In short
The Rest Is Politics - Episode 365: Trump's Mafia World Order
Episode Overview In this episode, Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart delve into the implications of Donald Trump's political maneuvers and the rising concerns regarding fascism in America. They also touch on Prince Harry's battle with the tabloids and the broader implications of these discussions on global politics.
Key Themes and Discussions
- Early Warning Signs of Fascism in the US
- Discussion Points:
- Alastair introduces a list of early warning signs of fascism sourced from the American Holocaust Museum.
- Signs include nationalism, disdain for human rights, controlled media, and fraudulent elections.
- Rory and Alastair assess Trump's actions and how they align with these warning signs.
- Notable Comments:
- Alastair gives Trump high marks on multiple warning signs, suggesting a concerning alignment with fascist characteristics.
- Rory emphasizes the uniqueness of Trump's brand of authoritarianism compared to historical fascists.
- Trump's Impact on US Soft Power
- Key Arguments:
- The discussion highlights Trump's potential to deliver a "fatal blow" to America's soft power globally.
- The hosts explore the implications of Trump's unilateral actions on international relationships and global perceptions of the US.
- Notable Comments:
- Rory articulates that America's historical approach to diplomacy is being replaced by a more coercive and aggressive stance under Trump.
- The hosts discuss the ramifications of Trump's decisions on foreign aid and international cooperation.
- Trump’s Aggressive Political Tactics
- Examples Provided:
- Trump's controversial executive orders and his approach to international relations, particularly regarding military bases and economic leverage.
- Specific instances such as his threats related to Greenland and the halting of foreign aid.
- Analysis:
- Alastair and Rory debate the long-term consequences of Trump's tactics on the American political landscape and global alliances.
- They highlight the risks of normalization of extreme political behavior.
- Media and Fascism
- Discussion on Media Control:
- The hosts discuss the media's role in enabling or curbing authoritarian tendencies, referencing Trump's disdain for a free press.
- They reflect on how public figures, including journalists, are adapting to or resisting Trump's influence.
- Notable Comments:
- Rory suggests that youth today may be dangerously receptive to authoritarian ideas, hinting at a concerning shift in political attitudes among younger generations.
- Prince Harry's Legal Battle with the Tabloids
- Overview of the Case:
- The discussion transitions to Prince Harry's legal actions against tabloid publications for phone tapping and privacy invasions.
- Alastair admires Harry's courage to confront powerful media entities.
- Key Takeaways:
- The implications of Harry's case extend to broader discussions about accountability in the media and the potential for systemic change.
- The hosts speculate on the potential repercussions for British tabloids if Harry’s claims are substantiated.
Conclusion
- Final Thoughts:
- Rory and Alastair emphasize the importance of maintaining democratic norms and resisting authoritarian trends.
- They encourage listeners to stay informed and engaged in political discourse to combat the rising tide of extremism.
Additional Notes
- Call to Action:
- Listeners are encouraged to reflect on the current political climate and consider the implications of these discussions on their own civic engagement.
- Next Episode Preview:
- The episode ends teasing further discussions on Trump’s political landscape and more on Prince Harry's ongoing legal battles.
---
This episode serves as a critical examination of the intersection of politics, media, and society, urging listeners to stay vigilant against authoritarian trends while fostering a culture of accountability and integrity in public discourse.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Thanks for listening to The Rest Is Politics. Sign up to The Rest Is Politics plus to enjoy ad -free listening and receive a weekly newsletter. Join our members' chat room again early access to live show tickets. Just go to TheRestIsPolitics .com. That's TheRestIsPolitics .com.
0:16The Rest Is Politics is powered by our friends at Fuse Energy. And there's still time to win one of our merch bundles signed by Alistair and me if you switch energy suppliers to Fuse by the end of January. All you've got to do is go to getfuse .com slash politics and use the referral code politics to sign up and merch on at no much. It is worth considering switching to Fuse. There are green electricity supplier generating power from their own solar and wind farms and they invest 100 % of profits into building more renewables. Their tariffs are cheaper than any of the big six competitors. So you'll still be saving money even though the price cap has gone up and their customer service is excellent.
0:59Fuse offer 24 .7 support and promise they'll answer any query within a minute on the Fuse app. So download it now, use the referral code politics after signing up, visit getfuse .com slash politics for terms and conditions and to learn all you need to know.
1:21Welcome to TheRest Is Politics with me, Alistair Campbell. And me, Rory Stewart, a quick apology to listen. This is being done from Geneva Airport in Switzerland. So if there's clinking in the background, that's because we've gone really gorilla here, which I'm record from an airport lounge before my plane boards. And you've got an amazing yellow background, right? You've got a Lib Dem headquarters. No, I'm not a Lib Dem headquarters. Although I'm pleased that the Lib Dems are finally starting to talk a little bit more about Brexit and we'll see whether the others follow suit. I guess Lib Dem headquarters presumably would have like Bungie Roops and special kind of climbing paddling stuff.
1:56They'll have a paddling pool of that sort of stuff. Now, Rory, let's get serious. We're going to devote most of this episode to talking about the 300 -pound gorilla, Donald J. Trump. We're also going to talk about Prince Harry and his battle with the press. And I've just before I was arriving, I'm actually in an office and on the way up, all the televisions were showing the 80th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz. I just saw your friend, the king, making a speech. So what I actually think that today is a good day to start to assess the extent to which we actually think that there's a note of fascism in the air in the United States.
2:32And as a starting point, Rory, can I just read to you, if you go to the American Holocaust Museum in Washington, there is a yellowing thinning paper that hangs on the wall. And the headline is the early warning signs of fascism. And as I go through them, can I ask you and our listeners and viewers just to say, maybe give Mark a sound of 10 for the centre which you might think that this is and that we're seeing these early warning signs in relation to what's happening in the States. Number one, powerful and continuing nationalism. Very good. Yep. Number two, disdain for human rights. Number three, identification of enemies as a unifying cause.
