316. Why Kamala Harris Still Has a Problem

12 Sep 2024 · 40 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Notes: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 316: Why Kamala Harris Still Has a Problem

Episode Overview In this episode, Katty Kay and Anthony Scaramucci discuss the current challenges facing Vice President Kamala Harris, particularly in the context of an election campaign where the economy is a pivotal issue. They analyze Harris's debate performance, her messaging, and Republican reactions to potential election outcomes.

---

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Kamala Harris’s Debate Performance
  2. Debate Insights:
  3. Many analysts believe Harris won the debate; however, her strong performance does not guarantee electoral success.
  4. Harris has yet to finalize her messaging, especially concerning the economy, which is central to voter concerns.
  • Strategic Messaging:
  • Harris is comfortable discussing social justice issues but struggles with economic discussions, which are crucial for undecided voters.
  • Emphasis on the need for clarity in economic messaging to resonate with voters facing inflation and cost-of-living concerns.
  1. Economic Concerns
  2. Voters' Focus:
  3. Cost of living and economic stability are the top concerns for voters.
  4. Focus groups indicate voters are impacted by rising grocery prices and economic uncertainty.
  • Messaging Challenges:
  • Harris's proposals, such as stopping price gouging, received mixed reactions, and she lacks a strong economic narrative.
  • Comparisons to previous candidates like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren highlight her need for a defined economic message.
  1. Republican Counter Strategies
  2. Trump's Debate Strategies:
  3. Trump's method of portraying himself as a victor, despite losing debates, is part of his strategy.
  4. The appearance of a sexist undertone in Trump's messaging and how it might influence voter support.
  • Potential Republican Outcomes:
  • If Trump loses, there are speculations about the future of the Republican Party, including whether it will stick to Trumpism or revert to traditional conservatism.
  • The rise of new candidates who align with Trump's base but could present a softer image.
  1. Harris's Positioning
  2. Strategic Recommendations:
  3. Harris should embrace her role as a champion of sanity and freedom, contrasting herself with Trump’s chaos.
  4. The importance of framing her economic policies to appeal specifically to middle-class voters.
  • Potential for Debate:
  • Discussion on whether Harris should engage in debates on platforms like Fox News to reach a broader audience.
  • The necessity for Harris to engage with voters directly to build trust and familiarity.
  1. Cultural and Social Dynamics
  2. Sexism in Politics:
  3. The episode discusses the additional hurdles Harris faces as a woman in politics, necessitating a stronger performance than her male counterparts.
  • Public Perception:
  • The hosts emphasize the need for Harris to connect emotionally with voters and address their immediate concerns regarding the economy.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Debate Success vs. Electoral Success: A strong debate performance does not directly translate to electoral victory; Harris must refine her messaging around economic issues.
  • Voter Concerns: Addressing the economy and cost of living is paramount for appealing to undecided voters.
  • Republican Party Dynamics: The future of the GOP may hinge on how they respond to Trump’s influence, with potential shifts towards or away from his brand of politics.
  • Strategic Engagement: Harris must actively engage with voters and communicate her plans clearly to overcome existing perceptions and garner support.

---

Conclusion This episode of "The Rest Is Politics" provides a thorough analysis of Kamala Harris's current political landscape, emphasizing the critical nature of economic messaging in her campaign. The discussions underscore the complexities of navigating public perception and party dynamics in the lead-up to the election.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Thanks for listening to The Restless Politics. Sign up to The Restless Politics plus to enjoy ad -free listening and receive a weekly newsletter. Join our members' chat room again early access to live show tickets. Just go to TheRestlessPolitics .com. That's TheRestlessPolitics .com.

0:36Boring money moves make kind of lame songs, but they sound pretty sweet dear wallet. BNC Bank brilliantly boring since 1865. Right now, with the home depot, you'll find stored solutions made to fit your needs. Grab an HDX tough tilt to protect your tools, or keep your sports equipment contained with reinforced snap fit lids, or stack up and make better use of your space with bins and totes built to last. Whatever your story, we've got the gear to keep it organized and protected at the home depot. How doers get more done? Gatorade is the number one proven electrolyte blend designed to hydrate better than water.

1:20So you can lose more sweat and raise your game. Gatorade is the venue.

1:35Hello and welcome to this edition of The Restless Politics US with me, Katty Kay. And with me, Anthony Scaramucci. You're recovered from the week and, are you still on that massive sugar high that you were on when you were down in the dead? No, I recovered from the week. I had a breakfast this morning of roasted Kat. I'm now looking on the menu for lunch for a girl dog. Don or Trump look like you're eating a cat at the end of that debate. I mean, this stuff is just, you can't even, I mean, listen, it's so crazy. And how many times in your life you said, you can't make it up. But when you have somebody that should be in an insane asylum running for president, but anyway, the cat tasted really good.

2:11We're just, I think the dogs are smarter than the cats, though, they, they heard Trump say that they're getting eaten and they were moving last night, you know, they were moving away from the television and they were running from Trump. Yeah, all the gazillion cat and dog memes that we are now going to have to sit through. Anyway, my cats and dogs are very safe. I can tell you, no one is eating them. The poor birds in my backyard are less safe, but there you go. So look, before we get going, we are very excited to announce that beginning on Monday, we have something a little different for you.

2:41We've recorded a four part series, which takes you behind the scenes of the 2016 presidential election when Donald Trump won the White House. You know, Caddy, it's just, it's just an amazing story, right? He's a reality television store. He's a property developer in New York and then 18 short months later. He's slayed. I don't know if you remember Charles Krautheimer. Charles Krautheimer is now deceased. He was a great conservative speaker. He said the 2016 slate of Republican candidates was the best that he's seen in history. And here comes Donald Trump. He smows down every single one of them.

3:18He defeats a Democratic establishment to win the presidency. And we're going to tick -tock this every step of the way. What happened? All the trials and tribulations. And Caddy, as you know, it creates post -traumatic stress in me, but we've already recorded it, so I'm starting to feel better. Yeah, I was there with you. I mean, I covered that whole campaign, and I got a little post -traumatic stress revisiting it all as well. We will release an episode every Monday for the next four weeks. However, if you want all four of these episodes on Monday the 16th, if you just cannot wait, you can sign up to our brand new membership club.

3:54Just go to the rest ispoliticsus .com to become a founding member of TripUS. It just takes you a couple of minutes. You know, when you read these selling blurbs, I'm like, I think it means she would have been such a good institutional salesperson on Wall Street, you know. I was like, I'm a little bit. Caddy, can I just come and work for you, Anthony? I know what was I doing going into? You know, I started out at the Bank of England. I could have stayed in finance. And what did I do? I went into journalists. You would have been running Goldman Sachs, but now you're stuck with me on the rest is politics US.

4:25And you guys are stuck with us too. Listen, okay, please support us. We're going to have ad -free listening early access to the series. And starting in October, we'll be releasing a bonus episode every week for our founding members. So sign up now for the rest is politicsus .com. Caddy is way better at this. I mean, I thought I was a good salesman, but I got to tell you're just blowing me away with these promos. These Trump mini series episodes will only be going out on our separate the rest is politics US feed. So if you're listening on Rory and Alistair's feed, they very kindly let us share their space for the last few months.

5:02To make sure we're not confusing you about which version of trip you're listening to will also be moving our weekly Friday episode over to the trip US separate feed to. So once you finish this episode, make sure you search the episode. Are you going to say anything nice about Alistair before we get out of this promo? Oh, Alistair and Rory who have hosted. I'm going to miss them. I feel like we've been tenants living in their basement for the last four months. I promise to say something nice about Alistair every 10 seconds, but not these 10 seconds. You just you just want to be teachers, but I'm afraid that spot is already taken Mr.

5:40Scaramucci. Okay, on with today's show, both of us Anthony have had a couple of days to digest that debate. You may have come off your sugar high. We'll probably have to have another look at the Scaramucci Lollipop by the end of this episode, which is fine. I will give you one more week to show it off, but I've had a really interesting few conversations over the last two days since the debate with democratic strategists with a very interesting woman who is actually a Labour party pollster for Kia Stammer in the UK who has been Deborah Matinson who's been over in the US helping the Harris campaign with some focus groups.

6:18And also with a couple of American strategists, I know. And, you know, I think there was a strong sense that Kamala Harris won that debate. There's questions about the impact the debate will have on the actual election. And there is also a kind of awareness, I think, that Donald Trump lost the debate as well as Kamala Harris winning it and that there were certain areas of her messaging, which she still has not got right, got strong and kind of forceful and crisp enough to make a sale to that whatever they are, 100 ,000 voters who are going to make the difference in this election. I mean, this is going to be such a tight election.

6:59And there's kind of whatever we used to say. There's a couple of Taylor Swift's concerts worth of people who are going to make the final choice. And the area that I feel, and I'd love your take on this because I know you've been kind of in contact a lot with the campaign, is that she just has not really finalized that message on the single biggest issue of this election. And that's the economy. And that Kamala Harris's background as a prosecutor has made her very comfortable on some areas. She was very comfortable on abortion. She's very comfortable on kind of justice and law issues, gun control.

7:35But she doesn't really have the background of kind of economics as her sort of political passion point. And I think that's still something she's going to have to work on if she's going to persuade those voters who are sitting on the fence. I do feel like I'm sort of the Democrats' angel of doom at the moment. You know, I don't think you're the Democratic angel of doom. And I'm going to say some things. And this is why we'll probably end up getting canceled at some point, Cadi, because I'm going to say things that people don't like in our current culture. But Donald Trump got elected, because we had a black man by the name of Barack Obama as president for eight years.

8:13And Van Jones, you and I both know Van, he worked for Obama. He's now a CNN comment. They're the night that Trump got elected. He said this was a white lash. And so Donald Trump blew the dog whistles and said, come out for me. If you're mad that a black man was in the white house, right? We named it the white house. So white people are supposed to live in the white house. So Donald Trump blows the dog whistle. Come out and vote for me. He wins the presidency. It was a white lash. Van Jones' words, not mine. So Donald Trump has great political instincts. And everything I'm about to say is totally inappropriate, but I want you to hear it.

8:50So Donald Trump goes back after getting destroyed in that debate because he was ill prepared. And he says, okay, I've got Roy Cohn's playbook. Okay. And so for listeners outside the United States, who is Roy Cohn? Roy Cohn was Donald Trump's lawyer. He was a very, very ruthless man. He was the lawyer for Joe McCarthy during the Red Scare in the 1950s. And he was a take no presiders attitude. And Fred Trump, Donald Trump's father said, go to Roy Cohn, he's going to mentor you. And Roy Cohn turned him into a ruthless SOB. And three things that Roy said to Donald Trump. Never apologize to anyone about anything.

9:28Never admit defeat under any circumstances. No matter what happens. It's 21 to zero. Don't admit defeat. I deny the fact that you lost an election. And then the third thing is no matter what other people are saying about you, go with your instincts. So let me tell you what Trump's instincts are right now. It's a team of one. He's talking to himself. There's probably like five people inside of his brain. And they're all having a committee meeting right now. And he's saying, you know what? This is a sexist country. I didn't win that debate. But I'm going to tell all my base that I won the debate.

9:59I'm going to go on Sean handed. He's shown immediately after the debate because I obviously lost it. And I'm going to say that I crushed her and her campaign is over. And he's going to use the prop that, oh, she's asking for the rematch only losing fighters or UFC fighters would ask for a rematch. She didn't win the debate. Why would you be asking for a rematch? And then the last thing he's saying is I'm going to go hard. Super hard at my base. And I'm going to find moderates that are actually sexist that don't like the idea that there could be a woman running the United States. And so whether people like this or not, that is Trump's strategy.

10:35Okay. And I'm going to say two last things quickly. The assassination attempt, if I'm being brutally honest and I'm grading both of us, we both got it wrong. We sat there in July, looked at each other and said, this is going to change the election. That picture of him, it's going to ascend him to the presidency. Cadi K, it had virtually no impact on the polling. It said virtually no impact on anything. And now we're at the debate. And some people like Frank Lundz, a famous political pollster here in the United States said this debate is going to win Kamala Harris the election. But I'm here to tell you that that debate is like the assassination attempt.

11:14It's going to last a few moments in time. It's helped her. It's helped her with the fun raising. And something happened this morning that we need to tell people, democratic registrations are off. They were boom when she got the nomination and they were rising. But in the last three days, they've trended downward. That's a problem for her. And she needs whether she likes it or not. She and Walt need more media time. They got to get out there more. This guy, JD Vance, I was trading the PPI numbers this morning because I do have a day job. And so I'm watching JD Vance on CNBC. And I said, this son of a bitch, I got to give him credit.

11:54He's on CNBC. He's lying through his teeth, the Trump won the debate. And he's lying through his teeth about the tariffs. And he's lying through his teeth about the economic policies. And by the way, he knows better. Yeah, of course he knows better. And he's lying through his teeth about all these ridiculous things. But the goal to go on CNBC and lie through his teeth and push back on the journalists is a winning strategy, Cadi. So guys, if you want to win this thing, you got to get in the flow. One thing that JD Vance said this morning that was true, he said to Joe Curtin, the anchor, he said, she's got to come into the process, the American journalism process, and answer questions.

12:34Easy questions, hard questions, medium questions. Just get out there. Any questions you got to do because if you don't do it, people are like, what is she doing? I agree. We got it wrong on that assassination. And I think we were both kind of, you know, we looked at that photo and it was such an iconic photo and his moment of strength and the fight, fight, fight. And also, by the way, that was when he was up against Joe Biden. So to give us a little bit of slack there, it was a kind of different era in politics. But I had this text, I flew over night from the States to London and I had this text from a very good, Dennis Kratik Stretter, just who basically texted me, same swing states, same undecided voters and same lack of clarity.

13:13And that was her kind of, you know, couple of days later analysis of Kamala Harris's problem. And it's true. There are still those undecided voters. And as we know, not very many Americans will watch the whole 90 minutes. I know this had record ratings and they said it had 60 million. But obviously what they're seeing are the clips afterwards. And what I'm hearing from people who really want her to win. I mean, Jim Messina, who famously managed Barack Obama's re -election against you and Mitt Romney, you personally and Mitt Romney back in 2012. They ate our lunch, actually. They ate your lunch.

13:49I was on Morning Joe with him the day after the debate and, you know, he was obviously saying she did a great job and we were all very impressed by her performance. And like you said, Anthony, she went through the playbook and she remembered everything and she prosecuted the case against him. But what his concern was was still that the lack of clarity on the single issue that ever since this election campaign has started, there has not been a single poll that has not showed us that cost of living inflation, affordability, whatever you want to call it, is Americans number one concern. So why is she not doing that, Kati?

14:25Look, it's not her wheelhouse. Her wheelhouse is law and justice and abortion rights. She's not Bernie Sanders who had Medicare for all, right? He had a very strong, clear, populist economic message. She's not Elizabeth Warren who had corporate greed. Again, strong, clear economic message. She's not Donald Trump who had immigration, strong, clear kind of message that he tied, yes, to cultural issues, but he's also tying it to the economy. And she has not developed. And maybe it's just because she's only been there for six weeks. Maybe it's because her team does not get how critical this is. And yet focus group after focus group, Deborah Madison, who's one of Kiss, Dumbass, Polsters and advisors, said she had had focus groups with people who are going through supermarkets.

15:12And as they're putting stuff into their basket, they're putting in orange juice, they're putting in milk, they're putting in eggs, and they're calculating on their phones how much it costs. And they get to the checkout and they put stuff back because they can't afford it. And that's the reality that a lot of these voters who are going to decide this election are dealing with. And until she comes up with a clear and crisp and passionate message. And I think standing there on stage saying, I believe in the middle class, I grew up in the middle class, I have a plan. It's not enough. Now, the one thing that Deborah Madison said when she focused group people, and I asked her, you know, okay, so of the proposals that Kamala Harris has laid out so far, are there any of them that are resonating with these, what she calls hero voters, the voters who will decide the election?

15:59Are there any of those proposals? And the one that she said, which I don't think you're going to like very much because a lot of economists and finance people don't like it, was the promise to stop price gouging by supermarkets, which got slammed by, you know, by democratic economists, who worked for Barack Obama. Centrist Democrats didn't like that plan at all, but it is the single proposal that she has come up with, the $25 ,000 for new homeowners, apparently is not resonating with them. It's not an easy one for her because her background is not in that field, but she's surrounded by smart people.

16:35And I think if they don't come up with a clear answer to this one compelling question, then however much people dislike Donald Trump's character, they have a nostalgia for the economy under Donald Trump. I mean, fair or unfair, they look back and they think, oh, price, you know, I could go to the supermarket and put stuff in my basket and I didn't have to take some of it out again at the end of the shopping run. So let me, let me test you. Damn, I hate these moments. Yeah, but not bad testing like the way you embarrass me with all these trivia things. I mean, just like I don't want to. Well, actually, I think I need another trivia.

17:09I want you to respond to some of these things. Okay. Yes. Who's fault is the inflation? And so I know that it's the situational. I know that if Trump had won the election, we'd have Trump inflation. I know that these things are cyclical. Does the American public know that? Who's fault is the inflation? It gets pinned on whoever's in government and it doesn't really matter who's fault it is. Yeah. Of course, it's supply chain. Of course, it's high interest rates. Of course, it's pumping. And to some extent, yeah, maybe it is the Biden administration because they pumped so much money into the American economy.

17:40There may be an element of that to which they hold on that. The pump started in March of 2020 under the Trump administration. So so you can't blame it on Biden himself. But I don't think it matters whose fault it is. It exists under them and therefore they own it. Let me say it differently then. If it doesn't matter whose fault it is. I mean, of course, it matters. It just doesn't matter to voters as they're deciding who to pull. I understand. But but if I'm if I'm on watch and inflation is happening on my watch and I pinned with it, yes or no? Yes. Okay. And so therefore, can I unpin myself with the American voters?

18:16Can I come up with a strategy to unpin myself with the American voters? And so I believe you can't. Okay. And I believe that you could message the people and I believe you can go on Bloomberg, CNN, MSU, you picked the measures. So okay, guys, here's the chart. The federal government put $3 trillion of cash into the economy to save people when they were locked in their homes. The federal reserve dropped interest rates to zero, which caused another $4 trillion to get dumped into the economy. The supply chain broke. Supply chain broke. And so we had less goods and services in the economy and more money in the economy.

18:52Of course, we were going to get inflation. This started in the Trump administration. No fault of Donald Trump's, by the way, I'm out here to blame him. And it's no really no fault of ours. We were trying to save the economy. Here are the things that Joe Biden and I have done to slow down the inflation. And here are the things that we've done to improve your bridges, rows, and tunnels. And we put $250 billion into manufacturing and reshoring. And oh, by the way, let me show you this wage data for lower and middle income people. Okay. And she's not doing that. And she's got to get out there and do that.

19:27And she's got to say, Oh, and you know what? Over the next six months is going to be better. If you stay the course with me in the next two years is going to be even better. If you go with Mr. Tariff, tariff Trump, you're going to have 20 % tariffs, 100 % tariffs. And you want to talk about regressive taxation. If you're lower middle income, he's stealing the money from you. And is going to drive up inflation and crash the dollar potentially. The way they handled the price gouging speech, the only thing people heard were price controls. That's the only thing they heard. So 37 states have price gouging laws.

20:01Many of them are conservative red states. And what are those set up for? Cad, I don't want to bore you with monopoly power and inelastic pricing. But let me just say a few simple things. If I control all of the product and the consumer needs the product and there's no competitor, I can jack the prices on the consumer. That's unfair to the consumer. The monopoly laws came into power actually in the renaissance Italy. People said, okay, we can't allow for that. In 1890s, we had the Sherman Antitrust Act in the United States. We got to bust these things up. They get too big. We had one company. I think you guys had British Telecromb in the UK.

20:42We had AT &T controlled every phone line, every phone call, every phone piece of equipment in the United States up until 1984. It was under the conservative Ronald Reagan. He broke up AT &T. And the great irony is the breaking up of AT &T unleashed all this innovation. And we ended up with Google and Facebook and all this stuff because AT &T was sitting on all that tech. They wouldn't let it out because they had a monopoly and they were controlling prices through the monopoly. Vice President Harris, all she has to say is people's look, when you have a monopoly or you have five food companies controlling the food, they control the prices.

21:21It's not fair to the consumer. I am all about market prices, but they're manipulating the prices on their side. I'm not trying to manipulate the prices. I'm trying to create fairness for the consumer in the freest possible market. You see what I mean? And by the way, my my rhetoric just now probably sucked a little bit, but you got to get reps in. You know, it's like training your mind. You got to get reps in. You okay? That interview sucked. Let me go to the next interview. Let me tighten up my language. And all of a sudden, two weeks from now, bam, she's on point on these messages. She did a week of debate prep and she was good, right?

21:57She was on message. She was sharp. She had her lines down. She was confident. She delivered super well. She didn't forget the lines that she was going to deliver. So it shows that it does work. I mean, I think of the of all of the things that you said that she should go on CNBC and the other business channels and say it's that the thing that actually moves the dial with focus groups and polls is the very last bit. It's it's not what happened beforehand. It's not what they've done up until now. I think keeping telling people that, you know, she could easily get pinned with bi -denomics, stop telling people that what they did has helped them when they're still going through the supermarket and they can't afford to pay for their groceries.

22:35Tell them what is going to make it better in the next six months to a year. And I think that's where she's falling down. Okay. Before we sound like we're getting super negative on what she's doing, there are a couple of things I think that she did well in that debate that she can also carry on with messaging. And I wanted to get your sense of those. One of them was that towards the end of the debate, when Trump was asked about 2020 and whether he thought he had won the election and he clearly said that he thought he had won the election and that he was only being sarcastic when he said that he hadn't.

23:09And she gave a what I thought was a very good rebuke of that because she tied his delusion or lying about the 2020 election to his mental fitness for office. And basically what she said is, listen, this guy either believes genuinely that he won the 2020 election, although all the facts and the lawyers and the courts have said otherwise, or he's pretending to believe it, but he's not up to the job cognitively. Do you trust somebody who is so delusioned about something as clear and obvious as 2020 with the realms of government? And I thought that was her comment on abortion has got so much attention and it was a very powerful comment.

23:52And the fact that he refused to commit himself to saying that he wouldn't veto a national abortion ban, I think is a problem for him. But actually, I think this answer where she kind of brought it home that he either doesn't agrasp or he ignores facts. And therefore, what would he do if he was having to negotiate with Congress? What would he do if he was having to negotiate with Putin? What would he do if he was having to negotiate with Kim Jong Un or with the Iranians? How would you trust him to have the real grasp of the facts if he doesn't get the facts of 2020? How can he govern? And I thought that she, I thought that was one of her most compelling features in this debate.

Read the full transcript

24:31And the fact that she went into it, as you said, well prepped, well versed on top of the subject. I mean, if this was a job interview for CEO, which of those two candidates would you give them the CEO's job for? Because if you want to be president of the United States, you have to prep, you have to know the facts, you have to be mentally agile, you have to be facile. And she proved herself, I think, better at all of those things. So I thought, I thought she did well there. I thought that was that was a point in her favor that will potentially help with those groups of voters who are still sitting on the fence, all three of them.

25:03Okay, so now I'm really going to get in trouble. Okay, you're ready because I've got the big butt. Okay, I've got the big butt. I'm going to try to end on a little ups. Everything you said is totally true. And she should be the president. I've obviously endorsed her. But ready? Yes. But she is a woman, Kadi K. And this is not 1979 and Margaret Thatcher in the UK. This is a sexist country. She is a woman. And so you know this about this country, you got to go 10 steps higher than any man. Any country. Any country. But definitely this one, she's a woman. And so to me, I would say there are three things that she's got to hammer into her campaign, her strategist and herself.

25:48Sanity. Okay, you're making a choice between sanity and insanity. A dog eating, cat eating, an election denying orange lunatic who 78 years old in mental decline. So sanity versus insanity. Freedom. Michael Lewis, the very famous author is writing about the federal government right now. And he's a gas that Donald Trump wants to fire 50 ,000 federal employees, rehire people that take a loyalty test to him and politicize the government, the government that's worked so successfully for us by not being politicized. Okay, you may not like certain aspects of the government. And certainly it could become more efficient.

26:32But the government has led to the most prosperous economy or been part of the most prosperous economy, one of the most exceptional countries in the world. And so don't break it. Okay, don't break it. Okay, so freedom. Okay, that would include reproductive freedom. And it would not politicizing things that shouldn't be politicized. And then the last thing is middle -class growth. Okay, the orange guy that I'm running against has done nothing to expand the middle class. Let's go over the Biden Harris strategy. And let's talk about what we've actually done to help the people that are aggrieved with the system.

27:12So I'm saying you get more freedom and you get more growth. And if you don't believe me, ask Goldman Sachs. And by the way, I know you're progressive and Goldman Sachs is a big ugly bad bank, but I applaud her for bringing it up into the big. Yeah, that Wharton School of Finance, no, she did well, kind of listing all of the financial institutions. They compare and contrast my plan to this guy's plan. This guy's plan is going to run into a ditch. My plan is about growth. The other thing I would add there is chaos that I mean, maybe that ties in with sanity. One of the things I think people do respond to people want, they want change in the sense they want prices to change.

27:53And they also want stability. This has been a really tumultuous few years, not just in America, but all over the world with, you know, we came out of 2008. We went into COVID. It's been, it's been a lot that people have had to deal with. And I think being able to represent stability and lack of chaos and say, do you remember the chaos that comes with this guy? And the sanity question, I think, is part of that. So look, there are things she can run on. I think we're both agreeing that, you know, she needs to work on that. And I think it's the last part of what you just said. And I think standing up there and saying, I have a plan for the middle class is probably not enough.

28:30There needs to be something more distinct. Get your reps in, get your reps in, build your mental biceps here. Let's go. That's what I'm always telling myself. And then I slack off and just don't do any more bicep curls. But there we go. I know you do. Okay, we're going to take a quick break and we'll come back and take some of your questions.

28:52This isn't ad from BetterHelp. At the moment, we're getting advice from everywhere. You just have to go on TikTok. Could be Alice's cold plunges. Could be my attempts to meditate or the digital detox that I'm doing in Colombia. But of course, one of the things that we know is that it can be incredibly valuable to talk to another human being, somebody who's actually been trained as a therapist to work through these ideas, calmly, objectively and professionally. And as the largest online therapy provider in the world, BetterHelp can provide access to mental health professionals with a very diverse variety of expertise.

29:28They've got over 5 ,000 therapists in the UK. They've helped more than five million people globally. And you can join a session literally at the click of a button. Change therapists anytime. It's obviously not about fixing you, but it's about hearing yourself clearly. Maybe for the first time. So talk it out with BetterHelp. Our listeners get 10 % of their first month at BetterHelp .com slash Rest Politics. That's better H -E -L -P .com slash Rest Politics.

30:17Trans starting at 1199. Saving is now in session. Burlington deals, brands, wow. Stalls on Selection is very by location. Put us in a box. Go ahead. That just gives us something to break out of. Because the next generation 2025 GMC terrain elevation is raising the standard of what comes standard. As far as expectations go, why meet them when you can shatter them? What we choose to challenge, we challenge completely. We are professional grade. Visit GMC .com to learn more.

31:01Welcome back to The Rest is Politics US with me, Katika and Anthony Scare -Moody. And before we start because I am the official salesperson for this show, listen guys, we are doing two live shows in New York City and in Washington DC at the end of October, right before the election. The New York tickets team, Anthony Scare -Moody, sold out in one day. The DC's tickets, Washington DC on the 30th of October team Katika, we need to do a little bit better. My hometown, please guys, come out and support us. It will be a really funny evening and it's right before the election. So I'm sure you'll have a ton of questions.

31:41So go to restispoliticsus .com. That's restispoliticsus .com. To find out about that Washington DC show on October 30th will be thrilled to see you there. And we are going to jump in because we've got some questions that have come in. I'm going to give you this one, Anthony. And it's from Mick Cavatt -Cini, which I hope I have said your name right. Why wouldn't the Harris team want a debate on Fox? If their intention is to broaden the base and reach traditional Republicans, great question, Mick. So I think it's a great question and I think she should debate him anytime, anywhere. And it's interesting.

32:22I was in the spin room before we went, I was in the holding tank before we went down to the spin room and her team came out to offer some suggestions of what they wanted us to say to the media. And he said the gentleman said, we've also requested another debate from the Trump campaign. There were a few people in there that's, well, why do you want to do that? She already won this debate. Why do you need to debate him again? And the point being is that she is still needs to get up to curve in terms of who knows her and how much they know about her and how comfortable they will be with her. That shows up in the polling, Mick.

32:55And so she should debate him anytime, any place, anywhere irrespective of the format. What about irrespective of the moderators? Because Trump has already said that he didn't want the two moderators who were proposed for Fox News, Brett Baer and Martha McCullum. Trump has already said he doesn't want them. He only wants Laura Ingram, Jesse Waters and Sean Hannity, who are big Trump supporters. Do you think that would make for a fair or useful debate? That would probably be unfair. That would probably be unfair. But it would take a lot of courage for her to do it. And if I was sitting in a situation with Jesse and Sean doing the antical stuff that they do for Trump, I would point that out to the American people.

33:39I say, great, look what's going on here right now. They're ganging up on me because they know that we're dealing with somebody that's unhinged. They know that doing something is not mentally well. We're dealing with an election denier. We're dealing with some of this cognitively impaired. And so we've got a three on one gang up right now, which is fine. Here's what I'm going to do for the American people. I think it would soften. And by the way, if they hit her like that, I think it would soften her. And I think it would make people rethink the bullying nature of Donald Trump. So I would do it.

34:08I understand why they don't want to do it. But to me, debate him anytime, any place, anywhere. I offered Steve Bannon money to come to my conference. And I said, let's debate. Okay, I'll pay $100 ,000, speaking fee. Come to my conference, let's debate. You pick the moderator. Roberta Thurin once said, no, Moss, when he was getting his ass kicked by Sugar Ray Leonard, Steve Bannon would not debate me because he knows that I know all the species lies that he's going to tell them to debate. And I'm just going to call him out. She's got to get there with Trump. She's got to be able to do that with Trump.

34:40Yeah, I think we need to hear more of her. So, Katty, I have a question. If I were back to you, Ashley Prime, which is a phenomenal name, by the way, Ashley, okay, what would happen to the Republican Party should Trump lose the election? Does it stick to Trump or have to reform totally? Okay, so I'm too biased to answer this question. There's a theory of the case that if Trump loses the Republican party as we have known it for the last 30 or 40 years, the Republican party of Mitt Romney, of John McCain, of Nikki Haley even can say to the party structures and the party voters, look, Trump is a losing proposition.

35:19He lost in 2018. He lost in 2020. He lost in the 2022 midterms. And now he's lost in 2024. That brand of extremism doesn't work. Come back to the center because that's the only way that Republicans can win. Now, what I'm hearing from Republican pollsters and focus group people is something quite different is that actually if Trump were suddenly out of the picture from the Republican party, even if he loses the 2024 election, the person that people would like in the Republican party that polls the highest to be the next leader of the party is not Nikki Haley. It's Tucker Carlson, the firebrand media personality who used to be on Fox News and now has his own kind of show and that they still want that populism that it's going to take more than Trump leaving for this kind of nativist populist element that's in the Republican party to kind of work itself out of the system.

36:18I remember when Trump was first elected in 2016 speaking to actually a British political scientist and it was the kind of beginning of the populist era and asking them how long does populism take itself to work out through the system? How long do populist policies hang around before people start thinking they don't actually work for us? I remember him saying it took something between 10 and 20 years. So, 2024, Trump was elected in 2016. I think we have a while longer of this. I don't think Trump losing means that you're suddenly going to get the old style Republican party that we used to have.

36:55I think it's a brilliant analysis. I'm just going to add one thing. What if they could find a young candidate who can appeal to some of Trump's base without the cruelty or the harshness? Tucker unfortunately is all about cruelty and harshness. Yeah. So, what about finding somebody that can appeal to Trump's base with less cruelty and harshness and see if they can create more space for other types of people to enter that party? The party whether they like it or not is going to need a bigger tent if they think the issue there is how that person deals with the question of immigration. We spoke in the first half of this program about how the economy consistently is the number one issue.

37:35The number two issue is immigration in America as it is in Europe at the moment, such a big issue. We're seeing in countries all over Europe how parties that are anti -immigration are picking up support. So, whoever that young more open version of Trump was, more sunny, less cruel version of Trump was would have to have an answer to that that would satisfy people's concerns about immigration. Okay, here's another one for you from Ellie. We all know that Trump is planning on disputing any result other than a win for him. Do you think a landslide victory for Harris or a very narrow victory would be better for him to try and argue foul play?

38:19Yeah, I'm just interested in question. Again, another good question. I think obviously the narrow victory is the one that he'll have the most chops on. A landslide will be less compelling for him to make that argument. But I've been saying to people, and here's a little bit of projecting, by the way, I was out with Trump alumni last night. I have to tell you offline how crazy that was, right? Because there were some die -hard maggot people there that were trying to poison my drink and there were other people there saying Trump is crazy. It was really a nutty therapy session. But some of the die -hard maggot people are saying that Harris is going to challenge the election results.

38:53See, that's projecting on their report. Of course, he's not going to do that. But I think he's not going to challenge the results. I'm going to be the contrarian on this. I'm going to explain why. He's sentenced for his 34 criminal convictions on the 26th of November. If he loses the election and he does an insurrection move or tries to challenge a free and fair election, they're going to put him in jail. And he knows that. And he's going to be told that. And so I think he's going to figure out a way to mute that. And he think he's going to figure out a way to negotiate with these people no jail time for a former president on any of these things that he's done that are criminal and insane.

39:28And with that, great prediction. We will wrap it up. Thanks so much for listening. We'll see you on Monday for the first episode of our mini -series over on our separate The Rest Is Politics US Feed. Just search The Rest Is Politics US wherever you get your podcasts and hit follow. Bye for now. Thanks very much guys. We'll see you next week.

From the publisher

What does Kamala Harris need to do next? How would Republicans react to a Trump loss? Would Harris ever debate Trump on Fox News?

Join Katty Kay and Anthony Scaramucci as they answer all these questions and more on The Rest Is Politics US.

The Rest Is Politics is powered by Fuse Energy, a green electricity supplier powering homes across the UK. Use referral code POLITICS after sign up for a chance to win tickets to the TRIP O2 Arena show in October. Learn more at getfuse.com/politics ⚡

Get our exclusive NordVPN deal here ➼ nordvpn.com/restispolitics It’s risk-free with Nord’s 30-day money-back guarantee! ✅

TRIP TOUR:
To buy tickets for our October Tour, just head to www.therestispolitics.com

Instagram:
@RestPoliticsUS
Twitter:
@RestPoliticsUS
Email:
TRIPUS@goalhanger.com

Social Producer: Jess Kidson
Assistant Producer: India Dunkley
Producer: Fiona Douglas
Senior Producer: Dom Johnson
Head of Content: Tom Whiter
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor + Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics

All 501 episodes
316. Why Kamala Harris Still Has a ProblemThe Rest Is Politics · 40 min
Listen in VO