357. Political New Year's resolutions, Elon Musk, and what happens next in Taiwan?

1 Jan 2025 · 56 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Summary of Podcast Episode: "The Rest Is Politics - Episode 357"

Episode Overview

  • Title: Political New Year's resolutions, Elon Musk, and what happens next in Taiwan?
  • Hosts: Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart
  • Release Date: New Year's Day Special
  • Main Topics:
  • Political New Year's resolutions for UK parties
  • Concerns over Elon Musk's influence
  • Future of Taiwan amidst rising tensions with China

---

Key Discussions

  1. Political New Year's Resolutions
  2. Labour Party:
  3. Suggestion: Pick fights with the right people on the right causes.
  4. Critique: Labour's recent negative media portrayal stems from fighting the wrong battles, such as with pensioners and civil servants.
  5. Historical Reference: Tony Blair's effective speeches as a model for Labour to follow.
  • Conservative Party:
  • Crisis: Rory discusses the existential threat facing the Conservatives, especially with Nigel Farage’s rising influence.
  • Recommendation: Leaders should acknowledge past mistakes while presenting new plans for the future.
  • Liberal Democrats:
  • Advice: Need to lead the national debate on Brexit and other significant issues rather than focusing solely on local campaigns.
  1. Concerns Surrounding Elon Musk
  2. Influence: Musk's contributions to political campaigns could lead to significant power imbalances in politics.
  3. Comparison: His influence is viewed as potentially more threatening than Trump's, with implications for democracy and political integrity.
  4. Call for Reform: There is a strong push for campaign finance reform to limit the financial influence of billionaires in politics.
  1. Future of Taiwan
  2. Predictions: There is a 30-40% chance of conflict over Taiwan, depending on China's internal dynamics and Xi Jinping's calculations.
  3. Impact of Trump: Trump’s return to the presidency might complicate the US response to a potential Chinese military action against Taiwan due to his isolationist tendencies.
  1. Broader International Issues
  2. Middle East: The likelihood of a two-state solution is viewed as very low due to current political dynamics.
  3. Ukraine: The stability of Ukraine's current territorial integrity may depend on European commitment to support amidst ongoing conflict.
  1. Reasons to be Cheerful
  2. Rory concludes with a note of optimism, suggesting that Europe may begin to take more responsibility for its defense and security, potentially leading to stronger alliances within the continent.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Strategy for UK Parties: Each political party must strategically position itself to address current issues effectively while learning from historical precedents.
  • Musk's Political Clout: Elon Musk's growing influence in politics raises critical discussions about the ethical implications of funding and political campaigning.
  • Geopolitical Tensions: The potential for conflict in Taiwan is a serious consideration for international relations, particularly with changing leadership in the US.

---

Conclusion This episode of *The Rest Is Politics* offers a reflective look at the challenges facing political parties in the UK as they embark on a new year, alongside crucial discussions about influential figures like Elon Musk and the international landscape concerning Taiwan and beyond. The hosts encourage proactive and strategic approaches to these pressing issues.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Thanks for listening to the Restus Politics, sign up to the Restus Politics Plus to enjoy ad -free listening and receive a weekly newsletter. Join our members' chat room again early access to live show tickets. Just go to therestuspolitics .com. That's therestuspolitics .com. At Blinds .com, it's not just about window treatments. It's about you. Your style, your space, your way. Whether you DIY or want the pros to handle it all, you'll have the confidence of knowing it's done right. From free expert design help to our 100 % satisfaction guarantee, everything we do is made to fit your life and your windows.

0:32Because at Blinds .com, the only thing we treat better than windows is you. Visit Blinds .com now for up to 40 % off site -wide plus a professional measure at no cost. Rules and restrictions apply.

0:50Welcome to the Restus Politics with me, Rory Stewart. I'm me, Anastakambo, first of 2025, Rory. Happy New Year. Happy New Year to you. Scottish Hogman A happening. Absolutely. Absolutely. No place on Earth like Scotland at any time of the year, but especially around about now. Well, Anastak, happy, happy New Year. And we're going to follow a plan that you've brought together where we're going to talk through New Year resolutions, but we're going to talk about what future plans the British should have, Labour, Conservatives, Lib Dems, but also what the future might hold for Donald Trump for Elon Musk.

1:28And what things might happen in 2025 that nobody has yet really thought about, what could this year hold? But before that, can I just quickly cheekily ask, are you somebody who does New Year resolutions? Yeah. You do. But are they secret? Do you tell us what they are? I saw. I kind of do do new resolutions, but I don't really hang on them for very long. Very good. They last about three days. Yeah, maybe a week. What are yours? I don't do them. I don't do them. I should start. Here we are. My New Year's President for the Year is I'm going to get going writing a serious book this year. Okay. Not long ago, you were talking about writing a novel.

2:10Has that gone off the boil? It's no good, my novel. Unlike you, I didn't think I'm able to write a novel. You've actually written novels successfully. I've decided I'm no good at the dialogue. Oh, don't get up. No, that should be your New Year's resolution. It needs to be perseverant about your novel. I actually very, very rarely. Actually, I will have a New Year's resolution. This is the first time I can remember in about 15 years where I haven't got a book actually on the go. I've always had a book on the go. Often I've had two or three books on the go. At the moment, I literally don't have a book.

2:46I wonder what it's because the podcast is taking a lot of my... I know. It is consuming a lot of mental energy, isn't it? Time and mental energy. Yeah. Yeah. Good. Yeah. Let's start with New Year's resolution. How about some political New Year's resolutions? I'm going to start with you. What should Labour's New Year resolution be? Oh, right. OK. Labour's New Year resolution should be. I think pick fights with the right people and the right causes. I think one of the reasons why the Labour government has had a very short honeymoon and is just surrounded by this sense of negativity. Partly media.

3:23The media has gone back into traditional anti -labor mode. But I think in parties because Labour had been picking lots of fights with the wrong people. And so you mean pensioners ever went to fuel farmers, now wasp women, just to remind people that don't know about wasp women. That's about women who caught on a cliff edge on when their pensions were going to kick in. Another one in Kierstarm's research speech just before Christmas. Through picking a fight with the civil service which wasn't necessary, this sort of sitting in the tepid bath of complacency would have managed to climb. Yeah. Yeah.

3:59You know, I think some good fights. I think one of Tony Blair's best speeches as Labour leader, best conference speech. And actually he didn't agree that it was one of his best and he retreated from it. But I would recommend that Labour go and read Tony Blair's forces of conservatism speech, where the fights that we wanted to take were the fights against the people who were holding the country back. I think you could have a very good and some of these are about thematic fights. I've been really alarmed the extent to which the kind of the fight against poverty and the fight against inequality and the fights against injustice and sort of, you know, slightly gone off the radar.

4:42I think they should pick a fight properly, probably with Elon Musk. I know that's a dangerous thing to do, but, you know, this is a guy who's a pretty dangerous force right now. Pick a fight. I know you think that the super richer attacks enough already, but the super rich who do not contribute taxes, who try to spend all that time avoiding taxes, I think there's a good fight to be had there. I think there is a good fight to be had with people who are trying to take the country back on, to sorry to echo Kamalares, but on some of what the right define as woke issues, which are proper campaigns of social justice.

5:19And just tactically, would you be picking a fight with Nigel Farage and Kimmy Bade knock or one of the two particularly on his through a risk of putting the spotlight on Farage? How would you think about that? Listen, the spotlight is on Farage, whether they like it or not because the Farage is is very good at getting the spotlight set upon him. I think they are both, Kimmy Bade knock and Nigel Farage are both absolutely forces of conservatism. They are people who are on the right of politics. And I think they have to be taken on. One of the reasons Nigel Farage and he was your politician of the year and the reason for that is because he's kind of he's exploited his arrival in parliament and his addition to the strength of his political platform.

6:07He's exploited it very, very well. That's the point that you were making. So you can't ignore him, you have to take him on in argument all the time. So I'm not saying you make him the big figure of your attacks, but he is a big part of why the country is moving to the right and Labour's got to drag it back to the centre. Having done so very, very well in the election campaign, having won that election but since then I just feel they've been picking fights with the wrong people. Yeah, that's a really, really, really good observation. I mean, I'll give my penny worse, but I think actually what you've just said is more interesting.

6:43I mean, my sense of where Labour's gone wrong is that they've done a lot of small things which appeal to the UK Treasury. Sort of sensible, small, tech ,ocratic decisions. The Treasury has always wanted to get rid of the Winterfuel allowance. Has always supported raising the pension age on Waspie women, has never liked the exemptions for farmers in inheritance tax. And Rachel Reeves, I think, is the heart of this problem. I think she is thinking too much still like her civil servant as though she's sort of bankiving the economists still. So she's doing these things which are presented to every minister.

7:24George Osborne makes jokes about this. This is basically the entire shopping list that every chance has been prevented with for 14 years. Most of them have had the political now not to make those their first moves. And the problem is that they don't add up to enough. Going back, you often are quite self -deprecating, interesting, about your early stage Labour. But I think that it is true that almost everything you did felt like it was about modernization or it was about social justice or about economic dynamics. And there was a kind of sense that everything tied into this. And they almost had this with the word growth.

8:03And I think it's a terrible, terrible decision to give up on a target of growth and talk instead about this sort of slightly tepid thing that everybody basically achieved since the 1950s. So GDP per capita and rising living standards. Because that would then allow them to do quite radical things instead of short term things. And so anyway, that's the enemy. And I think my final thought on that as whenever I reflect back to my own time and government. Is it is partly about Kierstrand, I'm really working out what he thinks. It took me nearly six months to remember as a prison minister before I really worked out what the one big thing was.

8:44And for me that was violence and prisons. And once I got it, I could then tie everything back into it. So I could explain that because the prisons were unsafe, people weren't getting educated. Because the prisons were unsafe, there was reoffending. Because the prisons were unsafe, drugs were getting in, etc. And I remember resisting it a bit like Kier is at the moment saying, well, you know, it's very complicated. There are many things we have to do. It's not about a slogan. But actually it was really helpful when I finally got to that boiled down to the big insight. And I think that should be growth.

9:14Well, that goes back to something we discussed a few weeks ago. When I, this was before Kierstrand did his reset speech. When I said I thought this should sort of, you know, take a deep breath, analyze the last few months, weeks and months, and then come back in the new year with the plan for growth. Here is the plan for growth. Almost like a big set piece event. Now it's difficult to do that now because it will, it will look like what the media will call another relaunch. But I still think if growth is the big thing, going through every, and presumably should be shouldn't it? Well, it should be for two reasons.

9:49One, because the economy is in a bit of a mess. And two, because they said it was going to be. Right. And so it's always, you know, and even though, as we said, at the time of the budget, they were specific about taxes. They were definitely not going to raise and quiet about the others. But the impression has been created and landed that they said they weren't going to put up taxes and they have. They said everything was funded, but now it seems as just black hole and, you know, therefore went to fuel payment, etc. So, but I think actually it is still important that they come back in the new year.

10:21And this is the plan for growth. Here are the big chapters of the plan for growth. Here is where we're addressing industrial strategy. Here's where we're doing skills. Here's where we're doing, you know, Europe. Here's where we're doing all these different things that relate to growth. And give themselves a kind of big root map that takes them through the next 12 months. And then because, you know, I was speaking to a minister a couple of days ago, who was saying, you know, and actually said, look, you sounded to get a bit grungy on the podcast. Well, yeah, I am getting a bit grungy. And he said, look, just relax a bit.

10:57We've got four years. And I said, listen, you haven't got four years. This is the period at which, yes, you can, this is a period where there's pre -delivery. You know, we used to talk about in 1997, Tony had this phrase, post you, for a pre -delivery. And it got, and it did get very kind of negative in terms of the overall mood. And you have, during that period, that's when an awful lot of opinions are being formed that are very hard to shift once they get up. Once they set. So the second half of the parliament is when you can begin to think about, you know, the next election. Right now should be absolutely focused on this idea of a root map.

11:35Where are we going, months to month, quarter to quarter year to year, how are we building the economy, how are we getting the health services set up properly. Now, I think they're doing parts of it well. And I know, Keir doesn't like this idea of what I call a narrative arc of a parliament, but you need one. Why doesn't he? What's he got? I mean, it seems to me completely central. I mean, even someone like me who can be a bit too verbose and a bit of a critic, I really concluded that my big lesson is narrative has to be tied to action. That there's simply no point because and there's a reason for that.

12:13The point that I try to make to him is that it's not as he might be tempted to think just a question of sort of cheap spin to the media. It's totally essential for leading and managing the government itself. That narrative is almost more important internally than externally. It's the thing that makes everybody at their desk understand this is what we're aiming for. This is where we're going. Yeah, and I think why not? I think because he feels that the way that he's done the job so far, he's done it by being this hard working, serious, sensible, steadfast. These are all good qualities, by the way.

12:52They don't get me wrong. They're good qualities. And I think he thinks that possibly thinks that people are trying to make him something that he's not. They say, well, you know, that's what Tony Blader, that's what Bill Clinton did. That's what Macron was doing. He's not that style of politician. But I think for the government as a whole and you're absolutely right is this is for internal communications as well as external public communications. You have to have this sense of that everybody inside the government knows what the whole of government is about and trying to do. And I still feel they're kind of they're struggling to get to that.

13:25Now, the one big advantage, Rory, is that they've still got main opposition party that seems to be struggling to find his feet as well. So what's your new year resolution for the conservative party? Well, the conservatives are in crisis and I was with senior Tories yesterday. I'll hold on a row. Before you go on, my definition of a crisis is an event or series of events that essentially comes together to form an existential threat. So when you say crisis, do you think that is an existential threat? I think it's close to it close to a threat to its existence because the crisis is about whether they essentially merge with reform.

14:06Right. And what's happening is that a lot of their major funders are holding the money back. They don't feel there's anywhere for their money to go. And the most live debate is what to do about fresh. It's this extraordinary situation where Farage with five MPs appears to have more momentum, more clarity than the conservatives with well over 100. And it's a situation where despite the fact the conservatives lost far more seats than Lib Dems and Labour than they did to reform, their total obsessed with reform. And Kimmy Bedanock has really got to find that oxygen. So she has to find a way of making sure that Farage seems irrelevant and that she's the leader of the opposition, not him.

14:56And how does she do that? I think she's firstly got to get out of her comfort zone. So instead of doing interviews with the spectators, she should be doing an interview with the rest of politics. Secondly, I think that there is an absolutely golden opportunity to nail Labour now on gross in the economy. If Labour doesn't manage to do what you're talking about in the beginning of next year, there's a really good story for the conservatives to tell that this Labour government is failing to make the investments, failing to reform, putting money into wages and unions. And I think there's also a gaping hole in defence, international security, foreign policy.

15:35Where again, there's a good conservative message about investing in the armed forces, Britain playing a bigger role in the world. So she should take that opportunity and I can't see her yet taking it. What do you think she should do? Well, this relates to what I was going to say that I think the New Year's resolution should be serious. I don't find them very serious at the moment about the sort of things that you're saying. So I'll give you a way, your point about, I think at the moment, I think on defence and foreign policy, actually the Labour government's been pretty good. I think John Healy's very effective as defence minister, I think he's saying and doing the right things.

16:12I think that David Lambie's actually been pretty good. And I think they both come across in the jobs that they're doing as being serious. Whereas I don't get that sense from as a whole, from the shadow cabinet, notwithstanding that our friend Andrew Mitchell is very good. But I'll tell you what I think in relation to what you've just said. So I'll give you an example of what I think she should say and do. There's no way that they can sort of turn around and say, oh, but we would invest more in defence. Because even though it irritates the public that Labour keep banging on about the inheritance that they got from the Conservatives, it's true.

16:49They left a complete mess. And if I were, Kenny Badenock, I would own that. I would own that. I would say, look, I'm not going to deny we left an absolute mess on so many fronts. And we all have to take responsibility for that. But now, the challenge that I face as the new leader of the Conservative Party is what would I do now? How would I rebuild the economy now? And here's a new set of ideas. How would I shape a new foreign policy now? And here's a different approach to the one that we did before. But I think while she, this has been her weakness in Prime Minister's question so far, it's almost as if the last government never happened.

17:29And the world started six months ago when the Labour government was elected. And I just don't think that can be effective. So she should own this place, how can I be intuitive? But she should own the perceived and real failings of the last government and use that as her lever for change. She did more of that in Rob Generic, didn't she? Because I remember her speech began with apologies. You're absolutely right. I mean, however unfair it is to Labour, tactically, it's inevitable. She's got to say, I'm really sorry, we fucked up. And this is the way that I'm going to turn it around. And I inherited a dismal situation.

18:08But here's the new plan, and this is the way in which we're going. And it's that that we're not yet feeling. And she's got to work out on earth she's doing with reform. Because I think that's the thing to just keep watching. Because it's going to feel increasingly as she struggles. You know, reform is now in opinion polls ahead of those Tories and Labour. Well, in some. Let's not make it in some. Labour's not chasing. It doesn't really have the option of being reform. But the Conservatives have that kind of dangerous temptation. Okay, last one on the UK before we move on to some good international stuff.

18:47How do you think the Lib Dems get more traction in the national debate? And I'm going to let you talk about that because I've got absolutely no idea what to do about Ed Davie.

18:57But he was your runner -up in Polish issue of the year. He was your he was beaten only by by Nigel Farage in your eyes. I like this is not going to surprise you, but it'll probably go down like a bag of sick with them. As you said, the Tories were more under threat from the Lib Dems than reform. And when we're talking and looking at the last last election and where the reason he fought the campaign he did. I'm not talking about the silly funny stuff, but the on the policy and the messaging was much more focused that sort of you know soft Tories as it were. I think the Lib Dems need to properly lead the debate on the impact of Brexit.

19:42I just don't understand why they've gone quite on it. I mean, they say they are thing, but really they've kind of they've let it go. Look, the fact that you and I how many events of you and I done between as this year dozens of them. I was in I didn't invent the other day with a law firm and it was a mixture of adults. It was a sort of bring your kids thing. It was adults kids. And I did my usual thing. How many people here think Brexit's been a success? Zero. Zero. And that's the same wherever you go north and south. Can I just interrupt for saying this law firm for their family Christmas party instead of getting Santa Claus got used to talk about Brexit.

20:22With a with a with a toddler's not a little bit disappointed when they were telling us a young boys only about six, but most of them they were mainly.

20:33I do what my kids would think if they turned up for the company Christmas party and instead of. You're a whole lot of it. Alistair talking to them about the single market. You're constantly dragging your kids off to see exhibitions to better carpets and the like. I mean, you know, I think so kettle black pot, etc. I honestly anyway, this was a law firm that was bringing. They were also inviting schools in. I'm going to give them a shout out. It was Pins and Mason's and they they have relationships with local schools and the kids gave it to schools as well. Anyway, my point is every single one of them thought Brexit was going badly and it was a bad thing.

21:15And yet you have just last week here's the summer rightly setting up some sort of unit in government to talk about how do we get close relationship with the trade with on trade with the European Union and break down some of these barriers that have been set up. And you have the idiot Johnson out saying, you know, this is a we've got a fight fight fight to stop the Brexit sellout. I'll tell you what the other reason why I think it be good thing to do because one of the things that the growing influence of reform in the debate reform being a classic populist party that doesn't really have serious thoughts through policy positions.

21:53It has positionings which it exploits for politics and that is sort of, you know, sort of negative eyes the debate in terms of how that debate is conducted. Actually the Lib Dems saying, can we stop focusing on this debate on a set of myths and can we actually focus on fact and reality. And I think that would give them traction. And the tactical problem presumably is that they ran a campaign which was all about focusing on very much doorstep local issues and it was triumphantly successful. They got a lower percentage of the vote that they got under netclay but enormous numbers of seats. And they deliberately didn't really have big national policy issues.

22:32It was all about, you know, cleaning up the waterways here working with this community hospital. So the question is, is Ed Davies a leader going to be able to transition having had this enormous success following one strategy? Is he going to be able to become a national leader? Now, I would say that is their opportunity with the conservatives this week. This could be an enormous and labor week could be an enormous opportunity for a really dynamic Lib Dem leader to really do a kind of macro and establish themselves properly in the center ground and roar into the next selection. Dominating the airwaves.

23:07Let's say it was Brexit or it could be net zero or it could be devolution. It could be to take a big issue. And basically say I'm sick to death of living in a political system where the debate that we have is really not focused on what is actually happening but on these political myths created by these charlatans like Farage and Johnson. I'm going to tell you the facts about this and I'm going to hammer them because as an opposition party, you need campaigns. Now, what are the Lib Dems right now campaigning on? Yeah, I don't know. And I'm afraid you need to stop at this point appearing in Santa hats.

23:47I mean enough already. We've got the point. He's funny. He does bungee jumps. He does this stuff. But he needs to now stop positioning himself as a potential man and government in four years time. And that involves getting rid of that stuff. Well, you can't have watched it because otherwise you raise it because you didn't see him on how I got news for you. Oh, no. Oh, no. Oh, no. Okay, let's go from how have I got news for you to another celebrity politician in the form of Donald Trump. How worried should we be after January of the 20th when Donald Trump becomes president? Well, the answer is very, very worried because America really matters to the world and because he's coming into a world which is much more dangerous and unstable than it was in 2016, 17 when he took over last time.

Read the full transcript

24:40So the whole post war system believes that the way that you stop wars, stop the first war, war, second war war was based on four things. One of them was making sure that there was open trade. So economies were interlinked and the great example there obviously is Germany France where they decided that the way to avoid going to war again was to get into this European Union. The second thing that people decided is that you needed generous international assistance to rebuild economies. And that was the Marshall plan. That was rebuilding Germany and Japan after the war. The third thing was setting up for this rule based international order which was the International Court of Justice and eventually the International Criminal Court and the UN and all these attempts to try to create an international system with rules and those rules were around respecting borders.

25:30So put an on invading curate or Ukraine, but also respecting human rights, which is doesn't matter if you're a Western ally or not, you should be held accountable if you commit war crimes. And the final thing was American hegemony that put this whole thing together. And I think the problem with Trump is he hits every single one of those four things. He replaces open trade with protectionism. He replaces a rule based international order with co -zing up to tyrants. He replaces development and support for other countries with cutting development age in America first. And he puts America into an isolated position that's undercutting world order over you.

26:11Yeah, I think it's potentially horrific. I guess, and maybe this is a wishful thinking, I was sort of, I was talking to somebody who was trying to explain to me. He is not naturally republican but did vote for Trump, who was trying to explain to me why he thought that he is not going to be as bad as we thought this time. That last time he wasn't very well prepared and it was all totally chaotic. This time he's much better prepared and he's doing what classic sort of art to the deal negotiation of staking a very, very tough position or all sorts of difficult issues. And then he's going to sort of, you know, wind his neck in a fair bit.

26:52I don't know if that's right or wrong. I do think on Ukraine, the one interesting thing I took out of that interview he did not long after the election. He did a big TV interview. He was definitely signaling a kind of change of tone on Ukraine. Either to the one that he was pursuing the election or that the ones that the real kind of, you know, the JD vanses who say, have nothing to do with it, we're saying. So it may be that he'll be, he'll be different. I think is, I think his economic stuff. If he goes ahead with the sort of, you know, tariff is the most beautiful word in the English language line that he had during the campaign.

27:26I think that could be a disaster for the world economy. But again, is that sort of part of a, you know, I'm the tough guy, get used to dealing with me, approach to things. I don't know. But no, I think it's alarming. But the fact is that, you know, we're going to have to live with it for four years. Well, predicting the American economy is a mugs game. And people predicted, you know, people I might immensely like Larry Summers predicted recessions and inflation that didn't happen. But it is true that he's taking over an American economy that's very different from 2017 because there's higher inflation and interest rates are higher.

28:01So if he decides to push ahead with tariff barriers, which will drive up the costs of goods, say, you know, 110 % import tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles or 60 % general tariffs on Chinese Chinese goods. If he does that, if he throws out 11 million undocumented migrants, illegal immigrants, that will create a labor shortage crunch. If he begins spending like Billy O through on defense and cutting taxes very dramatically, that'll roar up the deficit. So the worst case scenario you could see is that you end up with inflation taking off the cost of servicing the debt taking off and America finding itself in stackflation, finding itself in a situation where it's got inflation and recession at the same time.

28:49And we're not really factoring that in. And I don't know what percentage chance you put on that is that 20, 30 % chance. But my gut is that too many of the kind of people that we meet working in the markets have been so excited by the fact that the stock markets respond positively to Trump and that they see him as a business guy. And they're focusing too much on the appointment of the Treasury Secretary who reassures him because he's a hedge funder and not enough on the Thomas home and Stephen Miller stuff that's going on, which is the appointment of these much more right wing anti -immigrant pro tariff, more aggressive figures within the administration.

29:28So and that will change a lot of things because we're in a conversation in Europe where we've gone from five years ago thinking we all need to be like Germany to thinking we all need to be like the US. Now that will cease if the US economy begins to falter. Yeah, yeah. What about Musk? How worried do you think we should be about Musk? Again, we're back to talk about Farage again. I'm afraid because of course just before Christmas, one of the things that happened was forage and there's billionaire property developer Nick Candy, you know, Musk and Mara Lago. I'm Anthony Scaramucci who I like a great deal and we love his podcast with Cati K, but he did get something very, very badly wrong in the past because he told me absolutely hand on heart is not going to happen Donald Trump will never ever be present again.

30:17Now he's saying to us and on heart Trump and Musk it's done. It's finished. Musk is, you know, he's just pandered dream now. I'm not convinced about that. I get the sense that Musk is is really, really locked in there and is very, very powerful within it. And one of my favorite tweets towards the end of the year from our friend Tommy Vita at Potsay, America. I personally think having a ketamine adult billionaire, Oligar deciding which bills get passed by Congress is a great way to run the government. Now, and I think that the, I also, I did, you know, you know, it was really weird about these right wing people.

30:55And I know social media is not a great place for ironies, not great, but you know, when Tice and Farage and Rupert Lowe and these people were all saying absolutely nothing wrong. If Elon Musk wants to give 100 million dollars. Just for listens, these are all the reform MPs. The reform guys, yeah, you know, why are we getting so excited? These are the same people who used to sort of invent conspiracy theories about George Soros buying elections around the world. And this was terrible. So in response to this, I did this, I did a tweet breaking news. French billionaire Jean -Louis Lourish and German industrialist Hans Dietrich Geltman have decided to donate 200 million euros to a new campaign to get Britain back into the European Union after the disaster of Brexit.

31:38I'm happy to announce I will be campaign director. I'm sure that Nigel Farage and will see nothing wrong with this at all, common sense in it. You would not believe how many people took that seriously. One of them actually said your podcast should be called the rest of this hypocrisy. Why is it wrong for Musk to do this? But it's okay for this friction, German couple to do. I mean, absolutely madness. But the principle is that is the principle. If it is okay for Elon Musk to give money to reform, then it's okay for French people, Chinese people, Russian people, before we get on to the sort of big, or as you must campaign finance reform in the United Kingdom.

32:20Oh, got to work backwards. Absolutely. If it is even theoretically possible for somebody to give 100 million to any party, it should be stopped at once. Well, for an American citizen to do it, should be stopped for five pounds. Our elections at the moment go at about 10, 20 million pounds. 100 million pounds coming in is completely insane. It would be like, you know, aged 18 sitting down to the poker table and suddenly realizing that one of the people sitting down to the poker table is able to put 10 ,000 pounds on the table when you're all betting a fiver. I mean, it's mad and we need to change the rules to prevent that from happening.

32:58I think Musk is more of a threat than Trump. I think he's a genuine fascist. I think that he is somebody who loves the idea of being connected to stirring up a massive political movement. He loves the propaganda tool and he's showing the power of social media. X is a small platform with a few members, but he's doing something with it that nobody's tried to do with social media before. We saw with Facebook and Twitter in the Arab Spring that it was dangerous. But in those days, it was still just about pretending to play by the rules. If you put a weapon like that in the hands of somebody who actually wants to promote tweets from far -right groups in Germany, Austria, troll the British Prime Minister, fan a vision of anti -immigration, anti -climate, anti -development aid, you're doing something which is extraordinary.

33:53It's like the 100 million pounds coming into the British election. And I think nobody should underestimate Musk. I think he's incredibly clever. He's very, very ruthless. Look what he just did in backing Californian policies. He bucked the Californian policy on restricting his rivals so that he could then boost his business. And he's been like that ever since he was at PayPal. So I think he'll stick with Trump because he's actually a pragmatic businessman and a very ruthless businessman. And he thinks being close to Trump is going to allow him to get away with this crazy fantasy. And does Trump stick with him?

34:29I mean, the Mochis convinced that Trump has already decided he's outlived himself. And I saw that guy Adam Kinziger, the former Republican who sort of turned against Trump. He has started to call Musk, President Musk and vice president Trump. That's how he now defines them. Which is a clever way of undermining both Trump and JD Vance. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Exactly. I think that's right. I think the more you lean into the idea that Elon Musk is the first husband. The more you can begin to irritate both Musk and Trump. But just on the funding thing, you see, and I think this is again, is part they start at 100 million.

35:12They're probably going to end up where they say, well, why, if we can't give 100 million, why can't we give 50? Why can't we give 20 or heavier? But the fact is, when Kamala Harris was up against Donald Trump, I had so many people saying to me, why can't we donate? This is an election that matters to us as well. But you cannot, as a British citizen, you cannot donate to an American politician. Two principles in that. It should be a British citizen. The second is, even if it's a British citizen, nobody should be able to give 100 million, even if they wanted to. It's completely a grotesque, totally grotesque.

35:44And we need to stop a conservative party being funded by hedge funds, oligarchs, and a Labour Party being funded by trade unions, and all of them being in hocked. And we need to move, I think, to something that everybody hates, which is state funding of political parties, or very, very strict restrictions on how much you have. And I don't know whether the Labour government is yet really focused on the potential danger and damage that this can do. Look, and the thing that we're worried about as well as if they do bring it in campaign reform, funding reform, which they should have done anyway, the idea that it's going to be seen just as a way to try and stop for our country, which then again allows him to play the sort of, I'm the little guy up against the establishment, they're all trying to stop me, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

36:34Okay, Anastya, halfway through, rest of 2025 to come after a break.

36:45This isn't ad from BetterHelp. At the moment, we're getting advice from everywhere. You just have to go on TikTok. Could be Alice's cold plunges. Could be my attempts to meditate or the digital detox that I'm doing in Colombia. But of course, one of the things that we know is that it can be incredibly valuable to talk to another human being, somebody who's actually been trained as a therapist to work through these ideas, calmly objectively and professionally. And as the largest online therapy provider in the world, BetterHelp can provide access to mental health professionals with a very diverse variety of expertise.

37:21They've got over 5 ,000 therapists in the UK. They've helped more than 5 million people globally and you can join a session literally at the click of a button. Change therapists anytime. So obviously not about fixing you, but it's about hearing yourself clearly, maybe for the first time. So talk it out with BetterHelp. Our listeners get 10 % off their first month at BetterHelp .com slash rest politics. That's better, H -E -L -P .com slash rest politics. Let's play Burlington's Guess That Price. Back to school means Back to Saving. We're bringing you kids jeans starting at a hold on a minute, just 1199.

37:58Burlington's acing this test. What about character backpacks? We've got them starting at 1299. Burlington's done it again. How about sneakers for the kids? A plus brands and right on trend starting at 1199. Saving is now in session. Burlington deals, brands, wow. Styles on selections vary by location. Gatorade is the number one proven electrolyte blend designed to hydrate better than water. So you can lose more sweat and raise your game. Gatorade, is it in you?

38:38What about you, Robore? Here's a start of a 10. Who do you think will be the German Chancellor after February 23rd? Well, we know the answer to that because you've told us the answer to that. And you're presumably 99 % on that. So tell us who will be the next German Chancellor. Well, probably three drickmen out. Who's the leader of the union, the Christian Democrats and CSU, the Bavaria Party. And the great survivor, Alistair, is we picked up in the Angela Merkel interview because he was going to arrive all back in the day 20 years ago. Yeah, when Stoiba was the kind of the Chancellor candidate, hovering in the background, you had Angela Merkel and three three melts.

39:17And they didn't really get on that well. Merch is a little, is to the right of, he's probably more of a conservative than Angela Merkel. But there's a part of Merch that I like, Gory, which is, I know how obsessed you are with politicians and their hair. If you may know that I really don't like this bit of my hair, this sort of, this one, this one, this one means nothing to you, but this sort of Steve Clarage thing that comes down the front of my forehead. But Merch, if you look at him, he's got this isolation from the rest of his hair. So he's sort of bald, but with this little sliver at the front.

39:50But I think he's going to well, I think it's well ahead in the polls. But listen, we are living in such volatile times that, you know, you can't rule anything out. Scholz really does look like a man who thinks he can do something in this campaign. I mean, interestingly, I mean, he can look a bit from a distance like a kind of Biden figure. I mean, he's almost 70. He's got there by just hanging around and never giving up on the way that Biden did who kept losing his chance. So, so, so Biden obviously ran for the presidency many times beginning in the 1980s, never really worked out, just kept plugging along and eventually came through.

40:28And Merch is an older guy who you get a bit of that sense as somebody who's just stuck with it, been in the system, made it through. Or am I underestimating him? Has he got more of an edge to him than Biden had? Yeah, I think so. I think I think also he's getting on towards 70. He's got a lot of energy. He's definitely got energy. He's pretty strong Ukraine. I think what both of them have, but of course it's better to think about in common. So, it's much easier for the person out of government and the person in government. Neither of them are really articulating a strategy that says that the German economy, which we all used to think was kind of humming away nicely, is going to get back on track.

41:05But I'll tell you the other thing that's really been interesting in the election so far, much, much, much more robust campaigning, more aggressive campaigning than the Germans maybe I used to. And I wonder again whether that's the influence of the alternative for Deutschland or the way that they campaign. Presumably one of the things that we may see and to look at as we go into this is what happens to the AFD on the right and what happens to the far left, the Vulcan Connect party. Yeah, well listen, it's a totally different voting system. Whoever wins in quotes will have to form some sort of coalition with other parties.

41:42I think it's possible that you end up with a grand coalition between the CDU and the STP, but that's why the nature of the campaign is maybe interesting. But look, it's going to be one of the most important elections in 2025. And I could be wrong, but I think that's will be the next chancellor. Now what about France Roy, Beru at the time of recording is the prime minister. They had four in 2024. But can you see that last thing? Yes, I can't, I'm afraid, but it may be that I'm just becoming a French bear. I mean, it's true that they have had this thing called cohabitation in the past occasionally, but it's a very unstable situation.

42:24Their constitution to goals constitution basically creates the super power for president and assumes that they're going to be able to work with the parliament with the prime minister. And Macron by triggering this election has created this situation where I can't see how you keep things going if fundamentally either the far right under the pen or the far left under me no shong can pull the rug out from under you almost whenever they want or rather they can together if they decide to do it together. So I guess he's trying again, but I can't really see why you would be more optimistic about this than you would be about bunny it who any managed to last a few weeks.

43:04Yeah, no, it's the number. This is what happens with with with elections and maybe particularly snap elections is that the way the numbers fall. That's what the politicians then have to pick up and the numbers just don't work. The difference with cohabitation was was having a president of like I'm a Muishera can just a president of one party a government headed by the other what macro seems to be doing is trying to get prime ministers that essentially he wants them to be pretty much in his political space. Baniay to the right bill in the center but maybe leaning a little bit more towards the all men Tom category of politics but the france is is going to be so interesting this year because Macron certainly doesn't strike me as the sort of guy is going to throw in the towel early he's got the whole of this year and fair bit of the next before he has to go to you know leave office.

44:03So can you keep having sort of changes the prime minister does it become a bit like you know Italy used to be a laughing stock change is prime minister the whole time we were laughing stock change in the prime minister the whole time. Yeah, but but people point out that actually the problem is that it's more of a problem in France because France is so heavily centralized on Paris. Yeah Belgium you pointed out I think the podcast has had a lot of primal system frequent moments where it doesn't have government. But I then got called by Belgian friend who said yes but in Belgium there's a much much stronger decentralized devolved state system going on.

44:39It matters much less whereas France everything is drawn into the center everything's drawn into Paris and if they can't get a functioning relationship to prime minister parliament and the president. France is in much more trouble than these other countries and and of course the French president matters much more for Europe than the Italian prime minister or the Belgian prime minister. Yeah have you heard of Patrice de MacMahon who sounds like he ought to be a Scott MacMahon but in fact his family going way back descended from a former high king of Ireland. But Patrice de MacMahon was president of France and in 1879 he resigned after a similarly ill advised decision to have a snap election although ironically he was doing it because he wanted parliament to have more power than they then had vis -a -vis the powers of the president.

45:30Oh very good. I'm pretty amazing. You know we're responsible for the whole thing because it was actually John Law who was a Scott who managed to bankrupt the ancien regime and basically set the seats of the revolution with his amazingly cunning financial speculation. Well Patrice de MacMahon he was president and he resigned after losing support but we'll see whether we'll see where my friend Emmanuel Macron will do we'll do the same. So Rory I think this time last year or was it this time two years ago but you were sort of pretty sure that China Taiwan was going to kick off. I think what I've said is I think consistently but people can call me up is that there is a very big chance of it kicking off.

46:14So I keep trying to say 30 40 percent which is a way of saying I'm not saying it's certain that it's going to do it. It's probably less than 50 percent but people are underestimating the risk that as the Chinese economy struggles as Xi Jinping looks to try to regain popularity with his working class base. Nationalism becomes quite appealing and a lot of that I think will depend on his calculation of whether the Chinese military is ready and his view on how the world is going to respond. And if he thinks the world is in a relatively soft place where people aren't going to want to get into a cycle of sanctions and counter sanctions with China.

46:54Then there's no doubt in my mind that he sees part of his legacy being reincorporating Taiwan to China although he'd prefer to do it non militarily. And do we think that Trump's arrival makes China more or less likely to think that going after Taiwan is feasible? I think you're getting into this very strange question of mindset of very isolated leaders so Xi Jinping is now in for life already part of a polypuro and he will be guessing on the basis of pretty uncertain intelligence how Trump will respond. I mean after all you and I didn't really know how Trump would respond because he's got two competing instincts in his mind.

47:39He hates being humiliated which might mean that he wants to show strength but he's got another very very strong isolationist view which is this is none of our business and let me put it in really blunt terms. The only way of deterring China from going into Taiwan is with the US and that means US aircraft carriers. US aircraft carrier turns up it sunk by Chinese drone attacks 3 ,800 US servicemen die instantly is Trump the Trump that saw the Iraq and Afghan wars as terrible waste of time and energy going to want to explain to the American people why he's just lost nearly 4000 lives defending an island that will feel a very long way away from the United States.

48:24So I tend to the view that Trump will bark but in the end he's not going to want to deploy America militarily against China. Middle East more or less optimistic than 20, 24 new year about the possibility ever of a peaceful two -state solution. I think very unlikely to see sadly immediately a two -state solution might happen but it would be a miracle because Netanyahu smart rich and bangavir have no interest in a two -state solution. Trump's new ambassador Huckabee has no interest in two -state solution. I don't understand why Israel is continuing to bomb Gaza. I can't see what the strategic importance of that is apart from some strange internal negotiation with the right wing of Netanyahu's government.

49:15I think Trump will want the violence to cease and he'll try to put together some kind of version of his Abraham Accords but I think it's very unlikely that Saudi Arabia is going to play ball because the vast majority of the Saudi population is unbelievably angry and alienated by what they've seen in Gaza and I think they're very unlikely to feel that they want to make peace with Israel at this moment. I can't see a two -state solution coming but let me throw something else back. One of the problems is this crazy unknown unknowns. We've just seen in Syria how a situation that seemed static for seven years changed in a week.

49:57It's perfectly conceivable that we could see stuff that nobody's talking about. We could see the Iranian regime collapse and the Iranian regime could collapse and two directions could collapse and a positive direction and it could collapse in a negative direction. It's also perfectly possible that we could see things spreading. The sort of movement that we're seeing in Syria could spill over towards Iraq or Lebanon. We could see Turkey re -emerge as a player. This is in some ways a Turkish success. A Trump world where America withdraws more could be a world next year of Middle Power, Saudi, UAE, Qatar, Turkey playing not just in the Middle East but in the Sahel and the Horn of Africa.

50:43Yeah, anyway over you. I think another unknown unknown sort of feels very bubbly. This kind of American economy vibe at the moment. I wonder whether that's going to hold and I don't understand that. I can't pretend to be great understand of the whole crypto world but it feels very fragile to me. I wonder whether there won't be quite something of a crash in the US this year. Let's finally worry on Ukraine. Will Ukraine be the same Ukraine territory at the end of 2025 that it is now? I think that depends on whether you think Europe or bits of Europe are going to step up. So a lot depends on whether Poland, Nordic, Baltic countries and the UK step up.

51:30Yeah. Signs on that are pretty good I'd say. Yeah, but interesting. I mean, is it significant that Kierstamer hasn't visited Ukraine when Johnson and Rishi Sinat were perpetually going on? Well, John Healey, the Defense Secretary was there shortly before Christmas and announcing a whole new package of support. I think Poland is really interesting in this regard. I think Poland has really stepped up in terms of this commitment. The whole sort of talk is that Trump will offer some kind of bitter land, a bit of non -NATO commitment, whatever it might be. But I'm not convinced. I think there's a chance that provided Europe does hold for them.

52:06There's a chance that Ukraine will be the same. There's a very interesting thing at the centre of the Labour government that we don't talk about very much, which is that John Healey, as you say, has been a great defense secretary. We've got a leading interview coming up with Ben Wallace who pays tribute to him. But one of the appointments that maybe people who aren't being geeky haven't focused on very much is Alistair Khan's, who's a junior defense minister. And Alistair Khan's is extraordinary. I mean, it's a very, very unusual politician. He is an amazing fighting rar Marine. I mean, he's a real operations guy who played a very, very central role in what the United Kingdom was doing in Ukraine, which he doesn't talk about.

52:54But he's probably the most serious operational fighting soldier that's been in the British Parliament almost since the second mobile. And he's right there in the MOD. Now, he's not been given a big operational role. He's been given a veteran's role, which is a bit eccentric for somebody who's like a absolute kind of warrior. But that's a very interesting addition to the team and maybe a sign that I don't maybe be reading too much into it that Britain may lean in more operation into Ukraine. OK, Roy, final, final, final, final thing for 2025. Reasons to be cheerful. OK, OK, let me just before I go cheerful, I'm going to go really gloomy and then I'm going to go cheerful.

53:36So really gloomy. Sometimes we should talk about the significant risk of a dirty nuclear bomb going off in one of our cities. And we should talk about North Korea flinging nukes around. But reasons to be optimistic. I think if Europe sees Trump's retreat as a reason to step up and it begins to actually take more responsibility for defense and security and the new German Chancellor comes in with a bit of momentum behind him. It's likely to be him and forms a good alliance with Kirsta. You've got two big European economies that could begin to frame something not within European Union. But maybe with Poland with Donald Tusk and we've got the presidential action coming in in Poland next year.

54:22Things could begin to come together. We're actually this could be the beginning of Europe standing up a little bit more doing a bit more in the world. And that probably would be a good thing. OK, well my reason to be cheerful is Roy, things can only get better. Great. Well, listen, have a lovely new year. I'll know that you're seeing lots and lots of you through the year. Thank you to everybody who listened and watched last year and will listen and watch this year. Have a very happy new year everybody. Bye bye.

From the publisher

What should Labour’s new year resolution be? How worried should we be about Elon Musk? Could China move on Taiwan in 2025?

Join Rory and Alastair in this New Year's Day special episode to hear them answer all these questions and more.

The Rest Is Politics is powered by Fuse Energy, a green electricity supplier powering homes across England, Scotland & Wales. Use referral code POLITICS after signing up for your chance to win a TRIP merch bundle. Learn more at GetFuse.com/Politics ⚡

🌏 Get our exclusive NordVPN deal here ➼ nordvpn.com/restispolitics It’s risk-free with Nord’s 30-day money-back guarantee! ✅

TRIP Plus:
Become a member of The Rest Is Politics Plus to support the podcast, receive our exclusive newsletter, enjoy ad-free listening to both TRIP and Leading, benefit from discount book prices on titles mentioned on the pod, join our Discord chatroom, and receive early access to live show tickets and Question Time episodes.
Just head to therestispolitics.com to sign up, or start a free trial today on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/therestispolitics.

Instagram:
@restispolitics
Twitter:
@RestIsPolitics
Email:
restispolitics@gmail.com

Assistant Producer: India Dunkley + Alice Horrell
Social Producer: Jess Kidson
Producer: Nicole Maslen and Fiona Douglas
Senior Producer: Dom Johnson
Head of Content: Tom Whiter
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor + Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics

All 501 episodes
357. Political New Year's resolutions, Elon Musk, and what happens next in Taiwan?The Rest Is Politics · 56 min
Listen in VO