In short
Podcast Summary: The Twenty Minute VC (20VC) with Sheel Mohnot
Episode Overview
- Episode Title: Why Fund Sizes Should Be Smaller, Should Founders Also Have Their Own Funds, Is Emerging Markets Investing Gone, Is Fintech Investing Dead & Who Will Be The Winners and Losers in VC in the Next 10 Years
- Guest: Sheel Mohnot, Co-Founder @ Better Tomorrow Ventures (BTV)
- Fund Focus: Pre-seed and seed-stage fintech companies globally
Key Topics Discussed
- The Need for Change in Venture Capital
- Smaller Fund Sizes:
- Sheel argues that VCs should consider smaller fund sizes to align better with return expectations.
- Larger funds create pressure to achieve high returns that may not be feasible, leading to misalignments between VCs and founders.
- Misalignments:
- Identifies key friction points between founders and VCs, including differing goals and communication issues.
- Discusses how the relationship with Limited Partners (LPs) can create additional friction.
- The Future of Venture Capital
- Winners and Losers in 10 Years:
- Sheel speculates on who will thrive in the VC landscape, emphasizing the importance of adapting to changing market conditions.
- Micro-funds vs. Solo-GPs:
- Discusses whether micro-funds and solo general partners will grow or decline in prominence.
- Mistakes Made During Recent Bull Markets
- Key Mistakes (2020-2022):
- Highlights common pitfalls VCs fell into, such as overvaluation and lack of market readiness.
- Emerging Markets and Fintech:
- Sheel assesses the influx of capital into emerging markets and its impact, suggesting a reevaluation of strategies in light of recent downturns.
- Discusses the current state of fintech investments and the challenges faced post-boom.
- Fund Management Insights
- Scaling BTV to $225M:
- Sheel shares lessons learned from scaling their fund, including common mistakes and what they wish they had known earlier.
- Advice for Emerging Managers:
- Offers practical advice for those raising their first or second fund, focusing on building relationships and credibility.
Key Takeaways
- Fund Size Matters: Smaller funds may lead to better alignment and performance, as larger funds can cause dilution of focus and increased pressure to deliver high returns.
- Focus on Founders: Sheel emphasizes the importance of investing in strong founders and suggests that many VCs overlook this in favor of appealing ideas.
- Emerging Markets are Not Over: While challenging, there are still viable opportunities in emerging markets that require a careful and strategic approach.
- Lessons in Liquidity: The discussion underscores the importance of knowing when to take liquidity off the table, especially during bullish market conditions.
- Navigating VC Relationships: Building strong, transparent relationships with LPs can alleviate many potential conflicts and align interests towards achieving mutual goals.
Conclusion This episode of The Twenty Minute VC provides a comprehensive look at the challenges and opportunities within the venture capital landscape, as discussed by Sheel Mohnot. His insights into the need for smaller fund sizes, the importance of founder alignment, and the future of fintech and emerging markets are invaluable for aspiring VCs and founders alike.
Additional Resource
- For more insights and episodes, visit: [The Twenty Minute VC](http://www.20vc.com)
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00We are operating in a crazy prisoner's dilemma situation. There's a much capital that wants to go into Venture still, and if you increase fund sizes, the industry as a whole needs to return a lot more than it probably will. Welcome back, this is 20VC with me Harry Stebbings, and this was such a fantastic fly on the wall discussion with a guest that I was thrilled to welcome to our studio in person in London, Shield Monad. Now Shield is the co -founder at Better Tomorrow Ventures, a $225 million dollar fund that leads rounds in pre -seed and seed stage FinTech companies, Shiel and Jake, his co -founder, invested for many years together before founding BTV, and Roadshackers into companies like Mercury, Flexport, Ramp and Hippo Insurance.
0:40As for Shiel, before BTV, he ran 500 FinTech for close to 7 years, and before that was a founder himself, founding two companies, both of which were required. But before we dive into the show's day, you know all those mind -numbing, tedious, mundane tasks that seemingly take up half of your day? Well, Coda is here with their new AI powered work assistant that helps you and your team not just finish tasks but make progress So your product team can bring a feature to market faster by using Coda AI to tag customer feedback Tag PRDs suggest target audiences summarizing product discussions and more your sales team can engage more customers By bringing in data from sources like Salesforce and then use Coda AI to suggest action items meeting agendas and even your marketing team can drive an impactful launch with code AI summarizing user insights, creating briefs generated from notes and writing more past releases to visualize taglines with code AI.
1:35You can reimagine your to do list. So you're not only finishing tasks, but making real progress. Get started today with code AI for free. Head over to coder .io slash to zero VC. That's code a C O D A dot I O slash to zero VC. And to be here amazing tools we cannot live without, travel in these spends are never associated with cost savings, but now you can reduce costs up to 30 % and actually reward your employees. How do you do this? Well, Nirvana rewards your employees with personal travel credit every time they save their company money when booking business travel under company policy. Does that sound too good to be true?
2:13Nirvana is so confident you'll move to their game changing all in one travel, corporate card and it spends super app. that they'll give you a $250 in personal travel credit just for taking a quick demo. Check them out now at navan .com forward slash 20VC and last but by no means least, we need to talk cash. As of 29th June, you can get 5 .5 % yield on your cash, with 26 -week treasury bills. But buying treasury bills is not that easy and you have to navigate a website that looks like it was made before I was born. Enter public .com. Their treasury accounts make it simple to earn a high yield on your cash.
2:51And it takes 20 seconds. Here's how it works. Sign up at public .com, easily purchased 26 -week treasury bills that automatically roll over at maturity for a compounding yield. Plus there are no minimum hold periods. You can access your cash at any time, with the flexibility of a bank account, of course, to receive the full -gown tea deal. Of course to receive the full -gown tea deal, you do have to hold to maturity. But here's the thing. These are T -bills which means your investment has the complete back of the US government, making one of the safest places to park your cash. Go to public .com forward slash 20 VC to lock in a historic 5 .4 % yield on your cash.
3:313, 2, 1, 2, 1. You are now arrived at your destination. Sheel, I am so excited for this, we have to do this in person, David. It's amazing, I'm stoked. I mean, as a New Yorker, so much better looking in person. But first, I want to start with a little bit on you, and for those that missed our first show, how did you make the foray into vancher in a very distinct two to three minutes? Yeah, sure. I had always wanted to be in business. For those Indian people, I'm a Rajasthani, and I didn't know what to do, but I always was tinkering with ideas as a kid, always had a bunch of small businesses than I went into the corporate world, as a management consultant.
4:09Then a buddy of mine was leaving to start a company, and I joined him. And then we sold that company in 2012, then I ended up starting a company that we sold in 2015. And then at that point, I thought, I've really loved what I've seen on the other side of the table. I've loved what I've seen from VCs interacting just when I was fundraising. And on day this smart ones is sort of what I was thinking. And of course, now I know better. And like now it's the other side of the table. It's the founders that are the smart ones. But it's possibly just like anyone across the table from me is smarter than me.
4:37I'd love to hear if you could go back and cool yourself the night before you're first as. VC and say you should know this going in. What would you say to yourself on that cool? I would say like no one knows what they're doing. Do you believe that? I do. I feel like the more I've gotten into it, the more I've learned, there's no right way to do it. There are so many different strategies that can be successful. People can be very prescriptive and say this is the only way to do it. This is the only way to do it. You see that in so many different arguments? You have that in like we were talking about the remote work argument.
5:07So you can say the only way to do it is five days a week in person and if you don't do that you can't be successful. But there are clearly some companies that are successful that are remote. And now it is actually my preference, the companies are in person, but I can't mandate it. I don't mandate it because we've seen too many success stories that aren't all in person. I didn't arrest it down with your Bill Gellies of the world or your parent -gradies, it's a court. And you're saying they really fucking know what they're doing. They do. I've kind of pushed back on that because I think it's an easy trope to be like, oh no one knows what they're doing and it makes us feel better.
5:37But no, they do. And actually, that's often why they continuously have the best returns. So I'll push back on that. So we'll build early in particular. Let's say, Pat, I haven't spent much time with recently, but with Bill, I was talking to another one of his partners about their meetings. They actually had been talking about something I tweeted. And he said they had a rigorous internal debate about what was correct, and they don't know. Like they couldn't come to a conclusion about what was right. It's like there are ways that you can invest, but actually knowing what to invest in or what a mode is, people are still figuring it out.
6:07And even if you look at the greats, they have a bunch of misses and they have a bunch of companies that you say like, Why did you do that? It didn't make sense in hindsight. I mentioned Bill got even bunch more of that. The bunch more kind of famed for that discipline on fun size. Totally. You said before that fun sizes should get smaller. Yeah. I think we are operating in a crazy prisoner's dilemma situation where there's a bunch of capital that wants to go into venture still. And if you increase fun sizes, the industry as a whole needs to return a lot more than it probably will. And so if everybody reduced fund sizes, then we would probably be operating at a different level We would be investing in lower valuations and it would probably be better for everyone Instead we've got this continual upward march of fund sizes when you have a bigger fund size You become relatively gnostic about the price you pay because if we just like break it down before we can remove further in the argument Do you think that actually LPs are still in market?
7:01You hear continuously about funds that are struggling to raise whether it's the large 20 billion dollar P firms or actually it's a much more micro firms across this bedroom. People say LPs have been drawn or retreating last year. Yeah, I think there are LPs that have withdrawn quite a bit, but then you see everybody's in Saudi Arabia in I have no strong viewpoint about whether you should take money from there or not. We haven't, but I think it is very hypocritical that all these folks who were anti -Saudi money are now over there just praising everything. So we have that online the LPs side agreed.
7:34We do have funds that are starting to reflect what you say. Founders fund is really fine. Founders fund? Yeah, exactly. Do you think we'll see more? I think we'll see more. I think we have to. Why would managers do it? If you think for them, it's a loss of fees. It's not in their interests. It depends. If you're fully returns focused, it could be in your interest. A lot of the large funds have gotten so large that they're really more management fee focused than the other returns focused. But for the returns focus funds, and like if you talk to a founder's fund, That's what they say was the reason they did it.
8:04They felt like 1 .8 was too big. They wanted to go to 900 because they wanted to stay focused on returns. And they felt like that was a better size. Do you think we'll see funds give back funds? I don't know. I don't think so. I know that that's happened in the past. I just don't see it happening in this cycle. And probably if it were to happen, it would have already happened. So now it's helping the latest BTV fund. So we're $150 million seed fund to the 75 million art opportunity fund. I was with an LP last night and they said that when you do outcomes some scenario planning on $150 million seed fund, but I actually did $125 million and they were like, way too big, way too big.
8:35How did you feel about your fund sizing on that? We went from 75 to 150. I think for us, it was more about how many checks we wanna rate, what's the size of those checks, and what's our follow on strategy. Now, we raised over a year ago. Part of the reason we increased was, in fund one, pretty much every one of our companies raised a follow on round quickly after we invested, and we were almost forced to do that follow on round. if you lead the seed round and somebody good is following on, you kind of have to follow on. And so our first check to follow on strategy was totally out of whack because we didn't have enough data, but you have a great fund leading the next round at a huge markup.
9:10Do you have to? Can you know what to do the strategy of, hey, you know, we lead and then we're totally aligned to you. I want the best for you, but we don't actually write anything beyond our first check. You can do that for a fund like ours. It doesn't really make sense. I think for a lead investor, it doesn't really make sense because what ends up happening is some companies need more capital. Not the ones that are killing it, the ones that are killing it are able to raise easily, but there are other companies that are doing well But need a little bit more capital and you have to put more money into them doing well But not well enough to raise an extra round and we've had companies like that that ended up being super successful One of the companies recently we led a seed we put a little bit more money in six months ago Then they just raise at a hundred million valuation from Andreessen.
9:49We're really fortunate that we put that a little bit more money If you don't do the follow -ons, if your strategy is just to do one check, but you have to do some follow -ons, then you end up not following any of your best companies, you end up following on when you have to, which can be your worst companies. I think follow -on is actually just inherently harsh, because it assumes that you can essentially predict your winners so much sooner than I think you actually can. I think many of you have been in install enough for actually my winners, I would not have put as winners first, and my winners are definitely not winners.
10:17So I think that's true, but you do know your losers. So I know companies that I don't want to invest more into because the founders I ever sent to urgency are like, but actually the losers are the same as the slow burners that go nowhere to an 0 .5x to a 1x. I would say there are companies that I've had where I just know there's very little chance I'm going to put more capital into it. Do you tell them then? It's hard, you don't want to burst the bubble of confidence and hey, by the way, you're struggling and I'm not going to give you any more money. Oh, thanks, Shil. No, I wouldn't, so no, it's not necessarily that.
10:49Sometimes it's like the market hasn't developed the way we thought it was developing. There's an opportunity to pivot and sometimes they take that opportunity and sometimes it works. But if they don't do that, then there's little chance that I think the market has been developed the way we thought it originally was. So, for example, we invested in a company in Southeast Asia that we were betting on the FinTech market in Southeast Asia, getting much bigger in a way that hasn't really developed. So then we have to think about, okay, unless they pivot into serving a different type of customer, we can't subconsciously support them.
11:16I totally get you. You imagine it's the last piece of that. We both did four years into emerging markets. Yeah. You were just talking a little bit before on email actually before this about kind of the death of Fintech. I mean, first is like the death of emerging markets in a macro downturn. Everyone pulls back. Totally more than ever before. It's emerging markets investing pretty dead. It's struggling for sure. And the more emerging you go, the tougher it gets. So in a low interest rate environment, money's free and you're like searching for more risk and you go to emerging markets and a lot of people invested in a lot of places that they'd never been, didn't know much about.
11:48Now, people are coming way closer to home. But I still think there's opportunities in emerging markets. We still continue to invest in emerging markets, but probably less than really far. What was so really far out just so I understand that? I think people have invested a lot in Pakistan, Bangladesh, parts of Africa. They will continue to. There are still good companies in these markets. The great companies will continue to raise money. But I think what had happened was there are a handful of great companies. A lot of people who had never invested in these markets before started investing and then instead of just putting money To the handful of great companies the hundred companies after them that weren't that great also raised money Sure, I've been even the handful of great companies if you do not have a liquidity mechanism to get cash out even if it was Go to Pakistan go to Bangladesh.
12:30Where are you gonna go public? Totally come to the Nasdaq I don't think so it was a real lesson for me We spoke about like what you wish you'd cool yourself and you saw it or whatever that shit question was I asked I'd change the slaughters and into it, but I wish I'd really really actually listened to people when they told me that one I messed and packed the song. How do you think about that? I think liquidity mechanism. Yeah, I think first of all I think it can happen. It's tough. Like, but for a true league or a company there's always going to be an option. Is there anything so simple of that?
12:55In Africa we've had liquidity, we've had companies that went public, and on the NASDAQ cool. I think we've had companies that went public on the NASDAQ, yeah, from Africa. You could always have made that claim about Latam, and then we had companies, we had new bank, super -susual company. You could have made these claims about different markets that ended up maturing and building a robust market. Now, what happened that I think was totally shitty in 2021 was you weren't getting an appropriate discount. If it's going to be a really tough path, but you have an exceptional founder, there's going to be a path to liquidity at some point.
13:27But you have to get in at the right price to account for that. And we were paying prices that were akin to the developed markets. People started paying seed rounds at $20 million valuations in a market that's gonna be a really tough power to get to a billion dollar plus exit. And that was a shame. I used to have a bar kind of new bank kind of as D low cool. Which is like a seven billion dollar company. Well now it's probably a lot lower after that. There was a short sell at a report. I think it's like a few billion pounds. Okay, you know, we had Saber on the show. So, you know, maybe I wanted to be nice, but wherever they are, you know, It was that was fantastic, but it's like two or three.
14:03Yeah, there are that many. Like to build a firm on the back of that for sure would be a tough sell. Totally. They fee when you and Jacob sit down. Do you guys go shit? We're gonna have a lot of hungry mouths to feed in emerging markets. Yeah, I think there is some of that and I think we're probably more focused on the US now than we were two years ago. Okay, so we mentioned geography that. Obviously, BTV has a big fintech focus. It's not I only. Is that what I mean? I mean, that's just to be honest. Everybody should everybody just pivot day. I won all AR I feel this is happening and I'm running this week and was like my favorite is the way we shit on these coming out I face was of I won Google so I was Google with AR so far behind that who are these guys release bar everyone I knew they were coming I knew they were coming but same with Apple and AR I was like what Apple innovating on they do it's like AR question for you though how do you think about the negativity towards Fintech today yeah and respond to that yeah sure so I'd say like from 2016 to 2021 one, there was this like crazy upward slope of trajectory of Fintech companies.
15:03If I'm being honest, 2020 and 2021 were just like overhyped. That upward trajectory like that chart of e -commerce, like it went up and then it went like crazy hockey stick and then it went down. But it's still continuing on that same trajectory. I don't think Fintech's dead. I think we're just back to where we were a few years ago. Is it better for you now because there's much less composition? I think so, yeah. So less competition for capital, but also less competition for companies. In 2020 -2021, every company we funded, there were five companies just like it, also with great founders, with great investors.
15:35So what ended up happening is a bunch of capital went into these companies. Five companies serving the same customer set, that's a lot of competitive pressure, and nobody makes money because you're all price competitive and you're all serving the same customer set that now is comparing it to others. Now we're in a much better place, and the people that incremental founder that was building in Fintech because it was cool, is now building a Gen AI tool. And that's great. On the vansicide, when we think about next 10 years of vansure, how do we think they change it? We mentioned Andrew Easonard, even mentioned Benchmark.
16:03How do we think about what vansure looks like in the longer term and who the winners and who the losers are? Well right now it seems like we have these super big funds. Right, we talked about Andrew Senn, General Catalyst, all these other guys. Those guys seem to be in the He or M .A .Q. relation game and it's a tough business to have. Like if you think about these huge funds, just getting returns on these huge funds is really tough. You're really only shooting for 10 billion R plus outcomes. And then I don't know how many of those there are gonna be. But if you actually project a start, you know, you're NEAs as well, that's three billion.
16:35And with 10 billion R outcome, and you have 10 % which is pretty good. 10 % for the good, but doesn't retrograde. But that's the third. Yeah, I don't know how many 10 billion R outcomes are gonna be. Like if we're honest, like in 2021, it looked like there were a ton of them. And now those companies aren't looking so hot. So I don't know how often there's gonna be a 10 billion dollar outcome. So what happens with those funds? I think it's tough. I think they have to shrink if they want to be returns focused. Do they or actually do they just move into a different class of LP? Because now they've moved away from your family offices.
17:02You're totally even university namens is like the biggest of the biggest sovereign wealth funds. Totally. Yeah, but like those guys also at some point want returns. So in that vein, we actually don't pay ourselves as much as we could. We actually don't even take full management fees. What do you mean you don't take full management fees? So now we have 300 million AUM, we could take 2%, 6 million to run our business, we actually take a much smaller amount and return a Dell piece. We just wanted to be returns focused and the more money we have to invest, the better. So I would argue and I'm being deliberately divisive here.
17:34Yeah, but I would argue that short -size it because you can invest in your farm at a much more efficient rate that will deliver outsize returns with that $6 million. So we think we're investing as much as we want. We like the lean team. We have seven people and we think we're doing everything we want. The reality is Most other managers. It's not actually investing in their firms It's like we wanted to we could take a two million dollar salary each and have that's four million bucks Then we still two million to invest right in building the firm and that's actually a lot of money So instead we don't want to be fat and lazy.
18:05It's basically what it comes down to I think a lot of us has been money on like VC value -out services which are making it use and sell to get subsequent outpies. Do you believe that these Venture Valley web platforms actually have anybody? I'll say we recently won a highly competitive deal, and a big part of it was actually like, we've landed several high -quality candidates into our portfolio, and they were like, this is the hardest thing, and these guys have helped us with the hardest thing that we have to do. Fine talent. But generally, I've heard the same thing where people say it's all bullshit.
18:33What do you think of the biggest misconceptions about Venture? Oh, man. A lot of people think it's like a very easy, cushy job. But I think especially when you're starting out it can be very tough. And I think there's a big divergence among managers like it can be an easy cushy job at some of these big funds. But for the manager that's just starting out it can be tough you can be investing more into it and not getting paid for quite a while before you end up. What, what? What, what was me on the first fund? Did you have an earring cut? No, we had no anchor. So there was fun zero, my $15 million fund, then fund one, $75, and we had no anchor in the $75 million dollar fund.
19:05How did you know about that, man? Was it friends and family first? Was it institute? Yeah, so our first close mainly friends like people who knew us in the Fin ecosystem who were willing to back us just because they'd seen us in the ecosystem and then we had one institution of sendada. What does that get you to the friends and family sell that yeah, so it got us to 18 million 18 And it's no family family's My name is invoice I said you to 18 is good, but it's not near enough I don't know. But we hit Sondana in the first close, which was wonderful. Do they help while having an institution like that more?
19:41I think it gave some credibility. I think also just having a first close gave a lot of credibility. And we'd done our first investment. We were investing. We'd had a first close. How many of these do you do for the first close? 18. That is a really, I already first close. It's an early first close. Now, part of the reason we did the first close is we had a company that we had to invest in. We had committed to this company in September. We said we're going to leave your seed round. but we actually didn't have a fund at that point. And so we had to close as soon as possible so we could fund that company.
20:12The company was unit, a begging us service. Yeah, it's all right. Yeah, exactly. Yeah, so it was amazing because that company has been super successful. Like I think the winner in this begging us service space. Okay, so you can close on 17, 18 there. Was that right in hindsight? Would you advise managers to close as soon as possible? Like then LPs can take you seriously because you have a fund and you're investing. But true, but then how much was that first checking to you in it because like if you close on 10 and you want to do 75 if you can manage to leave a sea round with one or one or 15 % of what you raised out the door in the first go.
20:43Yeah I think we did a first call of like 10 % which is a lot but it was also fine and then once you do a first capital call of 10 % we were able to get a line of credit so then you can take more on the line of credit totally yeah you okay so you do the first close on 17 18 yeah what happens then? So then we were like we were feeling pretty good. It was December of 2019 and so we're like all right We're gonna do a second close we decided March of 2020 and we felt like we had a bunch of folks committed We did one road trip we went out to the East Coast from San Francisco Jake and I went out the second week of March 2020 when we flew out there things were fine all of a sudden Everyone canceled all the meetings COVID started the NBA shut down like everything happened and it was basically It totally wasted trip.
21:27And we came back on a completely empty flight. There were 10 people on a flight that would hold 200 people. And this clothes that we were supposed to do in March, everyone who had already committed, including people who had signed backed out. So we were like, shit. We don't have a fund. The world is melting. The world is falling apart. The stock market is going strictly downwards. I don't mind that people were like, I can't invest in your fund. I don't know how much money I have. I don't know it's going on in the world. Totally get it. So what do you do then? You get back in your life. Like shit, so we're like at that point we were shooting for a $60 million fund We said the letter to LPs saying you know what we're gonna go for like 30 to 40 We said all these things at a tight site were wrong, which is we thought valuations really come down Which you know at the time it seemed like that was gonna happen of course actually the opposite happened So we said we're gonna do a smaller fund and then what happened was May interest rates go down money printer goes burr Everyone came back and even folks that had said no to us came back and said hey actually like we were looking at the managers As we spoke to, we'd like to talk to you again.
22:26And several of the folks that said no to us actually came back and came into the fund. And we ended up with a pretty institutional fund. Did it get easier? Everyone was like, oh, when you get to halfway, people really get around the table. It did get easier. It did. And so our target was 60. We ended up going to 75. And even at the 75, we had to push people down from what they wanted to invest. When did it get easier? Was there a tipping point? I think it was when we were like over half. We got a few of these institutions in. do you find names helped? I think names probably helped some of them.
22:56We have, I think, several of the very good fund of funds that they're invested in us and we have, like, a university endowment and others. And I think all of that helps. What was the single best LP meeting? Now, fun too we raised in December 2021. The whole process only took a month. For fun too, we had a bunch of folks who knew us by reputation. They talked to other managers about us. They knew companies in our portfolio well, like they tried to invest in them or whatever. So there were folks who were literally just checking the box by talking to us and in a 20 minute meeting they're willing to commit large sums of money.
Read the full transcript
23:27So like, double digit millions because they knew us and I get where they're coming from. They know us by reputation. They've spoken to other managers who sit on boards with us or whatever. What more do you need? How did you use to the sense of urgency in the fundraise where it was a case of really committing to a closed -aid and getting LPs to move in unison? So in fun one, we tried to do it and frankly it didn't work. Hard, it's hard. Yeah, it was really, it was really, it was really cool because you don't want to force them to know You said I want to say a month where it looks like you've got too much time and then they didn't move to it Yeah, so there's no easy way I think you give them a date and then odds are they're gonna be okay Like I know that date doesn't matter because if I want to invest I'm gonna be able to invest and so that's what happened in Funwara took a while so it took us about a year from start to finish and Fund two was very different.
24:13There really was much more demand than we had space We told our existing LPs fund one LPs commit to us by this date all of them came back and committed by that date We were actually kind of surprised by that besides the year. Yeah We didn't know that that was gonna happen and it actually caught us by surprise and screwed us up a little bit in some ways We had intended on running a process and we'd spoken to a bunch of LPs and actually told these LPs like you have Funny of time and here for some LPs like university endowments It just takes time. It takes a few months like they have a different I .C.
24:46process and we told them like, Yeah, we're meeting now, but don't worry. We're gonna raise in Q1 and you can commit to us by March. What ended up happening was we closed everything in December and we did it all pretty quickly. Part of it was December 2021 was a good time to raise them. Yeah, so we ended up closing pretty quickly. Some of these folks that we actually would really like to have in our fun. Some like university endowments that we have a great relationship with and We told them that they had more time that they did so that didn't really work out. How would you advise managers on capital concentration on a power out P basis?
25:16All of our LPs are 10 % or less of our fund. It makes us feel good now in a market where if anyone LP doesn't come into our next fund because circumstances changed, it's fine for us. We have other folks who want to fill those gaps. We actually pushed folks down to the 10%. So some folks had wanted to do larger checks and we pushed them down. Do you have an LPAC? We do, yeah. It's only the LPAC. Five of our biggest investors, one family office, and then the others of Fund of Funds. I would say we don't use it that much. We use it for conflicts or we launched this accelerator recently. When we launched the accelerator, we said, hey, we should get their approval.
25:52And so we talked to them. Why did you launch the accelerator? This seems like the worst time to do the accelerator respectfully. I think it's the best time to do an accelerator. Number one, so I ran an accelerator from 2016 to 2018. And that fund has incredible performance. More important than that, Fathers that we backed back then, and the accelerator said, Hey, my friends are starting a company. What's the closest thing to what we had? Which was in person, super hands -on. So we had experts in growth, marketing, recruiting, available to them. The answer was there's nothing like it. YC's a totally different beast, but it's really built for scale.
26:23Some of our portfolio companies that went through YC said they didn't really get the support and fintech that they needed. They have like a generalist mentor who doesn't know anything about fintech. And so they would be asking these questions and they had no idea what to do. So we felt like, oh, there's an opportunity here. Once again, people are asking for a FinTech solution and we can give them that. In 2016 to 2018, I did it five cohorts. I was investing in a two and a half million dollar evaluation then. And we have five companies that are more than 70X. So we did five cohorts of six to 10 companies out of all those.
26:50So say it's like 40 companies in total. We have five companies that are delivering more than 70X return. We have DPI. We have returned the full fund. Can I learn how do you think about DPI? Again, I've spent some time with them, different LPs of the LLC days. Isn't there any manager who had the chance to return DPI and didn't over the last years? You're in trouble. I think that's right. You had to see the market and say we should sell here. So we did in some cases. Now of course, we didn't sell nearly enough. You should have sold more and we had opportunities to do it. But you did sell. We did sell.
27:21How do you advise on selling in terms of take it 30 % off the table and you know, just protect your initial position but ride the upside, take your jars off, take all off? I generally think in one case we sold our entire position to a later stage investor, but that's unusual for us. I think generally speaking, we'd like to just ease our position and if you can return an entire fund, there's something about having one XTPI that's quite nice. If you can get to a point where you can return one XTPI and still have upside in the company, that's great. Ideally, if you're still excited about the company, you want to keep half of your capital or half of your equity still in the company.
27:55What would you say is you'll single biggest investing mistake? For me, it was not taking enough cash out. I had the opportunity. I could have returned multiples on the fund, and I didn't. I mean, why did you not? There's one company I'm thinking of that could have returned multiples on the fund. And in between when I had started to discuss taking money off the table, and when we had finally like the documents, it took like a few months, and during that time this company grew so much, and they were like, you know what, I wouldn't sell at that price. They told me, we'll get this through for you, but I wouldn't sell at that price given how much we've increased in value.
28:29And they were like, we'll probably do another route in the next couple months. You might want to wait. I talked to the founders and they were like, you might want to make, wait, we might be worth double what you're selling at. And so I did that. And then of course they never were able to the market. This is, you know, beginning of 2022. The market started tanking and they were never able to get that round done that they thought would be a double. Do you find it difficult? It's quite a tough conversation. Hey, I love you. I love you. I love you. I want to sell my whole position in your company.
28:54Yeah, we haven't found it difficult in the selling. And we said, we're at a point where we've invested for so many years in this company. We want to start reducing our position. And founders get it. It's not a big deal. Especially back then, when there was way too much demand for every round of the company. Okay, so as you will mistake, when you look back at the last 24 months, what's the biggest mistake you've seen other investors making the industry? People can get too excited about an idea and invest behind the wrong founder, just in that idea. In our case, banking as a service, we talked about Units.
29:22units of banking and service company, a lot of folks looked at that company and said, we love this company, but they couldn't invest. They ended up investing in another company in the same space. And that was just a mistake. Invest in the best company, not in never two or number three. And a lot of those haven't have shaken out to not look out that well. Founder, product, market, how do you weigh them up? So we invest at super early stages. It's all about the founder. Three of my top five companies were Pimits. I had a guest on the show the other day and they said there's an inverse correlation between a found disability to sell, the salvation, sell to customers, whatever.
29:56And their ability to operate and build. I don't think that's exactly true. I think their founders who can do build. But many of our top ones, they had a competitor that was raising more and more money than they were. And then in the end, that competitor tanked our like, build guy who like never was a great fundraiser, ended up doing well. One thing about this like, founder versus market, there's a Warren Buffett quote that everybody likes to reference, which is when a great founder meets a bad market, the market wins. So he says that, but one of my favorite stories is Rose Blumkin. So there was this woman who came over from Belarus.
30:32She starts a furniture store in Nebraska, Omaha. Originally in their basement, then they grows and grows and grows. She didn't even go to school. She never even went to kindergarten, but she's just cut such a mind for business. She continues to grow this thing incredibly. He eventually buys it 90 % of it for like 60 million bucks or something. It was actually the largest acquisition that Berkshire had made at that point. Her kids end up kind of pushing her out of the business. She's 95 years old at this point. I'm fat. And actually what's really funny is they pushed her out of the business in part because they were fighting over the control of the carpet department.
31:02She said, I never want to let go of the carpet department. That's going to be my thing still. And they were like, no, you should get out of here. They pushed her out. Her kids. And then what she does is six months later, she opens a place across the street from them. Literally a furniture store competing with them across the street. It's called Mrs. B's furniture clearance market or something like that across the street from the Nebraska furniture market and then eventually Warren Buffett has to buy that one And then he he puts a non -compete clause in there that she whatever 96 years old He's not gonna compete with him again until your point is hard and what he said about her was he said I would back her in anything she did any business.
31:39She wanted to go into she would be successful And so it is actually a counter like it's a great founder. She would be successful at anything she did Have you ever had a really not good found a wind? Yes, but it was an interim win. It was like a two early win. I've seen in my age of portfolio a founder that I thought was just okay I ended up getting to an exit and I think if they'd continued on the business It wouldn't have been that successful and that happens all the time like you have companies that are successful up to a certain point The worst company gets an acquisition the better company sticks around and then they go public and then totally tank It's happened many times in the past few years One of the biggest reasons for you why great found his fail First of all, you can fail to find product market fit even if you're a great founder and you can get stuck behind your idea Not pivot early enough.
32:23I think you have to come to a point and this is actually where feces I think actually can be very value -ad is say we should think about a different business and like make a plan So actually add this going on with one of my portfolio companies now We have a plan and if we don't get to that plan in the next two months We're gonna think about a different company. We're gonna pivot we have years of runway but the current thing, it's working a little bit. There's signs that it's working, but we worry that even if it's working, it's not gonna get to a huge business. We're gonna test this out for a few months and we're staying close on it as investors.
32:53And if it doesn't work, we're gonna have to have it. Do you worry about the length of runway sum from piece -out? I have some companies in their life, maybe about 60 months. Yeah, and it's like, yeah, honest urgency is, but do you worry about that? And what happens? I think bad founders raise a ton of money and spend it. Great founders raise a ton of money and still have the same sense of urgency, still are on the same road map as if they'd raised a much smaller. So I say always on Twitter on this, it's so much hate and it's probably why Andrews didn't hate me. But like, you know, 5 on 25, I think has destroyed much of the season.
33:22Totally. But everyone goes, if you get great founders, I'll raise 5 on 25 and spend like they have two. And I'm like, it's so lovely idea. I love it. Yeah, you're right. And if you do that, then I promise you you're right. Yeah. It's actually almost impossible. Because what happens is if you raise five, the expectations people have for salaries are different than if you raised two. It's basically impossible to have the same mentality as if you raised two I'm so glad I agree with you completely like raising big rounds makes people cushy You end up attracting people with salaries that like they could have gone into a big company And actually they they belong at a big company.
33:55Yeah, they do know what belonging you know He's not so long at a hard scrap hard working scrappy startup. I completely agree with you Do we see them continue or do they go about you know? We could with the multi stage come in and out of seed Are they here to stay a lot of the multi stage stuff is quite dumb a lot of these folks have invested like a million dollar checks kind of a lot of folks and letting their junior team invest a million dollar checks at anyone Is a learning check. It's a learning check. But what happens is My portfolio company that is working is raising a series A or series B They don't want to talk to that investor because that investor invested a million dollars in their competitor That competitor is all those dead anyway, but they're like fuck them.
34:31I'm not gonna talk to that guy They invested a million dollars in my competitor And so they missed the opportunity to invest $100 million in a great company that is winning the category because they invested a million dollars in their competitor. So I just don't think it makes sense for a multi -stage fund to do it, especially in a category where like there are multiple competitors. Why would you invest what you know that like you might have invested in the wrong one and that prevent you from investing in the good one? When you think about the multi -stage strategies coming in seed, he do you think it's done at the best?
34:59I can't think of any multi -stage fund that I feel like has done a great job at seed. I always think founders fund a pretty good seed actually. They do a lot of seeds and then they have had good success My friends at Excel have done a pretty good job I think the folks that have done the spray and pray approach is very bad and people go in and out of it So like and recent did a lot of it early on in and recent Horowitz's 10 year and then they stopped doing it And they started doing it again, and I would guess they stopped doing it now We've seen also like large large seed funds. I think true branches of the seed one was 700 million Yeah, maybe spill across some but it's I think it's half and half I think it's like 400 500 the initialized is 500.
35:34Yeah, I think they're too big. There are any shade on it Are they too big? I think they're too big. They're both doing what I would call series A's as well Like they are writing 10 million dollar checks and I don't think about as a seed round But I think it's too big and I think as you get bigger You're more open to doing these 5 on 25 deals that actually aren't good for the founders either You're like, oh, yeah, it doesn't matter to me as your fun size increases I'm actually I need to put the dollars out the door yeah exactly one of the biggest sources of tension between VCs and founders. I've seen it in some of our portfolio companies, like a lot of VCs are very prescriptive on how to do things.
36:05We try to not be that. We try to be supportive, but not too prescriptive. I think you can get into a mistake being prescriptive. Telling founders what to do rather than like recommending what to do. And I've seen that even from good investors that I've been alongside on the board. I've had founders like call me after board meeting saying like, hey, what the fuck was that? I'm doing everything I was supposed to do. Why is this B .C. telling me what to do. Do you have any boards for you, helpful? No. I want to be supportive to a founder and there when they need me. And that can happen in a board relationship, but usually that's not what happens in the board.
36:38And so I'm meeting with the founder every week or every couple of weeks anyway. And the board is a totally different beast that's like structured. A board can be helpful for the founders to sit back and reflect on their business once a quarter. And it's very effective for that. Who's the single best bullman be used to handle the bull with? I have a board with Jeff Horeing, the founder, insight. He doesn't speak that much, but when he does, it's like, oh, he's absolutely right. And like, I can look back a couple times about what he said. He was like, absolutely right. One of my other companies we had, David Lowy, who was CMO of Google.
37:10Same thing. Didn't speak that much, but when he did, he was absolutely right. He had a story. In fact, Google, and it was really good. Their experience is right. And I think a lot of younger guys can discount that experience, but like, it's really valuable. and the same should happen time and time again. And you realize that like them having seen it over the past 20 years is incredibly valuable. What about tension between LPs and GPs? Oh yeah, a lot of GPs went a little crazy in 2021. LPs were probably unhappy about that. I think if you do what you say you're going to do, LPs are happy. So I think the GPs commence actually an error of misalignment.
37:45Not alignment. In the way that a lot of them will be like, hey, we need 3%. Yeah, I knew like, we'll shit my funds 140 million. and totally I have not been working for years in this. This is like four million plus. Yeah, I'm gonna have to borrow and bag and steal to not literally, but do you know what I mean? Totally. And I'll tell you what can happen if the GB commit is too high. You can be financially strapped and you can say, oh, I'm gonna sell my position in this company in the Series B because I need to return that capital to myself. And that can be a misalignment. But you say you get out of fees which then is not investments the firm might should be.
38:18Totally. And then also just bunny. I we won't diversity and you know amazing ecosystem. I think that's true But I think the way things are like a couple percent one to two percent like if you can't do it It's probably fine, but I actually don't think we need like a hundred new managers or thousands of new managers every year I think we see way less. Yeah, it's just so hard to raise a fund now and you have wonderful I'm still seeing a lot raster. I'm seeing it to well not we're not raised But trying to be telling me that right. It's the same. I haven't seen much of a slowdown I am a tool a lot of operators that didn't three to five minute from which I'm not like I was a tool I think for the show really hard business yeah running a tiny fund It's really hard many of these folks are gonna continue hard like they're fun two fun three's are gonna be really tough What do you think of what founders you have funds on the side their founders are funds on the side who like lead deals And that is crazy to me if you think about like especially now when we have a bunch of companies that are struggling We had the SVB crisis like you need to be there for your founders and if you're there for your founders, you're not there for your company.
39:18And that is a problem. So founders would like investing checks on the side occasionally as fine or if a strategic it's fine, but there are founders who are like leading rounds. And I think that's bonkers. We have a company going through some shit right now. I'm there for them 80 time at the day or night. And if I was running my own company and this wasn't all I was doing, like I wouldn't be able to do that. I don't know how you square that. How can you be operating a fund and running a company? What do you think? I think the biggest challenge that I just struggled to get over and I'm not really sure if I struggled to get over it.
39:47Which is like, when you take external capital, that is an incredible responsibility. And when you take external capital for a second thing on top of something that you've already raised, significant millions of... Totally. ...for the first one. I'm in the first one and that is disrespectful to my money. I gave you money to do this and that's like, I'm thrilled to do it. But like, do what you said you were going to do. Totally. And so I don't have a problem with found this Asian investing, but I'll be management. Yeah, so I need you have 50 LPs and you're like, You think about how I am doing this job, like, round the clock.
40:16I just can't imagine having another full -time job. For real for no one. Your wedding was like, it was in the Metaverse. Yeah. So how do you get that? Okay, so it was in the Taco Bell Metaverse. It was an Indian wedding Taco Bell in the Metaverse. And you're like, why the fuck would you do that? And credit to my wife, I'm with that, because she went along with all this crazy shit. You know me, I say yes to a lot of stupid stuff, and this was just another one in a long line of those examples. In this case, Taco Bell had a contest about getting married in the Taco Bell Metaverse. And I'm a fan of Taco Bell, people on my Twitter know that.
40:52So when they came out with this, a lot of folks tagged me. They were like, she'll, this is for you. They saw that I just got engaged. And they were like, this is perfect for you. You should do it. I was with my wife driving on a road trip. And I mentioned to her, I was like, can you look at this casually, like, hey, look at this, wouldn't it be fun? And to my surprise, she said, yeah, all right, Let's make the video it would be fun. It'd be like a fun exercise. So we we took 20 minutes and thought about what we'd say and we stopped and recorded it We really recorded it twice We didn't think that much about it because we just thought it's a fun thing to do But we're probably not gonna actually submit it and if we submit it we're not gonna win if we win We're not gonna do it.
41:23So you know what happens we get back from the trip But I'm just like let me just submit it whatever and then we get notified by talk about it We've won and then we kind of push back and said hey like I don't know if this is for us We don't want to get married in this talk about metaverse and then they were like hey Just gonna zoom call with us So we get on a Zoom call with them. They convince us. They say it's going to be your wedding. We're going to do whatever you want. It can be Indian. We'll design it for you. You're going to be part of the Taco Bell family. They said you're going to be part of the Taco Bell family.
41:47And I was like, that's what I've always wanted. So we eventually did it. It was really fun. It was in February. What does it mean? So you sit in a room? Yeah. So you're sitting in a room with some of our friends we're there too. And we're on camera. And there's this metaverse. It's in Decentral Land. It was actually really cool. For a while, I was pretty skeptical about it. I've never spent any time in the metaverse. But it was actually really really cool. I wrote it on an elephant people from around the world were there My family in India was attending they have their avatars. It was actually really cool It sounds really stupid actually the day of I was thinking this is cool And you say you're vows turt set our vows through it did everything it was illegal wedding We would legally marry this matter.
42:25It was quite emotional. It was very emotional. Yeah, yeah Did you do wife like him? Yeah, she loved it. Do you get like talking about credits? We do we do we have a lot of talk about her I don't know, they gave me 500 bucks for my birthday. They didn't talk about credits. Which actually talk about it gets you pretty far. They also paid for a honeymoon, 25k. It's pretty nice. And they've been great. I mean, that is amazing. I saw this and I was like, what the fuck is he going? It's pretty easy. Listen, I wanted to quit the firearms. I say a short statement and you give me your immediate thoughts, okay?
42:52What one seed from other than BTV, which you're investing? I think the best ones have now retired and early, they're investing their own money. So that's homebrew and I. You found a collective as well, I'm very, very good. Oh yeah, super good. Yeah. What series A firm would you most invest in? We've invested a lot with Excel. I think they do a really good job. In the spirit of keeping fun size small, it's hard to beat benchmark. Yeah. You can do a multi stage firm now. We're getting kind of grotesque slash multi stage. Who would you go for? Because founders fund trunk their fun size, I'm gonna go with founders fund.
43:20Greeners are really like, yeah, I'm really like addition. I'll get really like ribbit. They're all good. What have you changed your mind on in the last 12 months? We talked about secondary a bunch. I think I'm much more likely to do to take some chips off the table earlier than I was before. What do you advise founders on taking secondary? My rule that I like to live by is at the series being beyond you can take as much secondary as you have an error Just think about it. It makes sense, right? Like if you're building a real business I don't mind if you take chips off the table But like you've got to be building a real business But do you blame the founders?
43:49He took off a lot of money. No a lot of times it was like VCs Prussia do it and they're getting so much hate now from the media and it's a day I don't hate the founders at all for doing it Yeah, but if you did an index of companies where founders took a lot more than that, what I described, like 1x ARR off the table, you have a very negative returning fund. Yeah. What would you most like to change about the world adventure? If you were douchebags who like think they know it all, I think there's a lot of like insecure folks who just like put down other people. We don't eat that. What do you see that you don't eat enough people spending time in?
44:21Tough question. I think there's this overhang of valuations and we haven't yet seen the drop that is going to come and it's going to be so severe. all these growth -throwned investors that had companies go pipe IPO and then fall, they haven't made any investments. What we're not seeing in some of these companies that have raised more money is just the immense amount of structure that's going into them. What happens to tie again, 12th -large? They recently led a series A of one of our portfolio companies and they actually in contrast to their investments in 2021, which John Cardius and others were writing a lot of checks and sometimes very quickly.
44:53This one, they led a series A. They did a ton of work and they've actually been super helpful to the company, it's a very different tiger than the one of 2021. They're doing a really good job now. I think it's going to be a much smaller fund. And like you said, it's going to be a ton of their own GP money. I think they're, they're good actors. Is there a ton for soft bank? Self bank, I think is just really tough. Like they made just a ton of incredibly poor decisions, hoard a ton of money into bad companies. And we talked about five on 25 for them. It's more like 500 on 2 .5 for a company that was nowhere near ready to accept that kind of money.
45:24unfair. I thought Wang was a brilliant dog on the moon. What about zoom the pizza company? Oh, I was surprised. Of course, he didn't do that for himself. He didn't do that. And you're like, wasn't the surprise? Oh, that there. No, like literally from day one. So, okay, on that company, I met a guy who invested in that company. Relatively early, it was a data -driven VC. I was like, what data do you have for this company? He was like, we have all this data on like number of shares on Facebook of this video about them. And I was like, why the fuck would you invest off of a shares on Facebook shares out of pizza company?
45:56Like people are sharing this video about this pizza company on Zoom because it's like a robotic pizza company, and they used as input to invest. And I was like, that's crazy. Final one, my friend. B -T -V in five years' time. Where do you want to be then? I think we want to be cemented our reputation as the first choice of founders building a Fintech company. Globally. My friend, I've loved it. It's so much nice to do it in person. It's so great. It's so much for coming. And I've loved it. So fun. Loved it. either man. My word, that was so much fun to do in person with Sheila. I hope you enjoyed the fly on the wool nature of that discussion.
46:29You can see more of course on YouTube at 20bc as 20bc, but before we leave you today, you know all those mind numbing tedious mundane tasks that seemingly take up half of your day. Well, Coda is here with their new AI powered work assistant that helps you and your team not just finish tasks, but make progress. So your product team can bring a feature to market faster by using Coda AI to tag customer feedback Tant PRDs Suggest target audiences Summarizing product discussions and more your sales team can engage more customers by bringing in data from sources like sales force And then use Coda AI to suggest action items meeting agendas and even your marketing team can drive an impactful launch with code AI summarizing user insights, creating briefs generated from notes, and writing more practice releases to visualize taglines.
47:21With code AI, you can reimagine your stu -list, so you're not only finishing tasks, but making real progress. Get us started today with code AI for free, head over to coder .io slash 2 -0 -VC, that's coder -co -da .io slash 2 -0 -VC. And to be here of amazing tools we cannot live without. Traveling they spend so never associated with cost savings, but now you can reduce costs up to 30 % and actually reward your employees. How do you do this? Well, Navan rewards your employees with personal travel credit every time they save their company money when booking business travel under company policy.
47:58Does that sound too good to be true? Navan is so confident you'll move to their game changing all in one travel call precarred and Money spends Super app that'll give you a $250 in personal travel credit just for taking a quick demo. Check them out now at navan .com forward slash 20VC and last but by no means least, we need to talk cash. As of 29th June, you can get 5 .5 % yield on your cash with 26 -week treasury bills. But buying treasury bills is not that easy and you have to navigate a website that looks like it was made before I was born. Enter public .com. Their treasury accounts make it simple to earn a high yield on your cash and it takes 20 seconds.
48:39Here's how it works. Sign up at public .com, easily purchased 26 -week treasury bills that automatically roll over at maturity for a compounding yield. Plus there are no minimum hold periods. You can access your cash at any time, with the flexibility of a bank account, of course, to receive the full guaranteed yield. Of course to receive the full guaranteed yield you do have to hold to maturity, but here's the thing, these are T -bills which means your investment has the complete backing of the US government, making one of the safest places to park your cash. Go to public .com forward slash 20 VC to lock in a historic 5 .4 % yield on your cash.
49:18As always I so appreciate all your supporting stay tuned for an amazing episode with the CTO plaid on Monday.
From the publisher
Sheel Mohnot is a Co-Founder and General Partner @ Better Tomorrow Ventures, a $225M fund that leads rounds in pre-seed and seed-stage fintech companies globally. Sheel and Jake (his co-founder) invested for many years together before founding BTV and wrote checks into Mercury, Flexport, Ramp, and Hippo Insurance to name a few. As for Sheel, before BTV he ran 500 Fintech for close to 7 years, and before that was a founder, founding two companies, both of which were acquired.
In Today's Episode with Sheel Mohnot We Discuss:
1. VC Needs to Change:
- Why does Sheel believe that VCs should have smaller funds?
- What are the biggest misalignments between founders and VCs today?
- What are the biggest points of friction between VCs and their LPs today?
2. VC in 10 Years Time:
- Who are going to be the winners in venture in 10 years time?
- Who are going to be the losers?
- Will micro-funds be bigger or smaller as a segment of the ecosystem?
- Will solo-GPs be bigger or smaller? Were they a zero-interest rate phenomenon?
3. The Errors of a Bull Market:
- What does Sheel believe are the single biggest mistakes made by VCs between 2020-2022?
- Did Sheel take liquidity off the table in the last few years? What have been some of his biggest lessons on when to sell?
- How does Sheel evaluate the flood of capital into emerging markets in the bull market? What happens now?
- Fintech is also experiencing the same challenging time, how does Sheel assess what is happening in the fintech financing market today?
4. Building a Fund: Lessons, Mistakes and Advice Scaling to $225M:
- What are the single biggest mistakes Sheel and Jake have made in the fun scaling? How has it impacted their mindset?
- What does Sheel know now about fund management that he wishes he had known at the beginning?
- What advice does Sheel give to emerging managers today, raising their first and second funds?




