Reddit vs. Reddit: the latest on the fight for the platform

16 Jun 2023 · 1 h 20 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: The Vergecast - Episode: Reddit vs. Reddit: The Latest on the Fight for the Platform

Episode Overview Hosts: Nilay Patel, David Pierce, Alex Cranz, Jay Peters Topic: The ongoing conflict at Reddit regarding API changes and the implications for third-party apps and user experience. A discussion on the potential of the Apple Vision Pro to replace traditional TV viewing.

Key Points Discussed

Reddit API Changes and Community Backlash

  • API Proposal: Reddit announced significant changes to its API pricing in April, positioning it as a monetization strategy for data used by AI models.
  • Developer Impact: Third-party app developers, notably Christian Selig's Apollo, faced immense costs likely leading to shutdowns.
  • User Discontent: Reddit users expressed anger over these changes, leading to subreddit blackouts in protest.

Jay Peters' Interview with Reddit CEO Steve Huffman

  • CEO's Stance: Huffman stated that Reddit was never designed to support third-party apps and emphasized that third-party apps must either pay up or cease operations.
  • Contentious Interview: Jay described the interview with Huffman as contentious, revealing a strong corporate determination to follow through with price changes despite user backlash.
  • Community Dynamics: The hosts discussed how Reddit has shifted from a community-driven platform to one prioritizing profit, highlighting a disconnect between management and the user base.

Broader Implications of API Changes

  • Business Model Shift: Reddit's efforts to monetize data reflect a desire to align more closely with profitable business practices, especially with impending IPO ambitions.
  • User Loyalty vs. Profit: The hosts debated whether Reddit is overestimating user loyalty and whether the community will continue to engage with the platform after third-party apps are potentially eliminated.

Apple Vision Pro Discussion

  • Impact on TV Watching: The hosts examined the proposition that the Apple Vision Pro could replace traditional TV. While offering immersive experiences, they questioned the feasibility of widespread adoption due to isolation and practicality.
  • Cultural Reception: There was skepticism about whether consumers will embrace a solo viewing experience over communal TV watching, emphasizing the importance of social interaction in media consumption.

Additional News Highlights

  • Instant Pot Bankruptcy: The hosts briefly discussed the bankruptcy of Instant Pot after private equity involvement, raising concerns about the pitfalls of prioritizing growth over product integrity.
  • Legal Issues for Twitter: A pending $250 million lawsuit against Twitter for copyright infringement highlighted ongoing struggles for the platform amid financial mismanagement.

Key Takeaways

  • Reddit's Business Strategy: The conflict surrounding Reddit's API changes exemplifies a larger trend in tech where community engagement is often sacrificed for short-term profit.
  • Apple Vision Pro's Role: While the Vision Pro introduces innovative technology, it raises questions about future media consumption habits and the nature of social interaction in a digital age.
  • Private Equity Concerns: The Instant Pot's decline serves as a cautionary tale about the consequences of prioritizing growth over the sustainability of beloved products.

Conclusion The episode encapsulates the tension between technology companies and their user communities, underscoring the need for businesses to find a balance between monetization and maintaining user trust. As the tech landscape continues to evolve, the discussions around Reddit and the Apple Vision Pro serve as critical case studies in navigating these challenges.

---

Further Reading

  • [Full Interview with Reddit CEO Steve Huffman](#)
  • [Reddit API Changes and User Reactions](#)
  • [Apple Vision Pro: The Future of TV?](#)

Contact Information

Email us at vergecast@theverge.com or call us at 866-VERGE11. We love hearing from you!

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00When will AI finally make work easier? How about today? Say hello to Gemini Enterprise from Google Cloud, a simple, easy-to-use platform letting any business tap the best of Google AI. Retailers are already using AI agents to help customers reschedule deliveries all on their own. Bankers are automating millions of customer requests so they can focus on more personal service. And nurses are getting automated reports, freeing them up for patient care. It's a new way to work. Learn more about Gemini Enterprise at cloud.google.com.

1:01and cybersecurity professionals now have the ability to stop zero days before day zero. The world needs defenders. Defenders need Darktrace. Visit darktrace.com slash defenders for more information.

1:29Hello and welcome to Verchast. The flagship podcast of open API access for third-party apps. On this episode of the show, we go deep into React. That would be incredible if we just did a whole show on React. We should do a whole show on React. Anyway, I'm your friend, Neelai. David Pierce is here. Neelai, a thing that is true is that there is a whole series pitch that includes an episode on React. So don't you worry. It's coming. Very good. Alex Kranz is here. I can safely say I don't want to be on that episode. Yeah, Alex is like rust for life. I don't know what these words mean. and I hope people get very mad at me.

2:02I've learned that's the secret to online engagement. Can we make bumper stickers that say Rust for Life? I feel like we tell a lot of those. I want to be clear. I don't know what these words mean. Jay Peters is here. Hey, Jay. Hey, I also cannot tell you what Rust is. I'd buy the sticker though. We can Google it. The problem is that we'd Google it and get a result from a Reddit forum that is down. And that's really the show today. So we have a lot to talk about. We got to talk about the Vision Pro. We got a lightning round coming up. But the story of the week, which Jay in particular has owned top to bottom, is what is going on at Reddit.

2:35I will tell you, the listener now, Jay, five minutes ago, was on the phone with Reddit CEO Steve Huffman in what I think we can only describe as a somewhat contentious interview. Steve Huffman does not want third-party apps. He does not care for them, it appears. No, it shouldn't be a surprise if you followed his AMA last week, where he also said that he wants apps to pay the fees or go away. But in my interview with him, he kept that same line and believes very strongly that third-party apps should pay up or go away. So there's a lot going on with this story. On Wednesday, we had Christian Selig, the developer of Apollo, a third-party app.

3:17We should have got the developer and user side of what's happening with Reddit. It's important to talk about the Reddit side of what's going on with Reddit. Jay, walk us through what's been happening at the company. So at the highest level, this all comes down to API changes that were announced in April, which the company at the time positioned as a way to monetize their data that had been used to train AI and large language learning models. CEO Steve Huffman gave a big interview to the New York Times to this effect. At the time, though, we didn't know how this might affect third-party developers.

3:50And at the end of May, third-party developers learned how it would affect them. And it turns out the cost would be, for the vast majority of them, very, very, very high. To the point where now we know that some of the biggest apps are going to have to shut down. And users are really unhappy about that. And the company's perspective on this is kind of muddled, right? What started out as we're mad at ChatGPT and Google for scraping Reddit for all these years and using them to train large language models. And it's ended with, and we hate this third-party app that's developed by one guy in Canada.

4:28Well, so actually, I think it might be useful to back up even one tick further than that. Because I think the thing that has been true about Reddit for a long time is it is the best source of information on the internet. Right? Like it's sort of a truism of like people who love the internet that if you want useful information about a product, you like append Reddit to your Google search because that's where all the good product information is. It's where all the good conversation is happening. It's where all of the good stuff is, right? Like Google's a mess. We've been writing a lot about the disaster that is SEO.

4:57Reddit is wonderful, right? And the thing is Reddit has never for one second figured out how to like build a business out of this. So it has just like floated along as this like lovely internet place that has an alien as a logo. And then recently has decided, okay, we want to be a public company. We want to be an ongoing business concern that makes money. And so they have spent the last couple of years really trying to find ways to be a successful business that could be a public business. And that really turned again when ChatGPT became huge. And it was like, OK, it's very clear that Reddit's data is valuable, not just to people on the Internet, but to all of these companies who are building these AI models.

5:36And I feel like it started right at that moment to like, OK, our data is literally valuable in a monetary way. And we have to figure out how to squeeze more money out of it than we ever have before. and that's like it's 15 years of work that they didn't do that is all kind of coming back right now so i think that's right right they they need to make money they want to go public they've been talking about it this idea that other big companies are going to scrape their site and use that to generate outsized ai profits it's got to be annoying them they're just screwing up how they are talking about this like more than anything steve huffman in particular seems determined determined to just tell the users of Reddit what's going to happen.

6:19And I'm just reading the transcript of your interview, Jay. It comes through in text. What was it like in person? It was contentious, is what you said is the best way to put it. I wondered after seeing the AMA and seeing the company's response to this, I wondered if it was coming from the top. Like, I couldn't think of why else Reddit, which has previously been, I feel like, very responsive to its community, willing to listen, make adjustments as needed. That's not the case here. Steve Huffman believes very much in this business decision to charge more for its API. And he is going to go through with it, hell or high water, because I'm not 100 % sure at the end of the day why he wants to do that.

7:06But I think it's the combination of making money from these AI companies and to run out these third-party apps that he believes have built businesses that are in competition with Reddit itself. I get it. So this is like a, David hates it when I talk about decoder on the virtual house, but this is like a decoder trope is that two things that look the same on the internet, often one of them is much more valuable than the other, right? So accessing Reddit through Reddit makes much more money for Reddit than accessing Reddit through Apollo. And so if you're just looking at Reddit, and he says this in your interview, if you type Reddit into the App Store and Apollo comes up and you pick Apollo over the Reddit app, you are making less money for Reddit.

7:55So I understand that, right, that framing, that these things are in competition. These experiences are in competition, and one of them generates more revenue for Reddit than the other. I don't know, and I'm wondering if you got this sense when you were talking to him, if the API pricing actually equalizes that or it just gets rid of the competition. My sense is gets rid of is the latter. Unfortunately, that's what I think it is. The pricing seems so high for the developers who make these really beloved apps. And Reddit has just shown they're not going to give an inch on any sort of negotiation or giving them more time to follow the policies or even like a lower price that I really think Reddit wants to get rid of these competing apps so that users have to go on to the website or the official Reddit app.

8:49and Reddit can hopefully find ways to better monetize those users from there. So I'm gonna read the audience's quote from Steve Huffman to Jay real quick, because I think it really puts a lot into perspective. The vast majority of uses of the API, not third-party apps, the other 98 % of them make tools, bots and enhancements to Reddit. That's what the API is for. It was never designed to support third-party apps. And then Huffman goes on to say he let it exist and that he should take the blame for those apps existing because, quote, I was the guy arguing for that for a long time. There's an inherent tension in those statements, right?

9:26I was the guy arguing for third-party apps to exist. Also, the API was never designed to allow these apps to exist. Did he explain that tension at all to you? I mean, I'm still coming off the high of it all, but... We really did. We're like, Jay, pick up the phone and tell us exactly what happened. Yeah. I mean, I don't remember him speaking to that, which tells me this change was pretty sudden. And especially when we hear folks like the Apollo for Reddit developer, Christian Selig, when he had heard in January that the API is not going to change. I believe his quote was from Reddit was, it won't change for years.

10:04And then all of a sudden, it's going through this monumental shift, says that something over the past six months changed within Reddit. Even though this is something that Steve told me that they've been talking about doing something like this for a very, very long time, they actually have made a choice about it and they gave everybody a month and a half to figure it out or two and a half months. But ultimately, they didn't even get that long because I think and you point this out in a lot of the coverage you've been doing is that they made this announcement in April without saying prices. And what we've heard from a bunch of developers overwhelmingly is like, yeah, that sort of makes sense, right?

10:39Like you've been giving us free data for a very long time. It makes sense that at some point you're going to have to charge us for us. But then what Reddit was telling them was we're going to do this in a sane way. It's going to make sense. And then Reddit comes out with this gigantic price at the end of May with a 30-day deadline, which is essentially nothing. Like there's really there's not a lot of meaningful moves you can make in a 30-day window. And based on that, I don't know how you come out of this thinking anything other than they're just trying to kill the big third-party apps. Because they've got like it's not hard to model that out and figure out that's what's going on here.

11:10And Steve went out of his way a bunch of times to say, we're working with those who still want to work with us. A lot of the stuff that's on the platform is still going to be on the platform. And it's like, OK, but that's not the stuff you're describing as a competitor to Reddit. And what you're doing here is you are swiftly killing all of the things that you perceive to be a competitor to Reddit. I thought what was really interesting in your conversation there, Jay, was how actively hostile he was, not just to those developers, but to the users themselves. It really feels like the shift. And maybe it's because they figured out large language models and they can go and they can monetize that.

11:41But it really feels like there's a shift at Reddit where they no longer view the users as customers, but as something in the way of what their actual profit is. Like this whole conversation he had with you, he was talking about how the users are the ones that are shutting up other users. They're getting rid of dissent. They're not letting their true people of Reddit speak out. And this is just a tiny minority. And that just seems like incredibly hostile and cruel to your user base, many of which are mods who are certainly the most dedicated members of the team or of the community. What I feel like might be what the company is trying to stress test here is how much do people love Reddit, even if these third party apps go away?

12:24And I think for so many of us, Reddit has become a habit, it's become a site that we check on a regular basis. And will the power users of the Reddit apps, which I have to suspect are ultimately a minority of the users of the platform, do they move over? Or will they continue to be very vocal and want to be able to access Reddit in places that are not the official apps? That's what the protests this week have been about. and we'll have to see if Reddit will respond to that or if they're going to continue to stick to the party line. And based on our conversation with Steve Huffman, I think it's going to be the latter.

12:59I think the confusion I continue to have with this, and maybe you can give some insight. He repeatedly says it's costing them$10 million a year in infrastructure and costs to support these apps, which make them very little money to no money. And he views that as almost they're stealing Reddit profit and stuff like that. So$10 million, which for a company like Reddit is a lot, but also should not be a whole lot for a company that large. And he's willing to go to war with his most vocal, most active users over$10 million. Steve Huffman last week, he said in the AMA that we are not profitable is something that he said.

13:38And I think based on my conversation with him, I think he's really trying to turn the business into a profitable business as soon as possible. And one very clear line item for that appears to be this$10 million infrastructure cost to maintain these apps that he is okay losing, perhaps at the expense of people being really, really, really mad at him so that the company can find better business footing. We'll see if that pans out. You know, it's funny. Now I'm rooting for the Reddit IPO just so we can get public financial data on the company. Oh, I know. We just don't know the answer to that question.

14:15Alex, I think the one thing I would add to that is it's not just the$10 million, but it's the opportunity cost of all the people who use apps like Apollo, who are by definition going to be like power users of the platform, who are not using the Reddit app. So not only are you paying to keep Apollo alive, you're losing all of the money that you would get from all of the people who use Apollo. But the thing that confuses me there is that's a mobile only app, which means it's affecting their mobile traffic. Reddit has its own app. Yeah, and it sucks. By all intents and purposes sucks. Yeah. Like, I use Apollo because the Reddit app sucks.

14:50Yes. Right. The thing they should have done is spend$10 million to buy Apollo. Right. And that's the thing that I just, I keep getting confused on. I'm like, why are you like, we want to kill the good products and foist the shitty product on everybody and then be like confused when everybody's mad that we're foisting the shitty product on them. Again, part of the interview and part of what prompted Reddit to speak today, they have not been speaking a lot. They put out a fact sheet. Their claim is like, this isn't such a big deal. Jay, you want to run us through some of the numbers there? So with this fact sheet, the main thing that they have on the fact sheet is that more than 80 % of our top 5 ,000 communities by daily active users are now open.

15:34And this is what is technically day four of the protests that started in earnest on Monday. And what Reddit is trying to say here is that Reddit wants to be open. It does not want to be protesting. The many quote unquote normal people want to be using Reddit, talking in their communities. In this fact sheet, they had a few examples of like the Denver Nuggets subreddit is where people hung out when the Nuggets won the NBA championship because this is not what's included in fact, the NBA was closed because it was protesting these changes. And so I think Reddit is trying to counter the idea that the entire platform is in revolt, which is not necessarily a characterization I agree with when you go on to the are all subreddit, which I did during the interview with Steve Huffman.

16:28And at that time, four of the top five posts were images all about the blackout. In support of the blackout. Yeah, in support of the blackout. I just have to say they call out the subreddits that are open here. So it's Denver Nuggets, Dark Souls, not the onion. And then the last one, they're like, our Taylor Swift is open. And it's like, you are playing with the hottest fire that burns on the planet. Yeah, why would you come at Taylor Swift? She just broke Ticketmaster by herself. Yeah. Well, what's missing from that statement is that this subreddit went dark on June 12th in protest of the changes.

17:04I believe it opened up on the 14th, which many subreddits did because that was the original intention of the protest was June 12th to 14th. But I just thought that was an interesting piece of missing context from the fact sheet. What I can't figure out is what point Reddit thinks they're making there. Because I think, I do think it's true that there are a lot of people, even on the blacked out subreddits, who would like them to be open, right? That it is, it's, this is, this was designed to be a problem for everybody. It's designed to prove a point. And the only way you prove a point is by causing trouble.

17:37Right. But what I don't get is a, by saying a thousand of our top 5 ,000 subreddits are dark is actually like a pretty large number. I would argue. Yeah. It's a thousand subreddits are dark. That's, that's the math of the top 5 ,000, right? Like that's a big number in one protest against an api change like good god uh but but even beyond that i think that this there's this thing that reddit is trying to do that to some extent i'm sympathetic for because i think if you're steve huffman you know better than anybody that giving into reddit is like the stupidest thing you can do because once once they've defeated you they will ruin your life forever and and i think that's probably true but but on the other hand i i like there's just no part of this in which he sounds sympathetic to the people on Reddit and what they actually want.

18:26He just seems to be like holding his nose and saying, we have investors to appease. Screw the rest of you. I don't know. Is that is that am I overstating that, Jay? Like, did you get any sense that the guy like wants Reddit to be successful and happy? Clarify that question. There's Reddit, the business successful and happy. And there's Reddit, the community successful and happy. Fair. I guess I mean the community. Yeah. And And I think what Reddit always talks about and what Steve even said to you was a reminder that Reddit is a platform run by the community. And then everything else he said seemed very community hostile to me.

18:58I just think he's OK to take the heat. Like he has made this decision. He is fine with the blowback and he's just going to stick to it. So let's come back around to large language models, because that's where we started. And David, I think, correctly pulled us out of that. But this is like what most people are putting together. What we have put together is Reddit sees a bunch of big companies using Reddit's user data to train large language models. And they're going to go and be even richer companies. And Reddit's, I think, somewhat rightfully annoyed by that. Right. And then somehow they're taking it out of these like independent app developers.

19:38Did you ask him, are you talking to Google and OpenAI? I feel like the Reddit-Google relationship is a very complex one. Google needs Reddit and Reddit kind of doesn't need Google, but also needs Google. And now it's getting even weirder as Google trains data. I did ask what the AI company's response is to this. And he mostly just said that we're talking to them. We're having conversations with them. I tried asking one or two different ways and he didn't really get into specifics. So I don't know what those conversations look like. I don't know if OpenAI is like, yep, we're going to pay this. I don't know if Google says, yeah, we're going to pay this.

20:14And we haven't heard anything from those big companies saying that they are going to pay these fees either. Well, how much of that is a red herring for the other big thing that's happening with Reddit, which is they want to do an IPO, right? Like there's rumors of a planned IPO. They filed confidentially at the end or end of 2021. And you'll notice that's a year and a half since they filed confidentially. It's been a long time. It sounds like, based on my interview, that that's something Reddit still wants to go through with. But Steve Huffman didn't really give me any sort of timeline. And so I don't know if it's like the goal is once this transition is done, that they really start to move forward with that.

20:55Is it do they see if the AI companies spend a lot of money on them that gives them a really great revenue stream? I'm not quite sure how that's all going to shake out. Because if you go like Galaxy Brain, it's like, OK, the reason they're killing, like, I think he's pretty clear on the reason they're killing the API, the reason they're killing third party apps is because that's taking money away from them. And they want that money and they would probably really need that money for their IPO to make it successful. They want to show that they've got users. They want to show that they're driving ads.

21:27And so this is a quick, fast, easy way for them to do that while also they're off negotiating their LL with the LLM. Does that seem, did I go to Galaxy Grain? I mean, I think it's hard to get a really clear picture of what Reddit wants to do here besides shut down this API, make sure that no third-party app developers are making any money and potentially monetize their data for AI training models. And I think save costs at the end of the day. You know, Steve often talked about that$10 million infrastructure cost, which... They're not profitable. And they're not profitable. So they got to figure out if they want to IPO and look good for investors, I think they really have to try and put their business on as solid footing as they possibly can.

22:12And I think what's interesting there is you say their business, it's becoming increasingly clear their business is not the communities. And that's something that they said over and over again was, you know, our community is our, like, our business is our community. We love our communities. It's so important to us. It's the driving force of Reddit. And it's like, well, no, it's not if you're willing to piss off this much of the community. right like ultimately that's not your business that's not your priority we were talking about this earlier today at a meeting that reddit has such good data on the individual communities that like it should be able to build a strong business that's not that's also maybe not super hostile or like overly like annoying because there's lots of really focused communities who care about really specific stuff.

22:58That seems like really easy to target ads to, in my opinion. But clearly they want to make this broader statement about you need to be on our version of the app and not somebody else's. Yeah. I'm just reading through this interview. And at one point, Huffman says to you, I did my AMA. I took my beating. That's in here. Wow. Well, let me remind you about that AMA. He answered 14 questions. Nobody said when he was done, I had to ask Reddit and they had to tell me that. And I had to post it in the AMA for people to find out that the AMA was over. So yes, he took the beating, but for a guy who probably knows how AMA decorum is supposed to be, I don't know if he did the best job there.

23:45I'm just like reading this interview right now. And what I'm getting from it over and over again, is a sense that Steve Hoffman thinks other people are getting more value out of Reddit than Reddit the business is getting out of Reddit. And what I don't see here and what I haven't really heard from the company in this 18-month run-up to an IPO is how Reddit's going to get more value out of Reddit. That is just weird to me, right? We see this value that apps like Apollo are getting, and he's got a line in the transcript that's like, 95 % of them, like Apollo, uses our logo. They take our data for free and resell it to users making 100 % margin.

24:23And they use that. And that's competitive. OK, like, sure, I understand that. You should charge a fee to Apollo to regain your margin. Maybe that fee will be too high. But that's just a business conversation, right? You show up to the third party developers and you say, look, this is we need to get some margin back from you using our data. Here's how much we think we need to get. We realize that we've allowed you to do this for free for a long time. Let's walk down the road to the right answer. You can come or go, but you'll feel like you're at the table. There's we need to go yell at Google and Stability AI and OpenAI and whoever else to make sure they're not scraping the site.

24:59That's all just recovering the money. I haven't yet heard an idea for like, and we're going to make more money with X. And there's just a break there that I think is really important. Well, what I think is interesting there is this pricing, at least for like, let's say Reddit wanted to build a robust third party app ecosystem. It doesn't feel like this pricing is a way to do that. Yeah. I mean, again, I think what we keep coming back to is that's not what they want. They want people to use the API to build tools that enhance the core Reddit experience, which they will then monetize. Jay, you've been on this like crazy.

25:39I encourage everyone to go read all of Jay's reporting this week. Read this interview. It is important to hear what Reddit and Steve Huffman are saying in their own words. So read that. I think we're just reacting to the fact that Jay just had this experience, which is quite a lot. But go read it. I mean, take in what they're saying. Jay, what do you think happens next here? I've been asked that a few times this week. And I'm very sad to say that after the interview, my opinion hasn't changed. and I think the app shut down on June 30th and I think Reddit keeps going and I think the users stay really mad but until Reddit responds in some way to these protests which it really hasn't and the protests have lost a little bit of steam at least at this point we talk on Thursday evening I don't know if Reddit's going to budge and it makes me sad to say that it feels like Reddit might quote unquote win here But they're so strong in their conviction to get rid of these apps, move forward with the API changes, and maybe monetize from the AI companies that I think they're just going to go forward.

Read the full transcript

26:45I wonder if I brought up in the same meeting Jay was talking about, I brought up the example of eBay, which has weathered many, many storms. eBay famously just had some executives arrested for having a prominent critic of eBay stalked. This is a real thing that has gone down to eBay world. You just don't hear about it because eBay and they've just turned into a thing on the Internet that happens. They like mailed him a pig's head, I think. It was a pig mask, Alex, a bloody pig mask. Sorry. Sorry. But it's just eBay. It's just like it's in the background of the Internet. It's not important. We don't talk about it the way that we used to talk about Facebook or Google or whatever.

27:21We used to. We used to talk about Yahoo that way. AOL continues to just putter along for some reason. Like, is this the moment that Reddit goes down that path instead of being on the path it was on? That's the open question to me. Right. Your users hate you so much, but they don't really have anywhere else to go. Are we sure Reddit's not already in that position? No. I think what the protests have made clear is that Reddit is like the glue of the internet. That when stuff is happening and it's not like Twitter stuff, politics stuff, it's Reddit that creates most of the content and the vibrancy.

27:57That's why people append the word Reddit to search. From a community perspective, absolutely. Reddit is incredibly important. And I think it's only become more so as people have run away from Facebook and Twitter. Like Reddit has benefited from a lot of that. And Reddit as a company has figured out how to make more money over the last couple of years. I just found an article I was looking for that basically Reddit, as of a year or so ago, Reddit and Pinterest were about the same size. And Pinterest was making about three times as much money as Reddit. just to put some of the numbers in perspective.

28:30And Pinterest is famously under monetized and not doing a great job. You know, they've offered us the CEO of Pinterest for code. And I'm going to be like, what are you doing? What happens there? That's my plan. You have a mall. Why is it not making more money? And like Pinterest is not doing a good job and it makes three times as much money as Reddit. But I think to me, like the eBay thing is like, eBay is still chugging along. A lot of people buy and sell stuff on eBay, but eBay is not sort of vibrant in the same way, which I guess is your point. But to me, it's like Reddit has always been kind of a third rate social media company.

29:01And it seems less and less likely all the time that it's going to be more than a third rate social media company. Like Reddit consolidated forums, all the forums that existed in the world. They still are out there. But Reddit became the new kind of hub of forums, an easy place to search. And I think because the majority of people don't actually use forums, Reddit's been able to like skate by and be quiet. And now they're having what's essentially it sounds like a labor protest in many regards and certainly looks like one. It looks like if you look at what's happening there and the messaging and the actions and compare that to what's happening with the strike in Hollywood, it's very similar.

29:36And now they're just saying, oh, actually, like the money matters. You guys don't matter. You're you're the forums. Like we keep you up for niceties, but like we got to make money at the end of the day and we're going to do that. And if some of you leave, that's fine. I think it was very telling that he consistently was speaking up about how all of the people who are very vocal are keeping the majority of people quiet and not allowing them to speak up and not allowing them to have access to all of their beloved Reddits. Classic management tactic, Alex. Right. It's just like, OK, yeah, you're just trying to get everybody mad at the protesters.

30:13When you're the one who started it, you jacked up the API prices. Again, I just – the thing that strikes me about that is the only capitalists on the verge staff. It's fine. Check up the prices. That's a business negotiation. Great. Doing it with a hammer is like not great. Yeah. I think that's what's confusing – what's kind of baffled me here is like he's turned this into something that very much mimics a labor protest when it never had to be something that mimics a labor protest. Right. And I think that is like the third rail of Reddit. And that's really where my eBay comparison came from, right?

30:50Or Etsy. Like there was a time when Etsy sellers being mad at Etsy had like cultural cachet. Like it would break. We've covered moments like that. And now it's just on the marketplace. It looks more like eBay than not, right? It lost its definition. That's I think the danger for Reddit is like these actions. People need to care about you a lot to be this mad at you. yeah once you break that then you might as well just be anything else and i think the people on reddit for a long time felt like they were loved back by the company even when it was messy there's been many fights between the users and the mods and the mods and the admins but jay like steve is like an og redditor like i mean he is the og redditor that's what i'm saying like he should be one of the people who understands this community the best and i wonder if part of the reason this community feels so betrayed is because it's not like they hired some like, you know, corporate raider to come in and extract some money like they didn't make a private equity deal.

31:50It's like it's the guy they believed in who built this thing that they that they trust who is now the one upending it on them. And I wonder if that's part of the reason this feels bad to people. Steve said something to me to start the interview before I asked any questions. He talked about how my favorite analogy for Reddit is that of a city. Cities are physical things, but they're really these living organisms created by their citizens. And I think Reddit is very much the same. He said, we're a platform and a tech company on one hand, but on the other, it's a living organism, this democratic living organism created by its users.

32:23And I would agree with that sentiment. He clearly understands what the platform should be. He just also doesn't really care for them right now. Well, he doesn't care for a specific segment. And that's, look, the comparison there is Mark Zuckerberg, right? Who's like, I don't know, I'm going to do some stuff that everyone hates. Get over it. Famously with News Feed. But they've come back to this. Facebook in particular has come back to that moment over and over and over again. We rolled out News Feed. Everyone was mad at us. To members of Congress. Like, look, we rolled out News Feed. Everyone's mad at us.

32:56And they got over it and they realized they loved it anyway. And like, that's like part of the founding myth of Facebook is that moment. And I think Steve Huffman is the founder of Reddit. He understands his platform. He understands his company. And I think he's running a lot of that playbook or feeling a lot of that vibe. And I'm not sure it's the same moment or the same problem or even the same political skills as Mark Zuckerberg. I disagree. I think he's running Elon Musk's playbook of like, I'm coming in. I'm going to do what I'm going to do. Suck it up. I'm not sure that I see a lot of daylight between the Elon Musk Twitter playbook than Mark Zuckerberg.

33:34I'm the god king of Facebook playbook and the Steve Huffman, I'm the founder, CEO of Reddit playbook. That's fair. But one of them was like actively successful and happened almost 20 years ago. And the other one happened last year and is like in flux. And I think there's a direct line from how he treated that community and was totally fine with people leaving and what's happening here. Where, again, we're seeing him be like, yeah, I don't care if you leave. The people who are going to stay are going to stay because they love our community. I guess what I'm saying is if you believe that Reddit is a city, the thing that you are is the mayor of that city, right?

34:12You're not the dictator of that city. And that's the turn where you are also a politician. And what Zuckerberg was actually good at historically is being the politician at the top of Facebook. Loved, hated, admired, feared, whatever. He knows he has to play that role. and he does it to whatever amount of success you believe he does it. He, he knows he has to do it and he does it. And he has Adam Masseri doing it for Instagram, right? That's why Instagram changes a button from green to blue. Adam's out making a video being like, we made the button blue. Here's all the reasons we made the blue. Like, and everyone yells at him and he's like, if you don't like blue, maybe next week we'll change it, but probably not.

34:51Right? Like there's an amount of communication and presence for these leaders. Elon, whatever you think of what's going on with Elon, you cannot deny his constant presence. Yeah, he's out there shaking, kissing every baby on the forehead. No, he's not kissing the babies. He's telling the babies they're stupid. He's like, why aren't you making me money, baby? Make more money, baby. Jay, before we let you go, can I ask you a Reddit drama question? I've been trying to figure out what is going on with all of these subreddits who are claiming that they're being forced open and mods are being removed.

35:26And there's like all this intra-subreddit drama. What is going on? Can you explain this to me? This is like my favorite sub-drama, and I can't figure out what's going on. So maybe on Tuesday, earlier this week, there were claims that subreddits that were private in protest had been forcibly reopened by the Reddit admins because reasons. And the ones I'm aware of were claimed were advice animals and Tumblr, which my understanding is those are pretty big subreddits. But it's been hard to track who says what about which person doing which thing. And it has also been very confusing to me. Reddit, to its credit, said in the fact sheet today, we are not shutting down discussions or unilaterally opening communities.

36:10So Reddit says they're not doing the thing that some Reddit users say they're doing. Because the conspiracy theories on both of those have been rampant. People saying like, Steve is editing people's answers to his questions. Like it's been, it's been out of control the last few days. Steve has edited in the past. He's been busted doing that actually. But I think I would, I would suspect he's not doing that in this case, but he's also people have not been very happy with him recently. He's living his life. To be fair, if I had unilateral control of Reddit, I would probably do a lot of dumb things too.

36:44I want you to know that I edit every comment on theverge.com every single day. There's a reason every comment ends with Neil is so smart. A little macro I've got going, a text expander script. Now we know. Yeah. I always wonder. At the end of the day, it's my meditation. We thought it was just our community. Yeah, it turns out. Jay has been doing absolutely killer work on this story. Go read all the stuff. Read the stream. I suspect it's going to keep going until June 30th. So we've got much more to come. Thanks, Jay. We've got to take a break. We'll be right back with more BridgeCast.

37:20Support for this show comes from Shopify. One of the most exciting parts of starting a business is when the sales start coming in. If your business is looking to start selling online, Shopify has everything you need to create your online store. Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses around the world and 10 % of all e-commerce in the U.S., from household names like Mattel and Gymshark to brands just getting started. With hundreds of ready-to-use templates, Shopify helps you build a beautiful online store to match your brand's style. And Shopify is packed with helpful AI tools that write product descriptions, page headlines, and even enhance your product photography.

37:59And best yet, Shopify is your commerce expert with world-class expertise in everything from managing inventory to international shipping to processing, returns, and beyond. Turn those dreams into and give them the best shot at success with Shopify. Sign up for your$1 per month trial and start selling today at shopify.com slash vergecast. Go to shopify.com slash vergecast. Shopify.com slash vergecast. Support for the show comes from Crucible Moments, a podcast from Sequoia Capital. Sometimes the difference between success and failure comes down to one chance encounter. Or following a counterintuitive instinct.

38:44Or ignoring conventional wisdom to make a bold decision. Like when the founders at Palo Alto Networks wanted to redefine cybersecurity for the modern age. Everybody thought we were crazy. Nobody would use the cloud for cybersecurity. And when I hear something like that, I say, of course I'm going to do it, you know. If everybody believes it shouldn't be done or it cannot be done, then, you know, it's a good reason to do it. or when mobile gaming giant Supercell could only rewrite the rules of the industry after failure in the company's formative stages. Many of the best things we've learned have actually come through failures.

39:16These are Crucible Moments, turning points in a company's journey that made them what they are today. Hosted by Sequoia Capitals, Rule Off Botha, Crucible Moments is back for a new season with stories from Zipline, Stripe, Palo Alto Networks, Supercell, and more. Subscribe to season three of Crucible Moments. New episodes are out now, and you can catch up on seasons one and two at cruciblemoments.com, on YouTube, or wherever you get your podcasts. Listen to Crucible Moments today.

39:53All right, we're back. Thank you to Jay. He has been killing it on the Reddit reporting this week, along with Mia. It's just been amazing to watch. In many ways, this is what The Verge was made for, along with the story that I'm going to get into in the light near end. We've hit our peak. What did computers make us do? Is it the question The Verge was here to answer? Weird Reddit drama is one answer, and then something else. But this segment is just titled Kranz has feelings. I have a lot of feelings. So you wrote two stories this week. One of them actually connects to Decoder this week. It's about private equity.

40:28Another one is about the Vision Pro and the TV. actually Kranz both you and David had John Gruber dunks this week which I think is a record for us did we? that's exciting yeah so Kranz wrote the Apple Vision Pro might be a TV but it won't replace the TV and John is a friend so it's fine this is what like blogging is meant to be yeah and he was like this shoe might not be a shoe but it'll replace shoes it's like a great tweet from John and then David you wrote all phones should be flip phones and John wrote no they shouldn't effectively he's like what are you talking about so good this is what you want actually john and i've been talking about this thing like he is blogging a lot more lately uh-huh and we rebuilt our entire site to allow us to blog more and like the death of twitter and the end of the social web and all this reddit so it's all like mixing and matching the same thing but it has resulted in us all writing up more and like having conversations across our sites yeah the internet should have more fights on their own websites yes with other it's that's great i love it it's way more fun than Twitter.

41:28It's exactly what I want. But that means, Kranz, you are now compelled to defend your Apple Vision Pro take. And then, David, I want you to defend your flip phone take. Okay, we can go back to that. Let's start with the Vision Pro. I think we continue to just consider what happened to us a couple weeks ago at WWDC. Have you noticed, by the way, that there has been this run of people over the last couple of days kind of re-evaluating? It's like everybody does that re-review six months later. This is the like eight days after I experienced the Vision Pro, how do I feel? And it's just a lot of people like processing emotions about gadgets, which is very funny.

42:07It's been a really interesting week of like re-coverage of that 30 minutes people spent wearing the Vision Pro. I am this close to mandating that every story we write about the Vision Pro have a screenshot of Apple's video, just a frame grab of Apple's video, where the father is taking a photo of his kids playing. And so they're playing and he's next to them in the headset. And I'm just like, we should put this in every story we write about this product. Constantly remind people. Just bring people back to the essential nature of wearing this around other people. Which is kind of Kranz's point, right?

42:43Which is Kranz's point. Yeah, it leads right into it, which is this is not really what TVs are for. Talk about it. Yeah, yeah. Yeah. So basically, we had a big fight in Slack, largely because Gruber had this great piece about how he was still thinking about this thing and how great it was as a TV and how they were going to sell a lot of units because it is like a TV. And I was like, OK, that's true. I agree. I agree with him. It's like a TV. I agree with David. It's like a TV. But it's not going to actually replace the TV because TVs are communal by nature, even though most of us probably don't watch TV with other people all the time.

43:16They're still relatively communal things. And this thing is very isolating and expensive and TVs are cheap. And there's a lot of conversations about how, oh, this thing is going to be really incredible because you're going to be able to watch NBA games from courtside. And like, we can't even get NBA games in 4K. We're going to be getting 3D NBA courtside. Like, let's come on, guys. So it really was like thinking about how we've seen TV and stuff transform over the last couple of years and how that media is slow to respond. And the same thing is going to happen with this product, even though we do have this commitment from Disney and everything.

43:53This feels a lot more like 3D TV than it does 4K TV. And even 4K TV has been really struggled to adopt and get content out there. Yeah, I've been thinking a lot about this piece, Alex, since you and Richard and like half our staff were fighting about this in Slack. and the thing that i've come around to is i kind of think that this eyesight feature ends up being like culturally and technologically the single most important thing about the vision pro because like one of the things that happens at least in my life all the time is i sit on the couch and my wife sits next to me on the couch and we both look at our phones and we don't talk to each other we're both doing our own thing but we're in the same space and there's something to that and i think part of what feels so isolating to me about some of these headsets is like if i were to sit there and put on my quest 2 and start playing a game like i have in a very real way gone somewhere else right in the sense that like i can hear her less i can't see her as well she can't see me as well she doesn't know what i'm doing that's just like the dynamic changes even if i'm sitting next to you with my headset on versus i'm sitting next to you looking at my phone and eyesight in particular this feature where you can see someone's eyes through the headset when they're doing something and we don't know exactly how this is going to work with content can i watch a movie and have eyesight on i genuinely don't i don't know that we know the answer to that i think the answer is no okay i think eyesight only happens when you are talking to someone outside the headset but even that is messy right because one of the things we got in the demo is this idea that like i can be watching a movie and you start talking to me and you sort of fade in like do my eyes fade in as that is happening yeah i think this is why we weren't demoed it i don't think they figured all those moments out yet that's fair because the basics of it are very simple they take a picture of your eyes and they show them on a screen like i don't think i said it's gonna fix the fundamental isolation problem though because the fundamental isolation problem is you're sitting next to your wife you're both let's in this world you both have spent thirty five hundred dollars minimum on these headsets you're both sitting on your couch next to each other wearing them you can look and you can talk to each other but you know if you're looking at something on your phone you're like this is stupid you can like show it you can just look at it and be like honey look how stupid this is and hold it up to her face in this you can't do that classic phone interaction when i think about people who love each other it's like look how stupid this is but you can't really interact in that same way that you do when you're just like sitting on the couch watching tv and on your phone or something and i think that the fact that you can't interact that way that isolation is going to restrict use cases a little more.

46:28Well, spin that out all the way to the ideal hardware. I keep coming back to the idea that the Vision Pro, as it was announced, is a simulator of what Apple really wants to do. Which is AR glasses. Which is AR glasses. Okay, so now we're both wearing AR glasses. There isn't a dumb battery pack in our pockets. We've solved enormous technical challenges. No virtual eyeballs on front of... Right, right. We're both just wearing a pair of Ray-Bans. and we're sitting next to each other and something dumb happens and I need to show it to you. Like, there's still a problem there. Like, the friction, I agree with you, is like psychological and emotional friction.

47:02I mean, practically, I'm looking at a virtual object on my display and I want to show it to you on your display. And I've got to get two different computers to agree on that. Right? Hey, look at this. It's no longer me holding you a pile of atoms. is no longer me showing you a pile of atoms. It's me trying to send you a bunch of bits. And that is just, it's just harder. Like historically it's harder. I don't know. Like, are we going to get to a point where we've solved all of the technical problems to make AR glasses, but like airdrop isn't good enough that I can just like nod my head towards you and you see the thing that I'm looking at.

47:43Like that doesn't sound to me like the hardest problem of all of these to solve. Here's what I'm going to guarantee without a doubt that nod your head to airdrop a thing, 95 % successful. How long did it take bump? Yeah, exactly. One decade before you could wave your phones at each other. And even like, fine. I'm not saying it won't work or it won't mostly work. I'm saying that the problem of there's something on my screen that I want to put on your screen has bedeviled computers since the history of computers. And like, mostly it works fine, but it's never the same as we're both just looking at a screen together and it's even harder when you're trying to sync audio and video across those screens at extremely high bit rates in 3d with surround sound like what like isn't it just easier to to use our eyes and ears the way that we have them you know this makes me think of when i believe it was when our netflix show was coming out, you know, Disclosure of the Verge made a show with Netflix.

48:49We all got on like Netflix's sharing platform to watch something together. Do you guys remember this? And as it turned out, anyone who joined this thing could control it. So every single person that joins just instinctively pressed play to make it play. But actually what they did was pause it. So we got like a hundred people playing and pausing this thing. And so maybe you're right. Maybe we're never going to be good at this. Well, and Apple has SharePlay. Like they have begun to build the infrastructure they need to solve these problems. I'm not saying they're not working on it. I'm not saying they won't be 95 % successful.

49:25I'm just saying even if you spin it out to it's just a pair of wireframe Steve Jobs glasses, you have solved some of the most challenging physics and engineering problems in the history of computing. It's still like, all right, I got to Bluetooth some shit to you. Yeah. Like there's just something there that, okay, we've put up an expensive screen in the room and we're going to perceive it together. It will just forever be superior. Yeah. A TV is always going to be superior for that reason, right? Like you're always just going to be able to turn on a TV. It's a solved technology. It's way, way, way, way, way cheaper.

50:06And I think that's really crucial when we talk about this. We talk about like – because essentially I'm the ideal user for the Vision Pro, right? I live alone. I love TV. I love content consumption. Yeah. Having 105 inch 4K beautiful display in my home at all times, always in front of my eyeballs, sounds like the best thing in the world. But it also sounds like the worst thing in the world. It sounds just deeply unappealing. It's like it's expensive. And it is that isolation factor is there. And for me personally, I can't I wouldn't be able to get over the fact that like I'm just sitting in my house in a huge like not huge sitting in a fairly large apartment by myself, completely isolated.

50:50This is the Steve Jobs dream, a huge house devoid of furniture. And somehow there's just Macintoshes everywhere. Just everywhere. Have you seen that? There's a photo. Sean Lennon, John Lennon's kid got a Mac in the 80s for his ninth birthday. and there's a photo of Steve Jobs on the ground with Andy Warhol and he's like showing him how to use this nine-year-old's Mac. This is like what everybody wants, right? Now just imagine that Steve Jobs and Andy Warhol were wearing headsets at a nine-year-old's birthday party and he was like, look at my headset. Yeah. It's dumb. I think it's kind of stupid.

51:28And somebody after I wrote that piece immediately hit me up and was like, thank you. I don't think this is going to replace it because every time I use my husband's headset, I have to then wipe off like my face that's on the headset. And there's always like that, that intimate kind of grossness that headsets demand. Oh, dude, I use somebody else's laptop and I'm like, get this garbage away from me. Most people have natural scrolling turned on. Disaster. And now you're going to put it on your face. Yeah. Which is much more sensitive. By the way, people have asked us this. As far as I can tell, there's no profiles on the Vision Pro.

52:03So it's just one person. It's one person. And there were hints that there would be a guest mode, but there would be no user accounts, which seems like an enormous miss for the first version of this product. Really? I think it's the opposite. This is a win for people who want a reason to not give this to their children. I think this is a really good thing for Apple to launch on the third version of this. I'm not at all surprised this doesn't have family sharing stuff on it yet. I mean, if they want everybody to have a headset because everybody's going to be living in this AR future where you're wearing face computers all the time, then, yeah, you don't necessarily want profiles because face computers are just harder to share with other people naturally.

52:44So it's like, no, we discourage you. Everyone go spend$3 ,500. Get your entire family out. Yeah. Tell your mom to buy an iPhone, right? Like, that's the Tim Cook line. But you know, this makes me think of is the there's been this sort of long philosophical debate in tech about like, is the future that you sort of have the one screen that rules them all, right? Whether it's like your iPhone that the world revolves around, or in this case, like a headset that the world revolves around, or is the future that like everything around you is connected and has a display and it's and what you have is like a wearable or whatever that sort of imbues that with your preferences and information.

53:21And so like I can walk up to any screen on earth and just like tap it with my thumb and it will know that it's me and become my computer until I walk away. Like that's one vision of the future. The Vision Pro is the exact opposite of that vision, right? Where now the thing I have on my face controls literally the world around me, which I find fascinating. And Apple has always kind of been on the side of like your device rules the world as opposed to like every device can be your device. Like the Chrome OS vision is the every device can be your device, right? You just log in with your username and password to Google and boom, you have a Chromebook.

53:55Any Chromebook is your Chromebook. And it's really interesting to see the Vision Pro be like the very end of that, right? Where it's like you don't have a TV that you have information on. The information lives here. There's nothing else in the world that you need. I don't think there's an answer for that. I think that's going to be the persistent problem because the two things are so fundamentally at odds and privacy is sitting right there in the middle, right? Like your security and privacy are right there. And I think that's always going to be up to an individual and how much of that they want to give away.

54:23Some people are going to be like, yeah, I'm happy to live in this world. I don't want anyone to ever know what I'm watching. This sounds great. And a lot of people like myself are going to be like, no, I want some privacy. And then there are other people who are going to be like, yeah, I like leave every window open, lights blazing, look in my house kind of deal. And those people are making millions in subscription fees. I love them. Wait, so it's just like at the core of that, the problems are still the same. It's really interesting. If you drill into it, right, you're in your living room. You still need to put sensors and everything.

54:57You still need to put networking chips and everything. You still need to put control logic and everything. It's just kind of like where does the interface live? So I look at my thermostat, and the thermostat could just be a computer with a display and an interface and a whole bunch of stuff I got to learn. or the vision pro could say you're looking at a place where a thermostat should be we'll put up some thermostat controls but there still needs to be a bunch of stuff on the other end of that experience that controls the furnace and knows how hot it is in the house you look at an area where a tv should be you still have to like have streaming services and i think you run into the other situation and this is coming again from someone who lives by themselves has a whole home kitted out as a smart home people still come over to my house they like like you still have people over that's your first mistake yeah that's the first beyond the walls of the z-wave alliance you shall not pass but people visit and then if they want to do things like like one of my friends i didn't know this i had forgotten i set it up so anytime i took the dog for a walk after after dark it would turn all the lights off to save electricity i forgot that and she was like okay i'll stay in your house watching tv while you go walk your dog and then like a minute later she's just like texting me being like i'm in complete darkness and everything's off what do i do and i think the vision pro is like exacerbates that problem right somebody comes over to your house and they're like can we watch tv like what kind of no but they have their own vision pro theoretically they have their own vision pro but realistically no like like that level of adoption is so far down the line.

56:36It took us how many decades to like adopt, fully adopt TV? Right. And then the privacy problems are even worse. Right. So again, even if you solve it, it's just a pair of glasses. Everybody's got their glasses on. And you got to come to your house and connect to your network and get control of your devices and blah, blah. And it's like, oh, it's actually a little bit better for the computers to be like physically air gapped a little bit. Yeah. That's not the right word, but you know what I mean? It's like you can't actually control this unless you're touching it is a meaningful layer of security.

57:05Yeah. Yeah. You don't want the guy who's coming over to install your fridge to be like, oh, yeah, I'm just going to go adjust the thermostat. Like, you watch him do that in real life, you'd be like, dude, what are you doing? But with the Vision Pro, he could just be like, like, reaching out. Or maybe, or we live in, like, a horrible world of, like, sharing passwords for augmented reality devices. Whoa. It's coming. It's coming in the... They're going to have to solve the bump problem, right? They're going to have to figure out how they airdrop it. Again, if you're the sort of analyst out there who writes Apple fanfic, there are some of them.

57:37What you're doing is you're saying, OK, Apple's the beginnings of all of these technology solutions are getting made. Right. So the contact sharing with Bump, SharePlay, this, that, all these little branded Apple features will coalesce into an amazing AR experience. Yeah. Maybe, but right now that is fan fiction and that's fine. Like fan fiction has led to a number of things in this society. Fifty Shades of Grey. It started off as fan fiction. Maybe one day your Apple fan fiction will turn into reality. I can't. I can't predict the future, but I know that it's not now and I know that those problems are real.

58:21Here's the thing I really want to get into and I don't know the answer to this. I've been noodling on it. I'm just going to put out a call for submissions. Okay. I keep talking about this formula for things that you wear, where it's like the amount of time it's on your body versus the amount of time you fiddle with it has to be lower than the amount of value it gives you. And I think the Vision Pro is going to make it clear that it has to be like the most utility ever. Yeah. Right? Like a watch, a pair of glasses on your face is extremely useful, right? Like if I didn't wear my glasses, I couldn't see.

58:58So I want them on my face all the time and I will deal with cleaning them and generally being worried about the zombie apocalypse. Like if there's a zombie apocalypse, I'm done. We're boned. I'm like, these glasses are the most important things in the world. I will hold both of your hands and lead you to safety. Don't worry. It'll be fine. It's like, find the 2020s and we're going to build our society around them. But like, they're really useful. So you deal with the amount of care you have to put into them. my smartwatch Apple has generally increased the amount of utility and I deal with charging it every night the Vision Pro is like it lasts for two hours in a battery you have to wear it on your face all the time to get any value out of it at all and it delivers something and I just feel like we should write out that equation I've done it in all kinds of different ways I'm open to submissions like let us know like write to us and let us know what you think that equation is because I think as we come closer to reviewing the Vision Pro and the next quest and all this stuff, it will truly help us figure out if these things are going to be the future or if they're just a weird side quest.

1:00:02Yeah, I think, A, vergecast at theverge.com. Send us an email. Send us a formula. We will find the best ones, and we will give you credit for it. It's something like time on body times fiddliness equals value. You have to add the dillweed factor in there, too. It makes me like times how stupid do you look in this? Yeah. But I think this goes back to me for like the more I think about it, the more Apple's like fundamental whiff on the Vision Pro was how was the storytelling. And it's the guy at the birthday party. It's the woman doing laundry. It's like Mark Zuckerberg had that good zinger where he was like, all the pictures of this are someone sitting alone on their couch.

1:00:42Like, I think that's true. And I think what's going to be true about the Vision Pro is that it's going to be very cool for very specific episodic things, right? Like Chris Grant said this on the Vergecast a while ago, like VR is great for things you do for a short period of time and then you take the headset off. And I think if Apple had said that or like shown us versions of that where like here are things you can do in this that are cool, this is not a lifestyle product yet. and Apple would never say that, but they could have told stories about it differently because it's not a lifestyle product and it's a really long way from being a lifestyle product.

1:01:16But the idea that I would put this on, do something in it for a couple of hours and then take it off and go about being like a regular person in the real world again, I think is much more compelling than this idea of like, you are going to wear this headset while you do laundry and go to birthday parties for the rest of your life. But this is what I mean about it's a simulator. They showed us what they want it to be and they built like a hardware simulator of what it can be. Right. But they still told everybody that this is what it was. Like, I think the big problem with Apple and the messaging, and I think you're totally right, David, it is, they did bad storytelling here.

1:01:49The story was, we have a vision of the future. Here's your first taste of it. And instead they're like, here is the future. Now you can have it. And that's just wrong. We did it already. Yeah. Like, no, you didn't. To be fair, and I have criticized the Apple Watch launch more than anyone, I think, I would point out that they announced the digital crown as an input device on par with multi-touch and the mouse and the click wheel. But what they didn't show you is they didn't show you pictures of somebody sitting there at their kid's birthday party, like using the phone as a watch as a viewfinder.

1:02:21Right. But they showed us supermodels running through Africa with a first generation Apple watch, which we got and it was completely foolish. I run through Africa every day with my watch. they showed us that thing where people were sending heartbeats to each other which by the way I accidentally did to Joanna Stern the other day she's like what are you doing she's like are you sending me your heartbeat right now yeah that's like that's way too intimate that's like I wouldn't do that to anybody I didn't even know it was still there I just pushed the wrong button in iMessage anyhow the point I'm making is even with the Apple Watch they did the thing that Apple is prone to doing right now which is they sort of remix the greatest hits of their product launches.

1:03:02They say one more thing. They told you about a new input method. They tell you that everything else is garbage. It's a script, right? And they can kind of mad libs the announcement. And I think here the jump is so vast that that script kind of let them down in a way that the Apple Watch followed the script and computers had to get slightly better for the Apple Watch to start working. And then they totally rebooted the interface. uh it was a gen 3 or gen 4 series 3 or series 4 and you know then they figured out how to turn the screen on all the time and it got faster and like it just caught up to where they were going always this is like what are they going to catch up to well and also the apple watch was not as huge like revisionists might say it was successful it was not hugely successful when it first started there was a lot of criticism of it they like that was that script creaking under the load and having to wait three, four years before the watch really worked.

1:03:59Like my first watch I called my great regret. But what I'm saying is like the path from the beginning to the end of the fourth year. It was clear. Right. Even when they totally rebooted the interface, it was like, all right, we threw a bunch of spaghetti at the wall. We figured out what sticks. We're going to hide all this other stuff. Right. We're going to simplify this down. This is like, here's a bunch of spaghetti at the wall. No one can tell you. It was fairly obvious, I think, with the watch that notifications and health features were of the things that were the most interesting. It was never obvious that sending your heartbeat to people would be the thing that would sell Apple Watches, but they needed to fill out the idea of the product.

1:04:34We'll just see, like, your point with your piece, Alex, is what they have showed most compellingly is it's a TV. Yeah. Right. And all the other stuff is like, eh, you got a headset on your face. But ultimately, this is a very, very nice TV. Well, so if you do the math, their math on this is a nice TV and it might be worth it is not so off. A nice big OLED TV is going to cost you more than$2 ,000. So 65-inch. But this is much bigger than that, right? Yeah, yeah. So a 75-inch, 85-inch OLED TV, depending on the sales and the time of the year and whether it's a Super Bowl, who knows? It's going to cost you more than$2 ,000.

1:05:11Right. A nice Atmos sound system to pair with it will probably cost you around$1 ,000. And that's a cheap one. That's like a refurbished one with a receiver and speaker wires. Right. If you go like the Sonos, right? It's going to cost you way more than$1 ,500. Just the ARC alone is$700. Okay, we got there. We got to the price of a Vision Pro. But then you have a Vision Pro. You don't have a TV and a nice sound system that you can plug your console into. Well, and I think that's a different person necessarily. Because I think what this is for is for those people who don't want to have that one big home theater system, right?

1:05:48Like those people are going to go do that all the time. Hey, guys, I love you. You're my people. You're wonderful. I know they're here and I want to acknowledge them. Yeah. You guys all, you two, you and them all read the same publications on your iPad together. But that's one kind of person. I think this felt like it was more intended for everybody else. And everybody else is going to spend$600 on a TCL, maybe$100 on a Vizio soundbar after they keep saying it sucks and they go to theverge.com and Google best soundbar. And they're like, oh, okay, I'll get a Vizio. And so they're going to spend like a grand.

1:06:26How do you convince them to go spend$3 ,500? TV manufacturers have been struggling with this for a while now. They all keep pushing the biggest, fanciest TVs, but the TVs that actually sell, that actually move, are the cheap TVs. I think that price gap is going to be a problem for Apple. And it'll definitely come down in price, right? Like this is$3 ,500, but there's going to eventually be a Vision next to Pro, and it'll probably be like$1 ,500 or something. And you're still going to be struggling with that. OK, I could spend this and have a really good set for me personally. Or I could have something that is much more flexible and can do a lot more.

1:07:03And I think that's where they're going to struggle. But they don't have to. They're not trying to displace the TV market right now. Right. But that's what they're going to have to compete with because that's what they've made. They've made a competitor to the TV. Right. I think we're both saying the same thing, which is in the end, no one is going to cross shop this with TVs. Yeah. But in the end, the value proposition is look at this TV. So that's a there's a disconnect there that somehow some way will get resolved. And I think probably what resolves it is time and determination from Apple to make this a product that works.

1:07:38Yeah. And I think the stakes for it would be so much lower if it were five hundred dollars. Right. If this is like a thing you could buy that was sort of purely additive to your TV and you watched it when it was just you. But when it wasn't just you, you put it down and you watch TV with whoever else is in the room. But at$3 ,500, the value prop is just so different that I think Apple is going to lose that fight for a while here. Yeah, a$500 one, every single college dorm would be filled with them. It would be the most popular thing. There's a long way to go between this product as it exists and$500.

1:08:11Oh, yeah, we're not getting there any time to do. Just the displays alone. This thing costs$3 ,500 because it has to. All right, we should take a break. Like, Kranz, you also wrote about the Instant Pot and what happened with private equity. And I just want to point out. They're bankrupt. They got purchased by a big private equity firm that did some private equity stuff and now they're bankrupt. Yep. This was a pretty simple business. They made Instant Pots and then once a year they sold Instant Pots when everyone's parents bought them an Instant Pot. Like, it wasn't a complicated business. The connection I want to make is Kranz wrote a piece about how the search for endless growth tanked this company, which happens over and over again.

1:08:49And then just by coincidence, this week's Decoder is Brendan Ballew, who's a federal prosecutor, who wrote a book called Plunder about how private equity is destroying American markets. And you should just go listen to it and then consider the Instant Pot. It's a very good episode. As everyone knows, I hate Decoder and refuse to listen to it. But it's a good episode of Decoder. We'll allow it. I have never been more surprised. Like, soon after I was on Decoder, everyone's like, good job. I'm like, here's a federal prosecutor who wrote a wonky book about antitrust and private equity. And everyone's like, this is the episode.

1:09:20Okay. I know we've cultivated an audience of nerds. And even to me, sometimes it's surprising what people are nerdy about. Wait, before we take a break, I just have one question, which is, Alex, were you as sad as you seemed writing this story about the Instant Pot? You seem very sad about the Instant Pot. I was just bummed. I'm always bummed when private equity kills something that's cool. Stop doing that, private equity. But they won't because they love profit. I do love my Instant Pot. The bank isn't taking it away. Kicking down our doors, reclaiming all our Instant Pots. This is why you should buy things that don't rely on cloud services, because the bank can take that away.

1:09:57That's true. Always on my mind. All right. We got to take a break. We'll come back. We had a little lightning round, and we'll wrap this up. We'll be right back.

1:10:09Support for this show comes from Figma. Figma is the collaborative design platform where teams come together to turn ideas into the world's best digital apps, websites, and experiences. And now, there's a faster way to bring those ideas to life. Introducing Figma Make, an AI-powered prompt-to-code tool that helps you turn ideas into something real, fast. Figma Make is a different kind of vibe-coding tool. With just a few prompts, you can turn any idea into a code-backed prototype or app that anyone can explore, iterate on, and share. And it's all connected to Figma. So you can start from scratch or from your design file.

1:10:46Figma Make is made for designers, product managers, and builders who want to move fast and explore more ideas. Try it now and see how quickly you can make your ideas real with Figma Make. Just go to Figma.com slash Vergecast. That's F-I-G-M-A dot com slash Vergecast.

1:11:31You're doing practical exercises and projects that prepare you for the job you want. That's why 90 % of Udacity graduates surveyed say that they achieved their enrollment goal. Udacity just launched a master's degree in AI. You heard that right. And when you have a certification from Udacity, recruiters and employers take notice. So for a better job, better salary, and better skills, you can check out Udacity today. The tech field is always evolving. And you should too. You could try Udacity risk-free for seven days. You can head to udacity.com slash verge and use code verge for 40 % off your order.

1:12:12Once again, that's udacity.com backslash verge for 40 % off and make sure you use the promo code verge so they know we sent you.

1:12:27All right, we're back. Slightening round time. am david has picked one for me and in retaliation i've picked two more for myself but david why don't you begin yeah i really played myself on this one uh the good news is mine's very quick so we can leave two or three hours for your several mine is that instagram added a feature to its uh status update thing in the app that will now show what song you're listening to and i just want to give real genuine kudos to the instagram team and meta as a whole for doing its damnedest to bring back the away message yep i have been saying the away message and status things need to come back for years i believe in it with my whole heart i wish this were like an open standard that worked everywhere and i could like change my slack status it would also change my instagram status like that'd be rad but this rules this is aim away messages coming back via instagram um and i just i just want to applaud instagram i think they do a lot of bonkers things and it's mostly a bad app but notes and the whole status feature is very good so congratulations instagram well they're doing that and they added broadcast to instagram is quickly turning into the everything app yes eat it twitter like you can just see where it's going it's kind of neat but it's also boy you open instagram and a lot of things are happening i think instagram is really quickly heading down a path of being like the everything social app because like facebook is an entertainment platform slash dying whatsapp is only ever going to make money by helping you chat with businesses so they're leaning really hard into like shopping they're doing some social stuff but instagram is like especially if the their twitter competitor threads sort of attaches to instagram in an interesting useful way like this becomes the place you share stuff with your friends that is what they're going for in a really big way and i think it's gonna be really interesting to watch yeah all right my first one is one david assigned who's actually really cool taylor swift exists her fans exist the ticketing catastrophe happened that led to a series of hearings listings live nation slash ticket master along with a bunch of other ticketing companies and airbnb so live nation seat geek dice and airbnb it's so funny to me that airbnb is part of this well you know why but they have announced that they will no longer have hidden fees they're going to disclose the total price while you're shopping and this is like a classic right a threat of regulation like taylor swift fans were so upset that the government was like what if we regulate these companies and they're like what if we just do what you want don't regulate us And Airbnb is in the mix because people are so pissed about cleaning fees.

1:14:58So Airbnb also sees the writing on the wall. And so all these companies are going to be more transparent about their pricing, which is wholly a good thing. I think it might be better if there was more actual competition in the space. But I will take whatever crumbs of transparent pricing we can get. Yeah, they're going to take this to be a huge victory. But what this actually is is just they know that they can charge whatever they want. So instead of hiding the fees, they're going to tell you about the fees. But if you want to go see Taylor Swift's Heirs tour, you are still going to pay the dumb, enormous, monopoly-riddled fees because you have to.

1:15:33So we have not solved our problem, but we've solved this much of the problem. Let me read you. I mean, it's called the Breakup Ticketmaster Coalition. I don't think this quote is going to be surprising. Here's what the Breakup Ticketmaster Coalition said about this announcement. Live Nation Ticketmaster's announcement today is a half-hearted attempt to ward off a lubing DOJ investigation into addressing the real issue, its monopoly power over live events. Yeah. That's pretty much what the Breakout Ticketmaster Coalition would say. Also, do you actually want the fees broken out? Every time the fees get broken out, I just get really annoyed about the fees.

1:16:09Because then I'm like, why am I paying all these fees? Yeah. I would rather not know it all and just be like, why is that? But then you pay them. Yeah, I still have to pay it either way. But one way I can be like, you know what? Maybe this flight really did cost$1 ,000. And I don't need to know about the$100 gas tax fee that got passed on to me that Delta could have paid for themselves. They do that to make you mad at the government. Yeah, they're trying to make me. But instead, it just makes me mad at the company. And I just want to not be mad. Besides the price itself. I have bad news for you about the current state of American markets.

1:16:43You're going to be mad. All right, Kranz, what's your lightning round? Something I'm not mad about is Steam looks nice. It's looked pretty nice, versions of it. But you know how sometimes you're using Steam and you go to a tab and you're like, oh my god, what's happened here? They've started to make it a little more cohesive. Everything's running together. There's a new Notes app, which is a lot of fun. And Sean Hollister absolutely adores it. And I cannot wait to start using it on my Steam Deck. And it's just like, it's a nice thing. Something I'm not mad at. There you go. Yeah, something I didn't want to rage at.

1:17:20I want to do something positive. I regret to inform you there's a$100 gas tax. God damn it. For the next team update. Okay, I got two more, but they'll be really fast. One, Twitter, I got a work copyright law on to Overcast somehow. Twitter is being sued for$250 million by the Music Publishers of America because they just don't pay any licensing fees for music. It's a hilarious, hilarious problem for Twitter to be in. this is like the most solved problem for the major platforms these are just deals they all can take because the companies know that music on these platforms is a lucrative marketing channel for them whoops well and the my favorite part of this is the other things that twitter decided not to pay for this week which were like it's google cloud bill apparently uh and that's become a whole thing um they're getting evicted from an office in colorado because they stopped paying rent like twitter's new biz dev strategy is just like don't pay any of our bills and see what happens and it's a it's a move it is a move yeah it certainly worked for some people i would just say that the don't pay the music industry move is not one that traditionally works out well for anyone fair including the music metallica's yeah they're just gonna come collect on you they want their money and they're gonna get it uh okay and here's my last one i want to end on a high note This is the most important software update of all time.

1:18:43The Meter Smart Meat Thermometer has gotten a software update. M-E-A-T-E-R. That's very important. It's very good. It's owned by Traeger. This was a big deal when they acquired it last year. It now supports the Dynamic Island in live activities in iOS. What does it do? You're smoking a brisket. You just glance at your phone. It'll tell you the internal and the ambient temperature right there. And maybe I actually have very little success getting this work. It will calculate the time remaining. Our computer is good at math. Who knows? You got to wrap it in brown paper. It's all good. Yeah. My favorite thing about this is this is the stupidest thing I've ever heard.

1:19:20And also for sure the best use of the dynamic island that anyone has discovered since the dynamic island. Think about the amount of engineering that has had to occur for this to happen. Right? The meter people had to make a thermometer with a wireless chip in it that could survive the heat of a grill and work. And actually it has two different thermometers in it. That's just a feat of like miniaturization in packaging. All in and of itself. Apple had to make the iPhone. Can you imagine if the meat guys had been working on the Vision Pro? Yeah. I imagine it every day. Can you imagine you look at your grill and it just shows you a bunch of grill information?

1:20:05This is the future. This is why you want the glasses. That's what you want. Yeah. My wife says that whenever I'm operating the smoker, she's like, the only words you say to me are temperatures. She's like, how are you? And I'm like, 207. She's like, what have you done? I don't care. And then the other day when we had the wildfire smoke and we were running the air purifiers in the house, she's like, I finally understand. Because I just want to tell you what number of the air purifiers are at all day. And then she started calling them the smoke machines, which was a perfect name for an air-peer fire.

1:20:35That's about right, yeah. A wildfire smoke event. Anyhow, those need to get updated for the Dynamic Island as well. I just want to tell you, the Meter Smart Thermometer has been updated to support the Dynamic Island on the iPhone is the sentence that The Verge was created to publish. A number of concepts in that sentence that normal people don't give a shit about is so high. But you, my people, you're here for me. Also, I want to thank Dave Lee for tipping me into that story because that's why we have readers. They know you. All right. That's it. Thanks to you, our nerds, for being with us. One story I want to call out, Mia wrote about Google, about the storefronts on Google and how they're like SEO disasters.

1:21:18It's part of our ongoing coverage of like the world Google has made in this time of change. It seems like a good time to look at what we built before we tear it all down, build something new. So go read that story. It's really good. And we have lots more Google coverage to come. Okay, that's it. David, what's Wednesday's episode? Next Wednesday, we're going to talk to Jen Toohey about a bunch of smart home stuff. This week was smart home week on theversion.com. Like a lot of really great stories. I learned a ton about all of people's weird, insane smart home setups, including yours, Kranz. But we talked to Jen about basically like where to start and how smartphones should work or smart homes should work rather.

1:21:54and then we're going to talk to Josh Jezza about a thing he's been working on for a long time that I can't tell you about yet but it is really cool and it's coming next week very exciting all right that's it that's for chest and that's a wrap for verge cast this week we'd love to hear from you shoot us an email at verge cast at the verge.com the verge cast is a production of the verge and the Vox Media Podcast Network the show is produced by me Liam James and our senior audio director Andrew Marino. Our editorial director is Brooke Minters. That's it. We'll see you next week.

1:22:53latte, not ordering the red sauce. Those feelings of dread are what we call stain-ziety. But now, you can break free from your stain-ziety with Shout's Triple Acting Spray that has stain-fighting ingredients to remove a huge variety of stains, so you can live in the moment and clean up later. Just breathe and shout with Shout Triple Acting Spray. Learn more at shoutitout.com.

1:23:23Support for this show comes from Amazon ads. Every business owner has been there. You put a significant amount of money into an ad buy and then wonder, did those ads actually have an effect? Luckily, there's Omnichannel Metrics from Amazon ads. Omnichannel Metrics helps advertisers understand how their Amazon ads campaigns drive sales both on and beyond Amazon while campaigns are still mid-flight. OCM measures performance across streaming TV, video, audio, and display, helping you understand what's driving results across the full funnel. Using Amazon Shopper panel data plus third-party signals, you'll be able to see beyond Amazon product sales, units sold, and ROAS.

1:24:03Whether customers buy on Amazon or at a brick-and-mortar store, you'll understand the full impact of your campaigns. Measure comprehensive sales impact to better understand purchase behavior and drive greater efficiency, effectiveness, and ROI. Tired of guessing where your ads are actually driving sales? Capture the full impact of your media spend with Amazon Ads Omnichannel Metrics. Head to advertising.amazon.com to learn more. That's advertising.amazon.com.

From the publisher

The Verge's Nilay Patel, David Pierce, Alex Cranz, and Jay Peters discuss all the news about the API changes infuriating Redditors, as well as takeaways from Jay's interview with Reddit CEO Steve Huffman.
Later on the show: will the Apple Vision Pro replace the TV?
Further reading:

Reddit CEO Steve Huffman isn’t backing down: our full interview

Reddit CEO Steve Huffman: Reddit ‘was never designed to support third-party apps’

Reddit crashed because of the growing subreddit blackout

Reddit CEO tells employees that subreddit blackout ‘will pass’

How Reddit set itself up for a fall

Google is getting a lot worse because of the Reddit blackouts

The Apple Vision Pro might be a TV, but it won’t replace the TV

Steve Jobs Showing off Macintosh to Andy Warhol, Keith Haring and Kenny Scharf in 1984 ~ Vintage Everyday

In the bid to grow at all costs, Instant Pot is cooking itself and has filed for bankruptcy

Live Nation-Ticketmaster to disclose full ticket prices upfront 

Twitter sued for $250 million by music publishers over ‘massive’ copyright infringement

The Meater smart meat thermometer now supports the iPhone Dynamic Island and Live Activities.

Instagram’s status update now includes what song you’re listening to

It’s not just you: Steam suddenly looks nice

Email us at vergecast@theverge.com or call us at 866-VERGE11, we love hearing from you.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Vergecast

All 445 episodes
Reddit vs. Reddit: the latest on the fight for the platformThe Vergecast · 1 h 20 min
Listen in VO