The TikTok ban and the iPhone monopoly

In short

The Vergecast Episode Summary: "The TikTok Ban and the iPhone Monopoly"

Podcast Details

Title: The Vergecast
Hosts: David Pierce, Nilay Patel, Alex Cranz
Episode Title: The TikTok Ban and the iPhone Monopoly
Episode Description: The hosts answer questions about the debates surrounding the TikTok ban and the U.S. v. Apple case, addressing listener concerns and thoughts.

Key Themes and Discussions

Introduction

David Pierce opens the episode humorously recounting his struggle to find solar eclipse glasses before transitioning to the main topics: TikTok and Apple.
Acknowledgment of listener engagement through emails and hotline questions.

Segment 1

U.S. v. Apple Antitrust Case Main Arguments

Listener Feedback: A voicemail from a listener named Harrison questions why Apple is targeted for antitrust scrutiny, arguing that its success is based on popularity rather than necessity.
Neal's Perspective: The hosts discuss that the antitrust action is not solely against Apple but a broader movement against successful tech monopolies in general, emphasizing the need for a functional market that allows competition.
Comparison to Other Companies: Discussion about how other tech giants, like Amazon and Google, have faced similar scrutiny for using their market power to suppress competition.

Key Takeaways

Winning capitalism must be balanced with market fairness; monopolistic practices that stifle competition are under scrutiny.
The focus on consumer experience and the degradation of services to maintain control is a critical part of the antitrust argument against Apple.

Segment 2

TikTok Ban Debate Listener Opinions

Voicemail from Brandon: Raises concerns about ulterior motives behind the TikTok ban related to political interests rather than national security.
Algorithm Neutrality: The hosts explore whether the TikTok algorithm presents a neutral perspective, with skepticism about its role in shaping public opinion.

Key Takeaways

The discussion highlights the complexity of social media's influence and the challenge of assessing algorithmic bias.
Participants recognize that while TikTok is popular among youth, the underlying reasons for its potential ban may stem from broader political and economic considerations.

Segment 3

The Implications of a Ban Reflecting on Possibilities

Practical Enforcement: The hosts discuss whether a TikTok ban would be enforceable and what the implications would be for users who already have the app.
Hypothetical Outcomes: Speculation on the potential of TikTok being sold versus outright banning and the implications for consumer choice and media diversity.

Key Takeaways

The likelihood of a successful ban is debated, with overwhelming consensus that banning may not solve the underlying issues of media control and competition.
There is a sense of nihilism regarding the effectiveness of such bans in the current media landscape.

Final Thoughts

The conversation ends with reflections on the value of media plurality and the challenges posed by monopolistic practices in the tech industry.
The hosts also highlight the need for ongoing discussions about the role of government regulation in the tech space.

Additional Information

Call to Action: Listeners are encouraged to vote for The Vergecast in the Webbys and join the hosts at the Chicago Humanities Festival.
Outro: The episode closes with appreciation for listener feedback and a reminder about the hotline for future discussions.

Conclusion This episode of The Vergecast dives deep into the complex issues surrounding the TikTok ban and antitrust actions against Apple, reflecting a blend of listener concerns, expert opinions, and broader societal implications. The discussions underscore the ongoing struggle for competition and fairness in the tech industry while navigating the intricate landscape of consumer rights and corporate responsibilities.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.

Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:02Welcome to the Vergecast, the flagship podcast of super app regulation. I'm your friend David Pierce and I am what I would call desperately on a hunt for solar eclipse classes. It's Monday morning. It's like three and a half, four hours until the eclipse and like a super genius planner that I am just didn't go get eclipse glasses. I think I sort of thought that sunglasses would work. Turns out that is not correct and terrible science and you should not listen to me about anything to do with the eclipse. So now I'm running around trying desperately to get glasses and so far it's not happening target was out staples had a sign on the door that clearly somebody had just like hastily printed basically saying like leave us alone we don't have any eclipse glasses i'm now going to every store i can think of including some that just obviously won't have eclipse glasses trying to convince someone to sell me these glasses i have realized i will pay what amounts to an alarming amount of money for these glasses but i don't think it's going to happen anyway we have an awesome show coming up for you today i was in New York last week and took the opportunity of all being in the same city to drag Neelai into the studio and grab Alex and just talk about TikTok and Apple and all of the stuff that's been happening over the last couple of weeks.

1:13We've talked a lot about the TikTok ban and Apple antitrust, and we've heard a ton from you. Questions you have for us, thoughts you have about the things that we think, feelings you have about all of what's going on, and we figured we'd just spend an hour talking about it. We got a bunch of really great emails and a bunch of really great hotline questions. And so that's what this whole show is. It was really fun. I really enjoyed it. It got deep and kind of emotional at times in a really interesting way, as all of this Apple antitrust and TikTok ban specifically stuff tends to do. Super fun, really awesome show.

1:43All of that is coming up in just a second. But like I said, I have three and a half hours to get some Eclipse glasses. It's probably not going to happen, but wish me luck anyway. This is The Verge Cast. We'll be right back. When will AI finally make work easier? How about today? Say hello to Gemini Enterprise from Google Cloud, a simple, easy-to-use platform letting any business tap the best of Google AI. Retailers are already using AI agents to help customers reschedule deliveries all on their own. Bankers are automating millions of customer requests so they can focus on more personal service.

2:21and nurses are getting automated reports, freeing them up for patient care. It's a new way to work. Learn more about Gemini Enterprise at cloud.google.com. Support for today's show comes from Darktrace. Darktrace is the cybersecurity defenders deserve and the one they need to defend beyond. Darktrace is AI cybersecurity that can stop novel threats before they become breaches across email, clouds, networks, and more. With the power to see across your entire attack surface, cyber defenders such as IT decision makers, CISOs, and cybersecurity professionals now have the ability to stop zero days before day zero.

3:03The world needs defenders. Defenders need Darktrace. Visit darktrace.com slash defenders for more information.

3:16Welcome back. All right. So we've gotten a lot of feedback. We have asked for and received a lot of feedback on two things that we've talked about on the show the last couple of weeks. So we're just going to dive into a bunch of it. Neal Patel is here. Hi, Neal. Hello. Alex Kranz also here. Hey, what's up? Neal and I are in this small studio that I've never been in before. It's very exciting. There's a frame TV in here. I want to point out. Oh, it's so ugly. We're not doing this. We have a lot of questions together. We have a lot to get through. I'm just letting you know. So the two things we're going to talk mostly about here are the Apple antitrust stuff, which we talked a lot about, and the TikTok ban.

3:45We're going to do Apple first, then we're going to take a break, then we're going to talk TikTok. And we got a ton of feedback, so what I tried to do was find hotline voicemails from people that were roughly representative of the feedback. So some of them have questions that we should ask specifically. Some of them are just kind of points a lot of people made that we should talk about. We have three for Apple and four for TikTok. This is going to take us four hours. Let's go. All right. The first voicemail we got is from Harrison. Hi, David and Burge crew. My name is Harrison. I have a question about the Apple DOJ case.

4:17What I'm trying to understand is why people are going after Apple specifically. Apple has 60 % market share in the United States. And people like to say that like iMessage is a lock in or that green bubble envy is a thing, which it totally is. But I feel like people are getting upset that Apple, like, won capitalism. It feels like they made a product that won based off of popularity and not necessity because we all use SMS and then iMessage is built on top of that. It kind of feels like trying to force Apple to be – to open that up or to open other parts of the iOS experience up would be kind of like making it so Sony has to put God of War on the Xbox or that I have to be able to put the brake pads from a Honda Accord onto a Hyundai Tucson or something.

5:06It feels like we're just trying to create an argument for the sake of an argument. I would just genuinely like to know, what is it about this case with Apple that makes it a bigger deal in antitrust than something like Amazon Web Services and Amazon Storefronts or Google with Gmail or Search, I guess? Thank you. Have a good rest of your day. Bye. Okay, so I want to reframe this question very slightly before we get into it, because there is a part of this premise that I disagree with, which is that we're only going after Apple because there is antitrust action against all of these companies. But the reason I picked this one is because I would say the most consistent piece of feedback we got was that this is just the DOJ picking on Apple for being too successful.

5:48And that what is this fight if not just trying to turn Apple into Android or make it worse? And why are we mad at Apple for being so successful? So I figure that is a thing we should address here that this question is also very much about. So, Neelai, you were nodding through this whole question. What do you think? Yeah, I think those are good points. I agree with you, David. If you look at the landscape of antitrust actions, the governments around the world are going after all these companies just all over the place. So there's that. Just set that aside. Including explicitly Amazon Storefront and Google Search.

6:18All that stuff is in this in a very real way. Yeah. And then I want to just focus on two words, winning capitalism. I'm a capitalist, pretty unrepentantly so. I think you should win capitalism. I think you should try really hard. I think that's a good, I think that works. The problem is you have to have a functional market for other people to try to win. And so these cases are all premised on once you've won in one place, you shouldn't be able to take that power and prevent anyone from winning in another place. And I think in particular with the iPhone, Apple's desire for control or desire for quality or desire for fees, you pick and choose in what order they're in the equation and how they're weighted, desire for services revenue has precluded a bunch of other kinds of businesses from existing and competing with Apple.

7:10And that's actually the problem, right? It's that you get these companies that have a monopoly in one area and maybe they've earned it. I think iPhones are really good phones. I think their cameras are really good. Like all the stuff. I think they've earned that stuff. And then you take that and you say, and now we will make sure that no one else can compete in another area or we will make sure that we have an advantage in some other area that is unrelated to where we won. And I think that's the part where if you want a functional capitalistic market, you have to have markets. People have to be able to pick and choose freely and vote with their dollars, which I believe is more efficient than like voting for politicians in centralized control structures.

7:50Like I would rather vote with my dollars and vote for politicians. Like that's just a thing that I believe. And so you just look at the iPhone and you're like, oh, it's actually pretty hard to vote with your dollars here. It's a pretty hard to vote with your time. And if Apple doesn't want that to exist, it just doesn't. And I think that's the heart of these cases. And I think it gets lost. When I interviewed Jonathan Cantor on Decoder, he made a point of saying there is more interest in antitrust by young people than there ever has been before because people can feel that their options are being limited by a handful of big companies across the entire economy.

8:25And that's the heart of it. Yeah, it seems to me that thinking about this one compared to Amazon and Google, I actually feel like I can explain that tension very easily with Amazon and Google because there is sort of one specific thing, right? With Google, it's we built a very successful search engine. It is not illegal to win. But then what Google did is use all the money that it made from said successful search engine to basically buy all the real estate on the Internet so that no one else could have a successful search engine. At least that is the allegation, right? Whether that will win or not, I don't know, but that is at least sort of a straightforward version of the thing you're talking about.

8:58The thing that Amazon allegedly did where it would crawl the web to find sellers who were selling stuff cheaper off of Amazon and then ruthlessly penalize those people on Amazon, same thing. That is you created a big market and then you used it to punish everybody who played elsewhere. I don't know that there is one thing that feels as obvious to me in the Apple suit that we've seen so far. Is there one that you can point to that feels kind of because I think this is part of what people are responding to. And Alex, I'm curious how you feel about this, too, because it seems like the Apple thing is about sort of so many things.

9:29And I think to some extent, and Alex, we talked about this on the show, the wallet one feels to me like maybe the most straightforward version of this, where like Apple built a thing and then didn't allow anybody else to build said thing. That is a version of the thing. I think it's both about protecting markets and allowing markets to exist, right? Like part of this case is saying Apple has said these markets cannot exist. And the other part of it is that Apple has made the experience for consumers fundamentally worse, and it has such a large market share that that worse is now impacting people in a really real and measurable way.

10:02And that's the part I think about the most because I think I think Neil is right, right? Like they went in and they said, OK, you can't have these markets. Like if you want to have cloud gaming, it cannot exist on this, which means 60 percent of Americans cannot have this unless they choose to vote with their dollars elsewhere. But all this lock in is keeping them from doing that. And then the other part of that is if you want to send a message to your mom with a photo in it, that photo is now degraded because Apple has willingly chosen to degrade its services to keep people locked in. And those two things are like both existing at once.

10:35So it's like Apple won at capitalism and then made everything worse as like a victory lap is kind of part of this case. And that part I'm like, yeah, maybe that should be illegal. Maybe that shouldn't be a thing that's happening. And that's the tension of the case, right? The tension of the case is like, is that allowed? And I think that's where it becomes almost like a philosophical argument of like, should that be allowed? And I'm on the case, like, I love consumers. I want to help consumers. That's my job as a consumer technology reporter. I want to make sure that they're protected. And so I'm like, yeah, we shouldn't make things measurably worse just because we went at capitalism.

11:09And a lot of people are like, yeah, but you went at capitalism, you get to do what you want. Yeah. By the way, this is like a tension of the American economy dating back 100 years or more. Right. We did this with railroads. Yeah. The reason it's called antitrust is because there was a form of business called trusts, and we knocked them all down and built antitrust law. I highly recommend reading The Curse of Bigness by Tim Wu, which is a little – it's like a booklet. It's not even long. It's just like a fun, readable history of antitrust. But this is the idea is that you should have competition in our market.

11:41And if you don't protect the competition in our market, then you're going to end up with a handful of big companies that run everything and they will not be as good for you. And by the way, I think a bunch of big companies in our markets right now would love to be regulated monopolies, like just up and down. They would love it. Facebook would love to be a regulated monopoly and be in charge of everything and make all the money and not have to compete. That's just, I don't know. It feels tricky to me. I think with the iPhone in particular, you're right. It's hard to point at one thing, but I'll give you one example.

12:09There are ads in the setting screen. That's brutal. That's brutal, right? And it's like, that's just the clearest self-preferencing that anyone can do. And it's like, this sucks. Like, fine. Okay, put ads in the setting screen. But at least let other competitor apps have as much access to the phone. It should not be that because I picked an operating system one time or I preferred one camera, that all of these other choices down the line get made for me by some corporation that wants to extract 30%. I just don't, that feels icky. Like, that's my money. Stay away from it. Okay. What a truly perfect segue that just was into question number two, because there's more ways to talk about on that point.

12:47But this next question basically asks it directly. It's from Josiah. Hi, David. My name is Josiah. And I of course have a question about the DOJ versus Apple situation. A lot of the stuff in that complaint is about like Apple forcing companies to do things either the Apple way or just not at all. And I feel like that is an area where Apple being the bully to these other companies does result in a lot of benefits for me as a user. The nightmare scenario is like thinking about the wallet and NFC access. And obviously opening that up has the intent of creating a bunch of different competitors that have better features.

13:23And then that requires Apple to make their thing better. And I would love to live in that world. But far more realistically, I feel like the world we live in is one where the second the court says Apple exclusively can't lock users in, then every other company is just going to say, oh, cool. And they're going to remove their card from the Apple-like wallet, and they're going to make their own wallet, and then they're going to make me use exclusively their wallet to use their thing. And that's hell, because then all of a sudden I have my Amazon card is in my Apple wallet and then my Delta tickets and my SkyMiles card are in my Delta exclusive wallet.

13:57And how does that not just like result in a worse experience for everybody on the backend? Like how can we force Apple to open up? Is there a way to force Apple to open up that doesn't just allow all these other companies to be like, Ooh, Apple can't be the monopoly. So I would like to, and then lock everybody else out of their new thing. Is that possible or is by forcing people to open up, we're going to inevitably struggle with interoperability? Thanks. Hopefully it wasn't too long. I got an answer for this one. So I think it is down to the idea of capitalism is that competition would happen.

14:33The idea of capitalism is that Apple would say, okay, other people can make their wallets and they can now do this as well. And then Apple has to make sure their wallet is the best wallet and force people to, like Netflix was an example of this, right? Hulu were an example of this. They were early movers in these fields and they said, okay, we're going to be the best and everybody else is going to come work with us. And if they don't work with us, then their product is going to be measurably shittier, i.e. Paramount Plus. And that's what's going to happen. And that theoretically is what would happen in this case too, right?

15:06Chase may say, okay, we're going to go make our wallet app and not use Apple's anymore. And if their wallet app is worse, then people might be like, well, it's not that hard for me to move over to Bank of America or Wells Fargo or whatever. I'm just going to move my business over there because I need the convenience of this other product that's much better. So having just switched banks, I take unbelievable offense to that premise that switching banks is this is one of the things this question made me think about is like maybe where we're headed is we're about to realize lock in is more real more places than anybody has reckoned with.

15:37And actually what we're doing is we're starting down this like incredible hill of trying to get out of the holes that we've dug ourselves into over the years. But I don't know, Neal, what do you make of this question? So specifically with wallets, I have an answer, and then we can abstract it. With wallets, everybody wants your credit card to be everywhere. There's no incentive for anyone to make you use a different wallet app. The incentive is for your credit card to be everywhere. Right, because they want you to use your credit card. They want you to use your credit card. And you can see this play out on the web already, where every storefront has 15 payment service buttons.

16:09Like, do you want to use ShopPay? Do you want to use Google Pay? Amazon Pay? Apple, like, whatever. Just pay us. Like, pay us the money. PayPal and Venmo, which are the same company. They're like, we don't care. Just do it. Just do something. Any way to get your money, they'll do it. So the incentive, at least for that one, is for payment services to make it easy for you to spend money. So I think that one will be fine. I think there are other ones where the incentives will be get over here and we'll lock you in in other ways. What i'm hopeful for is that yep, we'll all perceive that and that'll be annoying in some ways But then over time that annoyance will actually reduce How much people use some of these services or the switching costs will be obvious alex brought up netflix I think we've all gone through this now in the streaming example Where every streamer was like we have these exclusives music services were like we have these exclusives And then people are like, but I don't care like Whatever and then like most of the streaming companies have gotten 90 and put their stuff on Netflix.

17:04I think the economy should wax and wane in these ways. And I think right now it can't. It can't because you picked an operating system, which is weird. That's too many decisions to give away. Okay. Yeah. I mean, I think I buy the premise to some extent that if you give everybody access to everything, you suddenly will get a thousand ads on your setting screen. And that actually that's a worse outcome than only Apple being allowed to show me ads on the setting screen just from a pure like user experience perspective and i think then you have to believe that oh okay people will ditch their iphones because there are too many ads on the setting screen you know there's a there's a counter example it's just like sitting in front of all of us all the time which is we use the web on our computers every day the model for computing is not only on phones yeah there's a whole other one like you buy any desktop computer and then you put another application environment on it in terms of a web browser and then you have multiple competing application layers and multiple, like all this stuff is just like pure chaos.

18:03And that market seems to be fine. Like from what I get, like all of us seem to enjoy it. It's like people make things. The browser companies seem to be doing fine. Like there's new innovative browser companies all of a sudden, like the market changes. People are selling laptops from what I understand, Alex. Yeah, they do that. Every day. We look at this other thing and you're like, well, that works fine. Until Google comes along and ruins it for everybody. But then we get another stuff that shows up and starts to work. I think that's largely right. I think what I wonder is how many things we're about to discover don't have the incentive structure of things like credit cards.

18:40And actually, as you were talking about the Netflix stuff, Alex, I was thinking about all of these companies that have shown up trying to be like the search service for streaming. And Netflix sometimes works with them and is usually part of the search stuff. And there was a really funny thing recently where a bunch of people discovered you can search on the Apple TV app and get Netflix stuff. And everybody got really excited. And it's like, no, that's been there for a while. But what it won't do is show up in the continue watching stuff and it won't show up in the recommendations. And it's like Netflix wants to own that experience.

19:11They'll take search because you've got to be there. But Netflix still wants to own that experience and is powerful enough that it can get away with not being part of that. And it just makes me wonder there are more things like that that are going to be out there, I think. Like the foundational premise of this question is also really interesting, which is like Apple makes people do things the right way, which is Apple's rep. Right. Right. They're like, we have a user experience. And if you want to be a part of it, you got to do it our way. Right. But this is the correct answer in some sort. But there's a correct answer.

19:39And like part of that's true. Like that's Apple's history. Like they're like, there is a correct design answer. I think that's being corrupted by Apple's financial interests. And then I think like actually you look around and you're like, we made a bunch of weird decisions. like we all have to deal with hdic's yeah right like that's weird like did that was not the right answer like i don't know tiktok started supporting hdr videos and it's just a mess like it is just a mess it looks like shit and like everything is too bright and then also kind of grainy instagram has the same problem with hd videos and it's like this is just because apple is like now the videos are hdr and it forced everyone to like deal with it and it's like this isn't great and it's like these are just choices that apple is sort of like making down the line i think one piece of evidence that you know it's kind of the lumbering monopoly is that the polish on some of that stuff isn't there the way it used to be yeah yeah and it's still coasting and it doesn't matter yeah it doesn't matter they get away with it yeah i think that's fair uh we have one more question from peter hey this is peter i'm brooklyn just heard the episode about the apple lawsuit with the u.s government and want to say one thing people never point out about super apps is that china China has one because the Chinese government has banned everything else and they want everyone to be in one app.

20:54It's easier to collect all the data and mess with all the information in one place. So maybe that's why China and India have one and no one else wants it. Yeah, just something to think about. Thanks. Bye. So I just I want to add one thing to this before we talk about it, which is, I think, another consistent piece of feedback we got when we talked about the antitrust stuff was people saying, why would you want super apps? Those are just monopolies of their own. And they have just as much, if not more lock-in than many of these other systems. Why are we, the three Vergecast co-hosts, standing so hard for super apps?

21:30All right. So maybe I didn't say this as clearly as I could have because I was on a beach drinking, literally drinking a pina colada and my audio is coming through AirPods. I think the DOJ is talking about super apps because that's a sexier idea than web apps. That is my fundamental belief. That's what I think too. I think they can point to be like, we could turn Facebook into a super app and then you would just like leave your iPhone and buy a cheap Android phone and Facebook would take you there and that would bring down prices of phones in the market. And that's one way, fine. But it's actually web apps could do the same thing.

22:06Right, I think of my phone in many ways as a vessel for Google services, which are also slowly degrading over time. But that was a real problem for Apple about five years ago when people would buy iPhones and then load them up with Google Apps and Apple realized, oh, we need services that can compete with this across the board. And those services have to be everywhere. That's why Apple Music is on Android. Like they know that some of these services have to be everywhere. So I don't know. I don't know that I want super apps either. I just my belief is that they they couldn't pick web app. Like you can't be like Apple start killing the web.

22:37Like that is somewhat famously the argument they made about Microsoft in the 90s. Right. So I think they had to pick something new and shiny. And honestly, I think because Elon keeps talking about turning X into a super app, I think they wanted to court that particular political base. You think it also might just be in the lexicon in a way that like if you say progressive web apps, everybody's eyes kind of start to glaze over, except for VergeCast listeners, which is why we love you. Yeah, that's what I mean. There's an element of politics here. Like the United States government is like doing a thing.

23:07I think they are communicating as political actors. You know this is law like the DJ is law enforcement the cops are like doing stuff and they need people to believe in their power as cops Okay, like I just I'm not out here saying we need a Chinese style super app I like the point is if you had one and in markets where there are one You see the switching costs between iPhones to other phones are very low and people switch between them all the time And that is true in Europe that is true in China that is true in India There are other ways to make those switching costs low They just happen to be the web.

23:39And it's only us here in our little Vergecast club that know that and care about that as much as we do. Alex, what do you think? I mean, ditto. It's just I totally agree with Nilay on that. Like, I don't think anybody necessarily wants a super app, but it's a really good example to use in this thing. And it's a really good example to show, like, we could have cheaper phones. This could be a lot cheaper. And we don't necessarily need super apps for that. It could be the Google suite. It could be the Amazon suite. It could be another monopoly, like tech companies suite. Who can say? But we should have choices and just choices at all.

24:13And to have just a whole style of app forbidden from 60 % of phones in the United States because Apple doesn't feel like it and is threatened by it is like bad. Yeah. Even if those apps themselves maybe aren't great. And I would point, once again, point to desktop computers where you can just, the entire application model is the web and that's fine. Right. Right. And like, do people switch between Windows and Mac all the time because you can just use Google search and YouTube? No, they don't. They have they still have preferences and the computers are still expensive. But a lot of them have gotten way cheaper in a way that, you know, phones have not.

Read the full transcript

24:49And we have evidence of this, right? Like Apple talks about not wanting parents to buy their kids cheap Android phones because that worries them that if people can just access the service on a good enough phone, they won't buy expensive iPhones. Yeah, I think that's right. Alex, we're about to get to the portion of our show where you and I get repeatedly accused of being China-loving communists. Would you like to briefly explain why you'd like WeChat to come to America and it'll make everything better and solve all of our problems? No. Okay, good. Yeah, I don't think it will. I don't think we need it in this country.

25:22And I think super apps are probably, I think to Peter's point, monopolies themselves. and we probably don't need them in this country, but we also should probably be able to have them if we really want them. Like the choice should be there. The whole idea of capitalism is we have choices and it's like, okay, I would like that choice. Yeah, also millions of Americans routinely choose to use meta products all the time. All the time. All the time. Like we are just like a little bit away from that thing actually being real. Yeah. And it's not like, John Gruber keeps pointing this out. When you give people the choice of, do you want a free service with personalized advertising?

26:02They're like, yes. And they're like, what if you didn't have that and you could pay for it? And they're like, no.

26:11Yeah, no, that's right. All right. Well, we should get to tech talk stuff. But first, we got to take a brief break. We'll be right back.

26:21Support for this show comes from LinkedIn. When you're a small business owner, your business is on your mind 24-7. So when you're hiring, you need a partner that works just as hard as you do. That hiring partner is LinkedIn Jobs. When you clock out, LinkedIn clocks in. LinkedIn makes it easy to post your job for free, share it with your network, and get qualified candidates that you can manage all in one place. LinkedIn's new features can help you write job descriptions and then quickly get your job in front of the right people with deep candidate insights. Either post your job for free or pay to promote.

26:55Promoted jobs get three times more qualified applicants. At the end of the day, the most important thing to your small business is the quality of candidates. And with LinkedIn, you can feel confident that you're getting the best. Based on LinkedIn data, 72 % of SMBs using LinkedIn say that it helps them find high-quality candidates. Find out why more than 2.5 million small businesses use LinkedIn for hiring today. Find your next great hire on LinkedIn. Post your job for free at linkedin.com slash track. That's linkedin.com slash track to post your job for free. Terms and conditions apply. Oh, hey, welcome to gift wrapping.

27:34Whoa, Zoe Saldana. Hey, can you wrap these, please? Wow, iPhone 17s, you splurged. At T-Mobile, you can get four iPhone 17s on them. It's the perfect gift for everyone. I'm the worst. I only got my mom a robe. Well, it's better than socks. So I have to trade in my old phone, right? No, at T-Mobile, there's no trade-ins needed when you switch. Keep your old phone or give it as a gift. Incredible. In fact, wrap up my old phone, too, for my Aunt Rosa. Forget that. Aunt Liz will be jealous. Sounds like my family drama. Oh, I got it. I'll give it to my abuela. I'll take reindeer paper with, hey, where are you going?

28:07To T-Mobile! Thanks, Zoe! The holidays are better at T-Mobile. Get four iPhone 17s on us. No trade-in needed when you switch. Plus four lines for just$25 a line. with 24 monthly bill credits and four eligible portings on essentials for well-qualified customers auto pay plus taxes fees and 35 dollar device connection chart credits and imbalance do if you pay off earlier cancel contact us finance agreement 256 gigabytes 830 dollars required visit t-mobile.com support for this show comes from zapier when people talk about ai they often talk about the future how will ai affect the economy what will ai's potential be in the future will ai be able to make popular art but the more important question is what can ai actually do for your business today.

28:50If you're looking for concrete implementation of AI for your business, you can try Zapier. Zapier says they can help you and your team actually reap the benefits of AI, not just talk about it. With Zapier's AI orchestration platform, you can bring the power of AI to your work. Connect top AI models like ChatGPT and Claude to the apps your team already uses so you can add AI exactly where you need it. Whether that's automatically enriching leads, coaching your sales rep, resolving IT tickets, or more, you could do it all with Zapier. Zapier is for everyone, tech expert or not. No IT bottlenecks, no complexity, no AI hype, just results.

29:29Teams have already automated over 300 million AI tasks using Zapier. Join the 3.4 million companies already automating with Zapier and transform how you work with Zapier in AI. Get started for free by visiting zapier.com slash verge. That's Z-A-P-I-E-R dot com slash verge.

29:55All right, we're back. Alex and I are card carrying members of the Chinese Communist Party. Oh, can I see your card? And Neelai is the lone bastion of free speech and goodness here on The Vergecast, but is also occasionally sometimes a monster who believes in the opposite of capitalism and hates everything. It's really been fun times listening to the feedback to the TikTok band stuff. We got so much feedback about the TikTok band, including somebody who called us, I think, three times to yell at me specifically in increasingly well-spoken ways. It's like they called. They weren't happy with how they did, so they called again.

30:33And then they did it. It was unbelievable. Thank you to that person. More people should call and yell at David in increasingly polite ways. No, no, no. They were not increasingly polite. Increasingly well-argued ways. I see. Okay. I'll take that, too. Do that again. Yeah. All right. But let's get to a few of them, starting with a question we got from Brandon. Hello. My name is Brandon. I'm based in Cleveland. I have thoughts about your conversation on The Verge cast about the TikTok ban. Not to be a complete conspiracy theorist, but I feel like there's a bunch of ulterior motives for getting rid of TikTok that have nothing to do with national security.

31:08First of which is that most of Congress is funded in part or in some significant way by APAC. APAC is sort of losing a propaganda war on TikTok regarding the Gaza situation. Secondly, it's sort of a source of, like, unfiltered current events information that kind of gets pumped out to viewers before sort of party officials kind of get the chance to formulate talking points about it. But I think that there's just sort of a vested interest to kind of eliminate the wild card of, like, unmediated current events news from the landscape on an election year. but the national security and sort of like China angle of it is sort of like a convenient sort of top level reason to use to get rid of the app but I feel like it just sort of is you know one hand that's washing the other and the other hand is really the true reason why both sides of the aisle want to get rid of the app but that's just my thoughts thanks okay two things going on here one we got a surprising number of voicemails that start with not to be a conspiracy theorist and then dive deep down into it, which is just delightful and is perfectly in line with this entire conversation.

32:17But I do think this question of the Israel-Hamas war being sort of the catalyzing event for a lot of this came up a lot. And we talked about it a smidge in the episode that we did on it, but it's been reported on a lot. And there's been this question still ongoing of like, what does the government know and why haven't they told us? Right. And I think - Without question. They have not been clear. But now, a couple of weeks later, I just want to come back to this thing about like, OK, what do we know about what this is actually about and what's going on and what the U.S. government believes it is actually doing here?

32:48Okay. I don't want to talk about AIPAC too much. You really can fall down a wild ride of conspiracy theories there. But I will point out that yesterday, as we're talking, probably last week as people hear this, Joe Biden told Netanyahu on the phone the situation in Gaza is unacceptable and conditioned further aid for Israel on some lasting solution to that situation. So the pressure has worked. Fair enough. I think embedded in this question and much of the feedback that we got is an assumption that the TikTok algorithm is neutral. And that what's happening on TikTok is a neutral representation of how everyone in America feels.

33:30And people are like, the kids are speaking and TikTok is like fighting back. And it's like, maybe, maybe that's true. I also believe the situation Gaza is untenable and there should be a ceasefire But I don't believe that the tick-tock algorithm is neutral. There's no evidence that it is But there's no evidence that by dance or the Chinese government is not like you know What the fastest way to break lasting Western peace would be would be to break the United States support of Israel like That is a true thing. That's a thing that you could do and the putting pressure on that alliance in particular Like resets the world order.

34:01Can you do that through the mechanism of fucking tick to I don't know But I think like if to accept that premise that it's because of what happened in Gaza and the young people arguing against a war is what is causing the United States government to say TikTok is like you have to accept somewhere in there that the algorithm is neutral, that it is a neutral representation. And I think that's a huge assumption that you should not just make lightly. I also think my formative experience as a young person was the war in Iraq. And I know and listen to me either. my friends got arrested marching down lake shore drive protesting that war uh and that straight up like no one like we were loud i wish i'd had a tiktok then i would have made a lot of videos uh and so i hear that frustration i feel it very keenly i feel the same way about this war and all wars um but i i think the presumption that the algorithm is neutral is one that if you want to make that claim i would just encourage you to challenge that presumption and think about how much you're relying on it.

35:04But at least the pressure has worked in some minor way. Well, and this is also a trend we see with social media every time. A social media that is used by younger people tends to have this moment where everybody's like, why is nobody else talking about this? And it's like, well, because you're just on this particular, you're just on Tumblr in 2016. That's why nobody else is talking about it because you haven't left Tumblr. You're just on TikTok in 2024. That's why nobody else is talking about it because you haven't left this app. And if you go and you look elsewhere, if you look at other media, you will see that this stuff is being covered.

35:39And I think that's a trend we see a lot. And on TikTok in particular, because of the algorithm, because of the way it is really, really good at disseminating information really, really quickly. We've seen that accelerate. We've seen that be a lot louder and a lot faster than it was in those other cases, which we have seen. Like, to be clear, we've seen it. We saw it with LiveJournal back in 2004 with the war in Iraq, 2003, 2004. You see it again and again and again. And it's a behavior where younger people who are starting to really get into media literacy and starting to really think about these things, they go, they get on an app, they find other people just like them, and they're like, why is nobody else talking about this?

36:14Why is this being held for me in these other areas? And the truth is, it's not. It's just being discussed in a different way. It's being discussed maybe with a little less heated rhetoric or whatever. But also, I do kind of agree with him. Not about that part, but I agree with him certainly about there are other reasons why the TikTok ban is being pushed. And I would certainly agree it is not just national security reasons. I think there's a massive financial incentive for both the United States and for the many, many companies based in the United States that are direct competitors to TikTok. And those are the people that like they do, they met a Mark Zuckerberg would be delighted if TikTok got shut down tomorrow.

36:53You know, like Elon Musk would be delighted if it got shut down tomorrow because that means more users back on their platforms. So I think like we can't ignore the fact that there are certainly other incentives here that are that are encouraging this. But we also have to like deal with the facts as we are given them. And like when we start to think about what is it, you know, why is nobody reporting on this stuff? People are reporting on it. People are looking into this stuff. People are examining it. But if we don't have proof, if we don't have like real quantifiable facts, we are just like pissing in the wind being like maybe something's happening over there.

37:25Yeah. Also, you know, most of Congress believes that what they're going to accomplish is a sale of TikTok. And that like if you believe they're going to sell it, like then you also have to believe that someone's going to find the big algorithm dial and turn it like towards Israel. and that implies that that dial exists and it is currently pointing towards God. It can be turned. And then now you're right back at the problem of who controls that dial. And so I would just like, it's that assumption that it's like, do you believe that the Instagram Reels algorithm is neutral? I do not. It mostly shows me babes.

37:57Like it just fully believes that that is what I want from that. And like, I can't type trucks exploding into Instagram like more loudly. Like that's the thing I actually want. And the TikTok algorithm is like, you definitely want trucks exploding And then here is some of the weirdest gadgets ever made. You should buy them. So TikTok gets you. TikTok is like, you're going to buy so many vacuum cleaners. Here's some cut rate anchor batteries. We're doing it this week. That's what's happening. And it's like these algorithms. We all know that the algorithms have preferences and biases and can be shaped by the people who control them.

38:29The question for this is who should do that? Should it exist in our country? Should it exist? If Rupert and Murdoch bought TikTok, would you be pleased about that? Why or why not? Right. And then the question is, would you be pleased that the Chinese government has the same power? Yeah, I think that's fair. And then the tangential to the question of is the algorithm neutral is like on what vectors can you move the knobs, right? And it's like that comes back to what do these companies want and who is really in charge. And it's like that's where all of this gets so messy for me, right? Because it's like I doubt sincerely that it would be good for TikTok's business to move the Gaza knob one way or another.

39:07I do think it moves the shop knob to move the business. That's just obviously true. Like it feels true being on TikTok. But then there's all of those questions next to the fact, like you're talking about, Alex, that the three of us sitting in this room have completely different experiences of TikTok. So to sit here and talk about TikTok as a single thing is essentially impossible. And this is where like I just start running in circles on all of this, right? Like we're essentially using different apps. I would bet 95 % of what the three of us see on TikTok does not overlap. Yeah. And what do you do with that?

39:41Yeah. It's so weird. Well, you explained Jojo Siwa to Neelai right before the show starts. No, I refuse to know any of this information. Yeah, Neelai got to, I know there is an entity called Jojo Siwa. Nope. I refuse to even acknowledge that it is an entity. I know that there are words that people say that sound like that. I see. Okay. Yeah. By the way, my belief is that the Instagram algorithm only shows me babes because I refuse to engage with it. And its default is like, huh? Will this work today? I know you want this. It's like, we don't know anything about you. Fair enough. All right, let's get to the next one, which in the name of fairness is very mad at me specifically.

40:18But we got a lot of these that are very mad at me specifically. And as a good journalist, I feel obligated to air one. This person, they said their name in a way that I couldn't identify. So we're just going to call them St. Louis. So this is from St. Louis. I'm Bart from St. Louis and listening to the latest episode of the Birchcast and taking my fist at the clouds and yelling into the ether because David and Alex are just, I don't know, I guess they've been brainwashed by TikTok or something. Let's start from first principles, right? The most compelling reasons for banning TikTok and then just work your way down to the least compelling.

40:53First and foremost, when Neelon mentioned the 1932, it was Communications Act known for ownership of media. Boom, right there. You don't need to go any further. That right there is justification for banning TikTok. It should have been done one time ago. We don't need to have any debate. We're done, period. Next, China, fans, U.S. social media. Why would that be? Why would they think they should do that? Maybe because if they think it's being done to them, it's because they're doing it to you, right? I mean, it's kind of a tit-for-tat thing, but again, you combine that with the other one, and again, I don't think we need to debate it any further.

41:26Second, you guys are talking about, well, what are they doing? This is all hearsay, blah, blah, blah. I don't know. You guys have a whole website, and you seem to like to investigate shit related to technology and whatever. How about looking into the differences in content between the different platforms? I would hazard a guess, and I'd take a big bet, that the types of content on TikTok versus reels versus YouTube shorts is quite different. Meaning, pick a controversial subject, be it Israel Hamas, Taiwan, etc., that there's a dramatic difference in the number of pros and cons posts that are presented on these different platforms.

42:10Hi. So the two things in here, one, he brings up a bunch of stuff we've been talking about. And I think the question of content differences is very interesting. But I specifically want to talk about this one because a lot of people responded to our talk about the TikTok ban by saying, well, China does it to us. The end. Problem solved. We should we can do it back. And I don't find that argument credible at all. But I am open to discussion on that. And, Nilay, in particular, I want to know what you think, because you are the most pro-ban of us, I would say. Yeah, I don't. I've heard that argument a lot.

42:45It makes sense in its way, like straight tit for tat. But China also directly controls its information economy, and it is an authoritarian government. And I don't think we should do that. Well, so this is kind of where I ladder up to you. I just want to be clear. I believe in the First Amendment in a very real and meaningful way. What I'm saying is there's a reason in the United States we don't allow a ton of foreign ownership of media. There's a reason that historically we have not allowed concentration of media ownership because we know that's dangerous to like the plurality that makes the democracy strong and all this stuff.

43:22And so like that, that's its own argument. That is not they do it so we can do it too. Right. Yeah. I think to me, there are sort of two inclusive questions inside of that. One is like, is China does something we can do it back a good argument? And I think no, for the reasons you just said, I don't want to be like that. I think that argument feels good. I want to be clear. I think that argument feels good. Sure. But I also when you like run around being like, what we want to preserve is a plurality of media. Like no one gives a shit. When you're like, they do it to us. Like, everyone's like, yeah, like, that feels good.

43:54I understand why the argument is made. And I understand why it feels good. Right. And I think it ladders up to an argument that I think a lot of the antitrust conversation also ladders up to, which is what do we think our government's job is to do here? And I think in a lot of ways, there is this belief in America that the market regulates itself. And this is how we talk about the stuff and capitalism and all this stuff. But then the question of what is the government's role in that is like it has it has occurred to me a number of times that this is a thing we should spend a lot of this year talking about is what the government's job is.

44:26and should be and what that actually looks like in practice. Because I think a lot of people in America feel like what the EU is doing to tech companies is like way overreaching and heavy handed and ridiculous. But it's like culturally, I think in a lot of places in Europe, it is less out of bounds with how things normally work. But to me, all of this stuff sort of circles around this question of like, is the government's job to govern what I look at on my phone? I don't know. No, I'll be very clear. No. Like, I really don't believe that. But you want them to ban TikTok. Yeah. Again, I think your question about, like, what can the government do and can the market regulate itself?

45:04The pendulum has swung pretty wildly over the last 40 years towards no regulation. Right. And now it might just slowly be swinging back. Right? Like, there's 1980 Ronald Reagan, Robert Bork. We've done that decoder episode. There's, like, a total deregulation of the market. You can see it. Jonathan Cantor mentioned it to me. Same thing. He's like, 1980, this happened. And now the pendulum might just be swinging back, like just a little bit. And people are like, ooh, that's weird. And that's fine. Like that is inside of our market. The thing that I'm saying about TikTok in particular is if you find out they're doing the bad thing, we can't go arrest the Chinese government.

45:43Right. You can't do it. You cannot hold them accountable in specific ways. I mentioned this on the last show and I'll say it again. Their kids aren't here. The people who run ByteDance, you know, their kids are there. They're in China. They're in Singapore. So there's just a thing that's different. Like our experiences here in this country are valuable to us. And our media ownership is just a part of that. Like it really is a big part of that. Like I said this as a joke at the end of the last episode. I think we should also break up Sinclair Broadcasting and Clear Channel. Sure. Like massive concentration of media ownership across the country is not good.

46:16It only gives you like a singular point of view and puts too many people in charge of what too many people see and feel. There's that really famous video that I think Deadspin made ages ago. It was just Sinclair news anchors All say all reading the same speech about the fake news. Yeah, and that is horrifying Right, that's horrifying and the reason you have media ownership rules is to make sure that doesn't happen And so like I landing all of my like we should ban tick-tock criticism in that idea Right, which is the people who make the media United States who shape opinion United States who have control over?

46:51what people see and experience, they should have skin in the game here. Fair enough. And there should be more competition in that. Any thoughts? Yeah. To Neal's earlier point, I think he's right that we took our eye off the ball for a very long time in this country. We stopped paying attention and we stopped caring to regulate companies. And historically, we did that a lot. And some of our biggest and most vibrant economic moments in this country were when we were heavily regulating companies. And so a lot of this is just like culture shock. If you haven't done something for 40 years and you start doing it even a little bit, everybody's going to be like, what the hell are you doing over there?

47:27But at the same time, like I see the TikTok stuff and I'm like, well, that feels kind of hypocritical of us to be like, well, we have to shut down TikTok because it has this really large control over our media. And it has this really important impact on our media when Disney has what, like 80 percent of American box office and has this enormous control. And so the only difference between those two is one is in China and one is Bob Iger. That's a huge difference. Like Disney's here and Ron DeSantis is like, here's a weird law about not saying anyone can ever be gay. Which is going super well for Ron DeSantis.

48:05Then Disney got into a political fight and they lost a tax district and they got to get it back. There was an investor fight that Disney just had to win. Like the consequences of Disney's speech in America are real. Right. And yes, it is true. They have mostly succeeded in all of their fights, but they had to fight. Yeah. Right. There were there were actual they were held accountable for their positions. And I agree with most of their position, not all of Disney's positions, I would hasten to say. But some of their positions here about being inclusive, like all that stuff, like a meaningful political element, United States tried to punish Disney for that stuff.

48:45in Disney fought back in largely has won or not won or come to some set of accommodations with the Florida government like whatever happened there is different than whatever if we find out TikTok is doing the bad thing yeah right and that's I think that is just a massively important like I don't know like Disney has employees in the United States like if Disney has 80 percent of the box office I'm sorry I was reading my I was reading my little red book that I received I I didn't hear anything. I was just saying like – Yeah, no. I think there is a fundamental difference, right? Like the argument here, the core argument of this TikTok thing is who is allowed to dominate conversations in America?

49:26And I think that argument shouldn't happen at all. Who should be allowed to dominate conversations in America? No one. We shouldn't have that. Like Disney shouldn't be as used as it is. TikTok certainly shouldn't be able to just have everybody believe a conspiracy theory or know who the what's up brother guy is. with just like a little twist of the algorithm. That's bananas. No one should have that kind of monopoly on our culture and on our media. But at the same time, I kind of agree with the fact that we probably don't want foreign actors in the United States controlling stuff, right? We don't necessarily want that because we've seen time and time again, but banning TikTok doesn't solve that.

50:06Russia has found many ways to get into our country and influence us at a mass scale using American tools. Like the tools themselves are the problem. It's not who owns them because the tools are the thing that is disseminating the information. We saw that in 2016 with how Russia manipulated Facebook and other social media platforms. And that's just proof. Like that happened. There was a bunch of reporting about how there was a Russian disinformation campaign around Kate Middleton. Yeah. And it's like, oh, they just keep doing it. They're still at it. They're still doing it. I'm realizing as we talk that I think I would be more compelled by your argument, Neelai, if I felt like the U.S.

50:45was regulating anything. That we have like a functional government. If we were preventing the American-owned services from doing the things we're accusing TikTok of, I would be more compelled by the argument that since we can't prevent TikTok from doing it, the responsible thing to do is kick them out. I think if you draw that line, that sort of makes sense to me. But that assumes that we are capable of doing it to anybody. And there's really no evidence that we're capable of doing that to anybody. Well, there's one huge prohibition, which is the First Amendment. It really gets in your way. Right?

51:19It's like a real problem. It's a good problem. A problem that I think we should continue to have. I swear, there will come a time on this show where I make you earnestly argue against the First Amendment. I'm so excited about it. It's very challenging. You have to believe. And I think this is why a lot of the people who don't think TikTok should be banned or sold, who think this is all crazy, you have to believe that American companies have in some way the best interests of Americans at heart or America at heart. And I don't think that's easy to believe. I think if I walked up to most people and I was like, Disney is a champion of American values.

51:51They're like, what are you talking about? Right. If I said that about Facebook or Apple or Google or Pfizer or whatever, like most people do not believe that that is the case. Right. I don't know that I believe that that is the case, but it is what I talk about challenging assumptions. That is one assumption at the heart of the idea that big companies in America should have all kinds of freedoms and big companies from outside America shouldn't. That is my assumption is the working assumption of lots and lots of policy. You are free to disagree with that assumption. I understand the reasons why you might, but that is the heart of it.

52:24Yeah. All right. We got one more and then we're going to get a little palate cleanser and then I'll let you two get out of here. We'll be right back.

52:33Support for the show comes from Udacity. AI seems to be everywhere these days, and if you want to prepare yourself to be able to use it, Udacity says they can help, no matter what field you're in. Udacity is an online learning platform with courses in AI and tech, including generative AI, Gentic AI, Python, data science, and much more. When you learn with Udacity, you're not just passively watching videos or reading articles. You're doing practical exercises and projects that prepare you for the job you want. That's why 90 % of Udacity graduates surveyed say that they achieved their enrollment goal.

53:09Udacity just launched a master's degree in AI. You heard that right. And when you have a certification from Udacity, recruiters and employers take notice. So for a better job, better salary, and better skills, you can check out Udacity today. The tech field is always evolving, and you should too. You could try Udacity risk-free for seven days. You can head to udacity.com slash verge and use code verge for 40 % off your order. Once again, that's udacity.com backslash verge for 40 % off and make sure you use the promo code verge so they know we sent you. Support for the show comes from Rippling.

53:51Is your business paying for 20 tools to do the job of one? that doesn't exactly sound like it's software as a service. It actually sounds like it's sad. Software as a disservice. It's time to replace your stitched together tech stack with one platform for all of your departments with Rippling. Rippling is the unified platform for global HR, payroll, IT, and finance. They've helped millions replace their mess of cobbled together tools with one system designed to give leaders clarity, speed, and control. By uniting your employees, teams, and departments in one system, Rippling can remove the bottlenecks, busy work, and silos your software might have created.

54:29Automated, perfectly in sync, and seriously simple to use, Rippling gives your company one source of truth for your people, their data, and everything they touch. With Rippling, you can run your entire HR, IT, and finance operations as one, or pick and choose the products that best fill the gaps in your software stack. And right now, you can get six months for free. When you go to rippling.com slash verge, learn more at r-i-p-p-l-i-n-g.com slash verge. That's rippling.com slash verge for six months free. Terms and conditions apply. Support for this show comes from Figma. Figma is the collaborative design platform where teams come together to turn ideas into the world's best digital apps, websites, and experiences.

55:20And now there's a faster way to bring those ideas to life. Introducing Figma Make, an AI-powered prompt-to-code tool that helps you turn ideas into something real fast. Figma Make is a different kind of vibe coding tool. With just a few prompts, you can turn any idea into a code-backed prototype or app that anyone can explore, iterate on, and share. And it's all connected to Figma. So you can start from scratch or from your design file. Figma Make is made for designers, product managers, and builders who want to move fast and explore more ideas. Try it now and see how quickly you can make your ideas real with Figma Make.

55:58Just go to Figma.com slash Vergecast. That's F-I-G-M-A dot com slash Vergecast.

56:10All right, we're back. One more question about the TikTok ban. This one comes from Lucas. Hi, Vergecast. This is Lucas from Virginia about the TikTok ban. I'm pretty much in the same boat as Nilay. Just, you know, I think of TikTok as digital crack. But at the same time, I think that most prohibition laws fail. So this will probably go that way. Love the pod. Have a good one. Ditto. Nilay Patel, TikTok is digital crack. That's the headline here. I'm not sure that's the idea. I want to pose this as a question because I think this is kind of where we ended the last time we talked about this uh and i i want to end here too is there a version of this that accomplishes anything the version of what the tiktok ban like can you a can you ban tiktok in a in an actually practically enforceable way and b would it do anything because i think there's there's a real nihilism setting in in a lot of this conversation that's like whatever it's it's yeah first of all just to be i think as of today uh tiktok is not banned correct there is no movement on a bill in the Senate.

57:13Alex and I are winning that bet so far. Yeah. Yeah. Uh, there's no movement on a bill in the Senate to actually ban TikTok. So whatever, right. Then there's the other reality, which is the bill would potentially force a sale. And there's a lot of people who might want to buy it and you might just end up in that situation. So there's a lot of things that have to happen first and many of them don't end up in the thing is banned. But I think if you do ban it, like I don't think people are just going to be staring like a blank screen on their phone. Just like wistfully thinking about when Charlie D 'Amelio started dancing again.

57:49You know, like I think they're going to just like move on. OK, but let me posit this. So the what this does is prevent app stores from carrying it. Right. That is that is essentially what this man looks like. There are what a couple hundred million people in the United States who already have TikTok on their phones. I don't think there's any real precedent for Apple and Google reaching out and proactively deleting apps from your phone. Yeah. So that's just a lot of people who have TikTok still already. It also VPNs exist. People have done a lot of work. I do love the idea of like some small country like becoming a honeypot VPN destination for TikTok.

58:23Like Monaco, you know. It's like everyone is just like VPNing through Monaco and Monaco's TikTok becomes U.S. TikTok. It's like the, I forget which country it is, but the country that owns the.ai domain is suddenly that's like a meaningful part of the GDP as all these companies. It's great. Yeah, great. All these things could happen. And I agree many, like the Chinese Great Firewall works, but it's not perfect. Right. And the idea that we would put one up and it would work perfectly is like nonsensical. Like, yes, some people are still going to use TikTok, but the app won't be able to get updated.

58:53And people won't be uploading content to a thing that looks like it's not. Like it will result in some kind of weird decline over time and fine. But there's just so many steps from here to there. Like so, so many steps from here to there. Yeah, Alex, you and I have been on the same page about this. And I'm curious where I've landed after, you know, two more weeks of this is I think most likely outcome by a pretty wide margin. Nothing happens. Yeah. Second most likely outcome. It gets sold in some way, shape or form. Not to Steven Mnuchin, but to somebody else. big, giant planet-sized gap down to option number three, which is that TikTok actually gets banned in a meaningful way.

59:32Do you agree or disagree? It's not going to get banned. It won't get banned. And I think even a sale is going to be super unlikely because who's going to buy it? Who's going to have the money and not have a monopoly as soon as they own it, right? And also then I think we just come back to that conversation of, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. It's not okay for the Chinese government to manipulate us through TikTok, but it is totally okay for Disney or Larry Ellison or whoever to manipulate us through TikTok. Well, that's not good. I think it's just such a stupid, stupid ban for those reasons. I understand the rationale behind it and the legal theory behind it and all of that.

1:00:12I get that. But at the same time, I'm like, the hypocrisy of it is so outrageous. And I'm like, don't be so dumb. I've decided that the funniest possible outcome is that one branch of the government forces it to be sold to YouTube. And then four minutes later, Lena Khan files a lawsuit against YouTube for antitrust. That'd be good. You got to keep the government wheels turning. We're just going to keep a lot of lawyers employed. Well, when I think of what the founding fathers really wanted, it was a self-perpetuating cycle of government actions. It's beautiful. All right. We got one more and then I'm gonna let you guys get out of here.

1:00:44This has nothing to do with TikTok or Apple, but it is a perfectly VergeCast-y question. And so I am obligated to play it. This is from Michael. Hello, this is Michael from San Francisco. So I've been loving you guys' coverage on the future of the web, and I love how obsessed with the web you are. And I, too, am obsessed with it, and I'm trying to find more and more web apps to replace the apps on my phone. So I'm wondering what web apps, not native apps, but whether they be PWAs or just web pages, what are the web apps you guys use day to day? What are some of your favorite web apps? Thanks. Goodbye.

1:01:19Okay. I just, I want to just, we're going to do two each. These are the rules. And neither, none of us can say the verge because the verge is the best web app that exists. You should download it to your home screen. It's actually very good on your home screen. Highly recommend everybody's furiously scrolling through their phones right now. So I'll go first. The two web apps that I use the most, I would say at this moment are, I use an app called feed bin as an RSS reader that is fantastic on the web. It's super light and super fast. It's where all of my stuff comes into, I started piping my YouTube subscriptions into there so that I get new things from the channels I subscribe to without the rest of the YouTube interface.

1:01:55Love it. Feedbin.com. It's amazing. I think it's like five bucks a month. Cannot recommend it highly enough. And the other one, there's two I could choose from here, but the other one I'll pick is a to-do list app that I have started using and stopped using and come back to because this is the sickness with which I live. It's called twos, T W O S. And it is like just a perfectly made, very simple list making app with reminders and integrates with your calendar. And it is just fast as hell. And a lot of the app works offline, even in your browser. It, it, it rules, cannot recommend it enough. I love a good, simple, fast.

1:02:30I think it's twos app.com. That explains a lot of things. It's very cool. Yeah. So those are my two. Alex, what do you got? story graph is probably my big one it's a good read replacement and it is it just slaps it is fantastic i don't use any of the social parts of it i just use it to track what i'm reading and anytime somebody says which book should i read i immediately open that and and start flipping through it because i just adore it and then my other one is probably like a console i use on to to interact with my raspberry pi that it's just like amazing like it's the pie hole console and you can just like there's like a web app version of it and and i adore that like a lot of smart home stuff has web apps and i'm just like yeah this is great and i so i was looking through and i was like oh i guess most of my web apps are like smart home quick access it's perfect i love it and that's like it connects to all your stuff it does all the stuff and it just does it yeah and they work yeah and it's great that's good yeah piehole is a good app all right nila what's yours well i wish i'd gotten this question knowing that i wasn't allowed to say the verge.com yeah it's just cheating it's like it's a website it is very good on the on the thing uh i want to issue one correction last week or two weeks ago i said notion calendar on the mac was native that's an electron app it just happens to be very good and the person who wrote it was tweeting about how happy he was he was very proud yeah that you you confuse it for being a native app that's good which means all the people who build bad electron apps shame on you yeah do better you've got nowhere to hide.

1:03:57So yeah, I have a HomeBridge and I use the HomeBridge web app on my phone all the time, mostly to update the plugins. But that's like a thing that I use all the time. I go to that web and then it's actually interesting that I don't think of these as web apps. They're just little web servers in my house. So HomeBridge just runs in my house. That counts, yeah. And then my Sony receiver has a little web server in it to change all the settings. And I spend so much time just It's like monkeying with the little settings on the Sony receiver. That's amazing. You know, this question gets at the heart of something.

1:04:27I was looking at twosapp.com, and you open it, and the banner is like, download our app. Yep. At the top of the screen. It's actually better on the web than any other platform, and it still wants you to download an app, which I think is fascinating. A lot of this question is just like, Apple does not want that thing to happen that happened to its laptops. Right. Yeah. And, yeah, there's going to come a time when I'm going to write 40 ,000 words about how annoying it is when you open up, like, Reddit or any other thing. site and it's like, isn't this better in the app? And I'm like, no, I'm on your website.

1:04:55Have a good website. If it's better in the app, it's your fault. But yeah, anyway, the web is great. We love the web. Please ask us questions about the web. All right, we got to get out of here. Neelai, Alex, thank you as always for doing this. And I suspect we will have more of this to do in the very near future. Peace. That's it for the Vergecast today. Thanks to Neelai and Alex for doing this with me. And thank you as always for listening and for sending in all of those hotline questions and emails. We love getting all of your feedback. There's lots more on everything we talked about, by the way, at TheVerge.com.

1:05:24I'll put some links in the show notes, but also the TikTok ban and the Apple stuff is all happening sort of constantly all the time. Even just recently, there's a huge lawsuit about the Apple Watch that is very much a regulatory question about Apple, even separately from the antitrust stuff. There's just a lot going on. Before we go, two quick housekeeping things. One, this coming weekend, April 13th on Saturday, I'm going to be in Chicago at the Chicago Humanities Festival, along with a couple of my colleagues doing a series of panels all about AI and creativity, trying to figure out what does AI mean for people who want to make things?

1:06:00And what does it give them in terms of tools? What does it take away? How do we as consumers understand what this stuff is when some of it is made by humans and some of it's made by AI and that line starts to get really blurry? We're going to spend a whole Saturday afternoon sorting through all of that with some really interesting people. I'm going to put the link in the show notes. We'll put it in the description. If you want to get tickets, if you're in Chicago, you want to come hang out and talk about AI, please do. We would love to have you. It's going to be incredibly fun. Thing number two, we have been nominated for a Webby Award for Best Technology Podcast.

1:06:32It's very important, A, that you vote for us because we want to win this award very badly, and B, that we beat Neelai and Decoder. It's so, so important. Neelai is nominated for Decoder as Best Business Podcast, and he can totally win that. Sounds great. Love that for an Eli. Enjoy that. I want to beat him for best technology podcast so bad. Plus, he wins anyway. Great news all around. Go to the Webby's. We'll put the link in the show notes. Put the link in the description. Please vote for the Vergecast. We love particularly when we win the People's Choice Award because it comes from you all, the listeners who say you like this show.

1:07:05We want all your feedback. We want all your thoughts. But the Webby Award is really cool looking, and I want one really bad. That's enough for now. Please go vote for us. Come see us in Chicago. Can't wait to hang out. As always, if you have thoughts, questions, feelings, or more you want to say about TikTok in China, you can always email us at vergecast at theverge.com or call the hotline 866-VERGE-11. Truly, the hotline is my favorite thing about the Verge cast. It's so fun hearing all of the things you have to say, some of which is super mean and doesn't make it on the show, some of which is really nice and doesn't make it on the show, some of which is somewhere in between.

1:07:37It's great. We do a hotline question on the show at least once a week, so please keep them all coming. This show is produced by Andrew Marino, Liam James, and Will Poore. The Vergecast is a Verge production and part of the Vox Media Podcast Network. Neil, I, Alex, and I will be back on Friday to talk about some fun gadget reviews we got coming this week and everything else happening in tech. We'll see you then. Rock and roll.

1:08:06And Doug. Here we have the Lemu Emu in its natural habitat, helping people customize their car insurance and save hundreds with Liberty Mutual. Fascinating. It's accompanied by his natural ally, Doug. Uh, Lemu? Is that guy with the binoculars watching us? Cut the camera! They see us! Only pay for what you need at LibertyMutual.com Liberty, Liberty, Liberty, Liberty Savings vary. Underwritten by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and affiliates excludes Massachusetts.

From the publisher

The Verge’s David Pierce, Nilay Patel, and Alex Cranz answer questions from The Vergecast Hotline all about the TikTok ban debate and the US v Apple case.
Further reading:

TikTok ban: all the news on attempts to ban the video platform

US v. Apple: everything you need to know

The Curse of Bigness: Antitrust in the New Gilded Age

Vote for The Vergecast in the Webbys!
Join The Verge at the 2024 Chicago Humanities Spring Festival
Email us at vergecast@theverge.com or call us at 866-VERGE11, we love hearing from you.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Ask about this episode

In short

Segment 1

Segment 2

Segment 3

Transcript

More from The Vergecast