Dry Powder in Venture Capital, VC Ratings, and more with Grady Buchanan and Victor Gutwein | E1895

9 Feb 2024 · 1 h 30 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: This Week in Startups - Episode 1895

Episode Description In this episode of *This Week in Startups*, Jason Calacanis hosts Grady Buchanan and Victor Gutwein. The discussion revolves around several key topics in venture capital, including dry powder in VC, the rating of VCs, and the persistence of returns in venture capital.

Key Guests

  • Grady Buchanan: Co-founder of NVNG, a fund-of-funds focused on investing in top VCs.
  • Victor Gutwein: Managing partner at M25, an active investor in the Midwest, backing startups at seed and pre-seed stages.
  • Jason Calacanis: Seasoned investor and moderator, known for early investments in companies like Uber and Robinhood.
  • David Weisburd: Host of the episode.

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Dry Powder in Venture Capital (1:38)
  2. Definition: Dry powder refers to the capital that venture capital firms have raised but have yet to invest.
  3. In 2023, VC dry powder reached a record $300 billion.
  4. Discussion on how general partners (GPs) manage cash and investment pace.
  5. Grady raises concerns about GPs sitting on reserves and the implications for future investments and returns.
  1. VC Ratings (14:22)
  2. Discussion on the importance of general partner selection for limited partners (LPs).
  3. The need for VCs to have a clear narrative and strategy.
  4. Mention of a recent ranking of VCs, with firms like Sequoia and Founders Fund ranking highly.
  1. Persistence of Returns in Venture Capital (29:33)
  2. A study revealed that 69% of funds that once achieved top quartile returns continue to perform above the median in future funds.
  3. 45% of funds that achieved top quartile returns are predicted to continue in that performance.
  4. The importance of access to top-performing funds versus the skill of picking stocks.
  1. Recent Investment Trends
  2. The final segment features a rapid-fire discussion on the last three investments by each guest.
  3. Victor's investments focus on practical applications, such as Corral (a smart solution for ranchers) and a healthcare tech startup.
  4. Grady discusses investments in emerging managers and specialized funds that show promise in the Midwest.
  5. Jason highlights investments in early-stage AI solutions and discusses the importance of founders who have a proven track record.

Key Takeaways

  • Market Dynamics: The venture capital landscape is evolving with a significant amount of dry powder, leading to strategic pauses by some GPs.
  • Risk Management: Emerging managers are seen as promising, especially those who have a defined strategy and successful past exits.
  • Investor Relationships: The quality of relationships within the VC ecosystem plays a critical role in investment decisions.
  • Future Outlook: The discussion foreshadows potential shifts in the venture capital landscape as firms seek to adapt to changing market conditions and founder needs.

Conclusion This episode provides valuable insights into the current state of venture capital, emphasizing the importance of strategic investment, understanding market dynamics, and building strong relationships within the investment community. The discussions around ratings, performance persistence, and recent investments highlight the multifaceted nature of venture capital today.

---

Sponsors

  • OpenPhone: Business phone numbers that work through an app, offering a 20% discount for TWiST listeners.
  • Lemon.io: A platform for hiring pre-vetted remote developers with a 15% discount on the first four weeks.
  • Northwest Registered Agent: Provides business formation services with significant discounts.

Follow the Guests

  • Grady Buchanan: [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/in/gradyb/)
  • Victor Gutwein: [X](https://twitter.com/lalayak), [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/in/victor-gutwein)
  • David Weisburd: [X](https://twitter.com/DWeisburd), [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/in/dweisburd)
  • Jason Calacanis: [X](https://twitter.com/jason), [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/jason), [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/in/jasoncalacanis)

Additional Resources

  • [TWiST YouTube Channel](https://www.youtube.com/thisweekin)
  • [Founder University](https://www.founder.university)
  • [Launch Accelerator](https://launchaccelerator.co)

---

This summary encapsulates the main ideas and discussions from Episode 1895 of *This Week in Startups*, offering insights into current trends and conversations in the venture capital space.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00today. Everyone's a GP. Everyone raised a fund in the past, or they're still trying to raise a fund. And they all, a lot of them seem somewhat similar and it's hard for us to separate signal from the noise, right? As LPs, especially when you're a smaller fund of funds and every, everyone's coming at you to try to raise capital, much less the bigger guys that we kind of know that we don't have access to today. But it's trying to find the ones that speak like you guys do like, Oh, here's what I'm trying to grow. Here's where I came from. Here's where the industry is today. Like you don't have to have been in it the last 20 years to understand what has happened or where you kind of want to position yourself for the future.

0:32But if you can't go through that story and you can't talk about it as a general partner, then those are really tough ones to get behind. And I do think we'll see this weeding out of probably most of them in the near future. But these 45 % we'd expect to continue to, they need to continue to do well, right, for this industry. This Week in Startups is brought to you by OpenPhone brings your team's business calls, texts, and contacts into one delightful app that works anywhere. Get 20 % off your first six months at openphone.com slash twist. Lemon.io. Need to speed up your product development without draining your budget?

1:12Hire vetted engineers from Europe at lemon.io. Go to lemon.io slash twist to get 15 % off the first four weeks. And Northwest Registered Agent will form your company fast, give you the documents you'd need to open a business bank account, and more. Visit northwestregisteredagent.com slash twist to get a 60 % discount on your next LLC. Welcome back to this week's liquidity podcast. This week, we are bringing you the Midwest edition of the podcast. With me today, I have Grady Buchanan, formerly of the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, WARF, where he managed the venture book for the$3 billion institution.

1:53Today, he is the co-founder of NVNG, a fund-to-fund focused on investing in the very top VCs. Next, we have Victor Gutwein, managing partner of M25 in Chicago, one of the most active investors in the Midwest, backing 140 startups at the seed and prestige stage, including companies such as Kin Insurance, Astronomer, and Loop Returns. And of course, with us, we have Jason Calacanis, JCal, world's greatest moderator and seed investor into some of the top companies in the world, including Uber, Com, Robinhood, Thumbtack, and many others. And I'm your host, David Weisberg, co-founder of 10x Capital.

2:28Today, we have four topics on the docket, dry powder and VC, VCs rating other VCs, a study on whether returns persist in venture capital, and the rise of the mass affluent in VC. We'll finish off with examining the last three investments made by Jason and Victor and the last three fund investments made by Grady. Let's jump right in. The FT reported that VCs are sitting on a record cash pile in startup funding. In 2023, VC dry powder reached a record$300 billion. Grady, how do you look at GPs that are conserving cash in this market, given that most are still getting management fees off these funds?

3:08Well, first off, thanks guys for having me on. And it's a good question. It's one we think about very often, as you guys can probably imagine managing a fund of funds. Our focus, I mean, NV &G started investing a couple years ago. So this isn't really come to a head for us. Most of our managers and the way that we pick managers, we like managers that can fully raise their capital and we do not pay them to sit on the sidelines, right? Right. If they are, and we do have a couple and we had a couple back in the day. Right. Just learning the whys and why nots, establishing the regular cadence with our managers.

3:38We'll speak with them at least quarterly, as Victor could probably tell you. Understanding why they sit on the sidelines and the why is not. And then importantly, so where are you spending that time and that effort? This is a management fee that is a loan to the venture firm from the LPs. Right. It's a zero interest loan. How how is that going to come back to us? And that might not mean in returns today. It might not mean in deal flow today. But if you are a fund manager and you're sitting on 50 % reserves right now and your investment term is kind of ending, what are your options? I mean, are your goals to hit reserve marks very quickly?

4:13Are your goals to push those to later stage managers? Or what are you going to do with this management fee that we continue to pay you? And there are ways to generate value to LPs that are outside of just investing in the right companies on time. But it has become an interesting world where a lot of funds raised a lot of money and now they've made good investments or bad and they're still sitting on half. So, like I said, at the end of the day, that's not what we pay our managers to do, to sit and watch them. But maybe these fundraising cycles start to elongate. Maybe they go back to what we've seen 10 plus years ago.

4:47And you start to see maybe some of that capital come back to LPs. Do you expect, Grady, at some point, GPs to return that capital? I mean, we've seen this happen at some of the big ones already, right? And some of the endowments we speak to, I mean, we're a$50 million fund. So speaking specifically to NVNG, no, I would not expect that. It's not what we're hoping for. But in terms of some of these larger, more established managers and the market in general, yes, I hope that they make the prudent decisions to return capital, open up some allocations for some of these bigger ones so they can start hunting again and making investments.

5:23But should they be at or near the end of their investment term? These are conversations that we at NB &G would start to have. Again, we're only a couple of years into this, but going back to our old portfolio, absolutely. It'd be conversations that we're having with them right now. What are the deals they can get for possibly that capital, right? What are we going to do with our allocation when they're not delivering it back? So fortunately for us, not today. Yes. Victor, when you look at your opportunity set of the startups that you can invest in, are you always determining that this year versus next year?

5:56Are you just looking at the current market condition? I think that the actual dry powder stats are kind of padded a little bit. It looks like there's more than there actually are. Because I think, first of all, we have firms that were going back to the well every two years of the new fund. And now they've elongated that every five years. So they're going from as fast as they could raise money to now they're going to as slow as they can raise money because they get the quitter and they need to show results. And so that, you know, if you take that number, you divide it by five and divide it by two, that's a lot less money to put per year.

6:30You also have in those stats, I think you have things included like Tiger, like OpenView, like firms that there may not be even yet publicly announced that they're not really active. And then there's also first and second time funds that were raised entirely off high net worth individuals that don't have any semblance of the DPI, that they don't have any money coming back to their LPs. So they're looking to stretch that capital as long as possible because they need to be active. They need to show up, they need to finally have some M &A or some IPOs in their portfolio before they can go back at this time to raise another fund.

7:05So that dry powder is a very, it's kind of a false sense of assurance of what's actually happening in the market. And so I look at that. I'm the first investor in a company almost always. So we need our companies almost always to raise future rounds of capital. Most companies won't be profitable after we invest. And I need to then understand like, hey, what does that mean for the types of deals I can do for how they need to spend their money, for how much capital they need to raise, and also for their valuations that I'm going to require to get in at because there's more risk now. there's less likely that we can raise it as a premium competitive markup.

7:44And so even if you have an active fund, so we have like three more years of capital with our fund that we recently raised. We are still steady. We're steady deployers. And so if you have recently raised money in the past year or two, I think you're deploying, but it's steady. Our 2023 was the slowest pace we've ever had as far as deploying capital. And that matches with what I hear from like years. I think probably Grady and Jason probably can kind of assess that from their networks too. But it feels like, you know, there's not a ton of pressure to figure the piece, but that people are more comfortable employing.

8:21But it's, you know, it's not that for everybody. For a lot of these funds, they only have a few bullets left before they have to go back to the market. They don't want it. So that's kind of how I see. And that's why we have adapted our investments because of that. And Jason, how do you look at your capital deployment schedule? Yeah, I've always been slow and steady. And you have to play the game on the field. During peak ZERP, we didn't see a lot of deals we liked. We thought they were overpriced. And so I'll just give an example there to your question. You know, if we have a company come to us and they say, well, we want a$20 million valuation.

8:54And I say, okay, what's the revenue? And they say, oh, we're pre-launch. And I say, okay, pre-launch, no revenue. So, you know, infinity times revenue is your valuation. I tell you what, why don't we talk in a year, or we'll talk six months after you launch the product, and we'll have some data there to talk about. So if the valuation sky high, it's not a former founder I've worked with, we're probably not going to make that jump. And we were a little bit quiet during those two years, I'd say 2020 2021. We did do some secondary sales during that time, we were able to clear some positions, and we were able to help companies raise money.

9:31So the managers and LPs understand this have many different job functions. One of them is meeting with companies and then placing bets. Another one is helping existing portfolio companies raise more money for a rainy day, which is exactly what happened. And we feel pretty savvy right now that we sold some shares during that period, got some DPI to our LPs, and we were able to help companies raise, you know, what were to me, mind blowing amounts of money, you know, compared to the valuations compared to the actual traction of the companies. Today, and we'll just look at a non ZERP environment when the market slow down, we're seeing a lot of companies that are three developers, two developers, a designer, working on a product, and they're raising a 5 million, and they only want to raise 250.

10:22And we say, Oh, how about 500k? We'll buy 10%. And they say, No, we just want 250. We don't want to dilute. We don't need it. And so the whole mind shift has changed. So what got us to this massive amount of dry powder is like a really interesting question. Well, people wanted to put money to work and there was plenty of money around. So founders and GPs raised a ton of money. Now the market slowed down. Actually, the wise thing to do is to slowly deploy capital in great companies and be patient. And so we wish a couple of our companies that were burning capital too fast, had done what VCs are doing here, which is going slower.

10:58And you're seeing like the laggards, even in the public markets, at the time we're taping this like snap, and DocuSign are cutting like nine and 10 % little tiny cuts, you know, in terms of how bloated those companies probably are. And so put it all together. I think net net net, you have to play the game on the field. And really LPs to your original question, to Grady, and I'm an LP and 24 funds. We're looking at, for myself, two numbers, cash in cash out. That's all I care about. You can charge me whatever fees you want. You can charge me whatever carry you want. I'm going to judge you. I put in a dollar, you gave me, did you give me back two, three, four, five, 10 or 20.

11:39And I've had funds, what I just described is a bunch of different funds I've been in. And when you give a dollar and get back 20, 10 years later, you feel pretty good about it. When you give back one and you get back three, you feel good about it. And you give one and you get back to you're like, and when you give one and you don't get back one, you're like, maybe yeah, we got we got to take a deeper dive here and click on it. So yeah, I wouldn't sweat the management fees. Because as I think Grady was saying, it's a loan. It is a no interest. I could see it becoming annoying if somebody had a lot of funds, and they stacked them and you're like, wow, you guys are taking down, you know, let's just take the case of injuries and Horowitz or something, you know, whatever 10 billion under management, they have 20 billion under management, or whatever it is now two and a half percent or three percent of that is a lot of money to be paying 300 million dollars a year or 600 million dollars a year who knows where those waterfalls are at with those man that that could be infuriating to some folks if they weren't seeing performance but if there's performance nobody cares that's what i've learned if you win who cares oh you you were skiing for 12 weeks in aspen uh yeah there was this negative story about you in the press.

12:45Oh, you're spicy on Twitter. And you're talking about wars and, you know, politics and alienating people who cares. Money in money out. Let's get back to it. Are you still using your personal phone number for business? Oh, my Lord, please stop. Please stop. It's such a common mistake that founders make, but you never have to make that mistake again. Thanks to open phone. Open phone has rethought every detail of what a modern business phone should look like. They make it super easy to get your business phone number for you and your team. And the magic is it works through a beautiful app on your phone and or your desktop, depending on where you need to use it.

13:21I can tell you open phone is amazing because our sales and our operations teams use it all day long. Open phone is the number one rated business phone on G2 for customer satisfaction for a reason. It's brilliant, it works, and it's affordable. And here's the feature that I love. You can create a shared phone number with multiple employees fielding calls and texts. And you know, at my firm, we try to have this like a mon level six star customer support. So we want to pick up the phone and respond to emails quickly. And open phone allows us to do that. And we want to be like first ring pickup. You ever get that you call down to the front desk, they pick up on the first ring.

13:52That's what I want to do at my company. And that's what open phone allows us to do. Open phone is already affordable, starting at just 13 bucks a user per month. Oh my god, what a deal. But twist listeners can get another 20 % off any plan for the first six months at open phone.com slash twist. And if you got existing numbers with another service, no problem. Easy peasy, lemon squeezy. Open phone will port them over at no extra cost. Head to openphone.com slash twist to start your free trial and get 20 % off. Thanks, open phone for making an awesome product. I'd love it. Grady, how do you look at that?

14:24Do you want your managers to be deploying systematically? Do you want them to be playing macro investor? I think Jason said it very well. And if you boil it all down, it's like the Charlie Munger thing, right? Like, tell me the incentives, I'll tell you the outcome, right? It's like, as long as they are performing and they've done really well, he's right. It's hard to argue with management fees. But that's why when we look at GPs and some of them are new, some of them don't necessarily have the DPI or that track record to come behind, or they have it at a previous firm, that can be challenging.

14:53And as long as they're thinking through this and it's like, oh, this is what it could look like. Here's our scenario planning, because we are launching in a COVID world and it is different um but to jason's point it's like some of these funds charge ridiculously high fees some are not justified in any way right like some of these newer funds um but they're playing the game that's on the field it is what it is and then some of these larger managers can charge because again i don't know what they're doing they could be like jason said it could be doing whatever they're doing if they're delivering cash on cash great and that's that's the moic that people that you keep coming back for so for us it's a little different with nvng because we are probably hunting in the more defined emerging manager space if we're looking at roman numerals threes or earlier but i i it's it's hard to disagree with what jason said i'm curious how do you pick when somebody's on fund one two or three what do you look for there are like two or three things that when you're making your decision around a table you really double click on yeah i could go through kind of putting the nvng hat on um and what makes sense for our strategy and our lps right like we are a fund to funds backed by corporates and some larger uh institutions But me personally, and the way we look at funds, I don't, and we said this earlier, the way my partner and I look at this, what emerging managers, what boxes aren't they checking, Jason, that we're okay with them not checking, right?

16:10We fully understand that they're not going to be exactly where they need to be. We fully understand they're not going to look like Sequoia. They do not have this machine made of people yet, right? But are they building a firm, not one fund? Do they have aspirations, right? Do they have a differentiator that's better than outline what's in their pitch deck? Do they think differently? And have we seen that in action either in their past careers or through the partnerships that they've started to form. Me personally, though, and I think Victor will tell you this, and you look at our portfolio, it's I liked really well networked funds, especially at the earliest stages.

16:41I like funds that have put in the work and have put in their time. I started an endowment fund and I didn't know anything about, I knew how to pronounce limited partner, right? But I didn't really know anything other than that. Called every endowment fund, called every venture fund. Victor, I've known for 10 years now. It's like, all right, How do you guys do this? What is so attractive about this industry? Put all that together. And now we have a decent network at NB &G and we're sitting in Milwaukee and Madison, right? And so for us, it's who are those funds that are like-minded in their thinking?

17:07Who are building, like I said, firms, not just one fund. We're not looking to just invest and then get out, right? We want to build this up with you. But those people are often real outliers. They come out of other funds, like we categorize them as operators, investors are kind of outliers, but it's hard. It's a lot of qualitative assessment and specific to our portfolio. We can get into the industry conversations and kind of how we align certain funds with corporations. But yeah, overall, it's who can we talk to that knows who you are? Network is important because network equals deal flow. Yeah.

17:40Yeah. Moving on. Speaking of network, VCs are now rating VCs. According to a newcomer newsletter, in a recent survey, four firms beat out other GPs when it came to being the most desirable venture capital firm. The four VCs with the highest ratings were Sequoia, Founders Fund, Union Square, and Elad Gill, who is a solo GP. Jason, you've worked with all these top investors. Why are these investors so highly regarded? Well, I mean, if you look at them, Sequoia is the goat. So of course, they're going to be in benchmark are kind of like goat status. So you would think they would be up there. Founders Funds had a heck of a run and is incredibly high profile because of the spacex um and the airbnb and the palantir investments also it's by an iconoclastic founder in peter teal and sean parker uh fred wilson the goat from you know when you see his returns they are pretty great and his dpi is pretty amazing so he probably gets up there because of the dpi stats so we're looking at this like basketball players you know you got michael jordan and kobe you know in the comparisons or lebron and kobe and michael jordan the comparisons for sequoia um and founders fund and benchmark those are just legendary companies but fred you know he's got that dpi where he just sells everything with the day it goes public is my understanding he just distributes and he always sells some early and so he's been like the king of dpi which makes him like you know like a clay thompson in his prime or a steph curry in their prime like where you just didn't expect the new york fund to just change the game and you know something i knew fred and um have a close relationship with him and his wife um for 30 years fred got burned really hard in flat iron partners which is the precursor union square ventures he was partners with jerry colonna there and they were in you know like 10 of the dot com top top gone companies and they didn't sell in a number of them and they got their asses handed to them and then they sold in a couple of them like a geo cities etc and then they just hit massive home runs.

19:39And, you know, at that time, you know, there were very few people who realized trees don't grow to the moon. But that was something Mark Cuban had said to me, and he collared his stock very famously, his Yahoo stock, and he and he got out on top. So I think he's the king of that. Eli is very popular amongst founders. And I think this came from Eric Newcomers newsletter. And so I could see Elad Gil going up very high there because there's a lot of founders. So this looks like founder perception. But did he say that was only to VCs he let vote in it? VCs, right. VCs. Okay. So I mean, also VCs understand DPI.

20:13And some of those folks have had just really great outcomes. So I would say that's an outcome based chart and not a popularity based chart. And I feel good that I'm in two of those as LPs. That's excellent. Victor, you get to hand off your investments as a pre-CNC investor into top GPs. What are you looking for? What is the number one or two value adds that you look for and a GP as a follow-on investor. Yeah. Well, I think it's interesting because it's almost every year there's some sort of rating that comes out on BC site. I wish it was a consistent one. Every year it's a different survey, a different metric.

20:44I wish it was consistent so we could see actually the movement and actually compare and know the actual kind of methodology. But we actually do this internally as well as our firm. We kind of say, hey, who are the top firms we want to work with our companies? we like rate the we have a top 100 hype firms that we you know do internally and we all score them and then compare results so it is important as a pre-seed investor we're going to be marked up the c the a the b like it's going to go all the way down the line and the first thing is probably like reputation is the most important and discover that that can come into play i think we asked the question like, are you the best investor for this company?

21:32So I remember when we had our company Loop Returns, they're a returns e-commerce infrastructure platform for Shopify. They're entirely on Shopify. They have huge platform risks because they're just on Shopify. But for the Series A, we were really excited that Amish Jani from FirstMark led that round because he also had led around Series A and Shopify five back in the day and he was close with them. And so for us, you know, he's the first mark isn't on the top four. I do think it's a quality, a really strong quality firm, but it's, you know, it might not be a top four or the top partner for every deal, but for that specific deal, it probably was unrivaled to have them lead the series A given that type of access.

22:16So we do try to think about that and try to really have that reputation and experience that meets that reputation with the every deal. The other thing for us, we're a small pre-seed fund. So having deep pockets and ability to follow on and to treat those follow-ons well, they're thick and thin, is important to us. So for example, we're investing and we get a great Series A, but then the company doesn't do amazing right at the gate. and so they're going to need a bridge. And so I would love to see my Series A investor or my Series B investor not punish that company too much because that's going to hurt me in the comment a lot.

23:05And so I do monitor that. What is their reputation for how they treat the syndicate when the company needs an inside lead round or needs deep pockets systemic through it? And of course, will probably not participate as well, in as much as we can, but we're not going to be able to do they crush the early investors or not try to take away their rights, take away their pro rata. And you know, this is something I fought very hard for over the years and wrote about in my book, but we really fight hard. And we just tell folks, listen, we're the point guards going into second decade of a little bit more influence, perhaps in dealing with these situations, but I'll just tell them straight up.

23:43I'm not happy about how you're treating us here in terms of rounds with that. I'm sorry, me ask a question about, hey, has anybody worked with this firm, I would say the name here, on Twitter, I'd love some feedback. And just the nature of me putting that tweet up, you know, put that firm, you know, and they were like, where because this is the same firm had misbehaved with me twice, and two different partners. And I said, Listen, I've now asked my portfolio. And I've asked publicly, I have all the receipts of your behavior like this, let's not have this happen again and so that's not you know like if you're the small guy and you got this giant firm with billions of dollars in assets under management and they're trying to screw our lps and us and our partnership we're going to stand up for ourselves and you know we may have non-traditional ways of doing that which is i'll just tell somebody i don't recommend that firm and they'll say why when i say i have a bad i've had a bad experience and other founders have had a bad experience and what influence do you think that has on a young founder well i just want to ask jason so you know how there's this top list that you know and you may recommend to you know your companies you also have a blacklist and we have a list now you know with our we only have nine years of experience but you know you've got 20 very similar to ours yeah we're just a couple years ahead of you yeah so i did you like uh like there's firms that don't actively say don't work with these firms um the founders who are in our portfolio do talk to each other on a slack channel.

25:13Just like the Y Combinator folks have bookface where they'll, you know, review VCs or whatever. So there's a back channel. And you know, there are some firms, I'll say probably here, like Koretsu, which is a forum for like angel investors, supposedly, but they charge to pitch. So like the word is out like, yeah, you probably don't want to go to a Koretsu forum, they're going to try to charge you 10 grand to pitch investors. But it's important that relationship from the handle from seed to series A is critically important, because I know I just had an LP meeting, and they were like, Hey, we benchmarked you versus your contemporaries based on this database and based on this series of investments.

25:47And, you know, you're they have more follow ons, these people have more follow ons from firms. And I said, Huh, can I see that data? And they're like, sure. And they gave me the data. And then I went to the database, and there were 30 names where they didn't have the follow on investments for our investments. And I was like, holy cow, I really have to then pay somebody on my team to make sure that all these different disparate databases are correct. And so it is very important to not only as you scale here, and you I'm on our fourth fund now, and you have more sophisticated LPs. And you know, I don't know, Brady, if you do this, but for early signal, you can be just like, hey, what did Jason invested in fund one, that Sequoia, that benchmark that whoever invested in, okay, fun to, you know, who invested in it, and you know, we had to go clean up some data and people were making decisions based on that data.

26:32And luckily, it was a friend of mine who was like hey your data is not great here and i said how that's weird because our returns are great um well we think our returns are great and we fix it but uh yeah great do you look at that uh for early fund managers we definitely do and i mean i just like everything you guys are talking about and and you sit back as an lp and kind of talk to all of these funds everything you guys are saying it's like information is very readily available it's very available like you pulled up a financial times article how many articles in the financial times are about venture capital if you go back how many years, right?

27:04So, you have this industry that's very transparent. You have very influential figures, this podcast, having a couple of them, right? And it's very transparent. And this is specific to founders. We go hard on the founders less than, and as Victor could probably tell you, I haven't done diligence on his fund. I go much harder with the founders and the references than I do with Victor and his team. That story needs to hang together. They're on their fourth fund, how that strategy hangs together. great um and that's easy to see right uh but and and they've been at it for a while but if founders are oh they pulled a term sheet on me i don't like um or if they're if they're talking to other founders and we have a fund of funds right so we have some that overlap and we could talk to certain funds that how are you dealing with this portfolio company what do they say candidly about this fund i will send fund managers to people like victor in our portfolio other venture funds and say would you work with these guys what have you seen about that have you heard anything from your founders and that becomes very important because again we're not investing our only our own money we have lps of our own we're trying to protect them do what's right for them and founders at the end of the day are the reason why we're all here right and so if they're not speaking very nicely about certain firms and we do have firms with very sharp elbows right and they're very honest about that but if there are founders out there that don't like this firm where's that reputation going to go right so transparency is huge now and it's actually made it helpful right right now startups have to do more with less we all know that it's rough out there folks so if you need great tech talent but you don't have the time to interview dozens and dozens of candidates you need to check out lemon dot io lemon dot io has thousands of on-demand developers to choose from and these devs are vetted experience result oriented and they charge competitive rates great developers can be incredibly hard to find.

Read the full transcript

28:50And when you do find them, it can be hard to integrate them into your team. Lemon.io handles all of that for you. Startups choose Lemon.io because they only offer handpicked developers with three or more years of experience and strong portfolios. In fact, only 1 % of candidates who apply get in. And if something ever goes wrong, Lemon.io will get you a replacement ASAP. You know what? A bunch of our launch founders have worked with Lemon.io and they've had great experiences, which is always good to hear. Go to Lemon.io slash twist and find your perfect developer or tech team in 48 hours or less.

29:20Go to lemon.io slash twist and find your perfect developer or even a tech team in 48 hours or less. And twist listeners get 15 % off their first four weeks. What a deal. Stop burning money, hire developers smarter, visit lemon.io slash twist. This is why I tell everybody on our team, we're going to be judged by the companies and the deals that we don't do in the companies we invest in that fail because in all that failures, a lot a bad feeling sometimes uh regrets etc and then people will talk hey how was jake how how was you know this person when your company came apart and i always do a call hey it's got to be a really tough weekend for you you want to get sushi or if you need to talk here's my mobile number uh and let me know when your next company is happening you know it's been interesting too jason when you do the diligence on the phones it's like all right tell me the founders that said no or the founders you couldn't couldn't win the deals um and if they're not transparent about that we'll get they're on our own, right?

30:11And we'll make sure that we go find them through their later stage funds. It's like, oh, you missed this one. But why did they miss them? It's like, oh, that wasn't the right fit for us. I wanted a brand name firm. I wanted to be in the Tech Crunch article in Series A. And it made a lot more sense than going with my local group. But if it's anything else and it becomes very negative and they have this kind of connotation about them, then we dive in a little bit deeper. But it is, talk to the losers. Talk to the ones that didn't let them in. Because oftentimes, if you find these good fund managers, It's like, I should have went with them.

30:39I didn't. Here's why. And they get very open and very candid as to the mistakes that they've made. Because we as LPs do the same thing. It's like, oh, I shouldn't have done that fund. But yeah, I think the transparency and speaking with everybody that everybody knows, it's easy to find who you guys are connected to now. LinkedIn, Twitter. It's pretty prolific, right? It's all out there. It's very interesting you say that because it is surprising to me how transparent the industry is. We're sitting here at the first segment. I don't know if I trust that data. It's like, there's data. at least there's data i mean and you you know some of what's going on here you can in fact make informed decisions now based on the information that's available like it is it is tough and not to get like all the information that's out there you still have to be intelligent make the right decision but talk to enough people listen to the listen to your podcast jason and you david it's like all right i'm you might not agree with everything that they say but at least they're telling you what they see at much higher levels they talk to a lot of people now i can make an informed decision sitting in milwaukee and working with victor in chicago right so i i think the way i've grown in this industry is like i just listen to everyone i try to talk to everyone it just seems to be the prerequisite for venture is to have that network and to learn from it right but yeah absolutely i had one firm due diligence on us recently while we're raising this fourth fund and um we had a bunch of people from founding university which is like a little pre accelerator um that's doing phenomenally well and um some people had put founder university on their linkedin and this third party started calling anybody with founder university and we just you know all of a sudden ding ding ding ding ding you know our slacks light up hey is it okay if i talk to this person and it was like i don't remember the name of the firm but it was like acme diligence services you know i'm just making up a name and somebody hired acme diligence services to go find 30 companies to just email every company that had a founder university on it and just ask them hey can i talk to you on the phone for 10 minutes um and i think we know who it is um and it's going well with them so awesome but yeah there are these third parties who do it too so you don't even have to you can abstract yourself and i remember somebody and this is a crazy story and this is over 10 years ago somebody wanted intelligence on a competitor they popped up a recruiting service something to the recruiting you know let's say it was a fintech company it wasn't but you know fintech you know elite recruiting they put up a fake website put up a couple job postings at incredible salaries and then started pinging the employees of their competitor and interviewing them and then asking them questions and say well i can't say who we're hiring for but you know it's a pretty amazing thing and you can work from home and it's a quarter million dollars and yeah so what did you work on there and employees are not trained to not spill the beans and they would just sit there and you know oh so oh okay and what servers do you use oh great what's your stack yeah okay yeah and how yeah oh you worked on growth what what were the growth projects you worked on and all of a sudden somebody who worked on growth i'm just making this up this is not the company but imagine you were you did this to like and it was you know robin hood and like their competitor or something and uh you know somebody did this for robin employees all of a sudden you get the roadmap you get the playbook i mean there's some sinister business intelligence going on is that illegal or is that just highly unethical it's unethical it's certainly unethical uh i would say that yeah it's i tell you it's probably it's definitely illegal for the employee who's probably breaking their agreement so there's some there's an employee training tip for you david crazy story i guess i i'm waiting for the company to set up their own counterintelligence figure out which which employees are leaking uh actually wow yeah you could do that yeah i think that actually exists idea for you guys there's a startup idea yeah no that exists as a i think that exists like in the three-letter agencies fbi cia they try to do honey pots etc to try to catch people in their organizations before the russians catch them or the Chinese catch them.

34:43Good, good, Paul. Great. Well, moving on, Stepstone, a top fund of fund, just released their report on the venture industry. In their report, Stepstone highlighted the University of Chicago study on the persistence of venture capital funds, which empirically shows why LPs are so focused on getting into the very top venture capital funds. According to the findings, 69 % of funds that previously achieved top quartile continue to perform over the median and future funds with a stunning 45 % of funds that achieved top quartile returns continuing to return in top quartile. Grady, given that 45 % of funds that previously achieved top quartile returned to top quartile, how much of being an LP is an access game versus a stock picking game?

35:27I think the data would show it's an access class still is kind of what we've always called it. And while we were at the endowment, we could throw some weight around. The book was over 300 million, right? We could write the checks we wanted to, and we could sell Wisconsin, right? And what's on campus, and we could kind of wiggle our way into some of these, what I would call heavier hitter firms that are in that 45 % that you mentioned, right? But at the end, NB &G, we're looking a little bit differently. It doesn't mean we'll ever forego returns. We just have to look elsewhere for them. But at the end of the day, I think we're in the pattern recognition business.

36:00A lot of these great firms that live out on the West Coast or on the East Coast, they've turned themselves into these kind of brand engines, right? Where founders are coming to them. Founders are speaking highly of them on everything we just talked about. And it's very transparent and you see these returns. And as more and more people start to see that, and I say people, and I'm sure we'll get to the retail side of things. It's people invest with what they see and what they know. And founders are the same way. And we've seen a lot of founders grow up over the last 20 years. I mean, 50 % of managers in 2001 were emerging that are still around today, right?

36:34And so if we look at that, it's like, okay, a lot of them have grown up. A lot of them have scaled. The founders know that. And the founders might be on their second or third company, right? Like how many have you guys done, right? Where it's like, oh, which firms do we want to work with? Which investors are great at this? And now I think you're seeing that come back where founders are like, oh, let's go right back to what we know, who we know. This worked for us. Maybe the early days, early cap tables look a

37:02it's it's it seems obvious to me um and to answer your question specifically david access is very important it always was when we were at the endowment um hit the spend your requirements and everything else that we need to do but nvng it's a little bit different i'd argue that picking is much more important for us these days um and could be for smaller lps that look like us that are just entering the market that don't have it i mean we're 50 million dollar fund what are we your coastal minimums 20, right? So it's not, this isn't the pool that we're hunting in, right? So for us, it does look different.

37:37Kicking would be what I would say. And, uh, or if you were managing$3 billion, you were obviously managing the private equity pocket. What did you see? What was your intuition around why there's such high persistence of returns in the venture capital asset class? To me, my partner, Kerry, will say it all the time. If the story hangs together, um, and that's very qualitative and quantitative, the quantitative stuff is relatively to assess, right? The DPI, the money, everything we've talked about, right? Can they do that time and time again? Can we speak with the founders as to why it happened? Can we speak to the downstream partners as, well, are you going to continue to invest with this fund?

38:11And when they say yes, you can kind of see that quantitatively. Qualitatively, it's, and I think you're seeing this come to a head today. It's how are you building your team? How are you working on your internal operations to make sure that this, and I say it a lot, that you're building this firm, not just one fund at a time, because that's how we're trying to do things. But yeah, at the end of the day, emerging managers should be following the same patterns that some of these bigger ones are following in terms of how they're setting things up behind the scenes and how they're constructing teams, making sure that they're not all top heavy, more of a egalitarian approach.

38:48We've seen some of the top performers focus on that with their internal teams and they've just kind of grown really great practices and what i love about these charts is that you know that when they say previous performance is not indicative of future performance this is the opposite previous performance is indicative of future performance in our business so you have to just ask yourself why that is and i think it's the network and the brand and it becomes a flywheel and so if you were the investor in google and youtube like sequoia was, well, the next Google, and the next YouTube, which might be Instagram, you know, or it might be Airbnb, they're gonna say, Oh, well, I, you know, I'm the founders of Airbnb, who did Google, who did YouTube, I want to work with them.

39:32And so you do get that flywheel going, and success breeds success, and then it builds a brand. And then that's part of the fun part of being an emerging fund manager, I still consider us on our fourth fund. Now, an emerging fund, because the first couple of funds was just me, you know, as a gunslinger doing instinctual network based investments. I've got 21 people, I got a database, I got a process, I got systems in place, I have methodologies, we've got like a really deep process. And I think that's where, you know, if you learn how to play poker, you might go play poker, have some early success, you win a tournament, you make some money, you make a terrible bet, but it pays off, right?

40:15You have like two cards that could win you the hand. And you know, you're on the river and you hit it. And now you think you're a genius park player. Everybody at the table screams and yells, Oh, my God, you made the wrong play, but you got rewarded. And then what happens is you become bolder and you get more interested in poker, just like they found with kids, you know, some kid hits a random three point shot to win a game, everybody goes crazy. The kids in the gym the next day doing three point shots saying how can I do them better? And they look up online and watch some YouTube videos. So sometimes like just random success can then manifest itself in the individuals wanting to be more successful.

40:46And I know that happened with me. I hit three unicorns in the first seven or eight investments when I was a Sequoia scout. And I was and they were like, wow, you're great at this. And I was like, Okay, I'm great at this. Thanks. I'll do it some more, I guess. And you know, but then that can carry you so far. And then at some point, you have to stop and go, how did I get that success? And then I looked at and I was like, ah, that was like, the beginning of the super cycle. And there weren't any angel investors at that time. And, you know, I was networked, like a lunatic. So, okay, so then what carries into the second decade, and what carries us into the second day is having programs that really deliver value to founders that make them tell their friends about it that make them put it on their LinkedIn page, and they're proud to be a founder university graduate, and they're proud to have gone to YC and then the self perpetuating thing happens and then having a decision making process and all that.

41:39so yeah what got you i always tell founders what got you here won't get you there so what got you to product market fit is not necessarily what's going to get you to from a million to a hundred million in revenue you may need a different group of people you you may need to evolve and learn some new skills and i think it's the same for fund managers what got you here it may not get you there starting a business used to be a pain you needed a lawyer there were hidden fees it was a mess. Now with Northwest Registered Agent, it only takes 10 clicks and 10 minutes. Northwest provides everything you need to start and maintain your business.

42:16Every LLC, corporation, or nonprofit at Northwest Forms comes equipped with registered agent service, a business address, a website, and hosting email, a phone number, and this is all covered by Northwest's privacy by default. Again, your full business identity will be live in 10 minutes and in 10 clicks. So here's your call to action. For$39 plus state fees, they'll form your LLC, corporation, or nonprofit, and launch your business in just minutes. Visit NorthwestRegisteredAgent.com slash twist today. That's NorthwestRegisteredAgent.com slash twist today. Well, Jason, I was just going to say that what got a lot of those top funds that were formed in 2010, 2012, 2014, what got then great returns was investing at$5 million and exiting a billion.

43:06And then when they quadruple or 10 times their AUN, now they can't have a billion dollar exit, which are much more common. They have to have a$10 billion exit in order to get the same results. So I also think like, there's probably going to be some issues with persistence with the strategy shift and the AUN growth with some of those top firms, because there's just no way to continue to hit up, you know, 10X spas when it's$3 billion. You know? Which is why Fred Wilson said, we're going to keep the funds, I don't know if he said$300 million or$400 million. And Benchmark had that same discipline.

43:39I think Sequoia had that same discipline with their Series A fund. So, yeah. So, those are the ones that have the most persistence. And those are the ones that are incredibly access constrained. And they're the ones that haven't bloated their fund sizes. Yeah. Are the ones that have the most access constrained. And if I was going to bet on what's going to be the one that's in that 45 % of the state's top profile, it's going to be the one that is doing the same strategy and hasn't had to completely shift their strategy. Yeah. Good point. You were going to say something, Grady? Yeah, I was just going to say, you guys are obviously right.

44:14And I agree with you. It's the intellectual honesty that you just provided, Jason. I mean, you're on fund four. I wouldn't call it an emerging manager. but it's, it's, we also have one manager that's like, there are no good VCs because every five years the world changes and you have to become a new VC. And so, and she might be right too. But it is finding those, those GPs, because especially in today, everyone's a GP, everyone raised a fund in the past, or they're still trying to raise a fund. And they all, a lot of them seem somewhat similar. And it's hard for us to separate signal from the noise, right?

44:43As LPs, especially when you're a smaller fund of funds and every, everyone's coming at you to try to raise capital, much less the bigger guys that we kind of know that we don't have access to today but it's trying to find the ones that speak like you guys do like oh here's what i'm trying to grow here's where i came from here's where the industry is today like you don't have to have been in it the last 20 years to understand what has happened or where you kind of want to position yourself for the future but if you can't go through that story and you can't talk about it as a general partner then those are really tough ones to get behind and i do think we'll see this weeding out of probably most of them um in the near future but these 45 we'd expect to continue to they need to continue to do well right for this industry um there's something about being able to really um about this industry when you get to your 10 year mark and you're working with lps and you're investing other people's money all of a sudden you know you have this data set to look at what you did.

45:41And then you have your emails and your slack. And you have like your your deal memos and your decision makings. And so the thing I've tried to do with our firm is we have ones to watch list in our database. So when we pass on a company, but we have that feeling, we just say once the watch list, and we just look at that one still watch list every three month, every six months, we check in with those companies. And then we ask them to send us our updates. It's like one of our secret weapons updates at launch.co. We just say, Hey, can you just send us your updates, to send to investors if you don't mind and we just we just hang out on that thread and try to find the companies we missed because you know the founders figure it out and that's the that when you see a founder figure it out and then you re-engage them they love it they love it and we you know as a writer i come up with the language for our firm so i tell my team you know hey we couldn't get there as a team you know in terms of the you know decision for this round but we'd like to stay in touch, you know, would you keep us on your updates?

46:39And then when they send the updates, I've trained my team to respond to them, even make sure and brief, congratulations. I noticed this point in this point, if you ever want to get back on the phone, we'd love to, you know, talk again. Or I'll just tell them, just ask them, hey, can we meet and catch up? We think we were really impressed with the progress you made. Sounds like we made a mistake. Or maybe we made a mistake and a smiley face and then a link to a Calendly. If you diffuse it like that, and you come up with that language, you know, you might be able to get yourself back in a deal and this industry is uh not a not a it's not about sins of uh commission it's about sins of omission it's what you missed not what you hit that is exactly true right and so to the gps that would be listening here it's like we just heard like a very and i keep it in the back of my head when i talk to gps it's a process around those intangibles they may be very real things right and lp should be asking about them but everything you do with the firm behind the scenes jason growing the team so they can be jasons of the future right and just kind of building into that strategy uh we don't see those in day-to-day numbers right like but that brand starts to proliferate itself out everything victor does with midwest summits bringing in firms to chicago like people on the coast know who m25 is and that's very helpful for people like me that have them in the portfolio that need to grow our own network um or we can bring them into chicago to meet with victor uh but it's that process around the intangibles a lot of that goes into david to your original question what makes a gp a gp that i would look at is are they what are they doing behind the scenes like how are they spending their time and energy because this world is very transparent now everybody wants to be in it right um too many people want to be in it i mean that's got to be the hardest part of your job i mean i don't envy your job as a fund of funds because it's self-selecting for people who are incredibly successful charismatic powerful you know who are starting these funds and then to determine are you going to be a good you know gambler are you going to be good at placing bets and working with people man it's a hard job you have and then you don't know if you made the right bet for and what's the soonest you would know three four five years into a fund yeah yeah we've been fortunately maybe maybe less fortunately some of these funds we've been last every party and so some of these portfolios were pretty well baked so we've seen some of their successes but you're right it's tough and i and i favor the funds that are 80 million or smaller kind of thing, the ones that we can kind of weasel our way into.

48:55And given relationships we built steadily at Wharf, we could get in some of these bigger funds and help balance out the back half of the portfolio for timing. But yeah, you're right. Everyone's a new manager. Everyone's early stage. Everyone has a little niche and they all sound impressive, right? I don't want to knock any of them, but we're not investing in 800 funds. We are investing in 20, maybe 25, right? And so to pick those specific ones, it's like, and you're right, I look at it as like a 10-year relationship, us two, same as them, building the firm, not just this one fund. Who are we going to be comfortable with for a very long time, right?

49:30And I don't expect to churn these managers very often, right? So, it is tough to get the conviction. Certainty will kill you, right? Conviction's critical. We kind of get as far as we can on that conviction side, which is why we feel comfortable with people like Victor, people that we've known for how many years have seen grow into their fourth fund. fund now right and it's been doing it well it's there's a lot of comfort there right yeah and great yeah i was because what's going to put you on the spot why did you invest in victor um well he's got something against me but no uh the i've i've known victor i actually like when i first joined wharf um our portfolio was very well built venture book was very well built into the flagships the verse and some of those big biotech ones that you guys would know right And we had some coastal firms, but we didn't really have ties to the Midwest.

50:23It wasn't something we were using our portfolio very strategically for. That was what was attractive to me. It's like, okay, we have all these managers. I'm not firing them. We're not going to get back into the flagships of the world, right? And they're doing great things on campus and we like their firm. What about some of these smaller ones? 10 years ago, Victor was kind of launching. I think they were through fund one, maybe onto fund two, almost kind of when I was watching them. It's like, all right, true emerging. but this guy spends his management fee on his team like all these conferences that he does like i don't know how he's doing all of this and these managers are very high capacity people but he's investing only in the midwest he's one of the few that that can you know pronounce milwaukee right and understand that there's something going on in madison wisconsin right so how do we get him here um and he has all of this data and facts about the midwest this one was a no-brainer for us in terms of our portfolio like how do we cover the midwest early stage generalist kind of market victor's an easy one we have one up in minnesota that does something similar we have another one in chicago that i'll talk about later that does similar things but uh for us specifically it was watching him over how many years seeing how the funds have performed and then just really understanding that all right he's got 130 portfolio companies across funds they're all midwest based that's aligned with our strategy.

51:40Yeah. Awesome. You know, we should do our top threes. We should do our top threes. Everybody loves this part of the show. Excellent. Well, let's get into the last segment, last three investments. We have, this week, we have two GPs and one LP. So we'll start with one last investment from each. Let's start with Victor. What was your last investment? My last investment is actually, it's a pretty neat one. It's a classic Midwest deal. This is a company called Corral. It sells to ranchers that have cow-calf pair operations out in ranges. And so this is something that goes, it's a hardware with a current software element.

52:19It goes on their necks of the cows and it stimulates them to move in certain directions when it's attached via solar power, it's cell or satellite connected. so you can be a cowboy in your house or across the world you can say i want these cows to move over here and now start to raise this pasture you could start to do cross fencing virtually and subdivide your pasture which allows you sick this is insane this is insane and it's a round open like it i mean i just slide a quick hundy into this you gave that was only one we told them about victor in the midwest yeah we can hook them like let's i like it jason i've got i think i've got your number you know what i like about this i call this category has not hot s like you know when you get into the car and you turn on the seat heaters we call that has in our family you put on the house but in business we call it hardware as a service i have a great company called density.io and they do little things you put on the roof like devices and then they count people in a space it was originally going to count the people like in phil's like coffee shop but instead, they were like, hey, well, this could do this campus where there's, you know, corporate campus where there's 5 million square feet around the world.

53:33And then we could tell them, you know, what's the utilization of each floor, each conference room, etc. So they can do space planning and, you know, get rid of leases. It's the same thing with us because they they don't charge for the hardware, I bet they charge a subscription fee, right? And they do they put the hardware into the subscription fee or they charge per hardware? They charge per device, they may margin on that, but there's a recurring yearly SaaS that they also have, you know, modules you can add on. So if you want to for people with one cow or thousands of cows or it's yeah it's gonna be herds so like yeah so it's kind of a b2b sale but these ranchers they're very slow to adopt tech and that's what kind of got me is i've never done an ag tech deal ironically being in the midwest but they were flying off the shelf i mean like the back orders the pre-orders this is incredible so it's this is really for corporate corral is for corporate well yeah i mean it could be anywhere from like i mean maybe 50 head at the minimum and then but like thousands are you know they're talking about groups of thousands and um you know like this is like so it's much more um carbon efficient for the for the land to do rotational grazing and you can increase your earth size with the same amount of land you can increase your size 20 to 100 percent so i bet you it's hard to get getting ranch hands is hard ranch hands are impossible everybody's you know old retired you know there's and then there's also capital cost of putting up fences if you want to cross fence so there's this guy jack he's a generational rancher out in atkinson nebraska is where he grew up which is between nowhere you know it's just it's it's uh and then he went to school at the university nebraska and uh you know uh the mechanical engineering started playing with dog collars on his family's ranch to do this and steer i love it it's genius jay cal you're you're up so So this one is called Howie.ai, H-O-W-I-E.ai.

55:21And it's an AI-powered scheduling tool. It's pre-launch, but it's coming shortly. And what it does is it lets you through a conversational interface. If, like, the three of us wanted to go do something, the four of us decided we're going to have a follow-up or plan a trip, it would handle our schedules. It's auto-magical. You know, Calendly became, like, a really interesting thing. So you can think, like, maybe what comes after that, but with AI. I'll tell you just a little bit about this company that I liked. This is a previous launch founder. So this person had done capiche, another company for ours, and it was a great performer.

55:53And he said, I got a new idea. He said, I had two new ideas, which would you do? And so I'm in this discussion with him. And we have a rule. If somebody has like, builder founders product velocity, and they did a great job on their company doesn't care if it worked or not. where that person goes right to the front of the list in terms of our consideration and we really really love to make the first bet on a second time launch founder the name of our firm is launch so when we looked at this one it was pre-product and pre-revenue but it was a sas company it was ai it had builder founders this founder had previously raised venture capital previously had an exit and so those are all part of our 13 tiles we call them of things we look for in companies.

56:36And so this had like five or six of them just out of the gate, including the most important one, which is a previous launch founder, because we had this previous launch founder, Raul, who had done reportive. And then he came to me with this new idea, which was superhuman, we gave him 500k, we were the first check in along with Dormesh from HubSpot. And so in this case, we just gave the founder 500k. It's a big conviction bet for us. And, you know, we're really excited about making those kind of bets. And we think these small companies providing really affordable AI tools to just solve problems quicker, better, faster, and delighting customers.

57:11It's just like the same way SaaS or cloud, and apps. And before that internet companies all had a chance to disintermediate the people before them. AI, if you just start from a blank sheet of paper and say, how would I build this company with AI? How would I build Google Calendar, Calendly, Gmail, but just using AI? That gives you like a really great starting point in my mind, because you don't have the baggage of the legacy business. You don't have to maintain the existing base of customers and please them. You can just start with a whole new concept, a whole new mindset, right? Which is what Hotel Tonight did or Uber did.

57:46Jason, how often are you doing pre-product, let alone pre-revenue type investments? Are we doing some, but not balancing it, I think? Yeah, great question. So we get 20 ,000 applications for funding a year. this is largely because it used to be four or five thousand then all in got very popular and then it quadrupled so i've been the beneficiary of being i think second only to y combinator and the number of people who ask us for funding at launch.co slash apply so we just have a url fill that out and you'll get a meeting with us if it's a reasonable idea and about half of those companies about half of them were pre-product they weren't incorporated yet and so we realized like ah they're too early to come to our accelerator where we like the product and maybe one to$10 ,000 in revenue.

58:33So we started founding university made a 12 week course, we said, go here, it's 500 bucks, if you come for the 12 weeks, we'll give you the 500 bucks back at the end. And we started getting all these companies to join that, or just finishing their product, and they needed somebody to like help them believe in them. And we just said, Hey, what if we give you a 25k check for 2.5 % of the company a$1 million valuation to incorporate. And every week, when they come to the program, 70 % of people ask for the 25k check. My internal team thought it was the stupidest, insane idea wasn't worth the paperwork.

59:05Why are we doing this? We did 80 of them last year. 80 25k pre launch bets. Jason, if I can ask how and you've seen the data because you just you just went through it. How do you wait? And I know the answer is that it probably depends. But how do you wait against this serial entrepreneur the ones that are coming back to you or the ones that are coming back into this application they obviously maybe move them to the front but i'm curious just on the data set alone like are you seeing a lot more serial entrepreneurs come back successful exits come back trying to get back to where you are it kind of goes to victor's question how early are they going to be uh yeah we one of the great things is um a lot of the people who i've forged friendships with who've had incredible success i had one founder it's not announced it so i won't saying i was the first investor when i was a sequoia scout in their company not the third or fourth and uh they came to me and said um hey we're launching a new company we want you to be the first investor i said oh tell me about the companies oh we're doing eight million dollars in revenue we funded it ourselves but i'm like oh right you guys built a billion dollar company um and i said can i ask you like you have your choice of companies you fund it yourself why do you need me and i said you're all good luck sean you were the first person to believe in us for last company and we want to be able to tell everybody that you invested in us again the second time and i said okay deal but you have to announce it on my podcast and they're like yes that's what we're going to ask you can we come on the pod and announce it on the pod so you know you want to talk about intangibles right like that's just like warm your heart make you want to come to work everyday moment uh that you're in it for when you're when you're a gp and you just love doing this but yeah we we really like anybody who's a launch co-founder a co-founder or even on a launch team so you were the you know you were hired gun you were employee number 10 at uber you know i'll get people who worked at uber thumbtack robin hood they're like hey i worked at robin hood we never met and i'm like here's my phone number here's a i have a cali link called 15 minutes with jacal and i'll just boom i just i don't even write the text if that's somebody i literally will be in line at starbucks or like with my kids in the park and i just boom quick key paste in the link and the person's like uh i put myself on your calendar is that okay is that what you wanted me to do and i'm like yes that's what i wanted you to do i wanted to spend 15 minutes so right to the front of the list is the answer to your question for obvious reasons if you've raised capital if you've had an exit even if the exit was like for a dollar or just saved everybody's job or whatever uh or you shut down and you think about what you learned that's like oh did you make a have you ever made a movie it's like yeah i made a movie it was terrible it's like great so you know how to set up a set and you know how to find a cinematographer and you know how to make a movie poster it's like yeah i did all that it was terrible but i really like our movie poster here's what i would do different that's why like even a fund manager who screwed up their fund it's like ah what would you do different i was just on a call with somebody and they're like i noticed this in your fund like and i was like yeah that was a mistake that's not me they're like oh i was gonna ask you if that was a mistake i'm like dude getting into cpg was the biggest mistake of my career like we have like two hits and you know 18 things that just went sideways i'm not touching cpg again it's not doesn't have the margins it was like a phenomenon i don't think it's coming back there's private equity people who are better at it you know i'm just not doing cpg anymore they're like oh that's what we wanted to hear it's like playing you know 10 jack when you're under the gun in poker it's like why are you playing that you know like what if you get two people who raise or playing like ace five you're playing or a seven you're playing a seven and you get two people raise and you call and like you don't think anybody's got aces ace king ace jack is green like you're gonna if you do hit your ace what happens you lose your stack so you kind of learn these things over time you know these positions that you're in yeah that's a good question speaking about positions uh grady uh what what are some of the latest nice segue what are some of the latest gps that you've uh invested in yeah so publicly um that we're out there on our website we invested in i'll do i'll do hyde park venture capital or hyde park venture partners first um victor and i know know them well so nbng we're trying to look at across the the the stage um we're trying to grow across that spectrum when we grow fund one right we are a first time fund ourselves right so we're trying to bring these venture capital funds and their attentions to wisconsin it doesn't necessarily mean they're ever going to make a deal find a deal find a team in wisconsin but they should have portfolio companies that are either aligned with the midwest or can work with midwest corporations ideally wisconsin's and rlps um if you look at this firm they've been around for quite a while they kind of they started as a as an angel group and now they have a venture fund and they've grown through the chicago ecosystem and the broader midwest ecosystem very very well They sit almost exactly kind of in line with Victor and M25, but a little bit on top.

1:03:54They have a little bit larger of a fund and they kind of go late seed into the A rounds, but they are a little bit more focused on. It's funny, Jason, when you talk about fund four being emerging, they're on their fourth fund and they've grown into their own themes. They've grown into their own strategies. And now they're really playing hard into what the Midwest is kind of known for. They like the, I don't want to call it, we do like kind of like you guys said, I like the software wrapped in hardware. You see a lot of that in the Midwest. These guys are not that. These are more software-based companies, but big winners that they've had, ShipBob, Four Kites.

1:04:27Like these are large companies with big enterprise contracts that are scattered throughout the Midwest. Like big, big entity, legacy corporations. Those are the types of funds that we're looking at, Hyde Park being one of them. to move to the next one. We did Decian's Venture Capital. They are a very, so I'm kind of going from the kind of more broad, almost generalist fund that has some insights in a bigger team. Decian's knows one language and it's FinTech. Dan, their founding partner, he, he standard treasury sold to Silicon Valley bank, his first company. And then he worked at like tech crunch on the event side of things, which was interesting.

1:05:06That wasn't really for him and now he's focused on growing his own firm but this guy is he's great doing he's been doing this for about 12 years just by himself and he's trying to institutionalize and we found this team we had an event this october and they came to milwaukee they they took the time and the effort and i might not know what dan's talking about more than half the time um when it comes to like when he starts to nerd out about this stuff that that i have to listen to podcasts for frankly to just understand but dan vishal ishan these guys are scattered throughout the time zones across the the us which i do like dan's kind of home base is chicago and albuquerque but chicago and so he likes the midwest but this this is a heavily concentrated portfolio won't do that many companies um and a fund of funds like ours we we like a few of those funds so we'll either go heavy industry speak one language kind of things think the 5 ams are in our portfolio right um or we like the more generalist ones that know the midwest like the victors the m25s and the hyde parks but decions is one that we look at and filling a gap within our portfolio that can speak the corporate language and they know fintech and they know that industry and what's happening around it i remember dan from the early tech crunch 50 days uh tech crunch and i partnered on a conference series which i named and i ran and dan was working at tech crunch and we the original idea was 20 companies and then there wasn't enough so then we went to tech crunch 40 and then the next year we made it 50 uh and we had 50 companies launch on stage but this almost was 18 years ago i think he's taken all those learnings he's digested them really well and now hopefully he's built this is a fun three right but i would consider this one emerging the first real institutional he's tried to build out the track records make sure his themes are appropriate and just like we look at every gp does he have a right to win in this space right does and and i and we believe he does um And so, yeah, that's that's the answer.

1:06:57Love it. J. Cal, number two. Oh, I got to give a number two. OK, here we go. Yes. I'll talk to you about per bar P.E.R. M.A.R. dot X.Y.Z. You know, tools that startups use. We look at what tools startups get a lot of value from. And we saw, you know, these folks wanting to create better landing pages using AI. and i thought hmm once again taking ai and putting it against the landing page business makes a lot of sense to me and if you're building that from the ground up yeah there could be something there they again went to our founder university program um and it's a sass business um but we look for those builder follow we look for builder founders who have product velocity so a builder founder to us is one of three types a growth hacker not like a marketing pr person no offense to them that's fine like a growth hacker a designer ux person and a developer who actively writes code that's somebody who was a developer in the 90s or 2000s but hasn't written code so somebody's actively writing code for this startup and when we see those as founders we kind of like it and uh they have this right and so and they had a lot of interest from other accelerators and so we you know we just made a small bet and we love the company and you know when we look at these even if it just has a little bit of MRR, a couple of customers, that's another one of those signals for us in that pre-seed stage, builder founders, product velocity, and then a couple of customers.

1:08:29As David Sachs said, at one point on All In, going from zero to one customer is the zero to one that he looks at, not zero to one product market fit, but zero to one, like one customer. It's much different when a customer touches a product. Also, like on diligence, you know, people don't talk to customers and we do and that's been a big part of our success i think in avoiding talkers and that's the thing i learned in my first decade you can get snowed and it really was different 12 years ago i can tell you like people didn't hadn't unpacked how to get venture money they didn't have like a playbook for that but after blogs and podcasts and medium posts and sub stacks and tiktoks like everybody knows how to pitch and be convincing and can you know it's been a good story right is that is that your new book jason how to get venture money it would be a good one to write yeah um no the problem is like people have unpacked the secret to it so what i realized over time was like i was getting snowed by people and i was teaching our team at the accelerator how to snow people i was teaching them like this is how you present your company this is how you present your tam and i was like wait a second people are getting more performance that you know they're doing more performance art than they are doing product building and touching customers and we had to like internally have a discussion like how do we spot when we're getting snowed and it was like we really refine our questions uh just this past month we had this thing where i was like okay so they had builder founders you checked off the button builder founders no i guess builder founders how do you know that um they told me that they're builders i said that's not the question you have to go look at their linkedin and you have to ask them very specific questions.

1:10:08Okay, you're a UX designer. Who's doing the UX for this product? Did you hire somebody or you're doing? Oh, no, we outsourced it to a firm in Manila. Oh, okay. And you're a developer. Yeah, I'm a developer. You know, it's at Google. Okay, who's writing the code for this? Oh, I got a I got a team in Paraguay, Uruguay. And like, you know, okay, they don't, they shouldn't get that checkbox, right? We gotta take that checkbox away. Doesn't mean we're not going to invest. But, you know, we see the companies where the founders are actually building the product and talking to the customers are much different than all the other customers the person with that with that uh you know the steers you know like i don't think that person has not it's the first time they've ever met a steer i think they've been in cow country before well that's the thing jason is like we work with a lot of these like diamond of the rough founders that already have the product market fit but they don't know how to pitch like they they don't know even so what a startup should look like or how a venture capital like we're kind of which is it makes it easy for us to be the experts and kind of bring them like hey like here's let's let's set this up let's do this type of structure this type of structure um here's what to expect for future raises maybe do a few practice board media like we can get them ready we can help them hire their first like like have you heard of customer success before i mean like here's retention stats that you need to care about you know like these types of basics um it's a lot like so it's kind of funny because we do have the founders that are coming out of the uniform and have a track record, know how to pitch, but then are trying to find product where you're going to fit.

1:11:36But we also have a lot of people that it's almost sometimes more refreshing to work with the ones that have already found product where you're going to fit, but then have a horrible pitch where you're like, well, hey, I can work with this. You've got a company. If you had to pick, they know how to build a kick-ass product and talk to customers, but they don't know how to talk to VCs or they're really good at talking to VCs, but they don't build product or talk to customers. I mean, it's a pretty easy decision. You can teach one in a short period of time. The other one takes a lifetime. So I think you're making the exact right decision.

1:12:07Here's my last one. Very curious, Jason, on this one, sorry. How do you assess competition at these early levels with these new kind of AI built tools? And it is exactly what you said. How do you separate what's theatrical from what is real? And do you do the competitive analysis with your team? Because there's going to be some winners in this space like there are, but it feels like everyone could be doing what some of these companies are doing, right? yeah we we will tag this is a crowded space um so you know when you're the first and when you're the third or fourth investor in uber everybody comes to you with the uber killer and like the uber killer is like we use evs uh or people would come to me and be like um yeah but but we take dogs like literally there's a great pitch i love dogs i have dogs they're like we're uber for you know people with pets and i'm like yeah okay good luck with it you know um and that i know travis has that on the roadmap like that's not enough of a differentiator so you want to really understand if they're a copycat product, or if they have a unique spin on it, right?

1:13:03And how are they coming to the problem? So that's how you figure it out. If you at the early stage, pull out any competitive landscape, you will never invest in a company again, almost like 99 companies out of 100, the competitive landscape is going to be really scary. I don't mind when people make a competitive matrix, you know, but they always make the matrix like, here's an obscure feature we have. and then here's another obscure feature we have see us on the top right the two obscure features we're the only one doing obscure on the top right everybody else all these boxes yeah right yeah everybody else here is doing the normal mundane that people love we're doing these things that nobody needs that's super esoteric and i'm like huh is that a good thing or a bad thing shouldn't you be where everybody's going that's like being like i don't surf at that beach because everybody goes there because there's great waves and you're like but you want to surf great way you know Anyway, competition in the seed stage is almost not the thing you're optimizing for.

1:13:59When you get to Series A and stuff like that, it can become really acute because you can use capital as a weapon, right, as we've seen. And when you have capital as a weapon come into play, man, that could be really problematic. But like, if somebody wants to do something that displaces Gmail, that pitch was absurd. It was ludicrous, Rahul's pitch on face value. I'm going to take on Gmail with a billion users and I'm going to beat Google by being faster. And I'm going to charge a dollar a day. I was like, Raul, let me repeat the pitch back to you. You're going to with your 10 person team be faster than Google with the largest global data centers in the world.

1:14:43You're going to get people to pay a dollar for something that's free. He's like, yep, there's a group of people who want luxury software who if I can save them an hour a day, a week or a month, they'll pay it. And I was like, great, I'm in. So you got to be careful with the great question. Competitive analysis. I don't know. What do you think? Victor, I see you're. Well, I just have like this opinion that, you know, that any unsophisticated angel investors always like, well, couldn't Google do this or couldn't XYZ do this? is always that like, and I think those are like some of the least intelligent questions you can ask as assessing a startup.

1:15:25I think it's more like, well, you know, there's a million ways to kill a deal. How is this going to be winning or not? You know, and then is their competitive advantage insignificant and irrelevant, like you said, or is it actually something that's like, you know, like we're all just said, like, you know, there's a luxury element and you're actually paying 30 bucks a month for this software. You know, like that's, that's what you have to assess. and it's, I think it's a very easy out for like putting XYZ to do this and somebody else are already doing this. So we try to be able to think. That being said, we do care about competition.

1:15:56Like, so I can go under one of our investments here. So there's a company that we invested in Madison, Wisconsin. It's a serial founder. He was a successful founder of a company called HealthFinch. And this is a company that's going into the very crowded healthcare insurance space, trying to get into self-funded healthcare plans. It's actually called self-funded health. It's basically saying, hey, self-funded healthcare plans are the future. Lots of companies trying to get in and do stuff, even maybe with ICROS or with other types of opportunities. So there's been a lot of funding. There's been a lot of activity here.

1:16:30They're saying, hey, there's a niche audience that's actually really big. And it's anywhere from 50 to maybe a couple thousand employees. They're starting just in Wisconsin. Even that, Sam alone is up for a billion dollars, just throughout one state for their one offering. And they can prove it out there in the lab, Minnesota, or out of Illinois next. And we'll grow from this kind of like legacy health insurance companies too. It's a very experienced team. We already had a handful of customers at the time we invested. And it was something that for us, his experience combined with the customers, combined with, yeah, we know it's better because everybody's heading in this direction.

1:17:05So we kind of thought it was more of like, it's a market wave that we want to ride to shift away from these group plans that are more expensive every year. So that was one. And I will give a gradient and an NG team a shout out for helping us get around this deal and do some references and diligence and share another co-investor on that one too. And the third company I'll call out is another one of these founders that had product market fit. So this is a Fargo, North Dakota company called AWS. So there's a lot of software in vertical construction buildings and companies that are working with vertical, there's a lot of money there.

1:17:47There's a lot less when it comes to horizontal construction, roads, pipelines, infrastructure, etc. This is a guy, he was an asphalt scientist, which is something apparently you can be in North Dakota. he came out and he had this base of understanding for years and years in the industry to contract as construction companies and he had productized his offering for planning around the pavement the gaming process all the subs all of the weather conditions all the projects that are happening submitting invoices and all the different paperwork to get the payments from these like often slow pay, hint factorable opportunities within the governments that pay.

1:18:29And so he created this company, PayWise, that was a SaaS product. And we sourced it as saying, and he's actually, I'm not a relatively competitive, they're now three or four term sheets. And we were lucky to not pay the highest price to get the access to Alivia Steel, put together a national syndicate on it with a lot of strategic investors. And, you know, even though he's relatively green to running an adventure-backed startup, that's what we're bringing bear on this one. So, another, he had already a couple hundred K of ARR, I believe, when we invested. So, he was there. But, you know, how to set up and start hiring, you know, what an option pool was, maybe not, you know.

1:19:12So, that's where. This is extraordinarily boring and it's going to print money. Yeah, sorry to drag down the podcast. It's a whole category. it's huge no it's like i love these companies like sass companies that are absurdly boring that give massive leverage to the you know industry like just think about they just make paving roads 10 more efficient which seems well within their mandate to be able to do i mean how much money is spent paving roads how much time how much budget how much pain and suffering and then we're also having this shortage of people so you know what i love about both your both your startups there two of the startups that are industrial stuff they're just going to save headcount and it's not that you don't want to see people have jobs it's just that there's nobody to take the jobs people don't want to do them jason the interest me is we're taking a little bit of risk because all the customers we talked to in both of those examples they don't have any software that's specific to them they maybe use text gmail a g sheet you know something like that they're not so they're running their whole business if the contractors are running it sending invoices via fax machines you know i mean it's like trucking we have one we've had maybe two or three trucking dredge kind of people come through our accelerators incubators and when they show us what truckers do i'm like really and they're like yeah we made an app you take a picture of this form it digitizes it and sends it to the home office and they still fax it to the home office but at least we have it and we digitize it and then they print it out at the home office but we're now getting them to understand that this could exist digitally and they you know don't have to fill it out 27 times and go find a fax machine and wait in line for a fax machine like truckers are at truck stops waiting for fax machines really is that what's happening in 2024?

1:21:07They're like, yeah. Wow. Interesting. A lot of it. Victor, some of your startups seems like they've de-risked a lot more than pre-seed and seed on the coast on San Francisco and New York. Do you find that some of your startups are more de-risked? I think they're de-risked. We're coming in at lower valuation. We don't invest above a 10 million post money. Our average post money is 5 or 6 million. And they're coming in with customers and they're coming in with a lot of the industry experience. It's not as competitive. They're not as capitalized. So there's often less capital around the table, which can be an asset.

1:21:44I think sometimes it's also a risk. But I do think that they're running with lower bird rates. They're running with the same ability to go to market. They're close to their customers. They're close to their customers. and other customers, but it's, you know, like it's, it's definitely to me, to me, I feel like it's, it's, it's the risk, because we know that they have demand already there for the product, not all the time, but most of the time. J. Cal, close us out. Oh, right. I have one more to give a plug for. This one is called deep trust AI.com. And when we made a, you know, small bet here on this company that hasn't launched this product yet.

1:22:30You know, we knew that people would start doing bad things with other people's voices. And since we, you know, made this investment, we had that robocall of Biden calling people, and all kinds of other ones. And so we know that there needs to be an API out there that verifies, when you hear my voice calling you, it's actually me, or you hear, you know, on a social media site or a podcast, me saying something. And so this ability for whether it's a call center, or a consumer app or podcasting app or anything in between, to know that this is an audio deep fake has got a chance of being an important API to exist in the world.

1:23:13We'd love when people want to build an API. And they have developers who want the API. And these companies tend to, if they can catch developers, you know, they can grow very quickly. You'd think like a Twilio or something like that. So this is just Twilio and their first product is finding deep fakes, you know, for audio. And so - Jason, did you use this to confirm wire instructions verbally? That's the thing I'm thinking of. We literally had a situation here in Silicon Valley where somebody's voice, a very prominent person, this was backchannel to me, you know, two or three phone calls, two or three different people at an organization to have the the wire instructions changed or the instructions to ship LP money to a bank account kind of situation and it happened in the venture industry and they caught it.

1:24:05But yeah, there's going to need to be all kinds of new tools and protocols to stop this stuff. And so you know, we like to make these smaller bets. So when you see us making these bets, and it seems very frisky, we like to make this 25k bet 125k bet then we're in it with the founder for six months or a year we see if they get traction if they get the next round we just ask ourselves a very simple question is this a likely winner and this is the framework i've been working on the last six months likely winner definitive winners likely winner definitive winner what's a likely winner coming out of seed what's a definitive winner coming out of seed i'll save it for another show because i'm not finished with my my new methodology but i'm trying to train my 21 people or 20 people plus me likely winner uh definitive winner what happens first jason deep deep fakes on the all in podcast which i've just been waiting for to hear what those two hours will be like um or does deep trust sponsor all in today right like what's what's going on yes a lot of people on it on all in already think there's some AI guests going on.

1:25:09Yeah, when we had Tucker Carlson come on, that was actually AI Tucker. It was AI Tucker. Yeah, he's actually, he's in a jail cell. He's in a jail cell in Russia right now. So they just use Tucker AI to do the Tucker Carlson show. All right, take us out of here, David. This is a long show. Two great guests. Nice job, boys. I like these two guys. Thank you, Jake Allen. Well, it's been another great episode of Liquidity Podcast for Grady Buchanan, Victor Gutwein, Jason Calacanis. This is your host, David Weisberg. Thanks for listening. Hey, everybody, I talked to a lot of founders here on this week in startups and as an investor, and they tell me the same thing over and over again, they want two things from me more FaceTime and money.

1:25:49They want me to invest in their companies, and they want to spend time together. So we've been working here on a new meetup program, we call it founder Fridays and founder Fridays are an event by founders for founders. This is an event that is hosted in cities by people like you. If you're listening to This Week in Startups, you're a founder. So what are you going to do at Founder Fridays? You're going to get together with other founders in your community. It could be four or five of you. It could be maybe up to 30 of you in a location. Pick a cafe, pick a co-working space. I like to go to a great Mexican joint or maybe a dim sum restaurant, you know, where you can do shared food, have a couple of cocktails, maybe.

1:26:27You do it on a Friday, you get together and you host it. Now, why is it important for founders to get together? Shouldn't you be at home just focusing? Shouldn't you be in the office just focusing on your startup? Well, if you get together with other founders, true founders who are in the arena building like you are, you're going to get a lot of value from that because you can trade notes with that other founder about what's working at your startup and what's not working. The truth is, if you're facing a problem, there are hundreds of founders out there who have probably solved it already. And instead of you banging your head against the wall, when you sit there and you talk to three or four founders, you're having some dim sum, you're, you're splitting the quesadillas and fajitas.

1:27:04Somebody say, Oh, you know what, I had that same human resources problem. Oh, I had that same technical problem. Oh, I had that same marketing problem. And they might tell you about a tool or a service that'll solve that problem for you. This happens over and over and over again. When I do founder Fridays with our portfolio companies, now we're going to give you that same experience. But here's what I need you to do. I need you to host this in your city. So you're going to go to this week in startups.com slash meetups. That's it. And you'll see a landing page where you can sign up and you can say I want to host in my city.

1:27:33Now your city may already be hosting. So you can just join that person. And what if you go to this event, and you learn some go to market strategy, that 10 x is your growth that might unlock funding, or you might be talking to somebody and they say, Hey, I'm a marketplace to I'm not a competitive marketplace, your marketplace is for used cars, my marketplace is for hairstylists, whatever your jam is, whatever you're working on, but they give you some technique that you didn't know about to increase your supply side or get more demand in your marketplace. And you 10x your business. I see this happen all the time.

1:28:02And founders are like mutants, right? And I'm like Professor X here, I'm trying to put on Cerebro and find all the founder mutants in the world, and then have you get together and do your own little meetup. And here's what you're not going to have to deal with. You're not going to have to deal with a bunch of service providers trying to sell you software or services. And you're not going to have to sit through a bunch of passive speakers. You can listen to This Week in Startups and get the greatest speakers in the world on your own time. And you're not going to have to pay for a ticket to a conference or get on a plane or fly somewhere.

1:28:33No, this is about having an intimate experience with five, 10, maybe two dozen other founders in your city. Please go to thisweekinstartups.com slash meetups if you are a founder. This is for founders by founders only. If you are not a founder, this event is not for you. You can start your own meetup for lawyers, accountants, recruiters. This is for founders by founders. We vet everybody to make sure you're a founder. And if you host it, it's a non commercial event. Our first founder Friday will start on February 2. So please mark your calendars. And we're going to do these on a rolling basis.

1:29:08You can join an existing meetup if it's already occurring in your city or you and one or two other founders can start your own. We're using a wonderful piece of software that we've invested in called River. You can sign up for a River account just by going to this week in startups.com slash meetups. We've already got hosts and attendees lined up in San Francisco, New York City, Toronto, Los Angeles, Las Vegas, London, and even in India. So this is your chance to connect. And if you didn't hear your city name, you can start your city go to thisweekinstartups.com slash meetups.

From the publisher

This Week in Startups is brought to you by…

OpenPhone. Create business phone numbers for you and your team that work through an app on your smartphone or desktop. TWiST listeners can get an extra 20% off any plan for your first 6 months at http://www.openphone.com/twist

Lemon.io - Hire pre-vetted remote developers, get 15% off your first 4 weeks of developer time at https://Lemon.io/twist

Northwest Registered Agent. When starting your business, it's important to use a service that will actually help you. Northwest Registered Agent is that service. They'll form your company fast, give you the documents you need to open a business bank account, and even provide you with mail scanning and a business address to keep your personal privacy intact. Visit - https://www.northwestregisteredagent.com/twist to get a 60% discount on your next LLC.

*

Todays show:

David Weisburd hosts Grady Buchanan, Victor Gutwein, and Jason Calacanis to discuss dry powder in VC (1:38), VCs rating VCs (14:22), a study on whether returns persist in venture capital (29:33), and much more

*

Timestamps:

(0:00) David Weisburd hosts Grady Buchanan, Victor Gutwein, and Jason Calacanis

(1:38) VC dry powder levels, cash management by GPs, and investment pace adjustments.

(12:57) OpenPhone - Get 20% off your first six months at http://www.openphone.com/twist

(14:22) The importance of GP selection for LPs, VC firm ratings, and the impact of relationships in the VC ecosystem

(28:30) Lemon.io - Get 15% off your first 4 weeks of developer time at https://Lemon.io/twist

(29:33) Performing due diligence on funds and the persistence of VC Returns

(42:00) Northwest Registered Agent - Get a 60% discount on your next LLC at - https://www.northwestregisteredagent.com/twist

(51:41) Rapid-fire segment on top recent investments

*

Mentioned on the show:

⁠https://www.corraltech.com⁠

⁠https://www.hydeparkvp.com⁠

⁠https://deciens.com⁠

⁠https://www.rallyventures.com⁠

⁠https://pavewisepro.com⁠

⁠https://selffundhealth.com⁠

https://www.deeptrustai.com

*

Follow Grady:

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gradyb/

Check out: https://nvngia.com/

*

Follow Victor:

X: https://twitter.com/lalayak

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/victor-gutwein

Check out: https://m25vc.com

*

Follow David:

X: https://twitter.com/DWeisburd

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dweisburd

Check out: https://10xcapital.com

*

Follow Jason:

X: ⁠https://twitter.com/jason⁠

Instagram: ⁠https://www.instagram.com/jason⁠

LinkedIn: ⁠https://www.linkedin.com/in/jasoncalacanis

*

Thank you to our partners:

(12:57) OpenPhone - Get 20% off your first six months at http://www.openphone.com/twist

(28:30) Lemon.io - Get 15% off your first 4 weeks of developer time at https://Lemon.io/twist

(42:00) Northwest Registered Agent - Get a 60% discount on your next LLC at - https://www.northwestregisteredagent.com/twist

*

Check out the Launch Accelerator: https://launchaccelerator.co

*

Check out Founder University: https://www.founder.university

*

Subscribe to This Week in Startups on Apple: https://rb.gy/v19fcp

*

Great 2023 interviews: Steve Huffman, Brian Chesky, Aaron Levie, Sophia Amoruso, Reid Hoffman, Frank Slootman, Billy McFarland

*

Check out Jason’s suite of newsletters: https://substack.com/@calacanis

*

Follow TWiST:

Substack: https://twistartups.substack.com

Twitter: https://twitter.com/TWiStartups

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/thisweekin

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thisweekinstartups

TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thisweekinstartups

*

Subscribe to the Founder University Podcast: https://www.founder.university/podcast

More from This Week in Startups

All 653 episodes
Dry Powder in Venture Capital, VC Ratings, and more with Grady Buchanan and Victor GutweinThis Week in Startups · 1 h 30 min
Listen in VO