In short
The episode argues that the Iran war will not achieve “regime change” by itself; regime change requires coordinated uprisings/armed uprisings and defections inside Iran, not just military strikes. It also claims anti-Israel/anti-West propaganda after Oct 7 is radicalizing some people toward the regime and distorting public perceptions.
Guest background
Elica Le Bon is an author and commentator critical of the Iran war; she speaks from the perspective of people inside Iran, emphasizing how protests and communications were shaped by internet shutdowns and state brutality.
Key claims
Hospital-reported casualties after Jan 8–9 are estimated at about 36,000 per hospital, excluding street executions. War is “step one” only; without steps two and three (uprisings/arming and defection), the regime may survive. She argues the IRGC (and “colectivos”-style thugs) must be neutralized for freedom. She says Reza Pahlavi’s calls mobilized millions and that his team claims ~150,000 potential defectors.
Notable examples
Jan 8–9 massacre; internet shutdown reducing support; uprisings throwing turbans off “Muellers”; Syria’s rapid collapse after a civil war; comparisons to Germany/Japan de-radicalization.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOIntroduction to Gaming App Snacksy
1:11 to 2:39
The host discusses a new gaming app Snacksy and how it benefits players.
“I'm not a gamer, even though I look like one.”
The Call for Regime Change
2:39 to 3:20
Elica Le Bon shares thoughts on the situation in Iran, uprisings, and the need for regime change.
“there was so many just of this sort of like universal voice that was saying we need help.”
Diverse Perspectives on the War in Iran
3:20 to 4:00
Elica and the host discuss the perception and authority of voices critical of the war in Iran.
“And I think ultimately this is the time to do it.”
The Situation in Iran and the Role of the West
4:00 to 5:00
Elica describes the brutal conditions in Iran and the responses of Western nations.
“And tell us, you know, what your take is on everything that's been going on.”
Understanding the Dynamics of Uprisings
5:00 to 6:20
The conversation explores the dynamics of uprisings and international involvement in regime change.
“They can't communicate with the outside world.”
Historical Context of Regime Change
6:20 to 7:40
Discussion about historical instances of regime change and the complexities involved.
“decapitation of an enemy, whatever, has now turned into something where people are being almost radicalized in support of the regime.”
Defections and Support for Opposition
7:40 to 8:40
Elica highlights the importance of defections and support for opposition movements in Iran.
“and it's something that I can't even get my head around, is that I don't think that there's ever been a time where war by itself would effectuate regime change.”
Brutality of the Current Iranian Regime
8:40 to 9:40
Exploration of the Iranian regime's brutality and its impact on the populace.
“I mean, I can only tell you what his team says.”
Challenges of Regime Change Strategies
9:40 to 14:00
Elica and the host discuss the complexities and strategies surrounding regime change in authoritarian states.
“But I have never called for people in Russia to rise up against Vladimir Putin because I always knew that if they did that, that they'd just get slaughtered and nothing good would come of it.”
The Role of Ideology in National Destruction
14:00 to 17:40
Explore how ideology can lead to the destruction of nations, with a focus on socialism and Islamism.
“going out on the streets, demonstrating.”
Show all 29 chapters
Concerns About Regime Change
17:40 to 20:53
Discussion on the challenges of achieving regime change and historical parallels to past conflicts.
“How many scratchers did you hit to get that?”
Strategies for Effective Regime Change
21:11 to 24:18
Analyzing potential strategies for regime change in Iran and why they may not be implemented.
“But the problem is, if you look at it at a purely practical level, what we're doing and what we're talking about is simply not going to enact regime change.”
Public Sentiment Against the Iranian Regime
24:18 to 28:00
Examine public opinion in Iran and discuss the implications for regime stability and change.
“This is kind of worse in a way, though, because Iraq wasn't holding the world ransom economically.”
Public Opinion on the Iranian Regime
28:00 to 30:54
Explore the complexities of public sentiment toward the Iranian regime and the implications of regime support.
“But again, example from my own experience, which sort of makes it easier for me to think about these things, the Soviet Union was deeply unpopular by the time it collapsed.”
The Impact of War on Iranian Sentiment
30:54 to 39:24
Discuss how military actions and public perception shape the response to the Iranian regime and its threats.
“And so it's just, it gets to a point where everybody understands it.”
Nuclear Threats and Regional Stability
39:36 to 42:01
Examine the implications of Iran's nuclear ambitions and the regional power dynamics at play.
“their death to America, Iran would have to be monumentally stupid.”
The Case for Regime Change
42:01 to 43:34
Explore the argument for regime change in Iran and its implications.
“So yeah, you can march straight into Lebanon.”
Narrative Warfare and Perception
43:35 to 46:24
Discuss how narratives shape perceptions of Israel and Iran amidst conflict.
“I don't know that Americans don't want it.”
The Impact of Propaganda
46:25 to 48:02
Examine the effects of propaganda and misinformation on public opinion.
“So now you're seeing like, for example, they hanged three men, a young wrestler, right?”
The Complexity of Middle East Alliances
48:03 to 50:18
Analyze the conflicting agendas of Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the US.
“And I think there's been a huge amount of propaganda and brainwashing and whatever.”
Concerns of Growing Extremism
50:19 to 55:20
Address concerns over the rise of extremism in political discourse.
“Which is totally fair and totally reasonable.”
Concerns of Growing Extremism
56:39 to 57:52
Address concerns over the rise of extremism in political discourse.
“When you buy seafood, what do you worry about most?”
The Rise of Radical Extremism
58:08 to 1:00:05
Discussion about the growing radical extremism and terrorist attacks related to current events.
“Well, the worry is you say you're worried about where it ends, right?”
Disillusionment on the Right
1:00:06 to 1:02:04
Exploration of how some on the right have become disillusioned with Western ideals.
“Some people on the right have become so disillusioned with where the West was going, particularly during the woke period.”
Scapegoat Theory and Internal Conflict
1:02:05 to 1:05:10
Analysis of René Girard's scapegoat theory and its relevance to contemporary conflicts.
“Another thing that's showing up for me right now?”
The Woke Theory of Everything
1:05:11 to 1:08:17
Discussion on how woke ideology simplifies complex issues into oppressor/oppressed narratives.
“They also feel that essentially Israel activates all of these different countries.”
Oppression in Context
1:08:18 to 1:10:01
Debate on the nature of oppression in global conflicts, especially relating to Israel and the Middle East.
“who've got that no one is illegal on stolen land sign, they don't leave their house, but they can say Israel should leave its house.”
Complex Discussions on Oppression
1:10:01 to 1:11:09
Explore the complexity of discussions around oppression and morality in conflicts.
“I think we could make an argument for that.”
Ideological Subversion and Its Consequences
1:11:10 to 1:13:10
Learn about how ideological subversion can manipulate public perception and societal norms.
“Elika, what's the one thing we're not talking about that we should be?”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00I've bought two mattresses in my entire life. Both times I walked into a shop, lay on it for about four seconds and thought, yeah, that'll do. Genuinely world-class decision making, which is crazy because you spend a third of your life on the thing and most of us buy one the way you'd buy a toaster. Today's sponsor is Avocado Green Mattress. Certified organic mattresses. No polyurethane foam anywhere near them, just natural materials and they're handmade. The bit that actually got me is you don't have to buy it blind. Avocado has real showrooms plus retail partners across the US. So you can go in, lie down properly, not for four seconds, and work out if it actually suits you before you pay for it.
0:39They're not everywhere yet, so check the store locator for what's actually near you. Avocado products are made, not manufactured, and thoughtfully crafted with real materials to deliver lasting comfort and support. You can experience them in person at an avocado showroom or a premier retailer near you. Or shop online at avocadogreenmattress.com slash trigger to check out their mattresses and furniture sale. That's avocadogreenmattress.com slash trigger. avocadogreenmattress.com slash trigger. Right, I'm going to level with you. I'm not a gamer, even though I look like one. I'm not going to pretend I've been grinding through RPGs between recordings, or that I have strong opinions about which Final Fantasy was the best one.
1:22I think it's Japanese and I think there's a sword. That's genuinely everything I know. But our social media guys showed me this app and I genuinely thought, that's quite clever. It's called Snacksy. Basically, game publishers need new players and they're willing to pay to get them. Snacksy just passes that money onto you. You play games you were probably going to play anyway. You own coins and you cash them out for real rewards. PayPal, Amazon, Netflix, gift cards. If you prefer gaming credit, you can redeem for PlayStation, Xbox, Steam and Nintendo or cash out your Ineba wallet. I've got no idea what that means.
1:56Actual money, not just points that expire. It takes a few minutes to set up. You open the app, swipe through the game offers, pick something that looks decent, play it, earn, redeem. That's the whole thing. There's a sign-up bonus worth up to$10 if you use our link, which is in the description of this episode. That's S-N-A-K-Z-Y, SnackSync. Click the link in the description to get started. And when you sign up, use the code TRIGGERPOD. That's T-R-I-G-G-E-R-P-O-D to claim your$10 bonus. And the app is mobile only, so click the link from your phone, not your laptop. There were so many videos. there was so many just of this sort of like universal voice that was saying we need help.
2:46We cannot fight this alone. These people are killing us with military-grade weapons. I'm worried that the administration and others have called for people to rise up only
3:01Francis Foster:for them to be killed for nothing. I think everybody understands and anticipates that they very well might not come home. But what else do you do? The war is one step. The uprisings, possibly armed uprisings is another and defection is the other. And I think that those two things, if they're neglected, we're not going to have the regime change. And I think ultimately this is the time to do it. The worst case scenario is that the war ends and the regime remains in power. Would have been better that there was no war at all. Elika, welcome back to the show. Thank you for having me. Every time we put out an episode where the guest is somewhat critical of the war in Iran.
3:39Francis Foster:All the comments are like, you need to speak to an Iranian. So here you are for diversity purposes. Diversity, oh my gosh. Or maybe authority. Author, okay. Don't hit me with the diversity. She's here for authority, guys. It's going to be an interesting one. All right. So welcome back. Obviously, the subject is a serious one, even though we're joking around. And tell us, you know, what your take is on everything that's been going on. I think my take is, you know, it's a very long take because this is something that has really built up, built up until the moment that we are right now. Obviously, if you were following what was happening in Iran around January, where we had this massacre on January 8th and 9th, where it's estimated, well, these numbers, you know, people want to war over these numbers.
4:29but the numbers that came back from the hospitals was about 36 ,000. And that was just each hospital in every city listing how many casualties they had. And that's not including the people who were just executed on the streets and who never made it to the hospitals. So suffice it to say that we're talking about tens of thousands. At that point, from my perspective and from the perspective of people inside Iran, we are always sort of hedging towards what's going on in there and what do they need from us, right? Because that's the only role we play. They don't have internet. They can't communicate with the outside world.
5:04So we want to know, well, what is it that you want? So through that period of time, there were so many messages. There were so many videos. There were so many just of this sort of like universal voice that was saying, we need help. We need help. We cannot fight this alone. These people are killing us with military-grade weapons. How do you defeat military-grade weapons? And so that was the call for help. Now, where things get tricky is that, okay, so then you have the US and Israel coming into this picture, and people sort of give this sort of condescending attitude of, oh, you think that these people are just here to save you and save your country.
5:44Well, none of us ever said that, right? None of us ever believed that any nation was acting anything but in their own interest. And it really, that is the way that things are. Everybody understands that nations act in their own interests. But because of this backdrop of, since October 7th, this radical anti-Zionism, anti-Israel, anti-anti-anti-anti-Western, which stems back to Soviet infiltration, right? We've had that conversation, I think. It came to a point now where this war, which was supposed to be seen through our eyes as a rescue mission, perhaps through the US and Israel's eyes as, you know, decapitation of an enemy, whatever, has now turned into something where people are being almost radicalized in support of the regime.
6:32And so it's getting really dark.
6:35Francis Foster:Well, I think there's probably some people are being radicalized in support of the regime, but there's also, I mean, cards on the table, Francis and I recorded a conversation, we'll go out a couple of days from now, from when this goes out, where we are basically saying, it doesn't look to us like any of the objectives any of us might have wanted to be achieved, i.e. Iran doesn't get nuclear weapons, i.e. the protesters who you are talking about get justice or have a regime that replaces the current regime that doesn't treat them the way that regime change. I don't think that's going to happen.
7:14Francis Foster:It's clearly not happening at the moment. and there's a possibility of a global recession. So you can also be concerned about what's happening without being radicalized in support of the regime. Well, yeah, of course, those are two completely different things. There's obviously, you know, a well-meaning sort of skepticism about what are the objectives of this war and when do we know if those objectives have been achieved? I think one of the main issues that's sort of, and it's something that I can't even get my head around, is that I don't think that there's ever been a time where war by itself would effectuate regime change.
7:47There are other things that need to sort of unite, like, for example, uprisings, defections within the ranks. And the person that has mostly, largely been responsible for that is the Crown Prince, Reza Pahlavi. So when he called people out into the streets in January, they went out in their millions. When the internet got shut down, his views went down in the millions. So there was a strong evidence that there was a strong connection there. And so I think where this war has gone, sort of been negligent is in not pulling in the other actors that would effectuate regime change, right? Also Reza Pahlavi, I think there's, I can't say the numbers for sure, but I think there's like 150 ,000 people within the ranks that are looking to defect to him.
8:34And so...
8:35Francis Foster:What are you basing that on? How do we know that? His team says that.
8:42How do we know? I mean, I can only tell you what his team says. But what I can tell you is that...
8:49Francis Foster:But do you see what I'm getting at, right? But we have enough evidence of his support, right? We have enough evidence of the people chanting his name in the streets. We have enough evidence of millions of people coming out when he called them to come out. So that's good enough that we know that there are a ton load of people inside of Iran who support him. But either way, it's not about... This isn't making a case about who supports him, who doesn't. It's making a case that why aren't we taking the necessary steps towards regime change? It's not going to be just the war in isolation. It's going to be the war does what the war needs to do.
9:21Then Reza Pahlavi calls the people into the streets. The regime is significantly weakened. There's been defection within the ranks and then the regime falls. So I think it's almost like we're doing step one. But if we're not going to do step two and three, then what's the point?
9:33Francis Foster:I mean, that's a fair point. And when we interviewed Ted Cruz, he talked about arming the protesters. But I'll be honest with you, Elika, you know, I feel about the war in Ukraine very much the way you feel about Iran. It's personal to me. I have family involved and whatever. But I have never called for people in Russia to rise up against Vladimir Putin because I always knew that if they did that, that they'd just get slaughtered and nothing good would come of it. And I'm and, you know, I was on Diary of a CO a couple of months back. And he when this whole conversation about Iran was starting, I think the protests were just happening.
10:06Francis Foster:And I was kind of saying at the time, I'm really not certain that calling people into the streets is going to create a positive outcome here. And I'm worried that that, I mean, the way things are going now, I don't see this working. Well, I mean, it really speaks to the brutality of the regime, right? It's because, like, when you think about 1979, when there were these uprisings in Iran, and the Shah just, he left, because he was like, I don't want this type of bloodshed of what it would take to sustain this regime, right? And so now, that is the situation. This regime is so brutal that there really is no lengths, no ends that it would go to to not suppress the uprisings.
10:46But at the same time, it's like, they're gonna die anyway, right? So that's the way that they look at it. They look at it like they have nothing left to live for. Everybody in Iran has been affected by this regime now. Somebody's parents has been hanged. Somebody's children have been shot. You know, this isn't a life for anybody. So when you tell people at that point, you know, to go into the streets to fight for their freedom, at that point, it's like they might as well die fighting. That's the way that they see it. I think everybody understands and anticipates that they very well might not come home.
11:17But what else do you do? And then the only other option is outside help. And now outside help is like the worst thing that you could possibly do because it's American imperialism and Israel's plan for greater Israel, greater Iran, whatever the hell it is. So it's like we're fighting a battle on so many fronts. And it's just, it's impossible.
11:39Francis Foster:Well, it's kind of what I'm saying. I'm not sure that this can get solved the way that people want and therefore encouraging more people to rise up against the regime. I take a point look if I was living in an authoritarian country and I felt the regime was evil I'd rise up against and look it'd be up to me do I get killed or not whatever but from outside I'm worried that the administration and others have called for people to rise up only for them to be killed for nothing but I think that it's they're killed for nothing if if everything isn't locked in place, right? I think if you have the war, which is decapitating the regime, if you have protesters who are coordinated in rising up, if they are armed, if there are defections, because that point of defection almost always happens where it seems that the instability is at a tipping point, that it could go one way or the other.
12:36And then there's personal stakes. There's personal stakes where it's like, okay, this is going this way, so I'm gonna... how it's always been with regime change, right? And we even saw with Syria, like, it was 11 days. Nobody could have, everybody said, oh, this brutal regime, decades-long Assad regime, there's no way that this is coming down. But somehow it did. I think the mistake...
12:55Francis Foster:Well, after a brutal civil war that lasted, God knows how long, and killed hundreds of thousands of people. Do we want that for a run? No, but when it came down, it was in 11 days. But you had to have the civil war first. Yeah. I mean, we've basically had, I mean, we basically had the worst of it, as far as I'm concerned. I just think what doesn't make sense is to half-ass these things. That's what I think doesn't make sense. I don't think it makes sense to have a war and to not be sort of collaborating with people like Reza Pahlavi or, you know, collaborating in ways that can help make the protests successful.
13:33Maybe if it involves arming, I don't know. Something that involves defection. I just think that this needs to be covered in a much more broad way for it to work. And also, look, nobody's ever really been honest about what it takes to turn a country that is authoritarian to a country which is a liberal Western-style democracy. For example, take Venezuela. My family have been involved in protests time and time and time again, going out on the streets, demonstrating. But what we have in Venezuela is something called the colectivos, and they're essentially Chavices or the regime's armed thugs, and they suppress.
14:14In order for you to gain freedom, you need to get rid of all the colectivos. In the Iranian case, it's the IRGC. And I think what this really speaks to is how much ideology can really destroy nations, right? So you talk about socialist dictatorships, Islamist dictatorships. In either case, these are people who are convinced to the death of them that their ideology is the right ideology, even in the face of contradictory evidence, right? With socialism, I mean, it's the worst ideology in human history, basically the deadliest ideology in human history. And you see that these people are so totalized in their worldview that they are willing to live and die to maintain that system.
14:55The same with Islamism, right? I think, to push back on what you're saying, Elika, I think Islamism is actually far worse. I take what happened in Venezuela with Delce Rodriguez. Now, people talk about regime change, but Delce was an integral part of Maduro's government. But, you know, when you talk about socialism and all the rest of it, she's not that ideological because she was happy to kick him to the curb and become leader herself because what she's really interested in is power and status and the money. Whereas you look at, you know, some of the lads in charge of Iran, you know, they're pretty...
15:30They really believe. You know, they're true believers. They are true believers. They are true believers. And that's why, that's why. And it really, to me, speaks to how much, and I guess this is why I have such a hard time now in the world that we're in, where radicalization is happening, because it's like, I know the story of the other end of that so well, right? Once that radicalization is entrenched, you can't convince, you can't push back on them. There's nothing you can do, because in their minds, they have this story, right? This is my fight. This is my fight and God wants me to fight this and to defeat the bad people, to bring the good things to the world.
16:08And it's like, you see what you're bringing to the world. You see this is just death and destruction. Oh, but they're martyrs. They're martyrs for a greater cause. There's always some way to spin it in your mind. And so it's just, that's really what we're looking at. We're looking at an ideology that refuses to leave Iran. And it's like, how do you kill an ideology? Well, if you look at history, the only way of doing it, if you look at Japan or Germany, is to essentially decimate the country, bring it to its knees, and then have a process of de-radicalization like we did with Germany.
16:40Francis Foster:And that's why I'm worried about this conflict, Elika, because we're not going to do that, right? And no one's advocating for that. And that means, you know, some of the conversations we've had while we've been here, it's likely that you end up in a trap where you are not prepared to do the actual thing that you need to do, because it's terrible, like what we did to Germany and Japan was awful. You don't want to do that to Iran. But that means you don't have a way of achieving your objectives. You don't have a way of getting rid of the nuclear material. They've taken it, they've dispersed it. We don't know where it is.
17:14Francis Foster:You're not going to get it with airstrikes. And now also the other thing is they've got control over the, you know, a hell of a lot of oil, gas, fertilizer, helium, et cetera. And there are a lot of people are now saying, actually, they've got all the trump cards. Best thing that's ever happened to you financially. Go. Easy. Sold my car on Carvana. Amazing offer. Really? I hit 200 on a scratcher. Did the scratcher come to your house and hand you a check? No. How many scratchers did you hit to get that? I hit a button on Carvana.com once. Okay, that's fair. It's like the lottery, except you always win.
17:51Not like the lottery at all, actually. Exactly! Inexplicably good. Offers worth bragging about. Sell your car today on Carvana. Pickup fees may apply. I mean, I don't know. I feel like they've had all the cards for the past 47 years. I just wonder where this goes. Do you know what I mean? Like, at some point, this regime has to fall. But when is it going to fall? Well, it can't last forever. Why? Nothing lasts forever.
18:17Francis Foster:Okay, sure. Even the British Empire didn't last forever. Oh, I'm very sad now. And that pretty much owned the whole world. But I... You see what I'm saying, though. Like, it could last another 50 years. I think the way that these regimes typically end themselves is because... I mean, we just have to remember that these people aren't really exactly in their right minds. They're not reasonable people. And so when you think of Hitler, for example, he was not reasonable. He was drunk on power. Eventually, he was killing the Jews and nobody really did anything. Nobody cared. Holocaust, whatever. Finally, when he invades Poland, people are like, oh, this is a real threat.
18:55And then so comes the war. I think the thing about actors like this, like the regime, is that they won't stop. They won't stop with the October 7th and the massacres and the sort of imperialism out into the Middle East that draws these forever wars. They won't stop. And so my thing is that one of these days, they're going to do something that's the last straw. They've already done something that's the last straw, according to the United States. It's just that this last straw wasn't enough to go all the way. I just don't see... I think the reason that this regime has to fall, like every bad faith regime in history, is because it will eventually do something that invites the world wanting to attack it.
19:40Francis Foster:Going into this year, I told myself I was finally going to stop guessing about my health. Like most people, I want more energy, better focus, and to be still strong and sharp years from now. But every time I've gone to the doctor, I walk out with basically nothing. Everything's fine. Drink more water, sleep a bit more. No real insight, no plan, just vibes. That's why Superpower stood out to me. Superpower makes it simple to actually understand what's going on inside your body. You do one blood draw either at home or in a nearby lab and they analyze over a hundred biomarkers. That's heart health, hormones, metabolism, vitamins, minerals and even environmental toxins.
20:18Francis Foster:What I love is that you don't just get numbers. You get a personalized action plan, supplements, nutrition guidance, lifestyle changes and even your true biological age that you can track over time. Price-wise, this is a no-brainer compared to the alternatives. Superpower used to cost$499. Right now, it's$199, while other testing services charge$500,$1 ,000, sometimes more, for similar, often inferior information. Your blueprint activated with Superpower. Superpower is just$199, and for a limited time, you can get an additional$20 off with our code TRIGGER. Head to superpower.com and use code TRIGGER at checkout for$20 off your membership.
20:59Francis Foster:After you sign up, they'll ask you how you heard about them. So make sure to mention Trigonometry to support the show. Once again, head to superpower.com and use our code TRIGGER at checkout. Look, that may very well be the case. But the problem is, if you look at it at a purely practical level, what we're doing and what we're talking about is simply not going to enact regime change. It just isn't. And that is the unfortunate situation. A regime change can happen now if the circumstances are right. And so the question is, why aren't we aligning the circumstances to make it right? We have this window in time.
21:35We have this window in time where we can get the Iranian people out into the streets, possibly arm them, possibly go for... You know, their precision strikes are so incredible. Why can't they go for the weaponry that they're using on the protesters?
Read the full transcript
21:49Francis Foster:Because it's just assault rifles, I like that. Well, can't they target that? No. They're targeting the booths. They're literally, they're targeting the booths where they're doing the checks. I know, but you're not going to take out every single AK-47 in Iran. It's not going to happen. And this is the thing. It's like the IRGC are still going to have guns at the end of the day. Yeah. Well, maybe then it involves arming the protesters. I don't know. Maybe it involves arming the protesters. Maybe it involves more coordinated riots. You know, the funny thing is that this is literally America's speciality.
22:20every time it's done these coups and things like that. Even 1953, that was exactly what they did. They coordinated protesters. They armed them. I actually don't know if they armed them, but they coordinated them. They made it a serious thing. And it was from that tension, that regime change, Mossad, whatever. But they know how to do that. I find it odd that there's no investment in that end of it, which is where the regime change happens. I think it's very odd. There's a part of me that wonders, do you want regime change?
22:51Francis Foster:Well, this is kind of the problem here because as we talked in that conversation that's coming out shortly, we've talked to a lot of people. Some of them work in the administration. Some of them know things, don't want to go into the details how they know them. But there is no plan here. There's no grand strategy here from what we understand. I'm not saying we know. We're not experts in this, but that's what we're being told. There's no great strategy here. This is just like, oh, we did Venezuela, now we can do this. And what you're pointing out is the same thing that we are concerned about, which is it hasn't actually been thought through to that level or pre-planned to that level, which is why you're not seeing the things that were promised or you'd want.
23:35Francis Foster:You see what I'm saying? Yeah. I don't know. I think that I think that this whole thing needs to be revisited, shall we say. But I do think that those are the three steps to regime change. It is, the war is one step, the uprisings, possibly armed uprisings is another, and defection is the other. And I think that those two things, if they're neglected, we're not going to have the regime change. And I think ultimately, this is the time to do it. If there is a window in time, it's now. and so I really don't understand why this isn't being coordinated in that way. It's also political, Elika, in that the Americans have no stomach for regime change, especially after Iraq, especially what happened with Afghanistan.
24:16But those are not the same.
24:18Francis Foster:They're not. They're not the same. This is kind of worse in a way, though, because Iraq wasn't holding the world ransom economically. Iran can and is. True, but the fear that people have over regime change is that, you know, it's gonna be another Iraq, it's gonna be another Afghanistan, it's gonna be another failed state. Well, it's not a failed state. It's like a thousands years old nation state. You're not... What those regime changes did was that they tried to impose an outside government and effectively build a state that didn't exist because those were new countries at the time as well. And so, Iran, you have this really old kind of nation state that is unified behind language, behind a flag, behind culture, behind all of these things.
25:02We don't want a foreign-imposed government. This is not Iraq. We want...
25:08Francis Foster:Well, you do, though. You do want a foreign-imposed government. No, we don't want a foreign-imposed government. Well, if you cause regime change and then replace it with one of your puppets, which is what you want to happen. No, that's not what we want to happen. Okay, maybe I'm... Reza Pahlavi is only a transitional leader. So this has been articulated so many times, I don't know why people don't get this. He's a transitional leader that comes into the country once the regime falls to facilitate moving the country into a democracy where people can vote for their own leader. What if they vote for an Islamist regime?
25:40Well, no one's going to vote for an Islamist regime. How do you not? Because we know the statistics of what people favor.
25:45Francis Foster:Oh, okay. I actually don't. What are the statistics? 90 % of people in Iran are against it. Against the regime? Against the regime. Wait, how do we know that? Because there's studies, like the Gammon study, which is in, I think, the Netherlands conducted, and it speaks to people inside Iran, obviously, anonymously, and they collect data about their public sentiments. And they say that 90%, or is it 85 % or 90%, there's 10 % that support the regime. Still, it's a country of 90 million. It's still a lot. And they have the guns. But your point about 90 % is very powerful. I mean, we've had people on the show, So Ayman Dean, who's a former Al-Qaeda, MI6 double Asian, for example, he gave a very different assessment of it, which was like 25 % of people support the regime, 25 % hate the regime.
26:39Francis Foster:To me, I'll give you a similar example for Russia, which is easy for me to explain. So I am someone who's a fierce critic of the Russian regime in the way that you are a fierce critic of the Iranian regime. But I would not say that I know what percentage of people in Russia are... Because maybe you don't know. Because nobody does. Yeah, but you absolutely can have a fair assessment about the sentiments of a country through extensive polling over time. And for the past 46 decades, repeatedly polls have shown that it's a very high percentage, almost 90 % of Iranians who are against this regime. And I just think it's just like, who would like this regime?
27:21You do have this minority. Of course, you have a minority of extremists, But this is where it's like, you do not know Iranians if you think that that's who the majority of Iranians are. They don't identify that way. They don't identify with Islamic extremism. It's not part of our culture. It's not part of our cultural personality. It's just, it's so obvious to us that when people ask these questions, it's like, we even give you the statistics, right? We even give you the polls. But it's like, people just believe what they want to believe. I don't know what to tell you. It's not a country that's 50 % Islamist radicalist.
27:57It's just not who the Iranian people are.
27:59Francis Foster:Oh, sure. No, no, I'm certainly not saying that. But again, example from my own experience, which sort of makes it easier for me to think about these things, the Soviet Union was deeply unpopular by the time it collapsed. But that doesn't mean that 90 % of people living in the Soviet Union were opposed to the Soviet Union. I think... You know, if you took a poll in the Soviet Union around the time that it actually collapsed and there was regime change, There was still a shit ton of people who supported it. It just became weakened economically and morally and in other ways. But to me, when someone says 90 % of people in a country agree on something, that to me, you may be right.
28:35Francis Foster:I'm not disputing it. I'm just saying to me, that's a bit of an alarm bell because that seems unprecedented. It's not an alarm bell. It's a terrorist regime that everybody hates and has destroyed the country. It's brought it to ruin, to economic collapse. everything about them that they do. They take the money and they give it to proxies. They are so radicalized. They don't take care of the country. They kill people for protesting. The methods of torture are medieval. They hang people. Nobody likes this regime. I'm not saying that 90 % of Iranians agree on other things. Iranians never agree on anything.
29:11It's actually disturbing how much they disagree. But if you want to include the diaspora, 99 % are against the regime, statistically.
29:21Francis Foster:Well, the diaspora are the people who left, right? So that would make sense that they'd be against the regime. So on average, you're talking about about 95 % of Iranians in this world at least agree on being against this regime. I've never even seen this type of overwhelming evidence of people who support the regime. When I go online, I don't see anyone except the bots that support the regime. If they are people who support the regime, they're here in the West. They're Anna Kasparian and Cenkuga. But where are all of these massive, you know, spokespersons for the regime? Well, I mean, look, there may be a lot of people in Iran who actually can't go online because there's been an internet blackout.
30:02Oh, they have internet. The ones who support the regime have internet. Okay. Yeah. And also as well, look, I don't know, but how many people get radicalised at school? They don't get radicalised at school. It just doesn't work. I mean, yes, they do. They have to go to school and they say, death to America, death to Israel. But it just doesn't work because they go home to their parents and their parents say, yeah, just say that, but, you know, we're not like that. You know, they don't go home to radicalized parents. It's just, the culture inside of Iran is very different. It's a culture of tolerating this sort of infrastructure of extremism, but also being outside of it because you have a people who are, what's the word?
30:45familiar, I don't know what the word is, it's like literate in this type of propaganda. And so you build propaganda literacy the more you live under this regime, right? And so it's just, it gets to a point where everybody understands it. Everybody understands the manipulation, the dishonesty, the lies, the danger. Everybody understands it. I'm not saying that there aren't the extremes. Of course there are the extremes. 10 % of 90 million, that's millions, I'm not good at math, but I'm pretty sure that's millions. That's millions of people. So I'm not denying that those millions of people exist.
31:19It's just there's a huge, you know, disparity. And you even saw when some of these uprisings were happening a couple of years ago, they started to throw the turbans off of the Mueller's heads when they were walking down the street. And, you know, that was a little bit controversial, some people said, you know. And other Iranians said, you know, F you. but there is quite a strong divide there. They don't even like seeing them in the streets. Because the concern is, going back to America, so they have said, for instance, on our show, Ted Cruz said that, I think it was by November, if the war had...
31:55By the midterms. By the midterms. If the war was still carrying on by the midterms, they would have failed. Trump said at the very beginning, four weeks maximum. Now, we all know that Trump talks a lot of nonsense. There simply isn't the stomach, Elika, to carry out a prolonged campaign in order to get rid of the regime and the regime's goons and everything that is needed to keep the regime in place, which is my concern. Because what could actually happen is Trump turns around in a week, two weeks, three weeks and goes, you know what, we've degraded their military capacity. We've bombed. He's already said that.
32:33We've got new leaders. Yeah, exactly. Exactly. So we've destroyed the capacity to produce nuclear weapons. Tick, tick, tick. We've secured the Strait of Hamus. It's now up to the Iranian people. Rah, rah, rah, Cuba next. That could very easily happen. I mean, I think that's pretty much happened already. Yeah. He's already said that there's a regime change because everyone there is a new leader.
32:54Francis Foster:Right. So this is kind of our concern. And look, I know we're pushing back on a lot of stuff you're saying. I'm going to sound like our mutual friend who we all admire, Dave Smith here. Like, I really hope what we are saying is wrong. No, I don't. And we are rooting for the Iranian people to be free of the tyranny of the Islamic regime. But we're just really seriously concerned at this point that there is no great plan. And given some of the ways that we, because of the conversations we've had, understand the way this can escalate, we're just very concerned that basically what is likely to happen is Trump is going to pretend that he got this big victory, but actually what he's going to do is cut and run.
33:35Francis Foster:And I don't think the Iranian people are getting better off. I don't think the nuclear material is going to be eliminated. So the one thing you could say is, well, you flattened the missile program. You've destroyed the military industrial complex. You've set them back 10 years, let's say. Some people will take that, I guess. Yeah You probably wouldn't I think what they've said inside Iran Repeatedly is that the worst case scenario Is that the war ends And the regime remains in power Would have been better that there was no war at all Because after that, that's when they do Their most brutal crackdowns That's when they start killing everybody And saying you were a Zionist, you were a Zionist You were a Zionist People who are just filming outside of their windows Whatever So that's actually worst case scenario If they stop this war But, you know, you can't deny how much public sentiment has shifted the direction of the war as well, because it's considered generally a very unpopular war.
34:35And I think that, and this is why I think this is largely because of this backdrop of what the conversations that have been had in the Middle East over the past three years, especially the very, very, very, very, very anti-Israel view of things, which has sort of driven this conversation towards, okay, yeah, some people are extreme and they're going to say, oh, the regime are the good guys. But some people, the more like Dave Smiths of the world, are going to say, well, these people are not really bothering us. You know, these people haven't done anything wrong. They're just a regular government, just like my government and your government.
35:08And isn't America a terrorist government too? And that sort of really manipulates public perception in a way that people are not willing to get on board with a war that they just fundamentally don't think has any purpose or benefit to them, maybe not even in the long run, right? I genuinely do not think that the public, the American public, think that the Islamic regime is a threat. But because it probably isn't a threat to them, really, if you look about it, if you look at it and you analyze it objectively. Now, it's far more of a threat to the UK. It's obviously a much greater threat to the Middle East and the stability of the Middle East.
35:46But to the average America living in Kansas City, why is Iran threatening them? It's a threat if the regime succeeds in its ambition. It's a threat, right?
35:56Francis Foster:So what is it? Well, its ambition is death to America, death to Israel. And right now its task is to remove Israel. But that's kind of like my toddler saying death to daddy. It's not. Right. But there's action. There's not just intent. So what is the threat that they pose to America? Yes. Sorry, sorry, sorry, sorry, sorry. So the first stage is to remove Israel because these are the two oppressors, right? The oppressors of the West and the oppressors of the Middle East. So they've put in action all of the stages necessary to remove Israel. They created a second IRGC called Hezbollah in Lebanon, which is closest border to Israel.
36:34Have been attacking Israel nonstop ever since. Of course, Hamas, same thing, Houthis. And all of this is part of the campaign to remove Israel. Now, Israel is relying on the United States for aid to defeat these proxy groups, which another thing that people are like, why should we have to pay money to Israel? Because they don't understand that Israel is the one that is holding down the forts against these forces. Because let's say if those forces did win, let's say the United States pulls out its funding. Let's say that they don't consider them allies anymore and Israel falls and the Islamic regime wins.
37:05Now the Islamic regime has exported its revolution out into the Middle East. Now you have the Islamic Republic of Lebanon, which already is a state within a state. It's just ready to go one way or the other. You have the Islamic Republic of Lebanon. You have the Islamic Republic of Palestine. You have the Islamic Republic of Yemen, the Islamic Republic of Syria, God knows where. And now you have these combined forces, right, with combined military technology, all of these things. You don't think at that point they're going to go for the second thing that they stated in their charter, which was, next, we're going death to America.
37:36You don't think that's going to happen. So, but then you could say, well, I just don't think that's ever going to happen because Israel will always be there and we're always going to support them. The public sentiment in this nation is that there should be no support for Israel, that Israel is the biggest terrorist state in the world. All of this stuff is just like a complete inversion. It's just total moral inversion of the situation. If you want to keep funding Israel for the rest of your life, then maybe the regime will never threaten you, sure. We get asked this all the time. Which VPN do you use at Trigonometry?
38:09The answer is simply CyberGhost VPN. CyberGhost isn't some fringe tool. It has 38 million users and over 20 ,000 five-star reviews on Trustpilot, which frankly is rare for any tech product, let alone a VPN. CyberGhost encrypts your internet traffic, which means your provider, your employer, your school, or anyone else on public Wi-Fi cannot see what you're doing online. It routes your connection through secure servers in 100 countries, hides your IP address and keeps no logs at all so your activity isn't being tracked or stored. On top of that, it unlocks regional content from 40 streaming platforms like Netflix, Amazon Prime and Disney Plus.
38:52And it works on up to seven devices at once. Phones, laptops, tablets, even your smart TV. You can share it with your family if you want. We rely on it when we're traveling for the show because it's simple, fast, and it just works. Right now, you can get CyberGhost for about two bucks a month with four months free, a 45-day money-back guarantee, and 24-7 support. That's protection for your browsing data and access to blocked content online for two bucks a month. Totally risk-free. To grab the offer, go to CyberGhostVPN.com slash trigonometry or click the link in the description of this episode.
39:31It's completely risk-free, so check it out today. But the one thing that I would say is that when we're talking about Iran, their death to America, Iran would have to be monumentally stupid. They would have to be monumentally stupid in order to do a 9-11 type terrorist attack, for example, because that would mean their entire country gets obliterated. That's why they go round the side door. they didn't do October 7th they went round the side door yeah but October 7th was done to Israel
40:04Francis Foster:right in the same way that like the Taliban didn't do 9-11 but they let Al-Qaeda train and do other things but then it was the Taliban that had the shit kicked out of them for like 20 years and now the Islamic regime is having the shit kicked out of them so it's not gonna be you know so direct but you move indirectly you say oh as Dave Smith said they had no idea about October 7th. Yeah, I don't think that's true. No. But I still don't know that if I were an American, I'd be sitting here quivering in my boots at the threat of Iran. I mean, some of the things that were said about this, you know, Iran is an imminent threat.
40:47Francis Foster:I mean, come on. Really? Imminent? I don't think it is, right? If it has a nuclear weapon, it's imminent. To whom? To anyone. Why? If as a nuclear weapon, you don't think it's an imminent threat? To America, no. No, it could do whatever it wants with it. Okay. But is North Korea an imminent threat to the United States? No. I don't know. North Korea got nuclear weapons so that they could just be left alone to have their dictatorship and peace, effectively, right? That's what they did. And this is the thing is like, I, you know, I remember I was very curious and interested in the arguments you made last time you won the show when you talked about the type of Islam that the Islamic regime practices in Iran and the fact that there's the Mahdi coming back and all of this eschatological stuff, which obviously that exists, right?
41:38Francis Foster:But from Iran's perspective, the much more rational reason to get nuclear weapons is to be a regional hegemon or at least to protect itself from what it perceives as the threat. But that's exactly the problem, isn't it? Because then you cannot control their behavior going forward because they're a deterrent state. Once you get nuclear weapons, they're a deterrent state. So yeah, you can march straight into Lebanon. Who's going to stop you? You can march straight into Gaza. You can go do whatever you want with Israel. Who's going to stop you? That's the whole problem. Well, Israel has nuclear weapons.
42:11Francis Foster:So who's going to stop you is Israel. So what, are we going to have a nuclear war? No. Well, historically speaking, nuclear weapons appear to actually create peace. Stalemate. Yeah. Yeah. This is not me advocating for us to let the Iranians get nuclear weapons. My concern is, if I'm being honest, as I understand the situation on the ground is, like, other than negotiations, which I don't think are going to work long term either, but they might work short term, there's actually no way of stopping the regime from getting nuclear weapons short of successful regime change and boots on the ground. That's why we need a regime change.
42:47And that's why everything else, no matter how long you go down the rabbit hole, is just kicking the can down the road. It just makes no sense. We want to get into this situation where both the regime and Israel have nuclear weapons, but the regime, this is the difference of what's in whose charter, right? In their charter, it's that they must eliminate Israel. So whether that escalates into a nuclear war actually becomes deterrent because they both have nuclear weapons, or they just keep... I mean, where does this end? And isn't the US always going to be implicated in that war when it comes to the regime and Israel?
43:21So I just... This is just dragging the October 7th nightmare on and on and on and on and on. I just think that none of this is going to make any sense unless there is a regime change. The problem is, is I don't think there is going to be a regime change simply because the Americans don't want it. I think the Israelis do want it.
43:40Francis Foster:I don't know that Americans don't want it. I just don't think they're doing, as you say, they're doing the things to achieve it. Yeah, so therefore you don't want it. If you're not prepared to do the things to achieve it, then you don't want it. If he wanted to, he would. Yeah, exactly. Exactly. I don't get that reference, but it makes sense. You don't get that reference? No. Oh, you didn't get it either. Yeah, I got it. What's the reference? It's like with men. Like when they don't call you or whatever, you say, if he wanted to, he would. I've been married for far too long to understand that.
44:07Yeah, so the Americans affect, don't want it. You look at the Israelis, the Israelis do want it. But the problem is they can't. The Iranian people definitely want it. Absolutely. But the Israelis can't do it without the Americans because the Americans are the senior partner. And also, the more Israel goes down this path, the more it loses support in the United States. You already see that there is a massive chasm between the way people of the ages 40 and over view Israel and the way people 40 and under Because of all of this radicalization, which I genuinely have serious concerns about where this ends.
44:43You know, like, this is such, you know, it's such... It's such Soviet disinformation, all of it. It's like this whole idea that, you know, the West is the source of all evil, and Israel and the US reflect that greatest evil, and this, like, sort of perception hijack over time, right? And I think especially after October 7th, it has been most, most deeply entrenched. Such that you can, you literally look at all of these situations and the way that they see it is the total opposite to the reality. And the fact is that the more that there are these wars, the more they see the bad guys as the good guys, right?
45:24Because they're constantly circling back to the same conclusion, which is that Israel is the source of all evil in the world. And to, you know, to make that true, to make that conclusion true, Everybody else has to be good. Everything that Israel is fighting has to be good or misunderstood or just reacting to Western imperialism, right? That's always the story. All of these people are always just reacting to Western imperialism. For 1 ,400 years, they were reacting to Western imperialism, right? Zero agency. So what I fear happens over time is that the more they're able to rewrite and invert these stories through war, because it's always happening through war.
46:04it happened through the Gaza war, it's happening through the Iran war, the more they're radicalizing people towards this really staunchly anti-Israel, like deranged anti-Israel perspective. And that, oddly enough, is starting to really hurt the Iranian people because of how much they need to make the Islamic regime faultless by extension. So now you're seeing like, for example, they hanged three men, a young wrestler, right? And you see these people, leftists, taking to the internet saying, he murdered an IRGC officer, here's the video, and it's like some black grainy shadow that doesn't show anything.
46:50And they're literally just regurgitating state propaganda, and it's like, look at what you're doing. You are romanticizing a terrorist regime just because of your hatred for Israel. Because if this really was a terrorist regime and you had to accept that, then you would have to also accept that Israel being at war with it might be justified. And you can't in any circumstance make Israel justified. So to make Israel never justified, the regime can never do any wrong. And so now this is directly affecting us and now our morale, because we're experiencing this where we're seeing thousands and thousands of people being killed.
47:27and you see people going on Piers Morgan saying, we think that Ayatollah was a very courageous man because at least he didn't capitulate to the Israelis. It's like, what planet are you on? Who says that? It's like saying Hitler was a very courageous man. And so this is such a time of extreme distortion and moral inversion. And I think my fear at the same time is like, you have a physical war, you have a narrative war, but where does this narrative war go? Where does that end?
47:56Francis Foster:Well, this is part of Francis and I's concern about all of this, because I think you described it very well, what's happening. And I think there's been a huge amount of propaganda and brainwashing and whatever. And also, though, I think we also have to be honest. And we've talked to lots of people off camera and on camera on this trip. A lot of people who are not anti-Israel and who are not anti-Semitic and all the things that people like to say whenever anyone has a critique of Israel's foreign policy. Can we get some more water? Yeah, please. That was so sweet, the way you were like. Nothing there.
48:28Francis Foster:There seems to be no water in this cup. No, that's apparently how you're supposed to make... I didn't even think of it, but that's how you're supposed to make men do things to you. Oh, totally. You just identify properly. A hundred percent. You just go, oh, something's missing here. There's no water in my cup. Yeah. And you did it. Yeah, it's beautiful. I like the fact that you pretend you didn't know what you were doing. She didn't pretend. She described exactly what she's doing. I'm like, I'm just so innocent. Oh my God, no water. We will cut this bit out, I think. I think it's good. Oh, shall we keep it in?
48:59Francis Foster:Yeah. All right, cool. Well, she just manipulated me to get her some water. Yeah. Anyway, I guess the thing that I'm concerned about is I think there's also a lot of people who are not anti-Israel, who are not anti-Semitic, but who see that Israel and actually Saudi Arabia and the UAE as well, they have, as all countries do, their own agenda. And the agendas of those countries do not fully align with the agenda, as they would perceive it, of the United States. For the reason that we tried to talk about earlier, which is there are different levels of threat that are presented to those countries versus America.
49:37Francis Foster:And because of that, and this is where a lot of people have like a brain spasm, where I agree with you, the propaganda begins to take effect, because they go, Israel has tricked America. And it's like, how? how? What is the mechanism? And they start to make all this shit up about the super powerful Israel lobby, which I don't think that's remotely true. I don't think President Trump can be tricked into stuff like this. What he can be tricked by is his own ego or his own political ambitions. These things might be very well possible. But I guess what I'm saying is there are more and more people now in America who feel that Israel has its own agenda that's different from America's and they want their government to be pursuing the interests of the American people.
50:22That's fair.
50:22Francis Foster:Which is totally fair and totally reasonable. And my worry is as well that one of the other things that starts to happen is whenever anyone expresses that point of view, there are far too many people online who instantly start calling them names and start saying they're anti-Israel, anti-Semitic. I mean, we get all the names. Everyone gets the names. Everyone gets the names. There's no option where you don't get the names anymore. Sure, that's true. But if you want to radicalize normies against a particular view, just start calling them names for expressing a view. You see what I'm saying? Yeah.
50:55I mean, I haven't personally seen that. I haven't personally, because those people, in my opinion, don't speak up too much. I haven't seen people, I haven't seen really, I've seen some videos where someone's like, where, I think I saw this video of a woman that she was like, this is not our war, blah, blah, blah, blah. And it was actually got loads of likes. Every time I've seen people say stuff like that, it's like very much like all the comments are like, you're so right, this is so amazing. I've never seen somebody get backlash for saying that.
51:21Francis Foster:I mean, there is a lot of people now who are in favor of this war, calling anyone who disagrees with it. You know, I mean, you've seen the, you know, the micropenis discourse on Twitter. I actually have not seen the micropenis discourse. It's one of the intellectual discussions of our time. The Mark Levin's of the world are going after the Megyn Kelly's of the world. And it's all just devolved to like literally micro penis. She's got a micro penis. She's a massive. I mean, I just like this is I find it incredibly sad that actually this is where the level of the discussion has got to. And it's body shaming.
52:01Francis Foster:I think you can shame someone with a micro penis. I'm still on board with that. I'm old school. You can what? You can shame someone for having... Oh, you can? Yeah, I think so. But how would you know? I mean, that's a good question. How does Megyn Kelly know Mark Levin has a micropenis? Yeah, the shame has to be at least accurate. Yeah, that's fair. Otherwise, it won't live in the body. And so what have you really achieved? That's a fair point. You might have MPE, micropenis energy. All right. Well, I'm glad this episode has taken this turn. This is great stuff. No, but I think that... I think this is all...
52:35This is all, you know, sometimes when I just look at the internet, and I try not to these days because it's so bad and it's getting worse, especially there's so many bots on X now. And I don't know if they've just targeted my account. I think it's the regime that's specifically targeting my account. Because every time I post, it's just like so many comments that are just like, you fucking bitch, all this, that. And it's always like zero followers, zero posts, zero. Oh, and I'm sure you heard about the whole beheading thing.
53:06Francis Foster:The beheading thing? The beheading thing. No. You guys didn't hear about that? No. No. So, Goldie and I, do you know Goldie? Goldie Kamari. Oh, right. Okay. We got an email from this hacker group saying that they'd commissioned a Mexican cartel to behead us for$250 ,000. So, um, I obviously went to the FBI and, uh, they opened the investigation. DOJ determined that it came from the Ministry of Intelligence in Iran. Wow. Yeah. So, and that was, and just get this, because it gets worse. After I had been on a, on an episode of Piers Morgan, right? and Anna Kasparian had taken a clip of me and Goldie laughing at Cenk because he was going, Israel's to blame for 9-11, Israel's to blame for Iraq, Israel.
54:03Like, it was just funny. Like, we were laughing. And then she manipulates the clip and takes our laughter and says essentially that we were laughing at war and she calls us laughing hyenas. So the Ministry of Intelligence in its email that it was going to behead me used Anna Kasparian's thing and said we were laughing like hyenas at war, just quoted her word for word. And it's like, is this? Oh, and then they have her in their Telegram group chats. So that Fast News, which is one of the state's media, they have her, they're promoting her, doing her like anti-Israel stuff within their group chats.
54:39And it's like, and they've also, you know, they've had Cenk Uygur on their Irib, which is their broadcasting channel. And of course, Tucker Carlson.
54:48Francis Foster:The gray man himself. And it's like, is there not a point where people are going to see, like, how on God's green earth, these are people that are going out there saying, like, oh, we're pro-American. You are literally being used by the enemy of the United States. They agree with your talking points. They follow you and fangirl over you. And the FBI is concerned about me against you. Do you know what I mean? Like, you're not pro-America. You've gone so far the other way. And it's this moral inversion that terrifies me, because where does that go, right? And I just, I don't think that people understand, like, I don't know why, but I keep thinking about Nazi Germany, because I get it now.
55:35because I get that during that period of time, the buildup, no matter what you said to these people, they would have been like, what are you talking about? This isn't extreme. This person is just saying their opinion and that opinion is true. Like there would have been no way to get through to people the more and more people were radicalized until something like that happened. And I just, it kind of just puts me like paralyzed in a way because I'm like, what do we do about this growing extremism, which isn't extremism anymore because it is the sentiment of a lot of the country now.
56:09Francis Foster:Commit to the shot. Tempo. Hold your finish. Golf is a mental game, but you can't focus if you're not comfortable. Lululemon Golf Gear frees your mind and your swing with fabrics that breathe, wick sweat, and block UV. Streamline cuts, clear distractions from your backswing and your follow through. So whether it's the first tee or the last hole, your mind stays where it matters. On your next great shot. Dial in your game this summer with Lululemon Golf Gear, available in stores and at lululemon.com. When you buy seafood, what do you worry about most? Nutrition? Sustainability? Taste? I've asked all of those questions.
56:47Francis Foster:This is why Wild Alaskan Company caught my attention. It is the best way to get wild-caught, perfectly portioned, nutrient-dense seafood delivered to your door. You have not tasted fish this good. When we first got a delivery from Wild Alaskan Company, it stood out immediately. The care that goes into it, the packaging, the clear sourcing, the attention to detail, you can tell this is a company that does things properly. What makes Wild Alaskan Company special is how they source everything. 100 % wild caught, never farmed. No antibiotics, no GMOs, no additives. Just clean real fish, frozen off the boat to lock in flavor and nutrients like omega-3s.
57:27Francis Foster:You get flexible shipments, expert cooking tips, and a box that genuinely feels like it's come from people who care about what they're sending. My favorite variety is their Pacific Halibur. Firm and meaty, it cooks beautifully in a pan or on the grill and goes with almost anything. And there's no risk. If you're not completely satisfied with your first box, Wild Alaskan Company gives you a full refund. No questions asked. Get seafood you can trust. Go to wildalaskan.com slash trig for$35 off your first box of premium wild-caught seafood. That's wildalaskan.com slash trig for$35 off your first order.
58:04Francis Foster:Thanks to Wild Alaskan Company for sponsoring this episode. Well, the worry is you say you're worried about where it ends, right? I'm going to tell you where it ends. And we're already seeing it now, which is a growing rise of radical extremism and terrorist attacks. That's where it's, that's where we're seeing it. We've been here a matter of weeks. We saw a terrorist attack in Austin. We saw a happily supported terrorist attack on a synagogue in Michigan, which could have been horrific, a truck loaded with explosives. We saw a nail bomb attack happen in New York. And the more this war carries on, the more people get radicalized, the more Iran starts to fund terrorism abroad, which I'm sure it will do at certain points, the more we're going to see this.
58:48But this is exactly what the regime has been planning all along. The regime is planning all along to subvert the Western left. And now it's happened. No, I don't know. I don't know how it happened to the Western right, who would just, we're pro-America, apparently not. I don't know how you get Tucker Carlson and the Islamic regime. I genuinely don't.
59:05Francis Foster:I wrote a whole article about it. Oh, you did? I didn't want to make you sneeze again. I heard that inhalation. I heard that inhalation. I wrote a whole article about a long time ago, Tucker Carlson and the woke right. And I kind of lay out what I think is going on. And I mean, that point that you make, Alec, is actually really important. And I totally agree with it, which is, I think there is an honest critique of this war, for example, to be made. Of course. And we've made it today. I mean, it's war. But there's a difference between that and where people are getting to now, where Tucker Carlson is literally on camera saying, oh, you know, Sharia law has made all these Arab countries brilliant.
59:43Francis Foster:And you're going, what the fuck are you talking about? Literally, what the fuck are you talking about? But you know what's so funny about even when I saw that? He starts and he's like, yeah, our problem here is self-hate. We hate the West. It's like, you're so close. But you are the one that's doing it. Which is actually the point that I actually wrote in my article, which is a lot of people on the... Well, not a lot. Some people on the right have become so disillusioned with where the West was going, particularly during the woke period. They started to almost hate the West, but in a different way.
1:00:17Francis Foster:So the left hates the West for its ideals, whereas this section of the right hates the West for failing to live up to its ideals. And they kind of became radicalized this way. But you would think that, and the funny thing is, the reason that conversation came up is, all the evidence shows that the American right considers radical Islam to be the number one problem. Not anymore. Well, the bulk of it still does. But some of these people who've taken trips to various parts of the Middle East, they are now trying to make that not the argument. And by the way, as three people who come from Britain, I mean, we can tell you how this is going to go.
1:00:57Francis Foster:Yeah, absolutely. Very well. Absolutely. And for someone like Tucker, who keeps slagging off Britain for mistakes that it's made, to be fair, in terms of immigration policy and other things, to then not see that that is going to also happen in America, I just, I don't get it. I think, yeah, there's so many moving parts here. I think, you know, we have the part of, like, you know, the Soviet ideological subversion where it sort of comes into the US in the 60s and 70s and starts to sort of radicalize people towards this Marxist slant. And unfortunately, there was that fusing of the social justice movement at the time, right?
1:01:31The civil rights movement, which was obviously a legitimate movement. But once it becomes fused with Marxism, it's kind of like inextricably intertwined. And so that's why we have this Marxist foundation in modern social justice, which is inherently anti-Western. It is anti-West, anti-imperialism, because this is the root of all evil. Well, imagine if they saw what the Soviets did, right? Imagine if they knew what communism did, then they would know that there's a very different route of evil. And then I think another thing which is like really showing up for me right now, that sounded so therapy.
1:02:06Another thing that's showing up for me right now? But is I keep thinking about Rene Girard's scapegoat theory. I don't know if you know it.
1:02:16Francis Foster:Tell everybody. Okay, so, and mixed in, I sort of have this hybrid model with Carl Jung's shadow. But essentially, René Girard talked about something called mimetic rivalry, where two people, two sides would rival each other because they want the same thing. And the wanting of that same thing is what assigns value to it. Like, two kids wanting the same toy. Oh, if you want it, I want it. So this kind of mimetic rivalry is something that exists, you know, maybe between political sides, like the left and the right, the east and the west, whatever. Um, so what he talks about, when he talks about scapegoat theory, he basically explains that these two sides that are rivaling each other, let's say the left and the right in the United States, they eventually reach a point where there's imminent violence.
1:03:04It's like there's nothing that can happen here, except one of us has to kill the other. In that moment, uh, what will happen is that they'll find a scapegoat, and they will project all of their social problems onto this scapegoat, and they will eliminate that scapegoat, and then feel or believe that all of their problems have been resolved. Obviously, this has happened numerous times, and René Girard actually created this theory because of the Jews, like the Jews being the convenient scapegoat throughout history, throughout Nazi Germany, blah, blah, blah. And, you know, then there's this other side of it So that's kind of like a macro kind of look at it.
1:03:48But I think there's another side of it that it's the same thing that's happening on an internal level. So when you think about these people who are so, so like these Candace Owens, Anarchasparians, these people that it's like their life and soul to destroy Israel, it's very clear that there's something in them, some type of wound, some type of trauma, some type of pain that they are projecting outward to avoid confronting that whatever is in that shadow, right? And by eliminating that thing, you feel like you've eliminated that shadow within you, right? So that's also Carl Jung's theory, and it matches perfectly with Rene Gerard's theory.
1:04:26And what I feel like we're seeing is people who have some degree of like really deep interpersonal problems, and they are now doing this whole scapegoat theory. But the difference is now, instead of saying Jews, they say Israel. And you can really feel, you see it in these people's eyes. They genuinely believe that they will finally get peace, or the world will finally have peace once Israel is abolished. And you know that it's a fallacy, because you know all of the things that are around Israel that they continue to ignore. You know that they continue to ignore this terrorist regime in Iran. ISIS, Hamas, Hezbollah, oh, they're not that bad.
1:05:05And, you know, they continue to ignore the worst of it. And that in itself is kind of like an admission that what they're doing with Israel is some form of scapegoatism, which is both political, in my opinion, and personal. They also feel that essentially Israel activates all of these different countries. And if you took Israel out of it, everything would calm down. It would be like turning just the hob off. And all of a sudden, the Middle East would stop being this boiling pot of resentment and anger. Yeah, if you killed all the Jews. Yeah, well, yeah, Israel didn't exist. Well, they wouldn't even say that.
1:05:38They would just go, oh, we need to change what Israel is. And you actually drill down on what they mean by that. They can't explain it. But basically what they want is for the state no longer to exist. And then once it does, it's utopian thinking. We're going to reach this nirvana, which is obviously nonsense. Yeah, well, it's the idea that once the state stops existing, they will be absolved, right? They will be absolved of all of that white guilt of Western imperialism, like the original sin, right? It's like Israel is the original sin of Western imperialism, colonialism, and all of the things that they've ascribed to it, which also came from the Soviets, mind you.
1:06:19And it's this sort of spiritual renewal that they want to experience through it, which is just such a sort of leftist, privileged, luxury belief, you know? It's like, I'm going to have spiritual renewal by dismantling the state of 9 million people, including Arabs and Muslims. Well, Israel is the perfect, it fits very, very well into the woke theory of everything.
1:06:47Francis Foster:That's a good book title. The woke theory of everything. But if you think about it, what is the core of the woke ideology? The idea is that everything is best understood through oppressor and oppressed groups. There is a group that is oppressing everybody. There's a group that's oppressed. Within original Marxism, that was about class and economics. Obviously, they updated it to race and ethnicity. So you've got these white people, the Israelis, they're white, Yeah. Oppressing the brown people who are also clearly oppressed because they're losing. Because that's how you know who's oppressed. Right.
1:07:29Francis Foster:And I've always said this is like, it's the teacher in the playground mentality where she hears some screaming. She turns up. There's a kid hitting the other kid. That must be the kid that's the bad kid. Right. Whatever happened before that, nobody pays any attention to. And so Israel. I don't think teachers are allowed to hit. No, no, the kids are hitting each other. I glitched in the middle of that. I thought I was explaining myself very well. Apparently not. What I mean is... You were. It was my fault. Your fault. Okay, I will go with that. So it fits very well with this mentality. And Israel is therefore the perfect vehicle for expressing what is ultimately the anti-Westernism.
1:08:12Francis Foster:That's what this is really about. Because they just see Israel as like the... A colonial outpost. Yeah, and so the people who live here in LA who've got that no one is illegal on stolen land sign, they don't leave their house, but they can say Israel should leave its house. Right, because the spiritual renewal has to come from afar. Yeah, of course, because you don't want to leave your nice house. Yeah, and I think, you know, and how far the moral inversion goes is that, you know, you say, well, there would be peace in the Middle East if it wasn't for Israel, you know, activating all of these groups.
1:08:43that it's never, the responsibility is never on the other end. Like, can these groups stop trying to kill Israel and then everyone will be safe and free? Because, no, but they would say, and I know because I've heard it and I've had the conversations with them, they would say that this is an uprising because they're oppressed. October the 7th was an uprising. That's how they would see it. No, but the other countries. What are you going to say about Lebanon? What are you going to say about Heskola? They're fighting Calola. It's an uprising. That's what it is. Well, then why can't we go to war with Iran then?
1:09:14Because we're fighting a colonial... No, because...
1:09:16Francis Foster:They're not colonists. They're brown. Yeah. They can't be. They can't be. It's not possible. Well, but that's... You laugh. That is how they think. Yeah, I know that's how they think. It's still funny. Because when they look at the Middle East, they don't know that it wasn't all Muslim before. Yeah, no, they don't understand that. So they don't understand that Muslims colonized all of that land. We were Zoroastrians. So we were colonized by Islamism. Right. Yeah. So why can't we say that this war is fighting a colonial empire? Because the Ayatollah is brown. That's literally what it is. He's Jewish.
1:09:51He's actually Jewish.
1:09:52Francis Foster:Is he? No, but we should say that. They'd say, well, he deserves to get bombed. That's quite a conspiracy. That's why I say we should say he's Jewish. I think he might have a few... Or white. I think he might have a few issues. I think we could make ourselves white. I think we could make an argument for that. And it's also, there's, there's the, America is the evil empire. As a result of them being the evil empire, everybody else is oppressed. Nothing, like, just like nothing about it ever makes sense. You talk about the, you talk about Hezbollah, you talk about the Houthis, you talk about the regime.
1:10:25You're like, yeah, they're fighting oppression, but they are committing more oppression than anybody else.
1:10:30Francis Foster:Yeah, but they're, they're doing it for good, Alec. They're doing oppression in their own lands for good? Yes. Yeah, because to suppress the Mossad agents. Because they're brown. Yeah. And oppressed by evil Israel. It's good we're agreeing, finally. Yeah, finally. All of the debate is over. I think the logic is airtight. It's airtight logic. They win. I think we have to go forward as leftists because we clearly see that that is the superior world view. Well, I'm fine. I'm gay and trans. We've done it. I don't think we'd be accepted. What do you mean? I self-identify as a woman. You self-identify as a woman?
1:11:09Francis Foster:Yes, I think it's a good note to end the episode on. Elika, what's the one thing we're not talking about that we should be? Oh, my gosh. Oh, my gosh. Don't say it right. Ideological subversion. Should I say more? Yes. Oh, okay. I thought that was the end of the episode. So manipulative again. Do you notice that? Yeah, yeah, yeah. Should I say more? She knows what she's doing as well. Of course she does. You said the end of the episode. I thought it was like, boom, and then no. You've watched our episodes. Come on, Aleka. Tell us more. Okay. I think that what people aren't talking about enough, or what people aren't seeing enough of, is the way that bad-faith actors use periods of vulnerability, such as war, to try and turn the public in their favor using tactics of ideological subversion and propaganda and how that, you know, radicalizes people, even people far, far away, people in the West, people in the United States.
1:12:11And that radicalization changes the nature, the fabrics of the society that we live in. And ultimately what happens is that this sort of, you know, becomes like a Trojan horse of humanity, where you keep saying that you keep siding with these people who have subverted you, right? You keep saying these are the good guys or these are the people that we need to have some understanding for. And then that sort of, you know, you usher in authoritarianism into our societies through this Trojan horse of humanity. And so now, authoritarianism, terrorism, all of those things start to become normalized when we see these terrorist attacks.
1:12:48We're like, well, I mean, this poor guy was probably like really just upset over something that happened. So we really have to have more understanding for it. And so our tolerant societies are now being lost to intolerance because of that normalization of authoritarianism, which is coming from this ideological subversion that these bad faith actors are doing to the Western world.
1:13:10Francis Foster:Nelika, thank you so much. Head on over to triggerpod.co.uk where she's going to answer your questions. The focus of Iranian female suffering is often on the birth of the the car. But what does life for an Iranian woman actually look like beyond that, that we do not or fail to understand?
From the publisher
Triggernometry is proudly independent. Thanks to the sponsors below for making that possible:
- Superpower: Test 100+ biomarkers. Detect early signs of 1,000+ conditions. Click https://superpower.com
- CyberGhost VPN: Our VPN of choice. Grab the offer at https://cyberghost.com/triggernometry
- Wild Alaskan Company: premium, wild-caught seafood. Go to https://wildalaskan.com/TRIG for $35 off your first box
Join our exclusive TRIGGERnometry community on Substack! https://triggernometry.substack.com/
OR Support TRIGGERnometry Here:
Bitcoin: bc1qm6vvhduc6s3rvy8u76sllmrfpynfv94qw8p8d5
Shop Merch here - https://shop.triggerpod.co.uk/
Advertise on Triggernometry: https://trigger-brands.com | or enquire at marketing@triggerpod.co.uk
Find TRIGGERnometry on Social Media:
https://twitter.com/triggerpod
https://www.facebook.com/triggerpod/
https://www.instagram.com/triggerpod/
About TRIGGERnometry:
Stand-up comedians Konstantin Kisin (@konstantinkisin) and Francis Foster (@francisjfoster) make sense of politics, economics, free speech, AI, drug policy and WW3 with the help of presidential advisors, renowned economists, award-winning journalists, controversial writers, leading scientists and notorious comedians.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices




