In short
Podcast Notes: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 426
Episode Title
Corbyn's Comeback, Musk's New Party and The Broken SEND System
Hosts
- Alastair Campbell
- Rory Stewart
---
Episode Overview In this episode, Campbell and Stewart engage in a comprehensive discussion regarding current political events including:
- Jeremy Corbyn's new political party
- Elon Musk's potential new political endeavor in the US
- The state of the Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) system in the UK
- The political landscape in Bosnia and the EU's stance on it
Key Topics
- Jeremy Corbyn's New Party
- Discussion on whether Corbyn's new party represents a bold move or simply aids the Conservative Party.
- Key Points:
- Corbyn's party may attract left-wing votes, but risks fragmenting them.
- Long-standing fears of "splitting the vote," akin to arguments made in previous political contexts.
- Polls suggest Corbyn's new movement could hypothetically gain around 10% of the vote.
- Elon Musk's Political Ambitions
- Analysis of Musk's plan to establish a new political party in the US.
- Key Points:
- Stewart and Campbell express skepticism regarding Musk's political judgment and the likelihood of success.
- The conversation touches on the historical failures of wealthy individuals starting political parties.
- Concerns about the tribal nature of American politics and how it may hinder Musk's efforts.
- The SEND System in the UK
- Examination of the SEND system's current challenges.
- Key Points:
- Reports highlight potential threats to educational and healthcare plans for children with special needs.
- The importance of personalized plans for children, particularly those with dyslexia or other learning disabilities.
- Discussions on funding and the increasing demand for support due to rising numbers of children requiring special educational needs plans.
- Bosnia's EU Membership Prospects
- Overview of Bosnia's political landscape post-war and its EU membership aspirations.
- Key Points:
- Despite challenges, there are signs of progress and potential for EU integration.
- Importance of EU member states taking a proactive role in supporting Bosnia.
---
Additional Insights
- Political Systems: Campbell emphasizes the need for reform in the political systems of the UK and the US, pointing out the issues of polarization and the first-past-the-post electoral system.
- Labour Party Dynamics: Discussion on Labour leadership and their handling of issues like child benefits and the SEND system.
- Public Sentiment: The hosts reflect on the disconnect between governmental actions and public needs, particularly in the context of welfare reform and educational support.
---
Conclusion This episode of *The Rest Is Politics* provides a rich analysis of contemporary political issues, blending insider perspectives with broader discussions on electoral dynamics, social justice, and international relations. The hosts maintain a critical yet constructive approach to analyzing the effectiveness and direction of current political leadership in addressing key societal needs.
For listeners interested in an engaging and thoughtful commentary on these pressing topics, this episode serves as a compelling resource.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Thanks for listening to The Restless Politics. Sign up to The Restless Politics Plus to enjoy ad -free listening and receive a weekly newsletter. Join our members' chat room again early access to live show tickets. Just go to TheRestlessPolitics .com. That's TheRestlessPolitics .com. The Restless Politics is a fissionly power by our friends at Fuse Energy. And somebody else we all know is that energy deals. They're about as stable, long -term and reliable as a, I don't know, Donald Trump promise to a country. But not this one. Fuse Energy is offering cheap, fixed tariffs for up to 18 months. No price hikes, no drama.
0:33Just a rock solid rate you can count on. And with the July 1 price cap, now's the perfect time to lock in a better deal. And the average home is going to save about a hundred pounds compared to the price cap. And that's not spin that is real money back in your pocket. And here's the clincher. When you sign up, you get Dada Trip Plus for free. And you know by now, that means at free listening, it means bonus content like our recent mini series on JD Vance, early access to question time and pre -sell tickets for our sell out live shows. Powering your home and your brain at the same time. Head to FuseEnergy .com.
1:13Stash Politics. Download the app and use the code Politics to get a free Trip Plus subscription. Fix tariffs, big savings, bonus content. What's not to love? Right now, with the Home Depot, you'll find storage solutions made to fit your needs. Grab an HDX Tough Tilt to protect your tools. Or keep your sports equipment contained with reinforced snap fit lids. Or stack up and make better use of your space with bins and totes built to last. Whatever your story, we've got the gear to keep it organized and protected at the Home Depot. How do we get more done?
2:01Hello and welcome to the rest of the question time with me, Alistair Campbell. And with me, Rory Stewart. And before we get going, Rory, just want to say a big thank you to all of our viewers and listeners who bought tickets for our live shows. Very excited to be going out again. We're going to London, Glasgow, Manchester and Bournemouth. And a little bit of music, I think, could be expected a bit of music here. Especially in Glasgow, dropping a hint there. I'm actually going to not our far ashes, quite away from Glasgow. I'll go to Scotland next week to be photographed for the Woodland Trust with my favourite tree.
2:33That's wonderful. That's something I really wanted to do and I'm a great artist. Well, you can do that. I've ducked out, so I'll try to do it next year. I assume your favourite tree is in Cumbria or Scotland. It's in Perthshire. Yeah, right. It's an oak cut by Burnham Wood. I've really gotten forward to Glasgow and these live shows remind me what the theatres are in some of these places. So we kick off November the 9th in Bournemouth at the BIC, which is where lots of particles, conferences get held, it'll just be me and Rory. Within 11th and 12th November, the eventim Hammersmith Apollo in London, following the footsteps of my daughter Grace.
