Bitcoin’s Bull Market Is Back | Checkmate

21:01But there's more and more people that realize I got too cute. It was at 60. I thought it was going to 58. I wanted my 58K gang.

21:10Checkmate:I wanted that just for the memes. Now it's at 80 and I didn't buy as much as I wanted. And those people, there's just a ton of them who are going to go, okay. I got too cute with the problem. I probably should have just DCA'd. Now I'm going to have to. And that's a hard feeling as well because that's me in 2019. I didn't buy anywhere as much as I would have liked in the 2018 bottom between 3 and 5K. I bought way too much at 14K. And then we had another bear market that ended in COVID. But, you know, really we chopped around 8K. It was kind of the average for that year. You know, 14K was not a good price.

21:42But now I look back and it's a great price. So, you know, it's just a game of timeframes. Just don't get caught up in all the micro daily stuff and just unfollow bears.

21:52Checkmate:But how long do you think it takes? Because October 7th was pretty much the top, right? Which means it was October 6th at 6 p.m. UTC. I measured this because that's when all the four-year cyclers have their bids. Whatever the price will be on October 6th. That's the top. That's the bottom at 6 p.m. So that's like eight months, seven months. You said it takes a year. Do you think we're close to getting out of this? Well, it depends because if the bull market's in play now, if 60K was the bottom, if we look back in six months and it was the bottom, then the bull market started in February. And by many metrics, we talked about this, the bull author is the bear that follows.

22:27If that thesis is correct, and again, all of this is a thesis I can't predict the future, but that's my current working model. If that is the bottom, then this bear market has a lot of similarities. And this is the part that I think a lot of people miss. A lot of the under-the-hood damage, the realized loss, the fear, the losses that actually came into the system, the pain people experienced. I can tell you my inbox on that day told me from very serious Bitcoiners. I've heard this from other very serious Bitcoiners. I just had a message from people who were tenured and they were terrified, thinking it's all over.

23:02I'm like, that is the signal. That is the feeling that people just go, I'm so long this thing, I don't know, I think it's over. Like, oh, shit. That's the kind of event that really flushes out everyone who is price sensitive. If you're a tourist, you're gone. You're done.

23:17Checkmate:But it's crazy to me that tenured people would think like that. Like, if you've been through the COVID crash and you've been through the FTX crash, like, this one was nothing. No, but I think this is where, and this is why I like the psychological angle of all this stuff. Bitcoin was in a bear market versus other assets from January 2025. Yeah. We topped versus bonds and fiat in October 25. By the way, let's zoom out a little bit because Bitcoin's a long-duration asset. If we zoom out a little bit and look at Bitcoin's performance since the end of the 22 bear market, because that's a key point because everything went through a bear market, bonds included, and we suddenly move into a bonds are heading higher, rates are heading higher regime, a bond bear after a 40-year bond bull.

23:59The end of 2022 was a regime shift for the world. Not only that, you've got the US freezing Russia's reserves, gold, all that stuff. So end of 22 is a very good anchoring point to say what changed since then. Now, if you measure Bitcoin's performance up till today, including the bear, Bitcoin kicked ass. 2023 all the way through the end of 2024, January 25, it topped out. Everything else started running. Gold, silver, equities, AI trade. They started outperforming Bitcoin. So people's emotions was this parabola envy. Yes, Bitcoin up versus fiat, but you don't think about your past gains. You only think about what you're not getting today.

24:39right people live in the moment so versus everything else bitcoin was in a bear market through all of 2025 and that's why i think november at 80k we had a very i think we did a pop then as well that felt like another very meaningful flush out because we just had this like this thing sucks i might as well go and buy nvidia right get me out of this thing so you got this pent-up frustration um and then february is just the final nail on the coffin people just like i'm totally done now everyone was talking about everyone turned into a silver bug for a period of time.

25:06Checkmate:Very short period of time. That silver parabola matched Bitcoin's post-2023 performance. Yep. So in a way, silver kind of caught up. Also a speculative long tail, precious metal, sound money, caught up with Bitcoin's performance, including its bear market. So that just puts in a perspective that yes, silver went vertical to match Bitcoin after it went down 50%, you know, that time period. If you zoom really in, Operation Epic Fury, Bitcoin is up 50 % versus silver since then. It's up 20 % versus equities. It's actually doing like, if you drill down and say, well, Nvidia specifically, yeah, once you get down to individuals, but you've got to look at these things in terms of like, you know, what is a reasonable comparison over what timeframe?

25:49You know, people love to measure, oh, Bitcoin's the same price it was at the 2021 top. It's like, yeah, what happened the last time it was the same cycle top price in a bear? It's kind of a good place to actually buy. And by the way, pro tip, don't buy the top and then not buy the bottom. Because if you buy the top, yeah, your performance is going to suck in the bear. But if you buy the bottom and you stop worrying about all these, oh, it didn't go up top to top, bottom to bottom is what matters. The CAGR of the 200-week moving average is like 40%, 35%. The floor is increasing in 35%.

26:20Checkmate:Everything else is just noise up and above that. Do you think we'll have the psychological level at 100K again? Because that was obviously a big thing on the way up. But now we've passed 100K. Do you think it'll still be something that plays a bit of a lot? I don't think it'll be as meaningful. No. And, you know, look, I'm yet to find a satisfactory reason for why we just had so much selling above 100K. Truly, I've just settled on the, I've satisfied myself that 100K was a very special number for a lot of people. It was the stretch of all stretch targets. And we hit it. I remember when I first got into Bitcoin, people talked about 100K like they talk about a million now.

26:50Checkmate:Like, it was this long shot thing that seemed, like, don't get me wrong, I can see how a million dollars happens, but, like, it still seems pretty far-fetched. And it was 100k when I first came into Bitcoin. I think there was people who had been holding from 2013, 2012, and, like, that's just a huge number. It is a huge number. It is the point where further gains actually don't improve your life that much. Yeah. You know what I mean? And by the way, if Bitcoin goes to a million dollars, there's a lot of people listening to this, who, if you put yourself two cycles before yourself, and you'd be there now, right?

27:20That aspirational target a lot of people have where it's like now it's actually meaningful. And again, none of this is because we like assume that Bitcoin must go to these levels. It's just, you know, a rational view of where fiat's going, you know, the whole world, the whole Bitcoin case. It's not hard to construct a million dollar price target. You know, it's kind of a base case of use it versus gold. It's just better. Is my son going to find Bitcoin more useful than gold? Of course he is. I mean, I found Bitcoin more useful than gold and I've, you know, It's a pain in the ass to move metals, which is a feature.

27:49It's also a massive bug. The internet's a thing, guys. It's a real thing.

27:56Checkmate:Who's moving the price now? Because people always talk about sailor buys not really affecting spot Bitcoin price. Who is going to take us from here to 85 to 95K? Yeah, I mean, I think people overthink this. A lot of institutions have, you know, I ran this study a lot. I'm well overdue redoing it, just looking at the ETFs and who their owners are, 13F filings and the like. I did this way back in 2024, so it's long out of date. But the stats were like 20%, 25 % was institutions. And then when you look at the breakdown of those institutions, disproportionately the most amount was held by very, very small firms, some of them running like 100%, their Bitcoin hedge fund, or they've got a 5 % allocation.

28:35Once you go up to like the trillion dollar, the multi-trillion dollar asset manager, they've got like 0.0001%. guys going to 0.002 % is like hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars. Like you just need the incremental accumulation. And I think people fall into the trap of being like, oh, it was individuals, then it was companies. It's got to be sovereigns next. It's like it could also just be companies getting bigger. You know, like individuals for me, I'm later in my life. I'm later in my earnings career. As you get older, you tend to earn more money. I'm buying more Bitcoin. I can't, my capacity to buy Bitcoin is significantly better than it was.

29:09Yeah, the prices are higher.

29:10Checkmate:I'm putting more dollars in and getting less Bitcoin. Well, that is also, well, yes, there's also a component of like, do you buy more because you understand this thing more? And, you know, and that's why bear markets like this, you can actually ramp things up because you've got that conviction. But, you know, institutions do the same thing. Once you get through 100K, and here's the other story. Once you get through 100K, the institutions that don't have the nuts to step in now will step in, back in. Do you think risk adjusted, this is like the best Bitcoins I've ever been? Well, again, if we go down to 45K, to 2011$2 Bitcoin.

29:40Based on my mean reversion study, of course it's not the same as$2 Bitcoin, but if you think about it, in order to go lower than where we are now, you needed catastrophic fraud and a complete evisceration of the whole lending market. Now, there's two things that I can see that could genuinely, let's say three things, that could genuinely be that risk factor I can see. There's a fourth that's just macro, you know, world implode. Okay, fine. We're going to get to that. Yeah, down, go up. The other one is quantum turns out to be a real thing. I don't think there's anyone serious who thinks that's coming in the next couple of years.

30:17So at a minimum, we'll probably be higher should that ever show up. There's two others I was going to say there. Coinbase has a major hack. Major loss of custody failure. Huge black swan. I would say the most catastrophic thing that could happen. Treasuries. And then the other one is just Saylor has a problem. Yeah. There is a game here where price goes down, the equity value goes to zero, and your preferreds. Because if you think about it, you've got the Bitcoin stack, you've got to subtract the debt, you've got to then subtract the preferreds. That's what's left in the equity stack, the MSTR share.

30:54There is a point in time where the equity does go to zero. And it's not when the price goes, when Bitcoin goes to 10K. The equity goes to zero much, much higher than where that is. and then stretch, sorry, not stretch, stride starts to get eaten into and then strike. And there is a level where things go pear-shaped there, right? People don't like to talk about it, but there is a real risk. If you subtract away and look where the equity value is zero, it is not where Saylor says price could go and the company would be fine. It's a lot higher than that. But what percentage would you put on that happening?

31:24Because it's got to be pretty low, right? I think it's low. Of the four risks I just illustrated, let's leave macro, of the three Bitcoin-specific ones, I think it's the most likely of the three. Quantum being the least likely. Coinbase, just because something can go very wrong there. That's another big risk. But yeah, Saylor having a real problem is, I would argue, the most prescient or most near-term thing.

31:47Checkmate:But you're talking like a 2 % risk or less? Yeah, 2%, 5%. But again, it depends where the price is. And I think when you run the analysis and actually look at where that equity value is, I forget the actual number. I think from memory it's like in the 50s, in the 50Ks, like MSTR is like quite literally worth, well, it's worth zero because there's no equity left. If you went to liquidation, now people can put a premium in there because they're like, well, the company probably won't liquidate. They would actually just sell the Bitcoin to deal with it. But there is a world where MSTR had a pure, I'm going to do an equity analysis of what is left after obligations.

32:23The answer is zero. And it's as high as 50s. I need to check the numbers. And to be fair, I'm actually leveraging someone else's analysis here, which I won't take credit for. But having read their paper, I forget the exact number, but it is higher.

32:37Checkmate:Wow, that's kind of scary. It is, it is. So ETFs, like how, when we last spoke, you were saying how strong they've been through this bear market. Is that still the case? We're about 3 % off AUM all-time high. And Eric Balthunis was on Marty's pod the other day, and he was saying cumulative flows. I've been tracking cumulative flows. and he was saying that is the metric because it's dollars in versus dollars out. It got down at the all-time high, like at 50 % down in price. We were down 12%, 12 and a bit percent from the all-time high of like$63 billion. I think we're like 5 % off all-time highs now.

33:12Checkmate:I would not put my money on ETS being the best holders. The hodlers. The hodlers of this cycle, unquestionably. You just need to add a load of friction and people won't sell. No, I actually think that Eric's got a good point that a lot of these people are, either it's a very small position, they just don't care. or just the characteristic of people who buy ETFs is that they buy and hold it. It's a small part of their portfolio. They're willing to take the risk. Potentially going in retirement accounts. All the rest of it. Yeah, that's cool, though. So are they the biggest buyer on the market at the moment?

33:41Checkmate:They're about equal with Saylor at the moment. So when you look at total capital flows, generally speaking, through all of the bull and all of the bear until very recently, when you look at spot sell side, it's been five times bigger than your ETF inflows on net. more than five times bigger than Saylor. Right now, Saylor, just in terms of the amount of money that strategy is pulling in, and the ETFs, they're approximately equal. They're about as large as in terms of the on-chain world in terms of the amount of flows. So they are very serious buyers relative to the amount of sell side. We're seeing a massive decline in sell side.

34:16From an on-chain perspective, there's two components. There's realized profit and realized loss. You can look at them as individuals. You can combine them together because they both take with signal. A lot of on-chain metrics come from the perspective of holders or sellers. Because in order to print something on the on-chain perspective, you have to own the Bitcoin. So if you're realizing a profit, it means you think Bitcoin is going lower. If you are realizing a loss, it also means you think Bitcoin is going lower. It's a signal from the sellers, the seller side metric. So the amount of profit and loss being locked in right now is very, very small.

34:48Just comparatively speaking, we see this in not just late bears, very late bears and all through early bulls 2023's 2016 some of 2019 like the period where it goes nowhere and drives you mad but the bombs in that's the kind of environment where it's just like no one cares peak apathy um our free subscriber list for the newsletter right we've got paid and freeze freeze has just been like a straight lineup since we started the newsletter there's always flows coming in there's always it's gone dead flat since february no matter how hard we push it's gone dead Red flat. Great sign. Apathy.

35:25Checkmate:That's probably similar to the podcast. I would say the growth, apart from like standout guests, this show will probably do quite well because we're here talking about the Bitcoin price and people want to know. But like, I think the amount of subscribers has definitely slowed. Because I think it gets to the point where people are just like, I'm not interested to hear about Bitcoin for now. I'll come back at 100k. On the sailor thing, do you think there's an additional risk where he's actually custing some of his Bitcoin at Coinbase? So it kind of like compounds that risk. I think they do custing some of it.

35:52Checkmate:Yeah, yeah. No, I think they do. But it compounds those two risks because the Coinbase one can also affect Saylor. I'm not worried about Saylor losing the coins in like a theft perspective. I'm just thinking from a capital stack perspective that they may have to sell literally to make the equity not zero anymore. Sure, but they can domino. Like if the Coinbase hack happens, that is one of your risks, even if it's a very, very small percentage, that is going to affect Saylor and then what happens to them? Oh, yeah. Oh, no. Do you think he should hold his own coins? No, look, I think there's reasons why they don't.

36:18I'm not going to speculate on why. I'm sure they've got their reasons. That's one of those things where, like, if you're betting on anything to do with strategy, it's inherently a long bet on Bitcoin. If anything goes wrong with Coinbase, that's just like everything's affected. Like, literally, it's the asteroid. So it's like, honestly, if it happens, what do you do? You go long. You go long because, like, it's complete and total disaster. It really can't get that much worse from that point onwards. It'll probably take a long time to recover, but, like, you know, asteroids here go long.

36:47Checkmate:If you hold Bitcoin, your phone number is one of your biggest vulnerabilities. SimSwap attacks are one of the most common attack vectors targeting Bitcoiners. Somebody socially engineers an employee at your carrier, moves your number to a new device, and they're into your account. It happens because traditional carriers put a human in control of your phone number, someone who can be bribed or tricked. But CAPE is a US mobile carrier built from the ground up with privacy and security at the core. They don't ask for your name or social security number when you sign up, they collect the minimum data required, delete it as fast as possible, and never sell it.

37:18Checkmate:When you sign up, you receive a 24-word passphrase, just like a Bitcoin wallet. That's the only way to move your number. Not a customer service rep, not even Cape's own staff can do it. You're the only person who controls your number. If you hold your own keys, you should hold your own phone number too. So head over to cape.co forward slash WBD and use code WBD at checkout for 33 % off your first six months. That's cape.co forward slash WBD and use code WBD. Do you wish you could access cash without selling your Bitcoin? Well, Ledin makes that possible. They're the global leader in Bitcoin-backed lending and since 2018, they've issued over$9 billion in loans with a perfect record of protecting client assets.

37:57Checkmate:With Ledin, you get full custody loans with no credit checks or monthly repayments, just easy access to dollars without selling a single SAT. Ledin exclusively offer Bitcoin-backed loans with all collateral held by Ledin directly or their funding partners. Your Bitcoin's never lent out to generate interest. I recently took out a loan with Ledin. The whole process was super easy. The application took me less than 15 minutes. And in a few hours, I had the dollars in my account. It was super smooth. So if you need cash, but you don't want to sell Bitcoin, head over to leden.io forward slash WBD and you'll get 0.25 % off your first loan.

38:32Checkmate:That's L-E-D-N dot I-O forward slash WBD. Do you want to pay less in taxes and stack more Bitcoin? Of course you do. Well, by mining Bitcoin with blockware, you can. Under section 168K of the US tax code, Bitcoin mining servers qualify for 100 % bonus depreciation. This means every dollar you spend on miners can directly offset your income in a single year. And that's true for both business owners and W2 earners. If you have$100 ,000 in ordinary income, you can purchase$100 ,000 in miners and potentially offset your tax liability entirely. Blockware's mining as a service does all the heavy lifting.

39:06Checkmate:They secure the rigs, they source the low-cost power, and they handle all the day-to-day maintenance. So you get to stack Bitcoin every single day while drastically shrinking your tax bill. get started today at blockware solutions.com forward slash wbd and use code wbd for a hundred dollars off your first miner that's blockware solutions.com forward slash wbd should we get into the macro risks yeah yeah because macro is interesting at the moment macro is very interesting um the one that's crazy to me i think people when you talk about bonds think it's boring but it seems to be like it's the signal for everything it's the bedrock um and 30-year yields in the US, the UK, Australia, I'm sure other places, are now above 5%.

39:45Checkmate:The trend of yields is higher. And why that matters is yields are inversely related to price. So if the price or literally the value of the collateral that backs the whole system goes down in price, higher in yields, it's the market saying that something's wrong with the bedrock. And so I think the UK is actually pushing 6%. Is that the market saying, well, Well, we actually saw inflation come back in the US. Is it the market saying they're scared about inflation? Is it them saying we think the debt is out of control, deficit spending is out of control? Is it all of these things? It's all of the above, yeah.

40:22Checkmate:It's basically the market saying we don't trust you anymore. Pretty much. I mean, if you think about it, at the highest level, there's obviously nuances, especially when you talk about the global reserve currency versus Japan. There's going to be certain nuances here, but higher yield means they can't attract enough buyers at that price. So the price must go down to find buyers, which means yield must go up. If you can't lend, if you can't get financing at 5%, someone might lend to you because you're riskier at 6%. And if you can't get financing at 6%, you might have to go to 7%. And that lifts, this is the thing.

40:56If the sovereign, the Aussie government needs to borrow at 5.5 % for 30 a year, who's more likely to pay back the Australian dollars? The government with a printer or you, Mr. with a job and a 30-year mortgage. You know what I mean?

41:11Checkmate:But do you think this signifies that something's going to break and they're going to need to print a load of money? It's a funny one because, and I'm talking to Nick Barty, honestly I rely a lot on Nick to process a load of stuff. But my general framework, I think this whole, the way macro is traded, again, I'm a macro tourist, right? I try to puzzle things together as best I can. The thing I found very interesting is how assets haven't traded the way people expected them to. Oil, for example, should be much higher. Everyone's mental model should be much higher. Now, there's an argument to say that we're drawing down on inventories.

41:46I've listened to, I think, Doenberg's got a good perspective, which is that China's got a ton that they bought in the years leading up to this that they're now releasing back into the market. There's all sorts of like supply dynamics. Also, life just finds a way. I've been using that line a lot from Jurassic Park. Life just finds a way. Like, you know, when they sanctioned Russia, do you think Russian oil didn't leave Russia? Of course it did. Of course. They found ways to turn it Norwegian. You know what I mean? Like, they fill it up in the middle of the ocean. Life finds a way. So I think oil prices have surprised people.

42:16There's still certainly risk that this war gets worse and then prices go up and then infrastructure gets damaged. Like, we're in no way in happy days. I think oil prices have surprised people. The geopolitical hedge, which is gold, has done terribly in this process. Why? because it did really well leading up to it.

42:34Checkmate:It's just... Same reason Bitcoin... Or the inverse reason to why Bitcoin's done well. Go listen to a big gold podcast and replace the word gold with Bitcoin when they say, oh, yeah, gold's always the first thing people sell because it's highly liquid. Yeah, of course. It's also just like it got to an RSI on the monthly at 95 because it's overbought. Like last time it was there was 1979 and then it had a 20-year bear market. So, you know, I'm not expecting that, but someone's got to pull back. Equities, all-time high. But then you've got to break down which sectors of equities are doing well. Some sectors are doing terribly.

43:04Some are doing really well. So I think the market's trading in a very strange way. But also when you look at it's on low volatility. Bonds are going higher, but the move index, which is the bond volatility index, surprisingly subdued. It was very high after the 2022 bear market. It took really three years to cool back down. Yeah, it's spiking here or there. It spiked in March. It spiked a little bit recently. But a lot of this is happening on low volatility. the dollar, the US dollar. You give the kind of set of facts in front of us, you would expect the safe haven bid for the dollar to be pushing DXY well above 100, which is where things start to get painful for the rest of the world.

43:42It's floating around 99, 98, going to go below 98, back to 99. But why is this happening? Why is it not reacting the way you'd expect it? It's a good question. And this is where you start to put, this is why I don't believe all this, like, oh, they're manipulating markets. All markets manipulate on certain levels. When you've got the bond market telling you a similar story to the oil market, similar story to the dollar. To me, a lot of the macro trends are still in play. There's bigger things that outweigh it. Could it be that the world can actually handle$100 oil better than the world thinks?

44:13Could it be that there actually is the capacity to, maybe the loss of barrels isn't as big and then, you know, Saudi's got pipelines and when you piece it all together, yes, it's a problem, but it may not be the end of world problem that's been pitched. bond yields going up is no doubt a risk factor i mean if i look at it from australia's perspective australia's got a we have no energy you know like there's there's petrol stations that ran out of diesel and we're a very big country it takes a lot of diesel to move stuff around we consume a ton of it and it got to the point where the prime minister is saying you know we're very glad we secured x million liters not barrels liters of diesel and you run on the back of a napkin you're like that's Three days.

44:53One day. So you're telling me that it is so bad that you're willing to get on television and tell people you bought one day worth of diesel.

45:00Checkmate:That's crazy. No wonder your bonds are going higher because you bankrupt. Australia's in a strange position at the moment. We are. I'm hoping, but I'm not hopeful, that it's the kick in the nuts we need to go, hey, we should probably... We dig a lot of stuff out of the ground. We process none of it. We are totally reliant on other countries to survive, which is not really a good spot to be in. That's cope. That's cope. Explain. The fact that you're saying you're hopeful. I am hopeful. I'm always hopeful. I'm the optimist. I think being a pessimist, I think bears have no ambition. Delete the bears.

45:35Ignore the bears. I think bears have no ambition. I mean, I'm hopeful. Sorry, I'm not hopeful it will happen. But I do hope that there's enough people. And I've had enough conversations with people who have no interest in any of this stuff, who have suddenly gone, really? We had no fuel on land? and like even the storage capacity, right? I think the IEA requires you have 90 days worth of fuel. That's not on your shores. That's just on someone's shores. I think Australia's is in the US. That's purely just to flood the market with oil. It's a price thing. It's not a you have your supplies thing.

46:09I believe that we will now go through a process of saying we probably should have some reserves on land. Obviously.

46:17Checkmate:No shit. What do you think this is going to mean for Walsh coming in as FedChash? because everyone expected him to come in and cut rates, but that seems like he can't really do that. Yeah, look, I mean, I've never been a Fed watcher. I'm a civil engineer. I don't think the Fed matters, honestly. I think the Fed follows what the bond market does. I think they just follow the market. I think we're in a world, if you just take Lin's perspective, what they do with interest rates is kind of irrelevant. It's all in the short-term end. Honestly, who cares when the government's the one spending the money in fiscal dominance?

46:49It just doesn't matter, right? If banks were lending a ton of money, it would matter. I just don't think the Fed and central banks matter that much.

46:55Checkmate:But what do you think this means then for normal people? Do you think people can expect inflation to go higher over the next few years? And rates to go higher. And rates to go higher. I think it's going to punch. It's painful. Yeah, no, it is. And that's kind of the world I think we're moving towards. And it's one of those things for you to think about it. Bitcoin has thought about this stuff for a long time. But then to live it and feel it and experience it, it's a whole different thing. But what does Bitcoin do in that environment, do you think? So at the end of the day, what we're looking at is liabilities or obligations, getting two big say sailors set up, not that I'm saying it's equivalent.

47:29There is a price or a value where your obligations are larger than your assets. And the more people, this is why you want out of the system, gold, Bitcoin, this is why sound money, what sound money advocates always talk about, you want to have assets outside the system that are underbaseable because everything else is going to be debased. When the times get tough, go to Satmojo's thing. What is the problem? That the button exists and they're going to push the button. They're going to push the button because it's the only way they can do it. Now, ironically, Australia right now is attempting austerity by raising taxes.

48:06They're trying to not push the button, to be fair. But the problem is it's made everyone significantly poorer, will make everyone significantly poorer. We will see how much stomach they have for austerity because I think they're going to end up just reverting back to the The worst scenario is they go austerity and the printer

48:19Checkmate:because then you're just royally fucked. Because with bond rates, so in the UK, I think it's the highest since the late 90s. US, higher since just before the financial crisis. If bond yields are like risk-free rate is 5.5 % or whatever, what does that mean for risk assets? Because they've got to really perform to be attractive. Well, gold has always traded inversely to the real yield on the 10-year until they froze Russia's reserves. We're in an era where the monetary system is changing, as we know. This is the period of tumultuous change. The world is going to look very different on the other side of this thing.

48:56If we're going through all of these structural reforms of what the savings currency is. Now, I'm very much in the world where you have to separate the global reserve currency, global reserve asset. One is medium of exchange, one is savings. We've actually seen this in a microcosm in just the Bitcoin crypto world. Stable coins are the medium of exchange. Bitcoin has been the store of value. This breaking apart of those two components of money, I think is we're separating the treasury from the dollar. The dollar will continue to be the medium of exchange. I think that's very, very clear. It's why Brent Johnson's, I think Brent Johnson is dead right with his milkshake theory.

49:29If you look back at all the money printing that's happened, all of COVID, everything, the wars, everything that the US has got into, really the DXY hasn't softened in like decades. Just been stronger. It's just staying around 100. It goes through ebbs and flows, but it really hasn't gone down, you know, the way a lot of people would have expected. Given how much of an exorbitant privilege they've exercised, the dollar's just not going down. Bonds are down 50-odd percent since 2022 and going lower as rates go higher. So the asset is getting crushed and gold's up significantly, right? And by the way, Bitcoin is also up significantly over that period of time.

50:10It's down short term, but it is also up significantly. So my general view is, are we moving towards a world where we trust each other more, that we trust governments more?

50:18Checkmate:Absolutely not. Am I going to buy more government bonds in the road ahead or am I going to buy more gold and Bitcoin? The answer is very, very clear to me. And so do you think that the asset side of that will be a mixture of things like gold and Bitcoin rather than one dominant? I think so, yeah. And I've used this example. I have gold and Bitcoin as my two primary holdings. Gold is the exact same trade. It's just slower. if it's down 20 % I'm not that fussed Bitcoin being down 50 % I'd really hate to have to sell it to do anything down 50 % couldn't care less if I had to sell my gold down 20 % it's ballast I'd never fully understand the reason you hold gold because you always say it's because you don't mind selling gold but if you think Bitcoin has more of an upside would you not rather have more Bitcoin and sell less Bitcoin in the future?

51:02No, Bitcoin is a longer duration even though gold is an infinite duration asset Bitcoin is an even longer duration asset so the way I think about it I think it is improbable and even if it does happen, gold going to$20 ,000 an ounce, going to$5 ,000 is a double from its peak more or less, I think that's in the cards. Is a double going to change my life? Probably not. Probably not. Bitcoin going from$100 ,000 to$1 ,000 ,000 or from$60 ,000 to$1 ,000 ,000, totally feasible, totally practicable. Is that going to change my life?

51:36Checkmate:Yeah, big time. So what do I want to put, what do I save in Bitcoin for? My kid's school fees. He's eight months old. That's a long, that's 10 years away, right? So I've got 10 years to let Bitcoin do its thing. What about a house deposit? I may want that in the next three years, two years, one year. Gold, the right place for that deposit. Clearing my mortgage, my 30-year mortgage, Bitcoin. It's about duration, right? Gold simply doesn't have, it's got a lot of growth in it. It just simply doesn't have the growth multiple that Bitcoin does. So I position my savings. That's why I just really don't care what either of them doing truly.

52:11But that was my general thesis. I don't want to hold cash. If, by the way, I go, okay, now is the time I really do want to start looking to buy and I'm going to auctions, it won't be in gold. It'll be in cash, in a term deposit somewhere or in a bank account. Because the idea is I now actually need the dollars, right? And I can't take the volatility. So it's me peeling back where is my volatility tolerance? I'm willing to take volatility, right, on the correct timeframe.

52:39Checkmate:Okay, fair. Because I end up postponing my life because Bitcoin is not the price I'm willing to sell. Precisely. Precisely. What if I don't want to postpone my life? We were talking about this at lunch. You may not want to postpone your life and sometimes parts of life are more important than money and the dollars and the numbers and value of your assets. Sometimes you just actually want to live. Sometimes you've got a family and their needs come before yours of saying, hey, I'd love to get to this value, but really want a house, really want that holiday, really want whatever, because I've only got 80, 90 years here.

53:10And, you know, you get old eventually and you can't do those things. If you're not going to live it, what's the point of being here?

53:14Checkmate:Yeah, 100%. You said before the monetary system's changing. Like, that's clearer than ever. And I think the stuff that's happening with Iran taking payment in Bitcoin is huge. It's wild, isn't it? It's wild. Have you seen the thing that came out in the last day or two? Yeah, yeah. Which is them... They've got like an insurance company And insurance taking Bitcoin. Yeah, because Tether froze their stable coins. Exactly. Surprise, surprise. But do you think this is like, that we'll look back at this as being a pinnacle moment in the shifting... I don't know if this was the pinnacle moment. Honestly, this, you know, if we really look back, US freezing Russia's reserves in 2022 was the event.

53:48That was the thing. Everything else is just a transition towards sound money and then people realizing, do I want a piece of metal in my vault that I can't sell? Or do I want something that's liquid and digital? that's global and is actually, you know, you think about it, it's kind of better. Oh, and by the way, I can actually do this multi-seed thing set up where I can have security around the world. We're in just that process of, we're moving towards the sound money backing, because it has to, because other people just lose all trust. And then it's just a game between, you know, who's younger and who's older, right?

54:21Bitcoin will progress one funeral at a time. That's kind of the framework.

54:25Checkmate:The reason I do think it's a pivotal change is like, I agree it starts with the freezing of the Russian treasuries. Like that was, like Luke Gromberg calls it, the shot that was heard across the world. And I don't think Iran will be doing this unless that happened. Agree. But the fact that this is the first time we've seen Bitcoin in the wild being used in this way by a nation state, in a clear attempt to basically go around sanctions, I think is huge. I listened to a podcast many years ago. I didn't, to be honest, I can't even tell you what podcast it was, who the guy was, so whoever it was, good shout.

54:56He was an oil trader. And he was just, I found it amazing. He was discussing how oil tankers work. And they really are just merchants that just go, oh, there's oil over there. We're going to pick it up. Here's the price. Okay, now we've got a buyer. It just - They're doing arbitrage. Doing arbitrage in physical world, right? And the idea is that you pull up somewhere on a port in Africa and you need to get the local currency and you got forex pairs and the banks freeze it. And he's like, Bitcoin is just such an amazing asset. When you really think about its use case there, head office in New York can wire the Bitcoin straight to someone on country X they can get an exchange rate everywhere and that's the other thing, right?

55:32Bitcoin's one of the few assets gold, the dollar, trades everywhere in every currency, you have a forex exchange I mean the Australian dollar does not have an exchange rate in most currencies, it's just true right? So that it's a kind of an example of yeah, digital is actually a lot better than a hunk of metal that you need bolt cutters to chop into And it's highly liquid in most of the world and liquid to a degree in all of the world. I saw a video the other day. I'm not sure who the bloke was, but I've seen his face. He's, you know, a very renowned gold bug. He was standing there in front of a table twice as big as this, covered in these, like, 50 ton, you know, massive blocks of silver.

56:11And he's got this big bar of gold and he goes, did you know that all this silver is worth half as much as this gold bar? And I just retweeted and said, bro, get a cold card. What are you doing? Seriously? Like, look at all this metal. What are you going to do with it? Ridiculous. So I get it. Final settlement. But like, guys, it's time to move on. And it'll happen. It's a process.

56:31Checkmate:Should we get on to the Australia fuckery? I think so. When I turned up today, you're normally like dead upbeat, super happy. I turn up today and you were dejected. It's been a shit week. It's been a shit two weeks. So loads of people listening won't know exactly what's happened. Do you want to just lay out everything that's happened? Yeah, sure. So first things first, None of this is signed into law yet. The odds are it is likely to happen, however. So short story is for, I think it's since 1999, we've had a capital gains tax set up in Australia where whatever your gain is, so you've got your cost basis of$100, you sell it for$200.

57:06If you held it for a year, that$100 is not taxable. You halve it,$50 is taxable. Now, this 50 % cap gains accounts for a whole lot of things. The holding time, inflation over that period. there's also the idea that you kind of accrued the wealth over the whole holding time but you

57:23Checkmate:realize it on the same day that you sell it kind of accounts for all of those nuances but most importantly it allows people to save and grow wealth yeah yep so that just to be clear so it's 50 % cap gains if you hold an asset for over a year you get a 50 % discount discount so and so then whatever's left over that$50 is times your marginal tax rate yeah now the low we have a tiered tax system. So the lower you are, the lower your tax is. For very low income people, this can resolve to less than 12%, which, you know, kind of is a good idea, right? You want people who have less money to be able to save better and have a more favorable system.

57:57The higher up you are, our top marginal tax bracket is 190K. And 190K, I mean, it's 70 cents to the dollar for Americans listening. So it's like 135 grand. That's where you start getting slugged with 45%. Then we have the 2 % Medicare levy. So your tax rate is 47 % marginal above 135 US. Now, the Labor government, as in all their infinite wisdom, has come out with a budget. Now, the budget is not in effect, but Labor can push it through the, alone can push it through the lower house, the House of Reps. And then the Senate, if they just pair with the Greens and can anybody point to a situation where the Greens haven't supported more tax, they have exactly the amount of votes that they need to push it through the Senate.

58:43So this thing has a very clear path straight through. Now, Australia has the housing bubble of all housing bubbles. There's very few. I mean, Canada, you know what this is all about. I think Switzerland and New Zealand, we're all looking at each other going, who's the bigger idiot here? The median Australian house apartment dwelling countrywide is a million Aussie, 720 US. That's the median. The median salary is 74K. The mean is 82. the median worker saving in a 5 % bank deposit will take 40 years to save the deposit for a median house or apartment dwelling.

59:21Checkmate:Insane. Doesn't make sense. Now, there's going to be people saying move regional or whatever. It's like, yeah, that's fine. Obviously, we're talking about means and medians here. I'm not going to go through every state and country and city. So the idea is they've brought in this budget and they're overhauling our tax system. This is effectively a currency devaluation, more or less. But they've pitched it saying it's going to benefit young people trying to buy housing. Now, there's a bunch of things in terms of negative gearing where you can offset your, you know, if you're losing money on the rent, you know, you're kind of banking on the capital appreciation of the property so you'll lose on the rent, offset your tax.

59:54I'm not going to talk about that. That's its own beast. But they snuck in there. The pitch is we want to make it easier for young people to save for a house. The median young person has a low income. It's going to take them 40 years to save in cash for the deposit. So they have to save in assets. And these bastards snuck in there that they're going to put a, they're removing the 50 % cap gains discount on all assets, ETFs, shares, Bitcoin, the whole lot. And you're going to get an indexation method. So that means your$100 cost basis goes up to$103 with CPI, then goes up another 3%. That goes up another 3%.

1:00:29So if you just think about that, if you hold it for a year in the current system, you would get, you make$100, you take off 50%, you got$50, that's applied to your marginal tax rate. Now, you take off 3 % and the$97 is added to your income at your marginal tax rate and at a minimum of 30%. So the people who are on the lowest marginal tax bracket suddenly have to pay 30 % gains, not 12 or 1 or 2 or 5, whatever that works out to. if you think about what this has done and there's this system they're only doing partial grandfathering which is also a scam as far as i'm aware almost every tax reform in australia if you held assets under the old system they remain under the old system the problem is that they at the first of july 2027 you move you kind of index your value everything up to that point unrealized is at the 50 current system and everything from that point onwards is indexed.

1:01:24So here's the thing. They're not indexing your tax bracket, but they are indexing your capital gains. If you're someone like me who has, we kind of, I will straddle my 10-year goal of saving for a house, my 10-year goal of paying for my kids' school fees, my tax goes up by about 40 to 50%, just like the component. So that's effectively, when you look at it, they're already taking 25%, more or less. When you do your marginal tax rate, 50%, they're taking about 25. that goes up to about 40%.

1:01:53Checkmate:Insane. So they've more or less, for people who are on full indexation, which is young people, they've doubled the tax. So in order to get on the first rung of the housing ladder, you need to climb the primary, the principal ladder, right? The primary ladder, which is your asset portfolio. So the assets that you're saving in, they're now going to tax it two times as much, right? So for me, someone who straddles that world over the next 10 years, they're going to take about 20 % to 30 % of my savings. For someone who is coming into that system, if you're a startup, you start a successful business, right?

1:02:26It's worth half a million bucks. Your cost basis is zero. What's 3 % CPI on zero? Also zero. So you owe the government full 47 % of your sale price. And this is why you'll see a lot of memes of people inserting our prime minister and saying, welcome to our 47 % shareholder. You take none of the risk, you put none of the capital up front, You pay none of the expenses, but you show up on payday for 47 % of the value. So the great irony of this whole thing is that it locks in people who already own property. There's just so many other layers to this. People who already own property, they get to keep all their negative gearing discounts.

1:03:04And if you buy new homes off the plan, you also get to do the current tax setup. So what they've actually done is got all the young people who want to buy a home and say you're now going to compete with 100 % of investors all vying for new homes, not old builds. So the whole setup doesn't help young people save. I ran the numbers on depending on the growth of your asset. Now, most people, if you're on 5 % or 10 % or 15%, it's adding eight to five years to your savings goal. If you're, and that's if you're on the full indexation, if you're owning an asset that goes up 50 % a year, which, guys, doesn't happen for a decade.

1:03:46Then they take about a year. I ran another model saying, well, here's the current school fees, a typical private school. Now, by the way, owning a home and sending a kid to private school, these aren't what I would call high net worth, upper high net worth things. This is middle class. This is middle class. I literally want to give my kid a good education type stuff, aspirational things. It adds, I worked at how many years, because school fees are 15 to 25 grand a year per kid, going up at 8%, the debasement rate, pretty typically. And I ask the question, how many years of school fees, if I just buy one Bitcoin now at 100 grand Australian, it's approximately the price, how many years can I peel off to cover all the school fees?

1:04:24How many years of school fees is it worth if it goes up at X percent? The general framework is that this new tax system removes approximately one to two years worth of school fees per child. So you go, how have you benefited me as a young person? I'm in my mid-30s. I've been saving to buy a house for a decade you've added two to three years to my most optimistic case of when i actually step into the market and my boy just lost a school a year of school fees and by the way i've got to pick between those two if i buy the house it's harder to buy the pay for the school fees and you just look at this thing how have my framework was i'm like i'm no genius right i think about a lot of stuff i'm smarter than your average bear right enough to be an engineer at least, it took me five seconds to go, something's fucking wrong with this budget.

1:05:10And then it took me about 10 minutes to go through just with an LLM and say, can you just model this out just to stress test, to test in a couple of LLMs to make sure they're not hallucinating anything. Come back with the same numbers and go, it took me 10 minutes to work out that this is not going to benefit young people in any way, shape or form. In fact, it makes it considerably worse. I'm in the camp where you can look at this whole setup and go, for politicians, there's generally two reasons they make bad decisions. Incompetence, door number one. Malice, door number two. I fall on the spectrum where I think, generally speaking, I like to give them the benefit of the doubt of being morons and just being incompetent with a bunch of stakeholders involved, all that, you know.

1:05:50In this case, you're telling me not... and here's the kicker. They broke a lot of like... the electric promises they made was specifically... No taxes. We won't do what we just did. Like when you think about that as a business, right, if I was to make a big decision, like I know, I'm going to start supporting Ethereum in my data. That's a huge reputational risk. It's also something I'm not going to do, by the way. But I would have gone through countless hours of study and thought. And, you know, if I'm going to make a big decision, it's going to change my reputation forever, I would think about it.

1:06:24If it took me five seconds of thought, ten seconds with an LLM, you're telling me not a single staffer did this. And if the staffer did do this, and they're aware of it... Then it's malice. Then it's malice. So I just look at this and go, and I know there's going to be folks in the audience going, that's always malice. I'm like, yeah, that's fine. But in this case, it's really hard to argue against that.

1:06:42Checkmate:Do you think it's that they're so out of touch that these boomers think that the way people are saving houses is by squirrelling money away in a bank account and not investing in assets? So this is what I've been puzzling over. Who are the people they're interviewing to come to this decision? Because I have in my mind's eye what they look like, and I'm pretty sure they shouldn't be asking those people anything to do with investing. It's quite interesting because like the media and you look at the propaganda arm, ABC, you look at how they're pitching this whole thing. You really had to work very hard to find anywhere they talked about the fact that they snuck it in for all assets.

1:07:16They did have a three-minute video that I watched where they talk about it and they, and I shit you not, they make the suggestion that this might actually make investing in government bonds a more attractive thing. And by the way, to their credit, that is true. If you buy an asset that underperforms CPI inflation of 3%, you are correct. The current indexation method is much better for your tax. You're also poor. So if you just look at this setup, you go, they kind of want people to buy shitty government paper. And the higher your growth asset, the more indexation doesn't help you at all. Bitcoin goes up 25%, 20%, and you take a 3 % indexation, it's irrelevant.

1:07:52You're a startup with a zero cost basis. Indexation does nothing for you and you just look at this whole thing you know this is a tax grab of all tax grabs and ironically people didn't vote for this because the election promise was and by the way i'm not going to pretend that i trust politicians in the first place and i certainly didn't vote for labor but it's kind of interesting to see i i know there's been a lot of backlash that's why you'll see a lot of millennials posting photos of albo right with a triangle as part of a band saying you know good good meme daz um saying welcome to the team for doing jack shit of the work and taking 47 % because that's effectively what it is.

1:08:24It is much the same as a currency devaluation. They devalue the savings of all Australians who hold assets. There's a bunch of people out there who are gnashing their teeth saying, bro, just leave. We also have an exit tax. The day you get on the plane, you realize everything. So basically, we've got a period of time here where you've got to fight back because if you don't fight back and you don't send an email, a politely worded email saying, listen here, dickhead, what are you doing? You can't support this to your local MP. you've got to do what you can yes there's an exit route that's one pathway but the vast vast majority of people simply are not going to pick up leave their family leave their friends sell their apartment sell their house sell their clothes and move overseas and then pay an exit tax which will take 30 40 percent of their ring of their assets anyway most people are just simply not going to do that so what do we do in the meantime because you've got to make an uproar in this instance you just and i'm not a i don't go to rallies i'm not a political dude this is one of those things where they have truly, truly, yeah, they're fucked over the average surround.

1:09:25Checkmate:You've got to do something. But the indexing is a scam as well, because we know the CPI numbers are caught to be favorable. Of course. Of course. Like, it's all a scam. They can raise taxes by fudging the CPI numbers. Yeah. Your asset has a bad year. Let's just imagine there's some kind of hit to the AI sector in June, 2027. And all those assets sell off 50%. Bang, your index of the 1st of July, 2027. That's your new cost basis. You don't get the 50 % cap gains on everything before that. The accounting nightmare of the whole thing is just, it's wild. Do you think this will definitely go through?

1:09:56I think it's a very good, it's a good test. So the reason why I wrote a piece on this called When the Government Pulls the Rug, which is free so people can read it. For non-Australians, don't believe they're not cooking this stuff in your neck of the woods. 100%. So this is a warning shot. To be very fair to them, as much as I oppose it heavily, I think it's a terrible idea, at least they're levying just a straight tax. They're going to inflate the money as well, but at least they're saying we're going to tax you outright. What will be very interesting? They're attempting austerity. What will be very interesting is this is a trial balloon for the rest of the world.

1:10:33How willing are the Australian people to accept tightening of the belts for somebody else's excess? And my answer is not, not. And it's not because it's tightening the belts because you're going to piss the money away anyway. 100%. If you had of actually, and this is the thing, if they had of come out with a tightening the belt tax policy that wasn't an outright scam and helped young people, like, I don't know, all the existing properties, you can't negative gear as well. And sorry, we're not going to grant, like, or we just limit it to property. They would clearly never do that though because like Australia runs on the housing market.

1:11:07So, well, and this is the thing that I think is very interesting. I think they've just pricked the housing bubble because first of all, we were just running out of buyers. The numbers were so high. You know, they talk about median to median income to property price. And I think five is where they deem it unaffordable. They literally invented a new bracket for Australia called impossibly unaffordable, above 15. Right? Sydney is the second most expensive place in the world, short of Hong Kong. So you look at all these dynamics, you go, I think they've pricked the housing bubble. Why? Because people no longer have certainty.

1:11:39They know the rules are going to change. So to come back to your original question, I believe this is a trial balloon where they're trying to see how willing are people to accept changes of this magnitude. If they had to come out and put in hard changes that would be difficult for the economy to manage but were directionally correct, that really did give people who are younger an opportunity. And I think about this like, I'm actually lucky that I'm going to straddle this system. The poor people who come into this thing who are young now have no hope. They're going to get hit with a full indexation.

