In short
The Tech Leaders Podcast: Episode #111 Summary
Episode Title
President, Global Head of Consulting @ Hexaware, Arun “Rak” Ramchandran: ''Disrupting Ourselves with GenAI''
Episode Description
In this episode, host Gareth Davies speaks with Arun “Rak” Ramchandran from Hexaware, coinciding with their historic IPO launch in India. They touch upon the Indian economic boom of the ‘90s and explore how Generative AI (GenAI) differs from previous technological revolutions.
---
Key Takeaways
Hexaware's IPO Launch
- Significance of IPO: Largest IT services IPO in India in the last decade.
- Preparation Timeline: The process took nearly a year, involving major decisions about where to list (India vs. US).
- Market Focus: India was viewed as a more favorable market for tech services than the US.
Leadership Philosophy
- Rak’s Leadership Philosophy: "Do It for Fun" - Emphasizes passion and accountability in leadership.
- Building Teams: Importance of creating positive energy and fostering team success.
Career Journey of Arun Ramchandran
- Early Career: Transitioned from engineering to business with roles in sales and marketing, leading to significant positions in Infosys and Capgemini.
- Key Learnings: Regrets about leaving Infosys for a smaller company (Virtusa) without brand recognition and the importance of patience in career decisions.
The Indian Economic Boom of the '90s
- Economic Liberalization: Major policy changes led to a thriving tech industry.
- Shift in Opportunities: Encouraged many to seek careers within India rather than going abroad.
Differences in GenAI Compared to Previous Tech Revolutions
- Fundamental Transformations: GenAI is reshaping work, interactions, and problem-solving, unlike previous cycles that simply advanced industries.
- AI’s Alternatives: AI can consider alternatives that humans cannot, creating new business models and workflows.
Concerns About Job Displacement
- Impact on White-Collar Workers: AI's capacity to affect knowledge workers, a shift from previous technology cycles that primarily displaced blue-collar jobs.
- Augmentation vs. Displacement: Workers who adapt and master AI tools will likely thrive, while those who do not may struggle.
Generative AI’s Impact on SaaS
- Transition in SaaS Market: Potential shift from "Software as a Service" to "Service as a Software" due to the capabilities of AI.
- Customization: Users may create tailored software solutions without needing extensive technical knowledge.
AI Regulation and Implementation
- Increasing Regulations: Companies are cautious about AI adoption due to regulatory concerns, especially in sensitive industries like finance and healthcare.
- Security and Compliance: Organizations are focusing on secure implementations to prevent data leaks and ensure compliance.
Upskilling for AI Talent
- Talent Shortage: Companies are facing a vacuum in AI expertise; solutions include catching young talent and retraining existing employees.
- Training Programs: Hexaware has implemented comprehensive training for their workforce to prepare them for an AI-driven future.
Future Outlook for Hexaware and Generative AI
- Vision for Growth: Hexaware aims for a $10 billion valuation and plans to double revenues in the next three to four years.
- AI-First Approach: Commitment to integrating AI into services and operations for transformation.
---
Conclusion
The episode presents an in-depth discussion on the evolution of technology through Generative AI, the IPO experience of Hexaware, and the future implications of AI on business models and workforce dynamics. Arun Ramchandran shares valuable insights and reflects on leadership, career journeys, and the importance of adaptability in an ever-changing tech landscape.
---
For more insights and episodes, visit [Be Digital](https://www.bedigitaluk.com/).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00I'm really excited about the embodied AI where you get the robots and the AI together and are able to do some of these tasks in a more intelligent manner. That's Skynet, isn't it, of Termini? Well, and that's really where it could go wrong as well, right? If not controlled properly, if not supervised, if we don't have the right ethical guidelines, the right regulation, the right testing, the right safety guardrails, then things could go off track. I mean, I'm not just talking about enterprises and business. It could go off track in many other walks of life.
0:35unlike previous technology hype cycles ai is not just advancing industries it's really starting to reshape how we work interact and solve problems in today's episode i had the pleasure of speaking with aaron ramachandran or better known as rack the president and global head of generative ai consulting at Hexaware Technologies, one of the fastest growing IT services companies globally. This conversation actually came on a historic day for Hexaware as they IPO'd, which was actually the largest IT services IPO in India for the last 10 years, a significant milestone given the competitive nature of that marketplace in India.
1:19Rak shares his remarkable journey from his time at industry giants like Infosys and Capgemini, through to his current role at Hexaware, we discuss a range of topics, including preparing for an IPO and why Hexaware actually chose to list in India as opposed to the US. We talked about the post-90s boom of IT services companies in India, why AI is different from other technology innovation hype cycles in the past, and also the fundamental shifts AI is set to bring from jobs displacement through to regulatory challenges and much, much more. Rack provides really deep insight into how global organizations are harnessing AI capability.
2:04He's truly a fountain of knowledge. I'm sure you'll agree. From Hexaware Technologies, it's Rack Ramachandran.
2:16Aaron Ramachandran, RAC for short, how are you? And thank you so much for coming on the Tech Leaders Podcast. I've been really excited to talk to you, RAC. A big day for Hexaware Technologies, yeah? Yeah, thank you for having me. And thank you for the wishes. It is a big day, both for my professional journey and for Hexaware. We literally went IPO today, all year today. We got listed on the National Stock Exchange in Mumbai. And that's a red-letter day for our company. And for myself, I have been with this company for seven and a half years. And it seems like a very purposeful journey, which has crescented nicely.
2:54Did everything go to plan? Was it all okay? Absolutely. The shares popped a little bit at the end of, you know, once they got listed, which is usually a barometer of how the retail interest is. The buy versus sell ratio was in favor of the buyers. A lot of retail buyers want to get a piece of the action. I think we are ending the day now with 10 % over the price we listed, which is a good pop, especially compared to the fact that the last 7 to 10 days in the Indian stock market has not been very kind to the share prices in general. Yeah, absolutely. No, of course. Can I ask you, how long does it take to prepare for a day like today for a company like Hexaway?
3:31How much preparation goes into this, Rak? Yeah, I mean, it turned out to be the largest technology services IPO in India in the last 10 years. Oh, really? Good goodness gracious. Okay. Yeah, just in terms of the valuation and number of shares and so on. It took us, I would say, give or take, it took us almost a year. Right. That doesn't surprise me. To get prepared and a whole bunch of people involved. I think the first major decision we had to take, along with our private equity owners, which is Carlyle, is that whether to list in the US or list in India. And once that decision was taken, that it will be listed in India.
4:09And there were some reasons why India was seen as a more favorable market to list. I think the depth of coverage and maturity, especially for the technology services firms, is much higher in the Indian market compared to the US. The US market has a focus on ISVs and product companies and platform companies and so on. I think the tech services market is much deeper in the Indian market. So that was the first key decision. Once that happened, then we had to obviously get up and get going with respect to selecting the banker, selecting the lead, you know, the managers and so on. We had to prepare our, what is called as a draft red herring submission, DRHP.
4:49Then we had to wait for SEBI, which is the local stock exchange regulatory authority, to review it, come back with points, comments, corrections that we had to do. That process itself, I mean, we actually submitted our DRHP sometime way back in October, September, October. Then we had to wait for the holiday period to get done because you wouldn't be able to do a proper roadshow when there are holidays around and people are away. we had to submit another one, final draft one, and then a final one. Once you submit the red herring prospectus, the RHP, then there's no going back. And that was like on Feb 5th.
5:27Feb 5th is when, or Feb 6th is when we actually submitted the final prospectus. Yeah, no, absolutely. I can imagine there was a lot of lawyers involved. Lawyers and financial analysts and bankers. Accountants, yeah. Risk. And we had to actually acknowledge all of them in the ceremony today. And there were quite a few. I mean, just our own team turned out to be like scores of them, right? People who are helping with checking the fine print and making sure calculations are right, every entry is correct. It's a lot of work, just getting ready for an issue of this size. Yeah, I can imagine. I can absolutely imagine.
6:02Well, look, first of all, I want to find out a little bit more about yourself and your career and the journey to this point, okay? Because I think that's what our listeners will be really keen to understand. So let's start with this one. And as we always do, what does good leadership mean to you, Rak? Yeah, it's something which, you know, I've both given it some thought and I've also interacted with leaders, both who I feel I consider good leaders and leaders who I don't consider as very effective leaders. And in my worldview, the folks who actually can create positive energy in the team can take accountability and ownership of their actions and their team's actions and what is the final outcome.
6:49People who don't wear it on their sleeve, people who do it as a matter of course because they genuinely care about what the journey looks like, what the goal looks like, and they're able to carry a team together. Yeah, doing it for love, not just for duty, I suppose is what you're saying, yeah? Do it for fun. Do it because it seems natural, right? It does seem like they enjoy it. They get their energy out of it, which is great. I mean, you need to love it. You need to be able to love what you're doing, which is even leadership is a kind of work that way. But you need to genuinely feel and feel passionate both about the goal and your team.
7:29Building a good team is a big part of what I feel good leadership is all about. Getting the right people on board, making them successful. I think all of those are areas where I think good leadership becomes important. Inspiring and building a team with the right mission, I suppose. Now, that's a fantastic answer. I absolutely agree, Rak. But first of all, can you walk us through your career, the early part of your career journey then, from the point of leaving university, making a decision on what direction you wanted to go into, and then right up until joining Capgemini? Sure, yeah. And it was not a straight line.
8:06My career has been a little bit of a, you know, I would say both meandering and a little bit of horizontal and vertical movements. So I started off as an engineer, right? I did my B-Tech from one of the premier institutes, IRE Bombay. Yeah, sure. Then I decided to go for a non-tech path, which is an MBA. And that led me to a career in sales and marketing. I joined Nokia mobile phones, which sort of pulled me back into the technology part, but there was more mobile phones and they were just launching in India. And that is when it was sort of a startup, although it was backed by a big name. Yeah.
8:4899 is where Infosys happened. So that sort of really pulled me back to the technology roots, so to speak. And I realized that that's obviously where action is happening. By2Go was widely talked about, and there was a whole thing about global models and offshoring. And Infosys was just beginning to emerge as a leading player. And that's really when I relocated to the U.S. as well. I moved to the U.S. in 1999 with Infosys as part of their initial business development team. I moved to the West Coast. I saw the whole dot-com boom. I saw the bust. I was part of, and I've been in the Bay Area since then.
9:24So I've seen several ups and downs in the technology landscape. Although some of them I played a role, some of them I've just been a bystander. No, of course, absolutely. Did you always feel like you belonged in the technology space, technology innovation? Where does that interest in tech come from? Well, you know, one of the ambitions I had when I was a kid was tech-related. In fact, I wanted to be an astronaut. I wanted to know more about space, right? Yeah. Yeah, I'm totally with you on that. Yeah, and I used to read science books. And, you know, once I got into IIT and then I started getting more exposed to other aspects, I realized that my upbringing, especially with respect to my focus, has been very narrow at the school level.
10:13It was more about getting into engineering, getting into the best engineering school and so on. And I realized there is a world outside of it as well, which I'm pretty well suited to, right? There were people interactions, there was debating, there was cultural events, there was, you know, it just felt like I had so much more exposure, which I could be getting, and I was suited for it. India was a great market at that time, 91, 93. That is when the economic liberalization was happening in India, right? With Manmohan Singh, and, you know, some of the policy changes. It felt good to be part of the opening of the Indian market, so to speak, and be part of the business cadre.
10:50Can you tell us a little bit, can you, Sorry, we'll get back on track shortly, but can you tell us a little bit about that, about that moment in India? Because India went from being, you know, a very different economy and then exploding into one of the most progressive technology, progressive technology economies in the world, which it is obviously, which has gone from strength to strength. Talk us through that shift around that time, Rak. It has been a big moment in a lot of our lives who have lived through that period. So this was 1991 was the, I would say, the pivotal moment. Before 1991, it was more of a closed economy, a lot of barriers to opening new private businesses.
11:32Bureaucracy, what is called as the red tape, the Inspector Raj, the License Raj. India as an economy hit the skids because of balance of payments issues and foreign exchange reserves. So the then finance minister, Manmohan Singh, along with the prime minister, Narsimha Rao, they took a bold decision. they decided to lift a lot of controls. And they decided to open up the policies, brought down a lot of the barriers, tariffs, and so on and so forth. And they gave a lot of freedom for private businesses and private sector to grow. You know, suddenly there was all this excitement in the air. I mean, you look at a person like me or a kid like me who's just getting out of college.
12:13Till then, the only pathway for good success was to just follow the herd, apply to U.S. universities and do a sort of a master's or a PhD in the U.S. and try to get onto a career in the U.S. in a tech field or whatever, right? A large portion increasingly later on decided that, look, I mean, there is action going on in India, which is of a different kind. Why not just stay here and experience it and see how it feels like? And that's what led me to actually accept an MBA program compared to going to the U.S. to study further. And I don't regret it at all. Yeah, absolutely. I mean, it's incredible how the Indian economy is played.
12:53It's an absolute powerhouse now in terms of technology, and certainly technology services, I know. But there's even a buoyant SaaS scene there, and AI is incredible there as well. You know, the AI research going on in India, I watch it very closely. Okay, so getting back on track, you obviously joined Infosys, and then you went to Virtusa and then went back to Infosys. What lesson did you learn? What did you take from that experience? And why did you leave to go to Virtusa and go back there? I would consider it as one of those decisions which I have a little regret and some learnings. So Virtusa was not really called Virtusa at that time.
13:32It was a much smaller company. It was e-runway. It's sort of more of a startup, I would say. And I think the decision was taken more like, okay, I come to the US, there is a lot of action going on in the startup world and maybe I should experience it. I left behind some ESOPs at Infosys, which if I hadn't left at that time they would have been worth a lot of money later on. And then when I joined Virtusa, I realized that that's really not the kind of startup I should have moved to because of the fact that it was not a platform or a product player. It was still a tech services company although they were marketing themselves as a platform company.
14:15And then there were some changes in their ownership, new VCs came in, and so on and so forth. What I really learned was, how do you actually create a business with no brand recognition, right? You are the only feet on the street, especially in the Western US, because this was the Eastern headquarter company, and you are on your own. What differentiated them? Were they specializing in certain sectors or what was unique about them? Well, they had strength in the financial services and healthcare insurance to an extent. They're pretty big in banking. They were trying to... But it was offshore services they were providing to European and US companies.
14:56Is that pretty much what their model was? Yeah, okay. They were, but they had this USP, which was around productization, right? And that was what they were trying to position to the ISVs and the companies in the high-tech industry on the West Coast. But this was like 24 years ago, easier said than done. Great idea, but timing was terrible. So they actually went through a lot of pain, wilderness in the years to come before they finally went public later on, much later on. I think seven to 10 years after I left, right? So I came back to Infosys at that time, lesson learned. be patient, don't act too fast, take advice in terms of financial matters, figure out what you're leaving behind and negotiate properly.
15:45Yeah, absolutely. Absolutely. Well, we all learn those lessons as our career progresses, don't we? So you're not the only one for sure. So what leadership lessons did you take from those two organizations that you've brought forward into your career with hacks away? Yeah, no, it's a great question because I interacted with four CEOs during my Infosys days and all of them were founders, co-founders, one after the other. When I joined them in 99, they were like 250 million in revenues. I mean, you know, it still looks pretty big if you look at it right now, but when I left them in 2011, they were 7 billion, right?
16:25So that is the kind of growth, stupendous growth over just 10, 12 years, right? Multi, multifold. And in market valuation, just amazing, exponential. When Narayan Murthy was there, but then he pretty much stepped aside and Nandan Nilekani, and I think he's seen as the tech czar, digital czar in India now. And he was the CEO. I learned a few things going on meetings with him, right? I mean, his understanding of both the tech aspect and commercial aspects of a business. And one of the things which strikes me as very unique with him, we had grown to 7 ,000, 8 ,000 by the time he became CEO. And I had left and come back.
17:06And there were other people of similar, and everybody had the same opinion. He would remember your names. He would remember individual people's name. He would see you and he will call you by your first name. And you were like, how does he even do that? Right? In an organization with thousands of staff. That's impressive. That I thought was great leadership. Absolutely it is, yeah. If the boss knows your name, you immediately feel like pressure to make an impression and do your job as best you can. This boss is boss's boss and he's already sort of flying high with all the successes that Infosys is getting.
17:42But he still has his fingers on the pulse and he will call me Rack, right? I mean, he will take me like, Rack. I mean, he knows my nickname. So that is, I would say, the best time at Infosys. When he stepped back, I think we had a couple of leaders who were more operationally strong and focused. Nandan was a great salesperson, right? I mean, I would say he really created the Infosys powerhouse brand. Yeah. And then we had Chris and Shibu. And that's around the time when I had sort of started thinking about leaving because things were not really... I think Infosys hit a little bit of a patch, rough patch during that time.
18:20Obviously, it started with the global financial crisis and so on. And I think we had two, three years of maybe bad results and some tough decisions to be made and so on and so forth. I was trying to create and work with a team which created the large deals team. And we had to start certain things like advisor programs and analyst programs, which Infosys had not really done in a structured manner till then. And even structuring some of these large complex deals, These could be multi-year, these could be deals which will get you into assets and rebadging and so on. And that is very, very different than what Infosys had been used to in its growth days.
18:57The last part of my Infosys career was more leading a business unit, which was life sciences. And I had never been a life sciences person until then. I had been more involved in business development across multiple industry segments. And life sciences forced me to learn about the domain in a very short period of time. When I moved in, I wanted to get more focus on R &D and some of the domain-specific aspects, which we did, and worked with some of the largest pharmaceutical companies, opened up medical devices, and so on. So that really sort of led me to when I left Infosys and joined Capgemini.
19:33That's really insightful. And the fact you were exposed to the founders is incredible. I mean, you were a relatively young man. Yes. And getting that almost mentoring, even if it's indirect mentoring, is an incredible asset for you for the duration of your career, isn't it? So if you could just tell us maybe a little bit about the Capgemini experience and how did Hexway come about? Why did you join Hexway? What was it about that organization that was special and caused you to jump ship? Yeah, so I actually met with several leaders in Infosys. I'm not going to get into individual names, but I had a great boss who was very understanding because I was going through a lot of family.
20:12crisis. My parents passed away during that time and some other things happened. So when Capgemini happened, I think there was a particular reason why they brought me in, which was to create more sales transformation. So Capgemini had grown being an SI company, but it still had a lot of European, seen as a European company with a lot of legacy. The US team was mostly drawn from EY technology, whom they had acquired sometime back, EY consulting, and then they had sort of created the separation when UI had to drop some of the consulting and so on, which they recently built back later. So it was more of, okay, you know, we've been through a fast growth Indian SI, Indian technology services.
20:51Can we replicate that in Capgemini, right? So I was hired by Salil Parekh, who actually then later on became CEO of Infosys. So that's a little bit of a switch there. So I worked with him. I worked with Thierry Dilaport, who's the CEO of, ex-CEO of Wipro. So I worked with them very closely in the sales transformation effort for their application services business. That was like over the next four or five years. And then I took on business leadership for one of the units called Sogeti, which is a North America focused unit. Yep. And it's pretty popular, well known in UK and Europe and so on. Now you did ask me a question as to why Hexaware.
21:28So I think Capgemini, while a big company, I think one of the things which I didn't gel well with was the, it is very decentralized. And I think one of the things I probably didn't do very well is manage all the stakeholders in different countries and different geographies. And I realized it's just too big. And I'm not really a very big company guy. Okay, there is politics, there is different channels of communication, which you sometimes don't even understand. And that led me to think about maybe joining a smaller setup. I enjoyed my Infosys tent because it was smaller and then it became bigger.
22:05And I wanted to actually experience something like that again, where I could be a little closer to not just the decision making, but also feel that I am empowered in a more entrepreneurial manner. And I didn't find that in Capgemini to the extent I thought I would. So then I think even folks like Salil left and so on and so forth. So there was a lot of changes which were going on at CAP at that time. Hexaware, I came in a couple of reasons. So one of the board members for the private equity, which owned Hexaware at that time, which is Bering private equity, one of the board members was Basab, Basab Pradhan.
22:42And he was my first boss at Infosys. And he and I have been in touch since then as well. The CEO of Hexaware was an ex-classmate of mine from B school. So it just felt like, okay, there are a couple of strong reasons and it's sort of private equity owned. There is a growth vision there. I would sort of be part of that leadership team, which will take this to greater heights, which is what exactly has happened in the last seven, seven and a half years. Yeah, of course. Culminating in the IPO today. Culminating in the IPO today, absolutely. This episode was brought to you by Be Digital. B-Digital support leadership teams to optimize cost and get more out of technology investments.
23:26B-Digital and the team have unrivaled expertise with technology license management and data remediation and are therefore perfectly positioned to help prepare organizations for AI technology capability. And on the last point, B-Digital have just developed a cutting edge AI readiness assessment, which provides tech leaders with the platform they need to make well-informed decisions about AI adoption strategy in 2024 and beyond. Go to bdigitaluk.com to find out more and get in touch.
24:03I want to ask you about the wave of generative AI innovation in the last three years has been quite breathtaking. It feels like you've overseen and you've been part of waves of technology innovation from the dot-com boom right through to the rise of SaaS, you know, and all the other bits in between. Mobile and so on, yeah. Is this different? Is this AI innovation and the potential impact of generative AI on the business landscape? Is this different? I'll give you a short answer and then a long answer. I believe it is different. I thought you'd say that. I understand, Rakh, this is a big, big question.
24:39So I'm hoping you can obviously give us an overview as to why you think this is a pivotal moment for human evolution, if you like, from a technology standpoint, at least? Oh, yeah, it's a broad question. Maybe we can talk about this in the context of enterprise, okay, of large organizations globally, because that is your world. And that's my world as well. So in terms of, you know, corporate organizations, big organizations, the impact of AI on the world of work on the world of enterprise. Yeah, let's let's do that keeps it a little narrow. Yeah, Yeah, of course. But any such answer, you have to understand that the technology is going to transform the world, right?
25:19Yeah. You know, we've seen that with a few other pivotal technologies in the past. There has always been a little hype cycle. So that's not going to change. There is still a hype cycle right now. Okay. So in that sense, it's not very different than what happened in the dot-com era and so on. Of course, yeah. But is the technology fundamentally transformational, similar to, let's say, an internet has been, or even before that electricity was, and so on? I would say yes. And that is one of the reasons why it's going to be fundamentally disruptive to enterprises. I think a lot of what we are seeing in terms of generative AI and AI in general, in terms of adoption right now, to the extent that that adoption is happening, is more on the productivity side.
Read the full transcript
26:06Productivity, workflows, knowledge management, handling customer queries, you know, so on and so forth. The big impact is going to come soon, maybe triggered through the agentic architecture, maybe something else comes after that and we can talk about it. which is going to be business model changes. Fundamental business model changes, new ways of doing things and coming up with products and servicing markets and servicing customers, which currently are not even being thought of. I'll try to provide an analogy, right? Internet happened in the late 90s, right? 95, 96 is when the email, you know, the Yahoos of the world and then some of the dot-com started happening, which is the dot-com boom from 99 to 2000.
26:51But Googles of the world, Facebooks of the world, they all happened three, four years later. Yeah, of course. And they actually took this in a very different direction. I mean, nobody knew there could be social media to connect people when internet actually started. Nobody talked about the power of Google search when you started internet. And I feel that something similar and maybe much more powerful would emerge out of the Gen AI ecosystem and the AI ecosystem. I don't want to just limit it to just Gen AI because Gen AI is a stratum on top of AI. And there are many other ways of doing Gen AI.
27:30I think this is going to create fundamental business model changes and the way products are developed and the way consumers consume. and what is needed to actually make some of these industries function in a manner which is going to be very different than what we have done. I mean, let me just give you an example, right? Even something like self-driving cars, we think about them as having a particular internal structure. There is a driver's seat, there is a passenger seat, and so on and so forth. In the future, with AI, with advanced IoT and whatever the new developments are, the internal structures of how a car is built itself will change.
28:10You may not have the same configurations. Same thing happens for urban planning. Same thing will happen for how healthcare is administered. So I think you'll start seeing a lot of innovation, a lot of disruption, business model changes, which we currently are just starting to get glimpses of. Yeah. No, I didn't think about manufacturing. I suppose AI will find ways to make manufacturing more efficient for products to be put together in a more efficient way, maybe more efficient from an energy standpoint, environmental standpoint or whatever, but it'll push everything forward, won't it? It'll accelerate the evolution of pretty much everything, surely.
28:49Yeah, one is evolution. The second is revolution. The main essence of what intelligent or close to AGI kind of intelligence would be is that it can take some decisions and it can figure out a more optimal way of doing something which human beings may not have thought of. A lot of our structures, like a lot of our business structures, a lot of our consuming patterns are built on human-centric design. Yeah, yeah. And an AGI will not necessarily always think from that perspective. I mean, you know, we all heard about this epochal move called Move 37, right? And you probably heard about it, which is the Go game, which Lee Sedol played with DeepMind way back several years ago, which created a paradigm shift in terms of what people thought of AI.
29:41This was the Go game and, you know, the DeepMind beat Lee Sedol. And what happened in that particular game, I think it was game two or something. And, you know, all the training that it was being given, this Move 37 was something which none of the experts saw. It was not something which any human being would have played. Even the creators of that algorithm were scrambling to figure out why that move actually got played by the deep mind. And then it ultimately won the game. And, you know, suddenly that becomes like a totally unexplained thing, but it helped sort of optimize its winning probability.
30:14I think something similar would happen when all the data sets have been incorporated, all the different kinds of algorithms are, you know, parameters have been put in. a new way of doing certain processes, a very different way of optimizing supply chains, a very different way of configuring transportation networks, very different way of manufacturing products. I think these are things which AI would be able to bring in, which currently I think human beings are even not even considering. Yeah, no, it's a good point. And that will be all for the better, all for the better. So you mentioned at the beginning revolution.
30:50We were talking about evolution and revolution. So speaking of revolution, jobs displacement. It's a controversial topic, Rack. Obviously, we talked about history earlier on. And as you and I both know, whenever there's technology innovation through history, it typically is where there's been a net gain in jobs normally. Just the jobs have changed. So I suppose it's a similar question to what I asked you. Is this different? Do you have concerns about companies automating so much that there's going to be certain swathes of people out of work? We've faced this before, right? We've faced this before with automation.
31:22We faced this before going back to electricity and steam engines and locomotives and so on. One example I think about is the use of automation in telephone switching. You know, when that automation came in, automated switching and PBXs and so on, there still used to be operating stations with multiple people actually doing the individual switching of telephone lines and routing calls. After the automation came, that pool of labor didn't just disappear right away. It took almost, and I was reading it somewhere, it took almost 15, 20 years for the last of telephone operators, manual telephone operators, to actually start disappearing.
32:01Right. So that is the curve through which automation actually worked its way. I mean, you know, we can go back further in terms of agricultural automation and so on. I think what the point I'm trying to make, there will be displacement, but I think it will be different kinds of jobs. Yeah. Which will get created. Of course. And this time, the displacement is coming for knowledge workers. Automation struck at the blue workers, the blue-collar workers. That's the first time ever, though, isn't it? All technology innovation in the past has really displaced blue-collar workers. Now it's the white-collar workers who are getting displaced.
32:37That's a first. So I think one way to look at it is AI will augment human capabilities. So people who can work with AI will be better placed than people who refuse to adopt AI. So think about it as in the future, there will be people who have a mastery of AI tools and can use that to augment their work, who probably will be more successful than people who don't use AI. That's the way probably to look at it in the current stage. But then there will be new roles created. I mean, we are already seeing new roles which are getting created, right? I mean, we are seeing that some of the basic coding is getting done by AI.
33:15So maybe the junior developers, they are finding that maybe their skills are not necessarily required. But as you become senior, as you understand features, as you understand product roadmaps, your utility can come in different ways. Interfacing with the business teams, you know, helping create, validate the results and outcome and so on. So I think there are different jobs which are getting created and different fields will open up, which we didn't have in the past. How do you think generative AI will impact things like the SaaS market? You know, obviously it's an enormous part of most economies.
33:48this SaaS business is everywhere. If you can go onto a model and essentially build a piece of software for your business like that for free, and extract it from the model and run it locally, you don't need SaaS products anymore, do you? So, I mean, obviously, there'll probably always be a place for SaaS products, but do you envisage an enormous chunk out of the SaaS market over the next 10 years because of people creating their own software using these models? Absolutely. Absolutely. I think the SaaS market will be inverted. Software as a service is the original definition and service as a software is the new definition.
34:29Right? So you're basically saying that some of these services will be delivered through software, which in today's language, it could be AI agents or co-pilots or queues and so on and so forth. So they will actually do some of the individual pieces of work. So as long as you have data foundation, ready. As long as you have access to the right kind of sources, data sources and data pipelines, what does actual SaaS package, current like the ERP packages and all do? They basically specialize in certain kinds of enterprise data, system of record, system of transactions, pull that stuff out and make sure that it's available in a particular format.
35:08Now, AI agents, if they do work as intended because they're currently still facing peathing issues, in terms of being able to access that kind of data, understand the categorization, understand the domain context, right? So there is a business logic, there is a domain aspect to it, and are able to connect the different parts of the workflow in a manner which obeys the need for an enterprise backend the way we are currently used to, right? And that is one stepping stone to having software as a service, right? And service as a software. That's the other way to look at it. Some of the services will be delivered as software agents.
35:48Has that already caught on, service as a software? I've not heard that before, but it's a concept I've been reading a lot about recently. I hadn't really thought about the impact on the SaaS world. It was Chamath on the All In podcast, which I'm sure you're familiar with, living in Silicon Valley. And they did talk about the SaaS, SaaS being this phenomena between the birth of the internet and the birth of AI, this phenomena which happened in between, which is kind of going to get, it was born because of the internet, it's going to die because of AI, which I thought was, that sort of blew my mind a little bit.
36:19And I just thought, wow, because we all just thought SaaS was here to stay and that was just the future. But I think AI is such a game changer. What is going to happen is, you know, the SaaS was really powering the large companies, the large corporations, because they were so complex and they needed all these rules and all these interfaces and there's ways to keep records. If AI can help manage that data and the workflow, which is still a big, big challenge right now. It's not that it's easy to solve. Just like, you know, AGI. I mean, you know, just enterprise intelligence, right? I mean, I'm talking about, you know, moving away from just human affairs and so on, just focusing on large enterprises, JP Morgan or Goldman Sachs or Delta Airlines and so on.
36:59They have their own enterprise entity and identity and DNA. and there is a lot of intelligence which is around. If AI can use that to create the services, you really don't need big backends for that. Yeah, sure. How are ExaWay leveraging generative AI across the business then? In terms of your own utilization of AI to deliver services, can you tell us a little bit about that? Yeah, absolutely. In fact, one of the pillars of our vision for AI and Gen AI, first of all, our stated intent as a company is to be AI first. Now, that by itself is not differentiated in the way that a lot of companies are talking about.
37:38But we're actually living through it. And when I say living through it, one and a half, two years ago when we formed this unit, one of the goals was not just to take services to the outside market, like, hey, we can do prompt engineering or we can do this. It was to actually adopt Gen AI in our own services, which is to disrupt ourselves. Now, what does Hexaware really do? It does three things very well. We build software which powers platforms and products which our clients want to take to market. We help modernize and transform the technology's landscape and tech stack, whether it's data warehouses, whether it's infrastructure, whether it's applications.
38:17And we help create the right tools and platforms for them to run this and operate this on an ongoing basis. And we use data and AI to power all of this as a foundation. So in every one of these services, which is sort of bread and butter for a lot of technology services, Gen AI is actually going to impact the way the service is being delivered. And we said, look, we know this is going to fundamentally change the economics of what being a technology services company means. When you're talking about coding or when you're talking about testing, you currently do it manually. A lot of it is done manually and a little bit of automation.
38:57It's typically time into material, P into Q. Now you create an AI-driven model which can help obviate the need for so many people, which can reuse what you already have, which can create an automated test framework, which can test the code which has been generated, gather the requirements, so on and so forth, or even service desk and help desk, right? Proactively solve problems and so on. You actually are creating a different economic model for delivering these services. So we invested, we have invested in certain tools. We call it RapidX and Amaze and Tenzai. These are platforms and accelerators which can actually deliver some of these services like coding, like requirements gathering, like testing, like cloud-based transformation and migrations using AI and Gen AI, powering them.
39:44So we said we will disrupt ourselves. So that's been one of the big pillars of our Gen AI strategy. Of course, the second one is to disrupt and work with our clients in their transformation journey. Right. So this is where our service catalog and solution accelerators and the fact that we have tech trained people comes into play. And we are actually taking this whole thing right from getting your data ready, helping create the AI models and fine tune and integrate the AI models, which are already there, helping create the UX layer for use of these AI apps, manage these on an ongoing basis through ops and so on.
40:19So that's the other part. And then the third one, the third and final part of our vision is essentially identifying some big bets for certain key industry segments. We have identified a few. We believe that these will actually be industry game-changing solutions and go-to-market IPs that we will have. We will work with some partners, whether it's Microsoft or AWS or Cohere and so on. And we have some relationships which are now happening with NVIDIA and so on. we will actually be able to take a few key slivers of these industries and transform them using Gen.AI. Wow, okay. Well, what real-world AI applications are making the biggest difference for your customers at the moment then?
41:00We are working with customers primarily on the productivity bucket, as I was telling you, right? And a lot of customers want to get started with making sure they have a fundamental underpinning of the right secure implementations of whatever model they are using. whether it's a GPT-based use case or it's knowledge management or document summarization. First of all, they want to have security. Make sure enterprise data doesn't leak out. Make sure there is no external data which is poisoning their database and so on. I think so that's one, right? So a lot of people are experimenting with it. The interesting use cases we are seeing, customer service for agents, right?
41:38So an insurance company using it for real-time transcription, cross-selling, understanding customer context, the policy information, what is missing, what kind of question is being asked and being able to provide those answers in an intelligent manner. And using voice to text as part of some of the interface, which is needed. Hospitality company is using us to actually transform their event management. Hardware manufacturers used us for product listing and helping create better product descriptions which can stand out on the website when compared to some of their competitors. and, you know, it's written out in such a manner.
42:17Those are becoming more and more prevalent as we go along. Yeah, no, absolutely. So AI regulation then is tightening globally. How are companies reacting to that, implementing AI capability in a fair, explainable, reliable way? What sort of considerations are you having with your customers in terms of implementing AI in compliance with regulation? Are you having any problems with that? Are you having any headwinds, RAC, or is it quite a seamless implementation in your experience? Some of our customers are very wary of adopting it in a big manner because they feel there is going to be certain issues with regulation.
42:58So they're getting their legal team involved, their ethics teams involved and so on. These are big corporations, big financial institutions with a lot of compliance and regulatory requirements. Technology-wise, there are ways of handling it which have started emerging, whether it is use of RAG, so just use your own data sets and use LLM only for the language part of it. There are smaller models which are coming into play, which are just focused on specific slivers or functions, which will become a little more prevalent in the future because of lower costs, both on the training side and on the inferencing side.
43:34So there are customers who are beginning to figure out lower cost options, more secure options which are contained. And that is probably going to be the future. I mean, what DeepSeek and so on have really shown is the art of the possible of trying to do AI implementations at a lower cost without having to spend like$60 or$200 a user and so on that was seen as the sort of the established payment benchmark. And that's being questioned, right? But that's why people are doing POCs. that's why enterprises are still taking some baby steps because one of the things they really want to be sure, especially if you're a financial institution, a healthcare provider, somebody who manages that kind of data, right, which is private and has to be regulated and so on, is whether there will be leakage, whether there will be injections which can disrupt some of their practices and privacy requirements and compliance requirements.
44:32So that is being really looked on seriously right now. Yeah, sure. AI talent. I've heard you talking about the AI leadership vacuum before. There's clearly going to be, and there is, a shortage of AI talent. How should businesses, enterprise organizations perhaps, or SMEs even, how should they respond to this lack of talent available within the AI space right now? And what are your customers doing to upskill their employees in light of this new innovation? I think two key ways to look at it. One is catch them young, right? I mean, there is more AI talent in the younger set, folks who are just coming out of college and just graduating because they are used to some of these tools and technologies and they've got more recent exposure.
45:14So I would say, one, catch them young. And two, focus on retraining. Some of this is not complicated stuff. I mean, we're basically saying the new interface programming language for the future will be English, right? So we are talking about tools which can be used by non-engineers as well. So provide more training to your existing set of people, even business users and leadership and functional operators, rather than just focusing on your engineering and tech team. Yeah, of course. Some of these tools will actually make their lives easier. What type of training are we talking, Rak? Are we talking sort of AI ethics?
45:50Are we talking prompting? Yeah, and this is what we did, right, in our organization. So we have 32 ,000 people, and we have been able to train around 90 to 95 % of our tech workforce into the basics. And we curated a course for ourselves. We went to Coursera, we went to Udemy, we looked at different kinds of courses which are available and we came up with a list of 30 to 40 hours of training program. We said, this is like fundamental. Everybody should spend this to get level one proficiency and we tracked it. We had a team which was tracking the training and the compliance for that. and even we had our management team members trained on it.
46:27I personally conducted some training for our leadership and for some of the clients that we have done. We created three layers of this. We said, this is the basic, this is the intermediate and this is the advanced. Then we created function-specific trainings and we got an outside company to help us with, you know, sort of rolling it out and they had a platform for doing it virtually as well. And we said, okay, all the delivery heads, you need to get trained on these kinds of things. All the client partners and account managers, you need to get trained on this. And it's been an effort over the last one and a half, two years, but it's been very successful because people want to learn.
47:01Believe me, I think if you get the right set of people, tell them why this is important, I think people will take time to figure out new technologies. And that's the hallmark of a growing organization, of an organization which knows that AI first is where the future is. Yeah, no, absolutely. So what are you most excited about, Rack, in terms of the future of generative AI within business? And also, what are you most fearful of? I'm really excited about the evolution and the revolution that AI can bring about, right? From automation to augmentation to amplification of human capabilities to ultimately being autonomous in many ways in the beneficial sense.
47:40I mean, whether it's the agentic thing, which will go on further, the AGI, or the embodied AI where you get the robots and the AI together and are able to do some of these tasks in a more intelligent manner. That's Skynet, isn't it, of Terminator? When you've got the robots and AI together. And that's really where it could go wrong as well, right? If not controlled properly, if not supervised, if we don't have the right ethical guidelines, the right regulation, the right testing, the right safety guardrails, then things could go off track. I mean, I'm not just talking about enterprises and business.
48:14It could go off track in many other walks of life for us. So I think there is a danger if we don't manage it properly, if we don't control it, or if you're not sure how it's going to pan out, we might let it go out of control. Yeah, of course. You've just done an IPO, a 1 billion IPO, biggest IPO in India in 10 years for a services company, which is incredible. And congratulations to you and your team and everyone at Hexaway. That's incredible news. Looking back on your career now, if you could talk to your 21-year-old self, What would you say to that guy? What advice would you give to that person?
48:50You know, one of the things which I tell people, because I also run our future leaders program at Hexaware, which is where Fresh MBA graduates, and I'm a chief mentor for them. And I do it as one of my other hats I wear. I tell them, I think, essentially, it's that life and career is a marathon. It's not a sprint. Yeah. Right? Things will change as well. Prepare for the long haul. Be patient. Everybody, right? irrespective of their origin, status, whatever, ultimately over a period of time, 10, 20 years, will get to their potential if you apply yourself. If you have the right attitude, if you apply yourself well, your own talents and your merit will come through.
49:30You may find something starting off, oh, I have a wrong boss or I didn't get the right role to start with or whatever. But those are temporary aspects in one's career. Yeah. Right. You will find your niche, you will find your track. And over a period of time, your talents will get recognized and so don't fret, right? I mean, but I think very important, people think that they need to have an attitude and sometimes they just burn themselves out sometimes because they think it's a sprint. And I would advise that save it for the long run. It balances out over the long run and focus on your strengths, right?
50:05Don't fret too much about your weaknesses. Have a good attitude to people, the people you work with, your bosses, your circumstance. And I think finally, most important, is life goals can change, right? Your situation could change. So be a little nimble and look at opportunities as they come rather than having a very fixated sense of where you want to be and what you want to be. Sometimes new opportunities can come which can change your trajectory and that's fine. Absolutely. And that's what it's all about, isn't it? It's taking the opportunities that come your way. Look, I've really enjoyed chatting, Rak.
50:39Thank you so much. Some incredible content we've got here. Let's finish on this one. You've just gone through the IPO. what next for Hexaway? I'm focused on the party tonight. Why not, eh? It's going to be a big party. It is going to be a big party. But I think we had a very fun, festive event today morning. I think the whole management team was there. Our stock shares popped a little bit, which is great. We are focused on the future, right? So, you know, in short term, stock and share valuations can go up and down. That's fine. Our entire leadership, our CEO or board is focused on making us, I mean, currently our valuation is close to$6 billion.
51:17We want to be$10 billion in valuation, which means that we want to be$3 billion and above in terms of revenues. And we are currently around$1.5 billion in revenues. So our focus is next three to four years, we want to double our revenues and get to a$10 billion valuation. And we want to obviously be an AI-first company, which is actually disrupting this industry using AI. Rakh, thank you so much for your time. It's been a pleasure. Thanks for coming on the Tech Leaders Podcast. Likewise, Gareth, thanks for this opportunity.
51:51Oh, that was fab. I love that. So one of the most eye-opening parts of that conversation was about the impact of generative AI on the SaaS world. This idea of shifting from software as a service to service as a software, as Raksa, you know, it sounds unusual, but it really makes sense, doesn't it? You know, imagine being able to create custom software with hardly any technical skill, just by inputting the right prompt, this would be truly transformative and would transform a massive industry. And that is inevitably, it looks like that's where we are. So frankly, I don't feel like this is getting enough attention.
52:29If I were working in the SaaS world right now, I'd probably be looking over my shoulder and looking to get on the right side of this innovation. But I'd love to hear your thoughts about it. So please drop a comment or a review. Let's start a conversation about it. Thank you so much for tuning in. I really hope you enjoyed the conversation. And please don't forget to subscribe and engage.
52:56This episode was brought to you by Be Digital. Be Digital support leadership teams to optimize cost and get more out of technology investments. Be Digital and the team have unrivaled expertise with technology license management and data remediation and are therefore perfectly positioned to help prepare organizations for AI technology capability. And on the last point, BDigital have developed a cutting edge AI readiness assessment, which provides tech leaders with a platform they need to make well-informed decisions about AI adoption strategy in 2024 and beyond. Go to BDigital UK to find out more and get in touch.
53:41Thank you.
From the publisher
Join us this week on The Tech Leaders Podcast, where Gareth Davies sits down with Arun “Rak” Ramchandran, President and Global Head of Consulting and GenAI at Hexaware, on the day they launched a multi-Billion Dollar IPO in India. They discuss the Indian economic boom of the ‘90s, and why Gen AI is different to previous tech revolutions.
Time stamps:
- Hexaware’s Big Day: The IPO Launch (2:25)
- US vs. India: Where to List the IPO? (3:57)
- Leadership Philosophy: “Do It for Fun” (6:15)
- Rak’s Early Career Journey: Meandering, Horizontal and Vertical (7:51)
- The Indian Economic Boom (10:51)
- From Infosys to Virtusa: Regrets and Learnings (13:12)
- Leadership Lessons from Infosys Founder, N.R. Narayana Murthy (15:54)
- Why Rak Chose Hexaware (19:56)
- How Gen AI Differs from Previous Tech Revolutions (24:04)
- AI’s Ability to Consider Alternatives Humans Can’t (28:50)
- Will AI Displace White-Collar Workers? (31:10)
- Gen AI’s Impact on the SaaS Industry (33:47)
