In short
The Rest Is Politics - Episode 363: The Return of Donald J. Trump
Episode Overview In this episode, Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart delve into recent global political developments, focusing particularly on Donald Trump's second inauguration, the situation in Gaza regarding Israel and Hamas, and the recent tragic events in Southport. The discussion highlights both the implications of Trump's return to power and the complexities surrounding Middle Eastern politics.
---
Key Discussions
- Donald Trump's Second Inauguration
- Context: Trump's second inauguration was likened to historical context, particularly referencing significant events in U.S. history.
- Speech Highlights:
- Trump declared a national emergency concerning immigration.
- He announced a pivot towards extreme isolationism in foreign policy.
- He introduced radical domestic policies, including significant changes to gender recognition and tariffs.
- The tone of the speech was markedly different, reflecting a more aggressive and polarizing stance.
- Immediate Actions:
- Signing of executive orders immediately after the speech, which included revoking previous administrations' policies and declaring intentions to limit immigration rights.
- The ceremonial aspect was overshadowed by the controversial nature of his policies, which received mixed reactions.
- Implications of Trump's Return
- Radical Shift: The episode emphasizes the contrast between Trump’s first term and his current approach, suggesting a more organized and aggressive agenda.
- Potential for Erratic Governance: Concerns were raised regarding the unpredictability of Trump's governance style, which may lead to instability within the U.S. political landscape and internationally.
- Isolationist Doctrine: Trump's approach suggests a focus on national interests at the expense of international diplomacy, raising fears about a transactional and protectionist global stance.
- Situation in Gaza
- Ceasefire Negotiations: The hosts discuss recent developments in Gaza, including a ceasefire and hostage release, but express skepticism about its longevity.
- Complex Dynamics:
- The likelihood of a continued conflict due to the Israeli government's demands.
- The imbalance of power and control between Hamas and the Israeli government complicates the reconstruction and governance of Gaza.
- The historical context of violence and distrust between Israelis and Palestinians continues to shape current political strategies.
- The Tragedy in Southport
- Incident Overview: Discussion surrounding the murder of three young girls by a young man known to the authorities.
- Inquiry Announcement: Keir Starmer's announcement of a public inquiry is positioned as a response to systemic state failures in preventing the tragedy.
- Underlying Issues:
- The episode raises concerns about youth violence and the state's capacity to manage risks associated with individuals flagged for violence.
- It underscores a broader debate on the balance between public safety and civil liberties, paralleling the discussions on governance in the context of Gaza.
---
Key Takeaways
- Trump's Agenda: His new term is characterized by extreme policies that may deepen domestic divisions and complicate international relations.
- Israeli-Palestinian Dynamics: The fragile ceasefire in Gaza reflects deeper, unresolved issues that will likely lead to further conflict if not addressed comprehensively.
- Systemic Failures: The Southport tragedy highlights the challenges faced by state institutions in preventing violence and managing individuals with known risks, calling for a broader examination of societal safety measures.
---
Conclusion The episode paints a grim picture of the current political landscape, with Trump's return marked by potentially authoritarian governance, ongoing international conflicts, and significant state failures within the UK. The hosts encourage continued dialogue and efforts toward peace despite the bleak realities discussed.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Thanks for listening to The Rest Is Politics. Sign up to The Rest Is Politics plus to enjoy ad -free listening and receive a weekly newsletter. Join our members' chat room again early access to live show tickets. Just go to TheRestisPolitics .com. That's TheRestisPolitics .com. The Rest Is Politics is powered by our friends at Fuse Energy. And there's still time to win one of our merch bundles signed by Alistair and me if you switch energy suppliers to Fuse by the end of January. All you've got to do is go to getfuse .com slash politics and use the referral code politics to sign up. And merch on with no merch it is worth considering switching to Fuse.
0:36There are green electricity supplier generating power from their own solar and wind farms and they invest 100 % of profits into building more renewables. Their tariffs are cheaper than any of the big six competitors so you'll still be saving money even though the price cap has gone up. And their customer service is excellent. Fuse offer 24 seven support and promise they'll answer any query within a minute on the Fuse app. So download it now, use the referral code politics after signing up, visit getfuse .com slash politics for terms and conditions and to learn all you need to know.
1:18Welcome to the rest of politics with me, Rory Stewart. And me, Alistair Campbell. And Alistair, I guess we're going to start with Trump obviously and then we're going to move on to talk about Hamas, the ceasefire, Israel and Gaza and then we're going to talk about the tragedy in Southport and the British government's response. But can we start with Trump? I think we have to start with Trump. I mean, it was just I was thinking when he first came in, do you remember what the big story was in the first 24 hours? It was a row about how many people he claimed were at the inauguration. Today he has announced, I mean, it really is sort of shock and awe.
1:58Even though we knew that they were better organized, we knew that they had this sort of project 2025 plan ready to roll. I think the speed with which he's pushing some of this stuff out is borderline terrifying. And of course, that's what he wants. He wants it to be borderline terrifying. But it's very, it feels very, very different in so many ways to this first year. Well, let's just quickly just summarize for people who didn't have a full chance to watch the inaugural what he said. So for see, it's presented as of course, Trump's second inaugural. And that's a great phrase in the United States because the second inaugural of Abraham Lincoln of FDR of Woodrow Wilson were these incredible events.
2:43I think it's the Abraham Lincoln second inaugural where where he does this with malice towards none with charity for all great speech. There was very little of that yesterday after say Roy. Yeah. So Trump's second inaugural. I'll just quickly run through the headlines and then give us your sense of how it it worked as a speech. So he immediately announced on immigration a national emergency on the southern border on climate. He was going to drill baby drill on protectionism. He was going to set up external revenue service with big tariffs and he announced that we're going to be henceforth only two genders in terms of American foreign policy.
3:22He says we're going to be judged not just by the wars we end but the wars we never get into. So that's hint of a new philosophy of extreme isolationism. He said that he was going to rename the Gulf of Mexico, the Gulf of America. And he said he was going to take back the Panama Canal, send astronauts to Mars. America was going to be respected again. And somewhat I think to the surprise of most international listeners, he announced that the United States would be a free sovereign and independent country. Anyway, over you on the general sense of watching this thing live. Well, several times during the day as I was sitting there getting ever more, I don't even know what the word was, but slumping deeper and deeper into a gloom to think this is happening.
4:08If you only kept coming in saying, why do you keep self -harming like this? But I felt well had to watch it. And you've got the right highlights in terms of the speech. But then of course he went on to sign all these executive orders. So when you mentioned Abraham Lincoln, seconded inaugural, I call it a badgered Abraham Lincoln in a sort of what looked like a boxing ring with a presidential desk in the center of the ring and the pen and executive orders, signing executive orders and getting these enormous cheers from a crowd of 20 ,000. So just just explain. So when he says in the speech, I'm going to sign an executive order.
4:50He then physically does it in front of the audience. He then what were we made the speech? Yeah. And just to give you the sense of that. So there he is, it wasn't outside apparently because of the extreme cold weather, but I couldn't help noticing the sun was shining most of the day. Sorry, just your joke there presumably is that given that he was so upset last time that there wasn't a big enough crowd, almost certainly he decided to manage expectations around the crowd by moving it inside. I don't know, but I mean, that is what that is what lots of people were speculating, although there were thousands and thousands of people who were heading towards Washington DC to take part.
5:25And I thought there was something very symbolic about the fact that the red mega hat people out there, Trump's our man, they were cut out from this in terms of, you know, they couldn't actually take part at all. And there in the rotunda, probably the place to the tech oligarchs, Musk, Jeff Bezos, Zuckerberg who looked like a hostage, the guy from Google, and they had better seats than the cabinet. They were alongside the sort of big donors, Millay and Maloney were kind of hovering in the background. But then of course right behind them are the former presidents, Biden, Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Georgian, Laura Bush, Obama without Michelle.
6:05They're all lined up there. And the speech basically was, if you're Joe Biden, you're sitting there having to smile your way through this guy, absolutely destroying your record, your values, your policies, everything. And then of course, we announced all these orders. And then he went off to do these various events. He went off the next stage, which was a really wild one of his weaving speeches to party supporters, JD Vance and Mike Johnson would behind him. And even there at times we're starting to go, whoa, where is this going? Then he goes off, there's other events, then he gets into this event at the capital arena.
6:41And he's on a desk there. And so he's got a white house official bringing him presidential folders with the presidential seal. And he's doing that big Donald Trump signature. And they go wild. So you said for example, he mentioned in the speech, drill, baby drill. He then signs we're coming out of the Paris Climate Agreement again. We're coming out of the World Health Organization. And they're sacking people who they believed he's sacking by social media, including people like Mark Milley and anybody who's got sort of federal positions, they're all going if they're considered to be disloyal. And it's being cheered like a goal at the football match.
7:17What's interesting there is I was following very closely the American reporters, and particularly the New York Times that was writing a live updated blog on the executive orders that they were predicting that he would sign. And it sounds to me as though they hadn't quite managed to anticipate with all their contacts and all their discussions quite the scale of this because they'd got to the fact that he was going to do something on the southern border to halt a legal entry. They'd got that he was probably going to allow more drilling, but they hadn't quite got to the scale of what you're talking about there.
7:56So this stuff was he kept this in his back pocket so that he was surprising people, right? Yeah. And certainly in the volume. Although he'd been saved for days, they'd been saved for days. There's going to be a huge volume of stuff. So he does the ones in the arena, does a speech, then he goes back to the White House, and the Resolute Desk is there, covered in folders, and the same official who's compact with him presently with these folders. And he's now doing this whilst doing a, you know, this I've been involved with, you know, they call him a pool spray at the top, you bring the press in while you're kind of busy doing stuff.
8:26So he's sitting at the desk signing things while taking questions, but all sorts of things you crane and what have you. You've mentioned the ones on the emergency declaration at the board and be clear what that means. That means he's, he now has the power to use the military and the national guard down there. He has the power now to unlock federal funding for the war. Cutting off birthright citizenship quickly on birthright citizenship to explain to people. So that that means that at the moment in the United States, if you're born in the United States, even if your parent is an illegal, you become an American citizen and he's he's stopped that now.
8:58Correct. That is one of the first that will end up in the courts. That is already, the civil liberties organizations are already saying that one's going to the courts, but the pardon to the January 6th with rioters or the hostages as he calls them. And well, I thought was extraordinary about the event in the rotunda and this barely came through any of the commentary. I kept thinking is somebody going to point out that this is the very part of the capital that those rioters on January 6th were looting and beating up police officers and so forth. So what you had was the Trump enjoying the pomp and the ceremony without any sense of that historical context of literary just four years ago.
9:36So he's basically pardoned all of them. Some of them, a small number of the really, really serious ones, they will have an offense against their record, but they'll nonetheless going to be let out. Now, in the speech that you that you saw and that you referred to the top, he talked about how his entire administration will be governed by the rule of law. I mean, it's hard to think. We know that he's convicted, Fallon. It's hard to think of something that undermines the rule of law more than something where one of the biggest investigations in American history led to considerable numbers of people going to jail for serious offenses and he now says they're pardoned.
10:13And I think this pardon thing is now emerging as one of the real weaknesses in the entire American constitutional setup. Oh, yeah. And Biden, pardon, family members in advance yesterday. Exactly. And as we've pointed out, there is basically no equivalent in summer like Britain. I mean, theoretically, there's a royal pardon. And it was used, for example, after his death to pardon Alan Turing, who'd been convicted of a pharmaceutical offenses. But the fundamental separation between the legal system and the executive is kind of rule of law idea and that nobody's above the law is really under threat here because you had, as you said, Biden pardoning his son, you also had this extraordinary final moment from Biden where he preemptively pardoned General Millie Fauci, Liz Cheney.
11:08And this, this, that wasn't really much for precedent for before. He's basically said, I'm going to issue a pardon without knowing what they're charged with. It's a preemptive pardon so that Trump can't then come and conflict. And some of the Democrats who were pardoned actually challenged this, some of the elected Democrats, and like we said, excuse me, we don't want to be pardoned and we don't approve. Biden's defense of this preemptive pardon is he's saying it's not that he thinks that they'd be put in jail. He wants to save them from the cost of having to defend themselves. But I think certainly many, many people within Biden's entourage do believe that these people could be arrested and could be sent to jail and don't trust the judicial system.
11:55And I suspect the reason that Biden is putting the emphasis on the cost so he's trying to re -emphasize how much he thinks they're innocent rather than that he completely believes the justice system under Trump can be relied on. That can only be out of a fear. And I wonder whether this relates to Fauci and Liz Cheney and the others as well, that they, they hurt something was coming. I don't know. This I've heard. I mean, so Reid Hoffman who we interviewed. And I think we've got quite a lot of this coming from your friend, the Mooch. Yeah. My friend too, but more your friend, the Mooch. You knew him well before me.
12:27But he's been pointing out for a long time this list. And obviously, Millie Fauci, Liz Cheney, are right there up on the list of the people that Trump's in. And Trump, of course, has repeatedly said that he was going to go after it. And I think in the speech that you watch, there was this amazing thing saying the weaponization of the Justice Department will end. And he's going to get rid of a radical and corrupt establishment. This is Trump's words, which has extracted wealth and power from our citizens. That's what we call gas lighting, by the way. Gas lighting. Because that is exactly what he's going to do.
12:56A very, very strong Trump determination to do this. But the thing I guess I'm getting at slightly long -windedly is that if the democratic system in the United States was functioning, you would trust the legal system and say, well, in the end, this is for the courts, it's for the judges, it's for the jury. It's not for one president to say, you're going to jail, and another president to say, no, you can't go to jail, because I've just issued a pardon. It's not up to presidents who go to jail or shouldn't be. This is why so much has been said, by people like Madeline Orbray, by people like Tim Snyder, who we interviewed on leading not long ago, that this is a precursor to genuine authoritarianism.
13:41It's why all of us are such a big deal in America that we talked about that before, that it's why it does have this huge admiration for people like Putin and Xi Jinping. This came through yesterday because Trump was even doing this thing, where he was saying, he and Melania walked down with Joe and Jill Biden to the helicopter to take them off and take them to where they're going. In Marine 1, it's the last time we'll use the presidential helicopter, etc. It's a nice custom and it's nice that the incoming guy can do that. And I'm thinking, is nobody even going to point out that he didn't do any of that when he lost, that he didn't turn up for the inauguration, that he left the White House before Joe Biden arrived, and that he consistently refused to recognize or accept that he's lost the election.
14:29And of course, these clearances, these pardons of the January the 6th rioters, that's all about saying he didn't lose the election. That is now sort of so embedded in the narrative. And of course, the worst thing from Biden's legacy perspective is that the legacy, whether he'd like say, or not in history as a one -term president, ultimately the presidency has gone back to Donald Trump. And he did lots and lots of good things as president, but people do remember these last minute pardons. They remember it with previous presidents, but he has done a lot of them. Just maybe move for a second on to what we're beginning to see about who Trump is and what the world is going to have to deal with.
15:09So I guess the first big fact that we've learned about Trump is maybe not a new one, which is that it's very difficult to know when he's going to follow through what he said he'd do and when he wouldn't. So he had said that he was going to end the Russia Ukraine war in 24 hours. He's now decided that it's going to take a few months. So that might make you think, oh well, you don't really need to take too seriously what he says because he'll just flip. But then you look at executive orders and many of those are of course exactly what he said he'd do. He said he would pardon the January 6th rioters.
15:46He said that he would declare an emergency on the border. He said that he'd revoke the electrical vehicle mandate. That is an interesting one too that maybe he's worth digging into a bit. Basically in order to get the American electric vehicle industry off the ground, Biden had quite generous subsidies for people buying electric cars. And Trump has revoked this, but presumably it'd be interesting maybe a listen can explain what that means for Musk, who of course is the largest electric vehicle manufacturer in the world, presumably was benefiting from people getting subsidies to buy electric vehicles.
16:20But just on that one for a second, how would you describe this type of person? Because I guess the routine that we had when he was in last time is he wakes up at some strange time in the morning. He watches Fox News. He goes on Twitter. He issues some radical statement. He then during the day his staff come in and they argue with him. And in some cases they row him back or they don't. And then the next morning he wakes up again and again does something very unpredictable and peculiar, which they then try to row back. What do you think this means for how government works? What would he be like working for someone like that?
16:58I think it is going to be very different. Anthony Scaramucci talks a lot about this woman, Susie Wiles, as chief of staff. And seems to think that she's somebody who will be able to keep him more ordered than he was first time around. You can't deny that what he's done in the last 24 hours does link back both to what he said during the campaign and a lot of the arguments in this project 2025 agenda that we talked about before. So when you look for example at the nominations, there was something absolutely chaotic first time around. And people didn't last and we'll see. I think the defense guy has to be gone in a year.
17:39Things that Rubio won't necessarily last the whole term. We shall see. But I think in terms of what it means for working around him, it is what we know. It is basically that you can say anything you want in private but you cannot criticize him in public. You have to flatter him. You have to accept that he is the most important person in the universe and that everything revolves around him. Now that makes life quite difficult unless you do you are able to develop a core team that can be utterly frank. But when you everything you read about the first term that is not how he operates will he read briefs anymore than he didn't do last time?
18:16Probably not. The other thing I think we shouldn't underestimate. And this relates to foreign policy and it relates to how other world leaders deal with him and how they describe him and what they say about what he is doing is the petting us. So one of these executive orders, it has got nice to know. I only saw this because I made the mistake of going on to the White House website to read a lot because I wanted to see how these things were framed. And they are in quite legalese language. Are they quite long? Tell us a little bit about them. Are they short or long? No, they are quite short. They are pretty short and they are very short expanatory.
18:56And then longer list of the ones that are getting the full pardon. But there is an executive order which is going to strip John Bolton, his former national security adviser, of his security clearance. And here is another one. So there is John Bolton who is a security clearance. And here is another one. You remember Hunter Biden, the big story about his laptop and was he involved in all sorts and various activities. There is an executive order taking away the security clearance of the American intelligence officials who believe that this might have been a Russian operation against Joe Biden through his son Hunter Biden.
19:34And then there is another one. This one is interesting. This one is not an order. It is an order where he is going to seek to overturn. And this is the Biden agreement on the OECD deal on minimum corporate taxation. So these are stuff. And then the energy stuff, you know, you would say drill baby drill. A lot of this is about energy, a lot of this about immigration. But he is doing what he said he would. And I think the other thing you saw from yesterday is just the power of the performative element of all this. Yeah. I mean, I was reading this more than I was going through the BBC website. And I thought, okay, I know they've got to cover every single angle.
20:13But let me just read you this one because this is mind blue. BBC website, Melania Trump appeared at the first ball wearing a gown that had some striking similarities to the ones she wore to Trump's first inauguration. Clavical showing cut the slit at one leg, geometric detailing on the front. But where last time the detail came in the same vanilla silk crepe as the dress itself, this time with a thick black ribbon light strip echoed at a chocostal necklace as if to underline the occasion with more solidity than perhaps she had first time around. From a distance, the Inquis Quigal could easily remind viewers of the signature that Melania's husband today signed on executive orders.
20:54The first lady's black and white look was echoed in the classic tux wall by our husband. Will we see more oval style couples dressing during Trump's second term in a move to signal unity between the pair? I mean, this is mind blue. Okay. So from that to the big picture then. So I think the first thing is understanding why Trump in 2025 is very different from Trump coming in in 2017. One big difference is his team. So when he came in last time, he was trying to bring in far more old establishment fingers. So his secretary defense was General Mattis, this great Marine Corps General. He brought in Rex Tillerson the CEO of the largest company in the world as his secretary of state.
21:44He had HR McMaster's as his national security advisor. This time round, it's much more radical team. Compared to Millie, Heskith, as you've pointed out, is a Fox News star who never achieved senior rank in the military, probably the least qualified defense secretary ever. So that's one big difference. You can no longer do what we tried to do. I remember when he came in because I was a minister in trees, a major government and I remember the national security council meetings around it. We were still able to rely. This is the Europeans in 2017 on the fact that people like General Mattis and Tillerson and HR McMaster's, we all had relationships with.
22:23I mean, these were people that people I knew from Iraq and Afghanistan and you could appeal to their common sense of NATO and they went out of their way to basically contradict him, disrupt him, slag him off to his fury. So that won't happen again. The second big change is that the world has changed a lot. So I think we talked about a couple weeks ago. When he came in in 2017, he's facing a world in which Emmanuel Macron is about to be elected, Trudeau's in in Canada, Merkel is still in Germany, Theresa May is in Britain, and quite a loss of a relatively kind of centrist world is still in existence.
23:00We're now in a very different universe. In the intervening eight years, the US economy has sold ahead of the European economy. It's much more powerful, 50 % large in the European economy. Many of the European leaders are in real trouble. You know, Matt Cross week short says about a go, Trudeau's about to go in Canada, it was gone in Canada. So there's less counterbalance. And then the final thing I guess is the conflict, which is that in 17, the Middle East was relatively peaceful, Ukraine was relatively peaceful. We're now in a very, very, very different world in which Russia is advancing in Ukraine.
23:36Advancing steadily, you know, just for Christmas, advancing about 100 meters a day and you'd cry in this in trouble, situation where it's very difficult to quite understand how Netanyahu's government is ever going to really allow a proper ceasefire to happen. And in which China's in a different position in relation to Taiwan, India's in a much more powerful position. And that's where, and that's where I've finished my long silly lecture. The key things underlying these executive orders show a really fundamental world view as emerging. It's protectionist, not free trade, it's isolationist instead of trying to get involved in other countries, had a phrase in his second and organ where he said, instead of America spending unlimited money protecting foreign borders, we're going to protect our own borders.
24:28It's absolutely anti -any conversation about climate change or energy transition. And I guess above all, it's pushing the rest of the world to be much more transactional. So if you're Britain or France or Germany or an African country, I mean, let's see your Uganda, you're looking now to think all I can do is defend my national interest, look for transactional deals that I can do with Trump. And almost certainly new blocks are going to emerge into the vacuum that he's creating back over the years. Yeah, I was talking the other day to Kevin McCarthy, the former speaker, who you'd have thought would have ended up as a bit of an enemy of Trump because he's, you know, he basically lost his job as part of all that kind of maggot infighting.
25:13But he seems to be reasonably still reasonably close to him. But I was saying to him, which of the leaders last time around, do you think handle Trump best? And he said, oh, no, no, the Japanese guy, he really improved his golf. And he was serious. He went to have, I'll be where it had golf lessons. To sort of, you know, the best thing I can do is really get my handicap down, play with Trump obviously, make sure a Trump wins. But so, and I think for, you know, for Britain, you know, Kierstamer did a sort of short statement from the, from Downing Street congratulating Donald Trump, welcoming him, work with him blah, blah, blah, David Lamy was on the airwaves talking up his charmingness as a host when they had dinner and before the election and these sort of, you know, love of Britain, etc.
26:00But the fact is, I worry in that sort of foreign policy mindset that you just set out. I do worry that here we are Britain for all our historical strengths. We are kind of bobbing around in the sea at the moment. China's over there, Europe's over there, America's over there. And it's, you know, it's quite, it's going to be hard. It's going to be hard for the UK. I think to deal with this. Mike Lignatia for quite an interesting article in the FT and we've interviewed him on leading if people want to pick up on him. But what he was really focusing on is that it seems to be a hint, more than a hint, that Trump basically is trying to create a empire focused on the Americas.
Read the full transcript
26:42That's why he's talking about Canada is a 51st state. That's why he's talking about Panama Canal and to some extent why he's talking about Greenland. And what Michael reads in that is not not that America's necessarily going to invade Canada. It's more that Trump will do his best to make Canada even more economically dependent on the United States and impose ever more aggressive terms against his neighbors. And that the Trump doctrine feels like he's saying my sphere of influence is the Americas. China's sphere of influence can be its neighbors. Russia's sphere of influence can be Europe. And I'm going to give up on the idea, all the ideas that liberals really had since the Second World War that it makes sense to try to talk about any kind of global order.
27:30He's hunkering down. And he's saying we've got the oil, we've got the gas, we've got the rear minerals and resources, particularly if we bring in Canada and Greenland to help us. And really we just put up the walls and we don't need to worry about the rest of the world. We're sort of a planet apart. Given that have been all these fears about what his mindset is and his attitude towards NATO, I don't recall hearing him mention NATO. Now you could say that's a good thing in that he wants to say I'm coming out of NATO like he is with the WHO and the Paris Climate Agreement. I think my final point, Ruf, we'll go to a break and then come back and talk about Gaza and Southport.
28:07The Mooch, again to quote the Mooch, he said on a podcast a few weeks ago that he felt that there was the danger of the opening for what he called a golden era of corruption. And again you mentioned Lincoln's second and organ. Now I know we didn't have cryptocurrency in the time of Lincoln, but if we did, I cannot imagine either Lincoln or his wife would launch a meme coin which would immediately raise millions and millions and millions of dollars. This in a currency that Donald Trump used to say was basically no good for anything apart from fraud and deception. And the other thing that just final, you know, having taken the making out of the BBC fashion coverage, if I can close on Melania, Melania apparently is part of the deal with the oligarchs.
28:58There's done this 40 million pound TV deal with Bezos for a documentary. And I noticed that vote at the Arlington the Cemetery the day before and as she was walking towards the redundor. I don't know whether you've ever done a documentary so high budget that they have these cameras that they can sort of move around in the air as they're walking with them. They're like, they're like a way like a matchbook. And she had those following all around. And I noticed that this means she smiled more than she normally does. And essentially I saw a sort of a ste banding interview and he said, these guys are there and they think they're all powerful.
29:35They've got to understand they are there now because they are, he's got them. They are now his little toys and that's why he's making them look, you know, he's part of the scene. So we'll see, we'll see, but it was it was quite a day. It was quite a day. Well, time for break.
29:56This isn't ad from BetterHelp. At the moment, we're getting advice from everywhere. You just have to go on TikTok. Could be Alice's cold plunges. Could be my attempts to meditate or the digital detox that I'm doing in Columbia. But of course, one of the things that we know is that it can be incredibly valuable to talk to another human being, somebody who's actually been trained as a therapist to work through these ideas, calmly, objectively and professionally. And as the largest online therapy provider in the world, BetterHelp can provide access to mental health professionals with a very diverse variety of expertise.
30:32They've got over 5 ,000 therapists in the UK. They've helped more than five million people globally and you can join a session literally at the click of a button, change therapists anytime. So obviously not about fixing you, but it's about hearing yourself clearly, maybe for the first time. So talk it out with BetterHelp. Our listeners get 10 % of their first month at BetterHelp .com slash rest politics. That's better H -E -L -P .com slash rest politics. Right now with the Home Depot, you'll find stored solutions made to fit your needs. Grab an HDX tough tilt to protect your tools. Or keep your sports equipment contained with reinforced snap fit lids.
31:14Or stack up and make better use of your space with bins and totes built to last. Whatever your story, we've got the gear to keep it organized and protected at the Home Depot. How doers get more done?
31:36Welcome back to the resty's policies with me, Anastakamal. And with me, Rory Stewart. Rory, you've been deep in Middle East talking. Tell us about it. So I'm been in discussions with a lot of different places because it's a Chatham House rules conference. I can't go through the details, the individuals, but we've been right in the middle of talking to Israelis, Americans, Brits about the cease -fidel. And just a quick reminder on where we are. And maybe just before I get onto that, a quick encouragement to people to listen to the Tom Fletcher interview that we just did on our separate leading feed because Tom, amazing new appointment of a British diplomat as the UN humanitarian lead worldwide talking about his first few weeks touching on Gaza, yes, but particularly on Sudan, Ukraine and Syria.
32:32What was your sense to Tom Fletcher and then I'll come back to this? Well, I thoroughly enjoyed it and I thought he was extraordinary, interesting and bright and clever. I've got quite amazing story about Tom Fletcher as a result. Anissa Misagi who works for a company called Plattis takes to me yesterday to say, on my way to Davos, listening to Tom Fletcher on leading, really enjoying it. What an amazing job, really interesting, blah, blah, blah, blah. She then arrives at Davos and she's waiting for her bags to come off the carousel and she thinks it's her suitcase. She pulls her suitcase off the carousel, but it's sort of a bit scuzz -dun, a bit dirty, looks like a bit more traveled than her her suitcase, but she thinks it is my, that is the exact same suitcase, but is it my suitcase?
33:19She looks at the name and it's Mr. Tom Fletcher and it turns out Tom Fletcher, as she said to me, she said, he may be bloody clever and he may be really smart, he may have an amazing job, but he's got great tasted suitcases, but he's also a thief. He nicked that suitcase. He too went off with her suitcase, yeah, anyways, he managed to track him down and they've no a suitcase swap. There we are. There's a horrible 1970s joke that my father likes about the brains of the world, stealing someone's sandwich box instead of the parachute for jumping out of an airplane. It's the same same story, really.
33:53There you go. So, Garo, let's get back to Garza. So, to remind people of what the deal was, in essence, it's a three phase deal. Phase one, which started on Sunday, is supposed to be the release of 33 Israeli hostages, a release of a number of Palestinians in exchange, humanitarian access and a ceasefire. Phase two is then meant to involve the release of all the remaining life hostages, more returns of Palestinians and opponents ceasefire. And then phase three is supposed to be the return of deceased hostages and the blockade lifted. So, this has begun. And on Sunday, there were these very dramatic scenes of the return amongst others of Emily, who's a British hostage, who returned with two of her fingers, cut off.
34:43It was a very dramatic scene partly because the three hostages were delivered surrounded by 300 Hamas fighters, very much publicly demonstrating to the world that Hamas still existed and that they were right out there on television, showing that whatever had happened over the last months of bombing, more than the year of bombing, they were still there. And the question now is, what is the end case? And I guess there are three scenarios. One of them is that it returns to chaos and conflict. So, ceasefire deal breaks down, fighting continues, almost indefinitely. Second scenario is an Israeli occupation of Gaza, Israel taking responsibility for security, putting IDF troops permanently in on the ground and trying to run and occupy Gaza.
35:39And the third scenario, which is the optimistic but probably unlikely scenario, but it's the one that everybody, of course, is trying to push for, is a permanent ceasefire and the reconstruction of Gaza. And there the devil is in the detail on whether you can possibly imagine what that would look like in a way that works for both Israelis and Palestinians. And the problem in a nutshell is that Netanyahu's government certainly would have two demands, which would be unacceptable in reality. The first demand is that Israel would have total security control of what was happening in Gaza. They want a hundred percent security, they want an absolute guarantee that can be no return to October 7th.
36:21And that means that they want to be able to continue military operations and are going to delegate it to anyone else. And that would not be acceptable on the Palestinian side because there's no way that the Palestinians or the Arab states that are often being talked about as coming in, doing the reconstruction could be Jordan, Emirates, Egypt are going to want to be on the ground if Israelis continuing to conduct military operations. And it's going to be very difficult to raise money to reconstruct buildings in Gaza if people think Israel is going to come in and blow them up again. The second condition is the Netanyahu government will demand that there can be zero participation of Hamas.
37:02And probably no participation of the PLA. We can get on to that later, but that's partly because they don't trust the PLA and the Israeli public. I think the PLA will either fail because there will be corrupt and useless or they'll succeed in which case there will be a stronger Palestinian state, which is something they don't want either. Whereas on the other side, international observers looking at it think it's almost impossible to imagine anything happening in Gaza without at least some level of consent from Hamas. Hamas may not want to be the government, but Hamas is still an incredibly powerful force on the ground.
37:33So if Israel says reconstruction can go ahead, but reconstruction involves continued Israeli military operations and no possible participation of Hamas, then it's almost impossible to imagine anybody Arab Palestinian taking responsibility. When the deal was announced, although it unleashed an awful lot of joy and hope and expectation, I think a lot of people who are maybe close to it and are close to these sorts of situations were not hopeful that we get to the end of phase three without an awful lot of hiccups along the way. And I think it was during that bizarre executive order signing press in for a bit of it session where I think Trump was saying he's not quite sure whether this thing will hold through the three phases.
38:22I didn't see that bit. I just read something in one of the papers about that. So I think this is going to be very, very difficult and I think that we are the rest as politics. I think the politics of this are a lot tougher for Netanyahu than he is projecting. One of the other orders by the way is reversing the sanctions against settlers was that part of the deal. Don't know, but I think you've got to worry that the politics that made him so dependent on the hard right in the first place to get into power to build a coalition to get through his legal reforms and so forth that whether he can hold on as long as he seems to think he can without those people being inside the tent rather than outside because their basic line is okay.
39:06Let's get the let's get the hostages back. We've got three so far. We've got another 30. They're going to come through hopefully in this first phase. But then we've got to go back to war. Why? Because they say the war aim was to destroy Hamas and as you say it was perfectly obvious and it was deliberate. There's no doubt about that. Hamas and they could have decided, well, to what we'll do, we won't have any of the media involved until we get to the bit where we hand them over to the Red Cross. And you could have driven a nice car up and they could have stepped out the car and walked in. Instead of what she was very deliberate that they showed these Hamas fighters opening the doors, jumping on the car, showing they're very, very visible, very, very present.
39:45So I think that was deliberate. The rest of it looked like it. I mean, it was joyous. It was amazing to see those three young women come back. We'll find out as time goes on, the extent of the trauma, physical and mental that they've suffered. But at the same time, you then had alongside it, the pictures of Palestinians going quotes back to their homes, which was heartbreaking. Because they were going back to places which frankly didn't exist anymore. It just literally sort of masses of rubble. And I think that reconstruction plan for Gaza, how much is that going to cost? Where's that going to come from?
40:23Is that all going to be about these kind of geopolitical and business deals that get done? So I think phase one, let's see if that gets through six weeks, phase two, they then have to work out the time of that. But I think there's a long way to go before we can be confident this is the end of the world. So I guess you've put your finger on three things. One of them is the politics around Netanyahu. The second is the question of what Hamas is up to and the third is this question of reconstruction. I mean, on the first, it's very striking how similar Netanyahu is to Trump. Firstly, in his complete illusion of the difference between truth, post truth, non truth.
41:00Secondly, obviously, these corruption allegations. Thirdly, his voter base, he's got this very, very strong voter base, which is strangely often composed of younger poorer Israelis from non -European backgrounds who see the old European -Israeli elite as traitors and corrupt, but who are voting for Netanyahu, who is of course a representation of that. I mean, it's another sort of Trump hacker. And his allies, of course, Smotrich and Ben Gavir, and Ben Gavir has resigned, but they will come back in again. Very difficult to put a cigarette paper. It seems between them in terms of their ideology.
41:39I mean, Hamas, of course, and many Palestinians talk about, you know, Palestine must be free from the river to the sea. Smotrich has written a book saying Israel basically should occupy an enormous amount of Palestinian territory, and it's very clear about the fact that he sees Palestinians effectively as the second class human beings. And Smotrich and Ben Gavir's deal has been, will give you a coalition if you give us war. And their mindset, and I guess this is the really difficult thing here, to get to peace, the Netanyahu government, and in fact the Israeli public, and part of the question is, would any Prime Minister make any differences, or is the Israeli public in a state where actually any Israeli Prime Minister would feel that they had to do this?
42:24But anyway, the Netanyahu government, with the support of a lot of the Israeli public, has got to the world view now that Hamas and many, many Palestinians are completely irreconcidable. There's no possibility of peace, there's no possibility of change. You get senior Israelis saying that this is Arab culture, this is their religion. There's no way of negotiating with them. They're saying that this conflict is not like any other conflict in the world. You know, if you raise an island or Cyprus, they say, no, no, no, no, those things could be resolved by interest. This is purely values based. And the only way this is going to end is with us killing them.
43:06But the problem is that Israel has so far killed perhaps 19 ,000 Hamas fighters on their own count, out of the nearly 50 ,000 that are being killed, and who knows how that counting works, right? But there are about 300 ,000 I think Palestinian males under 18, part of a conveyor belt that will come through presumably, and many of whom will feel that they need to get involved in resistance. What is the end game, and the end game for Smotritch and Ben Gavir feels at the moment like perpetual war. Yeah. No interest in reconstruction. Becky, I saw David Miliband at the weekend who, as you know, runs the International Rescue Committee.
43:43I think one of one of the things maybe you could add to your connection of Trump and Netanyahu is this sense of of impunity that, you know, you can get away with a lot more in the modern world. And the IRC have produced this really interesting report, which is their emergency watch list. It's the countries that they feel are most in need currently of humanitarian support. To go back to Tom Fletcher, Tom made the point in our interview that it is harder than ever to be working for a humanitarian organization. And the report that I mentioned in terms of the numbers that need of humanitarian support are now off the scale.
44:22Sudan is the country deemed to be most in need, followed by the occupied Palestinian territories. But interesting, this report builds itself around four themes, which I think maybe we should come back to them another time. We have more conflict, but we have less diplomacy. We have far more attacks on civilians, including aid workers than ever before, but we have fewer consequences for that. We have more carbon emissions affecting these poorer countries disproportionately, but we have less climate crisis action, and we have more wealth accumulation, but we have less poverty alleviation. And I read the report over the weekends, reading that in the context of then Trump coming in with the agenda that he sets out, which was basically sodden more diplomacy.
45:08Don't worry about law and so forth. Climate crisis is a myth, and as for poverty, drill baby drill, get richer, get richer, get richer, get more powerful, get more powerful, get more powerful. So it is a tough time, as Tom said, to be humanitarian. On this question of whether a deal is possible, and I think one has to keep hoping, and I guess this is presumably the situation that people would have felt that they were in in Northern Ireland or South Africa in the 80s. You have to keep hoping and trying to imagine what piece to be. But at the moment, it feels like a zero sum game because the Israeli government is basically saying, I think almost explicitly that Israeli security is more important than the rights and the dignity of the Palestinian people.
45:53And this push for 100 % security effectively leaves no room for risk, no room for autonomy, no room for letting staff happen in Gaza. And when we think about reconstruction, usually think about three things, when we think about governance, economic development, security. So from the Israeli point of view, security must be done by the IDF. Economic development, they will probably choke off an enormous amount of the border and the imports because they'll be worried that some of the things imported into Gaza could be reused to dig tunnels or fire rockets. And on the governance side, they're very unlikely to support any form of Palestinian authority, partly because if they had elections, they'd worry that Hamas could win the elections.
46:36But even if Hamas didn't win the elections, the whole idea of Palestine, the whole idea of a two -state solution now seems impossible to many Israelis because they see it as a threat to their security. And the threat to the security is an interesting one. I was trying to get my head around this because of course what happened on October 7th was brutal and horrifying. And of course, Hamas has documents committed to the elimination of the state of Israel. But the question I've been trying to focus on is what kind of threat really does Hamas actually pose to the continued existence of Israel. So if Israel improved its borders, it had a very, very bad border security with Gaza.
47:17The Israelis that you've been talking to, what are they saying on such a question? So what does everybody say? The threat is real and existential and we people who live here, we underestimate what it's like living there. Yeah, there's a lot of that. There's a lot of you don't know what it's like having people just 15 kilometers from your border who want to wipe you out. I think there's a middle ground which is people saying, okay, it's probably true that we've discovered that Iran and his Bala and who's the a less of a threat than we thought. And it's probably true that Hamas isn't actually in any position to conquer Israel.
47:50But even if they're able to do these terrorist attacks again, this is completely unacceptable. That both because it's an unbelievably traumatic to the Israeli people and also because of what it means for the Israeli economy and stability. But Israel's response to it or Netanyahu's response to it is creating a really toxic political atmosphere where the few remaining Israeli liberal critics of what Netanyahu is doing, the few remaining people still talking about the recognition of a Palestinian state, still trying to acknowledge that you probably do ultimately have to work with some parts of Hamas and that there are more moderate parts of Hamas to work with civil servants, for example.
48:31Now for the first time, I'm beginning to feel that they're under pressure to leave Israel. It used to be a great sort of shame to leave Israel. Now there's a sense around Netanyahu and Smotrich and Ben Gavir and their supporters that they don't want these levels around a sort of sense of, well, if you're not prepared to get involved in this perpetual war, you can you can leave and you see this is the first year where the number of people leaving Israel exceeded the number of people moving to it, 85 ,000 net external migration and many of those people that Israel doesn't, doesn't want to be losing.
49:07And of course, another point that an Arab friend of mine made is that the risk is that Israel is going to turn from being a liberal democracy into something that will feel more like a Arab state in which four tribes, the ultra -orthodox, the religious Zionists, the liberals and the Arabs within Israel live in completely separate silos, reading different media with totally different politics, totally different obsessions and the country becomes increasingly religious nationalistic and nuclear -armed. Before we turn to Southport, a couple of sentences, between 2013 and 2023, the number of countries facing attacks on civilians increased by 42 % from 33 to 47.
49:52Number of countries' single attacks on hospitals and healthcare workers increased by 57 .5 % from 40 to 63, between 2016 and 2023. And the number of countries seeing attacks on humanitarian aid workers more than doubled, 136 % up. Can I just finish before we get to Southport with a brief idea of what optimism could look like because we're often being criticized for not being optimistic. So the very best case scenario, which the world needs to try to move towards if there's any hope of a lasting ceasefire, is a technocratic administration led by Palestinians, the recognition of a Palestinian state.
50:32Let me jump in. What do Israelis you talking to say about that? Well, for the people who are close to Netanyahu's government and sympathetic towards it, total rejection. So to get there, you would have to have either a new Israeli president or some people being optimistic say, maybe what you get is Trump saying, I can deliver a Saudi Israeli deal. I can guarantee a lot of money and security guarantees for Saudi and Israel. And in return, you will recognize a Palestinian state. So there's two ideas. Either Netanyahu goes or Trump somehow gets into a very transactional conversation with Netanyahu in that if and it's a really big if you then would try to build an administration which was Palestinian led with Hamas not in the government, but consenting to what was happening and money coming in potentially from Saudi and the US and potentially Egypt, Jordan, UAE involved in some of the resistance into full reconstruction.
51:37Now, I'm only say it's because I owe it to the people who are desperately trying to get there. And I think the British government and others would desperately like to get there. Biden and Blinken desperately wanted to go there. Blinken had a whole detailed plan around how this is going to happen. But I'm saying it, of course, sadly, very, very doubtful because I just can't see how that's going to happen. How Hamas is going to allow that happen. How Israel is going to allow that to happen. Or why internationals would want to get involved when either Hamas or Israel can disrupt and upturn the apple card at any moment and destroy all the investment they've put in.
52:16Yeah. So you said you were going to be optimistic and ended up being pessimistic about your optimism, which is kind of sums it up. Now, look, finally, let's just talk a little bit about about Southport. So Axel Radikabana, the young man who's now pleaded guilty to the murder of these three young girls, Eliza, Alice and Bebe in the Southport. He ended a not guilty plea first time around. Yesterday, I think a lot of people were taken by surprise. He entered a guilty plea. He'll be sentenced on Thursday and Keir Starmer has immediately announced a full public inquiry. The reasons I think driving that other than the absolute horror and that led to the riots that we talked about a lot at the time is the fact that I think we're looking at yet another of these failures of the state situations.
53:10In that, this young man was known to virtually every aspect of the services of the state that relate to young people and the problems that they might be causing to themselves and more importantly to others. So kicked out a school for possession of a knife, mental health services, aware of his obsession with violence, police aware, social services aware, and three times reported to prevent the counterterrorism body. Now, Keir Starmer was given a pretty hard time. I caught the end of his part of his press conference after he made this very long statement about why he felt this was a need for an inquiry.
53:52He continued to say they didn't need the similar national inquiry in relation to the the rape gangs and the grooming gangs that we talked about before because he thought that we'd done locally. But there was such an interest in what led to this or if you like what led to this not being prevented. And I think a lot of it in the end is it reminded me a little bit of I don't if you remember one of the things that sort of shocked Caterpillar to Tony Blair to political fame for one to the better word was his response to Shadow Home Secretary to the murder of James Bulger, a young boy who was murdered by two kids in Liverpool and in Merseyside.
54:30And what Keir Starmer essentially was saying is this is about more than this case. This is about what we expect from the state. This is about young people now they develop. It is about community and integration and so but also if you remember that the hate that Elon Musk has towards Keir Starmer seemed really to be fired by what happened in the Southport. He was also very clear that he felt that a lot of this was about what young people are consuming on social media. He talked about the the access to videos of violence that you get again and again and again many of which should never get taken down.
55:04So he basically was saying this is a failure of the state is we've got to look at every aspect of what went wrong and he was essentially saying you know as often as said when these inquiries are set up they've got to look everywhere and whatever they come up with provided it's not crazy we've got to do it. Is this a sort of UK equivalent to these American school shootings? I mean when you describe him you know he's consuming sort of weird propaganda and violent stuff and he's into Hitler and Genghis Khan and he threatens people I mean it feels like the sort of these horrible cases that happened so much in the US I mean you know hundreds of them of young men of about that age going in and and pulling out their guns and just shooting lots of people.
55:49Well of course he'd been expelled from school and it turned out that prior to this he had been one of his previous thoughts was that he was going to go and do this at his old school. So I guess there will be those kinds of comparisons. I think it's very hard to talk about this without knowing all of the kind of facts and that presumably will now emerge. People are expecting it all to emerge during the trial but of course now the trial is going to go straight to to sentencing. But from a public policy point of view I'm just sort of trying to think about this as somebody who was the minister responsible for not just prison but sort of probation and trying to manage these kinds of risks.
56:27I guess that in the US the the conclusion for many people has been that it's very very difficult to fully anticipate and stop these things and the biggest problem in the US is people have access to guns and that if they didn't have guns they wouldn't be able to kill so many people. I mean I agree it sounds like a lot of things got dropped in this case but I guess in the US examples often you don't really find out until after the event that's when you get onto their hard drives and into their libraries and the stories start emerging and I suppose another problem for the state maybe that I don't know where this is true but what if there were thousands of young men who have extremely unpleasant violent fantasies and get into Hitler and Genghis Khan and how does one deal with them and what sort of protections are people suggesting could have been put around him.
57:17Are they suggesting he should have been arrested, tailed? I mean what practically do you do to stop this? And of course what will happen particularly now in the context of a public inquiry is that how this situation has ended is what will then cast a light on everything that happened before that and as you say are we saying that every time we think somebody might be becoming obsessed with violence might be have harmful designs upon other people that somehow they have to be locked up, they have to be hospitalized, they have to be given and then you're into the capacity of the state to do that kind of thing anyway.
57:52So I think this is going to be a really big moment obviously there's a politics attached to this as well because if you remember at the time Nigel Farage was saying there's a cover up that they know more than they're saying well of course they probably did however they were being governed by laws of contempt and and I think this is this is where the sort of pace and modern media and the pace and modern change does make life so much much more difficult for people who are actually tackling law enforcement at the front line. And it also connects to something which is very much about our politics which is we want to be in a 100 % security zero risk environment and of course in practice government is because of limited resources because of many things are perpetually making decisions you know when I was president minister we were perpetually releasing people from jail who'd done horrendous offenses and taking the risk that they might offend again you couldn't keep them you didn't keep them locked up for our lives and if we're moving into an environment in which the public really wants a 100 % security no risk at all that has huge impacts on many many things on the basic idea of liberty freedoms the amount of surveillance the state puts around you the way that prison works the way that sentences work I mean everything becomes challenging actually that you know that there is a sort of site echo of that isn't there in the in the conversation about whether one's going to try to take the risk of allowing a Palestinian's administration to re -emerge again in Gaza yeah so that was a fairly gloomy episode Roy I'm afraid it was a pretty gloomy episode but I'd also want to pay tribute to just how impressive the people are who are still trying to push for peace oh yeah in Gaza and I think they're completely right to do so it's all very well for people I need to set their own points out that it's all impossible on the room 58 problems are their response that is what we've got to do something and at least they're still pushing yeah we're going to keep that up see you soon bye bye
From the publisher
What did the inauguration tell us about how extreme Trump 2.0 is going to be? What is Netanyahu’s endgame for Gaza – peace or perpetual war? Why has Starmer launched an inquiry into the Southport attacks?
Join Rory and Alastair as they answer all these questions and more.
The Rest Is Politics is powered by Fuse Energy, a green electricity supplier powering homes across England, Scotland & Wales. Use referral code POLITICS after signing up for your chance to win a TRIP merch bundle. Learn more at GetFuse.com/Politics
EXCLUSIVE NordVPN Deal ➼ https://nordvpn.com/therestispolitics Try it risk-free now with a 30-day money-back guarantee!
TRIP Plus: Become a member of The Rest Is Politics Plus to support the podcast, receive our exclusive newsletter, enjoy ad-free listening to both TRIP and Leading, benefit from discount book prices on titles mentioned on the pod, join our Discord chatroom, and receive early access to live show tickets and Question Time episodes. Just head to therestispolitics.com to sign up, or start a free trial today on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/therestispolitics.
Instagram: @restispolitics
Twitter: @RestIsPolitics
Email: restispolitics@gmail.com
Assistant Producers: Evan Green, India Dunkley
Video Editor: Joshua Smith
Social Producer: Jess Kidson
Producers: Nicole Maslen, Fiona Douglas
Senior Producer: Dom Johnson
Head of Content: Tom Whiter
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor, Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices




