In short
The Vergecast Episode Summary: Ring's Adorable Surveillance Hellscape
Episode Details
- Podcast Title: The Vergecast
- Episode Title: Ring's Adorable Surveillance Hellscape
- Hosts: Nilay Patel and David Pierce
- Release Date: [Specify Date]
- Description: The episode explores Ring's Super Bowl ad that sparked a debate on surveillance, the trust issues surrounding tech companies, and recent developments in the AI field.
Key Topics Discussed
- Ring's Super Bowl Ad
- Ring's advertisement featured happy reunions between pets and owners, prompting a discussion on surveillance ethics.
- The ad promotes a feature called "Search Party" that utilizes neighborhood cameras to help locate lost pets.
- Discussion Points:
- Is the ad a heartwarming appeal or a step toward a surveillance nightmare?
- The moral implications of using surveillance technology to find lost animals.
- The hosts reflect on their own experiences with surveillance technology and the ethical dilemmas it presents.
- Trust Issues with Tech Companies
- The conversation shifts to why many people distrust tech companies, using Ring as a primary example.
- Reasons include:
- Concerns about privacy and data usage.
- Legal implications of surveillance technology.
- The hosts debate whether the public's fear of surveillance is justified.
- AI Companies and Executive Concerns
- The episode highlights a wave of resignations from AI executives, many issuing warnings about the state of the industry.
- Discussion on:
- Ads being introduced to ChatGPT.
- Ex-OpenAI employees expressing fears about the direction of AI development.
- Comparisons between AI's potential and its risks.
- The Lightning Round
- Topics include:
- Brendan Carr's ongoing controversies and legislative actions.
- Updates on Ferrari's first electric vehicle, the Luce, designed by Jony Ive.
- The future of Siri and its anticipated updates.
- The implications of ads rolling out in ChatGPT.
Further Reading & Resources
- Articles and opinion pieces related to surveillance, AI ethics, and tech industry developments are mentioned.
- Links to related news stories are provided for deeper insight into the discussed topics.
Conclusion
- The episode presents a critical examination of the intersection between technology, ethics, and consumer trust, urging listeners to consider the implications of surveillance and AI in daily life.
- The discussion is framed within a broader context of how technology affects societal dynamics and individual privacy.
---
Note: For accurate references, please include specific dates or additional context as necessary based on the podcast episode content.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOWelcome to The Vergecast
1:24 to 1:44
The hosts get comfortable and discuss their feelings about using surveillance for pet finding.
“How do you feel about using the full surveillance industry to find your pets?”
Super Bowl Follow-Up
1:44 to 2:29
The hosts talk about the Super Bowl, focusing on teams and outcomes that matter.
“You just let it poop inside your house for a while.”
Listener Feedback on Epstein Coverage
2:36 to 3:35
The hosts discuss insights received from listeners regarding their coverage of Epstein.
“how we're covering this stuff, what they want to see, what's interesting.”
SEO and Epstein's Digital Footprint
3:35 to 4:36
The hosts explore how Epstein managed his online presence and reputation.
“Every good content creator who cares about their numbers does this.”
Manipulating Search Results
4:36 to 6:06
The discussion continues on Epstein's strategies for controlling search results and media narratives.
“His digital footprint was a thing he cared about.”
The Culture of Reputation Management
6:06 to 8:06
The hosts analyze the broader implications of Epstein's tactics within information dynamics.
“And then you see how effectively Jeffrey Epstein was using that as a weapon, not just to shade the coverage, but connecting the dot all the way to his own search results, to SEO.”
Epstein and 4chan Connections
8:06 to 9:32
The hosts introduce a new angle on Epstein's connections to 4chan and relevant historical events.
“Again, Mia did an incredible job here just because we forced her to cover SEO for a year.”
Cultural Impact of Epstein's Actions
9:32 to 11:44
The hosts discuss how Epstein's influence extended into cultural dynamics and misinformation.
“And then a series of things unfolded where everyone's goals were being met.”
Researching Digital Dynamics
11:44 to 12:54
The hosts emphasize the challenges of researching the impact of Epstein's actions on digital culture.
“I suspect we're going to be covering this for quite a while.”
The Mystery of Redactions
12:54 to 13:25
The hosts tease an upcoming story about the significance of redacted information in the Epstein files.
“But what we can just see paints a very different picture of the history of the culture and the internet colliding in this specific way.”
Show all 50 chapters
Transition to Surveillance Discussion
13:25 to 14:00
The hosts shift the focus from Epstein to a new surveillance topic related to Ring's ad.
“To be clear, everyone, most of the time people say no, and then Eli does it anyway.”
Discussing Team Control
14:00 to 14:19
Exploration of feelings surrounding team management and control.
“think about like you have a whole team and like how much more in control you would feel.”
Transition to Surveillance Discussion
14:19 to 14:46
Shifting focus to the topic of surveillance and its implications.
“We're going to keep covering the Epstein stuff.”
Introduction to Ring's Search Party Feature
14:46 to 15:42
Overview of Ring's advertisement for a dog-finding feature using neighborhood cameras.
“that is designed to help people find their dogs that's it if you if your dog runs away you can activate the whole neighborhood of cameras to help you find your dog.”
Reactions to Ring's Ad and Features
15:42 to 16:49
Discussion on the implications of Ring's Search Party feature and the ad's reception.
“What a lovely ad about how to find your dog.”
Surveillance Concerns and Community Impact
16:49 to 18:16
Exploration of moral questions raised by surveillance technology in communities.
“And I just want to say that, like, if you are, your concerns about the surveillance apparatus are valid.”
Historical Context of Ring's Surveillance
18:16 to 20:26
Contextualizing Ring's mission to reduce crime through surveillance technology.
“One, again, I cannot overstate this, is, is this an explosion?”
Debate on Surveillance and Privacy
20:26 to 23:28
A deep dive into the balance between safety and privacy concerns in modern technology.
“But he and I spent an hour being like, what do you mean if you have enough cameras, you will zero crime?”
Impact of Surveillance on Society
23:28 to 27:03
Discussion on how surveillance affects social behavior and individual rights.
“I think he's a little annoyed that the nature of law enforcement and how people feel about the police using their data right now are radically different than when he founded Ring in like 2012 or 2013.”
CCTV and Historical Surveillance Debates
27:03 to 28:00
Comparison of modern surveillance with historical CCTV debates and regulations.
“And everyone was like, where's the doorbell footage?”
Surveillance Technology and Privacy Debate
28:00 to 29:50
Exploring the complexity of surveillance technology's impact on privacy and law enforcement.
“And there was a controversy about just the number of private CCTV cameras.”
Case Study: Nancy Guthrie's Incident
29:50 to 32:10
Analyzing the implications of the Nancy Guthrie case on surveillance tech and data access.
“You could say you can't light this up all the time.”
Consumer Choices and Accountability
32:10 to 34:20
Discussing consumer responsibility in choosing surveillance technology and its societal impact.
“And that is, especially in the Trump administration, whew, that's a long way away from being reality.”
Transition to New Topics
34:20 to 34:40
Preparing to shift focus to other gadgets and innovations.
“And these cameras are like a particular instantiation of that that just happened to be gadgets.”
OpenAI's Controversial Super Bowl Ad
36:54 to 42:00
Examining the alleged leak of OpenAI's Super Bowl ad and its implications.
“Support for the show comes from L 'Oreal Group, using the latest advancements in science and tech to create personalized beauty solutions for all.”
ChatGPT Ads and Public Perception
42:00 to 43:14
Discussing the perception of ChatGPT ads and the decline in product quality.
“But everyone sang a Backstreet Boys song for a minute.”
AI Industry Executives Sounding Alarms
43:14 to 45:08
Exploring the trend of AI executives leaving their jobs and raising concerns.
“I'm just going to keep pointing out the all-knowing voice assistant that can do things for you is a long way away.”
Controversial AI Developments and Safety Concerns
45:08 to 47:54
Examining the implications of executives warning about AI and its potential dangers.
“But there is something happening here where an increasing number of important people are finding cause to sound the alarm about what's going on with AI.”
Commercialization of AI and Its Effects
47:54 to 49:46
Analyzing how the commercialization of AI systems is affecting ethical considerations.
“And I think this is, to be fair, a sort of long tradition in the tech industry.”
Impact of Ads on AI User Experience
49:46 to 51:29
Discussing the effects of integrating ads into AI platforms like ChatGPT.
“And so I'm just stuck in this thing of like, I don't believe it's as good as any of these people say that it is.”
Conversations with AI: The Future of Advertising
51:29 to 56:00
Exploring the implications of personalized advertising in AI interactions.
“uh, opening, I just fired an executive who opposed adult mode, right?”
Advertising in the Age of AI
56:00 to 59:07
Explore how advertisers leverage personal data in AI tools to sell products.
“By exploring the space, we are positioning our brands at the exact moment of intent.”
Controversy Surrounding Apple News
1:01:10 to 1:10:04
A deep dive into the political scrutiny of Apple News and its biases.
“Get a$75 Sponsored Job Credit at Indeed.com slash podcast.”
The Algorithmic Nature of News Aggregation
1:10:04 to 1:11:56
Learn how algorithmic recommendations shape news trends and narratives.
“So you can't even argue with that because now you're running the same problem as saying meta is suppressing conservative speech, which is like everyone has their own algorithm and you're actually just telling yourself.”
Steve Jobs' Philosophy on Technology and the Arts
1:11:56 to 1:13:16
Explore Steve Jobs' belief in the intersection of technology and liberal arts.
“What I'm worried about is Apple no longer has an ounce of self-respect.”
The Role of Judgment in News Selection
1:13:16 to 1:14:48
Discuss the importance of editorial judgment in news curation.
“He turned it into one of the richest companies in the world.”
Government Pressure on Media and Free Speech
1:14:48 to 1:17:46
Analyze the implications of government pressure on media outlets and free speech.
“Like, thinking about how other people treat one another.”
Brendan Carr's Controversial Media Regulations
1:17:46 to 1:21:11
Examine Brendan Carr's proposals for media regulation and their implications.
“based on nothing more than this one media research council report, a threat against Apple, the biggest company in the world, one of the biggest companies in the world.”
Upcoming Gadgets and Market Trends
1:21:11 to 1:24:00
Get insights into upcoming tech releases and market trends in gadgets.
“Anyway, he is trying to say that The View is not news enough to qualify for the news exemption to the equal time rule.”
Evaluating the Base iPad's Future
1:24:00 to 1:25:15
The discussion critiques the current base iPad's hardware and its longevity in light of AI developments.
“and my read on it was essentially this is the first time the base iPad is not the one you should buy because it is full of such outdated hardware that actually it's going to run out on you before it should.”
Siri's Ongoing Evolution
1:25:15 to 1:26:27
Exploring the delays and anticipated improvements for Siri's capabilities based on recent reports.
“And Siri right now is very much automation control.”
Concerns Over Apple's AI Direction
1:26:27 to 1:27:38
A conversation on Apple's approach to AI and the potential implications for Siri and automation.
“It is still fine at setting timers, but like Siri as a voice recognition machine has gotten noticeably worse for me over the last, let's say, two years.”
Ferrari's New EV Design Insights
1:27:38 to 1:28:59
The hosts discuss Ferrari's new electric vehicle, focusing on its design by Johnny Ive and its innovative features.
“and just bury all of that under really technical language of features in the Notes app, which maybe is what it should have done all along.”
The Unique Features of the Luce
1:28:59 to 1:31:44
Detailing the unique interior and interaction design features of Ferrari's Luce, showcasing a blend of technology and tactile elements.
“Johnny Ive and Mike Mattis and a whole bunch of other, Mark Newsom, like, you know, love from Johnny Ive's company.”
Reflections on Automotive Design Trends
1:31:44 to 1:33:52
Discussing the broader implications of automotive design trends and how features from luxury brands influence the industry.
“Like, Ive is at his best when he's addressing millions of people.”
YouTube's Arrival on Vision Pro
1:33:52 to 1:36:20
Analyzing the significance of YouTube's introduction to the Apple Vision Pro and its implications for content creation.
“I don't know if that, it's not going to happen with the Ferrari.”
The Paramount-Netflix Acquisition Saga
1:36:20 to 1:38:01
An update on the ongoing acquisition battle involving Paramount, Netflix, and Warner Brothers, highlighting strategic moves.
“Vision Pro and the true believers in this content are like, that is one overlapping circle.”
Political Machinations in the Background
1:38:01 to 1:39:50
Explore the political dynamics surrounding the Ellisons and the Trump administration.
“But anyway, all of this is happening while there's a lot of political machinations going on.”
Larry Ellison's Unusual Trade
1:39:51 to 1:41:09
Discuss the implications of Larry Ellison wanting to sell Oracle stock to buy Warner Brothers.
“And you are desperate to sell your AI stock to buy Warner Brothers.”
Pop Culture vs. AI Investment
1:41:10 to 1:41:31
Debate whether to invest in AI or traditional entertainment properties like Warner Brothers.
“Tell us which of those you would rather bet on.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Nilay Patel:We're leaving today and entering a world of Mickey Mouse waving, princess meeting and greeting, lightsaber clashing, the Twilight Zone Tower of Terror dropping,
0:11David Pierce:Banshee flying, Space Mountain launching, galaxy rewinding, what's the whole deck with galaxy rewinding, fireworks igniting, World of Other Worlds. For whatever you love, infinite worlds await at the most magical place on Earth. Walt Disney World Resort. I'm RJ Decker, a private investigator uncovering the sunshine state's darkest secrets.
0:36Nilay Patel:Tuesdays, it's the premiere of ABC's hottest new crime show. RJ freaking Decker as I live and breathe. He's a private eye. It's not a standard murder. It's someone bigger. And a public mess.
0:48David Pierce:Trying to get someone back to prison today?
0:49Nilay Patel:You go to prison one time and suddenly it's all the jokes. RJ Decker, series premiere, Tuesdays on ABC and stream on Hulu.
1:00David Pierce:Spring is here, and there's a whole new way to chai at Starbucks that's made perfect for you. Choose your sweetness, dial it up, or keep things light. Add a touch of pistachio, a hint of strawberry, or vanilla, or make it a spring classic with lavender. Because this season, there's endless ways to chai at Starbucks.
1:23David Pierce:Welcome to The Verge Cast, the flagship podcast of slightly dystopian pet finders. I'm your friend David Pierce. The Appetales here. Hey, buddy. What's up? How do you feel about using the full surveillance industry to find your pets?
1:36Nilay Patel:This is why I don't have pets. Get them out of my face. Too complicated. The moral quandary of pet ownership is... We do a lot of moral quandary in this show, I will say. You know, do you really own a dog? Let's talk about it.
1:52David Pierce:Yeah, you just... You don't. You just let it poop inside your house for a while. At least that's my current experience. lots going on this week. We have some Super Bowl follow-up to do. The Packers weren't in it because they never are, so that sucks for you.
2:06Nilay Patel:Patriots did lose, which was important, I think, for America.
2:08David Pierce:Agreed. The world is a little brighter now that the Patriots lost the Super Bowl. We have a lot of surveillance camera stuff to talk about. We have some open AI news to talk about. We have some hardware that doesn't exist. We have some hardware that might someday exist. We have lots to talk about, but I think we should probably start the same place we started last week, which is unfortunately, with the Epstein files. You asked, in particular, people to give us feedback on how we're talking about this stuff, how we're covering this stuff, what they want to see, what's interesting. What did you hear?
2:41David Pierce:What have the vibes been like?
2:42Nilay Patel:I would divide this feedback into two discrete categories. Okay. There's the one I care about a lot, which is the actual people talking to us. You just look at the comments on YouTube. You shouldn't look at our email directly, Pam Bondi, but I will tell you what is in our email. And it's people emailing us and saying, keep doing this. It's important. We appreciate your approach to it. We want the stories. Your quandary about the source and the mechanism by which the material is being released. You can set that aside. We understand. So we're going to keep talking about it. Then there is just the data.
3:18Nilay Patel:And the data says people desperately want David and I to talk about J.R.A.P.'s team. Like the numbers are higher and we can't quite explain why. We don't do a lot of data-driven content decision-making at The Verge, which is why I haven't started a fully automated Android bot farm overseas to manipulate YouTube. I should. Every good content creator who cares about their numbers does this.
3:45David Pierce:You've come to meetings with that idea. Yeah.
3:47Nilay Patel:Can somebody buy 100 Android phones and just do a bot farm for me? That would be great. We don't do a lot of that here. Famously, our reporters don't get page views. All the stuff we don't do. But in this case, it was particularly notable that there was the qualitative feedback from actual people that we care about a lot that said, please do the stories. And then there was just the straight views and downloads on the podcast. And so, all right, that's enough signal. I'll mention two that are important to me, two Epstein stories we covered this week that are very important to me that I think are very Vergy in their scope.
4:20Nilay Patel:One, and this has come out in every version of the Epstein files that has been released so far. Jeffrey Epstein cared about SEO a lot, just a lot. And he employed people to manage his Google presence. He employed people to go on Wikipedia and clean up his bio. He did offensive SEO. He was all over it. His digital footprint was a thing he cared about. And he had people constantly emailing him, telling him how they were cleaning up his digital footprint.
4:50David Pierce:And to be clear, by cleaning up, you mean Jeffrey Epstein is a criminal and a pedophile was at the top of the rankings. And Jeffrey Epstein spent a lot of time and energy and money trying to move that down in the rankings.
5:04Nilay Patel:Yes. And he was seeding stories with oppositional links, again, monitoring Wikipedia and making sure Wikipedia, there's like edit wars about his entry, taking out negative information about himself on the Internet.
5:15David Pierce:There are a bunch of really fascinating back and forths with reporters from people in his orbit who are basically like yelling at reporters and threatening them in order to get them to remove stuff from stories and then reporting it back to Epstein saying, look, we did it. We got we got your name out of this story.
5:32Nilay Patel:Mia Sato and our team has a great story about this. There's one back and forth in particular where the report back says they didn't know I was working for you. They don't know that we're talking. And so you just see there's this, we kind of hint at it all the time, right? We spend a lot of time talking to comms people and PR people. And I love writing a spicy response to what is obviously like a secret legal demand and then looping our lawyers on it. It's one of the funner parts of my job that no one ever gets to see. I really do enjoy it. there's a lot of that in our world that you all never see.
6:04Nilay Patel:You should never see, right? We're just pushing back on people who want to shade our stories in some way. And then you see how effectively Jeffrey Epstein was using that as a weapon, not just to shade the coverage, but connecting the dot all the way to his own search results, to SEO. And so that's just a straightforwardly averse story. And Mia did a great job. We've been making Mia cover SEO for a while. She's the one who wrote all the content goblin stories for us about like the SEO industry, the last days of disco before AI showed up. That was a huge package she did for us. She saw this and was like, oh, I see what's happening here.
6:37Nilay Patel:So this story is great because she has so much depth.
6:39David Pierce:Yeah. And I think on that front, we talked a bunch last week about how one of the odd things about these files is how just sort of plainly they lay bare how all of this stuff works. We talked a lot about Steven Sanofsky who was running Windows at Microsoft and his negotiations for his package when he left Microsoft is like, it's the sort of thing nobody ever talks about in the way that they are willing to email their colleagues about it. And so you just see a different version of it. And this was so striking to me for the same reason that you see with no, um, no spin, no, no, nothing, just a perfectly completely laid bare plan for how to spin up a bunch of essentially fake websites designed to launder somebody's reputation.
7:23David Pierce:And there's Mia has has links and an explanation to this about like somebody who is basically buying and hosting domain names, starting fake websites, filling them with a specific kind of content, all in the name of gaming the SEO algorithms to move stuff up and down to their liking. And this is, I would remind you, a game that Google has said for decades is unwinnable and doesn't exist and no one is trying to do it. And it is just so fabulously clear that this is a game that everybody plays and can win with enough money and resources. And it's just this is the sort of thing you just don't get to see it laid out in front of you like this.
7:59Nilay Patel:Yeah, you never get to see the vendor talking directly to the client saying, I spent all this money. Here's exactly what we did. And here's how well it worked. Yeah. And, you know, that's a goldmine if you are researching the dynamics of information on the internet. So that's one big story. Again, Mia did an incredible job here just because we forced her to cover SEO for a year. Like her understanding of that space, I think, really comes through in this story. So that's one. And the other one that I would point people to, last week, I mentioned sort of in passing that Epstein had a connection to 4chan and in particular Slash Poll, the politics board.
8:29Nilay Patel:And so we thought about who can explain this. There's so much history. So we asked Kat Tenbarsh, who used to be an amazing misinformation, misinformation reporter at NBC News. She now writes a newsletter called Spitfire News, which is very good. You should subscribe to it. So we asked her to just write about the connections between Epstein, Christopher Poole, who ran 4chan, his name is Moot, his handle, and Poole. And the dynamics between all of that, between Gamergate, between the first Trump campaign. And you can see there's a straight line in Epstein's support for eugenics and his hatred of women and his weird ideas about just how to destabilize the country.
9:10Nilay Patel:There's a lot of Steve Bannon in the mix who understood early that you could weaponize forum culture and turn it into the culture war and then turn that into politics. And then here we are in 2026. So it's not as straight of a line as people have painted. You can't say that they had a meeting and the next day the thing happened. But in the emails, you can see, yep, they definitely met. Epstein said, I really like this guy. I think he's so bright. I drove him home. And then a series of things unfolded where everyone's goals were being met. And that, to me, is maybe the most undercovered story of our time.
9:45Nilay Patel:That, you know, there's always this push that you shouldn't take what happens on the internet seriously. That Twitter isn't real life. And to some extent, that's real. Like, the reality outs. Like, the truth outs for people. They go live their lives. They move their meat sacks of their bodies around in real space. You can't tweet everything. And you can't overcome the metaphysics of reality with Twitter. But, boy, you can come close. Yeah. And you can see, like, just as you're saying about SEO, you see them talking about it nakedly, openly, cynically, pushing the ball forward while everyone else is, you know, saying very sincere things about the nature of content moderation.
10:24Nilay Patel:And, like, the systems are being gamed at every level, and Epstein's right in the middle of it. So that story is also, I think, very good, very Virgie. Kat did a great job. So those are the two I wanted to call it this week. We're going to have more. Again, you know, I value people writing to us and saying things to us more than I value the data. But in this case, it's both. Like, clearly both says that we should cover this more. There's more to be said here. And in particular, Epstein as a force in the digital world is, like, overwhelming.
10:57David Pierce:Yeah.
10:57Nilay Patel:You can just see that he clocked it. He figured it out early. And then all of these people came to him for advice. And then his money influenced a bunch of platform dynamics and tech dynamics across the board.
11:11David Pierce:Yeah. And that this group understood the power of the Internet to move their own awful worldviews into the norm in like really structured and deliberate ways. Like you read that thing from from Ryan Broderick last week who writes the garbage news letter, who's basically saying I've been covering misinformation and the alt-right for decades. And I'm realizing that I may have just been following Jeffrey Epstein around. Like, the more we learn about these files, the more it feels like that is the case.
11:39Nilay Patel:Yeah, it's in there. And, you know, there's more to come, assuming our Department of Justice does the thing they're legally mandated to do by acting Congress. Bold assumption. There's more to come. I suspect we're going to be covering this for quite a while.
11:52David Pierce:Yeah, and I think folks should go read the stories. We'll link them in the show notes. But, yeah, the particulars of how all of this works, I think, it continues to be the hardest thing to mine of all of this. and our team's been doing a really good job because there's just so much. And like we talked about last week, it's just this unordered dump of PDFs. And if you want to, you can read almost anything you want into it, right? And so trying to go through and be like, okay, what is real? What is conspiracy? What is stuff that Jeffrey Epstein, who had a lot of reasons to vastly overstate his own importance, it's hard to parcel out, but there is just like the raw data of this, the more we start to put the pieces together is like a very different version of the history of sort of the modern internet than I think people are used to.
12:42Nilay Patel:And that's even just looking at through the slice of what's here. Like we don't know what happened at the parties. We don't know what happened at the dinners. We don't know what happened on the island. We don't know what happened on the plane. Like we don't know what happened on the phone. There's just a universe of stuff we don't know. But what we can just see paints a very different picture of the history of the culture and the internet colliding in this specific way. Yeah. Yeah. Oh, by the way, I have one for you. You and I were talking about this briefly on the show last week, and then we talked about it afterwards, and I went out and assigned it.
13:12Nilay Patel:The equal signs. Oh, yeah. And the weird things that feel like censored redactions, but kind of clearly aren't, we're chasing that down. I'm not going to give it away, but I think by next week, we will have a good answer. We will have a story about what's going on with equal signs.
13:27David Pierce:Oh, that's awesome. I'm so glad you assigned that story.
13:29Nilay Patel:Yeah, I was like, I'm the king now. Am I the editor-in-chief? Can I just do this? That's what happened. I love this. That's what all my meetings were like. Can I do this?
13:41David Pierce:To be clear, everyone, most of the time people say no, and then Eli does it anyway. That's the dynamic here.
Read the full transcript
13:48Nilay Patel:I had a good call today with a longtime tech exec, and he was saying the way to think about open claw in these AI agents is like, what if, like, don't think about it like you have one employee. think about like you have a whole team and like how much more in control you would feel. And I was like, I don't know, man, I have a whole team. I look at my phone. I'm always like, what happened now? What are you talking about? Yeah.
14:16David Pierce:Yeah. All right. Let's, let's move on for this. We're going to keep covering the Epstein stuff. I think this story is a long ways from being over even in our zone. So we'll keep talking about it. But for now, let's talk about a different kind of surveillance. surveillance a different scandal um so the the the beginning of this i think is there was a super bowl ad that ring ran um about a feature called search party and i'm going to describe this in the most milquetoast way and then we're going to get into it uh search party is a feature that is designed to help people find their dogs that's it if you if your dog runs away you can activate the whole neighborhood of cameras to help you find your dog.
15:02David Pierce:I'm just going to share my screen with you real quick and I'm going to play this ad because it's 30 seconds long and I just watched it again and it is just, it is really something special.
15:11Nilay Patel:This is Milo. Pets are family. But every year, 10 million go missing. And the way we look for them hasn't changed in years. Until now. One post of a dog's photo in the Ring app starts outdoor cameras looking for a match. Search Party from Ring uses AI to help families find lost dogs. Since launch, more than a dog a day has been reunited with their family. Be a hero in your neighborhood with Search Party. Available to everyone for free right now. Join the neighborhood at ring.com.
15:41David Pierce:So, Neil, I don't see the problem. What a lovely ad about how to find your dog. I don't know.
15:47Nilay Patel:So, Jamie was on Decoder not so long ago talking about this. And I would characterize that conversation as very pleasant. I like Jamie. He's very smart. and also just me for an hour being like, is this dystopia? Are you describing dystopia? And we just went back and forth on that. And do you have a ring camera?
16:05David Pierce:I do. We were grandfathered into the one on our front door when we bought this house. And it has actually been a really interesting process of deciding whether we want to keep it.
16:17Nilay Patel:It's fascinating to me that this is a moral quandary. We have ring cameras at our house. They're good. There's a product. They work, and that's fine. Do you have the Neighbors app or do you have Neighbors notifications turned on in the Ring app?
16:29David Pierce:No, I turned them off because it made me feel icky, to be completely honest.
16:32Nilay Patel:So we have them on. Again, I don't think you should feel moral quandaries about this. Like, I'm very curious. You know, I have the get out of jail free card of like, I'm a tech reporter. I have to pay attention. But like, it's fine. You can just turn them on. It's anonymized. And at least where I live, there are only two things that show up in the Neighbors app. Was that an explosion? By far and away, number one. just all day long people asking if things are explosions couldn't tell you why but that is it are they ever explosions sometimes okay like ever like once a year there's an explosion okay right like i don't know what to tell you once a year at the con ed plant a transformer blows you know like the rest of the time it's like nope big truck yep it's it's almost always big truck or nothing like nothing is a shockingly popular answer um and then that replies are always like you know hilarious lies like yes it was an explosion like go into your basement now like i actually asked jamie about this he's like yep a lot of people asking about explosions in the data okay and then the other thing is my dog is lost that's it that's all day long people are like i lost my dog or like i saw a dog here's a dog here's a pet whatever um and so you can see how anyone looking at what people are talking about and sharing their footage about would get to, we should just automate the process of saying we see a dog.
17:54Nilay Patel:Sure. And I just want to say that, like, if you are, your concerns about the surveillance apparatus are valid. Like, that's, everyone's listening to this, they're already yelling at me. I'm just saying that the logical, like, outside of the world we live in conclusion from why do people hit share on video footage in our app? Sure. One, again, I cannot overstate this, is, is this an explosion? Like, if they could solve that problem, maybe they should have started there, honestly. And then two is, my dog is lost where I saw a dog. And you can see how you would just get there. You would just very quickly arrive at, we should push a button and let people be like, here are some dogs.
18:36Nilay Patel:Right, sure. And I don't, I'm only pointing that out because it is the reality of the platform.
18:42David Pierce:That's the thing people are doing. It's also the sort of feature that in a vacuum, no one's going to have a problem with, right? Like, can I all at once reach out to all of my neighbors to see if any of them have found my dog? Near 100 % approval rate on that idea that big.
18:59Nilay Patel:And again, this is what people are already doing in the app. Now, in different neighborhoods, void, you run into different things people are doing that cause all kinds of problems, right? is this an explosion? Did you see my dog? Right, on the scale of moral quandary.
19:14David Pierce:We got a lot of, this is a teenager in a hoodie. They're probably a criminal.
19:17Nilay Patel:There you go. Yeah. I saw a guy looking at my car. Yeah. Comes up in the data. A lot of that. I'm mad. The delivery person for my food order didn't look like a citizen is one that is rising in the rankings. Like, this is all bad stuff that you can do once you have this level of surveillance. And Ring has been in the mix of this problem since the day it was founded. Because Jamie, who again, smart person, founded the company, famously founded it on Shark Tank as DoorBot. Like, very compelling story. Very compelling actor. Founder talk. The whole thing. Since the first day, he's been like, this is to fight crime.
19:59Nilay Patel:He's never wavered. He's never been, he's never, he didn't find, it wasn't like he had to find product market fit. He's like, why did I make this video camera to fight crime? Like, straight up, his pitch has been surveillance from the beginning. And on Decoder and to Jen Toohey, the last time I talked to Jen Toohey at the launch of the last round of doorbells, he's like, if you put enough of these in certain neighborhoods, we will zero out crime. And he and I spent an hour talking about that. And next week, we'll have a Decoder episode just really unpacking that conversation one more time. So I won't go into it too much here.
20:27Nilay Patel:But he and I spent an hour being like, what do you mean if you have enough cameras, you will zero crime? What is the mechanism by which these cameras will bring crime to zero? And the answer is, well, people will know there are cameras that will misbehave. And, you know, to some extent, it's we're going to share the footage with law enforcement. No, please.
20:47David Pierce:That that gives James Zunoff so much less credit than he should get for the aggressiveness with which he wants to give all of you. They keep signing deals with police officers, with police departments. This is a feature, not a bug. Like, actually, can I can I play you one more 30 second thing? So Wise, a smart home competitor to Ring, which hilariously has a whole bunch of its own security issues and privacy issues, got a lot of credit after this Ring ad came out and sparked a lot of people's fears. Because immediately, you look at that ad and it's like, oh, replace dogs with anything else. And this is a horrifying dystopian hellscape that you've just described.
21:30David Pierce:I am confident there is a reason that Ring launched this feature with dogs do you know what I mean? but anyway so Wyze makes this thing let me just play you this 30 seconds because I think it is a useful and important piece of the equation here
21:43Nilay Patel:this is Milo pets are family but every year 10 million of them go missing and the ways we look for them haven't changed in years except for all of these but what if we could make finding one lost dog require the computational power of a small dictator-led nation search party from all right you get the idea I get the idea can I just point out why has this had massive security issues yeah don't buy wise strangers can like control your wise cams over the internet don't do that yeah I'll just like cameras outside your house yeah you got weird surveillance problems we're gonna talk about how complicated all that will make you feel do not put cameras in your house don't do it yeah I completely agree the number of like feel good clips I watch of like babies breaking out of their cribs and going to the kitchen to like get juice it's like first she feel great.
22:27Nilay Patel:You're like, this is very funny. That baby jumped out of her crib. You're like, why is there a camera in your house? Why is there an internet camera in your house? Why is there one in your kitchen? Why is there one in your living room? Why is there one all the way from the baby's crib to the kitchen? What are you doing? And there's no way to like reach through your phone and disconnect the camera, but I want to.
22:42David Pierce:Yeah, for a fee, Neila and I will come to your house and slyly disconnect all of your cameras.
22:46Nilay Patel:I have a lot to say about the fact that the baby monitor camera that we bought got discontinued. And now the only one you can buy from the same brand has a Wi-Fi option embedded in it. And they know it's bad, so there's a hardware. switching the camera oh wild but i'm like i don't i don't even want to don't put a camera in your
23:00David Pierce:house yeah just don't do that but anyway to the point of this ad like i think if you're jamie and ring that wise video is not a good burn because you're like yeah that actually is exactly what
23:13Nilay Patel:we're trying that's what we're doing yeah they again he will tell you he will he he look i like people who are honest yeah right and jamie is very honest he's like i started this company to fight crime and I'm going to do it with pervasive video surveillance. He's not hiding the ball. I think he's a little annoyed that the nature of law enforcement and how people feel about the police using their data right now are radically different than when he founded Ring in like 2012 or 2013. It was back then. Right. The nature of all this has changed, but his point of view has not.
23:44David Pierce:But again, all of this stuff is it's a feature, not a bug. Right. And I think to your point about them being honest, I think the challenge here is that everyone is able to make those decisions for themselves, right? Like, is lowering the possibility of someone breaking into your house worth the intrusiveness of having a camera? I think reasonable people can disagree on where you land on that. The other thing that's happening is my camera is also watching you. And so what we've now created is this big society-wide problem that not all of society gets to participate in. And I think that has been the part that Ring has not done a good job of reckoning with.
24:26David Pierce:It's like, sure, would I consent to you lighting up my camera in order to find your dog? Sure. Fine. Is it unbelievably obvious to me what opting me into that automatically does and what you can very clearly do next with that exact same technology? Like, yes, of course. And do we as reasonable consumers in the year 2026 have any reason to believe tech executives when they tell us they'll never do the bad thing? No. So like I'm at this point now where I struggle with this because I don't know how to reckon with the fact that my block is filled with these things. And if my dog ever gets out, I will be grateful for the fact that most people on my block probably didn't know to turn this feature off.
25:09David Pierce:But I also sort of feel like I should go door to door until everybody to turn this feature off.
25:14Nilay Patel:I have this theory about just what is happening in our politics right now. It was, uh, I think about it a lot. Right now, we are convinced, like, culturally convinced that our actions do not affect other people. You just see it everywhere. Interesting. You see it in, there's a rise in measles cases. Why? Because we've decided our actions don't affect other people, even though they very clearly do. Like, all over the place. And Ring cameras are an incredible example of this. Where the cameras in my house are fine. They're fine. Sure. And I can turn them on and off and whatever, but they, to your point, they're taking video of you.
25:52Nilay Patel:And so, my cameras can invade your rights. But me turning that on has no impact on me. So here's this button in, you know, an app distributed by Amazon on the hardware that Amazon owns where you have like a moral quandary that is, should I affect someone else's rights? And I would just say American culture in 2026 does not equip people to think about that well. Yeah, true. like it just it just that you kind of once you like start looking for it like do you believe that all of us working together is a better solution or problem than ever working individually like do my actions affect you and should that have any impact on how i behave that's just no no the answer is no one wants to think about it like right please open tiktok and move on and you just i think this button is very challenging for people for that reason because your your individual decision will never affect you.
26:46Nilay Patel:It'll affect other people. And the collective decisions of other people will affect you. But you have no agency here, really. And I don't know how to reconcile that. But to your point, if you lose your dog, maybe this will be helpful. There's a reason they're starting with dogs. At the same time, Savannah Guthrie's mother was kidnapped.
27:03David Pierce:Yeah.
27:04Nilay Patel:And everyone was like, where's the doorbell footage? And she didn't have a Nest subscription on her Nest Cam, and everyone thought it was lost. And it turns out that the way the Nest cams work meant some data was sent to Google at some point and Google was able to recover it. We should talk about the mechanics of that because that's equally confusing. But the fact that the FBI then released the footage that Google had was, I would say, widely celebrated.
27:29David Pierce:Yeah, this was this is deemed to be a win by Nest and by law enforcement and by the existence of these cameras. And, you know, somewhere Jamie Siminoff is like, I told you this is what this is what this is for but to me it's like i don't know i i i have i also reacted to both of those things the ways you just described and i think having those you can't hold both those ideas in your head at the same time you just can't have it both ways either this stuff is is too problematic and too invasive and we need ways to roll it back and not have it be this kind of incredible ongoing permanently stored surveillance complex that can find anybody at any time or it's awesome that this piece of information about what happened in nancy guthrie is coming out and might help solve a crime you i you can't have it both ways well you can you can
28:19Nilay Patel:chart one middle path you can so you know 20 years ago uh cctv cameras became absolutely prevalent in England. Like this, a 20-year-old story. And there was a controversy about just the number of private CCTV cameras. And this is like the old technology, right? This isn't even like digital internet technology. This is closed circuit. There's tapes in the back of a convenience store. And they were everywhere. And there was a privacy debate in that country at that time. And you end up with a series of regulations and laws and social norms. And I don't know that it has worked out. I don't know if it's any different, but there is one other path, right?
29:00Nilay Patel:Which is to say we should have privacy laws. Like the way the government accesses the private surveillance footage on everyone's front door is regulated in some way and transparent in some way. And there's things the police can't do. And that is just not where we are in America as a society right now. Like we're not going to have some fulsome debate about what it means that everyone has a camera and the cops want all the footage all the time, especially because so many people no longer trust the intentions, the methods, or even their interactions with the police. Like, just, that's not where we are.
29:32Nilay Patel:So the idea that you're going to have some good faith debate outside of a high-profile true crime story, it seems lost, right? So now these companies are just going to do whatever they want, and it seems like what they're going to do is chase the check. And the United States government is going to write a lot of checks.
29:47David Pierce:Yeah, house by house, we are neatly solving a law enforcement problem.
29:50Nilay Patel:Yeah, there's the one middle path. And you could write that law. You could write a privacy law. You could say you can't light this up all the time. There's a million ways to do this. And maybe not everyone will be happy with any of those ways. I think the failure is no one is even proposing them. And even if you did propose them, no one believes that any of them will pass into law or be effective.
30:08David Pierce:What do you make of the Nancy Guthrie thing before we move on and get out of this?
30:12Nilay Patel:You know, I keep hearing a lot of cliches like, you're only paying for access to your data. But it is true that the Google cameras work differently than the Ring cameras work differently than the Wyze cameras work differently than the Arlo cameras. And Google's system in particular, we don't know which camera she had. So this is, like, depending on which generation of Nest camera you had, it works slightly differently. But it seems very much like you always get a few days of data for free. about a few days of video history for free. And so there was an emotional alert. The data was sent to Google, and it just didn't get overwritten.
30:49Nilay Patel:And so the only real insight we have into what happened here was, of course, from Kash Patel, who's not a reliable narrator, who said they recovered the footage from, quote, residual data located in backend systems. I think Google should explain exactly what that means. I think you have a right to know, if you're a Nest customer, exactly how residual your data is, to what level on what backend systems. But our best guess, given the way the Nest camera system works, is that the video went up because you do get some amount for free and it just had not been overwritten. And given the high profile nature of this case, Google assigned some engineers to go get it.
31:29Nilay Patel:I don't know this. I'm just saying this is the logical result of what they're saying. I think Google should absolutely have to explain if your data goes away. And Ring, you know, again, they're trying to claw their way back into everyone's good graces, said to Jen, we have no idea what the words residual data mean, because that's not how their system works. Right.
31:48David Pierce:And I believe them, right? Like, it's purely a system architecture question, what you're doing here. But yeah, I agree. I mean, the way Google and the FBI make it sound is that it was like, this is like the 1970s and somebody like left the VHS in the room without meaning to and that is like if if that is how it works that's because google made a deliberate choice in how it stores and eventually deletes and eventually overwrites the data on its servers and a the idea that that data still existed and b that it was clearly in relatively short ortable retrievable by google is just wild and again like i i i think it is possible in this case to both think it's good that this information is out there and i'm i'm glad that there is this clue as to what happened in nancy guthrie it is also like deeply weird and alarming that this was
32:45Nilay Patel:possible yeah i mean again i think all these companies owe us way more explanations about what's going on with their data i think they should be required to give us those explanations by law that's what a privacy law would do yeah and i think law enforcement needs far more guardrails how they access our data. And that is, especially in the Trump administration, whew, that's a long way away from being reality. There are no more guardrails for these companies. And so, yep, I have a problem with Ring, but I also have a problem with Clearview AI. Sure. Like, I have a lot of problems with a lot of the systems that are being deployed against us.
33:18Nilay Patel:I'm not making apologies for Ring. I just think, I know that company and what they care about. They're designed to be like, we will stop crime with video surveillance. And so, you know, yes, every camera kind of works this way. Yes, you can complicate this by talking about Nancy Guthrie. But if you don't want to participate in that mission, you can actually make a market decision. Right. You can be like, I'm going to buy one from a company that isn't like we're here to zero crime. That is that is a choice you can make with your dollars.
33:45David Pierce:But if you're the door dasher who has to go up to someone's door to bring them food and they get to take a picture of you and post it wondering if you're a citizen, you have made zero market decisions.
33:57Nilay Patel:Yeah. And this is what I mean. And your choices affect other people and really not yourself. And that's a weird thing. That's a weird problem. App design. Yeah. Right? How are you going to communicate this in a switch box in an app? It is also just a weird problem in our society right now that no one really has the tools to evaluate that kind of choice. And you're actually pushed away from thinking about those choices in that way right now. Again, this is big and small. But once you see it, it's everywhere. And these cameras are like a particular instantiation of that that just happened to be gadgets.
34:29Nilay Patel:So we're going to talk about it, guys.
34:30David Pierce:Yeah, indeed. All right. We should get off of this. I think we will keep coming back to all of this. I'm going to go make sure the camera on my ring is not running. But we should take a break and then we're going to go back. We're going to talk about some other gadgets that don't exist and some other gadgets that might. We'll be right back.
34:49Nilay Patel:Support for the show comes from 1Password. You might think that because you're a small business, cyber criminals won't waste their time on you. But the reality is that small businesses are actually the perfect target for bad actors. But the good news is that even the smallest teams can foil cybercrime. 1Password can help small teams manage the number one risk bad actors exploit. Weak passwords. 1Password provides centralized management to make sure your company's logins are secure. They provide turnkey solutions that can be rolled out in hours, whether you have dedicated IT staff or not. 1Password is designed to meet small teams where they are, but it's also built to grow with your company.
35:29Nilay Patel:However complex your security needs may get, 1Password will stay with you every step of the way. You can take the first step to better security by securing your team's credentials. Find out more at 1Password.com slash Vergecast and start securing every login. Support for the show comes from Twilio. Even in today's digital landscape, there are builders. You know, the creators and entrepreneurs who envision products and platforms that have never been done before. And those folks need an open space to tinker, play, and ultimately build. Think of it as a digital workbench. That's where Twilio comes in.
36:08Nilay Patel:Whether you write code or shape strategy, if you build, you belong. Twilio's customer engagement platform is the ultimate toolbox for developers, designers, business leaders and everyone in between. If you're scaling a startup or transforming an enterprise, you need a customer engagement platform that can keep up. And with Twilio, you can combine data, AI and real time communications in one open, flexible space to build, test and scale with confidence. You can create without limits, without work rounds and without compromise. Just the freedom to build your way. Bottom line, Twilio is the ultimate builder's toolbox.
36:44Nilay Patel:So what will you build today? Learn more at Twilio.com. That's T-W-I-L-I-O.com. Be a builder.
36:56David Pierce:Support for the show comes from L 'Oreal Group, using the latest advancements in science and tech to create personalized beauty solutions for all. The global beauty leader recently introduced two breakthrough technologies that bring the power of light to hair care and skin care. Light straight and multi-styler and the new LED face mask, both of which were recognized as CES 2026 Innovation Award honorees. Learn more about both technologies on L 'Oreal.com. L 'Oreal Group, create the beauty that moves the world.
37:32David Pierce:All right, we're back. We have, believe it or not, Eli, one more Super Bowl ad to talk about. But it both is and is not a Super Bowl ad. It's the Schrodinger Super Bowl ad that we're going to talk about. We've talked a lot on the show, and we've been waiting for OpenAI to release its hardware. OpenAI is working on something with Johnny Ive, potentially many somethings. There has been rumors. There's been reporting. There's been a lot of stuff out there. And then this week, there was a weird leak that started as a Reddit thread from a supposedly disgruntled employee explaining why they were mad that their Super Bowl ad about OpenAI.
38:08David Pierce:hardware didn't go on the super bowl and then they quote unquote leaked this ad have you seen
38:15Nilay Patel:this is a crypto scam can we just start with i'm not a hundred percent crypto scam positive you know but i i've seen a lot of photoshops in my time this is a crypto scam when in doubt crypto
38:27David Pierce:scam is a non-incorrect way to live your life at this point in time especially the way it worked
38:33Nilay Patel:because they they leaked it and then there was like what there was like a file name on a server and then someone was like, I've discovered the file name on a server. It got all the way to Alexis Ohani being like Reddit cracked it again. Yeah. Crypto scam. All of that just reads crypto scam to me. I'm not sure where the crypto scam was. Yeah, true. But just that sequence of events where a bunch of people were a little too smart, a little too fast. Crypto scam.
38:57David Pierce:Somewhere in there, Elon Musk asked you for your Bitcoin. It's like, that's the turn. But the ad, I think, is sort of fascinating. It's Alexander Skarsgård, wearing... It's AI Alexander Skarsgård. Sorry, fake Alexander Skarsgård. Very convincing fake Alexander Skarsgård. Wearing what looked like sort of open-ear headphones and playing with this little orb called Dime. Again, all of this is fake. Everyone at OpenAI has said it's fake to the point where it would be wild for this to be true.
39:32Nilay Patel:No, it's definitely fake. The whole thing is fake all the way up and down.
39:35David Pierce:But this ad ostensibly showing OpenAI's hardware really kind of caught on in a really funny way. Did you believe this ad the first time you saw it?
39:45Nilay Patel:No. No? No. Because again, look, I've seen a lot of Photoshop. Like my scam detection ability is under threat every day because of slot. Yeah. But the thing here where there was like a Reddit post for an account that had never existed before. and then the people in the Reddit figured it out so fast and then there was a full ad that was leaked with a celebrity in it that wasn't run because OpenAI chickened out because of the meta executives who work at it. Like, you just look at all that and you're like, none of that happened. Right. Like, 0 % of this went down. Yeah. Especially if you've ever watched Johnny Ive introduce a product ever in history, which we have done a lot.
40:27Nilay Patel:He does not make an ad where nothing is said.
40:31David Pierce:True. and there's a moment at the very end where ai alexander skarsgard picks this thing up and and does a sort of like checking his teeth face into it that is just so immediately tonally incorrect that it's like this why would why would even the person trying to fake this out do this this was apparently a pretty elaborate procedure to try and fake this they were they were sending uh they were sending people like proposals to to feature this ad really interesting thing but uh i i just found this whole ad so fascinating and it very clearly to me points to people are so desperately curious a what any of this ai hardware is going to be and b they're so deeply skeptical of this being anything that immediately there was this very funny feedback that was like of course this is real and of course it's this stupid so i read this more and we should talk about the ai industry
41:25Nilay Patel:as a whole. I read this more as like OpenAI's own actual ad during the Super Bowl wasn't any good. And the Anthropic ads were really good on Twitter. And then in a room where people were actually watching the Super Bowl, they played nothing. None of it hit in a room.
41:42David Pierce:None of it,
41:42Nilay Patel:like you just, no one's paying enough attention to these ads. Like the best ad was the Coinbase ad where they just did karaoke to Backstreet Boys. Yep. Because it at least got everyone's attention. And then you know what happened when they showed the Coinbase logo, at least in the party I was at? everyone groaned and said, fuck Coinbase. Sounds about right. But everyone sang a Backstreet Boys song for a minute. By the way, in the ad industry, that's called a pattern breaker. Do you know that? No. And they, very successful. And they're good at this, right? So like, whatever. Like, but what you saw was the actual ChatGPT ad isn't any good.
42:14Nilay Patel:The ChatGPT product, because it's about to get ads in it, people think it's about to get shittier in some way. And then, as we have talked about so much, like Claude and Claude Code are having this incredible moment and OpenAI doesn't seem to be poised to compete with that anyway, except to try to light up ads to compete with Google search. Right. And so I looked at this whole kerfuffle as like, in order for this hoax to work, in order for this crypto scam to sell one Bitcoin or whatever the hell they were trying to do, you had to believe that there was a better ad on the shelf. And that was believable.
42:48Nilay Patel:You had to believe that there was an ad executive somewhere at OpenAI who was furious that his better ad was shelved in favor of the thing they actually ran. And if you don't believe that, then of course this is a hoax. If you look at the state of the advertising, you're like, yeah, that's possible. And then you, or Alexis, you're tweeting this ad. Yeah, fair.
43:08David Pierce:Meanwhile, the actual OpenAI hardware news of the week is that it appears OpenAI's actual hardware launch has slipped to next year.
43:17Nilay Patel:I'm just going to keep pointing out the all-knowing voice assistant that can do things for you is a long way away. Even if you're the biggest open cloth fan in the world, that thing is a million miles away from being a mass consumer product. Yes.
43:33David Pierce:And it is increasingly clear that everyone, including Johnny Ive, might know that. But let's talk about some of the weirdness going on in this space right now, because you just alluded to this, but one of the things that has been happening all week is a bunch of people have been leaving high-profile jobs at AI companies and sort of sounding alarms behind them. Yeah. An open AI executive left and wrote a sort of scathing essay in the New York Times about how problematic it was that ads are going to be in ChatGPT. An anthropic safety person left and wrote a similarly sort of catastrophic thing about the state of AI and where we're all headed.
44:17David Pierce:Not similarly.
44:18Nilay Patel:I'm mad about ads is one thing. This dude wrote, quote, the world is in peril.
44:24David Pierce:All right, yeah, that's worse.
44:25Nilay Patel:There's a whole series of interconnected crises unfolding at this very moment. We appear to be approaching a threshold where our wisdom must grow in equal measure to our capacity to affect the world, lest we face the consequences. I would say that's a little different than I'm mad about ads and chachi music.
44:43David Pierce:It's a little worse. I would agree with that. And then the other thing is this big group of ex-AI people left. And I think there's a chance that that one belongs off to the side because XAI just became part of SpaceX. There's going to be a lot of corporate changes. A bunch of people presumably just got very rich from this thing, which created the largest private company, I think, in America or maybe even the world. But there is something happening here where an increasing number of important people are finding cause to sound the alarm about what's going on with AI. Do you make anything of all of this happening at the same time?
45:23Nilay Patel:Well, you keep saying that this is my pet theory, but I think this is real. I think this is an important thing to believe. I already
45:31David Pierce:know where this is going and I hate it.
45:33Nilay Patel:I think Anthropic thinks Claude is alive. Like, I really do. And I think this might be shared at other labs, but Anthropic is particularly kind of hinting that they think Claude is alive. They just did a big New Yorker profile called What is Claude? Anthropic doesn't know either. And it's like, dude, it's an L. I know what it is. But they think it's alive and they keep running these tests on it and it keeps surprising them in different ways. And yes, Claude is very powerful. And yes, if you give it a vending machine, it will sell everyone a tungsten cube for a dollar or whatever mistakes it's going to make.
46:05Nilay Patel:And yes, they release reports on scheming. But there's something in this industry where they have decided, the people who work in the industry sort of collectively have decided that they're touching consciousness. Maybe not human consciousness, but consciousness of a kind. I don't know how to evaluate that. I just see it, right? Like, particularly, I think, Anthropic Thanks Cloud is alive. Because they keep hinting at it. They keep talking about it like it's alive. They don't say it the way that Sam Altman is like, we're going to do AGI. They just keep hinting at it. So if you're there, right, of course your safety researchers are like, well, you're doing stuff to make money with a thing that's alive that might kill us all.
46:43Nilay Patel:We should stop until we figure out how to make it not kill us all. Sure. And then you see that happening at OpenAI. which has to make way more money way faster because they don't have the enterprise business that Anthropic has. And they're just disbanding their, quote, mission alignment team. And their head of platform safety is now the head futurist. And it's like, well, what do you think is going to happen in the future such that your head of safety has to be the head futurist? Oh, it's going to kill us all. And like, I don't want to buy into Doomerism. I think I'm personally still the most skeptical person about AI that I encounter on a regular basis.
47:15Nilay Patel:But this industry right now is marked by a sense that the people who work there are afraid of the capabilities that they've created and they do not think there's sufficient controls.
47:24David Pierce:Right. There is a measure of true belief that you have to have to quit your job in this way, which is a weird thing, right? Because it's not, it would be one thing if they were like, I'm quitting my job because I think Sam Altman is a scam artist who is just bilking people out of money and is going to ruin the economy. That's not what these people are saying. They're saying essentially we've created God and we're not doing enough to rein it in.
47:48Nilay Patel:You're not going to make more on the speaking circuit, given that talk, than you are cashing in your anthropic stock.
47:54David Pierce:I'm sure that's true. And I think this is, to be fair, a sort of long tradition in the tech industry. People left Facebook saying this same kind of thing. People left Google. Tristan Harris made a whole life. He did make more money on the speaking circuit. Oh, no question. Out of saying essentially the same things. Like, we have created this thing that is very powerful and we are neither honest about nor reckoning with the consequences.
48:17Nilay Patel:And we're seeing, you know, we haven't really talked about the fact that Meta is on trial. Adam Aseri was on the stand this week. And there is just a lot of documentation coming out of Meta that proves that they knew what they were doing to people.
48:26David Pierce:So this is the thing that I struggle with, right? Like, A, the people who have come out and loudly said this have been proven right historically in the tech industry over and over and over and over again. We should have believed Tristan Harris quicker than we did, right? Like, he eventually helped make a documentary that I didn't like very much, but that's beside the point. The idea that these people were coming out saying, we have built a machine that is changing the way that people live their lives and we're not talking about it enough. If we had recognized that at a bigger level about Google and Facebook much sooner, things might have been different in better ways.
49:01David Pierce:And so part of me looks at this and is like, okay, maybe what we need to do is take these people at their word that they see what they've built more clearly than we do because they see the dashboards. They see what's happening. They see how people are using these things. And this is why I bring up the ads thing too, right? It's like the people alarmed about putting ads in the experience are the ones who are seeing the kinds of information that people are giving to chat GPT. And you put this next to like everybody's up in arms about OpenAI retiring GPT-40, which is like the truly sycophantic thing that everybody turned into their best friend.
49:36David Pierce:And it's like that stuff is real. And I think we do need to reckon with it. And I have to remind myself sometimes that even though I'm confident that AI is not nearly as good as the people wanting to sell it to me say that it is, it's still good enough that it is causing people to do these kinds of things and make these kinds of trades. And we should worry about those things. And so I'm just stuck in this thing of like, I don't believe it's as good as any of these people say that it is. But maybe that doesn't matter because maybe the people are still doing the things that are scary, even if the tech is not as good as Sam Altman says that it is.
50:09Nilay Patel:Well, it's good enough to cause harm. Yeah. Yeah. Well said. That much is true. It's obviously true at this point. It's good enough to cause harm. Yeah. Is it going to destroy humanity? Like, probably not yet. But is it doing a lot of harm? I've watched so many AI cats do the Electrobreaker stance that I'm very concerned about humanity. It is just convincing every time.
50:30David Pierce:It is really ironic that that would be how it would do it. Do you know what I mean? Like, it's much more likely to, like, bore us all to death with cat videos or, like, entertain us all to death with cat videos than it is to just truly like it will dull in our critical
50:42Nilay Patel:thinking skills until it can con us into anything and that by the way is kind of how clod works so who knows um what i'm seeing is a bunch of people who see the technology getting commercialized who understand the incentives that commercialization will create particularly advertising and who are saying hey we have stopped being as careful as we should be and i think that this is the tipping point. These things are going from being research projects or things that you can give a TED talk about to actual products that are being deployed that now need to return on the massive investments that have been made into them.
51:18Nilay Patel:And that means the commercial pressure is arriving. And you can see in some of these notes and some of these letters, these people who are quitting loudly are saying, we're not making the right decisions. I raised the flags and I was overruled. uh, opening, I just fired an executive who opposed adult mode, right? He said, we should not let this thing make erotica. And you can see like why you would raise that objection, right? Like you can see why you would not want these systems to do that because you look at that headline. I went and read a Reddit thread about it, like in the chat, she'd be for him.
51:52Nilay Patel:And the first response was the reason I used Grok is because of erotica for me. And it's like, oh, this is bad. Like you can have whatever, you know, a high and mighty approach to AI that you want. And then hundreds of millions of people are using the tools. And the tools are being guided by commercial imperatives, not moral imperatives. And we're not good at that right now. We are certainly not good at not making the money. Like, again, as a society, we are going to make all the money that can be made. And I think that's underneath it less than, like, pure doomerism. It's, we've gone from being idealistic about it to being commercial about it.
52:28Nilay Patel:And those incentives really, really change the game with the technology that is, again, at least good enough to do harm.
52:35David Pierce:Yeah. And this is why we keep talking about ads in ChatGPT as such a sort of seminal moment in that transition. And that was there was some news about that this week. The first ads started rolling out in ChatGPT. OpenAI announced who the first advertisers were going to be. I spent a long time trying to get ChatGPT to show me an ad, and it hasn't yet. I even asked ChadGPT what kind of questions could I ask you that are likely to show an ad and then I asked all those questions and it showed me zero ads because AI is a good technology I'm like show me ads ChadGPT and it's like ah you're good everything's fine but I think you're right that like this is the turn towards a different kind of road of commercializing your product and it's like we talked about last week that OpenAI has said it has lots of values It has stated all of the ways in which it is not going to use ads and advertising to change the nature of your conversations with ChatGPT.
53:30David Pierce:And I think one of the things a lot of these people are saying is, A, those two things are impossible to separate. And B, all of your incentives are to mess up my conversations with ChatGPT in order to make more money. Yeah. And some of the initial advertisers are really interesting. It's like some normal stuff, you know, Target, uh, Williams Sonoma, HelloFresh. It's like, these are, these are advertisers. You're going to ask about a product and it's going to offer you a product. Fine. Already like you, this is, this is the beginning of a road that ends in a very different place where all of a sudden what you have is, is a giant set of advertisers who want to be in front of you in as, as sort of narratively normal way as possible.
54:15David Pierce:They're going to want to be as seamless and integrated and feel like they are part of the conversation that you're having with ChatGPT. And so HelloFresh is going to come in and I'm going to ask it to cook. And it's going to be like, oh, you're so tired.
54:26Nilay Patel:Why don't you just get HelloFresh? It's right there. Well, also, importantly, you know, all of these people are ex-meta people. FijiSimo ran Facebook.
54:35David Pierce:Yeah.
54:36Nilay Patel:Like, it's all meta people up and down running ads at OpenAI and building them into ChatGPT. and they all know that they do not make their money at meta or at google from the big fancy blue chip advertisers the brands you just listed are not the majority of the money on the big platforms it is bottom of the funnel long tail ultra targeted instagram crap and so if you are running a business where you need to peel maybe a hundred percent of google search revenue to pay back the trillions of dollars that Sam Altman has gone out and raised, you're going to have to get those advertisers and you're going to have to put them right in front of people.
55:14Nilay Patel:And that is not going to be as fun as, you know, Target. It's going to be a lot shittier in like a lot of different ways. Like, are you ready for Shark Ninja to be in your house in this way? Like, because it's coming. And that entire sort of like direct response QVCE world that we can see on the social platforms, if they want to make the money, they're going to have to do that product. And who knows? Like, who knows how it's going to work?
55:39David Pierce:Yeah, I just want to read you something from HelloFresh about this. This is a LinkedIn post from Patrick Saul, who does marketing at HelloFresh, and goes into basically, why are we doing this? Why we think it's important. And one of the things he says is it's meeting high intent moments. And he writes, when someone asks an AI for help planning a weekly menu or managing a busy family schedule, they aren't just browsing. They're solving a problem. By exploring the space, we are positioning our brands at the exact moment of intent. We're not just showing an ad. we are offering a solution to the what's for dinner dilemma at the moment it's being asked.
56:08David Pierce:And he describes this as a thing that might come up when you ask about meal planning. And like, you can just imagine the ways in this, this immediately goes sideways, right? You have people who have been talking to ChatGPT about being tired or the mental health issues they're going through or the actual health issues they're going through that they're uploading to ChatGPT Health. And you have an advertiser who comes in and says, well, don't worry about cooking. We know you've, we know you've had a hard day. We know you're tired. We know you're going through all this stuff, why not just offload all of the work of cooking to this great company, HelloFresh, that can do it?
56:40David Pierce:That's a good ass advertisement. That would work. And that's the thing is every single incentive inside of this product is going to be to use all of that information that people are giving to this incredibly personal, incredibly personalized, incredibly real-seeming-to-lots-of-people tool and essentially weaponize it to sell you stuff in a way that is actually potentially more powerful than the set of data Google has ever had and the set of tools that it has to put that in front of you.
57:06Nilay Patel:Have you had this happen to you in Gemini yet?
57:08David Pierce:No.
57:09Nilay Patel:So, you know, Google does personal intelligence now where they're happy to know about you. Yeah. And the other day I was trying to fix a sink and Gemini was like, well, you're a 45 year old guy who likes to do home improvement projects. You could just replace the whole sink instead of the cartridge. And I was like, you shut your goddamn mouth. And it's coming. Oh, I don't like that. To be fair, OpenAI has said they will not mix this data. Their ads do not yet mix the data, but the incentives are there.
57:34David Pierce:Even the advertisers want that. Like this is the thing. This is the HelloFresh marketing person saying this is the thing we're after.
57:40Nilay Patel:And Google's going to give it to them. Yeah. Their competitor is going to give it to them. Open ad either has to invent digital God. They got to do AGI or they have to take, I think 100 % of Google search revenue to pay down Sam Altman's loans. Who knows what's going to happen here? Yeah. Yeah.
57:56David Pierce:Anyway, if you see a ChatGPT ad screenshot it and send it to us firstcastattheversion.com I'm serious I want to see all of them
58:03Nilay Patel:also if you work in Anthropic and you can tell us whether Anthropic thinks Claude is alive let me know because I I'm just saying
58:09David Pierce:and if your email involves starting with the question well it depends on what you mean by alive if you're one of the cranks who wants me
58:15Nilay Patel:to interview in LLM like you get out of my face like I get those every day like the number of people are like have you interviewed Bing to see if it's like I'm not doing it but if you can tell me if Dario thinks Claude is alive
58:26David Pierce:You can't interview Bing. Nobody ever asked you to interview an Excel spreadsheet.
58:30Nilay Patel:That's not how it works. I will. One day, I'm just going to come on the show and I read the back and forth ad with the guy who asked me to interview Bing. And I was like, I think you need to step away from your AI, sir. And he got super mad at me. Yeah.
58:43David Pierce:Anyway, send us the ads. I want to see all of them. The weirder, the better. And if you want to send me your HelloFresh referral so that we can both get some free stuff, I'm down. Let's do this. We're going to take a break. Then we're going to go back. We got a lightning round.
58:56Nilay Patel:That's how we're going to break the ethics policy.
59:00David Pierce:For free meals, I'll do almost anything, is the honest truth about where I come from, journalistically. All right, we're going to take a break. We'll be right back.
59:11Nilay Patel:Fox Creative.
59:14David Pierce:This is advertiser content from I'm's Pet Food. Hey, humans. My name's Hero. I'm a cat. I'm here to give you a crash course on how we went from fierce hunters to the floofy friends you can't live without. Although, let's be honest, we could probably live without you. Around 10 ,000 years ago, humans started farming, which accidentally created a rodent hunting bonanza. That meant full-time employment and activity for us. Humans were like, okay, these guys are chill. they can stay. So unlike dogs, ew, sorry, we basically domesticated ourselves. We chose you. Fast forward to today. Some of us may not get as much hunting in.
1:00:04David Pierce:And okay, I admit, maybe we can get a little chonky. But you can help keep us healthy and active with I'm's Healthy Weight Cat Food. Now available in stores and online. When you want your spring break to feel like and your kids pool day to feel like and your hotel bed to feel like and room service to feel like because at Hilton hospitality feels like
1:00:38Nilay Patel:your cabana's ready. Would you like fresh towels?
1:00:40David Pierce:It matters where you stay. Book now at Hilton.com. Hilton for this day. This episode is brought to you by Indeed. Stop waiting around for the perfect candidate. Instead, use Indeed Sponsored Jobs to find the right people with the right skills fast. It's a simple way to make sure your listing is the first candidate C. According to Indeed data, Sponsored Jobs have four times more applicants than non-sponsored jobs. So go build your dream team today with Indeed. Get a$75 Sponsored Job Credit at Indeed.com slash podcast.
1:01:20All right, we're back.
1:01:21David Pierce:It's time for the leading round. Unsponsored for flavor. We keep forgetting to say that. I feel it's important to say.
1:01:28Nilay Patel:It is very important.
1:01:28David Pierce:Especially after I just told everyone to send me free meals.
1:01:34David Pierce:So, Neel, I'm looking at the Google Doc we use to plan out this show. And I have to say, there is a segment in here that is called Brendan Carr is a Dummy that we do from time to time. this might be the longest set of links you have ever put in so let's just say it's time for presumably a very long version of america's favorite podcast within a podcast brandon carr is a dummy he's such a dummy it's a segment where the logic goes spin the political theater is about to begin
1:02:03Nilay Patel:let the breakdown start it's time to take the car's arguments apart yeah Yeah, Brandon Carr is a dummy. He's such a dummy. Yeah, Brandon Carr is a dummy.
1:02:23Nilay Patel:Okay, our thanks to, I believe it's pronounced McKeel. We sent that to us on Blue Sky. It's Suna. That's AI music, but it rules. It rules.
1:02:31David Pierce:A thing you should know is if you ever want to know exactly what is David's music taste, that just there was alarmingly close to it.
1:02:39Nilay Patel:It's gray-suited government regulators being taken down by AI Pop Punk.
1:02:43David Pierce:There is also a full version of that song that we will link to in the show notes because it is spectacular.
1:02:49Nilay Patel:Thank you to everyone who keeps sending us theme songs. We're going to keep running them, obviously. This feedback loop is very strong. Talk about incentives. All right, Brendan did a lot this week. And we're going to start, you know, like it's a Brendan sideswipe. But to me, it's the biggest one of them all. So if you've been paying attention, a lot of people asked us to talk about this. The Trump administration came for the biggest controller of speech in America. The thing that dominates all of our conversations all day long, that sets the cultural tone. The Trump administration this week came for Apple News.
1:03:24Nilay Patel:You know, Apple News. You talk all day. Everyone, the agenda is set by Apple News.
1:03:29David Pierce:The broadcast channel, Apple News.
1:03:34Nilay Patel:So there was a study by the Media Research Council, which is a very conservative, sort of right-leaning media watchdog. And the study is bad. We'll get into why it's bad. But they looked at, of the 600-some Apple News stories at the top of Apple News over some period of time, most of them were by, quote, left-leaning outlets. And there were no, quote, conservative or right-leaning outlets on here. Now, if you've ever opened Apple News in your life, you know a couple of things. One, this product is for dead people. Like only old people use Apple News. And like a lot of old people use Apple News.
1:04:09Nilay Patel:Like a lot.
1:04:10David Pierce:We should say, disclosure, Nilay Patel is one of them.
1:04:13Nilay Patel:I'm one of them. Disclosure, The Verge is available on Apple News. Like if you're a subscriber to Apple News Plus, you get past our paywall. The media industry is addicted to Apple News like in a very real way.
1:04:24David Pierce:A real thing the Verge staff is used to is you just showing up at random hours of the day and dropping in an Apple News link that doesn't work for anybody because you were reading a news story.
1:04:36Nilay Patel:Well, I'll get to this in a minute. There's a reason why it's specifically just like three outlets that you do that for. So there's a study. Media Research Council does this study. This study gets picked up by the New York Post, which is like Apple News is horribly biased. And then the machine starts to turn and Andrew Ferguson, the chair of the FTC, the Federal Trade Commission, sends a legal threat to Tim Cook that he, of course, posts on X saying we are going to investigate Apple News for suppressing conservative news, which is not a thing the Federal Trade Commission can do. And I know it's not a thing they can do because in that letter, Ferguson says, we are not the speech police.
1:05:16Nilay Patel:But I'm curious about the speech that you're promoting. What? And so the mechanism by which the FTC believes it can be the speech police is the terms of service of Apple News may or may not suggest to people that this is unbiased and won't promote left-leaning outlets. That's not anywhere in the terms of service.
1:05:38David Pierce:I was going to say, I can't imagine there's a thing in there that is like, don't worry, conservatives, we got you too. Right.
1:05:44Nilay Patel:But Andrew Ferguson sends this letter saying there's consumer deception because of the Federal Trade Commission. They're going to look into whether Apple is playing fair in the market with Apple News, which, again, and I know this for a fact, is mostly read by very old people. like the the demos of apple news is you're not you're just not worried about it's it's it's extreme it's just boomers that's what it is it's very popular and it pays out a lot of money to publishers and publishers care an awful lot about apple news there are publications in this world big famous ones where like the majority of their revenue is apple news and we just don't talk it's like the same as google search but we just we can't talk about it like if you break the cone of silence like maybe apple will take the money away from you she just can't talk about it and No, but I always talk about everything because I think I should.
1:06:33Nilay Patel:Sorry, guys. Okay, so Ferguson does this. So then we get Brendan, who can't stay away from a speech controversy, tweeting, the FCC chairman Ferguson is exactly right. Apple has no right to suppress conservative viewpoints in violation of the FTC Act. I want to be 100 % clear, Brendan. Apple has every right in the world to publish whatever it wants, any way it wants. That is the First Amendment. I will remind you, it is the first one. It's the first one. The government should make no law respecting the freedom of speech. Apple absolutely can make any collection of stories it wants and publish them and say, this is Apple news today.
1:07:08Nilay Patel:Of course it can. Secondarily, there's no violation of the FTC Act found, right? Right. It absolutely has a right to suppress conservative viewpoints if it wants, which is not even doing. Again, we will come to that in one second. But in violation of the FTC Act is not a thing. There's no part of the FTC Act that says you have to publish all viewpoints. Like, absolutely not. you can't find it. If you can find me in the statutory language you send it to me. The thin read that everyone is standing on here is they've discovered somewhere in Apple's terms of service a promise that it will do everything fairly in Apple News.
1:07:45Nilay Patel:And then they have found this study by this media watchdog group that has organized outlets according to some political taxonomy that we do not quite understand that says right-wing news sources are suppressed. Now, the reason that I keep saying we'll come back to what Apple News actually is, is if you open Apple News, the outlets at the top of the app are routinely Reuters, the AP, CBS News, which you could now very much argue is a conservative outlet. And most importantly, and this is why everyone keeps getting Apple News links from me, the Wall Street Journal, because do you know who the biggest newspaper publisher that participates in Apple News is?
1:08:25Nilay Patel:news corp in 2022 news corp signed a deal with apple news saying it is a significant part of our revenue mix apple news do you know what doesn't participate the new york times do you know what just stopped participating cnn oh interesting so the reason that our team keeps getting apple news links for me is because the fastest way for me to read the wall street journal is to see a journal link and then send it to apple news where i can just get the story out because they're the key news partner of apple news yeah they're the reason apple news is a good deal
1:08:54David Pierce:It's actually cheaper to get Apple News than it is to just pay for the Wall Street Journal.
1:08:57Nilay Patel:And I have Apple One. So it's just there for me all the time. It's just like the fastest way for me to get this thing done. And so you're looking at this entire sequence of events where Brendan has said, quote, Apple has no right to suppress conservative viewpoints in violation of the FTX. Not one part of that sentence is true. Apple, first of all, has every right to publish whatever kind of newspaper it wants. And that's what Apple News is. The top of Apple News is editorially curated. I've met that team before. It's a bunch of old magazine editors. And they pick and choose. They really do pick and choose.
1:09:29Nilay Patel:They choose the best, most even-handed coverage of the things they think are the most important. And if you look, it is almost always big legacy news organizations whose standards and sourcing they trust. Right? Who meet the bar. CBS, ABC, Fox News is in there from time to time. Reuters, the AP, the Wall Street Journal. Those are the sources they often pick at the top of Apple News because the boomer audience trusts them too, right? Like, keep that in mind. One scroll down from that, this thing is all for you, right? It is all algorithmic recommendations based on what you've clicked before. And that's a huge range of sources.
1:10:08Nilay Patel:So you can't even argue with that because now you're running the same problem as saying meta is suppressing conservative speech, which is like everyone has their own algorithm and you're actually just telling yourself. One scroll down from that is my favorite part of Apple News, which is trending, which is the clearest glimpse into what this platform is and who it's for that I can offer you. Let me just show you what's trending. The number one trending story on Apple News as I look at this, and this is true every time I look, the number one trending story is from Fox News. It's about a tattoo that was seen in the Nancy Guthrie video.
1:10:41Nilay Patel:Possible tattoo. Seeing an answer you got through video. It may help ID subject. Says former profiler. Just some Fox News slap.
1:10:48David Pierce:I mean, that's a perfect. Perfect. Number one aggregator news story. Yep. Number two. Anywhere you look, I bet that's the top thing right now.
1:10:55Nilay Patel:Number two. CNBC. Psychology expert. Colon. The number one phrase to shut down a manipulator. Ooh. Sure. Number two story at Apple News. Number three is the athletic, which is at the wild start of the biathlon. Infidelity. Credit card fraud. And reallocated medals. Damn, I want to read all of those. Number four.
1:11:14David Pierce:I need Apple News.
1:11:15Nilay Patel:Former NFL player. Number four is People Magazine. Former NFL player's wife reveals what you don't see after retirement. This is just boomer slop. Like, you can see it's in the trending topics.
1:11:25David Pierce:Apple News is the magazine rack at the grocery store.
1:11:29Nilay Patel:Yes, it is. The thing that it is is not the coolest thing Apple makes. Number two, a couple hours ago, a self magazine. Nine simple exercises to improve your balance. Do you know who needs that? Do you know who needs that?
1:11:42David Pierce:I mean, me, to be fair.
1:11:44Nilay Patel:Okay, so this is all just dumb, right? This is just pure posturing left and right. If Apple had an ounce of self-respect, it would tell the government, in this case, like, go away. Yeah. What I'm worried about is Apple no longer has an ounce of self-respect. And so what I've been thinking about, actually, in this context, weirdly, is Steve Jobs. Not because I think I know what Steve Jobs would do, not because I have some vision of how Steve Jobs would, like, punch Donald Trump in the face, although I believe I've seen that AI slot video as well. But because of a thing Steve Jobs actually said all the time, which is that Apple stands at the center of technology and the liberal arts.
1:12:20Nilay Patel:I threatened David with a clip. So I think we actually have a clip of him saying this at one of the many, many events that he said. There's the literal sign behind him. Can we run the clip? So I've said this before. I thought it was worth repeating. It's in Apple's DNA that technology alone is not enough. That it's technology married with liberal arts, married with the humanities,
1:12:46David Pierce:that yields us the result that makes our hearts sing.
1:12:51Nilay Patel:If you're just listening to this, he gave this speech like a bunch of times and he would always stand in front of a literal street sign at the intersection of technology and the liberal arts, right? And the whole tech industry has forgotten about the intersection. We're just doing technology and we're all very confused about how governments and systems and societies work because no one reads the liberal arts anymore. They just ask I had to summarize it for them. This is the moment, right? If you believe that you built the richest company in the world on that insight, which he did, right? He built products people love.
1:13:20Nilay Patel:He built a company people trust. He turned it into one of the richest companies in the world. That's the insight. He's saying out loud, that's the insight. And this is the moment to say our taste is not up for grabs. for government pressure, right? Our ability to say to our audience in our news product, we, with our taste, with a bunch of fancy magazine editors that they have hired to run Apple News, we're going to pick the sources of information that we think are good at the top. And then all the rest can be algorithmic and trending stories about how to not fall over, like whatever the audience there needs.
1:13:55Nilay Patel:But at the top, we're going to use our judgment. And your weird media watchdog group We can't just hop, skip and jump into government pressure about our judgment. That's what it means to have the liberal arts embedded in your product. Like, I really mean that.
1:14:09David Pierce:And by the way, that is a case Apple has made for Apple News in the past. Like, we actually know for sure that Apple believes that is part of the value proposition of Apple News. That is like when Google News and Apple News were competing and when people were like, well, why is Apple even in this game? It talked a lot about the fact that this is people and this is taste and this is Apple. and that actually we are doing a thing here on purpose that matters. Like, we know that that is what Apple believes or at least believed about this product.
1:14:38Nilay Patel:Yeah, and by the way, I don't mean liberal arts in the sense of, like, liberals and Democrats. Like, little L, liberal arts, liberal democracy. Like, having a sense of culture. Like, in the most basic way. Like, thinking about how other people treat one another. Like, the humanities. The Steve Jobs is saying it. He doesn't mean Democrats. He means studying art and culture right next to science and engineering and putting those things together. This is the moment, right, to say to the government, we have made no promises in our terms of service about conservative news, and we think you have no place in impinging on our judgment.
1:15:14Nilay Patel:Now, here's the problem. Do you think Tim Cook is going to do that?
1:15:18David Pierce:No. No. A lot of recent history suggests Tim Cook is not going to do that.
1:15:23Nilay Patel:He's not going to do that. And I think that is a tragedy. Because he would be the winner if he did. Right? Like, by all rights, he could just— Apple could publish a letter tomorrow saying our terms of— the FTC Act— you cannot read our terms of service such that we have violated the FTC Act with the top six stories in Apple News. But is he going to cave? Is he going to make sure there's more Breitbart in Apple News? Or whatever other source that you think is conservative enough to count? Maybe. I think that's really bad. Like, especially when your partner's already News Corp and The Wall Street Journal and CBS News.
1:16:01Nilay Patel:Like, they're there. Fox News is there. I'm just saying, Brendan Carr's a dummy. Every sentence about Apple has no right to suppress conservative speech in violation of the FTC Act is purely wrong. That is maybe the single dumbest thing Brendan has ever published. And it's because he knows it might work. He knows it might work. He knows this company might cave. And this is the pressure they can apply.
1:16:23David Pierce:And the flip side is Tim Cook keeps caving, and it keeps getting him nothing.
1:16:27Nilay Patel:Nothing. Nothing. They just keep coming for him. And Apple is one of the companies in this world that is big enough to stand up. And I hope they do here. I really hope they do here. This is also such an easy, obvious win. Can I, by the way, can I complicate this with the flip side of this, which is really interesting? So this is the Media Research Council, right, which published this report. They got picked up by The Post, which immediately became government policy. That's how it works now. The flip side of this is there was a big merger of ad agencies. And part of that merger, Andrew Ferguson, said this merger can go through.
1:17:01Nilay Patel:But you have to stop relying on this company called NewsGuard, which rates the trustworthiness of media brands to decide where to put ads. Because that means you're not putting ads on conservative websites. And NewsGuard, you know, people have problems with NewsGuard. But they were just straightforwardly like, here's the reporting standards. Here are the sourcing standards. Like, here's how accurate they are. Here's how many scathing polemics about whatever they publish. They had a rubric. And you could look at the rubric. And the big ad agencies were saying, okay, like, we want our, we want, we're going to put ads near more trustworthy things.
1:17:32Nilay Patel:We picked this independent, neutral observer. And the FTC went and crushed them. Basically took their business away because they want to make sure the money can flow to conservative news outlets that didn't meet the standards. So on the one hand, you have, based on nothing more than this one media research council report, a threat against Apple, the biggest company in the world, one of the biggest companies in the world. And on the other hand, you have a very similar organization saying here's what you can trust, you can't, that the FTC is trying to crush because it might take dollars away. And so they have sued the FTC for free speech violations and saying this merger condition is actually a violation of free speech rights.
1:18:10Nilay Patel:Super fascinating. Like you can just see the hypocrisy of the Trump administration is laid bare and how they treat the media ranking organizations. It's a lot. Yeah. By the way, the Wall Street Journal. It's funny how often I'm like, I'm pointing to Wall Street Journal.
1:18:25David Pierce:Yeah, it's rough. And honestly, this isn't even the end of the Brendan Carr stuff this week. He's also mad at The View. I'm going to give you 30 seconds to tell me why Brendan Carr is mad at The View because then I'm going to stop caring and we're going to move on.
1:18:37Nilay Patel:Okay, so as we know, Brendan Carr fully believes that broadcast television is the only speech in America that matters, except apparently for Apple News. If you are an old person and you're consuming media in this country, Brendan, it wants to be in your face. He wants to control what you see. So he had this rule, the equal time rule, that has fallen into oblivion because everyone's just watching TikTok anyway. And he has decided he's going to enforce it very vigorously. So first he pointed this gun at Saturday Night Live because Kamala Harris on Saturday Night Live. And it turns out Saturday Night Live very good at this because they know they're a comedy show.
1:19:11Right?
1:19:11Nilay Patel:So comedy shows, there's no exceptions. And actually, NBC had given Trump equal time. So now, last week, I think we talked to a Brent car, pointed his gun at late night talk show hosts, which they can't quite claim that they're a bona fide news program, right? And news programs get an exception. If you're a news program, you don't have to give equal time to both parties, right? So the talk show hosts would have Democrats on and Brennan said, we're going to investigate you if you don't have an equal number of Republicans on. And talk show hosts are like, but there are interviews and also no one cares.
1:19:38Nilay Patel:But that's one, right? He's pushing the boundary on talk show hosts, whether they get the news exception. This week, he has launched an investigation into ABC's The View because the Texas Senate candidate, James Flerico, appeared on the show. This is ridiculous. First of all, The View is part of ABC News. Yeah. Like, it is straightforwardly a news program. It is run by the news division at ABC. You can think it's a bad news program. You can think it's a news program that prioritizes nonsensical debate and conflict over actual news, but it is a news program. That is the thing that it is meant to do.
1:20:12Nilay Patel:You could think that. One could think that. In the process of selling the book pitch that I was, I pitched for Decoder, I've often talked about how I want to appear on The View and I think I just closed that door as hard as I can. But whatever.
1:20:29Nilay Patel:It's a news program. It's straightforwardly a news program. There's nothing about it that isn't news. It's just a bunch of people talking about the news all day long. He's going to crash and burn on this if Disney fights back. Right. Is Disney going to fight back? I don't know. Brendan keeps pushing the boundary. This is so stupid. First of all, no one's watching this stuff. You know when they're watching it? They're watching it on YouTube. They're watching it in clips on TikTok that are pirated by the Android-powered bot farms that I think we should get. They're not watching a broadcast. And it's right next to all of these candidates having an infinity amount of their own time to capture.
1:21:04Nilay Patel:Ted Cruz has a podcast, for God's sake. That's how I know speech regulation in America is completely out of whack. Sorry, it's a really bad podcast. Just nonsensical. Anyway, he is trying to say that The View is not news enough to qualify for the news exemption to the equal time rule. It is 2026. What are we talking about?
1:21:26David Pierce:Yeah. He's so stupid. It does put Disney in a very funny position of either it has to fight against the Trump administration or just publicly drag The View as aggressively as possible.
1:21:39Nilay Patel:I mean, we should not be in a position right now with the amount of media we have and the access to media we have where we are trying to draw lines about where the boundary of the news is. Right? Yeah. Like, I want to draw some boundaries. I think we make the news. I think a bunch of influencers don't. Is that a good use of my time to argue that every day? It is absolutely the worst use of my time to argue that every day. We just need to make better news. The government stepping into ABC's face and saying, this isn't news enough. we're going to punish you for not making it news enough? Whew, that's rough.
1:22:12Nilay Patel:You should feel very bad about that. Again, I remind everybody that the politics you hear me express the most are that government speech regulations are bad and free market competition is good, which is why I find myself agreeing with the Wall Street Journal during this segment all the time. Brendan, as always, you are welcome to come on this show, to come on Decoder, and try to defend any of this idiocy, especially that boneheaded tweet about Apple not being free to suppress conservative news in violation of the FTC Act. Every word of which is wrong. Every single word of which is wrong. I welcome it.
1:22:42Nilay Patel:I would love a debate, a fulsome debate. At the end, maybe we could fight a little bit. Just an invitation I have for you, Brennan Carr. That has been, Brennan Carr is a Dummy, America's favorite podcast within a podcast.
1:22:53David Pierce:A true epic of a podcast within a podcast this time. He's such a dummy. Let's blow through the rest of the lightning round here because we need to get you out of here on time. My first lightning round is that for everyone who is like, shut up about all this other stuff, talk about gadgets. I have bad news and good news. The bad news is there just haven't been any. The good news is it's about to be gadget season again. Samsung confirmed that there's an Unpacked coming later this month. We're going to get some new phones. There's already been some leaks about those phones that suggest that maybe not the most interesting set of phones is about to come out.
1:23:28David Pierce:But we're about to get a bunch of new Samsung phones. The iPhone 17e is also potentially coming. the Google Pixel 10a is also coming soon. It's like, it's about to be a really interesting round of new, somewhere between like the mass market phones everybody buys and the like slightly cheaper phones that some people get.
1:23:46Nilay Patel:If you had Apple's last quarter, why are you doing a 17e? They should be like, it's a$7 ,000 pro phone. Like that's the thing that they sell.
1:23:52David Pierce:Yeah, 100%. Anyway, all of that is coming. We're also potentially about to get new iPads, which I think is very exciting. I reviewed the base iPad last year and my read on it was essentially this is the first time the base iPad is not the one you should buy because it is full of such outdated hardware that actually it's going to run out on you before it should. Like you should buy an iPad planning on it lasting you seven years and the current base iPad won't especially if you believe that there is ever going to be any useful future for AI. But the running reporting right now mostly for Mark Gurman at Bloomberg is that that's coming.
1:24:31David Pierce:it's going to get some big upgrades, so we should get a good round of gadgets coming soon. What we are not getting is better Siri. So I'm reporting again from Mark Gurman at Bloomberg that Apple is continuing to work on this revamped Siri that is going to be better and smarter and largely powered by Gemini, but that it has been pushed back a point release and is now going to be part of the May software launch, not March, which was what we had been hearing for some time. This is, I would say, a small bummer and a large heaping of not at all surprising.
1:25:10Nilay Patel:Yeah, it's not at all surprising. I think every one of the big smart home makers has had trouble integrating the powerful voice assistant with the needs to not be broken automation control. And Siri right now is very much automation control. Yes. And so, I don't know. I mean, Google's gotten better. I would say my Gemini smart home stuff has gotten better. but you like Apple is not in the business of breaking stuff. Not the way that Google will just break stuff and not the way that Amazon has just broken stuff.
1:25:38David Pierce:And Apple is also about to, the timing of this I think is really interesting because Apple is going to put this thing out in May and then in June has to explain to developers how to use it, right? And so the big thing that Apple has been talking about is all of this contextual awareness that it's going to have. It's going to know about all the other apps in your phone. It's going to be able to use those apps for you. Like Apple needs to ship a version of that that works in some meaningful way. They're not shipping anime. If it wants to get developers on board. It doesn't need all of that to exist, but it needs Siri to be good.
1:26:11David Pierce:Do you know what I mean? Like, I think we're at the point where.
1:26:13Nilay Patel:But Siri is so constrained right now. Siri is timers and music. And they can get there and add a dash of like you can talk to other stuff.
1:26:22David Pierce:So I agree with that, except I think even the very basic features of Siri have progressed. It is still fine at setting timers, but like Siri as a voice recognition machine has gotten noticeably worse for me over the last, let's say, two years. This is also like there are a lot of people who keep wondering why the autocorrect on the iOS keyboard feels like it's getting worse. Yeah. It's because it is. And it's because of all of this underlying technology Apple is working on. So like all of that stuff needs to be demonstrated as like a step change forward. If Apple is going to say this is the future of the interface, get on board to developers.
1:27:01David Pierce:And it is running out of time to prove that.
1:27:03Nilay Patel:I just want to point out is a minor pushback. Apple blew it with AI. Yes. No AI. They shipped liquid glass, which looks like butts. And they had the biggest quarter in their history. Sure. Just one of those things. Like, they're insulated because of the phone upgrade cycle. They're going to get more things wrong than right. And they're just going to keep selling phones because of what I believe to be iMessage lock-in, although the data shows that I'm not correct. But I believe it's iMessage lock-in.
1:27:35David Pierce:No, I think that's right. And I think there is a real chance that what Apple does at this year's WWDC is not show everybody the thrilling future of AI, but basically start to pretend that none of it exists. Yeah, that's right. and just bury all of that under really technical language of features in the Notes app, which maybe is what it should have done all along.
1:27:59Nilay Patel:I mean, that's what it did last year, right? I'm just saying, I think this year what you're going to get is, it's Siri, you can still do timers and music, and now when you ask it questions, it doesn't kick you out to a web search right away. Yeah. Because knowing what's going on your phone and controlling apps on your phone, they're nowhere close.
1:28:16David Pierce:So you're describing perplexity, basically. Like if the new Siri is perplexity, that may be job done for Apple.
1:28:24Nilay Patel:Yeah. In this moment, that might be all, A, it might be all they can do, but it might be all they need to do.
1:28:30David Pierce:Yeah, that's very possible. That's very possible. All right, what's your next one?
1:28:33Nilay Patel:All right, I got two cars and a YouTube. What do you want?
1:28:36David Pierce:Let's do cars first.
1:28:37Nilay Patel:All right. You may have seen this week Ferrari unveiled not its whole first TV, but just the inside of its first TV. It's called the Luce, which means light. The code name, by the way, was Electrica, which is way better. Oh, that's way better. I don't know what they're doing. Why is it?
1:28:53David Pierce:This is a conversation for another day. Everybody's doing stupid names for their EVs, and I would like them to stop.
1:28:57Nilay Patel:Electric has like a great name for a Ferrari. Yeah. Anyway, interior designed by one Mr. Johnny Ive and Mike Mattis and a whole bunch of other, Mark Newsom, like, you know, love from Johnny Ive's company. They designed the interior. So they had a big party. A bunch of people went. A bunch of people we know were there. Johnny Ive did an unveiling, and then it was just like the interior components arranged around a room. So like the steering wheel and the display were in one part of the room and like the center console was in another and like the vents were in yet a third and people were just like milling around and looking like doing this stuff.
1:29:30Nilay Patel:Very good. The video is very, very compelling because it's a Johnny-eyed video about how much he likes designing switchgear which should just be a genre onto itself. If I get Spotify just play me that playlist I'd be very happy. Yeah. It's so cool. It looks nothing like a Ferrari. James Barham was the first creative director heard the Verge actually said this looks more like a Porsche, and I agree with him. It's all very round, very iPhone-y. Obviously, it's Ive. But here's the thing. It's, like, not touchscreens. It's all digital displays connected to hardware controls, and as you use the hardware controls, like, the displays around the controls change and light up in different ways.
1:30:04Nilay Patel:So, like, the center screen is on a pivot, and you can pivot towards the driver, pivot towards the passenger, and then the top is a circle display that often looks like a clock, and has real needles in it. And if you push the button, And the whole display changes and it turns like a stopwatch. You can do lap times. It's like this, the sickest interaction you can think of.
1:30:21David Pierce:Wait, I like this now. It's very good. My immediate reaction looking at a picture of this was like, it's, it looks like a very fancy, like F1 racing simulator with a giant ass iPad. And I was like, really Johnny, like this is, this is what you're doing.
1:30:35Nilay Patel:But again, there's a part of me that's like, none of this is Ferrari. Like it was not the point of a Ferrari.
1:30:39David Pierce:No, it's not. But I do love the idea of connecting it back to physical controls.
1:30:44Nilay Patel:Yeah. he was very clear he gave interviews I think Alex Heath interviewed him Tim Stevens who writes for us all the time interviewed him and he was like it's a car I'm there to drive the car I don't want to look at a screen and touch the screen which is fascinating because if you remember all of the Apple car rumors was that he wanted to get rid of the steering wheel have full autonomy and then like do something else inside the car right this was the dream yeah and so it's fascinating to see him abandon basically all the ideas we'd heard about for the Apple car for the very tactile it's all switch gears and buttons and clicky magnet vents in a Ferrari.
1:31:18Nilay Patel:The thing that I'm saddest about, if you look at this, it's very cool, right? You can see a lot of Johnny Ive in here. And Ive is particularly good at accessible design. Like, accessible in every sense of the word. Like, accessible for people with different abilities, but also just, like, the point of the iPhone is that everyone has one. Rich or poor, everybody has the same kind of iPhone, right? Yeah. And you're like, oh, this is only for, like, five people. True. And it just makes me, that makes me a little sad. Like, Ive is at his best when he's addressing millions of people. And here it's like six guys are going to be able to afford this car.
1:31:52David Pierce:So what you're saying is you want Johnny Ive to do the next Camry.
1:31:56Nilay Patel:I'm saying if, yeah, if he, yeah, if this was a Kia. Yeah. He'd be like, no, this is the future of cars. And I think that was the opportunity with the Apple car. And I'm dying to know how many ideas moved from the Apple car to this. I'm dying to know if there are other ideas to bring these ideas to life. very quickly a bunch of Chinese manufacturers are going to copy all this. It's all going to happen. But, you know, there's that thing where you'd see an Ive design, and we would talk so much about care and polish. And you're like, oh, the thing that's amazing about this is that millions of people will have these products.
1:32:25Nilay Patel:They will experience this level of design and care. And here, it's like, it's beautiful. You're never going to see one. Most people will never be able to flip one of these switches.
1:32:33David Pierce:Does the car industry have the kind of fast follow thing that we see in tech all the time? That, like, if Johnny Ive did this for Apple. The thing I would say in response to what you just said is, well, the good news is everybody's going to copy this. And in two years, this will be some of the ideas here will at least be sort of normalized across the industry because that's what happened. Does that happen in cars? Like if does Ferrari do something and then it just sort of trickles down into like three years from now, Volvo's will look like this.
1:32:59Nilay Patel:There's a lot of pictures of like Mazdas that look exactly like Ferraris right now. Or Ferraris that look exactly like Mazdas. Okay. You can find those. This is such a car nerd thing. For a long time, BMW had this thing called the Bangle Butt. There were designers named Chris Bangle. Come again? Yep. Chris Bangle is one of the most controversial designers in BMW history. And he designed this, like, lid of the trunk of the 7 Series in, like, the early 2000s, I want to say. And now every car has that. And so BMW and Mercedes, if you look at them, the reason their cars always look so bananas and they're getting increasingly more bananas is because they get fast-followed so fast.
1:33:36Nilay Patel:Everybody wants to look like a German luxury car. And that dynamic is changing in some ways. You know, I think that the sort of, like, newer Hyundais and Kias in particular, they're, like, they're charting their own weird retro-futuristic course. But there was a time when, like, yep, within a year, every car looked like whatever BMW sedan.
1:33:54David Pierce:Interesting.
1:33:54Nilay Patel:I don't know if that, it's not going to happen with the Ferrari. And we don't know what the outside of the Luce looks like yet. People have suspicions, but nobody actually knows.
1:34:02David Pierce:I just, I am encouraged by the idea that a lot of car designers will look at Johnny Ive and say, oh, he doesn't think touchscreen everything is the future of cars. Maybe I should change my life.
1:34:13Nilay Patel:The whole industry already thinks that. Like, the car designers across the industry have been like, oh, this is dumb. China just outlawed motorized door handles because they're killing people.
1:34:21David Pierce:I mean, that, yeah.
1:34:23Nilay Patel:The industry, the pendulum is way on its way back. Like, Hyundai, Kia, Volvo, a bunch of car makers are like, yeah, we need the buttons back. Okay. That makes me happy. Yeah.
1:34:34David Pierce:All right. Do your YouTube, and then we'll end on mine, and we'll get out of here. What's your last one?
1:34:39Nilay Patel:Big news. Huge, huge news. YouTube is coming to the Apple Vision Pro.
1:34:48Nilay Patel:Huge news for six people. Well, look, first of all, YouTube has the biggest library of 360 content anywhere. Sure. And so it was always a huge miss that Apple did not have access to YouTube. because what are you going to do? Like when I reviewed the Apple Vision Pro, I was like, can I use YouTube? That's where all this stuff is. And they're like, eh, eh. Yeah. And they kind of shaded it because some of that content is really old. Like there's been 360 video on YouTube forever. Yeah. I interviewed Michelle Obama on YouTube 10 years ago in 360. Like that's a long time ago. Yeah. So that content exists.
1:35:23Nilay Patel:You can go look at it. You can get it. I think also YouTube wants to get people making the content again because Android XR is coming out soon. Right. And so it's on the Apple Vision Pro. It's just a way to get a headline. You can upload some 360 content to this platform. You should try it. And then that's how you get a trickle of new content for Android XR. That's my big strategic think of this. But I just think it's very funny. Finally, now there's a YouTube app for the Vision Pro.
1:35:50David Pierce:That's a good take. It was always kind of a deliberate burn that it wasn't there because YouTube is everywhere. Part of YouTube's whole thing is that it's everywhere that is available to look at stuff you can find YouTube. And so to not be on the Vision Pro was clearly a choice. So I think your take is probably right that they're now in the position of being like, okay, we want to incentivize people to make this kind of stuff. We might as well start somewhere.
1:36:14Nilay Patel:To be fair, they're already in the Quest and all these other headsets. They just weren't on the Vision Pro.
1:36:18David Pierce:The people who bought Vision Pro and the true believers in this content are like, that is one overlapping circle.
1:36:26Nilay Patel:And there's been like weird third party YouTube. Like that was the first wave of apps. It's like, well, this YouTube app, like,
1:36:31David Pierce:right.
1:36:31Nilay Patel:But I think it's, I think they're just trying to seed some content ahead of Android XR. Yeah.
1:36:37David Pierce:All right. Before we go, I have, I have just a very boring, but obligatory update on the Paramount Netflix war to buy Warner Brothers. Somehow this has become my cross to bear is that every time somebody does a weird, boring thing I have to tell you about it on this show. Although I will say I am enjoying the extent to which the Ellisons are just like, well, if we have more money, which is what happened this time. So Paramount, where we are basically is Warner Brothers keeps telling its shareholders not to accept Paramount buying them because they would like to be bought by Netflix. Everyone is very clear that Warner Brothers would like to be owned by Netflix and Netflix would like to own Warner Brothers.
1:37:16David Pierce:And Paramount just keeps coming in and just like hucking dollar bills at everybody hoping that that works. So what happened this time is Paramount is now offering to pay the$2.8 billion termination fee that would go if the Netflix deal didn't happen. So they're just handing over$2.8 billion more. And they're offering a$0.25 per share. They call it a ticking fee, which pays to shareholders in Warner Brothers Discovery for each quarter the transaction doesn't close after this year. So they're basically saying the money's going to go up. Every quarter the transaction doesn't close, which just incentivizes everybody to not take the deal, which is so funny.
1:38:01David Pierce:But anyway, all of this is happening while there's a lot of political machinations going on. The Ellisons are meeting with the Trump administration, and everybody's trying to convince everybody else to not.
1:38:11Nilay Patel:No, the machinations are even funnier than you think. Did you see the latest update today?
1:38:15David Pierce:No.
1:38:17Nilay Patel:So Sarandos met with Trump, the CEO of Netflix. The Ellisons have met with Trump. Trump was, I believe, on ABC News last night, and he said, everyone's paying attention to me. I must be very important. I'm going to stay out of this one and let the Department of Justice handle it. So you can just flatter his way. You can just flatter Trump into sitting it out. It's good. It's really good. And then you're like, oh, who runs the Department of Justice? Oh, it's Pam Bondi. That'll go well. Who's our antitrust chief? Oh, Gail Slater, the antitrust chief at the Department of Justice, just quit because she was about to take Live Nation Ticketmaster to trial.
1:38:55Nilay Patel:And Kellyanne Conway has successfully lobbied potentially the governor dropping that case over Gail Slater's objection and she quit over it. Wow. This is true. This is all in the background of this. Trump is saying I'm gonna let the Department of Justice handle it and the Department of Justice Antitrust Chief just quit because it appears the Ticketmaster has corruptly lobbied its way out of that trial
1:39:19David Pierce:so there's going to be no one to stop this deal potentially no one to approve this deal in either direction yeah there's just it's good it's perfect
1:39:29Nilay Patel:no one is gonna own anyone you know Ted Sarandos gave Trump an Emmy or some shit like it's like who knows what happened but he's like I'm out I'm not paying attention anymore
1:39:37David Pierce:unreal yeah so this this chaos will continue. But just the extent to which the Ellisons have all of the money and no idea how to win this fight is just great.
1:39:49Nilay Patel:I just want to say this one more time. Just put yourself in this position. You are Larry Ellison. All of your wealth is Oracle stock. Oracle stock is AI stock. And you are desperate to sell your AI stock to buy Warner Brothers. Do you, Larry Ellison, believe that your AI stock is going up or down if what you think a better trade is is to sell it and buy Warner Brothers? Just ask yourself, does Larry Ellison think we're in a bubble based on the fact that he wants to sell his Oracle stock and buy Warner Brothers, a thing that has killed every other acquirer for over 20 years?
1:40:34David Pierce:do you want do you want to buy the ai bubble or do you want friends reruns this is this is where
1:40:41Nilay Patel:we are in 2026 you can you can you can evaluate that any way you want but if you had if you today owned oracle stock would you think it was a good idea to sell it to buy warner brothers wait no no
1:40:54David Pierce:no i'm gonna put this in even simpler fashion do you would you rather bet on the ai industry continuing to go up the way that it is? Or do you want to bet on the success of the Harry Potter HBO show coming out next year? That's what I want to hear about. Versecastoftheverse.com. Tell us which of those you would rather bet on.
1:41:13Nilay Patel:There's a lot of ways to come up with the AI bubble, but I want to sell my Oracle stock to my Warner Brothers is one of them.
1:41:18David Pierce:Yeah, it's a tough beat. Personally, I'm out on either one. I'm going to go to Paramount Plus and keep watching Mission Impossible movies. It's going to be fine. All right, we should get out of here. We've gone way over as we are once to do. I blame Brendan Carr for this one pretty succinctly this time. Anytime you want, Brendan. If you read about any of this in Apple News, please send Neelai the link because he can open it. I can't. I don't want to hear about it. But that's it. That's it for The Verge Cast. Remember, as always, to get this podcast ad-free and to support everything that we do to make Neelai utterly ungovernable.
1:41:50David Pierce:The best thing you can do is subscribe to The Verge. Theverge.com slash subscribe. You get ad-free podcasts. You get all of our subscriber newsletters. You get all of our everything else. it's the best thing you can do to be part of this whole family and thing that we're building. We also love hearing from you. Keep hitting us up with ideas about how we can be talking about the stuff in the Epstein files, how you feel about the Ring and Wise and Nancy Guthrie stuff. It's all messy and we're sorting through it all in real time here and on the website. So keep getting at us. The hotline is 866-VERGE11.
1:42:20David Pierce:The email is vergecast at theverge.com. Send Neelai all of your Apple News links at neelai at theverge.com. The Verge Cast is a Verge production and part of the Vox Media Podcast Network. The show is produced by Eric Gomez, Brandon Kiefer, and Travis Larchuk. We will see you next week. Neel Eye, back and roll. Thought sweet green was just salads? Think again. There's a new way to do sweet green. Wrapped and ready. These handheld wraps pack bold flavor and 40 plus grams of protein into something hearty, satisfying, and built for life on the go. From craveable sauces to satisfying textures, They're designed to keep you going without slowing you down.
1:42:58David Pierce:So put that fork down. Try the new wraps today in app or at order.sweetgreen.com. Available at participating locations only.
1:43:10David Pierce:Rinse knows that greatness takes time, but so does laundry. So Rinse will take your laundry and hand deliver it to your door expertly cleaned. And you can take the time pursuing your passions. Time once spent sorting and waiting, folding and cueing, now spent challenging and innovating and pushing your way to greatness. So pick up the Irish flute or those calligraphy pens or that daunting Beef Wellington recipe card and leave the laundry to us. Rinse. It's time to be great.
From the publisher
Did you see Ring's Super Bowl ad and see happy puppies reunited with their owners? Or did you see the seeds of a complete, always-on surveillance nightmare coming for us all? David and Nilay discuss which is the right answer, why so many people don't want to trust tech companies, and why Ring might not care much about the difference. After that, the hosts discuss the ads coming to ChatGPT, the surprising number of AI executives quitting their jobs and issuing dire warnings on the way out, and the fake ad for OpenAI gadgets. In the lightning round, it's time for an extra long Brendan Carr is a Dummy, the latest Ferrari EV, the future of Siri, and more.
Further reading:
Jeffrey Epstein’s digital cleanup crew
Jeffrey Epstein might not have created /pol/, but he helped carry out its mission
Amazon Ring’s lost dog ad sparks backlash amid fears of mass surveillance
Wyze is sticking it to Ring
Sen. Markey calls on Amazon to “discontinue” Ring monitoring features
Ring’s new Search Party feature is on by default; should you opt out?
Ring launches upgraded cameras with Retinal Vision 4K recording
What the Guthrie case reveals about your ‘deleted’ doorbell footage
FBI releases recovered footage from Nancy Guthrie’s Nest cam
OpenAI’s first hardware slips to 2027
OpenAI’s supposedly ‘leaked’ Super Bowl ad with ear buds and a shiny orb was a hoax
Two more xAI co-founders are among those leaving after the SpaceX merger
OpenAI reportedly disbanded its Mission Alignment team
OpenAI fired exec who opposed ‘adult mode’
Read an Anthropic AI safety lead's exit letter: 'The world is in peril'
Opinion | I Left My Job at OpenAI. Putting Ads on ChatGPT Was the Last Straw.
What Is Claude? Anthropic Doesn’t Know, Either
ChatGPT’s cheapest options now show you ads
Here are the brands bringing ads to ChatGPT
Claude gets more free features to capitalize on ChatGPT ads
Ex-OpenAI researcher has “deep reservations” about its approach to ads
Brendan Carr is a Dummy theme submitted by Michiel Vanhoudt on BlueSky
FTC says it’s ‘not the speech police’ in letter warning Apple News about its alleged promotion of left-leaning outlets
Ferrari’s first EV will have an interior designed by Jony Ive
Here’s what the Ferrari Luce’s buttons, switches, and knobs sound like.
The early reviews of the Rivian R2 are starting to roll in
Live Nation’s monopoly trial is reportedly fracturing Trump’s Justice Department
YouTube is coming to the Apple Vision Pro
Apple keeps hitting bumps with its overhauled Siri
The iPhone 17e could launch soon with MagSafe and an A19 chip
Apple might let you use ChatGPT from CarPlay
Paramount ups its offer for Warner Bros. Discovery, again
Subscribe to The Verge for unlimited access to theverge.com, subscriber-exclusive newsletters, and our ad-free podcast feed.We love hearing from you! Email your questions and thoughts to vergecast@theverge.com or call us at 866-VERGE11.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
