Bootstrapping to IPO, product-led growth, & scaling SaaS with Atlassian's Scott Farquhar | E1800

1 Sep 2023 · 1 h 7 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

This Week in Startups - Episode E1800 Summary

Overview In this episode of "This Week in Startups," Jason Calacanis interviews Scott Farquhar, co-CEO and co-founder of Atlassian, discussing the journey of bootstrapping Atlassian to an IPO, product-led growth strategies, and the impact of AI on enterprise software.

---

Key Takeaways

  1. Bootstrapping to IPO
  2. Origins of Atlassian:
  3. Founded in 2001 during the dot-com crash, Atlassian started with minimal funding—only two minor rounds of secondary funding.
  4. The founders focused on building their first product, Jira, using open-source software, which allowed them to compete effectively in a market dominated by high-cost proprietary solutions.
  5. Defining Success Without Primary Capital:
  6. Scott emphasized that they did not take primary capital until later stages, showcasing that significant growth is possible through bootstrapping.
  7. Atlassian eventually went public in 2015 after scaling significantly.
  1. Lessons from HipChat
  2. Acquisition and Growth:
  3. Discussed the acquisition of HipChat and its growth trajectory before being sold to Slack.
  4. Key takeaways included the importance of being early to market and investing heavily in the growth of new products.
  5. Market Dynamics:
  6. Competition with Slack and Microsoft Teams revealed that market dynamics can limit opportunities despite having a superior product.
  1. Product-Led Growth Strategies
  2. Core Principles:
  3. Emphasized the importance of having a product that could sell itself—users should be able to try and buy without extensive sales support.
  4. Atlassian adopted a "high volume, low cost" model and aimed for significant customer acquisition.
  5. Scaling Metrics:
  6. Shifted focus from traditional sales-driven metrics to product usage metrics, such as active users and usage rates.
  1. Impact of Generative AI in Enterprise
  2. AI Integration:
  3. Discussed the potential of AI tools to enhance productivity and streamline operations in enterprise software.
  4. Scott believes AI will eventually transform customer experiences, including proactive bug detection and user friendly summaries of complex information.
  5. Future Opportunities:
  6. Scott sees AI not just as a tool but as a transformative element that could reimagine how businesses operate.
  1. Staying Motivated in the Long Run
  2. Philanthropy and Social Impact:
  3. Highlighted the importance of giving back through initiatives like Pledge 1%, which encourages companies to contribute a portion of their equity, profits, and products.
  4. Leadership and Vision:
  5. Scott stressed the importance of vision in leadership, emphasizing that inspiring a large team is critical even when one cannot have personal relationships with all employees.
  1. Future of Work and Remote Culture
  2. Evolving Work Environment:
  3. Atlassian's commitment to remote work is foundational; they focus on using AI to improve knowledge transfer and efficiency in a remote work setting.
  4. Innovation in Work Processes:
  5. Scott foresees a future where AI can significantly alter how teams collaborate and get work done, aiming for improved productivity through technology.

---

Conclusion Scott Farquhar's insights reveal the intricate balance between innovation, market dynamics, and the evolving role of technology in business. His journey with Atlassian serves as a powerful example for entrepreneurs navigating the complexities of building and scaling successful companies. The conversation underscores the importance of adaptability, vision, and leveraging technological advancements to drive business success.

For more information and to follow Scott Farquhar or Atlassian, visit:

  • [Atlassian](https://www.atlassian.com)
  • [Scott Farquhar on Twitter](https://twitter.com/scottfarkas)

---

This episode is sponsored by:

  • Squarespace: Create a stunning website easily.
  • Supergut: Nutrition solutions that improve health.
  • Miro: Collaborative online whiteboard for teams.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Our biggest competitor back then was a company called, well, it was a product called Bugzilla, which was made by Apache and it was an open source product product out there. and the word Bugzilla came from Godzilla, which was the sort of Japanese film. But it turns out that actually Godzilla was the, you know, anglicized Western name. Gojira is actually the Japanese name, Gojira. And so we dropped the Go and Jira became, you know, the product. And back then you could buy four-letter domain names, you know, just on your credit card without any problems. Maybe I should have not started a software company We just bought that forward in the main names.

0:38It would be more profitable. For sure. But we bought, yeah, bought Jira.com and, you know, we started building the product. This Week in Startups is brought to you by Squarespace. Turn your idea into a new website. Go to squarespace.com slash twist for a free trial. When you're ready to launch, use offer code twist to save 10 % off your first purchase of a website or domain. Supergut is the only nutrition brand clinically proven to improve digestion, balance blood sugar, sustain energy, and manage weight. Save 25 % on their delicious shakes, bars, and prebiotic mix at Supergut.com with code TWIST.

1:20And Miro helps take ideas from in your head to out there in the world with his ability to democratize collaboration and input. Sign up for free at miro.com slash startups. Hey everybody, welcome to this week in startups. Some companies are just so influential, they define a category or a region. And Atlassian really became the anchor, the foundation of the Australian startup industry. A lot of the great startups are alumni of Atlassian. And if If you're in the tech space, you know the firm. Today, we're joined by the co-CEO and co-founder, Scott Farquhar, on the program. How are you, sir? Great.

2:01What year is this for Atlassian? You're obviously in the second decade. I'm not sure what year it is, though. This is year 21 or 22, depending on where you count the starting points. So it's been a while now. We've been around the block a few times. Yeah, so technically entering your third decade. Well done. And the crazy thing about your startup was it was largely bootstrapped, right? Like just two small rounds of funding, if I remember correctly. And then they came in years 8, 9, or 10 or something. Yeah, we never took primary capital onto the balance sheet. So we did some secondary rounds to allow Mike and I to take some money off the table and allow employees to take some money off the table.

2:39But we've never taken primary money. And then we IPO'd in 2015. And so we originally took cash in 2010 from Excel because we wanted to head towards going public. And a submission story is going to that. And then in 2014, we did that sort of pre-public round that sort of popularized a bit these days from a public market investor to help us get across to being public. Yeah, to your real price, right? I have here in my notes. So this is incredible to build a company from inception to IPO without outside capital. I mean, that's really what I'd love to talk to you about. So how did the company start?

3:15What was the first product? And how do you build a company with essentially no venture capital, no seed funding people right now in the United States? Man, it's the entitlement level was really high for about five years there, where people wouldn't even start working unless somebody gave them 3 million bucks. they say how do i do it you know and uh so let's get into it it's perfect topic for you know 2023 when let's face it the the seed funding is really dried up uh continued funding also dried up it's pretty dark out there for startups so how did you do it what was the first product we started in sort of 2001 each time and back then it was really like the dot-com crash And we think 2008, 2009 and kind of the current downturn is bad for technology.

4:06And it is, but nothing really compares to the dot-com crash where most companies lost 90 % of their market capitalization. People laid off in huge, huge numbers. And back then, we thought it was the right time to start a company, probably because we were just graduating out of college. We had no other choices. It was either that or go work for a bank. And so we decided we didn't want to have to wear a suit and go to work. We knew the graduate salary to work at PwC was$48 ,500. And we figured as long as we could earn more than that and not have to wear a suit to work, we would be good. And so we didn't really have huge venture capital style ambitions at the start of our company.

4:52And I think the advantage back then was that while we couldn't get any money, None of our competitors or no one else in the industry could get money either. And so bootstrapping was actually... Yeah, it was a level playing field there. Yeah. Yeah, totally. Bootstrapping was a viable alternative. And we also, I think, there was some technology transitions going on at that time. And we built our products on open source software, which meant we could catch up to many of the competitors that had been out there. the browser was coming around and so many of our competitors at the time had built client server products and they all built a browser add-on as an extra thing which meant they just had to support two different versions and so we could catch up while they were building two versions of every feature we could build it once and so we bet on a new technology and also then you know the internet distribution had come around and it's a long you know way from there to now stripe where you can just write a lot of code and take credit cards.

5:54But we were sort of the very early days where you could, you know, conduct commerce online. And so instead of having to sell software for$50 ,000 or$100 ,000, which you sort of had to do when you were, you know, doing on a golf course and with credit cards and faxes and purchase orders, like we could sell software for$5 ,000. And so we had these huge advantages in a time that we could catch up with our competitors. And, you know, being in Australia, I guess we didn't really know any different. i guess if we'd been in silicon valley everyone would have told us that was impossible um in fact many australian venture capitalists told us it was really impossible to build a business that way um but it was a time and place that worked out for us and you were builder founders you were doing consulting gigs on the side uh high price consulting gigs right you can pay a couple hundred bucks an hour and then at night you're building jira uh and and that is really the heart of bootstrapping almost every bootstrapping story i hear starts with people doing some kind of consulting work they got an ad agency, they got a dev shop.

6:52And then they see some opportunity to build a product. And they go from building the product, you know, 20 hours a week and doing consulting 40 or 50 hours a week. And then the numbers just slowly switch to the point at which you just start telling customers, listen, I can't do any consulting for you anymore, because we got this other product that we built. Is that what happened over a couple years? Yeah, it was two bits of consulting. One is we started a support firm for a it was a company built out of Sweden called Iron Flare. And they had a product called Orion server, which is back in the application server days where there was like 50 different application servers, you know, vying for supremacy on the internet.

7:26And so we provide support for this small Swedish company who had most of their customers in America. And that was a terrible, terrible business. In fact, I'm glad it was so bad because many, I know many founders, you know, great founders get trapped in mediocre businesses. This was so bad. We had to get up at, you know, four in the morning or three in the morning when the phone rang to answer someone from the US, and try and sound credible at 3 in the morning trying to solve support calls. And so we did that for a while. Then we discovered writing software is actually our passion, not supporting someone else's software out there.

7:58And we started building that. But in order to bootstrap, we still needed money. So some of the people who had paid for consulting or paid for the support chose to fly me across to the Netherlands to work and do some code review over there. And so I flew across for a couple of weeks and eventually a couple of months. And I would work during the day in the Netherlands on what was a billing system for the Dutch telecommunications company. And I'd do a good job over there. And I'd read up textbooks at night on how to code. And then the rest of the time I'd be coding on JIRA, which is our first product.

8:36Yeah, I mean, that's bootstrapping at its best. Doing whatever it takes to keep the lights on, pay the bills. and then diverting, you know, the extra hours you have to building that product. And so how did you come up with the idea for Jira? What's the origin story there? We found back then in building our own software, like doing the support work, we realized there was nothing to track all the tasks that we needed to get done. And we built something sort of really crappily internally just because there was a need for it. and then we realized and went out to the market to sort of see well what else is there out there and there was nothing there was either open source and the open source stuff was really terrible and it would take you literally a week to set up you know the first stage was compile my sql with these special flags and you know that's not really easy for for most people to do and uh all you had very expensive stuff that started at a hundred thousand dollars you know going out from there and you know sold by ibm and in many cases the software was consulting where they'd come in and that was their introduction to your company rather than a product you would buy.

9:42And so we really felt that there was something in the middle that you could put on your credit card and do that. And our biggest competitor back then was a company called, well, it was a product called Bugzilla, which was made by Apache and it was an open source product out there. And the word Bugzilla came from Godzilla, which was the sort of Japanese film. But it turns out that actually Godzilla was the, you know, angler angler sized uh western name gojira is actually the japanese name gojira and uh so we dropped the go and ajira became you know the product and back then you could buy forwarded domain names you know just on your credit card without any problems and yeah maybe i should have given not not not started a software company just bought up more profitable for sure but we bought Yeah, boy, Jira.com.

10:32And, you know, we started building the product. Amazing. And it was open source to start. You're doing bug tracking, project management, all that simple stuff. But people had solutions for this in the market. It was just generally client server software, or that was what you were up against, proprietary IBM software, Microsoft software, etc. Yeah. So I think there's a couple of things here. One is there's a company called Rational, and I think it still exists somewhere. I don't know if it's ever been sold to these days. But when we started, Rational had about 1 ,000 customers worldwide. And, you know, those customers probably on average, you know, spent a million dollars with Rational, you know, between software and services and so forth and keeping it up.

11:10And when you're spending a million dollars on software, that really respects it down to a very small number of customers that can afford to do that. And I think a decade later when I stopped tracking it, Rational still had about 1 ,000 customers. Yeah. And so our original goal was to be very different. Our first Big Harry Audacious goal was to get to 50 ,000 customers worldwide. And it took us about 12 years to do that. And we set that goal when we had 500. So our Big Harry Audacious goal for the company was 100 times our current size. But more importantly, it was sort of a vector that really made us differentiated from everyone else in the market because we were really going to go after high volume, low cost at scale and sell globally.

11:55And so that really put the tenants like if we're going to sell globally, you have to basically sell through your website. If you sell through the website, it has to be in a credit card. If it's on a credit card, it needs to be able to sell itself because it needs to be good enough that you can sort of try it out and then buy it. So I started this virtuous cycle that we probably now known as product-led growth. It didn't have a name back then, but we were probably one of the earliest pioneers of people being able to try and buy business software on the internet. If your landing page is terrible, I'm out, right?

12:24most consumers are. It's 2023. You can't have an ugly website. Stop selling for okay or good and have great. And great means you're using Squarespace. It's out of the box. Beautiful. These websites have templates made by the world's greatest designers that are going to engage your audience, let you sell anything. And Squarespace over the past decade has just added feature after feature on top of the gorgeous templates that are designed for mobile. And the drag and drop web design with their fluid engine is just perfect, easy to use. And you get built in analytics, marketing channel analysis, sales data, all that stuff.

12:58It goes beyond page views and site visits and time and all that. And with Squarespace, you can create an online store or you can start a blog. Click of a button, right? Easy peasy, lemon squeezy. You can create a subscription business for members only content. You're seeing a lot of that out there. It's simple. It's cost effective. It's gorgeous. And they keep adding feature after feature after feature. That's when technology is at its best, isn't it? When you pay one price, but the product gets better and better and better. You get that with your Tesla, you get that with your iPhone, you get that with Squarespace.

13:27These are the legendary brands of the internet of this era. Go to squarespace.com for a free trial. And when you're ready to launch, I want you to go to squarespace.com slash twist. And they're going to give you 10 % off your first purchase of a website or domain, go to squarespace.com slash twist, because they know we sent you. The other thing people don't realize is you created Slack before slack existed people were using irc i guess to do you know like some general team chat really hard to set up an irc server it's it's meant for developers it's you know core infrastructure of the internet before the web irc but you created hip chat and that was just a side project talk a little bit about that i mean obviously you wound up selling anything ultimately to slack but talk about that side project and and what you got right there and maybe what you missed in terms of the opportunity to build something really big totally uh so we we uh there's a company called hip chat that we were using internally.

14:16And, you know, we were early on the internet. I sort of feel like if we didn't build Jira, we would have built a dozen other products that we needed, you know, in terms of, you know, to build a software company on the internet. We built our own, you know, billing system and we built our own, you know, effectively version of HubSpot internally. So when you're, I guess, early in these trends, you get to see a lot of, you know, kind of the new ways of doing things. And one of the things we felt was we used IRC internally for a long time. We used a whole bunch of other, you know, tools out there. and then eventually we set it on hip chat which is great because it was all in one and our developers loved it and so did everyone else in the organization so it was sort of the first development tool where developers loved it and everyone else loved it and we we acquired them when we acquired them now i think there were about six developers and uh they had a quirky personality you know as a brand as a company and uh we you know doubled or tripled that that team and uh it was growing really fast i think it was growing three to four hundred percent year on year, which for most offer companies, you would say is like, that's a home run.

15:18Like, you know, that's incredible. But what eventually happened was Slack, you know, spun out of a games company that, you know, went south with Stuart's second games company that went south. The first created Flickr, the second created Slack. And so they came out with a ready-made product. And, you know, Stuart was very good at branding and PR and so forth. And so they ended up growing 1 ,000 % year on year or more. And so it showed there was this huge category there. And eventually, we felt that between when Microsoft Teams entered the market, there was two players between Slack and Microsoft, and we didn't think that it would support a third player in the market, even though we knew we had a better product.

16:04I've used Slack since, and I used our product, and I would still maintain we had a better product. but the market dynamics weren't going to allow three. And so my lesson for that particular thing, like, you know, when people ask me what did you learn, what would you teach yourself or other entrepreneurs, a couple of ones. One is if you're early to a market, you need to bet heavily on that market. And, you know, we bet, we, you know, doubled and tripled the team size, you know, in line with its growth, but we didn't bet heavily enough in that market. We should have taken our banner ads and we should have really pushed that.

16:43The second one for me is that in an engineering sense, when you have a small engineering team, sub 10 people, the way that they operate as an engineering team is very, very efficient because you don't need to create documentation. Everyone knows where everything is. It's like a really small team. When you double that team to 20 or 25 people, you actually go backwards in productivity. You really need to triple or quadruple the team to actually get forward momentum. And so though we doubled the team, we went backwards in productivity because you had to create all the documentation and the way the teams interacted and so forth.

17:20And so we should have really put a lot more effort behind that engineering team. And the last one is big markets can be way bigger than you think. And even if you've got the numbers at your back in terms of raw growth, you should always look at in terms of like, what does that compare to the market size? And what does that compare to your competitors? And they were, you know, growing at stratospheric rates. You know, we could have grown faster if we pushed. And this is the amazing lesson of entrepreneurship. even if something's growing three or four times year over year three or four hundred percent growth you you really need to test to see if it should be 10x growth um and not accept that it's three or four x and you have to be even more ambitious but sometimes you know especially you guys were you know uh first-time entrepreneurs now acquiring companies you you have to invest more and then the paradox of investing i love your second point which is hey you had a bunch of people that actually creates all this overhead it slows people down and now it has to move from a 10 person little SWAT team a little navy seal team a perfect olympic team to now it's got to be an organization and and that's painful and requires infrastructure and i suppose you know the other parts of the business like jira are also growing incredibly well so now you've got to pick which of these projects to focus on and that also as first-time founders doing this you know running a house of brands is hard you need to have leadership in each one huh i agree the the trade-off between different uh you know capital investments is hard and the interesting one for us is we were always profitable so we actually had the cash ability to do that uh it was constrained by the ability to find people and probably a little bit our risk tolerance and uh that's interesting as a bootstrapper, there's a lot of advantages in that you're in control of your own destiny, but you have a history of measured investment and seeing the return and putting more investment in over time.

19:20And I think that you've got to move to a VC model when you've got this huge opportunity that does have potential entrance and move a lot faster. I think we've learned that now when we looked at entering new products and new markets these days, we're much more aggressive with putting the investments behind the new markets we go into. So tell me, now that you've got this new playbook and the go fast and really take the opportunity, what's the aggressive playbook? What's in that one as opposed to the bootstrapping playbook and how have you evolved that? Yeah, so if the two original bootstrapping ones would probably say Jira and Confluence were our original bootstrapped products and both came from just listening to market needs where a customer had come to us and we looked and said, we need this ourselves internally and if we'll get more recent products so atlas and compass they still form that same playbook which is we internally have needed something and we've gone out to the market and seen what's out there and more and more what we find is that we find products that companies like facebook and google uh you know have internal products to do these things but there's no product out in the market and so we feel like well we need to build it internally or we can build it for ourselves and customers and that's what we've done really well over over the years and so now we you know build products internally for ourselves and we invest a lot more behind them like we'll put you know 50 to 100 person teams on them not to start with because i think that's always a ramp period where you want a really small dozen people that build the core of any product i think that's the way to build any new go-to-market but as soon as we start seeing traction in the market, we ramp up so that we can, you know, continue delivering features and make noise out there on these products.

21:03Okay, so I want to get to two things. One, how you market them and scale them. But before that, how do you know you actually have product market fit? I got that piece in there that you slid in there about how you find products. If Facebook or Tesla or somebody, you know, a video game company like Stewart's old video game company builds some internal product to make everybody more efficient, well, of course, the long tail of companies, the quarter million companies that you service, half million company service, whatever it is now, they're going to need it, right? And they don't have the ability to put 10 developers on and build an internal thing.

21:34It's a brilliant insight. How do you know you have product market fit? Once you do have product market fit, how do you scale? What are the things that actually work with product-led growth and products for developers and business teams? I think product market growth hits you in the face when you have it. And if you're ever worried that you don't have it, it's probably true, is my experience and if i go back to atlassian's revenue numbers and i'll be off a bit on this this is not sec approved sort of numbers but like from my memory like our first year first full year of you know selling jira was about three hundred thousand dollars worth of revenue the next year was 1.2 million the year after that was four year after that was 12 we then had 21 35 42 and that was when the global financial crisis hit we sort of only went up 20 percent that year then we went to 56 75 and i think about 110 and so in each of those you know when you're going from 4 million to 12 million in revenue and you've got a dozen people working for you life is pretty good and you're really just trying to hold on and i feel like that's when you've got product market fit you really have that sort of near vertical growth and i've advised a whole a bunch of startup founders who think they have a great product, but they get trapped in these terrible businesses that grow at, you know, 15 % year on year on a couple of million dollars worth of revenue, and they're never going to be a hit.

23:09And in fact, a good friend of mine runs a company called Culture Amp, and they do employee surveys, and they're, you know, very, very big company these days. But he was also someone I advised. They did a different product early on, and it just wasn't going anywhere. and, you know, I advised him that product market fit really does feel, you know, when you've got it. So we did that with, you know, Jira and Confluence and, you know, and so these days I guess we've got a good playbook about what that looks like and we keep trying, you know, until we've got that. And then on the growth side of things, it's interesting.

23:44Many enterprise businesses have sales-driven motion. If you look at many of our peers, it will be, what's my revenue going to be? Well, that's really just the number of salespeople I've got times the quota that we put in them, times the attainment ratios, times our ramp period. That is the way that they predict revenue. And look at scale for enterprises. That's a reasonable way to do it. But if you want to build a product-led growth company, it's much more like a consumer model. It's basically how many trials do I get? How many people are using the product? At what stage in the funnel are they?

24:17And that's much more scalable at that stage. you know you're not throwing sales people at it to get every incremental dollar of revenue and you know so so we focus on on metrics like how many active instances are there of our product out there whether they're paying us or not just how many people are using it we focus on consumer metrics like monthly active users which is a big metric we use internally so we're sort of much more consumer focused in the metrics we use does that mean you still don't have famously a sales team you're still not doing like the sas model let's get a bunch of salespeople here you're still committed to hey the product-led growth model or did you ever add salespeople i remember in the early days you didn't have salespeople yeah we for a long time we had the sort of no sales mentality it'd be like uh sales forces no software mentality it's a great tagline um you know a lot of journalists want to write about it and uh i would say you know of of the 250 plus 260 000 plus customers we have today you know of 260 ,000, 250 ,000 don't have any person that touches them in terms of sales.

25:21So, we're still largely product-led growth for everything that we do. What we found though is as you get successful inside large companies, they then want to standardize on you, particularly in the last year or so when people are trying to save costs, they want to standardize on you. And so, they want to call someone up to have that conversation. And we found that having a more traditional sort of, sales motion in those customers makes a lot of sense. And what we did with those people is we have incredibly high quotas because these salespeople are not out there prospecting for customers, trying to call people up, looking at LinkedIn, trying to find a new prospect.

26:00It is really an existing customer that wants to talk to someone about how to use more of our products. And so I think that's the way sales of the future is that, you know, if you're trying to get a new customer by calling them up on the phone, I think that's a really difficult motion, very expensive. You're ending up in head-to-head motions. And whereas if you start bottoms up, start with a team, and a team's successful and they need it to another team, the enterprise process at the end to do a consolidation or get them to use a second or third product is a way different conversation that you're having.

26:32And particularly at our price points, we're subbing out a lot of competitors that are much higher price points, but we have the credibility because they're already in there. And I think that's eventually the model that, you know, I think most enterprise software companies should do. Unless you're, you know, a work day and you sell one copy inside your entire system, if you're any sort of collaboration product, whether it's us or Slack or anything like that, bottoms up with a motion at the top to help people consolidate is the way that it's going to go. Now, I do see some people make mistakes here.

27:04And there are many companies that started like that. And what they discover is that when we add salespeople, we get great results. So we keep adding salespeople at every stage of the funnel. And eventually, you get to the stage where every person gets touched by a salesperson. And it's death by a thousand cuts. And it makes sense on an ROI basis at every stage. But then eventually, your website has contact us for a price and talk to a salesperson. And you don't invest in the onboarding experience. And over time, I think that ends up being an issue. So we are very clear about who gets touched by a salesperson and who doesn't.

27:40Yeah. I mean, the total number of customers across all the products, approximately? I had read somewhere you broke a quarter million. Yeah, we have 260 ,000 customers around the world. I think that's like pretty much every country and territory we can sell to. That's wild. You've heard me talk about Supercut a bunch. This has been a key part of my health journey. It's an awesome nutrition company. that my bestie, David Friedberg from the All In Podcast started. I love their bars. I love their shakes, especially the gut-balancing chocolate brownie bar. It is delicious. They also have an unflavored prebiotic mix you can add to anything.

28:17I like to put it in my coffee. You can put it in your own mail. Their products are super helpful for weight loss. Why? Well, SuperGuts products mimic the effects of Ozempic by boosting your GLP-1 hormone. This helps quell hunger and boost your metabolism, which is a great, great combination, obviously. And SuperGut's prebiotic fiber, that actually alleviates digestive issues. And obviously, the products all taste great. The best part, the team at SuperGut actually put the work in and scientifically proved their products work. They conducted a placebo-controlled clinical trial with Stanford last year.

28:50That's been published in the medical journal Diabetes, Obesity, and Metabolism. The results were amazing. The participants in the study, they lost weight. They lowered their blood sugar. they improve their metabolic health, and they had improved digestion and so much more. Whether you want to improve your gut health, maybe drop a few pounds like I did, or just feel better throughout the day, and listen, you're busy, you're traveling, I like to bring SuperGut with me, go to supergut.com and use the code TWIST, you get 25 % off. Go to supergut.com and use the code TWIST to get 25 % off. I've been on this health journey, I've lost 40 pounds.

29:20A big part of that, sincerely, was me using SuperGut. So go to supergut.com and use the code TWIST for 25 % off. they just had dharmesh from hubspot on and you know they committed to the mid-size a small enterprise and they had to have the same discipline which is the product had to be exceptional the you know and the product had to sell itself and uh sure yeah if you're big enough we could have a consultative sale later but there's something about having to please a two-person or a 20-person organization that just makes you really efficient and sharp on products huh i think so dhamish is a great friend of mine an incredible technologist and uh also hats off to him for you know wanting to be the sort of technical person and not be the ceo like i think it's many it's very difficult for people often to make that but he realizes exactly what he's great at which is building products and he's deep rolling his arms up in the ai side of things as well and uh i think hubspot um we one of our employees is a board member over there and they've learned a lot from our product-led growth model and very similar, which is, yes, we have a great product that sells itself.

30:26If you need to talk to us eventually at scale, we're here, but we win because a great product that sells itself. And I think that's really hard to disrupt, whereas there are many enterprise companies that are there because they've got a great sales team. But you can sell, I presume Salesforce is HubSpot's large competitor. There can be pockets of HubSpot in a Salesforce deployment. it's unlikely to be the reverse because of the way that the sales motion happens that's fascinating yeah i mean it's it's just like hand-to-hand combat like a much more guerrilla style in a way the product-led growth teams like the ones at hubspot the ones at lassie and they're doing this like street level winning over the actual customer who uses the product every day and then you look at like the oracles or a sales force you know they might be doing like the you know, going to the Warriors game or taking people out to dinner and using the sales and the CTO top down sales, and it's going to result in something very different, as you're saying.

Read the full transcript

31:24Darmesh is obsessed with AI. Are you obsessed with it now too? And what impact is it having in the organization here as we move into this year one of chat GPT, language models, and, you know, an actual platform starting to emerge that can be used by, you know, any business user can just use any number of these language models themselves and you get hugging face throwing up new changes every day it's got to be in your consciousness huh yeah anchor ai in the way i think about it in technology because it's so much of a winner takes all market it usually takes some sort of technology shift to shuffle the playing board and in those technology shifts you find some companies that endure you know across multiple of them and some that stumble and if you look back historically you know back to at least my lifetime uh you had this sort of move to desktop software which obviously you know microsoft and windows and office were you know kind of the big beneficiaries of that and then you had you know the sort of turn of 2000 you know 1999 2000 when you had the internet came along and you'd say you know netscape netscape was uh you know the big window there and microsoft played play catch-up but it it birthed you know companies like google um that wouldn't have existed previously.

32:41And then you sort of roll through to mobile and, you know, that birthed Apple really as a company. And, you know, in Google, you know, sort of with Android did a good job there, but Microsoft wasn't anywhere really to be seen. Then cloud came along, which is not so much a consumer product, but Microsoft, you know, caught up heavily with cloud and suddenly Amazon's, you know, in the race as well. And so you see these technology shifts where a couple of the big players maybe make the shift and a couple of players don't make the shift and i think ai is the next big technology shift that's going to shuffle the playing board of technology and uh when i look at you know i've gone deep with all the different large language models and how i know how they all work um in some ways the industry has been saved by large language models because if you weren't deep in ai you can basically rent a large language model from someone which is very different i think to how most people thought this world would play out And so there are a lot of companies who are really just playing catch up effectively by running these large language models who didn't have investment.

33:43So it really is different than most pundits would probably thought it would. I think the real value is going to come from putting data together with these models because the large language models at the moment, I view them a bit like a Swiss Army knife. They're expensive. They're not particularly good at any individual thing, but they do a lot of different things for you. and that's great everyone's going to use them because they're the first thing available and i can pick up one of them and use it for lots of different use cases uh i think over time there's going to be specialized models um you know if you just want to do language transformation which we do we convert text to a query language we don't need a you know multi-trillion parameter model to do that and we can have much faster and cheaper and uh you know even you know cheaper and faster are pretty much the same here and so we can actually have better user experience and save ourselves money so over time i think you see specialization of particular niches or niches i think is it said in the us yeah either of those are acceptable we'll accept both of those as answers for niche uh or niche you're allowed to say both yeah but that's that's i think that's the that's that's the correct answer is you know you right now the swiss army knife i love the way you put that i can go in there and ask it about travel or to write me a blog post or throw in some code and clean it up great great swiss army knife but if somebody makes a verticalized thing like you know the you know github's copilot or stack overflow is working on one or somebody works on something just for finance or just for travel of course it's going to have a lot of features wrapped around it and a lot of verticalization and then reinforcement learning and it's going to blow away the general model that that's i it's that should be pretty obvious i think it's pretty intuitive to think that's going to happen and those are going to start showing up in the next year probably especially with all the open source uh projects so you're uh in open source a lot of your success is based on open source so do you think the proprietary models like closed ai previously known as open ai is pursuing what do you think is going to win the open ai model where it's closed uh or the actual open source models you know i guess uh facebook's lambda is uh open source and other ones that are coming out uh which one's going to which one's going to win the day?

35:59I don't think that for us, where we sit in the ecosystem, it really matters if one or other people win the day because they're so interchangeable. For me, it's an API call to use a large language model. And so unlike saying, well, how hard a choice was it to choose between Amazon or Azure or Google to host in the cloud? If I'm going to switch between one of those things, and I've invested millions of dollars, you know, right into their APIs and working that way, but the switching costs are very high. The switching costs, you know, for large language models are very low. And we've, at the moment, partnered with OpenAI because they're the best and, you know, we've worked with them even on their contracts and how they store data and making sure they're much more, you know, B2B friendly.

36:44We think that we'll be probably using lots of models over time and the real value is going to come from putting data together and having those, you know, data use cases. And this is where I think the landscape is going to change a lot because if you're a very small point player at the moment, you do one very, very specific thing for customers. I think you're going to be at a relative disadvantage compared to the larger players out there that do multiple things. Because if you do multiple things, you have lots of data across the lifecycle of that customer. And that can mean your experiences can be way, way better than they could be initially.

37:20And so I do think there's going to be a bit of a, the big get bigger in this next phase of the internet. I'm not sure if that's good for everyone. I mean, it's great for Atlassian. I don't know how good it is for society. But I do think that the, you know, the use of data is going to be the big win here. It does seem that you could switch these out really easy. I've been playing with it. And you can very easily, you know, send your prompt engineering through one and then try it in the other. Look at the response teams. I think there's going to be some meta layer here, kind of like CDNs, or, you know, I guess some people with their cloud providers create, there's a term of art for it where you can have your, you know, jobs in the cloud go to different providers, you go to AWS for one thing, go to another, and have that done.

38:05Multicloud, yeah. So you can have like a multi-cloud thing. I could see people having like multiple, you know, chat GPTs and just go to the language model that you think is best for this current job. And Meta's model obviously is Lama. Google's is Lambda. Founders always ask me for pitch deck punch-ups and how to present their startup in a better way. Well, I've got some great news. We worked with a team at Miro, the awesome whiteboarding software to create an amazing pitch deck template for founders. you can see it if you're watching the video right now or you can just go search for it you go to miro.com slash miroverse and search for pitch deck you'll find it immediately and this pitch deck will help you go from zero to vc ready our founder university participants they love using this template it starts them on second or third base and if you're hybrid or fully remote miro is incredibly useful to you it's like an old school in-person whiteboarding session but distributed and asynchronous so you can work on your time schedule.

39:02Miro lets you brainstorm ideas and collaborate on projects from anywhere in the world, whether you're in the Adirondacks or you're in Cabo or you're skiing in Lake Tahoe. When you think about Miro, think zero to one, but faster. And Miro is so much more than a simple digital whiteboard. Your team can collaborate on planning, research, design, and feedback cycles. Now remember, faster inputs equals faster outcomes, and velocity is how startup wins. We look for product velocity in all of our startups. So to access our new Miroverse template and thousands of others, sign up today for a free Miro account at Miro, M-I-R-O dot com slash startups.

39:38Again, M-I-R-O dot com slash startups, Miro dot com slash startups. Yeah, it does seem like they're already getting commodified in some way. And then whoever has the data is going to win the day. You have all this data on, you know, I mean, that's another thing with a long tail of 260 ,000 customers. you've got a lot of data and you can provide a lot of speed efficiency if people are trying to manage tasks or clear out bugs or whatever they're doing in the software that you provide you're going to be finishing their sentences huh and being their co-pilot any of those products released yet have you put any in the wild or you're in the laboratory right now yeah a couple things one is i think that from a b2b sense like they'll be interchangeable um we all know that consumer behavior is something that you know is harder to change and so you know there might be a better a search engine but if i'm used to using google every single day am i going to try a vertical search engine for that one search to do something probably less likely so i think there is you know and i think open ai has probably got the lightest consumer uh side of things so i think it'll be you know from a b2b sense yes there'll be a lot of providers i think it's still open how the consumer side will play out and if i go back to alasian strengths uh you know we have knowledge about how teams work and uh you know how strictly around engineering teams and development teams and so So we have information around what code gets written, what customer problems happen, what bug reports happened.

40:59And I keep challenging my teams to not just improve the way that our current customers do something, but really sit about the job to be done. And so take an example like customer support. No customer wants a faster customer support experience. They want to have not had to reach out to customer support in the first place. and uh you know if you take it to the example of a app you know on your phone it's like well why don't we send all the log files and all the errors from that app on your phone you know every single night like uh you know back to the developer and you know previously if there were minor errors in products you just couldn't find the needle in the haystack and or fixing them would be too expensive but these days with you know the with ai you can now see oh actually this little bug here i can even see the code it creates that bug and to fix that bug is a trivial you know change and so i can you know change the code and maybe it's a human gets reviewed it maybe it's a different large language model that has a whole different training set reviews it so you've got two different sets of eyes you know reviewing that code and suddenly your code gets more robust and you know sent out based on uh you know real life data that comes out from the field so instead of your customers having to file a bug report they actually just never had to solve the bug in the first place And I think that's what we're going to see over, you know, in the short term, we're seeing great party tricks like, hey, turn this list of three things into a list of 15.

42:25That's great. It looks good. It's kind of cool. But the real value, I think, comes from totally reimagining, you know, customer experiences. How far away do you think those will be? We've had this parlor trick, like, incredible. It's helping me write the blog post. I make it shorter. I make it funnier. And, hey, it got 60 % done, 70 % done. I polish it. Wow, this is crazy. I don't need to have a PR firm write a press release. The AI wrote it for me and I just polished it. So for a young startup, why hire some PR firm if I can just, the CEO or the person running product can just become a bionic.

43:00So when do we see what you're talking about, which is, hey, we're going to intercept bugs. We're going to have multiple language models, review it. And it's sort of like precogs and minority report predicting what's going to go wrong and solving it in real time. That's trippy stuff. Is that five years out, 10 years out, two years out? I don't think that's five years out. I think that we're working on things like that at the moment. And to take a more knowledge work example for, you know, the listeners who use that don't write code, you know, if you go away for a long weekend, you come back on a Tuesday, and you're like, hey, I want to catch up.

43:33What did I miss? At the moment, that is a painful process because you go, well, what do I need to read? What's important? What got actioned already that doesn't need my response? And because of the data we have on Teams and teamwork, we can say, well, Jason, actually, your closest peers over on Monday all collaborated on this document. By the way, here's, at the end of the day, here's the change from X to Y. And I don't need to do that as a diff with red lines. I can actually explain the changes in human readable form for you. And I might be able to explain it in one sentence or two sentences.

44:05And if you want to get the three-paragraph version, you just click. And if you want to see the actual red line changes, we can do that. And so, the ability for a knowledge worker to catch up on work, uh is huge and if i look at at least my my time and i'm sure your time is like reading through or even just understanding what to read through is like a huge burden for most knowledge workers and that's the stuff we're working on at the moment uh that's absolutely brilliant and i'm having this experience we started recording every meeting we have with founders for funding then we zoom gives you the transcript so you kind of get that for free then we put it into notion notion's got ai built in and we said summarize it and so now i get these little summaries hey the investment team met with this person they talked to the founder about this the founder said this they're talking about a term sheet there's a liquidation preference i mean it's scary how accurate it is and and it's saving me having to do that catch-up it's like having jarvis in iron man or something you walk up to the desktop and it starts explaining to you hey here's what you missed you know thor's in the other side of the galaxy solving this problem hulk's over here causing these problems what do you want to do iron man and that is invaluable that that doesn't exist as a current product and uh i don't know why slack doesn't do that right now slack's ai is just that is is kind of mia uh it would be incredible to open up my slack and just have it tell me here's what's going on here's the changes that you missed and so it's that's a that's a great vision um i think for time savings what do you think is going to happen because you're running a good yeah no respond well i think the thing with slack is that the if you think about the benefit like at the moment you're stringing multiple tools together you're saying okay let me take let me do a zoom meeting they get a zoom transcript and throw it into a you know notion or confluence and get confluence to summarize it and then i'll organize that in some way where i get to see the summaries in a certain you know why in a certain time and i've got to work out my workflows and for most people that they can do that but it's very complicated to make that happen and same thing with Slack is that, you know, Slack has short form, you know, here's 10 words, here's 50 words, like it's not paragraphs that need to get summarized.

46:13And for you to really understand a Slack conversation, you need to understand the context. Who is this person? What is their job? What have they been doing? What are they, what are they written in Confluence like, you know, today? What have they been doing in their coding? And I think you actually need to understand more data points across that ecosystem. And because of where we are at Elasian, because we can see the code and the specs that they write and the jobs that they had to get done in Jira. We have that data. We can provide all that. So eventually, we can summarize it in a way that's much more turnkey than you having to do it a bit at a time.

46:45And so that's why I think someone like Slack might be able to do it. But if you had to pick out of the two, you'd say Microsoft Teams probably has a better starting point because they see more of the workflow that a knowledge worker does. So that's why I think, again, that data gravity makes a big difference. and we have a huge advantage there. And we didn't even talk about it suggesting what your next move is. So you come back to work and it's like, hey, here's the three things that happened. By the way, you know, you have these three, this topic of this customer churning or threatening to churn.

47:17Here's ways in which we've saved customers before. Whatever, you know, issue that you've suddenly been faced with, the AI could start giving you ideas of how to address that incoming issue. How efficient have you gotten internally? I know you guys did a small riff, maybe 5 % of the company or something during the 2022 period, I guess, in the down market. I think that's when it occurred. A lot of people did that. People did bigger ones, obviously, 10%, 20%. And they didn't see, they saw things get more efficient. Obviously, if you cut the bottom couple of people, it's going to do that. It's just a performance metric there on any team.

47:52but today with ai in the enterprise do you see yourself having to add a ton of people or just making the decision hey how do we point ai at this problem what what is your default as the leader of the company or the co-leader of the company yeah let me um i'm bringing another trend here that's related because we're putting the two together we're the largest company that's committed to remote work in the world we have about 11 000 employees and no one is required to come to an office any day. You can work from home. You can work from the office. You can work from a cafe. You can work from a trailer, you know, traveling around the United States if you wanted to.

48:31And, you know, for a lot of times, you know, people's objections to that is that, well, how am I going to learn from that person sitting next to me at the desk? And, you know, you talked about the sales call example that like, hey, we know how to save a customer or not. And, you know, one way to learn in a sales call is to, yeah, listen, you know, you know, them sit next to the person at a desk when they do the sales call but that's a very much a sort of whack-a-mole just happened to be you know at the right place at the right time to hear someone slightly better if i look at using a company like gong which effectively records sales calls and then you know does the transcription and then looks at competitive analysis and you can tag hey like this was the best saving of a sale customer from this particular competitor or this is the best pitch in this particular scenario or this vertical i'm still into the healthcare space like here's the you know the best person that pitched the healthcare space i think we can end up with a world where you know training and learning from other people is actually mediated by computers in ways that are way way way more effective than they ever could be by just happening to sit next to the next to the person and so we as a company have committed to remote work to build out a lot of those capabilities and we're kind of the canary in the coal mine about how we're building out those experiences, whether it's whiteboards in our Confluence product, you know, and how do you make a digital whiteboard experience better than kind of running into people, or it's, you know, the summarization of data, like, so that you can catch up on people and what's happening that's not, you know, bumping into the water cooler.

50:03So we sort of put remote and AI together because we think that the combination of those two is really changing how knowledge workers interact. And so, you know, to back to your original question around, or how are we doing this internally? We've got, you know, AI projects across the entire business and we think, I think sales and customer touch will be heavily disrupted because I think there's a lot of busy work in many sales teams' job in terms of communicating with customers, but even just researching and understanding like what a customer is doing with our products and we can surface that in incredible ways.

50:38And so take an example of a, you know, salesperson wants to upsell someone, you know, to an enterprise version of the product. You know, they can see, well, you know, we have all this data about what our products get used for and how they get used. Of course, you know, not looking at the customer's, you know, private data, but just like, hey, which features get used. But previously, all that stuff would have been too hard to look at on a feature-by-feature basis. But we can, using AI, summarize that down for people and say, well, actually, we think the enterprise features that will be most appealing are X and Y and Z.

51:11And you can do it in real time, right? You could be doing that in real time. That's data that some team would work on, a team of data scientists for three or four weeks for some off-site meeting every other year. People would say, this is amazing. Then it would quickly be outdated and it would be like institutional knowledge that, you know, just doesn't exist anymore. Now it's going to be real time, right? So these assistants are going to be telling you in real time while you're on the phone call, yeah, you know, this type of customer has gotten these features that work best. This customer is using two out of the three.

51:41So maybe this third one, they don't even know that maybe they need training on that one. Maybe they don't even know that product exists. And we need to sell that into them. Do you worry about I mean, it's kind of a, you know, a very important question in some ways and a silly one in others. And I'm wondering where you sit on the sort of spectrum. Do you worry about this technology, which is moving faster than I think you would agree anything we've seen in our lifetime, maybe the spread of broadband, the spread of smartphones were also very fast. But this is faster, I think. this is going to have a tremendous displacement effect on certain jobs so do you worry about that or do you think yeah you know it's it's overblown it's a couple things here one is that you know the initial technologies i did a lot of research around how electricity uh ran through and kind of changed the world in the 1800s and it's interesting if you ever gone to new york you see go to soho you see these multi-floor uh you know warehouses basically that have often been turned into loft apartments.

52:41But you walk down and you think, okay, this is the manufacturing district and it looks nothing like how we do manufacturing these days. And it turns out that the way it worked was back then you had a steam engine that was in the middle of these factories, often on the second or third floor, and effectively the steam engine would drive belts and pulleys to effectively have all these machines. And you would bring your products up to the floors because it was really almost a sphere because you want to be as close to that steam engine as possible because the belts and pulleys would you know effectively lose momentum and you know slack and that you know over time so you had to be as close to the center as possible and when electricity came in what they did is you know those steam engines used to explode and kill people and other things the the factories would replace that steam engine with an electric engine in the middle of the same factory in the same floor with the same darts and pulleys and now it was great people didn't die but the jobs didn't really change you know there's less someone throwing coal into a steam engine but apart from that if you were a worker on the floor you didn't notice the difference and so that was phase one and that was basically you know sustaining what you currently did better and then phase two came along where it's like well hang on now we have this thing called electricity we don't need a central like uh one central boiler effectively powering everything we can have multiple smaller tools and that's when you sort of saw the henry ford production line it's like well actually let's move the product between the different tools as opposed to you know the reverse and that's sort of the second stage is where you start retooling how how things get made and eventually then the third phase is of course you know electricity being embedded in all the products like and uh i guess you've probably seen that now with electric cars but you know sort of you had various stages of that you know along the way and uh so that's what i think about ai is you go okay phase one is going to be existing tools existing products existing processes slowly augmented we've still got you know the belts and pulleys to the same engine but like it's a better way of doing things and that's what we're seeing right now and then over time you say okay well actually have to reimagine what that looks like.

54:53And that reimagining part, that does change the jobs that are available. But all the experience we've had in the past is that the jobs that are available exceed the new ones, exceed the previous ones. But there is a period of turmoil in between. That period of turmoil can last a decade as things get jumbled up. When I look at the industries that be affected, I say, well, what's demand constrained and what's supply constrained and in software which what we sell to you know if we could have more software developers out there we would like they would get sucked up in the market immediately i feel that's a supply constrained environment i think the open questions is is in sales is sales supply constrained or demand constrained if my my sales people were twice as effective would i hire more of them would i have less of them and i think that is open in certain industries as to like when we can make it more effective do we need more of them or less of them things like accountants and back office things are probably clearly in the twice as effective i just need half as many other areas of the business it's not as clear you know it's so funny i think as technologists of a certain age we're constantly trying to now that we have our you we both have like three decades of this and we watch the dot-com bus we watch the great recession and we've watched multiple paradigms shift in our own lifetimes from mainframe computing mini computing desktop client server cloud we've watched this so many times mobile that we even go back further and look for additional context the one i use you did electricity i did and i'll pull it up here because i think it's hilarious while we were talking i pulled up my chat gpt and i was like hey chat pt tell me about the history of ice shipping to homes before electricity because i had realized like this was the big craze and when you were talking about you know uh soho where i grew up in new york and um i was obsessed with that area in the warehouse i wound up living in a warehouse building on the west side of manhattan on 26th and the west side highway 13 14 foot ceilings and it was made to have you know like steam engines and all kinds of stuff in it there was a 95 year period which here's the description of it from 1805 to basically 1900 where there was a massive amount of investment and entrepreneurship for a century around harvesting ice and bringing it to india the caribbean all over the place and coming up with new ways to systematically harvest it and ship it and maintain it and there were a ton of people who would just drive around with horse and buggy in new york to bring ice to your refrigerator you got it dropped off every day and then boom overnight electricity and then boom the refrigeration unit and this is what but we didn't we didn't have a permanent unemployed class after this happened nor did we have a permanent unemployed class after um you know phones went away and phone operators connecting calls went away we found new uses for human ingenuity that's what will happen here um but the thing that i do find very interesting is every time i'm doing a new job rec now i look at the job and i'm like what are they going to do every day what are the actual tasks what are the goals what could we automate and i'm finding about 20 to 30 percent of each job could be automated away so and watching a portfolio of hundreds of companies i'm seeing the same thing happen you know three or four person startups don't add the fourth or fifth position they just you know they had the fourth but they don't have the fifth and sixth so the capital efficiency of these you know the the most um uh what's the word you know dexterous the most scrappy companies.

58:31They're looking to AI first and then solving their problem with AI and then going on. I have a friend, Brad Gerson, he wanted to make a video for a new project he's working on. He was working into script and then he took it and then he put it into, you know, Claude to make the script. And then he made this like generative AI video that looks like something, I guess he used 11 labs or something to make a marketing video. Now, this is something that a marketing agency would have spent, I don't know, low tens of thousands or an individual contributor might have spent three or four thousand dollars building but when i talked to him about it i had encouraged him to just do it himself write the script himself and then he took it to the next step the the big learning is well if you take some people out of the process it becomes more efficient to your point about when uh hip chat went from 10 to 25 it's actually more efficient if you can do the tools yourself all these creative things you know you you weren't allowed to as a business executive explore your creative chops you had to go to a video editor a designer a logo person and now you got the founders of companies i watch them i'm like oh it's a beautiful logo how did you make it they're like ai i'm like you made your logo with ai they're like yeah and then i remember five or ten years ago maybe ten years ago people were using like you know they would use fiverr or something they'd make their logo for 500 bucks 10 years before that when you were you know doing atlasson in the you know 2001 to 2010 period what did a logo cost you'd pay a design firm three five ten grand to do a logo study What did you pay for your first logo?

59:59Do you remember? I think we actually, if you look at the history of our logos, I think it's pretty clear that we made them ourselves, but that would have been made a lot better, I think, if we'd had all the AI back then. And I think it's the creative class. I think that when people ask me, what advice do I give to kids about where to spend your efforts and what should you learn? And clearly, the accumulation of knowledge is not something that is going to win anymore. Like the person that knows the most in the room, you know, is going to be beaten by Wikipedia every day of the week. But, of course, the accumulation of knowledge builds you the skill set of, you know, learning and like learning quickly and learning how to, you know, think differently.

1:00:39And so, I do think there's a benefit of still acquiring knowledge, not for knowledge's sake, but for getting great at, you know, at learning. And so, then it comes down to, well, it's can you bring multiple different disciplines together, which is sort of creativity. Like, can you create some new idea or something new to the world? And that's the interesting part. And so, I do think there should be a renaissance in, you know, the way we teach kids to be less about learning and more about what are the ideas that haven't been thought up yet. Again, I don't know if there's any traditional schools in the US.

1:01:10There aren't as many in Australia that teach that way. Yeah. We definitely need to rethink education because if you can just sit there with one of these guides, like you said, you know, pull up the Wikipedia page, just kind of create equalizer, wrote learning, you really need creativity, drive, grit, resiliency, teamwork, leadership, you know, all of those skills, which, you know, it's very hard to teach those things become, I think, really defining. listen you give me a bunch of time i just want to ask you one or two more questions which is how do you stay motivated in decade three of your startup a lot a lot of folks you get jeff bezos is on a boat somewhere he's like done i think he's going to come back i think he's going to get bored uh you saw bob eiger retired he told he uh he told uh cmbc he's like you know i was on a boat for like six months i lost my mind i had to come back you think about retiring you think about other projects you think about philanthropy i know you've done some great philanthropy work investing you you backed a lot of the like i think you lp'd a lot of the australian funds from what i understand did a bunch of angel investing and stuff like that you ever think of life beyond atlassian and how do you stay motivated in the third decade of the same company yeah i do want to plug the philanthropy side of things for answer your question please yeah open it up i uh i started about a decade ago actually almost two decades ago we committed ourselves to the sort of one one one model which salesforce did as well which is we give Atlassian 1 % of our equity, 1 % of our profit, 1 % of our product, 1 % of our employee time away.

1:02:37And we did that for a long time. And it's been great for us. Employees love it. They join for it. It's been a huge boon for us. And about a decade ago, I looked around and realized we were still one of the few companies doing this. And so I started a foundation called Pledge 1 % and the aim was to convince every company to do that same model. And in that decade since, we've got about 17 ,000 companies now have pledged to give 1 % of product employee time, product or profit away. And so we're really starting this corporate philanthropy movement. So I just encourage many of your listeners are startups.

1:03:16I just encourage you to check that out because no matter what stage you're at, it could just be the first day of your business. it could be you've been running for 10 years um you know pledge is a very easy thing to do because it doesn't take time until you've actually got something to give back and so uh quite proud about that um on your original question around well it's a big number for atlassian right like one percent of atlassian is a lot of equity and one percent of 10 000 people's time or so at 20 that's 20 hours each that's a lot of hours you're talking about 200 000 hours We've given away about 200 and something thousand hours.

1:03:52We've given away 100 and something thousand licenses, either free or discounted to communities or non-profits. And, you know, we've given away, I don't know, $50 or$100 million to charities over that time. Obviously, it's still a corpus of money to give away. So it'd be huge for us, but I think it's eclipsed by what Pledge 1 % can do if you... Amazing. There's many companies out there from, you know, Twilio to PagerDuty that have, you know, taken the pledge. So if you're a startup out there, check it out, pledge1%.org. Go to pledge1%. On the next side of things, what's next? I still get inspired by a mission, which is to unleash the potential of every team.

1:04:31And the sort of Archimedes said, give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to move it and I'll move the world. And, you know, the idea is leverage. How do you, like, improve things with a lot of leverage? and if you look at our products they get used by everyone from spacex to the american red cross to the australian antarctic division and if we can make every team you know 50 100 more effective if we you know that is going to change the world more than anything else i could do individually like i could go you know start a space company or start you know any sort of like you know huge entrepreneurial venture out there that's made a difference but the compound effect of helping 250 50 ,000 companies and tens of millions of people to be more productive and enjoy their jobs more and get more done for the world.

1:05:19That's way bigger impact that I could have in almost any other domain. And so that keeps me excited at the mission level. And then as an entrepreneur, you know, we're 11 ,000 people. Two decades ago, we were two people. So every single year, there's a different challenge and a different journey to go on. And that is hugely intellectually stimulating uh for me i love i love learning i love trying new things i love uh i don't like failing as much but like that's part of the process uh and uh yeah failing every day but it's really interesting to think about what it's like to manage 11 000 people i mean you meet you must be must meet people you're walking around on the weekend with your kids you must meet people who work for you you don't you never met it's gotta be surreal you do yeah when people wearing a Lassian shirt, you know, is around the streets or, you know, getting a selfie with your staff is a new one for me relatively recently in the last couple of years.

1:06:14And again, it's just a realization that, you know, across 11 ,000 people, you can't have a one-to-one relationship with all of them, but you can inspire them. In fact, one of my maxims is that the most important thing about leadership is to set a vision. People work for a complete asshole who has a great vision. they won't work for the nicest person in the world that has no direction and so my number one thing for leadership is vision and so i'm hoping across 11 000 people we can still set a pretty compelling vision even if i can't have that one-to-one relationship yeah fantastic listen scott thanks for taking so much time for the this week in startups audience amazing journey keep at it and i'll be back in australia i think next year we're going to do the launch festival again so hopefully i'll see you down there in either city or melbourne one of those cities that would be great yeah congrats on everything and we'll see you next time on this week in startups bye bye

From the publisher

This Week in Startups is brought to you by…

Squarespace. Turn your idea into a new website! Go to Squarespace.com/TWIST for a free trial. When you’re ready to launch, use offer code TWIST to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain.

Supergut is the only nutrition brand clinically-proven to improve digestion, balance blood sugar, sustain energy, and manage weight. Save 25% on their delicious shakes, bars, and prebiotic mix at Supergut.com with code TWIST.

Miro. Working remotely doesn’t mean you need to feel disconnected from your team. Miro is an online whiteboard that brings teams together - anytime, anywhere. Go to https://miro.com/startups to sign up for a FREE account with unlimited team members.

*

Today’s show:

Atlassian Co-CEO Scott Farquhar joins Jason to break down how he and his Co-Founder bootstrapped Atlassian to an IPO (1:34), his lessons from acquiring, growing and eventually selling HipChat (13:43), thoughts on product-led growth (29:27), generative AI tools for the enterprise (39:43), and more!

*

Time stamps:

(0:00) Atlassian Co-CEO Scott Farquhar joins Jason!

(1:34) Atlassian origins, bootstrapping to IPO

(12:22) Squarespace - Use offer code TWIST to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain at https://Squarespace.com/TWIST

(13:43) Lessons from HipChat: Acquiring and growing the service, selling to Slack, what Scott would do differently

(19:39) Atlassian's two playbooks: bootstrapping and aggressive growth

(27:57) Supergut - Get 25% off with code TWIST at https://supergut.com

(29:27) How product-led growth leads to a sharper product team, how Atlassian is thinking about LLMs and generative AI

(38:20) Miro - Sign up for a free account at https://miro.com/startups

(39:43) Remaining flexible re: AI tools, utilizing customer data, when to expect major knowledge work breakthroughs in AI

(47:27) How Scott thinks about AI, remote work, and efficiency

(1:01:39) Staying motivated in Atlassian's third decade

*

Check out Atlassian: https://www.atlassian.com

FOLLOW Scott: https://twitter.com/scottfarkas

*

Read LAUNCH Fund 4 Deal Memo: https://www.launch.co/four

Apply for Funding: https://www.launch.co/apply

Buy ANGEL: https://www.angelthebook.com

Great recent interviews: Steve Huffman, Brian Chesky, Aaron Levie, Sophia Amoruso, Reid Hoffman, Frank Slootman, Billy McFarland, PrayingForExits, Jenny Lefcourt

Check out Jason’s suite of newsletters: https://substack.com/@calacanis

*

Follow Jason:

Twitter: https://twitter.com/jason

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jason

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jasoncalacanis

*

Follow TWiST:

Substack: https://twistartups.substack.com

Twitter: https://twitter.com/TWiStartups

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/thisweekin

*

Subscribe to the Founder University Podcast: https://www.founder.university/podcast

More from This Week in Startups

All 653 episodes
Bootstrapping to IPO, product-led growth, & scaling SaaS with Atlassian's Scott FarquharThis Week in Startups · 1 h 7 min
Listen in VO