In short
Podcast Notes: The Twenty Minute VC (20VC) - Episode with Ed Sim
Episode Overview
- Title: 20VC: The Three Types of Seed Round Today, Why Seed Has Never Been More Competitive, Why Pricing Has Never Been Higher, Why Boards at Pre-Seed Can Be Helpful & How Too Much Cash Too Soon Can Harm Companies
- Guest: Ed Sim, Founder @ Boldstart
- Host: Harry Stebbings
- Focus: Discussion on the current state of seed funding rounds, insights on venture capital, and the impact of cash flow on startup performance.
Key Topics Discussed
- Three Types of Seed Rounds
- Discovery Round:
- Size: Less than $2 million
- Typically for first-time founders exploring new markets.
- Classic Round:
- Size: $3 to $5 million
- Preferred by seasoned founders who aim to be resource-efficient.
- Megatron Jumbo Round:
- Size: Greater than $5 million, typically around $6 to $10 million.
- Generally involves seasoned founders with prior exits, appealing to multi-stage firms.
- The Competitive Seed Round Landscape
- Ed highlights that seed funding has never been more competitive.
- Growth and multi-stage funds are increasingly participating in seed rounds.
- Concerns are raised about the sustainability of high valuations in the current market.
- Impact of Excess Cash
- "Too Much Cash Will Kill You!":
- Ed argues that excess capital can lead to poor decision-making and inefficiency.
- Founders should balance the need for capital against the potential for dilution.
- Growth Market Insights
- Is Growth Dead?:
- Contrary to popular belief, Ed argues that growth is not dead but evolving.
- Discussion of what multi-stage and growth funds are now looking for in startups.
- Market Trends: IPOs, AI, and M&A
- IPOs: Discussion on factors that may reopen IPO windows, notably interest rates.
- AI Investment: Ed expresses skepticism about the value of many AI startups, foreseeing a significant percentage of them not succeeding.
- M&A Landscape: Predictions on increased M&A activity in the next 12 months, especially among unicorns seeking to exit.
Key Takeaways
- Founders' Strategy:
- Smart founders prioritize finding the right partners over securing the highest price.
- There’s a shift towards operating with constraints to foster innovation and efficiency.
- Investment Philosophy:
- Ed advocates for a disciplined approach to seed investing, emphasizing the importance of understanding market dynamics and founder capabilities.
- Future of Venture Capital:
- The landscape is changing, with potential for new funding structures and strategies to emerge, necessitating adaptability among investors.
Quotes
- "Too much cash too early has a net negative impact on 99.9% of companies."
- "Ownership matters, but also you have to balance that out with valuation."
Conclusion The episode provides a comprehensive insight into the evolving dynamics of seed rounds in the venture capital landscape. Ed Sim shares valuable experiences and cautionary advice for both founders and investors navigating these competitive waters. As the market continues to shift, staying informed and adaptable will be crucial for success in venture funding.
For more insights and discussions, visit [The Twenty Minute VC website](http://www.20vc.com).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00The point is the three rounds are there's a discovery round, which my opinion is less than 2 million. So it's usually like maybe a first time founder exploring a new market, of graduating to the next round, which would be a classic. And a classic round in my opinion would be 3 to 5 million. And finally, this is the Megatron jumbo round, greater than 5, it's usually 6 to 10 million dollar round, and it's almost always a seasoned founder with a prior exit. So when multi -stage firms see opportunities like this, they want to supersize it. It's so recent 4 or 5, why don't you raise 10 and I'll give you the whole thing.
0:31Welcome back, this is 20vc with me Harry Stabbings. Now State is a very real time show. I've never before seen the level of high pricing at seed that we are seeing today. Bluntly it is very concerning. Then yesterday a dear friend Ed Sim at Boldstart tweeted about the three different types of seed round and the next generation of what he calls Inception Investing. And I thought it was so good we had to do a show on it. This was really really fun to do, Ed is one of the best at early stage, having back the lights of superhuman, sneak, customer, big ID in front to name a few, and let me know what you think of this style of show.
1:06I really like to hear your thoughts, this is much more news and real time nature than our traditional shows, so let me know on twitter at Harry Stebnings. But before we dive into the show's date, we have to talk about Canva. Canva is on a mission to empower the world to design. That is why they've introduced Magic Studio. Magic Studio brings together the best AI -powered tools for you and your team to help you redefine the way you design. Magic design creates custom designs for you in seconds. Just provided text prompt or upload your media and magic design cross professional social posts, presentations and even videos.
1:42And something that I am particularly really love is magic edit. It lets you add to replace or edit your images with a single text prompt, it's incredible. Simply select where you want to see the change, write your prompt and watch as your image transforms. With Canva, you can realise your ideas with ease, start in -spired with over 500 ,000 free templates and a rich content library to help you and your team achieve their goals, explore Magic Studio at Canva .com, forward slash magic, and speak of incredibly beautiful and useful products. Listen to this. Mercury has been a breath of fresh air. Getting started was maybe one of the most delightful onboarding experiences I've had.
2:23Mercury is just so easy to use. The aesthetic of it is actually quite relaxing. For me it was less a choice and more finding a kindred spirit. Imagine feeling this way about business banking. You could if you joined more than a hundred thousand startups on Mercury, the powerful and intuitive way for ambitious companies to bank. start building momentum and leave the friction behind by visiting mercury .com forward slash 20VC mercury is a financial technology company not a bank banking services provided by choice financial group and evolved bank and trust members of the FDIC and to be here amazing products like mercury there.
3:03Coda is a dock on steroids more than two million people have made Coda their home to supercharge their work create a feeling of organization and foster collaborative workflows And they just introduced Coda 4 .0, a set of updates that make them the true all -in -one platform for businesses, including Coda AI, the connected work assistant that knows your company and actually performs tasks instead of just answering questions. And it's free for dock makers, delivering on the promise to be the one single source of truth. By bringing your teams and tools together, Coda is the only link you need, the ultimate Coda handbook for every team, step by step guides and templates for overcoming common challenges, unique to teams, and how to solve them in Coda.
3:46Get started with Coda to stay for free. Head over to coder .io slash 2 -0 VC, that's coder .io, and get started for free at coder .io slash 2 -0 VC. You have now arrived at your destination. Ed, I am so excited for this, my friend. We haven't done this in a long time. We planned the world keeps on changing, but fuck it. There's doing now, so thank you so much for joining me today. I love it. Thank you for reaching out and I'm glad I worked out I know we've been planning this for a while and I think this is number three on your show It's been spread out over many epics We just discovered that your year of entry into venture was my year of birth and Sorry, I'm sorry There is a reason for that.
4:26I just want to start with some contacts before we jump into the seedlands Yes, people that don't know you and bold starts Plenty who are you and what do you do? I call ourselves an inception investor and in my opinion The world's gotten way too complicated with preceded seed and what have you So we love partner with founders when they have their idea Helping them iterate and battle test their ideas helping them presale their hires Having them be armed and ready add in corporation and leading that round from the very beginning and those rounds can be anywhere in size It could be a few hundred K in size It could be up to ten million in size I would prefer your classic structure of three to four million dollars but sometimes there are some opportunities you just can't like get away.
5:07We said this would just be a chat. If I don't just precede dude, that's what precede always was. I think precede presupposes that you need a seed round. And if you look at kind of the data frankly, the data is skewing upwards. Did you know that the median age of a company that raises a precede round is 1 .2 years of age now, and the median age of a company that raises a seed round is 2 .7? I'm talking about data across the last 10 years. Secondly, I would tell you is that a lot of times founders who are second and third time founders don't want to even be called to have a preceded round because it presupposes you need a seed round.
5:45And what does that mean to you Harry? It means that if you have a preceded round and you have a seed round, that's another lay of delusion. So what you really would rather have for the best founders is they just want to get a seed round. I mean, I wish we could just go back to that, but the cat's already out of the bag. So if we just take the kind of years to your precede, the thing that worries me most you have, and I'm seeing this so much, you have personally stripe or leave open AI or hugging face, and they raised 20 on 100, and that's happening more and more. Can you just help me understand why do you think that's happening more and more now?
6:17Yeah well look I gotta be honest with you, it's got really hard to venture. I mean people raised way too much capital over the last three or four years. Everyone kept raising funds a year after a year after year and the spigot dried out last year. All the big multi -stage firms with the billion dollar plus funds stopped investing in growth and the data is there. And if you look at the peak, I think the peak was Q4 2021 that about 200 billion dollars was invested. Most recently was 73 billion in the last quarter, right? 273 billion. So that's a massive drop. And let's talk about it. Looking at the Instacard IPO, who made money, Harry, and that Instacard IPO at pricing.
6:57YC and Lisa Quarer rounds. Yeah, first two rounds. These folks are like, okay, I need to go on raising other fun. I've been sitting with this drive powder for a while. Let me go right out 20, 30, 40, 50 million dollar checks because you know what? Even if I'm wrong, I get my money back and I am the first person in the cap table. So likely, if the outcome is enormous, I can make some money. I'm not saying that's a good thing. I'm just telling you that's what the dynamic is in the market right now. No, I'm saying that's a fuck thing. I'm sorry. and out of my way to say that as a fuck thing, a me and parker corner and not a good person to pick a fight with, by the way, note.
7:29But me and parker corner had thoroughly disagree. I think that too much cash, too early, has a net negative impact on 99 .9 % of companies, unless you are an exceptional allocator of capital like he is, like Daniel Eck is, like very, very few generation of founders are. Do you agree with me? To my dream with you 1000 % I said necessity is a mother of all invention look every person that writes that 20 million dollar check or the 15 million a hundred million dollar check thinks that the founder they're backing Actually is the Parker Conrads or the pro and the Daniel X the reality of it is there's only a few Parker Conrads And few Daniel X so you're more likely to create major issues than you are to actually have an amazing company Here's why first of all your talent has gotten way smarter way smarter So when they come and like what's the value?
8:20Oh, you raised a hundred million a billion How many of you are gonna make money on this because you know what? I've been seeing it in unicorn for a long time and I'm actually not making any money here for last three years And I took a pay cut the best town in the world Once to join a company not on the highest price but the best price with the right amount of capital for the right right risk Second thing is this is what we've been doing founders. They'll come out to us and say test the waters You know both starts a bigger fun. Let me raise three to six They were like, okay, how much do you really need?
8:47You know what? I'll lead you around now if you want three, but not at six. So they come back to us a few days later. And like, you know what, how about four? And the reason I do that, Harry, is because I want to test them. I want to test them to make sure that they are okay and that they want to operate with constraints around them. Because smart founders, there's a lot of second time founders. I can go on and raise 10 or 12, but there's some smart second time founders that we just backed, add inception, raising three or four, because they want the pressure. They want to take the heat off of the pressure to create and do dumb things and get a next up round It's much easier to do they want to hire a great talent and they would be lean Do you really find that I mean you mentioned one there but respectfully I come across them every day Whether they're very good or praise.
9:27I'm not missing them in any way But they're like this indeed. I love you. I want to work with you But I've got a reason giving me six on 30 and you're giving me three on 15 It gives me way more time. I'm not saying it's it's three and 15 team, but I'll move to like the four, right? You know what I'm saying? So I'm just testing the constraints. That's number one. Number two thing I would say is that this goes into fun sizing. And you know, as I said, I tweeted the whole thing about what an exception round is and there's three kinds. But you know, the way that we've evolved now is that sometimes I have to play ball Harry.
9:56There are some exceptional founders where, okay, you know what? I will split and eight to $10 million around for the exceptional founder, depending on what that price is and kind of where we go. So I'll give you an example. We'd known this founder Ian Swanson for 10 plus years and he came out. He was most recently running GoToMarket for AWS and their AI and ML group. Before that, he sold his other company in the ML ops space to Oracle. And he said, look, I want to raise 10 million bucks to go after AI security. This was in October of 2021. We started iterating with him and his idea and fleshing out the idea at the time.
10:27Let's just him. He eventually got two co founders, kept iterating on it and March of 22 before AI security was hot and it was hot. We let to call that a $10 million round with a crew. And fast forward, came out of the gates fast and said the goal was to collapse. This is collapsing around. I'm going to do my seed and seed plaster, whatever, all at once. I'm going to make it last three years because I don't know when the AI security market will be hot. And we closed a $40 million round just a couple months ago. And he's got a bunch of customers signed up. So my point is that I didn't want to pass on the opportunity.
10:58I didn't love the company raising $10 million, but in that case, it made sense. So you've got to be really careful about how you do this. You touched on the three types that you see in terms of the rounds. Can you just touch on them so we have an understanding of those? Okay, so Inception rounds, this is what I'm seeing across the board. This is even what Sequoia and Greylock are talking about. And in my opinion, in Inception round beans, you're engaging with founders well before the Incorporate. You're helping them bow, test, iterate in those ideas. You're helping them pre -sell some of their initial hires.
11:27When they incorporate, you're leading those rounds upon company formation so the founders don't have to dick around trying to raise money for months and they don't have to dick around looking for six people. They come out of the gates on incorporation with six people and money and they're ready to go so you save a shitload of time. And it's been happening for a very long time and the three cal rounds I see at inception are basically this. And by the way, this is not incubating a company that's not a scalable model unless that's all you do and there's some firms that do that really well. It's pre -accelerator because accelerator you've got to be incorporated to join so you can give them your equity and it's pre -preseed.
12:00And the reason I'm saying is pre -pre -CD is because as pre -CD has gotten institutionalized, a lot of these firms want to actually see a little more product at the door or are taking a little less risky bets around that to be honest with you. That's what happens when you take institutional capital. And so anyway, the point is the three rounds are there's a discovery round, which my opinion is less than two million. So it's usually like maybe a first -time founder exploring a new market, maybe like Wasm, Web Assembly, Markiplang, which or whatnot. The idea is there, a big market, but the market's really early, So they're gonna flesh it out for a while and the idea is it would graduate.
12:31It would graduate into the next round Which would be a classic and a classic round in my opinion would be a first or second time founder And this is where it becomes interesting It's about three to five million and this is the round that I prefer the most It's where that this founder it could probably raise more capital in a lot of cases But they want to be more constrained and like say you know what I'm gonna take the air of the balloon I'm gonna take four to five million dollars I'm gonna build a lean team and I'm gonna operate and the reason that this is interesting is because because your traditional seed -funded copy now, Harry, if you look at the data, the median numbers 2 .7 years old.
13:05Right? That means they've usually raised a pre -seed round. Now they're outgoing and raised a seed round right now, so that's really not an inception play. And finally, here's the jumbo. This is the Megatron jumbo round. This is greater than five. It's usually $6 to $10 million round. And it's almost always a seasoned founder like NEN that I mentioned earlier, with the prior exit. The pie building their next company, It's probably iteration number two or three in the same idea that they've had it made money on before and They're maybe reinventing an existing market with a huge tan So when multi -stage firms see opportunities like this They want to supersize it and they say you know what instead of raising four or five Run to raise ten and I'll give you the whole thing and that's kind of what I'm seeing in the market There's those three rounds and they're all people with ideas trying to get going and they can raise anywhere from zero to ten And by the way, I'm saying this is because you'd say this was pre -seed.
13:56I wish it was just called seed, because that was when I started 2010 there was seed in an A. And that would make the world simpler. But pre -seed usually is a small round in people's minds, and that's almost like a negative connotation for a really good founder. Well, what worries me is, people don't think long the time on the jumbo rounds and say we're just doing a 10 on 50, just base case. 10 on 50 is the jumbo, which we both see a lot. We see 20 on 100 a lot. Okay, sure. Let's project this out 12 to 18 months. It takes longer. Customers don't convert like they thought they would market Doesn't move like we thought it was you're pretty fucked because you can't do another 10 on 50 But if you raised three on 15 you could raise the do 7 on 45 that happens So you put yourself in a shit position, no?
14:43Yeah, and that's why I sometimes test founders I know you can raise they'll come out and say three to six I'll say why not race three to four? And here's why and some of them say, you know what? I'd rather have some more comfort in my own mind to have 10 million in the bank because then I have three years of runway, but the reality is having more comfort screw shoe. At least I do have my own, but then it buys me the wrong way. If I was if you put it in a bank and do not touch it, how often does one put it in a bank and does not touch it? Oh, that's stretchier. Oh, that knee geography we could open up.
15:12Oh, new product. Do you know what I mean? It's a very rare factor that that does it. You know, you know who actually one founder that did that was Rahul from Superhuman? So we gave him one of the first checks back in the report before he's from Fun1. Fun2, he wrote his first check into Superhuman and he raised quietly, you know, he made us put three or four different checks in seed rounds in seed notes just to get our ownership because we'd always asked for more, he cut us back. That was his strategy. Then he raised the $10 million A round and he put it in a separate bank account and said, I'm not going to touch this thing.
15:43I'm literally just going to put it there. I don't want to see it. It's in a separate bank account. I'm only going to operate on the seed money that I had. And you know, Rahul Eri, the guy is an operating machine that guy. So having been through the experience where he's scarred for life or when he sold his company to LinkedIn, he basically had no money, he's like, I'm never going to be there again. And so in some way, that I'm just killed him because he would not move as fast as he could because he had the runway. But I'm just saying, it's a very rare founder that can do that. And most people can't.
16:08And you're better off feeling that pressure. When your backs are against the wall, the best people perform. When you're actually too comfortable, Well, you don't perform. That's the bar mine. So my question to you as a result of this is when I look at that, seed funds back in the day were 25 to max 100 million dollars. That was kind of how big seed funds were. Yes, this doesn't work at all. If you're doing classic three to five million round, let's just project this out for people listening. Three to five million rounds, say that's eight the lowest, three, and we're leading those rounds, say we're doing two and a half.
16:40off. Okay, if we do thirsty, which is the average that we recommend, if you think my diversification, then you're done. On a hundred million fund, the biggest, with no reserves, that's all you could do. The seed funds structure doesn't work anymore, does it? I'll give you some different math. I think in order to win right now in today's venture climate, you've got to compete with angels, you've got to compete with preseed, you've got to compete with seed, you've got to compete with multi -stage, billion dollar firms period you have to. That means you need to get ball control in any round that is presented to you that the founder wants to have.
17:14You need to actually be able to write, if someone wants to raise a million bucks to write, just write a million dollar check. And that check needs to be meaningful from you. It doesn't, it has to not look like an option, okay? The same time, you've got to move all the up the stack and for that special founder like an Ian, you've got to be able to participate and lead a colleague that ten million dollar round. And so what I'm saying is that if you're ownership focused and you're highly concentrate. Let's just say I have 20 to 25 companies in my fund and my average check is $3 .5 million dollars.
17:42I buy 15%. Okay? You can talk about the next round being, let's just say, it could be anywhere from $5 ,250 to $150 to paying on what the company is, right? But let's just, let's pick a number. Depending on the, on the round size, your second check could likely be bigger than your first check. And I've seen that across the board. You know, when I start with the $3 .5 4 million check, I'm writing a $4 to $6 million check in the next round of the company's execute. If they don't execute, then that's another question altogether. Secondly, it usually takes a long time for these companies to get to proc market fit, particularly in the enterprise sectors we invest in, it takes a long time to build technical products.
18:16You might have to do a bridge or two, and you might have to have the deep enough pockets as your own firm to not rely on others and find the signals to step up. You know, Guy from Sneak carried you in any rounds he raised before, he raised his A, three rounds, three rounds a capital before his A. Guess who gave them all three rounds? We won't wavering when doing that. At some point you must go, Jesus, this is taking longer than we thought. We did. There was a company Jesus moment. I remember with Guy after we did in the first seed round and like we were getting traction. But download so on equal revenue, right?
18:45This was in 2016 and 2017. However, he's like, yeah, I got some enterprise customers here. I don't know if I want to do it. I might create this new bridge between the enterprise and my cloud. And it's going to be this thing called an agent broker that I'm going to create. I can charge 50k and he goes, I don't know how long I'll take. He did it. Took a few days. He builds it out. Signed a few customers, we're like, boom, here you go. Right. So if you are actively involved and engaged on the board from the very beginning as well and you have a very concentrated portfolio, you see signals. And the signals that we see may not be the signals and outsider sees.
19:19The important part is if Guy went out trying to raise capital from someone else and I didn't have enough capital to give to him, he would have gone out of business. That's where you have to kind of come in. You've got to know the founder. do we get all the bets right here? I don't know. We don't get it all right. But if one or two of them work within the model, so all I'm saying is that the fun size actually can be larger. And I don't think it's going to be a billion dollars. And I think 15 million, it shouldn't be 50. But I think a fun size between 150 and 250 for doing this in a highly concentrated position with ownership and doing it in a way that allows you to write bigger checks after the discovery round to help a classic round raise a little more of an extension and to support these founders through the B -Round.
19:57I think it's 150 to 250 and I don't think it's your hundred million dollar fund of old But I'm saying it has to be 150 to 250 Oh, yeah, yeah, I'm saying it has to be you cannot maybe get what otherwise And also you was horrible with the 50 fun size is you do need to write 500 to a million what you know ads if I'm writing 500 to a million I'm a pain in the ass to you if you're trying to bring me into the round even as a friend You're like oh dude. I've been there done that Harry I've done everything. We remember we started out with a million dollar fund. This is in 2010 when seed was the first round of record And then the pre -seed category was created because seed seed investors weren't taking as much risk And now the pre -seed investors aren't taking as much risk, which is why I'm saying let's do inception investing Really if it is the market in the world has changed and the point is that yeah, you know You need to have ball control and you need to be able to do anything so many ways of wanting to is but like Yeah, I chat with Jason Lamkin, what is good buddy of mine.
20:55And he's like, yeah, but I don't know if enterprise size actually is investible really anymore. And his reasoning for that before I just destroy, you know, bold start thesis is as engine with the expansion and inflation of entry point, the price that you pay when you come in and the rationalization of upside being public markets and revenue multiples. It's not possible to do as well anymore by any stretch. If you think about any growth investing in end -processed definitions, when we started this fund, LA and I were like, man, if we get like a billion dollar outcome, you know, if we are going to our funds to getting billion dollar outcomes, that'd be absolutely amazing.
21:33What we didn't see was that you could orient some funds towards 10 billion dollar outcomes, but that's kind of not the fun -sized one. Let's say we move back to a world where two to three billion dollar outcomes would be really fucking amazing. Well guess what? If you have the ownership that you target, let's say in our case, it's 15%, some people when we have more, if you are disciplined in your entry price, dude, I'll give the counter of argument. Enterprise IT spending is re -fucking accelerating right now. You look at Microsoft and data 11 down quarters, they're the first up quarter of the other day from re -accelerating numbers.
22:04And I'm just saying the cloud stuff, we're still only 25 % to the way of migration from on -prem to cloud right now. And cybersecurity spending, the wonderful thing on cybersecurity is that there's always a new attack vector. And JP Morgan, for example, spent the billion dollars a year in cybersecurity, security. Guess what? They're always looking to protect their next big thing. So my perspective would be, I love it when guys like Jason say it's overcrowded because I'll just keep putting my money to work where I'm doing it and just being just spun about it. So I think there's a massive upside to that.
22:30I do think people don't anticipate levels of dilution enough. I've been in this game long enough to know that dilution really hurts. And your 15 % entry turns into 9 % on that, as it often a little bit more sometimes. My point being, do you have any lessons observations from the impacts of dilution and just what it actually ultimately means when it comes to cash back. Yeah, well capital efficiency matters period, right? So that's number one. And to that point, you will never find both starts, for example, finding companies where, you know, they're raising $20 or $30 million and two thirds of that money goes to Nvidia.
23:06Because, you know, if my LPs went to actually invest in Nvidia, they can invest in Nvidia, then I'll have to take haircuts from fees for me to do that, right? So that's number one. So those aren't capital -efficient businesses in my mind and they're they're low lower margin businesses Number two is is this is also why Harry we created the opportunity funds So our opportunity fund right now is almost the same size as our core fund our strategy is to inception invest It's to continue supporting the best founders as they keep growing to maintain that ownership And then you know once it after it hits the series B We're still able to maintain that ownership and our board seats as the best ones go So from my perspective, that's where kind of the steady hands come into play in terms of working with the founder and Continue rate those checks.
Read the full transcript
23:49So I'm just pushing you here for fun. These are not my opinions obviously, but I tweeted yesterday There's a special place in VC hell saved for pre -seed investors to take board sees. Am I wrong? Yeah, so look I don't know what pre -seed is first and foremost because if you're raising 500k to a million That's what I think of pre -seed then yeah, you don't need a fucking board But here's what I do. Well, I go the other way. Founder, we're working for you from a cadence perspective. Number one, number two is if you're doing a classic round of your raising three to four million, I like to tell the founder that, hey, you should probably not do a series of safe notes here because you never really know what you own, especially in conversion.
24:24You want to actually do a proper round. And here's what we'll do. What we'll do is we'll put a board together. But you know, as I said, we are going to have our regular dialogue based on the cadence that works for you because usually the first six months, they're just heads down building. I'm not going to be helping them build their product. Harry, I'm investing in them to build the product of the future. That's their job. They will reach out. The best founders reach out to us and know exactly what to ask for. Know exactly how to ask for it. Know exactly what. And then what I say is, let's start doing a quarterly cadence for the board.
24:50I just want text. No fucking pretty images. But what I want to do is prepare you for the day, you know, a year from now, a year of six months in, so 18 months from funding, that when you have a board, you at least have this cadence going and we're actually prepping you for that pace to go. So it's more of preparation stage than anything else and it also depends on the founder. The best founders in my opinion are ping me within me. They'll send me a text, they'll send me WhatsApp, they'll send me I message, they'll hit us up and slack. But putting onerous frameworks around founders where you need to talk every week or two weeks or whatever or having every monthly board meeting cases, there's no set rule.
25:23It really depends on the company, the founder, their experience and the point is you've got to develop a really trusting relationship with that person. I saw that by the way. I was like, who does weekly or biweekly? How's it just like? That was... So I was so funny, the key to Reboy responded to that. So what's the core has been doing for the last 50 years? Thought, thought, thought. And then I had another message from another GP, probably one of the most successful and most last 10 years, that said, if you're founded, there's not one to weekly cool with you, you clearly are not adding much value in a shit.
25:53Here's my perspective. Look, we take board seats for the most part, but once again, if they're smaller, really much smaller around, there's usually no need for it, and you have their relationship, right? And they're gonna reach out to you. I don't want a backzone that doesn't think we can help them in add value and they're not going to want to take my money Either right. So that's why I stick focused in my swim lane I'm not devying and doing biotech or like health tech investing. It's just not my not my area of expertise Ed we're seeing my macro not looking great. We're seeing interest rates potentially going higher We're seeing global conflict with I mean the world is not in great shape And we're talking about going to 20 on 100 seed rounds is seed immortal to macro or externalities or will this shake down to the seed markets eventually do you think?
26:37I don't even know what the fuck a 20 on 100 post is anymore, frankly. I mean, that's just, I think at the end of the day, dude. It comes down to being disciplined, right? I don't know. I think that there's some lessons I haven't been learned in, and I'll just go on my rant. I mean, I think this whole AI thing, frankly, I think AI is the most transformational thing that we've, that we're ever going to see in a long time. However, I still think it's really fucking hard to make money there. This is a place I totally agree that where data modes matter anyone could take a API call to open AI and test things out I mean if I can look at Adobe they've done an amazing job kind of going after that space So I think chasing anything with a dot AI in their domain or an AI thing I think is insane However, I do think there's some opportunities there But I'm not gonna be funding these things at a hundred posts.
27:21That's what's regularly happening now I'll love to hear your thoughts here. You're pricing a ton of AI LLM next -gen stuff and I just think that this is just like I saw in an internet bubble. Everything had a dot com on it back in 96 because I saw that, I lived through that shit. There are going to be some massive companies built no doubt, but it's not going to be built chasing a portfolio of a hundred posts across the board. I would say I now see 85 % of all deal flow now. Purely is AI for us deal flow. What does that mean to you, right? Because I just did an analysis of my portfolio, okay? and I just said, okay, currently in the portfolio of our companies that are running from funds 4 through 6, 55 % of our portfolio companies have an AI related offerer today.
28:03And within the next 12 months, 80 % of the portfolio will have an AI offering. And in my opinions, does that mean I'm an AI investor? Well, if you want to call me an AI investor, you can, but I don't really think of myself that way. I always think about, we're problem are you solving first? How are you doing it uniquely? And oh, by the way, if you're adding AI very cool that, you know, let me know kind of how people will pay for it and why it's going to be better, but versus the A .I. company. I think honestly, the people best suited to win are actually your canvas styles of the world, who actually do have all the data, but none of the incumbent regulatory downsides of being a public company.
28:38I think it's your high growth pre -IPO companies. I agree. 1000%. Did you see Sneak? I don't know if you talked quite a bit about Guy recently, but Sneak has a sneak deep code A .I. Guy actually had bought a company four years ago with his own machine learning expertise. Totally, but also he probably couldn't have done that deal in terms of buying the company or moving at speed if he was a public company. It's not possible when. Exactly. And he wouldn't be able to do it now either because he did it when AI wasn't hot. So I think M &A is going to go to shit, by the way. I think anything sub -a billion is not meaningful enough for M &A teams and Corp.
29:11Dev teams to actually engage with. And the ending over a billion is going to be incredibly audacious to get over the line from a regulatory perspective. Do you agree or am I overly negative? I think we're going to see a lot more M &As coming ahead right now. And I'll tell you the kinds we'll see, right? There have been a lot of companies and there's what, 1000 plus unicorns out there right now. Not all of them will go public. Many of them are overvalued right now. And guess what? They're probably some growth investors sitting around saying, you may have five to seven years of runway. But if I can get my money out right now on the stack rate and I get my money back and investors, by the way, down the stack will get their money back.
29:45And by the way, founders will probably make money. Let's just say if there's an opportunity to go do that, that would be a brilliant opportunity for people to maybe exit out, take their 1X and they can go reinvest it somewhere else. And I'm talking to lots of growth investors who are kind of looking at saying, man, you know what? If I can get 1X out after a few years and actually reinvest that stuff into something else at a better price, or I think that the realization of holding on these people in the market. That they're not getting that deep because the founders are sitting on this pilot cash going, I'm not having your money back.
30:16And they're going, proxies. No, it depends. It situations like a loom where they had, that was a great exit for the founders. Look at those numbers. Fucking incredible, dude. God bless them. So it cleared the press stack. Even though the last round investor came in at a much higher price than the headline valuation, it was a huge win for the founders. So I'm pouring in situations like that where in the past you probably heard stories about VCs not wanting to get one X back Well, guess what? You're gonna see some smarter investors be like, you know what? Maybe I'll take that money up the table now and put it somewhere else and the founders in that situation killed it They should they put a great business.
30:52I love the tax grunge afterwards I joked a positive spin on it. I'm like I'm not fucking surprised He put a positive spin on it. I messed him off. There's been like water. Yeah, yeah, incredible And so yeah, and so people then say the investors failed. Well guess what? Maybe they didn't, right? Maybe they actually maybe they actually were like maybe that was a great opportunity for them because they can go Reinvest into some other things with it and it's a huge win for the founder. So I think those growth kind of funds that put the money at the peak I think the one to deliver one X or slightly above or probably do very well will be above You know because there'll be a lot of ones that are underwater is my opinion.
31:27I do want to discuss the growth on because like we and we've spoken about the frothy nature of seed today. Growth seems to have died though. Do you agree or do you actually think that there's resiliency in the growth market too and that we're overly negative on that? Look, first of all, I've been doing this long enough. This is your 27th for me, where things are never as good or as bad as it seems. And the echo chamber is stronger than it's ever been with social media and everything else. But my point is that, yeah, the number is the overall numbers itself in terms of growth round valuations. Yeah, they're fucking down big time.
31:58Number two is the valuations from growth rounds. I think, you know, if you look at CARDA's data, I think the series C was down from 475 to 375 already or 275. Something crazy like that. So yeah, they're getting crushed, but however, there's still pockets of opportunity where people are going from one to three to four million in the infrastructure space that I see to 10 to 12 kind of on the forecast, and they're still raising at 250 to 400 now. And that's kind of an early growth round. So yes, the majority of those things, The data says yeah growth growth is taking a hit and it is but there are pockets everywhere where people are paying up for things What are you saying to your founders like the founders that are going out to raise and they're like shit That's a really compressed price like 275.
32:41I thought we were more the 500 Are you saying it's a new world take it or you saying hey take another 5 10 million from us and push it out 10 to 20 months or 18 months whatever that is and the markets might be different then yeah So I have a couple thoughts. One is that when the markets are pretty hot, we got ahead of it. We got a lot of our companies funded with a lot of capital. I think the bigger challenge we might have is that there's some companies that have too much capital. We had to work with them to get more efficient. For the ones going from C to A or A to B, I was doing the math. I think we got a 16 next round done from our last annual meeting from a year ago to now.
33:18So we did get a lot of rounds done in the heat of the market. We even got a crypto infrastructure round done in an up -around $10 million a round done in this market. That founder, founding team, by the way, happened to go from zero to 1 .4 million of ARR from a standing start in 16 months. But the point is that the best founders now aren't, as we tell them, let's not worry about what the best price is, because the best price could once again set you up for performance issues down the line. We want you to get the best partner who believes in your business in the longer term at a fair price. I think the days of founders being obsessed about the highest price possible, I think for the most part are over.
33:55And I think the smarter founders want to actually get fair prices above average prices, but they also know that A, they don't want to take it way too much capital, which means more delusion. And they also don't want to set the bar too high because they see what's happening in the exit markets right now. You limit your options to create value when you take money at too high a price. You're not going to be able to sell your business because someone's not going to pay multiple from that. I grew with you and I get you in some ways, but then I was being to a fan of the other day operating Guess what in the AI space and then I get you high, but I need $10 million like we need a lot of compute I'm not planning that AI compute game right now So I do understand the need for those founders to go out and raise capital and go do it in the way that they need to But you know, I'm just saying that history rhymes you and I both know there's some lessons that we should probably learn from last two years Is it an issue?
34:45Lessons that we should learn because I'm looking at some of these I sent you that deck for the ridiculous round. And this was from Pedigree investor who's been through cycles at one of the best firms They're lessons. You should know better They're lessons that we should have learned that seemingly haven't as I said certain firms that have lots of capital to work checks like that a 10 -line dollar check maybe a complete option check for that firm You know or maybe they're almost fully invested right now And so I don't know what the reasons are but everyone along the stack has to do something that makes sense for them.
35:18I mean, just from my perspective, you won't be finding me participating in $2 ,800 million inception rounds from a seed firm, but the multi -sageers are doing it across the board. These are option checks, still option checks for them. My biggest lesson from the last few years was actually just to sell at some point. We were always told lean in, lean in, bullshit. You need to lean out strategically over increments over time. That was a big lesson for me. What was the lesson for you in hindsight you wish had done differently? I would say that the biggest lesson is not much different from you. Two lessons that I think about.
35:51One is, no matter how disamplined you are, we talked about too much cash can kill startups, right? At any stage, no matter what, right? As I said, there's a death spiral that can happen if you miss a quarter or a quarter or two and just the pressure goes up. And the last batch of hires who are usually the largest percent of your business. If you're growing and if you're in hypergruff mode are stealing like they're underwater, right? So that creates lots of issues from that perspective. So that's number one. Number two would be ownership matters always, but also you have to balance that out with valuation as well.
36:26So I'll give you an example. There are so many preemptive rounds happening over the last few years where every six months people raising rounds, that usually there hasn't been enough data points to merit coming in on the next round or the round after. And the company hasn't performed enough for you to de -risk yourself in between rounds, because let's say you got three rounds done in 12 months. And there should have been situations, perhaps, where we shouldn't have gotten into every single one of those rounds because maybe it wasn't de -risked enough between the time you closed around and to the next round.
36:56I think moving forward, since there are less pre -emptive rounds, there is more time to understand, has this been to risk enough? Is this an appropriate time to lean in even more to actually do your pirata or get more ownership? So that's kind of, well, I'd say, ownership always matters, by the way, on these exits, particularly in a world of lower multiples, but you've got to be careful about how much you lean in. Two final ones, Narasacea says, what's your biggest investing win and how did that impact your mindset and what's your biggest loss or mistake and how did that impact on mindset. My biggest win to date and we know called a realization was kind of leading the rounded inception with customer with a K and that was like an eight or nine pretty I think.
37:39Basically wouldn't let the founders out of the room wanted to give Brad and Jeremy the check right there like hold on let me incorporate first and this was their third startup right this was one of the ones where you're in the room you meet them you got the energy like yeah fuck yeah you got to do this right so fast forward there's some tough times what we learned in that process was that someone going after an incumbent at that point time was end -usk. It takes longer, you know why? Every time we're about to sell something like shit, you need more product. So to go after incumbents, you actually have to build more.
38:05So it took us longer. And we had to give them a bridge round between the A and the B before we eventually sold it to. There's not a reported price, but let's just say it was over a billion according to the news. And that was my first kind of really big win. So no matter how big of a vision you have, you still need at least the table stakes of checkbox of four things that they may need before they even believing your vision. So it takes longer. So that's one. And that has implied kind of some more investments now because there's a lot of founders coming back and reimagining things. So that's what happens in enterprise.
38:34It's the same shit getting rebuilt every 10 or 15 years in a different way with a different pitch. Second thing I'd say is my other potentially big win right now is sneak. I mean, it hasn't been, you know, exited yet. But, you know, we had funded Guy in the first company, right? When he sold his company to Akamai and I bothered Guy every quarter. It's like, when he's starting and when he's starting the next thing. And eventually he was like, I got an idea. And I was like, first two ideas are okay. The third one I'll give you, check right now. That was sneak. And, you know, those are some hard times, right?
39:02In terms of he was creating a new category. So that's a different kind of play. Creating a new category, category creation takes a long time too. It took him two and a half years, two and a half to three to guess first million of ARR. And there are some times where it was really fucking slow. But there's the signs were there. The proc love was there. The proc just cranking along. The pipeline was building. Just wasn't converting. So it just takes time. The biggest mistake I made probably would be, you know, as I said earlier, is that when companies do preemptive rounds and preemptive round after round after round in a short period of time, I never fault myself for the first check, right?
39:35Because you have to believe in the first check. Now you usually never fault myself for the second check. But the third or fourth, the third check, perhaps, yeah, that should be an opportunity. You were like, you know what, dude, you own enough, lean back a little bit. So ownership matters, but you have to be careful kind of the pricing and everything else and you can read between the lines here and that one But that would be leaning in too much too quickly without enough signals changing things from those rounds So those would be the two balanced answers. I want to do a quick fire on when the ads are I'm gonna say short statement You're gonna be immediate thoughts.
40:05That's not okay. Yeah, so will 99 % of money going into AI startups today go to zero venture money That is. I'd probably say 80 % of it will. I don't even know what the fuck an AI startup is. But let's just say, the money chasing all these LLMs, there'll be a lot of money vaporized for sure. What would you mind to change about the world event, you add? Man, it's gotten so fucking competitive out there. Man, it's insane. I think that, and there's too much money out there chasing things, and I think there's a lot of irrationality right now. I mean, as I said, I'm looking at the inception rounds, right?
40:38I laid out a framework from zero to six, zero to eight, zero to ten. But you're getting $30, $40, $50 million inception around stun. And I think it's just poker, man. And it's huge people's brains and memories. So I just wish there was some more rationality around whatever and everything that everyone was doing. What do you advise LPs today looking at the landscape, trying to get a grip on it, trying to understand what's going on? Well, look, I think being first on the cap table really makes sense in terms of making money in any environment with multiples compressed. I think too, I think ownership is going to matter.
41:12And I think three is, I think there's going to be a new generation of firms coming around that are building different businesses and different VC funds and trying things differently. I think that there's some legendary brands out there and I am so impressed with how long they've been around and the teams that they have, but I think there's also, given that the industry expanded a lot, the question for them is going to be who's going to be the next generation of of funds out there that are going to win for a long time. What will crack open IPO windows, do you think? We mentioned in Scott, the Insta .com didn't, Clavius added it in with it.
41:44I think it's very simple, Mr. Jerome Powell, sibling to the world that interest rates are to control now. And we're gonna say the air has been taking out of the balloon and the interest rates have to go down. I mean, there's a direct correlation ahead. So my friends at JPMorgan gave me a chart that at its peak, I think, any company growing greater than 40%, and there's an inverse relationship to interest rates and forward valuations. 35 times forward. Do you know today that number is at 6 .8 times forward as interest rates kept hiking up and the five -year historical number is 13 .9 times. So, do I think we're going to move back to where it's 35 to 40 for companies greater, going greater than 40 % never again?
42:26Do I think 6 .8 might be the low point? Yeah. Is it the five -year kind of average of 14? Yeah, let's just say it's somewhere between 10 and 14. So you've got to build your business and your investment strategy and your ownership strategy around looking in a world where we get 10 to 14 for the best companies, Ford, next year's numbers. And if you could do that, then I think you'll have an opportunity to make a lot of money. If we project it out, why do you want bold stocks being 10 years at? Like when are we, you think about fun design? What do you want bold stocks to be? I think we're pretty much the same that we are now.
42:55I mean, I think what we're gonna do is that, you know, where we have four operating, four investment partners, We've got an operating partner and out of London who you may have met with she worked with guy It's the X -Has employee for so we're gonna continue add more operating partners to help really these deception stage founders Get there faster and it's been working like a charm We have a few others identified that we're gonna bring to the team We're gonna stay where the market is in terms of we want to be in that inception round I don't want to lead a rounds. I don't want to get so big where I feel like I have to put money to work to make bad decisions I had to tell you this we only did last year we announced our two -do funds, which were our largest ever, we only did three net new lead deals in the back half of last year because we thought the markets were going a little crazy.
43:37We were seeing a lot of incremental ideas and big ideas. And then in this first part of the year already, we've done seven net new and we have an eighth one we're about to do. So we'll be up to 11. And that's not because we're chasing AI or anything like that. It happens to be because we have a lot of founders that we've known for a long time. Second and third time founders is coming out of the whip work, you know, ready to get going. So I want to stay in that range. Whatever you call it, 10 years from now, I hope it's kind of inception investing. I want to be in that place and no bigger. I don't want to be an asset manager.
44:06It's really hard to deliver returns in this market, the bigger you get. Dude, I love chatting to you always. I can't thank you enough for this and this has been such a pleasure as a always band. Harry, you are a fucking just, you have such a special talent for interviewing people and asking questions and you're so deep in your knowledge. And I think that you learn from every person you interview, you've interviewed the best and I could see that your mind is irring. So you're learning but you also have your own thesis that you're working on. I'm very impressed. So I just want to tell you that I'm watching you real time, fucking learning and I love what you're doing.
44:38I have to say that show was so much fun to do. For me personally, I so much prefer the more conversational episodes. Let me know what you think. I want them to be the best for you. They have to be your go -to listening material. So let me know on Twitter, Harry Stabbings. Likewise, as you can watch the full episode on YouTube by searching for 20BC. I always love to see you there. But before we leave you today, we have to talk about Canva. Canva is on a mission to empower the world to design. That is why they've introduced Magic Studio. Magic Studio brings together the best AI -powered tools for you and your team to help you redefine the way you design.
45:13Magic Design creates custom designs for you in seconds. Just provide a text prompt or upload your media and magic design cross professional social posts, presentations and even videos. And something that I am particularly really love is magic edit. It lets you add to replace or edit your images with a single text prompt. It's incredible. Simply select where you want to see the change, write your prompt and watch as your image transforms. With Canva, you can realise your ideas with ease. Start in -spired with over 500 ,000 free templates and a rich content library to help you and your team achieve their goals, explore Magic Studio at Canva .com, forward slash magic, and speak of incredibly beautiful and useful products.
45:59Listen to this. Mercury has been a breath of fresh air. Getting started was maybe one of the most delightful onboarding experiences I've had. Mercury is just so easy to use. The aesthetic of it is actually quite relaxing. For me it was less a choice and more finding a kindred spirit. Imagine feeling this way about business banking. You could, if you join more than 100 ,000 startups on Mercury, the powerful and intuitive way for ambitious companies to bank, start building momentum and leave the friction behind by visiting mercury .com -4 -20VC. Mercury is a financial technology company, not a bank.
46:38Banking services provided by Choice Financial Group and Evolve Bank and Trust, members of the FDIC. And to be here, amazing products like Mercury there. Coda is a dock on steroids. More than two million people have made Coda their home to supercharge their work, create a feeling of organisation and foster collaborative workflows, and they just introduce Coda 4 .0, a set of updates that make them the true all -in -one platform for businesses, including Coda AI, the connected work assistant that knows your company and actually performs tasks instead of just answering questions, and is free for dock makers, delivering on the promised to be the one single source of truth.
47:16By bringing your teams and tools together, Coda is the only link you need. The ultimate Coda Handbook for every team, step by step guides and templates for overcoming common challenges, unique to teams and how to solve them in Coda. Get started with Coda to stay for free. Head over to Coda .io -20VC, that's Coda .io, and get started for free at Coda .io -20VC. Now, stay tuned for an absolute Banger of a show with Nick Tommino at one confirmation coming out on Monday.
From the publisher
Ed Sim is one of the best seed round investors in venture as the Founder and Managing Partner @ Boldstart, Ed focuses specifically on developer, infra and SaaS at pre-seed and seed round. Over the last decade, Ed has backed some of the best including Snyk, BigID, Kustomer, Front and Superhuman.
In Today's Episode on Seed Rounds We Discuss:
- What are the three different types of seed round today?
- Has seed ever been this competitive?
- Will seed be unimpacted by the macro decline we are seeing?
- Why are growth and multi-stage funds being more active than ever in seed?
2. Too Much Cash Will Kill You!
- Why does Ed believe that too much capital can kill companies at the seed round?
- Why does Ed believe that the best founders are not always optimising for the highest price?
- What are the single biggest negatives of taking a high price at the seed round?
- What advice does Ed have for founders who have large offers from multi-stage funds at seed?
3. Is Growth Dead?
- Why does Ed disagree and suggest that growth is not dead?
- What do multi-stage and growth funds now what to see that they did not before?
- How will the growth market evolve over the next 12-18 months?
4. IPOs, AI and M&A:
- What will cause the IPO windows to crack open again?
- Why does Ed believe that many investing in AI are simply giving money to Nvidia?
- Does Ed agree that 95% of the cash going into AI from venture today will go to zero?
- Will we see more or less M&A in the next 12 months?
- How did Ed evaluate the Loom acquisition by Atlassian?




