got Egypt, Turkey and to some extent Qatar more on the side of the military. And this, again is a story that we've seen in Libya. It's a story we can see in Somalia. So I mean, I guess I suppose you just sort of throw that back to you. I mean, you know, we began by talking about how this isn't just about US China.
44:55This is about the rise of countries like India, but it's also about a world where much smaller countries, but with a lot of spare cash, are increasingly throwing their weight around the Africa. Yeah. And when, you know, when you're like us against you, you're like us against you, because I don't know if you saw it at the weekend, a dam collapsed in the Sudan. So leading to massive flooding, heaven knows how many deaths, how many injuries. And of course, one of the reasons we keep coming back to this is because it just doesn't get attention. So when I talked about the hunger, so this thing is, you know, United Nations run that have this thing called the IPC, the integrated food security phase classification.
45:36So more than 25 million people in Sudan now facing acute hunger and they say that's that the highest level of hunger that they've ever monitored within an individual country. We hear a lot about Egypt in relation to bordering the Israel -Garza Walters going on, but of those two million refugees who've actually left the country, they're in, you know, yes Egypt, but also Chad and South Sudan. So you're talking about the people fleeing poor countries to get to very poor countries to remind people where we were again With these coups that happened Sudan is the eastern edge of this huge belt across the Sahel where Democratic civilian governments have collapsed all the way now from coast to coast and been replaced with military dictatorships Which in the case of many of these countries certainly you know particularly Marley a Niger, Bikina Faso have been expelling French US troops and teaming up with the Russians and have actually cut ties to Ukraine because they're accusing Ukraine of attacking Russian back vagnomersenries.
46:38So it's astonishing how right the way across places like Marley and Niger, you can feel the repercussions of these much bigger global politics coming into this very fragile region. Just finally, Roy, on the point about this rapper, Maclomore, he did quite a long statement explaining why he wasn't going to go there, he couldn't support it. He also did said that it was partly inspired by what was happening in Gaza because he saw how the world had woken up to a particular issue and he's sort of saying that the world needs to wake up to this issue as well. When we were at the convention in Chicago, there was this rumor going around that Beyoncé was going to turn up, Taylor Swift was going to turn up and there was sort of massive of excitement about that.
47:19But what's your view about people in different walks of life who sort of, sort of, he's essentially boycotting a country over its foreign policy? Well, the question has it changed. I mean, someday maybe we should check to Bob Gilder for that. I mean, he very much thinks that the power of musicians and celebrities over things like global hunger and humanitarian disaster was much more powerful when they were doing the live aid conference and when they were getting ready for the Glen Eagles, which in 2000s. And I don't know whether he's right, but there's no doubt at all that there's something very shocking here.
47:52If this thing had been happening, if something like Sudan had been happening in the 90s or early 2000s, there would have been much, much more global attention on it. There would have been much more money going in. You know, the U .N .s barely got a third of the money that it needs. And there would have been talks about international intervention. None of that talk anymore. U .S. has lost its power. I mean, they basically completely humiliated the U .S. negotiators and lied to them. the Geneva talks, one side doesn't even bother to turn up to. So why is that happened? Well, definitely something odd has happened because if you go back to Darfur and South Sudan, you had a coalition of George Clooney, who really, really mattered in this.
48:31This is back in the early 2000s. You had Christian churches who really mattered, who were really important in the US for mobilizing Congress, human rights organizations, all coming together making this massive coalition, where you had people like John Kerry making almost daily calls to leaders on the ground when he was the section state. And now we're in a world where, as you say, obviously in the entire Democratic National Convention, I don't think anybody mentioned Sudan, they mentioned Gaza, and they mentioned Ukraine, but they didn't mention Sudan at all. So the world's changing, I think the trade union movements changed, I think, that musicians and celebrities have less power, I think, Christian churches, which used to contribute to international violence change.
49:10but also with generally in a much more isolation as well. Well, you know, we talked about Modi -Nabalhood first. You got, if you got Trump America first and then Joe Biden with a much more kind of America -focused attitude to foreign policy, you've got nationalism sort of developing around the world. People just seem to be caring less about other countries. And you saw that Kirstaama hasn't talked much about foreign policy. I haven't heard him talk much about Sudan or Britain showing leadership there or wanting to lean in. He had his first call with Xi Jinping last week and he's off to see Macron and Shultz today or tomorrow, I think.
49:45I listen, he's going to find, as every leader does, that foreign policy takes a big part of your chunk of your life, whether you like it or not. Maybe my final point, as you mentioned, these youngsters who were doing these speeches yesterday, there was a young girl called Daisy, who made a wonderful speech. basically saying, why can't we be nice to refugees? And there is something vile about the way that they're all kind of put in the same category, the same boat. But when you just think of that, one country, 12 million people have been displaced because essentially two leaders of warring factions have decided that they can't settle their differences.
50:21And we've also got to get the narrative back on being much more positive about the potential of Sub -Saharan Africa. It's got an incredible population. You know, as we often say, one in ten, the babies born in the world, we've born in Nigeria. There's so much talent there. Credible entrepreneurs, incredible potential businesses. It's going to be the supply for a loss of the critical minerals and rare earths that we need to drive the energy revolution. It's got the sunshine for solar. It's got the wind for wind generation. I mean, so we've got to find a way of harnessing the incredible potential of Africa, not just talking about it as a victim.
50:59And that I'd like to see maybe Britain working with France and Germany putting the EU back in that conversation that the EU used to be very central in, rather than us just sort of giving up on what's going to end up being almost half the population of the world. Well, that's an unusually gloomy note on which to end, or maybe let's come back tomorrow. Great. Look forward to it. Thanks again. Bye -bye.
From the publisher
Does Starmer have a plan to fix the UK? Why did Modi visit Ukraine? What is really happening in Sudan and when will it receive more coverage in the international media?
Rory and Alastair answer all these questions and more in today's episode of The Rest Is Politics.
The Rest Is Politics is powered by Fuse Energy, a green electricity supplier powering homes across the UK. Use referral code POLITICS after sign up for a chance to win tickets to the TRIP O2 Arena show in October. Learn more at getfuse.com/politics
TRIP Plus:
Become a member of The Rest Is Politics Plus to support the podcast, receive our exclusive newsletter, enjoy ad-free listening to both TRIP and Leading, benefit from discount book prices on titles mentioned on the pod, join our Discord chatroom, and receive early access to live show tickets and Question Time episodes.
Just head to therestispolitics.com to sign up, or start a free trial today on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/therestispolitics.
TRIP TOUR:
To buy tickets for our October Tour, just head to www.therestispolitics.com
Instagram:
@restispolitics
Twitter:
@RestIsPolitics
Email:
restispolitics@gmail.com
Podcast editor: Nathan Copelin
Assistant Producer: India Dunkley
Video Editor: Teo Ayodeji-Ansell
Social Producer: Jess Kidson
Producer: Nicole Maslen and Fiona Douglas
Senior Producer: Dom Johnson
Head of Content: Tom Whiter
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor + Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices




