In short
Netflix earnings and engagement anxieties (flat TV share, YouTube competition, AI use) plus Stephen Colbert’s cancellation and what it signals for Paramount/CBS; also a Murdoch/Trump/Wall Street Journal Epstein-story lawsuit angle.
Guest backgrounds
Lucas Shaw is a Bloomberg reporter covering media and entertainment. He’s based near the Colbert studio and discusses Hollywood business dynamics. Producer Craig Horlbeck is also present.
Key claims
Netflix beat earnings (revenue +16% to $11B; net income +45% to $3.1B) but shares fell ~5% because expectations were already high and Netflix’s US TV viewing share is flat (8.3% in June). Netflix is “worried about YouTube,” may consider more YouTube talent, and is using AI via its “production innovation shop.” Colbert’s cancellation is framed as financially driven but with a “cloud” of politics; Paramount cost-cutting likely threatens other scripted shows.
Notable examples
Squid Game Season 2; Adolescence (145M views); Peppa Pig; Miss Rachel; Stranger Things and Wednesday returning later; The Eternot (AI-assisted production); Fox/WSJ Epstein lawsuit.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VONetflix Earnings Discussion
2:31 to 4:40
Discussion on Netflix's recent earnings report and stock performance.
“Amid all the craziness of the Stephen Colbert cancellation and Rupert Murdoch getting sued by Donald Trump over a Jeffrey Epstein story, Netflix released its earnings on Thursday.”
Analyzing Colbert's Cancellation
4:40 to 7:30
Analysis of Stephen Colbert's cancellation and its implications.
“Hello from 30 blocks south of Ground Zero.”
Future of Late Night Shows
7:30 to 10:10
Speculation on the future of late night television and Colbert's next steps.
“It's very hard for people to take everything that they do at face value, whether that's fair or not.”
Netflix's Growth Expectations
10:10 to 14:00
Discussion on Netflix's growth expectations and market reactions.
“Does he do anything like this again, or does he do something totally different?”
Netflix Earnings and Market Reactions
14:00 to 20:17
Discussion on Netflix's earnings report and market reaction to it.
“because the stock market has been on a tear for a lot of these companies for much of the year.”
Kids Programming and Netflix's Success
20:46 to 22:32
Insights into Netflix's kids programming performance and its impact.
“was there anything else in the Netflix engagement report that really stood out to you?”
AI in Netflix Productions
22:32 to 25:00
Discussion on the use of AI in Netflix's production process and its implications.
“Are you going to do a box office over under, even though it doesn't count as box office, for Happy Gilmore 2?”
Challenges Facing Netflix
25:00 to 28:00
Exploration of Netflix's challenges in maintaining viewer engagement and competition.
“I mean, Kevin Feige at Marvel has been talking about that in his press rounds and Ted Sarandos.”
Trump vs. Murdoch: A Legal Tug-of-War
28:00 to 32:51
Explore the implications of Trump's lawsuit against Murdoch and Fox News.
“Craig, did you see what I referenced at the beginning of the show?”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00If you care about Hollywood, and I assume you do if you're listening to The Town, you should really be getting the whole story about Hollywood. That's what you get with Puck. I'm a founding partner at Puck, and I write a newsletter called What I'm Hearing. It's got exclusive news for insiders and analysis of the biggest stories. Puck has a bunch of great journalists. We just hired Kim Masters, who also covers Hollywood from the inside, plus media, sports, fashion, politics, and finance. It's a must-have for plugged-in people. Fans of the town get a discount on the description page of this episode or at puck.news slash the town.
0:31Go further into Hollywood by becoming a Puck member today. For adults with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis symptoms, every choice matters. Tremphaya offers self-injection or intravenous infusion from the start. Tremphaya is administered as injections under the skin or infusions through a vein every four weeks, followed by injections under the skin every four or eight weeks. If your doctor decides that you can self-inject Tremphaya, proper training is required. Tremphaya is a prescription medicine used to treat adults with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease and adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.
1:09Serious allergic reactions, increased risk of infections or lower ability to fight them, and liver problems may occur. Before treatment, get checked for infections and tuberculosis. Tell your doctor if you have an infection, flu-like symptoms, or need a vaccine. Explore what's possible. Ask your doctor about Trimphia today. Call 1-800-526-7736 to learn more or visit trimphiaradio.com. This episode is brought to you by LinkedIn Ads. Ever invest in something that seemed incredible at first but didn't live up to the hype? Marketers know that feeling. They optimize for the numbers that look great, impressions, reach, and reacts.
1:48But when they don't show revenue, well, that's a not-so-great conversation with the CFO. LinkedIn has a word for that, bull spend. Instead, why not invest in what looks good to your CFO? LinkedIn Ads generates the highest ROAS of all major ad networks. Reach the right buyers with LinkedIn Ads. You can target by company, industry, job title, and more. So cut the bull spend. Advertise on LinkedIn, the network that works for you. Spend$250 on your first campaign on LinkedIn ads and get a$250 credit for the next one. Just go to linkedin.com slash the town. That's linkedin.com slash the town. Terms and conditions apply.
2:31It is Monday, July 21st. Amid all the craziness of the Stephen Colbert cancellation and Rupert Murdoch getting sued by Donald Trump over a Jeffrey Epstein story, Netflix released its earnings on Thursday. Strong numbers yet again. Remember, Netflix doesn't release subscriber numbers anymore, but the financials all topped analyst targets and the co-CEOs, Greg Peters and Ted Sarandos. They said they were raising revenue and profit forecasts for the year. Despite all that, the Netflix stock then dropped 5 % on Friday. It's holding steady today. And why is that? Well, Netflix has enjoyed an incredible run over the past few months.
3:12It's now worth about$500 billion, far more than all the other traditional Hollywood studios combined. So while the results were good, Wall Street now expects great out of Netflix. And the dollar weakness probably boosted revenue outside North America. There's that. There's also another concern about Netflix, namely its share of viewing. The share of viewing on TVs has stopped growing in the U.S. According to Nielsen, Netflix generated 8.3 % of all TV viewing in June. That is down slightly from last year at this time. It's partly due to more competition, especially for more people watching YouTube on TVs.
3:49The other services have also kind of gotten their acts together. And maybe that's because there weren't as many breakout hits this quarter. Netflix did have more Squid Game and Adolescence has been a monster hit. The most viewed show of the first half of the year, actually. But new seasons of Stranger Things and Wednesday are coming later this year. That should juice engagement, exactly what Netflix wants right now. So today we've got Lucas Shaw from Bloomberg back. We're going to discuss the Netflix engagement report and the issues they're having. Should they be worried? What's working and not working based on new numbers?
4:22We'll also touch on a couple angles in the Colbert situation that hasn't been reported on yet. Here are Lucas's take on what's happening there. It's a combo platter today from the Ringer and Puck. I'm Matt Bellany and this is The Town.
4:37All right, we are here with Lucas Shaw from Bloomberg. Welcome back, Lucas. Hello from 30 blocks south of Ground Zero. I'm very close to the Colbert Studio. Oh, you are. Okay. We're referring to it as Ground Zero now. You mean the Ed Sullivan Theater that will likely be sold in the next year or so? I think that's part of this. They are looking at that real estate portfolio and saying, what can we offload? And they can get some money for that Ed Sullivan Theater. All right. You bring it up. So we will start with that. We're going to talk about Netflix, but first we got to get your take. The people must hear your take on the Stephen Colbert cancellation.
5:15I have offered mine. Where on the politics versus economics scale are you landing on the Colbert cancellation? Well, look, I can only go based off of what we know, right? If you just follow the facts, then I lean pretty heavy on the financial, the timing and the circumstances. There's a lot of extenuating circumstances or circumstantial evidence, shall we say, that would lead you to believe that politics play a big factor. But neither you nor I are in a position to be able to say that definitively and be irresponsible to do so. Oh, but wait a second. People on the internet are definitely in that position to say so.
5:52And many, many celebrities are in the position to say that. It is obvious that the business of late night has gotten worse and worse. Now, we can ask questions about why now, and I've heard the well-crafted explanations for why it had to be now. We've talked about it. They had producer deals with all these producers on the show that go from September to August, right? So if you're thinking about canceling the show after Colbert's deal is up in May, you have to tell those people now that their next deal is going to be September through May, not September through August. You and I have heard this, and it is a very credible, plausible explanation, which is why we're going with it.
6:35The fact that it also happened right as this deal is getting approved, the day before David Ellison is meeting with Brendan Carr, not the day before, the week that David Ellison is meeting with Brendan Carr, all of these things make it hard to accept that that is the only thing going, but it's all we got. I call it a cloud. There is a cloud of politics over this entire thing. It may not be the reason for the decision, but it's a factor. In ordinary circumstances, if you took the deal out of the equation, the need for approval, all of that, you would buy the financial decision. It's a show that the audience keeps getting smaller.
7:11It's not a huge hit on social. They're losing a bunch of money. And you would maybe even give them credit for saying, rather than squeeze this thing dry, we're just going to cut it and move on. But they have lost the benefit of the doubt in a lot of people's minds because of everything else, because they settled the Trump suit against CBS, because of all the things that they have done to get this deal across. It's very hard for people to take everything that they do at face value, whether that's fair or not. That's just how it's played out. I also think people in town are kind of in denial about what's about to happen at Paramount in general.
7:47100 percent, which is what I tried to get at in my newsletter a little bit. But there is about to be a lot like if they think there's been a lot of layoffs and cost cutting at Paramount to date, it's only going to get worse. Yeah, Colbert is only the beginning. I mean, these Star Trek shows are in jeopardy. The Taylor Sheridan shows, do they go after Lioness or one of the like lower rated Taylor Sheridan shows? He's never had a show canceled by Paramount Plus. I mean, CBS programming is going to start to look a lot like ABC and NBC, less scripted, more reality, more news filler, more celebrity stuff.
8:23I mean, are Paramount Plus and Pluto about to merge? Is The Daily Show in play? Dick Wolf, the FBI shows I'd be nervous if I were him. Amazing Race. All of these things that we associate with CBS and have just kind of continued on, the model increasingly doesn't support all that. And Cindy Holland, who's coming in to do her TV slate. She's got to find the money to make her TV slate. And I think it's going to come out of a lot of these things that we consider sacred cows at CBS. And it's only beginning for all of the uproar about the show, setting aside political or not. You asked Bill on his podcast last night, like how many of the people who are up in arms about this have been regularly watching like, right?
9:07I know I put it to Bill. I'm like, tell me right now, the last time you watch Stephen Colbert or any of these guys live in linear. Nobody does. I was never a late night viewer. But like if I have ever watched any of these shows, it has always been clips on YouTube or Instagram. Always. Yeah. And there's just not as much money in that. Yeah. The question is, can they find the model to do that? It's also like the only type of television or one of the only types of television that like Netflix has not figured out how to copy. I know. Craig's been asking like, why doesn't Netflix just have a late night show?
9:38It's a good question why it hasn't worked on Netflix. I don't think they've had the perfect match of program and platform. They've had the traditional late night type people do shows for them, like Hasan Minhaj, Letterman, John Mulaney. But those shows weren't the perfect match for the Netflix platform. They got to figure that out. Is it Colbert? Would Colbert work on Netflix? If you had to bet, what do you think is Colbert's next landing spot? Does he do anything like this again, or does he do something totally different? I think he does something totally different. And by totally different, I just mean probably a weekly show, something more in the John Oliver vein.
10:21Maybe he creates another character like Colbert Rapport, or does something with Sketch Comedy Incorporated. That's his background. I don't think he does a four or five night a week show for another platform. I just think those are dead, unless it's a podcast. where he could do a podcast five days a week or three days a week and then reverse engineer it via video to get it on some platform via video, which would be ironic if he ended up on Paramount Plus or one of these other platforms as a podcast-to-video situation. And then you guys can do some cross-promos together. We could, yeah. So, yeah.
11:00I mean, what do you think? Do you think he's going to come back? Well, not in hosting a nightly topical talk show, just because I think that that format is on fumes. I think they all look at John Oliver and say, I want that. Or some of the podcast hosts, or maybe a YouTube star. I don't think Colbert is going to do YouTube native. He's just not, that's just not him. Right. I do see him, maybe HBO or Netflix, or I don't think Amazon. I think the politics of the leadership at Amazon likely would prevent Colbert from going there. but the others, I think they're open for business. I just don't get it.
11:38I've never understood why the, oh, late night can't work on streaming, particularly can't work on Netflix. I've never understood that argument. They have like 90 million subs in America, which is similar to like the peak of cable subscription. Why can't Netflix have a Colbert show that they push in front of people's face in the evening every night? I don't understand. People don't watch Netflix that way. It's not a lean back type format. Netflix is not a lean back type format. I think Netflix is becoming a lean back type place. Okay, that's a good point. But I'm saying, meaning it's video on demand is what I'm saying.
12:10These late night shows were largely a product of you'd watch primetime, then you would watch your local news, and then you would stay on the channel and just keep watching the comedy interpretation of the news. And that's not how people watch Netflix. There's also no long-term value for any of these. And Netflix is still figuring out the only live programming that they do is sort of the big, loud event where they only have to make you come in for that once every month or two. They have struggled at directing people to something every night. And Bill Maher and John Oliver do draw an audience to HBO Max.
12:47And I know that they are churn preventers. People subscribe to HBO Max because of their favorite host being there. And Colbert does have an audience. And if Netflix were to host a show, they'd probably be people that would subscribe just for that. Do you think it's possible that Stewart would leave his show and him and Colbert would team up for something together somewhere else at like a Netflix? Love it. Maybe. I think he just pitched something called Babydoll. No, he definitely hasn't thought of that. Yeah. Babydoll could make it happen. All right. Speaking of Netflix, earnings last week, Thursday, the numbers came out.
13:20Typically very strong. They grew revenue 16%. They got a record$11 billion in revenue. Profit, their term, net income, up more than 45%,$3.1 billion in profit for Netflix. For the first half of this year, Netflix has already generated$6 billion in profit. For all of 2024, it generated$8.7 billion. So we can see where this is all going. Yet, on Friday, the Netflix stock dropped 5%. And there are these concerns about slowing growth. So what is going on at Netflix, Mr. Netflix's favorite reporter? I'm just going to ignore that you're... My slander. Yeah. The first is expectation. A lot of this was already priced in.
14:12And we're seeing it not just with Netflix, but my colleagues had a piece on how it's happening sort of across the earnings and the economy where you have pretty strong earnings reports with a lot of companies, but the stocks aren't popping. because the stock market has been on a tear for a lot of these companies for much of the year. So Netflix going into its earnings had been, its shares were up more than 40%. Over the previous year, its stock had doubled. So when you already had a company that was being valued at more than$500 billion, it beat its numbers, but they were all relatively small beats.
14:42And so the only way the stock was going to pop was if it was a big beat or they made some news that got people really excited. And so the fact that it was just like solid numbers didn't get people excited. the stock went down a little bit. I think the other factor is what you're getting at, which is it's probably too early to say people are worried about it. But their share of US TV viewing is basically flat over the last year plus. And by their own numbers, their engagement report, the global viewing was pretty much flat. And since they've added more customers, that means the amount of time that every customer spends watching is probably down a little bit.
15:18But however you look at it, the total amount of time that people are spending with Netflix has not been going up at the same time that streaming is growing. And that YouTube has been growing its audience pretty significantly, which is why they're so obsessed. At least on television. It's a company that is like just everything is running really smoothly, but you want to see, you know, stock market is looking into the future. And is this a company that has a ton of growth ahead of it? Or is it becoming one of these very profitable, but not fast growing media companies? Yeah. Yeah, I mean, one of the interesting things on the earnings call was when Stephen Cahall, the analyst, he raised the question that he raised on this show when he was a guest on whether Netflix should start poaching YouTube creators.
16:03And Ted Sarandos basically said, yes, we're interested. I mean, he couched it as we want the best talent from all over the world, wherever they originate. But it was interesting for him to say like, oh, we are interested in more YouTube talent. And I think that is a reflection on this kind of YouTube anxiety that Netflix has because they're growing and Netflix is not. Can I tell you why that framing is, I want to be nice because I like Steven, but like wrong. Please. There is no world in which Netflix can or will poach talent from YouTube. Why? Because they're not going to leave YouTube. There is a world in which Netflix can make shows with talent that also wants to be on Netflix.
16:45Sure, but you know what? People said the same thing about Shonda Rhimes. People said the same thing about Ryan Murphy. Money talks. Why wouldn't a YouTube drop their current following in order to take hundreds of millions of dollars at Netflix? It fails to understand the relationship between a lot of those big talent and YouTube. They see YouTube as the home base where they're going to be for years and years and years. And just leaving to do a show at Netflix that may or may not work is not worth it to them. Look, Mr. Beast, biggest star on YouTube. He made an Amazon show, but he didn't stop posting to YouTube.
17:19Yeah, that's the example. But not everybody is Mr. Beast. I don't know that there is anyone else out there that is going to get as much money as Amazon paid Mr. Beast to make that show. And by the way, you don't lose that YouTube audience. It's still there. You just go to Netflix for a few years and make content exclusively for them. Ryan Murphy ended up going back to Disney after he was at Netflix and he still had his franchises at Disney that he could go back to. And your audience sits there for a while on YouTube, but then you get$200,$300 million to be at Netflix. Maybe there are one or two people who will do it, but I do not think you will see some stampede of 10 or 20 top YouTubers saying, we're going to go exclusive to Netflix.
18:03That would require probably hundreds of millions of dollars. And I don't know that this is high enough on their priority list from a programming perspective to do that. The competition with YouTube, yes. But I don't know that their answer to that is going to be, we need to take the 10 biggest stars. Because the other thing to keep in mind about YouTube is YouTube is not dependent on any one talent or any few talent. It is a volume scale game. So you could take the 10 biggest stars off YouTube and it would not matter. That's true. I think Netflix is increasingly a scale game as well. They do depend on specific talents.
18:37They are, but it's a totally different type of scale. Yeah, I agree. But then you look at something like Miss Rachel and how well Miss Rachel did in the recent Netflix engagement report. I mean, the numbers are insane. One of the 10 biggest shows on Netflix, the new Cocomelon. So imagine if Miss Rachel was exclusive to Netflix. But she doesn't have to be. That's exactly my point. She doesn't have to be. But imagine the benefit to Netflix if she was exclusive to Netflix. I don't know how much it would benefit Netflix if she were exclusive to them. Because how much of it is that people are going to Netflix for Miss Rachel and how much of it is that people are already on Netflix, they want a kid's programming and they pick Miss Rachel?
19:17I don't know, man. You don't have a toddler. When the toddler starts screaming Miss Rachel, Miss Rachel, you got to turn on fucking Miss Rachel or else you're going to have hell to pay. It's an interesting argument and I don't know the answer to that. clearly Netflix will tell us what it thinks over the next year or two and whether it starts poaching YouTube talents. Yeah, YouTube is top of mind for all these companies. I just don't know that that exact strategy is how it's going to play out.
19:48Evening. Buyers remorse. Buy a new car? I'll be moving in. Let's get started. Sorry, I think there's been a mistake. I bought it from Carvana. You what? Yeah, great price. I even have seven days to love it or return it. So there's no... No, no buyer's remorse. More like buyer's rejoice. I guess I'll let myself out. Congratulations. I mean it. Buyer's rejoice. Buy your car today on Carvana. Limitations and exclusions may apply. See our seven-day return policy at Carvana.com. This episode is brought to you by the Active Cash credit card from Wells Fargo. That's a mouthful, but that's because it packs a lot in.
20:24earn unlimited 2 % cash rewards on purchases with it big or small. So whether it's buying tickets to the game and grabbing a coffee, it earns unlimited 2 % cash rewards on purchases. Say it with me. The active cash credit card from Wells Fargo. Be a two percenter. Learn more at wellsfargo.com forward slash active cash. Terms apply. Other than the Miss Rachel, was there anything else in the Netflix engagement report that really stood out to you? On the kids front, I think the power of Peppa Pig. Yeah, it's the number one show if you add together all the seasons for kids. Yeah, I mean, it's kind of insane.
21:00And that's another one where like the kids audience, I think, is so undervalued by the mainstream media, people like you and me, because we don't watch that stuff ourselves. And it's just such a driver of value for these services. It's kind of amazing. the top netflix movie was back in action the cameron diaz jamie fox movie not a surprise there to me those huge talent fees well worth it yeah exactly and the fact that they can put cameron diaz on a tile and people haven't seen her in a while the top non-netflix movie was secret life of pets 75 million views no surprise there the venom the last dance was up there which is pretty surprising given how much people hated that movie, but did well on Netflix.
21:51The top docu-series, not surprising. American Murder, Gabby Petito, 56 million views. Were you surprised by how big the gap was between adolescence and everything else? A little bit. Adolescence in the streaming report was 145 million views. And that is at least double the viewership of every other show except Squid Game Season 2. And three. So everybody on Netflix has watched Adolescence. It's kind of crazy. I have a confession to make. I still haven't seen it. No, I haven't either. So I guess everybody except us. Yeah, we really got to get on it. Are you going to do a box office over under, even though it doesn't count as box office, for Happy Gilmore 2?
22:37Oh, we should. That's a good one. Yeah. I do think Happy Gilmore 2 would do well in theaters if Universal made that movie and put it in theaters. They chose to let Netflix make it. Probably had something to do with Sandler's deal at Netflix and him saying, I will do this if it's at Netflix. But yeah, that's a big whiff for theatrical. That movie would have done well, and it's probably going to be huge on Netflix. I want to talk a little bit about something else they talked about on the call, which was AI. There is an Argentinian post-apocalyptic thriller called The Eternot. I think I mispronounced that.
23:12And they acknowledged that they used AI tools developed by the Netflix in-house, what they call the production innovation shop. That is a very intentionally vague term. And they used AI on this. And it is not a SAG-AFTRA production. It is a foreign production. And to me, that just highlights the kind of farce of what the guilds are doing here on AI. They can prevent the American-based productions from using AI in certain situations. They can always make sure that everyone's getting paid and getting credited. But Netflix and Amazon and the others, these are now global platforms. They are hosting content from all over the world.
24:00And the stuff that's made outside of the US, not under the guilds, is going to have AI on it. It was notable in that, other than the Amazon House of David show, this is probably the foremost example of a major Hollywood studio company streaming service kind of owning to use of AI. Yeah, everyone's using it. But they're not talking about it. Ted Sarandos in particular has been very consistent in his messaging saying that it's not all about saving money. We think this will make our stuff better. Whereas you've had some people really pushing about how it's cost savings. They're trying to make it not just about cost savings.
24:38At the same time, they said that what they did in this program wouldn't have been possible without it. Yeah. I think that we've seen a subtle shift in the messaging from the executive class in Hollywood. I think that the messaging now is about the ability to save money and to, quote, do more on these movies if we are able to save money. I mean, Kevin Feige at Marvel has been talking about that in his press rounds and Ted Sarandos. And you're hearing it more and more as, you know, this is an innovation tool. This is coming to help all of our creatives. And we are able to be more efficient. And that's a subtle shift from, I think, the head in the sand aspect of the public discourse for a while on AI.
Read the full transcript
25:26Well, everybody can agree that film and TV is too expensive to produce right now. It's the number one problem right now if you're talking about the studio business. You don't need to have every summer blockbuster cost$200 million. dollars. Especially if the box office expectations are coming down for a lot of these movies, then the cost has to come down. All right. So you're at Netflix. What are you most nervous about right now? Viewers share being flat. Their whole goal with adding more types of programming, expanding all over the world, doing the live sports, as they need to grow their ad business, they talk pretty openly.
26:06They need to grab more time of viewing. They used to say we're about 10 % of TV time we want to go after the next 90%. Now, because they're trying to quiet the concerns about YouTube, which obviously they're worried about it. They're like, well, YouTube and Netflix combined is about 20%. So we're really focused on getting that next 80%. But no matter how you look at it, they want people who are leaving television, linear television, and coming streaming to watch Netflix. And right now, they're not grabbing very much of that share. Yeah, it's a land grab. It's like when, you know, So America opened up the West to anyone who would go there and set up a homestead.
26:45And Netflix sees this vast swath of linear viewership that is still out there and up for grabs. And they want to capture more of it. And right now, it doesn't look like they are capturing more of it. It's one of the reasons they just did that deal in France with TF1, the big broadcaster there. They want people who are leaving TF1 on TV. If they come to stream, don't go to Amazon. Don't go to somewhere else. go to Netflix. Because they're looking at the numbers in the US, and even though their share is steady, and they still have the depth, but at the top with the big hits, some of their competitors are starting to have more and more big hits.
27:22And they don't have the depth to keep people going, but if people are coming into HBO for the Pit and White Lotus, if they're coming into Apple for Severn, if they're coming into Paramount Plus for the Sheridan shows, there is a greater risk that they will stick around instead of defaulting back to Netflix, which has been the default for so long. Exactly. The answer is Colbert. If they put Colbert on Netflix. The Colbert-Stewart mashup, and Craig can get put on as an executive producer. Craig needs a producer credit on the Colbert-John Stewart mashup show. They switch off. One night's Colbert, one night's Stewart.
27:54Friday nights, they team up, and it's like the big end of the week. It's the two of them. Done. Baby doll, give him a call. Alright, thank you, Lucas. Thanks, Matt. We're back with the call sheet. Great. Craig, did you see what I referenced at the beginning of the show? This Donald Trump lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch and the Wall Street Journal over the Jeffrey Epstein doodle story? Yes. The birthday letter. Yes. Kind of an interesting story. This is why, honestly, as much as Rupert Murdoch has kind of poisoned a lot of the old people in this country with the Fox News stuff over the past few decades, I've always liked Rupert.
28:33I believe that deep down he is a news person. He values the story over all of the politics stuff. And this is where Rupert Murdoch's true self comes in. He has a television network, Fox News, that is 100 % pro-Trump and doing the president's bidding. But he also owns the Wall Street Journal, which does actual journalism and reports pretty aggressively on the president. And Trump called him to kill the story. And he's like, F you, we're doing the story. Sue us. Do you think this will result once again in kowtowing to Trump and settling and paying him? Well, that's what my prediction is today, because I think the consequence of being in litigation with Trump is that we are not going to see a sale of the Fox television empire anytime soon.
29:22For those who haven't been following, Rupert is involved in this pretty elaborate probate case in Nevada, where he is essentially suing or involved in litigation with his children, very succession-like. But there was a negative ruling for Rupert and Lachlan earlier this year that said essentially that the children, the non-Lachlan children, the three others, could potentially have disposition over whether Fox is sold or what Fox News looks like once Rupert dies. And my reaction to that was that I thought Rupert would engineer some kind of a sale or transaction that puts the Fox assets in some kind of private equity hands or some big Republican billionaire's hands with the caveat that Lachlan be in charge, and that would be a way for him to pay off his children and keep the empire in Lachlan's hands once Rupert dies.
30:16I don't think that's going to be possible now, at least for the foreseeable future. I don't think Trump is going to let that happen while they're involved in litigation, unless Rupert writes him a big check like Disney and Paramount and Amazon and Meta have done to settle this. So maybe we'll see a settlement, but for right now, I think this makes it significantly less likely that Fox will be sold in the next year or so. Who would you have said would have been a buyer? There's a bunch of private equity firms that could do a blood pact with the Murdochs to take control of these TV assets and agree that Lachlan will run them.
30:58Maybe offshoot of the Koch brothers, maybe even Elon. I don't think Elon would get involved in that anymore. Do you think this is going to change the Fox coverage of Trump in the coming months? No, it hasn't so far. In fact, Fox hasn't really even discussed or mentioned this lawsuit, which is pretty extraordinary. It just shows that Rupert has big discipline when it comes to the audience of his various outlets. The New York Post has covered it, but the Wall Street Journal is fighting its own fight here and Fox has not taken a stand because they know that the Fox News audience doesn't want to hear about that.
31:32They want to hear stuff that is pro-Trump. They don't want to hear about some scandal involving Jeffrey Epstein. So it's kind of amazing. It's been interesting to see some of the Trump supporters starting to turn. That's the thing, is that if the noise around Epstein gets loud enough, I think Fox will have to cover. Right. Like when the Tucker Carlson start to turn and cover this stuff, it'll be interesting to see if Fox follows. Because they'll lose audience. You know, that's the problem with Fox. They're not afraid of the left. They're afraid of the right. They're afraid of the audience getting sucked away by Newsmax and OAN and Tucker Carlson and all of these people online.
32:07And that's what they did after the election, after the whole Arizona call for Biden, is that they pivoted right because they were losing audience to these outlets that were denying the election. So that's what got them into the whole Smartmatic and Dominion lawsuits in the first place, is they were feeling pressure from the right. And if they start to feel pressure on Epstein, then I think they will. But for now, it's the journal in one media ecosystem and Fox News in another and Rupert kind of balancing on that tightrope. So you know what? He is who he is. 94 years old. All right. That's the show for today.
32:43I want to thank my guest, Lucas Shaw, producer Craig Horlbeck, artist Justin Lopez. I want to thank you. We'll see you a couple more times this week.
32:52This episode is brought to you by Whole Foods, who has your back to school eats sorted. Wow. We're going back to school already. They've got your fast and easy breakfast covered with frozen waffles and pancakes. Lunchboxes are looking tasty with organic seedless grapes and baby carrots and essentials like cheese sticks. Then for dinner, you can build your own meal. Choose from a variety of entrees like chicken scalopini in two sides, and it's all good too. Whole Foods has banned more than 300 food ingredients store-wide. Shop back to school must-haves at Whole Foods Market in-store or online. This episode is brought to you by ChatGPT.
33:26Hey, it's Bill Simmons from the Bill Simmons Podcast. Have you guys heard about ChatGPT work? It's the new way to use ChatGPT for bigger multi-step projects. And when you need more than just answers, give ChatGPT work access to your apps and files, and it can create real work documents like spreadsheets, slides, and structured reports. Get started at ChatGPT.com by selecting work mode available on Plus and Pro plans.
From the publisher
Matt is joined by Bloomberg’s Lucas Shaw to discuss what's next for Stephen Colbert, and whether Netflix could ever produce a successful late-night show. Then, they dissect Netflix's latest earnings report and highlight its strengths and weaknesses, including why the stock fell despite strong financial earnings, how concerning is its stagnation in the share of viewing metric, its use of AI in ‘The Eternaut’, and more (02:42). Matt finishes the show with a prediction about the future of Fox amid Donald Trump’s latest lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal (25:12).
For a 20 percent discount on Matt’s Hollywood insider newsletter, ‘What I’m Hearing ...,’ click here. Email us your thoughts! thetown@spotify.com
Host: Matt BelloniGuest: Lucas Shaw
Producers: Craig Horlbeck and Jessie LopezTheme Song: Devon Renaldo
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