3:11Number four, supremacy of the military. Number five, rampant sexism. Number six, controlled media. Number seven, obsession with national security. Number eight, religion and government intertwined. Number nine, corporate power protected. Number ten, labor power suppressed. Number eleven, disdain for intellectuals and the arts. Number twelve, obsession with crime and punishment. Thirteen, rampant, cronism and corruption. Fourteen, fraudulent elections. Okay. Let me just quickly try to get into this because this obviously, you know, the million dollar questions, whether it's fair to describe Trump as a fascist or not, whether it helps to describe him as a fascist or whether he's something quite unique.
3:55I'm actually about to argue about that later on this that there are bits of him that actually have quite unique that aren't really like the 1920s or 1930s at all. Oh yeah. But I guess the obvious things that seem to be there are the beginnings of real ultra -nationalism, authoritarian leadership, edges of violence and militarism, mass mobilization propaganda. One of the things that might be interesting is this fascist, particularly Mussolini, and to some extent Hitler, although I noticed on Twitter people are very keen to say Hitler's not a fascist and they've had quite a lot of the people who are real musk fans, are real experts on the the nuanced micro -details of the differences between fascism and artism.
4:34I'm particularly on uniforms and salutes. I got this extraordinary thing where people were like, no, no, no, that's not exactly a Roman salute, the angles slightly off and you got to hold your hand at this angle. Anyway, certainly for the Italian fascists who began all this stuff over a hundred years ago, there was a sort of third way corporatism wasn't that kind of halfway between capitalism and communism and the beginnings of this sort of creation of a different kind of economic structure. Where are you on this? I mean, and do you put Franco Spain's Salazar's Portugal in this kind of category?
5:02It's kind of phenomenal. The 30s, isn't it? 30s and 40s. It is, but the reason why I've said to you before, I did an interview with Attorney Blair for GQ a while back. This is in Trump's first turn and I said, aren't you worried about the parallels with the 30s? And Tony said, I don't be so ridiculous. Trump's not here, the Trump's not Stalin. But I think if I go down through those 14, I give him very high marks on the first 13. And I think I would give him very high marks on the 14, which is fraudulent elections, not for the ones that he says are fraudulent. The one that he lost, but says he won, which in its own way is a way of, you know, is fraudulent election.
5:39But the talk already beginning that maybe the next election will actually happen in the same way. Will they change the rules? Will he try to subvert the constitution? And so forth. And I've just been, I'm going to use the Tory word again, rereading because I read it improved to give a quote for the cover. And it's extraordinary book, which is just coming out, I think this week, The Nazi Mind by the historian Lawrence Reese. And it's about, you know, like some of these other books, The Rise of Nazism and The Rise of Fascism in pre -war Europe. But honestly, you cannot read it. And I read it first time before Trump won, and I'm out reading a second time after his one, you can't read it without thinking that, oh, that just happened.
6:20And it's the little things, it's the little things that build up and develop. And suddenly they're normalised. And suddenly there was a wonderful phrase that I saw from somebody quoted in one of the American papers yesterday talking about this voluntary obedience from people who used to be critics. You're seeing it in the media, you're seeing it in academia, you're seeing it with some of the public figures. They're just sort of thinking, oh, I can't get on the wrong side of it. And that sort of, I think, leads the way for this. I think one of the things that makes the big question with the difference between, I guess, classic far right authoritarian movements and fascism is the desire for a total transformation of politics, economics, society.
7:00And that's where, you know, for the fascists in the 20s and 30s, that's where the paramilitaries come in. That's where the big corporations come in. And that's where I guess the interesting thing is the ambitions of this new Trump and how very different Trump feels in 2025 to how he felt in 2017. We talked a little bit about this when we were together in Switzerland, right? So, I mean, the obvious things we started with, which we could see before he came in, but there's so much I certainly missed. And I wasn't expecting about these executive orders. Before he came in, we could see one big difference, right?
7:32One big difference that was obvious to us is that we've lost a lot of the central powerful progressive liberal leaders in Europe that balanced him in 2017. You know, Angela Merkel's gone, Macron 2017. Yeah. And if you go through some, just let's just go through some of the things. So first time round in his first term, you know, it just felt chaotic at the start. Today, I quoted one, we talked about the scaremits, you know, the day of the live stream, I quoted this journalist that I've met out in Davos who said he's just looking ahead to the next four years with utter exhaustion because if it's like this, these first few days, I just go through them and ask yourself whether you think any previous president would have done this.
8:13So for example, take the TikTok decision alone. In doing what he's done, he's defined both bipartisan, Congress decision and the Supreme Court. Would previous presidents have done that? Not so sure. Just remind us what the TikTok decision was for this. Essentially, not least because Trump had been calling for it, the Americans decided that TikTok, because of its role in Chinese, economic espionage and so forth, that it was effectively to be banned and he says, no, we're going to get it. And that's presumably partly because TikTok was very helpful in his election. And now he's thinking about whether one of his friends, one of his tech colleagues might be able to take it over.
8:46Exactly. Exactly. Then you have the stuff like with drawing the security detail for people who are under serious death rates, John Bolton, Fauci, Pompeo, etc. I'm not sure what previous presidents would have done that. The DEI stuff where every government department is being told, not merely the DEI stuff has to go, but if anybody says anything that goes against that, complains about and so forth, they will quote, face adverse consequences, firing the inspectors general, which is illegal. Just again, to explain this, the national audit officer, and these are like the internal auditors for different American government departments who are there to try to keep the finances straight.
9:25Well, they're there specifically to guard against abuse, waste, and corruption. And the law says that if for any of them to be appointed or sacked, Congress must be consulted no decision within 30 days. Now, Lindsey Graham, very prominent Republican, was interviewed on CNN yesterday and said, but the law says that, so he's broken the law, yes. And he just goes, well, yeah, but we're into, it's okay to break that. Well, yeah, but. And then he justified it. Same as Kevin McCarthy did when we talked to him in in Devils. Let me throw in a few of my own additions because it's so difficult following all this.
10:01Absolutely. Of course, there are many people who, of course, think we suffer from Trump's arrangement syndrome and are just entirely hysterical and he can't be quite as bad as we make out. So let's try to be sort of quite straightforward about pointing out what he's actually done. So for example, people will be aware that he put out a message on, I think, a niche on true social telegram, which later ended up on Twitter where he said that Canada should be the 51st state. America should reacquire the Panama Canal and the Greenland should become part of the United States. Now, when that happened, people imagined before the election that this was a bit of sort of bravado and humor.
10:36He then called the Danish Prime Minister and in a 15 minute call insisted that Denmark hand over a Greenland. And when the Danish Prime Minister said, essentially, you got to be joking. It's up to the people of Greenland, but they want to be part of the United States. He offered money and appeared to be threatening military force. Now, this is something very interesting and I just want to focus on it. I mean, I could look at a couple of other things and I'd like to move on to the second, you know, the cutting of all US international development systems immediately. And we talk about that a little bit and we can talk about his announcement that he's wishes to ethnically cleanse Gaza, remove every single Palestinian from Gaza and move them to Jordan, Eddie.
11:18I also want to talk about his silencing of the organization, which releases data on things like bird flu and down the line, should there be such a thing, a pandemic? Absolutely. And then maybe we can talk about the pardoning of the January 6th rioters and who they are and how many of them are and what some of these people did and why putting them back on the streets maybe a bit dangerous. But let's just focus on Greenland, for example, what struck me most about Greenland, which we honestly, I don't think have seen in more than 2000 years of Western history, a ruler doing something like that without pretending to have any legal or ethical justification.
12:01Even the Roman Amprus, when they went around trying to acquire territory, claimed they were doing it for some kind of reason and tried to get senatorial consent. The British Empire, it's very worst, always said that it was doing it because one of their consoles had been threatened or they were defending indigenous people or some interests of even Hitler. This is what's so weird. Hitler did not feel that he could invade Russia and Poland without staging an attack against his troops claiming that he was acting in self -defense. This represents a very, very new culture. I'm interested in what is it about the modern world, about the world that's been created by social media, by mass communications, by total cynicism and dissolution that means that you can now just say, excuse me, I'm going to help myself to territory from a friendly neighboring ally.
12:55I'm not even going to pretend that the rights of the Greenlanders are being oppressed or that America has illegal, just when the English King invaded France, at least did so claiming that they were the rightful kings of France and they would descend it from Saint -French King. This is a different universe. Also, you said in your preamble that he said it during the election, but actually on this one, he didn't say it during the election. He has no mandate for this whatsoever. This came out of a clear blue sky after the election. And you say what does it say about the world and how that world has developed?
13:28What it says about the world is that people like Trump, Putin, Xi Jinping, probably Modi as well, basically see the world as chunks and you have this bit and I have that bit and let's see how we can work things out. And let me say to you, by the way, every day I met in Davos, I've told this, and also I've been talking to people in the Danish government as well and I've given them a very good idea. Can I tell you my idea? You basically say, you know about a Zen pick in Wigovie, the anti -obesity medication, right? 90 % of Wigovie goes to America, 66 % of ozempic sales go to America. And this is a company now that is the biggest company in Europe.
14:13So what we're going to say is Donald looking at your slimline version because he's lost about 30 pounds. You're clearly on this stuff. Let me just tell you, you're going to have to get on the black market from now because we're going to stop all sales of ozempic and Wigovie to America. And then you think all these guys are serious. What do you think of my idea? Well, it's beautiful. It's beautiful. Can I just develop this one stage further? It's extremely unlikely, but it's not impossible that Trump begins to tie too much of his ego to the statement. He's not backing down after this call with the Danish prime minister.
14:46He did a full press conference reasserting that Greenland should be part of the United States and that he's going to get it. Keep saying he's going to get it. So it doesn't seem to me impossible that he begins to use economic sanctions to make this happen. Now, what happens? What happens if you actually ended up with a US president who started saying actually we're going to help ourselves to Greenland? And of course, you can begin to see it from the Magger, the deep Magger crowd on my Twitter feed and now people saying, yeah, they can't do anything about it. We've got the greatest military in the world.
15:16We'll just walk in and we'll take it. It's 56 ,000 people. We'll just help ourselves to Greenland. I mean, while using pink things, well, you take we'll take Taiwan. What are you going to do about it? Trump will say, yeah, fair play. No, sorry, to defend Xi Jinping. He has much more right to Taiwan than Donald Trump has to Greenland. And at least Xi Jinping and Putin are pretending to have legal reasons, historical reasons for what they're doing. So what would actually happen if the US landed troops on Greenland? I honestly don't know. Well, they've got troops. They've got to base their now, haven't they?
15:47If they took it by military force, I just don't know what would happen. For a start, where does that leave us on Article 5? Article 5 of the NATO Constitution is an attack on one is an attack on all. Right. Denmark is an NATO member. And the reason I'm pushing it, I mean, a big bit silly because I don't think that's likely to happen. But the reason I'm pushing it is I'm just trying to get people to think about how even these kinds of threats and behavior is now pulling at the most fundamental threats, the international system. If you follow that logically to its conclusion, absolutely. Europe would feel forced to respond.
16:20Right. Denmark might even try to fight. Troops might be deployed to try to support Denmark. And the reason why this is worth saying is that for 70 or 80 years, America has built an international system. It's built international institutions. It created NATO. It created the World Bank, the IMF. Helps us set up the United Nations. It's done these enormous military assistance programs. Well, why did it's got bases in over 100 countries? It has made everything interoperable. So the British military, the French military, can't operate without the US military. When we go into Libya, we need the US. The reason why NATO couldn't stay in Afghanistan when 2 ,500 American troops were removed is because various vital bits of the whole war fighting machine only America can really do.
17:07We can't really operate them. With countryside Jordan, they have signed 10 billion, 10 ,000 million dollar aid contributions with 60 promises. And Jordan has signed up to being part of American security architecture because for 50, 60 years, they've been able to depend on them. And at no point in the last 78 years, has America tried to use these things for extortion. When they have shifted changes, they've done it with consultation, they've done it quite slowly, they've done it quite predictably. And they've usually done it in a way that countries can understand it's been about democracy, it's been about human rights, it's been about American enemies.
17:43You can sort of understand over 78 years what the American values were, whether you like them or not, they remained pretty constant between different bipartisan people. And you didn't feel that you were taking an incredible risk integrating your military with the American military or taking 10 billion dollars of international aid over six years and basing your whole budget on it until now. But if you think about the way that this, let's just take it back to Denmark and Fredericks and the Prime Minister, the tone of what's emerged of that conversation of the politics around it is basically it's less diplomacy and it's more kind of mafiosist stuff.
18:14It's like look, meta, we can do this nicely or we can do this in a way that's going to be really, really difficult. That's your prerogative. Do you want to get hurt or do you want to do it nicely? And that's the sort of the tone of this. And by the way, the other thing which has got next to no coverage at all that I've seen, the Department of Homeland Security has put a pause on the programs which allowed immigrants to settle temporarily, including Ukrainians, okay? 10 to 15 ,000 Afghans who have already been vetted and approved for immigration to the United States have been blocked, including some who were blocked as they arrived at the airport to leave the other day, right?
18:54That's Afghanistan. Yeah, people who work for the Americans. Let me just spell out what's happening now with USAID. So the American government gives about 40 billion dollars here, 40 ,000 million dollars a year and overseas assistance, 25 .6 billion through USAID. On Friday, I got a flurry of emails from all the NGOs that I'm associated with or partnering with around the world because they had all received a message from USAID saying all funding stops now, stop your programs. These are NGOs who have contracts with American government, signed contracts. So let's say you're operating in the Congo and you're doing vaccination, you've hired a lot of staff, you've bought your vaccines, you're rolling out your vaccination program, stop.
19:41And when people tried to ask questions, there was the most extraordinary email that came back from USAID. And I'm just going to read it to you because I think it's quite a good way, maybe, of illustrating what must be happening inside the US government at the moment. This is an email from USAID, Dear Grantee, just imagine writing this as a civil servant. We are aware that you may have questions about how the executive order on foreign aid will impact your grant. At this time, we are coordinating internally while waiting for formal guidance on how to interpret the new executive order on foreign assistance funding.
20:18We appreciate your patience and we'll be in touch as soon as we have more information. Now, if you're the Jordanian government, this is your entire education budget, health budget, it's all gone on budget and the money's been stopped on a dime. So your government basically is bankrupt and can't deliver services. Now, the US government gets to do this once and only once. What Trump has done is one of the great scams of all time. You become a monopoly provider, you insert yourself into the middle of everybody else's military, political and economic system and then you say, I've got you over the barrel, give me everything you want.
20:53What does that mean? You can't do it again. Nobody's going to let America integrate into their political economic and military systems in the same way in the future because they've seen it. It would be like if somebody turned up in your house, said, I'm going to take responsibility for all your heating, electricity, broadband, services, children's education and then turned up and said, by the way, I'm providing all that, I'm going to extort you for you know, $200 ,000. You might pay out once, but you're going to get another provider in future. What do you think this does for soft power? Do they care about soft power anymore?
21:23Because I know historically, the Americans have really liked this idea that they're sort of top of the global soft power. It's usually other than the Americans that are up there. This is going to damage them so much, but it's so deliberate. And then the other thing that happened yesterday, which, you know, the Trump people will say, well, that's good because it shows how strength works. Two planes set off full of Colombians, nationals who are being deported from the United States and the president of Colombia refuses to allow them to land. Trump immediately announces immediately 25 % tariffs, 50 % in 24 hours if they haven't reversed the decision, they reverse the decision.
22:03So what it shows is that bullying, if you like, works. However, it will also upend whatever positive relationship there is between Colombia and the United States, which is actually the previous administration had worked pretty hard to try to repair. So this is a sort of deliberate, let's just everybody's an enemy. We go after everybody. Right now, he'll be thinking, this is working. I'm getting my way on everything. But they'll come a point where I think there's just backfires. Exactly. I mean, so he can in the short term get his way on anything. Because at the recent partly, I guess that all previous leaders pretended to have ethical and legal justification before they did things, is that if you were hit them going to the Czech Republic, you didn't want Britain and France to go against you.
22:49So you invented some legal justification to try to give you a bit of cover and hope that some of the people in that country might support you. He also wanted the legitimacy in the country you went into. So that the whole series of reasons, America is now a superpower so enormous that it's not like any of these other powers that had to worry in the same way about allies and about local populations. America's military is, as I said, so indispensable and enormous. But again, if he starts using American military bases as blackmail, so you know, he started a bit of this in the last administration. You put a big US military base in some country in the Middle East.
23:32And you say to that country, thank you very much, you're now going to start paying for my base. You create a whole NATO system which involves selling quite a lot of American weapons. Let me give you that as an example. Okay. So when I was the chair of the House of Commerce Defense Committee, one of the most fashionable things to say in those days was, well, why don't we just buy American instead of spending all this time developing our own weapons with BAE systems, wasting a colossal amount of money. There are these cheaper American tanks through these cheaper American rifles. They make them at scale.
24:04Let's just buy American. Now you wouldn't look so smart, right? Because Trump might well turn around and say, oh, excuse me, yeah, you've got the weapons. But if you want any resupply, if you want any of the software updates, if you want any of the missiles, you're going to start paying as four times as much as you were before. And by the way, if you don't use the weapons, in exactly the way that we want, we're going to stop spying and we can cripple them. So all these American systems that they provide, we sort in Afghanistan, turned out that none of the American helicopters or planes that they provided the Afghan army could fly without American consultants and contractors doing software updates daily.
Read the full transcript
24:40And as soon as they remove them, they're crippled. Let me take you to another area where I've been actually talking to people in the protective health sector. And again, I think this is something that people should be really, really concerned about. This is one of the orders they've got. Next to no coverage at all. A freeze at the National Institute of Health on meetings, travel, communication and hiring, while they quote review protocols. Executive orders also, halting publication of regulation and guidance documents issued by bodies, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Centers for Medicare, Medicaid Services, and the Food and Drug Administration.
25:17Now, it says that the pause will be temporary. But meanwhile, the people who are in these organizations, one of which I spoke to says that the whole thing has had an absolutely chilling effect. And that for the first week in something like 64 years, something called the morbidity and mortality weekly report, this is something that goes out every week and has them for 64 years. And it explains with real live data health risks to the American people. This week, it did not go out. And the thinking is two things. One, he wants to show them they can be muzzled whenever he wants them to be muzzled. And secondly, he wants to make sure that if there's bad news coming out about health and what have you, the White House can be in complete control of it.
26:06I've got another email read. This I think is chilling as well. I'm interested in NASA when we talked about this with the Mooch. And do you want to know the name of the email and the address that you have to send to? If you see somebody who is not going along with this new DEI initiative to basically get it out, it's called DEIA Truth at OPM .gov. And it says, there will be no adverse consequence for timely reporting of this information. However, any failure to report such information within 10 days may result in adverse consequences. In other words, if you hear somebody saying, well, this fucking DEI stuff, you can bolster that.
26:49I'm not going to get engaged. You're sitting at the next desk. You have got to tell Truth at OPM .gov that you're neighbouring the office. I mean, it's positively or well in the whole thing. Let me come back on, I know I'm being boring on international aid. No, no, it's not boring. I'm still struggling to get the scale of it. Let me just say why I don't think it's boring. Why I think you're right to come back on it. If I remember rightly, we're moving on to the big, big, big players on aid and development were America, the UK, Germany and Japan. Yes. And America the biggest of all. And virtually every country in the world, particularly the poorer countries, organizations that were keeping people alive and that were making systems kind of valiant work suddenly overnight have the plug pulled.
27:36That is really serious. Exactly. So we're in a situation in which the number of people living in extreme poverty in Africa has gone from about 170 million in 1980 to about 430 million today. We have an incredible number of refugees, displaced people, places like Sudan, Somalia, South Sudan, faced these repeated droughts and humanitarian catastrophes. And what's happened by stopping it and again, they're claiming they're just stopping for a review is that you are stopping programs now in 100 countries. USID has programs in 100 countries. And they have dozens of programs in each of those countries.
28:18Thousands, tens of thousands of programs have just ground to a halt overnight. And that's everything from vaccination, nutrition training for young children, healthcare and none of the countries know what's happening. So you saw Zelensky saying, oh, as far as I'm concerned, I'm still getting assistance from the United States. Well, it doesn't look like it on the list at the moment. The clarification is exempting only Israel and Egypt from the total cessation of aid. Now, this idea that they're going to review it. How are they going to get around reviewing thousands upon thousands of USID programs?
28:56How long is it going to take them? What are they going to do? What are the judgments they're applying as well? And then what happens is these institutions that many institutions, even with big NGOs, they're often 40, 50 percent dependent on USID for all their work. Now, there's a lot wrong with the international development system. I was to section state for international development. I run NGOs. There is so much nonsense in the development system. But the way to do it, of course, would be to set clear targets, address future contracts, not existing contracts, and provide a very, very detailed, rigorous way of shifting the strategy of USAID.
29:35But stopping all existing contracts and stopping on budget payments, the US government went away from USAID giving money to NGOs to other things to saying, okay, we will support the Jordanian government budget on health and education. Stop that. You're stopping the government providing its own services to its people. Of course, anyone listening to me who's on the Trump side is like, yeah, well, that's therefore why would they rely on American money anyway? Well, sure as hell, they ain't going to be relying on American money in the future. And all the soft power and all the influence that America's built up over 70, 80 years because remember, Jordan isn't just in the way that Trump thinks some sort of neutral recipient of American aid.
30:12They have been the key American security partner in the region. For decades, there's American troops on the ground. American bases. Jordan took a million refugees out of Syria. Jordan was vital for balancing ISIS. Jordan is vital for the security of Israel. Toppling Jordan is not just, oh, well, we were giving them money and Buggerat will have our money back. It's toppling your entire system. Do you know, I find most alarming at the moment. There was a single column on the front page of the Times today about a survey of the extent to which around the place, including the UK. I think it said that half of Gen Z young men actually think there would be no harm in us having a dictatorship in the UK.
30:53This is what this thing is doing. And this is why, you know, we talked about this to some people in Davos, the left or the progressives. I've got to get their act together in understanding this is an international. This is the culmination of an international campaign that has been going on for many, many years and they are now absolutely on the rampage. So let's take a bit of a break room. When we come back, Keir Starmer's first call with Donald Trump happened last night. And I also watched so that you didn't have to. I watched Elon Musk speaking to the alternative of the Tochland rally in Germany.
31:24Great look forward to it.
31:31This isn't ad from BetterHelp. At the moment, we're getting advice from everywhere. You just have to go on TikTok. Could be Alice's call plunges. Could be my attempts to meditate or the digital detox that I'm doing in Colombia. But of course, one of the things that we know is that it can be incredibly valuable to talk to another human being, somebody who's actually been trained as a therapist, to work through these ideas calmly, objectively and professionally. And as the largest online therapy provider in the world, BetterHelp can provide access to mental health professionals with a very diverse variety of expertise.
32:07They've got over 5 ,000 therapists in the UK. They've helped more than 5 million people globally and you can join a session literally at the click of a button.
32:18Change hearing yourself clearly, maybe for the first time. So talk it out with BetterHelp. Our listeners get 10 % off their first month at BetterHelp .com slash rest politics. That's better HELP .com slash rest politics. Right now with the Home Depot, you'll find stored solutions made to fit your needs. Grab an HDX tough till to protect your tools. Or keep your sports equipment contained with reinforced snap fit lids. Or stack up and make better use of your space with bins and totes built to last. Whatever your story, we've got the gear to keep it organized and protected at the Home Depot. How do we get more done?
33:10Welcome back to the rest of politics with me, Boris Stewart. And me, Mr Campbell, I love the fact that you're whispering. Is that because there's lots of people pouring coffee and clinking their glasses? Yeah, I'm feeling slightly embarrassed. Are you in the business class lounge? Do you manage to get into the business class lounge? Are there all these people trying to get their beers and get their coffee is going? Okay, tell us about the call with Kierseimer. Can I just sort of preface? I mean, I sent you that thing on the first 20 calls made by Marco Rubio. And it was absolutely staggering. Is there a single European in there?
33:43Basically no Europeans on the list, EU not on the list, UK not on the list, India number one, and then a lot of other countries who you would not have thought were their top priorities. Yeah, yeah. Well, Marco Rubio is definitely going to be going big. I think he's first big visits going to be to Latin America. Trump said when he was on the plane back from Las Vegas that he thought his first visit would either be to the UK or Saudi. But they had a call yesterday and the readout, certainly the readout from the British end was very, very sort of warm. And there was certainly no threats to take the hebrides or to rename the English channel, the American channel.
34:21There was none of that stuff going on. But I think that being said, you know, the government is really going to have some big, big, big choices to make. And I do think this is happening at a time when the Europe debate is changing. And of course, if you speak to the pro -Brexit people say, well, look at Europe, it's a complete bloody mess, etc, etc. Well, it's not a complete mess, but certainly there's got a lot of problems. And you and I, when we're in Davos, we heard from a lot of the American, the big American people in particular, almost contempt for Europe, and I think that's about because Europe still wants to have a rules -based order.
34:57But I think that there's no way that a Labour government in the UK, as it work in ride on the ideological coattails of somebody like Trump. So it's really going to be quite difficult to navigate this. But what I would say from the tone of that call is that you've got the sense that Trump is looking to have a decent relationship, which sits very, very oddly with this kind of Elon obsession. Yeah. And so that was something I did pick up on Davos because I was talking to people who are part of this kind of new Republican, deep and dark mega movement. And they were saying they would be very, very anxious if they were the UK because a story has developed, which Elon Musk has been obviously peddling, which is that the UK has basically been taken over by Islamists.
35:44It's become a kind of Islamic state. And you can see people on Silicon Valley saying to you, oh my goodness, poor you, you live in the United Kingdom, are you okay? Are you safe? You have Jordan Peterson giving this extraordinary and future peers Morgan, where he's just like, what's happened to your country? The whole thing's gone to Hellenhan Basquit. He was one of the people, by the way, named in this survey of young men and he and Andrew Tate, who are named as, you know, role models and what have you. I mean, this thing is kind of off -the -scale map, but it needs a proper fight against it.
36:16These people have just been allowed to kind of dominate the airwaves, dominate the intellectual debate. And it's so dishonest. I mean, Jordan Peterson, I mean, began as an academic, began with his first book, you know, a slightly match, show, and he used to come and give talks in Britain, which mostly, Ernest Young men listening to him, but you know, he talked about God and religion and truth and my goodness, by the time you see him on Pearson Morgan, I mean, he doesn't care really about getting his facts, right? Doesn't care about putting things in context, doesn't care about proportion, doesn't care about pointing out who's been prosecuted or who hasn't, when these particular rapes have happened.
36:51Yeah, I mean, if you end up being one of these big, big names on the kind of ideological right and this opinion forming attention economy, it is big, big, big, big business. You become very wealthy, you become pretty powerful. Do you want to hear what Musk had to say to, um, to the AFD? Yes, okay, so quick reminder for people again, AFD, right wing party in Germany that did surprisingly well in the elections in Turingia and Saxony Turingia, okay, first. And this matters because the far right in Austria, now dominate Austria and Germany's about to go into an election. And at this particular moment, Elon Musk has decided not to get behind the conventional sort of equipment to the Tories, not even behind the equivalent of kind of Nigel Farage, but to go much further out.
37:36Remember, he's a guy who who supports Tommy Robinson and wants him, sees him as a prisoner conscience, Tommy Robinson being this kind of hooligan football, loom, I mean sorry, maybe that's unfair to you as a football supporter, but I'm like, a kind of crazy Islamist conspiracy theory, unrepentant propagandist. And he's now gone for the AFD, Musk is now trying to promote the AFD in Germany, interview their leader and has now appeared on their stage over to you for what he said. Well, he appeared with this massive, enormous, a hall with 4 ,500 people in it, Alice Fiedel, the Chancellor, Canada that introduced him.
38:07And it was this huge, his face was about 60 feet tall. And he did his usual kind of slightly geeky, couldn't quite get his words together and what have you. But it was straight on pro AFD propaganda. AFD is the best hope for Germany. It's okay to be proud to be German, be proud of your cultural values. If you lose everything in multi -cultures, I mean, dilutes everything, we mustn't become one big soup. You're an ancient nation, you go about thousands of years, Julius Caesar, he said, his account of meeting the German tribes is how strong and powerful they were. And then he said, you've got to move beyond past guilt.
38:46You shouldn't have to live and carry the guilt of your grandparents, be excited for the future, preserve German culture, protect German people. And then he had a dig at Brussels, which I suspect, I think this is about Brussels. Brussels, as I said earlier, rules based, online, looking at the regulation of social media companies, same as Trump in his speech, he said, I like the member states, but he deliberately didn't say Europe. He ended it just by saying, I hope the AFD do well, I hope Alice Vidal becomes Chancellor. I mean, what the fuck does he know of Alice Vidal? That would be very good for Germany.
39:18I strongly support the AFD. And then he just went, go. It's extraordinary. We talked about fascism at the beginning. I think the guy who really is a proper or a chair in fascist or emerging as such is mask. I mean, the recklessness now of this man, that stuff that you've just talked about where he says, every country needs to have its own culture, connects directly with this ethnic pluralism phrase, which all the far right in Europe used. And ethnic pluralism, as I said a couple weeks ago, is this theory that Germany is only supposed to have a limited number of people from other countries. I think they've calculated they're supposed to have exactly 600 Afghans and no more.
39:59And I think pluralism, because it's got this word pluralism, sounds quite liberal, it's not at all. It's the justification, what mask is staying out there, is the justification for this remigration, it's justification for saying German and Austrian citizens who happen not to be ethnically white should move out of the country because they come from an alien religion, they haven't assimilated properly. And the most worrying thing of all, I listened to a Jewish friend who was like, well, it's fine, you know, they're only going after the people who aren't making a real effort to assimilate and who are wearing funny clothes and are going to mask too much.
40:32Of course, this is very, very dangerous because of course, this was indeed what people said in the 1930s. Oh, you know, maybe they're just going to go after the Jews who aren't assimilating properly. This is why I refer to Lawrence's book, and that's your mind, it's got this vibe of, it'll be fine, don't stop going on about, it's not worrying too much. And you've still got lots of people saying, I will at least be strong, at least be funny, get stuff done, all this stuff. I've been always done so far, I've signed a lot of executive orders, created a lot of noise. The one thing I really do worry about is the point that the mooch made on our live stream is that, you know, the descent just seems to be kind of a bit weak.
41:09It'll come, it'll come, but you know, honestly. Well, one of the things that's also special in this new situation, which wasn't so true in 2017, is that young men in particular, and this is, this is famous see, also the task I've given you for the year is our kind of envoy to young men, right? Yes, I know, I'm on the case, don't worry, I'm reading about the gel. Anyway, one of the key points about them is they're completely obsessed at moment with anti -heroes and the idea of the disruptor. And the disruptor is a kind of tech bro who comes in and take the phrase from Silicon Valley, move fast and break things.
41:43So, fantasy Elon Musk is willing to take risks that his unmanned rockets will blow up and just keep throwing them up in the air and therefore can get them built more cheaply than NASA can that has all these safety protocols in place. So somewhere there's a kind of melding between the vision of the heroic anti -hero disruptor who moves fast and breaks things and just gets shit done. And which Curtis Yavin, who's been profiled in the New York Times, talks about the need for an American Caesar, an American king, an American monarch, just imagine the difference between if Elon Musk was running the government and a normal kind of liberal Democrats are running going.
42:22And somehow Trump is harnessing that. All these executive orders, the flurry of it, the fact that he's basically saying, and you pointed this out, a lot of what he's doing is technically illegal in US law. He's deprived, he's announced one of his executive orders that you can't by being born in the United States, be an automatic American citizen anymore. That is going directly against the US constitution. The stopping of all, stopping of all his funding is going directly against all the contracts that the US government has signed. So eventually Congress will try to act, people will take legal cases.
43:06But what's so interesting is he's behaving as though Congress doesn't exist, a legal system doesn't exist at no point in the drafting of these executive orders apparently is a lawyer involved. Is anyone saying is this legal or isn't it? Can we actually do this? Crazy, crazy stuff. Well, doubtless, unfortunately we'll be talking about in a fair amount on the podcast this week next week and in many other weeks. But can we close off with a little discussion about the second son of your friend the king Prince Harry? Yes, I'm an admirer of Prince Harry. I like people we guts. I like people who take on big powerful forces.
43:42What I want to draw attention to. I want to ask these listeners and viewers and you to ponder. Let's just say Harry had taken this case to court and lost. I wonder how many front pages that would have filled and how many pages inside they might have used to cover it. So just take that a little bit because not everybody's following the story. So this this for internationalist, this is this immense phone hacking scan. Believe me Roy, Prince Harry gets a lot of international coverage. Okay, but just just explain the story for us in simple terms. As far as I understand it, what happened is that a lot of the British newspapers were hiring private detectives and others and what they were doing is they were tapping the phones to celebrities and then the stories that they ran and their papers came not just from tapping but also breaking into their homes, going through their rubbish, doing all this kind of stuff.
44:30Prince Harry was one of the victims of this, but just probably one of the more famous victims because there were, I don't know what thousands of victims there's stuff, right? Thousands, yeah. And Hugh Grant and others have been involved in cases over many, many years, but what was different about Prince Harry seemed to be that he was saying he was going to take it all to the way to the way because the others have often settled out of court, is that right? Correct, yeah. First up, there were loads of cases for the news of the world and and of course the news international claim, news group claim that this was just isolated in the news of the world, not the other papers, the mirror said the same.
45:03And the news of the world was enclosed, they then closed the news of the world, there's part of this. The news of the world was then closed, a tactical move I would argue. The settlements and the legal course up to now, of course news group newspapers up to two billion. And so what's happened with Prince Harry the other day, they were literally minutes away from the start of an eight week trial, okay? Now the problem is with our legal system, there is a danger that if you are offered a settlement and you don't settle but then you go through with the process and even if you win, if you're awarded less than the settlement that you could have had, you can end up paying the costs even of the people that you've defeated.
45:43So it's a stupid system and that's why for example Hugh Grant said that that was why he settled and ultimately I think that's one of the reasons, but Harry and Tom Watson, the former Labour Deputy Leader, settle as well. That's the reason that they, I think settled on this occasion. However, what Prince Harry managed to get as well as a full and unequivocal apology was an admission by news group of law breaking on their behalf. They said it wasn't their journalist, it was all these hundreds of private detectives and what have you. However, what this has opened the door to is the possibility of perjury because these are people who have stood up in the levy's inquiry, which is under oath, who have stood up in previous court cases, said they had no knowledge, etc, etc, etc.
46:27And the other thing, the reason why, and this is not going away, Tom Watson stood outside the court and said he'd be handing over dossier to the police because we're talking about literally millions of emails that have been deleted, lost from evidence. And by the way, this after a court case had been sort of put in train as it were, and I was sent yesterday, we should maybe try and since 1999, the incidents in which the police have been informed of serious clear evidence of serious allegations against the press and have essentially ended up with saying no further action to be taken right through dozens and dozens and dozens of these.
47:17Can I ask a sort of really awkward question? I mean, you were a journalist with the Daily Mirror, like a tabloid newspaper for many years. You had nothing to do with this, and you didn't see any of this, you want to wear this stuff was going on or... Well, you could remember, I was a journalist in, I stopped being a journalist in 1994. So I can't remember when the whole sort of mobile phone thing became. There was a case, I was involved in a court case where we were somebody who'd been tapping somebody's phone, brought in some information, and we ended up in court and we were told we couldn't use the information because of the, we'd argue that it was in the public interest.
47:53So that was the only time I had any kind of sign of this happening. And just the culture of it makes sense. I mean, was it just sort of almost inevitable that the whole culture of newspapers had become so kind of cynical and brutal that it was almost inevitable this kind of stuff was going to happen? Totally, totally. Well, what was the extraordinary is that so when we were in government, I had a settlement because they'd been, you know, getting into our stuff. I was actually a witness in the Prince Harry thing because they, I was used because they wanted to show that just because it didn't lead to a publication of story, it didn't mean that the law wasn't being broken to get information.
48:31And this was what these private detectives were being used to get into our, into my bank account. And that sort of went nowhere. But so, no, I think you're right about the culture. And it's the culture. We're back to this point, we keep talking about the whole time, impunity. They think they get above the law. And the thing that's happened since Harry's case is that, and as I said to you at the start, if Harry had lost this case, it would have been, we'd still be talking about it. The papers would still be full of it. He's finished. He's gone back to, you know, and Diane will be turning and agree with all this sort of stuff.
49:01Let me just give you some examples of this. So the spectator now edited by Michael Gove, brackets, Rupert Murdoch, in the end, right, the spectator, Harry folded his much balli -hood case, which was due to beginning the high court last spring, it was, has concluded, much balli -hood. I mean, I'm more dismissive. The mail barely reported it. And they didn't mention the fact that they are currently involved in a case, which is coming to court next year. The son, the paper at the heart of it, it was kind of tucked away on page six. The times, since the paper, it was on the bottom of page 12, alongside a story about Judy Dench being worried about her eyesight.
49:42The mafe and the mirror buried away. And the telegraph, to be fair to the telegraph, Rory, it was on the front page, but guess what the headline was? Harry climbs down after eight figure payout. And the Sunday papers, it was as if nothing had happened. It's all gone away. And so this is how they get away with it. But I think with this one, I think, I've got a feeling this one could go, because we're talking about perjury. We're talking about the destruction of evidence and so forth. And it's very rare that I would quote Kelvin McKenzie, former editor of the son, favorably at all. But I do think he had a lot of, I read a transcript of an interview he did.
50:20First of all, he pointed out that this was happening on the watch of Rebecca Brooks. She was editor. She's now the chief executive of the entire shooting match. And he said this, if this was the BBC, BP or John Lewis, with a CEO involved in the scandal like this, they wouldn't last 10 minutes. The criticism from the press would be unbearable. But he says that basically, he says that the media and Britain has got an NPP, which is a no pissing pact. In other words, they don't piss on each other. And so I just think, you know, how guilty must they feel to have spent two billion pounds not going to court?
50:58Now, it's beyond a matching. It's beyond a matching. And I'm glad that the the rest of politics has not signed up to the NPP, but we're actually prepared to call this out. So thank you for that. We're prepared to go. And also, I'm also going to shout out, you mentioned Hugh Grant. You know, that's what I mean about I, there's a guy who is very, very famous. He's very, very wealthy. He would acknowledge, I think, that he's had a few issues in his past that he probably regrets. But he's got guts because I, you know, I know to take these people on, you have to have a lot of courage. And I also, I'm great believer in organized campaigns on stuff like this.
51:36And I do think Haktoff, I understand why they press hate them because they keep going for it. And so I want anybody who wants to, who does have information about the legal activity and their relations with the police and all that stuff, just get in touch with the Haktoff inquiry. And they'll lead you down the path of righteousness. Very good. Thank you, Anna. Well, lovely to talk to you. And, and, and, well done on making it work with this rather chaotic background. Thank you. Yeah, well, I enjoy whatever you're going to go and get from the, the buffet. Thank you. See you later. See you later.
52:09Bye. Bye.
From the publisher
How many ‘early warning signs of fascism’ are we seeing in the US? Has Trump delivered a fatal blow to America’s soft power around the world? Why does Alastair admire Prince Harry and his battle with the tabloids?
Join Rory and Alastair as they answer all these questions and more.
The Rest Is Politics is powered by Fuse Energy, a green electricity supplier powering homes across England, Scotland & Wales. Use referral code POLITICS after signing up for your chance to win a TRIP merch bundle. Learn more at GetFuse.com/Politics
Get our exclusive NordVPN deal here ➼ nordvpn.com/restispolitics It's risk-free with Nord's 30 day money back guarantee ✅
TRIP Plus: Become a member of The Rest Is Politics Plus to support the podcast, receive our exclusive newsletter, enjoy ad-free listening to both TRIP and Leading, benefit from discount book prices on titles mentioned on the pod, join our Discord chatroom, and receive early access to live show tickets and Question Time episodes. Just head to therestispolitics.com to sign up, or start a free trial today on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/therestispolitics.
Instagram: @restispolitics
Twitter: @RestIsPolitics
Email: restispolitics@gmail.com
Assistant Producers: Evan Green, India Dunkley
Video Editor: Joshua Smith
Social Producer: Jess Kidson
Producers: Nicole Maslen, Fiona Douglas
Senior Producer: Dom Johnson
Head of Content: Tom Whiter
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor, Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices




