464. Labour’s Tax Timebomb, Climate Backsliding, and Sudan’s Forgotten War

5 Nov 2025 · 55 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 464

Episode Title Labour’s Tax Timebomb, Climate Backsliding, and Sudan’s Forgotten War

Episode Description In this episode, hosts Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart discuss critical issues including the Labour budget, public perception of climate change, and the ongoing conflict in Sudan. They delve into the challenges facing the Labour party, the implications of climate change, and the complexities of the humanitarian crisis in Sudan.

---

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Labour’s Upcoming Budget
  2. Rachel Reeves’ Speech:
  3. Reeves hinted at potential tax increases, indicating Labour may break previous manifesto commitments.
  4. The discussion centered on whether she would raise key taxes, such as VAT and corporation tax, which traditionally generate significant government revenue.
  • Public Trust:
  • Breaking manifesto commitments could further decrease public trust in Labour, which is already low with Keir Starmer's popularity ratings at a concerning -52.
  • The hosts debated whether economic recovery or adherence to commitments is more important for electoral success.
  1. Climate Crisis Concerns
  2. Public Sentiment:
  3. Recent polling indicates a growing belief among the public that responses to climate change might be overreactions.
  4. Several reports highlight alarming trends in climate-related health impacts, such as increased heat-related deaths and productivity losses.
  • COP Summit:
  • The hosts expressed skepticism about the effectiveness of upcoming COP summits, citing declining public interest and efficacy in addressing climate change.
  1. Humanitarian Crisis in Sudan
  2. Current Situation:
  3. The conflict in Sudan has escalated dramatically, with around 150,000 killed and millions displaced.
  4. The podcast discussed the dual military factions, the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and the Sudan Armed Forces (SAF), and their historical context.
  • International Involvement:
  • The hosts explored how various countries, particularly from the Gulf region, are impacting the conflict dynamics through support and resources.
  • There was mention of the role of the UAE and other nations in providing military and financial backing to the RSF.
  1. The Role of Media and Political Discourse
  2. Social Media Influence:
  3. The discussion highlighted how social media platforms have become a battleground for misinformation, impacting public perception and political narratives.
  4. Elon Musk’s controversial statements and his influence on public opinion regarding immigration and civil unrest were brought into focus.
  • Journalistic Responsibility:
  • The hosts criticized the media for failing to adequately cover humanitarian crises like that in Sudan, suggesting a shift in focus towards more sensational news stories.
  1. Broader Implications for Global Politics
  2. Shift in American Influence:
  3. The conversation examined how the U.S. has lost leverage in international crises, particularly in Africa, as other nations become increasingly involved.
  4. The hosts speculated on potential U.S. interventions and the unique challenges posed by the current geopolitical landscape.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Economic Decisions vs. Public Trust: Labour faces a delicate balance between implementing necessary economic measures and maintaining public trust.
  • Climate Change Perceptions: The narrative around climate change is shifting, with increasing skepticism among the public and diminishing urgency in political discourse.
  • Urgent Humanitarian Needs in Sudan: The crisis in Sudan requires immediate attention, with a need for international responses to prevent further deterioration.
  • Social Media as a Double-Edged Sword: While it can be a tool for raising awareness, social media also spreads misinformation that complicates public understanding of critical issues.

---

Closing Remarks The episode encapsulates pressing discussions in UK politics and international affairs, urging listeners to reflect on public sentiment and the importance of informed discourse in addressing both domestic and global challenges.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:28Thanks for listening to The Rest is Politics. Sign up to The Rest is Politics. Either way, you get paid instantly. It's fast, transparent, and 100 % online. Car selling that saves your time. That's Carvana. Carvana. Pickup fees may apply. This episode is brought to you by Spotify Portal for Backstage. But you're wondering, what's Portal? Well, it's an internal developer portal built to improve developer experience and boost productivity. All software components are centralized. Documentation is automated and easy to maintain. New projects and components? Just a few clicks. With your best practices already built in.

1:05Think less friction, more innovation. Ready to double your productivity? Try Spotify portal at backstage.spotify.com. What she's done is she's signaled before the budget that she's thinking of putting up taxes. They are preparing to break a manifesto commitment. So they really are going to have to win a big argument about why they had to do it. They're screwed at the moment anyway. Keir Starmer's net popularity ratings almost couldn't be worse. If Labour were to slide away from being a global leader on climate change, I think that politically would be a mistake. The politicisation and the weaponisation of it by the right, Farage, Trump, etc.

1:38It's got some traction within the political debate. Look at what happened in Jamaica last week. Yeah. Uninsurable. They're talking about somewhere between£8 and£20 billion worth of damage. Absolutely. This episode is powered by Fuse Energy. Now, more and more drivers are moving to electric as the economic and environmental arguments get much harder to ignore. And the real benefit of an electric car comes when you can charge affordably at home. Saves time, saves money, difference between a late night queue on the motorway and stepping outside in the morning to a car that's already full. And Fuse makes that shift very, very simple.

2:09It's already the fastest growing energy provider in the UK. They go further, installing affordable smart EV chargers and linking them directly to their smart EV tariff. Which means the charger in your driveway is synced to the cheapest hours of the day. So every charge costs less. Think of it as having an economist in the garage, but one who finally earns their keep. Fuse is not just supplying power, they're setting you up properly, charger installed, tariff aligned, everything in place. Switch to Fuse today. Make driving electric cheaper. Find out more at fuseenergy.com slash politics.

2:53Welcome to The Restless Politics with me, Roy Stewart. And me, Alistair Campbell. And we're going to talk very briefly about Rachel Reeves' speech, which she just made in Downing Street. But beyond that, we're going to look at two huge issues, the climate crisis and the war in Sudan. But also, I think, time to ask the question whether the world cares as much as it did. Nine years ago today, the Paris Agreement on Climate Change came into effect, November 4th, 2016. And then, I would argue, the climate debate looked like it was all moving in one direction. And fast forward today, and we've got this COP summit in Brazil, and people even asking whether it should happen.

3:29So, we'll talk about that. And then Sudan, both of us want to talk about Sudan. And again, just over 20 years ago, mass killings in Darfur, and it led to marches around the world. George Bush as American president saying it was a priority for his government. And another George. George Clooney leading protest. What's going on there now is, I would argue, a lot worse. And yet it seems barely to be on the political and media radar. So we'll come to that. But let's briefly talk about Rachel Reeves and the upcoming budget. Yeah, well, let me start with a question on that. So it seems to me that what she's done is she's signaled before the budget that she's thinking of putting up taxes.

4:10But she isn't answering the big question for someone like me, which is, is she going to put up VAT, national insurance, corporation tax, income tax, the kind of big taxes which they ruled out in their manifesto? And which for, I think, someone like me or Dan Needle or even kind of Paul Johnson would say, if you were sensible about the economy and you weren't tied into a manifesto, those are the taxes you should put up. They're the broadest base taxes. They're the ones that generate 70 % of the revenue of the government. They're probably the fairest, most stable way of raising revenue without scaring investors.

4:42But she's not actually answering that fundamental question. So what's the point of making the speech? I guess it's what we call pitch rolling. What is pitch rolling when you're not really telling us what the pitch is? Well, because pitch rolling is, I think it goes from cricket. So you've got the ashes coming up, Rory. Right. And the test matches will be played on different pitches around Australia. And they roll the pitch. Priti Patel, who was my boss, kept talking about this all the time. Every meeting, she'd say, we've got to roll the pitch. and literally neither I nor any of the civil servants ever had any idea what she was talking about.

5:10What she meant was to prepare the public for what's coming or to prepare the political landscape. But what I think is going on is that, so they've come in on manifesto promises that we've talked about before, the tax ones, single market, customs union, boxing themselves in slightly. And sorry, just to remind people that's ruling out the single market, ruling out the customs union, ruling out the tax crisis, which I thought was a bit of a mistake. You thought might have been necessary to get to win the election that was there. I don't know. I think they could have done, but anyway, they did. So then, in they come for the first budget, they've rolled the pitch there by talking about the black hole, mess left by the Tories worse than we expected.

5:50They've raised taxes to fill it, and they've been very, very clear, that's it, not coming back for more. What I think today, this morning's event was about, was saying, I'm afraid we may have to come back for more. She talked about productivity being worse than they expected it to be. And she also talked about her absolute determination to get on top of debt. One in 10 pounds of public money is going on servicing huge levels of debt. Proud that they're bringing weightless down, but they have to keep going, and so on and so on and so forth. So she was essentially giving the framing for the budget.

6:19I didn't watch the whole of the press conference, but every question that I saw was about, hold on a minute, so you can no longer say you're absolutely committed to keeping those taxes down. Therefore, you are preparing to break a manifesto commitment. She just used it really to repeat the framing message. So I suspect the papers in the morning and the media today will be full of she is preparing to break one of, if not more, the manifesto commitments. Two quick questions. Number one, do you think they've already made their mind up? Or one of the things you do when you roll the pitch is you're actually floating it and you're spending the next week working out whether you're going to break your manifesto commitment depending on the press reaction?

6:57Well, there is definitely a debate going on, but I suspect the debate has been settled. Interesting, when we talked about this last week, if you remember last week, we talked mainly about domestic stuff, which is why today we're going to talk mainly international. But last week, I got a message from Harriet Harman, who had also been talking about this, and she said she was really shocked by how relaxed you and I seemed to be about saying they're going to break one of their manifesto promises. I was simply saying what I think they're going to do. Where I think she's got a point is that if you think about the big thing in politics right now, trust.

7:26We don't trust our politicians. If they do put up one of the big three taxes that they said they wouldn't, they are then going to have that right up to general election. So they really are going to have to win a big argument about why they had to do it if that's happening. Well, we don't have Harriet in the studio. But if I was going to disagree agreeably with Harriet, I would say that they're screwed at the moment anyway. Keir Starmer's net popularity ratings minus 52 almost couldn't be worse. His only hope of actually winning the next election is to get the economy growing. And if you have to make this very difficult choice between being criticized at the next election for breaking your manifesto promise, but with a growing economy, or keeping your manifesto promise, but going into the next election with more and more wealthy people having left the country, investment down, economy not performing, but you're saying, well, I kept my manifesto promise, but I kept it by going increasingly overtaxing the top 1, top 0.1 % and not putting in broad-based taxes, so raising a few billion by putting more and more pressure on the wealthiest people and driving them out of the country.

8:29I think that would be the bad move. I think the working backwards, the big picture question for him is, can he demonstrate by the next election, above all the cost of living is coming down, but also ideally productivity is going up, growth is coming up, and people will forgive a broken manifesto commitment if the government's performing well, and they won't be at all impressed by poor performance and them saying, but we kept our manifesto. Okay, well, listen, the budget's on November 26th, and it will become, without doubt, one of the seminal events of this parliament. And I think one of the interesting questions that we'll get to now, because we're about to get on to energy and climate, is the way in which very rigid promises and targets become something which work maybe in an election, and then become very problematic for you afterwards.

9:13So I was heartbroken that they decided to rule out Customs Union, for example, going into the election, European Union Customs Union. I thought it was very, very sad that they ruled out those tax rises when it seemed to me pretty clear that they were much too over-optimistic on growth and that they weren't going to be able to cut the welfare burden on the way that they wanted because the Labour Party wouldn't let them do that. They should have had the political sense to see that. They should have known their party well enough to see that. And now we're getting on to the story of Ed Miliband, where again, doubling down on net zero by 2030 targets on getting rid of petrol and diesel vehicles, which in the current polling, I think only 18 % of the public actually even believe these targets are going to be met.

9:54And of the professional community, I think it's even smaller numbers. Well, I've been looking at loads of polling on this. But first of all, I still think there is a substantial proportion of the population that understands climate change is a real threat. The climate crisis is real. The politicization and the weaponization of it by the right, Farage, Trump, etc. It's got some traction within the political debate, but I still think the public are broadly behind all this stuff. Let me just tell you, though, I read last week this thing called the Lancet Countdown, tracking progress on health and climate change.

10:27And this was established at the same time as the Paris Agreement to sort of keep track on the health implications of climate change. And it's pretty terrifying. It's pretty terrifying. Heat-related deaths are up 23 % since the 90s, 446 ,000 a year between 2012 and 21. 2.5 million deaths every year attributable to the air pollution that comes from continued burning of fossil fuels. Air pollution from wildfire smoke linked to 154 ,000 deaths. These are all new records within this sphere. Productivity we talked about in relation to this. Heat exposure. I don't know how they work these things out, but this is a serious piece of Lancet work, right?

11:07639 billion potential hours of lost labour productivity. There's a really interesting section on sleep, how much sleep we are losing because of going through an extraordinary number of hot weather days where it becomes really, really difficult to sleep. And meanwhile, then they go through the whole thing of food and diet and all that stuff. The one that really leapt out at me worryingly, 15 out of 87 countries, which are responsible for 93 % of global CO2 emissions, spent more on net fossil fuel subsidies than their national health budgets. So it's not just that the politics are going in a really odd place, but also that the reality of whether we are weaning ourselves off fossil fuel, that stat suggests we're not going nearly as fast as we should.

11:53Yeah. So maybe I think that's the really big important point to land before we get on to what the UK is doing about it, which is that we're failing. Despite all the razzmatazz about cops, and as you say, there's a cop about a happen which barely anyone's paying attention to. This is that SU obviously you and I care passionately about. And I'd encourage listeners to get into what we're doing on leading on this. We did a great interview, you'll remember, with Cristiano Figueroa, the great Costa Rican who set up the COP process. We did that great interview with probably, I think, Britain's smartest energy economist, Dieter Helm, done an interview also with Emmett Pinchbeck from the Climate Change Committee.

12:33And we had that two-parter with Ed Miliband. So yeah, no, I think we've got to keep talking about this because it is slightly going down the agenda. So fundamentally, the world was getting about 80 % of its energy from fossil fuels 20 years ago, and it's getting about 80 % of its energy from fossil fuels today. Now, that sounds weird to people because we all know that there's been a massive explosion in renewables. But the fact is just as a massive explosion in renewables happens, a massive explosion in fossil fuels. Because the demand is greater. Yeah, exactly. Data centres are driving it even further.

13:01Absolutely. And the big driver, unfortunately, is GDP growth. As people become wealthier, they consume more and more energy. Second thing is we're going to miss this 1.5 degree target by country mile. We're well on course to miss the two degree global warming target by country mile. With catastrophic consequences. With catastrophic consequences. It's likely to be two and a half, three percent. So there are two things have to happen at the same time. One of them is reducing carbon emissions to try to make sure it's held at two, two and a half percent, not three, three and a half percent. But the second thing is a massive amount of energy now has to go into adaptation because we've lost the one and a half percent.

13:39So we just have to assume. And I was talking to Claire Perry, who was the Conservative Energy Secretary, and she, I thought, made an interesting point, which is that water is the cutting edge of the climate crisis, both lack of water and too much water. Too much water flooding, lack of water, obviously drought. And also these data centers use masses of water. Absolutely. And mass amounts of electricity. And then that's another paradox you just raised with data centers, which is one of the problems that Ed Miliband faces, and in fact, all countries face around the world, is that in order to go cleaner, we are pushing for more and more electrification.

14:13So for example, drive an electric vehicle instead of driving a fossil fuel vehicle, but also more and more electricity for data centers. And that means therefore that your renewable net zero electricity is not a static thing. Your electricity demand is soaring through the roof. And therefore, you need to generate more and more renewable energy just to keep up with that electricity demand, which is one of the problems that people are facing all over the world. Yeah. Just on this question about whether we care, do you think we do care less than we did? I think that you can see two different types of polling.

14:44You can see global polling, often put out by environmental NGOs saying 85-90 % of the world population still think it's a big problem. And then you can see YouGov polling drilling into a specific country like Britain, which will show that the number of people who think that we're overreacting to climate change has doubled in the last 10 years, gone from about 15%, 25%, 30%. And the real killer is that the polling shows that only something like 16 % of people would be prepared to pay higher bills to pay for the switch to electricity. It was interesting that in the poorer countries that are going to be more affected by climate change, they're willing to pay more than they are in the wealthier countries, which to a large extent have caused it.

15:30Just one thing on the polling though, so for example, 71 % of reform leaning voters think that the big polluters like oil and gas firms should be taxed more to fund climate action. And 67 % of reform supporters say they're worried about increasing damages caused by climate change. So I still think this is an argument there to be won. Well, let me get to you on that because I think that's right. But I think we've got to think about how you win it. So I think immigration is an argument where it has almost been lost. It's very, very difficult now in the British political context to have an argument about higher migration.

16:07I think there's 70 % probably the public now are in favor of more control, lower migration. Climate, I think there's much more movement. I mean, those figures you've shown show that a really good politician, good leader could shift that. But I think the argument probably is changing from an idealistic argument about saving the world, because I think voters are aware that Britain is only 1 % of global emissions, towards cost of energy, jobs, the economy, and energy sovereignty and security. The other report that came out from one of the UCL, University College London, was a really interesting report essentially saying that investment in wind energy, for example, has produced a net financial benefit of over£100 billion for consumers over the last 15 years.

16:55Part of this is the problem. You and I are studying this stuff all the time. But what we're facing, I would say, certainly for me and probably for you, is completely conflicting reports. But a lot of it's misinformation. This is the point about... Some of it's misinformation. Some of it is the way that you count these things. Sure. So the question with UCL is, how are they calculating that£100 billion? are they taking into account the cost of the grid? Are they taking into account the fact that because renewable energy is intermittent, you need to continue to have gas power stations behind? Why is it, if that were true, why is the latest auction on wind paying three times the current electricity cost in the auction?

17:36Why are our bills going up if it's actually true that the stuff is cheaper? And normally the answer would be people at UCL are not looking at the total cost of renewables. They're not looking, for example, at the fact that renewables are generated, let's say, in northern Scotland, the demand is in southern England. And for that to work, you need to build an entire grid infrastructure to try to get that electricity down. And they often don't count that. What they're often counting is per hour, how much does your wind turbine cost to generate compared to a gas station, not what's the total cost of the system?

18:07Well, I'm afraid in relation to the grid, I think we're back to our old friend austerity and the underinvestment in the grid. The grid is virtually falling to bits. And I I suspect UCL will come back and say that they have calculated all that. But the reason why we're so exposed is because of the price of gas, which has gone up. Ukraine has been, the war in Ukraine has been a huge factor in our energy costs. So another guy that I really respect on this, a guy called Nick Stern, who you'll remember was... I love Nick Stern. Well, he's great. And he's written yet another book on the climate. And we're very happy to interview Nick Stern if you'd like to do that.

18:39Well, we can't keep... Rory, we've got such a baglock of interviews. these, let's have these interviewee discussions between ourselves rather than on air. Not on air. Yeah, I think we keep throwing them out. But we would say to an extent, we both like him and we admire him. And I think at this stage, we'll plug his book, which is about the economics and opportunity of climate action. Now, he led, when we were in power, he led the Treasury Review on Climate and Economics. And then he chaired the Climate Change Committee. We interviewed his successor, didn't we? Correct. correct yeah and what he now says is that when he did this work almost two decades ago now he says he underestimated the risks of climate change and was way too pessimistic about the potential benefit of clear energy alternatives and he's saying that what this loss of the political consensus trump drill baby drill richard tyson nigel farage net stupid zero etc etc and the Tories now playing the same game, that the loss of the political consensus is undermining business confidence.

19:39And those businesses that are investing in renewables are getting a really good return on their investment. And it's interesting that some of the business events I've done recently, and this takes me back to when Trump won his first term. I think I've told you before, I was just coincidentally was at this same event with Al Gore, one of the big climate campaigners. And I said, how are you going to deal with Trump in the White House? And he said, we're going to have to work around it. We're seeing, I think, a version of that now because the business investment, there's an argument to be made that the business case for renewables is very, very, very strong.

20:15And I think the reason why it's important we don't get into this habit of saying, well, the UK is only 1%, what can the UK do on its own? Is that one of the things Ed Miliband, I think, is trying to do is stake out a sense of global leadership. That's why I think this COP is important. And because Trump takes out so much oxygen from the political debate, I heard a thing on the BBC, you know, does it really matter if Trump's not there? Well, yes, it does matter if Trump's, it's better if Trump were there. It's better if Trump hadn't vetoed the thing we talked about a couple of weeks ago, the shipping changes to the shipping fuel regime.

20:44But it's still important that countries like ours, I think, make the case consistently for why we have to go down this track or face consequences that are just off the scale. Look at what happened in Jamaica last week. Uninsurable. They're talking about somewhere between£8 and£20 billion worth of damage. And that is climate crisis. Equally, though, the reason why businesses are losing confidence, and our friend Nick Stern is right, is nobody believes that Ed Miliband is going to hold to these targets. Nobody believes it. I go to all these energy conferences, and they basically think that No. 10 is already signaling that they're uncomfortable with what Ed Miliband is doing.

21:21He's set targets which are too rigid. He hasn't got the market signals right. The siting isn't being properly priced. In other words, the cost of generating in the north as opposed to the south. So businesses are sensing that number 10 thinks that Ed Miliband is too rigid. And actually, number 10 has been telling a lot of these businesses that they wanted to reshuffle him. Have they been telling the businesses? Come on, I'm going to challenge you. Number 10 has been telling businesses. What you mean is the businesses have been reading the papers. Okay, businesses have been reading the papers, correct.

21:50Right. And I think what businesses expect, and we'll see whether they're right or wrong, is that come the next election, either Ed Miliband will have been gone, or he will continue what seems to be the case of him rapidly rowing back from many, many of the commitments they made before the election, and in particular, around timelines on electric vehicles, net zero, etc. Well, I think politically that's a big mistake. I think that the argument can be won. I think actually Ed Miliband is doing a better job of winning the argument than other arguments that are being fought within government. And added to which, don't forget that one of the political challenges Labour are facing is the rise of the Greens under Zach Polanski.

22:30Now, of course, he's not talking much about climate. He may not be, but there is a clue in the word Green. I think if Labour were to sort of slide away from being a global leader on climate change, I think that politically would be a mistake. Well, you can see. So, Claire Cattino, who was the Tory Energy Secretary and is now the Shadow Energy Secretary, is beginning to set out the case, I think, which will be made by the right in the election. And their case will be, we need cheaper electricity for industry, for AI, for data centers. And it's going to come through solar and wind. The data centers are going to Texas and Spain at the moment because the truth is, unfortunately, the cost of electricity in Britain is higher than it is in the US or Europe.

23:11And that isn't just because of gas prices. I mean, they also have to pay gas prices. It's the way that our electricity prices are tied to gas in a different way to the way that they are in the European Union and in the US. And it's also to do with our pricing, our levies, our subsidies. and also as we decarbonize and we're going to have to get more and more people onto electricity, we're going to have to find alternative sources, which is why Claire Coutinho sounds surprisingly like your friend Tony Blair who of course also came out saying phasing out fossil fuels is doomed to failure we need to focus more on AI we're getting other voices, you know, Claire Perry now regressing, she didn't do more on carbon capture.

23:52Yeah No, I wasn't terribly happy with my friend Tony's contribution to it, anymore than I was very I wasn't quite sure what Bill Gates was saying last week. Absolutely. Well, he's come to the same thing. So his basic view, I think, which is increasingly common amongst the tech bros, is that technology is going to be your best hope of fixing this. AI is going to be your best hope of fixing this. And that they're hoping that by going all out their data centers, blowing a lot of electricity demand, these brilliant brains within the computer are somehow going to fix the problem. Yeah, well, let's see.

24:22Let's see. Just briefly on Jamaica, because the other thing when we talked about the manifesto commitment, and of course, you know, I think we accept, obviously, people do not like it when governments blatantly break manifesto commitments. But don't forget, they've already broken one, which was the commitment on overseas aid. And I was really quite shocked that the UK government initial pledge of support for emergency work in Jamaica was 2.5 million. That's unbelievable. 2.5 million? I mean, And if I've just been up in Cumbria, that is considerably less than we're going to spend on rebuilding the Isleswater Community Centre.

24:59Yeah. I mean, for the whole of Jamaica, that's just been wiped out by funding. Under a little bit of pressure, they added another five. But if you think that Kylian Mbappe, who is a footballer for Real Madrid and France, he has put in 20 million. So I was quite rightly pulled up by the Foreign Office because I actually got my maths wrong and underestimated the amount of overall spend. So to get my maths right, it was about$20 billion when I was the Secretary of State for International Development. At DFID. Yeah. And it's gone from 0.7 % to it's heading to 0.3%. Much of which is on Ukraine. Exactly.

Read the full transcript

25:37And bits are also going into refugees and bits are committed to the World Bank. It still leaves a few billion, but the reality on the ground is exactly what you've seen. When I was running GiveDirectly, which was this direct cash transfer NGO, I remember turning up in African countries and finding that our budget as an NGO was now three times the budget of the British government. So British ambassadors in some of the poorest countries in the world had bilateral budgets at that stage of five, six million pounds when we alone as an NGO was spending 25-30. And you've just made that point with Jamaica.

26:09And if you think, when I was doing the job, the standard thing that you got from civil servants for almost any climate crisis or emergency response to any world was usually 100 million. It's usually 100 million for Yemen, 100 million for Sudan, 100 million for South Sudan, 100 million for Somalia, 100 million for Syria, going up in a case like Pakistan, 400 million. So if you look at 2.5, it's not a lot. But the other thing, this I think goes back to the point about, and maybe this is where we should talk a little bit about the way the media landscape has changed. Because this goes to the heart of the thing about whether we care more or less.

26:45I think the debate has moved, I'm afraid. And I think a lot of them, because I think if that had been back in the days when you were in power, 2.5 million to Jamaica, which has just seen this catastrophic. And which has this huge historical relationship with Britain in every single way. Absolutely. Yeah, yeah, yeah. We couldn't be more closely connected to Jamaica. I think there would have been an absolute outcry. Yeah, from both sides. Absolutely. From the progressive left saying, here are people suffering, and from the Tory right saying, Commonwealth, historical times. Yeah, but there hasn't been.

27:17And I think one of the reasons there hasn't been is because this argument, you know, why are we helping people abroad when we've got enough of our problems at home? And playing into this whole thing about immigration and so forth. And I thought this week, you know, you and I saw the same thing. Elon Musk, I mean, he did this thing yesterday. It was circulated very widely on social media, talking about how Britain, in Britain now, in Ireland, Scotland and England, there are villages of 500 people who are sitting there like hobbits, living a nice, peaceful, quiet life. and men are arriving in their thousands to rape their women and children it was utterly nuts and it was getting millions of views on social media alongside the we had this terrible stabbing on a train at the weekend and literally within minutes you had politics including quite serious significant politicians out essentially spotting something that they felt they could exploit you know we need to know the identity of this man with a knife immediately well of course we do and that's the police's job to go and try and find them and they did actually an amazing job you know in dealing with this crisis as with this disaster as it unfolded but i think this is where i think social media has changed a lot of these debates musk has driven it and we now have a body of politicians right and left who basically think that it's there as something to exploit rather than something to challenge for the damages due to our debate.

28:44And to remember, back in 2015-16, our least favourite or second least favourite politician in the world, Boris Johnson, when Donald Trump said there were no-go areas in London, Boris Johnson said Donald Trump is out of his mind and is displaying stupefying ignorance. Fast forward 11 years, where are the mainstream politicians calling out Musk? Yeah, absolutely. And I had an argument with Peter Karl about this some time back when he was doing the tech job and said, well, look, you know, like it or not, this guy's an important political figure because he was so close to Trump. He's an important economic figure because of his wealth and all that stuff.

29:19But I think this guy's doing real damage, using his platform to do real damage to the country that we live in and doing it deliberately. And those absolutely bugger all, right? So what preceded this, I mean, he's completely obsessed with Lord of the Rings, like a lot of these tech bros are. Palantir. Yeah, Palantir, exactly. Exactly. Arundel, exactly. All this stuff is Lord of the Rings. And he said that Tommy Robinson is like the Rangers of Rohan, the men of Gondor, brought out to protect the hobbits against the bad men. Now, the truth is, if anything, Tommy Robinson's one of the orcs, and he, dear old Elon Musk, is the evil wizard Saruman who is releasing them.

29:57Well, you're talking about a book I haven't read as closely as you have, but I can see the young people in our production team nodding, nodding knowledgeably. I was in Dublin when the riots were going on. So they've got asylum hotels, same as we have. And the dinner I was speaking at, I was sitting opposite the chief of police, the Guard of Commissioner, a guy called Justin Kelly. Very nice guy. And he'd been through the mill with this thing. But what he was explaining to me was that this terrible, terrible, terrible incident happened where a 10-year-old girl, who I think is in care, was out in the middle of the night, and she was raped by somebody who was in one of these hotels.

30:34And this is in Ireland? This is in Dublin. Yeah. And the minute the story got out, Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, Charlie Robinson, so-called, was in Israel, where he'd been parading in his Maccabi Tel Aviv shirt. Yeah. And was - Invited as a guest by one of the ministers. By one of the Israeli ministers. Yeah. And he was tweeting about this hotel in Dublin. He said that a Canadian similar figure was not only tweeting about it, he was filming himself getting on a plane in Canada to come over to join the Irish Patriots outside this hotel. And he said within a matter of hours, they had two and a half thousand people outside this hotel.

31:15And they had people charging them with carts, horse and cart. They had people with pitchforks. They had a laser that was trying to disrupt the activity of the helicopter that was above. Now, actually, they did an amazing job to bring it under control as quickly as they did. But what it shows is this Musk is part of the internationalization of the production of as much mayhem as they can in our country and in Ireland. Yeah. And of course, what he's doing on X is he's saying, I predict civil war. Now, but of course, my sense is he wants civil war. He's trying to create civil war. He's not going to get it, but he's fantasizing about it.

31:54He wants it. He wants to create it. It's not really a prediction. Most of his predictions go wrong. He predicted the AFD were going to win the German elections. He was wrong. None of his supporters remember this, right? But they really want to believe that civil war is coming because that feeds the sort of desire for violence. What is this thing about? The other big thing that's happening today are these elections in the US and including Mamdani in New York. One of the big attack lines they've been running against Mamdani is that he's going to be like Sadiq Khan in London because they've seeded this idea that London is like this hellhole where you can't walk down the streets.

32:32What I was pointing out was Boris Johnson. They've been saying for 11 years. The American ambassador in Ireland was at this thing and I had a chat with him, a guy called Ed Walsh, and I said to him after this, look, you know, can you please keep this guy Musk out of our politics? He knows absolutely F all about what goes on here. He misrepresents it the whole time. And I was telling him some of the stuff that Musk had been saying and tweeting and he didn't know about it and he said it sounds pretty bad yeah it's really bad just just on this i mean there was a really i was actually trying to send fraser nelson ex of the spectator the predecessor to michael gove current leading episode um top of the charts which which it was an extraordinary episode anyway i was trying to send fraser nelson a direct message to congratulate him on a piece he'd written but i was very surprised to discover he's blocked me on social media.

33:20I must have said something to upset him sometime in the past. But he pointed out, he said social media, he was talking about the train stabbings. And he was saying that literally within minutes, these theories were going around and politicians were piling in and, you know, speaking to their existing biases and prejudices. And he said, for those interested, here are the facts about recent trends in violent crime. First of all, yes, the immigrant population has doubled over the last two decades, but crime, as measured by the gold standard crime survey for england and wales has halved this crime has halved in spite of all these children born to immigrants now it's about a third of all births or half in london and london the most immigrant heavy racially diverse city in the uk releases monthly figures for murders perhaps the hardest of all crime metrics they are at a multi-year possibly even multi-century low so there are facts and and the response from nigel farage when challenge with exactly this is look at your phone.

34:17So the whole of politics has become virtual, whole of politics become TikTok. These kinds of facts are entirely irrelevant. So when I challenged Musk's thing on Twitter, I got two and a half thousand replies. And everything was, you're out of touch, Rory. Why don't you visit Britain? Why don't you come to my thing? It's mayhem. It's civil war already. It's madness already. And you turn around and you say look at the figures you know fraser nelson also has looked at hospital admissions which is pretty black and white how many people are admitted to hospital for stab wounds down over the last five years but that is not what people believe on social media if we if we go with what people feel and what people believe that is what feeds populism and that's why there has to be a far better job done i mean you'll wait a long time if you get the media to sort of do the job properly but i think politicians have got to do a lot better job they are currently doing at rebutting the lies and the nonsense.

35:11And you've got to be careful because you don't want to spend your whole time doing this stuff. But I think somebody with as big a following as Musk, and it wasn't just about Britain, the stuff he was, he had three hours of Joe Rogan and Joe Rogan, pathetic and no rebuttal, no sort of challenging or whatever. But I just think this stuff is way, way, way more dangerous than we think. And they create a narrative, which is very, very hard to push back on. And if you let it go, if you let it go, it becomes a fact. And that's become the world, isn't it? That's really what's driving the world. Yeah. Anyway, shall we take a break?

35:40Let's take a break and come back. After the break, let's get into Sudan, which is probably the most interesting international issue in the world at the moment.

35:54Welcome back to The Recipalities. I'm Anastar Campbell. And with me, Rory Stewart. Very much looking forward to seeing people in our forthcoming tour. To remind people that's Bournemouth, Glasgow, Manchester, London, come to the live tours love to see you I think we're 96 % sold out but there are a few tickets left and we'd love to see you It starts this weekend Rory It does I hope you're feeling fit and well Well I've not really focused yet I will focus I'll be there I'll be there I'll be there But we've got West Ham Burnley on Saturday and Rory Stewart and Alistair Campbell at Bournemouth on Sunday and then also if you're in we get a lot of people in Belfast and in Dublin saying why do you never come here I go there all the time but not necessarily with the rest of its apologies but I'll be going there March the 5th and 6th with not Rory Stewart, but Anthony Scaramucci.

36:39So just the Mooch. So just go to therestispolitics.com to get the few remaining tickets for the current tour and also to sign up for Belfast and Dublin. Tickets go on sale on Friday, November 7. And of course, if you'd like to sign up for early access to this amazing Alistair Mooch double show, please join as a member, which also helps us support the podcast and gives you access to some of our mini-series and much more. Okay, let's talk about Sudan. 150 ,000 killed. so far thousands currently trapped in El Fasher that's the reason we're talking about this now because the extraordinary battle has been in El Fasher siege followed by the one side taking over this crucial strategic city two million at risk of or already in famine 30 million in need of aid 40 million displaced 90 percent of children not in school and the our friend David Miliband and his IRC, rescue organization, they're saying this is pretty much the worst thing that's happening anywhere in the world right now.

37:36I think so many interesting things to be said. One is that 150 ,000, to put it in context, is about 50 % more than the number of people we estimate to have been killed in Gaza. Although, of course, it's worth bearing in mind there are some very, very big differences when people try to draw equivalences. One of them is that as a percentage of the population, that's far lower than Gaza. The population of Sudan is about 50 million. Population of Gaza is about 2-3 million. So as a percentage of the population, far more were killed in Gaza than Sudan, but it's still a horrifying number of people, 150 ,000.

38:05Another difference, of course, is that Israel is a Western ally supplied by the West. It's a liberal democratic state, as Sudan is a civil war. Nevertheless, it is absolutely true, as many people have said, that most of the focus has been on Israel, Gaza, and on Ukraine, and not on Sudan. And although we've done quite a lot of episodes on Sudan, I think we can see we haven't done anything like as many. And my goodness, it's both horrifying and interesting. Quick reminder, explainer, essentially, there are two different military groups operating. There is a group called the RSF, led by this man called Hermeti, who was essentially a camel rustler, camel trader from the Chad border, Arab nomad.

38:51And his group used to be called the Janjaweed, devils on horses. And people remember them because they were the big perpetrators of the genocides in Darfur going back 20 years ago. His uncle was a famous criminal. He himself has been indicted by the International Criminal Court 20 years ago. And on the other side, you have the Sudan armed forces, the SAF under Burhan, who is the general commanding them. And back then they were allies on the same side, fighting the same war. And this is part of the whole complication because effectively, when the dictator of Sudan was trying to attack the people in Darfur, he used the Janjaweed militia.

39:28He used Hermeti to do that. And then when that war began to come to an uneasy, fragile peace, he tried to merge the Janjaweed militia, the RSF, with the army. And then those two forces then brought down the dictator, 2019. And then 2021 did a coup d 'etat against the new, inverted commas, democratic government. And then in 2023, started fighting each other, which has led to this horror. And Al-Fasha is basically the last major fortress of the Sudan armed forces west of the Nile, which has just been taken. And people who are able to get out of the city now fleeing to a refugee camp 600 000 people in that refugee camp to wheeler and we're not going to play um but the atrocity videos are i mean i've been sent many of them and they are just so shocking uh what's happening on the ground well there's this there's this guy who's become a bit of a sort of social media abu lulu who is literally posting videos of himself killing people who are begging to stay alive and defenseless, not armed.

40:33So I think we're talking quite a lot of war crime being committed. But of course, the other thing that's happened is the extent to which other countries are engaged and involved. So the SAF, Sudanese Armed Forces, are backed by Egypt, backed by Turkey, backed by the Saudis. And then the RSF, although the UAE deny it, are very heavily backed by the UAE. And there's been a little bit of a kind of diplomatic media flurry in Britain this week, because of course there's been the suggestion that weapons that we have sold to the UAE have found their way into this battle in Sudan. So if you go back to 20 odd years ago, when there were these global protests and concerts and all the sort of usual panoply of support for a place in real trouble.

41:23The pictures were of these guys kind of riding around on horseback and camels. They've now got the modern war, they've got drones, they've got howitzers, they've got really good transport equipment and so forth. And I think what they're looking for is, I guess, for the Americans and others to step in and go beyond the pretty pathetic statements that have been forthcoming in the last few days. And UAE, great reporting from Declan Walsh, who's a veteran journalist in the region, and great reporting by the New York Times in general. We talked about the podcast, how they managed to use satellite imagery to expose that UAE had effectively a fake hospital on the Chad-Sudan border, which they were using to push in supplies.

42:06A lot of weapons, many of them seem to be American weapons supplied to the UAE or Chinese weapons supplied to the UAE have been found on the ground. And there's no doubt at all that the RSF, Hermeti's group, this ex-Gandri group, just couldn't operate without the money and supplies coming directly from the United Arab Emirates. So one of the questions is, why is the UAE doing this? And why indeed? You've just mentioned Turkey, Saudi, Egypt, and others. Why do they care? Well, there are basically three things that people seem to be caring about. One of them is resources. So gold, oil, and increasingly food.

42:45So many of these Gulf monarchies are trying to think about food for the future. And that's particularly true because we're in a world now where people don't trust US security guarantees in the same way. They're trying to hedge, they're trying to get other resources. UAE is now, this year, the biggest growing investor in Africa ahead of China. The second thing is ports. So people really got their eyes on Port Sudan, and they're really thinking about the Horn of Africa. And that's true in place all the way down Somalia, Djibouti, Kenya, many of these countries competing to try to control ports all the way down to Yemen.

43:20Just say that again, they've got more, what was the thing with UAE and China? Yeah, more investment coming in from the UAE and more growth and investment than any country in the world ahead of China this year into Africa. So the story over the last 10 years has basically been that China, France, Britain, which when I was the African minister in 2016, we were ahead of China. We've been dwarfed by China over the last 10 years. But now the UAE has become the biggest semester. Because back in George Bush's time, when I remember George Bush saying, this is a priority, we've got to sort this is a real problem.

43:47One of the issues was that China was investing very, very heavily in Sudanese oil. But that's fascinating. There's a UAE all over all of it. UAE's all over all of it. They've got an incredibly close relationship with Abiy Ahmed in Ethiopia, which we should also watch when we talk about global conflict, because Ethiopia's now pushing to take Eritrea. And we need to talk to you about that too, because you know about Eritrea. You went on an amazing trip to Eritrea, where there's the famous picture of you with the current leader of Eritrea. Well, this was a long, long, long time ago when he was a really good guy.

44:18He was a freedom fighter. And we were supporting him. He was a great hero of the left, yeah. It was extraordinary, and he's since become one of the worst dictators on the planet. We should talk about that another day, because it's another big global conflict brewing as the world falls apart. They're also very close to Debi and Chad, very close to Hiftar in Libya. They've been playing in South Sudan. They've been playing Yemen. So what's UAE up to? Resources, ports. The third thing is that they are emphasizing that the Sudan armed forces are relying on Islamist militia groups. And one of the ways in which they retook Khartoum is with these Islamists.

44:52And Mohammed bin Zayed, the leader of UAE, has a very, very strong anti-Islamist view. He's very against the Muslim Brotherhood all over the world. That's been some of the splits traditionally with Syria, some of the splits with Qatar. And I think also a really strong sense of loyalty because this was the mercenary force. It's the Sudanese, it's the Janjaweed militia, the RSF, it's Hermeti that Mohammed bin Zayed used in Yemen. He took these Sudanese militia groups and deployed them to Yemen to fight in Yemen. So along with other things, such as the extraordinary amount of gold going into UAE, far more than any of these African countries are registering as exported, is coming into UAE like sort of four times more than the registered exports.

45:37So what are you saying? It's illegal smuggling. And quite a lot of this will be coming from Hermiti. Although it's probably also true that gold is coming in from Sudan armed forces who are also far from saints in this whole picture. Yeah, there aren't really any good guys in this story either. There are not any good guys in the story. And this is where I think the question is whether Trump can pull something off. So this is about number 20 on the US list of priorities. It's a classic problem. I was talking to an amazing guy called Alex DeWall, who's studied the Horn of Africa for 20 years. And Alex was saying that it feels to him a little bit like the way the East India Company, the British East India Company, used to behave in India in the 18th century.

46:14We can listen to the kind of the Empire podcast, our sister podcast, the Goldhanger Group on this. But basically, it's about sovereignty collapsing. Many of these states no longer have real sovereignty. They're being divided in two, like Sudan, de facto. Their resources are being pillaged, and lots of external actors are using generals, political leaders for their own devices. And the world system, which used to be what we thought was in the 70s, 80s, 90s about sovereignty, is collapsing into something that feels much more like the age of empire. But on this one, you mentioned Trump there, and of course he keeps, this interview that was CBS this week, he produced a list of all the wars that he's sold, most of which he hasn't.

46:55But this one is where you don't really feel an American engagement. I think he does have a special envoy, but I couldn't even tell you his name. And you said probably rightly that we won't show some of the worst videos, but there was a very, I think there's something we should maybe put into the newsletter or put online. And that was a guy called Nathaniel Raymond, who's the head of the Yale Humanitarian Research Lab. And he did a really interesting analysis of this. And he said he's been investigating war crimes for 26 years. And this is as bad as he's seen it. And these pictures where you see from the air these body-shaped bloodstains on the ground.

47:34And what's happening, of course, these people are – so they've been trapped inside L fascia. There's been an infective in a siege, no food, no medicine going in, lots of reports of people eating animal feed to stay alive. And as people try to leave, quite a lot are being killed as they go. And so the IRC, who are based in Tuwila, they've actually, or as you say, they've got tens of thousands that have got there, they have been expecting more. And I think the worry is that quite a lot of people have just simply not made it because they've been picked off as they go. Well, there's been such extraordinary work done by different humanitarian organizations.

48:12So Jerome Tubiana and Eddie Thomas with Médecins Sans Frontières, who we talk about a lot, MSF, are people who have 20 years of Sudan expertise. I think Jerem, to be honest, parents were anthropologists working in Sudan. They speak local languages fluently. Eddie Thomas is part Armenian, part Lebanese, part Goan, part Irish. And these incredible characters, along with some very, very brave Sudanese, incredibly brave Sudanese, are trying to keep the support together. But it's also a story, if we want to link it to the bigger story, of the collapse of American power. Because what I think we're seeing with Trump is a president who is able to exercise a lot of power and leverage over America's erstwhile allies.

49:04Developed countries like Canada, Japan, Switzerland, European Union, very vulnerable to Trump and American power because we're so integrated in terms of our economies. but America has basically lost its influence entirely over places like Sudan. And this began probably five years ago. I was known very, very well Molly Fee, who was the American Assistant Secretary for Africa, because she and I lived together for six months, shared a shipping container together in Iraq. And she found herself taking over a situation where Jeff Feldman, who was the envoy of Sudan, had literally sat down with Hermeti and Bohan, who had promised him that they were working together to resolve things, got on a plane.

49:45When he landed, I think he landed in Doha, he discovered they'd just thrown a coup d 'etat and thrown the whole country apart. And the sense for America then in 2021 of this total betrayal, that people could lie to your face two hours before they do a military coup, was really the moment where everyone was like, okay, what on earth has happened? And of course, what had happened is rise of China, France kicked out of Africa but also the rise of these middle powers suddenly all of Africa particularly the Horn of Africa dominated particularly by as you say Turkey Egypt Qatar Saudi UAE which turned out to matter much more than the United States well there we are biggest humanitarian crisis in the world right now and and a possible US solution so this is my pitch And my pitch is that actually Trump could do a repeat of Gaza, which is not a peace deal, but he could pull off ceasefire and humanitarian access.

50:41And the way that he'd do it is put pressure on UAE and Mohammed bin Zayed. That's the key to the whole thing. And there you've got to work out what does Mohammed bin Zayed and UAE want. Do they want access to ports? Do they want gold? But if you put that pressure on, the RSF cannot operate without international support because, as you say, they're so reliant on all these fancy drones, command and control equipment, electronic jamming. This is not a sort of Taliban-style war of the sort you had in Afghanistan with people just wandering around with clashy cops. And that is something you can imagine Trump playing through the theatrics of peace might be able to do.

51:16So let's tempt him towards that for his next Nobel Prize move. Yeah, because one thing I have noticed, he has not talked about this one very much at all. So you're not that confident. I'm not that confident. But I think you're right. The key is to actually put pressure on the UAE. The UK could do a bit of that as well. Well, we've lost a lot of leverage, haven't we? I mean, we lost our relationship. I mean, that's been a really interesting one. You know, we often talk on the show about how we bring foreign leaders when they're young to Sandhurst so that they develop a love of Britain. I think Mohammed bin Zayed had such a bad experience with Sandhurst that he's hated Britain ever since.

51:49And to add to that, we were very critical of their internal human rights abuses, stopped a lot of our intelligence work with them, and I think we lost a lot of leverage there. So I don't think Britain has much influence now on UE. There we go. So last week, I mean, pretty much all domestic and a bit of international. This week was the other way around. Quite depressing, both climate and Sudan. And I think this is the think we should come back to another point about why we seem to be focusing so much less on crises and disasters and situations that deserve more attention than they're currently getting okay rory back tomorrow with question time whether you like it or not we're going to talk about your friends in the royal family the former prince andrew apparently what's your middle name by the way nugent nugent we're going to have to call you rory nugent stewart and i have to be alasdair John Campbell, because apparently we now have to call the former Prince Andrew, Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor.

52:44What's this sort of middle naming thing? And remember, they were originally called Battenburg. They only changed their name to Mountbatten during the First World War because they didn't like the German sound of it. Well, I'll look forward to your history lesson tomorrow, along with your explanation for the interview you did on Newslight, which we're still getting lots of feedback on. We'll also talk about the Dutch elections. Rob Yetten, a young gay leader. Amazing result because interesting in terms of populism. And of course, the other huge issue, which is what Trump is up to with his sea and trade talks and nuclear testing and all that kind of big stuff around the world.

53:19See you then.

53:26Hello, I'm David Ulushoge. And I'm Sarah Churchwell. This week on Journey Through Time, we are exploring the story of the gunpowder plot of 1605, the story of how a small group of Catholics engaged in what would have been the most devastating terrorist attack in all of British history. The plan was ruthless. Blow up Parliament, King James I, and most of his family, all in a single blow. The series will tell the story of treason and traitors, of a group of men led by the charismatic Robert Cadesby, who believed that the only option left to them to win their rights as Catholics was the violent destruction of the Stuart State.

54:03We look at the story of Guy Fawkes, the nation's most famous traitor, from his recruitment to becoming the plot's fall guy and ultimately being tortured and killed. Finally, we find out why this plot is still remembered now, 400 years later. Listen to Journey Through Time wherever you get your podcasts.

From the publisher

Is this the Budget that breaks Labour, or can Reeves walk the tightrope? Why does the general public increasingly think we’re overreacting to climate breakdown? Why aren’t Elon Musk’s provocations of a civil war in Britain being challenged more by mainstream politicians?

Join Rory and Alastair as they answer all these questions and more.

__________

Get more from The Rest Is Politics with TRIP+. Enjoy bonus episodes, ad-free listening, early access, live show ticket priority, our members’ newsletter, and private Discord community – plus exclusive mini-series like The Rise and Fall of Rupert Murdoch. Start your 7-day free trial today at therestispolitics.com

The Rest Is Politics is powered by Fuse Energy. The Rest Is Politics is powered by Fuse Energy. Fuse are giving away free TRIP Plus membership for all of 2025 to new sign ups 🎉 TRIP Plus gets you ad-free listening, discounts, and early access to episodes and pre-sale tickets for live shows! To sign up and for terms and conditions, visit ⁠fuseenergy.com/politics⁠ ⚡

Get our exclusive NordVPN deal here ➼ nordvpn.com/restispolitics It's risk-free with Nord's 30 day money back guarantee ✅

To save your company time and money, open a Revolut Business account today via https://get.revolut.com/z4lF/therestispolitics, and add money to your account by 31st of December 2025 to get a £200 welcome bonus or equivalent in your local currency.

For more Goalhanger Podcasts, head to goalhanger.com

Instagram: @restispolitics

Twitter: @restispolitics

Email: therestispolitics@goalhanger.com

__________

Social Producer: Celine Charles

Video Producer: Josh Smith

Assistant Producer: Daisy Alston-Horne

Producer: Evan Green, India Dunkley

Senior Producer: Callum Hill

Exec Producer: Tom Whiter
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics

All 501 episodes
464. Labour’s Tax Timebomb, Climate Backsliding, and Sudan’s Forgotten WarThe Rest Is Politics · 55 min
Listen in VO