In short
Podcast Episode Summary: The Future of Warfare: Anthropic vs Open AI
Podcast Information Title: The Rest Is Politics Hosts: Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart Guest: Matt Clifford Topic: The implications of AI in modern warfare and international relations.
Episode Overview In this episode, Rory Stewart and Matt Clifford delve into the complexities and ethical considerations surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) in warfare. They explore potential American dependency on AI technologies, the risks of autonomous weapons, and the geopolitical ramifications of AI developments, particularly focusing on the Anthropic and the Department of Defense (DOD) relationship.
---
Key Concepts and Discussions
- AI Dependency and Geopolitics
- Concerns about Dependency: Europe may be "sleepwalking" into reliance on American AI technology.
- Geopolitical Landscape: The evolving relationship between Europe and the U.S., especially under the Trump administration, complicates matters.
- Anthropic vs DOD
- Ethical Dilemmas: Anthropic, a company known for its ethical stance on AI, is scrutinized for its partnership with the DOD. The conversation raises questions about who truly controls AI technologies in a military context.
- Thought Experiment: The hosts discuss hypothetical scenarios involving powerful figures like Kamala Harris and Elon Musk setting ethical guidelines for military use of technology.
- Sovereignty in Military Technology
- Complexity of Dependencies: The power dynamics shift when military technology requires ongoing support from private companies (e.g., software updates).
- Historical Context: The discussion references failures in Afghanistan where military technology became obsolete without contractor support.
- AI and Autonomous Weapons
- Risks of Autonomous Warfare: Clifford expresses concerns about the development of autonomous weaponry without adequate human oversight.
- Corporate Competition: There is a troubling aspect of competition among AI companies, where some may disregard ethical considerations for the sake of advancement.
- Regulatory Environment
- Trump Administration's Influence: The hosts discuss how the current political climate may lead to inadequate regulation regarding the development and deployment of AI technologies.
- The Future of AI Development
- Need for Domestic Capabilities: The conversation concludes with a call for the UK and European nations to build their own AI capabilities to ensure they have a seat at the global table.
- Collaborative Approach: A proposal for collaborative efforts among democratic nations to develop robust AI technologies that align with ethical standards.
---
Key Takeaways
- AI's Role in Warfare: AI is becoming integral to modern warfare, raising ethical and operational challenges.
- Geopolitical Implications: The U.S. and Europe must navigate complex dependencies on tech companies while ensuring national security.
- Importance of Ethical Standards: The need for rigorous ethical considerations in AI development is paramount to prevent misuse and catastrophic outcomes.
- Collaboration is Key: Nations should collaborate on AI development to maintain relevance and influence in the global arena.
---
Conclusion This episode raises critical questions about the intersection of AI technology and military applications. It emphasizes the need for ethical frameworks and collaborative efforts among democracies to navigate an increasingly complex geopolitical landscape influenced by emerging technologies. For more in-depth discussions on AI and its implications, listeners are encouraged to sign up for exclusive content on The Rest Is Politics website.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOGeopolitical Implications of AI
4:06 to 5:15
Discussion on the geopolitical implications of AI technology deals.
“announced it was going to stop all exports of rare earths, nobody really has sovereignty.”
Ethics and Military Technology
5:15 to 6:20
Exploration of ethical concerns surrounding military use of AI technology.
“And as soon as they were removed, all these helicopters and planes that the Afghan Air Force had bought were complete useless because they basically needed a software engineer tinkering with them every time they landed.”
The Role of Private Companies in Defense
6:20 to 7:40
Discussion on the influence of private companies in military operations.
“Well, I have to say, in general, I find myself very sympathetic to Anthropic, and I think they are trying to do the right thing in very difficult circumstances.”
Challenges of AI Regulation
7:40 to 9:00
Insights into the difficulties of regulating AI amidst political climates.
“And that's also another thing that we don't talk about enough, which is you've just put your finger on it, right?”
Building a European AI Strategy
9:00 to 10:18
Discussion on the need for a unified European strategy in AI development.
“But I do think this is why it's important that Britain is building domestic compute, but also trying to build AI companies that are relevant and important.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Matt Clifford:Thanks for listening to The Rest is Politics. To support the podcast, listen without the adverts and get early access to episodes and live show tickets, go to therestispolitics.com. That's therestispolitics.com. This podcast is brought to you by Carvana. Car shopping shouldn't feel like preparing for a marathon of paperwork. That's why Carvana makes buying and financing your car easy. From start to finish, search thousands of vehicles with great prices. all online, all on your time. And when you're ready, your new car shows up right at your door. It doesn't get better than that. Buy your car the easy way on Carvana.
0:40Matt Clifford:Delivery fees may apply. Kayak gets my flight, hotel, and rental car right so I can tune out travel advice that's just plain wrong. Bro, Skycoin, way better than points. Never fly during a Scorpio full moon. Just tell the manager you'll sue. Instant room upgrade. Stop taking bad travel advice. Start comparing hundreds of sites with Kayak and get your trip right. Kayak. Got that right. I'm R.J. Decker, a private investigator uncovering the Sunshine State's darkest secrets. Tuesdays, it's the premiere of ABC's hottest new crime show. R.J. freaking Decker as I live and breathe. He's a private eye.
1:24Matt Clifford:It's not a standard murder. Someone bigger. And a public mass. Trying to get someone back to prison today? You go to prison one time and suddenly it's all the jokes. R.J. Decker, series premiere, Tuesdays on ABC and stream on Hulu.
1:40Rory Stewart:Hi, Rory here. With so much happening in the world of AI this week, both AI-powered attacks on Iran with Antropics fight with the Pentagon, I've been very lucky to be able to sit down with Matt Clifford again in our exclusive AI mini series, where we will be talking about defense, security, geopolitics, and even some practical tips on how AI can improve your business. So please sign up at therestospolitics.com to join our member series and listen to the discussion between me and Matt and all the other content that we produce. A lot of our conversations over the last few episodes, you have brought back to geopolitics, and in particular, the changing and challenging relationship between Europe and the United States under President Trump.
2:29Rory Stewart:I'm really intrigued by how you think about the sort of core principles that are at stake in this Anthropic-DOD deal. And the reason I want to do it is that I think right now, because Anthropic is sort of the liberal, coded, slightly European, hence the question that we answered, but a lot of people are like, this is outrageous. This is DOD trying to overturn reasonable ethical company drawing red lines around the product. But I want to do a thought experiment for you, which is, imagine Kamala Harris has been elected. Elon Musk says, of course you can use Starlink in defense. By the way, no one else has anything like it.
3:08Rory Stewart:But here are my red lines about how you're going to use it. And they're deeply ethically based. And in particular, my number one issue is I don't want it used for anything that could increase the likelihood of a nuclear event in Ukraine. And therefore you're not going to use it for blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. I think the same people who are protesting now that Hegseth's overstepped would be saying, why should a private company be setting red lines over what a democratic elected government does with the technology? Yeah, I think that's right. And I think at some level, the philosophical position that Hegseth holds, which is that if you've bought a bit of kit and you're a military, you want to be able to deploy it and you don't want someone stopping you deploying it.
3:48Rory Stewart:It's absolutely right. But actually, as you've pointed out with Musk and as the Saudis found out when they bought some very expensive American airplanes and tried to use them in Yemen, and indeed, as we found in the Ukraine war, where Trump suddenly instructs American companies who we've contracted with not provide things, or as indeed as the US found when it took on China and China suddenly announced it was going to stop all exports of rare earths, nobody really has sovereignty. Not even the Secretary of War is actually able to instruct without having a lot of friction of various other actors saying what he can and can't do.
4:28And that's partly because of all these things that you've talked about.
4:32Rory Stewart:The more complicated these systems become, the more dependencies you have. I mean, if what you've purchased is a hand grenade, nobody can stop you using a hand grenade. I mean, it's basically the explosives in the thing. You pull the panel and you chuck it, right? It's gone. And the person who sold it, you can't do anything about it. But increasingly, what we're talking about is defense companies, and we saw this in Afghanistan, it was absolutely extraordinary. What really happened to the Afghan military was not the US decision to withdraw 5 ,000 troops. It was that the US withdrew about 20 ,000 contractors, many of whose jobs were about doing the software updates on the helicopters and who sat in these bases.
5:16Rory Stewart:And as soon as they were removed, all these helicopters and planes that the Afghan Air Force had bought were complete useless because they basically needed a software engineer tinkering with them every time they landed. And if they didn't get that, they couldn't take off again, right? And these companies have designed their contracts like that because they don't make their money now by selling a hand grenade. They make the money through the software engineers that maintain them. And that's cheaper, of course, for the Department of War too, right? So, part of war hasn't bought from Anthropik a hand grenade.
5:49Rory Stewart:What they've bought is Anthropik services to run these things. They've bought Musk's Starlink and all his people who do it. So short of nationalizing Starlink or Anthropik, which they could do, and of course is what you probably would do in war. If you really were worried about Musk, you'd be like, okay, so sorry, Starlink is now ours. Short of doing that, I think you are very vulnerable to companies no longer providing. I mean, just as you do when you privatize anything. I mean, I found this in the prison system where we managed to bring in a company who offered to do all the maintenance in the UK prisons for a quarter of the price the government was spending and then turned around and said, we can't maintain your prisons anymore and we couldn't do much about it.
6:36Rory Stewart:Yeah. Yeah. Well, I have to say, in general, I find myself very sympathetic to Anthropic, and I think they are trying to do the right thing in very difficult circumstances. But I do buy the argument, which has been flowing around the internet the last few days, that there is a contradiction in spending three, four years saying, by the way, we're building incredibly dangerous technology that is equivalent of import to nuclear weapons. then being upset when government says, well, in that case, we really need to control it. Well, listen, I mean, the other thing that's going on here, which is so troubling, and the reason, you know, if the world comes to a grinding halt, or autonomous weapons are flying around, killing everybody without proper human supervision, is competition between these companies.
7:21Rory Stewart:Because as soon as Anthropic refuses to supply, Sam Altman turns up and seems to initially say, well, I'm not too bothered about surveying everyone and killing everyone with autonomous weapons. And then a couple of days later, it's like, oh, okay, maybe I saw you ever did that and I'm going to backtrack. Yeah. Someone pointed out it's the first live negotiation on Twitter between a private company in the Department of Defense. And that's also another thing that we don't talk about enough, which is you've just put your finger on it, right? This AI development could not be happening at a worse time because it's taking place in the context of the Trump administration, right?
7:56Rory Stewart:Who is Pete Hexith. He's a TV news anchor whose greatest claim to fame as Secretary of War is that he can bench lift 290 pounds and who conducts sensitive secret negotiations over Twitter. And we have a president who has a weird instinct for deregulation, which means he's not going to get involved in really telling anyone what to do in terms of safety, but he's also vindictive, narcissistic, capable of waking up in the morning and randomly punishing anyone. So if you were really thinking, what is the ideal political framework in which to develop what could be some of the most dangerous world-changing technology in the world?
8:44Rory Stewart:My God, we're unlucky that it's happening in the middle of Trump's America. I actually would put more confidence that the Chinese government has long-term thoughts, protocols, procedures, processes to assess its AI development than I do with the US at the moment. Well, I think one of the things that goes back to things that I've been banging the drum on for a while is, I don't think to the first question that we talked about that there is a realistic case where we sort of relocate one of these companies and make them British. But I do think this is why it's important that Britain is building domestic compute, but also trying to build AI companies that are relevant and important.
9:22Rory Stewart:Because it strikes me that particularly with this administration, which I think it would itself say has a more transactional approach to Europe, we need to have bargaining chips. We need to be relevant. And at the moment, we don't have the hard assets in AI to have a seat at the table. What it sounds to me is though, you've just told us at the beginning of the show, that any policymaker in the European Union needs to say, okay, let's put 450 million people together, let's put the economies of Germany, France, the European Union together with Canada, the UK, God knows Australia, Japan, South Korea, and let's solve the problems that Matt's raised.
10:04Rory Stewart:Let's work out how the hell we do build a two gigawatt center. Let's work out how the hell we get the advanced chips and let's make it an objective to get one of these frontier AI models here because everything that you've told me is terrifying. Thank you so much for listening. If you want to hear the full episode as well as the rest of our AI miniseries with Matt Clifford, the government's former AI advisor and a man who's leading so much of the policy around the world. Please sign up at therestospolitics.com and become a member.
11:05Matt Clifford:your first year, visit lifelock.com slash podcast. Terms apply.
From the publisher
Is Europe sleepwalking into American AI dependency? Are we building toward a world where AI genuinely thinks for itself? And as AI becomes the backbone of modern warfare, who's really in control?
Join Rory Stewart and Matt Clifford as they answer all of these questions and more.
For the full AI series, sign up at therestispolitics.com
For more Goalhanger Podcasts, head to goalhanger.com
Instagram: @restispolitics
Twitter: @restispolitics
Email: therestispolitics@goalhanger.com
__________
Social Producer: Celine Charles
Video Editor: James Clayden
Producer: India Dunkley
Assistant Producer: Daisy Alston-Horne
Senior Producer: Callum Hill
Exec Producer: Tom Whiter
For more Goalhanger Podcasts, head to goalhanger.com
Instagram: @restispolitics
Twitter: @restispolitics
Email: therestispolitics@goalhanger.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices




