20Growth: The Golden Rule to $100M in ARR, Why CAC to LTV is BS Early On, Why Your First Growth Hire Should Be a Former Founder & How Ramp Does 200 Growth Experiments Per Quarter with Guillaume Cabane

29 Nov 2023 · 1 h 5 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Notes: The Twenty Minute VC (20VC) - Episode with Guillaume Cabane

Episode Overview Title: 20Growth: The Golden Rule to $100M in ARR, Why CAC to LTV is BS Early On, Why Your First Growth Hire Should Be a Former Founder & How Ramp Does 200 Growth Experiments Per Quarter with Guillaume Cabane Host: Harry Stebbings Guest: Guillaume Cabane Release Date: Not specified

Guillaume Cabane is a well-regarded growth advisor known for his work with successful SaaS companies, including Ramp, Drift, and Segment. In this episode, he shares his insights on growth strategies, effective hiring practices, and common mistakes companies make during growth phases.

---

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Entry into Growth
  2. Guillaume's Background:
  3. Began in marketing at Apple and shifted towards growth strategies.
  4. His experiences involved leveraging engineering to create quasi-products for demand generation.
  5. Key lessons learned at Segment, where he quadrupled revenue.
  1. Enterprise vs SMB & CAC/LTV Myths
  2. Challenges in Enterprise Growth:
  3. Transitioning from SMB to enterprise is often more difficult than the reverse due to the different sales cycles and customer expectations.
  4. CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) to LTV (Lifetime Value) analysis is not feasible for early-stage companies.
  1. Activation, Engagement, and KPI Setting
  2. Activation Mistakes:
  3. Many companies fail to understand activation strategies leading to poor engagement.
  4. Emphasis on using relevant metrics rather than vanity metrics to measure success.
  1. Hiring the Growth Team
  2. Characteristics of Effective Growth Hires:
  3. Former founders often make the best first hires for growth due to their understanding of long-term outcomes.
  4. Importance of speed in identifying bad hires—often becomes apparent quickly.
  1. Growth as a Portfolio Management Challenge
  2. Growth Strategy Insights:
  3. Companies need a diverse range of channels to scale and avoid dependency on a single source for growth.
  4. Timing for diversifying channels is crucial to maintain consistent growth.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Golden Rule for Growth:
  • Achieving $100M ARR requires reaching $1M, then 3x growth, followed by maintaining 2x growth for subsequent years (3-3-2-2-2).
  • CAC to LTV Analysis:
  • In early stages, focusing on CAC to LTV is impractical; companies should prioritize gaining insights from customer engagements instead.
  • Experimentation Framework:
  • High-performing growth teams typically run hundreds of experiments quarterly to identify successful strategies.
  • Impact of AI on Cold Outreach:
  • As AI tools become prevalent, distinguishing between automated and human outreach will be essential for engagement.
  • Focus on Customer-Centric Messaging:
  • Marketers should prioritize understanding customer needs and problems rather than pushing product features first.

---

Conclusion In this episode, Guillaume Cabane shares actionable advice for founders and growth leaders, emphasizing the importance of strategic experimentation, understanding customer dynamics, and building effective growth teams. His insights serve as a guide for startups aiming for significant growth while navigating the complexities of acquiring and retaining customers.

For more insights and future episodes, listeners can visit [20VC](https://www.20vc.com/).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00When I care about how many experiments can I have running at the same time where I learn if you can drive value about mistakes problems of the business, you have discovered that you all just does not know you will get engagement guaranteed reject any KPI that is vanity. You don't care about traffic, you don't care about any of those KPI so anything you care about is weighted -justed pipeline dollars. Welcome to 20 growth with me Harry Stebnings. Now this is the monthly show where we sit down with the best growth leaders in the world to discuss their tips, tactics and strategies when it comes to scaling growth experiments and teams.

0:37Today's show is why I started this series, actionable granular advice that founders can learn from and use in their business today and so with that I'm thrilled to welcome G Kabine or Gion Kabine, growth advisor to high growth SaaS startups including RAMP, G2, gorgeous and others. Geon previously held VP of growth rolls at Drift, Segment and other successful start -ups, where he helped them grow from 50 to 300, and before that Geon spent 6 years at Apple. But before we dive into the episode's date, I'm refreshing the 20VC Miro Boardnud, love your input again, it's really easy just head on over to Miro .com ford slash 20VC and leave your guest suggestions for future shows, and you can do it with a digital sticky note or a comment, you can head over to myro .com forward slash 20VC and myro actually sponsored this episode.

1:25If you haven't already tried it, I think you'll love it. Myro is the online workspace for innovation. It's packed with the right capabilities to be your dream products home base that you can visualize content, data and research findings all in one space with no problem. It means this space is where you map customer journeys with the whole product team create user behavior dashboards and map process diagrams and finally it's where you'll run productive team sprints using integrations with tools you already love and use like Giro for developers, Asana for project managers, Figma for designers and so on.

1:59We use Mirror and love it to brainstorm future shows, vote on potential guests, and leave feedback for the rest of the team in our own time. And right now I'm using it to hear from you. Leave your thoughts on the board at myro .com forward slash 2 -0 -VC, that's myro .com forward slash 2 -0 -VC, and 20 growth is obviously focused on building the best growth teams and great growth teams are obsessed with making data -driven decisions. But getting good data is hard and growth and product teams have to spend hours each week configuring metrics, setting up experiments and writing custom queries, or what if your growth team could get this time back.

2:36With StarSeq they can, thousands of companies from huge enterprises to start -ups rely on StarSeq to ship faster, automate experimentation and improve key metrics. If you're building software products, StarSeq is the one stop platform you need for experimentation, feature flags and analytics. After implementing StarSeq, the growth team would answer street .com. 10x is the number of experiments they were running. If you're a startup, Starosick has a free tier and a special program for venture -backed companies, and if you're a large enterprise, they have transparent pricing with no sea -based pricing or tiki -tank fees for small features.

3:1420 growth listings can also take advantage of a special offer, including 5 million free events a month and white glove onboarding support. Visit Starosick .com for and slash 20 growth, that's 22 zero growth, to get started on your data -driven journey, and finally, so do you know the impact of your marketing efforts? It's more important this year than ever to know the impact. Or how much you've spent so far this month and what you've got as a result. You're not alone in not knowing these answers, even though marketing is now all about the data. Most companies still use manual spreadsheets for reporting an analysis, but if you want a supercharged gross, spreadsheets just won't cut it.

3:52Funnel is the world's first and only marketing data hub that takes all the manual effort out of data collection and as you blend data from different platforms to unlock new, deeper insights and the best part is this can all be achieved without writing a single line of code. I can hear your sigh of relief. That's why it's used by more than 2000 of the world's top brands and media agencies, including Samsung, Adidas Sony and have asked media. Start your own free trial by visiting funnel .io slash 20vc. That's funnel .io slash 20vc. You are now arrived at your destination. Gee, I am so excited for this.

4:30We last spoke in 2017, six years ago, which is just incredible. My word, I'm like Benjamin Button, but thank you so much for joining me today. I'm so glad to be here. It's been a while and I think we've got to turn more stuff to talk about. Oh my god, we've got so much more to talk about, but I just want to start with some context. Growth is a weird world. How did you first make your way into growth? What you think is your first growth role? One is, I'm an old man now, I started in the early 2000s at Apple, and if there's one thing you want to know about Apple, especially you know I was based in Europe, is that it's a very centralized company and so you need to ask authorization for everything and you never get it in marketing Just never get it.

5:08It's a MyBoss who was the head of marketing for Apple France. He was not running campaigns because he was not getting authorized He was running experiments because for experiments he did not need to ask. We're talking about 2005 here at Verizon 4 They don't need to ask for anyone and they want to get cut. Oh no, we just ran an experiment to see if the audience of the market React well to that like that's smart, right? And the second founding story couple years later I was in IT security are consulting from leading marketing over there That's when I realized that leveraging engineers to build quasi -products to build Demand gen drive people to the product that is different So I've people built something which is a quasi product, works really well, especially for technical audiences.

5:53Both of those things merged in 2014, 2015 when I joined mention and I started using segments and I'm like, hey, I have felt the technical now and I know how to an experiment and I know how to do technical marketing and at that time it has started to be called growth and I just landed in the right place at the right time. I love that in terms of kind of an alternate tool that drives demand gen to the core product. I automatically think of actually HubSpot and the website raider which did it so well. Do you think that still works today or is it too commonly troddened path now where everyone's tried to do it?

6:25It's hard to come out with a really good product that you're not monetizing directly. First, because many people, if there is interest for a product, people have built a better version of it and have monetized it. So like, a lot of those niche have disappeared. And the second is that the quality has gone down and people have become desensitized. Well, they say, oh, there's that good free cost calculator. We don't have investment calculator. Like one of those typical things, right? Or website grader. Most of those are terrible now. And so people are thinking, oh, I'm not going to like sign up and put my info, my PII there, because I'm not going to get my values worth, right?

7:01But if you have something truly amazing, does it still work? Absolutely. You mentioned segment there. You grew revenue for I .C. Sackman. What was your biggest lesson from your time as Sackman's? Sackman is a technical product targeting a engineering audience. I know I often get founders who have a similar audience, one of the self -to -engineers, and they're telling me to be like, you know, out of my name, I wasn't a work, engineers don't want to be sold to. And by a large that's true. Though, if you're lucky enough to have a really good product, let's put aside those that have like a bad product.

7:32We have a truly good product that is useful. You have an incentive to have a free plan, a startup plan, because engineers will stay engineers as they change jobs and they no longer are in startups and they join a real legit company. And they will bring your product along with them. That's what we found at second. We did a crazy attribution logic where we found engineers across jobs by keying not on the email because the email changes, the main changes, because not on the name, that's not relevant, on the LinkedIn URL. Because unless you have psychopath, you don't change your LinkedIn URL between jobs.

8:09It's the same slug. And so we just took from clever all the LinkedIn URLs of other people and we said, hey, has that person came three months ago, four, five months ago? And if yes, did they come through a startup plan? And then we did reverse attribution, that way. And we found that a lot of people coming for like mid -market enterprise deals had used the product quarters ago at a small startup that had died. and that attribution was worthwhile. So if you can do that, go for it. If you can do that, go for it. The thing I find really challenging, I tell you, fucking up the schedule, but the thing I find really challenging with that is, like, then you're doing kind of a PLG motion and an end -to -price motion at the same time.

8:45And I'm always like to start -ups, you can't do both well, do one focus, and then move to another over three to five years, honestly. Am I wrong? Who does it well, Harry? Name me companies that at the early stage are really good at PLG or enterprise. It's very rare that they have one of the two motions like thin down. And so most of the time they try a bit of PLG, they try a bit of enterprise, they land most of the time in between segment, both PLG and enterprise, sells that drift, ditto, gorgeous, ditto. All of the companies I worked for, I worked with and we're gonna talk about CAC, I'm sure, but like mostly for CAC reasons, they optimize for efficient acquisition and selling and land with both motions.

9:34So no one kind of does it well and they kind of do both the same. No, it happens. It's rare. It's extremely rare that you have like super strong virality, real apology. Well, most people who like say, I want a new apology, they don't do apology. They have a free plan. They have a self -surf plan. It does not mean there's virality. It does not mean that people invite each other. Even the people I love and care about, you think of like something like a rap amazing company like do you think there's PGA do you think CFOs randomly invite other CFOs to use rap? Hell no it doesn't happen like that it doesn't work like that maybe there are some network effects we can talk about there's no Pology I agree you not worries me most so actually is the fact that a lot of startups that I work with today essentially layer on the enterprise cost base of sales marketing customer success onto a PLG style price and I'm going that doesn't work.

10:29Am I right or am I wrong because they aren't good -scale? You're right but there's worse. You're absolutely right. If you don't create the packaging, the pricing plans to support the high cost of the enterprise motion, then you're killing yourself. But there's worse. It's companies that are enterprise first with the entire like cost structure and product structure of an enterprise software and then want to open a PLG. Angles is Hey, let's let people like sign up on their own and like nothing works like the acquisition does not work The product is not self -serve you can't build like self -serve like featuring to like something was meant for your like CSM's to build the the instance Like and that happens.

11:10I see those people come to me and it's like this is just not going to work It's impossible. You can't pivot that way. Does it matter? And what I mean by that is you got nothing to lose by opening that up Focus, success in startups is being able to focus your efforts to grow faster than your competitors. If you lose focus, your competitors grow faster than you, you lose. So if I'm a startup founder, listen to this. And I hear a say, well, he kind of do both at the same time, try and make it work. How do I think about that? How do I think about messaging, resource allocation, marketing channels?

11:44They're so different. I'm torn between two worlds. Let's first start with why do you land in that situation? Generally, it's because you find one of the two motions. Generally, to be honest, most people start with the SME market because you don't have what it takes to close, like enterprise -based market companies, you don't have stock two compliance and whatnot. And eventually, one exec at a lot of company is more risk -prone than others, and likes is an early adopter, and will come to you, and will all feel like it three, four, five times your current ACV, and you're gonna take it. And then you're going to wonder, are there more like that?

12:20It happens like kind of naturally. It just happens. You just start closing a few of those. And then you need to start layering the cost structure you need like to support them. You don't lose them because the chart would look bad. You put the logo on your page because you want like that. And exciting logo, you put in your board deck. So you need to support that. Prevent the chart. Most of the time it happens insidiously. It's very rare that people tell me I do not want to do enterprise features. I don't want enterprise customers. I have one example Zapier did that for very, very long. I talked to the Zapier founders when I was at Segment and I wanted enterprise features and he said, gee we love you but I'm sorry we're not going to build those features.

12:57I'm like, why? I pay for that. He's like, yes, but we lose focus of the huge market of SMBs and we want to close as many of those. Other people will take care of the enterprise markets. We don't want you to go there. I remember it because it's extremely rare. I totally agree with you. I always think, now, a friend of mine is now the focus increased to quality. My question to you then is, how do you know when is the right time to expand the focus? How do you know when you should go from SMB to mid -market? And also, how do you think about diversification? I hate to say I'm just ranting now, but I hate companies, whereas we're just selling to like high -grids startups, and I'm like, yeah, there's that thing called a macro recession that's going to impact spending and funding.

13:37And I don't like concentration on customers, basically. I think often what you see is companies find one early adopters market, one audience where in the words of Randolph, there's like there's a message to audiences or a product to audience fit. And you start just maxing that out. You have a competitive advantage, your message resonates well. And eventually you're going to plateau because you have convinced most of the early adopters, the people that are early into your product. And the others have made the conscious decision. They don't want your product, right? Right, the friction increases and you're going to start looking for new audiences.

14:10You can think, hey, this small audience is too small for us. I can't raise my price. I can't convert more of those. I can't sustain my growth there. Right, I can't do my 2X, my no, 332222. It's really looking for new audiences. And those new audiences will be either in different industries in different segments, generally, more rarely in different geos. So you tend to generally go like same company size different industries, then you go different segments Company sizes and then you go into different geos. That's the way that you had IC most companies grow You know this shit's getting real when I get my pen out You said three three two two when it came to growth for people who don't know what that framework is Can you just explain that for us the golden rule to be in the top -design of of startups in terms of performance, the thus in terms of advation and funding and outcomes, you would have to grow past the first million, three X, the first, sure, three X, the second, sure, and then two X for every year for the next three years.

15:11So three, three, two, two, two, right? And if you do that, you end up at 100 million plus in revenue in five years. When we chatted before thinking kind of that growth mechanism, you said, boards want I'm just skipping to, I love, can't. You said the boards want low -calc and high -scale gross. I just want to kind of break that down. How do you define low -calc? Gee. It's a great question. So at first, why do boards want that now? Well, it's because when this kind of recession or tough times, I want to say, in a way where capital is scarce. And when capital becomes scarce, there's two ways to win.

15:50You either grow fast out of it, Let's stuff or you reduce cost and found us right to do a bit of both right to g risk when you think of all of the people Asking about PLG for PLG that's another way of saying they're looking for low -CAC tactics They're looking for customers that bring themselves that bring other customers for free that you don't have to pay for if you go beyond that If you can't do the PRG which most can't as we discussed I'd say low -CAC if you look at the look at the top quartile of solids in terms of performance post five -nuality revenue. You're going to see that the roughly it's about a dollar of revenue.

16:25So your dollar of cost for a dollar of revenue. So you spend a dollar to get your dollar. That's the top quartile and that's fully loaded cack. Well that means that it takes into account like the marketing spend, the marketing headcount, the sales team, bonuses and whatnot, everything but building the product. Marketing generally represents about 30 % of that. So about 30 cents on the dollar and so if you take know on a payback then 12 months of justice like one for one that's about four months of payback time. Four months of payback time is really good. That's really good. You pay back, you think about it.

16:55It's just like if you're doing a loan. You actually loan four months to a third party to your customer after four months you start being in the money. That's how you should think about it. Every time a customer turns before four months is a loan that has not been repaid. It's a default on your debt. Four months is very, very rare though. I never see four months. When there's 12, it's like, okay, like what is a good payback to you? I think below 12 is good. Now when you think of that, generally, like that's a very simple framework. If you want to be a bit smarter, you're going to like, catch real TV.

17:25Again, going back into it. I mean, FinTech these days with Ramp, where people on board a financial platform, global platform like Ramp, they tend to think to sick for very, very long multiple years. And so you can afford, it's a something much higher in terms of payback time because the LTV is huge. people stick for 3, 4, 5 at the mid market 8 euros. So in this stick around for 8 euros you can start being very aggressive, you can start spending like more than 1 year maybe 2 euros. I don't like that because we're being very asuptive on the future state of markets. In 5 years time there may be a completely different financial protocol with I don't know what it is which is why it's not known but the assumption that we can have 8 to 9 years as an LTV.

18:11In the first 2 years of a company I get it more more if you're visa where we've got 50 years of data, but like, for a startup, I just think LTV is bullshit. You've got no freaking idea. Am I right or am I wrong? I understand what you're coming from on financial products. You can see the rate at which companies have switched the payment platforms and they're like, expanding platform, it tends to be, especially the minmarket very slow. And it's unlikely that changes because the cost of switching is super high. And that's the, even if you look at why you know, rear but also cracks and others have raised so much money it's because the VCs have made the same calculations and have decided concluded that it is very likely that people stick for that log.

18:53That's the only reason those companies are worth that much it's because the trend is almost like slitch. So then why do boards want now lower cash? Because most people don't have an ATR retention time frame. So then when we think about that and we think about the cat 12 tv what is But there is kind of rules of some way. You're like, oh, interesting. Yeah, 3 to 1 is really good. 3 to 1 is good. And great is 5 to 1. When does that become relevant? Because I see it in seed fund decks. I don't think that you can calculate or you can attribute how or why customers have come to you at the early stage.

19:29I don't think it's worth it. You don't have the scale. You don't have the diversity. And even if you have found one channel that works, it's unlikely that you can scale it that way. And so to speak in simple terms, you can't take this Google sheet cell and drag it to the right. It's unlikely to be real. And so don't try. The customers get more or less expansive to acquire from your experience. You've got one side which says, more expansive, you call audiences saturated, so you're going to less obvious people. And then another one is that you get brand -marked income to play word of mouth, PLG, that makes it cheaper.

20:05Where does it go? In most successful startups, the CAC will rise faster than the brand can compensate for that's rise. As you said, every new audience is slightly harder to acquire and convert. Because if not, you would have converted that audience sooner or later. The first audience was right. The people who have, as I said earlier, senior ad, talked to you, took a demo and said, no, can you really reach back to them? You know, after three months to say, hey, Harry, you told us no two months ago. Have you, we considered your position? Nah, you're not going to do that. That just doesn't work. Eventually, I'll give you an example, gorgeous, coming that I love, right?

20:46Focusing on the e -commerce merchants. If you look at their total adjustable market, we're talking of a couple hundred thousand merchants in the US and Europe. That's the market. By now, they touch each of those merchants at least once a quarter. At least every single merchant at least once or quarter. So once you do that, how do you grow? Well, you go by, you know, you've maxed out your typical demand -gen efforts, you're touching the people. You go by increasing price, by adding new products, to convince people on products that you didn't have before, and by doing brand, by convincing them that their decision that they made prior is wrong.

21:22That is an entirely new orientation and new business, it's a completely different. This is no longer growth. That's no longer worth once you touch everyone every quarter what takes you to the next stage is Traditional marketing traditional product you're now an established business So how do you define growth then answer two questions like one is growth right and what is growth? It's not worth it's growth growth is a risk Adjusted way of creating value what that means is that I have limited information when I'm in angelic best I have I limited to religions when they do growth I have limited knowledge on that experiment on that hypothesis.

21:58I'm going to do some simple heuristics and say, he is this a worthy bet? If I make not one, but 20 of those bets can one of those pay back all the failures. That is typically a visa mindset and that is the growth marketing mindset. I don't know what's going to work. You got to be very humble. You just need to move fast, have high velocity and to have just the right level of quality to be able to figure out Will this stick? So it is a multi -disciplinary way of creating competitive modes, whether that's in pre -sign -up, or post -sign -up in the product, it doesn't matter. And when it's nuts, it's, I hope, was a core product, core marketing the traditional way of, I'd say, releasing features or campaigns.

22:44Question for you. You said about the speed that testing experiments you don't know. We were talking about the success we have in TikTok, it takes a lot of time often for new content initiatives to play out. How do you know whether an experiment is failing or whether it just needs more time? That's a great question. So first, the biggest mistake that I see happen in growth teams is they undertake an experiment without assessing the cost, the effort, or the audience size. And often I ask, can we reach statistical significance here? is the audience big enough for us to be able to learn the outcome.

23:19And often when I dig, the answer's no. There's just not enough people. And that happens very often in B2B SaaS products, which is like my stuff, post product. It's very hard to get Statsig post signed up in the B2B SaaS. Because you couldn't even need like a thousand users to be engaged in with the product in a short time film. Who has that? It's really truly it's rare. Just think about that. So you gotta be able to like be ruthless less, and exclude those experiments where you won't be able to come out with the learning. What I care about is not so much the wins, because I can't predict those.

23:51When I care about how many experiments can I have running at the same time where I learn whether this is a failure or a success, and I store that information. A lot of people don't actually get good learnings at anything. What's it in there say, yeah, I didn't work. What's a good learning and what's a bad learning? A good learning is a statistically significant deviation from your status quo. It's hard. I'll give you one example. People often change their on -boarding email, they welcome email, post sign up to get people to use the product. And they test and it's hard to get a lift there. You know what I tell them?

24:28Have you tested, again, say, hold out a control audience and they tell me yes. And they tell me all the control is the standard emails and no you're wrong. The control is no email. Have you tried not sending a welcome email? Not sending, you know, the the first three four five emails to get people to use the product and of course they happened and I tell them try it Take 20 30 whatever it takes to be statistically significant and don't send emails and let's see what the true Divigation and activation and retention is. I know what happens Harry Also time it's not statistically significant to the people who are going to activate will activate regardless of getting an email or not And so the email adds no value at all.

25:07Did you do one way out? You changed anything and it did add a lot of value and activation one way up. Yeah, that's the value of experience. And I think it's Luke Leveck who is the chief growth officer at Shopify who said that. I think growth is one of those disciplines where the knowledge of something that has worked somewhere else and that is replicable is extremely valuable and rare. That doesn't really happen in products like you've done a product really well somewhere else. So you can't really replicate that in another company. It just doesn't work that way. It's also not true and I can marketing or in like engineering.

Read the full transcript

25:40But in growth, if you have something where you're able to like take a look at human psychology, just the right way, it's likely to work again. And the next company, because they're still the same humans. I gave you an example. I heard recently one company sent verification emails, but the product is not need verification emails. You don't need to click to verify your email, but they just tried. Hey, what if we ask people to verify the email? Does that bring the people back into the product? What if we do it regardless, rather than the product? And what if we sell it twice? We're going to have to verify the first time.

26:10It works. It works great. It's interesting to find that that is an example of something that is very replicable in almost any SaaS business. It's very easy to implement and it will drive your user retention up. What are the biggest mistakes you see companies make or do when it comes to activation? Generally, the take -y work -in -go for tactic like that one. and they tone it down a bit. I'll give you an example. You often see emails where they have this like almost toning cheek personal, like the CS person or like a sales engineer, making it look like the text is personal. It's wrapped in the HTML layer, which makes it very clear it's not personal.

26:51And I tell them like, you got to pick folks. Either this is a corporate email and it's corporate looking or this is a text based email that's made sent through Gmail, Now, which behavior are you trying to get your users to do? What do you want them to believe? Is this coming from a human? This is not going to be a human. They haven't put themselves in the shoes of the recipient. They don't think what's feeling it might try to create. So the biggest mistake is they don't think of the humans on the other side. They don't think of the psychology enough. Okay, so they don't think of the psychology enough.

27:23It brings me to my biggest challenge, so actually with growth and growth marketing, which is when you have horizontal SaaS products, it could be air table, it could be drop box, it could be any of these, it can be used by dentists, they can be used by product managers. And the use cases are so different, so to get messaging that resonates across that spectrum is so tough, how do you think about that horizontal product marketing being done well and resonating and getting a Ness like, or does she? You know what's fantastic? And so we live in 2023. And now you have AI products, you name it, all the ones you like love, and you can build personalized content with a scale you never dreamed of before, which is at a quality that was other achievable before.

28:03What people care, especially in horizontal products, is that you talk about them, their problems, their challenges. Actually, I might go back when I said just earlier, you asked me what was the biggest mistake. Actually, it's probably because that company's marketers talk of them and their product first. They don't talk about you, the audience and your problems. They say, hey, here's my product, here's what we do, here's our customers, here's why we are great. I know what, as a recipient, I don't care. I really don't care. I've got other things to care about in my day than like a random company I never heard about.

28:39But if you reach out to Harry and you have contacts in his business, what he does, what he loves and care, what challenges you have a really good assumption that he's facing right now, Now it's much more likely that you can peak his interest. So these days, with large language models and injected data about his is a dentist, what's the size of the dentistry? Well, they're based all day in the mission in SF. You can start being extremely specific and relevant. And relevance creates reciprocity. Respiracy gets you responses. Can you do some part of that for me? Relevance creates reciprocity. Respiracy gets you responses.

29:18Yeah, I'm straight that down. There are two things that work when you try to reach out to someone that you don't know, a prospect, whether it's by email, whatever the communication channel. True value, your communication, let's call it an email, contains something really helpful, I can give you an example. And the second is reciprocity for humanness. They truly believe it comes from a human and thus they will feel compelled to respond because somebody else has spent some time. Let's unpack those two here. Okay, true value. Give it an example, gorgeous again, right? A support platform for merchants.

29:49Emergence sell, you know, these days a lot, of course, on TikTok, but also on Instagram. In certain, it's a major platform for merchants. And what we found out is that sometimes some customers, potential customers of the merchant of the bread posted negative comments on a brand's post. And nobody took care of that. We said, hey, that's a mess from the brand, but wait, can we scrape that? Can we automate that? We found out that we could. I guess we started scraping and automating the detection of negative comments on brand post and Instagram, sending it to the brand order, to the company order, to the marketing leader.

30:24This is hey Harry, love your products, but just let you know there's a couple of negative comments here on your posts and it's been 40 hours, you haven't responded and really you should. That's it. Don't talk about gorgeous, don't talk about the product. This works super -wide. When it's public, I'm not doing anything like, you know, it's easy, it's easy, it's like everyone can see it. True? It's true. You can see it in verify and click on the post, you'll find the negative comments, you know it's not me. And second, like it's helpful. Absolutely, you should take care about it. You should respond if you haven't.

30:54Right? You see those three things, the response you can have is thanks. Thanks for catching it. Thanks. That's it. Of course, I'll follow up to that email with an ask for demo. And of course, it will be compelled to give me your time. Because you would really be a douchebag, not give me some of your time, given that I found some mistakes that you made in your brand. All right, so super high response rates there. That's value. I have a million examples of that. If you can drive value about mistakes, problems of the business, you have discovered that you all just does not know, you will get engagement guaranteed.

31:28Did that scale? Absolutely. The challenge is finding those opportunities, those pockets of opportunity and scaling those. That's a challenge. But that does actually scale. I mean, that's much more scalable than say, like, paid. Think of the cack of that. That's where I love growth. There is an upfront cost to finding that. Testing it? Of course, we don't automate anything before we test it manually. We had like some gym people like send a couple hundred manually to see if it works. And once we knew the response rates were huge, we then invested in doing it with our own chinels. But once you've built it and you've amortized the upfront cost, the marginal cost of that email is zero.

32:04You're just running a few scripts. Yeah, acquisition costs are doing that is zero. So if you're competitive and not doing it, you have this green ocean in front of you with no competition. Zero dollar cake. That's competitive mode. What was the response rate? Just so I like 50%. No, it's more like 10, 12%, 10, 12%, which is about 5x the standard response rate of a good, cold email reciprocity. You want to go to a reciprocity? Yeah. What the other thing equates to responses? Here's the thought experiment I want you in the audience we have. At home, you have a mailbox, physical mailbox. And then mailbox, you receive junk mail, right?

32:38Most of it is junk mail. You take that junk mail, you throw it away. You don't even think about it. You don't care. You have no personal feelings. They have no emotions for that junk mail. You feel maybe even lighter about it away. Now let's say you go through that junk mail as you throw it away. There's this one letter. That's seal letter. That's obviously written by a human, obviously, by an old person. And there's your name Harry on it. Harry's having something written on it. And there's the return address behind it. They even maybe like lick the stamp and put it on the envelope. You're very convinced as a human.

33:06How like you are you hairy to dig that envelope and throw it in the trash without opening it? No way, right? You would be a psychopath if you did that. I tested that thought experiment at Saster in front of hundreds of people, not one person raised their head, not one. Which makes sense. Why? We have a restposting. But how do you do that with email? Because with physical, you can do the nice stamp, the nice textured lacer, whatever it is. How do you do that with email? Give an example. Ramp targeting financial platform targeting CFOs. Notoriously difficult audience to engage with. Almost nothing can scrape about a company or a CFO is useful.

33:42They're not posting about their financial issues on Twitter. It doesn't happen. What we did is we scraped that. We didn't. Oh, we've got so much data that we just don't know where it is. We're really missing our payments right now. Oh, this is so much better than we did. And you were supposed to. Yeah. So what we did is that we scraped. Very typical, they are linked in profile, their colleges. And here's the trick. The trick is we thought about what's the commonality between CFOs. They all are well -educated. They all went to college, about 100%. I'd went to college. Okay? In the US, very specific about the US, you and people who went to US college tend to be very passionate about that college sports team.

34:23Very passionate, right? So what we did is that we matched 2D assets. that's the college where each CFO went and the upcoming games of their college against the opponent team. We then built a very simplified betting algorithm to see is the CFO's team likely to win or lose. And we send that in an email and say, Hey Harry, your team, the sharks or the boys going against like the bison's or whatever next week. And I'm ready to bet 50 bucks that your team is about to lose. If you win up on top, I give you 50 bucks. I'm a question to ask. If you lose, I'll just ask for a 20 minute call. Now, that is a typical $50 for a call email.

35:01But, and here's the but, the sophistication of the email with this upcoming game that you know about, the ability to be able to bet for free, what looks for free, on sports, which people love, makes it feel so human. Nobody believes this is automated. But it is. Nobody believes it's automated. People are like, hey, somebody actually researched. Somebody knows the upcoming names. Let me tell you something I care about too, this is fun. The response rate here is 12 to 15%. About the same, there was no one so gorgeous. Again, for you, very, very small cast and something that no one in the right mind would think of doing manually.

35:37That is resposting. You see that. You immediately believe, hey, there's a human that cares, like, at least I have to respond. At the minimum, I have to respond. Does AI make this much, much harder? Because cold outbound, done well like you've done there. People think that it's actually a human that's not. Kind of the wrapper of AI makes people just inherently more cynical that everyone's so robot. Does it make it harder? It will. I have a conviction that there are two possibilities and I think two things will happen that will be true at the same time. Some part of the population will start rejecting communication and coming from anonymous people because they won't know if it's a human or not and thus they will, by default, think that it's a robot and does that there is no reciprocity that should be expense.

36:24And some other part of the population, maybe the more text I people will not care. And say, here is this information valuable. The problem is that because the marginal cost is so low, high quality text, high quality communication about you will become huge. It's going to be all the time everywhere. And you just won't have the time for it. It's very likely that we'll start ignoring messages from real humans at the much higher rate because the quality of AI will be better than the quality of humans. Does that mean cold out bounds dying? It's not cold out bounds communications diet. Personal communications diet.

36:58It's not just cold out means the same is true on phone calls. Phone calls, text calls, like block posts. Anything that is a human written content is soon likely to be better if done by an AI. So then what do we do? What replace it? The existing channels and tactics just get bigger in terms of portion of sales. Is that net new? Well, if that's a total pie, then net new, what is it? I love the worry on your face about the future, have you? Yeah, I'm good with that. I think there's a few things. One is if you are on the cutting edge of tools and platforms, you will win regardless of what happens.

37:36All right, you will, because the others, like anyone who's not doing the things that they said, is already losing right now. Second, this negative pessimistic view of communication is a few years in the future. It's not a bright now issue. Do you have a couple of years to like handle it? Third, if you ask like a wild bet, I think it will be more about social proof, community, and relationships. I've seen a product which instead of a chatbot on your SaaS home page or pricing page, connects to your LinkedIn, your email connections, relationships, and says, hey, Jake, how easy is using this software?

38:10You want to ask him about it? And I thought that's really smart. I can still look like doing random social proof about other companies that the people I don't know. It's like, hey, this connection of yours, this person you know and trust, use this stuff to right now daily, just ask him about it. And because I have I trust Harry, I know Harry, I'm like, yeah, Harry's a good guy, I know him. Just give him a call, Harry says, yeah, this is legit. I'm like, okay, cool. Done. That, you can see, has the immediate opportunity of solving the problem we just created. Can I ask you, when we think about different channels and getting to say 50 million in an hour, I was thinking to keep a HubSpot who told me that it takes one child to get to 50 million an hour and two to get to 100.

38:52From your experience here, you've been a segment, you've been a drift. It's not the case, it's a much broader diversification. How do you think about that when you hear it? I'm a big fan of HubSpot and when they've been able to build in the past couple of years, almost in what is HubSpot. And they have one of the biggest addressable markets in the world. It's almost any business. These are so M, that's one. Second, their market is almost an oligopoly. There's Salesforce, there's HubSpot, maybe there's like fresh desk, so that's about it. There's like less than five companies that are like decent when you look at the entire suite, okay?

39:27Which is extremely rare, given the size of the market, that there's so few players on that market. And you need to have one. It's not like you can say no, I'm good. Like I don't need a share RAM, I don't need a market option. You need to. So you will buy one of those. Which is why it's a great company. It's a great dream. So well, almost no one has the combination of those market attributes. And I have never seen companies I've worked with, neither at segment or at the drift, or GSO, and not in one of the companies I engage with, we were able to get to 50 million on one channel, not one. The question I have from founders is like, Hey, this channel's working, it's working well.

40:06How do I think about the other channels? And I'm normally saying, hey, don't get too cute. Facebook ads is working. Just pummel it. Keep going, keep going, until it doesn't work. Obviously you want to transition quickly. Don't be too cute too early. Do you agree with that? Or do you think actually diversification is important early? I'm in between. I'm in business. I don't like to be surprised. And what that means is, if I'm going to raise a series A or B, whatever your stage is, I want to know, like, can actually spend that money? Do I have, like, more than, like, hypothesis that I know how to spend that money?

40:38And so I recommend, increasingly, as you go through the stages, to test the cack and the depth of those channels. Like, if you want an example, let's take, like, paid on Facebook. Do you really know what's the depth of that channel? No. How do you do it? I recommend companies to 2X the budget every week until it's that line. Just do it for like four weeks, six weeks. It's not gonna like burn your budget, your entire like capital, but just two X on a week two. Two X on a week three. Two X on a week four. Very quickly, you're gonna find out where the cap is. All right, you're gonna find out you're not getting more, like engagement, more clicks, more revenue.

41:15And then you can scale back and can tell your board, hey board, we've pressure tested the depth of that channel. And we know how much we can spend on that channel. And you then go and do the same on every other channel. I did the same for me on emails. What's the number maximum of emails somebody can receive before there's like negative outcomes? Is it like once a year, once a quarter, once a month? Let's just take a small sample and let's go down. Obviously, like this is like dinner shift effects, but you should test it. Test the same with every channel and they go back to you once a day. We know the depth of email We know the depth of like paid.

41:48We know that if every other channel. This is why we need to raise money This is how we can spend it. How do you know when you've truly had it? Is it that obvious? Yes, is that grey? Do you know what I mean? If we're doing Facebook and it's like, yeah, we're a couple of percent less effective. Is that the depth? To exit again, and you'll find it. Eventually, you won't be able to spend more money. There's a point where you can't spend more money or you're spending more and not getting more engaged. If you're not sure, to exit again. I think people worry about destroying a channel too quickly. Think they could randomize a symbol of the audience.

42:19If you can't do that, it means your target market is too small and you should be doing ABM. If you have like, let's take gorgeous again, like if you have like 200 ,000 companies, can't you take 5 ,000 companies, 2 ,000 companies? The smallest audience Facebook will let you have like 2 ,000 and like really increase the budget there. If you burn those 2 ,000 out of 200 ,000, burn 1 % and you've learned the outcome of the channel, is it not worth it? I hate you here and I'm like, okay, so we think about the debt and the returns driven and that converts to sales. The question that I have is, yeah, I spoke to Fabrizia before the show and he said that you're the master of aligning marketing KPIs to dollars.

42:58Can you just help me understand how do you approach marketing KPIs to dollars and just take me through it, imagine I'm a founder trying to understand. Reject any KPIs that is vanity. You don't care about traffic, you don't care about any of those KPIs. The only thing you care about is weight adjusted pipeline dollars. So, all those KPIs, engagement KPIs, your growth in your marketing team needs to convert them based on lead score based on company size and stage your close rate. Every single logo that engages with your brand at any stage needs to be converted into a dollar figure. We then sum those and you have a pipeline by stage that is not just for your sales team, that is also for your marketing team.

43:42Your marketing name has a funnel, tam, to mqls, going down to sqls, then over to your sales team, they should have a pipeline figure per stage. And based on your conversion rate, you should give them goals at every stage of that pipeline. The key learning is what has worked for sales also works for marketers. If a marketing candidate that you're looking to hire does not own a pipeline figure, that is the wrong candidate, my friend. Can I ask you a pipeline figure? I can give you bullshit, I can feed your pipe with a lot of low quality leads. And then you don't have a good lead score. Then your lead score is bad.

44:17If your lead score is good and your pipeline is adjusted with lead score, that should not happen. Talk to me about that relationship between lead score and pipeline and how founders can and should use it. If that's like your ACV is 10k and your lead score predicts a likelihood to close of 30%. So the value of that company of pipe is 3000 bucks. It's not 10, it's 3. If the lead score is shit, maybe it's 1. You don't count the 10, you count the 3. And if you can't make that prediction, then you should be working on the lead score. How many people have this in place do you think? All the ones who are winning.

44:51It's fairly easy to build a lead score. You could like, outsource it to a company like Matt could do. You could build it on a modern A out of that form like Akeo. Like there's like even Hopspawn has like simplified models for that. If you haven't think of like the lead score, it means you haven't thought of your ICP. If you haven't thought of who's a good customer for you. You just stop everything and just go define who are the good customers and what are their attributes? We're not earth to these people sitting our company G. These growth -minded people who are working on activation experiments Who are working on testing new channels?

45:23Are they marketing or they in product? Well they answered them growth, but so it should be a standalone function in your mind I love for that to be true I have although that I'm wrong and that is barely the case. The local effects of the world are the exception truly. It generally rolls into like either product or marketing. I would love for that abuse talent function. The elites quite self generally is within like ops. When do we hire the first person? When's like you know what we've got enough day to hear? That's test. Let's start this process. After a couple of minutes of interview, once you've handled the other adopters, you've scaled at least one channel that works well and you've started to think of optimization, testing, aggressively building a growth team, then you should have enough data for the topic.

46:10But let's flip the question the other way. If you don't have enough data, then your growth team can't learn. If the growth team can't learn, you should not hire a growth team. Well, sometimes you need a growth team to get data. Well, if you think about actually like understanding whether a funnel works and is efficient, you need to drive people to that funnel. I'm playing Devils advocate here, but... Yeah, I don't think that's a good case for a golf team because kind of like you said earlier you can drive terrible pipeline to a funnel. I can drive terrible leads to your product. If you hire a golf team too early, will they get you using engagement?

46:46Absolutely. Is that going to be the right users? I your bet is as good as mine. People respond to incentives. If the incentive of the team is to drive signups and engagements, the problem is they will optimize for that, not for the long term viability of the business. That's a huge risk. I'm French. I know how to cheat 10 times out of 10. You give me anything as a goal that is not revenue and you incentivize me strongly for that. You're gonna get that KPI but you're not gonna get the revenue. Okay, it's in it, isn't I agree? So it's this kind of couple of million there are we've got enough data.

47:18We've got a couple of channels maybe working. Cheat your name, chew your advisor to my business. I'm the founder. We're in that stage. Should I hire a senior person who's got years of experience? Should I hire a guy? God, no, stay away from that. Uh, who's that? A former founder. You know what the good thing about Swaps? Most don't make it out. Like nine out of ten. Die. That doesn't mean it's a bad founder. There's a million reasons for the sort of doubt they'd have to have survived. And most of the founders are amazing individuals. They know how to bounce back. They know how to pivot. They are focused on long -term outcomes on revenue.

47:55All of those things that are said are exactly the key attributes which you want for somebody you'd be eating your growth team. If you don't have it from a founder, go for somebody from like a consulting background with a big five, somebody who's really focused on like data on precision on the running hypothesis and on running a process. Growth is about running a process, not about like being super smart. It's running a process. We hire a former founder, probably one that hasn't worked out in the earlier stages. Is that it? Do we just hire one at a time? You want for a growth team to work out. First, it exists after your product team, obviously, otherwise you don't have a product.

48:32Generally, after your first few marketers, who are doing the traditional campaigns, the core campaigns, and you're gonna create this startup and the startup, this team within the team, and they're gonna take risks as we talk as a VC. What do they need to be able to do that? They need to be able to build and to ship. That means you have this one of founder who's like the head of growth slash PM, running the process. You're gonna have at least one engineer. You know, maybe data analysts, if the founder can do it, but you're the pedagog, is the analyst in the other days? So you have like, kind of growth engineer and one marketers that's copywriter.

49:05That's your team. That's the team. Now we know that as a structure. If you're advising me on hiring for that team, how on earth do I structure the hiring process for that first growth hire? You want to ensure that they can look at your data, which means you need to give them a take home that has some of your data. I would recommend hiding a few Easter eggs in there. Some outliers. Do you see, have they, look at the data? Have they found the Easter eggs? And the question that the data set and those lines, that's the first thing. Just so we're clear, when you say like Easter eggs, this is like an anomalous number that is outside of the path.

49:39Yes, absolutely. I will put a couple of people, a couple of like logos that have like very weird, no retention, revenue, acquisition, stuff like that, right? Behavior, things like that. Do they see that? All right. If they don't see it, It's like, you can't really eyeball it in a data set. That's the first thing. And then what's their approach to risk, to making bets and coming out on top? How do they win? When they face interesting challenge, what's their approach? One of the key questions I always ask that is really how the people don't expect it. I asked them, like, have you played video games?

50:11I used to be a gamer before I had kids. And they were like, yeah, actually, most of you will have played games at one point in their life, right? I'm like, cool. Tell me about it. What's the platform, what's the game? What's your strategy? How you win? Teach me and tell me about the rules. what makes a really good player in that game. To understand the rules, and can they think outside the box? Because that is growth. Is understanding the rules, thinking outside the box, and making interesting, valuable bets. Risk -adjusted bets. Again, as we said, the risk -adjusted works for your pipeline, works for the growth, and experiments works as a VC.

50:44It's the same logic that I'm looking to find are they reasonable risk takers? How many of the candidates do you find can actually do that? I'm thinking of mine now and I'm saying like, you know, I played FIFA a lot when I was younger with my brother I didn't know like what makes me win Particularly and like there's very different styles. It's not like chess or can inform you like a game Where maybe it's more black and white on what makes someone win do you see what I mean? So I'm like that's hard Have you played a board game like Starcraft? I've been monopoly what makes you win your monopolies survival Longer than anyone else.

51:17Okay. Good. So how do you do that? Like what's your approach of surviving? How do you ensure you can survive? I stay at the table when everyone else goes for dinner. Yes, you can start drilling down to understand what is one person's approach. Obviously it's easier when it's like a boy game, like a starcraft or something like that. And it's also because it gives me, I know better, but even in modern games, I try to understand that. And maybe you're not a mistake or a harry. And when you harry, another ripe candidate for that. That's my point. Do you find that a bad hire is very obvious in growth or do you need time to know whether they're a bad hire?

51:52You mean somebody that I have hired and eventually comes out as a bad hire? Yeah, exactly. It's fairly obvious, really fast. They won't try aggressive things. It's all about being very aggressive. Let's go back to the things I talked to you about today. I saw your face, like you think like, well that's crazy, that's out there, that's out of the box, like where's the box? That is just aggressively thinking of like, what can I do that stands out? But it's really different. People will question, this has to be a human. This is really valuable. This is not like, can that person, can that continue to do that?

52:22Or are they gonna say, hey, we're gonna run some ads, we're gonna talk about product. Maybe that's a great marketer. That's a dimension person. But it's a combo of being very thoughtful about the odds and the bets and running the experiment in the scientific way and being aggressively creative. How do you think about the sizing of that, I'm thinking now in venture, but like if you have a budget it and we're thinking about that. Is 10 % too big a bet to make on budget? Or is that no? My budget is my head count. It's the time allocation of my head count. My constraint is how many experiments can my small team ship?

52:58And if you look at your team like CWAP, these days with like 10, 15 people on the growth team, they ship about 200 experiments per quarter. Now, you go back to the individual. It's not crazy 10 experiments per person per quarter so like you know roughly a bit less than one per week So it's not crazy at the rate of 200 or quarter some stuff has to work or you're very unlucky But some stuff has to work and you're getting like a good you know 10 -15 solid wins So my constraint is headcount and velocity. That's why you optimize for those things So we have the budget because I'm not competing on budget What are the biggest hiring mistakes you've made?

53:37What the fuck? Jay, can't believe you did that. Hi, I'm Chris Senior. Being like having stars in the eyes because somebody has had a huge track record and is very senior and believing what they tell me. And they tell me, yes, I'm excited by going back around the stage and getting my hands dirty that has never came out to be true. Not once have I hired a senior person in a position where there's no one else to empower them and they told me they would get the hands dirty, have they gotten the hands dirty. not once, they lost it. It's almost like going back to your soccer, like FIFA game. There's an age, and once you're past the age of playing soccer, you become a coach.

54:16Do you ever become a player again? Absolutely not. It never happens. You can't do that. Same thing here. This one thing we can talk about here. So why does it happen in marketing and not in engineering? It's very unique. As an engineer, you can be an L -8 engineer. individual I .C. right? Very experienced. You're the best engineer at this code base. You know, in an out and you will be respected and nobody will question it. As a marketer, do you know anyone who has done like five, six, seven years of the same world without becoming a madger and you'd say yeah that person's awesome other way they do their best?

54:50Hell no. Everybody in marketing is forced to become a madger pretty fast. Why? Because there is no respect for deep knowledge of one channel. I know exceptions like for example Rex at HubSpot on Paydads is like even him he's a major now. Actually I don't think I can name one person who's still an IC. There's not much people is getting their hands dirty on a daily basis and has like plus five years of experience. I don't think anyone. So you got your higher early because in don't hire senior. They won't get the shit done. Do you think marketing gets the respect it deserves? Sometimes absolutely.

55:27When this is like very great and with this good campaign it depends where like if you're talking about engineering companies, engineering companies, engineering products, like second -hand, is it harder? Absolutely. For sure, it's harder. But the place is like obviously I start to make a red apple. Apple is a marketing company. Do people respect apples brand and marketing? Absolutely. But that's more like the exception than the rule. Final one and then we'll do a quick fire. Now you're an advisor in many amazing companies. When should companies hire an advisor? When should they hire full -time?

55:56You should always hire full -time when you can. Like always tell people like if you can hire the person you want that's a right fit for you go for it I'm not a good replacement for that the whole that I plug the problem that I fix is generally you can't make that hire The experienced growth person or that founder that you care about that is amazing Did they want to take the risk with you at the series a no the one who got their own company? And so who you gonna hire you gonna hire a more younger? higher on the execution skill, but they don't have the expertise. They don't have the experience. I'm the fix for that.

56:31But if you get higher, though guy who has experience, the skills, the knowledge, and can like ship higher that person, absolutely 10 times out of 10. But it's ironic because they have to be that intermediary. Given what we just said about the seniority, they have to be three years in. Absolutely. That middle ground. It's a tight overlap. Which is why I have a business. I have a business because the people like me, like I know all people at like my level of experience in the US. There's less than 200, there's 120 people. Dude, it's so funny. Like, you know, we have 20 growth funds now, which is Casey Winters, it's Darius, it's Lut Le Vask, it's Elena Werner.

57:09What's one of those can you hire in a CVSA company? None. You think you're laughing? None. Zero. Okay. Zero of those people are available on the market. Not one of the 120 or third is like semi -retired in VC and other things. A third is in like, great walls, like Luke, and you're not going to poach Luke from like Shopify. And there's a third like me who's like doing like, consultancy and I could advise you and like other things. You can hire those people. Not at the Series A at least, I mean, sure if you're like, Shopify, like everything's possible. But like, you're a Series A, Series B. You're not getting those people.

57:40I want to be honest, like, it's just not happening. I want to go into a quick fire round. So I say a short statement, you give me your immediate thoughts. That sound okay. It's cool. What's your craziest experiment? Coffee, hot coffee, cappuccino, and segments are homepage. It worked when you came to the website instead of asking on the chat how can we help you which is lame and not unique We said like how did I get coffee and because it was like a reverse IP running pre -COVID We knew what the HQ was the company the rain and knew the city and we would just ship coffee to you We just asked for your first name.

58:12We knew you were Harry boom ship a caption to you Why are you awaiting for the capuchino that was run by postmates? We would say hey, do you have 20 minutes for a demo? Of course you'd say yes And then it came to the end. Of course, $20. $20 .00 for a demo? Good cack. It worked well. Yeah, it worked well. That's smart. What tactics have not died a death over the last five years? What is strong as ever? Email? People have called the death of Abla email every year. It's still going strong. What tactics have totally died a death? One's back, I don't know what you'll have died to death, but the Phoenix of tactics is called called.

58:46Code call was dead from like 2012, 2013 to 2022. And with LLMs now and tools like O 'Rum, Code call is back big time. What would you advise a new growth leader starting a new role today? I have strong connections to learn what others are succeeding. The key to success in growth is testing and learning. And so if you can outsource the cost of learning to other teams either through advisory, like I did in the early days or through like good relationships, You are saving a ton of effort and capital and you can just deploy those learnings to your business and look like a fucking genius What's the worst strategy you've done a worst growth experiment you've done which did not work it sucked Generally building bundles like bundles are a terrible idea when you start Bundling different features different products together into one the size of the ideas that counts about the entire bundle is smaller and smaller as the bundle increases.

59:45What would you most like to change about the world of growth? The fact that it's not independent, growth is not an independent function. It has to wall up to marketing or product or another that creates conflicts, which eventually leads into death of growth teams at late stage. There's almost no company at a late stage with a growth team. So you'll feel like Facebook, Shopify, and a couple others. Final one for you. We've spoken about Rambly to a Mac Gorgeous. What growth strategy have you been most impressed by another company. One thing I've never had to put here to do myself, it always like an admirer, is the typical of virality.

1:00:19I think of the draw box of the world as a pro -sumer. Think of Zapier. I know those companies, I know the leaders, I know how they pull it off, and the combination of a huge market, a very viral product, a very sticky, viral product, good product, creates opportunities unlike no other. The ability to have people, customers bring other customers to no cost to you I just want to like sit back and relax and see the customers sign up And I want to be in that in the in my beach chair and see that and for me it's always been like hard work And I always imagine like derayos, you know at at drop box and other places thinking like Million people just invited themselves as month.

1:01:00How cool is that? Gee, this has been so much fun Thank you so much for putting up the show. I'm yandering and I've absolutely loved this. Harry, it's been great for me too. Let's talk again sooner than six shows next time. As I said, shows like that are why I started 20 growth. Actionable granular advice that you can use today in your startup. If you want to see more from us, you can of course check us out on YouTube by searching for 20VC. That's 20VC, where you can watch the full episode in video. But before we leave you today, I'm refreshing the 20vc Miro Boardnud, love your input again, it's really easy just head on over to Miro .com ford slash 20vc and leave your guest suggestions for future shows and you can do it with a digital sticky note or a comment and head over to Miro .com ford slash 20vc and Miro actually sponsored this episode.

1:01:49If you haven't already tried it, I think you'll love it. Miro is the online workspace for innovation, it's packed with the right capabilities to be your dream products home base that you can visualize content, data and research findings all in one space with no problem. It means this space is where you map customer journeys with the whole product team, create user behavior dashboards and map process diagrams and finally it's where you'll run productive team sprints using integrations with tools you already love and use like Giro for developers, a sauna for project managers, Figma for designers and so on.

1:02:22We use Mirror and love it to brainstorm future shows, vote on potential guests, and leave feedback for the rest of the team in our own time. And right now I'm using it to hear from you. Leave your thoughts on the board at myro .com -20VC, that's myro .com -20VC, and 20 growth is obviously focused on building the best growth teams and great growth teams are obsessed with making data -driven decisions. But getting good data is hard and growth in product teams have to spend hours each week configuring metrics, setting up experiments and writing custom queries, or what if your growth team could get this time back?

1:03:00With Star sig they can, thousands of companies from huge enterprises to start -ups, rely on Star sig to ship faster, automate experimentation and improve key metrics. If you're building software products, Star sig is the one stop platform you need for experimentation, feature flies and analytics. After implementing StarSea, the growthpeamardansistry .com 10x is the number of experiments they were running. If you're a startup, StarSea has a free tier, and a special program for venture bank companies, and if you're a large enterprise, they have transparent pricing with no seed -based pricing or tiki -tank fees for small features.

1:03:3720 growth listings can also take advantage of a special offer, including 5 million free events months and white glove onboarding support. Visit starafsick .com, 4 -20 gross, that's 22 -0 growth, to get started on your data -driven journey, and finally, so do you know the impact of your marketing efforts? It's more important this year than ever to know the impact. Or how much you've spent so far this month and what you've got as a result, you're not alone in not knowing these answers, even though marketing is now all about the data. Most companies is still used manual spreadsheets for a portee and analysis, but if you want a supercharged gross, spreadsheets just won't cut it.

1:04:16Funnel is the world's first and only marketing data hub that takes all the manual effort out of data collection and lets you blend data from different platforms to unlock new, deeper insights, and the best part is this can all be achieved without writing a single line of code. I can hear your sigh of relief. That's why it's used by more than 2 ,000 of the world's top brands and media agencies, including Samsung, Adidas Sony and Havas media. Start your own free trial by visiting funnel .io slash 20vc. That's funnel .io slash 20vc. As always, I so appreciate your support and stay tuned for an incredible episode this coming Friday with Dominic, founder and CEO at HelloFresh.

From the publisher

Guillaume Cabane is a growth advisor to high-growth SaaS Startups, including Ramp, Spot, Airbyte, G2, Gorgias, Metadata, Madkudu, and others. Guillaume held VP of Growth roles at Drift, Segment, and other successful startups, where he helped them grow from ~50 to 300. Prior, Guillaume spent 6 years at Apple.

In Today's Episode with Guillaume Cabane We Discuss:

1. Entry into Growth:

  • How did Guillaume make his way into the world of growth?
  • What are 1-2 of his biggest lessons from him time at Segment where he 4x revenue?
  • What does Guillaume know now that he wishes he had known when he entered growth?

2. Enterprise vs SMB & CAC/LTV:

  • Why does Guillaume think it is harder to go enterprise down than SMB up?
  • What are the biggest mistakes companies make when scaling into enterprise?
  • What are the biggest mistakes startups make with product-led-growth motions?
  • Why does Guillaume believe it is impossible to analyse CAC/LTV in early companies?

3. Activation, Engagement and KPI Setting:

  • What are the biggest mistakes companies and teams make in activation?
  • What can growth and marketing teams do to guarantee engagement in prospects?
  • Why are all KPIs not tied to revenue BS?

4. Hiring the Growth Team:

  • What are the core characteristics of great growth hires?
  • How quickly does it become apparent when you have made a bad growth hire?
  • Why do founders make the best profiles when hiring your first growth hire?
  • What are the biggest mistakes Guillaume has made when hiring for growth?

5. Why Growth is Like Venture:

  • What is the secret to building a great growth portfolio?
  • Why is it impossible to scale to $50M ARR with only one good channel?
  • What is the right way to spread resources across channels?
  • When is the right time to add new channels and diversify?

More from The Twenty Minute VC (20VC): Venture Capital | Startup Funding | The Pitch

All 520 episodes
20Growth: The Golden Rule to $100M in ARR, Why CAC to LTV is BS Early On, Why Your First Growth Hire Should Be a Former Founder & How Ramp Does 200 Growth Experiments Per Quarter with Guillaume CabaneThe Twenty Minute VC (20VC): Venture Capital | Startup Funding | The Pitch · 1 h 5 min
Listen in VO