20VC: From Leading the BBC to Leading Venture Capitalist, The Biggest Similarities and Differences Between the Best Founders and the Best Actors & The Future of Media; Legacy vs New, The Creator Economy, The Rise of TikTok and more with Danny Cohen

8 Nov 2023 · 51 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: The Twenty Minute VC (20VC) - Episode with Danny Cohen

Episode Overview Title: 20VC: From Leading the BBC to Leading Venture Capitalist Guest: Danny Cohen, President of Access Entertainment Host: Harry Stebbings Description: In this episode, Danny Cohen discusses his transition from leading the BBC to venture capital, the parallels between great founders and actors, the future of media, and broader social issues like loneliness.

---

Key Discussion Points

  1. Transition from BBC to Venture Capital
  2. Career Shift:
  3. Danny transitioned from running BBC Television (responsible for multiple channels and programming) to investing with Access Entertainment.
  4. He sought new challenges and opportunities for growth.
  5. Nervousness about Transition:
  6. He felt apprehensive about investing as it required different skill sets compared to media production.
  7. Biggest Takeaway from BBC:
  8. The importance of talent management, delegation, and focusing on what only senior roles should handle.
  1. Great Founders vs. Great Actors
  2. Similarities:
  3. Both require emotional intelligence, the ability to read people, and a focus on quality.
  4. They must separate what matters from noise, maintain attention to detail, and adapt to changing conditions.
  5. Differences:
  6. Founders take financial risks with others' money, while actors take personal risks in public.
  7. Management Styles:
  8. Both need different management approaches to harness their unique strengths and vulnerabilities.
  1. The Future of Media
  2. Investment Focus:
  3. Danny looks for "eyeballs and attention," emphasizing the need for compelling content in a fragmented media landscape.
  4. Legacy Media Challenges:
  5. Legacy broadcasters, like the BBC, face difficulties adapting to digital consumption and the rise of social media.
  6. Impact of AI:
  7. AI is expected to significantly increase content supply, complicating the discovery process for quality content.
  1. Social Issues: Marriage, Children, and Loneliness
  2. Loneliness as a Societal Challenge:
  3. Danny highlights the ongoing loneliness epidemic affecting both young and old populations, exacerbated by digital culture.
  4. Thoughts on Marriage:
  5. He shares insights on his successful marriage, emphasizing mutual support and cherishing one another.
  6. Decision on Not Having Children:
  7. Danny and his wife decided against having children, as they felt fulfilled in their current lifestyle.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Talent Management: Successful leadership hinges on understanding and managing talent effectively.
  • Content Quality: The future of media will rely on great content, as audiences fracture across platforms.
  • AI and Loneliness: As AI changes content creation, it may worsen the discovery of quality media, while societal loneliness continues to be a pressing issue.
  • Personal Fulfillment: An emphasis on personal happiness and meaningful relationships is crucial for long-term satisfaction.

---

Conclusion Danny Cohen’s insights bridge the gap between media, investment, and personal life, offering a multifaceted view on navigating the evolving landscape of entertainment and societal challenges. His experiences underline the significance of adaptability, emotional intelligence, and the ever-important quest for quality in both content and personal relationships.

For more episodes and resources, visit [20VC website](https://www.20vc.com).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00What is it about founders that gives you the confidence to invest in them? It's metrics, but it's also a question of emotional intelligence and an ability to read people, extreme drive, focus on quality, an ability to separate what really matters from all the other stuff going on, an attention to detail, and flexibility of mind, because as conditions change, what do you do about that? If conditions change, how flecks blow you in and changing your approach? There is true of someone acting on the stage to 300 year old theatre as they are of a gaming company. This is 20VC with me Harry Stabbing's number really excited for this episode today as we have a very different profile of guest.

0:36He previously led the BBC where he managed over 3000 people and was at the forefront of the world of media, before making his way into the world of investing as president of our SS Entertainment, Lamb Levannex investing practice. And so with that I'm thrilled to welcome Danny Cohen, but before we dive into the show today, there There is no shortage of helpful AI tools out there, but using the mean switching back and forth between yet another digital tool. What was supposed to simplify your workflow just made it way more complicated and less of course, you're in Notion. Notion combines your notes, docs and projects into one space that's simple and beautifully designed and you can leverage the power of AI right inside Notion across all your notes and docs without jumping between your work and with a separate AI powered tool, automate the tedious task like summarizing meeting notes or finding next steps, freeing you up to do the deep work.

1:28It allows you to save time and right faster by letting Notion AI handle the first draft, jumpstart a brainstorm, or turn your messy notes into something polished. And you can try Notion for free when you go to Notion .com slash 20VC, that's all lowercase Notion .com slash 20VC to try the powerful easy to use Notion AI to stay. And when you use our link, you're supporting our show. And to be here for game -changing products like Notion there, we have to talk about Canva. Canva is on a mission to empower the world to design. That is why they've introduced Magic Studio. Magic Studio brings together the best AI -powered tools for you and your team to help you redefine the way you design.

2:09Magic Design creates custom designs for you in seconds. Just provide a text prompt or upload your media and Magic Design cross professional social posts, presentations and even videos. And something that I in particular really love is Magic Edit. It lets you add to replace or edit your images with a single text prompt. It's incredible. Simply select where you want to see the change, write your prompt, and watch as your image transforms. With Canva, you can realise your ideas with ease, start in -spired with over 500 ,000 free templates and a rich content library to help you and your team achieve their goals, explore Magic Studio at Canva .com forward slash magic and speaking of incredibly beautiful and useful products.

2:55Listen to this. Mercury has been a breath of fresh air. Getting started was maybe one of the most delightful onboarding experiences I've had. Mercury is just so easy to use. The aesthetic of it is actually quite relaxing. For me it was less a choice and more finding a kindred spirit. Imagine feeling this way about business banking. You could if you joined more than 100 ,000 startups on Mercury, the powerful and intuitive way for ambitious companies to bank, start building momentum and leave the friction behind by visiting mercury .com -220VC. Mercury is a financial technology company, not a bank.

3:33Banking services provided by choice financial group and a Volvo Bank and Trust members of the FDIC. You have now arrived at your destination. Danny, this is such a joy to do. I've wanted to do this one for a long time. Leo and Akin have said so many wonderful things. Thank you so much for joining me. Ah pleasure. It's very nice to be here. You've had a really amazing people at Sean, your podcast before. So nice to be in the company. Do you know what Danny? I think it's the British Atnocent, the American audience. It makes a big difference. He put you 10 IQ points higher. And actually, tell me, it's a fascinating background that you have, not the usual in terms of starting the end -same industry and then moving to investing.

4:08How did you make that transition to? So my job before working for Access for Leblavatic was running the television division of the BBC. So I ran networks, the BBC TV networks, I was in charge of production and all the green light of content. And I'd been there about eight years and I was ready actually to just do something different. The way I think about it is, I want to work until I'm really old. I think that's what keeps you healthy. So I was about 43, 44 and when I reflect on that thought well I'm not even halfway through my career if I'm going to work till I'm old Do I want to be doing the same thing with the same people in the same world?

4:42However wonderful and exciting it is So I want to be doing those for another 25, 30, 35 years and I couldn't imagine that So I left the BBC without deciding what I was going to do next and I went and had some nice meetings on the West Coast and so on TV businesses and studios and so on But around that time, Lemble of Atnic could approach me. I had no lend actually through my wife for quite a long time. And the proposition he offered was so much more interesting, so much more runway to have a long career in this rather than treading around the same turf I had been for the first 25 years of my career.

5:12It was just much, much more appealing. Eight years at the BBC in the position that you were, there must have been some really big takeaways in terms of how it shaped your operating mindset and how you act today. What would you say are one or two of the biggest? It's all about talent, whether that's about a founder of a company or a presenter on a BBC One or a mainstream no -mox show, the fundamental thing it's all about talent. It's all about teams. It's all about being honest about what you're not good at and what you need to put from other people at. It's all about delegating, doing the things that only you can do.

5:43And if you're in a very senior role in a business night, you know, I sometimes say this to the CEOs of the companies we invest in. If the thing you're doing on your list is something someone else in the company should be doing you probably shouldn't be doing it because your focus as CEO should be on only on the things only you can do. So I learnt lots about management and I think that's helped me a bit because not all investors have had many decades in management. I think people talk a lot about kind of the decay of operator experience, especially applies technology. I think the most valuable thing is that she just how to handle people.

6:10Yeah, understanding people and also understand it's hard. I mean, it's hard managing things. And sometimes when you sit outside as an investor, you can sometimes think, Why didn't they do this? Why didn't do that? And often you don't understand the complexity of what the person in the hot seat as the manager was having to do and all the different elements they were having to juggle. So I think those things around emotion, intelligence and management experience can give you a deeper understanding of the challenges of business faces. In terms of the challenges, are there eight years that the BBC has going to be some challenges?

6:38What was the biggest challenge that you faced, Stephen? I think the biggest challenges, the one that I think about every day now, which is the fragmentation of audiences, fragmentation of entertainment audiences, and the rapid shift to digital consumption of entertainment. You know, you have day -to -day crises, whether that's around a certain show or anything else, but the biggest challenge, the macro challenge, the most interesting challenges, is about that fragmentation and that digital transition. And that's very challenging for a legacy broadcaster like the BBC, or like a network in the US, CBS, ABC, when you can see those audiences fracturing and going towards digital consumption, and curated consumption.

7:16That's the biggest ongoing challenge, both for me then, going back for years, and I think still for the management of raw cast doesn't TV stations now. I had this beautiful structure of the conversation, and I'm just kind of gonna ignore it because I wanted to just roll with this. How do they then think about it? Internally, when they think about that fragmentation, what are they saying, and what did you think when you were in that seat? First of all, you shouldn't accept that linear television is over, raw cast television is over, particularly for older audiences, they are watching quite a lot of amounts.

7:41So channels have value, but I believe particularly with digital audiences, it's the young audiences that have obviously moved over first. And you really need to pay a lot of attention to what young audiences are doing because they're the pathfinder for the older audiences. I try to think most about youth audiences as the kind of pathfinder to what the future will be like. One of the very interesting stats I noticed more recently was, so in the US, more hours are consumed of YouTube on connected TVs than Netflix. And that's because you know, you can watch YouTube now on your main TV and people are watching so much YouTube.

8:11It's now more out of the Netflix. So that gives you an idea about how the ground is shifted. So I think you focus on the young to start with because they're the pathfinders and the key more than anything is have great content. If you don't have great content, you've not got anything great to distribute. So you start with the content and you go from there and that, you know, there's a one -on -phrase content is king or queen and that's still the case because unless you've got good things to watch, unless you've understood the zeitgeist, Unless you've got the right talent, you've got nothing of quality or value to distribute.

8:42Content is king, I get you, I agree. Do you know what I find worrying? Discovery. I'm in the content game too. Yeah. There are some amazing pieces of content that never ever see much attention. And it's because Discovery is like a fundamentally broken thing. How do you think about the problem of discovery of great content in a world of so much content? You're 100 % right. It's a big, big problem. I mean, I've been involved with a one or two projects that went to streaming platforms. Very, very high quality projects that just disappeared. That's because there's so much on there, they don't market very much.

9:12They trust only on the algorithm to throw things at you. The quality of those algorithms is I think slightly overrated. Take some of those streaming platforms. The stuff they offer me as the things they'd like to watch. They don't often offer me something I really want to watch. The quality of the recommendation engines is not as good as I think people hope they would be. And so that problem discovery is a very, very profound one now. And my worry is also this gets worse and worse with AI and content creation. We use AI to create content today. And what it will do in 2 to 3 is, I think, will 10X supply of content.

9:42How do you think about that, worsening the discovery problem even further? It's going to worsen it. I think you're right. You know, there's a big who knows about everything in AI now, but hits and stars. I mean, hits and stars. And that's something Len actually says quite a lot. You know, someone who bought one of the three majors in music and has plenty of experience in it across entertainment like me now. Now, you have to focus on talent to give yourself the best chance. You also have to take risks. You know, that's something I learnt throughout my career. If you try and do exactly what people have done before, you often get a slightly shallower facsimile on it, a failure facsimile.

10:14And you have to take risk at which means some of them don't work, but some of them do. And actually that really fits with Len's perspective of investment too. You know, he's something of a contrarian investor who looked for opportunities in the opposite direction from where other people are looking. And I think that's actually been one of the hallmarks of his success. Do you know the thing I worry about is kind of the sounds a bit strong of me, but kind of the bastardization and content Which is we can have a 60 minute episode and then there'll be a 45 second clip Which just tastes a very strong viewpoint and that is the one that shared on Twitter with 45 million views The episode may get a million views.

10:47You're right. I don't know whether one has to work out Okay, how do you manage that? There was a very interesting recent large -scale survey in the UK young people in the UK are watching over an hour's TikTok a day now on average. She seems astonishing for one platform. You're not going to be able to fight those trends, but you can ask yourself, what can I do to make sure that the shortfall content I'm creating has the best chance of taking people to the longfall episode. And you could argue that's a kind of responsibility if you care about longfall content. I really care about longfall content.

11:17It's the longfall content where the money is as an investor. You know, you're not going to make much of unless you're a very highly influential influence on TikTok, you're not making much at the moment. The big YouTube creators, they make money on the long -form videos that you can put adverts in. That's where the money is. And that's true of a lot of these, you know, that if you have a great 105 -minute or 120 -minute movie, you've got a good chance of success. Not really got anything like that chance success with a minute clip. That's what I worry about also with this generation of TikTok stars, where it's like, they're a fine several who do make a lot of money.

11:48But actually, the broad scheme of things, the creator economy, does not make actually very much money at all there. Well, I think you have to again, get credit to YouTube on that, because that's where you look at the biggest crazy on YouTube, they're making tens of millions. There's a set behind them who are making thousands a month or hundreds a month, and that is a platform where you can take your talent and make money from it, whereas I agree with you. Some of these other platforms, there's no pathway at the moment. Now, you could argue that these companies will work out what that pathway is.

12:14They'll work out a way of rewarding their top creators and the creator generally to do it, but we're not seeing that pathway yet. And so I would advise people if you want to be a creator, focus on the areas where you could actually make money. And if that means doing short form, make focus on that short form, throwing your audience to the long form. What do legacy media think about? What does the BBC think about the creator economy? There's a TikTok star who does kind of newt in the UK, and he has 10 million followers now, and the BBC attacked him recently. I'm just wondering, like, what is the response from legacy media to the rise of this form of media?

12:47I think they're massively challenged by it. You see their attempts to respond to it in, I don't know, this morning, Taylor Swift being an FL match last night with a new boyfriend was one of the main stories on the BBC News website. That's not really news in the way you would expect the BBC to present news as a story of significance. But what they're trying to do by doing that and which other legacy media also have to try and do is track young audience, make those young audiences feel that there are some topics which are particularly focused on them. Do you know I think that's kind of a what and where and what I mean by that is like, but that is a written piece of content on the BBC News website.

13:22And I think it's the wrong what, it probably should be a short form video or an animated clip or whatever that is. And it shouldn't be on the BBC website because that's not where they are either. Well, this is the problem though, that's a catch -22 isn't it? Because if they're not on that website, you can't get young audiences to the BBC. So you've got to keep trying. And you've got to see whether you can attract them. I think in that story, there was probably something to click on, which was probably the Instagram clip of her, to take a swift laughing at the game or whatever, surrounded by some other celebrities, and that's right.

13:49But as I say, the only thing young people are interested in, but you can see these efforts to attract younger people to legacy platforms because they know that those audiences seeping away from them, and that's a big, big, big challenge for them for their future. So it's existential actually for those companies. What do you think happens in five years' time? To legacy media. Yeah, I had someone recently said to me that actually, with AI and the explosion of content, they will become more valuable because they are verified sources of media that you can trust and you know there is a person there, they have morals, they have liable versus AI first could be anything.

14:21I hope that's true. I think trusted brands are really important, but AI isn't the thing that's suddenly going to challenge trusted brands. Social media has already done that for what, 10, 15 years now. The breakdown in shared truths, the breakdown are understanding of a shared reality and what's really happened, that's already happened. So, AI might make that worse. I hope as a kind of concerned citizen that those brands hold on to truth, hold on to that trusted status. But I don't know. If that many young people are getting the news from TikTok, why would they, when they're 10 years older, decide they want it on the BBC?

14:57They may do, but I'm just not sure. I have to find that concerning. And it's not that the story for these services over, it's just they've got massive, massive challenges and they're going to require great leadership, great talents, new distribution models to be able to survive. Do you think the incentive structure is aligned to that? And what I mean by that is in a world where I make a lot of money from my podcast if I was in a traditional media house, I would be paid at salary. The BBC's salary incentive structure is not nearly as attractive as what one can earn in a modern media world. That's always been the case.

15:29You know, in the case the BBC, and I left quite a while ago now, people are very proud to work there. And they still are, and I didn't mean that really, but there's been a lot of shade on that. Some, yeah I think some but not all. And actually, you know, I think this comes in phases. There was a moment I remember when I was there where everyone seemed to wanna work for Google or Facebook. Not sure everyone feels like that now. There is, I'm sure 10x, 20x the amount of young people who wanna work at the BBC than they have roles for. Do you think BBC, ITV, traditional legacy media, do you think they are more or less valuable in five years if you're gonna put a back down?

16:00I think it just depends on your strategy. I'm not someone who really believes you could imagine what's gonna happen in five years at this time because things are changing so fast. Look at what A .A. has done in just the last few months, once people begin to understand the power of generative AI. People tell you with confidence they know what's kind of a five years there to be there over -confident. Do you worry about the business model of media? We remember the days when it was X -Factor on a Saturday night, and those slots on ITV were like a million each or whatever it was. People mostly watch on demand, catch up, take it.

16:28So this actually goes to the heart of the investment stress that I lead on at Access, that my part of Access Entertainment. We don't think about one investment vertical film or television. We think about attention and eyeballs. And that attention and eyeballs, that can be across a wide range of entertainment experiences. You don't think about formats, you think about talent and people, across and companies, across the entertainment spectrum, then I think you'd give yourself the best chance. Does attention and eyeballs ever not lead to financial value creation? TikTok might be an example of that.

17:01So, yes. The thing that I found fascinating when I was obviously doing the research for this is the upside maximization cases across these industries are very different. It's a very different upside to a triple dot. I think triple dot could be a $10 billion company in the next five years. Respectfully a theater is not going to be a $10 billion business. There is a limit to the value that can accrue in a theater. How do you think about upside maximization when investing when there are very different profiles? You're 100 % right. It's one of the advantages and actually joys of working for someone it's one person's capital because different things will have different types of value.

17:36Triple dot, amazing gaming company, amazing founders. I think the skies are the limit and I think they'll continue to be great executing. A theatre, you get a certain rent a week. There's only the same amount of seats every week. Productions cost a certain amount and you can invest a certain amount in them. But I work in a very fortunate place where I work for someone who both likes making money and likes building big businesses, but also has a great love of the art and a great love of storytelling and a great appreciation of talent. And so there are things we do in the mix at Access, which aren't about profit maximization, but are about smaller profits and also a love of the art.

18:12And I feel extremely fortunate actually to be in that position because I love the arts and it's great to work with someone who is the same. Does it also impact downside scenario planning? When you think about lost ratios in startups, We both know many startups fail. It's harder for actual physical events I imagine to fail in must've experience his theatre's hard to fail like a startup would go to zero That's true. I mean it's certainly true in a theatre because you own the real estate So as a minimum you've got it's a grade one with we only a Leno's the theatre or hey market It's a grade one list to building it's been on that site for 300 years It's primary estate in London has to have a specific use, but it's primary estate in London So there's no way of going to zero.

18:51The way of maximising its profitability is to bring in big stars and big shows. So for example, in January we have Sarah Snook, you know, Shiv from Succession. She's starring in a play at the Haymarket. She's actually playing all 26 characters in the new version of Dorian Gray. I mean, that's a real sweet spot for me. Big talent and innovation. That's the way you maximise it, but you're right, you've got something there which has value. Similarly, if you have the privilege of working with someone like David Hottney, and the immersive show with David Hockney has IP value that we share with him in terms of royalties and license fees and you could take that show around the world.

19:23So you're right, the downsides in our case is different. I love the theater, but I look at it and I'm always like, it's a lot of cost. He's in a good business. It depends what you're comparing it to. If you're comparing it to a fast growing tech stock, probably not, you can make money, but you're never gonna make a huge amount of money. The real money comes in the creativity. The stars of musicals like Andrew Lloyd Weber and so on. You know, they're billionaires. And rightly so because they've created a piece of art which has lasted decades and people continue to want to see. In that kind of area of theatre, IP is the key.

19:53What's the hardest thing about investing across so many different disciplines? Keeping the bar high, the way access is run, it's a lean operation. We try and invest in other companies rather than build a lot of our own infrastructure. When I arrived, I couldn't quite understand that because the asset size that the access industry has and the lembravaniac has is, it's a lot of money. But it's a small -ish team and it took me well to understand that that's what it makes you do is focus on really exciting opportunities rather than just doing lots of things So it keeps the bar high focus on big things not doing lots of things is a kind of important mantra access and important mantra for Len That's how we think about it.

20:27So keeping the bar high ban with making sure you're focusing on the right things I think that's the biggest challenge It's so interesting because you know you've mentioned David Hawkely, Tom Hanks, Sarah Snoke I don't know interview investors who invest across disciplines like you do What are the commonalities in the best talent regardless of whether they're on stage or in a boardroom? Yeah, it's a great question and it's a really interesting question also about how you decide someone is really smart and good. Let's take Leorge as an example. I felt that you pretty quickly that Leorne Kean was special.

20:58I didn't need to spend four chase hours in their company to understand that. Now, it was backed up by some metrics. It was backed up by what they'd previously done in the industry. It was backed up by the fact that already at an early stage of their company, they were already profitable. But you could just feel it and see it. And it really asks an interesting question about what is it about founders that gives you the confidence to invest in them. And I think it's this mixture, it's metrics, but it's also a question of emotional intelligence and an ability to read people, ability to understand what they're like, what you notice as some commonalities are, extreme drive, focus on quality, an ability to separate what really matters from all the other stuff going on, a passion and an understanding for what they do, an attention to detail.

21:42All of those things are some of those things and there is true of someone acting on the stage at a 300 year old theatre as they are of a gaming company. And flexibility of mine because as conditions change, what do you do about that? If conditions change, how flex blow you in changing your approach? What's the questions that you ask to unveil that? And so like one thing that I will ask is like tell me how you first made money and that always shows like true entrepreneurial Great. Yeah, I sometimes go a bit back a bit further actually I kind of like to know where people what they were interested when they were teenagers and did they study University and all that matters But there's two answer that one the degree is interesting But if they hadn't maybe that tells you something else about them over there They're hunger for business and they're desired for business And I think you learn quite a lot about people when they almost tell their foundation story a step back from where you go But I think that question of where you first made money is a really, really good one.

Read the full transcript

22:32I am also interested in have they always been in one area or have they moved around. There's not one definite right or wrong answer to what that means. But you learn a lot from that also. You learn a lot about people's focus, their attention, their drive, the quality of their execution in the past. I like all of those details too. It's funny, I find that the best founders that I work with have a hobby that is just very unusual. That's interesting. Give me the example. Akin, he will absolutely master the shit out of online chess. Yeah. And he will get so deep in it and understanding every possible optionality tree of moves.

23:08And then I'll have one who is fascinated by lodging for families in the 17th century in England. That's interesting. And it tends to be one thing. It tends to be one thing. And it can move. Is there anything that's different between them? When you look at it, like, maybe the more your actors, your directors, writers versus the founders, is there anything where the best have a difference? On stage talent, often come with a range of insecurities. It's a different thing that they take a risk and put themselves out in the public that the rest of us don't. And that involves risk and vulnerability. Most of us don't ever experience.

23:41That's something interesting in how you manage them and get the best out of them. I think that's actually one really, really important difference. that they take a different kind of risk. A founder is taking risk with people's money, an actor or an artist is taking a risk. A very public way about how people will respond to their art, and what they're doing on stage, or on film, or in a gallery. So I think that's actually one of the interesting things you have to do. And again, it comes around to how you manage people, how you understand what concerns them, what are the strengths you have, other people might not have, or you've got more of.

24:12I'll give you another example. I am not going to be the fastest in the room on the Excel. I understand how the Excel works. I can do the maths, but I won't be the fastest. But I may be one of the better people at understanding how people are feeling about their work, how you can encourage them the most, what kind of incentives they need, being very honest with yourself about what your strengths are, and where you're much better to lean on other people. You mentioned it earlier when we were just chatting for you, stars about your network, and the people you rely on who can do stuff better than you.

24:42Whatever business you're in, whether you're an investor or you run a business, Being honest about what your strengths are and being honest about where you need to lean on other people, that is the secret of success to me. Seagra's success is surrounding yourself with brilliant people who can fill in the bits that you're not as good at. Have you ever thought someone was brilliant and you were wrong? Yeah, I'm sure I have. Yeah, what did you not see that you should have seen or seen as a good question? I think the holes come pretty clear pretty quickly and hopefully you see those before the investment.

25:10You know, hopefully that initial meeting, initial zoom, if you ask the right questions, the holes become pretty clear, and you have a quick sense of, either this isn't ready or this isn't for me full stop. Sometimes it could be something like you wouldn't expect like they don't seem very discreet. You know, they're talking about other investors or they're critical of other people. Sometimes you get a flag like that, you think this isn't gonna be for me. Oh, very often. And so sometimes the flags around things which are not necessarily about, okay, here's our business plan, but the behavioural things around the way they talk to you and what it might tell about how they might run their business.

25:44I totally agree with that. When people name names on investors kind of callously or flippantly, to always a big sign. How do you give hard feedback? Well, I think the thing is, if you are generally good to people, when you say something directly, they really notice. One is the product of the other. If your temperament is always be shouting or over aggressive, people begin to tune you out a bit. If you're supportive and helpful, it makes it actually makes it easy when you have to say the tough thing because it's sort of, oh my god, they're saying that now, they must mean it. And I still think you can present that well, you know, you can easily say, listen, I'm going to be very direct with you now or I'm saying this because I think it's going to help you.

26:21And then you say something very directly. But I do think the two come together that if you are thoughtful generally, then when you have to be very direct and sometimes tough, which I can be, you'll notice more because that's not your typical Danny, when do you cut the cord? When do you cut the cord? I've ever had enough of being supportive. Yeah, it's not like. Well, if you know in your heart, it's not working, do it sooner. We've all had that experience where you leave someone in place too long and you think we'll give them another chance and another chance. We'll do it. And then a year later or nine months or 18 months later, you make the decision you should have made 18 months ago.

26:54And you think to yourself, I should have done that earlier, I knew it. I think when you know you know and you have to act because it's very, very rare that you go further down the line and you're wrong on that. Do you start with full trust or is it there to be gained over time? There's an immediate signal you're giving of confidence by investing or empowering a new CEO. Then they've got to prove back a bit of confidence after that. So you've created the runway of confidence for them. That doesn't mean they've got your confidence forever. It means that they then got to validate trust and verify.

27:23I think it's an example of that, really, isn't it? That that you give that initial vote of confidence, but then you've gotta help me show me I was right, give me the signs, the data, the results, which prove I was right and that you were on the right path. Have you ever had your trust broken? Yes, probably in television a few times, yeah. Did you become jaded as a result? Not really, I mean, it made me very cautious about working with those people again, but I think it's certainly, if your trust is badly broken, it's very hard to go back. Yeah, I agree with that. You said something earlier, which I just really struck me, but I didn't want to interrupt you at the time, and it was you said you wanted to kind of work for a very significant time and really for the rest of your life.

27:59Do you have to love what you do? I think so as you get older actually. I think as you get a little bit older you do. What changes is it? Why does he get older you do? I think when you're younger, you're related to hustle more, you're ready to put up with staff. It doesn't mean that as you're older you shouldn't put yourself into uncomfortable positions in situations because you learn from those uncomfortable situations. I think you think, you know, I want to use my time in the most valuable way possible and therefore or I want to enjoy what I'm doing. By the way, that's a privilege. I reckon a small percentage of the population, if you are a big job where you love it, you should realize how privileged you are.

28:32Danny, what's the decision making look like if you don't mind me asking? Is it like a weekly call with an investment committee? Is it you and Lynn on a call? So it really varies depending on the size of the investment. So if it's quite a small investment, it's something we might talk to Lynn just about directly, you know, in relative terms. If it's a very large sum of money, what we do is we get together, the way Lynn has built access, So we have a real estate team and it have the industry's team. We have biotech, we have real estate, we have some major investments in things like Warner Music and DeZone.

29:01So we have a very wide range of small team but a great range of experience across industries and in investing in general. We may not always have the specific industry knowledge. So we try and pressure test ideas together for where we meet every week. And I hope it's okay for me to ask an element of imposter syndrome. Did you feel that when you made the move? I knew I had a lot to learn. I felt really nervous, which is what I wanted to feel. You know, I didn't want to feel like I was going to keep doing the same thing for another two or three decades. And so the feeling of nervous was an active decision.

29:33And it was about as I was saying that pathway to having an interesting career for another 25, 30 years. But yeah, I had a lot to learn. I had a lot to learn on the finance side. I had a lot to learn about investing. What was the hardest thing to learn? The hardest thing to learn in a way is how strange the way the market's behavior is. Because I don't find it was entirely rational. I found that quite surprising. Have you heard the statement, a market can stay irrational longer than your company can stay tholland? Yeah, that sounds true to me. How does that shape your thinking then? If you take that one level deep, but if it doesn't always seem rational, do you do anything as a result?

30:07Well, to some extent you have to move with the trends. So obviously we've seen that movement from, you know, it's all about revenue to show you can make some money, show you can make some profit. So it's partly about understanding how things are changing and how things are going to be changing the way they're valued. I think it actually just takes you about the fundamentals. Do you believe in these people, do you believe in this idea, do you believe in their execution? What was your favorite part about the move? What was freeing about it? Lack of bureaucracy, the agility of a place -like access compared to a, you know, managed about 3 ,000 people at the BBC, it's an organization of 20 ,000 people.

30:38It's a huge tanker that takes a long time to move things around. So I think agility, flexibility, access to capital that you can spend on a range of different things. I think all of those things being great. What do you think is your biggest insecurity today? I always think to myself, am I got the right people around me to help me? And I really believe I have, but that's the thing that you always want to keep testing. Can the people around me on the things I'm less good at? Can they answer the questions for me that I can't answer myself? I think that's the biggest thing. I think the other thing is, you know, you're always having security around certain investments you've made.

31:09You know, I think you it gets particular, rather than big fundamentals around anxiety. I think, have we got this one right? What do we learn from it if we haven't got right? How might this change our investment thesis in this area? I think you can have the insecurities around certain things. I'm not sure I have a kind of large macro -insucurity. What would you say in terms of biggest mess? How did that impact your mindset? So one of the things I've learned in these years since I've been an investor is if you believe in a thesis about an area, invest in more than one thing in that area. Something I did a two or three years ago, we had a great company in an area, really believed in it, it grown very, very fast and I was brought another opportunity in the same territory.

31:50And rather than thinking to myself, I really believe in this thesis, I really believe in this area, I can be in more than one, I thought I should just focus on this one, give that the attention in this area and invest more in that. And I didn't take the investment and it would have been an A -tex in about 15 months. So that was a really interesting, maybe painful learning. We all have those learnings and investing. But what I took from it was, if you believe in something it's okay to double down, it's okay to take more than one risk even in an area. So that was one I really learned a lot from.

32:19I love that. What about biggest hit where it's like, it worked really well and you had great success with it? How did that impact your mindset? Don't get carried away. It's hard. Lots of things can happen, still in the future. take a long -term view, don't grow your ego, remain humble, keep listening. People often go wrong, and I've seen it, you know, with people on television. People often go wrong when they get too carried away by a moment of success or a period of success. How do you keep them on the ground? Yeah, I think you've just got to keep bringing people around to focus on execution.

32:48That's what it's all about in the end. You know, if you can just ask very granular, specific questions around execution, that's what brings people back down to worth from the clouds. Two final ones, which is actually one on marriage. What was the secret to a happy marriage, darling? So I married up. I married someone much smarter than me. My advice would be marry someone smarter than you. My wife's a lady called Narina Hertz. She sits on the number of company boards. She's on the board of Warner Music, Mattel. She's also written a number of bestselling books. So she's clearly much smarter than me.

33:21Support your partner and able them, liberate them, cherish them, those are the things I try and do and I know she does for me. So I'm fortunate to be very, very happily married. on marrying up. Does that ever make you feel insecure? Marrying up. Yeah, I think Marina tells me that I'm confident enough in myself not to feel that, even though I know she's very, very smart. I think it's the best thing you can possibly do, because it makes, like, very, very interesting. You can be proud of each other's achievements. Try and hold back that insecurity, because the benefits of it are so great. And also, if you're both ambitious people, if you want to achieve a lot, it can be better to have a wife or husband who is the same.

33:56on children, if you could cool up yourself before your first and say one thing, what would you advise yourself? Well, we don't have children. I'm so sorry I thought you did it. No, you don't need to say sorry because we're not apologetic about it. We just decided not to, we were so completely happy. We didn't want to mess around with it. Was it always that way, if you don't mind me asking? Yeah, I don't know, our fifth date was a holiday together. We went to go about 17 years. Just actually gets better and better. We didn't want to change anything because it feels pretty perfect. It's the right for lots of people, but it just didn't feel right for the way we live and the way we want to live our lives.

34:28And we feel so fortunate to have what we have. We don't really want to mess with the dynamic. How do you retain romance with time? This is going into places I didn't expect. How do you remain? 17 years is an incredible. You just have to cherish the person and make them feel special. And you do it at special moments like birthdays, but really it's about the way you treat each other every day, I think. It's about the way you treat each other every day. You know, it is one of the most popular discussion points on the show, though. It is happiness. It is happiness. It is a quarter happiness and meaning.

34:55Do you worry about the loneliness pandemic? We spoke to earlier about people management and how they feel and you said about being really very good at how they feel. I'm really worried that actually, which is more of a... So my much more than me wife wrote a book about this three or so years ago before everyone started talking about it, called The Lonely Century. So yes, it's a huge, huge issue for young people as much as old people. The data around the young people are actually lonely than old people. Yeah, those are some terrible stories and things around old people. But I think it's a massive, massive thing, digital culture and social media and our phones have played a massive role in that.

35:29The thing is, you can't get my head around and then we'll do a quick footage. It's like the business model of loneliness, respectfully, mental wellness, abs, solutions. So far, just haven't proven to be good businesses, of course. So Nareena describes this in the chat because the loneliness economy. It's wide. She found classes where people go and have hugs with each other. There's different ways of doing it where there's YouTube stars who eat loads and people find company in watching them eat and eat their food, particularly in Asia actually in this one. People get company from eating their meal with this person eating on screen.

36:02The range and diversity of the loneliness economy is huge. I think it's going to keep growing. Do you think it can solve that it's to one or two platforms? And do you think they will be platform providers who try and solve mental health and loneliness in the next few years that take a lion's hat? Maybe, I mean, there was an amazing woman in Wales that Nareena writes in the book who started these chatty benches in parks where, you know, it's a bench to chat on and people who need someone to talk to could come and chat there and make a friend. So there's so many different ways both in the physical world and in the digital world where this needs addressing.

36:31I want to move into a quick fight. So I say a short statement, you give me your immediate thoughts. That sounds alright. Trust me, you've got through the past, not so. I mean, this is easy. What do you believe that others around you maybe disagree with? I think I believe in storytelling as an incredible source of revenue in terms of film, television, theatre, you know, in a way you hinted at it. They won't necessarily be the high growth gaming or crater economy that it could do. But I believe fundamentally if you find the right things you can't make a lot of money in that area. We look at Barbie, 1 .6 billion in growing.

37:02I really believe that, you know, it's about hits and stars and it's hard, but I think the idea that you can't still make a lot of money from high quality, well -judged, long -form storytelling is not correct. It's not all going to be about TikTok. You mentioned Barbie that we have Barbie and Oppenheimer and that kind of mammoth weekend. Yeah. COVID cinemas. How was that? Disasterous for cinema, utterly disastrous. I mean, Barbie and Oppenheimer were a wonderful moment. It was actually became quite a frustrating moment because it was the biggest moment since the pandemic where you felt the electricity of cinema.

37:33You felt people returning in their droves and then we were in a writer's nexus strike. And the knowledge that there would be some kind of dislocation in content supply for cinema in the future. And so I found it both a joyous moment but also because of the labour disputes and of course good news is one of them has already been solved. The writers one looks like there's an agreement. It was also quite a frustrating moment because you know I went to LA a couple of weeks later. There was a lot of frustration and disencharming in LA at that point before the writer's strike suddenly was agreed because everything was stuck.

38:03So it was an interesting moment for cinema that where I was a moment of elation. But also this might be stuck again soon. What does the dislocation mean in terms of that content supplies? It means we won't have enough content for six months. It sort of depends how long it goes on for. But yeah, there will be a point, a pinch point, in the next year to 18 months where there's probably a bit less content around them before. If any industry pauses for four months, five months, six months, supply dwindles. Why is Broadway more expensive than the West End? I think a lot of it's cost -based, part of that cost -bases union costs.

38:34The union costs are many things in New Yorker higher. But what we're noticing and we're finding it more and more extreme is that the cost of financing a play or a musical in the West London West End Could be four times less than financing on Broadway now I think this is really problematic for Broadway because Broadway partly benefits from and exists because of the generosity of some very wealthy people to keep backing a very very high risk Type of investment and if those investors begin to feel the risk has just gone too high because the bad the capitalization for this musical is now 25 million where I have three or four years ago might have been 15 million and they think it's going to take three years to get my money back if that.

39:13Even with the amazing goodwill of those people or those benefits abroad where they begin to think differently about it and they're going to ask themselves more questions about whether they want to be supporting that. Good for the West End in one way but it's something I am growing concerned about and it's making us certainly at this point at access, access, entertainment much more cautious about about what we invest in on Broadway because we just see these capitalizations rising so high. How many Broadway shows percent wise, as successful versus not? Differing layers of profit. I mean, Len was one of the very, very first investors in Hamilton.

39:45He's good at investing. Is all the value created there in IP, in the music, in the DVDs, in the merch? No. I mean, the music has a lot of value and the Hamilton soundtrack was released on the record company Len Oensworn in Music. So it's been a lot of value in that. But if you're selling out theater every night, you're going to start making money. And then the other thing you'll get is that if you invest in the original production, you have a right to invest in all the other productions around the world. So access and investor in Hamilton in New York, but also in London, and in Australia and in other countries.

40:16You earn that right by taking that risk, want to invest in a successful production as it moves around the world. Tell me, what was your biggest lesson from working with Lennon? He also says, do big things, do less and do big things. I think, you know, you've only got so much amount of bandwidth. Whenever I'm with him, I learn things every time from his business experience. A story he might tell, he'll say, you know, generally speaking, I've found this and I've seen this pattern. So there are some like big things, but actually when you're lucky enough to work with someone like that, you know, when the world's most successful businessman, you learn from them all the time, you learn from every conversation.

40:48You can have dinner with anyone that are alive. Charles Dickens. No contest. 19th century English literature is my thing and most particularly Charles Dickens. Do you have a favourite Charles Dickens quote? I don't have favourite book, great expectations. Why that one? I think it's the most perfect novel in English language. When you start thinking about storytelling and this is why I did an English literature degree and I think that's giving me great training for the rest of my work in terms of storytelling, you think about character, you think about structure, you think about plot, you think about dialogue, you think about the emotional impact of what you've read.

41:19For me, great expectations unifies those in the most perfect way I've seen in any book I've ever read. actually reread it again last year. And I adore Charles Dickens. Do you think we've lost the art of storytelling? No. You don't. Do you find many goods? Why would you say that? Because I don't think we have many good storytellers, especially in technology and in lasting. So I think you'll write about... The learned game, they'll say, oh... I think you're right. And it's a really interesting point of connectivity between the worlds I've been in, the entertainment world is all about storytelling.

41:46And storytelling by companies and founders is not all as good as it needs to be. Sometimes it's about assuming too much knowledge I find some kind of founders. They expect the person they're pitching to to understand a whole set of things about what they do or about the area they're in. That investor may just not have. So I think a lot of it is breaking things down to their simple initial components and building a story. And storytelling needs a thought, it needs structure, it needs a shape, it needs highlights. It needs all of those things that are true if you're making a film or you're telling the investment story when you're pitching your business.

42:17To me it has immense value on it, it's something I love dearly. Can you learn to story tell? Undoubtedly. There are certain elements of it which you can learn, you can study, you can learn from people who are better at it than you. And some of them, as I say, they're fundamentals. It's about beginning, middle and end. Okay, when you're thinking about storytelling, fundamental story is a beginning, middle and end. So whether that's a novel or a film or a play or an investor pitching their business, what's the beginning and middle and end of your story? How do you want to tell it? How do you want to grow?

42:45He was understanding. Where do you want to land some key points? Where are your reveals? All of those things are true of very different kinds of stories. Which brand do you think tells the best stories today? I think I key is very good at storytelling. I just think you know what they are, you know what their tone is, you know what they do, and they keep delivering. I think that's a really, really interesting brand. And also some people become be good at storytelling and then lose their way. Yeah. You know, you can have a great brand and a clear story. The thing I find unbelievable is Chanel. And the reason I find Chanel amazing is a storyteller and a brand.

43:15It's because teenagers in Beijing love it. Mother's in New York, do your grandmothers in Paris, do. Normally with stories, it works for an audience. But you know there's an initial clarity of proposition there and a consistency of proposition that I think you're awarded for. Often people over complicate things I think when it comes to a brand. A brand is hallmark of something you like and maybe quality but it's also feeling a brand gives you. And a feeling is quite a simple thing in one level. It has to be clear and immediately accessible because feelings are things you don't think about them just what you feel as a reaction to something.

43:48Some of the best brands, they keep the brand clear and consistent once they've achieved it, you know, success in it and that gives you a great advantage. Do you think it has been a massive brand, missteps? I think there's been mismanagement. Yeah, I think you could probably look at some of the tech companies and they don't seem responsive to concerns. Leggo is another great story of that, isn't it? I mean, it's an incredible thing. What Matteladon with Barbie's pretty exceptional at the moment as well. I mean, that's a remarkable story of taking a decade's old brand, making it feel incredibly of the moment, incredibly contemporary.

44:17So I think it's always possible, but you have to have a strategy, a very clear strategy for doing so. Do you worry about work culture? I find there's two extremes to this now, and they both annoy me, right? People just use woke too easily now as a generalization. It's much more subtle, it's much more complex than that. So on one side you've got woke, and on the other side you've got people who are woke, criticizing people who are more traditional. And both sides have got to a point of, They've lost the ability to be subtle to understand complexity, to understand nuance. And that means they're too easy to dismiss each other.

44:48It's too easy to dismiss people who are more traditional values, like, are they just traditional their old school values? In the same way, it's too easy to go, that's work, there's nothing to it. And I think it goes to polarization of debate. And I think it goes to social media, has a role in that. I find both ends of the spectrum really, really off -putting, because they don't allow for really actually thinking about it. They allow for too easy dismissal of people's opinions that are different to your own. and I'm willing as to understand why they have that opinion. And we need to re -issue nuanced and specificity to it.

45:16Every subject, every question in the work, first traditional debate. Do you worry about the eradication of cultural history and what I mean by that is that, you know, role dial is getting edited for many of his characters? Yeah. I mean, I'm sure there will be Dickens' quote, slime statements that will not be worked. There's some things I feel very traditional on. On that one, I don't think anyone should be changing role dial or child's Dickens. I think you may want to, in your footnotes note, something about that use of language, but it's sort of under my intelligence of people, not to be able to see and understand that and if you want to read a footnote, do.

45:46But I think that culture history stuff is stupid. It, listen, it asks really, really interesting questions of how you feel about different artists over time. I love Virginia Woolf. I didn't feel great when I read that some of her d 'aris and d 'aris and d 'aris and d 'aris and this are pretty unpleasant, anti -Semitic things. So how you separate the art from the artist is also really interesting, important question and how you make sure you introduce nuance into these topics is really, really important. Yeah, no, totally. Yeah, you tell me, media in 10 years, final one, you can paint the ideal landscape for you, how you would like media and content to look.

46:21What would that landscape look like in an ideal world? Less distribution, less confusing distribution structure, easier for people to navigate. What is the less confusing distribution structure? Just too many different ways. And I think that's going to be proved by not all of these platforms are going to survive. There's just too many, you know, you've got to have too many subscriptions. It's too much for people. It's too expensive. It's too confusing. I think you're going to see consolidation there, which is in the interests of business, but also in the interests of the consumer. We're going to be ever more curators of our own experience.

46:52I don't believe that people will want to stop having live experiences. Look at Taylor Swift's concerts. I mean, look at that. So I think people are going to want to live in the real world. I don't believe that people can only want to live in the other world. My big, big hope at the same time is people put their phones down more and spend more time with each other and spend more time experiencing things and thinking. I thought to myself quite a while ago, do I want to get to the age of 70 and think I've spent a huge chunk of my life staring at my phone? I think that would have been a depressing way to spend too much of your life.

47:20And so how we dislocate ourselves, how we wean ourselves off the addictive quality of our smart phones is, I think important to our happiness. Danny listen I love doing this. Thank you for putting up with my very wayward questions. We've won all over the shops, but I loved it. Yeah it's pleasure. I absolutely love doing that, Shoe. I love a show that's a little bit more diverse in terms of content and theme types. So if you enjoyed the show and you want to see more you can check it out on YouTube by searching for 20VC, but before we leave you today, there is no shortage of helpful AI tools out there, but using the mean switching back and forth between yet another digital tool.

47:54What was But supposed to simplify your workflow, just made it way more complicated, and less of course, you're in Notion. Notion combines your notes, docs and projects into one space that's simple and beautifully designed, and you can leverage the power of AI right inside Notion across all your notes and docs, without jumping between your work and with a separate AI -powered tool, automate the tedious task like summarizing meeting notes or finding next steps, freeing you up to do the deep work. It allows you to save time and right faster by letting Notion AI handle the first draft, jump start a brainstorm, or turn your messy notes into something polished.

48:30And you can try Notion for free when you go to Notion .com slash 20VC, that's all lowercase Notion .com slash 20VC to try the powerful, easy to use Notion AI to stay, and when you use our link, you're supporting our show. And to be here, game changing products like Notion there, we have to talk about Canva. Canva is on a mission to empower the world to design. That is why they've introduced Magic Studio. Magic Studio brings together the best AI -powered tools for you and your team to help you redefine the way you design. Magic design creates custom designs for you in seconds. Just provided text prompt or upload your media and Magic Design Cross professional social posts, presentations and even videos and something that I am particularly really love is magic edit.

49:18It lets you add to replace or edit your images with a single text prompt. It's incredible. Simply select where you want to see the change, write your prompt and watch as your image transforms. With Canva you can realise your ideas with ease, start in -spired with over 500 ,000 free templates and a rich content library to help you and your team achieve their goals, explore Magic Studio at Canva .com forward slash magic and speaking of incredibly beautiful and useful products. Listen to this. Mercury has been a breath of fresh air. Getting started was maybe one of the most delightful onboarding experiences I've had.

49:56Mercury is just so easy to use. The aesthetic of it is actually quite relaxing. For me it was less a choice and more finding a kindred spirit. Imagine feeling this way about business banking. You could, if you join more than 100 ,000 startups on Mercury, the powerful and intuitive way for ambitious companies to bank, start building momentum and leave the friction behind by visiting mercury .com -220VC. Mercury is a financial technology company, not a bank. Banking services provided by choice financial group and a bold bank in trust, members of the FDIC. And as always, I so appreciate all your support and stay tuned for an incredible episode with Chris Degnan, CRO at Snowflake on Friday for an incredible 20 sales.

From the publisher

Danny Cohen is the President of Access Entertainment, a division of Len Blavatnik's Access Industries. Access Entertainment’s corporate investments include film and television studio A24; Europe’s fastest-growing company Tripledot Studios; creator economy leader Spotter; and a new immersive arts’ experience launched in collaboration with David Hockney and Lightroom. Before joining Access, Danny was the Director of BBC Television where he had responsibility for all of the BBC's network channels and the greenlighting and production of the BBC's drama, entertainment, comedy, arts, history, science, educational content and documentary. 

In Today's Episode with Danny Cohen We Discuss:

1. From Leading the BBC to Investing for Len Blavatnik:

  • How did Danny make his way from leading the BBC to investing for Len @ Access?
  • What was he most nervous about when making the transition to investing?
  • What has been the hardest investing skill to learn?

2. Great Founders are Like Great Actors:

  • What are the biggest similarities in what makes the best founders and the best actors?
  • How are the best founders different from the best actors?
  • Why does Danny believe the risk that an actor takes is so different to the risk founders take?
  • How does Danny feel both founders and actors can and should be managed?

3. The Future of Media:

  • What does Danny mean when he says he looks for "eyeballs and attention" when investing?
  • How does legacy media respond to the threat created by social media today?
  • How does AI change the future of content creation and distribution today?
  • How do the strikes in Hollywood impact the future of content supply?

4. Marriage, Children and Loneliness:

  • Why does Danny believe that loneliness will continue to be the biggest problem we face?
  • What are Danny's biggest pieces of advice from 17 years of happy marriage?
  • Why did Danny decide to not have children? What did that decision-making process look like?

More from The Twenty Minute VC (20VC): Venture Capital | Startup Funding | The Pitch

All 520 episodes
20VC: From Leading the BBC to Leading Venture Capitalist, The Biggest Similarities and Differences Between the Best Founders and the Best Actors & The Future of Media; Legacy vs New, The Creator Economy, The Rise of TikTok and more with Danny CohenThe Twenty Minute VC (20VC): Venture Capital | Startup Funding | The Pitch · 51 min
Listen in VO