In short
Podcast Summary: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 434: "Why the West is Finally Recognising Palestine"
Overview
In this episode of "The Rest Is Politics," hosts Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart discuss significant developments in the international recognition of Palestine and the U.S. tariff policies under Trump. They examine the response of Western countries, particularly the UK, France, and Canada, to the crisis in Gaza, and explore the implications of tariffs imposed on Brazil, India, and Switzerland.
Key Topics Discussed
- Recognition of Palestine
- Historical Context: The episode reflects on the shift in global perspectives towards Palestine, noting that it would have been inconceivable a year ago for countries like the UK, France, and Canada to recognize Palestine as a state.
- Humanitarian Crisis in Gaza:
- The hosts discuss the severe humanitarian situation in Gaza, characterized by starvation and military actions by Israel.
- Recent statistics reveal that more people have died of starvation in Gaza in the last 11 days than in the previous 21 months.
- Global Response:
- The episode highlights how public opinion and Israel's military actions have pushed Western nations to reconsider their stances on Palestinian statehood.
- The UN General Assembly's potential recognition of Palestine as a state is emphasized, with discussions on whether this recognition was conditional on Israel’s actions.
- The Role of Leaders
- Macron's Approach: French President Macron's comments about a demilitarized Palestinian state prompted debate about the implications of such a statement.
- Keir Starmer's Labour Party: Discussions revolve around whether Starmer's Labour should adopt a more populist and direct communication style.
- Missed Opportunities: The hosts reflect on how a joint statement from the UK and France could have amplified their message regarding Palestinian statehood.
- U.S. Tariff Policies under Trump
- Tariff Impositions:
- Trump’s tariffs on Brazil and other countries are analyzed, particularly in the context of political motivations rather than economic necessity.
- The tariffs are seen as punitive measures against nations that challenge Trump's policies or former leaders, such as Bolsonaro.
- Impact on Global Relations:
- The episode discusses how these tariffs create economic distress and complicate diplomatic relationships, particularly with long-standing allies like India and Switzerland.
- Economic Predictions:
- The hosts express concern over the implications of Trump's tariff policies on the global economy, highlighting that these actions could lead to increased costs for consumers and disrupt international trade dynamics.
- Insights on Communication Strategies
- Political Communication:
- The hosts urge Labour to adopt more transparent and accessible communication methods, drawing comparisons to Trump's unfiltered style.
- Jeremy Hunt's suggestion to learn from Trump’s public engagement techniques is debated, emphasizing the need for authenticity in political discourse.
Key Takeaways
- Shift in International Perspectives: The recognition of Palestine marks a significant shift in Western diplomacy, reflecting a growing awareness of humanitarian crises.
- Consequences of Tariff Policies: Trump's tariffs are a double-edged sword, potentially harming U.S. interests while asserting political control over other nations.
- Importance of Effective Communication: Politicians need to adapt their communication styles to resonate better with the public, learning from both successful and unsuccessful approaches observed in contemporary politics.
Conclusion This episode of "The Rest Is Politics" provides a nuanced analysis of the evolving geopolitical landscape regarding Palestine and highlights the complexities of U.S. trade policies under Trump's administration. The discussions underscore the interconnectedness of humanitarian issues and political strategy, advocating for a more engaged and informed political dialogue.
---
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Thanks for listening to the Restisted Politics, sign up to the Restisted Politics Plus to enjoy ad -free listening and receive a weekly newsletter. Join our members' chat room again early access to live show tickets. Just go to therestistpolitics .com. That's therestistpolitics .com. Gaza is an emergency immediate humanitarian horror. Israel, a Netanyahu's government has made it clear they no longer even say they believe in the two -state solution. It is an extraordinary change. It would have been almost inconceivable 12 months ago that all these countries would have recognized Palestine. It's a sign of the focus on the starvation, which is becoming so brutal and so clear.
0:41Meanwhile, Benjamin Netanyahu is now talking about taking over the whole of Gaza. It's a brutal, almost existential divide between how Israel sees itself and how the rest of the world sees Palestine. The Restisted Politics is powered by Fuse Energy and Fuse and are offering £20 credit and free trick -plus membership if you switch to a fixed tariff before the end of August. They've listened carefully to their customers and the number one request was gas tariffs. So now at last you can switch both your gas and electricity to Fuse, one supplier, one bill, one less quokmaya to navigate. Fuse gas and electricity customers typically save £150 versus the price cap.
1:27Today's political climate has full of talk about control and clarity. Fuse have quietly exercised some, at least when it comes to your energy bill. And they began with a mission which was to make electricity cheaper, cleaner, simpler. And Fuse now supplies over 50 ,000 homes across the UK, all unquitely, efficiently and without a single campaign bus tour. Fuse's support is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, with real people replying in under two minutes. So go to FuseElegi .com forward slash politics to switch your gas and electricity to Fuse and get your £20 credit and free trip plus membership.
2:15Welcome to the Restisted Politics from the Alistair Campbell. And with me, Rory Stewart. And we're welcome back from Colombia. Thank you, thank you, thank you, and something to discuss maybe in tomorrow's podcast. Yeah, we're going to do lots of Colombian in question tomorrow. I think this week a lot happening in Gaza, Israel, we should focus on that, not least. I don't think we've done an episode since the whole recognition issue, France, Canada, UK, etc. And then also I think we should revisit tariffs. I mean, God knows what you're thinking of your Brazilian Swiss, Canadian, Indian, Lysoten.
2:49The first Rory, when I was at school, I was very, very good at languages and very, very good at maths. Were you very good at maths? I was quite good at maths here. I was sort of 98 % in my old level mock. But then I had to make a choice. Now I get on the maths route or the languages route. I went down the languages route. But my maths knowledge is being severely, prevoundly tested. By Donald Trump, keep saying that he's cut drug prices by 1500%. And I want to know if can you explain that? Yeah, well, I guess if someone said they were cutting something by 300%, they'd mean that it was down to a third.
3:27So I guess if it's down to 1500%, I guess, yeah, I'd it off top of my head. Maybe he'd says they're now 4, 5 % what they were. If they were a pound, they're now 4 or 5 pence. But surely he's now paying us to take the drugs. Yeah, I agree. It's testing me. And it's presumably not true. His other great one, which we, I think, have touched on in the past, is this amazing two week thing. Everything's always going to happen in two weeks. Yeah. And I've got a deal in two weeks and two weeks time. We're going to have this. It's going to be sorted in two weeks. I think he'd reduced it to 10 to 12 days for the ultimate and to put it during which he and Medvedev have indulged in this sort of really childish tip for Tatong social media, which then involved Trump claiming he was moving Euclid submarines.
4:11Anyway, let's put him to one side until part two. Let's talk about Gaza. What are you made of the whole recognition? So I think the first thing is that it is an extraordinary change. It now looks as though by the UN General Assembly, the likelihood is that three of the countries out of the G7, Canada, France, and the UK and two members of the opponent members of the Security Council, in addition to Russia and China. So it'll be four out of five members. The Security Council will have recognized Palestine as a state. There's a big thing we can get into about whether it's been down on the right way, whether it should have been made conditional on Gaza and Israel on this way.
4:55But there's no doubt I think that this is the product of Israel's actions in Gaza. It would have been almost inconceivable 12 months ago that all these countries in it began, obviously, with Spain and Norway doing it. November would have recognized. And in particular, it's a sign of the focus on the starvation, which is becoming so brutal and so clear. Yeah, just on that, I mean, just give some facts on the starvation. We're recording this Tuesday morning. More people died of starvation in the last 11 days than in the previous 21 months. And when you were away and I was talking to Katty K about this, we had an input from this guy who's used to run anti -starvation projects for USAID.
5:41And we're so explaining once it starts, even if you get food in, it is very difficult to stop. Meanwhile, the Israeli military killed just short of 100 Palestinians, including 56 on the way to try to get aid in Gaza. Meanwhile, Benjamin Netanyahu, according to the Jerusalem Post, is now talking about taking over the whole of Gaza. Meanwhile, Ben Gavir, in breach of his own government's policy, went to pray with Jews at one of the sacred mosques. Taking, I think, 4 ,000 people with 4 ,000 settlers. I think this is all built up to a sense of public opinion in the democracies that you've talked about.
6:22UK, France and Canada. Public opinion, really demanding change in stance, change in attitude. You made a very interesting point about whether we could argue about whether it was done in the right way. So, Macron, I think, clearly wanted to be out front, because that's where Macron likes to be. I thought there was a very odd line in his approach, essentially saying that he talked about this would have to be a demilitarized Palestinian state. Well, that's quite a big thing to say. One thing to say, Hamas should have no rule in the governments of Gaza, which they're all saying, but demilitarized basically means you can't have armed forces.
6:59And then with Kierstarm as recognition, there was a lot of debate about this, because I think a lot of people think, yes, two state solutions. So, let's recognize, as it were, both of the states. And we can get onto the Montevideo definition of what a state is. The issue with Kierstarm as recognition was, essentially, he was, he was applying conditions of recognition that applied to Israel. In other words, we won't recognize if Israel does ABCD, whereas I wonder whether it might have been sensible to say, you know, the context is the war. We condemn the way that Israel is conducting that war. We will recognize Palestine provided that Palestine does ABC.
7:40I think that's a different way of doing it. And then Canada, poor old Canada, I know we're going to talk about Tara's later, Mark Arley Cubsa, does it? And Ibedially Trump makes a part of his trade war. A couple of questions on Stammer. One is, I think it would have been incredibly powerful, if Macron and Stammer had made a joint statement with the same policy at the same time. Because Britain and France are the two authors of the Sykes -Pico agreement, which is right at the heart of the province, at least. They are the two permanent members of the Security Council. I think that was a really missed opportunity to, as a way of, partly demonstrating, well, you and I care about a lot, which is thinking about how this would join European voice, some defence and security.
8:20But just internationally, I think it would have been to do some Trump maths maybe three times as powerful to have the two together, then having them separately. Any thoughts on that? No, I agree with that. I find that if I was paying texts to sources close to the Prime Minister and the French President at various points, not least around the summit that we had, saying, look, this recognition issue is clearly kind of in the ether. Wouldn't it be really, really powerful to do it together? I think that there were probably issues around could they say exactly the same things. I think they could have ironed those out.
8:59I know that Jonathan Powell, and Jonathan, as you know, I've got a huge admiration for Jonathan, and he's a real sort of expert in peace processes as well. I think he felt that this should be part of a bigger thing, and maybe what they were doing was that Macron's going to go out on front. Because that's what Macron does. Let's see if we can build in a sense of momentum. I think Canada comes in. I agree with you. I think that would have been powerful. And of course, on the one hand, we said, again, talking to Katia, I made the point that Trump and Netanyahu have sort of engineered this situation.
9:32So it's like there's the only voices that count. Whereas I think if the European voices come together, I think there's a acceptance that mayts Germany are not going to be in this position. They're in a different position, and they're going to probably going to stay there. But I think the power of the international voice, I agree with you. I think it would have been more effective. And now, of course, we get to September. There's no way the Netanyahu is going to abide by these conditions. He's made that absolutely clear. O Contrare, Pache, the Jerusalem Post, and Ben Gavir as well. Ben Gavir is an incredible thing.
10:03That's like impunity within impunity. We've talked about Israel, the government operating with impunity in Gaza or seeming to. Now we have Ben Gavir within his own government operating with impunity. That's an interesting one, isn't it? Just some Ben Gavir, because often when we are getting emails attacking what we're saying, one of the claims is, well, Ben Gavir doesn't really speak for the government, but I think that makes no sense at all. I mean, partly it is that Smotritch and Ben Gavir were given these key posts of finance minister and security minister. But also clearly, as you say, it's not just that they are part of the cabinet.
10:42It's that it appears that they can do whatever they want. Nothing they do gets any criticism, presumably because they could topple the government at any moment. Just a little overview again, because I was trying to get my head around this about this question of recognition and why it didn't happen earlier. So there's a strange story. Up until 1967, there wasn't really a Palestinian state to recognize in the sense that Egypt had taken Gaza and Jordan had taken the West Bank. They were part of other countries. After 67, when Israel occupied that territory, and particularly from about 1980 onwards, there was increasing moves pushed by Yassir Arifat to try to get people to focus.
