Navigating startup funding market trends with Becki DeGraw | Wilson Sonsini Startup Legal Basics

8 Aug 2024 · 26 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

This Week in Startups: Episode Summary

Episode Title

Navigating Startup Funding Market Trends with Becki DeGraw | Wilson Sonsini Startup Legal Basics

Episode Overview In this episode of "This Week in Startups," host Jason Calacanis welcomes Becki DeGraw, a partner at Wilson Sonsini, to discuss the current state of startup funding. They cover various topics including market trends, anti-dilution provisions, management team incentives, and more, offering insights into navigating the complexities of startup financing.

Key Discussions

  1. Current State of Startups and Funding (0:37)
  2. Market Status: The startup market is described as "choppy" after a volatile couple of years.
  3. Investment Trends:
  4. Strong activity levels in early stages (C to A).
  5. Growth equity is showing signs of recovery after a silent previous year.
  6. AI-driven investments are significantly influencing overall funding trends.
  1. Consolidated Investment Trends and the Venture Capital Slowdown (1:21)
  2. 2021 Peak: Significant funding peaks were reached in 2021, followed by a slowdown.
  3. Current Activity: While there's a slowdown, many investors continue to seek opportunities in AI and early-stage startups.
  1. Importance of Due Diligence, Runway, and Down Round Impacts (4:23)
  2. Due Diligence: Longer deal cycles are prevalent, shifting back to pre-2021 norms (4 to 6 weeks for financing).
  3. Advice for Entrepreneurs: Maintain sufficient runway to accommodate longer deal cycles.
  1. Anti-Dilution Provisions and Investor Communication (7:11)
  2. Definition of Down Round: Selling shares at a lower price than previous rounds, triggering anti-dilution adjustments.
  3. Misconception: Anti-dilution does not mean investors get more shares; it adjusts the conversion rate of preferred to common stock.
  1. Re-incentivizing Management Teams and Insider-Led Funding Scenarios (16:23)
  2. Management Incentives: Founders must ensure retention of key executives, often through creating new employee pools.
  3. Pay-to-Play Mechanism: Encourages existing investors to contribute to new funding rounds to maintain their ownership stakes.
  1. Importance of Investor Relations and Board Management (23:46)
  2. Communication Strategies: Transparency with investors and clear documentation of decision-making are vital.
  3. Documentation Importance: Keeping detailed records of funding discussions and decisions protects against potential legal issues.

Key Takeaways

  • Resilience in Startups: Despite the challenges, strong companies are still securing funding. The current landscape may yield a "great vintage" of resilient entrepreneurs.
  • Investment Behavior: Insider-led down rounds are common, and existing investors may need to adjust their expectations during tough financing situations.
  • Legal Considerations: Legal counsel plays a critical role in navigating complex financing scenarios, particularly with recapitalizations and anti-dilution provisions.

Additional Resources

  • Wilson Sonsini: [Visit Wilson Sonsini](https://www.wsgr.com/en/)
  • TWiST500 Newsletter: [Subscribe to TWiST500](https://ticker.thisweekinstartups.com/)
  • Jason Calacanis on Social Media: [Twitter](https://twitter.com/Jason) | [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/in/jasoncalacanis)

Conclusion This episode provides an in-depth look at the evolving landscape of startup funding, emphasizing the need for clear communication, thorough due diligence, and proactive management strategies in challenging market conditions. Becki DeGraw's insights equip founders and investors with essential knowledge to navigate these complexities successfully.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:03Hey, everybody. Welcome back to this week in startups. It's time for our startup basic series. Now, when we do this series, sometimes you're nervous to ask basic questions. So I bring in my friend, Becky DeGraw. She's at Wilson Sincini WSGR. You know that firm. They're famous. They do a really great job. They're hardworking. And Becky and I have been doing this for five or six years now. And we love doing it, right? Because this is, we have to repeat ourselves all the time with the basics. And so we'd like to get the basics out there for people to understand. Absolutely. Thanks for having me. Let's just start with our market update.

0:39We're sitting here at the halfway mark. It's half time in Silicon Valley, as it were, after two years of absolute chaos in the market. Silicon Valley Bank and First Republic and, you know, all this chaos, you know, down rounds after peak ZERP. what's the state of the market today in terms of startups and funding and all of this indigestion in the market we saw peak valuations and large amounts of money being invested now we see this down market lots of headwinds but signs of life obviously a lot of new investment occurring in ai so what are you seeing from behind the desk at the table with you know these at scale startups and even the swallows.

1:21Yeah, absolutely. That overview is perfect, right? I mean, we were on a heck of a tear there for a number of years, right? Of just up, up, up. 2021 was kind of the top of that, maybe first half of 2022. And then we started seeing things change. And, you know, last year was a really different story to tell from the 10 prior years. This year, the best word to describe it, I think is just choppy. We see a lot of things still happening, a lot of action still going on, particularly at the C to A stage. I would say that side of the market is still strong. We are starting to see in the last six months movement on the growth equity side, which is great.

2:03Like last year, growth equity, and when I talk about growth equity, I'm really talking about kind of very late stage financings, pre-IPO type financings. Last year, that was almost silent. There is so little activity. And we're seeing more things happen there. And that kind of makes sense because it corresponds to, I wouldn't say the IPO market is gangbusters or anything, but we are starting to see some green shoots there. And as we start to see that, it trickles down, the growth equity picks up, then other parts of the market do as well. The seed in the A stage, because they're so far from the IPO, that's why we continue to see those stay strong.

2:41And even in that regard, right, like the valuations are still quite high, and they are still trending up, ticking up from even 2021 levels. The amounts being raised are also ticking up. I'll put a little asterisk over that, though, and that a lot of that is being driven by these really huge AI deals, that the valuations are really out there and the amounts being raised, in which case, right, it's bringing the averages up. But we have looked at the data of pulling out those outliers, I'll call them and say, what does the rest of the data look like? And the CDA market still feels really strong. Yeah, it makes sense.

3:15Because entrepreneurs are always going to start great companies. Y Combinator, our accelerator, the launch accelerator, tech stars, they're going to still incubate companies. And so, you know, that part of the market doesn't require massive amounts of capital. And that money is kind of locked in to venture funds and ready to be spent. But the later stage stuff, that's a little more complex. Yeah. Absolutely. Yeah. And one thing that we're literally in the middle of right now is the summer slowdown. Traditionally, July, August, we start seeing things slow down. People are taking their vacations, whether that's the management teams, the VCs, right?

3:54And it just takes longer to get attention, longer to get traction, longer to get the deals done. But even outside of the summer period, we have seen just longer deal cycles. It's not the 2021 days where it's like you sign a term sheet and we're closing in two weeks. We're kind of back to the norm. I would say four to six weeks for your first preferred stock financing. Obviously, if we're talking about safes, that can be much faster or convertible notes. But if you're talking about your preferred stock round, four to six weeks is definitely what you should count on from the time that you sign the term sheet to closing to actually getting the money in which is healthy and good right people are taking the time to do diligence they're taking the time to pick a partner well so if you're an entrepreneur i guess the best advice is to make sure you have time um and runway to close these deals because the concept of the 48 hour you know a speed run where you do this blitzkrieg fundraising and nobody gets to do diligence and nobody gets information rights and there's no change in governments all of that kind of what i consider unhealthy um and just bad hygiene that's gone but it hasn't been replaced with never-ending fundraising it's you know people are still i wouldn't say a blitzkrieg but a brisk pace for good deals it's still a brisk pace correct yeah absolutely and i say this all the time that good companies are still getting financed at all stages right maybe the money is not being handed out like candy on halloween but there's the good companies are still getting plenty plenty of deals are happening and if you look at the amounts that funds raised i mean 2020 was record-breaking 2021 was record-breaking 2022 was record-breaking even though half the year you know was considered you know part of this kind of new down market So there's so much money in these funds that need to be deployed that need to get out there.

6:00You know, they're they're dedicated particularly like the early stage funds. They're dedicated to doing the early stage deals. They've got to do them. So they're looking for for good companies to invest in. and you know as far as his early stage investor is concerned i uh think that this is going to be one of the great vintages because anybody crazy enough to start a company in a slow market in a challenge market generally we see less tourism less tourists more serious people and maybe even a consolidation of talent in the management teams so i think it's going to be a wonderful vintage for venture because the seriousness the ruggedness the resiliency of this cohort of entrepreneurs feels distinctly different to me than the ones we saw funded in some cases, not all, in 19 and 20 and 21.

6:45So let's talk about down rounds. Let's define what a down round is. And then, you know, a lot of these terms people hear anti dilution, pay to play, and recaps. Let's let's define all of these. These are important terms for founders to know. Yeah, so let's start with down round. Really, all that is, is you're selling stock today at a price per share less than what you originally sold your outstanding preferred stock. Let's say you have Series A, you sold it at a dollar per share. Anything that you're selling your Series A-1 or B or whatever we're going to call it at less than a dollar per share, it's going to be considered a down round.

7:23So what does down rounds do? it triggers anti-dilution like when you signed up to those financing documents out of the couple hundred of pages of documents that got put in place at that time one of them relates to anti-dilution that says as an investor hey if you sell shares at less than what you paid or less than what i paid then i get an adjustment now one common misperception about anti-dilution adjustments is oh the investor gets more shares technically the investor does not get more shares of preferred stock, what happens is the conversion rate at which the preferred stock converts to common stock just gets adjusted.

8:00So every share of preferred stock is convertible into one share of common stock. That's the default when a preferred stock is issued. And let's just say there is an anti-dilution adjustment. There is a down round where we sell stock and we adjust that conversion ratio. That one share of preferred stock, you still only have one share of preferred stock, but it now may be convertible into 1.05 shares of common stock or whatever the number is. And there's a whole formula for determining what that adjustment is going to look like. And that conversion all happens on exit or IPO. On exit or IPO, technically preferred stock can convert to common stock at any time voluntarily, but there's no reason that you would unless there was an exit or IPO.

8:45The voting rights do change because almost all of your preferred stock votes are done on an as-converted basis. So even though I have one share of preferred stock, when I'm voting amongst all the other classes of preferred stock, I would get that in my example 1.05 votes for each share that I have. But otherwise, it doesn't really come into play unless the preferred stock converts. The other thing about anti-dilution is that it can be waived, right? So your existing preferred stockholders could waive having that anti-dilution adjustment even kick in. And sometimes we see that, sometimes we don't.

9:24It all depends on, you know, the circumstances as to what's going on and who's leading and all of that good stuff. And the founders have to then go ask the investors, hey, you backed us three, four, five years ago. Now we want you to waive this, even though you were the earliest investors who believed in us, and then these new people are getting a better deal than you, what is the best way to communicate that to get a chance of the investor to say yes? What is the best argument people make? And sometimes people ask you, hey, Becky, how do I tell Jake Al that I need him to take the haircut, not the new people?

10:02Yeah, a lot of times it's the new investor that's saying, you got to get this waived in order for this whole thing to work. Because oftentimes, well, vast majority of the time, like when we are doing these down rounds, it's insider led. So it may not be the earliest investor that came in, but it's likely an investor on the cap table is the one who's coming to the table. We don't often see a lot of new investors coming to the table to lead a downer. Not to say that it doesn't happen it does but the vast majority of the time it really is insider-led and a lot of times it's okay i'm not putting the money in unless we can set the company up in such a way that post-financing we're going to be able to go out and raise when we need to at the next financing round and so often it's really trying to look ahead to what is that next financing going to be and what do we need the company to look like?

11:01How do we right size the cap table? Do we need to incentivize people to participate? And that's when we get into all the other terms of do we use a pay to play? Do we do a recap? Do we not? Right. So there's multiple levers here. One of them is, hey, get everybody to waive their anti dilution so that the founders retain more ownership, the existing investors who aren't investing in the new round, take a little bit of a haircut, but they're still in the game, but they didn't want to pay extra money to keep the company going. So therefore, that's where pay to play comes in. You either put more money in, and it's typically at, you know, your existing ownership.

11:41So if you own 5 % as a seed fund, you know, and they're raising a million, okay, 5 % of a million is 50 ,000. So we need you to put in 50 ,000 to pay to play. If not, your original 5 % ownership is going to, you know, maybe take it on the chin. Yeah. Yeah. And the whole point of the pay to play, not every down round has to have one. Really, the reason that you would put it in place is you need other investors to come to the table. And you may have one or two insiders that say, okay, I'm putting money in and I'm going to put together, we're going to put 10 million in, but the company needs 15 million to get to the next milestone.

12:18And I'm not putting my 10 in unless I know the company is going to get to that minimum amount, because otherwise you're not going to do anything with my 10 million. So then they'll say, well, if other folks around the table aren't willingly to step up, we're going to put a mechanism in place to essentially you if you don't play something bad is going to happen. And there's all sorts of something bad. You know, most times the something bad is you get converted. We were just talking about preferred stock converting to common stock. Most of the time, the way that we do this is to say, if you don't participate to your full pro rata percentage, then all of your preferred stock is going to get converted to common stock and you lose all of your preferred rights.

12:58Now, you can do that on a one to one basis. You can do that on a something else like a 10 to one. So for every 10 shares of preferred stock you have, you're only going to get one share of common stock. right and if we have a really big decrease in valuation and we and this is oftentimes where a recapitalization is coming into play in connection with that pay-to-play is it may be well we've got enough insiders who are willing to participate and in fact we do this pay-to-play if you participate you get to keep your preferred stock which means the liquidation preference the liquidation stack that goes along with that preferred stock stays in existence if it turns out that your total liquidation stack is higher than your new valuation, that's not really setting the company up or a good spot come next financing.

13:49So in that case, that's where we will start trying to mess with those ratios to say, even if you do participate, you're only going to get a tenth of a pull-up or 25 % pull-up or whatever it might be. And this is why a lot of firms, if there's a recapitalization, a pay-to-play or a down round, they just don't participate because as venture capitalist as seed funds, you have your choice of investing in the next company that has all the promise of a clean cap table and a new idea. And then you have this other company, maybe they've hit five or 10 million in revenue. But you have this very hard discussion that has to occur.

14:25And a lot of VCs, you know, when I talk to them privately, I just don't want to be involved in the bad feelings. It's a lot of bad feelings, a lot of people get hurt. You know, as a seed fund, And Becky, we will be faced with situations where, hey, this is happening. We own 10 % of the company. We've made four investments in it over five years. And now we're getting wiped down from 10 % ownership to 10 basis points, one tenth of 1%. 99 % of our value is being wiped down. I have to say, hey, wait a second. This doesn't feel exactly fair. Can we get somewhere between 1 % and 100 % of what we did here to help the company?

15:00But, you know, it's a difficult conversation because the company is, in many of these cases, destined for either a zero or a very small outcome. And so this is where people, you know, might feel like they're putting good money after bad. They made a bad bet on the first, and now they feel like they have good money here. Or it could be bad money after good. You know, there's all kinds of scenarios. And it's just really difficult. So if you get yourself in this situation, yeah, the management team has to look at themselves and say, do we believe in this enough that we will go down to 0 % ownership and then revest our stock over the next five years?

15:38So talk a little bit about what is expected of founders in a recap. What's the worst case for a founding team? You know, you have three founders, let's say five executives who have, you know, over 1%. So you got these eight people, but only three of them are going to continue on. and those eight people let's say they owned an aggregate 50 of the business six let's say 60 of the business those eight people each owned eight percent ish maybe some own 20 maybe someone on two what should they expect if they're going to continue on with the business and then some of them are not or going to keep going for aren't what what do they what should they expect yeah i mean that's that you you hit it on the head of one of the most important parts of all of this right we can from a legal perspective we can go in and we can put the pay to play in place we can do the recap, we can get it to where the company is, cap table is right sized and you're set up for success of whatever that might be, right?

16:30Like best, best position available to go forward and fundraise. But if your management team has been wiped, and it's not happy, it's a hard road to hoe. Like after you do one of these, one, you've got to go back and communicate to your current base. It's going to be out there in the news, okay, you're not going to hide it. Even if you somehow hide it from the press for a short period of time, it's going to get out, they're going to see it in connection with, you know, future stock options, they're going to be priced at a much lower price than what the prior employees were. So I always say like one, a good communication plan, you got to be able to pitch it and believe it, that this is setting us up, you know what, we kind of got off and a wrong direction.

17:13This is kind of a critical moment for the company. This is your opportunity to be in, you know, we've done the layoffs, we've done the cost cutting, we've done we've got fun fundraising in the door now and now we're able to really turn it around and you got to be able to believe that and communicate that to to your team and that's all to your investors too because to your point like if you don't believe that as an investor don't put the money and have your stuff convert right like put your money in someplace else where you you think that there might be a return but every term sheet that i do and this is literally at the term sheet stage whether i'm on the company side or the investor side and we're thinking about putting one of these types of structures in place, one of the topics that needs to be really thought through is how are you going to re-up the team?

17:58Because you can't just expect them to be, I'm going to put in the really, really tough work now to turn this around and to make this work without re-incentivizing them. So we will often see things like a 20, 30 % employee pool being put in place to re-up the people that are staying and actually going to be the executors on making this hopefully successful for the next step. And so in this hypothetical example, 10 million in revenue company, there's something here. Maybe it's not growing. Maybe they're out of capital. They need more money. They're burning. To make that 10 million a year, they're burning$4 million a year.

18:36So they've got work to do in cutting expenses and growing revenue in a hard market. And let's say there's eight executives at the company, some combination and four don't want to go well you know that that part of the common pool and with the preference that might be wiped out 60 70 80 percent so those people who are leaving are going to see if they own 10 of the company now they own one percent maybe but the four people who are staying hey they the good news for them is they should participate in that 30 percent pool and earn it over maybe five years because they're sticking around and so if you are part of the you know the group that gets ground down but you decided to get off the boat well you should be thankful you have anything because this thing was going to sink anyway and that's a really hard conversation to have it's a very real conversation to have and it's a test yeah this hasn't been an easy journey we did get to 10 million in revenue but we're upside down in terms of profitability but we're here at port and that's the way i like to explain hey we're at port people can get off the ship if you're not feeling it people can stay on the ship the people who are staying on the ship get the new carry they get the new provisions they get the new opportunity the people who are getting off they get a hug good luck you get to get on the next ship you're at port you can start a new company you can build a ship you can work on the port what if you want to do but those people who are going back out to try to get to the new land you know they they got to be incentivized and so hard conversations uh and make sure you have great counsel like becky when you do it because you have to make sure everybody's protected and it's buttoned up worst case scenario if you do this wrong uh do you see people taking actions later on and and you know suing the company getting upset and that kind of thing or do people generally in the industry just write it off and say yeah yeah it's bad luck i you know the company didn't work out what typically happens yeah so if you go through one of these and ultimately the company doesn't make it which i will say most don't um that's usually the end of it right like investors aren't going to file lawsuits to get nothing yeah to get nothing from nothing so i mean unless there is still something of the company left so that there is going to be either you know some sort of liquidation process or you're still able to sell the company quite often in these situations it's it's pennies on the dollars at that point and because there's just nothing left in the company to really you know revive it so i don't think investors go there but the times when we do see these things come up in court cases is when it actually is successful at turning it around right so we go through one of these really nasty recap down round pay-to-play transactions and we do all sorts of stuff and right some people get converted to common and all of these things happen right the company amazingly turns it around now they go out and they sell the company well now that's when we'll see the lawsuits hit from years ago right um and any of these any of these transactions that we talk about and the more that we couple together um if it's an insider-led down round such that we don't have a disinterested board we're going to be held to a higher scrutiny level.

21:57Once we add an aggressive pay to play, we add a recap, we add that insiders are getting benefits that others aren't, right? Like all of these things to where at the time, it may be like, this is the only option that we had. Nobody else was coming to the table. But if that's the case, you just got to document it, right? You got to have like the best process that you can follow, use advisors, make sure your board records reflect all those conversations, all the market check, that there really was nothing else there, that this is the last resort, that'll help you if you end up in lawsuit. Very simple.

22:33I mean, you got to make sure you have that unanimous consent, everybody signed off on it. And if there's an investor who is not responsive, man, you better make sure that you have all the receipts, you FedEx them a document, you emailed them the document, they opened the document, you sent them docusigns, they clicked on it, you need to have all that buttoned up yeah yeah you i mean like these things are very expensive and it's like the worst time to incur legal fees because you're probably not raising a huge dollar amount you're raising just what you need to get to that next point but yet these you mess these up and it's very very costly later and i always tell everybody like hey let's keep a record of 20 investor meetings that we did we reached out to them we sent them the materials we explained the opportunity to them we got of the 2012 you know 12 took a exploratory meeting three took a second meeting and we have every email in a file somewhere we have a google sheet you know our notion page with you know who we contacted what dates we did the meeting we have why they said no sounds silly but like a very simple process like that because when i get pulled into it and we're a small shareholder that's the first thing i say tell me about the process of raising capital who did we speak to what was their reaction what did we offer them in terms of terms and did we follow up with them and they're like yeah we talked to a ton of people i'm like i would like to know the number of people we talked to and i'd like to see the list and i would like to introduce you to 10 people so and then they're like oh it's too late i'm like okay so now we're in bad hygiene it's never too late never too late and if you talk to three people who are your friends and you didn't take a formal meeting you said back it's like this is where you could get accused of doing like some sort of inside deal and you know um you you don't even if you're right it doesn't stop somebody from suing you as we well know so yes absolutely and the one the one thing i would add to that like all of what you said i love that like that would be amazing if we had those types of records the one addition to that is just make sure all of that gets to the board and is in the board minutes like it's one thing we we see this all the time where it'll be like oh the ceo will say, oh, I had this conversation with the board member.

24:45I had this other conversation with another board member. I'm like, did we ever have a board meeting where we all talked about it at the same time? Like, no. Ah, like just little things like that. And I think that is also where counsel who is experienced in dealing with these will be like, hey, just call a meeting. I need you to, I need to get this on the record. We need to show the process. Call a meeting and here's an attachment. Yeah. And here's the attachment, the list of people we contacted i mean it's so simple we could put that in any what do you call it an exhibit or something in the board notes or the deck and you put that attach it everybody signs it easy breezy lemon squeezy so you know this is i gotta i got and i got a lot of scar tissue on this one and i don't know why but i always like if the founder wants to fight i always get in there and i just fight to the last you know i'll be the guy in the cave last two guys last three gals standing i'll fight all the way if the founder wants to so i'm crazy like that but i always like to get this documentation done uh becky you're amazing you're awesome tyler's supporter everybody uh you know it's very easy to find her becky wsvr you'll find her they do a great job they do most of my work and i love them for it uh all right we'll see you all next time on startup basics go to this week and startups.com slash basics and you'll see becky discussing this stuff over the years get educated have great counsel and uh details matter we'll see you all next time bye bye Bye, everyone.

From the publisher

Todays show: Wilson Sonsini Partner Becki DeGraw joins Jason on the latest edition of Startup Legal Basics! In this episode, they break down the current state of startup funding (0:37), anti-dilution provisions (7:11), re-incentivizing management teams (16:23), and much more!

*

Timestamps:

(00:00) Wilson Sonsini Partner Becki DeGraw joins Jason

(0:37) Market update: Current state of startups and funding

(1:21) Consolidated investment trends and the venture capital slowdown

(4:23) The importance of due diligence, runway, and down round impacts

(7:11) Anti-dilution provisions and strategies for investor communication

(16:23) Re-incentivizing management teams and insider-led funding scenarios

(23:46) Importance of investor relations and board management

*

Check Out Wilson Sonsini: ⁠⁠https://www.wsgr.com⁠

*

Subscribe to the TWiST500 newsletter: https://ticker.thisweekinstartups.com/

Check out the TWIST500: https://www.twist500.com

*

Subscribe to This Week in Startups on Apple: https://rb.gy/v19fcp

*

Follow Becki:

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rebecca-degraw-639bbb62

*

Follow Jason:

X: https://twitter.com/Jason

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jasoncalacanis

*

Great TWIST interviews: Will Guidara, Eoghan McCabe, Steve Huffman, Brian Chesky, Bob Moesta, Aaron Levie, Sophia Amoruso, Reid Hoffman, Frank Slootman, Billy McFarland

*

Check out Jason’s suite of newsletters: https://substack.com/@calacanis

*

Follow TWiST:

Twitter: https://twitter.com/TWiStartups

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/thisweekin

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thisweekinstartups

TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thisweekinstartups

Substack: https://twistartups.substack.com

*

Subscribe to the Founder University Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/@founderuniversity1916

More from This Week in Startups

All 653 episodes
Navigating startup funding market trends with Becki DeGrawThis Week in Startups · 26 min
Listen in VO