In short
The Apple TV+ series Murderbot, created/adapted by Paul and Chris Weitz from Martha Wells’ novel All Systems Red. The episode discusses the show’s “comedy of manners in space” tone, its character-mystery coming-of-age arc, and how it avoids the usual “robot wants to be human” trope. It also covers production choices (voiceover, design, casting) and how violence is handled with psychological realism.
Guests (backgrounds)
Paul Weitz and Chris Weitz are writer-directors and longtime collaborators (notably American Pie). They are show creators/adapters for Murderbot. They discuss working with actor Alexander Skarsgård (voiceover/internal monologue performance) and cast including Noma Dumezweni, David S. Melchin, Sabrina Wu, Tatiana Jones, Tamara Podemski, Akshay Khanna, and others.
Key claims
Murderbot is a machine-cloned human hybrid that hacks its governor module, gains free will, and pretends to protect while obsessing over entertainment feeds (e.g., Sanctuary Moon). It becomes “infected” by human messiness but doesn’t become human. The show treats identity and personhood as a journey, not an allegory.
Notable examples
Murderbot’s obsession with Sanctuary Moon; the “hysterical laughter” reaction to violence (Sabrina Wu); voiceover recorded with Skarsgård in Copenhagen; and a prop gag involving a non-swiveling chair during an interrogation scene.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOExploring Murderbot: A Comedy of Manners
0:45 to 4:48
Discussion on the comedic elements of Murderbot and its narrative style.
“Yeah, Chris kept describing it as a comedy of manners and now he can explain to me what he meant.”
Murderbot's Identity and Mission
4:48 to 6:44
Delve into the character of Murderbot and its journey of self-discovery.
“whose job it is to protect usually mining expeditions.”
Violence and Psychological Realism
6:44 to 8:16
Examination of the themes of violence and its psychological impact in the show.
“are paul and chris weiss the new project for apple tv plus it's murder bot there is this thing that But we've talked about sort of fantasy things that appeal to all of us before, like the Elwick books.”
Character Dynamics and Representation
8:16 to 10:56
Insight into character relationships and social themes within the series.
“And one of the characters burst into hysterical laughter upon saying this violence, which is Sabrina Wu's character.”
Voice Acting and Performance
10:56 to 12:43
Discussion on the voiceover work and performance by Alexander Skarsgård.
“That's what I was saying before we started, and that the books feel in their way kind of reported.”
Voiceover Challenges and Actor's Modulation
14:01 to 18:02
Learn how voiceover sessions were approached and the nuances of actor performance.
“Yeah, I mean, we had many, many voiceover sessions after shooting.”
Character Depth and Actor's Commitment
18:02 to 20:25
Explore how the actor's choices enhance character depth in 'Murderbot'.
“Well, like if you look at Infinity Pool, right, the weird contortions that he has put through in that.”
Production Design and Visual Storytelling
20:25 to 24:20
Discover the significance of production design and its impact on storytelling in sci-fi.
“But she was great in terms of hiring a whole team that were kind of storytellers.”
Humor and Emotion in Sci-Fi Narrative
24:20 to 27:30
Understand how humor and emotion are woven into the narrative of 'Murderbot'.
“And so that's where sort of Murderbot's love of, you know, not sort of high quality award winning entertainment is something that I personally can identify with.”
Exploring Spielberg's Jaws Experience
28:32 to 29:41
Discussion about Spielberg's reflections on making Jaws and the pressures he faced.
“You can also hear this show at KCRW.com.”
Show all 20 chapters
Cultural Impact of Jaws
29:41 to 31:21
Laurent discusses the international phenomenon of Jaws and its reception in different cultures.
“And he offered to me the human perspective, you know, of what that experience was like.”
Literary Context of Jaws
31:21 to 32:56
Discussion on the book Jaws and its subplots that were not included in the film adaptation.
“It's Peter Benchley wanting to quote what Fidel Castro said to him, because Castro had read the book.”
Title Evolution of Jaws
32:56 to 34:26
Laurent shares insights on the various titles considered before settling on 'Jaws'.
“But it was interesting, too, to see you have his family on camera and to see the number of titles.”
Filmmaker Camaraderie in the Jaws Era
34:26 to 36:23
Discussion on the sense of community among filmmakers during the Jaws era and its influence.
“It struck me, like at the beginning of the film, where Spielberg talks about going, like just driving around in the car with Janet Maslin and Albert Brooks, looking to see how the film was doing, just driving around.”
Influence of Jaws on Future Filmmakers
36:23 to 37:16
Laurent talks about how Jaws inspired many filmmakers, including Steven Soderbergh and Emily Blunt.
“They're influenced by MTV and music videos and fast cutting.”
Diverse Perspectives in Jaws Documentary
37:16 to 39:30
Laurent discusses casting different filmmakers for the Jaws documentary and their unique insights.
“And thanks for correcting me on my cynicism here.”
The Production Struggles of Jaws
39:30 to 41:12
Insight into the struggles faced during the production of Jaws and its parallels to the film's themes.
“And at one point Spielberg even said to Esquire magazine, maybe I'll just continue making Jaws for the rest of my life.”
The Evolution of Jaws' Script
41:12 to 42:00
Discussion on the collaborative writing process of the iconic Indianapolis scene in Jaws.
“So it's fascinating to me that it's one of the few cases, I think, in film history where the production, the making of the film is exactly a reflection of the story itself.”
Exploring the Evolution of a Scene in Jaws
42:00 to 44:35
Learn about the collaborative process behind the iconic Indianapolis scene in Jaws.
“but the tensions and extremely competitive nature of the three stars of the film.”
Lessons from The Shawshank Redemption
45:35 to 49:34
Will Packer shares how The Shawshank Redemption has inspired him through resilience.
“Producer Will Packer is no slacker either.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00From KCRW Santa Monica and KCRW.com, it's The Treatment.
0:14It's The Treatment, which you can also hear at KCRW.com slash The Treatment. I haven't had these two gentlemen as a team before me in about 20 years. The writers, directors, Paul and Chris White, are back together on a new project for Apple TV+. The show is Murderbot. First of all, guys, thanks so much for being back. Thanks, Elvis. Thanks, Elvis. See you again. And the show is really, really funny. It's really, really funny. And this thing that you guys tend to do where everything is kind of a comedy of manners and that you can turn colonialization and wanton savagery and gore into something out of Thackeray.
0:57Well, it is really funny, essentially. Depending on one's point of view. Yeah, Chris kept describing it as a comedy of manners and now he can explain to me what he meant.
1:11I'm not sure I actually even know what a comedy of manners is, but I did insist it was a comedy of manners in space. And that was its sort of distinguishing feature, although that's not how he pitched it to Apple. Because I don't think they would have. It's Jeeves and Bertie Worcester in space, I think, was how he pitched it to Apple. Oh, my God. Of course. I'll buy the second season already. In its way, it's kind of a character mystery. There's an evolution of character. this thing, this creature, this hybrid, this android, whatever you're calling them these days, who, do we say who or that? I think you can say who because it's a person.
1:47It would call itself it, but it also knows that it's a person. It's not a human, though. Let's ask chat GPT how it prefers to be called. Yeah, thank you, because nobody needs me on this show anyway. Let's get chat GPT to ask all the questions. But I feel like what it's about, and I want to ask you guys, is it's really the story of the protagonist, played by Alexander Skarsgård, learning what it is. Yeah. But it learns what it is in proximity to things, which I think is a really interesting sort of twist on the original material. One thing that Martha Wells did, the author of the books, which is great, is not do the trope of the robot that wants to become human.
2:30It inverts it entirely. It's very much aware, it thinks, of what humans are like and has no desire whatsoever to be like that. So a lot of it is about what it isn't as much as what it is in terms of Murderbot figuring itself out. It continues to want to figure out who it is, basically. We also saw it as a coming-of-age story in some ways. It's kind of a mash-up of a bunch of things because there's also a noir element to it. It's Philip Marlowe, who seems to be hard-bitten and cynical but keeps on doing kind of the right thing. There's a mystery as to why all this stuff is going down. Also, it feels a little bit like Chinatown, too, in that there's corruption involved.
3:12There's also this sort of look at utopia. There's a lot in it. it's all very light on its feet which is I think you're laughing Paul I'm just laughing because of the Chinatown reference because one way it's like Chinatown is that there's a yech element to it you know the stuff going on between John Euston and Faye Dunaway in Chinatown is not particularly savory yeah so that's why I was laughing yech which is our mad magazine influence also very important influence here well no part of this is that like early on Murtabot is says that it's worried about being infected by the sort of human messiness and sloppiness of this group of people that it's trying to protect.
3:57And it sort of does become slightly infected by it over the course of dealing with them and over the course of sort of becoming something. But eventually it's not fatal. It doesn't become human in the end, even though as an audience, I think everybody's used to the idea of rooting for everybody to be together and to be the same. I think that in terms of the book, I actually do think that there's a lot thematically in the book that's what you're talking about. And one of the themes that one's really drawn to is this idea that you shouldn't tell something else what to be. And that is, to me, the whole journey of this.
4:34Well, now we said what it isn't. Maybe I ask you guys to describe a little bit what the show is for people, because it's kind of hard for me to do. The show, I mean, is based on these amazing books by Martha Wells. And so the show is about a machine-cloned human hybrid whose job it is to protect usually mining expeditions. It's rented, it's owned by a corporation and rented out and usually treated like a piece of equipment at best. And then it figures out how to hack its own governor module, which is the thing that prevents it from acting in its own interest or with its own decisions. And it could kill everybody around it and sort of hijack a ship and go off into space.
5:25But it realizes that it would soon be hunted down. And what would it do anyway? So what it stumbles upon is that it can access the entertainment feeds, meaning all these shows, including this sort of wonderful schlocky show called Sanctuary Moon. And it just becomes obsessed with watching its own TV shows, basically. Yeah, so basically it's going to continue doing its job and pretending to be under the control of the humans it's protecting while just watching a lot of soap operas. And that's its sort of middle term plan, basically. But this gets kind of screwed up by the fact that it's next. The people supposed to protect are actually, for once, not a bunch of greedy psychopaths.
6:06They are from a kind of consensually ruled, somewhat commune-like set of planets called the Preservation Alliance. And they start to treat Murderbot like a person, which makes for trouble because it really doesn't want to deal with their emotions. It doesn't want to deal with any kind of entanglements. and furthermore they're they're kind of out of their depth because something very dangerous and terrible is happening on this planet uh where they find themselves and murder bot has to protect them while at the same time in theory not exposing the fact that it it has its own free will that's our elevator pitch that's 25 words or less barry dillard love it it's the treatment my guests are paul and chris weiss the new project for apple tv plus it's murder bot there is this thing that But we've talked about sort of fantasy things that appeal to all of us before, like the Elwick books.
7:01They have a sense of play about carnage. Yeah. And this has that, too. No, it's true. They share a deep cynicism of human nature and somebody who's incredibly good at killing people, but who questions their own actions to some degree. I mean, the thing about carnage in Martha's universe is that as opposed to just sort of moving on or high-fiving, Martha's human characters actually suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder. They are traumatized by violence. And that has resonance in the books that are coming up, which was a really interesting aspect for us as well. Because in spite of the fact that there is violence and sometimes it's kind of funny in the sense that it's abrupt and unexpected, at the same time, there's a level of psychological realism to the characters that I think isn't always present in science fiction.
7:51No, in fact, there's a moment that's as chilling as anything I've ever seen, which I don't want to give away, but there's a panoply of reactions to this moment of violence that really is sort of, A, tells us what these characters have endured here to for, but also what this moment of violence is like in real time. And I just thought that was a really terrific beat that really, I think, informs the show as much as anything else. Thanks. And one of the characters burst into hysterical laughter upon saying this violence, which is Sabrina Wu's character. And they came up with the idea of what if I started laughing?
8:24And that is, it's interesting because in seeing some people's reactions to it, some people actually brought up their own sort of inappropriate reactions to getting in a car accident or being around violent situations. So to some degree, it's sort of trusting people and the actors playing the stuff to have their own reactions to it. That also reminds me of that moment of hysteria from the first Alien, the famous sort of gut buster. and the reactions there. And also it reminds us too that these people are all working people and people literally in their trenches to sweating. And I just thought that was a great sort of, for me, point of reference too.
9:03You know, I think Alien is a movie that does so many things well, but it has that kind of, although I think it was made in the 80s, it has that kind of 70s sense of working people in their culture and a sort of a natural reaction to something terrible. There is a kind of a workshop feeling to that. And that was a great thing that we were able to do with our cast, who got along so well that they really were able to vibe in their characters in that sort of way. But it also felt to me incredibly great in Modern that there's a couple of scenes, sort of these two women of color who represent authority going toe to toe.
9:41I thought it was extraordinary to watch. I mean, like I said, it's a show that accomplishes so much. And those beats to me, I was exhilarated by them. I think the idea with that and some other things that might be kind of considered whatever, progressive or woke or something, it's like to do it casually because we're in space in the far future. And a lot of the things that we are kind of plagued with now have been kind of figured out. Or at least that is the least of people's concern. They're mostly about getting as much money as possible. So, yeah, that was a really fun scene. just kind of post-facto to think, oh, that was actually kind of cool.
10:16But it wasn't like we had kind of massive plans to do it that way in order to demonstrate something. And like, again, it's in Martha's world, you know, there are probably majority of female characters as opposed to male characters. So in terms of the sci-fi without, you know, ever kind of trumpeting it, it's just a world in which things have organized themselves in a slightly different way. And also So there are books that appeal to the aromantic, asexual community, to people who are neuroatypical. But it's not trying to be an allegory in any way. This is just the way that things have kind of fallen out.
10:56That's what I was saying before we started, and that the books feel in their way kind of reported. They're not really commenting on what's happening. It's just this relation of incidents. And I think what's great about the show is that we really get a sense of who these people are right away. Chris loves when I make this reference, but one of the things I was thinking of early on was the Peanuts gang and how like immediately you know who they are. Like you got to be murder bot. Oh, boy. Was partly like he has it has a Charlie Brown aspect of depression and a Snoopy aspect of being able to do things such as.
11:30Fly around on a doghouse. I'm stressing this too far. Fantasizing like Snoopy does. I mean, there's a moment in the series, which is definitely from like Charlie Brown Christmas, which is each of the characters dancing in their own particular way. And somehow they just knew how that was going to be for each of their characters. What's interesting, too, is that you tied together by at some point when we go off these characters, someone would say, you know, he can hear us. Just so that that character's presence is always there. Yeah. Well, they continually forget that Murderbot is an extremely sophisticated surveillance device amongst other things.
12:08Like the ones in our pockets. Exactly. We are, in fact, constantly being watched by intelligences, by machine intelligences. But they forget. And so they tend to kind of let it all hang out, much to Murderbot's dismay. And there are several times where you realize that Murderbot is watching all of them on several kind of surveillance cameras at once. And it doesn't even want to. It's being forced to watch this show, which is much more messy and boring and upsetting than the one that it would choose to watch, which is Sanctuary Moon. Well, now we've been reminded the show is being produced by Apple TV+.
12:46It's on Apple TV+. It's Murderbot. It's creators, adapters. Paul and Chris Weitz are here. We're going to take a break this morning. Come stay with us. This is The Treatment.
13:14As I was just saying, it's hard not to give too much of Murder, Bottle, away, but we can talk about the joy of it. This creator is Paul and Chris Weiss. This show is on Apple TV+. This is the treatment. I guess one of the things I was thinking, too, when we were talking about this a bit before we started, is making the voiceover work. And what Skarsgård does as an actor is so interesting because a character who doesn't normally inflect, he brings so many different changes on disgust and disdain. Alexander was very keen on not expressing too much and not sort of revealing too much emotionally with his performance, but really going for it in terms of its internal monologue.
13:52And then it was a process of literally doing every line, I mean, frequently like 100 times or so because Alexander likes to work. Yeah, I mean, we had many, many voiceover sessions after shooting. We recorded during shooting and sometimes in good enough kind of audio that we could have used it. but eventually that all sort of felt like slug dialogue because once we had the footage cut together and took a look at it we wanted to get it just right Alex is always kind of bouncing around the world and we one of the great things was being able to go to Copenhagen just to record voiceover with him which is like the most uh like glamorous thing that has happened in a long time uh flying into Copenhagen uh yeah it was a lot of work and and in retrospect you know it all happens in this kind of rush of work.
14:43And it's not that we didn't think Alex was really good, but it's amazing to see the kind of modulation of his performance from moment to moment and episode to episode, especially knowing that a lot of it was shot out of sequence. And he's kind of there in the right place at the right time in terms of his expression and the way that he's comporting himself all the time. I think what's interesting too is that that's where his vanity comes out. You can see his sort of sense of self and that becomes more and more pronounced over the course of the show with the voiceover, which I think it's interesting that voiceover offers so much not only in terms of sort of exposition but in terms of inflection what that tells us about how his vanity sort of spikes as he's around these awful people.
15:31Yeah, I mean personally I can say that I'm much funnier inside my own head than I am when I'm trying to make comedy. and you know we all have this like amazing internal monologue going which is incredibly dramatic and exciting and we're able to imagine we said the right thing in the right situation and then there's certain moments where and murder bots may able to do this without having to deal with anybody treating it like a person so it's all it's had and then there's certain moments where it forgets that it says something out loud and gets itself in trouble and also So there's a moment after which, after the point at which it's been discovered that it has hacked its governor module and has freedom of choice.
16:15It's out in the open. It's out of the closet as a person with free will where it doesn't constrain its disdain for the crew as much. So it behaves a little differently towards them externally as well. I guess I wondered what your first conversations with him were like, because I think it's a really hard thing to pull off just because so much of it is nuance in terms of not only vocal inflection on the voiceover, but in the room as well. Because, again, that starts to creep out the more he's around humans. It's almost like watching John Cleese at a certain point. He does everything but sort of like glare at him.
16:58Alexander is somebody who has this sort of exterior, which you might make judgments about, like, oh, he's really good looking, tall, handsome dude. And he probably likes being that. And he doesn't mind it, I think, but it's not in any way the essence of who he is as a person, Alexander. He's very idiosyncratic, eccentric, is eager to do things that are embarrassing to the normal person. And he's also really cerebral. So actually the thing was, as we were talking about it with him, we can see kind of like flashes of this character. Oh, because one of the things about him as an actor is he's not afraid as an actor to voice the kinds of things that we wouldn't expect to see coming from somebody who looks like that.
17:41Yeah. His affinity for saying so in this kind of infantile with a deadpan is really kind of perfect for this, isn't it? Yeah, I think he actually seeks that out. He seeks it out not just in terms of performance, in terms of what he says, but he seeks out uncomfortable positions to put himself in as an actor. Really? Well, like if you look at Infinity Pool, right, the weird contortions that he has put through in that. And then, you know, he was about to go off and do something where he turns into a kind of a tree creature as well. I remember having this discussion with him when he was like, do you think I should wax my body?
18:23I mean, in order to play Murderbot. And I said, well, listen, man, it might make like 2 % difference in the perception of the character. Like, I'm not going to force you to do this. He's like, yeah, I should wax. And then he had to do it every week for months on end, I think quite painfully. He was quite happy when he could stop doing that. the fact that he so often in this show gets too close to people. I mean, there's this sort of thing of that creature not understanding what proximity does. You immediately make people uncomfortable by getting too close to them. And there seems to be some perverse glee as an actor he takes in sort of doing that.
19:04We can feel that in performance terms. It's an interesting thing about Alex, and maybe it is because he's so cute, that he's actually, he knows he's just got a lot to play with, right? He's not going to lose the interest of the audience if he does something that is embarrassing or looks kind of silly or looks ungainly. Having said that, the whole performance is kind of a gamble because he was not with our collusion early on. He said, I don't want to sort of show him that I'm thawing towards anyone because then the tension is going to be gone, basically. The framing feels like a feature film to me.
19:38And the production, it feels really lived in in a way that doesn't feel like it's aping things that have come before it. which I feel like is really hard to do in doing science fiction and fantasy, because so much of that is referring to this and this and this and that and that. And it's actually felt like in this sort of way that some things won't change in the future. And so rather than trying to sort of come up with some thing that would be a supplicant, you just, well, let's just say there's a table. And not pretend that it has to float in space or something. This fascinating combination of sort of futuristic thinking in the practical, in production terms, informs the show.
20:15We had a really great production designer, Su Chen, who did Shang-Chi and is capable of doing things in a variety of budget levels. But she was great in terms of hiring a whole team that were kind of storytellers. And the thing was to be creative without sort of being self-conscious or too fabulous and to try to navigate something that was conscious of other cliches but not falling into them, hopefully. Yeah, I mean, there's so many versions of this that have been done so well. Sort of the world of Alien is one I know. Star Wars, obviously. Star Trek, there are all kinds of aesthetics that you have to be conscious of and try to be different from without bending over backwards too far.
21:00And in ways, it's kind of the analogy as to the way that people speak in the show, which is it's pretty slangy and in everyday speech. There's the occasional God or. Yeah. There's the occasional neologism, but not not much. And yeah. So the idea is, yeah, there are tables in space and chairs in space. And also that this group, the reason that they have Murtabot is because they got the cheapest security unit and that has to sort of extend to everything. So they have an extruded environment that they're living in while they're exploring this planet for mining rights. So it's all kind of crappy looking, but they're kind of hippies.
21:37So they do graffiti all over it. And, you know, without worrying if they're going to have to pay for it. It's a treatment. We're talking about the IKEA of the future with my guest, the creators of Murderbot, which is on Apple TV+. Paul and Chris Weiss have been away too long since they've been here. One, I hate to use the word sort of impishness, but there's a sense of fun. and so much of the stuff you guys have done together that is so often missing from, I mean, the satire usually announces itself as satire so often in science fiction, fantasy, and that it's so textural to this that extends what you're talking about, Paul, with the look and the way everything feels like it's got handprints all over it.
22:15Because that sense of play also exists in the books too. That's what attracted you to it? I have been thinking a little bit about how this is somewhat based off our kind of friendship as kids, everything from watching Second City television together to just cracking each other up. I think that in Martha's world, people still have a sense of humor in the far future. There's still kind of pathos, but also bathos. You know, there's still people being a bit over the top. And I think part of that is casting as well, because I want to say just how great our crew is. Noma de Mensahui and David S. Melchin, Sabrina Wu and Tatiana Jones.
22:53and Tamara Podemski and Akshay Khanna. So there are moments that are just out of their sense of character and allowing those things in rather than saying, that's not what's in the script. There's a really fun moment, which is kind of a prop gag almost, or a dressing gag in which we were rehearsing a bit with David S. Melchin, in which he's kind of about to interrogate Murderbot, and he turns around, and David had gotten the wrong chair, one that didn't swivel in an impressive way. And instead it like scraped on the ground because there were no wheels. And we just decided to stick with that because like in this moment where he's going to try to be, to grill Murderbot over the coals, he can't quite pull off the cool turnaround in a cool swivel chair.
23:39And it's just trying to balance all of those things where, yes, it's sort of hard sci-fi. Yeah, we're dealing with these big issues of what is a person? What are humans? what is space capitalism going to be like, but also always having this perverse sense of people still being people. I feel like in subtextual terms, there's a whole lot going on in this, that the alacrity and the humor of it doesn't upend. I mean, it's a lot to balance, and I was really taken by it. Thanks so much. It's not pretentious, I don't think. It's pop entertainment. I mean, it's meant to be really fun, actually, And sort of what it's putting forward then by implication is you can have something that's fun that has layers to it.
24:25And so that's where sort of Murderbot's love of, you know, not sort of high quality award winning entertainment is something that I personally can identify with. No, it's a consumer. Finally, I mean, it's part of a consumer culture. It feels like it's in subtextual terms. It would make sense for it to have no taste. because you look at it's a third generation sort of machine that knows it's a heartbeat away from being obsolete and sort of finds some relief in this sort of stuff that's cranked out for, I mean, some part of its DNA, if it's partially human or whatever, is sort of built towards consuming blindly.
25:03I mean, again, I thought that was just such a great sort of thing. Of course it wouldn't have any taste. Of course it's so powerful that it's almost reality TV or reality TV. these sort of things that you can sort of just take up and not have a thought about. Well, to defend Murderbust's taste for a moment. Let's hear it. I mean, I think that it has exactly the taste that it needs, right? And so the sense that most, if not all, of the other members of the crew think that Sanctuary Moon is absolutely terrible. We are not convinced, Paul and I, ourselves, that Sanctuary Moon is a bad show. Oh, really?
25:38Yeah, I'm not sure. It might be a great show. in other words you should say who the cast of sanctuary moon oh well this is one reason why we are why it is a good show uh john show it's all people who we work with before um john show duanda wise clark greg jack mcbrayer who we hadn't worked with but is alexander's best friend um but uh yeah so so to to get people who are really uh can lend a lot of subtlety to these over-the-top moments in that show seems cool um but but also i do think that like human behavior in general is oftentimes over the top. Like if you catch somebody in a real moment of, of sort of, uh, distress, or frankly, just if you weren't putting a camera on them, you know, brushing their teeth in the bathroom, you know, you'd be like, that person's overacting, um, like they're in some crazy ass drama.
Read the full transcript
26:27And so I actually think it's accurate sometimes to, uh, to have something that's, that's really super emotive. And then also, you know, there's some reason why, uh, opera is still an art form that's considered um that people are addicted to even though all the emotions in that are completely um yeah magnified and on the surface i think but it's interesting too just because these over-the-top moments in the life in the real world in the show exists in a way that's kind of understated so it makes all the sense again that it would everything would be so kind of purple and aura done in this show that is watching i i think it was like sometimes writing writing sanctuary moon is sort of going with your first instinct before you're like, oh, no, that's too much egg in the custard there.
27:12But there were things that I really loved saying, like, you know, feelings are the commands from inside. Like, I believe that, as well as the fact that it's also kind of, like, schlock sci-fi writing. Well, apparently some schlock can be autobiographical. The show is terrific. It's Murderbot. It's on Apple TV+. My guests are its creators, Paul and Chris Watts. It's been way too long since you've both been there. Please come back. You're welcome here anytime. Thank you, Elvis. It's good as tomorrow work. I'm not doing anything.
27:47Writer and directors Paul and Chris Weitz first joined us in 1999 with the film American Pie. Their newest project is the Apple TV Plus series Murderbot, based on the Martha Wells novel All Systems Red. Previous interviews with other hardworking creators, They're at the archive, kcrw.com slash the treatment. More to come. I'm Elvis Mitchell.
28:32It's The Treatment. I'm Elvis Mitchell. You can also hear this show at KCRW.com. I think if Laurent Buswell did not stop by to do this show, he wouldn't get any rest at all. In the past couple of years, as I just mentioned before we got started, he's only done four films and two books. His newest, because he can't let grass grow beneath his feet here, as we say in the United States, is a look back at 50 years of Jaws beyond Nat Geo. First of all, it's so great to have you back here. I've just found myself thinking about the relationship that you have with filmmakers, the way you get them to talk.
29:04Because just hearing Spielberg say it was his first film and it could have been his last one. And instead it could have broken him. And instead it made his career. I don't think he's ever spoken that poetically about Jaws before. You know, Elvis, I was super nervous about making this film, even though it was an obvious thing to do. 50 years, you know, of a masterpiece like this. It's worth examining, you know, why it's still relevant today. But I was nervous that I was just going to rehash the same old stories and focus on the behind the scenes where suddenly sitting across from Stephen, as it always is the case, it surprises me.
29:45And he offered to me the human perspective, you know, of what that experience was like. And that opening quote really blew me away because you feel that it's something that makes him even more relatable, even more relevant to today's world, where it's just so easy to give up. And he never wanted to give up, even though he knew in his heart that potentially this movie just just would slow down his career. I don't think it would have ended it, frankly, but it would have maybe like press pause for a second. The other story that blew me away along the same lines is really when you went to a party while making the film on Martha's Vineyard, where it was just so difficult.
30:35And a very famous actor, I don't know who it is, came up to him and said, you know, your career is over type of thing. And for that actor, potentially Spielberg would be, you know, hiring him for a movie, just simply didn't care to hurt his feelings. And to say this to him was absolutely cruel and just showed, you know, that they can't wait to build you up and they can't wait to tear you down. And to have that happen at such a young age, at such an early stage in his career, must have been very scary. I think what's interesting about the film, Laurent, is just that you really make the point that it was an international phenomenon.
31:16And there's one anecdote that, besides that quote from Spielberg earlier in the film, may be my favorite thing. It's Peter Benchley wanting to quote what Fidel Castro said to him, because Castro had read the book. And that great Castro quote, he called the book a marvelous metaphor about American capitalism. I'm so happy you caught that also and like that because I saw the film in France where it was known as the teeth of the sea, not jaws, the teeth of the sea. and the impact culturally that the film had in France when I was a kid. I mean, if you had not seen Jaws, you had not lived. So I'm not surprised that both the book and the film were, you know, equally embraced worldwide.
32:10The thing that's interesting about the book, though, you know, is that it had so many interesting subplots that didn't make it to the film, But the book is really good. You know, as all those filmmakers are emerging, like Stephen and George and Brian De Palma, etc., Marty, you have the same thing happening with authors. Michael Crichton is going to be doing science fact. Mario Puzo is going to be writing, you know, mafia related stories. Stephen King, same year as the Jaws novel, is going to do horror. Peter Benchley is going to be writing ocean related stories. So it's really a phenomenon, a movement that's happening in movies and in literature, American literature.
32:55So it's a fantastic thing to see that Peter's book, you know, just literally branded him for the rest of his career. It did. But it was interesting, too, to see you have his family on camera and to see the number of titles. There are pages and pages of truly awful titles because they couldn't figure out titles of the book. I know. It's pretty funny to see that it boiled down to this one word, you know, Jaws. But they just couldn't figure it out. But Peter was definitely an intellectual. And so for him to come up with a title called Jaws was probably at first very painful because he had things that were, you know, akin to something you would see in France, like, you know, Francois Sagan or something, you know, something very pretentious.
33:49Not that they were pretentious, but the titles could be a little challenging. Anyways, Jaws is perfect. You know, I can't imagine anything else but Jaws, maybe the teeth of the sea. by the way it's the treatment I guess the title bonjour tristesse was taken so Peter Benchley went with Jaws instead we're talking to filmmaker and author Laurent Buzel whose new film for Nat Geo is looking back at 50 years of Jaws with an incredible cast of people that goes from Steven Spielberg to James Cameron with a few drop ins from people such as Peter Benchley it's an incredible group of people that you got for the film Laurent but I think so many things sort of It struck me, like at the beginning of the film, where Spielberg talks about going, like just driving around in the car with Janet Maslin and Albert Brooks, looking to see how the film was doing, just driving around.
34:39I thought, that's a conversation I want to be in on. I know, right? I just wish I had a time machine and being in the back car. I wouldn't say anything, just listen, right? The thing that I love about that era, and George Lucas particularly talked to me about this, was the camaraderie that existed, not only with filmmakers and actors, but also critics. I find that incredible, you know. And, you know, when you think about pulling Cain on Brian De Palma, for example, and there you had Janet, you know, emerging as a critic and is in the car checking out the lines for Jaws. I find that to be a thing of the past, sadly, where there was a real sense of community within people who just loved movies.
35:29And George is very interesting. He said to me, he said, you know, at that time when he went to look at how the shark was being built and he went with Stephen and John Milius, another giant of that era and still today, they were all very supportive of one another. but he said we were all very different. You know, obviously they all made very extremely different kind of films, but the thing that bound them together was that love for the history of movies and that love for classic cinema. And that to me was very moving because that's what connected all of them was, you know, they all loved Hitchcock.
36:14They all love John Ford, William Wyler, George Stevens, you know, all the great classic films. Because the next generation, Elvis, as I think we've spoken about, is a different influence. They're influenced by MTV and music videos and fast cutting. It's no longer that love. No, no, no. Let me stop you here for a second, just because that next generation, you include somebody from the generation after Spielberg who talks about being influenced by the film. And that's Steven Soderbergh, who is a really unlikely person for many of us. Steven Soderbergh saw Jaws, and at the age of 11, it made him think he wanted to be a filmmaker.
36:54I mean, I think what you do in the film is show that from 1975 on, Jaws has been a touchdown and a focal point for anyone who aspires to be a filmmaker. At some point, they see Emily Blunt talks about seeing it. And it's not only a film that people see and love, but they continually revisit the film. Absolutely. And thanks for correcting me on my cynicism here. But no, you're absolutely right. And, you know, there are, you know, classic examples of those filmmakers who have carried out the torch that the generation of Spielberg, you know, had. But the one thing that I wanted in the casting, if you will, of other filmmakers, I wanted to cast very different types of filmmakers who love Jaws for different reasons.
37:45So, for example, Guillermo, you know, obsessed with the monsters. You know, we see that in his cinema. So there he is making really interesting remarks about the depiction of the Jaws, the shark monster in the film. You know, Cameron, who has notoriously done a lot of films on water and also is quite a shark, you know, person and ocean activist and very informed in that subject, which I thought was fascinating. and Steven Soderbergh is so obsessed with Jaws. He has studied the call sheet. He has studied the schedule. He has such anxiety talking about going over schedule because he's notorious for making films that are absolutely amazing in a very short amount of time.
38:37You know, Presence, I think, was shot in two or three weeks, one of his last movies, you know? So I could, each of them was bringing a different level of love, but also anxiety. Cameron saying, filming on water. And then you have Soderbergh. Oh my God, he's overscheduled. I thought that was hilarious. And then you had Jordan Peele, you know, who wanted to use that T-shirt of Jaws in his film. And I thought that was absolutely, I have to get Jordan Peele. And Emily Blunt, you know, I was on Instagram and she's on red carpets. and there's all those quotes from her about Jaws. I'm like, I've got to get Emily Blunt.
39:17I mean, I have to talk to her about this. So it was fun casting this film, but they, you know, not like just out of my head, like looking for anybody. It was really very strategic. It's interesting you're talking about what these directors and the kind of anxieties, because the anxiety-producing production of Jaws was covered everywhere, and it's in these movies that at a certain point, And, you know, I remember as a kid reading it, thinking, gee, I guess this movie's just never going to come out. And at one point Spielberg even said to Esquire magazine, maybe I'll just continue making Jaws for the rest of my life.
39:53But there's a line from Guillermo del Toro that you, as you were talking about him, I remember when he called, what was that great line he had about directing? It's a hostage negotiation with reality. I love that. And just having him say that, because all these filmmakers, as you know, will say, oh, my God. I mean, as you were just talking about Soderbergh, it's his third film that he's releasing this year will be coming out in a few months. And that these directors were all kind of aware of the sort of pressures that were on Jaws. It's interesting that it's this thing we're talking about, a touchdown.
40:30You're right, it's something that they all can reflect on. They came into movies knowing, because of Jaws, that these can be really kind of punishing things that you have to stick with and find a way to make work. Yeah, I mean, I think it just shows that making a film is a human experience, regardless of the result of it being a success and not a success. It really is a human experience. And the humanity of Jaws and the story itself, you have the three men trying to slay the beast. And in real life, the production is completely reflective of that, too. You know, it's like this director and his collaborators trying to make the beast work.
41:18So it's fascinating to me that it's one of the few cases, I think, in film history where the production, the making of the film is exactly a reflection of the story itself. I was just going to say, it's interesting, too, because as we know, you just did a film on Hitchcock's Silence, a terrific documentary. Oh, yes, there's a great narrator in it, too. Yeah, you can do better. I'm sure you will next time. But what I was going to say is that film was kind of finding itself in real time. And I saw the connection between that and Jaws because there's also another film that was finding itself in real time.
41:56It was, as you mentioned, a real collaboration, but reflective of not only the tensions it took to get the film made, but the tensions and extremely competitive nature of the three stars of the film. And you reveal something in the film that people have heard the story about the Indianapolis scene and how it was Howard Sackler, who said the germ of it, and then John Milius came and did a rewrite and showed up with eight pages. But you reveal in the film that the final version of that scene came from Robert Shaw, who was himself an acclaimed playwright, as well as being a film actor. Yes, absolutely.
42:30And the thing that's fascinating about that is just showing this sort of, you know, genuine faith in the life of a script and the life of a story and how it evolves with the personalities of the actors and the filmmakers and their relationship. And that is a perfect example of just an idea from Sackler becoming a much better speech from Milius, who, of course, wrote Apocalypse Now and put in his knowledge in it, but ultimately in the hands of a writer, actor, stage genius, and actor genius that was Robert Shaw. And for Stephen to recognize that and to feel confident that he had captured what he was trying to do is nothing short but inspiring.
43:26And it just shows that you have to have a level of trust in the team you've assembled. And same thing happened with the music. You know, when John played those two notes for Stephen, he had great trust in what the composer was going to bring to his film. film. So you really see a Spielberg at a very young age surrounding himself with collaborators. And to this day, when I'm on set with him, it's amazing that sort of dance, perfectly choreographed that he has with all of his collaborators. And I've seen, you know, the opposite with other filmmakers who feel threatened by collaboration. So you see in Steven at such a young age, you know, is instinct.
44:11And the scene with Shaw is a perfect example of the harmony that would, you know, cohabit every single Spielberg movie moving forward, you know. My guest, who's the only filmmaker I know who's busier than Steven Soderbergh, is Laurent Buzereau. His new project for Nat Geo is to look back at 50 years of a little film called Jaws. Always great to talk to you, my friend. Thank you so much. Likewise. Thank you so much, Elvis.
44:45In the past two years, Laurent Buzreau has made documentaries on Alfred Hitchcock and Faye Dunaway and John Williams, and written the books The De Palma Decade and Spielberg, The First Ten Years. His new film is Jaws at 50 for Nat Geo, Hulu, and Disney+. Next, The Treat, from author and, of course, producer Will Packer, An enduring story of endurance. Present assessments of past encounters can be heard at the archive. KCOW.com slash the treat.
45:34This is The Treat. I'm Elvis Mitchell. Producer Will Packer is no slacker either. In addition to his slate of film and TV projects, he also recently brought out a book, the memoir Who Better Than You? It showed that he's been tested by hard times, and he's inspired by a story of triumph. I'm Will Packer, and this is The Tree.
46:01For me, Shawshank Redemption is a movie that inspires me.
46:20long before i was at the success level that i am now as a filmmaker that movie spoke to me on a level because it was about the power of human resilience and persistence
46:40And I looked at that movie and watched what Tim Robbins went through and realized that so often we are in unfair situations like his lead character Andy Dufresne was in that movie. and just being in an unfair situation takes us out. Just knowing that the cards are stacked against us takes us out. Just knowing that we shouldn't be where we are takes us out. And we say, this is not fair and I'm out of here. I give up and that's the end for many people. I'm Andy Dufresne. Wife killing banker. Why'd you do it? I didn't since you asked. You gonna fit right in. Everybody in here is innocent. You know that?
47:30Hey, what you in here for? Didn't do it. And that character in that movie, and I just think that it's so well done. He never, ever, ever, ever gives up. And of course, throughout the movie, we realize that he actually has clung on to hope even when we think that he's let it go. When we think all hope is lost, he actually is doing something active. to try to change his situation even when we don't realize it. I played the mean harmonica as a younger man. Lost interest in it, though. Didn't make much sense in here. Here's where it makes the most sense. You need it so you don't forget. Forget? Forget that there are places in the world that aren't made out of stone, that there's something inside that they can't get to, that they can't touch.
48:29It's yours. And so I have personalized that in my own life. And when I reach challenging moments, I say, even if nobody can see it, and even if it is just a little bit at a time, the same way that he chipped away at that wall in his jail cell years, right? Even if it's a little something, that someday I'm going to get out of this situation. Someday I'm going to get out of whatever challenge or hole. And that was me because, you know, after I graduated from college, I had 11 years before I had my first number one movie. And so people see you with success and go, oh, yeah, overnight success. It was an 11-year long overnight.
49:04And it was a lot of ramen noodles and odd jobs and that type of thing. And I think back to Andy Dufresne, and I think how he chipped at that wall when nobody was watching, but he knew it and it kept him going and he clung on to hope.
49:33Author and, of course, producer Will Packer on 1994's sleeper cult hit The Shawshank Redemption. Actor and Emmy nominee Lionel Boyce felt the call of a story about personal freedom. it's a bear of a treat at the archive kcrw.com slash the treat the treat the moment of inspiration with lightning strikes can be swift and decisive or a longer languorous interval but it's that power that inspires creators from all endeavors to talk about why they do what they do the show is produced and edited by Rebecca Mooney and mixed by Katie Gilchrist there was help this week from Phil Richards Hope Brush and Laura Kondarajan.
50:17To better days, everyone, I'm Elvis Mitchell. It's The Treatment.
From the publisher
This week on The Treatment, Elvis speaks with Murderbot co-creators Chris and Paul Weitz about the Apple TV+ sci-fi comedy series. Then, filmmaker Laurent Bouzereau stops by to break down his new documentary about the 50th anniversary of the summer blockbuster Jaws. And on The Treat, producer Will Packer reveals the film that gives him hope.