3:04Satjus the 15th, we're in Glasgow at the SEC Armadillo. And then on Sunday the 16th, we finish up in Manchester at the O2 Apollo. So to go to your tickets, just go to aegp .uk -trip25. That's alpha -echo -gulf -pupar .uk -trip25. Can't wait to see that. Right, let's get going. Lots of new party talk in the air. Finley, and given the green party already, provides a political home for many on the progressive left, doesn't Jeremy Corbyn's new party risk to a little more than left -wing vote? Innervertently strands in the electoral strands of the right. That's a good loyalist argument. That's what they always say when I was trying to run us in independence, what my Tory colleagues, oh, you're splitting the vote.
3:51And then we've also got questions about Musk, Francesca Vills. What do you think about Musk's new America party? Could it disrupt the Republicans' 2026 election? It's splitting the vote against. It's splitting the vote against what we're looking at. It sort of does. Well, look, I think, I'd love to bring you on this, but let me just begin. I think that our systems in Britain and America are really broken. I mean, I can't get back to it enough. I tried to write this whole book about it. I don't think I did it properly. I don't think I explained how I think a lot of our problem in democracy is these systems.
4:25You talk a lot about polarization, post -truth, populism. And now this is super -powered, I think, by these first -pastor -post -systems. The Republican Party being dragged off by Trump. The Democratic Party totally lost. And I think there is so much room to try to rebuild a sensible, exciting, good -humored, active, socially -media savvy centric round. We need independent parties and the centric round. And you think in the UK that would be somebody who has beautiful ears? Obviously, I'm trying to hold off saying that Jeremy Corbyn or Elon Musk is the answer to anything. But I think the only point that Musk has got, because I think he's got no political judgment, I think this idea may be like Dominic Cummings' new party, something that spats out on social media and disappears the next minute.
5:17Well, presumably thousands of American political consultant mercenaries are writing little tax forum and slide presentations to try to convince them that they're the people who can do it. I suspect not just American, but I think the thing with Musk, look, I don't think this is... You know, there's that old joke, how do you make a small fortune in America? You start with a huge fortune and you found a political party. Right, and a lot of the people who've done that. Ross Perot, Ruff Nader, this time. Ruff Nader, Ross Perot. Actually, Teddy Roosevelt went off to a new party for a while. Sometime, over a hundred years ago.
5:531912 was a very long time ago. But it's never worked. And I think one of the reasons it never worked is the tribalism, the two -party system. In America, it's never worked as well because of the money. And of course, Musk has got the money. What I don't think Musk does have is either the political judgment or the political appeal. Or indeed the ideas. Well, what an authority's ideas. I mean, sorry, we know his central idea, which his government needs to be run more like one of his Silicon Valley companies. I'd run by him and his mates. Yeah, run by him and his mates, cycle the civil servants, become more productive, become more efficient.
6:28I don't think he's got an answer at all to the fundamental problems that affect America. What is he really saying about people on low incomes? What's he saying about welfare? What's he saying about defense? What's he saying about immigration? We don't know the answer. One of the other stuff, right? He polls very badly. I'll have to let's just be frank about this. He's obviously got something about him to become close to the richest man in the world. However, that's defined. He's very clever in lots of different ways, but he's hopeless at politics. I think he was very good at throwing money at Trump.
7:00Why? Because Trump is actually quite good at politics. And Trump needed money and he found a guy who would give him limitless quantities of money. He's loosed by people on the progressive side because he helped Trump. And he's now loosed by the Trump people because he's gone against Trump. So I don't think he's the vehicle at all. So let's come closer to home. So Sarah Sautano, elected as Labour MP, suspended for defying a whip over what to child benefit. To child benefit camp. Very, very strong against Israel pro Gaza. And she shot the bolt to some extent by announcing that she and Jeremy Corby would be co -leading a party of the left.
7:39Jeremy then, we were back. Jeremy would, every time we had the news, we had cabers outside Jeremy's house, and he would trot out a lot of say anything. I wasn't mind him for that. The fact that he just got into the cabin and went off. But we had a bit of that. And he came out and said, yeah, there is going to be something happening. Because he's now not in the Labour party because he's been expelled. What they're saying is the polls would say they could take 10%. My answer to that is, well, maybe I think this is all much more just symptomatic of this sense that we talked about last week of the left of politics, not feeling at one with itself.
8:13Part of the problem that Kierstama is dealing with, because of course, that 10 % is driven by people who feel that Stama particularly has let down Labour voters on social justice. So there's a report that just came out this morning as we're speaking about explosions and child poverty, which is putting a huge emphasis on the fact that the cap that you can only get benefits up to two children, that you don't get it beyond that, is a real contributor to increase in what the report describes, almost de -Kenzie and levels of poverty. People living in houses today, in Britain, with no running water, eating moldy gone off food, rats running around their apartments.
8:58And so that I think is core, but there's also a sense of moral outrage. And where is the courage of the Labour Party around international law and around Donald Trump? And I think that nobody should underestimate Jeremy Corbyn's appeal. I mean, in 2017, he got far more votes than Ed Milibout had managed to do. In fact, far more votes than any Labour leader had got for some time. And Morgan Kierstama got in getting his landslides, just the way the votes fell. Let's take some of the next question then. And this is from Sen Network, they are right at the heart of this debate. The recent news, the education and healthcare plans for children and young people's Sen might be under threat without any clarification, and Bridget Phillipsen about what could replace these legally binding documents, is causing great concern for families and educators alike.
9:49The Canalistron Maury, please discuss. I mean, it's very strange. I mean, at the moment, there's a legally binding commitment on schools to develop a personalized plan for a child. And why? Well, let me imagine that you are like many, many people in Britain, maybe 20 % of children in Britain. And you have dyslexia, and you could be very, very bright at verbal reasoning. And equally have very significant memory problems on numbers, or significant memory problems on certain types of words. And you can deal with this, a good school can deal with this, and give somebody with dyslexia fantastic opportunities.
10:30So, you're simple things. Could be making sure that they know what the work is going to be in the week ahead, and give them the chance to prepare. Could be a little bit of revision at the end of the week, maybe watching a little BBC film on history to embed the knowledge they've developed that week. And teachers doing this well have completely transformed the opportunities of children who frequently are incredibly talented and creative, but who, if you just put them in the conventional system, would be exhausting themselves trying to work in a way that doesn't work for them, and end up feeling stupid and excluded when they're not.
11:10So, even the conservative party, and it's very worst, was not trying to get rid of these personalized plans. I cannot imagine what Bridget Phillipson is talking about. Well, I don't think she used to talk about getting rid of them, but they are talking about reform. And the reason why, and by the way, can be bad knock, seems to be against them and thinks that we're over medicalizing mental health and all that sort of stuff. There's an argument coming on the Tory side on this as well, but I know somebody called Sam Carlisle who campaigns on these issues a lot. And their worry is the Labour are looking at everything through the prison of the cost, because why wouldn't they?
11:48Because money went so tight. But the worry is that on this one, they look at it from the cost perspective as opposed to genuine analysis of the need. And also potentially because of Rich Reeves, which we'll get onto, and this moment where she broke down on the House of Commons, and the pound collapsed temporarily, and the bond price went up, and the fact that they're now really trying to get behind her and prove that they're tough. They're really pushing down this, but the problem isn't cost. It's short term cost against long term benefit. If you think about 20 % of the children in Britain, not getting the support they need now, you might save some money now, but the long term consequence of the economy of producing children who are not as able, creative, skilled as they could be in 10 years' time, that is devastating for our productivity, our businesses, our industry, and indeed for their wellbeing and fulfilment.
12:43Sorry to do the opposite why I said they should do, but just let's look at the cost. So the number of young people with an education and healthcare plan, these ECHPs, this used to be called a statement and the last government changed it. It's more than doubled. And you thought they're about dyslexia, the main area where the cost of co -op has been autism, then what's called BSD, behavior, emotional, social difficulties, and speech and communication. There've been some rise in physical disabilities and severe learning disabilities, these account you have much less of the rise. But the reason why this is such a massive problem for the government is because, as I say, the numbers have doubled, the costs have trebled to 12 billion a year since 2015.
13:28And you taught people in local authorities, I do, they are so struggling for cash and they've been given this thing called statutory override. They can actually complicate this, but they can park the costs. So it doesn't go on the spending that is set out in all the kind of, you know, the red books and the green books and all the rest of it. And that, if they were actually to confront the real costs, you're talking about a lot of councils that, frankly, are bankrupt already. Now, then go on to the point about why is this rise happened and where is the argument coming from? One of the things that some of the people on the right say, oh, this is all because parents who, if they're children aren't geniuses, they want to think that they're special and then these specials are bought.
14:16Right. Most of the demand for these extra ECHPs is coming from the teachers and the schools because they're finding that so much, this is what I said about the head teacher I talked to you last week, so much of their resources and their time and their work is going on children who clearly need to have extra support. So I think what Bridget Phillips is looking at is how do we continue to give proper support to children who need it and keep them in mainstream education and at the same time get a proper understanding of why these numbers are going so high. I think a lot of it, we think a lot of it's going to be COVID, we don't know that.
14:53And then bring in some sort of reform that allows the system to work better, but it is go politically, this is a nightmare. Absolutely, completely. I remember it's also in a Sunday interview strongly implied that Labour would not now have the money to revise the two child benefit cap. And all this is, and I mean, let's take it back to the basics and sound more like a story for a second. Country basically has been stagnant since 2008, GDP per capita grew 2 .5 % from 1989 to 2008, it's grown by about 0 .7 % now, but we're about 33 % poorer than we would have been if we'd been on the previous trend rate.
15:35And one of the interesting things that the government is struggling with, which nobody really talks about, is nobody really knows why, it's really strange. There's a very, very good article written in the FT by Martin Wolf on this, where he says the problem is productivity, but actually nobody really knows how to sort it out. And there's a massive need for really rigorous, serious intellectual work understanding what on earth is wrong with our economy. And if we can't fix that, Labour is in the most terrible situation, which is our public services get more and more expensive. We have a more richer and richer understanding of people's needs and their real needs, as you pointed out, these children genuinely need support, their lives will be much better if they get support.
16:25And the stuff that we can offer in the national health service is better than it was 30 years ago, but we simply don't have the economic growth and the tax revenue to pay for it, meaning that there are basically two ideas out there, and Labour can't decide what it's doing. One idea is the very old idea, which is austerity, we can't afford this, we're going to cut services, we're going to cut quality and children will suffer. And the other one is to go Jeremy Corbyn on this, which is that we need to tax people more, we need to spend more and we need to become more like a kind of classic 1980s social democratic Scandinavian country.
16:58And there's a danger that's where they get driven, and it's better to get there by your own volition rather than constantly being driven there. But I also think, I think I do think, Kimmy Baylock and the Tories that are going for Labour on this, I've got a lot to answer, this was definitely in that basket marked. Let's leave it if there is a lot to sort out. I don't understand, Kevin Vaynerman, we can get on to this in a second. It strikes me that her most silly tactical error was actually she should have supported Kirstama and Rachel Reeves on their welfare reforms last week and given Kirstama a very difficult choice, which is she could have said, I'm providing 120 MPs, I can get your bills through for you.
17:37And that would have put Stimer in a very difficult position because then he would have had an option of passing his bill but doing it with Tories support. I can't understand why she didn't do that. You would know better than I, I'll tell you there's a piece we should put in newsletter, Sam Friedman who was a special advisor and go in education and who writes really well. He does, yeah, but he's written a very long piece about special educational needs and starts actually with this sense of forage and baylock, basically coming at it from a, we've got to cut the money, we've got to get the money down without actually analyzing the issue.
18:06So, can I sorry, I mean keep in truck to you, but it just maybe think about another thing. One of the things that we've learned about forage and reform voters is that they're disproportionately often people whose children have special education needs who are benefiting from sin. They're disproportionately elderly, they're disproportionately receiving welfare payments. So, one of the odd things is that forage can't really go full mask because his voter base actually really depends on the welfare state. Well, you'll go wherever the wind takes him at a particular time, won't tell you that's what he does, but anyway, I think it's the story we're going to have to come, we'll come back to the other big difference this time.
18:41I think you've got amongst the new cohort of labour MPs, you've got quite a few who are the from teaching backgrounds or actually have kids with special education needs as well. Roy, if we've got your break, can I pin you on another educational matter? Did you vote in the Oxford Chancellor's ship? I was support of William Hake. Oh, so you didn't vote for my friend Peter Mandelson? No, William Hake. Okay, and tell me there are lots of people going for the Cambridge one, apparently I get a vote in that. Who should I vote for between the ones that I know are Chris Smith, former cabinet minister, under us, Gina Miller, and Gibraxia campaigner, Sandy Toxfick, John Brown, former chairman of BP.
19:18And my Canada, Mohamed El -Aryan, who is the present of Queen's College Cambridge. And you vote for him? I'd vote for him, and of course, my Canada in Oxford, William Hake, one, so I wonder whether this is going to help my men. And why would you vote for him? So firstly, I think it's great that somebody who has a real deep love of Britain, but also has an international background is a really serious international player, loved running Queen's College Cambridge. He's somebody who was a great master of college, has incredible affection for the university. Well, they all got that, surely. Well, I was really struck by Mohamed because a lot of people, you will know people who run these colleges, who often get a little bit thrown off balance by having to manage academics.
20:02I had to manage academics, but it was difficult to do. They're extremely intelligent, independent people with tenure. They didn't want to be too pleased. Yeah, follow the results. We're not going to be very careful. So I think he would be really good, and I think it'd be very exciting to have Mohamed El -Aryan as the Chancellor of Cambridge. Who are you going for? I think John Brown. John Brown? I think so, because I think he's got, listen, I think these jobs are all about fundraiser. I don't know if you've spoken to William Hake, but I'm sure he loves all the sort of blur and the blur and the blur, but ultimately, I think these are people who've got to get around the world with education in such a parlor state.
20:34Why are you not running? Cambridge. Cambridge, yeah. Oh, you already hatched it, didn't you? I think you like it. Do you know what? I'm going to throw that one back at you. Why do people want these jobs, these positions? Well, I didn't run to be Chancellor of Oxford. No, but would you, might you next time? I don't know. William Hake will be there for 10, 15 years. Will you just be a young lawyer? By that time I'll be completely forgotten about. I'll be on the dustbin of history. I'll never be relevant to anyone. I've written another 30 books. But no, I think ultimately, it is about fundraiser.
21:03I think that you need somebody's properly networked, can do lots of leadership stuff, does genuinely think about education, which is, you know, I'll be getting lots of Christmas, I like. I like lots of... Well, they're all your mates, aren't they? Most of those people... I'm quite friendly with a lot of them, yeah. I'm sure it's difficult. Maybe I'll be able to. Pretty difficult. Were you going to go for Oxford if you'd had a date? I would have done, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And then would have... I'd love to see whether you could have beat Abbasid or Ant -Chancell and had all those titles. Okay, well, should we take a break and then come back and talk about your old party in Israel?
21:33We've got quite a few questions on that. Very good. See you after the break.
21:41This isn't ad from BetterHelp. At the moment, we're getting advice from everywhere. You just have to go on TikTok. Could be Alice's cold plunges. Could be my attempts to meditate or the digital detox that I'm doing in Colombia. But of course, one of the things that we know is that it can be incredibly valuable to talk to another human being, somebody who's actually been trained as a therapist, to work through these ideas calmly, objectively and professionally. And as the largest online therapy provider in the world, BetterHelp can provide access to mental health professionals with a very diverse variety of expertise.
22:17They've got over 5 ,000 therapists in the UK. They've helped more than five million people globally. And you can join a session literally at the click of a button. Change therapists anytime. So obviously not about fixing you, but it's about hearing yourself clearly, maybe for the first time. So talk it out with BetterHelp. Our listeners get 10 % of their first month at BetterHelp .com slash rest politics. That's better, H -E -L -P .com slash rest politics.
22:49Welcome back to the rest of politics question time with me, Rory Stewart. And me, Alistair Campbell, and Roy Olliglover wants to know, given there's been so much coverage and focus on labor's positional Gaza and a lot of criticism, all well and good, but what are the Tories doing about it? Well, I think the first thing is that the conservatives and right -wing parties in general for reasons that are a little bit mysterious have always traditionally been very, very pro -Israel. But part of the story, I think, in the case of the Conservative Party, in my experience, when I came in in 2010 as an MP, is that Linton Crosby, the Australian strategist, had very much decided that one of the dividing lines they could provide with labor is by trying to make labor seem as though it was obsessed with Palestine, Corbanista, anti -Semitic, and that they could mobilize a right -wing vote that was basically anti -Muslim and use it to seem pro -Israel and challenge labor.
23:51But the Conservative's pro -Israel position goes way back beyond that. Yeah, it goes all the way back to Balford, isn't it? Yeah, it's a very longstanding position. There is a labor equipment of it. I was striking because he came in and I remember this because we sat down, didn't we, with David Mensa, who's now the spokesman, Fennet Nia, who was leading labor friends this around those days. So there's also very complicated questions about who the senior figures in the party are, where support's coming in from, and that again becomes very sensitive because there's anti -Semitic tropes which are deeply disturbing and misleading around the question of funding of parties.
24:28But there is obviously a question around funding and incentives. Let me though say that the Conservative Party, quite interestingly, is beginning to change. And one of the big figures in this change is somebody called Kit Maltese, who you might have heard of. So Kit was Secretary of State for Education. He was a close to Boris Johnson. He's somebody who pretty much you would have thought was on the right of the Conservative Party. He'd been in charge of policing. He'd done big job in London. He'd been a big champion of challenging anti -Semitism, supporting Jewish community in North London. And now he's come out incredibly strongly on Gaza.
25:06He raised in the House of Commons, for example, this is a conservative MP. He challenged the Labour Minister and said, why is the Labour Home Office refusing to give visas to injured guards and children? This organisation called Project Pure Hope has raised all the money to pay for disfigured children from Gaza to come be treated in Britain. The government has given two visas. Only allowed to and and Italy has taken well over 100. In fact, Italy is taking people who were all lined up to come to Britain because the Home Office won't give visas and the Home Office won't explain. So, won't explain why they won't give visas for injured children.
Read the full transcript
25:39You wouldn't have thought was any controversy for injured children, right? So, that's Kit Maltese. But he's got quite an interesting group of people coming behind him. So, some of them are the kind of old and bold Conservatives. People you remember like Edward Lee, people like Martin Vickers who came into the House of Commons with me, but I think he was probably 60 when he came into the House of Commons. Mark Pritchard, who made this big speech saying he changed his mind, Jeremy Wright has now proposed recognition of power, and he was quite a senior figure. And then against them is a different bit of the Tory right, Swella Brafman, Oliver Dowden, Nick Timothy.
26:17Pretty Patel. Yeah, pretty Patel though, quite interesting having been challenged hard by Lamy, slightly softened down position, but Kenmie Bednock is right out there on the Michael Gove, spectator, Israel always right, never criticise a position. I think, let me just finally just to think a little bit about this. I think Kenmie Bednock is getting politics wrong every week of the month. She should have, as I said just for the break, come strongly out in support of Labour's welfare cuts last week. That would have been consistent with Tory policy and put Keir Starmer in difficult position because she would have been agreeing with Keir Starmer against his rebels.
26:56And this week, I think she should have come out in favour of special educational needs because that's something that Jillian Keegan, who we interviewed, the former educational secretary, actually as a conservative invested more in special educational needs and schools. And if Kenmie Bednock had done that, she would have again put Labour in a very uncomfortable position instead of which she took the wrong position on both and keeps Keir Starmer a free pass. Question here, Alistair, from Willow D, please discuss the devastation of the Texas floods, Trump's role in the disaster. It's impossible to deny that his scaling back of climate regulations is essentially a eliminated climate progress.
27:32Do you share my fear that these floods will simply lead to further conspiracy, Texas floods? Well, Lamy, if this had been Joe Biden, or Kamala Harris, I don't think there's any doubt whatsoever that within 48 hours they would have been there. A lot of people died, a lot of children died, but I think Trump is so locked into this idea that the climate crisis is overblown, that it's not real, that it's not man -made, that he can't quite bring himself to show even the most basic empathy. And what happened with some believe in the water rose from something like three foot to 35 feet high in an hour and a half, and essentially as the climate warms, there's more and more saturation of water in the sky, and the amount of rainfall and flooding in Texas is up, I think, by 10 % this year.
28:23So essentially as the planet gets warmer, Texas will experience more and more of these kinds of events, more and more flooding. There's an amazing shot, one of the channels I saw of the, it was an aerial shot from a drone, of the sight of this water chasing people down a street, and it was uphill as well, it was going uphill, and these people running it, running away from it, but he can't bring himself to say that this is climate change. He was then asked whether he thought that the sacking by doge, Elon Musk's outfit, they sacked lots of the weather forecasters, and whether that might have contributed to this, and he said, no, I don't think so, and we won't be rehiring them, this is just like a one in a million thing, nobody could do anything.
29:07So not to be depressing, but in the United Kingdom in Humberhull, there are nearly 100 ,000 people basically below sea level, and a chance of, I don't know, maybe one in 30 year event of people being hit by water, when that last happened after the Second World War, thousands of people were killed, and one of the things that we're going to have to do in Britain, it'd be another problem for the government, is put more and more money into flood defenses, modeling, as we deal with surface water flooding, sea flooding, river flooding from remote. There was the nonprofit Mercy Corps, you know, that was very well.
29:46They did report this, we saying that Kabul, which is now home to six million people, not least because lots of people have come in from around Afghanistan, they're predicting they may become the first modern city to run out of order in the next five years, because climate governance, so Shishana's in Kabul at the moment, as we're speaking, and one of the problems is the main aquifer, I mean, Afghanistan's actually quite a dry country anyway, and the population, when I first saw it just after 9 -11, was down at about 600 ,000, and as you say now it's pushing towards 8 million, they've built all over the aquifer that's supplying city, and it's almost impossible to understand how you're going to continue to be able to supply people in Kabul with drinking water.
30:32So that's what the water is. And until we get a grip on the politics of the climate, I think this is going to get worse, worse, worse, worse. Yes, I do share your fear that these floods will simply defer the conspiracy. Roy, racial reefs, Gordon Larkhor wants to know if you ever cried in the commons. And if you did, do you think you've got the same reaction that racial reefs did? I didn't cry in the House of Commons. I mean, I thought that was a very, I mean, that was a really, really disturbing the way that people were so cruel and unpleasant on social media. Such a Java came out very strongly in support of racial reefs.
31:06Stephen Flynn, yes, and being I did. Do you know about some of the campaign on by the way? Well, that was again, I mean, look, I think it was cruel, but it was also massive political misjudgment to basically mock and bully racial reefs in that situation, was just such a stupid thing for Camille Vade not to do. She had an incredible opportunity to be gracious and she missed it. It's tricky isn't it, because the House commons the whole thing is set up on the basis of conflict and debate and division and so forth. So there's racial reefs is sitting there. Funnily enough, I was watching, I don't know, New Watch P .M .Qs, but I was watching it live.
31:39And I actually took a picture of the television or I sent it to Fiona as it is that racial, because it didn't even look like these huge bags under eyes, you slumped. And the history just quickly to explain to international listeners is that what had happened is that the Chalzera, our finance minister had just been through a bruising incident the day before, where Labour rebels had essentially destroyed her fiscal plan, almost certainly can have to force her to raise taxes, frighten the markets and she basically lost this battle of will because Stammer gave in to not going ahead with his welfare reforms.
32:12In the context of that, she came into the House of Commons, sat down next to him. Stammer was extremely sort of a brilliant, cheerful, optimistic and appeared to be paying absolutely no attention to it. There was no attempt to put her arm on her. She chose to turn up rather than what I would have done in that situation, which is simply not turn up on the benches at all. And so this whole thing was played through and the markets concluded that she'd been fired, so there was this drop in the pound that was that drop in the bar markets. Stammer again, very flat -footed, didn't manage to defend her when Badenock said, are you going to fire her?
32:47He didn't say no, I'm not. He said it afterwards, which then restored fate in the markets, but it was a very, very odd limit. It was really interesting about that though. If you think about it, when the market's thoughtless trust was going to stay, they crashed, they picked up a guy where she went. So it's actually bizarrely with the markets, a strength and racial resposition. They didn't want her to go. The point about, so people talk about you said flat -footed and somebody said, you know, you like emotional intelligence, what he said the next day was that when you're in PMQs, you are absolutely focused and you have to be absolutely focused.
33:24So he's getting up and down, sitting down. So he wasn't aware of what was going on. I think the thing that should have maybe triggered him to be aware was when Badenock did what she did, which was to say, look at the chance that she's absolutely miserable, look at her, she's miserable, which was, as you say, I think a sort of mistake. But I think that what I really like about what's happened since then, so they gave it as it was nothing to do with politics, it was a personal matter, right? I was still don't know what that means. So I think that's quite good. I like a bit of sort of, you know, cardboard, you get the line, you don't move off the line, then what have you?
33:58But I think what we're, we talked about send earlier, special educational needs, you look at all the big challenges in the health service in schools, in crime and policing and transport, they are facing a level of challenge that is beyond a lot of governments. I think at some point they're going to have to be much, much more, more upfront with just how bad the situation is. And I know that people get sick to death of saying we inherited a mess, but I actually think Labour have underdone the mess that they've been asking. I mean, I think the problem's, part of they set themselves up for failure.
34:39I mean, we did an interview with her before the election when it was already incredibly obvious that they would be taking over without any money and that the promises they were making were completely undeliverable unless they raise taxes, totally obvious. And I remember challenging Rachel Reeves about this, I think how north you're going to pay for the NHS without raising taxes, how north you can do any of the things you want to do without raising taxes, right? You can't sign up to saying we're going to stay within the Tories spending plans, effectively keep austerity in place and also suggest to your Labour voters that you're going to improve public services, not possible, right?
