442. Question Time: Trump's Plot To Cancel The Midterms

27 Aug 2025 · 40 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 442

Episode Title

Question Time: Trump's Plot To Cancel The Midterms

Hosts

  • Alastair Campbell
  • Rory Stewart

Episode Overview In this episode of *The Rest Is Politics*, Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart tackle pressing global issues, including Donald Trump's potential maneuvers to incite civil unrest in the U.S., the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. The discussion blends political analysis with insights into current events, emphasizing the implications of leadership decisions on a global scale.

---

Key Topics and Discussions

  1. Donald Trump's Military Maneuvers
  2. Concerns Over Military Use: Rory and Alastair discuss the alarming normalization of military deployment in civilian contexts under Trump's administration. This includes the National Guard's involvement in Democrat-strong states, raising fears of authoritarianism.
  3. Potential Election Manipulation: Alastair emphasizes that Trump could exploit civil unrest as a pretext to cancel midterm elections, a tactic suggesting a strategy to maintain power by creating a national crisis.
  4. Intimidation Tactics: The hosts highlight Trump's approach to intimidating critics and shaping narratives against perceived adversaries within government and media.
  1. Humanitarian Crisis in Gaza
  2. Famine in Gaza: Rory outlines the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, citing the IPC (Integrated Food Security Phase Classification) report which indicates severe famine levels.
  3. Key Statistics:
  4. High rates of malnutrition and starvation.
  5. Destruction of agricultural infrastructure and commercial assets.
  6. International Response: The discussion revolves around the challenges of delivering humanitarian aid amidst Israeli military actions and the legal implications of using starvation as warfare.
  1. The Ukraine Conflict and Russian Aggression
  2. Putin's Strategy: Rory and Alastair analyze Putin's continued military aggression in Ukraine and the implications of Western support dwindling.
  3. U.S. Policy Under Trump: They note Trump's conflicting strategies, including concessions to Putin and the impact on Ukraine's sovereignty.
  4. Zelensky's Leadership: Alastair praises Ukrainian President Zelensky for his resilience and leadership amidst the ongoing conflict, positioning him as a modern political hero.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Authoritarian Trends: The hosts underscore the worrying trends towards authoritarianism in U.S. politics, particularly under Trump’s leadership which combines military power with populist tactics.
  • Gaza's Destruction: The episode highlights the catastrophic impact of military conflict on civilian populations, emphasizing the urgent need for international humanitarian intervention.
  • Ukraine's Fight for Sovereignty: There's a consensus that sustaining support for Ukraine is critical, not just for its survival but also as a measure against rising authoritarianism.

Closing Thoughts Rory and Alastair conclude with reflections on the interconnectedness of global politics, energy crises, and the importance of informed public discourse in addressing these challenges. They encourage listeners to engage critically with these topics, emphasizing the need for accountability and transparency in political leadership.

---

Additional Information

  • For more discussions and exclusive content, listeners can join *The Rest Is Politics Plus* at [therestispolitics.com](https://therestispolitics.com).
  • The podcast is part of the Goalhanger Network and listeners can follow them on social media (@restispolitics) for updates and engagement.

Episode Released

[Insert Release Date Here]

---

This markdown summary provides an organized, detailed overview of the episode's content and discussions, maintaining clarity and accessibility for readers interested in current political affairs.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Thanks for listening to the Restus Politics, sign up to the Restus Politics Plus to enjoy ad -free listening and receive a weekly newsletter. Join our members' chat room again early access to live show tickets. Just go to therestuspolitics .com. That's therestuspolitics .com. The Restus Politics is powered by Fuse Energy and Fuse are now offering £20 credit and free trick plus membership if you switch to a fixed tariff before the end of August. They've listened carefully to their customers and the number one request was gas tariffs. So now at last you can switch both your gas and electricity to fuse.

0:35One supplier, one bill, one less quokmire to navigate. So also cheaper. Fuse gas and electricity customers typically save £150 versus the price cap. Today's political climate is full of talk about control and clarity. Well, fuse have quietly exercised some, at least when it comes to your energy bill. And they began with a mission which was to make electricity cheaper, cleaner, simpler. And Fuse now supplies over 50 ,000 homes across the UK, all unquietly, efficiently, and without a single campaign bus tour. Fuse's support is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, with real people replying in under two minutes.

1:15So go to FuseEnergy .com, forward slash politics, to switch your gas and electricity to Fuse, and get your £20 credit and free trip plus membership.

1:28MUSIC Welcome to the rest of this politics question time with me, Rory Stewart. And with me, Alistair Campbell. And Rory, I think we did that must be the first time in a long time that we got through a main episode without talking about Trump or Israel. We're going to do both in question time. Let's start with Trump. John Nixon, trip plus member for more than. If it's true that Trump is sending the military into blue states, Democrat states like Illinois, is it also conceivable that he plans to incite such civil disobedience that he can claim a national crisis, cancel them in terms of the basis of preventing civil war, and repeat for the 2028 election?

2:07We've got a lot of questions on this sort of theme. Yeah, I mean, I think it's absolutely stunning. I mean, basically what we're seeing now is stuff that would have been unimaginable a few months ago, in the way that Trump is using the military. I mean, traditionally the military is only deployed into civilian context in the most extreme situations conceivable. He's now making it almost the norm for the National Guard who are really the equivalents of the territorial army. I've had a much better armed, much more full -time version of the UK territorial army, people who deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan, are now being deployed into Washington, and DC deployed into California and now the story is they're going to be deployed in Chicago in order to deal with what he calls an epidemic of crime.

2:54And basically what with pumping up Homeland Security and deploying the National Guard in this way, Trump is essentially creating a military state. And part of this is just about intimidating opponents. And part of it is he raided John Bolton, who was his national security adviser and become a prominent critic, sent people into his home, and you can see this. I was talking to American lawyers who over the last five months have been shocked at how people I knew who were very critical of Trump, and now beginning to be very careful what they say about him, because they're seeing what's happening to real people in their careers.

3:32University's another example. Anyway, every year. Yeah, I mean, just to go through some of the things in recent days that sort of play to this theme. So they've sat the head of the Defense Intelligence Agency. Why? Because he contradicted Trump's contention that Iran's nuclear sites have been obliterated. They've fired now, I think, two dozen law enforcement investigators who were involved in investigating January 6th. They've sacked the director of dance programming at the John F. Kennedy Center for being to woke. And then here's another one, which relates to the discussions we've been having about energy, they've ordered that all construction stops on revolution wind.

4:15And a 4 billion wind farm off the coast of Rhode Island is already almost built. And that is a classic example of doing something because I can and because it speaks to what I think. And I think this whole thing about, you know, this is about making people feel that they can't speak out against something that is non -Trumpian. I wanted the most extraordinary size this week was, I think it was Hexath Vance and Stephen Miller being heckled. My favourite heckle was a guy shouting out, did you shag the couch Vance? I thought I'd quite like that one. But Miller, I mean the guy is just, he's not even a kind of politician, he's an advisor, would it be like me when I was working in number 10, standing up and in his case saying that we've got all these 90 -year -old hippies protesting against what we're doing, they don't belong here.

5:10These were people who were protesting against the National Guard stuff in Washington. So I think it's very hard to say these are not... They're more than creeping signs of authoritarianism. They are very powerful signs of authoritarianism. Well, John Nixon's question on whether he might cancel the midterms on the base of of the Ranting Civil War, I think it's very worth thinking about all the different ways in which Trump can play with the midterms and use intimidation and the military to do that. So he could say, unfortunately, we can't hold elections in these strong democratic voting states because there's too much for a crime wave.

5:47He could say he could refuse to certify him, and of course, the majority of his team still insists he won the 2020 elections. But I think what he's proving is this line that ban and produces again and again, which is we're not afraid, we'll do anything and we sense that our opponents are afraid. Great speech, just a shout out before we move on to the next question to Pritzker, the Governor of Illinois. I don't know whether you caught his incredible response, but the bit that struck me most, which I think you'd like, is to the members of the press who are assembled here today and listening across the country.

6:22I'm asking for your courage to tell it like it is. This is not a time to pretend here that there are two sides to the story. This is not a time to fall back into the reflexive crouch that I so often see, where the authoritarian creep by this administration is ignored in favor of some horse -raced peace on who will be helped politically by the president's actions. And that's some of you say a lot about the British press, but this idea that there are always two sides to story or reducing everything to who's up and who's down and and distracting people from What's really going on because as Pritzker points out it's putting the National Guard in their possible situation They have to deploy because they could be caught marshaled if they don't But there are Republican governors and other states talking about sending their National Guards from their states to Illinois Which is really testing the boundaries of the US federal settlement?

7:16Yeah, yeah, no, I think it's it's it's horrific and getting ever more so and he'd want to be sort of Rumble we've pressed conferences yesterday, which you just I didn't watch the whole thing, but just the clips of it were absolutely mind blown We're now up to 10 wars that he's that he solved. He's decided six was boring seven was boring. He's now solved 10 Hasn't he's playing yet what they are now? The next one will be the civil war in the United States, which I mean he's his secret isn't it? is that basically to encourage wars and then claim that he's solved them by giving into the aggressor.

7:47Exactly. Gaza, Martin West, famine in Gaza, can the international community create a group of the willing to provide Gaza with food trucks from the land borders? Would Israel bomb the trucks? Do you say away, see a way out of this aura? They wouldn't bomb the trucks necessarily, but I think there's no doubt that they have been pretty active in making sure that trucks don't get through. I mean, This has been a pretty horrific week on the famine front. So the integrated food security phase classification IPC, which is back by the United Nations, is the world's leading monitor of hunger. They have these three key indicators, and you have to meet two of them to, for them to say that famine is taking place.

8:31Starvation, at least one in five households facing extreme shortage in food, Monutrition, roughly one in three children or more, acutely malnourished, mortality, at least two in every 10 ,000 people dying daily because of outright starvation or the combination of malnutrition and disease. So they have decided that is happening. The UN Human Rights Chief Walker took this reminder that there's a war crime to use starvation as a method of warfare. And yet, of course, the Israeli lion remains that this is all down to Hamas and is all down to the failures of the international community and blah blah blah.

9:10Just a sort of short one on that as somebody who was a development minister. This IPC classification is a very very serious international process with a lot of international NGOs involved and usually the IPC is accused of being too cautious. But definitely if you take it back in the day when I was a different minister. If a official came in and said an IPC five classification, which is the most serious in the world, has been declared in Somalia or South Sudan or Congo or Ethiopia or Yemen, that is would be the immediate trigger for the UK government suddenly announcing a massive hundreds of millions of pounds contribution to a big UN fund on dealing with famine.

9:53And for that to happen in what's basically a middle -income country, I mean, there's other places I've described with some of the poorest countries on the world. But Gaza before October the 7th was a country with one of the highest literacy rates in the world. It was a middle -income country with people living lives very similar to what you would have seen in a lot of southern Europe and the Middle East. To trip that into famine is extraordinary.

10:25And for the the detail of the report. So I mean obviously there's a lot of focus on death, there's a lot of focus on pictures of you know of children with their bones sticking out and what have you but get this, fishing facilities destroyed. 90 % of commercial or industrial assets required for any kind of food production destroyed. 62 % of the road network destroyed. 82 % of agricultural Virtual Wells destroyed as of April 2025. 71 % of greenhouses destroyed. 90 % of cropland destroyed. As of June 25, 26 % of sheep have survived. 34 % of goats. 3 .8 % of cattle. 1 .4 % of poultry. So when you read stats like that, you were basically seeing the absolute breakdown of an ecosystem that is meant to keep people alive.

11:20Yeah, and let's just point out what's hidden behind those figures because Israeli journalists have now got hold of documents from the Israeli army that suggests that the Israeli army itself is acknowledging the very, very high number of civilians that are being killed, that this isn't a question of everybody being killed being Hamas. But the story on the killing of civilians, of course, is that they're used as human shields by Hamas. To put it very bluntly, that is not true sheep and it's very, very difficult to understand what the explanation is for the death of that number of livestock and the erosion of that amount of agricultural land unless it's a deliberate policy I'm afraid or a very, very odd policy of targeting munitions when you end up with that kind of destruction.

12:07And again, the water is electricity provided from Israel to run desalination plants and in gas are directly controlled by a soil when the water is turned off. 96 % of people report moderate to severe water insecurity. Municipal water reduction is 28 % of what it was in 2023. 78 % have lack of access to sufficient required toilet use, 80 % no income, no savings. During July, this is July, I think things have got a lot worse since. 43 % of children have diarrhea, 58 % reported fever, 16 % had vomiting episodes, 25 % acute respiratory episodes, and 49 % of children had skinned conditions. This is off the scale.

12:55It is man -made and it can be addressed by the international community, but if Israel doesn't let people in, they don't let them in. The final thing which I think you said in the past worth re -emphasizing is that that then contributes to so many other problems, so much more difficult to survive surgery if you're malnourished, much more difficult to get vaccines to work if you're malnourished. So the starvation then will contribute to a whole series of other very, very extreme life threatening conditions facing people in Gaza. A question from Tom McEwan, who is a trip plus member from limmington.

13:34Assuming that Putin will continue to sacrifice men and materials until he's able to claim victory against Ukraine, do you think that he would be able to hold such a huge territory populated by a determinedly anti -Russian population and if not what then? When you think about how many words we and everybody else devoted to what happened at the meeting in Alaska and then the meeting with European leaders in the in any progress on the political front, none that I've seen. I think broadly speaking, that was our sense, which is that the only policy Trump really had was hoping that by conceding everything he could to Putin, that that would bring an end to the war, there was no real sets of negotiation.

14:21I'm afraid this is returning to my boring metaphor that the Europeans feel all the time, so they're just sticking their finger in the dike, that the basic direction of Trump is to get behind Putin and Cells Lensky down the river and the Europeans that spent months hoping that they can sort of stop left from happening. But we've had revelations now from the Washington Post confirming that the Americans prevented Ukraine from using its attack on missiles and indeed from using British stormshade missiles to fire into Russian territory hoping that by reducing attacks on Russia they would encourage Putin to stop.

14:57but Putin isn't going to start because he feels he's got momentum. He doesn't feel he has any incentive to start. There's no leverage that Trump has over Putin and increasingly no leverage he has over Zelensky. On the question though, and I'd love to hear a little bit about independence, and your reflections on that, and your reflections on North Korea as well, but on the technical question, I think Putin's hope is to take control of the Donbass. He hasn't at the moment been talking about permanent occupation in Western Ukraine. If you attempted that, that would be a complete nightmare. I mean, that would be another Afghanistan for the Russians because he would be facing a continual insurgency from a profoundly anti -Russian population against Western Ukraine.

15:40Yeah, I don't know. The independence day was profoundly moving. I thought his speech was, I thought he was very nice that he wore a suit. It was a more traditional suit than the one that J .D. Vance told me what to wear. I thought it was great that Mark Carney was there, and I had an exchange with Mark Carney last night who said he found it almost poignant, things that he's done in his entire life, never mind since he became Prime Minister. But I think there's an understanding that, you know, Zelensky is, as you've said in your radio series on heroes. I think he is the closest we've got to a sort of modern day political hero.

16:18and he's a very, very impressive guy. I think the fallout in a way from the whole sort of fuss that there was last week with Trump and Putin, and then the European leaders, is we are pretty much back where we were. And then a lot of this is about whether Zelensky can maintain the levels of political support. And I think he does, this is what's so remarkable. If you read Mark Arnie's speech, That was somebody who is not remotely moving away from a position of absolutely solid support. The Kim Jong Un thing that you mentioned was fascinating. I saw this on Dershpil. I don't know whether you've got much coverage in the UK, but have they North Koreans admitted that they've been sort of sending lots and lots and lots of soldiers to help the Russians?

17:07Initially it was the secret to the US. It was broken by some very courageous journalists. I think it's no longer a secret, but initially it was a real surprise for people. But what this was, and we should put it in the newsletics, it's a pretty remarkable piece of film of it was from Korean North Korean state television covering in life, so we were told, the return of troops, North Korean troops who had been killed fighting for Russia against Ukraine. Now they've now said they're going to send another another 30 ,000, but he put metals, they had pictures of all the soldiers who had been killed.

17:45I couldn't get the number, but there's a lot of them. And he's pinning metals to the pictures. He was hugging the children of these soldiers. And then he was crying. And I don't know whether I was, you know, I don't imagine anything gets put out on the media without them wanting it to be put out in the media. But he obviously felt that this was an appropriate response to seeing these fallen soldiers and their buried families. And he was literally sort of weeping as he watched these coffins come off the plane. Yeah, well, you very kindly did a little plug. So the last episode of my five -part BBC series on heroes and this one focuses on Zolensky goes out on Monday, 9 a .m.

18:29in the UK. As one says, you catch up on BBC sounds, but it's been really interesting getting responses on trying to work out who our heroes are today. You know, what do we make a Trump? What do we make a mask? Of course, dresses like a superhero. Is Zelensky really a hero? You know, people now talk about corruption allegations and in Ukraine and what does it mean to be a modern hero? But I wanted to finish with one last question about one of our mutual heroes, Mark Carney. There seems to be a debate in Canadian foreign policy about whether they should focus, for example, on Ukraine and Hawaii, or whether they should continue to be a big international convener going around with international coalitions.

19:15And I favor the latter. I think Mark Carney is in a very interesting position. He's got the credibility in the international leadership. And I think at a time of Trump, we desperately need Canada to help form these international coalitions with UK, Europe, South Korea, Japan in a way that probably wasn't true in the past and it would be a great pity if Canada said, instead of doing all this international stuff, we're just going to knuckle down and focus on a couple of places. Well, I think the only thing I was going to say about that, he was the world leader that was there in Ukraine for the Independence Day.

19:50I think he's very much of an internationalist mindset and I think he's obviously top of his agenda most of the time is going to be high manages this sort of big, the big bear next door. But no, I think he's, I think he's absolutely stepping up to the mark. And it'll be lovely to see him continuing what he's doing. And you know, as I said, we would have been lovely to see Matt Cross, Stammer and Connie together doing their announcement on Palestine. It would be great now to see Connie really pushing because I think that there isn't necessarily the international leadership there. Yeah. And I think if Canada used to beat itself up a little bit a few years ago because it sort of thought that it was just sort of meekly going along behind a Western consensus that now can really lead the Western consensus.

20:34Agreed. Right, let's take a break. Then we'll come back another hugely consequential leader that you're always very nice about. That said, David.

20:45This episode is brought to you by Nord VPN summer, the season of sunburns And in your suitcase an unsecured hotel Wi -Fi called something like guest 123. So from Cornwell Walter Croatia, people connect to whatever network is nearest. No password, no protection, just you, you inbox and a stranger monitoring your keystrokes in flip flops. That's a very good reason to use NordVPN, which is what I use. It encrypts your connection. NordVPN masks your IP. It blocks unwanted trackers. So, it's not just safer, it's also smarter. Whether you're booking in last -minute flights or chasing end of season hotel deals, NordVPN keeps online prices honest.

21:28It's the one bit of your setup that works exactly as it should. Whether you're at home, abroad, somewhere in between. So, to get the best discount of your NordVPN plan, go to NordVPN .com slash rest is politics. Our link will also give you four extra months on the two -year plan. There's no risk with Nord's 30 -day money back guarantee. The link is in the podcast episode description box. Hello, I'm Gordon Carrera, National Security Journalist, and I'm David McCloskey, former CA analyst, turn novelist. And together we're the co -hosts of another Gohanger show, The Rest Is Classified, where we bring you the best stories from the world of spies and secrets.

22:03We have just released an absolutely cracking new series on the infamous Colombian drug lord Pablo Escobar, how the US spent decades fighting a war on drugs to bring his cocaine empire to justice. By 1989, Escobar was the seventh richest man in the world. Well feared than the entire state of Columbia. He was a husband, a father, and the most feared narco terrorist in the world. But to the poor in his hometown of Medellin, he was kind of a hero. He built roads, houses, soccer fields, became almost a Colombian ravenhood, to a nation weary with a very unequal and violent political and legal system.

22:42Over the next few weeks will take you deep inside the murky world of the hunt -fareskabar. Using accounts from members of the secret military units deployed to find him, we'll reveal how Colombian and American forces work together to track down the man who controlled a global cocaine empire. If this sounds good, we'd love to clip for you at the end of this episode.

23:08Welcome back to the Rest As Politics Question Time with Mirorissiard and me, Alistak Ambal. This episode is brought to you by Fuse Energy. And we're talking about how global politics has a direct link into the energy that you are using and the cost of the energy inside British homes. Wars and rivalries may feel very remote, but when Russia squeezes pipelines or China Titan's supply chains, the ripple effect can be on your heating bill. Yeah, we've had a great question from Kate Maddox from Brighton. Are we just too dependent on imports? And is that why global tensions hit our energy bills so high?

23:45I mean, definitely true. We're very dependent on imports. I mean, it is pretty amazing the story of energy and geopolitics. And people remember 1973, the Arab -Israeli War drove up oil prices fourfold. And if you look at the kind of stuff we're talking about on the podcast, It can all push in very different directions. So for example, if Trump's tariffs go wrong, we could end up with a situation in which global demand drops and the oil price drops. If on the other hand, there are sanctions on Iran and Iran produces a million fewer barrels a day if I got fewer or less there, Alistair. A fewer, that's right.

24:20Thank you. Then the price could go up again. And then there's other questions. Are we going to be able to develop our own domestic supply? there was an article by my old sparring partner, John Redwood, in the telegraph today. I think the combination of John Redwood and the telegraph, gonna give you a bit of a pulse thing. I did see it trailed on the front page. I can't pretend that I picked up to read it. Well, he's pointed out that the government is really struggling to sell licenses for offshore wind at the moment. In its latest auction, it had offered 73 pounds a megawatt hour, and couldn't get anyone to buy it.

24:54It's now up to 113 pounds megawatt hour, and it's still struggling to get people to come in because some of the policy uncertainty and planning uncertainty means it's quite difficult. Anyway, any last thoughts from you on Geo? Yeah, I think it's a great question, and it's true that this stuff has a direct impact on oil prices, the one that people always go to. But we regularly get asked by people, why can't Europe just pull the plug all Russian energy. And the, you know, the honest straightforward answer is that, you know, we've got to keep the lights on. So this stuff really matters. I think we're going to see it matter more because the conflict between Russian Ukraine is going to continue to be a factor.

25:37We've got the rivalry between China and the America, which is influencing supply chains and liquid natural gas flows. And the energy market, you know, you and I both talk to sort people who work in these kind of risk assessment places and political consultancies, they now look at energy flows every bit as closely as they look at the the politics of the countries. This stuff really, really matters. Because in Britain we have this very liberalized system. A changes in global energy prices hit very, very directly into your bills so they can fluctuate pretty quickly. Which of course brings us back to our sponsor, Fuse Energy.

Read the full transcript

26:15So, households can't control what happens on the world stage, but they can choose fused. Cheap at tariffs today with many saving £200. So, switch your gas and electricity to fused before the winter price hikes. Find out more at fuseenergy .com slash politics. Okay, Roy Liz, listen, let's get back to the Lib Dems, because we've talked about them the last couple of weeks, and last week when you were sort of saying that they never say anything terribly interesting and nothing that got through, we said to them, if any of the Lib Dem team were listening. Could they send us some of the things that Ed Davies said and done in recent weeks and months?

26:51And they did. Speeches, big conference speech that sort of set out the whole agenda, one on Europe, one on the future of the economy, article on Brexit saying that Starma must find the courage to change core. So what did you make of them? And have you shifted your view at all? Well, look, I think some of them are good speeches. Some of them are serious good speeches. I am really very strongly in favour of his idea that we should join the European Union Customs Union. I'm sorry he didn't make more of that in the election campaign. They probably say they made a certain amount about it, but I absolutely believe, and I think you do too, that that's a critical part of restoring confidence in the UK and would make a lot of difference to trade.

27:35I think his policy on Palestine was very good and that was a very good speech. I'm much more skeptical. I'm afraid about him on the economy, good that he's speaking up for free trade, but really the speech which is, you know, the importance of education and training, something we've always emphasized as liberal Democrats or another speech which I'm afraid I sent you, which I was cited. I'm sorry that I put on a voice where I'm being mean to him, aren't I? You are, yeah. You've got the Christian Schmidt yesterday, and Ed Davis today, I don't know. Here he is. He's got a slight tendency to go for sort of ground rhetoric and then slightly pathetic final sentence.

28:16So because Donald Trump is not only betraying Ukraine, it's not only their sovereignty he's selling out. It's our security, the security of Europe, the security of our United Kingdom, and And that is unforgivable. Yeah, but Roy, you're ready in a certain way. I could deliver that in a way that you roll and you roll and you roll. And that is unforgivable. Ran and forward and forward and forward. Much better. I thought his, I mean, conference speech is a very, very hard gig. And I thought the conference speech they sent was good. I thought his stuff on Brexit was good. I, this goes back to a point that we were making yesterday in the main podcast.

29:01It is absurd. So yesterday, the BBC news, I got off the plane, I get in the car, I'm having a look at some of the websites where I've been in the BBC news. One of the main headlines was, Ferrage says, immigration is a scourge. Tell me the newsworthy value of that. That is something that he said, that's like so if if Ed Davis said care is very important would they get covered on the BBC? I don't think so. So I think there is a real problem with the with the way the media view for ours and the way they view the other parties. They've got 72 MPs, yes they could do a better job. I think where they're caught we talked a little bit about this last week.

29:41I think they're caught the whole time between local strategy and national strategy and maybe they need to find the best single issue that brings those two together. Because as you saw in this speech, you just have a very strong line on Trump. It has other very strong lines on Europe. But is that the thing that's going to bring a national and a local strategy together? It's so interesting because we're plugging the interview with Nicholas Sturgeon and the one time when she really sort of gets cross as when we suggest to lib Dems to her. She really thinks that's the most shocking idea. And it is something I'm afraid that traditionally as a conservative and most of my labour colleagues too, we like to grumble about the Lib Dems.

30:21There's a hilarious piece of the real political geeks. If you read Tim Shipman's account of Sam Gima trying to, my friend and former conservative, try to defect to the Lib Dems during the 2019 election. And it was meant to be this big thing they'd got this conservative minister over and he was joining the Lib Dems and he was going to run. And the description of how the Lib Dem press team managed to destroy that moment is one of the funniest pages you'll ever read in your life. I mean, begins with them putting Sam Jimer in a hotel which he describes as being like something out of the shining, I mean kind of peeling walls, kind of crazy, you know, they then try to creep him up through the fire exit and distract by using, I think it's somebody like Geet Ver Hofstadt or Franz Timmer Mons to make a speech which they think is really going to attract the attention of the media while they slip Sam and threw the back door and by the time they've got Sam and they've missed all the front pages, the newspapers because they've got all the timing out.

31:20Just tell me honestly, I mean, why do you think at a time when I believe there is a massive story to be told, you know, I'm afraid Rachel Reeves hasn't got a grip of the welfare budget. I think she's going to be in real trouble with the next budget. They haven't managed to deal with the criminal gangs on boats. There's a real story about not getting the growth that we want massive space, I think, for somebody to make a good, pretty technocratic argument for a different type of government. Why do the Lib Dems not fill that space? And why when you're not endorsing a Davies book, and I got you off camera, might you secretly agree that there's sometimes something a little disappointing about the Lib Dems?

32:01No, it's not. I've always been slightly of the Nicholas Tergent view that their problem is that where it suits them, they lean towards labor, style arguments and policies, and where it suits them, they lean towards the tourist. What I'm suggesting is that they find something that sort of breaks through that. No, it's not that I voted Lib Dem once, and that was a protest vote. And I'm not a natural Lib Dem at all. There's a Klegend Miriam regularly tell me, because they say, you're not really liberal, is there view of me? But I honestly do think, I think this media point is a fair one. I actually, if I were them, I'd make far more complaints about the way that our media culture has developed and the way that our media landscape is.

32:45I'll read you the message that I got from one of their team. You say, no, I've got a vested in just the making excuse for us not cutting through. But the time when the far right control one of the biggest social media platforms, the BBC fall around forage waiting for them to say something mean about immigrants. The Conservatives are great fun for the media and the government is having a bit of a shocker. It's pretty hard to get noticed by saying progressive things, doing OK and opinion polls and doing very well in local elections. That's their complaint. I think they should find, they should keep complaining.

33:15There's nothing wrong with complaining about the way that I'm being used. I used to do plenty of that myself, but I think you have to have that bigger message and strategies that's cutting through. And I think that the closest he gets to really is with the personal story, but that's not enough. You've got to have a policy and an area that you identify with. And I think at the moment they're core because they're doing Trump, they're doing Gaza, they're doing Europe, and then they've also done all this domestic stuff. If I were there, I'd pick one max two and say, right, that is going to be our national story.

33:48Okay, well let's keep coming back to it because I still think there's something difficult to explain to anybody, really, which is why when we all feel that this is... And we said Jacob's question, what are you asked on the board? Why is it when we all feel there's a massive gaping hole in the central British politics and we all want an alternative to forage conservative and in my case an alternative to labor? Do the Lib Dems not naturally occur? Yeah, most of them. And it's been a problem since the 1920s. I mean, there is that space and I don't know what's what the problem is. Okay, welcome, welcome, Batcher.

34:24But thank you for listening, Lib Dems, and thank you for sending us. At least you thought that there was a bit of substance in them. That's quite important. Here's one for you, Rory. Nula O 'Connor. I'd love to understand more about how politicians get their data before making big policy decisions. Having never myself been asked to take part in a government survey, I wonder how represented these really are. It's a big problem. The Office on National Statistics, which is the key to everything. And I guess the two biggest use we've been talking about this week are probably immigration and the economy, I guess, is where I was with the Lib Dems.

35:01We don't have good data. I mean, when I say that, I mean, it's completely shocking. I mean, some of the government data has had to be removed and reject to something like seven or eight different times. And it's a problem in a whole series of ways. There's some very straightforward bits of problem. I mean, one of them is that, unlike most countries, you'll notice when you leave Heathrow, you don't go through a passport desk. So people don't actually know how many people are leaving the country. We don't have ID cards or stuff. Secondly, I think there are also potentially problems around the UK census and how people respond, how much detail they respond.

35:37And there's another issue, which is that Scotland now runs a separate census from England, which causes, on a different day, which causes other complications on people moving around. But I think the basic stuff, immigration economics, is the stuff where we really don't know. And we've had to continue revising. I remember Afghan's saying to me when the figure was there were 30 ,000 Afghans in Britain. My Afghan friends were saying it's a complete rubbish. We think there's 150 ,000, 200 ,000 in London alone. Thirdly, I think as our economy becomes more complicated, I really felt this in Cumbria that we didn't really know what was going on.

36:08It's the true and the awkneys here. If you try to look at the economy of rural Britain particularly, everybody's got multiple jobs. and a lot of these jobs are very difficult to categorize, and nobody actually from the government is going around asking what anyone does. All we've got is sort of basic tax statistics. So you're in a situation where policy makers are making decisions without really knowing what's going on, and that's why I think we see a lot of the problems. You see these situations where the government will say, we're going to put inheritance tax on farmers, and they've done some treasury indication running through their figures, and they've convinced themselves it's going to affect almost nobody and then the NFU will come out and say, well, this is insane, this affects almost all our members, the government will say, well, it's not what our figures say.

36:51And why is this happening? Well, it's happening because something's gone really badly wrong with statistics and most of our policy is based on statistics. Final question, Lucy Parker, straightforwardly, but the line up for straight -to -come dancing having now been announced, can either you dance, would either you ever consider going on the show? So, well my answer is no to both. I'm a very, very bad dancer. I've been asked God knows how many times to do it. I see, I read that some bloke who's quote famous, whatever that means in the modern age, for saying Bosch a lot and being a friend of Nigel Farage is on this year's Strict to Come Dancing.

37:31And it's now being endorsed by Dominic Cummings to be the new Mayor of London and met J .D. advanced, there was this very odd meeting with J. Vance held in the Cotswolds where he got damn crew girl along. Is this all part of the BBC's getting with the anti -wote zeitgeist that we have to get somebody who's famous for saying Bosch? Well, it's also something where we've got to be serious about how famous people become. I guess this is why Matt Hancock made these slightly embarrassing decisions to go on. What was it? Celebrity jungle and SASC, you heard enough, because people become really famous.

38:00So I was talking to your friend of mine, Christian Guru Murthy, when he went on strictly. And he said it was absolutely unbelievable. Once he'd gone on strictly, he couldn't walk down a high street without being stopped and photographed by everybody. I love dancing, completely love dancing. You've been to one of my dancing partners. I've seen you dancing with Theresa May. And see me dance with the palladium on stage. I am. When you were channeling, what was school the cheeky chap? Max Miller, the cheeky chap. Max Miller, the cheeky chap. Yeah. But yes, no, I'm not going on celebrities shows like that.

38:31No, I mean, I'd love to be able to dance I mean, I can dance like you know, I used to do something called polygliding when I was a student which is this sort of Thing where you can a bit northern solely you move across but I don't know you just need the you would you say you're a good dancer Roy, I don't know about that, but I love it I mean, I do a lot of it and I think it may be I do here's a completely totally non -scientific theory I wonder whether because I'm not actually that musical, whether I'm not more taken with a beat, I'm very, very, I think I would have been a decent drummer, I could have been a kind of Ringo star figure, but I think maybe if you're very, very musical, you get very caught up with complexity in music and you're missing Yeah, the basic movements.

39:12Well, there we are. Yesterday you were looking on the rich today, you were in the star. That's it. That's good. It's good. Marvelous. All the best looking, best looking celebrities in the world. That's it. Yeah. See you soon. See you soon, bye -bye. Take care, bye. Take care, bye -bye. Take care, bye -bye. Take care, bye -bye. Take care, bye -bye. Take care, bye -bye. Take care, bye -bye. Take care, bye -bye. Take care, bye -bye. Hi again, it's David from The Restless Classified. Here's that clip we mentioned earlier. Victory over drugs is our cause. Adjust cause. And with your help, we are going to win.

39:47Pablo Escobar, the head of the Medi -Eing Drug Cartel. The world's 14th richest man was in many ways a terrorist. This is an economic power concentrated in a few hands and in criminal minds, what they cannot obtain by blackmail, they get by murder. And I don't think he is personally read at all. He tries to portray himself as a man of the people that's kind of like leftist revolutionary outlaw. Nearly everyone in Medellin supports the trafficers, those who don't arrive at dead or targets It's huge to clear a war. You gotta expect the state to respond. This is the moment where he goes too far. 13 bombs have drawn off the median since the weekend.

40:32By the end of 87 Bogota's essentially a war zone, U .S. spending for international anti -drug efforts is going to grow from less than $300 million in 1989 to more than $700 million by 1991. It is the certain knowledge that no one has really safe in Colombia from drug cartel assassins. It's a conflict where the goal wasn't even to stop the flow of cocaine. It was to bring down this snarko terrorist. Everything has turned against him to this point. The whole thing he was building is collapse. To hear the full episode, listen to the rest is classified wherever you get your podcasts.

From the publisher

Is Trump edging the U.S. toward military rule? Can Gaza survive famine amid total collapse? Will Ukraine resist Putin if Western backing falters?

Join Rory and Alastair as they answer all these questions and more.

Join The Rest Is Politics Plus: Start your FREE TRIAL at therestispolitics.com to unlock exclusive bonus content – including Rory and Alastair’s miniseries – plus ad-free listening, early access to episodes and live show tickets, an exclusive members’ newsletter, discounted book prices, and a private chatroom on Discord.

The Rest Is Politics is powered by Fuse Energy. The Rest Is Politics is powered by Fuse Energy. Fuse are giving away FREE TRIP+ membership for all of 2025 to new sign ups 🎉 TRIP+ gets you ad-free listening, discounts, and early access to episodes and pre-sale tickets for live shows! To sign up and for terms and conditions, visit ⁠https://www.fuseenergy.com/politics⁠ ⚡

Get our exclusive NordVPN deal here ➼ nordvpn.com/restispolitics It's risk-free with Nord's 30 day money back guarantee ✅

For more Goalhanger Podcasts, head to www.goalhanger.com

Instagram: @restispolitics

Twitter: @restispolitics

Email: therestispolitics@goalhanger.com

Social Producer: Celine Charles

Video Editor: Josh Smith

Assistant Producer: India Dunkley, Evan Green,

Senior Producer: Dom Johnson

Exec Producers: Tony Pastor, Jack Davenport

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics

All 501 episodes
442. Question Time: Trump's Plot To Cancel The MidtermsThe Rest Is Politics · 40 min
Listen in VO