Why I Told President Trump to Attack Iran - Sen. Ted Cruz

25:03In my experience, prediction markets reflect the conventional wisdom at the time. So to give you an example, the prediction markets in the 2016 presidential election at this point said Jeb Bush was the runaway favorite and he was going to win. And so that was the conventional wisdom at the time. And that's where the prediction market was. I don't disagree with the proposition that politically, where we are right now is a challenging position for Republicans. That if the election were held today, there would be a very good chance we would lose the House, and we could lose the Senate as well. Now, obviously, I hope that doesn't happen.

25:40And we do have seven months until Election Day, so we've got time. And I think we've got a remarkable record of success, much of which has not been communicated to the voters. And so I think we've got a real record to campaign on. And I don't believe that what is happening in Iran will be front and center on November. I don't think that this will extend. If it extends that long, we've done something wildly wrong. I don't believe it will. I think the president said at the beginning, this is going to be a matter of several weeks. This is not, I don't think the president is envisioning anything that extends multiple months, much less multiple years.

26:20I think I think this will prove a very different military involvement than Iraq did. Senator, so you've got Cuban heritage, I've got Venezuelan heritage, and Constant has Russian heritage. We know how autocratic regimes work. We know that it's not just the people at the top, but they have the tentacles, which they use to control people, in particular the IRGC, Islamic Revolutionary Guard, numbering roughly around 200 ,000 highly trained soldiers, many of whom are fanatical. They are Islamists. How are you going to deal with them? Because they are the ones keeping essentially the Iranian people.

27:01Let's be honest, they're the ones keeping them in control. And that's where this military campaign, I think, is making a difference, because you're taking out significant numbers of the IRGC as well. You're weakening the apparatus the regime has to oppress the people. And look, weakening the regime, you know, we're at an interesting moment in time because there is a very real possibility in the next six months, we could see new governments in Iran, Venezuela, and Cuba. And if we end up with governments in those three countries that want to be friends with America rather than are enemies with America, that would be the biggest geopolitical shift since the fall of the Berlin Wall.

27:46Now, let me be clear. There are a thousand ways that can go wrong. I'm not being Pollyannish and saying, oh, everything's wonderful. But on any objective level, the regimes there are weaker than they have been in our lifetimes. That is a moment of enormous opportunity. And so, look, at some level, it's going to be up to the people of Iran if they want a new government to step up and insist on that. I do think the president's putting pressure, weakening the regime and weakening the oppressive power of the regime makes them more vulnerable. And that, at the end of the day, I think that increases the safety of Americans.

28:29And the other challenge that you're facing is the Strait of Hormuz at the moment, because when you look at the natural resources going through there, the petroleum, the liquid natural gas, the fact that it's been shut and it's been closed. And let's be honest, that is Iran's main trump card. That is a very real issue, not just for America, but for the globe in general. Unquestionably, though, I will note the Europeans who are more impacted by the Strait of Hormuz closing than America is. The Europeans have said, well, gosh, we don't like it, but we're not willing to do much, much about it. Identifies Venezuela.

29:03That sounds very on brand for Europe at the moment, we say as Europeans, unfortunately. Look, the Strait of Hormuz is no doubt a critical choke point. And Iran, I think part of the reason that we're seeing them go after the strait is because I think they're in desperate straits, that they are so weakened they don't have very many options left. And look, we've seen, for example, we've seen a short-term energy price spike. Now, listen, if energy keeps soaring and if you end up with gas prices much, much higher, you know, you asked politically about the election. High gas prices historically have not been good for elections.

29:44People are pissed. Now, I don't believe that'll happen in the long term. I think we're seeing a short term spike. Anytime you have military conflict in the Middle East, you predictably have a spike in the price of oil and the price of gasoline. if we can bring if we can see a stable regime in Iran that is not waging war with us. And if the Iranian energy can come to the global market free of sanctions and free of conflict, I think long term that has a significant downward pressure on the price of oil and the price of gasoline. And I also would point out that even with the spike we've seen, the price of gasoline is still significantly lower today than it was under Joe Biden.

30:24And so we saw under the Trump administration and Republican Congress, the price of gasoline basically cut in half. And then we've seen about half of that go back up again during this conflict. I think the conflict will be short-lived and I think you'll see prices fall when that happens.

30:41Francis Foster:Going into this year, I told myself I was finally going to stop guessing about my health. Like most people, I want more energy, better focus, and to be still strong and sharp years from now. But every time I've gone to the doctor, I walk out with basically nothing. Everything's fine. Drink more water, sleep a bit more. No real insight, no plan, just vibes. That's why Superpower stood out to me. Superpower makes it simple to actually understand what's going on inside your body. You do one blood draw, either at home or in a nearby lab, and they analyze over a hundred biomarkers. That's heart health, hormones, metabolism, vitamins, minerals, and even environmental toxins.

31:19Francis Foster:What I love is that you don't just get numbers, you get a personalized action plan, supplements, nutrition guidance, lifestyle changes, and even your true biological age that you can track over time. Price-wise, this is a no-brainer compared to the alternatives. Superpower used to cost$499. Right now it's$199, while other testing services charge$500,$1 ,000, sometimes more, for similar, often inferior information. Your blueprint activated with Superpower. Superpower is just$1.99, and for a limited time, you can get an additional$20 off with our code TRIGGER. Head to superpower.com and use code TRIGGER at checkout for$20 off your membership.

32:00Francis Foster:After you sign up, they'll ask you how you heard about them, so make sure to mention Trigonometry to support the show. Once again, head to superpower.com and use our code TRIGGER at checkout. But we're looking at, for instance, a significant gas field in Qatar being bombed. Yes. And it's now being shut down. People within Qatar are saying it's going to take three to five years for it to be up and running and to be fully functional. And that is responsible for 15 % of the world's natural gas. And you're going, this is unsustainable, surely. Well, look, that was bombed by the Iranians. And it is an amazing statement that Iran, when this military conflict started, began firing missiles at practically every one of its neighbors.

32:43And ironically, the Arab world is more united behind this military conflict than Europe is. And I think it's because they understand the threat of their neighbor. And listen, when the Ayatollah says death to America, I believe him. I don't think those were empty words. One of the reasons why I have been leading the fight to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon is I believe the Ayatollah, if he had had a nuclear weapon, the odds are unacceptably high that he would use it. And let's - Why do you say that, Senator? Because he was a theocratic zealot who embraced a death cult that celebrates suicide.

33:31So let's compare and contrast Iran to North Korea. If you go back, let's go back to the Bill Clinton administration, Bill Clinton administration, was negotiating with Kim Jong-il, Kim Jong-un's dad, and cut a deal. And they said, okay, if you don't develop nuclear weapons, we will give you billions of dollars. And Kim Jong-il said, great deal, happy to do it. Well, what happened? They took the billions of dollars, they turned around and developed nuclear weapons. And now North Korea has nuclear weapons.

34:08and they regularly threaten to use them. They threaten to use them on their neighbors in Asia. They threaten to use them on the United States. North Korea claims they have missiles that can go. In fact, Austin, Texas has been one of the targets they have identified as a nuclear target. Now, look, Kim Jong-un is narcissistic and unstable and a megalomaniac, but perhaps some modicum of deterrence is possible. Because the one thing Kim Jong-un understands is if he were, God forbid, to use a nuclear weapon, his regime would end that day. The response would be devastating, and he wants to stay in power.

34:47It would have been a much better world if he didn't have nuclear weapons, but there's at least some modicum one can hope of deterrence. What is qualitatively different when religion comes into it, when a theocratic zealot comes into it, is that ordinary cost-benefit analysis doesn't work nearly as well. So, look, if the Ayatollah had a nuclear weapon, I think there is some real chance, and I don't know what the possibility is, but it's real, that he would detonate that weapon in Tel Aviv or New York or Los Angeles. Now, if he did that, the result would be an overwhelming military response and a response that predictably would take the lives of many Iranians if he detonated a nuclear weapon.

35:32Here's the problem. I think the Ayatollah might have been just fine with that. If he got to kill lots of Jews or he got to kill lots of Americans, I think with religious zealotry, that might be an acceptable tradeoff to him. And so my view was, as a matter of national security, we should do everything necessary to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. And I will say, one of the additional justifications the administration has used for this military conflict is that Iran was rapidly building up its short and medium term missile stockpile. Building over 100 missiles a month, and they were building them up and building them up.

36:13And the administration was concerned that they would get such an overwhelming stockpile of missiles that it would be extremely expensive in terms of loss of lives to engage in military conflict with Iran. And they would do that essentially as a shield to then be able to develop nuclear weapons, that they were developing these short and medium term missiles to be able to inflict massive pain and loss of life on all of their neighbors. And so the administration said, we don't want to be sitting here a year from now where their stockpile and their drones are so massive that to go in and try to take out their nuclear facilities risks a massive loss of life.

36:53I think that is a reasonable justification as well. But all of this is keyed on are you are you protecting America? Are you keeping Americans safe?

37:04Francis Foster:I am completely with you on the fact that Iran should not be allowed to get nuclear weapons. I don't think there's any evidence to suggest that they were ever likely to be able to hit Los Angeles or New York. Tel Aviv, maybe. Tel Aviv, maybe. Although, look, there's more than one way to hit a target. Do they have an ICBM that could cross the ocean? No. Although they had an ICBM program, they were trying to develop an ICBM. And I would point out to people all the time, the I in ICBM stands for intercontinental. You do not need an ICBM to hit Israel. They wanted an ICBM for one purpose, which was to carry a nuclear warhead to the United States.

37:42So they were trying to develop it. But I will point out beyond that, look, if you have a nuclear weapon, there's more than one way to deliver a warhead. And if they could find a way to get it on a ship or another cargo carrier to put it in a container and put it in Manhattan, you don't have to have to deliver the warhead using a missile. And so I don't want to experience a world where the Ayatollah has a warhead and his only problem is, how do I get this to America to detonate? And look, I appreciate that this question, you know. And I'll point out, London could be another target. I think he would have rather murdered Americans than the British.

38:18But London is certainly another target you could envision him striking. We are little Satan.

38:24Francis Foster:No, I think that's Israel. But nonetheless, I mean, I appreciate the president can't think in the terms that I'm about to describe. But nonetheless, it's not a much more likely explanation of why Iran was seeking nuclear weapons. It's actually the reason that North Korea was seeking nuclear weapons, i.e. to deter aggression from Israel, from the United States, and to prevent the very things happening now. And the worry for some people is actually this conflict has created an incentive structure that will only accelerate the attempts to get nukes. So I don't think that's right. And I will say, look, there's a reason the Ayatollah referred to Israel as the little Satan and America as the great Satan.

39:05As I said, when he would lead mobs chanting death to America, I believed him. I don't think it was empty rhetoric. I think he believed it with all of his heart. And his whole life, he had been carrying it out. He had been murdering Americans. So we knew it wasn't empty rhetoric. He murdered every American he could and every chance he could. And listen, there are some, if you look at the Biden administration, their approach, they dealt with every foreign conflict with weakness and appeasement. And those on the left think, well, that's how you avoid war. Well, it's amazing. When Joe Biden came into office, there was peace and prosperity across the globe.

39:41And we had two military conflicts break out simultaneously. Russia invaded Ukraine, and we had October 7th and the Gaza war that unfolded. And I think both of those were in a very direct way caused by Joe Biden's weakness, that are enemies. When Biden withdrew from Afghanistan and an absolute debacle of incompetence that, among other things, cost the lives of 13 American servicemen and women. I said at the time. I said this has made the world much more dangerous. I said the odds of Russia invading Ukraine have just increased tenfold, and the odds of China invading Taiwan have increased tenfold.

40:20And our enemies have looked to the Oval Office. They've taken the measure of the commander-in-chief, and they've concluded that he's weak and feckless. In contrast, Donald Trump, our enemies are terrified of him. And I think America is safer when our enemies are afraid of the commander-in-chief. Appeasement increases the chances of military conflict. I've joked, there's a reason nobody goes and studies and gets a degree from the Neville Chamberlain School of Foreign Affairs. It doesn't work. Appeasement encourages bullies and tyrants. And so you see, look, when Trump went into Venezuela and arrested Maduro and his wife, that had a profound impact.

41:04And it resulted in our enemies. I think it reduced the chance of conflict. Now, you said, well, couldn't Iran want nukes to avoid people attacking them? Look, if they weren't killing everyone, nobody would be attacking them. This is not a military. The United States is not an aggressor seeking conquest. We're not trying to conquer the land and make it an American territory. We're not an expansive regime. We're acting to stop people from killing Americans. That's a very different thing. And so the justification of the Ayatollah you suggested, well, I want to get the tools to kill a lot more Americans so I can keep killing the Americans I can now, that doesn't pass the smell test.

41:48Francis Foster:One of the other things that's become, you know, we've traveled around the United States many, many times before, but we've been here for a couple of weeks now talking to all sorts of people on camera and off. As you'll be aware, as we're recording this yesterday, a counterterrorism official resigned, Joe Kent. And he's saying, I mean, I thought there were a lot of baseless things about Israel that he said in the statement. But broadly speaking, he's actually saying something that many people are now openly saying, which is that Israel and the United States have different objectives in this conflict.

42:22Francis Foster:And in fact, it is Israel's objectives that are being satisfied while Americans are not. Look, I think that is silliness. And I actually think Israel had very little to do with why the United States is engaged in this military conflict. President Trump is acting to keep America safer. I can tell you when I talked with him about it, Israel didn't even come up. We talked about the Iranians killing Americans. Like in my conversations with him, Israel was not even part of the conversation. It was simply this regime has been tried to murder Trump twice, twice hired hitmen to murder Trump twice. He was not happy about that.

42:57He doesn't understandably. Sure. And this was all about keeping Americans safe. That was his reasoning.

43:05Francis Foster:How do you square that? And forgive me for interrupting, but how do you square that with Secretary Rubio's statements, which he sort of walked back. But nonetheless, a lot of people felt that when he was talking about this, he basically, quote unquote, gave the game away when he said, well, Israel was about to attack. So we had to jump in there before we were attacked. I can't tell you why he said that. You'd have to ask him why he said that. One thing that doesn't get talked about enough is how demanding modern diets can be on digestion, especially if you're eating higher protein meals. So I've started using Mass Zymes by BioOptimizers, a full spectrum digestive enzyme formula designed to support how your body breaks down food.

43:46Bio-Optimizers has been around since 2004, and they're still a founder-owned company. Their whole thing is quality and formulation first. They've even got their own in-house lab team, and they test raw ingredients, because in supplements, that part matters more than most people realize. Masszymes is their digestive enzyme product, and what sets it apart is that it's a full-spectrum blend. It includes 18 enzymes that support the breakdown of proteins, fats, carbohydrates, and fibers. It's also got a high level of protease to support protein breakdown and phytase, which helps make minerals like iron and zinc more accessible from the food you're already eating.

44:31When your body breaks food down more effectively, that can support smoother digestion, better nutrient absorption, and may help with occasional post-meal discomfort or bloating. No drama, no miracle claims, just supporting the process. Here's how I'm using it. I take two to three capsules with meals, especially heavier meals, and I'm paying attention over time to how I feel afterwards. The point is consistency, not chasing some overnight transformation. And here's the big trust piece. Bio-optimizers back themselves with a 365-day money-back guarantee so you can try it properly. And if it's not for you, you're not stuck with it.

45:11Just let them know and they will refund you 100%. Quick UK note, if you click the link from the UK, you may be redirected to a UK distributor site. That's normal and the offer will still apply. If you want a practical way to support digestion and nutrient absorption without changing your whole routine, Mass Zymes is a straightforward place to start. Click the link in the description of this episode or go to biooptimizers.com slash trigger and use our code trigger at checkout to get 15 % off your order. Go through 2026 with better digestion and more energy with Mass Zymes by BioOptimizers. My reasoning was very straightforward, which is this Ayatollah and this regime is a serious threat to the United States.

46:04It's not a theoretical threat. It's a threat. It's reality. Let me make a broader point on you asked about Joe Kent. I don't know him personally. I know of him, but I will say I think he embodies. Let's talk philosophically for a second. For a long time, people have thought about foreign policy, particularly foreign policy among Republicans in the United States as essentially a bipolar world, that you're either an interventionist and you want to go invade other countries and engage in military conflict, or you're an isolationist. You want to withdraw from the world and never engage in military conflict.

46:43And sort of the paradigmatic interventionist would have been a John McCain. And the paradigmatic isolationist would be a Ron Paul or Rand Paul. And those are treated as the only two options. I can tell you, I've always thought both were wrong. I don't agree with either one of them. And I think most Americans don't agree with either one of them. I've always described myself as a third point on the triangle. And so I call myself a non-interventionist hawk. Now, what does that mean? It means, as I said before, that every decision is keyed on protecting the vital national security interests of the United States.

47:20So you don't engage in military conflict, to engage in nation building, to promote democracy, to defend norms. That was a popular phrase in the Obama administration. I don't know what the hell it means to defend norms. but I'm not willing to have U.S. soldiers die to defend norms. I am willing to put the U.S. military in harm's way to protect Americans and save America's lives, American lives. That's why we have a strong military. And so it means, let's take, for example, when Obama was president and he talked about, he talked about bombing Syria and he drew a red line of chemical weapons and Bashar Assad crossed that red line.

48:01And when he talked about engaging in military conflict, I did not immediately reject it. I said, okay, let me listen to the commander in chief. Let me hear your argument for why this protects U.S. national security. And I could have envisioned, so at the time Bashar Assad had chemical weapons, he was using chemical weapons against his own people. I could have envisioned conceivably a military operation that I would think makes sense and would support. So I wanted to listen to him. And I will tell you, I asked in both classified settings and in public settings. At the time, there were seven major rebel groups in Syria,

48:44many of which were affiliated with radical Islamic terrorists, Al Qaeda, Al Nusra. and I said, okay, let's say you go in and topple Assad. How do you stop the radical Islamic terrorists from taking over? And if Al-Qaeda has chemical weapons, we've made the world much worse. As bad as Bashar Assad is, he's not using those weapons on Americans. Al-Qaeda would love to use those weapons on Americans. I'm not interested in having terrorists who hate us get weapons they can use to kill us. When you asked them those questions, the answers of the Obama administration were incoherent. They were all over the place.

49:19They said at one point, John Kerry said, we're going to launch an unbelievably small attack. And it was like, OK, well, what the hell is the purpose? And look, I could have envisioned, let's say there was a mission to go in. We knew where the chemical weapons were. They were in one warehouse. We're going to send in a squad to get the chemical weapons and remove them. And I could envision that being targeted in a way that might make America safe. Obama administration never articulated anything like it. And so I vocally opposed that military action because it didn't make America safe. Contrast this with Iran.

49:55Iran has been actively killing Americans and has plans to continue killing Americans. What is interesting when I say non-interventionist hawk, I think there are two presidents in modern times that reflect that same philosophy. One is Donald Trump. Now, Donald Trump doesn't articulate it using the same language I do. But if you look at Trump's foreign policy and national security policy, virtually every foreign policy and national security decision Trump has made, I agree with. And that's not accidental because for many of those decisions, I've been advocating those choices. And so he's agreed with me as we've talked about them.

50:35The other president who had a very similar philosophy was Ronald Reagan. Ronald Reagan called it peace through strength. You look at it in eight years as president, the biggest country Reagan ever invaded was Grenada. He was not one of the interventionists whose solution to everything was send the Marines. We see a country, let's invade it. We see a country, let's invade it. I'm not interested in that. But he simultaneously rebuilt the military, bankrupted the Soviet Union, and won the Cold war without firing a shot. That is peace through strength. That's another way of saying being a non-interventionist hawk.

51:14Don't invade everybody, but be strong enough that you defeat your enemy.

51:17Francis Foster:Well, you've made your point, but forgive me, I must drag you back to Israel. And it's not because it's a personal obsession of mine, actually, at all. But this is an issue that comes up in a lot of conversations now. And of course, it is being driven by people like Tucker Carlson, increasingly others as well. Do you not accept that there is a growing concern about the relationship between Israel and America and that many people feel that it is not to the benefit of the United States now? So look, there is a growing anti-Israel sentiment, certainly on the left, and there is a sliver on the right.

51:57And so let's break. And by the way, it's not just an anti-Israel sentiment, there is growing anti-Semitism that is getting materially worse. And in the United States, it was about a decade ago that anti-Semitism and vicious anti-Israel animus began rising on the left. And I think the Democrats' leadership, by and large, just looked the other way. They just hoped it would go away. And I think it's all but completely consumed their party. I mean, today there is a very real pro-Hamas contingent of the Democrat party. And the remaining Democrats, even if they don't agree with that extreme, they're terrified of them because that's where the energy, the money, the power in the party is.

52:41Look at all of the Democrats who made the trek up to Manhattan to support Comrade Mandami. That's where the Democrat Party is today. On the right, in the last 18 months, I've seen more anti-Semitism on the right than I have at any point in my life. And I think it is growing. You mentioned Tucker Carlson. I believe Tucker is the most dangerous demagogue in America. And he is obsessed. He hates Israel. He is attacking Israel on a daily basis. He's attacking Jews on a daily basis. And I will say, and there are others, there are a handful of podcasters and voices that are amplifying these views. Look, anti-Semitism is a gateway to anti-capitalism and anti-Americanism.

53:26Mondami is a great example of the green red alliance that Marxists and Islamists come together because they hate the same people. And so, look, you've seen it with Tucker that he starts by he has one crackpot historian on his show who says Winston Churchill was the villain of World War II. Yeah, we weren't fans of that one. He then has another crackpot professor who says there's a good argument America should have supported the Nazis and intervened on behalf of the Nazis in World War II. And Tucker gazes adoringly as he's saying this. He has said he thinks America should apologize to Osama bin Laden's family.

54:07He has said he doesn't know that Hamas is a terrorist organization. He thinks they may just be a political group. He's also said there's no one on planet Earth he hates more than Christian Zionists, and he's identified by name, me and Mike Huckabee, as the two people he hates the most. Not only has he gone down the road where he is defending Islamists, defending Iran, he had the president of Iran on and did this fawning interview, asked no difficult questions whatsoever. He had Nick Fuentes, who is an open Nazi. And by the way, I don't use the term Nazi lightly. But when you say, as Fuentes has has said, I like Hitler, I agree with Hitler, and Hitler was very, very cool.

54:47I view that as somewhat tautological. If you say you agree with Hitler, then you're a Nazi. You're saying it. That's not an adjective I apply unless someone's views make that clear. Tucker interviewed Fuentes and nodded when Fuentes said his mission was to defeat global Jewry. By the way, not Israel, Jews. news. Fuentes told him every year he celebrates Stalin's birthday. Now, let me ask you, what kind of freak even knows Stalin's birthday? I don't, and I don't care. He was one of the most evil men to have ever lived, as you know very well. But, and by the way, Tucker has also defended Mondami and defended Maduro.

55:35Like you go down the road where you're defending Islamists, you're defending enemies of America, that as you start down this road, it is a very problematic road. And at least on the right, it is still a minority on the right. So if you look at, for example, supportive, and by the way, Tucker hates President Trump. He opposes everything about his foreign policy and he's attacking President Trump on a daily basis. Now, he's too chicken to actually say that. So instead of saying that he's attacking Trump, He just has every clown who hates Trump on his show to attack his policies, but he won't actually say the name.

56:12Look, I've resolved I'm not going to sit quietly and watch my party destroyed by the same forces that have destroyed the Democrat Party. Because I don't want to wake up in five years and find both national parties in the United States unequivocally anti-Israel and viciously anti-Semitic. And I think that is a possibility. And I'm going to do everything humanly possible to stop that from happening. Tucker's views are still fringe, but they're being heard by young people. And if young people don't hear a response to it, that's how both parties are lost to this poison. Senator, but it must concern you that the longer that this war goes on, the more casualties on either side, but particularly on the American side, ratchet up, the more we're going to see this anti-Semitic virus, mine borrows, which is how I like to call it, being spread.

57:05Look, I don't want to see more American casualties. As I said, I don't think this will be a longstanding military conflict. I expect it to be a matter of weeks and not extended. And to be clear, if the proposal from the Trump administration had been, let's invade Iran and put hundreds of thousands of troops on the ground and let's stay there for years, I'd say hell no. Like, my mission is not to turn Iran into Switzerland. If they want to turn themselves into Switzerland, knock yourself out. I think the mission should be to protect America. And that is a much more focused mission that I believe the president is directly focusing.

57:48And is the problem as well that you've got the two main people, your greatest allies are Israel involved in this war. Are your objectives different? Do Israel want a complete regime change? sure i i assume so i actually don't i haven't seen them articulate that objective but i assume so because for the same reason it would be unequivocally in america's interest to see a regime in power that doesn't want to murder americans the same is true for israel they'd like a regime in power that doesn't want to murder israelis like that's a natural when when you have a leader who with religious fervor chants death to America and death to Israel, you would expect both America and Israel to be like, wait, that's not good.

58:32I'm reminded of during the Obama administration, John Kerry was secretary of state. And there was an editorial cartoon of the Ayatollah going, death to America. And John Kerry says, well, can we meet you halfway? But like, there's not a middle ground compromise. And let me be clear. America supports Israel because it is unequivocally in America's national security interest to support Israel.

58:58Francis Foster:Why is that? Because we get massive benefits. Number one, the Mossad is an incredibly effective intelligence agency, and they share that intelligence with us. We're seeing this right now in this war with Iran. How is it? You look at the 12-day war, the 12-day war last year, which Israel weighs almost the entirety of. We did virtually nothing. The only thing we did in the 12-day war was the one thing Israel couldn't do, which is they did not have bunker buster bombs that were big enough to penetrate into the base of a mountain where Fordow, the Iranians had built their nuclear weapon research facilities in the base of a mountain precisely because Israeli munitions couldn't take it out.

59:36The only country that had bombs big enough to do that was the United States. And so we sent our B2s over, delivered those bunker busters, took out the nuclear weapons facilities and left. Hugely successful. You look at how the 12-day war proceeded. Israel took out the air defenses almost immediately. They systematically took out the leadership, one after the other after the other. If you remember the IRGC, you asked about the IRGC. In the 12-day war, you'd have one head of the IRGC. Israel would take them out. The next day they'd appoint someone else. Israel would take them out. By the third or fourth day, I can't imagine what it was like for them.

1:00:12I told them to say, hey, you want to be head of the IRGC? No, no, no. Get Bob to do it. Like it was literally the precision of the intelligence penetration that Israel had of Iran was spectacularly effective. That benefits America. Israel shares our values. It is a free market democracy that is allied with America. Their intelligence benefits America. Their military, the enemies of Israel, the people who want to kill Israel, also want to kill America. So every time Israel takes out a Hamas terrorist or a Hezbollah terrorist or an IRGC terrorist, they're doing it in their own national interest.

1:00:55But it also is making America safer because those terrorists are eager to kill Americans. And so we are friends with Israel because they they are fighting people who want to kill us. And so it is making Americans safer. That's why. And look, conspiracy theories. You look online and it's amazing. Everyone blames the Jews for everything. I think that's unhinged. And so and I don't want to see, as you described it, that mind virus spread. And so and I find it amazing that the Tucker Carlson's of the world can look at what happened on October 7th. where Hamas terrorists cross over into southern Israel.

1:01:42They target civilians. They go house to house. They murder the elderly. They murder children. They rape women and little girls. They kill 1 ,200 people, including dozens of Americans. It was one of the largest terrorist attack on Americans in U.S. history. They take even more people hostage where they violently assault and rape them. and I don't understand the Tucker Carlson's of the world that can look at that and say, you know, I'm with those Hamas terrorists who are raping and killing people and not the people who are the innocent victims and then are fighting back to defend themselves against monsters.

1:02:20You know, I don't know, you know, when I see these left-wing activists who go on and on, you know, I ask them, I say, look, in World War II, were you rooting for the Nazis? Like at the end of the day, there is a difference between targeting civilians and murdering civilians deliberately, which is what Hamas does. It's what Hezbollah does. It's what Iran does. And defending yourself and taking out terrorists who are trying to murder your citizens, which is what Israel does. And it's what the United States does.

1:02:49Francis Foster:Actually, the left wing anti-Semitism makes perfect sense to me because it is a logical conclusion of the work worldview where you have oppressed groups which tend to be dark skinned, etc. and they're weak militarily. And you have white, straight, whatever, which they think Israel is, because they've never been, I assume. And they are the oppressors. And so they must be increasingly challenged with violence. It is exactly the Marxist ideology of oppressor and victim. That's right. I want to talk about something that men collectively pretend isn't an issue and collectively know absolutely it is.

1:03:26Uncomfortable underwear. Sheaf sorted it. sheath.com. The dual pouch system separates and supports everything properly. So you're not making constant adjustments or dealing with chafing that by 3pm has become genuinely distracted. I'm a podcaster. I sit down for long periods and talk. Comfort is, professionally speaking, relevant to my output. Breathable Fabrics works across every context. Gym to office to a long flight where you're already miserable enough without your underwear contributing. Trusted by fighters, athletes, and veterans who don't have patience for gear that doesn't hold up. Speaking of veterans, Sheath was founded by Robert Patton, who developed it during his second tour.

1:04:07That's not a marketing angle. That's just the actual story. And 10 ,000 five-star reviews from men who tried them and didn't go back suggest the product delivers on the idea. 100 % money-back guarantee on the first pair. There is no downside scenario here. Sheath.com Code Trigonometry for 20 % off Go to Sheath.com or click the link in the description of this episode Try them once and the underwear you own right now will feel like a punishment by comparison That's 20 % discount code again It's Trigonometry at Sheath.com Hey, it's Kelly Rowland You may not know this, but I have eczema So I get how it can steal your time But why let eczema take over when you can talk to your doctor about EBCLIS.

1:04:53EBCLIS Lubrikizumab LBKZ, a 250 milligram per two milliliter injection, is a prescription medicine used to treat adults and children 12 years of age and older who weigh at least 88 pounds or 40 kilograms with moderate to severe eczema, also called atopic dermatitis that is not well controlled with prescription therapies used on the skin or topicals or who cannot use topical therapies. EBCLIS can be used with or without topical corticosteroids. Don't use if you are allergic to EBCLIS. Allergic reactions can occur that can be severe. eye problems can occur. Tell your doctor if you have new or worsening eye problems.

1:05:24You should not receive a live vaccine when treated with Epclus. Before starting Epclus, tell your doctor if you have a parasitic infection. Paid partnership with Lilly. Respect your time. Ask your doctor about Epclus and visit epclus.com or call 1-800-L Lilly-Rx or 1-800-545-5979.

1:05:43Francis Foster:Speaking of Marxist ideology, you alluded to Cuba. President Trump's alluded to Cuba. Do you think Cuba's next? I hope so. I don't know. I think we have a greater likelihood of it. There was a bit of a right smile there. I must observe. Look, I. All right. I mentioned that my Tia Sonia passed a few weeks ago. When she was in the hospital and she was dying, I told her at the time, I said, Tia, we just arrested Maduro. And the Cuban government is going to fall. and she was in her last moments, but I will tell you the smile that was on her face. It was a wonderful thing just to share that with her in her last moments here.

1:06:26And I think there are millions of Cubans. I've never been to Cuba. I look forward to going, but I want to go when Cuba is a free nation, when they're not under the jackboot of communist oppression. Well, why were you so convinced to be able to tell your aunt that it's going to happen? So, look, if you look at the history of Cuba, for the first four decades, they were dependent upon, and in many ways, a satellite state of the Soviet Union. And they were dependent on the Soviet Union for energy and for money. Then America wins the Cold War. We defeat the Soviet Union. And suddenly Cuba became dependent on Venezuela.

1:07:02And the Faustian bargain they cut with Venezuela is that Venezuela would provide Cuba with oil and with money. and Cuba provided Venezuela with thugs, with soldiers and thugs to oppress the people. And the know-how to how to turn a liberal democracy into a communist state. Yes. And so you look, when Maduro was arrested, he was surrounded by about 100 Cuban soldiers. It was Cubans who were guarding Maduro. They were, and when we arrested Maduro, what that did is it removed the lifeline of oil that was coming to Cuba from Venezuela. So they're no longer getting oil from Venezuela. For a brief period of time, Mexico stepped in to the breach and was providing oil to Cuba.

1:07:48And President Trump quite rightly leaned on Mexico and said, stop it, cut off the oil. You look at Cuba right now, their economy is an absolute free fall. The public transportation has been shut down. They've run out of jet fuel. And that economic crisis is powerful. Now, will the regime fall? I don't know. Because you've got six decades of a machinery of repression that is built up. And that machinery is hard to dislodge. But I will say the economic pressure is massive. and and so and it is weakening the existing government i'll tell you a story about cuba so my my tia sonia has went back to cuba several times and she described to me one time she went back and she was visiting a a friend of hers from high school and she said this guy was kind of a mid-level communist party apparatchik and and he had in his living room above the sofa he had a painting or a photo of Fidel Castro hanging, like that was the main thing hanging on the wall.

1:08:57And she described how he walked her into the kitchen and he closed the kitchen drapes so that no one could see in. And he sat down at the kitchen table and she said he burst into tears and he just began weeping. And he said to her, he said, Sonia, I look at you. And she was there with my cousin, Bebe. And Bebe is my first cousin. She's this vivacious Latina. She's beautiful. And he's crying. And he said, I look at you and I look at your daughter. And she's so happy. And she's so joyful. And she has such a bright future ahead of her. And he says to her, he said, I was too much of a coward to escape.

1:09:42And I've consigned my children to misery. You had the courage to get out of here and your daughter has an incredible future. And she said he sat at that table and wept for about 10 minutes. Then he got up and he went to the sink and he turned on the sink and he got some water and he like cleaned his face and he smiled and opened the drapes. Look, that's what's happening in Cuba. And so it is my prayer that this economic pressure is enough to cause the regime to collapse. And by the way, the upside for Cuba, if you actually had a government in Cuba that was democratically elected, that you had free elections and free speech and freedom of religion, and that wanted to be friends with America, I think you would see, I think you could see in Cuba what Hong Kong was in the 1990s.

1:10:33You could see an oasis of free enterprise. There's a massive Cuban-American community in the United States who would love to come back and invest billions in the island. I think you would see a tourist, they're 90 miles away, some of the most beautiful beaches on planet Earth. I think the prosperity and abundance that could come from Cuba with a government that was not a communist regime is enormous. So will that happen now? I don't know, but I think the pressure is

1:11:02Francis Foster:greater than it ever has. Senator, I believe you've sown the seeds of the next conspiracy, given that you have a cousin called Bebe. They will not hear the end of that. But thank you so much for giving us your time. The last question we ask all of our guests is, what's the one thing we're not talking about that we really should be? You know, it's interesting. This week, Palmer Luckey, the tech executive, came and had lunch with all the Republican senators. And Palmer's a friend of mine. I know Palmer quite well. And he's an amazing tech entrepreneur. In fact, I said at the lunch that I think Palmer and Elon Musk are the two most important tech entrepreneurs in the country.

1:11:42And he's an innovative thinker. And he's talking about everything he's doing at Andrew, which is amazing. And like Elon, both of them, they don't just think outside the box. They don't know there's a box. Like, it's, I love, both are really good friends and I love watching how their minds work. I asked him, I said, look, you're really good at thinking outside the box. What is the future of military conflict? What is the future of military conflict in 10 years? And what should we be afraid of? If you were an enemy, how would you attack the United States? And he raised in particular for a non-nation state.

1:12:23I mean, he talked about all sorts of things where the future of war is going. Obviously, things like drones and AI, although he actually He said that would be slower than many people think. We'd still be using B-2s and F-35s and a lot of the legacy equipment for 10, 20, 30 years. He talked about subterranean warfare that he thought would be a component going forward. But in terms of a vulnerability, something very few people are talking about that Palmer mentioned, he said he worries about our vulnerability to a bioweapon attack, that we don't have nearly sufficient defenses to fight against and the ability to spread.

1:13:06And, you know, he pointed out, look, COVID, which at the end of the day, in terms of mortality, there are many bioweapons whose mortality is orders of magnitudes worse than COVID. COVID shut the world's economy down for a year and inflicted trillions of dollars of economic harm. And he pointed out that we're not nearly prepared enough to defend against that kind of threat. And I think that's when you talk about the kind of things that we ought to be worried about. Those are the kind of threats that I think are really dangerous. And by the way, he talked about also the ability to bioengineer a virus or some germ that could potentially target individual races, could target families, could target people.

1:14:03and so he said you know look do you think if the ayatollah could create a virus that would kill jews that he wouldn't be eager to release it and you know what maybe his scientists are wrong and it doesn't just kill jews it kills everybody like that kind of danger it is something we are in a dangerous world but when he raised it all of us now look the united states government is doing a lot of research to combat against that. But I think we need to be doing more because that kind of asymmetric attack has the potential to do enormous damage.

1:14:38Francis Foster:It's interesting you mentioned that my father was a biochemical engineer in the Soviet Union. He's retired now, but it's something that he always said to me that one day this will be possible. And it's actually the most terrifying weapon that human beings will ever have come up with. Particularly because I think we often to overestimate what we know. So let's take COVID. I think it is overwhelmingly likely that the COVID virus escaped from a Chinese government lab. I think it is likely, although I wouldn't say overwhelmingly likely, that it was bioengineered in that lab, that they used gain-of-function research to make it more contagious, to increase its ability to impact humans.

1:15:21And I think it's entirely possible they were doing so in what they thought was a defensive way to learn about how to protect humans. I have not seen any compelling evidence that the Chinese deliberately released COVID. Although I haven't seen evidence one way or the other, but given the very shoddy protections, particularly at the Wuhan Institute for Virology, I think what is most likely is there was a lab leak where you had lab workers who were infected and then went into the community and other people got infected. And then I think the Chinese government, in fact, I know the Chinese government affirmatively covered it up and was complicit in its spread.

1:15:59But there, I think they probably thought, oh, we know what we're doing and we're just researching and then, oops, they screw up. And so, and that, by the way, is a nation state with trillions of dollars of resources. If you take a couple of, you know, terrorists in a stood up lab in a warehouse somewhere, you would imagine even less expertise, which has the potential, you know, God forbid, for a virus that could kill millions or more. Senator, thank you for coming on the show. It's been an absolute pleasure. That cheery note.

1:16:35Francis Foster:It's very on brand for our show to end on something very depressing. All right, I'm going to end on something happier instead. Directly behind me is a painting of Ronald Reagan standing in front of the Brandenburg Gate. And up top are the words, tear down this wall, in German, in the style of the graffiti. And the reason that's on the wall is I think those are the most important words uttered by any leader in modern times. And let's wrap on this. I'm going to tell you the story behind that speech. Three times, the State Department crossed that sentence out of the speech. And three times, Reagan wrote it back with his own hands.

1:17:17And the State Department argued to him, said, Mr. President, you can't say this. This is too provocative. This is too bellicose. And here was their killer. It's too unrealistic. It will never, ever happen. The Berlin Wall will stand till the end of time. and Reagan with a twinkle in his eye, he said, don't you understand? This is the whole point of the speech. Less than three years after he gave that speech, the Berlin Wall was torn to the ground. And it wasn't torn down by American tanks bulldozing it. It wasn't bombed to the ground by American missiles. It was the power of American leadership, of truth, of standing up against tyranny that resulted in the Berlin Wall being torn down.

1:18:05So when I talk with optimism about what could happen and what I hope will happen in Iran and Venezuela and Cuba, it is with that example that when America stands and leads, freedom is an incredible and a powerful thing, and shining a light of truth on tyranny and oppression can be transformation.