439. The Pro-Putin President: Are Zelensky and Europe sleepwalking into disaster?

19 Aug 2025 · 51 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Notes: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 439

Episode Title

The Pro-Putin President: Are Zelensky and Europe Sleepwalking into Disaster?

Hosts

  • Rory Stewart
  • Alastair Campbell

Overview

In this episode, Rory and Alastair discuss the implications of Donald Trump's foreign policy, particularly regarding his relationship with Vladimir Putin and its effects on Ukraine and Europe. They also analyze domestic unrest in Israel amidst the ongoing conflict in Gaza.

---

Key Discussions

Trump's Foreign Policy and Its Implications

  • Trust and Engagement:
  • The episode centers on the trustworthiness of Trump and Putin, with Rory suggesting Trump may actually be on Putin's side and indifferent to Ukraine's fate.
  • Trump's approach is characterized as potentially dangerous for Europe, with his inclination to appease Russia being highlighted.
  • European Leaders' Concerns:
  • The hosts discuss the urgent reactions of European leaders following Trump's meeting with Putin, who felt alarmed and rushed to secure guarantees for Ukraine's safety.
  • Alastair highlights the chaos in Europe as leaders scrambled to recalibrate their strategies in light of Trump's shifting stance.
  • Negotiation Dynamics:
  • Discussion on the outcomes of Trump's Alaska summit with Putin, where no substantial agreements were made, leaving European leaders anxious.
  • They explore the concept of "security guarantees" and the ambiguity surrounding them, questioning their effectiveness in deterring Russian aggression.

Analysis of Domestic Affairs in Israel

  • Israeli Protests:
  • The episode addresses mass protests against Netanyahu in Israel, suggesting he may be losing support among the populace.
  • Discussion on the recent poll indicating that a significant majority of Israeli Jews believe the IDF is acting proportionately in Gaza, contrasting with the protests against the war.
  • Military and Political Tensions:
  • Alastair and Rory touch upon tensions within the Israeli military regarding Netanyahu's strategies, particularly plans to escalate operations in Gaza City.
  • They note the critical role played by extreme coalition partners, such as Ben Gavir and Smotrich, in shaping Netanyahu's policy decisions.

The Psychological Landscape of Leaders

  • Trump's Indifference:
  • Rory posits that Trump’s lack of genuine care for Ukraine leads to a muddled foreign policy that prioritizes personal acclaim over strategic interests.
  • The discussion emphasizes the psychological profiles of both Trump and Putin, suggesting that their personal motivations significantly influence their geopolitical actions.
  • Media Dynamics:
  • Alastair expresses concern over the media's focus on Trump and Putin, potentially overshadowing significant developments in other global contexts, such as the situation in Gaza.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Trust Issues: The episode strongly emphasizes the trustworthiness of political leaders, particularly Trump’s past actions and their implications for international relations, specifically regarding Ukraine.
  • European Unity: The urgency for European leaders to maintain unity and clarity in their approach to security guarantees is crucial to countering Russian influence.
  • Israeli Domestic Politics: The protests against Netanyahu reveal a fracture in Israeli public support, hinting at a potential shift in domestic policy preferences amidst the ongoing conflict.
  • Media Influence: The hosts highlight how media narratives can shape public perception and political discourse, often sidelining critical issues in favor of more sensational stories.

---

Conclusion

The episode provides a rich analysis of the current political landscape, examining the interplay between personal relationships and international diplomacy. It raises critical questions about the effectiveness of current strategies in dealing with authoritarian regimes while emphasizing the importance of understanding the underlying motivations of world leaders.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Thanks for listening to The Restless Politics. Sign up to The Restless Politics plus to enjoy ad -free listening and receive a weekly newsletter. Join our members' chat room again early access to live show tickets. Just go to TheRestlessPolitics .com. That's TheRestlessPolitics .com. Coming up on Today's show, Trump was saying he was going to end the war in 24 hours. He meant by giving Putin what he wanted. Trump is on Putin's side on this and always has been. It's all about whether anyone can trust Vladimir Putin. and it seems to me that the only person in this equation who is remotely minded to trust Putin is Trump.

0:32And then it's the question of whether you can trust Trump. What if Trump just doesn't care about Ukraine? Doesn't care about NATO, doesn't care about Europe. His gut instinct is screw Ukraine, it's really part of Russia anyway, it doesn't really matter. Even if Putin proposes a deal and Trump gets behind it, Zelentsky won't accept it. The rest of politics is powered by fused energy and Fuse and I are offering 20 pounds credit and free trick plus membership if you switch to a fixed tariff before the end of August. They've listened carefully to their customers and the number one request was Gas Tariffs.

1:09So now at last you can switch both your gas and electricity to Fuse, one supplier, one bill, one less quokmire to navigate. So also cheaper. Fuse gas and electricity as you can see, it has typically saved £150 vs the price cap. Today's political climate has full of talk about control and clarity. Well, the fuse have quietly exercised some, at least when it comes to your energy bill. And they began with a mission which was to make electricity cheaper, cleaner, simpler. And the fuse now supplies over 50 ,000 homes across the UK, all unquitely, efficiently, and without a single campaign bus tour.

1:46Fuse's support is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, with real people replying in under two minutes. So go to fuseenergy .com forward slash politics to switch your gas and electricity to fuse and get your 20 pounds credit and free trip plus membership. This podcast is brought to you by Carvana. Got a car to sell but no time to waste? Hop onto Carvana .com to get a real offer for your car in seconds. All you have to do is enter your license plate, answer a few quick questions, and if you accept the offer, Carvana will pay you as soon as you hand the keys over. They even offer same day pickup in many cities.

2:26Save your time, score some cash, and sell your car the convenient way to... Carvana! Pick up time's very, these may apply. This podcast is brought to you by Carvana. Buying a car shouldn't eat up your week. That's why Carvana made it convenient. Carvana that fits around your life. Not the other way around. You can get pre -qualified for an auto loan in just a couple of minutes and browse thousands of quality car options all within your terms, all online, all on your schedule. Turn car buying into a few clicks and not a full week's endeavor. Finance and buy your car at your convenience. On... Carfada!

3:02Financing subject to credit approval additional terms and conditions may apply.

3:12Welcome to the rest of this politics with me, Rory Stewart. And with me, Alistair Campbell and the first half all matters Ukraine after another big episode of the Trump Realized TV show. And second half, Gaza. And then we'll perhaps go a bit more domestic when we get to question time. Let's start on the soap. Our super keen listeners will have picked up that we did an extra episode on Saturday morning. So live after the Putin Trump meeting in Alaska. We're now recording 48 hours after that. In the time since and people will remember, nothing really was said at the end of the Trump Putin meeting.

3:48But there was massive anxiety from Zelensky, of course, the Ukrainian leader and the European leaders who then jumped on a plane, dropped everything. I've never seen anything like it, how quickly these guys clear their schedules and get on a plane. To get out to Washington to try to sit down with Trump and presumably to return, I mean I guess to my centralality which is that I think always the momentum of Trump, the rolling boulder is heading in the direction of Putin. But over the last eight months again and again the European leaders in Zelensky try to sort of stop it and keep saying please give us security guarantees, please give us to cease fire.

4:25Please don't sign up to what has seemed almost since November the inevitable deal with Putin. I imagine when Trump was saying he was going to end the war in 24 hours. He meant by giving Putin what he wanted. But anyway, over you, what's your sense of what's going on? I mean, it's all about trust, isn't it? It's all about whether anyone can trust Vladimir Putin. And it seems to me that the only person in this equation who is remotely minded to trust Putin is Trump. And then it's the question of whether you can trust Trump to stay engaged, to stay interested. Look, I thought the outcome of Alaska and the optics of Alaska were both horrific for Ukraine and for Europe.

5:04I think that's why you did see this extraordinary action of Macron, Mertz, Starmum, Maloney, Stubb from Finland, Ritter and von der Leyen, all feeling, oh my god, we've got to get this show back on the road. I think the significant shift that's happened since that meeting. If you remember Trump went into the meeting in Alaska saying he would be very unhappy, there'd be severe consequences if he didn't get a ceasefire out of Putin. ceasefire not even discussed. So therefore he comes out with a new line which is basically we don't go to the ceasefire, we go straight to a peace agreement and we go straight to security guarantees.

5:40Okay. So he's sort of totally reframed the kind of the positioning of this thing. for obvious reasons from the the optics and the substance of Alaska. So for obvious reasons, the European leaders were very alarmed, very worried, very anxious about what was going on. The reason why the European leaders were so horrified is that they had had a call with Trump two days earlier in which he had absolutely promised not to do that and they had somehow convinced themselves that they had a deal with Trump that that Trump then broke as soon as he sat down with Putin. And so a lot of the last two days, I guess, has just been trying to reverse and get back to where they thought they were on Friday.

6:20And they also know he is very impressionable. He does have the ability is that what is the thing that lots of people who know well say is that he actually doesn't enjoy confrontation. So I won't have enjoyed that meeting with Zelensky that advanced triggered it. It's probably why Vance was kept in his box. So the Europeans know that the best chance to maybe at least that the margins get him to shift to position, to give them a bit more time to do the things they're trying to achieve, get in the room with them and, you know, that's what they did. You talk about Trump being the bolder, but the bolder is kind of moving, a little bit of like he moved on that red carpet Alaska, it's sort of going a little bit sideways rather than the straight line.

7:00So what the European said is we cannot have a repeat of Trump vans beating up Zelensky in the White House. Have you said thank you once this entire meeting? No, in this entire meeting of you said they feel to do. Therefore we have to kind of be there like a bit of a bolstering shield. Before they went to the White House, first of all for the bilateral was Zalensky, then with the broader meeting with all European leaders, they met at the Ukrainian Embassy. They clearly decided, I think, that whether we like it or not and it's pretty clear they don't all like it, we're going to have to do a bit of, you know, back side kissing so that a lot of that this wouldn't be happening without your leadership.

7:43Thank you so much for getting put into say whatever he said and at least to be talking about security guarantees. The problem where we are now I think is that so if you take care of Starmer's reaction and his response at the end of the day which I thought was fair and balanced he basically said we're at least talking about security guarantees and how the hard work begins on what that means and we're talking about the possibility of a trilateral meeting. The only thing I've been able to pick up that I've not seen in the media from any of the people who are there is that it was put in on the phone call with Trump in the middle of the meeting with European leaders who suggested starting with a bilateral meeting with Zelensky.

8:24Now I don't know quite what to read into that but it seems that that is what gave them some sort of confidence that Putin was at least talking about it. However, the Kremlin line is, they said they had a very frank and constructive discussion. Now, Frank usually means not very friendly, and they then talked about setting up a new process of negotiators to talk about the possibility of the meeting between Trump and Zelensky. So, more drama, more theatre, more announcements of process, but very hard to assess if it actually adds up to very much. I'm going to play a devil's advocate maybe and push harder and say there's a pretty good chance and if I was really forced to predict I'd say that Trump is on Putin's side on this and always has been.

9:20And I think we're misreading it away. I was listening to our friend, the Mooch, saying, you know, how come Trump got so outmaneuvered by Putin, you know, it was 3 -0 against him. What I thought is that maybe we're looking at it the wrong way up. Trump is only outmaneuvered if you assume that what Trump is trying to do is support Ukraine or take the European position. I'm as known out, the Ukrainian European position was outmaneuvered. But what if Trump just doesn't care about Ukraine? doesn't care about NATO, doesn't care about Europe, and what he really cares about is having good relationships with Russia and potentially getting some minerals deal and business deals in Russia.

9:58In which case, from his point of view, the art of the deal he's making doesn't really have anything to do with defending Ukraine or Europe. But we're sort of imagining that in Trump's mind, he's back in the 1980s in New York and somehow Ukraine and Europe are his company. But his company is the US. But, Rory, if that's the case, why doesn't he go much closer to the JD Vance position? And JD Vance looked very miserable yesterday. He was made to sit at the children's table. We had the BT with the leaders there, Trump sitting with all the leaders. And then over there behind that side of the table, I spotted Jonathan Powell and some of the European diplomats who were there.

10:40And then over there you had JD Vance, Rubio, Besant, Hexer, Susie Wiles, and it really did look like this is for the big people and you sit there and you don't speak. And in the meeting in the Oval Office, I think it's quite interesting. Yes, there was a lot of fuss made in the fact that the Zelensky War is suit because last time he wore his uniform that has been wearing since the war started. But the other thing that was very, very different is JD Vance did not open his mouth. So I think Vance was told by Trump to stay in his box. Rubio looked very nervous at both meetings, I thought. But I think a lot of this depends on your base of his saying, they don't care about Ukraine and he only wants to help Putin.

11:28If he doesn't really care, why go through all this effort? I wonder whether getting into Trump's psychology or Putin's psychology is very difficult. Well, it's all the leaders we're doing yesterday. Yeah, well, we're all doing that. Let's say broadly speaking, your analysis is that the things that he cares most about now are fame, money, but he's got more money than he used to, and that he has certain sorts of beliefs of which the strongest one is he loves tariffs. The second one is he doesn't like immigration, and third, but maybe not quite as strong is the belief that the world is divided into spheres of influence, and big countries get to do what they want in their backyard.

12:10Yeah. And basically Russia gets to do what it wants back at. But if it's a slightly less strong belief than his love of tariffs and his hatred of immigration, then he's facing a concerted effort by an enormous amount, not just of European allies, but NATO, a lot of the Republicans, a lot of American public opinion who are skeptical about Russia. So, although his, I think his gut instinct is screw Ukraine, it's really part of Russia anyway. It doesn't really matter. Everything would be much easier. And anyway, they're never going to win. I think that's another very important part. He thinks that Putin is winning.

12:48Ukraine's doomed the way to get peace is just to let Putin get the ones. But the reason in eight months he hasn't quite got there is that he quite enjoys probably having all these European leaders jumping on planes to see him all the time. He loved it. He loved it. And he probably feels well, I don't care enough really about this issue to totally throw my whole weight behind Putin, but if you were to grab him one -on -one, I think he hasn't changed his position, which is still Ukraine's really part of Russia. This isn't relevant to the United States. If we get to sell some weapons to Europe great, but that's not that important to me either.

13:25And I'd like the Nobel Peace Prize and the easiest way to get peace in a vertical is to take the aggressors piece. And the most straightforward sort of piece is, dear Putin, have some more territory and stop fighting. Yeah, of course, so much that we talk about Trump's psychology. We lot of this is about what Putin thinks. It was really interesting. During the pool spray at the top of Zelensky, oh my God, I did try Brewery. I've fed in to every person I could think of or had any influence on this, please can we not have a pool spray at the top of Zelensky? But it happened. If you listen very carefully, Roy, you heard Zelensky when Trump was obviously going to take questions.

14:04Zelensky said, he's sort of whispered, let's make it short. And Trump said short, very short. Then went on for about five years. He took questions from Marjorie Taylor, Green's boyfriend about every three minutes, including about policing in male and balloting all sorts of nonsense. I thought Zelensky was quite clever. When he reached Ed for the envelope, I thought, oh, no. or he said, who's the Ukrainian king who's going to give a state visit to Trump? But in fact, he was a letter from his wife to Melania Trump. We obviously think about Trump a lot because he's in our heads all the time because he's on our phones and on our TV screens all the time.

14:41Putin, we see a lot less of. But here's Rory, let's try why you just been talking, the other Rory in my life, my son, he said with his tweet, have you seen this? It's a tweet from Medvedev, former president, still a, you know, we don't know how important to he remains in the Putin's sphere. He wasn't there at the meeting, but this is his tweet. This morning, the anti -Russian war -mongering coalition of the willing fails to outplay Trump on his turf. Europe thanked and sucked up to him. That's true. The question now is which tune, the Kiev clown, that's Zelensky, will play about guarantees and territories back home, once he's put on his green military uniform again.

15:20So he's trolling Zelensky, he's trolling the Europeans. I mean, we talk about Putin being a sort of Barbara's dictator. Does Medvedev put that out there with Putin's blessing or not? Because if he does, he's basically taking the piss. I think he has taken the piss and I think if I were Putin, I'd be pretty confident at the moment that things are going in my direction, that these European meetings are just froth. I mean, I'm increasingly coming to the view on lots of fundamental things with Trump, including tariffs, but also what we'll get on to, I think maybe when we talk about some question time, some of his internal repression stuff that he's actually surprisingly consistent.

15:59And the reason that we get confused is because he'll send out posts on truth social, saying things like I'm getting fed up with Putin or he's got 50 days and I'll put sanctions on. But never actually happens. It's the same with Israel. There were moments where everyone was like, always getting really annoyed when Netanyahu didn't visit him on his golf tour, etc. But fundamentally, it feels as though he is never actually going to punish either Russia or in fact Israel, whatever they do. And that's because at some level, he's kind of on their side. On the Russian thing, it's also really worth emphasizing that Putin rightly or wrongly seems much, much more confident now about his military position.

16:40So I was looking at some of the statistics around recruitment. And the Russians are consistently recruiting about twice as many people a day as the Ukrainians. And it's really remarkable. Part of this is about incredibly generous payouts that they're making. Yeah. So in Russia, you can normal personal on about $900 a month, so you know, 750 pounds a month. So in British terms, very, very much well below the minimum wage. But soldiers on the front line earn much more than their British equivalents. If you're on the front line, you get $2 ,450 a month, salary, so nearly two and a half times median income, $30 ,000 signing bonus.

17:23Then you get special money for, you get $12 ,000 if you get a medal, you get money if you get tanks and helicopters. And when you retire, you get a guaranteed $1 ,100 pension a month for the rest of your life. That's a really significant thing and they don't seem to have any problem recruiting. At the same time, there have been these breakthroughs. There was a breakthrough in Poverosk, which begins to seem to threaten nearly 10 miles worth of breakthrough, which is forcing the Ukrainians into a very, very narrow corridor to one of their central logistics bases in the east. So I think if you're Putin, you're sitting there thinking, in the end, the war's going in my favour.

18:02In the end, I know that yes, the Europeans will continue to buy American stuff, but there's going to be less American stuff, less American focus. I know that there is no US appetite, so you talked about Vance. I know with these stories, then, if you're on Sunday, he said, I think the president, and I certainly think that America, we're done with the funding of the Ukraine War business. But if the Europeans want to step up and actually buy the weapons from American producers, we're okay with that, but we're not going to fund it ourselves anymore. That basically is what they mean by security guarantees.

18:32We will make weapons and you lot can buy them. Yeah, we're over to you on that. So that's the final thing. So this security guarantee's story. Remember Macron in his meeting with Trump, which I think is now back in February, thought that he'd got security guarantees out of Trump. But if you listen to Trump, there's no detail on what these guarantees are. And if I were Putin, I would think, well, this isn't anything like Maloney's article five NATO, you know, attack on one, it's an attack on all. And if it remains ambiguous, it's not really a deterrent, is it? those press conferences are utterly horrific because the journalists just they don't do their job there.

19:07You have people like this Mr. Mayor, Marjorie Taylor Green who was actually talking about going for a walk with MTG around Washington. Thank you Mr. President, it felt so safe if you can walk around Washington safe with MTG, you know, then the plates thank you and then all this sort of nonsense going on. The guy from Fox News basically just trying to needle Zelensky the whole time. But the other point where you say that about them being more confident militarily, there's an amazing thing. I don't if you follow this thing that goes out pretty much every day, the British Ministry of Defence military intelligence put out these kind of analysis of what's going on.

19:44They get way more coverage around the world than they do in Britain. But the one that I call my eye this week, the Wendtown, basically says, if they carry based on the battle field advances so far in 2025, it will take Russian forces approximately 4 .4 more years to gain 100 % of the 4 Ukrainian oblast's territory. Now, just think about that because what Trump seems to have fallen forward Putin is the idea that Zelensky will have no problem handing over the Donbass, which is two of those or blasts. And somebody said yesterday that it's like saying to Trump, look, give, decide who your biggest enemy in the world is and give them Florida and maybe throw in a bit of Texas as well.

20:31You're from the economist Shasha and Joshi. I saw him being interviewed on television yesterday. And he said for Zelensky to hand over the Donbass would be suicidal. So that can't happen. That means that this really hasn't moved past stage one. And Zelensky He did not give any promises on that. At all. Again, the coverage has tended to assume that we're on the cusp of a deal. The way it's normally described as there's like a pro -Russian deal, and the pro -Russian deal would mean that Putin would get, as you say, the head of the Donbass, and Ukraine would agree to demilitarize, so limit the size of its army, not join NATO, not join the EU, and sanctions will be left in Russia, so that's the kind of pro -Russian position, which is I think the position to which Trump basically favors in his gut.

21:17And then there's the other position which is the kind of pro -Ukraine deal, which is no recognition of the territory Russia has taken, frees the front lines where they are. Ukraine can arm as much as it wants. It's got a free pass to join NATO and the EU and America will produce in the most optimistic scenario, almost the kind of NATO -style guarantee for the security of Ukraine. My guess is that neither of these things are going to happen. My guess is that even if Putin proposes a deal and Trump gets behind it, Zalensky won't accept it. And therefore, what you'll really have is a sort of frozen conflict, a kind of grey zone going on for years and years and years.

21:57I was reminded thinking about this, our interview with the president of Cyprus and the way that he thinks about Turkish occupied North Cyprus. So obviously from his point of view, he in a way is like Ukraine. That was part of their territory. The Turks invaded, they captured half the territory, and 60 years later, the Greek Cyprids are still saying this is an illegal occupation, we don't recognise it, get out. But the rest of the world, unfortunately, is beginning to, I'm afraid, lose energy and think, well, facts are facts, and basically, Turkey occupies an onsite, President might as well have a two -state solution.

22:30So there's a serious chance that that's the kind of world that you end up in Ukraine. Well, the other thing that we, you know, when we talk about, you can't work out from psychology, but so much of this is about his psychology. He doesn't stick with things for long. So we're going to talk in the second half after the break. We're going to talk about Gaza. Now what's been happening in Gaza in the last 24 or 48 hours? There's been some pretty consequential stuff going on. But was there any mention of that yesterday in the long ramble that he did in the overall office? Because in his head he's kind of already, I think moved on from that.

23:06He's now thinking Ukraine is the episode I'm dealing with now. That is what I'm going to get fixed. I've got to get a new storyline out every day. And then event, I think you're right. I think eventually this will possibly beat around. Now, I don't think we should underestimate by the way the significance. You know, we can laugh and say, oh, you're looking at them all getting on a plane and going to sort of get his backside. It felt to me quite significant that the Europeans were there yesterday. And that he felt this need for whatever reason, he went round the table, basically saying something very nice about all of them.

23:37And even though to some European eyes it will have been puke -making to watch them say, we couldn't do this without you and blah blah blah. One, they stopped short of any of the Nobel Prize nonsense. But two, when you actually dig into what they were saying, there were some pretty substantial points being made. The one point in the round table when Trump, I felt, is about to lose it, was with melts because MOUTS was absolutely clear, you cannot possibly go on with these negotiations without ceasefire. Likewise with Macron, Macron said, yeah, be grave and get a trilateral meeting, but then there should be a quadrilateral meeting, where we should be there as well, because Ukraine's security is Europe's security.

24:17So they were making some pretty substantial points. So of course, the big point, there's a lensky kept making repeatedly, was security guarantees. Now what nobody did in public, but I suspect this is what they're now doing in private, is okay, you've said security guarantees, let's drill down on that. And you know one of the most interesting moving things I saw this week, I don't know when it was done, but it was an interview that Bill Clinton did with Miriam O 'Calaan, who's the Irish television presenter. He was talking about the deal that Ukraine did to get rid of its nuclear weapons. And he was basically saying, I feel really bad about that because I was part of swading the Ukrainians to give up their nuclear weapons on the bases that Russia would never attack them.

25:03Russia has now attacked them with the same leader. That's this point about trust. How do you possibly trust somebody who has broken so many promises and so many red lines? And as you know, I'm in Germany and I picked up develt yesterday and there's an amazing feast by Gary Kasparov. Now Gary Kasparov we know is not a fan of, yeah, Vladimir Putin. He's actually quite courageous Kasparov. I mean his criticism is like, I mean, those kind of Russian criticisms of Putin by a leading figure have ended up with people being assassinated. Well, absolutely. I mean, you know, you see comedians doing his stories about, you know, who's going to fall out the window next.

Read the full transcript

25:44No, Gary Kasparov, he is right out there and has been for a long time. But the headline is Putin is not the Hitler of 1938. And what is The whole piece essentially is about these comparisons we're made between Putin and Hitler. And he says, yes, you can make a comparison of their both evil regimes. But in 1938, Hitler may have become an authoritarian leader in his own country, but he had not yet broken a massive series of international norms, which Putin has. And he actually says, Chamberlain may have been naive, but you could be forgiven in 1930 for taking Hitler at face value. He said it may have been cowardly, but it was rational.

26:28And he says the difference with Putin, we know, we know from Chechnya, we know from Georgia, we know from Syria, we know from all the wars that he's fuelling over across Africa. And he has this wonderful line at the end. And I think this is a message to the European leaders about Putin, but also possibly about Trump. He said, we should do our best to learn from the past, but this must happen with integrity. Instead of looking for historical justification, we should ask, how do we want to be seen in the history books of the future as spectators of authoritarianism or as defenders of freedom and democracy?

27:09So very powerful So that, of course, raises the big question, which is, are the Europeans playing this right? And my fear is that they're putting all their focus on to trying to change Trump's mind, and there's another strategy they could have pursued, which is to conclude in November December, so six, seven months ago, that yes, they can try to change Trump's mind, and it's worth continuing to try to change his mind and delay him. But the likelihood is, the overwhelming likelihood is, he's not going to come in on that side, and therefore what they should have been doing is using the seven, eight months to really rearm and sort themselves out because there's a repeated pattern here.

27:47Remember, if you're met, you announced just under a week ago that you'd had a meeting with Trump where five principles had been agreed with Trump, right? And those principles were no peace terms or landswark without ceasefire, no legal recognition, security guarantees, keep your current right. And sure enough, two days later, the whole thing's broken again, right? And there's been repeated again and again and again and again. So what's worrying me is that if Europe genuinely believes that Russia is a significant long -term threat to Europe, and I think what we mean by that is that if Russia takes all that it wants in Eastern Ukraine, it is then emboldened, will be convinced that NATO and Europe are weak, and therefore the likelihood of them trying something in Lithuania or Moldova goes up and that unless Europe actually within the next few months to years really sorts out the lessons of Ukraine and how to defend itself against Russian attack Putin will be opportunistic.

28:50And that's going to be very, very difficult economically and politically in a lot of the countries that we're talking about. Of course Putin knows that the other thing that I think is just worth reflecting on Trump has these talking points that he uses and uses and uses again and then they get fed back by these poodle journalists that he travels around with. One of them is this thing about, you know, I ended six wars, okay. Now just this morning, so one of the six wars is the war between Congo and Rwanda, okay. This very morning, the main rebel group in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, the M23 has walked away from peace talks with the government, saying it will not return unless the authorities adhere to a previous ceasefire deal.

29:33What did Trump say when Merz raised the issue of ceasefire? I've sorted these six wars without anybody talking about a ceasefire because these ceasefires don't always happen. Now that shows two things. One, he knows nothing about what's gone on between Congo and Rwanda. He just wants to be able to say I've ended it because he had a meeting with the leaders and said how great they were. But that one looks like it's falling apart. He then said this other thing Roy. We're going to talk about guards a later. He said, I thought this was going to be the easiest of the war to sort, Russia Ukraine, is turning around to be the hardest, but it's the last one on the schedule.

30:09So in his head, he's got a lot of things. It's all been sorted. So just as we go to the break, just final thought, we talk about, you know, whether or not Trump is being naive, trusting Putin. I don't think he's being naive. If I didn't think Trump trusts himself, I don't think he trusts anybody. I don't think he's that kind of person. I don't think that's how his business deals work. I suspect he doesn't care really about what happens in Ukraine. All that he cares about is getting some kind of deal so that he can talk about his no -bought peace prize and saving the US some money and getting some deals in Russia.

30:47So, in that sense, he doesn't really need to trust Putin. The people who need to trust Putin are the Europeans. But Trump doesn't actually think Putin's a threat to the United States. He doesn't think this is relevancy United States. So I think this whole idea that Trump is being naive or outmaneuvered is slightly missing the point. I think he's basically indifferent and the only reason that he feels like he's being naive and outmaneuvered is that he enjoys the flattery and the spectacle of European leaders groveling to him, which means that he never quite just gets behind the Putin deal. but I think it would be a mistake to think he's on our side, but somehow a naive version of us.

31:23Also, I don't think any of the leaders think that. I think they've decided that as part of their structure, they have to say that. I think if you talk to them sort of away from the cameras, you know, I mean, even Maloney was even rolling her eyes while he was talking at one point. She's very, she's got a very expressive face that he was, I can't remember the issue, but she was sort of looking around the room. There was another bit where Stammer and Macron were sort of whispering to each other in a way that was like, you know, they clearly, they know what they're dealing with. They've decided collectively whether they like it or not, and I suspect it makes most of them feel sick.

31:59They have to do this factory stuff. They have to say none of this could happen without him. But I think there was enough yesterday of ultimately, this is about Putin. Putin has to be the one who makes changes because he's the one who who often nothing to Trump. The other thing, Rory, you mentioned the Nobel Peace Prize cup of times. I've had an absolute brainwave on this. Well, you know that people seeing the Nobel Peace Prize is always given to individuals. It's often given to institutions. Okay. I think one of the reasons why Trump hates the United Nations and hates the European Union, they are both previous winners of the Nobel Peace Prize.

32:38So Nobel Peace Prize, open the envelope, is awarded to USAID. There we are. It's even better than your previous idea of Obama. But because the reason why this is a good idea, and it is the thing where you could say, we invite the president to come to accept it on behalf of USAID. Because sadly, after all the amazing work that is done, it's not really the same shade that it was. But the truth is this is this is partly a serious point USAID I would argue has helped to stop wars because it's addressed the root causes of wars at times poverty famine Drown what Putin calls the the purple prachini the root causes the root causes So I just think let's say I think we need to get a campaign going on this, you know USAID for the Nobel Peace Prize Yeah, didn't you know that I often go to institutions?

33:33Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, but I think that's a beautiful idea. I'm supporting your campaign. Let's get behind that. Okay. Okay. Right now, with the Home Depot, you'll find stored solutions made to fit your needs. Grab an HDX tough tilt to protect your tools. Or keep your sports equipment contained with reinforced snap -fit lids. Or stack up and make better use of your space with bins and totes built to last. Whatever your story, we've got the gear to keep it organized and protected at the Home Depot. How doers get more done? Hello, I'm William Durimple. And I'm Anita Arnond and we're the host of another Gohanger Show Empire.

34:18And we are here to tell you about a recent series we've done on partition. On the 14th and 15th August 1947, Pakistan and India announced their independence from the British Empire. But as these nations gained their freedom, their rushed and violent division resulted in the deaths of well over a million people and the forced migration of over 14 million more. It's a piece of South Asian history that many people are familiar with, but in this series, we want to explore it alongside four less well -known partitions which continue to affect the region in more monumental ways. Yeah, you're quite right in one episode.

34:55We dissect how Dubai almost became part of modern India, and in another we're going to unpack the history behind the headlines about the conflict in Kashmir. We also explore how the separation of Burma from India is linked to the origin of the Rengar genocide and how East and West Pakistan separated in 1971 to create Bangladesh. So if you'd like to hear more about the five partitions that completely transformed modern Asia and how the weight of the memory of partition has been passed down through the generations, we've left a clip of the series at the end of this episode for you to listen to.

35:39Welcome back to the rest of the politics of the Meal and Astacamble. With me, Rory Schütz, so I'll have to say we're now moving on to developments in Israel, which aren't just about Gaza. It's partly about an announcement that has come from the war cabinet that they're going to go into Gaza City, effectively clear out the northern half of Gaza. But secondly, announcements from Smotrich that they're going to try to build an enormous settlement which would tear what remains the Palestinian territory in the West Bank at half. And finally, protests against Netanyahu in Israel itself, which some people think had as many as 400 ,000 people in the streets.

36:21And I think the other one to throw in is Hamas suggesting that they're up for a ceasefire. Absolutely, Frash in this morning. Yeah. So I think the protests are interesting because you said a couple of weeks ago, I think it was that Israeli public opinion was pretty solid in support of the war, the basis of the war. I think there is a sort of sizable chunk of public opinion who's pretty horrified about what's going on. And the other thing that's happened recently is that it started to be some coverage in Israeli media of the actual hunger, the starvation, the suffering on the ground, much more than there was previously.

37:05So I look, I think that we shouldn't overstate this, but I think that Netanyahu's position is not as strong as it was. He is decided he's going to go all out, take the hold of Gaza, that's the current plan, but I don't think it's as popular at home as he might think. So let me quickly come into that. I think this is a really interesting question, and it slightly depends who you are talking to but there was a recent poll done at the end of July suggesting that basically 78 80 % of the Israeli Jewish population, in other words not including Palestinian Arab Israeli citizens, believe I think the quote is that Israelis making substantial efforts to avoid causing unnecessary the Seri sufferings to Palestinians and Gaza.

37:56So that's four fifths of Jewish Israelis still believe that the IDF is being very proportionate, taking real steps, no one's necessary suffering is being caused. And I think the second thing is that if you were to ask people about their support for two state solution or a Palestinian state, there's very, very little support indeed. Again, I even imagined very similar numbers would say any kind of Palestinian state, any kind of two -state solution, would just be a haven for terrorists and a repeat of October 7th? Yeah, just to say that that poll was done at the end of July. And when I do think there's been a shift in Israeli media coverage on this, not, you know, listen, there's always been some Israeli media, I often call herets, which are, you know, pretty tough on the Netanyahu government.

38:46But generally, the media that people are consuming on their phones or on television, and I don't think they've been getting the full picture. I think that full picture is starting to shift on that. And then the other thing that's happened to cause on the international front, we interviewed Arag Baguti a few months ago, the son of Marwan Baguti, who's this guy, who's seen as the possible leader of a future Palestinian state, who's been in jail for decades. And there was a truly horrific, filmed meeting. Well, I say a meeting, it was like he was sort of there looking pretty gallant in his vest. Ben Gavira turns up at the prison where this guy's being held and basically just berates him.

39:31And you know, so what every time you see you were talking the first half about how you know, we think that we're moving, Trump might be moving to this position where he's been moved to that. And I think sometimes we like to think that about Netanyahu that maybe he's trying to move because he's very good at reading politics and what have you. But every time there's any sense that Israel, Netanyahu might move, Ben Gavir and Smotrich, you're just out there, I think, ever more extreme. And I know that every time we talk about Ben Gavir and Smotrich, we get some listeners and some supporters of the Israeli government saying, you do guys obsess, you overstate their importance.

40:08I don't think we do. Here's the guy in charge of security going into a prison to berate. The guy seen as a possible leader of a future Palestine. And this is because Netanyahu made a deliberate decision to create a coalition bringing these people into his government and giving them these key positions, finance, security, and therefore his government completely depends on them. If they leave, they can topple and bring down his government, trigger an election. So he's tied to them completely. And as you say, that gives him real power. You can see this if we go through some of the stories that we've been talking about recently.

40:44So number one, this decision from war cabinet to go into Gaza City, really interesting because it's a decision which has been opposed by the Israeli chief of the army staff who has made it quite clear publicly that he thinks that this is tactically mad, that it won't achieve its objectives on Hamas, that it will risk the lives of Israeli hostages and he's not sure that he's got the troops, the reservists, to be able to do this effectively. Now that plays into the coalition politics of Netanyahu, because of course he's reliant on Chas as one of his coalition partners, who are an ultra -orthodox group who very much believes the ultra -orthodox should not be conscripted.

41:26So that's an important part of the hard -to -reservice picture. Secondly, Netanyahu may be thinking about going into Gaza City because it's, I don't know, something to keep his coalition together or something to deal with Hamas, But from the point of view of Smotrich and Bank of I, this is the first step in getting rid of the population of Palestinians and colonizing the whole of Gaza. Turning it into a whole settlement territory. Now, again, it's an interesting move there because that's not part of their religious Zionism. Their religious Zionism is all about the West Bank, all the stuff that they're taking from the Old Testament about Israel and Judea.

42:03is about the West Bank. Gaza was where Goliath comes from. Gaza was always not Israelite territory. It was the kind of Philistine fringe down on the coast. In fact, in many ways, Smotch and Benguevere hate the people who live on the coast. They associate it with liberals and Tel Aviv and topless bathing and parties. They're very much religious conservatives, right? Now we move on to the peace deal. So there's the story that's come today that Egypt and Qatar and Hamas have now got Hamas to agree to a piece deal. But it doesn't seem to me that there's much likelihood of that going through it because Bengavir is completely opposed to any kind of piece deal of that sort.

42:43And then finally we get on to the settlement. I'd love to get your views on this. So this settlement is called E1 and this is a settlement that has been talked about for certainly 30 years. This is something that even Rabin was talking about. It's a settlement which would essentially put Jewish settlers right the way in a strip between Jerusalem and Jericho in the east. And by doing so it would completely cut off the northern part of the Palestinian West Bank, so Nablus and Ramallah from the southern part, which is Hebron and Bethlehem. It would be the end of any state. Why are they doing it? Well, they're doing it because Smotch is making it quite clear that if people in Europe and Australia and Canada are going to recognise Palestine.

43:28He's going to make sure there's no Palestinian state left for them to recognize. It would back a bit. Well, let's just put the two together. Ben Gavir goes into President Birriets, Ma 'am Barguiti. Meanwhile, Smotriach, not just sort of let's do it as they've done over years, they've built the settlements, built the settlements, he says they're going to 3000 new homes into this particular settlement project to quote, bury the idea of a Palestinian state. And that's where we're at. And it's not a new idea. And the only reason it hasn't happened in 30 years is because of American pressure. I mean, one of the most famous meetings between Condoleez and Rice and the Israeli Prime Minister was about that settlement project.

44:11I mean, the US has been clear for 30 years that that is the one settlement project that can never be built because it will be the end of any hope of a contiguous Palestinian saying it shows how much the world's change because I don't think the Trump administration is likely to seriously oppose it. What about timing also? It's very noticeable that you get a sense that Netanyahu knows that August is the time when most of these parliaments are on holiday and he's leading up to the UN General Assembly and he's going to just do everything he can. So you'll get Gaza City, you'll get settlements, You also are getting stuff around Australian diplomats.

44:51So the Australian representatives to Ramallah, to the Palestinian Authority, have now been declared percent and on gratia and expelled. Why? Because Australia didn't give a visa to one of the most extreme religious scientists in the Israeli parliament who was proposing to do a speaking tour of Australia. Now, the hypocrisy there, because remember, a Labour MP who tried to go and visit Israel was denied entry into Israel. We did not respond by expelling Israeli diplomats. So why are they responding to not allowing an Israeli MP into Australia by expelling Australian diplomats? OK, well, let me give you one that's even worse than that.

45:26One of the many sort of cartoon but dangerous characters in the White House circle. The moment is this influence, Laura Luma. The Americans have stopped the visas for sick children who, due to becoming to America for treatment, and they have been bringing some children in from -guards of the treatment in specialist hospitals in the United States, because Laura Luma, who is a self -confessed Islamophobo, white supremacist, etc., and somebody who has President Trump's here, has been raising Mary Hall about this issue on social media. So you say, we can have operate by rules. They operate by spasm according to whatever ever being pushed by these influences.

46:15The other thing I read in the German press yesterday, which was really quite stark, was an interview with the woman who leads one of the two organizations in Israel explaining why they moved to a position of saying this is genocide. And it was setting out the process by which they did that. And here's another thing that struck me this week, Rory, this is something again in the Israeli media, a general by the name of Aaron Haliva, who was leading military intelligence at August 7, said 50 Palestinians must die if every person killed that day, and it doesn't matter now if they are children. Well, can I just, I mean, on that, because I was attacked for saying that I'd heard from a senior Israeli, not long after October 7, that they believed they needed to kill seven Palestinians for every Israeli that are being killed and people suggested this was an anti -Semitic trope.

47:11The guy said it to me quite openly and it's now clear that actually the XIDF chief of military intelligence is saying 51. He's saying they killed 1000. I'm going to kill 50 ,000 people, including children. And so it's interesting that he is that explicit and I'm absolutely, I'm just gonna double down on this. There are people within the setup who genuinely believe that the way they achieve deterrence is by killing many, many multiples of anyone that are killed. That this is what the whole thing is about. But what's interesting, unfortunately, is that after October 7th, somebody said to me, we're going to kill seven for everyone.

47:54They killed seven for everyone, then they killed 20 for everyone, then they killed 40 for everyone. Now they've killed 50 for everyone. And it doesn't look like at the moment it's stopping. However, one more thing, worth watching maybe the relationship between Netanyahu and the Israeli military. The Israeli military, traditionally, is the, by far, the most respected institution in Israeli public life. All Israelis do national service, women and men. They are part of the founding of the state. So many senior Israeli politicians have been generals or special forces officers. And there is a real problem now emerging between Netanyahu and the military.

48:37As we said at the beginning of this, the chief of staff is warning against what he's doing in Gaza City and now the defense minister is threatening to fire this chief of staff. But he lost another chief of staff just a year ago who resigned on his conduct to the war. He's fired his Shinbet chief, so his internal security chief. And Israelis are going to be very torn on this because they think there are many Israelis who give an a choice between listening to Netanyahu and listening to the military who they respect much more will tend to respect the military. Yeah. Well, there we are. I guess my final point on this goes back to what I was saying about the way the international media operates.

49:18It is really, I think it's terrifying the way that whatever Trump focuses on and engages in is sort of multiplied in terms of the public oxygen that it gets. Now, you create him meeting Putin for the first time in years. I'm not denying remotely that that isn't used where he is and he's the meeting in the White House over the weekend, of course, is massively newsworthy. But it's almost like when Trump decides he's going to focus on something, most of the world's media, and certainly the Western media, sort of it can only cope really with that at that time. And it means that other stuff gets forgotten.

49:59And when, you know, here we are in a week, as I said at the start, where lots more death in Gaza, some really significant political developments as well, but it kind of was playing second fiddle. And Rory, I've got to say, Rory, we should, I think we should start tomorrow with the fact that so many of our listeners and viewers, they were a bit pissed off that when we were talking about where does a radical centrist go? Or were we in response to the voice note from young Jacob Stokes last week that neither of us mentioned the Lib Dems. We've You've got a lot of flags for that. So we'll come back to that.

50:33We also need to talk, I think, about this, the other stuff happening in America, about redistricting and ballot rigging in Jerry Mandry and all the other stuff that's going on ahead of the midterms. And I know you had a letter from the head of the education service here to UK prison that you want to talk about as well. So lots to get into. See you tomorrow. See you tomorrow.

51:05Hi, it's William Drempel here again from Empire another goalhanger podcast. Here's the clip from our recent series on the five partitions that created modern Asia. And it was deeply emotional, sparse picked up some pebbles from the village, which he made into jewelry, family heirlooms for his family going down the generations, because he was always saying that my family doesn't have archives, et cetera, we lost everything in partition. And there's nothing that we have from Bela to show where we came from. But so he wanted to pick up something from Bela and make it into airlines for the next generations.

51:39You know, three or four generations from now, they'll still have a piece of Bela with them, even if the relationship between India and Pakistan worsens again. And even if his kids can never visit Bela, they'll always have a piece of Bela with them. This connection with earth, dirty, you know, they call it dirty in India and Zameen is the other word for exactly the same thing, but it is much more than just the earth. It is who you are, where you have grown from, where your forebears have grown from. And the number of people I know who have been lucky enough to travel across the border, and I count myself as one, who find it impossible to leave without a scoop of earth.

52:17And I have one too. you know, in Lahore, picked up a handful of earth and brought it back with me. Because I thought, you know, this is the stuff my grandfather used to walk on. To hear the full series just search MPAR, wherever you get your podcasts.

From the publisher

Is appeasing Trump and Putin a recipe for disaster in Europe , or simply a pragmatic approach? Why was JD Vance so silent in Zelensky's second White House visit? With mass protests on the streets of Tel Aviv, is Netanyahu losing the Israeli public — and his own army?

Join Rory and Alastair as they answer all these questions and more.

Join The Rest Is Politics Plus: Start your FREE TRIAL at therestispolitics.com to unlock exclusive bonus content – including Rory and Alastair’s miniseries – plus ad-free listening, early access to episodes and live show tickets, an exclusive members’ newsletter, discounted book prices, and a private chatroom on Discord.

The Rest Is Politics is powered by Fuse Energy. The Rest Is Politics is powered by Fuse Energy. Fuse are giving away FREE TRIP+ membership for all of 2025 to new sign ups 🎉 TRIP+ gets you ad-free listening, discounts, and early access to episodes and pre-sale tickets for live shows! To sign up and for terms and conditions, visit ⁠https://www.fuseenergy.com/politics⁠ ⚡

Get our exclusive NordVPN deal here ➼ nordvpn.com/restispolitics It's risk-free with Nord's 30 day money back guarantee ✅

For more Goalhanger Podcasts, head to www.goalhanger.com

Instagram: @restispolitics

Twitter: @restispolitics

Email: therestispolitics@goalhanger.com

Social Producer: Celine Charles

Video Editor: Josh Smith

Assistant Producer: Evan Green, India Dunkley

Senior Producer: Dom Johnson

Head of Content: Tom Whiter

Exec Producers: Tony Pastor, Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics

All 501 episodes
439. The Pro-Putin President: Are Zelensky and Europe sleepwalking into disaster?The Rest Is Politics · 51 min
Listen in VO