Mandelson – the biggest political scandal since Profumo?

6 Feb 2026 · 18 min · 7 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Notes: Mandelson – the Biggest Political Scandal Since Profumo?

Episode Overview

  • Podcast Title: This Is Why
  • Episode Title: Mandelson – the Biggest Political Scandal Since Profumo?
  • Host: Niall Paterson
  • Guest: Vanessa Holburn, author of *The Profumo Affair*
  • Producers: Tom Gillespie, Emily Hulme
  • Editor: Wendy Parker

Context

  • The episode draws parallels between the Profumo affair of the early 1960s and the current scandal involving Peter Mandelson and his connections to Jeffrey Epstein.
  • The discussion emphasizes the recurring themes of power dynamics, exploitation, and moral failings within political elites.

Key Themes and Discussions

Historical Context of the Profumo Affair

  • John Profumo was a high-ranking politician (Secretary of State for War) involved in an affair with Christine Keeler, a young woman connected to a Soviet spy.
  • The affair led to significant political fallout, including the resignation of Conservative Prime Minister Harold Macmillan.
  • The scandal highlighted the establishment's tendency to protect its own and disregard moral accountability.

Current Political Climate

  • Sir Keir Starmer is facing scrutiny over Mandelson's history and allegations regarding his connection to Epstein, drawing parallels to the Profumo affair.
  • Both situations underscore how powerful men may act as though normal ethical standards do not apply to them.

Expert Insights from Vanessa Holburn

  • Holburn discusses how the Profumo affair revealed the moral failures of the political elite in a deferential society.
  • The notion of national security arises in both scandals, with historical documents sealed until 2048 and current allegations being treated with caution under similar pretenses.

Comparison of Figures

Profumo vs. Mandelson

  • John Profumo: A product of privilege, he was well-connected, charming, and ultimately able to rehabilitate his public image post-scandal through charitable work.
  • Christine Keeler: From a disadvantaged background, her life was significantly impacted by the scandal, facing public vilification and personal struggles.

Current Ramifications

  • The episode suggests that if the Mandelson scandal escalates, it could have a more profound impact on public trust and political accountability than the Profumo affair did.
  • The discussion questions whether contemporary political leaders, like Starmer, are learning from past mistakes in managing their political allies.

Key Takeaways

  • Recurring Scandals: History shows that political scandals often echo one another, highlighting systemic issues within power structures.
  • Gender Dynamics: The treatment of male versus female figures in scandals often reveals underlying societal biases, with women like Keeler facing harsher public scrutiny.
  • Public Perception: Modern society is less deferential towards political figures, demonstrating a shift in public expectations for accountability.
  • Moral Compass: The episode explores how political leaders' judgment can impact public trust and political stability.

Conclusion

  • The podcast draws compelling connections between historical and contemporary political scandals, prompting listeners to reflect on the ongoing challenges related to power, influence, and ethics in politics.

Further Listening

  • The episode encourages listeners to explore related discussions on the fallout from the Mandelson-Epstein affair in their sister podcast, featuring strong opinions on its implications for the Labour Party.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

The Profumo Affair Background

0:45 to 3:00

Exploration of the Profumo affair and its historical significance in British politics.

“This could potentially be one of the political scandals of this century.”

Establishment and Power Dynamics

3:00 to 6:00

Discussion about the establishment's response to scandals and the treatment of women involved.

“So it feels like this impenetrable male upper echelons of society are still living exactly how they wish, perhaps with rules that don't apply to the rest of us.”

Profiles of Key Figures

6:00 to 8:30

An overview of John Profumo and Christine Keeler's backgrounds and their roles in the scandal.

“He was a society osteopath, well-connected.”

The Role of Stephen Ward

8:30 to 12:00

Investigation into Stephen Ward's influence in the Profumo affair and his connections.

“That is a story that we have heard, frankly, all the way to the present day.”

Consequences of the Affair

12:00 to 14:02

Examination of the fallout from the Profumo affair and its impact on British politics.

“And if anyone says anything, then I will sue them.”

The Legacy of Christine Keeler

14:02 to 16:30

Exploring the impact of Christine Keeler's life and her fight for justice.

“You have a married, educated, 40 plus year old man in a relationship with a very young girl from no background at all.”

Christine Keeler's Reflections on Fame and Politics

16:30 to 17:08

Discussion on Keeler's complicated relationship with fame and her experiences with politicians.

“Did she feel like she had been able to put her side of the story?”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:02Niall:Sky News, the full story first.

0:08Van:Coming up, secrets being shared, a government on the edge, young women exploited by men of power and influence. This isn't 2026, instead 1963 and the perfumo affair.

0:24Van:There's been one story in town this week, the relationship between Peter Mandelson and Jeffrey Epstein, but there's been a parallel drawn in the coverage that you might not be entirely familiar with. The Epstein and Mandelson scandal is being described as the greatest this country has faced since the Profumo affair of 1960. Think about the 20th century, you know, the Profumo affair. This could potentially be one of the political scandals of this century. On the face of it, it looks like one of the biggest crises, scandals about standards in public life, I don't know, since Profumo? In the early 1960s, the Secretary of State for War, John Profumo, was having an affair with a very young woman named Christine Keeler.

1:06Van:She was herself connected to a Soviet spy. When the truth finally emerged, it ended careers, shook the government and exposed how instinctively the establishment closes ranks when scandal threatens power. Decades later, doesn't it all feel just a bit familiar?

1:23Niall:It's shocking that the Profumo affair was 60 years ago, and yet here we are still looking at members of the establishment, male members of the establishment, who feel they're beyond the normal rules.

1:35Van:Vanessa Holborn is author of the Profumo affair.

1:38Niall:They will lie to get what they want. They will deny allegations. For as long as they can, they will exploit vulnerable girls and young women. You know, we have this aspect, these Russian overtones, the threat to national security that Mandelson allegedly, you know, passed on information to other countries. And the naivety, perhaps on the part of our own prime minister, echoes how Harold Macmillan was so happy to believe that, you know, this rising star of the Tory party, Profumo, couldn't possibly have done anything wrong. Let's not forget Mandelson had already been made to resign twice from the Labour government under Blair and Gordon Brown.

2:20Niall:And yet Starmer still gave him that third chance, you know, still wanted to believe that he could do his job properly. It's an even actually the fact that now the Profumo files have been closed. The archives are not available for the public and have not been and will not be opened. They've been officially sealed by the government for reasons of national security until 2048. And now we're looking at Keir Starmer saying, oh, I can't release some of the Epstein information or the Mandelson files because of national security, because it might prejudice a police case further down the line. That's another interesting parallel.

3:00Niall:So it feels like this impenetrable male upper echelons of society are still living exactly how they wish, perhaps with rules that don't apply to the rest of us.

3:11Van:So some parallels definitely between the two scandals, but the Profumo affair happened at a very different time in the country's history. Just take me back to the early 60s. What was Britain like?

3:22Niall:It's very interesting, a very divided 1960s. I think we think of it as the swinging 60s, but there were still quite a lot of old fashioned ideas, obviously post rationing, things like that. So I think perhaps we think that we'd all recovered from the war, but we hadn't. And a lot of the people in charge of the country were very conservative with a small C as well as a large C. So, yeah, promiscuity, homosexuality, any kind of gender fluidity was just not tolerated, despite the fact that perhaps a lot of those people in the establishment were enjoying the high life.

3:59Van:One of the men who was at the centre of the scandal, he gave his name to the affair, John Profumo. He was very much part of the establishment, wasn't he?

4:05Niall:He was such a lucky, privileged individual. Aristocracy, best schools, Oxford, even though perhaps he wasn't that academically bright, but was very much a rising star in the Tory party at the time. He became the youngest MP for the Tories, and he was very much fetid. Everyone loved him. He could do no wrong, although he was a well-known rascal, ladies' man, married to a beautiful actress who'd had her own career, well educated, well connected, everything that could propel you further. You know, at one point they did consider that he might be a future prime minister.

4:42Van:In what way was he a ladies' man? What was known about him at the time?

4:46Niall:There was a very well-known club in Soho, Murray's, where Christine Keeler and lots of other of her friends and associates worked and played. and so the women there would be topless. Some would be dancing but if you were topless you had to stand still. That was the law at the time. They also did that hostess thing where they'd go and sit next to these rich, charming men and encourage them to buy drinks. So yeah, he'd definitely be out in his club and many other locations in London chasing young women even though he was married.

5:19Van:So how high did he rise in government? Where was he at the time all of this was going on?

5:24Niall:He was the minister for war at the time. So obviously, very well connected to everyone that played a part in politics in that day, and also very well connected to the royal family, definitely had friends in high places. And that continued throughout his life, even after his fall from grace. You know, he was still invited to Thatcher's birthday party, Queen Mother, you know, all those those kind of people he associated with.

5:52Van:But we've already mentioned the other name at the heart of this saga, Christine Keeler. Just tell me a little bit more about her and how exactly did the two of them meet?

6:00Niall:so christine keeler absolute polar opposite to profumo she was very young she was 18 when she met profumo she had absolutely no supportive background she grew up very impoverished lived in a disused sort of railway carriage no education to speak of and she was living in london at the time working as a sort of model dancer whatever work she could get she was friends with a person called Stephen Ward and she lived with him at the time as a flatmate. He was a society osteopath, well-connected. He rented a house in the grounds of Cliveden. Cliveden is a big stately home that at the time was owned by the Aster family.

6:43Niall:Bill Aster was a big friend of Profumo. So Profumo and his wife were up for the weekend enjoying Cliveden, the country estate, and Christine was up visiting Stephen Ward in the cottage on the grounds. They met at the swimming pool, which they both were using at the time, and apparently Profumo was immediately infatuated with her and flirted with her there, tried to get her number, which she told him, oh, it's the same as Stephen's number. The next day, Profumo got straight on her case, trying to contact her, wanting to date her.

7:19Van:Vanessa, tell me more about Stephen Ward, society osteopath But this was a man who had connections And he played a key role in the unfolding of this scandal

7:29Niall:He was unusual, I guess, to be involved in the establishment In that he was probably, you know, politically He did support more socialist politics But he was apparently a fantastic osteopath And had helped lots of very well-connected individuals with sort of back complaints. We're talking Churchill, Gandhi, stars of the stage and screen, newspaper editors, and everyone liked him. He made sure he surrounded himself with lots of young, attractive women, which was a magnet, obviously, for people. You know, he was a bon viveur, I suppose, enjoyed partying. Not only did he have friends in politics, he had friends in newspapers and he had friends in high society.

8:15Niall:So in that respect, He was a perfect mark, if you like, for anyone who might be looking to penetrate English society and potentially look for secrets.

8:27Van:A politician sleeping with a much younger woman whilst married to another woman. That is a story that we have heard, frankly, all the way to the present day. What happened with this particular affair that turned it into the scandal that we know it now is?

8:43Niall:So a key element of the Perfumo affair would be the entrance into the stage of a Russian diplomat, Eugene Ivanov. He became friendly with Stephen Ward, spent a lot of time with him. Some would say this was deliberately targeted. Others would just say they were natural friends. Because Keeler and Stephen Ward shared a house, that gave Ivanov, you know, great access to Keeler. So there is a suspicion that perhaps she was being manipulated either by Stephen Ward or by the Russian diplomat to engage in pillow talk, if you like, with Profumo as minister for war. Just little tidbits that perhaps could be useful.

9:28Niall:Ivanov has claimed in his biography that he gained access to certain people's houses because of his friendship with Stephen Ward and that he had cameras in his clothing that his wife had sewn in there so that he could take pictures of important documents, anything basically that was left carelessly around.

9:48Van:So if anyone had known about the affair between the Minister of War and a girl who works in clubs in Soho, who was at the same time dealing with in inverted commas, a Russian diplomat. I mean, it doesn't look good. So how did this all unravel for Profumo?

10:05Niall:It was noticed that there were lots of other things going on in the background that brought sort of Stephen Ward and Christine Keeler to the attention of the authorities. You know, London society was very small, I think, in those days. So yes, people did know and people did warn Profumo that perhaps visiting Stephen Ward, who might be considered friendly to the Soviets, was not a good idea and that he should call this relationship with Christine Keeler off. And because of that, in some ways it was his downfall because he then wrote her a letter on headed notepaper and it's known as the Dear Darling letter.

10:38Niall:And he writes to Keeler and says, Dear Darling, you know, we've got to call it off and I hope to see you soon kind of thing. There's lots of interpretations. Profumo told his son that that was it. That's when the relationship ended and that's what that note meant. Christine Keeler will say that it was just a temporary hold, if you like, while the fuss died down. But that letter then gave Christine Keeler proof, evidence of their affair. And there was a kind of newspaper bidding war, if you like, to get access to that letter. And that letter became quite contentious, because obviously it proved the affair, because up until that point, you could deny things quite easily.

11:17Van:And deny them he did. And ultimately, of course, being caught in that lie was what ended his time as a frontline politician, didn't it?

11:25Niall:Absolutely. The Conservatives were in government. A Labour politician who found out about all these goings-on and the top Conservatives met, had a little powwow and they said, right, he has to deny this. They pulled him in in the early hours of the morning and said, tell us the truth, have you been seeing this girl? And apparently he denied it to these top politicians. So the next morning got up in the house and said, Absolutely not. My relationship with Christine Keeler is all above board. I just know her as someone who shares a home with someone that I've visited a couple of times. There's nothing in it.

12:01Niall:And if anyone says anything, then I will sue them. You know, he spoke about he'd be quite ready to take people to court for libel. So, you know, gave a very firm denial that he had an affair with Christine Keeler.

12:15Van:In terms of scandal, over the past few years, it has often felt like there has been a political scandal every 48 hours in SW1. I mean, how big a moment was this in British politics at the time?

12:27Niall:They have always called it the biggest British political scandal. I think it was so shocking because perhaps it was the first time that people on the street had been able to question the sort of ultimate moral compass of the establishment. At that point in time, it was a very deferential society. We looked up to people who held positions of authority. It gave the public quite a shock that these were the people in charge of our country.

12:55Van:What happened to Perfuhr?

12:56Niall:He had to resign when the story broke that he had indeed been lying. You cannot lie to the house. People often say, oh, he had to resign and he lost his position and, you know, he left with his tail between his legs. But actually, him and his family just sort of went off to their country house for a bit. And then they spent a lot of time touring around other people's lovely locations in England while the heat died down. Money-wise, he was absolutely fine because he went off and worked for the family business, which is the Prudential. He didn't have a loss of income or anything awful like that.

13:30And he was still accepted by society.

13:33Niall:He also did some charity work, which he was much applauded for, was given an OBE for that charity work. He was very much forgiven, I think, by the Conservative Party and high society, whereas Christine Keeler ended up in jail.

13:48Van:That, Vanessa, is the contrast at the heart of this story that has always stuck with me. The way in which Profumo, who was, you know, the adult, the politician, the way that he was treated and the way that she was treated after all this.

14:02Niall:Yeah, absolutely. You have a married, educated, 40 plus year old man in a relationship with a very young girl from no background at all. She struggled financially for the rest of her life. The public vilified her when she gave evidence at the Stephen Ward case. She was pelted with eggs. She had to go round the back eventually. She had death threats phoned into the newspapers. Further down the line, you know, the very famous photographs that we know of her sitting on the chair, things like that. She made very little money out of those. Quite often they went into a management company who ripped her off again because she was a very trusting individual.

Read the full transcript

14:41Van:To what extent, then, do you think that what is happening right now is, in essence, a parallel to the criticism that Harold Macmillan received back in the 60s? That on a question of judgment, he just got it wrong. That there was plenty of evidence about Profumo's character. That for him to deny what people were reporting and people were suggesting, you know, Macmillan might have done well to challenge him a little bit more strongly. as indeed Keir Starmer might have done with Peter Mandelson.

15:12Niall:Definitely Harold Macmillan. You know, perhaps he was a different generation. I think there was that argument in his favour that he really thought that men of standing would be perhaps as moral as he was. You know, this is Super Mac, who saw England through some great times, actually. You know, you never had it so good was one of his famous catchphrases. And I guess he just believed perhaps that everyone in his party would be of similar moral fibre. Keir Starmer, you know, obviously knew about Mandelson's past. There's been no cover up of that, but perhaps he wants to see the best in people.

15:51Van:Is it a case then in your mind that this is of a similar or perhaps even greater level of significance and impact that won't happen back in the 60s?

16:01Niall:I think perhaps there's a greater impact here because, you know, 60 years on, the public aren't as naive. I don't think that we hold our politicians in such a high regard. I think we're better able to question them through the media. We want to see the people we elect the best they can be. And we're very disappointed when they fail.

16:23Van:Let's give the final word to Christine Keeler. At the end of her life, had she made peace with what had happened? Did she feel like she had been able to put her side of the story?

16:33Niall:I think she still felt badly treated, if I'm honest. She was close to her son, Seymour Platt, who runs a campaign to have her pardoned from her perjury charge. And I'd love to see that happen because I think it's important that we look back and correct our mistakes about the way that she was treated. But no, I know that she was invited to be in the very first I'm a Celebrity, Get Me Out of Here. And she didn't go on it because she was frightened of snakes. So, you know, she had some fame and I think perhaps she enjoyed that. But no, at the end of the day, I think she felt very cheated.

17:08Van:I do wonder whether her fear of snakes might have had something to do with the politicians she encountered in the early years of her life.

17:15Niall:Yes, she was used to dealing with them. Absolutely.

17:19Van:Thanks for listening. For much more on the fallout from the Mandelson-Epstein affair, head over to our sister podcast, hosted by Beth Rigby, Ruth Davidson and Harriet Harman, where Harriet has some very strong words for what Mandelson's actions mean for the Labour Party. Just search electoral dysfunction. That's your lot from The Daily for this week. Have a great weekend.

17:48Niall:Thank you.

From the publisher

John Profumo was secretary of state for war when he had an affair with Christine Keeler, which ultimately brought down Conservative prime minister Harold Macmillan in the early 1960s.

Parallels are now being drawn between the Profumo affair, and the crisis Sir Keir Starmer is facing over Peter Mandelson's links to Jeffrey Epstein.

Not just because of the damage to his government but also in how the people at the centre of the scandals behaved as though normal rules did not apply to them.

It's said that history often repeats itself - and it seems politics is no different.

Niall is joined by Vanessa Holburn, author of The Profumo Affair, to discuss the parallels between the two scandals.

Producer: Tom Gillespie and Emily Hulme

Editor: Wendy Parker

More from This Is Why

All 332 episodes
Mandelson – the biggest political scandal since Profumo?This Is Why · 18 min
Listen in VO