11:22And I think by about 1988, you had this, particularly not just Arab governments, but you had Eastern -Bot governments, former communist, or then communist countries, recognizing Palestine, which is why quite a lot of Eastern European countries in the European Union today recognize Palestine. They haven't had to do it recently. I think Poland, for example, recognized it back in 1988, and that's when Russia recognized it. But the real story, I think, began to change most dramatically after Oslo, because of course, with Oslo, this Norwegian agreement, the world signed up to a two -state solution.
11:54And once you get an idea of a two -state solution, the logic is, well, why are you not recognizing a Palestinian state if you believe in a two -state solution? And there was this merely -melt excuse, which is, no, we need to hold it back for part of the negotiations. Somehow the idea was that conferring statehood would be the last stage of this complicated peace deal. But in reality, it was because Israel would have been very angry if people had recognized it, and so people held off. There was a big push again with Abel Marston, I think sort of 99, 2000, and we ended up with a situation where, before October 7, nearly three -quarters of the countries in the world recognized Palestine as the state.
12:35But the major Western European G7, G20 countries generally didn't. And then we had two little bits in which we just didn't feel the Norwegian Prime Minister, which I think people would love, because he was incredibly good, I thought, on Gaza very strong, very clear. So we had Spain and Norway, and now we're going to this second phase. Roy, why do you keep forgetting Ireland and Slovenia? They were part of the same move. The four who did it together, the four who did it together was Spain, Norway, Ireland, and Slovenia. So on that story, do you have memories of this over? What is your sense of what's been going on since the 90s with this recognition of statehood?
13:14Was it a big issue when you were in government? Why would, I mean, given that we acknowledge the two -state solution, why will we not recognizing a Palestinian state for the last 30 years? I think you're right, because people assume that what would emerge out of Oslo was the process, the progress towards a two -state solution. The state of Israel was already in existence. Palestine was recognized by some, but not by all. And the sense it would become part of that process. And what I think people are seeing is that Israel and Netanyahu's government has made it clear they no longer even say they believe in the two -state solution.
13:50So I think that's what's changed the dynamics around it. And also, there is this sort of never -ending debate about what represents a state. So I mentioned the Montevideo Convention, and this is from days back to 1933. And there are four key criteria for a new state to be recognized. One is defined boundaries. Well, you know, the whole settler thing has confused that. A permanent population, a government, and the capacity to enter international relations. Now, you could argue that Palestine has got bits of all four. And although the level of Israeli intervention into the West Bank and the current situation in Gaza makes government very, very difficult.
14:33But just to say, for example, sometimes you might get in a quiz, in a pub quiz, how many countries in the world are there? And there's actually no agreement on that. The United States says there are 197. Others say there are 200 and even more than 200. The United Nations has it 193. And at the Second World War, when the United Nations was formed, there were 51, 99 by 1960 and the 189 by 2000. So, and you know, we interviewed recently, just to take two of the interviews we did. Albin Kuahti, the Prime Minister of Kosovo, Kosovo is recognized by a lot of countries, but not by enough to get it accepted as a state.
15:13We interviewed the President of Cyprus. Now, right next to them, they have what the Turks call the Turkish Republic of the Cyprus. They're the only people who recognize it. What was the last country that was recognized? Is it South Sudan? Was that the last? Yeah, South Sudan was definitely the last one that I remember. And that was extraordinary because again, Sudan was a big contiguous territory. And this amazing combination of counterterrorist people in the US, Christian churches because South Sudan is predominantly Christian and George Clooney, a sort of Hollywood churches and counterterrorist people, put pressure on the US government.
15:51We're now in sort of 2005 and recognize this whole new country. And it was part of that moment that we often talk about of extraordinary optimism. And the international community moved there and Juba became full of foreigners and Lebanese restaurants and discos and then collapsed into civil war. And again and again, as you are aware, with a lot of these conflicts around the world, there are always people suggesting maybe the answer is partition. You remember in Iraq, people would say, well, maybe things will be easier if we partition Syria. Obviously, the droves and the Kurds, to some extent, are still trying to push for creating semi -independent nations splitting these countries up.
16:30And of course, we just interviewed Nicholas Sturgeon. Ruri, you're plugging all these interviews. So we should just sort of maybe let people know, we've got Jeremy Hunt. And we're going to talk about him later. Jeremy Hunt, two episodes. We've got Nicholas Sturgeon, two episodes. Then we've got the Norwegian Prime Minister. And I'm glad, I'm really glad you liked Jonas Skastorra because I think he's a very, very impressive guy. And he was, you know, when people will hear, we'll put it out. He was, I thought he was brilliant on Palestine because he was coming at it the whole time from the position of the Oslo Accords.
17:01And okay, Norway obviously has a sort of a sense of attachment to that. But that was the closest we got to the sense of that process being there. And what he's refusing to do is to depart from the principles on depending there. And you know, when we talk about Colombia tomorrow, I think, you know, Santos, who want a Nobel Peace Prize for his role in bringing the Civil War in Colombia to an end, was always talking about the framework. You have to get the framework right. Otherwise, you get chaos. I also thought, by the way, on the way of recognition, Roy, the other thing that I don't think got nearly as much attention as I thought it deserved was when the foreign ministers met recently, mainly the foreign ministers, some heads of government as well, but David Lamy was there for the UK.
17:44And they met in New York and had this meeting about recognition. One of the most important things, I think, was the fact that the Arab League signed up to something that was a very, very, very clear recognition of Israel, which has been, you know, a complicated political diplomatic process too. Huge big move, exactly, because people are very aware, because we often hear that Iran refuses to acknowledge the existence of the state of Israel. But that was absolutely true, as you say, of most Arab countries. Many of them still don't have full diplomatic relations with Israel. And I think it's countries like Indonesia, traditionally, didn't recognize Israel.
18:23Many other Muslim countries. So I think that's the huge thing. Just on the line, that Roy, so the statement that they agreed condemned the activities of what they call militant group savage attacks. We know what that means. October 7th. And also they linked the peace deal of the future with the disarming and disbandment of Hamas. And that included Turkey, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Egypt, Jordan, Indonesia from the Asian side, African countries, Latin American countries, Europe, obviously. So I thought that was a pretty big deal. The challenge we now face, of course, is that the overwhelming majority of Israel, so I think this was right.
19:08Now I'll reject the two -state solution. It's not just a minimum in it, you know, I think there are two different views on this. There's the extremist Ben Gavir view, which is that the whole of Israel and Judea belongs to us because the Bible serves it. And we're simply going to, effectively, for the sum of the extremist smot -rich talks openly in terms that sound like ethnic cleansing. Let's just push out all non -compliant Palestinians and just create a massive Israeli state over all the Palestinian territory. The more mainstream opinion, I think, is not that they're making a great claim on the Bible.
19:51Traditionally, these might have been people who have been prepared to compromise on some of the history, but who simply believe that anytime they leave territory, leave South Lebanon, leave Gaza, they end up with terrorists, a terrorist state on their borders. And therefore, they, particularly after October 7th, can't contemplate the idea of a Palestinian state because they believe a Palestinian state is simply a guarantee that you get your Hamas or a pro -Tahams. So we know, and that's just a long way of saying, we're in an opposition where three -quarters of the countries of the world and now Britain, France, and Canada have signed up to something that is offensive to the overwhelming majority of the Israeli population.
20:38So there's this is not the 90s anymore. There's now a, and it's feeling more and more like a brutal, almost existential divide between how Israel sees itself and how the rest of the world sees Palestine. Yeah. I guess the other thing we should recall is that over last weekend, Israel released another video that was filmed by Hamas of one of the hostages emaciated digging his own grave. So that is, for obvious reasons, what drives a lot of the anger and the hatred within Israel. But I think, where I'm not sure I completely agree with you, I think there is a fairly unmovable and pretty sizable chunk of Israeli public opinion that really does think Netanyahu has been exploiting this at various points for his own survival.
21:35Hasn't actually seized those opportunities when he maybe could have got more of those to his back. And I think when the reckoning is told on this whole episode, then, look, who we say what history judges, but I think it's not impossible to imagine that Israel itself and the actions of this current government, particularly the extremists that we've talked about have inflicted as much damage upon the standing of the state of Israel as any of that side forces. Well, we've had this shift and we quite quite an important shift, which is to Israeli human rights groups. Well, respect it, Israeli human rights groups now saying that what's happening in Gaza is genocide.
22:15Ehud Al -Mert, who we interviewed, the former Prime Minister of Israel being more more aspect, was a brilliant interview done by the Guardian podcast with a surgeon called Nick Maynard, who just come back from Gaza. And for people who don't want to hear, and I think a lot of people don't want to hear about what's happening in Gaza, or who hear Netanyahu saying, Netanyahu said it's a bald -faced lie that the starvation in Gaza. Nick Maynard just, I think it's the it's the small details that are so telling. He says that he was working with American doctors who'd heard that there was a shortage of infant formula.
22:52So they'd flown from the US with their suitcase, this packed full of infant formula. And every last packet of infant formula was confiscated from them by the Israeli military in the border. Just weren't allowed to bring in baby formula. Or what it's like working as a surgeon with Palestinians whose all their children have been killed, their wife's been killed, who have to leave the surgery because suddenly their sister's been killed and a strike and then return to scrub up again to do the thing. And your point, which you did very perfectly with Catechay last week, which is the way in which Mount Etrishan makes all the other medical problems far worse.
23:36This compounding issue. So Nick Maynard's esophagus surgeon and he was describing a great detail reconstructed surgery. He's down on an 11 -year -old girl who'd been struck by a bomb and how he was pretty confident she would have pulled through. But of course, the Mount Etrishan means that it's much more difficult for people to recover from surgery, secondary infections. The other thing maybe before we go to break, I'd like to plug is because in this modern age of Tik Tok and all the rest of it and the Israelis in their own way are very powerful communicators. I think their communications has been a bit of a disaster because they're so kind of aggressive and denialist and so forth.
24:18But they're very effective, historically as communicators. But you have to be kind of snapping. One of the most impressive things I saw was a three -minute thing on the social media from Medihassan who, coming very much from a sort of anti -Israel perspective or one level. But he was just debunking some of the lies that they tell. And that's where I think they're doing themselves on a damage. And because they know that Trump lies a lot, we're going to talk about this in the second half. He's, I think he's kind of sui generous in a way. There's nobody else like him. People may think they can operate like him, but I don't think it's nearly as he gets away with more than other countries too.
25:01He gets away with more than other leaders too. I wish he didn't, but he does. And so I think the Israeli, I've said there's many, many times before that. I know they don't listen. And David Mens was stopped even replying to. I thought we might try and get the president on October the 7th, for example, to talk about, you know, to a reflective look back on the whole thing. But he's not even replying to that. But I think their communications is a bit of a disaster for them. Yeah. Well, I just to wrap it up, I suppose those two things connect, don't they? Because it's clear that this recognition of Palestinian statehood is driven by what Israel has been doing in Gaza.
25:43But I think it's also worth returning to your first point, which is there's something that doesn't feel quite right in making recognition of statehood conditional on Israel's actions. I mean, either Palestine's a state or it's not. Yeah. And actually you could recognize Palestine as a state separate from Gaza because Gaza is an emergency immediate humanitarian horror that should be pursued through international law, through international courts, normal approaches to international law and shouldn't be muddled up with the question of statehood. And I think there was some missed opportunities along the way.
26:24I think it would have been very, very nice to see this done as a big joint diplomatic statement. However, probably in the long run, it shows things strategically shifting against Israel and global opinion. Let's take a break and come back and talk about tariff Trump and some very interesting advice that Jeremy Hunt has for Keir Starmer. Very good. See you off the break.
Read the full transcript
26:53This isn't ad from BetterHelp. At the moment, we're getting advice from everywhere. You just have to go on TikTok. Could be Alice's cold plunges. Could be my attempts to meditate or the digital detox that I'm doing in Colombia. But of course, one of the things that we know is that it can be incredibly valuable to talk to another human being, somebody who's actually been trained as a therapist, to work through these ideas calmly, objectively and professionally. And as the largest online therapy provider in the world, BetterHelp can provide access to mental health professionals with a very diverse variety of expertise.
27:29They've got over 5 ,000 therapists in the UK. They've helped more than 5 million people globally and you can join a session literally at the click of a button.
27:39Change hearing yourself clearly, maybe for the first time. So talk it out with BetterHelp. Our listeners get 10 % off their first month at BetterHelp .com slash rest politics. That's better HELP .com slash rest politics.
28:01Welcome back to the rest of politics with me, Rory Stewart. And me as the camera, and Rory before we head on to the subs, you get dropping, dropping information about different interviews that we've been doing while we've been in different places. So let just bring people absolutely up to date. Leading as a separate podcast channel, the Wheat Roy and I do, where we interview somebody every week, we've mentioned Jeremy Hunt and the current episode now is Jeremy Hunt. Part two of that interview is out this coming Monday. But if you can't wait, you can become a member of the rest of politics plus and you do that by going to therestespolitics .com.
28:41So we go Hunt, Hunt, Nicholas Sturgeon, Nicholas Sturgeon, then the Prime Minister of Norway, my friend Jonas Gashtora, and then we might have a little bonus episode with the President of Guyana as well. So we get loads and loads of really great interviews and we hope that you enjoy them. I mean, I think as a huge thank you actually for getting some of these big names. They're great A -listers and I think it's lovely to have current heads of state and current heads of state who are talking much more openly than I sometimes fear serving politicians do. Yeah, I think the King Harold might be upset that you just refer to Jonas Gashtora as the head of state, or you as a sort of out and out.
29:22There we are. I would say as well, I enjoyed Jeremy Hunt a lot more than I thought I would. I thought he was, and he goes, he's still a politician, he's still an MP, but it does I think go to your theory, he's no longer in the cabinet. He was very loyal to Kenny Badek, up to a point, but he was very much more reflective than most frontline politicians are. So I think he's got that balance right, still in politics, but being interesting. And of course, for me, I think it's a really example of what the Conservatives could be doing and it's so sad. They're not, I think there is a huge appetite still for the centre, for the left wing, the Conservative Party, for a Conservative Party that doesn't get caught up in culture wars, that emphasizes pragmatism, thoughtful approach to staff is open about mistakes and failures.
30:22And I think there's huge opportunities actually for if the Conservatives wanted to, for taking on labour because I think there are real communications problems. Keir Starmer's net popularity rating is catastrophic. And a good Conservative Party speaking in the way that Jeremy Hunt was speaking, I think could have a real future and I think it's very, very sad that where they're likely to go is, is to lurch towards Robert Generator and an attempt to chase for Arge on the right. Yeah, the point I wanted to highlight from Jeremy Hunt's interview because he said to me really interesting, when he said it, I thought this is nuts, but he basically said, Keir Starmer should take a leaf out of Donald Trump's book and communicate more, talk more to the public.
31:06Now I said earlier, I don't think there's anybody in the world like Trump in the way you know, those 75 minute rambles he did at Turnbury and you know, he's communicates four, anyway, which maybe doesn't lend itself to the same sort of communication. But the more I've thought about it, the more I think, you know, we might have a point. We don't see enough of the Labour government talking about what the Labour government is doing other than when they're on the defensive. Yeah, I think that's right. And I think definitely this is part of the trick of Zora and Mum Darni, the New York mayoral candidate too.
31:45And it was actually something that even back in the day, David Cameron did a lot more of, if you remember his foreign secretary, there were often videos of him going down the steps or when he was running to be prime minister, he'd have people on the train with him chatting and doing. Also, when when when David Cameron was prime minister, I would reckon David Cameron was on the main news bulletins pretty much every day of his prebureship, not far off it. I've seen, I remember that. I exactly remember, I remember someone observing that somebody who really didn't like Cameron saying, okay, I mean, there's a lot of things wrong with this guy, but one thing you can say for him is that you basically turn on the main news every evening and there is David Cameron.
32:25It was right now you turn on the main news and you've got Nigel Farage sort of trying to stir up hatred and violence. And obviously you'd have to find a way of doing it, wouldn't you, where to follow your friend and Norwegian prime minister, who's very much about authenticity and being yourself, it would have to very much be, starmer being starmer. But yeah, it would be lovely to see that the question is, could he do it? Because what of course, um, Mamdani and Trump are able to do is respond very, very fluently without too much nervousness to whatever's going on in the world. They're partly being commentators, something that traditionally, Linton Crossby, I remember saying to us, the Australian election advice, the conservatives used to always say, don't be a commentator, your job isn't to be a commentator, your job is to repeat the government line.
33:19Well, I say, do you remember when we interviewed that milliband? He said, that's why I used to say to him, stop being a commentator, don't commentate. Well, maybe, maybe cross people are probably going to mix it from you. Anyway, but Trump and Mamdani and these people have to slightly be commentators, they have to be a little bit more like that because if they're going to be talking two, three times a day, a lot of the time, they're just speculating, reacting, holding forth. And Trump presumably does quite a lot of stuff, which isn't really much to do with global politics at all. It's just, yeah, not as often he was talking about some woman he makes jeans and he confused the country with a company in one of his sort of mad rambles.
33:58He talks about golf a lot. I think the, I look, it is not Kier's style. And also something I'd say about Kier is that I think sometimes he's the way he projects himself in public. Isn't the same as he speaks in private. And I think when people see the interview, for example, with Jonas Gastora, the prime prime's annoy, his speaking style is almost identical, regardless of what he's doing. And I do think that's the most effective form of communication. Yes, when you get up on the platform, in a rally in front of 5 ,000 people, you do a bit more of the kind of boom and boom and boom. But actually, it should be a recognizable form of communication to how you talk to your mates.
34:42It's one of the great tricks of modern politics, which isn't quite being met by most people, because we see it, don't we? When we interviewed such a javid, people like, my goodness, have any been like that when he was a cabinet and people I think will feel that when they watch the necklace, sturgeon interview. My goodness, if only, if only if only she'd been quite as open and reflective and thoughtful. So somehow, it's just, and I feel that was Kier's summer, when I meet him one -on -one, there's actually quite a lot of kind of charisma and energy and humor to him, which isn't coming across in his.
35:18So it's about getting very, very controlled, cautious, slightly more introverted politicians to learn to speak in public a little bit more, like the way they speak in private. And I don't know how you get them to do that. Yeah, well, I think a lot of it comes with practice and just doing it. I mean, the one thing I'll say about Kier's summer, I think he's got a lot better at primalist's questions than when he started, which shows that he can improve and does improve. And I think on this communications point, I mean, again, you know, Nicholas Sturgeon made the point that she said, you know, we're not just Kier, but she had a lot of the labor ministers when they come up, they come on, they speak.
35:55And then when they finish speaking, you think, what do they say? Right. Because they're just something a little bit robotic about it all. Well, also, also from your point of view, and I think the other thing that of course makes people nervous is that talking that way, you're going to take risk. If you're going to be talking two, three times the day about whatever things will go wrong, headlines will be generated. And so you need politicians who are a little bit more like I guess, Trump or Mamdani or Farazhar, who when their comms team come in and say, what the f of you done, you've just generated another mad headline.
36:32Just shrug and say, don't worry, I know my people. I know my face. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I actually think of Faraz's communications is, I'm not sure he's as effective right now as he thinks he is. I know they're doing well because they're getting this whole sort of focus on migrant hotels. And that's where he wants in, you know, crime or have you. But I think the thin skin is getting to be a bit of a problem with them. The more I've thought about what Jeremy Hunt said, though, I hope the Labour people, I hope Labour people listen to it and listen to it, not thinking of his attorney, what does he know.
37:02I actually think there's something in this. There's Labour's communications needs to change from what it currently is. Because, you know, even I as a political obsessive, quite often if I'm sort of going scrolling through social media, looking for interesting things, I'm not hanging around law when I see most of the Labour ministers pop up on my feet. And I am an obsessive pro -labor tribalist, id politics. So there we are. Listen, let's get to a man who definitely can communicate it and interested you do you do it way less. That's Donald Trump. You talk about flood the zone. So just to go through the last few days, we've had this massive spat with Medvedev, quickly accelerated to moving nuclear weapons.
37:44We've had the tariff mayhem, we've had him sacking, and this is real Putin stuff now, North Korean stuff, sacking the head of the government's statistical service, wonderful name, Erica McIntyrefer. I mean, she's got to get a job just for having that name. So I hope she won't be out of work for too long. Another Fox News host getting a big job, the new US attorney. We've also had, maybe we should have covered this in part one, the $60 million that he wanted thanks for from the starving in Gaza turns out it was only three million. But he has found 200, he is finding 200 million to buy to build a new ballroom.
38:27Meanwhile, Gelaing Maxwell's being moved to a low security prison. Oh, just after the deputy attorney general went to have a chat about Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump. And to add to it, Columbia University has signed a very, very controversial deal where they've, you remember their federal funds were suspended by Trump. He's now releasing money to Columbia University in return, essentially, for Columbia signing up to what come in as an academic at Columbia University. Effectively means that when he teaches his Middle East course, he can criticize pretty much every country in the Middle East.
39:06But he cannot make points about Israel. He doesn't feel that he'd be able to and there's an extraordinary sort of academic policing outfit that has been agreed as part of this deal to monitor courses, provosts, etc. Just on tariffs. So I mean, the thing caught my attention particularly because I'd been in Latin America was what's happening in Brazil. But as you've pointed out, there's much more than that. But just let's just start with Brazil as an example of what's going on. Trump has imposed 50 % tariffs on Brazil. Now we're we're so deep into this Trump world. It's any August that 50 % tariffs doesn't start for people anymore.
39:50But it's an incredible level. I mean, these are levels. This is essentially economic sanctions. This is the sort of thing that people used to do against Russia or South Africa and he's doing it against Brazil. And why is he doing it against Brazil? He's doing it against Brazil not because Brazil has a trade surplus with the United States. He's doing it against Brazil because Brazil and its Supreme Court justice are prosecuting Herbal Sonara, the previous president, who did his own mini January the 6th. So they're pursuing him for essentially insurrection and a coup. Both of our son has been hanging out in DC presumably going to the new members only club set up by Trump's kids and Wiccoff's kids and has somehow convinced the Trump family that they need to get his dad out of jail.
40:40So 50 % tariffs are now sanctions against the Brazilian Supreme Court justice and travel ban. And Lula, who's a leftist leader, now has his own cap which looks like a sort of pseudo -magic cap, a certain Brazilian independence. But he's in a very, very difficult situation. Same situation Canada is in Mexico, and we'll get onto Colombia tomorrow. How on earth do you keep a sense of national sovereignty, national pride? You can't say, listen, it's fine, interferon my judicial processes will sack the head of the Supreme Court, will drop the entire legal processes of Brazil, please dear America drop the 50 % tariffs.
41:24Anyway, over to you. No, he's quite incredible. And it's a sort of form of strategic mayhem, the whole thing. I mean, the other two that really I found fascinating. One was, first was India because Trump has always talked about this great relationship with Modi and Modi has always talked about this great relation with Trump. And whenever they visit each other's countries, they have these 80 ,000 people rallies and massive cricket stadiums tell each unposts of each other all over the place. But India's been very badly here, but the one that really shocked you was Switzerland. So they're Switzerland.
41:57And we talked earlier about what is a country. Switzerland didn't become a member of the United Nations to very late on because it's always precious, preciously guarded, it's sense of neutrality. But the president, Karen Keller Sutter, she did something very, very clever, I thought at the time, and she thought at the time, the talks between America and China, she organized for them to be held in Geneva. And at the time, she managed to get a meeting with Scott Besant, the Treasury Secretary. She came out of that meeting and the interviews for the Swiss media, where she basically, and this must have been based upon something the Besant said to her, basically said that they were going to be hovering between the UK 10 % and the standard 15 down from the 31 % that Trump had announced on Liberation Day with his game show board.
42:48He comes out a few days ago, 39%. So it's gone up, gone up from his game. From beyond 31, they've gone to 39. And this is led to an emergency cabinet meeting, is led to furlough schemes for some sectors of the economy that are going to be particularly hard hit. And the other thing that's really gotten scratching their heads, because Trump, of course, says it's all about the size of the trade deficit. Switzerland says two thirds of their recent exports are gold, bullion, and bars that should be refined in Switzerland. And gold is supposed to be exempt from tariffs. Yeah. And this, so this is, they just don't know what to do.
43:29The India thing is, as you say, a similar story, because I remember when this was all beginning in January, people I knew who were very close to the Modi government saying India is very convinced that they're going to be front row. In fact, they were hoping they'd be the first to get a deal. And we're a bit disappointed that Britain got there ahead of them. And Modi was very much communicating for all the reasons that you've said that India is going to be in a very special position. And of course, part of the reason for that is not just their friendship. It was about China. So the story was basically that the US needed allies against China, geopolitical competition.
44:06And the biggest potential ally in Asia was India. You know, India is on track to become one of the very largest economies in the world. It's growing very fast. Population of over a billion. And many companies were being encouraged to relocate their manufacturing away from China to India. So Apple, for example, move its manufacturing from China to India. So India thought it was sitting very pretty that it had very cleverly positioned itself as the alternative to China, the big, rapidly growing investment location and the US's greatest ally in the region with its own navy, which could help. So for all those reasons, both the personal connection and the geostrategic they thought they'd be fine.
44:45And they have been hit unbelievably hard. Now, that means that if you are an international manufacturer trying to manufacture goods, you picked up that China wasn't going to work. You were thinking maybe I moved to India. Maybe I moved to Vietnam, but all of them have now been hit with tariffs. And that means that the basic goods that were all dependent on, if you're an American consumer, and everything from T -shirts to Apple, you're basically hit with a very, very high VAT. It's like a sales tax. So it would be like putting up VAT by 25 % or in the case of China, you know, 40 % on key products.
45:22And this is bringing revenue and Trump's making a lot of money on this, you may well make hundreds of billions of dollars off this. But he's doing it by cutting taxes on the rich and then putting what's basically a VAT on the poor. Yeah, absolutely. And he's also scondering lots of goodwill. I mean, say with Modi, he spent so much time and effort building good relations with Modi. And now comes along and does this. And of course, the other thing that the Swiss are sort of really baffled about, because it's quite hard. And you know, Switzerland, they basically say they're already the world's six largest investors in the US.
45:58They're the biggest per capita. Right. And there's even talk now. I mean, I can't see the Swiss doing this, but actually they've got a big order for F -35 fighter jets from the States. Yeah, that's right. About saying, well, maybe we don't take their fighter jets. But so they've Swiss sort of, they've got the, they've now got the highest tariffs in Europe. And globally, there's only Brazil, Syria, Laos and Myanmar that are higher than them. Fiona and I are actually going to Switzerland in a couple of weeks. So we'll be able to check it out. But I was reading one of their newspapers, Blick, and it said that this is the country's biggest defeat since the French victory in the Battle of Marignano in 1515.
46:44What'd you do? Come on, Roy, let's imagine you are the president of Switzerland. What do you do? Right. It's impossible, isn't it? Because we know that one thing that Trump really likes and has worked for some countries is announcing a massive package of investment in the US. So when Europe announced, I think it was $600 billion worth investment, he cited that as a reason to bring the tariffs down to 15%. Even though it's meaningless. Even though it's meaningless, right. But as you say, the problem for the Swiss is they've already got a huge amount of investment. And of course, as we found with Norway, when we were talking to the Norwegian Prime Minister, indeed, when we talked to the Danish Prime Minister, smaller countries in Europe like Switzerland, Denmark on Norway are very, very vulnerable to the US.
47:32They're very open economies. They're very much dependent on global trade. And they're frankly very weak. They don't have much leverage. It's the first time I think that Switzerland has really experienced the pain of not being in the European Union and customs union. Because the trick that Trump didn't do that people were afraid he might do is to try to do divide and rule within Europe. Now, I know how an earth Europe would have responded. But there was a fear for a moment that you remember that he might think, well, actually, you know, I don't really like what Spain's doing on recognition of Gaza will go finally.
48:04Suddenly, now, Switzerland, which seemed to have this very complicated but fruitful relationship, the European Union is in real trouble because it didn't manage to get in on that 15 % tariff negotiation. I don't know what you do. And I God forbid you think that you can go down the mark, Rutta Routes, which is that if you just totally humiliate yourselves, say Trump should get the Nobel Peace Prize, call him daddy, call him Mr. Bigley, wonderful president, you get out of this hole. The other thing I think that's interesting is that we used to say in talking about Trump's tariff policies that there were four basic agendas which contradict each other.
48:41Number one, he wants to move manufacturing back to the US. So leave China back to the US or leave Switzerland back to the US. Number two, he's trying to make money in which case, the manufacturing stays outside the US and he makes money. It comes at number three, he's trying to chase fentanyl number four, he's trying to punish China. But it's clear, I think now that it's quite different that yes, he is going to continue to make revenue from it and he likes his 10 % because it'll bring money in at expense of poor Americans. But it's now become a general purpose tool. If you're doing stuff we don't like with Russia, which is the story with India, if you're prosecuting Bolsonaro, if in the case of Colombia, you're refusing to take people back on a plane, we're just going to use this.
49:23And Syria, I guess, I mean, presumably Syria doesn't have a big trade surplus with the US. So those tariffs are just there. I don't know what has leveraged over the Syrian present. They're sanctions, aren't they? They're basically forced to economic sanctions. Yeah. Having just lifted other sanctions. And I mean, that's what I say. It's going to strategic mayhem. Maybe just for we clothes, Rory, what did you think of the, I mean, I was sort of maybe a bit too light -hearted about it because of a wonderful name, Erica McIntyrefer. But what are we to think about the president of United States, still the biggest economy in the world, firing the head of the statistical service because he said she was coming up with phony job figures.
50:05She inflated the good job figures for Kamala, bad job figures for him, everybody in that world, including people who have worked under Trump before has come out and said this is ridiculous. If you look through some of the history New York Times, that are very interesting piece about the history of countries where they've tried to figure a little bit fiddle -based statistics. I mean, there's the old joke about the Soviet Union, the tractor production, the potato production. But Greece, they go into a real mess by faking their deficit numbers. China constantly manipulating their growth figures. And you know, Argentina, I forgot about this until I read it, Argentina in the early and the centuries systematically, understating inflation figures.
50:48So eventually, the international community is no longer bothered to read Argentinian government data. So this is a bad, bad move, isn't it? It's a very bad move. And it's also, again, creating this strange sort of Bulgarian Communist Party thing, which is that all the Republicans loved citing her. Yeah. That she was their go -to person, and now they've had to flip to say, oh, this person I was quoting, and the state, two weeks ago, is now a villain. So there's a bit of the kind of show trials going on. We don't know, I think to finish on a sort of bigger note, one of the things you're reminding me of is that there's no real historical precedent for an economy, the size of the United States, in a world this globalized doing these kinds of things.
51:37Because the things that you're citing are, you know, Argentina, or even China, when it was a growing, closed communist country, but there's something we don't know what to deal with, which, and the Switzerland story is part of the story. The US is so powerful, so big, so impossible to ignore, so entwined in the global economy, so powerful, partly because actually they export much less than they import, partly because they're the world's reserve currency. We don't really know what happens with this experiment as it goes on. Normal economics tells you all those things that you've said. If you start screwing around with your tariff policy, you end up with expensive domestic goods, non -competitive domestic industries, you're shredding all your international alliances because you're alienating not just Switzerland and Western Europe, you're alienating Japan, India, South Korea, Canada, Mexico, and then you start destroying your statistics agency, you start going after your central bank, so we've got J -PAL having to take a very firm line saying, I'm not going to be driven to bring down history.
52:48So at some point you assume that investors are going to say America is ceasing to be a reliable, predictable investment location, but the global economy is in such trouble. Where else do they put their money? I mean the US is now 70 % of the world stock market if you go into a tracker fund, and this is and the US treasuries the way you put your money. So Trump is there so much in the bank, there's so much economic power that he can do these things that nobody else has ever done, and we don't quite know how long he can get away with it from and at what point the catastrophe happens and the is of course eventually people selling off US treasuries, leaving the US stock market and giving up on this project.
53:30Or the American economy declines and drags the world into some kind of you know some sort of recession, and of course don't forget he's got a lot of forwardness going back to his very very first days president term one. If you remember the big row day one of his first term was him claiming there were more people at his inauguration than there had been Obama's when clearly there weren't. So he's you know if the facts don't fit his narrative he changes the facts and I should say that, bro if you ever heard of a guy called Olympic Avikin, no Olympic Avikin was a Soviet Union census director who made the mistake of producing a population count that was lower than Stalin had already announced and for his troubles I'm afraid he was arrested and executed.
54:23So we're not quite there yet but we're we're some of the way there. It's not great it's not great and of course it is it's a fascinating is it just final thing that remember that what undid Liz Truss was her attempts to attack the Treasury the Bank of England and the analysis of the ignore our end statistical predictions and our own agencies. But in a small economy like Britain that that was kind of the end for her but in America as you say this was exactly a fortune -teller done it the moment of which is a massive yeah the currency collapses the stock collapses the debt goes crazy but in the US who's such a huge okay well let's see some more open to talk about Columbia we're going to talk about a couple of aspects of France and Germany not going to well we're going to talk about changes at the Samaritans which I know quite a lot of people worried about so we'll see you then.
55:12Very good and if I could answer this there's a very cheeky but I just wanted to plug. Two days ago was the first episode of my BBC series which has partly inspired by a conversation I have with you on the idea of the hero so it's a program called the idea of the hero from Achilles to Zelensky. So at nine o 'clock in the morning on BBC Radio 4 and a Monday if listeners want to listen a Johnny romp through different heroes from the classical world a through to some painful discussions about Musk Trump and Zelensky at the end. I think you should also probably mention BBC sounds you know BBC sounds that's right they will go on there eventually they'll go.
55:47I'll show it out if I may Roy we've just had I know you don't really follow sport the most exciting test match series probably in my lifetime certainly since Ian Boatham's ashes I think England and India has been absolutely amazing and I want to give a shout out to test match special when you when you're riding around the French countryside on a bicycle there is no better thing to listen to than test match special so Aga's and Co thank you so much. Oh beautiful great. All right well a happy note. See you soon. Bye bye.
From the publisher
Why are the UK, France and Canada finally recognising a Palestinian state? Why is Trump punishing Brazil, India, and Switzerland with tariffs? Should Starmer’s Labour be less cautious and more populist in the way it communicates with the country?
Join Rory and Alastair as they answer all these questions and more.
The Rest Is Politics Plus: Join with a FREE TRIAL at therestispolitics.com, for exclusive bonus content including Rory and Alastair’s first ever miniseries The Real JD Vance, early access to Question Time episodes and live show tickets, ad free listening for both TRIP and Leading, our exclusive newsletter, discount book prices on titles mentioned on the pod, and our members’ chatroom on Discord.
The Rest Is Politics is powered by Fuse Energy. Fuse are giving away FREE TRIP+ membership for all of 2025 to new sign ups 🎉 TRIP+ gets you exclusive bonus episode, ad-free listening, discounts, and early access to episodes and pre-sale tickets for live shows! To sign up and for terms and conditions, visit fuseenergy.com/politics ⚡
Get our exclusive NordVPN deal here ➼ nordvpn.com/restispolitics It's risk-free with Nord's 30 day money back guarantee ✅
For more Goalhanger Podcasts, head to www.goalhanger.com
Instagram: @restispolitics
Twitter: @restispolitics
Email: therestispolitics@goalhanger.com
Social Producer: Celine Charles
Video Editor: Josh Smith, Adam Thornton
Assistant Producer: Evan Green, India Dunkley
Senior Producer: Dom Johnson
Head of Content: Tom Whiter
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor, Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices




