In short
Podcast Summary: The Vergecast - "It's not your job to fix the internet"
Episode Overview In this episode of The Vergecast, hosts Nilay Patel and David Pierce explore the concept of "enshittification," a term coined by author and activist Cory Doctorow. The discussion centers around how the internet has degraded over time and what can be done to improve it. Cory's new book, *Enshittification: Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It*, serves as a foundation for the conversation.
Key Concepts and Terms
- Enshittification: A term describing the process in which technological platforms become worse over time for users as they prioritize profit and shareholder value over user experience.
- Three Stages of Enshittification:
- Stage One: A platform provides good services to its end users while locking them in.
- Stage Two: The platform starts degrading services for users to benefit business customers, often at the expense of user satisfaction.
- Stage Three: The platform extracts maximum value from both users and business customers until little value is left for users.
Episode Highlights
- Cory Doctorow's Background: David introduces Cory as an experienced tech activist, who has spent decades analyzing internet policies and their impact on users.
- Discussion on Consumer Responsibility: The conversation raises questions about individual responsibility in combating enshittification. Cory argues that expecting consumers to shop their way out of monopolies is unrealistic.
- Collective Action vs. Individual Choices: Cory emphasizes the need for political change rather than individual consumer choices, suggesting that organizing around collective issues is necessary for systemic change.
- Alternatives to Major Platforms: The hosts discuss how platforms like Mastodon and Blue Sky offer alternatives to mainstream options like Twitter, but acknowledge the challenges of shifting user bases and the need for easier transition mechanisms.
- Role of Policy: Cory argues for strong policy changes that empower users, such as making it easier to switch platforms without losing connections and data.
- Future of the Internet: They explore the idea of a decentralized internet where users can choose from a variety of services without being locked into a single dominant platform.
Key Takeaways
- Need for Structural Change: To combat enshittification, there must be a focus on policy changes that dismantle monopolies, rather than relying solely on consumer behavior.
- Encouraging Innovation: Cory believes that opening up platforms and allowing for interoperability can lead to the creation of better alternatives, disrupting harmful practices of existing monopolies.
- The Importance of Community: The community aspect is crucial when considering the transition to new platforms. Users often remain on platforms like Facebook due to their social networks, despite dissatisfaction with the service.
Audience Engagement
- Listener Feedback: The episode encourages listeners to engage with the topic, share their thoughts, and discuss their experiences related to enshittification and internet platforms.
- Call to Action: The hosts invite listeners to contact them with questions or insights about their internet experiences or opinions on the discussed topics.
Conclusion This episode offers a deep dive into the challenges facing the modern internet, highlighting the term "enshittification" as a lens through which to understand the degradation of user experience on major platforms. With insights from Cory Doctorow, the conversation emphasizes the importance of collective action, policy reform, and the potential for a better, more equitable internet.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01Welcome to the Vergecast, the flagship podcast of transferring all value to your business customers. I'm your friend David Pierce, and I am sitting here in my almost entirely empty basement. Right behind me is where my desk used to be, but it's all gone. This is all good news. We're moving this weekend. It's all very exciting. But I made the very stupid mistake of taking all of my audio equipment, all of my lights, my computer, my desk chair, everything out of this room before I recorded this. So now I sit on the floor and I talk into my MacBook Air, which is currently sitting on a couch cushion.
0:34This is the life that I lead. Thank you, by the way, Apple, for making the MacBook Air microphones pretty good now. So hopefully this will sound okay. And by the way, if you're like, oh gosh, David, not only does the MacBook Air microphone sound pretty good, it makes your voice sound like deeper and more powerful than normal. Alas, no, I just have a cold, but I'll be over that soon. Anyway, we're not here to talk about any of that. We're here for a conversation that I had a couple of weeks ago with Cory Doctorow. Cory is one of those people who has been writing about and thinking about the internet like for decades.
1:04He was at Boing Boing where I read him for a long time. He's done a lot of work at the EFF about internet policy and that kind of thing. And a couple of years ago, he coined a term called inshittification, which describes basically the way that technology companies and the products that they make have systematically gotten worse. He also wrote a book called In Shitification. It's out now. It's fabulous. You should read it. And we're going to talk to him. We did this interview and I was like, I don't know what we're going to make of this. And I enjoyed talking to him so much about what happened and what we do about it that I just figure we're just going to run it.
1:38I think you'll like it too. All that is coming up in just a sec. This is The Verge Cast. We'll be right back. Support for the show comes from Charles Schwab. At Schwab, how you invest is your choice, not theirs. That's why when it comes to managing your wealth, Schwab gives you more choices. You can invest and trade on your own. Plus, get advice and more comprehensive wealth solutions to help meet your unique needs. With award-winning service, low costs, and transparent advice, you can manage your wealth your way at Schwab. Visit schwab.com to learn more.
2:16How do more than 100 million Fortnite players join the battle without lag? AWS is how Epic Games scales up to keep them in the action. AWS powers next-level innovation for millions of businesses. Avoiding your unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start? Thumbtack knows homes, so you don't have to. Don't know the difference between matte paint finish and satin? Or what that clunking sound from your dryer is? With Thumbtack, you don't have to be a home pro. You just have to hire one. You can hire top-rated pros, see price estimates, and read reviews all on the app. Download today.
3:17that a lot of people like, it starts to shift value away from users and towards business clients, right? So if you're Google, instead of having a great search engine that gives people exactly what they want, you start to turn knobs that make your advertisers more money. And then the third step is that you eventually take all of that value for yourself. So if you're Amazon, instead of being good to your buyers or good to your sellers, ideally you'd do both, right? But the theory is you do one and then the other, you're just good to yourself. And you find ways to squeeze both sides of the equation, all to deliver value to yourself.
3:53Corey was just on Decoder or other podcasts a couple of weeks ago describing how all of this works, how we got here and why this all happened. It's a fabulous interview and you should go listen to it. I think you can listen to it after you listen to this. So it's not like you have to pause and go listen to that, but it's a really good companion to the conversation we're about to have because I wanted to talk about something different with Corey, which is essentially what do we do now? Corey's book is full of policy recommendations and ideas about the future and ways that things can get better.
4:20But there's not a lot in the book that is like pointing you in the face and being like, here is what you should do. And I wanted to know if there's anything that I can do and you can do to change this and make sure it doesn't happen again and to see how we can build a better internet together, if that's even possible. So that's most of what Corey and I talked about. I really enjoyed this conversation and I think you will too. Let's do it. Corey Doctro, welcome back to The Vergecast. It's been a minute. Thank you very much, David Pierce. It has been a minute. I'm glad to be back. Last time you were here, we yelled about printers together.
4:52We got a lot of feedback about that episode. And now I feel like we get to take that thing and sort of blow it up to the size of the universe. And I'm very excited about it. Excellent. Me too. So I want to spend very little time talking about like the premise of in shitification in part because you were just on decoder or other podcasts uh that i generally refuse to talk about and you did a very good job sort of running through i think how it works and i want to i want to build on that more than anything but i just want to do sort of two minutes of level setting here sure uh and the first is talk to me about the word in shitification i haven't seen anybody ask you if having this this thing has become a phenomenon.
5:32Was it the right word? Like, I'm sure you didn't imagine it was going to be this thing when you first use the word in shitification. Is it the right word? Is it still the right word? Yeah, I think so. Look, I, first of all, I'm a science fiction writer, so I coined neologisms like ants build hills. Uh, and also I'm a tech activist. I've worked with the Electronic Frontier Foundation. I'm in my 24th year now. So for most of my adult life, I'm 54 years old. And that job is a job of getting people to care about things that are quite abstract and technical until they're not, at which point it's kind of too late.
6:07It's a little like climate change, right? Where like, sure, everyone starts to understand what CO2 means and a greenhouse gas is when there's a wildfire outside their door and a zoonotic plague that's locked them in the house that's on fire. But it would be really nice if we could do something about it before then. And so I've spent like most of my adult life coming up with parables, analogies, funny words, framing devices, whatever. And so I'm quite pleased with the legs that this word has. I'm also quite pleased to see it being used loosely. so there's a cohort of people who are quite adamant in defending my honor by telling other people off if they use inshittification in a non-technical sense and I really wish they'd cut it out I see it the other way where like any bad thing that ever happens to anyone anywhere is now about inshittification oh I'm happy to see that right so my my first two languages were English and Yiddish which are both like you know glorious mongrel languages that happily steal vocabulary from other languages and use them loosely and so on.
7:07So I'm really happy to have my word used very loosely indeed, not only because it gives me a little ego boo, but also like tactically, if 10 million people use the word loosely and 1 million normies look it up, that's a million people I just never would have reached. And then the word itself, I think it's quite fun. You know, in the American Dialect Society made it their word of the year, they had linguists actually like talk about how it decomposes, which, you know, I have to say, like, I, um, I don't have a background in linguistics at all. Uh, and, and barely have a background in grammar. I went to weird alternative schools.
7:43We never got any formal grammar instruction. I learned English by ear the way most native speakers in most languages do. Uh, and it was very interesting to hear them decompose it, break it down. I do think that prefix N implies both something that is underway and something that is maybe intentional. And so I quite like the way that that plays out. And then the one other thing I'll say is that I've had some colleagues say, well, I wish you'd chosen a word that didn't have a swear in it. I was just about to ask if the swear is a feature or a bug. So obviously it's a feature, right? People love to cuss.
8:19And so the word is getting more usage than it would because it makes some people go teehee to say the word fit. But also, like, this friend was like, you know, he's a security expert. He's like, well, I can't use this word in an address to a bunch of NATO generals. And I'm like, well, dude, first of all, I'm pretty sure that NATO generals have heard the word shit. But second of all, if you've got a better word, like, you know, go off, King. Like, like, I have come up with a million words. None of them ever spread the way this one did. So yeah, by all means, do something better and I'll happily use it, right?
8:54Like this is not my, my glory doesn't come from having a word that's on other people's lips. My glory, if it ever comes, will come from having made a difference in the world. That's fair. I buy it. My only note would be it doesn't sort of transpose into other parts of speech very well. Like you use the word in shittificatory a bunch. Oh, I love it. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. And I will say listening to you say it in the audio book is spectacular. You're very good at saying it. but boy is that a hard word to figure out it makes it fun it makes it fun we're in the inshitticine there's inshittificatory impulses being advanced by inshittifiers we need to be disin-shittifying and we need to fight the forces of anti-disin-shittification like it's i never learned latin but this makes me feel like i'm learning those complex verb tenses all right i i love it i mean i'm sold so the you've been on this book tour for a while which means i suspect you have this next part down pat and this is hopefully the only speech i'm going to make you give that is like a rehearsed speech at this point.
9:48But for folks who have not read the book, and everybody should or have seen your stuff on this, walk me through the very quickly the three steps of initiatification just at the sort of basis level. Sure, sure. So the three steps of initiatification, that kind of procession of the illness in a firm, is that first you have a platform that is good to its end users while finding a way to lock those end users in in stage one. In stage two, because the users are locked in, things can be made worse for those users without risking their departure in order to make things good for business customers. Once those business customers are locked in, you go to stage three, which is harvesting the value both from end users and from business customers in order to deliver it to shareholders and executives until there's no value left in the platform, save for that mingy homeopathic residue needed to keep users locked to the platform and business customers locked to the users.
10:38And that's in shitification. And you would say, I think I've seen you say that Facebook is probably your cleanest, perfect example of what that has looked like. Yeah, yeah. Okay. And I think, yeah, I tend to agree. I think you could make a case that it's either Facebook or Amazon, but they both feel, and in a very sort of mainstream, like in my own day-to-day life, we have felt that change. And I think it's really useful. So I want to spend almost all of our time here talking about what we do about it. Because I think the thing that is not in the book that I found most surprising is some like raw, raw speech to me, the reader, about how I should change my life in order to make all of this do better.
11:18And like if only this is just a collective action problem that we can all solve together by quitting Amazon, right? That it's like why the end of the book is just you being like, here's 10 other stores you can go to that are not the same thing. Why is that not the prescription here? Well, I just don't think you solve systemic problems with individual consumption choices, right? Shopping your way out of monopoly is like trying to recycle your way out of the wildfires, right? It's just, it's not going to work. You know, these are like, I think if you, you know, the galaxy brain meme where there's sort of three explanations and the brain gets bigger.
11:51So, you know, the smallest version is, well, consumers are the secret regulators of the world. We vote with our wallets. We get the outcomes we vote for. if you want to go real neoliberal on this, you could talk about revealed preferences, right? You know, if you say you hate it, but you still shop there, then you must love it. Anyone who sells their kidney in order to pay the rent has a revealed preference for one kidney. And, you know, this is like what you get if you're a neoliberal and you have no theory of power, and you just think of things as a bunch of people of equal power bargaining equally among one another with perfect market information.
12:23So that's the tiny brain. The medium brain is, Oh, no, it's these like ketamine addled Zucker Muskie and failures who took over these platforms and are really bad. And sure, like there is like a tech oligarch shaped hole in the policy environment, but it would attract any sufficiently terrible tech executive to fill it. Right. It's not that Elon Musk is a singular genius. It's just that Elon Musk is uniquely suited to fill the Elon Musk shape hole in our environment. And there's plenty of people who are nearly as good. And if like he overdouses on ketamine tonight, there'll be a succession battle among 10 big balls.
12:58And whoever ends up sitting in his chair tomorrow will be indistinguishable from him. So if you really want to think about what's going on here, you have to think about this in shitogenic policy environment, right? That the choices that I hope the book actually really does reveal for readers, the policy decisions that are quite concrete and have a really clear, bright line from making this decision to these firms going sour on us, right? When we say, okay, well, we're going to let you buy your competitors. There's nowhere for your users to go. We make it easier for the platforms to treat us worse.
13:26When we say we're going to change IP law so you can block reverse engineering. So if people still want to use the part of your platform that's good, they can't block the part of your platform that's bad. We invite them to make the part of their platform that's bad worse in order to make themselves richer. So it's frustrating because it would be really nice if you could just like have seven weird tricks or 11 beneficial companies. And like, you know, by all means, if you think Twitter sucks and is bad for your mental health and you'd rather be on, you know, Blue Sky or Mastodon, whatever, like go off.
13:56But like, that's not going to it's not going to fix the problem. It just might make your life a little better, which, you know, not a terrible goal. But, you know, at the same time, this is a thing from Zephyr Teachout's great book, Break Them Up. If there's a big demonstration down at the Amazon warehouse and you miss it because you don't want to buy your markers from Amazon. And so you drive around for two hours looking for an artisanal stationer to buy your markers out to make your protest sign. You miss the protest. Amazon won. Right. So, like, don't worry too much about your consumption choices.
14:24Do what is nice. Like, buy from the people you like, who you want to keep in business. Buy from the shops in your neighborhood if you can. Right. Like, do all of that stuff. But, like, organize yourself around, like, political change. That's the thing you should be devoting your energy to. So, you know, Electronic Frontier Foundation, we have this national network of activist groups, the Electronic Frontier Alliance. If you go to EFA.EFF.org, you can find groups in your town that are working on everything from, like, digital abortion privacy to, you know, drone regulation to, you know, ending the use of digital technology for ICE raids to right to repair legislation at the state level or right to repair rules for domestic procurement.
15:04So, like, your town's not going to buy cars for its motor pool unless they don't have DRM on the engine. So any mechanic can fix it. That's how you make a systemic difference. It's not by like shopping really hard. I mean, I think I agree with the spirit of that, but it does feel like there is something to the idea of like, if not voting with your wallet, then sort of voting with your feet in some ways. Right. Because I think a point you make in the book that I think is very true and that we don't necessarily talk about enough is that there is this constant push and pull between I hate being on Twitter and there are people of incredible value to me on Twitter.
15:44Right. And so it's like if if you could all at once sort of engineer the network effects to be like, we're all today going to leave Twitter. You could make a lot of real progress on a sort of person by person website. Do I go to today? It's just that doing that is impossible. Right. And I think the thing that we've seen like this is where Cambridge Analytica comes up for me all the time. It's like, that was the moment that I think, frankly, even more than was rational, everybody lost their minds about meta. I don't believe in Cambridge Analytica's marketing hype, but I do think that they're terrible for making that hype and for selling it to other people.
16:18Yeah. Right. And it was like, it was very, it got people up in arms about a specific platform in a way that I really have never seen before or since. And yet everybody stayed on Facebook. And so that was the moment where I was like, okay, this idea of sort of suddenly we're all going to leave may just be irrelevant. But then I come to things like Amazon, where like Amazon has no, my friends are not on Amazon in some way that is like important and meaningful to me. It's pretty easy to pick up and leave Gmail. So I think like you talk a lot about sort of the switching costs of a lot of these things, but I do wonder, there are some things that it feels like it ought to be pretty easy for me to buy toilet paper from somewhere else, right?
17:00Like why, why isn't it worth pushing people harder to do that? I just think that like, there's a limited number of hours in the day and a limited number of things that people can care about. And, you know, making, making your own life a lot harder to eke out a very, very small incremental advantage. You know, one of the problems with Amazon is that because we're again, very lax about enforcing antitrust, we let them corner a bunch of markets and force a lot of firms out of business. They sort of finished what Walmart started, right? And it is very hard not to shop on Amazon. And like you can, right?
17:35If your hobby is finding places to shop that aren't Amazon, then you can probably assemble a pretty good list. Maybe someone could make things easier, but I'm, you know, call me a solutionist, but I'm interested in how technology could solve this. So in the case of Amazon, I don't know if you've ever seen there's these browser plugins you can get that if you're looking at a book on Amazon because ISBNs are a completely standard identifier. It'll put a reserve this at your local library button in the place of the buy it on Amazon button. Oh, I love that. Really cool. Right. So ASINs, right, the stock keeping units that Amazon uses, they represent an uncopyrightable database.
18:10Databases don't attract a copyright. And in theory, you could start a co-op in your town or that helps produce software that works with like the four giant point of sale apps that exist today in the market, because this is one of the weird things about monopolies is that oftentimes the solutions are a little easier, at least as a technical matter, because everything is the same. So imagine now you've got neighborhood co-ops that are just like data co-ops that allow you to list your inventory in a database that translates UPCs to ASINs. And then whenever you're on Amazon shopping, it just says like, buy it at the corner store if it's there.
18:52Right. And like you could imagine something very similar for Uber, right. Where like the, one of the problems with a co-op platform for gig riders is that there's a kind of chicken and egg problem. Why would a passenger install an app when there's no drivers who have the app? Why would a driver install the app when there's no passengers install the app. But what if instead, like when my phone fires off a request to Uber and your phone accepts it, both of our phones are running another app that uploads the details of that as like hashes to a server. And if it detects that we both have the co-op app, it tears down the Uber ride and rebuilds it as a co-op ride.
19:28So all this stuff is like technically possible. It's just illegal. It's illegal because this reverse engineering engineering violates section 12.1 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which bans most forms of reverse engineering. And I want to say, by way of closing the loop on this, Facebook never organized an everyone leave MySpace day. What Facebook did was gave everyone on MySpace who wanted to go to Facebook, a scraper, a bot, you gave that bot your login and password, and it went to MySpace several times a day, pretending to be you. It grabbed all the messages in your MySpace feed and put them in your Facebook feed so you could reply to them and then push them back out to MySpace.
20:05So, you know, there is that you've said organizing the everybody leave Facebook day is impossible, but it might also be irrelevant. Right. Maybe we don't need that. Right. Maybe we can just change the enchantogenic policy environment so that we can do unto Mark Zuckerberg as Mark Zuckerberg did unto Rupert Murdoch when he owned MySpace. Right. And the difference, to your point, is that since then, Facebook and others have worked very hard to make it illegal to do that thing. They did it and then they pulled up the ladder behind. Yeah. It's this kind of mesh woven of IP law interpretations and contracts that make, you know, modifying a thing you own illegal if it's bad for the shareholders of the company that made it.
20:48And we see that in Right to Repair a lot with like things like tractors. And we see it with printers that we talked about before. And we see it with service design. We see it with, you know, the stuff that's here now. Okay, so the thing about a lot of what you just described is that there's this concept that I've always found really interesting, and all the designers on Twitter are always talking about this, and they're like, oh, embrace friction, right? It is actually good to make your life a little bit harder. And I think I find the argument very compelling that we as a society have accepted everything in order to get slightly more convenience.
21:19That like we anything that makes something faster or easier for us, we will do and we'll figure out all the downstream consequences later. And so the idea that actually like you should go out of your way to make life harder, I find very compelling in a sort of like, you know, meditative way. I also think it's practically impossible. It's just not how anyone lives their life. like you're very hard pressed to find somebody who's going to like deliberately choose the harder way to do just about anything. I mean, look, if you choose the friction of shopping really hard or like trying really hard to get off Facebook or whatever, then you lose the time for the friction of making sourdough with your five-year-old, right?
21:54Like it's like it's, it's, it's zero sum. There's, I'm not, I'm not like saying everything should just be like, as I used to say in the seventies, a zipless fuck, right? I, you know, So but I am saying that you should choose where your friction is that like you can't have friction for everything. Right. Right. Right. But I think the thing that seems true or at least has pretty much always been true is that the big, huge, all encompassing nightmare hellscape surveillance platforms are the easiest ones and the best ones to use. They are like it is it is faster to make a Twitter account than to make a Mastodon account.
22:31And and part of me wonders, like, is there something structural about the better way that is just always going to be a little harder and a little worse? Or is it just that no one has ever been able to or has successfully tried? So I'm interested in this. I mean, we're getting into the weeds now with Mastodon and Twitter design, right? So I don't think actually these days, it's been a while since I set up a Mastodon account. I don't think it's actually harder than setting up a Twitter account, except to the extent that you might want to choose a different server than the one that they default you into.
23:06I think what they do now is they suggest a server. But even the existence of that choice is harder than making a Twitter account. So you don't have to know about it, right? You can just go to Mastodon and ignore the fine print that says other servers are available. All right. You can just go default, default default i think the thing that is harder is the um algorithmic suggestions because they don't exist in mastodon so mastodon in a state of nature uh has like when you open an account de novo you don't see anything except for like people on your home server i actually just set up a pixel fed uh account so pixel fed is like instagram but runs on activity pub and i have this problem i subscribe to like 25 people and they're okay but they're not great it's and uh And then I've been trying to find other people to subscribe to.
23:47I look at like my home server feed. I look at the universal feed and I look at the record and it's just not as good. And so if there was a way to get recommendations, I would probably take it. Now, there was a way that people were finding really easy to go to Mastodon at one point, which was when the Twitter API existed, you could just run a like a little app that found all the people that you followed on Twitter that had a mastermind account just signed up to them. That's that's a thing that we cut off. So if we want to talk about like a policy prescription here. There's a thing built into ActivityPub, which is the protocol Masterdom runs on, where if you want to change servers, you click a link in your account settings or your profile, and it dumps out a little text file that has everyone you follow, everyone who follows you, your mutes and your blocks, all that stuff.
24:31And if you sign up for another server, it asks you, like, are you coming from another server? And you say yes, and you move that file there, and then all that stuff moves over. So it's like when you're switching from like Verizon to T-Mobile, you do like five minutes administrative work and your phone number pops over. No one cares which network you're on. No one calls a friend and says, dude, you would not believe whose SIM is in my phone today. Right. It's just just irrelevant. And we can talk about friction being a big deal. But I'll tell you what, when number porting came in with cell phones, it really did change the competitive nature of that market.
Read the full transcript
25:03it. Um, it's why we have all these VNMOs, right. You know, these, these, uh, Ryan Reynolds phone company and whatever, right. It's because you can now really easily switch them on carriers. And so, uh, if we said as a policy matter, uh, the legacy platforms, Facebook, Twitter, maybe Tik TOK have to, um, provide you with a file that lets you, um, follow all the people that you were following on Twitter when you moved to Mastodon or blue sky or anywhere else, right because it's a standard protocol anyone could support it uh and show the messages that you post to them if they're still following you if we made that not only would that go a long way to resolving that issue make it really easy to go from one place to another but it would also be really easy to enforce and so unlike say a hate speech rule which is one of the things we've tried to do to make places like twitter more viable we have it in canada australia europe they've got various harmful content rules the uk has just got this new online harms act and so on And leaving aside all the other questions, right, about like whether it's a good idea or bad idea, if you like the idea of a hate speech rule, you still have to agree on what hate speech is.
26:10You have to evaluate every accusation of hate speech to see if it satisfies your definition. You have to do a technical investigation to see whether the platform has taken reasonable steps to avert that hate speech incident. And this is like a seven-year, fact-intensive, deep investigation that you have to do for something that happens 100 times a minute on these platforms. Meanwhile, if you just say, like, you can leave. You can leave. It's really easy. If you go, you still follow all the people that you were following. They all follow you. It's like the work of a few seconds. You know, you resolve a seeming paradox, right?
26:45The paradox I alluded to at the start here, this reveal preference paradox, which is like, why would a member of a disfavored minority who faces endless harassment and hate speech on Twitter stay on Twitter? Well, it's because the only thing worse than being a member of that disfavored minority and being showered in abuse is being a member of a disfavored minority showered in abuse and being isolated from your community. Right. So let them go. Let people go somewhere else. Let's not rely on Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk being better at being the unelected absolute dictator of people's social media lives.
27:17Let's just abolish that job. Yeah. I mean, I think the only thing that comes to mind for me there is that that way you're thinking about it sort of assumes there is good stuff on the other end, if only it were easy for us to get there. Sure. And this is where I come back to, like, why isn't anybody building the better products? Oh, because people can't leave. right i i do wonder that is like back to chicken and egg problems right it's like i think that the hardest part of uh like i i am you know we could spend forever talking about how terrific i think the fetterverse is and i'm gonna try very hard not to do that while we're sitting here but uh i think that the thing that is so frustrating to me about the fetterverse is that is that there no one has yet quite built the thing and and everything i hear from people is like well nobody's gonna build the thing because there's no business in building the thing because how on earth are you going to?
28:04Yeah. You just can't do it. There's no business in competing with these because it is a mix of illegal and impossible. Yeah. And if we so and I guess your argument would be that's why we have to start with the policies and that you're but that requires confidence on your side that if we even if we just sort of removed the gate that suddenly there is this like huge latent supply of great stuff that would immediately come to exist and solve the problem. So, I mean, look, I don't know that the platforms management always knows what's best for their own firms, but they sure act like if you made it possible to go, you would leave.
28:40Right. Think of agree. You know, this is an argument that comes up a lot with right to repair. You know, there's the there's the kind of no true Scotsman version of the Apple fanboy, which is just like no one who owns an iPhone wants to use a third party app store or take their phone anywhere but an Apple store to get it fixed. It's like, wow, if that were true, it would seem like Apple wouldn't need to spend tens of millions of dollars making sure. You've done a lot of work you didn't need to do in that case. Yeah. And so like maybe they're I mean, sure, they might be making some foolish choices there and misallocating their capital.
29:10But I don't think it's the case. I think that we should take them at their word. I think that they do understand that people would want to go. You know, the Berlin Wall was said by the commissars of the German Democratic Republic, was said to be there to keep people out of the Soviet socialist utopia and not to keep people in. And yet they sure act like the reason the wall was there is to keep people in. I also think that there's like a growing geopolitical case outside of the US to get off American platforms. Uh, and you know, you have this effort now in Europe called Eurostack, tons of capital going into cloning, uh, American services because Donald Trump has made it really clear that America doesn't have trading partners.
29:55It doesn't have allies. It has rivals and those rivals, uh, will be, uh, neutralized with American tech companies. So when the international criminal courts, chief prosecutor swore to Warren against Bibi Netanyahu for genocide, Trump denounced it. And then Microsoft terminated his Outlook account. And the chief prosecutor of the ICC lost all of his email archives, his address book, his calendar, and access to all the working files of the International Criminal Court. And I think a lot of policymakers in Europe were like, oh, wait, we need to do something about this. And then I think it was the German regulators asked Microsoft, hey, just to be clear, if an American spy agency asks you for access to a European data repository on a server stored in Europe, you're not going to give it to them, right?
30:41And they were like, oh, no, we'll probably give it to them. And we won't tell you. And we may not ask for a warrant. And so there's just like a very strong case for getting the hell off of these platforms. platforms and uh i think as they build these um duplicate platforms they're going to run up against a wall which is that there's no way for people to get their data out right like no one's going to copy and paste a million documents out of a ministry into uh you know from outlook or gdocs into like a euro stack equivalent you need to be able to like run virtual phones in a cloud and autopilot an app and you need to be able to like jailbreak things and do on-device bridging and and scrape and like all this other stuff.
31:20That's the only way we're going to get data out of it. It's a very honorable tradition. People have been doing this with online services, like since the IBM 360. It's, it's a totally reasonable thing to say that people who have their data on one platform should be able to take it to another platform without the first platform's permission or cooperation. It's nice if they do that, but they don't, you shouldn't have to rely on it. And, and I, I liken it to like the EU, uh, observing a housing crisis in East Germany and then building a lot of great housing in West Germany. And then being like, well, why is no one moving into this great housing, right?
31:55Eventually you have to look over at that wall, notice it and tear it down. All right, we got to take a break and then we're going to get back to Cory Doctorow. Support for this show comes from Shopify. One of the most exciting parts of starting a business is when the sales start coming in. If your business is looking to start selling online, Shopify has everything you need to create your online store. Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses around the world and 10 % of all e-commerce in the US, from household names like Mattel and Gymshark to brands just getting started.
32:29With hundreds of ready-to-use templates, Shopify helps you build a beautiful online store to match your brand style. And Shopify is packed with helpful AI tools that write product descriptions, page headlines, and even enhance your product photography. And best yet, Shopify is your commerce expert with world-class expertise in everything from managing inventory to international shipping to processing, returns, and beyond. Turn those dreams in two and give them the best shot at success with Shopify. Sign up for your$1 per month trial and start selling today at shopify.com slash vergecast. Go to shopify.com slash vergecast.
33:09Shopify.com slash vergecast. Support for this show comes from Grammarly. Have you ever had something tailor-made for you? A jacket, a suit, a pair of jeans? The difference is transformative because once you find something made to fit your needs, you just can't go back to a generic feel. That's kind of how it works at Grammarly. Because they have features that are tailor-made for working professionals, you can get all of your writing done from start to finish, all in one place. Grammarly brings more polish and impact to your emails, presentations, and proposals without switching between tools and tabs, all while amplifying your voice and moving your ideas forward.
33:49Your time is valuable, and you don't want to waste it on some second-rate program. That's why Grammarly is designed to help professionals with real-time writing support on any project email and more. When you open a new doc, start typing right away, or ask Grammarly's AI chat to help anytime, whether to kick off your ideas or polish them. One easy place to get quick help from AI whenever you're writing. Sign up for free and experience how Grammarly can elevate your professional writing from start to finish. Visit Grammarly.com slash podcast. That's Grammarly.com slash podcast. Support for this show comes from LinkedIn.
34:28When you're a small business owner, your business is on your mind 24-7. So when you're hiring, you need a partner that works just as hard as you do. That hiring partner is LinkedIn Jobs. When you clock out, LinkedIn clocks in. LinkedIn makes it easy to post your job for free, share it with your network, and get qualified candidates that you can manage all in one place. LinkedIn's new features can help you write job descriptions and then quickly get your job in front of the right people with deep candidate insights. Either post your job for free or pay to promote. Promoted jobs get three times more qualified applicants.
35:03At the end of the day, the most important thing to your small business is the quality of candidates. And with LinkedIn, you can feel confident that you're getting the best. Based on LinkedIn data, 72 % of SMBs using LinkedIn say that it helps them find high quality candidates. Find out why more than two and a half million small businesses use LinkedIn for hiring today. Find your next great hire on LinkedIn. Post your job for free at linkedin.com slash track. That's linkedin.com slash track to post your job for free. Terms and conditions apply. Support for the show comes from Crucible Moments, a podcast from Sequoia Capital.
35:41We've all had pivotal decision points in our lives that, whether we know it or not at the time, changed everything. This is especially true in business. Like, did you know that autonomous drone delivery company Zipline originally produced a robotic toy? Or that Bolt went from an Estonian transportation company to one of the largest rideshare and food delivery platforms in the world? That's what Crucible Moments is all about. Deep diving into make-or-break moments that set the course for some of the most important tech companies of our time. with interviews from some of the key players that made these companies a success.
36:14Hosted by Sequoia Capital's managing partner, Rule Off Botha, Crucible Moments is back for a new season with stories of companies as they navigated the most consequential crossroads in their journeys. Hear conversations with leaders at Zipline, Stripe, Palo Alto Networks, Klarna, Supercell, and more. Subscribe to Season 3 of Crucible Moments and catch up on Seasons 1 and 2 at cruciblemoments.com on YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts. Listen to Crucible Moments today.
36:50All right, we're back. Let's just dive right back in with Corey Doctro. Here goes. I've become sort of fascinated by the local first software movement and apps like this app Obsidian where it's like the thesis behind these things is what I have is a folder full of text files. And what you provide is a way to manipulate that folder full of text files, but there's still a bunch of text files on my computer. And that is such a complete 180 degree inversion of how we think about most software now. That is like, what actually happens is I am logging into something that is at a data center very far away.
37:23And I think like we're talking, you know, not that long after this huge AWS failure. And one of the things that fascinates me about those is everybody then has this moment of like, oh my God, none of my stuff is mine. All of my stuff is somewhere else. And you have this visceral moment of like, I get on my computer and I don't have anything that I think is like those moments are very eye-opening to people. But is there a way we can start to solve this stuff in product by just being like – like Tim Berners-Lee, I know, talks about this with the solid protocol stuff. And I think that is like an interesting idea that I haven't seen anyone other than Tim Berners-Lee talk about.
37:56But this idea that like we have to start from a new premise of whose data is whose and where. and if we can build different software on top of it, maybe that starts to solve some of this problem too. I just think you end up with this problem of how you get the data out, right? And how you manage the awkward transition. Because if we're going to go back to friction, that's the source of friction. There's a little bit of friction in learning to use a different app, right? Being like, oh, you know, Adobe, one of the stories I tell in the book is like Adobe decided it didn't want to keep paying the license fee for Pantone and decided to shove it off onto Adobe customers.
38:31So you're going to have to suddenly pay 21 bucks a month for the rest of your life to see the Pantone colors in your own files. Including all of your old files. Your old files, they would go black. What was it, black pixels? Yeah, they would go black if you didn't pay 21 bucks a month. And, you know, you go like, OK, I'm going to download all my files and I'm going to learn to use the GIMP, right? But like that's a little bit of friction, right? Learning some new key combinations and stuff. The real friction is like getting all the data out, reworking all your workflows, collaborating with other people.
39:02You know, like you think about like GDocs, the value of GDocs isn't editing in a browser. It's editing with other people on a browser. Yes. You know, so how do you how do you move all that stuff over? How do you maintain the permissions? You know, all of that stuff is the source of friction. We need to we need to address that part. I'm all for like holding things locally. Actually, you're reminding me, we gave a presentation 20 years ago at the O 'Reilly OS 10 con about now that the Mac is a Unix machine, here's a really easy way to build an IMAP server on your own computer. Oh, interesting. And you can pop your mail into like an inbox file and then you can use any mail client you want with IMAP pointed at your hard drive.
39:49and so you can like use mail.app for reading and composing you use thunderbird for searching you can use pine for something else right like it's the apps are really small and the repos there and depending on how you like configured it you wouldn't necessarily have to make multiple copies of your mail and you know it's it's very cool and you could even imagine having like two imaps right one on the one in the cloud one on your computer those two are kept in sync and then you've got five pop clients on your computer if you want to use them use them for different reasons right? Like all of that's like fine.
40:20You know, maybe that, maybe there are people listening to this are going, well, that's insane. But, uh, if you're like me and you live in email and I absolutely live in email, um, then, uh, you have a lot of archives, you have a lot of workflow recorded and like, you know, as you say, like a folder full of text files in your hard drive is a very powerful repo that lots of different programs can act on. And one of the nice things about a folder full of text files on your hard drive is that we have some very standard utilities like our sync that will keep them connected to something else that you can do encrypted syncs with.
40:52And that allows you to have like a hybrid world where you can access your files remotely and or even do things like, you know, leave your laptop at home, take a burner when you go across a border and configure the IMAP server. So this is a thing that Google used to do when Googlers probably still do. When Googlers had to go to China, they would give you a burner and it would only access like the last three days of your IMAP and not like the whole spool. And you just like your IT department wouldn't let you look at that file. So if Chinese authorities made you unlock your laptop at the border, you just handed it to them.
41:26I have a friend who used to go to China for Google quite a lot. And he says that when he got back, the Chromebook would just go in a shredder because they would just assume that it had been compromised in his hotel room or whatever. Wow. That's, that's wild. Well, we're going to have to talk more about that some other time. But I think as you talk about that, it just makes me think, again, we're in this place of how much is the onus on me to sort of think differently about what I'm doing versus should all of this stuff just work better? And I think you're of the mind of all of this stuff should work better.
41:58I think it's easier for you to think differently if everything works better. Yeah, sure. It's very hard to imagine the thing that doesn't exist and that isn't in the world. I've been going back and back and back to Larry Lessig's Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, which is just still such an important work, talks about these four forces that regulate our world. There's code, law, norms, and markets, right? So code, things that are technologically possible can happen, right? It sounds very tautological, but you can pass a law requiring the repeal of gravity, but if no one's built an anti-gravity engine, it doesn't matter what the law says.
42:36So you can't really ban or mandate the use of a technology that doesn't exist. Or you can ban it, but it doesn't matter. Banning time machines doesn't matter. And when things are profitable, it's easier to get them legalized. And once they're legalized, if they are profitable, it's harder to ban them. Uh, and once things are normative, right. Once things are like considered reasonable, it's harder to ban them and it's easier to legalize them and it's easier to sell them. So you, you have these things kind of going around and around and cyclically reinforcing themselves. Yeah. By all means, like let's have a norm that says asking someone to use Facebook to book the kids a little league for, for, you know, the carpools is like asking someone to like sit in the smoking area to plan, you know, the little league thing.
43:23Sure. Normative. Yes. Fine. Right. Clip that, put it on social media. Yes. That is how everyone should treat Facebook groups about anything. Yeah. But at the same time, like, look, there's a wonderful person called Andrea Downing, who runs a nonprofit called The Light Collective. And Andrea is a breast cancer previvor. So this means that she has the gene for breast cancer. And she's part of a group on Facebook for this. And they were lured to Facebook. They were courted by Facebook in the early 2010s when Facebook actively went around to different medical communities online and said, come on Facebook.
43:54We have all these features for you that'll make things better for you. And being a breast cancer provider, previvor is a very medically consequential and socially important thing, right? So you're making a bunch of choices like, should I have my uterus, my ovaries and my breasts removed? You're also dealing with the sickness and death of your daughters, your sisters, your aunts, your grandmothers, your mothers, right? So this is, this is like a really important group to these people. And Andrea, not a security researcher by training, but she was poking around on Facebook one day and noticed that you could enumerate the full membership of every Facebook group, even if you weren't a member of it, including her group, which obviously this is a bad thing.
44:33So she tells Facebook about it. She files a bug report and they won't fix it. They said, oh, no, no, that's part of the ad tech stack. It's a feature, not a bug. So they sued Facebook. And when the FTC under Obama settled all claims outstanding against Facebook with a big fine, they settled this case. And they're still on Facebook, right and they're still on facebook because as much as they hate mark zuckerberg and the way that he runs that platform they love each other and are important to each other in a way that outstrips it and yet they are still hamstrung by this collective action problem right so you know like yeah yeah let's say like we should all get off the platform but once we make it easy to leave right like if you could go to blue sky or mastodon and see the messages in that facebook group and reply to them, people would trickle out.
45:18And if we make it easier for people to go, the people for whom things are intolerable will leave. And then maybe the company that's running the firm will, or the service rather, will get the message and make things more tolerable for the people they haven't lost. Or maybe what'll happen to them is what happened to Rupert Murdoch in MySpace, which is that we'll like double tap it and stuff it in the shallow grave it deserves to be in. Which is a pretty solid outcome in a lot of cases. It's a great outcome. Who cares? Right. It's not the Mona Lisa. We don't need to preserve it forever. It's fine.
45:50So long as the people can leave. Right. Like the demise of LiveJournal is fine. The destruction of the communities on LiveJournal is a tragedy. If we could have gotten rid of LiveJournal, which was like, and you know, it's still around as part of VContact, but which is like, which was like under management that manifestly was not suited to continue running LiveJournal. if we could have got rid of that and gotten rid of that and kept the communities that would have been the best of all outcomes yes and i think to the extent that you have if like if you wanted to pick one single solution that solves that it's let us move the communities i i totally agree with you on that and i think i mean the the step beyond that even then is like this is where you get real fed-a-versy where it's like actually it shouldn't the the community should just be the size of the internet and we should not like, I shouldn't even have to know what platform you're on.
46:40Yeah. But that I think is like, that's yet another sort of product bridge that we're going to have to figure out. I don't care which email client you use, right? Like we, I don't care what browser you use. Yeah. Yeah. You know, I don't care what phone carrier you use. Exactly. We have solved this problem before. Yeah. Okay. So I'm curious, I want to talk a little bit on the sort of flip side, which is like from the product makers side. And I think you bring up a couple examples in the book of companies doing things that are somewhere between delightful and disliked by major platforms and illegal, but they're doing it anyway.
47:15Tell me about this company, Para, that's doing really fascinating stuff on top of DoorDash that I think is a pretty good example of a lot of the possibilities of what you're talking about. Yeah. So Para, it started off as an app to help DoorDash drivers not get cheated by the platform. So the way the DoorDash platform would dispatch a job to a driver is they would expose the base pay, but not the tip. And the tip was like the majority of compensation. Like oftentimes the base pay would be like a buck 50 and the tip would be 10 bucks. And you wouldn't find out what the tip was until you clocked on the job.
47:50So it was like a blind box, right? It was like a slot machine. And if you saw the total pay for the job and then you changed your mind and you canceled the job and you did that too often, you'd get taken off the app because you were booking jobs and then canceling them. So it turns out DoorDash wasn't very good at this. And the JSON object that they transmitted to your phone just had the tip and the clear text. So they were just like hiding it with CSS on the page, basically? Yeah, exactly. Cool. So yeah. So, so para was just an app that extracted that value and showed you an overlay that was like, this is an$11 job.
48:27This is a$1 job. And, you know, from, from DoorDash's perspective, you can think about it this way. Like if you as a customer can lowball the tip and still get a delivery, then you will be more likely to be a DoorDash customer. Right. Right. And if no drivers clock on because the tip is too small and DoorDash doesn't want to lose you as a customer, they have to take some of the junk fees they've taken off of the customer and give it to a driver. So if they can just blind that transaction until after it's been locked in, then they can just take more value from drivers for themselves. Which is like pure stage three in shitification.
49:05Absolutely. That is exactly what that is. Yeah, 100%. Okay. So they rolled this out. DoorDash accused them of stealing drivers' social security numbers, which is amazing because if your DoorDash app is storing your social security number, that's bad. Yeah. If I can get it from DoorDash, we have a real big problem. Yeah. And empirically, it wasn't happening. And because we could see what the app was doing. And then they threw 40 full-time engineers at it. And they eventually, like, basically crushed it. But partly the reason they crushed it, I think, is that Para couldn't raise the capital to hire 80 engineers because there were all these legal threats hanging over it, too, where it was quite a capital risk.
49:50So DoorDash these days, what they want to do is pry open multiple offers from all the gig platforms on your phone and then let you figure out which one you're willing to take based on the one with the highest compensation. And one of the things, if you've never done work on a gig platform that people don't always appreciate is that you get an offer and you only have a few seconds to decide whether to take it. And you know how like if you go to the grocery store, they put unit pricing on the shelf. So, you know, the raisins are like four bucks, but they're three cents a gram or whatever, three cents an ounce.
50:26You don't get that breakdown. So you don't see what your mileage and your minutes are being paid. You just see a total. You have to try and do that math in your head. And you can imagine like if you're a dasher and an Uber driver and a Lyft driver, and you're also doing like three other kinds of delivery work on your phone, it might be really hard to do the sums in your head. And so one of the things that para can do is just normalize those values and show you like a true unit cost for this. Right. Which like, again, like it's very weird that we would try and make it illegal for a worker to know the unit costs of their labor offer.
51:05Right. This whole argument for piecework, which allows the firms bidding out the piecework to avoid insurance and overtime and whatever, is that the seller of the labor can make their own choice, that it's paternalistic to make the choice for them. Okay, but I don't think it's paternalistic to say doing a whole bunch of algebra in your head in real time while driving a car is a thing that most of us can't do. And maybe we should have a computer do that for you. You know? Computers are pretty good at that. So the reason I bring this up is because my sense throughout the book is this is the sort of thing you'd like to see a million of across every possible platform.
51:47Like you talk a lot about jailbreaking and the concept of adversarial interoperability. And it's like until we get these big policy swings, like what we need is to just poke and prod at every available piece. Well, and to get the policy swings. Well, right. I guess we need the one to make that legal again. And then, but then the way to pry this open is not to like build another Amazon. It's to just tear Amazon into a thousand pieces with a thousand different kinds of apps. Right. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, why wouldn't you know what Jeff Bezos said when he started the business? Your margin is my opportunity.
52:24Right. Right. So just raid their margins. And I think this is like back to geopolitics. Right. So Canada's response to the tariffs, like a lot of countries, has been retaliatory tariffs, which is another way of saying things in Canada now cost more because we import a lot of finished goods from America. Also, we have to drink shitty rye instead of delicious bourbon. It is a lot of cell phones in the name of geopolitics. Yeah, it's a very weird way to punish America. This is like punching yourself in the face really hard and hoping the downstairs neighbor says ouch. Meanwhile, we could consume the accumulated monopoly rents of these tech platforms that have been extracted from Canadians and other people in the world.
53:03And not only realize a consumer surplus for these goods are cheaper, but we could create export markets for disensitifying software, right? And that's stuff that everyone in the world would want. And if Canada doesn't do it, someone else will. So there's this kind of interesting equilibrium where if anyone defects, that defector, the first defector, reaps a huge benefit. and all the subsequent defectors reap a much smaller benefit, right? Like, so consuming the accumulated monopoly rents of American tech platforms as fuel for a single-use rocket to boost Canada's tech sector, which used to be very big.
53:38We used to have a company that made all the world's smartphones called Research in Motion, right? To boost that into a stable orbit on a better cash basis, right? Because selling app stores for iPhones that loot the$100 billion per year transaction fee business that Apple takes out of the iPhone without incurring the hardware costs that Apple is bearing. That is a very good opportunity. That margin could be our opportunity. And if we don't take it, someone else will. And if that's not enough, if you remember when those Russian soldiers looted those Ukrainian tractors and they were all low jacked by John Deere and they showed up in Chechnya and then the John Deere dealership in Kiev bricked the tractors And everyone was like, ha ha, dumb looters, you get your comeuppance from John Deere.
54:25Well, it does mean that Donald Trump could order any country's tractors immobilized. Right. So there's like a geopolitics case for this. This is what we were told that Huawei was going to do to our critical infrastructure. And it's what American tech companies have done to the world's critical infrastructure. And I say that first because it's scary and bad in an era of Trumpism. But second, because like as Putin showed us after invading Ukraine and accelerating the European transition to solar by 15 years in five, when the devil's at the door, a lot of the things that used to seem like burdens you could never hurdle or barriers you could never hurdle are suddenly things that you can just jump over with ease.
55:11They're just not that big a deal. You know, the U.S. trade representative says, well, unless you have these IP laws, we're going to hit you with tariffs and then they hit you with tariffs. Right. Well, like someone threatens to burn your house down unless you do as they say, and then you do it and then they burn your house down. You're kind of a sucker if you keep doing what they say. Right. So I'm quite excited by this moment, like not about Trump broadly, but about this specific thing that this thing I've worked on for a quarter of a century and more than half my adult life is actually closer to being realized.
55:39I think like having has better a more fertile soil to grow than at any time. And as Americans, we're going to be able to import those tools because, you know, if you've got a payment method and an Internet connection, you can download jailbreaking tools. you know it's easier than getting cheap insulin from canada getting good software from canada you know yeah that was one of the things you said in the book that i thought was really interesting is that that actually this is a we're going to have a global solution to an american problem because there is no incentive to play nice in in geopolitics right now yeah um last thing real quick and then i know you have to go yeah i'm i couldn't tell throughout the whole book whether you think that under sort of the current conditions in shitification is essentially inevitable that if I build a thing that is successful enough that it is inevitably going to go this way because, you know, money and power corrupt the same way that they always do.
56:30So I'm, I'm curious, like what you would tell startup founders and people who are like new at this and are saying, I don't, I don't want to, I want to do a good job and not build a horrible and shitified platform. Is there, is there a way out other than you just like holding their heads in both hands and being like, don't be an asshole. No, you gotta, you gotta, you gotta hack your future self. So the Ulysses pact is named after one of the most important hackers, Ulysses, who, uh, you know, was, was in this situation where he was going to sail onto the sea of the sirens. And if you heard the siren song, you would jump it in the water and drown.
57:07And so the accepted protocol was to fill your ears with wax, but he wanted to hear what the sound sounded like. Cause it was probably amazing. So he anticipated his future weakness and he had his sailors tie him to the mast so that he could hear the song but not jump in. So a Ulysses pact is anytime you take a course of action off the table and a moment of strength because you anticipate your future moment of weakness. So being strong is not being infallible. It's in fact recognizing your own fallibility. And so if you think about the forces that led to inshittification, right, monopolization, regulatory capture, a weak workforce, the ability to modify products after their sale and make them worse.
57:46What you need to do is create the circumstances where neither the devil on your left shoulder whispering things in your ear, nor the VC threatening to pull the plug on you can force you to do something that today seems like a bad idea. So unionize your workforce so that they can tell you to fuck off if you tell them to incentivize things and make it stick. Make all your software irrevocably open source. create APIs and make sure that at least, you know, 51 % of your users are API users off platforms. So if you shut the API down in the future, you go out of business instantaneously, right? Like all this stuff may sound like a big lift.
58:21It is a big lift, right? But you, you do this stuff and not even you can pressure yourself into incentivizing your product without immediately going out of business. And so that's how you do it. Ulysses taught us how to do it. now we know. I like it. All right, Corey. All right. Thank you so much for doing this. This is really fun. Thanks, David. All right. Thank you again to Corey for being here with us. That was super fun. I learned a ton from that conversation and I kind of have come to think differently about how I exist on the internet. I've been noodling on that interview for a couple of weeks now and I think the way that I approach these services is already starting to change.
58:56If you want to talk about in-shittification, if you have thoughts, if you have feelings, get at me. I want to hear all about it. First cast of the first.com call the hotline and speaking of, We're going to take a break and we're going to do a hotline question. We'll be right back. Support for the show comes from Rippling. Is your business paying for 20 tools to do the job of one? That doesn't exactly sound like it's software as a service. It actually sounds like it's sad. Software as a disservice. It's time to replace your stitched together tech stack with one platform for all of your departments with Rippling.
59:26Rippling is the unified platform for global HR, payroll, IT, and finance. They've helped millions replace their mess of cobbled together tools with one system designed to give leaders clarity, speed, and control. By uniting your employees, teams, and departments in one system, Rippling can remove the bottlenecks, busywork, and silos your software might have created. Automated, perfectly in sync, and seriously simple to use, Rippling gives your company one source of truth for your people, their data, and everything they touch. with Rippling you can run your entire HR IT and finance operations as one or pick and choose the products that best fill the gaps in your software stack and right now you can get six months for free when you go to rippling.com slash verge learn more at r-i-p-p-l-i-n-g dot com slash verge that's rippling.com slash verge for six months free terms and conditions apply
1:00:29300 sensors. Over a million data points per second. How does F1 update their fans with every stat in real time? AWS is how. From fastest laps to strategy calls, AWS puts fans in the pit. It's not just racing. It's data-driven innovation at 200 miles per hour. AWS is how leading businesses power next-level innovation. In business, they say you can have better, cheaper, or faster, but you only get to pick two. What if you could have all three at the same time? That's exactly what Cohere, Thomson Reuters, and Specialized Bikes have, since they upgraded to the next generation of the cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure.
1:01:14OCI is the blazing fast platform for your infrastructure, database, application development, and AI needs, where you can run any workload in a high availability, consistently high-performance environment, and spend less than you would with other clouds. How is it faster? OCI's block storage gives you more operations per second. Cheaper? OCI costs up to 50 % less for compute, 70 % less for storage, and 80 % less for networking. Better? In test after test, OCI customers report lower latency and higher bandwidth versus other clouds. This is the cloud built for AI and all your biggest workloads. Right now, with zero commitment, try OCI for free.
1:01:58Head to oracle.com slash vox. That's oracle.com slash vox.
1:02:06Oh, hey, welcome to gift wrapping. Whoa, Zoe Saldana. Hey, can you wrap these, please? Wow, iPhone 17s. You splurged. At T-Mobile, you can get four iPhone 17s on them. It's the perfect gift for everyone. I'm the worst. I only got my mom a robe. Well, it's better than socks. So, I have to trade in my old phone, right? No, at T-Mobile, there's no trade-ins needed when you switch. Keep your old phone or give it as a gift. Incredible. In fact, wrap up my old phone, too, for my Aunt Rosa. Forget that. Aunt Liz will be jealous. Sounds like my family drama. Oh, I got it. I'll give it to my abuela. I'll take reindeer paper with, hey, where are you going?
1:02:41To T-Mobile! Thanks, Zoe! The holidays are better at T-Mobile. Get four iPhone 17s on us. No trade in needed when you switch. Plus four lines for just$25 a line. With 24 monthly bill credits and four eligible board ins on essentials for well-qualified customers. Proto pay plus taxes, fees, and$35 device connection chart. Credits end of balance due if you pay off earlier. Cancel. Contact us. Finance agreement. 256 gigabytes. $830 required. Visit T-Mobile.com.
1:03:11All right. We're back. VergeCast hotline time. The number, as always, 866-VERGE11. one. The email, vergecastattheverge.com. I'm davidpierce.11 on Signal. Get at us. I want to hear all of your questions, all of your thoughts, all the other feelings-y tech books that you think I should read. I want to hear about it. And we got a question about an episode we recorded a couple of weeks ago that I think is like perfectly on brand for this conversation that we're having right now. So let me just play it right here. Hey, this is Matt from Springfield, Missouri. I was listening to the episode where we're discussing how Amazon has been a lawsuit with perplexity.
1:03:45And I actually sell old manuals for machinery on my own personal website, Amazon and eBay. And actually, if I'm seeing an increase in sales from referral links from these AI agents on my personal website, actually, I would prefer these AI agents, people to shop that way, because then I wouldn't have to spend more time and resources to be diversified on different markets, and I could just keep it on my website. I also sell my products cheaper on my website because I don't have to pay for the Amazon and eBay fees. Anyway, that's my two cents. Thanks for the show. I was really struck by this question because I think that we have come to see Amazon in particular as like the platform on which you sell stuff, right?
1:04:31And there is this sense that if you can't compete on Amazon, you can't win. Amazon in so many ways has set it up to be that way, right? There's an antitrust case against Amazon because of the practices that it used to monitor prices around the internet and actually penalize sellers for having lower prices elsewhere than they had on Amazon. This is the kind of thing that Amazon has done to preserve itself as the only place that people can reasonably go to shop. The other thing is that it's really hard to make a good shopping experience somewhere else, right? I think Shopify has done a really interesting job of just sort of taking pieces of the puzzle and making it simpler.
1:05:08So now like I can have a website, but Shopify handles all of the actual logistics of selling. That's really interesting, right? Like I think if we can sort of pull the catalog apart, but make all of the logistics centralized, there's something really interesting there. But this is a total inversion of that. That is like, okay, what if instead of having a central platform where all this stuff was, we had a central shopper that could go all of the places. And instead, as a seller, I can have my website and trust that there will be agents and there will be these autonomous bots that come around and find things on my website to buy.
1:05:47Maybe that's a better outcome here. It's at least a very different outcome than this incredible centralization that we've had. And this is something that I hear from the AI people who are web defenders. And to be totally honest, I'm very skeptical of those people. I think it's very hard to think the open web is a good idea and that everything should be intermediated by AI. But there is something to this idea that actually what we need is a new way of finding stuff on the web that is not just about finding stuff, right? Because it's one thing to say, okay, we're going to show you the coolest coat you've ever seen, but you have to set up an account.
1:06:24You have to enter your credit card details. You have to enter into a relationship with a new company that's going to send you emails all the time. You have to wait weeks because they're not as sophisticated a shipping operation as Amazon or Walmart. So there are a lot of reasons that just purely logistically and in a convenience sense, it makes sense for everything to have been totally centralized. But if you match this idea of now I have an AI agent that is capable of finding these sort of product needles in haystacks for me with now there are these tools like Shopify that are starting to centralize some of the boring grunt work logistics of it all.
1:07:02in such a way that it is easy for me to track my packages. It is easy for me to know my credit card is secure. It is easy for me to get things quickly, but I don't have to just do it through the one player. All that is super interesting, right? And this is like classic bundling and unbundling. Amazon was a complete bundling phase of the internet where it said, we're going to take every single piece of the puzzle and we're going to do it all in one place. And what happens when you get a big bundle is people start to just pull parts of that out, right? There's no way that one company can do every single thing the best.
1:07:32And so you take a company like Shopify, not to keep bringing up Shopify, that is like, well, we're going to take a part of this and do it better or differently or more accessibly to more people. Or you get companies like Walmart who are like, we're going to compete on having this sort of premium bundle that gets you lots of other stuff. There are just a lot of things about Amazon that we're starting to see people pull apart and make better products individually out of. The question then is, what is the thing that knits all of those things together if it's not just another huge Amazon-style platform.
1:08:06Maybe it could be AI. I'm skeptical of AI agents in every single way, including their ability to find good, interesting products and not just the same products that they would find on Amazon or the products that they have made corporate deals with. But in a world in which there is a truly neutral, truly useful agent that knows what I like, knows the full catalog of the internet, and can handle the logistics because there are ways to handle the logistics, that becomes a really fascinating shopping system. And so I think the idea that there are people out there who are saying, I have been selling things and I'm starting to see an uptick on my website, not just on the other platforms that I am forced to play with because of AI agents, that's a huge win.
1:08:50There are lots of complicated downstream effects, but that thing by itself, I take as a victory. And that's really interesting. And I think in the sort of in-shittification universe, the thing after in-shittification is unbundling, right? And I think in a certain tiny, small way, this is what that looks like. Anyway, Matt, thank you for calling in. This one sort of broke my brain open in a really fun way, and I appreciate you calling in. Anyway, that's it for the Vergecast. I gotta go finish moving. I gotta stop talking because this cold is just gonna destroy me. So we're gonna get out of here.
1:09:23As always, if you have thoughts, feelings, questions, other books I should read, feelings about AI agents, tell us everything. 866-VERGE-11 is the hotline. vergecastsattheverge.com is the email. We want to hear everything from you. Absolutely, all of the time. The Verge Cast is a Verge production and part of the Vox Media Podcast Network. The show is produced by Eric Gomez, Brandon Kiefer, and Travis Larchuk. We will be back on Friday with, I don't even know what, a bunch of fun stuff. We're also shooting version history all of this week. I'm going to be in New York, so I'll be in the studio with Neel Eye for Friday's show.
1:09:53we have a ton of fun stuff coming up for you. This like holiday season of podcasts from The Urge is going to be great. I'm looking forward to it. We'll see you then. Rock and roll.
1:10:05Men need a store that has the right thing for their thing. Like a Kenneth Cole suit made with Showflex fabric to keep them cool at their cousin-in-law's third wedding in the middle of July. Whatever the thing, Men's Warehouse has the clothes for it. Love the way you look. Men's Warehouse.
From the publisher
Enshittification. It's fun to say, hard to spell, and a useful descriptor of exactly how the internet has gone wrong. Cory Doctorow, the author and activist who coined the term a few years ago, recently published a book on the subject, called Enshittification: Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It. He was on Decoder a few weeks ago to explain what happened, and joins The Vergecast this week to help us figure out what to do about it. Can we, as regular people on the internet, help to de-enshittify the place? What responsibility do we have, and what kinds of choices should we be making? Cory has lots of thoughts on whether you can shop your way out of a monopoly, and what it really takes to enact structural change online.
Further reading:
Cory Doctorow on Decoder
Read Cory's book, Enshittification
Cory's last Vergecast appearance
From Pluralistic: How monopoly enshittified Amazon
AI is killing the old web, and the new web struggles to be born
FTC files a massive antitrust lawsuit against Amazon
Subscribe to The Verge for unlimited access to theverge.com, subscriber-exclusive newsletters, and our ad-free podcast feed.We love hearing from you! Email your questions and thoughts to vergecast@theverge.com or call us at 866-VERGE11.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
