In short
Live discussion and reaction to the Manchester synagogue terror attack (Crumpsall) on Thursday 2 Oct 2025, focusing on police response times, the attacker’s device, counterterrorism/Prevent effectiveness, radical Islamism, immigration and integration, and related political/media ramifications.
Guest
Peter Bleksley, former police detective. He frames himself as a long-time critic of policing failures but praises “brilliant” counterterror work when it happens.
Key claims
- 999 call at 9:31; Greater Manchester Police declared a major incident by 9:37; armed officers shot 35-year-old Jihad al-Shami at 9:38.
- He appeared to have an explosive device strapped to his waist; a bomb disposal robot later carried out a controlled explosion; it was not viable.
- Two people were killed; three more were seriously injured; one victim reportedly had a gunshot wound (implying police involvement).
- Bleksley argues the attacker was not known to authorities/counterterrorism and criticizes failures in referral/monitoring.
- He claims radical Islam accounts for ~75–80% of counterterror workload (MR5/MI5 referenced).
- He argues Prevent is imperfect (“net” analogy) and that terrorism will “happen again.”
Notable examples
- Axel Rudakubana (Southport) as an example of prior radar/Prevent involvement followed by later atrocity.
- Mentions IRA-era attacks and the Harrods bombing as historical context for faith-driven terrorism.
- Compares Northern Ireland terrorism (political end) vs Islamist violence (no clear political objective).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VODetails of the Manchester Terror Attack
2:55 to 6:36
Overview of the events of the Manchester terror attack.
“What do we know, first and foremost, about what happened yesterday?”
Police Response and Critique
6:36 to 8:12
Discussion on police response times and efficacy in handling the attack.
“But the other thing, before we get into the other ramifications of this, is, you know, on this show, we are often critical of certain aspects of what people have described as two-tier policing.”
Terrorism and Political Ramifications
8:12 to 11:15
Exploration of the implications of the attack on politics and security funding.
“had deployed more armed police officers to be in those kind of locations.”
Major Incident Designation Process
11:15 to 14:01
Explanation of how a major incident is designated by police.
“there wandering the streets who we don't know about, as well as all the people on terrorist watch lists who we do?”
Initial Reactions to the Attack
14:01 to 15:07
The discussion begins with reactions to the Manchester terror attack and information about arrests.
“or would they have had some other information going, this guy is actually potentially a terrorist?”
The Threat of Radical Islamism
15:07 to 16:39
Exploring the extent of the radical Islamism problem in the UK and its implications.
“And again, it goes back to my earlier point, which is this is so incredibly worrying because he wasn't known to the authorities.”
Concerns Over Illegal Migration
16:39 to 20:40
Discussion on the rise of illegal migrants and the potential security threats they pose.
“endeavouring to frustrate and otherwise stop murderous terrorist plots.”
Challenges of Prevent Program
20:40 to 23:03
Debate over the effectiveness of the Prevent program in combating radicalization.
“and point the finger at police counter-terrorism, But then the police encounter terrorism can go, look, there's only so much we can do.”
Historical Context of Terrorism
23:03 to 27:59
Reflecting on historical terrorism threats, particularly from the IRA, and their impact on society.
“as far as we know, this jihad guy was not monitored by Prevent.”
The Good Friday Agreement and Its Impact
28:00 to 29:00
Discussing the contributions of various individuals to the Good Friday Agreement and the implications for current political grievances.
“and he never gets very much press for this, the process being started by John Major.”
Show all 33 chapters
Challenges of Religious Ideology
29:00 to 30:00
Exploring the difficulties in addressing grievances driven by religious ideology versus political grievances.
“when I was born in 1959 The first census of my lifetime was in 1961, when 21 ,000 people in the UK identified as being Muslim.”
Understanding Radical Islamism
30:00 to 31:20
Examining the objectives of radical Islamists and the distinctions within the Muslim community.
“But what are the answers, though, Peter?”
Personal Stories and Community Integration
31:20 to 33:00
Sharing a personal anecdote about a local business and the perspective of a moderate Muslim on integration and coexistence.
“that will never come to succeed and can be thwarted and won't be the desire of the moderate Muslims, but is the desire of the lunatics off-the-scale radical Islamists.”
Radicalization and Responsibility
33:00 to 34:40
Discussing the role of citizens in reporting dangers and the complexities of community connections.
“But of course, his moderate, as I would call it, version of his faith that he follows is very, very different, I would suggest, to somebody who went to a synagogue in Manchester yesterday.”
The Need for Uncomfortable Conversations
34:40 to 36:00
Arguing for the necessity of uncomfortable discussions about immigration, integration, and societal challenges.
“They have no connection to this country.”
The Risks of Discontent and Violence
36:00 to 38:00
Speculating on the potential for societal unrest if issues of integration and extremism are not addressed.
“And he hadn't been sent to his maker by Greater Manchester Police.”
Migration and Its Misconceptions
38:00 to 39:40
Critiquing misconceptions about immigration and its relation to terrorism, emphasizing specific contexts.
“But I could see a holy war happening at some point down the line.”
Media Responsibility and Terrorism Narratives
39:40 to 42:00
Analyzing the media's portrayal of terrorism and the implications of conflating immigration with radicalism.
“Ukrainians are not storming synagogues with knives.”
Understanding Extremism and Immigration
42:00 to 45:20
Explores the complexities of Islamism and the implications for immigration policy.
“And the logical conclusion of that is you have to stop pretending that all immigrants are the same.”
Protests and Political Responses
45:20 to 49:10
Discusses recent protests related to political events and responses from leaders.
“My point about them is they are the mainstream.”
Youth Perspectives on Protests
49:10 to 54:30
Examines young people's motivations for participating in protests regarding Israel and Palestine.
“I mean, they're disrespectful last night and Saturday.”
The Need for Better Messaging
54:30 to 55:59
Argues for improved communication to engage youth on complex issues.
“and it's not just, by the way, I was in a cab on the way here to the studio, James O 'Brien was using the word openly, genocide.”
Discussion on Digital IDs and Government Actions
56:00 to 56:59
The conversation covers the implications of government measures such as digital IDs and their connection to immigration and welfare fraud.
“The right to work is the first one, then the right to rent, banking, education, childcare, voting.”
Discussion on Digital IDs and Government Actions
58:08 to 59:21
The conversation covers the implications of government measures such as digital IDs and their connection to immigration and welfare fraud.
“Let me introduce you to the people I work with to protect my family against financial instability, inflation and turmoil.”
Discussion on Digital IDs and Government Actions
59:27 to 1:00:29
The conversation covers the implications of government measures such as digital IDs and their connection to immigration and welfare fraud.
“Take control of your financial future today.”
Starmer's Response to the Attack
1:00:43 to 1:02:04
Analyzing the adequacy of political responses to recent terrorist acts and the implications of police intelligence.
“Thank you for sending in your questions.”
Judicial and Police Accountability
1:02:04 to 1:03:43
Discussing the perceived issues of judicial biases and the effectiveness of law enforcement in dealing with threats.
“It's a crime to call upon people to kill another person.”
Community Safety and Self-Protection
1:03:43 to 1:06:59
Examining the need for communities to take safety into their own hands due to perceived police inadequacies.
“I was talking to a judge some time ago, basically talking, and he was saying, look, I don't say this publicly, but our profession has been captured.”
The Broader Context of Terrorism
1:06:59 to 1:10:02
Discussing the rising threats of Islamic terrorism and the need for protection across different communities.
“This is along the lines of something Katie's asked on Substack, but I want to expand her question a little bit.”
Concerns After the Attack
1:10:02 to 1:11:26
Discussion on the implications of the recent terror attack and community safety.
“The police will have additional patrols around mosques because they'll be thinking once the full background of jihad, I'll say that again, Jihad al-Shami is revealed and his devout Muslim beliefs become public knowledge.”
Practical Self-Protection Advice
1:11:26 to 1:13:29
Peter Bleksley offers practical advice on personal safety and crime prevention.
“This government getting a grip on immigration for the birds, sadly, no.”
Addressing Extremism and Policy Suggestions
1:13:29 to 1:16:11
Discussion on extremist groups and suggestions for policy changes to address terrorism.
“When you go out onto the street, don't wear headphones.”
Reflections on Yom Kippur Attack
1:16:11 to 1:18:27
Reflections on the significance of the Yom Kippur attack and its implications.
“I hear stories, and I'm afraid I can't disclose my source, but people from the Middle East, that speaks to somebody I know very well, and they say, why do you let all this dross in here?”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00I've bought two mattresses in my entire life. Both times I walked into a shop, lay on it for about four seconds and thought, yeah, that'll do. Genuinely world-class decision making, which is crazy because you spend a third of your life on the thing and most of us buy one the way you'd buy a toaster. Today's sponsor is Avocado Green Mattress. Certified organic mattresses. No polyurethane foam anywhere near them, just natural materials and they're handmade. The bit that actually got me is you don't have to buy it blind. Avocado has real showrooms plus retail partners across the US. So you can go in, lie down properly, not for four seconds, and work out if it actually suits you before you pay for it.
0:39They're not everywhere yet, so check the store locator for what's actually near you. Avocado products are made, not manufactured, and thoughtfully crafted with real materials to deliver lasting comfort and support. You can experience them in person at an avocado showroom or a premier retailer near you. Or shop online at avocadogreenmattress.com slash trigger to check out their mattresses and furniture sale. That's avocadogreenmattress.com slash trigger. avocadogreenmattress.com slash trigger. Right, I'm going to level with you. I'm not a gamer, even though I look like one. I'm not going to pretend I've been grinding through RPGs between recordings, or that I have strong opinions about which Final Fantasy was the best one.
1:22I think it's Japanese and I think there's a sword. That's genuinely everything I know. But our social media guys showed me this app and I genuinely thought, that's quite clever. It's called Snacksy. Basically, game publishers need new players and they're willing to pay to get them. Snacksy just passes that money onto you. You play games you were probably going to play anyway. You own coins and you cash them out for real rewards. PayPal, Amazon, Netflix, gift cards. If you prefer gaming credit, you can redeem for PlayStation, Xbox, Steam and Nintendo or cash out your Aniba wallet. I've got no idea what that means.
1:56Actual money, not just points that expire. It takes a few minutes to set up. You open the app, swipe through the game offers, pick something that looks decent, play it, earn, redeem. That's the whole thing. There's a sign up bonus worth up to$10 if you use our link, which is in the description of this episode. That's S-N-A-K-Z-Y, SnackSync. Click the link in the description to get started. And when you sign up, use the code TRIGGERPOD. That's T-R-I-G-G-E-R-P-O-D to claim your$10 bonus. And the app is mobile only, so click the link from your phone, not your laptop. Hello, everybody, and welcome to this episode of unscheduled episode of Trigonometry, of course related to the terrible attack in Manchester on a synagogue yesterday.
2:48Joining us again, returning to the show, is former police detective Peter Blexley. Peter, welcome back. Thank you for having me. It's a terrible thing for all of us that we only get to see each other when terrible things happen, but that is where we are. What do we know, first and foremost, about what happened yesterday?
3:04Peter Bleksley:Okay, at 9.31am yesterday, Thursday 2nd October 2025, a member of the public dialled 999 calling the emergency services and they reported that they had seen a car drive in to people and that the driver of that car had got out and was attacking people with a knife. So that was the scene setter for the people receiving that call and the information that's then going to be relayed to the police and other emergency services. What we then know is that at 9.37am, probably based on other information that had come forward, Greater Manchester Police declared this as a major incident, and that means that other resources basically can be deployed to it.
3:57Peter Bleksley:And at 9.38am, we know, and the footage has been widely available on social media and elsewhere, that armed police officers shot a 35-year-old man, Jihad al-Shami, who was apparently born in Syria and came to Britain as a child. he was shot dead by armed police. Jihad al-Shammy had had what looked like a potentially explosive device strapped around his waist. Again, the images are widely available on social media and broadly mainstream media. After he'd been shot, because he has a device that the police do not know whether that is a viable bomb or not. They have to work on the theory that it is.
4:53Peter Bleksley:And so, of course, huge caution has to be exercised here. A bomb disposal robot was deployed, which then carried out a controlled explosion of what appeared to be the device on Jihad al-Shammy's body. They later told us that, in fact, it was not a viable device. And I would imagine, in my opinion, something designed to spread fear and terror into the very hearts and soul of anybody that saw it, along, of course, with his murderous actions. And as we move on to that, tragically, two people were killed by him, were stabbed to death by him. although there has been recent reports that one of the victims, one of the dead people, did in fact have a gunshot wound.
5:52Peter Bleksley:And Jihad al-Shami did not have a weapon. So that gunshot wound must have come from a weapon fired by a police officer. I'll perhaps touch on that in just a little while. Three people remain in hospital, seriously injured. and that is with a very broad brush the dreadful, appalling terrorist events that happened at a synagogue in Crumpsell, Manchester, yesterday. Now, one of the things that I think it's really worth saying, well, two things really. One, of course, the thoughts of everybody will be with the victims, their families, the people who are in hospital. We hope for the swift and speedy recovery and full recovery.
6:40But the other thing, before we get into the other ramifications of this, is, you know, on this show, we are often critical of certain aspects of what people have described as two-tier policing. There's criticism, rightfully, in my opinion, under police. But in this instance, you have to say that this is an incredibly fast response to get there in seven minutes and deal with the terrorist threat in this way is a testament to their professionalism. Was there also a stroke of luck, do you think, in them getting there that quickly? Is this a standard speed of response to this kind of incident?
7:14Peter Bleksley:Like your show, when justifiable, I am a very fervent and vocal critic of the police. Likewise, when they do brilliant things, and our police do do brilliant things, they are rightfully deserving of praise. What we don't know about yesterday's timings, In other words, they were there and they'd shot him dead within seven minutes. We don't know if those armed police officers were nearby by default, by design or by luck. We just don't know. That will come out, I'm sure, in the ongoing inquiry. Perhaps they were deployed to be close to synagogues because, of course, it was the most holy day in the Hebrew calendar yesterday.
8:03Peter Bleksley:Yom Kippur, it would make sense if the police, given the heightened tensions in the world and in Britain today, had deployed more armed police officers to be in those kind of locations. We don't know yet. Either way, what is clear to me from the footage that I've seen, everything I've heard, everything I've read, Those police officers, having initially shot Jihad al-Shammy, saw him fall to the floor, and then he starts to move again after having been originally shot. Those officers, without any concern for their own safety, by the looks of the footage, were less than 15 metres away from Jihad.
8:58Peter Bleksley:al-shami as he laid on the ground as he tries to lift himself back up i don't know but i would imagine that perhaps the officers thought is he going to come at us again with a knife and he's already wreaked so much havoc or is there a possibility that he's going to detonate that device and had that device been viable and had he detonated it then in all probability those police officers would not be here today but they got close enough so they could engage him and they then shot him again as he tried to get up from the ground and i would imagine it would be perhaps the final fatal shot. But all of this will come out at a later inquiry.
9:51Peter, so we know that the belt wasn't viable, the bomb wasn't viable. Is there another reason why these terrorists wear those belts is so that they almost ensure the fact that they're never going to be captured? Because the police really have to kill them. They have no other option, because you simply can't risk the detonation of a bomb in a crowded area like that next to a place of worship.
10:15Peter Bleksley:Yeah, I think you raise a very good point here. Perhaps it is in their sick, twisted, evil minds. Perhaps this is a way that they can try and claim some form of martyrdom by being shot dead by the police. They're not martyrs. They're cowards. He is a murderous, repugnant, repulsive piece of garbage. and the good thing about the police shooting him dead is that he will never be able to carry out such despicable acts ever again. One of the worrying things about the, I mean there's lots of worrying things about the case, but one of the particularly worrying things for me was is that he wasn't known to the authorities, he wasn't known to counter-terrorism, which then begs the question, well if somebody like him who is clearly as extreme as he was, and there were reports which haven't been confirmed that he sent death threats to a conservative MP.
11:14Aren't they thinking, well, how many of these people, how many other jihad al-Shamis are there wandering the streets who we don't know about, as well as all the people on terrorist watch lists who we do?
11:27Peter Bleksley:Well, we know that of the people that are of interest to the security services and counterterrorism police, around about 75 or 80 % of that workload is radical Islamists. So that's a huge, huge chunk. The breaking story about did he send death threats to an MP or not, I think is yet to be confirmed either way. Let's just say he did. Then if he did do that and he has not been referred to counterterrorism police or even local police at the very very least that will be a major failing but we will have to wait and see what happens as a result of that but while we're talking about mps and i'd just like to echo your words right at the top of this interview and thank you of course my thoughts with the family and the loved ones of those who lost their lives and those who are still in hospital and all of that community but let's think about MPs because of course we've had two MPs murdered in recent times to David Amess and Joe Cox.
12:39Peter Bleksley:We've got a lot of bloodshed in this country, unfortunately. So there should be huge attention and suitable resources when required deployed to the MPs where we do feel there's a risk. And on that very note, what happened this week? We heard that the Home Office had cut the funding for Nigel Farage's security by 80%. And they'd offered up a kind of mix and match whereby 20 % of funding, so 20 % of security staff would come from the Home Office side of things, and the remainder would have to be made up from private costs and a different security company, which would have been, of course, largely unworkable.
13:30Peter Bleksley:So these things are all linked. MPs, danger to MPs, terrorism, bloodshed. But they're inextricably linked. Peter, can I take you back a little bit? We'll talk about the political ramifications of this, I'm sure. You mentioned that almost immediately the decision was made to designate this a major incident. How would that decision have been made so quickly? Is it because there was reports of somebody stabbing numerous people or would they have had some other information going, this guy is actually potentially a terrorist? How did they know so quickly that it was a major incident? There's a number of criteria that have to be met by somebody senior within the control headquarters of Greater Manchester Police.
14:20Peter Bleksley:I'm sure that the 931 call wasn't the only call they got. We know there were other people there. Some people were filming it, and these things come to the attention of a considerable number of people very quickly. Whatever it was, the information that went into that control room, it filled all the criteria, ticked all the boxes, and so they were able, in a very short space of time, say, yeah, this is a major incident. And I've also heard that two other people have been arrested. Do we know anything about those? Have they been released? Have they been charged? Do we know anything at all about them?
14:52Peter Bleksley:Three other people, apparently. Three? Yeah, three. Two men in their 20s, I believe, and a woman in her 60s have been arrested. We know nothing about them as we speak, but they were arrested nearby. And again, it goes back to my earlier point, which is this is so incredibly worrying because he wasn't known to the authorities. The question I'm going to ask you is quite a blunt one. But how big a problem is radical Islamism, jihad in this country at the moment? This is going to sound like a preposterous question, given the guy's name. but do we actually know that he was a radical Islamist at this point?
15:36No, to the point of being able to confirm it live on air.
15:39Peter Bleksley:No, we don't. The media have not said that. But I am quite happy to stake whatever shredded reputation I've got in the fact that he has been radicalised. He's an Islamist. Of course, let's look at the facts. You don't have to be Sherlock to work out what his motivations probably were. So how great a threat does this ideology pose to this country, to the stability of the country and to the safety of people? 80 % of the workload of counterterrorism police and MR5, radical Islam. That's a huge chunk of their workload. And they're just the ones they know about. The security services and our counter-terrorism police, while we sleep soundly in our beds, together with some hugely courageous people, are out there thwarting plots, observing people, endeavouring to frustrate and otherwise stop murderous terrorist plots.
16:49Peter Bleksley:And they do that 365 days of the year. and we owe them all a huge debt. Of course, with the scale of the problem as it is, there are going to be individuals that act alone or in a small cell that does not come to the attention prior to the police or the security services. That's inevitable. It's going to happen and it's going to have tragic consequences. We only have to look back at people like Axel Rudabacana and his murderous rampage in Southport. He was on the radar. He'd been a part of the prevent program in the past because he'd been radicalized or was regarded as such a such a threat. So even people that have been on it at some stage have gone on to commit atrocities.
17:47And now we have this character with his murderous actions of yesterday.
17:53Peter Bleksley:It's a problem. It's a considerable problem. We have getting on for four million Muslims in the UK, many of whom, of course, are law-abiding, peaceful, worship as they want to, contribute to the country, pay their taxes. But there are some that don't, some that make up that 80 % of the security services and counter-terror polices workload. And bear with me one moment while I just delve into my phone, because this is apposite and relevant as I see it. In the last five days, for the figures that are available, in the last five days, 2 ,037 illegal migrants have entered the UK on 30 dinghies. 2 ,037.
19:00Peter Bleksley:people who I am not with a sweeping statement going to say they are all Islamic jihadis right but we don't know where they've come from we don't know their backgrounds we don't know their intentions and we don't know how they're going to fill their time while they are in the UK And because we have had an abhorrent government followed by another pathetic government who are not gripping this problem, who are allowing these people into our shores, in fact, with the help of border force and such like, facilitating it by bringing them in on their vessels. And so it goes. Smashing the gangs. it's almost abhorrent for me to say that phrase because it's clearly not happening and there has to be an element of danger to the UK to the citizens of this once great nation and it is negligent it is abhorrent it is an absolute disgrace that our government are not stopping it.
20:21Peter Bleksley:Because time, sadly, will tell us that amongst that number are people coming to our shores who are a threat. If not a terrorist threat, then a threat in terms of so many people that we've seen arrested for sexual offences and the such like. And it's a great point because, look, we can then turn around and point the finger at police counter-terrorism, But then the police encounter terrorism can go, look, there's only so much we can do. And we're working as hard as we possibly can. Eventually, one is going to slip through. Well, on that very thing, I was speaking to somebody earlier today who isn't, I won't give the details, but who's familiar with the security case workload.
21:02And he was saying, basically, there's so many plots now being stopped. Everybody always knew at least one, maybe more, I hope not, would get through by the year end. because there have been so many of these, because the scale of the problem now is so vast.
21:20Peter Bleksley:Yeah, and let's face it. Let's talk about some more uncomfortable truths, shall we? Many of these people, and I'm talking about immigrant populations that have come together, live together. They occupy street after street in their own little environment, their enclave. and I can see why people who come to this country as a migrant might be attracted to wanting to live in the same street as another migrant but it's not really integrating is it? If all you're doing is living with people that look like you, talk like you, sound like you as an immigrant, you're not really integrating are you? If ever I was to live in another country, the last thing I'd want to do is live in a community surrounded by expats, British expats, that wouldn't be the point of going to live abroad, would it?
22:14Peter Bleksley:Anyway, I digress somewhat. So when you've got, you know, we have a huge number of people that are off the radar, living the black economy. We know all this because we see so often when immigration officials or border force or people from HMRC carry out searches, raids on premises and they end up levying fines because people are here illegally and working illegally. The bottom line is our nation does not know the identity of everybody here and we don't know how many undocumented people living under the radar there are. Well, up to a million at this point from some of the figures. Peter, I know it's a tangential question because this person, as far as we know, this jihad guy was not monitored by Prevent.
23:10Do you think Prevent is working? Prevent being the government program to de-radical. Do you think de-radicalisation is working?
23:19Peter Bleksley:When I was a detective and you'd get a new young officer, you know, come to work with you for a while and you'd talk to him about criminality and we can say the same about terrorism and such. I used to tell him the story, it's like we cast a net. OK, as police officers, we cast a net and we hope that that net is going to scoop up every bad boy, every bad girl. And we're going to live in some kind of crime free nirvana. But it's not like that. When you cast that net exactly as if you're casting a huge, great fishing net into the ocean, you're not going to scoop everything up. Things are going to get through the mesh, up over the top, round the side, fall out, whatever.
24:14Peter Bleksley:You just hope to scoop up as many as you can. And that's how it is. That's how it is now. I'm sure counterterrorism police and security services know that it's imperfect. They can't stop every plot. Yesterday's tragic events showed us that. I'm never going to hang them out to dry because they do do astonishing work and believe you me as somebody who has worked with people and done an element of being out there in the dead of night myself climbing through quarries and uphill and down dale to get a suitable observation point where you can watch people having worked with colleagues that shall we just say without giving away too many secrets, are brilliant at conceding themselves in places where us three just would never want to go in order to keep surveillance.
25:14Peter Bleksley:Of course, it's 2025, so there's also huge elements of technical surveillance. We're very much in the digital world, but it still needs courageous people, and they're still out there, and they'll be out there on Christmas Day when we're tucking into a bit of turkey or whatever takes your fancy, pulling crackers, drinking, surrounded by our loved ones, there will be people out there like there are every other day of the year trying to stop people, blowing us to smithereens or stabbing us to death. And the threat is out there. It's very, very real. This will happen again. and I feel it is in the here and now just another symptom of the decline of this once great notion.
26:12Peter, when are we going to start talking openly and honestly about this? I don't mean here or in certain podcasts. I mean out in the media because I used to go to football. I went to football a few times with Sir David Amos. He was a wonderful man, English eccentric in the best sense of the word. And he was murdered in the most awful, brutal way. It still has a profound effect on me now. And I remember watching the news coverage afterwards and they were talking about online hate. And I was saying to myself, this isn't about online hate. This is about radical jihad. This is about radical Islam.
26:51This is about people who feel entitled to kill and maim and destroy other people's lives purely for a political and religious ideology. My question is, when are we going to just be honest about this and talk about it bluntly instead of hiding behind terms like, oh, hate and hate must never be allowed to exist? And all of this, quite frankly, bollocks that we're talking about.
27:15Peter Bleksley:But I'm 65, so terrorism driven by a faith and political kind of motivation is no stranger to me because I grew up every time going on a bus or the underground or an overground train looking for an unattended bag because the IRA carried out attack after attack after attack after attack during my childhood and into adulthood. And, of course, the Harrods bomb took some of my B Division colleagues with it, tragically, and injured many others. So I've had a terrorist threat virtually for as long as I can think of or remember. That threat, of course, was tackled by politics, because we eventually, thanks to the brilliance of, and he never gets very much press for this, the process being started by John Major.
28:16Peter Bleksley:Then Blair, of course, who took all the glory. But people like Mo Molen and many, many others who, I hope they'll forgive me because I've forgotten their names. Many, many people played a huge, huge part in bringing about the Good Friday Agreement. so when his politics essentially driven by faith I think it can be tackled when however somebody's grievance and their hatred is driven purely by a religious ideology without kind of trying to establish any acceptable political norm how do you tackle it? I don't know and is it going to grow? when I was born in 1959 The first census of my lifetime was in 1961, when 21 ,000 people in the UK identified as being Muslim.
29:16Peter Bleksley:There's now nearly 4 million. That's a significant growth of that population in my lifetime. I think those figures understandably alarm many people. a lack of integration driven by hatred an ideology, a religious ideology which people certainly are and I would fundamentally suggest jihad al-shami was yesterday is a deeply worrying thing and I don't suspect there's going to be any simple answers to it but there may be multiple answers if only people were willing to grasp the net stand up, be courageous and say, this is what needs to be done. But what are the answers, though, Peter? What are some of the answers to dealing with it?
Read the full transcript
30:08Because I've heard a lot of people make the comparison with Northern Ireland. And for the reasons you give, I think it's completely inappropriate for the very reasons that you state, because Northern Irish terrorism in the mainland of Britain was about achieving the political end of a united Ireland. Yeah. And let's say the government of the day had been willing to do that. we would not have had terrorism in this country. But I don't even know if the British state was prepared to surrender to Islamism, might well be at this point, frankly, what the surrender would be. Like, what do these people want from us exactly?
30:44Why are they killing our fellow citizens? What are their objectives? What is it that they want exactly? I don't think anybody knows. I do. You do? Okay, tell me.
30:53Peter Bleksley:You don't have to delve too deeply into social media to find many, many videos of people saying we're here to take over. Oh, you can see them. You can see them on social media. They're quite simple to find. They will pop up on my timeline from time to time. People saying we are here to take over. Simple. It's a plan. Now, of course, I sincerely hope that's a plan that will never come to succeed and can be thwarted and won't be the desire of the moderate Muslims, but is the desire of the lunatics off-the-scale radical Islamists. You know, it's Friday, so I'll probably go for a curry tonight. My local curry house is amazing and it's run by it.
31:51Peter Bleksley:Muslim fellas, right? The father, who's since retired, originally came over from Bangladesh 40-odd years ago, ran the business, drew it, wonderful restaurant, amazing, a real kind of centre point for the community. And he's handed it over to his boy now, okay, who's a lovely fella. And I say to him a few weeks ago, getting my curry, I said to him, you know, what do I say? to people who are concerned about the rise of Islam and are concerned about people who claim that they're here to take over and not to live side by side and contribute. And he says, well, he says, it's them not, isn't he? Because, of course, there's a huge great division, isn't there, in Islam between Sunni and Shia.
32:42Peter Bleksley:He said, it's them, he said, it's not us. He said, my dad came here 40 years ago, built this business, provided our family with a great living. He said, why would I want to change anything? He said, I love this country. I love running this business. I love customers like you, Peter, and everybody else. I don't want anything to change. But of course, his moderate, as I would call it, version of his faith that he follows is very, very different, I would suggest, to somebody who went to a synagogue in Manchester yesterday. So coming back to ways of dealing with this problem, what are your thoughts?
33:25What can be done?
33:29Peter Bleksley:I'm not the most learned man on the planet, as I've made blatantly obvious. I'm an ex-cop and a keen observer of life. I think the problems are probably multiple. people you how do we stop people being radicalized in this day and age of the Internet very very difficult I would suggest I think there's a huge responsibility on people the company's country or live in this country to have concern compassion for their fellow citizen if I knew that either of you were a danger, I would be on the phone within the blink of an eye because I love my fellow citizens and I love this nation. If anybody has a suspicion or they know that somebody is a danger and they do not notify the authorities of that, then they are an enemy of this state.
34:41but the problem is Peter there is a lot of people like that we've seen it we're not just with this particular crime but crimes going back 20 30 years you look at the member of the grooming gangs family members were covering it up and you just go wives wives covering up for their rapist husband daughters with sons all the rest of it and you think to yourself these are people who have no alliance. They have no connection to this country. Their only connection is to their clan, to put it quite frankly, or to their religion. And you go, this is not sustainable. And I genuinely think that unless we are prepared, and by us, I mean the political class, to have a very uncomfortable conversation about this, that's got to be the first step.
35:31But we can't even have an uncomfortable conversation without saying, oh, we need to stop online hate.
35:37Peter Bleksley:I'm up for the uncomfortable conversation. I know. I'm up for seeing people deported out of this country, and I don't care how big of the numbers are. If they've come here illegally, they break our laws, they don't contribute, then ta-da. I mean, give me the shackles. I'll gladly wrap them around the ankles and the wrists and march them onto an aeroplane. but the problem comes when you have people like jihad himself he came to this country he's a british citizen now he came here as a young boy so we you're going to make the argument okay well he could be stripped of his british citizenship but we know that's not going to happen what are you going to send him back to syria there is no way in a million years that that was going to be allowed to happen even if he provided the level if they knew he provided the level of threat that he did.
36:28Peter Bleksley:And he hadn't been sent to his maker by Greater Manchester Police. Yeah. Yeah. It's complex. It's very complex and I completely agree with you when you say it's going to require brave conversations. I look at some parts of London these days. And of course I'm old enough to remember Brixton and Notting Hill when they became centres for Afro-Caribbean communities that drew one another together and lived together. And, of course, I policed Beckham where there was a sizable Afro-Caribbean population. But some of the swathes of East London and other major cities, there's talk about Evochdales, Oldham's, and so on and so forth, where there's communities that don't look very integrated to me in any way, shape or form,
37:37Peter Bleksley:is it an intractable problem? Do we all just have to say, well, that's how it is. Governments aren't going to do anything about it. It's too difficult. So we'll all just go on that slippery slope to however it might end up. I'll tell you how I think it would end up if things are not done. I don't think we'll have a civil war in this country. because I don't believe there's that greater division, to be perfectly frank. But I could see a holy war happening at some point down the line. What do you mean by that? I could see people rising up to fight against if there became a significant amount of people that followed one particular faith that was hugely damaging and wanted to take over, like some of those clowns on social media claim they do, then I could see a huge number of people rising up to take that on head on.
38:33This is the worrying thing. The fact that you actually said that and a few years ago, I'd be like, oh, come on, Peter, chill out, mate. Let's keep within the realms of reality here. But you're saying that and I'm going, well, that's not outside the realms of possibility because that's where it feels that we are.
38:53Peter Bleksley:And I don't want to see it. Of course I don't want to see it, but there is so much discontent out there in a country. Was it 2037 in the last five days? I know that's a very visible and visceral and emotional side of the whole migration debate. Look at the figures last week. The UK's population increased in a year by what? 750 ,000. What was that almost entirely down to? migration. Right? It's... But see, we talk about having uncomfortable conversations, but even in this conversation, we're conflating things that I think are... I understand why people keep talking about immigration, but I think we have to be honest.
39:42Ukrainians are not storming synagogues with knives. Hong Kongers are not blowing themselves up on tubes. Polish people aren't doing jihad. This isn't an immigration problem.
39:55Peter Bleksley:And if we were to Google terrorist attack carried out by Jewish man in northern Europe, you wouldn't find it. So this isn't about immigration. And that's and that's where I think we get into a lot of difficulty, because the mainstream media is already in overdrive mode to, you know, the Emily Maitlis and John Soppel on their podcast yesterday. They were talking about the fact that the real problem is the right wing journalists who are exploiting this tragedy. They're unhinged. Just move on from those two. Well, you say that, but I think if this was just random people on social media, I think we would move on because, you know, there's a spectrum of opinions.
40:40Some people are stupid. Some people are devious, frankly. But Emily Maitlis and John Soppel are two former respected, I'm using inverted commas for people who are listening, authoritative using inverted commas, balanced inverted commas, unbiased inverted commas, stalwarts of the BBC, the national broadcaster, until like two years ago. Right. So we are talking about the very core of the center of the mainstream media in this country. And what they're already attempting to do is to distract people's attention away from the fact that this type of terrorism and this type of incident is coming from a very particular subset of the migrant population.
41:23Radical Islam. Radical Islam. And the reason they're doing this is very clear, because one of the things that you see Shabana Mahmoud, the Home Secretary, talk about this, you know, this guy was, how did she phrase it? I don't want to get it wrong, but he is the only one responsible. Something like this, right? So attempting to make this a kind of lone wolf type of situation. When I, we don't know exactly what's happened here, but, you know, if you call your son jihad, it sort of feels like that might cause some problems down the line. No! No, no struggle to live a virtuous life.
41:57Peter Bleksley:Nothing to do with holy war. No, not at all. And so I guess what I'm saying is one of the reasons that they're attempting to say that Islamism has nothing to do with Islam, I mean, how you can say anything of that kind with a straight face is hard to understand, is that the inevitable logical conclusion of believing that Islamism has something to do with Islam is what you said, which is if you have 4 million people who are the overwhelming majority of whom are peaceful and law-abiding and wonderful people and so on. But if a small percentage of the Muslim community are prone to this kind of extremism, then the greater your Muslim population, the greater the absolute number of people in your country who are prone to this kind of extremism.
42:44And the logical conclusion of that is you have to stop pretending that all immigrants are the same. You have to stop pretending that all cultures are the same. you have to stop pretending that all religions are the same, as you pointed out about Jewish terrorism in Europe. It's not happening, right? And then, unfortunately, you have to start dealing with the reality that not everyone is the same. And that is the greatest threat to everything that we are forced to believe because then you have to start treating different people differently. You have to start saying, well, according to the numbers, people who have come from this particular part of Syria are way more likely than other people to commit terrorism or rape or whatever.
43:23And therefore, if we are going to allow people from that part of the world to come, if we are going to do that at all, we have to have extra vetting. We have to be extra thorough. We definitely have to close the bloody border because when your border is open, you don't know who's coming in. But all of that makes our elite so uncomfortable that what they would rather do is what Francis is talking about. When David Ames gets murdered by an Islamist, let's talk about online hey when this happens let's talk about not looking back in anger as they did after the manchester arena bombing and that's why i think you guys are talking about having an honest conversation the honest conversation is not all cultures are the same and not all religions are the same and until we recognize that we're not going to do anything
44:08Peter Bleksley:about this problem i guarantee you that i agree entirely yeah of course not all cultures are the and not all religions are the same. I'm fortunate not to be burdened by religion. I ran down my throat as a kid, but I'm not a person of faith as an adult. And I like being deliciously unburdened. I've got time, of course, for faith, and so many of my friends have faith. Faith is really important to them. So I respect it. And I've got a bit of an obsession with religious architecture. um go to the milan cathedral if you know and i can mention other places i've been but um back getting back on message well so people make this are an irrelevancy as far as i'm concerned because i would never listen to them i had the misfortune to read something of theirs once upon a time and they're quite frankly in my opinion unhinged and such a lunatic leftists that it's they're not worth.
45:09But they're the mainstream. I'm not trying to put a target on their back or get people to dislike them more than they do. I think they do a brilliant job of that themselves. My point about them is not individual to them. My point about them is they are the mainstream. They are the people who are just like you had religion rammed down your throat. These are the people who've been rammed down our throats for the last 20 years by the neutral, unbiased BBC. That's who is setting the narrative on this stuff.
45:41Peter Bleksley:But now they're not at the BBC. We all have the power to go off. That's true. Or change the channel. We don't have to listen to those people. I occasionally listen to another unhinged lunatic left broadcaster just because I want to know what the enemy are thinking. But I normally suffer it only for about 10 minutes and then I have to get a grip of myself once again and move back to sanity. Because the big issue that's coming out of those appalling events of yesterday now is not only the protests that took part last night in Whitehall, but the protests that are planned for tomorrow, Saturday. It's Defend Our Juries, isn't it, in Trafalgar Square on Saturday.
46:31Peter Bleksley:and I don't know what ragtag and bobtail lot it was last night in Whitehall but I saw many of them I was travelling through Westminster Tube Station and they come with these packages over their shoulders the poles of the banners are poking out in front of them and the sort of part of the placard is over their shoulder and I was attempting to go and buy some of them some soap but anyway moving on yeah should those but the language that came out from shabana mamood and robert jenrich today was pathetic they were like oh um i think jenrich said do the decent thing and don't protest tomorrow and mamood said something else along very similar lines well if you're displaying such weakness and not being fervent and not saying, actually, you're not having your protest tomorrow because it's inappropriate, because we may have received some information that there might be disorder, some intelligence, for example, and you've only got to look at last night to know that there's disorder.
47:43Peter Bleksley:Talk to last night, right? The amount of people that met in Whitehall for that protest, which turned ugly early, was tiny compared to the Unite the Kingdom march. Okay? Unite the Kingdom, correct me if I'm wrong, there were 26 arrests. Did you see how Shabana Mahmood got up at the Labour Party conference and banged on about it? Okay? We did. Not only that, by the way, Peter, I'm sure you know this, most of the arrests were actually among the counter-protesters too. In Greece. Let's just give her that one, right? Okay? Let her have that, right? and of course there was some assaults on police officers.
48:23Peter Bleksley:And let me just make it clear, if you assault a police officer, you're an idiot, right? If you misbehave yourself at a protest or a demonstration, you're an idiot and I don't want anything to do with you. Anyway, so last night there were 40 arrests, regrettably six police officers injured. So on a pro rata basis, last night was way, way, way, They almost infinitesimally worse behaved, more dangerous than the Unite the Kingdom march ever was. So they can ban a march if they've got credible intelligence. There will be disorder. I would say, well, last night's protest, if it's anything to go by, would give me plenty of reason to suspect there will be disorder on Saturday.
49:17Peter Bleksley:Ban it. Stop them. Don't have it. I mean, they're disrespectful last night and Saturday. I mean, look, I completely agree with you. I think her argument was is that legally that she can't. That was her argument, which you're disputing. Well, if the police can't gather intelligence to say that there would be significant disorder. let's just wait and see I guarantee there'll be significant disorder so why haven't the police got their ear close to the ground why are they not gathering that intelligence why are they not privy to that information it makes those pro-Palestine demonstrators look absolutely abhorrent when I saw that that was going ahead I was genuinely shocked Peter I thought there has just been a horrific...
50:13Were you shocked? You don't remember October the 8th? Yeah. So, look, let's stop pretending. On October the 8th, there were people who were protesting against Israel before Israel had done anything. Yeah. They were not protesting against Israel. They were celebrating the mass murder of Jews. That's what they were celebrating. Let's be honest. So why are you shocked? Let's stop being shocked.
50:35Peter Bleksley:Now, I know there are some Jewish people that go on these pro-Palestinian marches. I've heard some of them on the media talking to them and such like. And of course there are. But I believe overwhelmingly these protests are filled with Jewish hating people. Absolutely convinced of it. because are you really going to be fervently pro-Palestine if you don't really dislike Israel?
51:15There are, you know, for our channel, I've gone along to a number of those protests and I talk to people there. And I think it's fair to say that, of course, the hardcore you're talking about definitely exists. I also think, actually, the majority, I would say, of the people there are people who are very captured, you might say, or very badly affected by the horrific images they're seeing from the conflict in Gaza. This is really the first conflict, urban warfare type of situation in human history where it's been broadcast through the smartphone into people's living rooms in that way. And a lot of the young people in particular who go along to those protests, they're not there because they hate Jews or even hate Israel.
52:02A lot of them are just horrified by what they see and they don't have the understanding of war, urban warfare, conflict, history, to contextualize it in any way. So all they're really there to say is I have this horrible image on my phone and it makes me feel bad and therefore I feel like I'm
52:21Peter Bleksley:doing something have they not listened to the stated aims and the primary goal of hamas no they haven't really no they haven't oh so i there's a clip on our channel peter that i go and talk to some young people and they have a sign which is which says uh something something uh socialist intifada i they have a sign which says socialist intifada and i go up to them and i say what's a socialist intifada? And the guy goes, well, I actually don't know because I picked up the sign over there. And I said, well, do you know what the word intifada means? There was about five or six people in that circle.
52:59Not one of them knew what intifada means. They don't know anything. It's hard to imagine they don't know anything. So the reason I'm interjecting with this is I think it's really important for us not to dismiss the entire group of people as Jew haters or whatever because we have to believe that young people look we're all young people once were you
53:20Peter Bleksley:the most educated the smartest no we still not and i thank you by the way they're putting me straight well what i'm saying i'm not even putting you straight i just i just think we have to believe always that young people can be persuaded with knowledge information maturity time uh you know i have lots of opinions that i've changed in the last 10 years francis has you probably have as well. So I don't want to dismiss all of them as that because we're going to have to win a lot of them over to the side of sanity. And we're going to have to persuade them to look at Hamas' stated goal, to understand the history of conflict, to understand what war is like generally and why you ought not to start wars that you then end up losing, why you shouldn't use human shields, why you shouldn't take hostages, you know, all of this stuff.
54:08When you educate yourself about things, it gives you a different perspective. And we are going to need those young people to open their minds. If we just dismiss them as haters now, I think it's a bad part together. Thank you. And it's also as well, look, we know that when you're young, your friends are the most important thing to you at that time. And if all of your mates are pro-Palestine and talking about a genocide, and it's not just, by the way, I was in a cab on the way here to the studio, James O 'Brien was using the word openly, genocide. several times over a four-minute period on LBC, which goes out to 1.4 million people just in London.
54:48And that's just one person. Think how often it's been repeated, not just in the mainstream, but on social media. So these people think that there is this genocide happening. So to them, it's the morally right thing to do. And I just think that we all need better messaging and we all need to be able to connect and go across the threshold and actually be able to persuade these people, this path that you're going down is not a good one. It's not a good one, and it's going to lead to something very, very ugly, which is what we saw yesterday.
55:26Peter Bleksley:Indeed. Well, Peter, we have lots of questions, I think, suspect for all of us coming in. If people are watching, if you'd like to submit a question, of course, our Substack supporters, you have First Dibs. We've got a bunch of your questions that we'll read out in a moment. In the meantime, do, if you want to send in a super chat, we'll try and get a few of those in as well. We're going to go to an ad break if we're ready. And then when we come back, we will look at all your questions, put them to Peter. We'll discuss them among each other and continue the conversation. We are that close to a situation where you basically need a digital ID to go online.
56:03The right to work is the first one, then the right to rent, banking, education, childcare, voting. Five billion was wasted last time this country tried to introduce digital IDs. That's about 50 times the amount of the border security command. Very, very clearly, this isn't about immigration. The Starmer government has just introduced mass banks buying powers on the premise of rooting out welfare fraud. The Home Office right now is supporting essentially an expansion of live facial recognition across multiple police forces. The time to really put up a fight is now.
56:59and join thousands of our supporters who watch all our interviews with exclusive bonus content ad-free. In an era when free expression feels under threat, the Battle of Ideas Festival stands out. Its motto is conversations for the public, with the public, in public. Co-organisers Alistair Donald and Ella Whelan say the festival aims to tackle everything from the vibe shift of a second Trump presidency to the fracturing of global alliances and the challenges of economic and tech innovation. Over two packed days, the 18th and the 19th of October at Church House in London, you can join around 100 discussions on politics, science, culture, law and more.
57:40We at Trigonometry are regular attendees at the Battle of Ideas. It's one of the few places where we know we'll find proper debate, lively discussion and people unafraid to speak their minds. If you believe in free debate and want to explore the toughest issues facing society, this festival is for you. Put your tickets at battleofideas.org.uk and use code TRIGGER25 for a 20 % discount on all tickets. That's battleofideas.org.uk. Let me introduce you to the people I work with to protect my family against financial instability, inflation and turmoil. For me, one of the best ways to safeguard your wealth is by investing in gold.
58:19And that's why I trust the Pure Gold Company. Here's a smart tip. If you buy UK-minted gold coins like Sovereigns, you won't pay VAT when you buy them or capital gains tax when you sell. All the profit is yours to keep. And the best part? Gold is a completely private investment. It's outside the banking system, so it can't be manipulated by governments or anyone else. Unlike digital assets, it's yours in the truest sense. The Pure Gold Company is trusted by first-time investors and seasoned professionals alike. What I really appreciate about them is a knowledgeable, pressure-free approach. They explain everything clearly, so you feel confident about your decisions and they never push you to buy.
59:00Physical gold has stood the test of time as a store of value, and it offers peace of mind that other assets can't match. It's reassuring to know that even if the banking system falters, your gold and its value remain safe. Whether you're looking to diversify your investments, protect your savings, or just gain the security of owning a real physical asset, we highly recommend the Pure Gold Company. Click the link in the description or go to pure-gold.co.trigger to get your free copy of the investor guide. That's pure-gold.co.trigger. Take control of your financial future today. You, the trigonometry audience, understand how vital free speech is.
59:39That's why we're proud to reintroduce you to our longstanding partners, Give, Send, Go. We caught up with their founders at Jordan Peterson's Alliance for Responsible Citizenship Conference this year, and it was clear they are not just running a crowdfunding site, they're defending a principle. Take one of the most powerful examples, Daniel Penny. He stepped in during a dangerous subway incident in New York and was later charged with homicide. His Give, Send, Go campaign raised$3 million, allowing him to mount a strong legal defense as his case moves through the courts. That case made headlines, but the biggest story was this.
1:00:16While other platforms shut campaigns like his down, Give, Send, Go stood firm. So if you want to support causes that matter or raise funds yourself, whether it's for free speech, helping a friend in need, or disaster relief, visit givesendgo.com and use the code TRIGGER for a special 2.5 % processing rate. That's givesendgo.com, the platform that doesn't just talk about free speech, it protects it. All right. Welcome back. Thank you for sending in your questions. Keep sending them in, particularly in the super chats. We will be able to get to those as we go. We've got a bunch of questions from our sub stack first, though.
1:00:53Francis, go ahead. J.S. Powell asks a great question, which is Starmer's response to this attack seems woefully inadequate. What would be the right response and associated actions thereafter?
1:01:05Peter Bleksley:after i think starmer gets blown by whatever political wind is blowing on any given day to be perfectly honest with you um it was a very predictable photo opportunity of going up there with his wife but i could imagine why his wife would want to go there she is of jewish heritage so um that i think is understandable i think i would be saying if i was the leader of the country which of course I'll never beat, saying to the police, give me the intelligence that says there's going to be disorder at the protest on Saturday, then we can stop it. This is from Helen who says, what legal consequences should and will there be for the imams of the four British mosques recently shown on videos encouraging their followers to kill Jews?
1:01:55I'm not aware of this. I don't know if this is... I haven't seen it. Yeah. But if that is happening, is that a crime?
1:02:03Peter Bleksley:Yes, of course it is. It's a crime to call upon people to kill another person. It's very much a crime. If there is such footage, please send it to the police. I beg of you, send it to the police so that they can deal with it appropriately. You say that, Peter, and I'm sure that's the right thing to do. I'm just remembering only a week ago there was a trial for a man who wielded a knife and attempted to stab someone who was burning a Quran. He got off with a custodial sentence. Yes, he was convicted of crimes connected to that event, but he didn't receive a custodial sentence. I think the whole different issue now of activist judges within the UK is something that very much needs to be looked at.
1:02:53Peter Bleksley:And we are fortunately having people that are exposing the background of many of our judges, particularly those who sit on immigration tribunals, for example. and make decisions relating to deportation. We're seeing so many of those who have previously been attached to either chambers, barristers' chambers, that did human rights work, so you would imagine there could be a bias there, or people that have judges who are now judges who have worked for refugee charities, for example. Then how on earth could you expect anybody to give an impartial and unbalanced judgment when sitting presiding over such cases.
1:03:41Peter Bleksley:They need exposing. And, you know, it's interesting. I was talking to a judge some time ago, basically talking, and he was saying, look, I don't say this publicly, but our profession has been captured. There you go. There you go. Nailbunny asks, are the police prepared for what may be coming? Do we need the military involved? There's been many an occasion when I've thought, should we get the military involved? I mean, what does that mean? What does that mean to get the military involved? Because most people wouldn't understand. Well, look, I was not in Egypt. I was in Uzbekistan a couple of months ago, right?
1:04:17Outside of every mosque, because they used to have a problem with Islamic terrorism. They don't anymore because they dealt with it. There's a couple of guys with AK-47s, right? Yeah. And if there was a guy with an AK-47 outside of that synagogue yesterday, this jihad guy gets sorted without any casualties, right?
1:04:34Peter Bleksley:Possibly. You don't know. You've got to remember, more like the attacker has the element of surprise. Okay. So I wouldn't want to downplay any potentially heroic efforts made by the security guard yesterday and the such like. That's the trouble. The attacker's got that element of surprise. But that's the point of when we say about getting the army involved. You want to equalize that element of surprise with superior force, don't you? Yeah, but our army, of course, are not... particularly trained to carry firearms and behave like a civilian police. They are, of course, the army. So it would be a huge, possibly, admission on behalf of the police that they've failed.
1:05:18Peter Bleksley:I think first and foremost, they would see that like that and they would argue very strongly against it. I'm just putting myself... Look, having praised the police at the very outset of this interview, I sort of think the egos of police constables and chiefs don't matter as much as the safety of people in this incident. And I echo those words entirely. Funnily enough, you've said about the judiciary being captured. Right. Ditto senior police. Right. Go for it. Rob says, do you feel the only way to protect our Jewish community is to change our feeble government, sack the duplicitous mayor of London, and root out the culture of appeasement amongst senior police officers?
1:06:02Peter Bleksley:Well, I'm no fan of Sir Sadiq Khan. Sticks in the back of my throat that I have to call him a sir. But anyway, I'm really not a fan. Sack the government. I'm afraid the Jewish community is going to have to do more of protecting itself through the Community Safety Trust, which has had some government funding to do that. They're going to have to do more of it. And you know what? They are not alone. There are now leafy suburbs and nice parts of the home counties where private security companies are patrolling the streets, paid for by residents, protecting them because the police can't do it. We are on this inexorable slide towards all having to pay other people to protect ourselves because the police can't do it and because division, divisiveness and hatred is so prevalent in our society.
1:07:01Peter, can I ask you something? This is along the lines of something Katie's asked on Substack, but I want to expand her question a little bit. And it's something I genuinely don't know what the answer is. I'm just thinking out loud. We have seen case after case after case where there have been various failings, whether that's at the level of immigration. I remember, I think the guy's name was Abdul Yazidi, who threw acid on a woman. And he, I think, if I remember correctly, in his instance, he was given asylum based on fake claims that he was a persecuted Christian when it was blatantly not true.
1:07:32So I don't understand the legal system well. I'm sure you understand it better. Is there ever any room for repercussions for people who make these terrible decisions, for them to be held to account? No. None whatsoever.
1:07:45Peter Bleksley:None whatsoever. They are utterly intouchable in that regard. Should there be? It is, of course, not the criminal law we're talking about here. It's the whole immigration process, which, interestingly enough, of course, Shibana Mahmood, the Home Secretary, only this week said the Home Office is not fit for purpose in many regards. This all needs gripping. The whole Home Office, the Immigration Department, the borders, it all needs gripping because it is simply becoming the number one issue on the doorstep, as political campaigners tell me. They say when they're leafleting, when they're knocking on doors, people are saying immigration.
1:08:34Peter Bleksley:And then secondly, when they say, and who are you voting for? People increasingly and increasingly and increasingly are saying reform. I guess what I'm asking is, again, I'm just thinking out loud. This may be totally wrong and un-British or illiberal. I don't know what the words are. But if you're an activist judge or if you're a home office employee who's rubber stamping these people and letting people through without proper checks, you're letting people off, having committed crimes that then go on to reoffend. If there are no sanctions for that and you are an activist, well, you'd carry on, wouldn't you?
1:09:14Right? Wouldn't you just. Wouldn't you? So presumably, I think that ought to be looked at. Are there some repercussions to be had for people who are negligent in their duties? I mean, if you were guarding a military base, right, and you just waved people in who don't have the right pass, presumably you'd be punished for that in some way.
1:09:31Peter Bleksley:Well, look at Palestine Action, who got into a military base very, very reasonably. Should have been shot. And who that protest tomorrow, I believe, is in support of. Right. So we're going to have more idiots with their, oh, if they put Palestine Action banners, getting arrested, the clowns, thereby draining police resources away from dealing with crime anyway, preventing crime and protecting the Jewish places of worship. And, of course, you know what's going to be protected this weekend? Mosques are going to be protected. The police will have additional patrols around mosques because they'll be thinking once the full background of jihad, I'll say that again, Jihad al-Shami is revealed and his devout Muslim beliefs become public knowledge.
1:10:22Peter Bleksley:I'm guessing that's what will happen, right? We don't know yet. Then, of course, they'll be thinking, oh, will there be retaliatory attacks on mosques? Not by Jewish people, everyone. Well, I really very much hope that churches are also protected this weekend because I don't think Jews are the only group of people who are targeted by Islamic terrorism. I mean, we know from their very statements they consider Christians and Jews infidels in the same way and would happily kill them both. So I hope our Christian friends are also kept safe this week. As was dreadfully exhibited at an Arianna Grande concert on London Underground trains and elsewhere.
1:10:57Peter Bleksley:They don't care. If you're the infidel, you're the infidel, and you need to be blown to smithereens, according to their perverse, vile thinking. And on that subject, Mickey says, Does Peter believe there are very likely to be further attacks of this type in the near future? And will it lead to this pitiful government taking serious action to stop illegal immigration? Answer to the first question, sadly, regrettably, yes, I think there will be further attacks. This government getting a grip on immigration for the birds, sadly, no. Yeah, it's so, so worrying that when you saw yesterday's attack, one of the emotions that I had, I was just, actually, I'm surprised it took this long.
1:11:50It's not an emotion, that was a genuine thought that went through my head. I went, I'm surprised it took this long.
1:11:56Peter Bleksley:Yeah. Yes, I can see entirely why you feel like that. We live in an increasingly dangerous nation. We really do. This is a question from SammyT40 who says, Every Jew in the entire world knew something terrible would happen on Yom Kippur. It's sad, but it's true. We were all on eggshells waiting for something to happen because our leaders throughout the world do nothing, all talk and just say stupid things and forget about it. I agree that is very sad indeed Marco asks a great question says hi team any practical solutions to issues discussed to issues discussed as plain and practical as possible step by step thank you all I've got loads okay let's crack on let's go right the very very sad reality of life in Britain is that we have to protect ourselves okay we've got to protect ourselves not only from the potential of a terrorist attack, but from criminals.
1:12:59Peter Bleksley:So what do we do? If you own your own home, protect that home. I'm talking burglar alarm, state-of-the-art CCTV system. I could go on and on about what you grow in your garden if you've got a garden and such like, which stuff that burglars and intruders and other people don't like. Do the obvious. Don't leave things in the back garden like shovels and forks and all of that which Burgers can sell with. And you can find lots of that crime prevention advice online. When you go out onto the street, don't wear headphones. It's utter lunacy. And I know people do. You know about the element of surprise that I was talking about with a terrorist attack?
1:13:44Peter Bleksley:If you've got your headphones on, in all likelihood, you can't hear and you won't be focusing on the world around you. you are giving the terrorist an even greater head start. In all likelihood, you might be killed or seriously injured before you even realise anything's going on. Whereas if when you travel, when you walk, when you are out and about, when you're driving, use these senses that are given to us. Don't shut them off. And even on a very basic level, if you're on a train and you can't hear the train announcement, that again could be something really, it could mean life or death. Listen to the podcast when you get home.
1:14:27Peter Bleksley:Listen to the new album when you get home. You need these, you need those, and you might well need these and to be on your dancers in an emergency. And I think those are great points. But I think what Marco was really driving at is what practical solutions does this government, let's say we had a brilliant government, OK, let's just play that little thought experiment. Yeah. What policies do they need to do in order to really get a grip of this with this problem? Outlaw the Muslim Brotherhood, make it a prescribed organisation. Correct. Yeah, that's that's a day one thing. People won't understand what the Muslim Brotherhood is, Peter.
1:15:09Can you just explain that to the people who don't know?
1:15:12Peter Bleksley:Well, Constance will know far better than I the full history of it. but it's basically a very dangerous organisation which essentially, from my standpoint and from what I've seen, spreads a lot of bad stuff into a lot of decent places and therefore needs to be stopped. By the way, the Muslim Brotherhood, this is one of the great ironies that I've talked about often, is Muslim countries are much better at dealing with Islamist extremism than we are. The Muslim Brotherhood has been banned across the Muslim world for decades now in modern countries because they don't pretend it's Islamophobic to be concerned about Islamic terrorism.
1:15:54They know that these people are extremists and they don't pretend they aren't and they deal with them. We obviously we banned Hizb ut-Tahrir like last year. Hizb ut-Tahrir has been banned in the entire Muslim world for like 20 years. This is the shocking irony of this. we are more permissive towards Islamist terrorism than Muslims are.
1:16:16Peter Bleksley:Yeah. It's unbelievable. I hear stories, and I'm afraid I can't disclose my source, but people from the Middle East, that speaks to somebody I know very well, and they say, why do you let all this dross in here? We wouldn't have it in our country. We don't have it in our country. We don't allow them anywhere near us, and yet you have them flooding in. Well, there we go. Peter, thanks for coming on. Obviously, it was a tragic day yesterday. We all hope this is the last one of these we have to deal with. Sadly, I think a lot of people are concerned it's not. It won't be. I've said nothing but thoughts and best wishes to everybody affected by it, for what that's worth.
1:17:01Peter Bleksley:I was having lunch with a great mate of mine who happens to be Jewish on Wednesday. and of course one of the great things about having friends from other faiths and people of faith you get to learn so much about their faith and of course he was saying yeah it's yom kippur tomorrow so tell me all about it you know what do you do what's the point of him why you know all of that um so then see that horror unfolding so early on that day it was uh and of course the murderous bastard knew it was Yom Kippur and planned it for Yom Kippur. Because in the way that many people might be Christian but don't go to church, so many of them do on Christmas Day, don't they?
1:17:44Peter Bleksley:Yeah. And it's kind of, and if it sounds clunky, it's not meant to be an insult anyway, but it's kind of that sort of equivalent. Jews who don't go to the synagogue very regularly will go on Yom Kippur, which is why they get vast numbers. same as like Church of England churches get packed on Christmas Eve or Christmas morning, you know, it's that kind of thing so Jihad Al-Shamie knew exactly what he was doing he plotted it, he planned it he chose the date I bet he'd sussed out that location
1:18:18Peter Bleksley:and yeah, sadly we'll have to wait till the next time Peter Bilexy, thanks for being here thank you for watching and we'll see you soon
From the publisher
Apologies for the Sound. This was an Impromptu Live.
Join our exclusive TRIGGERnometry community on Substack! https://triggernometry.substack.com/
Triggernometry is proudly independent. Thank you to the following sponsors for helping make that happen:
- GiveSendGo: the free speech crowdfunding platform https://www.givesendgo.com/#triggerpod
- Protect your wealth with The Pure Gold Company. Get your free investor guide at https://pure-gold.co/trigger
- Battle of Ideas Festival 2025: Book your tickets at https://battleofideas.org.uk. Use code TRIGGER25 for a 20% discount on all tickets.
OR Support TRIGGERnometry Here:
Bitcoin: bc1qm6vvhduc6s3rvy8u76sllmrfpynfv94qw8p8d5
Shop Merch here - https://www.triggerpod.co.uk/shop/
Advertise on TRIGGERnometry:
marketing@triggerpod.co.uk
Find TRIGGERnometry on Social Media:
https://twitter.com/triggerpod
https://www.facebook.com/triggerpod/
https://www.instagram.com/triggerpod/
About TRIGGERnometry:
Stand-up comedians Konstantin Kisin (@konstantinkisin) and Francis Foster (@francisjfoster) make sense of politics, economics, free speech, AI, drug policy and WW3 with the help of presidential advisors, renowned economists, award-winning journalists, controversial writers, leading scientists and notorious comedians.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices




