In short
Whether the UK (and Europe/US) can “trust nuclear power again” as Britain pursues a new nuclear build for net zero and energy security, despite past accidents, waste, and high costs.
Guests
Dr Tim Gregory, nuclear scientist at the UK National Nuclear Laboratory at Sellafield (chemist; measures radioactivity/chemistry of reactor materials, nuclear medicines, environmental samples; author of Going Nuclear, How the Atom Will Save the World).
Key claims
Nuclear is essential for net zero because renewables can’t reliably cover multi-day gaps; nuclear is carbon-free and energy-dense; accidents are rare and, over 70 years, fatalities are comparable to wind/solar and far lower than fossil-fuel air pollution. Waste can be managed via long-term geological repositories (Finland as example).
Notable examples
Calder Hall (UK’s first commercial nuclear station); Three Mile Island (1979); Chernobyl (1986); Windscale/Sellafield fire (1957); Sellafield leak/cyber hack investigation (Dec 2023); Finland’s geological repository; France’s ~80% nuclear electricity (mid-2000s); UK projects Sizewell C and Hinkley Point C; US restart plan at Three Mile Island for Microsoft data centres.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe Shift Towards Nuclear Power
0:45 to 2:26
Exploration of the changing attitudes towards nuclear energy in the UK and Europe.
“So when Ed Miliband's Department for Energy Security and Net Zero was awarded a 16 % budget increase last month, you'd be forgiven for expecting more windmills, more heat pumps, electric cars for all.”
Tim's Journey into Nuclear Science
2:51 to 4:51
Dr. Tim Gregory shares his passion for nuclear science and his work at Sellafield.
“Because it seems quite a retro thing for a young chap like you to be into.”
The History of Nuclear Power in the UK
4:51 to 6:04
A historical overview of the UK's involvement with nuclear power since the 1950s.
“But obviously, given that your livelihood depends on nuclear, it's unsurprising that you would be pro-nuclear.”
Impact of Nuclear Accidents
6:04 to 7:52
Discussion on the effects of Three Mile Island and Chernobyl on nuclear expansion.
“it kind of runs in parallel to the history of nuclear power in general in the West, in North America and Europe.”
Current Nuclear Energy Landscape
7:52 to 8:52
Analysis of the current state of nuclear energy in the UK and its declining share.
“And so I think in the UK we haven't actually built a nuclear power station since the 1990s, so we're relying on ever more ageing reactors.”
Government's Commitment to Nuclear Energy
8:52 to 10:12
The UK government's recent investments in nuclear projects and their significance.
“So, Tim, Christmas must have come early for you last month when the government committed a lot of money to nuclear.”
The Role of Nuclear in Achieving Net Zero
10:12 to 11:34
Exploring the essential role of nuclear power in reaching net zero goals.
“Renewables are great at getting you started and they definitely definitely have their part in the future of the UK's energy mix but they're not enough on their own.”
Comparing Nuclear and Renewable Energy
11:34 to 12:31
Discussion on the efficiency of nuclear power versus renewable energy sources.
“But can you just explain how efficient a nuclear power station is compared with renewable energy generation?”
The Promise of Small Modular Reactors
12:31 to 14:01
Introduction to small modular reactors and their potential benefits for energy generation.
“But they've also got a newfound enthusiasm for these mini reactors.”
The Potential of Nuclear Power
14:01 to 14:31
Exploring the feasibility of small modular reactors and their current status.
“It's a bit like there's episodes of Grand Designs, you know, when people order those houses that come on the back of a truck from Scandinavia, and then suddenly within a week, they're up.”
Show all 18 chapters
Nuclear's Role in Energy Transition
14:32 to 15:48
Discussing the ideal proportion of nuclear energy in the UK's energy mix.
“There are a couple of prototypes dotted around the world, and there's no reason that they shouldn't work in principle.”
Historical Nuclear Disasters
15:49 to 17:35
Examining past nuclear disasters and their implications for public perception.
“I think you can still detect it in the milk of some cows in Cumbria.”
Current Safety Measures in Nuclear
17:36 to 18:54
Analyzing safety practices in modern nuclear technology and waste management.
“And at the same time, the site's operating system was hacked by cyber groups.”
Finland's Nuclear Waste Solution
18:55 to 19:59
Discussing Finland's geological repository for nuclear waste and its effectiveness.
“been implemented by Finland, which gets somewhere between a third and a half of its electricity from nuclear power alone.”
The Consequences of Nuclear Accidents
20:00 to 21:08
Understanding the far-reaching effects of nuclear disasters compared to other tragedies.
“Can we really be so blasé about the safety issue?”
Comparing Safety of Energy Sources
21:09 to 22:36
Evaluating the safety record of nuclear power against fossil fuels and renewables.
“And it's many, many orders of magnitude safer than fossil fuels.”
Economic Considerations of Nuclear Energy
22:37 to 25:09
Discussing the costs associated with building and running nuclear power plants.
“So it's simply not true that renewables make electricity cheaper.”
The Future of Nuclear Energy
25:10 to 26:07
Reflecting on the potential for nuclear power to meet future energy needs.
“the future that this technology will work, that it will be good, that it will be safe and it will be safe for the next 10 ,000, 100 ,000 years when it's buried deep under the ground, the waste.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Today in Focus Host:This is The Guardian.
0:08Today in Focus Host:Today, are we entering a new golden age for nuclear power?
0:23Today in Focus Host:Most people have been agreed for ages now. Burning fossil fuels is bad. And anyway, they will have run out by the end of the century. For maybe 20 years now, it's all been about renewables. Wind turbines, solar panels, hydroelectricity. Sustainable forms of energy that won't cost the planet. So when Ed Miliband's Department for Energy Security and Net Zero was awarded a 16 % budget increase last month, you'd be forgiven for expecting more windmills, more heat pumps, electric cars for all. Not quite.
1:00Dr Tim Gregory:For all these reasons, the government is taking decisive steps today to usher in a new golden age of nuclear for Britain. Yep, nuclear.
1:13Today in Focus Host:That old, new technology, which rather lost its shine after Chernobyl, Fukushima and Three Mile Island. There is no chance of the UK meeting its climate obligations without nuclear, said Miliband. And it's not just us. The Danish parliament recently voted to overturn a 40-year ban on nuclear power. Belgium also announced an end to its nuclear phase-out. Belgium has reversed plans to phase out nuclear power, which had been in place for two decades. Part of a bigger trend across Europe, with countries like the Netherlands, Sweden and Italy rethinking nuclear power to improve energy security and tackle climate change.
1:55Today in Focus Host:And in the US, perhaps most surprisingly of all, there's a plan to restart a reactor at Three Mile Island to help power Microsoft data centres. Rising from the banks of the Susquehanna River sits a three mile island in Pennsylvania, where America's nuclear renaissance is about to be in full swing. But with each nuclear plant costing tens of billions of pounds, and the waste remaining radioactive for 100 ,000 years, is this really the technology of the future? From The Guardian, I'm Helen Pidd. Today in Focus, should we trust nuclear power again?
2:37Today in Focus Host:Tim Gregory, Dr Tim Gregory, You're a nuclear scientist working at the United Kingdom National Nuclear Laboratory at Sellafield in Cumbria. And you're also the author of Going Nuclear, How the Atom Will Save the World. Tell me, how did you end up being such an evangelist for all things nuclear? Because it seems quite a retro thing for a young chap like you to be into. I think you're only 32, I believe.
3:01Dr Tim Gregory:Yeah, I am. I was just obsessed with the idea of atoms as a kid. I remember reading about them and sort of starting to get my head around them for the first time and thinking like, what? Like everything is made from these tiny, tiny particles and they come in 92 different varieties and they go together in different combinations to make the world. How amazing is that? How cool is that? I guess it's a bit like music. You can't explain your music taste. I just can't explain my fascination and love for science. and as I've grown older, become a bit more worldly, take more of an interest in politics, in human development, in the environment, I'm really, really of the mind that science and technology are two of the best tools that we have for creating a more prosperous world sustainably and nuclear power fits that remit perfectly.
3:53Today in Focus Host:Tell me, what exactly do you do for your job at Sellafield?
3:56Dr Tim Gregory:So I work in a lab and I measure the chemistry and the radioactivity of all sorts of interesting materials. I'm really lucky as a chemist that I kind of get to tap into all different areas of nuclear science. Sometimes it's the kinds of materials that we put into nuclear reactors or pull out of nuclear reactors. Sometimes it's nuclear medicines. Sometimes it's even material that will one day power spacecraft, perhaps on the surface of Moon and Mars. And sometimes it's environmental samples. And so I'm very lucky that I get to interact with all sorts of cool and interesting people as part of my job.
4:29Today in Focus Host:And I believe that you're out of the lab today because you've cut your finger. And that's a big no-no in a nuclear lab.
4:34Dr Tim Gregory:Yeah, you're not allowed in the nuclear lab when you have a cut in case you get radioactivity inside you. That's common across all nuclear labs in the world. And mine is no exception. So I'm having a rare working from home day, which I don't actually like that much. I much prefer being in the lab.
4:51Today in Focus Host:Well, Sellafield's loss is our gain. But obviously, given that your livelihood depends on nuclear, it's unsurprising that you would be pro-nuclear. And full disclosure, I grew up just down the coast from you in Morecambe, a.k.a. the Lancashire Riviera. And there are not one but two nuclear power stations there. Loads of people I know that I went to school with work there. I once won a science prize that was sponsored by the nuclear power stations.
5:16Dr Tim Gregory:Oh, brilliant.
5:17Today in Focus Host:But I feel like I've got enough distance from it to interrogate it with a critical eye. But for those who did not grow up near a nuclear power station, can you just give us a bit of background? When did the UK first get involved in nuclear power?
5:31Dr Tim Gregory:So it was back in the mid-50s. The UK was actually the first country in the world to have a commercial nuclear power station. And that power station is called Calder Hall. From any morning, thousands of people have been arriving to witness an historic event in the industrial life of Britain and indeed of the world.
5:49Today in Focus Host:Today, Her Majesty the Queen is coming to Calder Hall
5:53Dr Tim Gregory:to open Britain's first atomic power station. And it's actually at Sellafield. I see it pretty much every day. The building is still there. The history of nuclear power in the UK is, it kind of runs in parallel to the history of nuclear power in general in the West, in North America and Europe. There was nuclear new build starting in the 50s and the 60s, but it really got going in the 70s. There was lots of new nuclear during that decade. And unfortunately, it kind of all came to an end in North America after Three Mile Island in 1979. There was a partial nuclear meltdown of one of the reactors at the Three Mile Island nuclear power station in Pennsylvania.
6:32Today in Focus Host:It all began at 4 a.m., a combination of mechanical failures and human blunders. Vital cooling water was spewing out onto the floor, forcing the core to overheat.
6:42Dr Tim Gregory:Nobody died, nobody was hurt, and nobody was exposed to radiation beyond what you would ordinarily be exposed to every day going about your daily life from background radiation. But it really shook confidence in nuclear power amongst the public, in industry, amongst politicians in North America. And so it effectively ended the nuclear expansion on that side of the pond. And then, of course, in 1986, we had Chernobyl in Europe, and that effectively did the same thing for Europe's nuclear power expansion. It ended it. It does now seem likely that sometime in the last couple of days there's been perhaps the worst accident in the short history of the world's nuclear power industry.
7:22Dr Tim Gregory:The Russians may have been hoping they could contain it without having to release the news as they appear to have tried to do so in an earlier accident in the Urals 19 years ago. But the fact that they've had to reveal it and admit that there are casualties suggest they're deeply worried about the scale of it. Again, we built more nuclear reactors in Europe in the five years leading up to Chernobyl than we have built since. And so it's really no stretch to say that it was Three Mile Island and Chernobyl that put an end to the expansion of nuclear power in the West.
7:52Today in Focus Host:And so I think in the UK we haven't actually built a nuclear power station since the 1990s, so we're relying on ever more ageing reactors. But currently, in terms of the energy mix in the UK, How much power does the UK generate from nuclear compared with other sources?
8:08Dr Tim Gregory:So we get about 15 % of our electricity from nuclear power at the moment. That's down from a high of about 25 % in the mid-90s. And you're absolutely right. We haven't connected a nuclear reactor to the grid since the late 90s, and that was size well B. And so that 15 % nuclear that currently makes up the nuclear generation in the UK is a legacy of our old nuclear power stations. and they are going to be shut down in the next five, ten years, something like that. They keep having their lifetimes extended, which is encouraging that there's no point switching a nuclear reactor off that's perfectly functioning.
8:46Dr Tim Gregory:But they will be retired probably in the next five to ten years, which will put a massive dint in the UK's nuclear power generation capacity.
9:01Today in Focus Host:So, Tim, Christmas must have come early for you last month when the government committed a lot of money to nuclear.
9:07Dr Tim Gregory:I can announce today to you that this Labour government is investing in the biggest rollout of nuclear power in a generation.
9:15Today in Focus Host:So the government has recommitted to building Sizewell C on the Suffolk coast and they've ploughed yet more money into finishing Hinkley Point C, which will be the first new nuclear power station to be built in the UK since the 1990s. And these should supposedly be finished sometime in the next decade. What did you think when the plans were announced?
9:36Dr Tim Gregory:I was delighted. You know, the thing about net zero is that no one has achieved net zero yet. Basically, every country in the world is a really, really long way from net zero. We're nowhere near net zero. And we in the UK, we've only been trying to do it for the last five or six years, something like that. And so it's no surprise that this embracing of nuclear power as a means to net zero has taken a little bit of time to get going. but the fact that it's finally happening with the announcement of Sizewell C is enormously encouraging because I'm certainly of the mind that net zero is impossible without nuclear power.
10:11Dr Tim Gregory:We pretty much face a choice between net zero with nuclear reactors or net zero never. Renewables are great at getting you started and they definitely definitely have their part in the future of the UK's energy mix but they're not enough on their own. We need that nuclear power as well.
10:26Today in Focus Host:And you don't see it as a kind of transition technology to get us on the road to being a fully renewable energy economy? You think it's something that we should have in the mix forever?
10:37Dr Tim Gregory:Definitely in the short and medium term. I don't think that we will ever be 100 % renewable powered because of the intermittence of renewables. I mean, it sounds so obvious saying it that it's almost become a cliche, but wind turbines don't work when it's not windy. And solar panels don't work very well in winter and they don't work at all at night time. And so the question is, how do you plug those gaps when renewables are not generating power? And people often tout solutions like batteries and hydroelectric dams. But unfortunately, the amount of storage for electricity that you get from those technologies are measured in minutes, maybe hours, whereas the weather and the sun can falter for days and weeks at a time.
11:20Dr Tim Gregory:And so you need something reliable to support the intermittence of renewables. And nuclear power is a really obvious solution to that problem because it's carbon free. It does not emit carbon dioxide.
11:30Today in Focus Host:No, but there are other issues with nuclear that we will come on to. But can you just explain how efficient a nuclear power station is compared with renewable energy generation?
11:40Dr Tim Gregory:Yeah, for sure. So a single nuclear reactor can produce electricity for about a million people. It's something like that. And when SizeWellC comes online, it will generate, it's something like 10 % of the UK's electricity, which is just, it's an astronomical number. It's not just like a couple of percent here and there. We're talking about like 10 % of the UK's power from a single power station. And so they're incredibly efficient. They're incredibly energy dense as well. You don't need to take up much room to generate an enormous amount of power with a nuclear reactor, unlike wind turbines and solar panels, where you need to consume actually quite an enormous amount of land, not just to install the infrastructure, say in the UK, but also to mine the minerals from which those solar panels of wind turbines are made.
12:27Dr Tim Gregory:You need to exhume enormous amounts of land to mine the critical minerals.
12:31Today in Focus Host:But they've also got a newfound enthusiasm for these mini reactors. Tell me about them. How do they work?
12:37Dr Tim Gregory:So they're really exciting. And miniature nuclear reactors are actually not new. Back in the 50s, a lot of the early prototype nuclear reactors would easily fit under your kitchen table. They were actually quite small. And for many, many decades, we've been powering submarines with nuclear reactors as well. And as you can imagine, to fit a nuclear reactor aboard a submarine, it's got to be quite small. And so these small reactors are not new, but what is new is deploying them for pumping electricity into the grid. And that's where these small modular reactors are kind of generating a lot of excitement.
13:11Dr Tim Gregory:And the idea is that you can fabricate upwards of 80, 85 % of the nuclear reactor on a factory line. You can essentially mass produce them just as you might mass produce IKEA furniture. And just as you might transport IKEA furniture to your house in the back of your car, you can transport these pieces to where you want the nuclear reactor and click them together without all the fuss of building a giant gigawatt style power station like Hinkley Point C or Sizewell C. And so it's not just good for the timescales of deployment, you know, we're talking about maybe two or three years to build one of these small modular reactors.
13:46Dr Tim Gregory:It also means that you can fit them where no traditional nuclear power station could possibly fit, perhaps close to industrial centres, next to steelworks, next to AI data centres, tech hubs, biotech hubs, all that kind of thing. And so it's kind of reimagining nuclear power for the 21st century.
14:04Today in Focus Host:I mean, you make it sound so easy. It's a bit like there's episodes of Grand Designs, you know, when people order those houses that come on the back of a truck from Scandinavia, and then suddenly within a week, they're up. But, you know, there's no, as far as I know, there's no country in the world that uses these small modular reactors and has them working any kind of commercial level. You might be able to have them on nuclear submarines, as you've mentioned, but aren't they very unproven at a commercial level?
Read the full transcript
14:32Dr Tim Gregory:Yeah, that's right. There are a couple of prototypes dotted around the world, and there's no reason that they shouldn't work in principle. But you're absolutely right. No one yet has achieved the dream of mass production and rapid deployment.
14:43Today in Focus Host:And you said that nuclear power currently provides 15 % of the UK's energy needs. In your dream world, I guess it would be 100 % because you love nuclear so much. But realistically, what proportion of our energy do you think nuclear could be or should be?
14:58Dr Tim Gregory:It would vary from country to country. If I were to kind of scribble on the back of a beer mat, if I was feeling optimistic in the UK, why not something like 80 % nuclear, 20 % renewables? I mean, in 2005, France got 80 % of its electricity from nuclear power. 80%. And just think that was before climate change became the hot topic that it is today. They almost decarbonized their grid entirely. And France has done absolutely fine in the decades since their economy has grown, their living standards have gone up, their electricity is some of the cleanest in Europe. They had 80 % nuclear back in the mid-noughties.
15:37Dr Tim Gregory:Why can't we do that today but make up the remaining 20 % with wind and solar? I don't see why that's not possible, certainly before our net zero deadlines in 2050.
15:55Today in Focus Host:and you do talk a very good talk when it comes to nuclear and clearly you're a fully paid up member of the nuclear fan club but you work at cellarfield and just that name alone for anyone over a certain age connotes nuclear disaster for those that don't remember and even and I don't, because it was in 1957, there was a fire at the power station there when it was called Windscale, which spread radiation all over Europe. I think you can still detect it in the milk of some cows in Cumbria. At that point, it was the worst nuclear disaster until Chernobyl came along. Is this really, I mean, this is part of the problem with nuclear, isn't it?
16:33Today in Focus Host:When things go wrong, they go catastrophically wrong.
16:36Dr Tim Gregory:So the history of nuclear power generation is punctuated by a series of very infrequent, but very high profile events. Obviously, Fukushima most recently, Chernobyl before that, and Three Mile Island, but also the accident at Windscale too. And, you know, it is true, you can detect the fallout from these events over an absolutely enormous area, but that's not because West Cumbria is an uninhabitable wasteland brimming with radioactivity and wild animals with multiple heads and many eyes. it's because of our analytical instruments we can actually now detect almost down to individual atoms now with our analytical instruments it's the kind of kind of instruments that i run in the lab on a daily basis and so although it sounds like you know you could scoop up a handful of muck from from outside the perimeter fence of cellarfield and it would be glowing that's absolutely not the case it's just a testament to how sensitive our analytical instruments are in the modern world
17:35Today in Focus Host:Only 18 months ago, a Guardian investigation back in December 2023 found evidence of a leak of radioactive waste at Sellafield. And at the same time, the site's operating system was hacked by cyber groups. This is where you work and you're still trying to tell us that it's a safe modern technology.
17:54Dr Tim Gregory:Sellafield is an interesting place because of how old it is. It was the first large scale nuclear site in the UK. It was one of the first in the world. And so lots of the buildings and lots of the infrastructure there date back from the really, really early years of the nuclear power program. They were constructed in the kind of the haste of the Cold War without as much thought as we would use today for the end of life of these buildings and these facilities. And so it's no wonder it's difficult decommissioning Sellafield. As for new nuclear waste, though, that's actually the best controlled waste in the world.
18:29Dr Tim Gregory:and nuclear power is the only form of power generation that internalizes the cost of its own waste disposal and waste treatment at the end of the lifetime of, say, a nuclear fuel rod. We're very, very well practiced at handling it, and we're very well practiced at processing it. One of the things that we're not well practiced at, and this is definitely a challenge and worth talking about, is what to do with it ultimately. And actually, there's a solution to that that's been implemented by Finland, which gets somewhere between a third and a half of its electricity from nuclear power alone. Last year, Finland opened the world's first and currently only geological repository for nuclear waste.
19:10Dr Tim Gregory:And put simply, their idea is to bury it in the hard, impermeable, crystalline finish bedrock. Because one of the things about nuclear waste, and this is true for all radioactive substances, incidentally, is that it becomes less radioactive over time. And in the case of nuclear waste, it's something like 100 ,000 years, which sounds like an incredibly long time. It sounds like a long time to our ears because, you know, we live for maybe a century if you're lucky. And the lifetime of nuclear waste is a thousand times longer than that. But on a geological timescale, 100 ,000 years is basically the blink of an eye.
19:46Dr Tim Gregory:It's absolutely nothing. And so the idea is if you bury nuclear waste and you leave it for long enough, it's not nuclear waste anymore. It's just waste. And that's what Finland are doing. That's what the UK will be doing as well. It's currently looking for a site to bury its nuclear waste.
20:00Today in Focus Host:But I guess, and I do remember covering this quite frequently across the north of England for years, one of the issues is that it's really hard to find the right place to store this kind of waste, you know, where it will be safe, where communities won't oppose it. I think it's worth dwelling for just a bit longer on what happens when things go wrong, because it's not like a plane crash which is a terrible tragedy for anybody on board and anybody who gets hurt when the plane hits the ground the ramifications of a nuclear disaster are felt so far beyond the initial site you think back to chernobyl there were maybe only 50 deaths caused you know immediately after the disaster but it's estimated that ultimately 4 000 people will die as a result and there were 350 000 people evacuated from the area at the time and most of whom have never been able to go back.
20:49Today in Focus Host:Can we really be so blasé about the safety issue? Because these disasters might be rare, but they are so serious.
20:56Dr Tim Gregory:I would definitely not be a proponent of being blasé about them. You're right, they are incredibly serious and we have to treat them as such. But when you look at the number of fatalities from nuclear power over the entire history of nuclear power generation, and that includes immediate deaths from Chernobyl and all the latent cancer deaths amongst the affected populations and including the deaths from Fukushima, you would include the deaths from Three Mile Island, but there were none. When you take the fatalities caused by nuclear power over the last 70 years of nuclear power generation and set those fatalities against the number of megawatt hours of power that we've got from nuclear, you actually find that it's comparable to wind and solar.
21:38Dr Tim Gregory:And it's many, many orders of magnitude safer than fossil fuels. And so every couple of hours, more people in the world die from air pollution caused by fossil fuels than have ever died from nuclear power. And so it's not the case that nuclear is perfectly safe. Nothing is perfectly safe, but it's actually one of the safest things that our species does. And it's certainly safer than setting fossil fuels on fire. And so I would never be so blasé to say that, you know, these nuclear accidents are just nothing to worry about. They're just not a big deal because they are, and they should be taken seriously.
22:11Dr Tim Gregory:But when you set them in context, Nuclear power is actually incredibly and surprisingly safe, given its kind of mythical reputation of being this really, really dangerous technology.
22:26Today in Focus Host:Coming up, the UK's newest nuclear plant may now cost£46 billion. Can we afford to go nuclear?
22:40Today in Focus Host:and what about the extreme costs involved of building these power plants at least in the uk hinckley point may now cost 46 billion pounds twice the original cost there are a lot of people who would say renewable infrastructure is far cheaper it doesn't have the it doesn't it doesn't have a footprint that lasts for 100 ,000 years, it's much more cost effective and it's better for the environment.
23:06Dr Tim Gregory:So it's simply not true that renewables make electricity cheaper. What people often talk about is the levelised cost of electricity. And that's a very simple calculation where you take the cost of, say, a solar panel and you divide that cost by how many megawatt hours of power it will produce over its lifetime. However, there's more to the price of electricity than simply the cost of a solar panel. You have to take into account things like transmission. You have to take into account maintenance. You have to take into account intermittence. All of these things conspire to make it actually incredibly difficult to estimate the true price of a unit of electricity from different power sources.
23:44Dr Tim Gregory:But when you take into account these system costs, the cost of nuclear actually drops enormously, not least because it's reliable. It's as simple as turning a nuclear reactor up and down in tandem with demand, but also because of the longevity of a nuclear power station. Once you build these things, they last an incredibly long time. And so many of the reactors in North America are approaching 60 years of age and they're still working fine. And some of them have even had their lifetimes extended to 80 years. And I wouldn't be surprised if some of them become 100 years old one day. And so once you build these nuclear power stations, they last a really, really long time, and they're relatively cheap to run.
24:27Dr Tim Gregory:When you look at the cost breakdown of nuclear power, most of the cost is actually in the upfront cost of building the power station in the first place. And so when they overrun massively, such as Hinkley Point C, I share those frustrations with everybody. I would love to see it become cheaper. It's one of those lessons of the more you do it, the better you get at it and the cheaper it becomes. And so the French fleet, for example, arrived on time and within budget because they built 55 basically at the same time. The UK has only done one in the last 20, well it's more than 25 years now since SizeWellB went online.
25:01Dr Tim Gregory:The UK has only done one in quarter of a century and so it's no surprise it's taking forever and it's gone over budget, we're out of practice.
25:08Today in Focus Host:But it is of course a big old bet on the future that this technology will work, that it will be good, that it will be safe and it will be safe for the next 10 ,000, 100 ,000 years when it's buried deep under the ground, the waste. Do you ever have doubts yourself about it?
25:26Dr Tim Gregory:I don't think it is a bet. This is not what I think. This is what history shows. This has been done before. I mean, I know I keep coming back to it, but it's a great example because France is not too dissimilar to the UK in how big it is, how its economy functions, how its government functions. And it got 80 % of its electricity from nuclear power in 2005. This is possible. This is not just some kind of pipe dream of somewhere where we might be in 20 years. This has been done before. The technology is there, the science is there and the deployment has happened in the past. We just need to do it again.
26:02Dr Tim Gregory:And I think that now we will because we've got this added motivation of getting rid of fossil fuels in the name of climate change.
26:08Today in Focus Host:Tim, thank you very much.
26:10Dr Tim Gregory:My pleasure. Thank you.
26:12Today in Focus Host:That was Dr. Tim Gregory. his book Going Nuclear, How the Atom Will Save the World is out now. And that's all for today. This episode was produced by Lucy Hoff, Eli Block and Chantal Roman and was presented by me, Helen Pidd. Sound design was by Jo Shanshana and the executive producer was Sammy Kent. We'll be back tomorrow.
26:34Today in Focus Host:This is The Guardian.