35:14And she totally refused to acknowledge it because somewhere in their heads was this naive idea that the only reason things weren't working is because the Tories weren't doing it right. This way you get Kirsta Amas saying fundamentally the systems fine, Britain's not broken, all we need is a little bit better management. No, the choice is this, do you go tight on public spending, keep taxes down, run down public services or do you tax more and spend more? And Rachel Reeves has never got to grips with the one central question in her chance ofship. She should have done it before the election, she should have done it after the election, she should have done it when Trump gave an opportunity, they're just ducking the leadership in this country and we're a year on and I think we're giving them too easier right.
35:56Right, Melinda Gold, 30 years on from the Bosnian War, wow, 30 years, the country's more divided, politically volatile than ever. Not sure it's quite as politically volatile and divided as of then, but okay, one of the chances of emerging is a functioning state eligible for EU membership, they've certainly got big challenges right now. Yeah, big challenges, I'm going to make an optimistic case, so there was a very gloomy article in the FT on Dodick who is the leader of Republic of Subscaught, so just to remind people at the end of the Bosnian War 30 years ago, Bosnian was effectively a double state, there's Republic of Subscaught which was to serve bit and then there's the other bits in Bosnia, they integrate the Bosnian and corrupt populations.
36:35Dodick has pushed things hard, but ultimately if you look at the really big picture, over 100 ,000 people were killed, war criminals were on the loose checkpoints everywhere, the war criminals were arrested, the killing stopped and despite all the problems in Bosnia, the institutions are still functioning, Dodick agreed to go to the courts to answer charges, there isn't any violence, and if you go to central Bosnia, I had a friend who was in central Bosnia just last week, you can go back to those areas where horrible fighting was happening and you can see mosques have been rebuilt, churches have been rebuilt, communities are living together again, and actually I think the European Union needs to make much more of the running and return to the idea of bringing them into the single market, offering other forms of membership for all those countries in the Western Balkans, rather than panicking now.
37:27Now here's a question for you, in George Eton's article on Morgan McSweeney in last week's New States, a number 10 source stated that Campbell wouldn't last two minutes in Morgan's job and was utterly clueless about the sentiment and state of the country, any response? Last year's look. And who is this source? Do you think it's Morgan McSweeney himself? There was a lot of briefing goes on in there. I mean I was with I had a look just today with Godric Smith who was my deputy in Downey Street and he said, God the Lord seems taught to the press quite a lot, and he did say those words that I promised never to say, didn't happen in our day, did it?
38:11There was always a pretty clear line going on. Why are they so cross with you at the moment? I don't think Georgian doesn't make stuff up to see. I don't know that well, but I just make it strike me as a sort of daily male type person, daily express, the sun, you know, all those sort of, you know, in senior source. I've always longed for somebody to say a junior source who doesn't have access to any real information set, because there's a lot of people just hanging around pubs and talking to journalists. I guess if any of them do have it in for me, it might be because I don't see my role as being a cheerleader.
38:47I actually get quite a lot of flat -from -people who think I'm too soft. If you just said you think we're a bit soft, I'm a bit soft. On Labour? Yeah. Fiona, constantly says you're being too soft. You're stuck between a rock and a hard side. Yeah, but then and Tom Baldwin, my mate Tom Baldwin, who cares biographer, who regularly gets told, you know, you're just a propaganda, you're just a cheerleader, they were briefing against him last week. So I don't know, I don't know, but you don't accept with them that you wouldn't last two minutes in the job and you're utterly clueless about the sentiment and state of the country.
39:21I don't think I'm clueless about the sentiment and state of the country, and I did survive about a decade. In, you know, circumstances that weren't necessarily quite as challenging economically, but we had quite a lot of really difficult things and people to deal with. But I would say, and by the way, I should just say for the record, Morgan Sweeney did, I mean, basically saying that was not his view. So there we are. But I think somebody probably did say that, and I think it's probably because they think, and they're right to think this, that once you've been in those jobs and you're outside, it's easy to sort of castigate and say they're not been doing well enough and what have you, but I am determined not to be Roy Keen.
40:02I'm never going to be that person who says it's not going to be Roy Keen. It's, well, there's a lot better than I'd done. We had quite an interesting example of this just as we come to the end, which is that the most senior former ambassadors in the foreign office rose a letter saying that we should recognize, Britain should recognize Palestine. And it was an interesting example. It's it's Lord Hane, it's Jeremy Greenstock, it's William Paytie. I mean, I don't know, people when there's a serious point. We don't know all these names, but these were people right at the very, very top of the foreign office saying that we should recognize Palestine.
40:34These are people who know the Middle East unbelievably well. And I suppose one of the questions there is, is what is it that happens when you leave that suddenly when you're a former ambassador, you can see things much more clearly than you can when you're inside. I think the same, you often make the point, including about people that we've interviewed, that there's something that gives you a broader perspective when you're not in it at the centre 24 hours a day, having to defend the line, having to be banned by a lecture responsibility, and you've just got more time to think. Most of my family, I have to tell you, would say all of the time, to me, I have got a unique position and I should be far more robust about calling them out on ABC, that most of them say that to me all the time.
41:16I think you've got to be careful with that. I've never hidden the fact that I want this Labour government to succeed, I want them to win again. When we go back to the new party thing, I do think that's a bit of kind of left wing self -indulgence that does help the other side, but equally, I want to try to be helpful and constructive about what I think they could do better. I think you're in a slightly different place with the Conservatives, I think you basically think they're no longer your party. Correct. Right. So that's different. But at the same time, I don't want them to think that I'm going around the place saying they're all shit, it was much better than our day.
41:52Well, you're good at keeping your cool on this one. Final one for me, Hey, Mish, you often give out book and film recommendations, but I'd love to know your anti -recommendations. Have you ever been lulled by hype into going to see something you wouldn't usually see? Give us an unpopular opinion. Oh, that's more chatty. Well, I've got absolutely made for this because it happened this weekend. Right. So I'm not a big fan of reviewers because I think in the end it's a bit like what we're just talking about. You know, there's dictators pretending to be players, right. But I am often, I think the FT review pages are really, really good both on book, sound on film is very rare.
42:33If I read the FT and they give a film four or five stars, it's not good. And likewise, Matthew Dancona, who's my fellow editor at larger the new world, he does a brilliant culture column. And he regularly points me towards films that I wouldn't otherwise go to see. So this weekend, Fiona and I based upon a very good review in the FT, a Matthew Dancona saying, I don't like Formula One, but this film was amazing. Fiona, I went to see F1 Brad Pitt. Yeah. I thought it was absolute shite. And I'm sorry to say that. And I have to say Richard Curtis, one of the greatest British filmmakers, he was actually in the same cinema.
43:10And I saw him after, so I said, what do you think of that? And he said, I thought it was really good. Then I felt terrible because he knows about films. So all these people you know about films think it's brilliant and you think it's rubbish. Why do you think it's rubbish? Because two things, the story was ridiculous. And a lot of the story was told through a race commentator, giving a commentary that he would never give because he was talking endlessly about the two cars at the back, rather than the cars at the front. And the thing that drove me almost to leave the cinema early, I know Formula One's a big industry.
43:40And I know this film is part of the development of that industry. The marketing, the product placement, the advertising within the film was hideous. I'll tell you what, however much Heiner can paid, however much guitar, airways and Eti Head, however much Rolex paid, DHL, Pirelli, however much you paid, you've got your buddies worth. You're you have got your buddies worth. You're actually advertising the brands on the show to finish it. And you're welcome to sponsor the list. Let me finish with a positive one. Drops of God, really fun. It's about a young French woman and a young Japanese man who given a challenge for 160 million euro to taste wine.
44:23And it's a story about parents and it's about taste buds and it's about French culture and it's feel good and funny and intriguing. It's in Japanese French and English with subtitles. Right. You hear all three languages. I saw it on Apple TV. But so you weren't, but it's very, very, the question was about whether you were lulled into hype. I've not seen any hype for that film until now. Well, I'm hyping up drops of God. And if you want me to be anti -hype, blue eyed samurai on Netflix. You're very Japanese week. Yeah, very Japanese. Blue eyed samurai Netflix. I was sold it as being a wonderful example of using comic book manga imagery to tell a moving story.
45:04I find it horrifying. It like a loss of stuff like that. There is extreme violence, spattering, blood, soft porn, totally unnecessarily. And I don't know why we inflict this stuff on ourselves. And I slightly feel that was Game of Thrones as well. Okay. Right. I've never seen Game of Thrones. I wasn't lulled on anyone. I should just say for the record as well. I do think Brad Pitt is a good actor and I think he's very, very good looking. And I can obviously like to come on the show. We'd be happy to make it. Yeah. That'd be great. But no, that film really was not for me. And so there's your formula.
45:39One invitation gone out the window. Well, that's fine because I have been to a formula one. Race a few times and that is just not for me. All right. And thank you all for listening. I'm watching and Friday. JD Vance Power 4. Much more exciting than Formula 1. Listen to our mini series on JD Vance by going to therestispolitics .com and signing up to become a member.
From the publisher
Is Corbyn’s new party a bold move — or a boost for the Tories? Can Labour fix SEND — or are vulnerable kids being left behind? Is Bosnia ready for the EU — or is Europe looking away again?
Join Rory and Alastair as they answer all these questions and more.
The Rest Is Politics Plus: Join with a FREE TRIAL at therestispolitics.com, for exclusive bonus content including Rory and Alastair’s first ever miniseries The Real JD Vance, early access to Question Time episodes and live show tickets, ad free listening for both TRIP and Leading, our exclusive newsletter, discount book prices on titles mentioned on the pod, and our members’ chatroom on Discord.
The Rest Is Politics is powered by Fuse Energy. Fuse are giving away FREE TRIP+ membership for all of 2025 to new sign ups 🎉 TRIP+ gets you ad-free listening, discounts, and early access to episodes and pre-sale tickets for live shows! To sign up and for terms and conditions, visit GetFuse.com/Politics ⚡
Get our exclusive NordVPN deal here ➼ nordvpn.com/restispolitics It's risk-free with Nord's 30 day money back guarantee ✅
For more Goalhanger Podcasts, head to www.goalhanger.com
Instagram: @restispolitics
Twitter: @RestIsPolitics
Email: therestispolitics@goalhanger.com
Assistant Producers: India Dunkley, Evan Green
Video Editor: Josh Smith
Producers: Nicole Maslen, Fiona Douglas
Social Producer: Celine Charles
Senior Producer: Dom Johnson
Head of Content: Tom Whiter
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor, Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices




