How to keep your data safe when you travel

In short

The Vergecast Episode Summary: How to Keep Your Data Safe When You Travel

Podcast Information

Title: The Vergecast
Hosts: Nilay Patel and David Pierce
Description: A podcast discussing technology news, gadgets, and their impact on daily life.

Episode Details

Episode Title: How to Keep Your Data Safe When You Travel
Episode Description: The episode explores the importance of protecting digital data while traveling, especially across borders. Guest Gaby del Valle discusses data security measures, while Matt Belloni from Puck analyzes why tech giants like Apple and Amazon invest in streaming services.

Key Topics Discussed

Data Security While Traveling
Guest: Gaby del Valle joined the conversation to provide insights on securing digital data when traveling internationally.
Key Issues:
Increasing concerns about digital privacy, especially with border security that allows customs agents to search devices without warrants.
Anecdotal reports indicate a rise in phone searches by Customs and Border Protection (CBP), even if statistical data shows low occurrences.

Practical Advice:
Travelers should consider what data to bring and may need to take proactive measures to protect personal information.
Suggested precautions include:
Factory resetting devices before travel.
Turning off biometric authentication (e.g., face ID, fingerprints) as it can be compelled by law enforcement.
Keeping devices updated and protected with strong passwords instead of biometrics.

Legality and Practices of Device Searches
Legal Framework:
In 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that law enforcement can't conduct warrantless searches of cell phones without consent. However, there is a border search exemption that gives CBP broader powers to search devices at ports of entry.

Types of Searches:
Basic Search: Agents can look through the contents available on the device in airplane mode.
Advanced/Forensic Search: Agents can copy all information from the device, which may be stored for an indefinite period.

Implications of Sharing Data
Risks:
Concerns about how data, once taken, could be used against individuals or shared with other authorities.
The importance of understanding that data can affect not just the individual but also those connected to them (friends, family, etc.).

Streaming Wars Among Tech Giants
Guest: Matt Belloni provided insights on why companies like Apple, Amazon, and Google are investing heavily in streaming services.

Key Points:
Companies view streaming as a way to enhance their brand image and create a ‘halo effect’ that attracts consumers to their other services.
The question of profitability versus brand enhancement is central to these companies' strategies.
The competitive landscape of streaming services raises questions about whether these companies can sustain long-term losses in the pursuit of market share.

Google Pixel as a Recommended Device
Hotline Question: A caller expressed curiosity about how Google’s Pixel phone has evolved into a recommended device.

Discussion Highlights:
The Pixel has made strides in becoming a simple, reliable smartphone option.
The phone is positioned against other Android devices like Samsung, highlighting its straightforward usability and good camera performance.
The podcast acknowledged that Google’s commitment to updates could influence long-term trust in the Pixel line.

Key Takeaways

Protecting personal data while traveling is increasingly crucial, with practical steps available to enhance security.
Legal nuances around device searches at borders can lead to misunderstandings about individual rights.
The streaming industry’s dynamics involve significant investment without immediate returns, emphasizing brand strategy over traditional profitability.
Google’s Pixel phone has successfully positioned itself as a user-friendly alternative in the Android market, appealing to those who prefer simplicity over complexity.

Conclusion In this episode of The Vergecast, the hosts successfully navigated critical conversations around data privacy while traveling, the implications of device searches, and the evolving landscape of streaming services among major tech companies, concluding with insights into the Google Pixel's market position. The discussions emphasize the need for individual awareness and precaution in an increasingly digital world.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.

Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:03Welcome to the Vergecast, the flagship podcast of having really famous friends. I'm your friend David Pierce, and I am in my backyard, on my patio, putting together this little Tykes house that we got for my toddler. It was a gift from my parents. My two-year-old, I think, is very much going to like it. But also, if I'm being honest, it was very fun and cathartic to put this thing together in the way that it's fun to, like, do IKEA furniture. It's a little bit of work. It's just enough to make you feel like you've really accomplished something. And I'm like, yeah, I built a house today. Is it made of plastic, and will it blow away next time there's wind?

0:36Yes, but that's not important. I built a house today. Anyway, this house is not what we are here to talk about today. Today on the show, we're going to do two things. First, I'm going to talk to Gabby Del Valle about a thing we've actually heard from you a lot about recently, which is how to travel with your phone, especially across borders right now. It's very complicated in the United States politically, and so Gabby and I are going to try to give you some tips on what to do to secure your data before you travel. Then I'm going to talk to Matt Bellany from Puck about what he's seeing in the big tech streaming wars and why companies like Apple and Amazon and Google want in on this in the first place.

1:14We also have a really fun hotline question about Google. Lots to get to today. But first, I have to figure out how to get out of this house. I barely crammed myself in here, and it's going to be very ugly getting out. So this is The Verge Cast. We'll be right back.

1:30So, your AI agents they make the team that uses them more productive, right? But if they aren't connected to other agents or your data or your existing workflows how productive can they really make your teams? Any business can add AI agents IBM connects your agents across your company to change how you do business Let's create smarter business IBM Thank you. new Acrobat. It's time to do your best work with the all-new Adobe Acrobat Studio. Support for this show comes from Strawberry.me. Be honest. Are you happy with your job? Or are you stuck in one you've outgrown? Or never wanted in the first place?

2:40Sure, you can probably list the reasons for staying, but are they actually just excuses for not leaving? Let a career coach from strawberry.me help you get unstuck. Discover the benefits of having a dedicated career coach in your corner. Go to strawberry.me slash unstuck to claim a special offer. Welcome back. All right, the house is finished. I get to get rid of this giant box behind me. I made it out alive. Life is good. Let's get into it. We've heard from a bunch of you over the last few months with kind of a similar question, which is basically some version of, I'm about to travel and I don't know what to do with my devices.

3:23I think for a lot of political reasons, especially here in the United States, there are new questions about how you should be securing your phone and what data you should be traveling with across borders. It just feels different now. And I actually think this is the kind of thing that has been interesting and important for a long time, but is really just coming to the forefront now in a new way. So I I grabbed Gabby Delvalle, who wrote a really great story for us about this, and we dug into it. Let's do it. Gabby Delvalle is here. Hi, Gabby. Hi. How's it going? You're here out of the trenches of the insanity of our world right now.

3:59I feel like every time you turn in a story, it's just like, the world is weirder than you even think or realize by Gabby. Yeah, that's kind of my beat. It sucks. I mean, I like it. I like doing it, but I'm like, what if things weren't that way? That would be awesome. Yeah, indeed. So I've asked you to do this because you wrote a story about basically traveling to the United States with your phone in 2025. And we also got a hotline question very specifically asking about the same thing. Your story did super well. This is clearly a thing people are curious about. And I just wanted to dig into some of it.

4:34But let me let me just play you the question that we got on the Vergecast hotline as a way to just kind of set up the conversation we're about to have. Does that sound good? Yeah. All right. Let me just play this. hey David I'm European I'm about to travel to the US I read about customs and border patrol searching phones what might happen if I refuse and if I have to let them search my phone how do I prepare do I delete chat apps and password managers do I log out of my google account and delete my google drive do I change my phone password and what about my laptop okay so there are a bunch of good practical questions in here but before we get to all the good practical questions.

5:08I just want to sort of lay the land a little bit on this. And one thing I've been wondering a lot is how widespread is this kind of border search right now? The idea that like somebody will detain you and search through your phone and look for anti-Trump text messages is like a thing we're hearing about. How big and widespread is this right now, really? I would say it's not super widespread, at least according to the most recent data we have, which is from the 2024 fiscal year. So it's not current, but that year, less than 0.01 % of arriving international travelers had their devices searched by Customs and Border Protection.

5:46But at the same time, we are seeing, you know, a lot of anecdotal reports of people having their phones searched, of people having their laptop searched, of being turned away because of what comes up in a search. So I would say, even though it's not necessarily something that happens really frequently, like people's anxieties are not entirely misplaced either because you don't know if it's going to happen to you ultimately. Right. And it does seem like it'll probably be a minute before we get real quantitative data about this stuff. But it certainly seems like anecdotally, the stories we're hearing about this seem to have increased pretty dramatically.

6:21Yeah, I would say anecdotally they've increased. And I mean, you know, part of that could be like whenever Trump is in office, like people care more about what Customs and Border Protection is doing, what ICE is doing. It's just kind of like an attention effect. But at the same time, like the reasons why people are being turned away are in some cases unusual. Like a French scientist who sent like text messages saying that Trump's research cuts were bad. Like that's not a usual reason to turn someone away or deny them entry. So how did it come to pass that these are legal searches that Customs and Border Protection is actually doing?

6:56What is the legality of these searches right now? So in 2014, the Supreme Court ruled that law enforcement cannot conduct warrantless searches of people's cell phones without their consent. But there is what is called the border zone or border search exemption, which is exactly what allows CBP to search your phone at an airport or other port of entry. So in this instance, border doesn't mean like the physical like land borders of the U.S. Like if you're flying into Chicago on an international flight, like that's a border zone. If you're flying into like, I don't know, Omaha, I'm just picking places in the middle of the country.

7:29Like you don't have to be physically at the border for you to be in like a border zone. So the border zone exemption basically means that there are just like areas where the fourth amendment, not that it doesn't exist, but it's a little bit more flexible, a little bit less robust because you're being inspected for entry into the country. So even that you are physically present in the United States, you have not yet been legally admitted. So it's just like a kind of different, different situation. So it is the idea that just by virtue of the fact that you are coming from not in the United States to in the United States, that somehow there is, I don't know, like probable cause or a reason to check or like, I guess, what is the reason behind that exemption?

8:14So I spoke to a lawyer at the Electronic Frontier Foundation who explained it to me basically is like, you know, there's always kind of been a border exemption. And it's before there were phones, it was they would check your luggage. They would check the things on your person, things that similarly like what you would need, like reasonable, reasonable suspicion or whatever for search and seizure. But because you are entering, these things are considered like related to your travel, related to your reason for being in the country. But your luggage, you know, they might be looking for you smuggling something, trafficking something, drugs, people, contraband, eggs recently.

8:51CBP has had an increase in people smuggling eggs for Mexico, which is really funny. Yeah. But your phone is not really like just a thing that you're carrying with you or your laptop. It like contains your entire life on it, which is why like Like domestically, the Supreme Court has held that, you know, law enforcement can't just go through your phone without a warrant. But it's because of this border search exemption, they can do it at ports of entry. Right. It's exactly the thing you just said about your phone is both the reason it should be more protected and the reason Customs and Border Protection would really, really, really like to look at.

9:33Exactly. Those two things are exactly in like diametric opposition at all times. Exactly. Okay. So what do we know about how these searches actually work? Like, I'm imagining just like a dude standing in the corner, just like flipping through the apps on your phone. What actually happens in one of these searches? So it depends, I would say. You know when you get to the airport and you go through customs and they're like, where were you? What's the reason for your travel? That's just like your standard run-of-the-mill inspection. You can get pulled into what's known as a secondary inspection, which is when they take you into a back room.

10:08and this is like they ask you more questions. You're sitting in the room and so they can ask to look at your phone. If you say yes, there's two types of searches they can do. There's what's known as a basic search. They have to put your phone on airplane mode and they can look at whatever is on your phone on airplane mode. They can use the search function on your phone. They can go through your pictures. They can go through your texts. Like any apps that you have open that like maybe are still cached. Like they can look through all of that with your phone on airplane mode. Then there's what's known as a advanced or forensic search, which is when they hook your phone up to an external device and they like grab everything that's on it and they keep it.

10:41They keep it for as long as they want. And in some jurisdictions, like they can only do warrantless forensic searches that are pursuant to like border crimes. In some jurisdictions, they can only do searches that are pursuant to other types of crimes. It depends. But mostly they can just look at your phone and tape what's on it. And they just store that information forever. or maybe not forever, but for a very long time. I need to check the laws on that. Yeah. But even in the basic search, to your point, like I think it strikes me as, I think one of the questions a lot of people are going to have, like our caller here is like, okay, what information are they looking for?

11:22And I think to the question of like, okay, you're going to dump everything on my device and take it off. I think that's one question, but like, okay, I'm sitting in the room and there's somebody flipping through my phone. Are they just like doing a spotlight search for the word Trump and seeing what happened? Like, is that a reasonable guess as to what's going on here? I don't know if I could speak to that just because I don't know. They could be looking for anything. Like, it's kind of like the inverse of, well, if you have nothing to hide, like, what are you afraid of? It's like, you don't know what's on there.

11:50You don't know what could be used against you. Like, somebody texting his friend, like, it's so crazy that Trump cut science funding. Being a reason to deny them entry from the country is like wild. There is a story of a Brown University doctor who had her visa rescinded and got turned away. The CBP agents who were interrogating her say that she had admitted to going to Lebanon, where she is from, to attend the former leader of Hezbollah's funeral, which, like, in most instances, that would get you turned away. But they apparently searched her phone and found photos, they called sympathetic photos and images of the former leader of Hezbollah in her phone's recently deleted folder.

12:36So not even like in her camera roll, but in the recently deleted folder. um when they asked her like why do you have these pictures on your phone and why did you delete them she was like oh my family sends them on whatsapp um and i deleted them because like i i don't know like they're not me but like yeah i support some of his like religious like whatever she said a lot of stuff but the point being like if you read between the lines there like whatsapp defaults to downloading whatever images people send you so yeah like yeah like my family sounds like a zillion like, good morning, everyone, things.

13:09And I have to delete those on WhatsApp like every single day. All of which is to say, you don't know what they're going to find in your phone. And even like trying to delete stuff might not necessarily help you if you don't fully delete it and then they find it in your recently deleted folder. Right. Interesting. Yeah, I was just thinking like we're in the middle of, you know, litigating like the signal group chat for attack planning and all this stuff. And it's like, there's actually a lot of ways that things can happen on your phone without you even necessarily being actively engaged in it. Like I was actually thinking about the WhatsApp one where like mine is all, all my friends are like degenerate sports gamblers.

13:46So there's now my camera roll looks like I'm a degenerate sports gambler, even though it's just all of my degenerate friends sending the bets that they're losing that just dump into my camera roll now. And so I'm like, if you just opened up my phone, you would actually make a bunch of assumptions about me that are wrong. And that is just one specific tiny way that that stuff can actually start to happen. Yeah, your friends are the ones whose parlays are hitting. It's not you. It is your friends. All my parlays hit, Gabby. Yeah, that's right. That's right. But yeah, like, I don't know. Like, I have texts on my phone from like 12 years ago.

14:18I don't know what I was saying 12 years ago. Totally. Like, I just, I don't think about it. And, you know, maybe, maybe we should be thinking about it, which is concerning. And it applies both to like people traveling to the U.S. from outside the country on visas and to U.S. citizens. The difference is just like what your rights are. whether you have the ability to say no and what happens if you say no. Yeah, let's talk about that, actually, because I was going to ask you about this. You said if you say yes, these are the two kinds of searches that they can do. Can you say no? Who can say no? What happens if you say no?

14:52Technically, anyone can say no, but different things will happen. If you're a U.S. citizen and you say no, they can't deny you entry into the country because you are a U.S. citizen. They might hold you in there for a while. They might try to be like, why are you saying no? but they can't not let you in. They can take your phone and they can use forensics tools to get into your phone if they really want to. This has happened before. There's case law about it. If you're a permanent resident, so you have a green card, it's tricky. You can say no. And in some cases, you can't be denied entry into the country.

15:27But if you've been out of the country for more than six months, then you are basically once again being inspected for entry. And so saying no could like affect your inspection for entry. If you have like certain charges on your record, like that could lead to you also kind of being inspected again. So it's just a little bit trickier than it is for U.S. citizens. If you have a visa and you say no, they can just fully not let you in. They can send you back to wherever you came from and they can deny you entry. So the safer thing to do than saying no is to, you know, travel with your devices really locked down and really clean.

16:09Yeah. OK, so this this is a good segue to like, let's get let's get super practical about this here. The sort of nuclear option here is just like factory reset your phone before you get on the plane. Is that is that just the idea here? Is that what you should do? I mean, it's not a bad idea. I would say it's not a bad idea. Like upload whatever, back it all up, factory reset. If you don't want a factory reset, there are like other things that you can do. And I would say this advice applies most to U.S. citizens and permanent residents. If you have a visa, I'm not really sure like whether, you know, just like targeted deleting of stuff is going to is going to help you much.

16:47But if you don't want to factory reset your phone, you should. I mean, actually, everyone, everyone should turn off biometric fingerprint face ID. Turn it off. Turn it off. Can you explain that to me, actually? Because that was one thing in your reporting that I found sort of confusing and surprising, that there is a difference between what they can do with your face ID or touch ID and what they can do with your, like, six-digit passcode to get into your phone. What is going on there? Yeah. So this is like a very interesting legal thing. It's the difference between what's known as testimonial and non-testimonial.

17:22Testimonial and non-testimonial evidence, I believe. And this has mostly been litigated in like local police departments, unlocking people's phones with their fingerprint or their face. But like some courts have ruled that a cop cannot compel you to give them your phone password like one, two, three, four. They cannot ask you or whatever it is. But they can use your finger or your face because basically testimonial evidence is evidence that compels you to disclose the contents of your mind or your thoughts. So you were by telling them your password, you were disclosing something that you think you were being compelled to tell them what you think.

18:03Interesting. But that doesn't happen when they're just like putting your finger on the thing. This is also like when people go to protests, they're advised to, you know, turn off like biometrics because they can take your phone and just like kind of. So just like the only analogy I can draw there is like that's that's the law you make so that they can fingerprint you at the police station. And but you still don't have to talk like is that is there some similarity there? Yeah, yeah, yeah. I don't know if that's the legal reason, but that is an analogy that makes sense to me. There is, so one federal appeals court ruled that non-testimonial evidence, so like a biometric login for your phone, requires no cognitive exertion, placing it firmly in the same category as a blood draw or fingerprint taken at booking.

18:49Yeah, so you're totally right. Oh, there you go. Okay. Yeah, so because it doesn't require you to think or express your thoughts against your will, then they're allowed to do it. Okay. I'm not sure I buy that distinction, but it is an interesting distinction nonetheless. Okay, so the practical advice there is turn off everything but the passcode. Yeah. For sure. Turn off all biometric authentication. And turn off your phone before you cross. Why? Because the first time you turn your phone back on, you can't log in with biometrics. So even if you forgot to turn off biometrics, like the first time you need to put in your passcode, there are, depending on your device, you can maybe disable biometrics by like, pressing the button on the side a couple times.

19:30So, like, yeah, the main thing is no biometrics, passcode login only. Turn your phone off. So, you know, backup your device, wipe whatever you want to wipe. And again, like, people are going to say, like, why do I have to wipe my device if I'm not doing anything wrong? It's like, because the scope of what is wrong is expanding and expanding and expanding, even if the law hasn't changed. Yeah, and truthfully, like, the way I would answer that question is, like, maybe you don't. but is it worth the risk right like even if you don't think there is something in there like i think about this like you were saying your text messages from 12 years ago like this is the reason i i like deleted all my tweets at one point i was just like i i don't know what i was tweeting in 2010 but i absolutely do not want to be held responsible for it right like no one should be held responsible for what they were saying on the internet or in text messages 15 years ago and in this particular case you are potentially signing yourself up for if nothing else that and that that That should scare everyone.

20:28And if they do a forensic search of your phone, they keep the data. Like, they keep it. It's theirs. So DHS is building out this massive surveillance database called HART, which stands for the Homeland Advanced Recognition Technology. And it's going to basically replace their current massive database, which is called the Automated Biometric Identification System, or IDENT. and heart is like their plan is to be able to map people's like non-obvious relationships like all of these different things about a person's life that again like go beyond like who like why are you traveling to the U.S. where are you coming from like what do you have on you like if you let them you know take your phone and take all the contents on your own and back it up for god knows how long like that is data that is being fed into this like massive machine and you don't know how it's going to be weaponized against you or other people.

21:20It's kind of like the 23 and me thing, you know, like you get a Christmas present, you spit into a vial and like suddenly like your 12th cousin is getting arrested for like murder. Maybe, yeah, just weird analogy, I guess. But yeah. But it is true. And I think that that question of not only like, how does this affect me? But how does this affect you? You don't know the sort of second, third and fourth order effects that this data being out there has. And this is the thing we've learned over and over, right? That like the location data in your phone and the usage data on social networks like this stuff actually affects a much broader circle of people than just you as it gets out there.

21:59And I think it's like that's a useful thing to hold on to, especially in this particular case, I think. Yeah, there was actually just an instance of a lawyer who was coming back to the U.S. with his family from spring break. U.S. citizen, lawyer. The agents at CBP at the airport, like, tried to look through his phone. He got away with, like, just a basic search, basically. Not a forensic search. They didn't back up his information, but it's like his client's information is on that phone. There was another instance where CBP took an immigration lawyer's phone and, you know, they did like use the forensic search to like comb through what was on it.

22:39And a lot of that, what was on it was like client information. and so you know a lot of us myself included use our phones for work for personal things and there's not just information about me on my phone there's information about my friends there's information about my family there's information about like my sources and so I would say like it's really important for everyone and it's like especially important for like journalists or lawyers or people who have like sensitive information on their phones. So given all of that Do you think the selective deletion strategy even makes sense? Like, is there a sort of half measure people can take that will help them?

23:21Or are the possibilities here just so huge and broad that you kind of might as well just do the nuclear option because it's the safer way to go? I mean, I would say, like, you know, it's still a small, very small percentage of people who are getting their devices searched. But at the same time, like, realistically, how long does it take to back up your data and wipe your phone and then put everything back on your phone? Doesn't take that long. It might be annoying, but it's also annoying to sit in a weird interrogation room for hours and have law enforcement looking through your phone. And so I would say I'm not going to tell anybody what they should do, but I think that the wisest course of action is to minimize your risk as much as possible.

24:09And maybe that means wiping down your phone entirely. Maybe that means like typing in keywords that you don't want people to see and then deleting whatever fits into those keywords. I think just like the main thing to do is assess your risk as much as possible and try to protect yourself as much as possible. And then also, especially if you are a U.S. citizen, like assert your rights as much as possible as well. Yeah, yeah, that's a good one. And if you delete things, you have to then go to trash and delete them again. Delete permanently is the phrase you want to look for in almost every case because that's when they're actually deleted.

24:45All right, last thing and then we'll let you go. How do you think about this stuff as it pertains to other devices? I think phones are unique in that they have that sort of massive information that you're talking about. But also, like, I travel with my laptop. Should people think about their laptops the same way they think about their phones? Are all devices kind of looped into this? I would say all devices are looped into this. I kind of want to do a separate piece on laptops because I also travel with my laptop. I have so much stuff on my laptop. I do not want to put everything like, I don't know, like on an external hard driver in the cloud and then back on my laptop.

25:17Like that frankly sounds like really annoying and time consuming. Yeah. Resetting your laptop is way more annoying than resetting your phone. Yeah. Yeah. So I'm not sure about that, to be honest. I will say that my old MacBook does not have biometric login, which is great for me in this particular instance. and yeah, I don't know. That's a good question and I think one I should probably call up some lawyers about because I'm not 100 % sure. Okay, but in principle, if you're traveling now, you should be applying kind of the same thinking and rigor to all of your devices, not just your smartphone.

Read the full transcript

25:53Yes, yes, definitely. Okay. And like smartphones, you know, are maybe easier to lock down, also easier to search, but there's a lot of stuff on my laptop. Yeah. A lot of JSTOR articles. Yeah, like think of the PDFs we both have just like randomly kicking around in our downloads folder. I'm confident some of those would get me in trouble. I don't even know what they are, but I am confident they would get me in trouble. Oh, for sure. Same. I know what mine are and they're weird. They're weird even like when I'm showing something, like when I'm sharing my screen, I'm always like, no, no, no, guys.

26:26And you don't understand. It's research. It's research. I swear. Yeah, exactly. Exactly. There is a part of the challenge here that there is so much kind of mystery in it. And like you mentioned in the piece that you wrote that even what airport you land in could change the way that you go through some of this process because of the different ways that different districts of federal courts have ruled about how these searches can work. So it's like, I think my sense is it is in part designed to be complex and hard to understand, which makes it all the more important that like you as the person going through it understand what is in your rights to do.

26:58Yeah, yeah, totally. It's like, I mean, I just like having to read about circuit splits to write this piece. I was like, I'm not a lawyer. I'm not a lawyer. I'm not a lawyer. What's going on? And I was talking to lawyers and lawyers are like, yeah, this is really complicated. It's really complicated. It doesn't make any sense. We have begged the Supreme Court to rule so that there's like a single national binding policy and there isn't one. But at the same time, like, I don't want people to think too much about, like, the circuit splits in the different jurisdictions because ultimately, like, the rulings and the differences are mostly about forensic searches.

27:34The legal question hasn't really been raised for basic searches, which means, like, they can do basic searches basically anywhere. and you know once again if you volunteer your phone if you say no then there's like a whole situation with like legality and everything but if you're like yeah sure here's my phone like maybe don't do that if you don't have to yeah that's a good place to start all right gabby thank you this was great super helpful and to our caller thank you for for calling in i hope this helped thanks gabby thanks so much all right we're gonna take a quick break and then we're gonna come back and talk about streaming.

28:11We'll be right back.

28:16Amazon has everything for everyone on your list. Like your teenage son, who won't give up the peach fuzz currently posing as a mustache on his upper lip. Get him an electric razor. Amazon has early holiday deals on gifts everyone wants, like the latest kitchen gadgets and toys, and some they don't even know they need, like that razor. Grab him a mirror, too, so he can see how pretty he is without that dirt on his lip.

29:05to the other big guys. You heard them. T-Mobile is the best place to get the new iPhone 17 Pro on us with eligible trade-in in any condition. Check them out to see how much you can save versus the other big guys at T-Mobile.com slash switch. Fox Creative. This is advertiser content from Al Nylem.

29:26Living with disease can be draining. Managing new symptoms and medications, scheduling endless appointments and tests, losing the flexibility and independence you're used to. The drip, drip, drip of disease takes its toll. On a genetic level, disease is like a leaky tap. Our genes instruct our cells to produce proteins that the body needs to function. But sometimes genes instruct cells to produce unwanted proteins, or too much of a protein, which can cause or contribute to disease. Most conventional medicines treat disease by targeting the symptoms, like mopping up the puddle rather than tightening the leaky tap.

30:07But an innovative class of medicines pioneered by alnylam pharmaceuticals targets disease at the source. With RNA interference, we can disrupt the production of unwanted proteins to silence the drip, drip, drip of disease. This innovative approach to treating disease is already helping thousands of people around the world live amplified lives. And it's just the beginning. Learn more about RNAi therapeutics and alnylam science at silencedisease.com. Alnylam. Silence disease. Amplify life.

30:52Welcome back. So I think I've mentioned this before, but one of my favorite podcasts is called The Town. and it's hosted by this guy named Matt Bellany, who is also a writer at Puck. He was the editor of The Hollywood Reporter for a long time. He is like a guy who knows everybody in the entertainment business. And that's mostly what he podcasts about. And he has talked a lot recently about Apple TV in particular, but also kind of all of the big tech streamers. And I've been listening to him talk about this for a while, wondering why on earth would a big tech company want to get into streaming in the first place?

31:25Hollywood is a messy business. Everybody's up. Everybody's down. It's super complicated. It's all about relationships. It's like the exact opposite of what these ruthlessly efficient tech companies want to do. So I called up Matt and just basically said, this is what I want to know. Can you come on the show and answer it for me? Why on earth is big tech doing streaming? And he agreed. And here it is. Matt Bellany, welcome to The Verge Cast. Thanks for having me. Thanks for being here. This is very exciting for me. You see a lot of the same like streaming wars stuff that I see and that we talk about on this show all the time.

31:58But you see it from a very different perspective. Like I'm a guy who grew up like reviewing smartphones and you're a guy who grew up in Hollywood. And I think it's like we're sort of running at each other in the tech industry right now. And that's that's what I want to talk about. I was the last guy with a BlackBerry. Yeah. I feel like everyone in L.A. was the last guy with a BlackBerry. They were very popular here. I don't know why. Maybe that we were just kind of afraid of losing the keyboard. Yeah, there was something to the like everybody in LA wrote really long emails way after it was cool to write long emails is a theory I've developed.

32:30So I think I think I want to start with Apple because I have I have like a big picture question I want to talk about. But I think the easiest way to talk about it is probably by talking about Apple TV, which is on a run of like, pretty good hits. Severance was huge. Everybody's excited about Severance. The studio seems to be very good. You're in it. So you're hopelessly compromised. I am. Yes. I'm not going to trash my own show. The three scenes I'm in. The good news is it seems to be very good. So I think you're safe on that front. And yet there's been some reporting that Apple is losing up to a billion dollars a year on this whole project.

33:07So I guess maybe the easiest place to start is why is this not working for Apple as a business? Well, do we know that it's not working? just because they're losing money doesn't mean that the entire endeavor is not working. It's just not working on traditional metrics where you have a P &L and you get into a business to make money in that business. Apple seems from the very beginning to approach Hollywood from two perspectives. One, this would be a brand halo. This would be something nice that they could do that would give them something cool to talk about, and they would work with the kinds of stars that they, as Apple, consider themselves worthy of working with.

33:49And they would put out some shows and have a service that would be additive to their services business, which they seem to care very much about these days, and would give them something cool to put in commercials and to talk about in tweets and on earnings calls. That was one reason. The second was to essentially provide a bundling opportunity with their other services. If they could keep you longer in the Apple ecosystem because they had Apple One and they had news and games and television shows that you've heard of, that that would be additive to their other businesses. So I think when we talk about the failure in Hollywood, there's legitimate things they're not doing that they should be doing in my opinion, but I don't know that we can say that they're not getting out of this what they wanted to get out of it.

34:46That's fair. I mean, and I think the question of does it matter if Apple TV Plus makes any money seems like it has been sitting there for Apple since it started this project. And I feel like I'm curious how you see the brand Halo piece of all of this, because to me, it's like I remember back when they first launched this thing. And do you remember they had that event that they just like paraded a bunch of A-list celebrities out on stage. Oh, yeah. It was the cattle call. Right. And so it's like, is this entire endeavor worth it just for that? Like, is that what Apple needs to get out of it? And it can just sell a bunch of iPhones and who cares about the money?

35:21Like, is the brand Halo real enough that it's actually worth it for this company? Well, you'd have to ask them. But I think from my perspective, it was meaningful for them to get all of these celebrities up to Cupertino. Remember the famous Oprah line? Like they're in a billion pockets, y 'all. Like that was her reason for getting into business with Apple. And if you look at the choices they are making on the content side, one after another, it is huge stars. If you, I mean, it's a joke around town. Like if you've got a big star filled package and you're selling it around town, Apple will bite.

35:59Like they just want to be in business with big movie stars and big TV stars. and the criticism of them is that they don't ultimately often enough follow through on the promise of those stars there's lots of projects that are kind of littering apple tv plus that have big names in them but don't ultimately turn into great shows there are examples of course of shows that do turn into great shows with big stars but the the the evidence we have for whether they're getting out of this what they want is that they continue to sign up big stars and when it works there, you know, Eddie Q can go to South by Southwest and have an hour long conversation with Ben Stiller and he doesn't have to talk about all the other problems that are circling Apple.

36:44Is that something we see across Hollywood, this idea that like it's worth the cost to be able to sit next to Ben Stiller for an hour? Like, is this is this sort of a long playbook run by companies in Hollywood? People in Hollywood don't care. They just want them to keep doing it. The biggest nightmare would be if Apple suddenly decided one day to get out. and this is not worth it to them. So people in town are terrified that Eddie Q is going to wake up one morning and be like, wait, why do I have that meeting in LA on my schedule? Let's just not do that anymore. That is the fear because then it would suck a few billion dollars out of the professionally produced content industry and Apple's a big buyer of that kind of content.

37:26And does the average Apple customer think more highly about Apple because they have a Jon Hamm show or they produce the studio? Like, I don't know the answer to that. I mean, that's a Harvard Business School study waiting to happen. It probably doesn't hurt. And it's a rounding error for them to be in this business. And it does let Tim Cook go to the Oscars and talk about it on the earnings call and tweet about how much he loves Ted Lasso. So is that worth it for them? Maybe. Yeah, people will pay a lot of money to have famous friends is a lesson I have learned over and over in covering this business.

38:08Especially when you already have a lot of money. Right, yeah, you already have the money, get the famous friends. Yeah, exactly. Like when you got everything in the world, what don't you have? Exclusivity. And famous friends are exclusive. And to be able to say that we are producing a Martin Scorsese movie with Leonardo DiCaprio. Not everyone can say that. So you've kind of run at the big picture question I wanted to ask you, which is basically, why do these big tech companies want into Hollywood in the first place? And I think the way I think about it, like it's a risky business at best and a terrible business at worst.

38:45These companies don't necessarily seem to have any particular aptitude for it. And yet it seems like every tech company that hits a certain kind of status is like, okay, our next big project is we're going to go just headlong into the streaming wars in some way. Well, I think it's specific to the companies. If you look at what Amazon is doing, for instance, I actually do think that it makes sense for Amazon to get into this business because look at what Amazon is. It is a massive retailer. And television is a massive retail product. If they can be the next generation gatekeeper of all television, that is a good business for them to be in.

39:26And by the way, it would also help keep people in the Prime ecosystem and sell them more toilet paper. So Amazon, I think, is the poster child for what a tech company can get out of Hollywood if they do it right. And I think the jury's still out on whether they are doing it right or whether they can turn this into a massive business, they think at Amazon, they think that Prime Video is going to be profitable in the next year or two. And if that's the case, then good for them. They spend a lot of money and they are making headway there. And in some ways, they have a leg up on Apple because what did Apple do this past year?

40:04They put Apple TV Plus in the Amazon Prime channels business. They essentially bowed down to Amazon and said, okay, we need you to sell our product. We, Apple, the biggest company in the world need Amazon to get people to subscribe to Apple TV Plus, and it's working. They are getting a lot of subscribers through the Amazon Channels program, as are all the other services, and that is the endgame. Just like Amazon wants to sell you four different varieties of recliner, they also want to sell you four different varieties of programming. But is it definite? Are we sure that you then need your own massive slate of content and you need to spend eight and a half billion dollars on MGM in order to do that?

40:51Like, I actually get the retail side of that for Amazon in particular. That makes a lot of sense. But do you need your own Hollywood universe in order to be that company? It's a differentiator for sure. I mean, there's a lot of these companies out there like Roku and DirecTV that don't produce their own shows on that scale. And Amazon believes that if it owns enough of this stuff and can use it as a lure to bring people into the ecosystem, then that is a differentiator. And I think I agree there. I think that the fact that they have original programming that people do watch. I mean, these shows like Reacher and Cross and, you know, the kind of guy with a gun shows, people are watching that stuff on Amazon.

41:35Obviously, now they have Thursday Night Football, which has been a big deal for them. And it costs nothing but money, which is what they have. And they are in business with the NFL, which is the most premium video product there is. So I do think it's a differentiator and it sets them apart from some of these just platforms. The programming does matter. Maybe not on that scale, and maybe they won't do it forever, but I think it does matter. I'm particularly curious, when companies like that come into Hollywood and they're like, we are going to invest in streaming in some meaningful way, we're going to start making content, they all have essentially unlimited amounts of money.

42:13What happens in Hollywood when one of those companies shows up? Is it just like, oh, thank God, another money fountain that they're just going to have to come buy our stuff and everybody's psyched about it? Well, yes, I think that's certainly part of it. But then it becomes what do they actually want? And what are they actually going to do for my creators? And that's the representative community when they're looking at this. And I remember when YouTube started doing professionally produced shows. It wasn't just whether Google had the money to make them. Obviously, everybody knows they do. It was, okay, how is this going to be produced?

42:51Are you are you? doing this via the unions. You know, that's a big thing. Netflix, the first thing they did when they got into original programming was we are going to play by the rules and we're going to do union contracts with all of the different unions. We're going to pay people differently. They're going to give you more money than your quote up front, but they're not going to pay back ends. And that was a big shift for the industry and everybody went along with it because they were making more money up front. And when YouTube started doing this, it was how is this going to be displayed? Is my show going to be a pop-up video next to a cat falling downstairs?

43:25Or is this going to be presented in a premium elevated app format where you go to a separate area and then the premium shows play? And I think those are all the questions that people get asked. Still to this day, people complain about the Amazon interface and it's hard to find stuff and it looks like a retail store. And that's a factor. The Apple interface is super elegant and looks like an Apple product. And people like that. And their shows look like they're expensive. And they are, how are you going to market this? That's the other thing, is that Netflix doesn't do very much marketing. They have an algorithm that does most of the marketing for them.

44:05So outside of the awards context, you're not going to get much marketing for Netflix. And Apple and Amazon have said, okay, we will actually market your shows. And I think it depends on who you are as to whether you actually get that. But those are all the things that you look at when the tech companies come to town. And is that kind of the list that any new entrant in this space would have to come up with? Like if you're any studio or distributor, are you having to answer those same questions? Like, is there anything different when it's these tech companies that are trying to do this? The thing that's different, I think, is the question of presentation.

44:45Because in the old format, you kind of knew what a movie was. You knew what a show was. You knew if you sold it to NBC, it was going to get a certain kind of treatment. You could argue over the marketing and you could argue over the time slot and all that stuff. And in movies, you argue over the release commitment, whether you're getting a wide release, whether you're getting a platform release, the marketing spend associated with it. On these platforms, there's a fear of just being churned up by the algorithm and not being presented in a way that your art is should be presented and when i talk to representatives they really try to think about that in some places like netflix say you got it you know you got to trust us this is what we do we will find the right audience for your show um others you could have a little bit more of a conversation.

45:34What's the marketing going to be on this? What am I going to get for a theatrical release for my movie? And, you know, the F1 movie that Apple is releasing this summer, they guaranteed at least a 45-day window in theaters. We'll see how long it ultimately ends up getting beyond that. But that was a big reason why that F1 movie went to Apple and not to Netflix or one of the others, because they got a guaranteed theatrical release. So those are, So there's some of the considerations. There's an interesting disconnect sort of inherent in all that that you've written about a bunch over the years. And like you always use the word content as sort of a shorthand for the difference in how these people talk about it, which I really like.

46:17The C word. Yeah, we talk about it all the time, too. It's right. It's like what is what is art and what is content? Yeah. And that was the big problem at Amazon is the head of the studio referred to a James Bond movie as content. And the producer of the James Bond movie did not like that. Yeah, so that's actually the exact example I was about to ask you about. Like, I think the whole saga with Bond and the broccolis and the great quote where, you know, she hates everybody at Amazon, still not perfect relations everywhere. But I remember years ago, there was this feeling that like the tech people don't get us Hollywood people and the tech people were like, shut up, we have all the money.

46:54And has that gotten better over time? Like, have these groups of people figured each other out a little more? Well, the interesting thing is that slowly but surely these tech companies have been populated by traditional studio people. If you look at the people that are running the content operations at Apple, Amazon and Netflix, they're all traditional Hollywood people. Bella Bajaria ran the content group at NBC and now she's the chief content officer at Netflix. Jen Salke, who just ended up leaving, but she was also an NBC executive before she went to Amazon. And over at Apple, the top content executives ran Sony Pictures Television, and they were big producers.

47:34So, you know, and on the movie side, they popular. So slowly but surely, at least in the Hollywood groups, I'm not talking about the people who work in Los Gatos for Netflix, but the Hollywood people are Hollywood people. So there's a level of comfort that the representation and talent community has with those people because they're one of their own. Now, often that will butt up against the instincts of the tech companies. And that's when you see conflicts. And it comes to a head all the time at Netflix where they absolutely do not want to put movies in theaters. And obviously the artists all want their movies in theaters.

48:12And they lose projects right and left over that. And they want traditional marketing. Netflix doesn't do that because they have the algorithm. And there's an interface where, you know, the creatives would love for the credits of their shows and movies to play after they air. But the Netflix model is to push, push, push to the next piece of content. So it starts autoplaying before you even see any credits. Like, that's what you have to live with if you're working with those services. But I guess in the words of Don Draper, that's what the money's for. Yeah, I always get a kick out of whenever you're watching something with a post-credits scene, you have to like work really hard to go find it because Netflix is desperate to just get you off the credits and onto something else.

48:53And I'm like, no, no, I'd actually like to watch this Netflix. It's annoying. I know. And like makes me feel 100 years old, but it's like, why? Why are we already on the next show? And I get it. Like, you know, it used to be that those would count as views. When the autoplay started a new episode of a show, all it would take is like 30 seconds or a minute and Netflix would count it as a view. They don't do that anymore. But yeah, it was kind of a fraud. Yeah, agreed. So I feel like there's that kind of Hollywood people inside of these companies who then have to go like sit in conference rooms with the business people and the tech people and the product people.

49:28That tension, at least from where I sit, still seems sort of alive and well. And I feel like this is a thing that we hear about and cover all the time. It's like if you're, you know, you're Andy Jassy or the CEO of Amazon and you look around and you're like, OK, times are tough. Tariffs are coming. Things are complicated. where can we pull back? And you look over at this thing where you're like, well, we just spent hundreds of millions of dollars on Citadel, this show that no one watched and was awful. That's a lot easier to cut than a bunch of like AWS engineers. And so I wonder, like it does seem like there's been a little bit of a cultural shift towards sort of understanding how that world works and what the investments look like and caring about, you know, the art.

50:09And those people seem to be more powerful inside of those companies than they once were. But I do still feel like if you're if you're an executive at Amazon or Google or Apple or any of these companies, I don't feel like the Hollywood people are winning yet. That's probably true. The ultimate deciders still are in the headquarters and they're not in the L.A. operations. And I think that that is, you know, they are they operate on the whim of these these overlords that determine budgets. And there have been a couple come to Jesus moments, especially at Apple, where they have said, listen, you know, we we put these movies in theaters and they flop and they give us bad headlines.

50:51People write about people write the words Apple and the word flop in the same headline settings. Like, that's not what we want. We're Apple. We don't have flops. so although I guess lately they do but yeah more so recently yeah they you know so they're like why are we doing this so when they had this movie Wolves last summer Clooney and Pitt and they didn't think it was great they just said we're not doing that well you know we're gonna put it just on the service and there's a real question as to whether Apple's gonna put more movies in theaters I think F1 this summer is a big test because they don't like the bad headlines if they're not doing this for money essentially they're doing this for brand halo and for services then why endure bad headlines if you don't have to?

51:32I feel like streaming hits are like the new cult classics where you say that movie was a huge failure and everybody's like, well, no, everybody saw it later. They really liked it. It's like, sure. Well, that's been true forever. I remember being in meetings with the HBO people in the 2000s where they would talk about how all the press attention is on their original series. But when you look at the bread and butter of who was watching HBO, it was people watching those movies that they didn't see in theaters, but had their first run on premium cable on HBO. And one of the biggest movies for HBO of all time was the flop Battleship.

52:09Remember that movie? Oh, yeah, I do. Huge flop in theaters. But it had a lot of stars. They had Rihanna. Remember that? It had all these hot stars in it. And there is a train wreck element when you're watching on television that works. The thinking in streaming is that the originals bring people in and the licensed content keeps them. Because you come in for the sexy title. If it's Max, you're coming in for the HBO original series. And then you stay for the Warner Brothers library of movies and all the other stuff that's on Max. The knock on Apple is that for reasons beyond me, they have not invested in a library.

52:52They could license a ton of movies. They could license kid stuff. They could license shows from other networks. They don't do that. It's really just a repository for their originals with some other stuff that they put in there. And as a result, the engagement numbers, the time spent on the platform are tiny. Nielsen releases a gauge metric once a month where it tells you the percentage of time for each service on connected TVs. And obviously, YouTube and Netflix are the top draws. us, but Apple doesn't even rate. Apple's not even on the top 10 list because the engagement numbers are so low because people are coming in for those five shows that they've heard of and that's it.

53:40They're not staying for anything else. So as we look ahead, we're obviously it's a weird moment in the world and economy right now, but I feel like we've been for years. everybody has been asking like okay at what point are some of these companies going to decide to just go all in on this apple's gonna buy disney or netflix somebody's gonna go amazon's gonna go spend all the money in the known universe and just eat the nfl entirely like someone is going to fully like a hundred percent this strategy and yet it hasn't happened yet uh why why do you think not why haven't we seen the like full push into the middle of the table from one of these companies I think there's a couple of reasons.

54:23First, the antitrust concerns and the Biden administration was so openly hostile to M &A activity that I think there was a real sense that any effort on the tech company's part to buy a studio or pull off another MGM or Fox Disney would be met with pretty swift resistance. And now under Trump, we're seeing a different kind of chaos where the market is so volatile that you're afraid to do anything in this kind of environment. So that's one reason. Secondly, like other than the Beats acquisition, we have not seen Apple do anything in the M &A space in this arena. and all these people out there saying, well, oh, it's only a matter of time before they buy Disney.

55:07Really? Are we sure about that? Apple wants to be in the churro business and the turkey leg business in countries around the world and have to deal with a kid getting eaten by an alligator at Disney World and things like that. That's what they want to be in? I just don't see that. I could see them picking off something like Warner Brothers, which would give them HBO, which is what they wanted to buy a decade ago and Time Warner wouldn't sell it to them. That's right. I forgot about that. And I think that that makes a little bit more sense. But again, that would come along with all of these dying television networks.

55:44And does Apple want to be in the business of managing the decline of television? I mean, they could try to sell that stuff off, but that's a real challenge there. So there's all of these different M &A scenarios from the tech companies. They raise both regulatory and logistical problems. And I think that's why we haven't seen them so far. Doesn't mean they won't happen. I'm just saying that's why. Last thing, and then I'm gonna let you go. F1, you mentioned this earlier, strikes me as kind of a big moment for Apple TV Plus specifically, but also this whole sort of big tech streaming thing. This is certainly the biggest, most expensive swing I can think of from one of these sort of big tech companies trying to make this happen.

56:30It's doing the theatrical thing. We've been seeing ads about it for like forever. Brad Pitt was like at F1 race. This is like, this feels like a moment to me. Does it feel like a moment to you? Like, are you watching this carefully? Certainly for Apple. It's definitely the biggest thing they've done. And they partnered with Warner Brothers for the release. Apple doesn't release their own movies and theaters. They partner with the traditional studios for that. And I think it's a big moment for them because it's kind of a make or break, I think. If this is a total flop and they put all this effort and money into a movie for theaters that didn't really make a dent, I think they really question what they are doing in the theatrical space.

57:09And that has repercussions all the way down the line. Having said that, Eddie Q was at the CinemaCon movie theater convention last week and he was doing meetings with the traditional theaters and he was at least saying, we care about theaters and we're going to do some movies in theaters. So maybe they're committed to this, but I think if F1 flops, they're going to really question it. I don't think it will. I think the movie looks good enough and I think that there will be an audience globally for this movie. So it may not be a billion dollar grocer, but I think it will do enough for them to feel like it was a success and that it's worth doing for the right movie in the future.

57:48All right, Matt, thank you so much. This was really fun. Appreciate you doing this. Yeah, no problem. All right. We're going to take one more break, and then we're going to come back and take a question from the VertiCast hotline. We'll be right back.

58:23Join us as leaders from Stripe, Zipline, Palo Alto Networks, Klarna, Supercell, and more. Share what it's actually like to navigate the make or break decisions. Crucible Moments is back on October 23rd. Until then, catch up on seasons one and two wherever you find your podcasts.

58:46Avoiding your unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start? Thumbtack knows homes, so you don't have to. Don't know the difference between matte paint finish and satin? Or what that clunking sound from your dryer is? With Thumbtack, you don't have to be a home pro. You just have to hire one. You can hire top-rated pros, see price estimates, and read reviews all on the app. Download today. Morning, Zoe. Jeff Bridges. Why are you still living above our garage? I want to be in a T-Mobile commercial like you. Teach me, Sildana. I couldn't possibly. At T-Mobile, get the new iPhone 17 Pro on them.

59:22It's designed to be the most powerful iPhone yet and has the ultimate pro camera system. Impressive. Let me try. At T-Mobile, you can save up to 20 % versus the other big guys. You heard them. T-Mobile is the best place to get the new iPhone 17 Pro on us with eligible trade-in in any condition. Check them out to see how much you can save versus the other big guys at T-Mobile.com slash switch.

59:46All right, we're back. Let's get to the VergeCast hotline. As always, the number is 866-VERGE-11. The email is vergecast at theverge.com. Call us, email us, text us. I don't know if you can text us, but try and text us actually. And if it doesn't work, let me know because I think that's a thing I can do. I might just have to go and turn it on. Anyway, we try to answer at least one question on the show every week. And I think, by the way, we're gonna do like a full hotline episode here in the pretty near future. So if you have questions you want us to answer, get them in. We got a lot of fun stuff coming up.

1:00:16This week, we have a question about Google. hello my name is nick i'm a long-time listener of the vergecast i have a couple thoughts after your last episode i wanted to ask about the google pixel it seems like the pixel has gone from being a what is this phone book to even do in the future to a this is what i recommend to my friends and family can you walk us through how that happened thanks i really like this question because one of the reviews that I am frankly most proud of in retrospect, but was very skeptical of my own thoughts at the time, were when I was at Wired and the very first Pixel came out, I said it was the best phone on the planet, period.

1:00:58Like not just best Android phone, best phone, because what we had been wanting was a phone that ran Android that didn't come with all the limitations of iOS and the iPhone and all of the closed wall garden-ness of it, but was simple and easy to use and just worked. And you didn't have to spend all your time like tweaking settings and installing launchers and thinking about it. Something that just did all the things your phone was supposed to do. And the very first Pixel was very close to that. It wasn't perfect, but it was very close to that. And I think to me, the most fascinating thing about the Pixel line ever since then has been this weird roller coaster of progress that it has made.

1:01:38I think Google has over the years gotten better at design. I think you can quibble with that a little bit, but the sort of cyclopsy thing that happens on the pixels now, I think looks nice. The cameras have consistently been very good. And yet every time you turn around, there is some weird thing going on with the pixels. This is what I mean by the roller coaster. It's sort of two steps forward and one step back with every one of these hardware iterations. There have been these mysterious hardware issues with a lot of them. My wife actually had one of these with a Pixel 7, I believe it was, where her screen just went green, like matrixy green, all of a sudden out of nowhere.

1:02:15And I looked it up online and tons of people were like, yeah, this happens. Google says it happens. They'll replace it. This is the kind of thing that is hard to engender real confidence. And Google has had pretty rough customer support over the years. its interest in the Pixel lineup has kind of waxed and waned. It has had some issues with the Tensor processors. There was one of the Pixels where the fingerprint reader didn't work very well. Some of the phones have been really sort of big and clunky. Google has just never quite put all the pieces together. But the thing it had going for it all this time is that it was the simple one, right?

1:02:49I think Samsung for most of its life in the Android world has been the default Android choice. And with good reason, right? Samsung makes really good phones. It has really good, interesting hardware. It has great cameras. It caught up a long time ago in a lot of those things and consistently does a very good job. But a Samsung phone is sort of by definition a power user thing. And Samsung has still not done enough to pull back the operating system to make it so that you can just get a phone and have it and use it. And it can just be your phone. I don't think most people want to do work on their phones, right?

1:03:24And so I think for me and for Allison Johnson on our team and for a lot of our reviewers, the thing that we keep landing on is that simplicity is really important, right? And when I say like a Pixel 9a is a perfect phone for my parents, I mean that literally, right? Like I think there are lots of people who want to do stuff on their phone and they like mucking around in settings. And I actually think Samsung deserves enormous credit for how much it lets you do on the phone. Samsung is just like a tinkerer's paradise of an Android device and should get real credit for that. But not everybody wants that.

1:03:59I think most people don't want that. And I think, frankly, the reason Google started making Pixels in the first place is that it understood that most people don't want that. Most people want a phone that they turn on that works. And that is not a thing you get from most Android manufacturers. And so Google set out to say, OK, we think Android is really great. We think everybody is kind of bastardizing Android in the name of being interesting and customizable and trying new things and adding their own apps on top of our existing apps. And it was just too much. And so Google came in and said, OK, we're going to pair all of that all the way back.

1:04:30And we are going to give you the basic, simple, straightforward, pure version of Android. And I think that was the right idea. And Android, you know, has also had its ups and downs. Android has had some weird ideas about like where apps go and how widgets work and all different kinds of settings ideas. But I think at this point, Android has landed in a really stable, really mature, really solid place. And so has the Pixel. I say this with real trepidation because, frankly, at any moment, Google could just decide it doesn't care about this stuff anymore. And it has made grand promises about supporting these things for a long time that it has walked back in the past.

1:05:11Right now, it promises seven years of security updates for its devices. That's a big deal and a big win. Am I confident that Google is going to want to make smartphones in seven years? No. But if Google does want to make smartphones in seven years, I think that's great. And so at the least, I think we've landed on a place where you have two really great Android options. And that's a victory. You have Samsung, which is like the power user lineup. It lets you do the most. It is the most capable. It is the most phone, like in every imaginable way. And on the other hand, you have the Pixel, which is simple and straightforward.

1:05:47It is like the set it and forget it smartphone. And I think that's also very powerful. And I think different phones will work for different people. I think, frankly, I'm an iPhone user. I have been for a while. I'm terrified of leaving iMessage, just to be completely honest. But that dichotomy, I think, is great. And I think the fact that the Apple lineup doesn't have that, where you get to choose between the one that just sort of works and you don't really have to think about and it's simple and clean and nice versus the one that will just let me go in and muck around and have some fun. I love that about Android.

1:06:20I hate that about iOS. But anyway, so that's where I've landed with the Pixel. I think the Pixel and really sort of solidifying with the 9 lineup last year and the 9A this year has landed at a point where like, I trust these phones, right? They're good. They don't have obviously huge glaring flaws. I don't have to tell you about the thing to watch out for. It's just a good phone. And it is a good phone that I'm not going to have to spend hours teaching you how to use and that you're not going to have to spend hours figuring out how to use. And that's a victory. And we need more of that in the tech industry.

1:06:51I say all this and, you know, give it three days and Google will cancel the next Pixel and everything will be set. But until then, I'm going to keep recommending the Pixel to a lot of people because I continue to think it might just be the best phone out there. All right, that is it for the Vergecast today. Thank you to everybody who came on the show. And thank you, as always, for listening. Thank you, by the way, to everybody who voted for us in the Webby Awards. We're going to know on, oh, today, Tuesday, the 22nd, whether we won or not. We will tell you on Friday. We're either going to, you know, happy celebrate or sadly yell at Brendan Carr one way or another.

1:07:26That's going to be the Vergecast. As always, if you have thoughts, questions, feelings, or other Android phones you want to sell me, You can always email VergeCast at TheVerge.com or call the hotline 866-VERGE-11. Like I said, we're going to do a full hotline episode here in the very near future. So get your questions in as soon as you can. We love hearing from you and they have set us up on some truly wild reporting adventures. So thank you for that. This podcast is produced by Eric Gomez, Wilpour, Brandon Kiefer. VergeCast is Verge production and part of the Vox Media Podcast Network. Neal and I will be back on Friday with Brendan Carr, OpenAI.

1:08:02more signal shenanigans in the government and lots more we'll see you then rock and roll

1:08:19here we have the limo emu in its natural habitat helping people customize their car insurance and save hundreds with Liberty Mutual. Fascinating. It's accompanied by his natural ally, Doug. Uh, Lemu? Is that guy with the binoculars watching us? Cut the camera. They see us. Only pay for what you need at libertymutual.com. Liberty, Liberty, Liberty, Liberty. Savings vary. Underwritten by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and affiliates excludes Massachusetts. Rinse takes your laundry and hand delivers it to your door. Expertly cleaned and folded. So you could take the time once spent folding and sorting and waiting to finally pursue a whole new version of you.

1:08:57Like tea time you. Mmm. Or this tea time you. Or even this tea time you. So did you hear about Dave? Or even tea time, tea time, tea time you. Mmm. So update on Dave. It's up to you. We'll take the laundry. Rinse. It's time to be great.

From the publisher

If you’re heading on vacation this summer, you’re going to want to listen to this. The Verge’s Gaby del Valle joins the show to explain how worried you need to be about your digital data when you cross borders, and what you can do to protect yourself. Even if you don’t think you have anything to hide, a little precaution goes a long way. After that, Puck’s Matt Belloni joins the show to explain why Apple, Amazon, Google, and other tech companies continue to pour money into the streaming business, when it seems so far removed from what those companies do well. (Spoiler alert: it’s fun to be friends with Ben Stiller.) Finally, we answer a hotline question about the Google Pixel’s ascent to “best Android phone for people who just want a phone.”

Oh, also: thanks to everyone who voted for us in the Webby Awards! We’ll know soon whether we won, but however it shakes out, we’re so grateful to everyone who voted for us.

Ask about this episode

In short

Transcript

More from The Vergecast