378. TRUMP VS. ZELENSKY: OVAL OFFICE SHOWDOWN

28 Feb 2025 · 53 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Notes: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 378: TRUMP VS. ZELENSKY: OVAL OFFICE SHOWDOWN

Overview In this episode, hosts Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart discuss Donald Trump's recent confrontation with Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office, analyzing its implications for Ukraine and global politics. They explore the dynamics of the meeting, Trump's provocative statements, and the broader geopolitical context.

---

Key Themes & Discussions

  1. The Oval Office Showdown
  2. Trump vs. Zelensky: The episode opens with Rory and Alastair describing the dramatic confrontation between Trump and Zelensky, highlighting the unexpected intensity and aggression exhibited by Trump and J.D. Vance during the meeting.
  3. Public vs. Private Diplomacy: The hosts contrast the public display of conflict with traditional diplomatic norms, emphasizing the unusual nature of the situation.
  1. Background Context
  2. Trump's Statements: A recap of Trump's claims regarding the Ukraine war, his intentions to negotiate peace in 24 hours, and his derogatory remarks about Zelensky as a dictator.
  3. European Leaders' Involvement: The episode discusses the emergency visits from President Macron and UK’s leader Keir Starmer to persuade Trump towards a more collaborative stance on Ukraine.
  1. The Meeting Dynamics
  2. Pre-Press Conference Incident: The unusual format of a "pre-press conference" is discussed, where tensions escalated dramatically instead of following normal diplomatic protocols.
  3. Zelensky's Responses: An analysis of how Zelensky defended his position against aggressive remarks from Trump and Vance, emphasizing Ukraine's diplomatic efforts and rejection of bullying.
  1. Geopolitical Implications
  2. Trump's Demands: Discussion of Trump's demands for significant Ukrainian mineral resources in exchange for U.S. support, perceived as extortionate by the hosts.
  3. Security Guarantees: The episode dives into the concept of security guarantees for Ukraine, including European considerations and the implications of U.S. withdrawal from support.
  1. Future Scenarios
  2. Potential Outcomes for Ukraine: Alastair and Rory explore various scenarios, including the possibility of Europe having to engage militarily without U.S. support.
  3. The Role of China and Russia: The hosts speculate on how Trump's actions may embolden Russia and China, impacting global security dynamics.
  1. Reflections on Leadership
  2. Zelensky's Courage: Commentary on Zelensky’s leadership qualities amidst the crisis, and how his resilience is crucial for Ukraine's fate.
  3. Impact on British Politics: Discussion of the implications for the UK, including potential reevaluations of military and diplomatic strategies in light of U.S. unpredictability.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Conflict as a Strategy: Trump's approach is characterized as leveraging conflict for media attention and political gain.
  • European Allies' Dilemma: European leaders face complex challenges in securing support for Ukraine without a reliable U.S. partner.
  • Importance of Diplomatic Norms: The breakdown of usual diplomatic protocols during the meeting signifies a worrying trend in international relations.
  • Future of NATO and Global Security: The need for NATO to reassess its strategies and security commitments in the face of shifting U.S. policy is critical.

---

Conclusion This episode of *The Rest Is Politics* provides a thorough analysis of the alarming confrontation between Trump and Zelensky, revealing deeper concerns about the future of international relations and the geopolitical landscape. The hosts emphasize the seriousness of the situation, urging a reevaluation of strategies among global leaders to ensure stability in the wake of U.S. unpredictability.

For more in-depth discussions and exclusive content, listeners are encouraged to consider joining *The Rest Is Politics Plus*.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Thanks for listening to The Restless Politics. Sign up to The Restless Politics plus to enjoy ad -free listening and receive a weekly newsletter. Join our members' chat room again early access to live show tickets. Just go to TheRestlessPolitics .com. That's TheRestlessPolitics .com.

0:16The Restless Politics is powered by our friends at Fuse Energy. And, Rory, you know that Fuse have been very generous in their offers to members and to supporters of The Restless Politics. So how about this one? Anyone who switches, energy supply to Fuse, you get free membership to this wonderful podcast and The Restless Politics plus for The Restless 2025. Well, that's a very, very generous offer indeed. All you have to do is go to GetFuse .com .com forward slash politics and use the referral code politics once signing up. And you will get as a member of Trip Plus all of the episodes ad -free.

0:52Question time episode, you'll get that day before everybody else. You get access to members only live streams. You get early access to tickets for our live shows days before the general public. And we'd love to have you as one of our members. And hopefully it's just the perk you need if you're considering switching energy provider. It's always worth mentioning that Fuse generate power from their own solar and wind farms and they invest 100 % of profits into building any way. Anyway, we're going to look at Trustpilot. And on there, people give Fuse 4 .7 out of 5. That's a very, very eye mark in the modern demanding age.

1:26And there is comment, have to comment about how helpful and attentive people find the service that they get. And I do think people appreciate speaking to real human beings rather than those awful chat bots. So download Fuse's app now and use the referral code Politics after signing up. Visit getfuse .com forward slash politics for the terms and conditions and to learn more.

1:58Welcome to a restless politics live stream. Friday night, I think we're both expecting a quiet night in and they've just witnessed. I honestly can't find the words. The most extraordinary bust up in the Oval Office between Trump and the vile vans who really showed his true colors today with President Zelensky of Ukraine. I don't know how much you were able to catch a bit, but I don't think I've ever, ever, ever seen anything like in public. The only thing I ever saw in private, I wasn't sort of bloody me a putin, absolutely losing his rag with Tony Blair. But even that was nothing like this, nothing.

2:40Well, let's let's just quickly bring bring people up to date. So, quick reminder, Trump campaigns saying that if he came into office, he would end the Ukraine war in 24 hours. He then announced talks in Saudi Arabia with Russia and has gone out calling Zelensky a dictator and saying that he's very popular and choosing him starting the war and saying that the US was had spent three times more than it's actually spent in Ukraine. Everybody, of course, very, very worried, so that then lent to a emergency scrambling by President Macron and Prime Minister Stama who flew over to Washington. And the major objectives of their meetings, which were this week, Macron's meeting was on Monday.

3:30Stama's meetings just happened, was to try to convince Trump to get back into a more moderate position on Ukraine. And really what they were hoping to do is say, okay, Europe will put up much more money. In fact, they've even suggested Europe will put up all the money. Provided the US is prepared to continue to sell weapons systems and provide something called security guarantees, which we can get into a bit later. While this was all been going on, Trump has been making demands to Ukraine for a mineral steel. And in the draft that people saw, he was asking for 50 % of all Ukraine's minerals now and in the future.

4:13It's going to be about $500 billion worth of minerals for the United States. In return, it appeared for nothing. President Zelensky then has flown out to the United States. He arrived. There was quite a warm greeting on the steps of the White House where Trump made some jokes about Zelensky's clothes. Said it was a great honor that he was visiting. And then they sat down in this rather strange pre -press conference. So there seems to be, and I'd love to ask you about this, just to explain the logistics. This seems to be a pre -press conference. Then they go to their meeting and then traditionally they do a press conference at the end.

4:53What's this pre -press conference where the problems started? Well, I alluded to this in the discussion we had about Kierstama and his press conference, his meeting with President Trump yesterday. What happens is you arrive and traditionally, you then go into the over office. It's a big moment, obviously, particularly if it's the first time a leader is going there as Kierstama was yesterday. And then they bring in this thing called the Pulse break. And both when I was a journalist when Ronald Reagan was president and Bush won, and when I was working with Tony Blair through Clinton and Bush era, usually you take two or three questions, maybe two each, and it would be very much to set the scene.

5:43What this was, what this became was a full -scale shouting match. I think deliberate, I think deliberately provoked. It felt to me like an ambush. And the point is that we were talking this afternoon, we should tell others, we didn't interview this afternoon with Martin Wolfe, the guy who's now written four books about Trump. But he said something very, very interesting. He said, you guys keep trying to find what makes this guy tick. He's not a serious person. He's a reality TV guy. All he cares about, he said, remember this, are ratings and conflict. And he knows that to drive his ratings and keep him in the art public eye and get it all the attention he needs, he has to have conflict.

6:32If you are serious about this deal that he's talked about for the last few days, you'd have welcomed Zelensky. You're team sort of done all the work in advance. And then if it was still work to do, you'd have gone for the meeting. Done a few pictures, shaken hands, gone for the meeting. Instead of which they had full -on, his usual talking points about Biden was terrible, Biden did nothing. There would have been no war if I had been present. October 7th wouldn't have happened. The inflation wouldn't have happened. Raging about, and I think this is the crux of his hatred of Zelensky revisiting this thing about, you know, Hunter Biden, when he asked for favors, he asked Zelensky to do stuff which Zelensky felt he shouldn't.

7:13But I think the other thing that really, I don't know whether it should have shot me, but it did shot me. There's Zelensky's in a elected president of Ukraine. Very important country right at the height of things. There's nothing wrong with people in the meetings coming in. But the way Vance came in was utterly disgusting. It made me think it was a deliberate, intimidating, bullying behavior. Let me do a quick explainer again for people who didn't view it and then get your analysis on it. So the meeting started relatively calmly in a normal way. Then a journalist from Polish radio asked a direct question about whether it made sense for Trump to trust Putin.

7:57At that point, President Trump started attacking Zelensky. He started saying that Zelensky had a very bad attitude towards Putin. Then J .D. Vance, a prepover not very much, suddenly weighed in and made a speech mocking Biden saying America had been chest thumping and saying that America had made no attempts to do deals. But he Trump was going to bring peace. It was at that point that Zelensky felt that he needed to stand up for himself. He said, I think partly offended maybe that the vice president had interrupted him this way. He turned to J .D. Vance and he said, look, we did a lot of deals.

8:38Macron, Merkel, myself, we signed deals with Putin. He promised we did gas deals and he broke all those ceasefire agreements and deals. Then when Vance challenged him again on diplomacy, Zelensky said what diplomacy and eventually said and have you ever even visited Ukraine? It was at that point that things really began to get out of control because they started shouting at him being disrespectful, not showing enough gratitude to the United States. You don't have any cards. Let me tell you, this is very rude. You mustn't talk to a psych. There's you've done enough talking. Okay, every for now, let's just now have given a little.

9:14Yeah, that's what made me think it was deliberate, bullying, intimidating behavior because they kept putting points to Zelensky, which she tried to respond to and they just sort of shouted over him. The other thing that Vance said, he said at one point, he essentially, he said, we said that you don't have any, you don't have any soldiers left. At one point, Trump also said, all your cities have been flattened. Zelensky said, no, because the truth is that we said this on the podcast last week. 20 % has been occupied but most of the big cities in Ukraine, they're functioning. They're, it's not easy, but they're functioning.

9:50So they kept and the other point that both Macron and Stammer had pushed back on this thing that Europe just gets, Europe's getting all the money back and we paid more than Europe. So Lensky very factually, very calm. They said, no, Europe has paid as much. Europe has given us much and we're very grateful to you, we're very grateful to them. Vance literally his first words were, have you actually said thank you? And Zelensky again, very calm. And by the way, I went back and watched the whole thing again. It's 15 minutes. So Zelensky started by saying thank you to the American people. Started, thank you for the invitation, thank you for the American people.

10:27So Vance sits there, utterly vile that man, I've been thinking this for a while about Vance, he's utterly vile and you really saw it today. And he basically said, have you ever said thank you, when are we going to get gratitude? That triggers Trump to say when are we going to get gratitude? I felt that Zelensky did look slightly on the edge, hardly surprising. He's been a war leader for three years. He's been flying around the world. Vance also said, all you do are these propaganda tours. He talked about taking people to Ukraine on propaganda tours. And as you're not showing, I always thought he was going to say free speech, you're not showing us the whole picture.

11:04And so as a result, it got work. And instead of Trump, if Trump was a serious person, a serious diplomat, the minute he sensed it going wrong, unless he wanted it to go wrong, he just said, okay, you've had your questions, you've had your pictures, we're now going to do the meeting, we'll speak to you later, that have gone and tried to resolve it. Instead of which, he went, you, you, you, another question, another question. And kept gusting. And then the story at least that's just been printed in the independent is that they then went into an hour of meetings and at the end of that hour, Marco Rubio and Mike Waltz, the Secretary of State and that secretary of vice, asked Zelensky to leave the building.

11:47And Trump then posted on three socials saying this guy isn't interested in peace. And part of the problem of see why Zelensky is unentripe, presumably, is that he's in an impossible situation. Trump has been asking for $500 billion, which is much more than the United States has given and offering nothing in return. And Zelensky has been sitting on his tongue, being as polite as he can, hoping because the Europeans have been encouraging to leave this, that maybe if he gave him an in -nual deal, maybe if the Europeans put up the money, the United States would provide some kind of security guarantee in return.

12:22But that phrase, security guarantee hasn't happened at all. And can I just try to dig into this maybe just for a little bit so that we get into the the the question of what these different deals are, what it is that Trump seems to want, what Putin seems to want, what Europe seems to want, what Zelensky seems to want. So let's start with Europe and Zelensky. Their starting point, which was pretty similar to President Biden's starting point, was that Russian economy is in trouble. Russia has been making advances, but very, very slowly, I think it was you that said it would take 88 years for Russia to be able to conquer the whole of Ukraine of this rate.

13:04And that you could get a deal in place in which maybe Putin held on to bits of eastern Ukraine, but Western Ukraine was fully secured. And fully secured for Zelensky means becoming part of the European Union and NATO, and becoming part of NATO means article five protection, which basically means that if Putin stepped foot into that part of Ukraine, NATO will be obliged to respond with a nuclear missile strike. It's pretty, pretty extreme stuff. Putin's demand on the other hand has been that he gets full recognition for the territory he's taken. He gets more territory. He's got more bits of territory that he wants.

13:47He wants Ukraine completely demilitarized. He wants Zelensky gone. He wants all sanctions lifted and eastern Ukraine recognized as part of Russia. And it now I think is increasingly clear that the Trump plan is the Putin plan. And why? Well, maybe these reasons. Number one, he may have a very strange relationship to Putin, and you talked about that a little bit. He's got something in his head that Putin backed him over Hunter Biden. Secondly, there are people in Trump's administration who have a national security ploy where they believe that China is the priority, Russia's the distraction, and some of the more imaginative ones even believe they might be able to peel Russia off and use it as an ally against China.

14:33Thirdly, since that he feels he's wasting a lot of money, foresteely he's got a lot of isolationists in mega behind him. And I think finally he wants to present himself as the great peacemaker. He wants to be able to come and say, I ended this war. Right back over to you. Well, I think this thing about being the great peacemaker and the great deal maker. And when he was saw Macron on Monday, he was saying, you know, all my life is deals. You have to understand I'm a deal maker. I make great deals. Putin has completely played him on this totally played it. Putin's first big step was to get back at the top table.

15:09And the top table when it comes to pretty much any big international issue with the UN so weak at the moment, it's the United States. So he has a one -on -one phone call. That's where this all started. Trump came out and said, I've had this long chat with Putin and he started to say, I know him, I trust him and all this. That was the other thing that I think triggered Zolensky slightly. Was he sitting there? His country having been invaded. Trump not having said a single word of criticism pretty much since he returned to office. A few -tent. And he's saying, yeah, I believe him. I believe the guy.

15:43He says he won't invade. He won't invade. He says this. So and then into this whole mineral thing. And the minerals, of course, I hadn't quite realized that so much of the mineral wealth that we're talking about. And they're a very good podcast, the German podcast today with a woman called Florence Gau, posit she works for NATO in Rome. And she, I don't know quite where it's the extent to which a lot of these rare earth minerals are in the occupied part. And so Zolensky has been bullied into doing this deal, which is, you say, 500 billion, which Ben Wallace on the radio earlier was talking was calling blatant extortion, which Garamucci has called scarab extortion, which I think you have as well.

16:30And so he's basically being put in there and told, we're going to sign this deal. We're going to sign this deal. And it was perfectly obvious that the groundwork hadn't been done. It wasn't like, you know, Kierstheim and you that Trump was going to accept the state visit and they knew they were going to say Cheg or silence because the work had been done. That hadn't happened. And that is not serious diplomacy. So I think I do think Michael Walls point about him just not being serious. Now what he will feel now, I don't know, as you say, the Magcrowd and it's actually, it's pathetic. Do you remember Boris Johnson was Prime Minister?

17:05And each time there was a scandal, the cabinet were given these cut and paste tweets by Dominic Cummings to say, you know, well, the Trump cabinet is now doing the same. Including Marco Rubio, who by the way looked absolutely sick in that meeting. Would it just just remind, remind listeners little on Marco Rubio and why he looks sick. So Marco Rubio was one of the leading voices in the Senate of skepticism towards Putin. He was the guy who used to ask other people and confirmation hearings, as I think we've discussed in the podcast, is Putin a dictator. He has always been on the record saying you can never trust Putin.

17:43Putin doesn't want to deal all he wants to do as we can the United States. And now he's having to claim that he believes Trump. And that he believes Trump's, you know, fundamental claim, which is Trump thinks he can hand over Ukraine to Putin. And he sort of implies that he thinks and then Europe will be safe. And that NATO will be safe. And Putin will back him on China. All this is unbelievably naive, because he's got no leverage over Putin on Europe. He's got no leverage over Putin on NATO. He's got no, by which I mean, now that he's simple, that he doesn't believe in security guarantees, I'm not quite sure where no to is at all.

18:19Let me read you his tweet, which is the same tweet that lots of others would have. Thank you, Potos, President of the United States. We're standing up for America in a way that no president has ever had the courage to do before. Thank you for putting America first. America is with you. Now, you've sat in the meeting. You've seen what's gone on. Is that a serious secretary of state who was who was sitting there, just look at the look at his face there. Look at how he looks during the meeting. He knows it's going really, really badly. And yet he cannot bring himself afterwards to do anything other than what he's told to do.

18:52And by the way, you talked about some of the questions. And as with the Macron, he's clearly, they clearly have planted questions. One of the questions and Trump was giving the guy a little wink was this guy who said to Zolensky, couldn't you have actually, you know, worn a suit. Now, Zolensky is we all know is dressed like that for a reason to show that he's countries at war. And I think a lot of people respected him for that. So, Zolensky rightly just sort of battered it off. But then Trump gave his little wink to the guys, if to say thanks for that. They gave him a little punch as well. And I just feel that if you don't have a serious government in the, in the White House at this time, he have Trump and Trump and he's put it in his FSB guys will be laughing their heads off watching every single minute of it.

19:37But what it means now, I think for the UK, for France, for Germany, for Canada, for Australia, for other countries. And this, this summit that Kierstarm was hosting now in London on Sundays, unbelievably important. I'm hoping Zolensky is still coming. And I think it's, I think the Europe now really has to step up. It may, you may end up with somebody having to negotiate, like Starmor or Macron to negotiate to get Trump back in the same room as Zolensky. Let me play the full pessimistic picture here. So basically, Macron and Starmor's trips to Washington seem now to have been wasted. Their objective was to get there before Zolensky, get US security guarantees.

20:22Macron believes that he'd charm Trump to do that. Starmor famously turned up with a letter from the king. They got a lot of sort of warm smiles and no real language. And the end of it is the week ends with this incredibly aggressive humiliation of Zolensky. So what can we read from this? I think that the worst case scenario is this and it seems increasingly as though it's probable. So not just the worst case scenario, it's probably what's going to likely to happen. If Trump holds to his current position, he will withdraw US support from Ukraine. He will withdraw all US military assets from Ukraine.

21:03He will withdraw all US money from Ukraine. But worse than that, he will also not allow European countries to continue to buy American systems in order to continue the war in Ukraine. He will wash his hands. It's Zolensky. He will say, I tried to make a deal. You wouldn't sign the minerals deal. I hand you over to Putin. And that is, I'm afraid, unbelievably difficult. We can talk on his podcast about Europe stepping up. But at that point, it's no longer US and Europe's war. It's Europe's war only. And there are two questions for that. Can Europe fight that war? And would Europe want to fight that war?

21:48Can Europe fight that war? Well, very, very difficult in the next two years. It would take at least 24 months before Europe was in any position to replace a lot of the key US equipment. Would Europe want to fight that war? Does Macron have the support, the strength in his own parliament? Does Stama, my sense is Stama hasn't been pitching himself as the grand big picture international statesman? Is he going to want to take the full burden of the Ukraine war? And what's really involved? Well, I think the next thing that will happen is Putin will start advancing very, very fast. Because without US anti -aircraft missiles, he's going to be able to get pushes artillery much closer.

22:40Without US electronic warfare, the drones will be able to take out the Ukrainian tanks, etc., etc. So I think we are in a situation in which almost certainly Putin can guarantee that he can radically increase his territory. But I think it's not impossible that Putin could march all the way through Kiev to Moldova. The Dmitry Medvedev, who is the former, the guy who pretended to be president when Trump was in Putin is an interregnant. The insolent pig finally got a proper slap down in the overloss. Trump is right, the Kiev regime is gambling with World War Three. This is what we've seen since the election is Russian delight at pretty much everything that Trump says and does.

23:28I mean, you really do begin to wonder, we talked on the podcast the other day about, you know, the question we keep being asked is what has Putin got on Trump? And we keep, this goes back to the discussion with Michael Wolfe, we keep trying to find strategic and tactical and psychological reasons as to why Trump operates as he does. But it may, there may be something very simple behind this. But I think that what I saw in Zelensky as well, and I honestly, I felt the sight of, I think, Zelensky is an incredibly courageous guy. He's an unbelievable communicator. He's the way that he's kept going for three years, kept traveling around the world or he's propaganda tours as Vance called it.

24:15But I think that I sort of felt, you did feel he was on edge, you felt that even he was shocked. He knew, listen, when you've been called at your theater, when you have to listen to Trump saying, you know, Russia, Ukraine started the war, you can see why might arrive pretty angry. But he arrived looking like he was, he was kind of, you know, serious about trying to get something done. But then it was like just these, first of all, they start chipping away and then the big stuff, these planted questions coming in. I don't know whether it's true, but somebody on the chat just said that the question about the suit was asked by the same guy that I told you about who asked the planted question at the press con, was with Macron, the guy who's a friend of Marjorie Taylor Greene.

24:58But I think in this, that the Maga crowd probably think, great, yeah, we're, you know, we're showing the world that we're at the boss, et cetera. But I think this does unbelievable damage to the American standing in the world, unbelievable damage. But part of the issue is that in some way, as with everything with Trump, it sort of was predictable and not predictable. So I guess if, you know, when you and I were doing podcasts before the election, we were saying, well, if Trump wins, he will give in to Putin and the way that he'll make pieces by basically allowing Putin to have all the territory and toppling Zelensky and creating a puppet regime in Ukraine.

25:37So we can say that quickly. But then he actually gets in and he starts leaning into that. Then it becomes clear that he's made these promises to Putin. He's made these promises to the American public. So it becomes increasingly clear that he's going to sell out Zelensky in order to be able to boast that he's ended the war and saved America money. But we still don't quite believe it. And you've got these trips by Stama and Macron, where I guess we keep saying, well, you've got to try. I mean, you've got to keep hoping that something that you can do, that the some way through. But I'm afraid after tonight, we might just return to the analysis back in October and November.

26:18This has been Trump's position all the way through. We've been hoping against hope that some element of diplomacy, realism, arguments about Putin not humiliating him will change it. But honestly, I don't think Jedi Vance or Trump could have been more clear from the beginning. But this is what they intended to do. Now the problem is because nobody quite took them seriously. We haven't really thought about what that looks like. We've now need to plan for the possibility that Putin thinks he's in a much stronger position he could have imagined. And Putin may think he can take the whole of Ukraine and maybe help himself to mold over to.

Read the full transcript

27:01And I think the other final point, and I maybe this come to you on this before we go to comments and questions. We've been talking about security guarantees all the time. And what were these security guarantees that Stama and Macron were asking for from Trump? Well, it wasn't very clear. But it seems as though what they were saying is you can take all your troops and money out. We'll produce the money. But we'd like you to produce a security guarantee that if Putin comes into Western Ukraine after the peace deal, you will respond on how you will respond with nuclear weapons. In other words, they were suggesting that Ukraine be treated like a NATO member state that the US security umbrella.

27:41Go over. Now, obviously, when you say that out loud, you realize that Trump was never going to sign up to that. Trump was never going to sign up to the idea of firing nuclear weapons at Putin to defend Ukraine. Furthermore, when you really begin to pull it out and say, well, isn't that what article five and NATO's about as security guarantees, it's presumably pretty obvious to all of us now that he's not going to fire nuclear weapons at Putin to defend Lithuania, which is a NATO country or Poland, which is a NATO country or France, which is a NATO country. And I don't need security guarantees.

28:11He was asked about some of his countries. He was asked about Poland. He said, I like Poland. They're spending lots of money on Poland. We definitely stand up for Poland. And then something's about one of the Baltic countries. Yeah, well, they're in a tough area. They did one of his little sort of smiles, win some smiles. And yeah, we'd kind of think about them. I should tell you, by the way, Friedrich Mertz, the soon -to -be -new German chancellor, is tweeted of English, dear Vladimir, we stand with Ukraine in good and in testing times. We must never confuse aggressor and victim in this terrible war.

28:42And he's put brackets FM, which means that I am tweeting this by self. This is not by office. I hope that Kierstarmadar something similar. I hope Macron does something similar. I hope Tuscita something similar. I know why Macron and Kierstarmad and I still think they did the right thing in going. And I think they did the right thing in stroking his ego and, you know, trying to get that balance between pandering to the narcissist. Actually working on him. Now he has ended up in a worse place, even worse place. But you've just got it. You've got to keep going. I should say, by the way, as well, Roy, the guy who asked Zelensky about, you know, whether he, and as you said earlier, Trump commented on, on Zelensky's clothes.

29:26Why did none of the cabinet say to Elon Musk when he turned up in the cabinet meeting? Why don't you wear a fucking suit? Anyway, sorry, that's just me going off. Here's a question, Michael K question lads. What does Zelensky do next? Well, it comes to London. It comes to London. But in terms of his military options, there's a very, very small possibility for him, which is that he tries to mobilize. This is the really nasty scenario. He tries to do a full mobilization. So he hasn't done full conscription yet of the entire Ukrainian population. And he leans into urban warfare. He hopes he doesn't lose all his CXs.

30:09He tries to hold on to as much territory as he can while Europe builds up its defenses and tries to buy that critical 18 months, two years until Europe's in a position to provide. But that's a lot of ifs. That's assuming a lot about the Ukrainian people. That's assuming a lot about morale in Ukraine. That's assuming a lot about European willingness to do that. And that's assuming a lot about Russia, because Russia would then throw everything that it had against him. Essentially, we're getting thousands of comments here, and they go so fast and as they are, I can't stop them. Here's a good question for you, where we would Turkey step up to help you create.

30:49Yes. So Turkey has been very interesting, and it's a really, really important player here. So Turkey has a traditional rivalry with Russia. In the Black Sea and in Syria, as people know, Turkey has a pretty formidable army, and an army that actually has a lot of combat experience and is prepared to fight. Turkey's been providing a lot of drones to Ukraine, and Turkey has offered to get involved on the ground. So any European defense alliance that you tried to put around Ukraine would definitely have to include Turkey, and it would certainly try to pull in Japan, South Korea, Australia, those major economies.

31:26But you're still missing critical things. And this is, part of this is obviously our fault. We never developed enough anti -aircraft missile capacity. We never developed proper satellite coordination. We haven't got a proper replacement for styling. We're not good enough at electronic warfare. There are these gaping holes. And whether it's true, they'd take two years to fill. I suppose some people might say we move much faster during the Second World War, but it's really, really big lift. And I think the problem, Alistair, is that you and I, and many, many people on these comments, are desperately thinking, what do we do to support Ukraine and the absence of the US?

32:11It's much more difficult to face the possibility that the odds are really against you if the US pulls out. I mean, really. Sure. And we talked on the main podcast this week about, we are virtually all of our defenses are so tied into American systems and to American cooperation, because we always assume that was going to be there. And that's what you have to keep again, defense forces. Listen, there'll be a lot of people in the American military tonight who are thinking what the F is he done. There'll be a lot of people in American intelligence thinking what the hell has he done. So there will be, there'll still be that cooperation going on.

32:47That, but meanwhile, I think we just have to face Friedrich Merck said it, you know, on the night he was elected, on the night he won the election, he said, you know, we've got to become more independent of America, we've got to understand they're not as reliable as they were. There's another question there, Bobby, does this leave Turkey is the only power that can supply Ukraine with the security in these for the next 24 months? Well, I think it's going to be a combination of powers to do that. The other big story in the UK today, Roy, that probably would have been, in fact, it was leading the news until all this was Analyse Dodds, resigning as development minister, and she was making the point as we did in our livestream about the aid cuts the other day, that this sort of opens the door to Russia and China in that space.

33:34But I actually think now what a combination of all these things happening, she says in her in her resignation letter that she thought she and I thought it was very dignified of a not to resign until here got back from from his visit to Trump, that would have been disastrous that happened in the middle of it. But I think it was interesting that she pointed out I thought we were going to have discussions about whether we could actually look Rachel Reeves' fiscal rules and also at the tax situation. I think at some point in the not too distant future, the country and we're not the only country this is going to apply to right across Europe, we're going to have to really ramp up defense spending and that is going to, you know, we're talking about tough choices, it's going to mean really tough choices, not least related to fiscal rules and tax issues.

34:22Well honestly, we talked about this which is that Labour felt that the only way of winning the election was to promise not to raise the taxes which make up 75 % of revenue, so VAT, a corporation tax income tax national insurance and they came out of that election, found themselves in a fiscal hole, felt that their only option was to raise employees national insurance for damaging tax. They need to get back if they're going to raise more money for things like defense to those broad base taxes and this was their opportunity to do it. It was very, very sad that Starma decided that the way to do it was to have basically international development spending from where it was when I was Secretary of State.

35:13Potentially, I mean, I can get into this a bit more, potentially even breaking manifesto commitments legal commitments in order to do it, but the bigger point was this presumably was his political opportunity to say Trump, Ukraine, the world situation, this is a good reason which even conservatives, I would argue, could buy into to actually look at raising some of the main taxes. Yeah, Samuel Yeats here, with a three sort of stay awake at night question, could you envision a scenario where the UK is at war with Russia but the USA is not? That's a big thing because of course, you know, the entire sort of thinking about NATO is about preventing war and seeing Russia as the enemy, as it were, for a lot of it's period.

36:01There have been moments of rap wash, maln that have gone a bit, but in recent years, that's gone away again. But what you have a sense of now is that Trump is an ally of Putin and most of the other countries that thought they were allies of the United States are not allies of Putin. And that, so Samuel, I hope not, but I think that's the kind of that's the kind of scenario planning that now does have to be thought about. Yeah, it's, I mean, there's clearly something which we've talked about before which, I mean, you know, this Michael Wolfenfuel, I recommend to people who haven't heard it, but well, we have this area where we said it.

36:45They kind of, he focuses a lot on this idea that Trump's not serious. Look, I agree with that, but I think that's also a bit misleading because I think, as you've pointed out, what he does in the world is certainly serious. So the question of whether or not he himself is serious is a little bit, the effect of what he does is incredibly serious. And I think it's also true that that maybe Michael Wolfenf over does this idea that there's nothing constant about Trump. I think there are certain things that are constant about Trump. And one of them is a longstanding admiration for strong men, a longstanding admiration for that in Putin, a sense that the United States should be dominating the Americas that Russia should be dominating Eastern Europe and implicitly that China should be dominating Asia seems to be somewhere in the back of his head.

37:34And then there's other stuff too. He clearly is interested consistently in tariffs in immigration and it's getting more ideological. I mean, this is the other thing that I think we haven't fully articulated yet. This is a much more ideological administration than Trump's first presidency because must must convince in particular have become theorists, very strange theorists on democracy, freedom of speech, getting in behind these far right groups in Europe, undermining our end democracies from within. That wasn't part of Trump's playbook last time. And this stuff, authoritarian, pretty fascist in nature feeds in pretty well to stealing minerals from Ukraine, giving Putin leeway.

38:29And as I think that question points out, I don't think it's really an open question anymore whether the US is on Russia's side or Europe's side. It is clearly on Russia's side. I mean, this decision and this spectacle, this horrifying spectacle, is Trump declaring for Russia against Europe. Margaret Gowdy, where is Kierstama, why no statement, yeah, European leaders are making statements for support? Listen, they'll be thinking things through, they'll be, every rule of follow this, everyone will be aware of what's gone on. Kierstama now has to share this meeting on Sunday. It's going to be very, very consequential.

39:08I really, I think they're talking about already about 18 European leaders who are due to be there. I hope all European leaders say, by the way, I want to be there too. I think this is one of those moments where you just have to show real solidarity with Zalensky. And you know, you said there that Trump admire strongman leaders, the strength that Zalensky has shown as a, do you remember, go, let's go back three years, Joe Biden said to him, right to the start, listen, Vladimir, this is going to be really, really tough. If you want us to get you out of there, we can do it. And Zalensky was basically offended even at the suggestion.

39:47And if you remember the Kremlin spread a story that Zalensky had fled and he posted a selfie of himself with his troops, I think Zalensky has got real strength, real courage. And let's never forget, you know, Donald Trump, Bonesburg. We had a question here. Is this the start of World War Three from Sulus? Try to take that seriously because it obviously sounds terrifying, but just explain, well, it's also what is what Trump said to Zalensky, you're risking World War Three. And as usual with Trump, he's flipped it around in a bizarre way because it is he that's bringing us closer to World War Three.

40:31So essentially, the way that we prevented World War Three, in other words, nuclear war since the invention of the atom bomb was through this extraordinary nuclear deterrence. And right at the heart of nuclear deterrence was NATO. And the idea was that Russian Soviet Union would not attack NATO countries and NATO would not attack Russian Soviet Union because of these nuclear weapons. And it was psychological. And this is why what Trump has done is so unbelievably devastating. Deterrence only works if people have faith that you're going to use it. And for 80 years, for better or for worse, Russia has believed that the United States would stand behind its article five guarantees in NATO.

41:21And that there was a good chance they would use nuclear weapons to defend NATO territory. In other words, we've had peace and avoided nuclear war paradoxically because of the threat of nuclear war. What will happen now, almost certainly, is that Putin will sense that Trump is no longer willing to defend somewhere like Lithuania. Lithuania is pretty easy for Putin to get into. In fact, he has a small bit of territory which he can join together by going through Lithuania. And I think we can take it as red that Trump would not be firing nuclear weapons at Putin where he'd go into Lithuania, but Lithuania is a NATO country.

41:59So once he's taken one NATO country, then the whole thing opens up. And then the thing that leads to World War Three, of course, isn't just Putin. It's the way in which Europe responds. How does Poland respond? Well, Poland, of course, has spent a lot of its historical existence being part of recent experience. The Baltics were part of the Soviet Union itself. So for those countries, they will then respond violently to try to defend themselves and the risk of war increases dramatically. There's also, there's quite a couple of comments that people saying that you said the real winner tonight was Putin.

42:35The real winner tonight is actually China. And of course, that's the other thing that if we do get into a situation where the whole of Europe is feeling that we have to focus on this, then China and America is not going to engage. Then China starts to feel a lot more relaxed about Taiwan. Kalam Haladeh, what do you think of the future of the Five Eyes Agreement? This is whereby the US, the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand have major intelligence sharing going on. And we talked about that when we did a podcast with David McCloskey from the rest is classified. And he was making the point that it just makes sense that when you have people who are operating with similar systems, he said, what did he say?

43:25Did he say, did you got 20 of America's providing 20? UK's providing five, three Canada, two Australia, one New Zealand. And it made sense. But when you see the extent to which the Americans now appear to be frankly closer to Putin than they are to NATO, and when you see people like Chelsea Gabbard and the guy at the FBI in charge, then you do start to wonder and you do start to think about whether they can rely on it. James, when he says Five Eyes is dead, stop sharing intelligence now, one of the other things that happens with the Five Eyes system is that the United Kingdom will shut down intelligence stations in other countries relying on the United States to then fill the intelligence gap.

44:11Yeah. And we've been doing this for many, many years. So and we hand over agents, the running of agents, we hand over classified material. In other words, the whole design of the British Australian New Zealand Canadian intelligence services are designed around the CIA and assume that we can specialize in areas and the CIA will provide us intelligence scenarios where we don't have a presence. That will now cease because we will assume now that Trump will order the CIA not to share that kind of intelligence with us at which point we would then have to develop far larger. Absolutely. And the question is this one.

44:51Yeah. A couple of things here that relate to that. Freddie Johnson, American here, Freddie's in American, welcome Freddie, we still like Americans. It's just your president, your vice president, we have a bit of trouble with this evening. Horrifying me. So as Trump is doing everything in his power to align the US with Russia politically, militarily, economically. And Martin Smith, LBC is saying that TAS was allowed into the pool spray, but Royters and AP were kept out. Did you hear about this TAS, that's the sort of Soviet, the Russian news agency, somehow, even though they weren't on the list, got into the overbought this and were putting it out live.

45:32The other thing that's really weird about this American system, sorry to go back to the trivios of media management, is that you talk about the White House is one of the most consequential political buildings in the world. America is one of the most media conscious countries in the world, but they still have this system where you have the pool spray at the top. And the reporters are all in there telling you everything that's being said, but the pictures don't come out for about 20 minutes. It's the weirdest thing. So anyway, the guy from TAS was in there reporting live to Moscow, which is sort of some sort of damn thing up.

46:07Here's the last one for me before we wrap up. And brother and interesting one from Issam Kazi, he says, what if China steps in and gives Ukraine security guarantees and ends the war for 25 % of the minerals, the US is done in that case. Now, I think it sounds, it sounds point is really interesting. China has been trying to present itself as the dealmaker, the arbiter between Ukraine and Russia. China sees an enormous opportunity in America's retreat. It's getting into Nepal, it's turning up in the Middle East, it's putting out my statements to Europe saying, you know, we're a stable, reliable security partner.

46:43So I think Issam may be being too imaginative, but I think there's something in it. I wouldn't be too surprised if we don't begin to see China stepping forward over the next few days and weeks, trying to insert itself into the middle of this position as the US loses its power. Yeah, Roy, I'm going to close by pointing out that a lot of the questions, a lot of the comments coming in should Britain withdraw the offer of a state visit? What will King Charles be thinking as he watches all this? Now, I don't know anybody really close to King Charles to just be able to pick up a phone and do you know anybody who could maybe give me some indication of that?

47:26It's a very, very unfair question, but look, it's a really, really difficult position now that the King is in. And remember Canadians are now very upset because they feel that... Oh, Roy, I've been looking at the Canadian media all day. They really weren't... I mean, I've spoken to sources close to Keir Starmer who actually said that he was about to say we didn't discuss it, but when Trump actually sort of cut in and called another question, but Canadian media today is absolutely on the rampage about this idea that the head of state, the head of our state, who is also the head of the Canadian state, is giving a state visit to this guy who says he's going to take over Canada.

48:09And I'm afraid this will have been an idea from the Prime Minister. This is not something that the King or Buckingham Palace generates. Here we go, sources close to the King, just to give himself up to state visit. There's a great question here, Roy, let's close on this, Grail Applebee, should we be recalling the British ambassador? We can't recall Peter where he's just arrived. We can't do that. That was a lovely, lovely question. Anyway, I feel a little bit better than I did, but honestly, when I was watching, I don't think... I can't remember the last time I thought so, angry at watching. It's very, very rare in world events that you get a single moment.

48:49I mean, you got that with the assassination of the Archduke and Sarajevo, starting with the First World War. This moment will become one of the most visible, extraordinary, excruciating moments where the Western Alliance fell apart. This is the moment where... Or, or, or, some of the else happens. But what it is definitely, that was a historic meeting. The thing that came into my head was happening was, you know, was it Christchurch, Brangie's shoe on the desk at the United Nations, or it was... I mean, you just know, the minute it started to kick off, I was actually doing something else and just had it over here.

49:27And the minute it started to kick off, I thought, oh my god, and I'm still thinking, oh my god, but you know, you just got to hope that people grown up, stand up, and try to get this thing to a better place, but it's going to be bloody hard. And you were right to pull me up, of course, because actually, what we learn from these things is you never know quite what happens. There are third, fourth, fifth consequences from these kinds of things, and tracking them through in the chaos of this world, Trump's mind is unbelievably difficult. We've talked about some, we've talked about what could happen with China, what could happen with Lithuania, we've talked about how Putin might or might not respond, how Zelensky might not respond, the options that Britain might or might not have France might or might not have, whether there's any chance to tall that Trump could change his mind.

50:15But there's no doubt that all these questions are questions that were not being asked in October of last year, and then questions that go to the very, very heart of international security. Yeah. Well, it's a good to talk to you, Zavarory, and I just want to thank everybody for tuning in. And if you want even more podcastery, then our colleagues at the rest is politics US, Anthony Scaramucci and Katty K, they're about to go live into a live podcast very shortly as well. So obviously, we don't want as many people to listen to that as listen to us because we are the numero uno in the rest is castle, but the mooch and Katty are both brilliant, and I'm sure they'll have an awful lot to say about what was a truly horrific but unbelievably consequential meeting and non -press conference in the White House.

51:10See you soon. See you soon. Bye.

From the publisher

What does Trump’s dramatic outburst at Zelensky mean for Ukraine and the world? Was this an orchestrated ambush by JD Vance and Trump? Should King Charles withdraw his Trump state visit invitation?

Join Rory and Alastair as they answer all these questions and more.

The Rest Is Politics is powered by Fuse Energy. Fuse are giving away FREE TRIP+ membership for all of 2025 to new sign ups 🎉 TRIP+ gets you ad-free listening, discounts, and early access to episodes and pre-sale tickets for live shows! To sign up and for terms and conditions, visit GetFuse.com/Politics ⚡

The Rest Is Politics Plus: Become a member to receive early access to Question Time episodes to live show tickets, enjoy ad-free listening for both TRIP and Leading, receive our exclusive newsletter, benefit from discount book prices on titles mentioned on the pod, and join our members’ chatroom on Discord. Just head to therestispolitics.com to sign up, or start a free trial today on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/therestispolitics.

Get our exclusive NordVPN deal here ➼ nordvpn.com/restispolitics It's risk-free with Nord's 30 day money back guarantee ✅

Instagram: @restispolitics
Twitter: @restispolitics
Email: restispolitics@gmail.com

Assistant Producer: Evan Green
Social Producer: Jess Kidson
Producers: Nicole Maslen, Fiona Douglas
Senior Producer: Dom Johnson
Head of Content: Tom Whiter
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor, Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics

All 501 episodes
378. TRUMP VS. ZELENSKY: OVAL OFFICE SHOWDOWNThe Rest Is Politics · 53 min
Listen in VO