330. The US Election: One week to go

29 Oct 2024 · 54 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Notes: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 330: The US Election: One Week to Go

Hosts

  • Alastair Campbell
  • Rory Stewart

Episode Overview

In this episode, the hosts discuss

  • The upcoming US election and media trustworthiness
  • The Australian election and its implications
  • The rise of far-right politics in Europe demonstrated through recent elections in Austria and Georgia

Key Discussions

US Election Insights

  • Media Trustworthiness: The hosts dissect the reliability of media outlets in the lead-up to the election, highlighting:
  • Endorsement Dynamics:
  • The New York Times endorsed Kamala Harris.
  • The Washington Post and LA Times chose not to endorse any candidate, marking a significant departure from historical practice.
  • The hosts speculate on the implications of this decision, suggesting it stems from ownership influences (e.g., Jeff Bezos's reluctance to offend Trump).

Commentary on Trump and Media

  • The Role of Influential Figures: Discussion on the influence of figures like Elon Musk and Tucker Carlson in Trump’s rallies.
  • Rhetoric and Public Perception: Analysis of the language used by Trump supporters at rallies, including derogatory comments about Kamala Harris.

Discussion on Kamala Harris

  • Strategic Messaging: The hosts emphasize the need for Harris to focus on her policies and vision rather than primarily attacking Trump.
  • Youth Engagement: The significance of young voters, particularly young women, in the electoral process.

Global Perspectives

  • Australia's Political Landscape:
  • Overview of the recent Queensland election and its implications for the national political climate.
  • Discussion on the effectiveness of compulsory voting and the rise of minor parties in Australian politics.

European Far-Right Politics

  • Austria: The rise of a far-right party and the challenges of coalition-building among other parties.
  • Georgia: The recent election results and the implications of alleged electoral fraud.
  • The hosts discuss the role of European leaders and the EU in responding to emerging authoritarianism in the region.

Japan's Recent Elections

  • Political Turmoil: The impact of calling a snap election on the ruling party's majority.
  • Opposition Critique: The hosts draw parallels with past political strategies in other countries, noting the lack of clear policy differences from the opposition.

Key Takeaways

  • The importance of independent media and its role in democracy was a recurring theme.
  • The dynamics of youth engagement in politics were highlighted as crucial for upcoming elections.
  • The global rise of far-right politics is a concern, drawing parallels between various countries' political landscapes.
  • The ramifications of electoral strategies, such as calling snap elections, can backfire on ruling parties.

Conclusion Rory and Alastair concluded with a call to action for listeners to engage in the political process, noting the importance of informed voting and awareness of global political dynamics. They hinted at upcoming discussions regarding the UK budget in the following episodes.

Call to Action

Listeners are encouraged to

  • Engage in the electoral process.
  • Trust verified media sources.
  • Participate in discussions about the implications of global politics on local governance.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Thanks for listening to the Restus Politics, sign up to the Restus Politics Plus to enjoy ad -free listening and receive a weekly newsletter. Join our members' chat room again early access to live show tickets. Just go to therestuspolitics .com. That's therestuspolitics .com. At Blinds .com, it's not just about window treatments. It's about you. Your style, your space, your way. Whether you DIY or want the pros to handle it all, you'll have the confidence of knowing it's done right. From free expert design help to our 100 % satisfaction guarantee, everything we do is made to fit your life and your windows.

0:32Because at Blinds .com, the only thing we treat better than windows is you. Visit Blinds .com now for up to 40 % off site -wide plus a professional measure at no cost. Rules and restrictions apply.

0:50Welcome to the Restus Politics with me, Rory Stewart. And with me, Alistair Campbell. Rory, where are you now? Which bit of Australia are you in? I'm in Queensland where there's just been an election as you've been concentrating on. I'm actually speaking to you. I've just come down to Ken's, which is up for people that don't know Australia well, it's up at the northern edge of Queensland. If Australia looks like a sausage, it's like a pointy stick sticking off the top right hand end. And I've been a Melbourne, and I'm on my way to Sydney tomorrow morning, and then I'm going to be in Brisbane, and then I'm going to be in Canberra and then in Perth.

1:27Excellent. So we're going to talk about that election in Queensland, because it was actually quite interesting, I think. But we're going to start with the American election, not long to go. More elections, fascinating election in Japan. We're going to talk about that. We're going to talk about the election in Georgia, which is already proving out to be very, very controversial. And then we'll look ahead to the budget, although there's not much to say beyond what we've already said. And we're going to be doing a special episode on Thursday morning. We've managed to get our clocks roughly aligned so that we can both follow the budget and then comment on it, hopefully in an informed and intelligent basis the next morning UK time.

2:08That's the best we can do. Well, let's start on the US media. And I'll give a little explainer and then over to you for the commentary. So the three big newspapers, serious newspapers in the US are the New York Times, the Washington Post and the LA Times. And we're now obviously just coming to the election, where you and I are going to be meeting in the States, a little brief plug there. We're going to be doing a lovely election coverage about which, but more later in the show. And the New York Times has come out and endorsed Kamala Harris. But very unusually, the Washington Post and the LA Times have refused to endorse a candidate when I say very unusually.

2:48The Washington Post has basically regularly endorsed a candidate all the way since the 1960s early 1970s. There was an exception in 1988, I think. But broadly speaking, even with pretty mild things like, you know, John McCain running, they will have chosen one candidate or another. And the Washington Post has been very, very clear in its criticism of Donald Trump. Some of the best reporting on some of the travesties that Trump administration would done by the Washington Post. But it's decided not to endorse and the LA Times the same. So over to you for some commentary. Well, the obvious conclusion.

3:23And if sorry to for the relentless plugging listener and viewer, but the other thing we can plug is our interview on leading this week with Timothy Schneider, who is fascinating on the subject of freedom and fascism and tyranny. And one of the points he makes about avoiding tyranny is not to bow down to it even before it's happened. And my very strong sense is that that's what has happened. The Washington Post is owned by Jeff Bezos who until Musk came along was reckoned to be the richest man in the world, owner of Amazon, gets hold of the Washington Post. The publisher, which is kind of like an edit superior to the editors, is a guy well known in Britain called Will Lewis, former right hand to murder, former right hand to Boris Johnson, accepted one of Johnson's ridiculous resignation honors.

4:14And he is the one who was given the job of telling the staff that they were not going to be picking sides between Trump and Harris. And it is widely reported, I don't know, but widely reported that this is Jeff Bezos not wanting to offend Trump before the election. Then emerged that people of senior executives from Jeff Bezos' space exploration side of his business had been in discussions with Trump about a big NASA contract on the same day. So the very strong sense at the least of it's they've dressed it up as a sort of, you know, going back to our traditional of just letting the reader make up his own mind, our own mind.

4:56But it smacks to me of absolute cowardice and deservedly they have been losing an awful lot of subscribers in the last 48 hours. Yeah, but the whole thing's a bit weird, isn't it? Because these sympathies, the Washington Post and the LA Times are very clear. The editorial boards are very pro Kamala Harris and against Donald Trump. And Woodward and Bernstein, who famously from the Washington Post, Blue Open Watergate have put out a statement on Twitter condemning what Washington Post has done. And very, very few of the core supporters of Donald Trump read the Washington Post. So what on earth is happening?

5:33I mean, it would be a bit like, I don't know, a newspaper like the Guardian suddenly deciding it didn't really know what it thought about some about Donald Trump. So it's not going to have any impact. Everybody knows what the Washington Post thinks. It not endorsing isn't going to change anybody's electoral behavior. So presumably in the end, it has to come down to the business interests of Bezos. Yeah, I think that's right. And I think that's what I mean by by cowardice. I also think, by the way, that if that is the motivation, Donald Trump is not going to be abreast by that, because he will be thinking, well, why aren't they backing me?

6:08Because we know what he's like. And maybe this is quite a good bridge via the musk into the whole, the question of this enormous rally that Trump did in Madison Square Garden, where musk and Tucker Carlson, this just shows you the way that, you know, we talk about the kind of the sort of incestuous media politics world in the UK, but this is where musk and Tucker Carlson, two media figures, were very much part of the kind of headline act ahead of a head of Donald Trump as the sort of top headliner. And you know, it's very, very hard. I didn't watch the whole thing. Peter Hyman, my former colleague from number 10 was there and he sent through.

6:48I passed on some of his comments. Yeah, it's some some of the quite interesting. Do you want to give us some of them? What should I read them out? All right. Yeah, you, you, what did you, what did you make of what he was saying? Let me, let me quickly. I mean, I've had actually a couple of things, which I think, I mean, obviously we get a lot of stuff from different people who are out there on different sides of the campaign. But I thought your Peter Hyman stuff was interesting. And I'd like also to bring an affirmative mind who's been campaigning on the ground trying to get out the vote in swing states for Kamala Harris.

7:17So here we are. Here's your friend Peter Hyman. This is describing the Trump supporters in the crowd. One said that Kamala Harris was pathetic if all she's got left to close the campaign as abortion and Hitler. So comparing Trump to him, many of them saying she's vacuous and airhead doesn't have a single idea. Lots of talk of Harris's words salad. Largest mass deportation, which is this Trump idea of mass deportation of immigrants, very popular. Strangely given that Kamala Harris will be the first black woman president of Alexa, Trump seems to have a better personal story to tell the comeback kid.

7:51Every speaker repeats they tried to jail him, shoot him, etc. But he got back off the ground and fought back and will restore America's greatness, celebrity with genuine grit. So in very virtually everybody, I didn't watch the event, but I've been following, looking at lots of other social media this morning. Virtually every speaker used this phrase about you know, they tried to kill him. They, the person who tried to kill him was a registered Republican. So the way that they just, they, the Republicans, the Trump people just rewrite history as they go is pretty extraordinary. I thought that the bits that I saw were, I thought pretty horrific.

8:30And I think May in the end, Anthony Scaramucci are our US colleague. He said that he thought this could be an election losing event. And I don't know because there was this terrible joke about Puerto Rico. And do you remember when we met the Marshall Scholars in that trip organized by the Marshall Scholars in London recently, there was a Puerto Rican congresswoman who was a Republican. And I was sitting next to the dinner and she was trying to persuade me that Trump was, there's bad as I thought, etc. Salazar, she's called. And she has put out a thing this morning saying she's absolutely disgusted by the jokes that were made at the, at the expense of Puerto Rico.

9:10They're probably 450 ,000 Puerto Recruits in Pennsylvania. So they may be, may be brewing some of the, the warm up acts. That guy, Stephen Miller, who I think we're going to be careful with the Hitler comparisons and the fascism stuff. And I'll come on to why. But he was being, I mean, there is a physical likeness between Hebrew Gervals. But there's, there's somebody who's running this thing of the words that he was using and then finding words that Gervals has used that were very, very similar. You know, America must only be for the Americans, Germany must only be for the Germans and so forth.

9:45The reason why I think that the, they've got to be careful on the fascism stuff. I mean, I think Trump is a fascist. I think Musk is a fascist. I think that they have very, very, dangerous fascist tendencies. But there's a danger at this stage of the campaign, just a few days to go, that it sounds like when you're attacking him as a fascist, you're attacking anybody who supports him as a fascist. And it might go into that sort of, you know, when Hillary Clinton talked about the deplorables. So I think they've got to be a little bit careful. And I think the reason, the other thing that worries me about the, I mean, Trump is such a great sort of, he's got this, got even as I'm talking, I'm moving my hands like him, he's such a, he's so brilliant at what the Germans call this insensial, where this projection, he absorbs the oxygen.

10:32But I would like to hear more from Kamala Harris about, less about Trump now. Yeah. And more about her. And couple of small things. One of them is that, we, we interviewed Bill Gates on leading. And one of the things that people will pick up if they go back to our interview is how reluctant Bill Gates was to say anything public about Trump or indeed any other world leaders. It seems as though he's given $50 million to a political action committee to a basically finance in Kamala Harris's campaign. And it also seems as though Jamie Diamond, who's also this kind of great celebrity banker, is lined up for a position in Kamala Harris's team.

11:13But again, they won't come out and criticize Trump publicly. And it feels as though that's a little bit also connected with these awesome. One got that sense and knew when we were talking to Gates that, yeah, that, you know, he feels he's running a lot of businesses, he's running this huge foundation. I mean, and it's a sort of paradox, isn't it? Because in some ways, you would have thought if you're, you know, amongst the very three or four wealthiest men in the world with this incredible power, you'd have the freedom to speak your mind. But it almost seems with most of them with the exception of, I guess Elon Musk on one side coming out, strong for Trump.

11:45And another one of our subjects, Reid Hoffman coming out very, very strongly for Kamala Harris. But many of them seem to be ducking it out. Yeah, although when it comes to the sort of mega celebrities, then it's Kamala Harris is winning hands down. I think you, you know, I think if you're going to go for Beyoncé or Tucker Carlson, I think I know who most people, but they're not the big business billionaires, are they? The business people seem to be more more more cautious. And that's what's a little bit different to to the last time. I think the last time, Silicon Valley was very much on the, on the side of the Democrat candidate.

12:19I mean, Musk, Musk is extraordinary. I mean, in many, many ways, but I did watch a little bit of his speech. I mean, the guy, he's almost as bad as Liz Truss at public speaking. I mean, I felt at one point he was going to say pork market, but it was just so bad. But he's very, he's quite shy, isn't he? I mean, he doesn't, and I felt this when I listened to the, or maybe shy as the wrong word, but I listened to the Twitter interview that he did with Donald Trump. He's an awfully bad interviewer. He doesn't know when to let the other person speak. He speaks quite awkwardly himself. He's clearly not good.

12:52If you think about, look, he's turned Twitter into a kind of propaganda weapon for Trump. That's worth a lot of money. He's given a lot of money to Trump's campaign. He's got this million -pound, million -dollar -a -day thing for voters in Pennsylvania, which I think the electoral authorities are probably already looking at. So he, so Trump sees him as a very useful, financially supportive ally. I have got, and he's given, he's promised him this job, Department of Government Efficiency. There was one bit last night where Musk was sort of blathering at the, at the microphone. And there was a guy there, I don't know, he was like a compact type person who sort of butted in and asked him a question.

13:30I said, how much money are you going to take out of this multi -trillion -pound wasted government budget that we have? And he just sort of said that, oh, I don't know, two trillion. And the guy goes, two trillion, two trillion. And it sort of, it just felt, it just felt bizarre, weird, not thought -through. I think Musk is just enjoying being a mega -cell celebrity. To quote Cady Kay, so that you don't have to, I listened to Joe Rogan's podcast interview with Donald Trump. And that's that's some commitment that's, and I didn't make it through all of it because it's three hours long, right? And I mean, we're obviously, our own kind of mini version of this, Joe Rogan and podcasts, and particularly the Joe Rogan podcast, the big podcast, the US are incredibly influential, probably much more influential than questions like what Washington Post chooses to do or not do.

14:21I thought it was fascinating because I have never heard, and this is going to be depressing, I've never heard Trump so confident, so relatively understated, so relaxed. I mean, he, in a very, very odd way, he spent quite a lot of time asking Rogan questions. They rode out about an hour through, about boxing and martial arts. And Trump was just very confident, just saying, can you just help me understand what changed between the 15 round boxing rules and the 12 round boxing rules, and then Rogan would talk for a couple of minutes, and Trump would be like, aha, aha, that's very interesting, and that guy that was killed, what happened there, and then Rogan would talk a little about dehydration.

15:09And then this, so that's one thing, second thing, I totally disagree. I'm afraid with anti -scaramucci idea that there is strong sense of mental decline. That is a three hour interview where I didn't see any sense of mental decline. I mean, I think what we're picking up when they talk about Trump's mental decline is Trump's personality, which we've known about for 15, 20 years. Yeah, and his inability to differentiate between truth and lie. Yeah, yeah, absolutely, but he is, Chris Peelecens, he responds, and of course one of the things he does is he fires out statistics and details all the time.

15:47Much more than Kamaharis, a lot of them are wrong, a lot of them are lies, but when he's talking about Springfield, he'll say, it's a very nice town of 52 ,000 people, and it's just received 2 ,000 immigrants across the hospital, and the schools are full. And then he'll move on, and he'll, I mean, almost everything he does is much more, if you haven't heard a long interview with him, it's quite interesting, it's much more filled with data, much more filled with anecdotes, concrete examples. He's, well, he makes me a very good speaker, is that he's always able to reach for the detail, even if it's complete fecary, right?

16:22Yeah, he makes it up. I thought the bits I saw, I didn't watch the whole thing. I sort of flitted it in and out and fast -forwarded, but the bit, one bit that really caught my attention was when Joe Rogan was challenging him to substantiate this claim that the election was stolen, and I thought Trump got very, very lost, and at one point actually seemed to concede rarely for him that he'd lost against Joe Biden. He said, I lost by like, and he was going to say a few, he said, no, I didn't lose, I didn't lose. So, you know, he got a wonder. So I think the other thing, I sent you this thread from a guy who was saying that what that Madison Square Garden audience felt like was the culmination of all these male dominated, in fact, exclusively male, usually, chat groups in the early days of the internet, 4chan, Reddit, where they were telling each other, and then the whole in -sale community, essentially saying that, you know, their power, their strength was being taken away and they got to get it back, and they see in Trump, somebody who will get it back for them.

17:27One other thing about the Trump Rani Rourry, he normally wears a red tie and a red make America great, again, hat, cap. He wore black and gold, and they are the kind of the young boys, and they're the ones who sort of did the, you know, we're part of the January 6th insurrection. You're being much more trendy and technically adept than I am. I mean, I very vaguely, all this stuff you're putting out about 4chan and Reddit, I vaguely picked up because I listened to a podcast called The Witch Trust of JK Rowling, which made the case that quite a lot of different stuff on both sides of the trans debate emerged initially, in these quite detailed discussion groups and channels.

18:05But anyway, yeah, thank you. Okay, you're learning something there, I have to check that stuff out. I still feel that camera's going to win, and the reason I feel that is because I think that women, I thought the other big event in the campaign I thought this week was Michelle Obama speech. You and I both thought that Michelle Obama was probably the best speaker at the Chicago Convention, and I thought her speech the other day. I mean, it could have done with a bit of a trim at points, but I thought it was a brilliant piece of oratory, and I thought the way that she was speaking to men directly about the impact of Trump upon their wives, their sisters, their daughters, their nieces, I thought that was very, very powerful.

18:48A couple of quick things coming up behind you, you mentioned women, and I still think that's the number one big fact. I am incredibly confident that Kamala Harris is going to win this, and win this by a large margin. And I would bet £100 ,000, and you know, I'd make 160 ,000 on top of my 100, whereas if you bet for Trump at the moment, you'd make about 40 ,000. It's a huge spread. So, Rory, you just said you would bet £100 ,000, but I would. I'm very, very confident Kamala Harris will win, and I think the odds are ridiculous. I think the fact that their favourite in Trump so much don't reflect your big point is the number one fact that you, I think all that really matters is, apart from my belief that the permanent companies are panicked, and their models are broken, is that women support Kamala Harris, young women, much more than young men.

19:41So, we've talked about this as a kind of 16 -point lead amongst young women in Pennsylvania, where Trump has a 17 -point lead amongst young men, and all you need to know is young women are much more likely to vote than young men. And the turnout is what's going to fling this. I wanted to come back in a second. I let you talk, but I want to come back in a second. So, my friend who's been out campaigning in Michigan, and what he's picked up there. The point I was going to make about the polls, again, this goes back to the Joe Rogan interview, and Trump does do a lot of sort of thinking out loud, and he actually set out loud at one point.

20:11He says, you know, you pay like half a million bucks to these polling companies, and he's speaking there as you, the candidate, you, the campaigner, and they go out and they talk to 251 people, and they come back and tell you this stuff. And what he was admitting, this is the thing that Skyrim etching, I talked about at the O2, was that there's this kind of concerted buying of polls to come out with a certain outcome that you want. So, what I think this rally is about, what I think a lot of the stuff with the polls is about, what the whole sort of, all this kind of stuff moving on the markets is about, and muskies at the heart of this, is getting to a point so as the if and when Harris wins, they can be in far better position to say this was stolen.

20:56Right, right, right, right. Now, let me, let me just quickly on the question of turnout. So, my friend is canvassing in Michigan, and he did Pennsylvania in the last two elections now doing Michigan. So, I spoke into enthusiastic voters for both Trump and Harris, people who are not planning to vote. The famous undecided voter who needs more information and families who are voting in different directions, but by far most importantly, I've talked to people who still don't know where their polling place is, or more dramatically when the election is. Wow. Right, all this does not play the huge role in every swing voters life that we imagine it is, which is why turnout in these last few days is so important.

21:32Each day of dawn, I can literally take me from a trailer park or grinding poverty to an opulent gated community. And he really believes that, you know, I know that I've personally moved hundreds of voters across the line to actually cast their ballot in the years I've been doing this. And a given day, maybe only one or two in a few days of Duffton. But when things are this close, it really matters. So, and this is his point to you, Alistair. He says, um, remind us this to knock on doors before election days. Get out the vote. Knocking on doors is the ultimate way to disagree agreeably, having real human exchanges with decent people of all political persuasions.

22:09He's a lot in there. I mean, and again, the other point about Michelle Obama's speech, a couple of things. This is the same to use the same message that she had at Chicago. Don't just complain, do something, get out, get people to vote, drive them to the polling station, find out where they were going to vote, etc. And the other thing she, she made the point, Alistair chained at the same one, she was on the stump with Kamala Harris, is saying directly saying to women, it's a secret ballot. In other words, you don't have to listen to your husband or your brother or your dad to tell you how you vote.

22:47You decide how you are going to vote. And it is really interesting, the extent to which this sort of gender divide has become so big. So listen, I'm not as confident as you. I wouldn't be 100 ,000 pounds. I've been speaking to too many Democrats who are just sounding very, very, very jumpy. Now partly, I think that's just a feeling you always get at this stage of the campaign, particularly when the polls are so close. But I still, and I also think that in the closing days, I'd like to see less of the celebs, less of the straight for let Trump, everybody knows what they think about Trump. Keep the attacks going, but at a lower level, I think at the Kamala Harris campaign level, I want to see her, as her, because I think she's a very attractive personality.

23:36And I get all the stuff that Peter Heimann is saying, what's that, what that's about is the negatives that they've been pumping out about her. They're getting through. But you know, the more people see of her being at her best in the closing days and the best of the better than others. And sorry, did just finally on that, you'd want her talking about the economy, talking about Koso living, talking about what she's going to do for the American middle class, talking about what she's doing for the American economy. Just giving a bit of hope and things feel terrible, but the climate, I mean, the climate's just kind of gone from the debate.

24:08So I think that speech she made at Chicago, what Michelle Obama did, basically, I know it's easier for her, because she just dips in and out and one of her best slides in this speech was everybody knows I hate politics, right? But she made the same speech in a different context to the one she made in Chicago. Kamala Harris, I think, has to do the same, just to recapture that sense of optimism. This is a big change moment, and we've got to make the right choice for the future. And here's what I can deliver to you and let everybody else take out a drug. Okay, well, that brings us just before we go to the break to touch briefly on Australia.

24:45So, Alex, you just pointed out that I'm in Queensland, where there's just been an election, and tell us a little bit about why you were interested in the Queensland election, just to again, to explain for this is Australia is really interesting democracy, and it's interesting for many different reasons, compulsory voting, which we love, preferential voting, which gives opportunity for these people called the teal independence we often speak about, but also because it has a very strong state system as well as the federal system. Anyway, over to you on the Queen's election. Now, the reason I found it interesting and a bit depressing as a Labour supporter, if you have a map of Australia right now, okay, you've got the the federal government is Labour, Prime Minister, Antony Al -Balaisy, so that's all read.

25:25The whole of Australia is read at the federal level. And then if you go state by state, it is also read apart from Tasmania, which is the island at the bottom. So until Queensland the other day, with this guy David Christopher Lee, who's become the new Premier with a majority of one, but it was quite a big swing, although he lost a lot of support during the campaign, and the thing I think is interesting at the moment about all elections, we're going to talk later about Japan, is the challenge of incumbency. Labour has been very, very dominant in Queensland for quite a long time. And yet the Liberals, which just to remind people that's their equivalent to their sister parties, the Tory party, not the Liberal Democrats.

Read the full transcript

26:04So the Liberals seems to be streets ahead, they lost traction during the campaign itself. But the other thing is really, really interesting. I sent you this morning, right? I don't know if you had time to look at it. I sent you analysis by the Australia Institute, which is a research organisation. And the headline is the steady decline of voters choosing the major parties is reshaping Australian politics. And there's a graph, which we can put in the newsletter, state by state, showing how over the past four decades, the share of votes that's going to smaller parties and independence is risen in both state and federal elections.

26:40And it's really quite dramatic. And one of the most interesting things in Queensland was this guy, you know, we've talked about the Saira Vagen Connect in Germany. I don't know if you picked up about the Qatar Australian party because they managed to get three seats. They managed to get a abortion and abortion rights right into the heart of this debate. So again, we can romanticise about the Teals, but this is a party literally started by a guy. He then gave the leadership over to his son. And it looks like they're going to get three MPs out of this one, but they really, really impacted upon the debate.

27:12Stepping back for a second, I mean, so you're right, there's a lot of interesting things happening, a by Dan Australia, but the big picture, knowing very little about Australia, and I'm speaking to you, and having been here for just over a week, with another week and a bit to go, is just how healthy in some ways democracy feels in Australia. Very unusual, I mean, we're normally on this podcast talking in a gloomy way about the far right in Germany or whatever nonsense is going on in Britain or what's happening in the US. This is a very surprising country. It's a country where there's a strong liberal democracy, where the GDP per capita, how wealthy average people are, is much, much stronger compared to Britain than it was 25 years ago.

27:52So 25 years ago was about kind of just slightly below Britain. It's now well above Britain. As we all know, all our doctors are hiking it off to Australia to get jobs, the healthcare system works. Obviously, the sun shines quite a lot up here in Queensland. And there isn't the equivalent of really, on a national scale, the sort of far right populism that is tearing Germany to pieces, France to pieces, Hungary to pieces, etc. And they're very, very proud of compulsory voting, and they think that's a reason for it. Compulsory voting is amazing, and I also think preferential voting. So this thing that, you know, which was the way the London Meryl used to work, that if you didn't make it, get enough in the first round, you went through to a standoff, which allows these independence to come through.

28:33I also wonder though, to be a bit controversial, maybe wind you up a bit, whether one of the reasons why there isn't a far right movement here, we're not seeing the kind of populism we're seeing in Europe, is paradoxically because Australia did take quite brutal control of its immigration. And obviously, the thing that's really tearing Europe to pieces is the perception that people don't have control over immigration. That's what's giving the gift to the AFD in Germany, and of course, people talking about votes in Britain. That doesn't wind me up, because I think there's something in it. I think a lot of Australian politicians who listen to what you just said will be surprised, because I think they do feel a lot of the same pressures that our politicians do, but I think you're right.

29:11I think they've got far more cause to be optimistic. And remembering that they're in this place on foreign policy and big strategic stuff, which is they probably feel that their relations with Britain have weakened because of Brexit, and then much more focus on the European Union. They worry as much as we do about what's going to happen in the United States, but I think in terms of their own politics, the point I was making about incumbency though, so if you take Albanese, I mean, he won, anyone pretty well against Scott Morrison, but he's already, his ratings are already pretty low. Just quickly on that one, I mean, he'd just remind, he won on a very impressive, positive campaign.

29:52So Scott Morrison was very sort of mini -populous to ask first, as they're in Albanese, was all about a new politics and common interest and unions working with business and reaching out across the aisle. And that's how slightly come off the rails, hasn't it? I mean, Dutton has managed to punch into the middle of that. Interestingly, the guy in Queensland, I watched his acceptance speech. Now, this is a guy who's got a majority of one. And he's also in Brisbane, the capital, he got very little support. What happened was a really big rural, urban divide. So they got a lot of support and rural areas less so in urban.

30:27Just again, to bring that lesson out, I mean, that's the way in which although I think we both agree, Australians in a much stronger position than many other liberal democracy, that's a sort of parallel, isn't it? Because there's a sense that Labour the left is increasingly becoming a party of better off urban people and rural communities. In Trump's case, that would be Flint, Michigan, or as Johnson's case, the Red Wall are increasingly voting conservative for cultural issues, conservative for cost of living issues, whereas the left is getting the cities. Exactly. But I think Dutton, who's this former policeman, he's got these literally completely bally looks, looks like a better hard man.

31:06And he is proving to be quite a difficult opponent for Albanese because he's just going pretty much full on pressing the populist buttons. Now we'll see if it works, we'll see if it works. But my point is, and I just think in Cumbansy is such a hard thing in modern politics. And I think that's why Labour have lost in Queensland. In Cumbansy very hard, and also trying to hold the centre, trying to hold the progressive centre is very difficult. I mean, the classic example for Albanese is that even though the Australian economy is in a position that would be the complete envy of the British economy and you know, able to run budget surpluses and things we can even fantasize about.

31:43Nevertheless, of course, cost of living really matters, people are feeling it, people don't like what's happening on interest rates, they don't like what's happening on housing prices, so that stuff makes it feel like the Netherlands or Canada or Britain, so a lot of things in common. There's also problem stagnant median wages, so another problem they've got in Australia that we all have is this problem about what's happening to people in lower wages. But Israel, another classic example of ways in which Australia is not that different to the rest of the world. Albanese is stuck, you know, on the one hand he's accused by the Murdoch press, and I'd love to hear you a little bit about Murdoch press in Australia, but he's accused of abandoning Israel by them.

32:20And of course, the progressives and the Greens are being complicit in genocide. Murdoch and Murdoch papers in Australia, politicians probably talk about them way more than ours do. He has this big network of regional papers and they are pretty vile about labor, they always have been. They love these sort of, you know, a bit like with the freebie route with the UK Labour Party, they've had this great thing to get their teeth into recently because Albanese and his partner have bought this multi -million pound luxury beachside house. How did he afford that? He came from quite a modest background.

32:52Where does the money come from? I don't know. I don't know. I can't say I've looked into his deeply as the Australia papers are. All of those is causing a lot of grief. Also freebies on Qantas is also causing some problems. He's been getting upgrades on Qantas here. So I think the Mitzemeckos have written there too. Yeah, that stuff never helps, does it? Well, at least he's not going around getting into fist fights with constituents as one of the labour and pieces right now. Anyway, should we take a break and come back on Japan and Georgia? Very good. Looking forward to it. Thanks.

33:27This isn't ad from BetterHelp. At the moment, we're getting advice from everywhere. You just have to go on TikTok. Could be Alice's cold plunges. Could be my attempts to meditate or the digital detox that I'm doing in Colombia. But of course, one of the things that we know is that it can be incredibly valuable to talk to another human being, somebody who's actually been trained as a therapist to work through these ideas, calmly objectively and professionally. And as the largest online therapy provider in the world, BetterHelp can provide access to mental health professionals with a very diverse variety of expertise.

34:03They've got over 5 ,000 therapists in the UK. They've helped more than 5 million people globally and you can join a session literally at the click of a button. Change therapists anytime. It's obviously not about fixing you, but it's about hearing yourself clearly, maybe for the first time. So talk it out with BetterHelp. Our listeners get 10 % off their first month at BetterHelp .com slash rest politics. That's better H -E -L -P .com slash rest politics.

34:35Welcome back to the rest's politics with me, Anastak Campbell. And with me, Rory Schutton, coming very, very close just to remind people to tune in on YouTube. We'll be sending out all the details to people, but it's very exciting. We're going to be on with our US politics opposite number. On with the great Anthony Scaramucci, but also on with Dominic Sandbrook from the rest's entertainment, doing an amazing US election special out of the US. So looking forward very much seeing you flying straight from Australia to see you there. In the last podcast, we raised the issue of Georgia and Japan, both were going into elections and both have turned out to be really, really fascinating.

35:15So to depress listeners who are already worried that I've miscalled the US election, Georgia, where it looked as though the opposition parties were in a pretty strong position, and most of the polling was suggesting they were going to win, and the exit polls suggested they were going to win. Skippy -Doo, Sudden Surprise, the pro -Putin authoritarian Georgian dream party, has suddenly brought in a massive victory up from 48 % in 2020 to 54%. In 2024, getting over 90 % of the vote in some of these rather remote rural minority areas of Missouri, she and Muslims and Armenians and various else who've turned out in astonishing ways as far as possible from the election monitors into Bliisi.

35:57Anyway, every... There are a number of exit polls that came out as soon as the polls closed, and most of them gave the combined opposition, several parties who were all united by their opposition to Georgian dream gave them the win. And then a polling company with very close links to Georgian dream came out and basically said, no, no, no, they're all wrong. It's 54 % for Georgian dream. And then the electoral commission, which also has pretty close links to Georgian dream, they came out and said, Georgian dream was won. And then you've had the president, no less, the president of the country has gone out and said this election is being stolen, and is calling on people to take to the streets and protest against it.

36:38And meanwhile, you have just to give you a sign of who side people are on, Victor Orban, as we speak, on Monday, is en route to Bliisi to congratulate Georgian dream on their wonderful historic win. And Georgian dream have always said that Orban is like their model. And one of the things that people should be really, really worried about, and Geefa Hofstadt, another of our previous leading guests, he has constantly been very, very critical of the European Union and the European Commission, for not being strong enough on Orban and the anti -democratic tendencies that he is, you know, exporting to different parts of that region.

37:12He is basically saying that, you know, surely this is now the sign that the European Union has to take far more seriously the way that Orban operates, the way that it links up with Russia and their interference in elections and so forth. So this is a big deal and it's a bad deal. And, you know, you just go to feel for people in countries like this where they cannot trust their own electoral processes. Let's just develop for a second this Geefa Hofstadt thing. So it's again, just to give an explainer to listeners, basically in 1989, the Communist Party collapsed in Central Europe and then in 1991, the Soviet Union collapsed.

37:49And the story really from 1989 to 2004 is that in Central Europe and in the Baltic states, there were all these countries that were desperate to join the EU and NATO. And basically by 2004, they had succeeded. Meanwhile, in other places, Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan, which are these countries and the Caucasus. So just on the eastern edge of the Black Sea up above Turkey and Iran and below Russia collapsed into war and Moldova collapsed into war and Ukraine basically vanished. So you had two different stories happening in these sort of former communist states and on the edge of the Soviet Union.

38:26On the one hand, states moving rapidly towards Europe and NATO successfully of which, you know, one of the real poster children I suppose was Romania. I mean, Romania was a pretty desperate poor place. Lithuania was pretty poor, but by 2004, we're looking pretty successful. And that then meant that these states, as they came out of their civil wars in the 90s, began looking at that European model and thinking, well, wait a second, Romania and Lithuania can set off on these pretty positive paths. Maybe we could too. And these led to these things called these color revolutions where many of these countries had, you know, orange revolutions, other revolutions called off in different colors.

39:01And it was at this point that things became existential. And this is where I think your friend Giver Hoshchut is right. The European Union essentially took its eye off the ball and instead of really focusing on the question of the eastern edge of the European Union and enlargement, they allowed Russia to make the play. And particularly after 2014, which is when Putin takes Crimea, so 10 years ago, first time he changes these borders, he has had a determined effort to make sure that Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia and these other countries are going to remain within the Russian sphere of influence and the opposition parties that are trying to push for a pro -European western model are on the defensive and they're just not getting the support from Europe that they'd hope partly because there's no leadership in Europe.

39:47On the actual day itself, there was a European Parliament mission that was there along with lots of other election observers. And the general view was that the election day itself was pretty well organized. But they did say that they saw a lot of pressure, a lot of tension, physical assault of observers, lots of instances of stuffing ballot boxes, all the stuff that you associate with the kind of ballot ringing that we've seen before. And the final result, the official result as it were, Georgian Dream 54 .08 % and the union of these pro -Western opposition alliances 37 .58. So that's according to the chair of the Electoral Commission and that's a very, very big gap compared to even the Georgian Dream supported poll that came out.

40:32So that means they've got 91 seats and 150 member parliament. What it doesn't give them is the super majority which they need to make constitutional change. And one of the changes they were planning to make, this is absolute butanism, was to ban all the main opposition parties. So you can see why the opposition, they do see this as existential because if they don't, you know, at least establish that this election was somehow taken from them unfairly in the international public mind, then it will be like Putin and this you start at this sort of game and then once you get away, when you get away with the next one.

41:07My friend Geralt Knaos who I seem to be quoting almost more than I normally do my hero David Gork. Or your mum. Your mum hasn't even had one mention yet. My mum has no feature. He would ask, why is it that it's Victor Orban who's out on a state visit and why are the other European leaders not playing the other side? Why are they allowing Orban to have a foreign policy in Georgia, a pro -Putin or authoritarian policy? I mean, the Orban fantasy obviously now is this is great. You know, France is going to go with Marine Le Pen. My friend Alice is doing better and better in Germany. The Netherlands has gone with health builders.

41:44Austria has had a far right party come up top in the polls. So he knows what he's about and he's obviously looking and hoping that Trump's going to go in that direction too. Why are we not seeing the other European states, other European leaders pushing in the other direction? Who else could be on that plane? Yeah, but what would they do? Are they going on that plane in order to say well done, Georgian Dream U1 or accept the result or are they going to plane to say we share the concerns of the opposition? We'll go on the plane before the election? Well, they did sort of, Versa of Undelied did set out this sort of big financial package.

42:19But I think that they've got, for off that's point, is that they don't fight hard enough for the values that are meant to be at the heart of the European Union. And that's what allows Orban just to get away with doing whatever it feels like. By the way, I'll just briefly on Austria -Roye, really interesting there. As you say, kick or won a hard right party, won in that they top the poll. But every other party has refused to form a coalition with them. And therefore, the president is taking the very unusual step of not asking kick or to form a government. He's gone to the next party down, which was the governing party, the Chancellor Karl Nehammer, and asked him to form a government if he can.

43:02So that is, I mean, God knows where that's going to end, but it's going to take a long, long time to sort out. I'm worried by that too. I didn't think necessarily this is going to hold together. I think we're assuming that these politicians are going to hold their nerve. I'm worried that just for self -interest and power, some of them are going to break away. These coalitions won't work. And again, potentially Germany, really, it's just the CDU that stands in the way of this sort of center right, stand in the way of the FD and taking place. But I think there are lots of people in the Austrian -Less far -right, for example, Kuts, former Chancellor, who might be tempted to come to some kind of arrangement with a far -right.

43:42So I think it's still possible that we could end up with a very dangerous situation in Austria. Yeah, I think he's pretty discredited, but the other thing is the numbers. I mean, even if you put what would be a grand coalition of the conservators and the social democrats together, you end up with a majority of one, which is why they're now talking to the liberal party to try and build something bigger. But the point again is that I suspect that kick or they will be enjoying to some extent the fact that he's basically saying we top the poll, but they won't even let us talk to the other parties about former government.

44:13And therefore that might lead to another election down the track. Which presumably Marine Le Pen is going to lean into. I mean, that'll be an obvious narrative for her going into presidential election. So let me just finish that on this. What has gone wrong with European foreign policy? Now, they spent a lot of time between sort of 2004, 2014, mucking around with treaty change. And a lot of the treaty change was about creating an external action service in a common European foreign policy. And basically, they put a lot of money into them at least, but they now feel completely irrelevant in the Israel, Gaza, West Bank, 11, and debate.

44:46They seem to take their eyes off the Caucasus and Georgia. The Balkans is not going well. Serbia is not going well. Cosfers not going well. Bosnian is not going well. Afghanistan, they seem to just throw in the towel as soon as the US announced that it was leaving and they had no independent policy at all. So what's going on? What's happened to the idea of European foreign policy? I think you're underestimating the impact that the drive towards nationalism is having on the big international institutions. You could say the same question about the United Nations. You could ask the same question about NATO, particularly with what's happening in relation to the upcoming American election, the possibility of Trump.

45:24So there was a very good interview, I saw by the way. I can't remember the name of the guy. A French politician was interviewed and he was arguing for much stronger European foreign and defence policy. By the way, I thought it was interesting. I was pleased that John Healy, the UK defence secretary, signed a pretty serious significant alliance with the German Defence Minister. I've always thought that Britain's way back into the European debate is through security and defence. I hope that's just the first step. But this French guy was making the point. He says, are we really going to sit around every four years dependent upon the votes of a few people in Michigan and Wisconsin to decide the security of Europe?

46:06He was basically saying that the reliance, the dependence upon America for our security has just gone on too long. We can no longer rely on it in the way that we have done so to the Second World War. So I think you're being a bit harsh about foreign policy. I think it's actually the deeper question is, why has the politics of international institutions become so bloody difficult? Yeah. There's also a question of European leadership, isn't there? Because macro is seen as a sort of slightly pompous Louis XIV figure holding forth in the Alize, if you're German or Swedish. And your friend Olaf Schultz, the Chancellor in Germany, doesn't exactly have a real credibility or legitimacy.

46:44You normally say my friend Macron, not my friend Schultz. I think you pick up a few Aussie habits. You pick up these sort of, you're wacky liberal, you just head the ball out. Yeah, but where's the European leadership? Where are the people who are really going to be able to articulate what that foreign policy is? Or lead on issues like the Middle East or Cox's or Balkans? Well, listen, there's an international bond that line has got another term. And, you know, I think she's a pretty impressive figure. But I think it's very, very difficult at the moment as they head of any of these big international institutions.

47:13They're dealing the whole time with politics that has become much, much more fractured, much, much harder to coordinate. And all, man, this is where F. Hofstad is right. All, man, is just taking the piss. He's not waiting for a concerted, consolidated, agreed line between all the countries of the European Union about how to respond to the Georgia election. He's just saying, right, okay, my side, when I'm in there to say, well done. That I suppose is the other alternative, isn't it? Which is maybe accept that you're not going to get a unified European foreign policy with people like all men around.

47:47And therefore, the other European states and Hungary is a mini -mini state with a declining population of small economy. So why are the other states? Are we going to stake Spain, France, Germany, Sweden? I mean, why are they not leaning in? Why's it all bad? And being allowed to make the running? Why can't they be making the running as individual states more for liberal democratic values in the West? I think those that try, like Macron, as you say, has become unpopular in his own country. And all of them are having to address really difficult politics within their own borders. And a lot of it goes back to the point you made out of immigration.

48:25Immigration has become a really big challenge. You talked about the way that the Australians had approached it. Now, Australia is an island and it's a big country, massive country with a population of fewer than 30 million. But you then within the European Union, you're talking about, you know, dozens of smaller countries, but all of whom are having to address a problem. And I think that what's happened is that the internationalization of the institutions worked very well for a while and is now working less well. And that is forcing everybody to respond to lesser and greater degrees to this old America first, Germany first, France first, Hungary first, whatever it might be.

49:03And don't forget as well with Orban, there's a guy whose domestic record is actually pretty poor. But first of all, he's got a group of the media, got a group of the legal institutions, played the Putin playbook. And now is able to sort of parade as this big foreign policy figure. But it's very depressing, which brings us finally just to conclude with an update on Japan. So attentive listeners of the podcast, indeed attentive, follows world news, will have followed the fact that there's been a new Prime Minister in Japan and the new Prime Minister chose to do the one thing that the rest of politics advises against, which is calling a snap election.

49:38Did not work for Rishi Sunak, who had he held his nerve and held on, would now be looking at better economic figures. Didn't work for Macron, who got himself an event of medicine. It hasn't worked for the Japanese Prime Minister, who looks like the domination of the LDP, which has dominated Japanese politics since the 1950s, had a bit of a wobble in the 90s, but has been absolutely the dominant force since the late 2000s, has basically come to a grinding halt. It really has, yeah. A disparate coalition has come after him and he's managed to blow his majority. And I think I'm right in saying, I think you predicted that.

50:09I think when we talked about it, I said that I still reckon the LDP would somehow pull it off, but they haven't. With their coalition partner, Komito, they've got 215 out of the 465 seats, so they're pretty well sure. You need 233 to get a majority. And Shigeru Ishiba, who's the former Defence Minister, this was his sixth attempt at becoming part of the leader, and he said that he called the snap election to bolster his position. Well, it really, really has backfired very, very badly. He's going to stay on. He says he's going to try build a coalition. The guy who ran his campaign, as basically decided to fall on his sword, but I think it's very, very hard to see how this guy lasts long term, not least because he's actually not very popular with his own and peas.

50:55And if you're not very popular with your own and peas, and then the election suggests that you're not very popular with the public, it's hard to see how you survive much longer, to be honest. That's just to make Japan, which is a very, very, just the most fascinating country, but to make it more real for British listeners, there's a little bit of the Ming -Var strategy stuff going on that we talked about in the way that Labour ran against the Conservatives. So Mr Ishiba himself had initially sounded like he was very radical. In fact, one of the reasons he was unpopular with MPs, but popular with the public as a whole, is he was always seen as a real kind of radical guy, and he was going to be doing stuff on interest rates and capital gains taxes and a nation version of NATO.

51:37And we hear bandend almost all that. Meanwhile, the opposition, and this again is a little bit out of the Kierstamer playbook, Rana campaign, where it was almost impossible to see any policy difference, what they were really running against as the LDP being a bunch of corrupt elite out of touch guys. You've been above too long. Exactly. It's your anti -incumbency, it's general sense that these people are corrupt and useless, rather than any grand specific policy proposals. The opposition clearly have increased their presence in the parliament. It'd be very interesting to see where he goes to try to form his coalition.

52:13I can't see them putting up with him for that long. They're pretty ruthless to Japanese when it comes to their political leaderships. Great. We shall see. Meanwhile, you and I are going to be back tomorrow, wednesday with question time, and then, Thursday, we're going to give our views on the budget. Are you going to be able to watch the budget somewhere, Rory? Yeah. I will be able to watch the budget somewhere between Sydney and Brisbane. Excellent. And then we'll listen to what Paul Johnson says and we'll say, yeah. That's right. That's right. Exactly. That's the way we go. How unusual approach the budget.

52:44That's how you should approach the exact thing. Very good. Okay, I'll ask the war. Thank you for the time. Bye -bye. See you soon, bye.

From the publisher

With one week to go until the US election, what media outlets can you trust? Is Australia immune to the populist wave that seems to be sweeping Europe? What do the elections in Austria and Georgia convey about the growth of far-right politics in Europe and beyond?

Rory and Alastair answer all these questions and more in today's The Rest Is Politics.

The Rest Is Politics is powered by Fuse Energy, a green electricity supplier powering homes across the UK. Use referral code POLITICS after sign up for a chance to win a signed copy of Rory and Alastair's books with personalised messages. Learn more at getfuse.com/politics ⚡

Get our exclusive NordVPN deal here ➼ nordvpn.com/restispolitics It’s risk-free with Nord’s 30-day money-back guarantee! ✅

TRIP Plus:
Become a member of The Rest Is Politics Plus to support the podcast, receive our exclusive newsletter, enjoy ad-free listening to both TRIP and Leading, benefit from discount book prices on titles mentioned on the pod, join our Discord chatroom, and receive early access to live show tickets and Question Time episodes.
Just head to therestispolitics.com to sign up, or start a free trial today on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/therestispolitics.

Assistant Producer: India Dunkley and Aaliyah Akude
Video Editor: Teo Ayodeji-Ansell
Social Producer: Jess Kidson
Producer: Nicole Maslen
Senior Producer: Dom Johnson
Head of Content: Tom Whiter
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor + Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics

All 501 episodes
330. The US Election: One week to goThe Rest Is Politics · 54 min
Listen in VO