In short
The Unprocessed Truth: Episode Summary
Episode Title
Dr. Giles Yeo: Why Calorie Counting Doesn't Work & The Real Danger of Processed Food
Host
Sunna Van Kampen
Guest
Dr. Giles Yeo Episode Overview In this episode, Sunna Van Kampen interviews geneticist and professor Dr. Giles Yeo, where they challenge the commonly held belief that a calorie is simply a calorie. The discussion emphasizes the importance of focusing on the quality of food rather than just the quantity, particularly highlighting the dangers of ultra-processed foods.
---
Key Concepts and Discussions
- Calorie Counting Myths
- The Fallacy of "Calories In, Calories Out":
- Dr. Yeo argues that this simplistic model ignores the complexities of how our bodies process different types of foods.
- He emphasizes that not all calories are created equal; the nutritional value and the source of calories matter significantly.
- Nutrient Blindness of Calories:
- Caloric counting does not take into account the nutritional content (fats, sugars, proteins) of foods, making it a flawed metric for health.
- The Role of Genetics and Environment
- Genetics vs. Environment:
- Dr. Yeo uses the poker analogy to explain genetics, stating that while genetics (our "hand") play a role, the environment (the rules of the game) significantly influences outcomes like obesity.
- Personal responsibility must be balanced with recognition of environmental factors that impact food choices.
- Focus on Food Quality
- Protein and Fiber as Key Metrics:
- Dr. Yeo advocates for prioritizing protein and fiber intake over calorie counting as indicators of food quality.
- Foods high in protein and fiber tend to be more satiating and beneficial for overall health.
- Challenges of Ultra-Processed Foods:
- The discussion addresses how ultra-processed foods are often low in protein and fiber, leading to poor dietary habits and health outcomes.
- Dr. Yeo expresses concern over the rising consumption of these foods, especially among children.
- Behavioral Changes for Weight Management
- Personalized Understanding of Eating Habits:
- Understanding personal triggers for overeating (e.g., stress, boredom) is crucial for making lasting dietary changes.
- Encourages individuals to control their home food environment to support healthier eating habits.
- Societal Responsibility and Policy Changes
- Government's Role in Food Environment:
- Dr. Yeo emphasizes the need for policy changes that support healthier food choices, such as subsidizing healthier foods and regulating marketing for unhealthy options.
- Suggests that legislative measures could help normalize healthy eating habits and reduce the impact of ultra-processed foods.
- Discussion on Weight Loss Medications (e.g., Ozempic)
- Potential and Limitations:
- Dr. Yeo discusses the effectiveness of medications like Ozempic in promoting weight loss but warns against their use as a first-line solution without addressing dietary quality.
- Concerns over rapid weight loss leading to loss of muscle mass and potential malnutrition if the underlying dietary issues are not addressed.
- Future Outlook
- Optimism for Change:
- The episode concludes on a hopeful note, suggesting that as awareness grows and discussions around nutrition continue, improvements in public health and dietary habits are possible.
- Emphasizes the importance of ongoing conversations to challenge the status quo in nutrition and food policy.
---
Key Takeaways
- Challenge Conventional Wisdom: The notion that calorie counting is the only metric for weight management is misguided.
- Quality over Quantity: Focus on nutrient-rich foods (high in protein and fiber) to promote better health outcomes.
- Recognize Environmental Influences: Individual choices are influenced by broader societal and environmental factors, necessitating systemic changes for effective public health strategies.
- Support Healthier Options: Advocating for policies that make healthy foods more accessible and affordable is crucial in combatting the obesity epidemic.
---
This episode serves as a clarion call for listeners to rethink their approach to nutrition, emphasizing the importance of understanding food quality and advocating for systemic changes to promote healthier eating habits across society.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Welcome to Catching Up With The Royals, a brand new show with me Richard Coles. And me, Emily Andrews. Every week we'll be going beyond the headlines, lifting the lid, and what life is really like behind the palace walls. Hello, sir. Good morning. I'm the Sun's new royal correspondent. Oh, he said, look at me up and down. Things are looking up. We'll be diving into the moments everyone's talking about. What does the world owe you if all of a sudden you've handed back your crown? Meghan and Harry can't keep hold of their staff. We'll reveal the secrets of an organisation usually shrouded in mystery and explore defining moments of royal history to see how the past still shapes the monarchy today.
0:38Now, you actually knew Princess Diana. I think one of the ways she acquired power was through that relationship with the present. But before that interview, no-one had really spoken and been so open. Was that a game-changer? So join us every week wherever you get your podcasts, on YouTube and on Saturdays on 5 as we catch up with the royals.
1:03Today, we're joined by Giles Yeo, a University of Cambridge professor that has spent over 25 years studying the link between obesity and how our brain works with what we eat. And this one is really interesting. He's a PhD. He's an MBE. He knows this subject better than anyone else. And he's on a mission to change the way we think about obesity, change the food we put in our body, and make everyone healthier. This one is a must listen. I love the conversation. Now let's start it. Welcome to the podcast Giles. I'm very excited to have this unprocessed truthful conversation with you about health, calories, weight loss, you name it.
1:48We're going to get stuck into the detail of this very controversial topic that everybody has an opinion about. It's going to be a fascinating one. But before we dive in, can you give people a little bit of your background, your credentials, what you've done in your career, the books you've written, so that they get where you're coming from. Because you're probably the smartest person I've ever spoken to by your credentials. That is terrible. Oh my God, I've got to leave now. So I am a geneticist, so I came into LiveLooks, so I look at genes. And I've always been interested in why people are different.
2:21But what I ended up doing was going into body weight. On one end of the spectrum happens to be obesity. And so I started my career. So I did my PhD in Cambridge. And then after that, we moved from severe childhood obesity to body weight in general. So small, medium, large. And we within the field now know that the genetics of body weight is how our brain, the genetics of how our brain influences our feeding behavior. So now I'm an accidental neuroscientist and I study how the brain controls our feeding behavior. So ultimately that is very rapidly my career trajectory and why, perhaps why we're actually having this conversation now.
3:02I try and study food intake and how our genes influence food intake in health and in disease. Fascinating. So you talked a lot about genetics there. Everyone always talks about how genetics load the gun, environment pulls the trigger. What's your view on that statement? I prefer the hand of cards in poker thing. where you can play any kind of card game. You can have good hands, you can have bad hands and like your genes, the only people you can blame are your parents because that's where they've come from. But even with a tough hand in poker, depending on how you play the hand, you can still win.
3:41It's more difficult, it's more difficult but you're not done until you're done. And so that I think is more than a point. You are given a set of cards in life and yeah, I'm more privileged than others you know so other people are less privileged than me but then we then take the cards we have and go i love that because there's a personal responsibility within that right it's your hand so it's up to you how you use it so it is up to you how you play your hand but clearly it does depend the analogy is you you're not playing poker by yourself right so you're playing poker amongst the analogy is well how good is everyone else's hand what is what is everyone else doing what is the rest of the table doing?
4:23And if you take that analogy as the environment, so now you're playing your hand. What is the rest of the environment doing? If you're playing it in a good environment, where it's easier for you to win, gold. But if things are just more difficult, it is always going to be more difficult. So I think the personal responsibility comes from not being fatalistic, saying that, look, this is what life gave me, so this is the end of the story. But by saying, okay, well, what can I do about it with this, with this, with what I have? What can I do about it? So it's not, it's personal responsibility for sure.
4:58But if the environment is rigged against you, that personal responsibility is always going to be more difficult to apply. Well, yeah, I mean, and the environment is rigged against us, right? The food environment we live in and the world we live in today isn't created for our optimal health in any shape or form. but you wrote the book on calories don't count yeah so I want to get into the question which all gym bros are going to love us for oh absolutely absolutely I get a lot of hate about this I'm an advocate for you know just eating healthy whole foods not necessarily counting calories I think it's over complicated and hard for most people to do but why did you write the book on calories don't count the why was and and and the whole calories don't counting is more my outward facing about how we actually talk about things yeah um but what people did care about the the was actionable information like like okay that's fine you can do this you can map this you can you know do the stuff what does that got to do with me and so it was at that point that i even though i studied the biology of it okay so the hand of cards then i begin to realize yeah and i can do this as a job but we also need to deal with the outside otherwise this is just one part of the story and that is when when I begin to explore more the environmental stuff um I'm still a geneticist and I still do this but I think the interaction between the environment and the genes matters so much and that is what ended up getting me to think about our food our diets the sort of food environment we live in and it got me to calories because I think we obsess too much about calories these days but every app every fitness influencer every government guideline still every pack of food in the country still has calories on it and they put it as the holy grail why is that but first of all in order to prevent the gym bros from totally hating us I'm not anti physics like I understand that 200 calories of chips is twice the amount of chips as 100 calories of chips clearly clearly right I mean I mean like the basic the calories are used because they are a number and it's a singular number and the powers that be um sort of thought that they needed to be simple we need to simplify for the people in order to get them to eat healthier the problem is they've taken to my mind they've taken the wrong number to try and simplify down to and anyway one number is not enough they've taken the wrong number and what calories are is one-dimensional that's all they do is they tell you this is twice the amount of chips as this hmm and that's pretty much it it and that's only within the class of food that are chips right it doesn't take into account anything it doesn't talk about fat sugar salt fiber protein nothing it is nutrient blind that's my problem with the calorie it only tells you one dimensional thing nutrient blind so if you're counting calories what what what calories are you counting are you coming sugar are you eating celery are you eating a burger donut and vegetarian vegan whatever you know that's my that that is my problem but it works so if I'm consistently in a 500 calorie deficit I will lose weight you will that is true I think there are different ways of doing it I think here's the new ones imagine if you had a relatively healthy diet okay and you decided i need to lose weight i need to reach a 500 calorie deficit and what i'm going to do is take my entire diet that i do now and cut everything by x percent 20 something like that exactly okay that works of course that works because it's physics but that's not how we function this is the this is the problem i mean like if you're making a meal and i say i'm going to do two-thirds of this how do you do how do you do two-thirds of an egg you're going well you know and so life then becomes more complicated in which you then begin to simplify that the matter I was in a and you can hear these conversations I was in a supermarket place you know buying a sandwich for lunch and then and then you overhear these conversations oh my diet says I need to be on 400 calories oh look this sandwich says this this thing he says this is 400 calories this is good and you walk out and it's this singular dimension that it so yes it does work but in the real world people obsess about the calories and hence will add it up and says okay I was 400 calories for lunch today we're all good good yeah so what's the right thing to look at I mean I don't know if I have the answer I have an answer and clearly it is the best thing in the world if all of us eat minimally processed foods from scratch okay and I think the reality is if you're able to do that, then I don't think you really need to worry about calories at all.
9:52You can think about how much they're food, but that's not the world we live in currently. Okay, so if that's the case, then I think a good shorthand to the quality of the food is going to be two things. I mean there's probably more, but but this is the two things I would focus on. The amount of protein in the food and the amount of fiber in the food. Those two things. Now protein is important because I'm not talking about eating as much as possible. I'm talking about eating the right amount of protein okay uh for what fiber as much as possible like literally right and fiber only comes from food and vegetables so ultimately if you have to buy a package food or a sandwich or thingy because life demands it then i would look at the protein and the fiber and ignore the calories and say well look compared to this compared to that does this have higher protein higher fiber than this and then that's the way that I would actually look at it and I think the front of pack labeling in which we're putting I don't mind front pack labeling protein on everything protein fiber which is not there at the moment it does calories yeah fine I think salt and fat and what have you that has its place but I do believe it's a little bit further down the line I think the red green um amber should be on protein and fiber and then maybe free sugars and that other line.
11:13And I think that's a good shorthand. It's not perfect for what we should be looking at rather than calories. Really interesting. So why is protein so important? Because there's a lot of debate going on about, well, there's protein packages of everything. You can get protein cereal, you can get protein chocolate bars, whatever. It's kind of probably an overused term in a lot of instances. So why is it so important? Foods that take longer to digest will travel further down the gut. and because of hormones that are released will make you feel fuller okay so if you take just that that thing in mind first then if you look at that then actually protein is chemically the most complex compared to fat and carbs and so hence it takes longer to digest it travels further than the gut it's more satiating so a calorie of protein even though they don't count but a calorie of protein using them no I know exactly a calorie of protein makes you feel fuller than a calorie of fat than a calorie of carb in that order for sure and the The reason behind that is twofold.
12:10First, it takes longer to digest. So that's the first thing. Now we know that these macronutrients, you know, carbs are turned to sugar, fat is turned to fatty acids, and protein is turned to amino acids, okay? This is the digestion phase. Then what happens is it crosses the gut wall, it gets transported to your organs, it's metabolized for energy. That's the second thing. Now what happens, the other thing with protein, is that we don't have any inert store of protein in our body. We clearly can store carbs as glycogen and we store fat as fat. All the protein in our body is active. So it's either there for building or repair.
12:47So that's why you need to eat enough protein. We don't have a store of it. But if you eat too much protein, the proteins convert it into fat. I don't know if people know this, but that's what happens. Fat and carbs are only made of three atoms, carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen. So it's very easy to actually move these things around. This is true about protein, but it also contains a lot of nitrogen. So in order to then, if you're not using it, convert it to fat, you need to take out the nitrogen, which we pull out as urea and we weed out, right? And then it goes into the storage or burning scenario.
13:18That takes a lot of words to say, and I'm sorry about that, but it also takes a lot of energy. So for every 100 calories of protein, pure protein that you eat, you're only ever able to use 70 calories, 7-0. 30 calories of every hundred calories of protein you eat is given off as heat to sort protein out to move it around your body and none of this is on the side of the pack incidentally it is none of this is reflected on the side of the pack so that's the other reason why protein makes you feel fuller so if you take those two things it takes a lot more energy so your body has to work harder to sort of use protein and store protein and remember protein so and it takes longer to digest those two things make you feel fuller and so if you eat something that's higher in protein not too high because it will get converted to fat otherwise then you're maintaining growth you're maintaining this and in totem it makes you feel fuller so you snack less on exactly whatever exactly you can overdo it i mean clearly if you're an olympic athlete then you need more protein if you're a someone who's just undergone cancer treatment if you're an old person in the itu if you're a small child you need more protein but you me we're living our normal lives we need to write have the right amount of protein let's get into a bit about weight loss then yeah because people you know people are rightly concerned about their weight the uk is now 63 percent overweight or obese on the latest numbers i see so what can people do if they're not going to calorie count what can they do they need to do something there's a national health crisis here that we need to address?
14:54So I think when you say what can people do or what do people need to do, I think we need to sort of ask two different questions. I think there is what you can do for yourself and I think for the individual I think we've got to control the environment we can control and that tends to be your household. Okay, what do you bring in through the gates of your of your house? And there you need to, if you're trying to lose weight, then you, to my mind you have to to be honest about what makes you eat because we know that the huge amount of obesity is driven largely by eating as opposed to differences in metabolism.
15:31We can get to that in a second. There are differences but largely driven by eating. So if we take that as read, then what you got to do is ask what makes you eat more? And it's a complex question. Some people eat it because they're more hungry, others because they're less full, others because they can't ignore the yellow M's on the out of the motorway things like that and so if you know why you eat say if say for example you know you eat when you're stressed and your go-to stress food for example is chocolate and you know this then maybe don't have as much chocolate in your house and that's i think is the way to personalize it to you if you prefer fatty foods me i can take or leave chocolate i don't not like it but if you put a bar there we could have this whole conversation i wouldn't touch it i prefer fattier foods and it's just i know me right and so if there was a bag of crisp or something you know i would think you'd be all over it so then i won't have that in my house so that that's the thing so if you want to lose weight you have to be honest about why you eat and what you eat and and and control what you can control which is your household second problem however is we don't live only in our house we're not in jail right the broader world however that requires there's societal fixing, largely governments, because they control the rules in which things happen.
16:48And then why I do this, for example, why I go out and speak is to then broadcast towards the people who have more societal power in which to actually change the environment we live in. Then obviously there's society in general, that's a broader, more philosophical question. But those are the two things I would do about. For the person looking to lose weight, try and be honest with why you eat and to do your best ability control your in-house environment and then on the outside world I think we all as society need to have conversations vote you know be opinionated towards the policymakers well let's get opinionated then go on the environment specifically what's driving the obesity epidemic so I think three things we'll start with the first two and then we'll end with the one we want to talk about.
17:40There's changes in behavior. I don't like the word lifestyle because lifestyle implies choice on the individual and there are some choices. I like behavior because we can change behavior. So behavior, what I mean by that is the jobs we do, we're not coal miners anymore, we have washing machines, dishwashers, we drive everywhere. So there's that. The built environment plays a big role. So is it safe to walk to school? Will you increase your risk of dying if you're crossing this free lane motorway? Things like that. And those two things have an effect. The big thing, however, is the food environment.
18:14And that has changed beyond recognition since actually very recently, probably 40 years. I'll give you an example. When I first moved to this country, which was 30 years ago, so early 90s, there were no grocery stores open on a Sunday. So imagine if I wanted a bowl of cereal on a Sunday night, but I didn't have cereal and I didn't have milk. Tough. I'd have to wait till Monday and sort it myself out in order to do it. Today, someone will deliver it to your house. So I think that is one big example, the ease of which we can now access pretty much anything you want. Anytime. Anytime. So all of us have the same drive.
18:58Our genes haven't changed, and I studied the genes, right? Some people will have a greater drive to eat, other people not. But if it's so easy for me to get that bowl of cereal or whatever you want to eat on a Sunday night, when 30 years ago it would have been impossible for me to do that, that is one of the things. And I think that's first. So we're more susceptible to our impulses. We are able to access the desires that we want a lot easier. And this is part of market forces that drive because we know we want what we want. and we want things that are convenient. This is not necessarily a bad thing until it becomes a bad thing.
19:34So that's the first thing, ease of access. Then the second is the type of foods that we get today are also so different. Those are the two big reasons for me. Ease of access, and actually they're relatively cheap. Calories have never been cheaper. We can get, in this country, a thousand calories for less than a pound, but what the hell kind of calories are we talking about? Less than a pound. Less than a pound, but they're all chips, typically. Yeah, but I mean it's a really important point the price right because everyone's going through cost-of-living crisis Everyone's seeing food inflation on their weekly shop.
20:07It's incredibly painful and I even notice it I'm like wow, this has got really expensive all of a sudden But actually if you look back in history the Portion of money of our income that we spend on food is actually lower than it's ever been correct Right, and that's the thing most people don't realize we used to spend most of our wages on housing and food now we've created this environment which then allows us to spend much less on food and then go on holidays and buy TVs and buy that's not a bad thing that's not a bad thing because ultimately the incentives of what we buy we don't we rarely now shop within a you know sort of farmers market that system yeah there's some portion you know very middle upper-class people that do that but the vast majority of population we we are beholden to the supermarkets we are this is this is just way it is and so what we buy food companies and i don't i don't want to demonize food companies because they make our food but ultimately food companies have some of the smartest people in the world working for them to find out what people want to eat and direct our direct our so-called choices and when you walk into a supermarket everything is designed okay for us the smell of the bread the smell of the coffee which they kind of spurts right and then and i got a colleague of mine, Dame Theresa Marteau, you know, she runs the Human Behavioral Unit in Cambridge.
21:31And a few years ago, she, and she has a fake supermarket, you know, it's one of these things, it's an academic thing, like a supermarket, in which she can control where things are. She also had another situation in which she worked with some big supermarket chain and what have you, and put sort of barcodes, well two things, GPS and some kind of barcoding machine in the supermarket trolleys so she then did a lot of work in trying to understand where people will buy stuff depending on where it is in the supermarket and here the isles and she she did this and people really knew this she was she was reverse engineering the system that is set up for us okay is that all the sale she was reverse engineering the system which the food companies the food retailers already know sale items always at the end of the aisles of course the most expensive foods in the middle and the reason is because this is the this is part of the journey and then people slow down as they come to middle of the aisles so in order to get them to stop at the end of the aisles they put all the sale items there this is true in every single supermarket just walk in yeah and then the most expensive foods right in the middle of the aisle at eye level okay so that is what this is what you do so with that basic premise you can now set up the only way I'm gonna get people to stop there is if I put buy one get one free if I put the stuff that that that's on sale etc etc then I can put all my expensive stuff in the middle at aisle level because we don't have to discount it we don't have to do the things and so it's our choices are not real choices at all that then we're not isolated yeah we're not I mean this is one place where you got give the government some credit they have brought in as of last week i think that they've now banned buy one get one freeze they have so they're too long i want to point out but they did do it eventually it did take too long uh again about the argument of affording food right that's why it took so long and it was a hotly contested bait when it shouldn't be but also the end aisles as well now you're not allowed the h f s s high fat sugar salt items on the end they've had to move in aisle but i see now all the supermarkets have made beautiful displays in the middle of the aisle with all the same junk on it right so it hasn't I don't know how much that fixes it whether it's on the end or in the middle but it's still there um but they are trying so do you think that's a key way to get people healthier in the UK then change the shopping profile and layout in the supermarket yes because that is a way of that is a way of making changes without annoying the populace I'm not because ultimately I think You know, public health is an interesting thing, to my mind.
24:16There's always a tension between loss of certain personal liberties for the greater good of the population, okay? Now, you know, we drive on the side of the road, we stop when the light is red. We can't do what the hell we want, okay? So we haven't got to this point yet in terms of talking about nutrition and food in all its guises because people get hysterical when they talk about food. And this tension needs to be accepted by the population, otherwise you get riots, right? And so, but the government needs to play a role in setting the discussion, rather than us, setting the discussion and the key points to find this point in which we understand that for the greater good, I can't just eat Mars bars all my life or whatever other chocolate bars are available, you know, for doing all kinds of things.
25:01Or if we wish to do this, we have to go to a specific place to get it. And this is going to differ from culture to culture, country to country, of course, but we haven't got that point yet. And so I do think that a way of doing that is to legislate, okay, with a small L. But you need to make some rules, but the rules have to be the same for all food manufacturers and food sellers. And then it's up to them to innovate within those rules to do that. I think the rules need to be tighter. I think the government needs to have a bit more cajones, shall we say, in order to do it. They're not doing it at the moment.
25:39Voluntary. don't do anything voluntary it's the stupidest thing you can do yeah i mean it doesn't happen does it and i think you're totally right like i'm actually someone who's a bit against legislating our way to solve the problem because i think often legislation gets it wrong and disproportionately affects poor people that's always the two things yeah but at the same time we're in a situation in the uk uniquely where you know 63 of overweight in the uk is costing the taxpayer 6.5 billion a year in direct costs to the NHS so 30 billion indirect I want to point out 30 billion indirect right so huge amounts of money that is costing our economy which isn't in the best shape at all whatsoever at the same time everyone absolutely loves the fact the NHS is free healthcare to all and it's totally accessible to everyone which god you know I've lived in America for a couple of years if you break your leg you don't want a 10 grand bill to go with that day like your day already sucks you don't need another 10 grand bill with that so i love the nhs i think the premise of it is super important and we should save it but to save it we need to maybe do some more legislation right so what would you legislate i i guess it's how how long do i have no i i think i think so no someone's actually asked me this right if i were p.m yeah uh for the day what would i do and you know what i would do i would make and i think this would solve a lot not all problems i I would make health, I would subsidize healthier food.
27:05I would make healthier food cheaper. Now, I don't just mean carrots. They're relatively cheap anyway. That's not what I'm talking about. I'm saying for every class of food that we might be eating, sometimes we're eating whole foods. We should be doing more, but sometimes we're eating whole foods. Sometimes you need a chocolate bar, energy bar, something, some treaty thing. Sometimes you do need some frozen food in the house, okay? Within each class of type of food, I think Whole Foods are going to be fine, but I think they should maybe put broccoli on sale more, for example. Within each class of food, there's always a healthier option versus not.
27:39Mrs. Smith, who has a tenor to feed her kids, she's got two minimum wage jobs. She walks into a supermarket. At the moment, the cheapest thing she can feed her kids with are three frozen pizzas, which no one would think here is the healthy way to go. But who am I to judge her if that's the only way she's going to feed her kids? that's the food system problem at the moment. If, however, Mrs. Smith, who has limited agency because of the tenor she actually has and the kids she's got to feed, if the default food she buys, whatever it is, is healthier, then that's the way we've got to do it. Then there's the problems of you and me, right?
28:14Then we've got to think about it slightly because we can buy cramped food. But I think we start with the people who need it the most because at the moment, there is a steep, tragic, socioeconomic gradient with diet related illnesses so if you look at the bottom quint the bottom 20 socioeconomically compared to the people listening to your podcast now the top 20 socioeconomically more particularly in kids more than twice as likely to have obesity and all the related illnesses than us that's a tragedy i mean it is a tragedy and we're now believe it or not the world leader in ultra-processed food consumption in kids, 61%.
28:57We've overtaken America, which is wild. And what's worse is if you look at low-income households, that number's actually around 80 % for ultra-processed food consumption. Because it's cheaper, if you don't have a fridge, then you can buy stuff or don't want to pay for a big fridge, then that's stuff that has longer shelf lives. the industrial processing of a highly processed food makes it cheaper to manufacture from from so and these are just the wrong incentives you know because I think processing clearly has kept us alive we have eight billion people in the world we need to feed this this is all true right and so I don't think we can get away from processing because we won't be able to preserve enough food and and that's where it started from right we we had a harvest we had too many vegetables what do you do with it you pickle them jam them whatever it's processing yes yes cure it dry it whatever you do.
29:48So, I mean, I have an issue with the term ultra process because I think it covers too many foods. However, what is undoubtedly the truth is that within that ultra process, to my mind, too big an umbrella are foods that we should eat a hell of a lot less of, okay? And I think we need to identify those foods. And I don't want to remove them from the diet because, look, everyone, you got your kids birthday parties you got this you got that every we just we shouldn't be eating cake every day I mean ultimately that that that's the issue right it's not the cake that's the problem it's it's the food the dose makes the poison this as someone said once it's it is absolutely it's absolutely the frequency I think all of us should have the ability to enjoy going to you know meet mates at a pub children's birthday party um why should you know Christmas yeah we shouldn't be eating Christmas every day And the problem is, like you say, the cheapest food is the ultra-processed food that's low-nutrient.
30:49Like, my problem with ultra-processed food is, sure, there are additives, but actually, fundamentally, all ultra-processed food is low-nutrition. And crucially, lower in protein and lower in fiber. Those are the two things. You look and that's it. So that is where the protein and fiber comes back into, where that is, to my mind, a fundamental issue. Yes, there's short sugar, fat, da-da-da-da-da. Low protein, low fiber. So here's my idea, which I haven't told anyone yet, but I'm going to tell you first. Okay. Because, I mean, maybe someone in the government might listen to this one day, and you never know.
31:23But because they want, you know, Rachel Reeves has got a tough job and she needs another 20 billion. She's not about to cut taxes. But I believe, and I haven't done the maths on this yet, so I'm making probably some out-of-pound of claims but if we started to take ownership and responsibility as a government that we need to make a difference to food and accessibility of affordable food yes usually to the lower income households how we can do that potentially is through the vat system because you could it would take a lot of work and a lot of time but you could in theory put move vat onto all the unhealthy foods and move, take VAT off all the healthy foods.
32:04So VAT, there's no VAT on whole foods anyway. There's not, but there is on biscuits, but there isn't on cakes. Okay, that's true. Right, so there's a lot of random... Yeah, yeah, they're still moving, they're still moving. Vitamins, VAT. All two, three pounds more expensive because of tax on top of it when someone's trying to make a healthy choice for their body. Right, so I don't know how it would work, But my theory is you could mix that system. And like, you know, you put VAT on Coca-Cola. It's one of the biggest selling things. You're going to make a lot of money, right? So there's ways to make more money out of it.
32:39And then at the same time, provide access and make all of a sudden vitamins become cheaper. You know, healthier foods become cheaper. That's my theory. I don't know if it's true, but I'd love someone's. This is it, right? How do we make the health? So because what we've got to do, this is it. Don't tell me choice. because as we discussed, actually there's limited choice, even if we have money. I think what we've got to do is to make the healthier choice the cheaper, more convenient, equally tasty choice. That's what you've got to do. And don't tell me it's impossible. The brightest minds in terms of moving them, it's possible.
33:15It's just will and incentives. That's what we have. If you do those three things, and yes, we can still have the stuff that we like to have every so often, But by default when we're tired when we you know, I don't have the mental space to make the decision I don't want to know what I'm gonna have for dinner tonight And if I then have this shortcut that it is automatically gonna be healthier for me That is the way to do it 100 % I mean, you know that meal occasion of I can't be bothered to cook Let me just grab a pizza and stick it in the oven right because it's cheap And I mean mind you pizzas aren't even that cheap some of them are like a fiver now Yeah, yeah, yeah.
33:48But, you know, actually, you can also buy the ready-made soup pots, which are super cheap, have no additives, no junk in them, and it's primarily meat and vegetables and some water, right? And you could have that. It's just as easy to make. You pour it in a pan, heat it up, you're done in two minutes, right? So easy. But it's the fact that the pizza's that bit more psychologically tempting. We love the crunchiness of the crust and the melty cheese and all of that stuff. And it's just the same price, roughly. So if you flip that... You need to flip it. You need to flip it. You need to flip it. That's the only way.
34:22You cannot rely... We have primitive brains. We still have chimp brains from way back when. Our brains and what we're evolved to do, from a genetics perspective, is to survive in a time of feast and famine. Sometimes we had the antelope, sometimes you didn't have the antelope. So this is what we're set up to do. Our problem is we now live in a feast environment. 100 % of the time. So you've got to now take that and say, okay, within this feast environment, we need to change the incentives. Because if we allow our chimp brains to take over, we're always going to go, not even executively, we're just going to end up picking something which is going to be less healthy for us.
35:06You talk about the chimp brain. Why do we do that then on a biological level or a genetic level? We just crave sugar. Everyone loves the sweet taste. So this I can tell you. So we are all mammals, and all mammals, you know, we kind of drink milk. Yes. So what is the job of a baby mammal as it comes out? All mammals, including humans. Okay. It is to grow as quickly as possible to stop becoming tiger food, ultimately. Right? That's the goal. And so what you do is you latch on to the first food source available, the boob. Okay. And what is in the boob? Milk, obviously. And milk is one of the only foods, naturally, only foods that are high in fat and carbs together.
35:50And the carbs is in lactose. So it's the sugar, right? So the reason we love sugar is because it's the first food that we get onto. We need to clamp onto it and grow quickly. And then what that happens, obviously, as we know, is that if any of you have kids, some of the kids can eat stuff that is so sweet that your pancreas dissolves. You go, oh my God, what the hell is that? but then your quote-unquote palate matures you hit depends what the age is right 12 15 whatever it is where suddenly most people don't grow up liking beer for example but then now we I look here and then so now you like the bitterness and foods and that is because our desire for super sweet stuff naturally drops as you get older and then your your more complex taste buds take over this is now clearly the slope can differ depending on who you are genetically but for all humans this is true we need to save kids from themselves in terms this is why I study childhood obesity because if you let children make their own decisions they will downshift into the blissful face of sugar they will so we need to control the access to the kids and then hopefully drive them to the more mature palate sooner but none of us have a mature palate we still eat sweet stuff all the time i don't see people just pushing away from it sure less than when we were kids but fundamentally we're all eating too much sugar right we are fundamentally eating eating too much sugar and there's and you know why so i don't know if this is the full answer another colleague of mine you can shut me up by the way if you don't know so another colleague of mine she was at yale university at the time dana small and she did a study that had a couple of different steps and she was brain imaging okay and so what she did was she This was a two-fold thing.
Read the full transcript
37:38So the first is she was trying to, and this is all human beings, she was trying to understand our ability to predict the energy content. Calories, they don't count, but anyway. So we are very good, on average, at determining how much energy there is in fat. We are less good at determining how much energy there is in carbs because they come in very many different forms, complex this and that. We have no freaking idea at all what happens when we mix the two together because in nature, you only have milk, maybe an avocado, maybe a coconut, okay? But there are no... Roast potatoes doesn't count because you're introducing carbs to the fat.
38:19Okay, so that's the first thing she did. Our ability to judge what we're eating completely goes away when you mix fat and carbs together. First thing. Then she imaged the brain, okay, and showed pictures and put the flavor in the mouth. Fat. I don't know if you saw this bit in Ratatouille and it was having the cheese and the grape, okay? Amazing. Right? So she did the same thing where it was fat. It was carbs. Fat and carbs. Christmas tree. Freaking Christmas tree. Lit up. Now, this is fat and carbs specifically rather than ultra-processed foods, but ultra-processed foods, highly processed foods, have a lot of fat and carbs in it.
38:58So when you go back to your question, why do we do it? because we still have primitive brains. We still have brains that value energy density because we never had enough food. That's why we do it. Right. So it's our biology essentially staying the way it's always been and then our food environment's totally changed and now we've got all this fat and carbs kicking around, right? Why do we love croissants? Oh, right. You're making me hungry. But ultimately, you might argue that the illnesses we face today, obesity, etc., etc., is an evolutionary response to the change in the environment. It is just a natural response.
39:44We've gone too far in natural response. So if you look at that, then what is the solution? Is it to berate the individual? Is it to, say, make better choices? No, it is to fix the environment. Or invent a Zempic. Now, are we going to go there? Let's go there. Let's go there. Let's talk a bit about it. Yeah. I think it's a hot topic and everyone's curious about it, right? And still learning. Yeah. And you know, great studies out there showing how much you lose weight on a ZenPic. So what's your take? So first of all, I need to declare interest. Otherwise, I'll get in the trouble. I do advise the companies that make not only the people that make the ZenPic, but the various companies that make the drugs.
40:26Okay. And I get some grant funding for them. So you're biased? Well, I mean, you could call it biased. You could call it biased. I'm declaring an interest. Fair enough. I'm declaring an interest. I don't make any money from it, but I'm declaring an interest. So these drugs, just very briefly, these drugs are, whenever we eat, whatever we eat, gut hormones go up. Because they go through the gut. And these drugs are based on our normal gut hormones. and what they do is they put, they chemically decorate the hormones so they stick in the blood for longer. Ultimately that's the case, but there are natural hormones that are there.
41:03They signal to the pancreas to enhance insulin secretion. That's why they're a type 2 diabetes drug. But most gut hormones make you feel fuller. So if they stick around the blood for longer, they hit the brain, it makes you feel fuller. You feel fuller, you eat less, you eat less, you lose weight. That's the way it works. People have called it, and they're remarkable. I've been in the obesity field for 30 years they're remarkable in a sense where we did not expect something quite this effective to appear now and broadly safe there are side effects but broadly safe and so people have been bandying words game changer, silver bullet blah blah blah and as with the pendulum of things that actually swing, these are powerful drugs and they do work for some people but they're not a cosmetic drug and that's the first thing, they're meant to treat illnesses that you get that are not meant to get into your bikini or your 100 % yeah budget hangers whatever they're called okay that's not the actual goal so that's the first thing the second is the only thing which these things do the only silver bullet element of uzampik munjar or whatever you want to call whatever drugs they are is to make you feel fuller that's what they do that's all they do you feel fuller you eat less it doesn't improve your diet right so in other words if your diet was rubbish before all it will make you do is eat less rubbish.
42:22Which could be argued to be a good thing. No. Well, okay, clearly you want to eat less rubbish. But if all you eat is rubbish, then what then happens, and we're beginning to see it already, okay, where somebody has a really bad, awful diet, and because suddenly they're on these drugs, they eat less, they actually become malnourished. So what happens is you're eating so much garbage, thus you get enough protein and minerals and what have you, okay? because everything is less, you've got to eat this volume. If you cut it by a third, which is roughly what these drugs do, they cut it by a third, now you're not getting enough protein, micronutrients, anything like that.
43:00So that's bad. So we need to improve the diets. The second thing that is becoming clear with these drugs is, and I don't think these are specific for the drugs, I think this is rapid weight loss. Rapid weight loss means that you lose fat, which is what we're shooting for, but you also lose muscle mass. which no one signs up for. So if you don't put in some kind of exercise intervention, in addition to the high quality diet, with enough protein so you can build, then what you end up doing is losing fat and quite a lot of muscle mass as well. And bone, I read. And bone, not lean mass. So everything that is not fat, you can't.
43:39I mean, it's largely muscle. So it is good, but only for very specific things. So you have to use the right tool for the job. use a hammer for a nail and a screwdriver for a screw. The drugs are useful to treat people with obesity and various diseases. In clinical occasions where they can't lose weight any other way. In clinical occasions. Losing weight is going to save their life, yeah. It's not designed to prevent obesity, and it doesn't improve your diet. So that still requires the environment back to what we were talking about. So it's a tool, it's part of a solution for some people, but it will not solve the broader environmental issue.
44:17And I fear, this is my big fear with these drugs. Well, there are two fears. There's an acute fear. One of the big fears I have about this drug is that the good thing is that they're powerful in their work. The bad thing is that they're powerful and they work for pretty much anyone. There is no weight limit. It's not that if you are 300 pounds and a guy looking to lose 100 pounds, fine. I think you know if you're a 16 year old girl who's 75 pounds it will still work for you that's the problem so you know you gotta gate where these drugs goes to well I'm right now you can just go online fill out form and I'll have it in the post the next day a little bit more difficult than that but only so problem number one all right you need a gate it this is not some party drug like seriously it's it's it's it's a serious drug for serious conditions thank you The second thing, and societally a huge concern, is that I fear in a time in which there's not enough cash going about, that the government will use these drugs as an excuse not to take the tough decisions they need to make to still improve our food environment.
45:27I don't think there's a shortcut for the individuals that need the drug, but the government can absolutely use it as a shortcut to say, well, now we don't have to regulate the food industry. Now we don't have to do this because, you know what, it's cheaper just to buy the drug. And politically it's easier. Because these choices for legislation are always politically inexpedient and in a short election cycle. That is my biggest fear about the drug. So where do you think it's going to be in five, ten years' time when it's growing at an insane rate, right? the adoption of it, the use of it, everybody's talking about it.
45:59Where do you think we're going to be in five, ten years if everyone starts to use it cosmetically? We've got to stop them using it cosmetically. We now have a powerful tool and I'm someone who studies obesity and the bad things that come with obesity. And these drugs can fix a lot of the bad things that come with obesity. And I want them to be used like that. And the way to ensure that we continue to do this and not get bad press and everything is to legislate properly. The pharma companies, you might say, well, they want to sell the drug as quickly as possible. Actually, they do want to sell the drug.
46:29They want to make money, undoubtedly. They don't want bad things to happen to their drug because bad marketing will shut down their program. So we probably, at the moment in time now, have the same incentives as the drug companies. Amazing. But we do in terms of we want the drugs to be used correctly and no bad things to be happened. So I don't want to even entertain the idea that more people will use it cosmetically. However, the drugs are only going to get cheaper. Now, Ozempic will go off patent in 2032, which means that generics will come in. They're not a white powder, so they're still quite expensive to make.
47:03But there are going to be white powders coming probably 10, 15 years down the line that will get dirt cheap. So we need to have... We have a period of time right now, okay, in which the drugs are still relatively expensive, so not everyone can have it. It's only rich people that are having it at the moment. And we can... We have a period of time in which people like you, people like me, who have platforms and have discussions, nuanced discussions like this, to try and convince, first of all, how do we improve the food environment and how do we legislate to make sure the drugs get to the right people only?
47:36And we're not there yet. We're walking into this blind and if we don't discuss it and talk about it, and we have a few years, we have a few years lead time to try and fix this problem, then we may end up in a situation which I don't want to entertain, which means that most people use it cosmetically. Which would be horrendous, right? because we're going to end up shifting the problem from everyone's obese and overweight to everyone's malnourished. Yes. Fundamentally. Fundamentally. If you don't fix the food environment, that is what's going to happen. Yeah, because you'll eat less ultra-processed food, fine, in theory, but then you're not getting enough nutrients, vitamins, minerals in your diet.
48:10Fundamentally, we need to rethink the model of prevention, cure, and how that interacts. Okay. So you create the new government department for... Yep, for prevention. prevention and health. Yep. What are you doing? What's your policy? One, two, three. Okay. Policy number one. We'll go back to what I said. I think we should find a way to incentivize moving choices, quote unquote, default choices towards the healthier option. I think that's the first thing that we actually have to do. Oh, yes. Second. Yes, so that's the first thing. Second, we need to really, really, really focus on child health.
48:47Now, why child health? Because if we go in to the prevention is better than cure thing, healthy children, healthy adults, unhealthy children, unhealthy adults. We've known this since year nought. And actually, primary school children. Why? Because that is the time in life society has the most levers. Most of us will tell our kids what to do. We don't get upset if someone else tells our kids to do. I think, and this is what I would do, that all school meals, two things need to be need to have a minimum standard we can debate what that standard is and it should be free to everybody under the age of 12 whether or not you are a billionaire's daughter or son or whether or not you can't afford anything it should be universal it should be free it should have a minimal standard that's your first 12 years of life the problem after that is then we have money allowance and and and that's more difficult i think we need to target the first 12 years of life where we have the levers we can teach them about vegetables we we we can tell them that foods have can be this sweet or this salty or something and we can make them not be afraid of something that looks like a fish i was i was um in a supermarket once i met my mate and he had he had his kid there i'm not gonna name my mate um and i i just bought some fish i just a couple of sea bass which was on sale and he says oh what what did you buy i says i bought fish and I stood in the fish go oh what is that I says fish but don't fish come in a rectangle and basil oh my god and so and so I I think I think so that's number two number two is I would make all school meals meet a minimum standard and be free regardless of how rich or poor you are below the age of 12.
50:31oh I think that's brilliant because I totally agree a and b in the 1940s 50s 60s you did have one hot dinner at school and there wasn't choice you got what you were given and the teachers sat in the school hall and literally waited until you finished so there was no skipping there was no choosing a pack of crisps instead and arguably you know as much as parents I'm a parent I've got two kids we all try and do the best we can for our kids the typical lunch box in the UK is now 82 % off the process yes and it's horrendous It's bags of crisps, it's chocolates, it's white bread with processed ham in it.
51:06Because parents don't want to waste money on food. Well, we've got to buy something that lasts a whole week. You know, I don't want to have to... I'm not roasting a chicken and slicing chicken breasts and what have you, which we should, but you're not. And so, exactly, there's a price pressure. Well, there's a price pressure, and I think it comes back to the environment, though, because without wanting to put the blame on parents, because we're all stressed, tired. There was never a time in history when, you know, both parents had to work and then prep the school lunchbox, get the kid to school, do everything else, right?
51:40It's traditional, fine, it's old school, but the woman stayed at home typically, not being sexist. No, no, this was just in the past, right. This is what happened in the past, and she had time to roast the chicken, slice the fresh chicken breast and make a proper meal or send them off with a proper meal, right? We are where we are, which I think is why we should just remove that stigma, the blame, the effect, because you have to work. Otherwise, you're going to afford to pay rent, mortgage, free school meals for everyone under 12. You heard it here first. Okay, so that's your point one and two.
52:16Point three has to be for the adults today who are eating, on average, 60 % ultra-processed foods, on average overweight, how do we create policy or change that actually helps them? What should an adult do today or how can we fix the system we're in?
52:38I don't know, that's a difficult question. I mean, if I knew that, I wouldn't be here talking to you. That's not true. That's not true. That's not true. I mean, that's a very good question. I think that's probably way above any of our, sadly, way above any of our pay rates at the moment. I do think that this is a broader societal issue. It's a food environment issue. And I'll go back to the point where I think that we need, we have not yet reached a comfortable point in which we can discuss what we think we should do to regulate the kind of foods that we eat. And so I would actually not be shy about explaining to adults, because the kids will do what the kids are told, what public health means.
53:27And explain to them, look, guys, I know you want to do what you want to do, and you want to be able to eat anything you want to eat at the same time, and most of us really get. But we still need to understand that for the greater good of society that we need to make some choices We need to make some decisions and here's the science and that is what I would do to as the other I don't have anything to say for that aside from that because we haven't got to the point where where we're doing I mean, I can I can give some examples I can say well for adults You need to have roughly speaking in a daily 16 % of your energy come from protein unless you're an Olympic athlete But I mean, we already do that, right?
54:03The government already says we need to eat less and move more. But it doesn't help. No one listens. No, it doesn't help. Exactly. So just saying it is not going to help. This is a systemic problem. And so it needs to be fixed with systemic, broader... I don't want to be negative and leave on a negative note. But I think we need to enunciate the problem. And the problem is none of us are having, the government is not having the adult discussion with the populace, the voting populace, that we can't do what the hell we want. At least not to the degree we're doing it today. If we expect to live long enough to pay freaking taxes, you know, and do the things we got to do to survive.
54:47Diet related illnesses, obesity, is a public health problem. Deal with it like a public health problem. We never willed our way into freaking seatbelts. You know what I mean? We didn't will our way into whatever. It was dealt with as a public health problem and we sort of solved that problem. We have to deal with food as a public health problem or issue. Okay, let's not be too negative about it and let's find that middle ground in which we can go to our kids' birthday parties. They can have cake. We can meet our friends for pints, but yet broadly speaking over a week over a month over a year Our diet has to be far better than they are now They have to be they fundamentally have to be but then the danger is you get into digital IDs and You've eaten too much of this ultra-prosive food So now you're not allowed to buy that if they track all your spend right this is where the conspiracy theories I am not arguing for that you lose liberties So, please, this is the tension I'm talking about, right?
55:50Yeah. I am not talking minority report. This is not what I'm talking about. But yet I'm not talking about a tin hat in Nevada, the Federals are going to come get me. I'm also not talking about that, right? The full libertarian approach. There's got to be some middle ground between the federales and minority reports. Well, there has to be. But then that's where you get the sugar tax, which arguably just shifted all the sodas into artificial sweetness? That's because it wasn't a holistic approach. The problem was that was, it was a good, it was a good for one thing. It made us eat, let's be clear what the sugar tax was good for.
56:29It made us eat less sugar. The problem is the entire, sorry, it made us drink, let's be more specific. It made us drink less sugar. So what then happened is artificial sweetness are not neutral. None of the foods that were high in sugars were taxed in the same way. It did include fruit juices and things. So we just moved our way around the problem because we only put one piece down in the thing. If you're going to do it, do it properly. Have the evidence. You need the evidence about what would work. And you've got to then deal with it as a whole. Otherwise, you'll just find a little rat hole and move down and you're going to end up eating the same amount of sugar anyway.
57:08Okay, so let's leave it on a positive note, Charles. Yes, yes. Do you think we can get there? What does, you know, if you look five years into the future, do you think we can get there? We can reduce obesity. Do you see positive signs? I see positive signs, for example, in the discussion we're having now. You know, you've given me the time and the space to sit here and actually have this discussion with you. This would not have happened ten years ago. It just, not you, but there would have been no interest ten years ago for us to sit down and us discuss the nuances of these things. whoever listens to this, whoever, and other things that I've done.
57:45So I think the positives is the drugs, good or bad, in terms of how they actually rolled out, has given us a focal point to talk about obesity, not as someone's fault, but as something that can be treated. Not everyone is going to be treated by the drugs, but if there is ability to treat someone, because we're now recognizing that obesity has really bad bits to it, and how we're going to cure it. A lot of it is diet. How are we going to fix it? The positives is more people are talking about it. And that's the only way we're going to fix this is if we talk about this more. And that, I think, is a positive.
58:25We're definitely talking about this more. No one is looking at me like I've got two heads or landed from Mars. No, and I absolutely agree with you because I've been making these videos that go viral on social media for the last three years. And in that time, I've had Tesco approach me and want me to do talks at their head office. all these retailers come to me and go can you give a talk about health it's on the agenda and even in just three years we've gone from basically eating ultra processed food bread in the supermarkets and that's all there was with 26 ingredients to now one of the best-selling breads in the country is sourdough right and that's a better thing for our health and that's shifted because we're having the conversation, influencers and people on social media and on podcasts are talking about the benefits of sourdough, educating the population in a way they couldn't 10 years ago because we didn't have access to the media or whatever.
59:20And people didn't want to listen anyway. And people didn't want to listen. And now they're listening, they're changing, and the supermarket will rapidly change if it makes them money. Market forces. Market forces, right? So there is an element of, whilst I do agree, you know, the government could be doing a lot more to step in. At the same time, I do believe we, as the people, have the power to change it through market forces, the choices we make and the money, where we put our money. Essentially, every purchase we make is a vote for the world we want to see. It is. That's true. So on that note, Giles, it's an optimistic world.
59:56We will get better. The information, the truth, it will get out if we keep having these honest and nuanced conversations. and thank you for coming in. I think it's been fascinating. Thank you so much for having me. Thank you, John.
From the publisher
Welcome back to The Unprocessed Truth with me, Sunna Van Kampen 🎙️
This week, we're joined by the brilliant geneticist, author, and Professor Dr. Giles Yeo.
We dive headfirst into the biggest lie in modern nutrition: that a calorie is just a calorie.
Dr. Yeo is here to dismantle the "calories in, calories out" model, explaining why obsessing over a number on a food label distracts you from the real danger hiding in your diet—ultra-processed foods.
Let's unpack the real science of weight, appetite, and why focusing on quality, not quantity, is the only truth that counts!
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