1:12:09It's a scam for their whole career. It's wrong. So if they had have said, tighten your belts and done it correctly and done a bunch of modeling that I, when I run the numbers, I go, look, I may not agree with all of it, but directionally, fair enough. I'll support it. But they came out and they just slugged everybody with a true scam

1:12:25Checkmate:and it's like, I just can't. If you own Bitcoin today, after these rules come into effect, does the Bitcoin get grandfathered into the new system? No. So it's partial grandfathering, which again, is a scam in its own right. Whatever the price is, let's say you just bought it, 30 grand Aussie, right? whatever that is in US terms, you buy 30 grand and the price is 100 grand on the 1st of July, 2027. That's 70 grand gain times your Bitcoin value. That 70 grand gain gets the 50%. And then your cost basis in the indexation method is 100 ,000. So then you tack on 3 % or whatever CPI. So that's why you're saying you straddle it.

1:12:59Correct. So if you think about it, if I was full indexation, the 97 % of every gain every year is fully taxable. Whereas for me, the first part of Bitcoin's journey is 50 % cap gains and then everything after that, which, by the way, this is why it's a real scam, I didn't buy Bitcoin for one year. I bought it for my kids' school fees before I even had a kid. You know what I mean? I'm thinking more than a decade out, that decade is now going to be under the indexation method. Sorry, it's actually getting beyond the point. The indexation method alone is a scam. Index the salary brackets. And you listen to the politicians on the news recently and they say, are you going to index salary brackets?

1:13:42They go, oh, no, I can't do that. It's like, what do you mean you can't do that? You can index your taxes, but you're not going to index people's incomes? I mean, malice.

1:13:48Checkmate:Yeah. What do you think Bitcoin is in Australia that aren't going to leave should be doing? Is this time to call your accountant? Get a good accountant. Yeah. And not because you're doing anything wrong, but because they know how the system works. And a wise man once told me that when you squeeze the right-hand side of the tax balloon, it creates opportunities on the left-hand side. Tax is a complex system. When something breaks or they change the rules over here, it opens opportunities over here. So a good accountant will understand the mechanics of how this stuff works way more than you and I do because it's not our job.

1:14:22You know what I mean? So find a good accountant. And the other one, the Australian Bitcoin industry body, they've got a whole page, click on their link on their site for Bitcoiners. They've literally got a template that you can send to your MP, a politely worded letter that just says, listen, I've run the numbers. It really just makes it a whole lot worse for young people. And if you're supporting it, really can't support you.

1:14:42Checkmate:I mean, borrowing against your Bitcoin has never looked so attractive. Yeah, there's also, I mean, yes, that's certainly an approach. There's trade-offs to that as well, right? However, it's custody and some people just don't want debt. There's a bunch of layers to that. But at the end of the day, the system is disproportionately, I actually think this is more of a principled thing. You have pitched this as improving housing and improving affordability for young people. You have kicked the rungs out of the pre-ladder just to get on the first rung of the housing ladder for young people forever.

1:15:13It's just untenable.

1:15:14Checkmate:You just got to push back and say, it is unacceptable. I mean, I guess the hope is that they have pricked the housing bubble because if they have, the pressure they're going to get to not push this through will be unreal. Yeah, and that's why I said it's a trial balloon. We will see what the consultation process looks like because it would amaze me if they didn't know that this pushback was coming, but then you get into the world of incompetence, right? Where they inflate their egos and say, oh, they're going to love it. And then it actually comes out and people go, nah, mate, this isn't it. So it'll be very interesting to see whether they back down.

1:15:44Checkmate:So this is a very Australia-specific thing. But I think the interesting part of this is, yes, it's fucked. Yes, it's a scam. But this isn't going to end in Australia. Absolutely not. This is the kind of thing that will spread throughout the world. Correct. And I think it's very important that we push back hard. No, I agree. And it's very simple. Like, you know, my parents aren't overly politically active. I just, and by the way, neither am I. Yeah, me neither. No, I honestly couldn't care less. I wanted as little of the government in my life as possible. We're having conversations with them saying this just, it can't be.

1:16:15Your kids are affected now. Yeah. And your kids' kids are affected. And the truth is, if this continues, if this system is put in place and not reverted, you roll this ball forward and my son goes, hey, how do I build wealth? The hard thing I've got to tell him is you probably have to go overseas.

1:16:31Checkmate:Yeah. That's kind of the point where it's at. Now, if that message resonates with you, you've got to speak up. Just talk to people. Help people understand that this actually doesn't help young people at all. It makes it considerably worse. And the simple mechanics is you've got to save in assets, otherwise it's going to take you 40 years. We were talking at lunch. You spend money on beer and whatever else up until 25. You start saving at 25. Okay, what's 40 years from there? You're 65 when you take your first mortgage. For 30 years. For 30 years. And at 95, you pay the bastard off. If that story doesn't make sense, then you've got to save in assets.

1:17:10So then you wind back the clock and say, you've just doubled the taxation on assets. And the high growth assets get hit the most. You buy government bonds, you won't have much tax because you didn't make much money. But what do high growth assets mean? Growth, innovation, like opportunity. Don't you want Australians to be doing better by owning assets that are worth something and growing. And you just look at all the incentives this sets up and you go, you're actually going for serfdom. This is feudalism at its finest and you just have to push back because it is a permanent thing, right? This goes into effect.

1:17:46Yes, politicians can change it, but hoping for some other mob to come in and change it.

1:17:51Checkmate:So I don't pay any attention to the politics and especially Australian politics, to be fair. Like what has the pushback from the other parties been? I mean, they all push back no matter what it is, but I'm starting to see One Nation, I mean One Nation, which is, you know, your equivalent of your reforms, I would say, polling well ahead of the Liberals. They'll form a coalition. They'll have to. That's just common sense. Yeah. I would say that if this goes... Look, I would say there's a decent chance that Labor has to wind this back. The degree to which they wind it back for people who are non-Australian and Australians, that is our pain.

1:18:24That is how much politicians are willing to take austerity. It's like an indication of how much is going to be the print versus the austerity factor. And then we're going to get a coalition. I would say if they push much of this stuff through, if it goes through in a lightweight version just for property, they probably won't touch it. If they push it through in its current format, I would hazard a guess that they get slaughtered in the next election and they'll pull it back.

1:18:45Checkmate:But the thing that's completely fucked about this is, like we were talking before, we both have companies that both operate in Australia. Like, I just made my company overseas. Like, there's no way that I stay in that jurisdiction. Of course. And like, is that what they want from this? Is that the outcome they want? And that's the thing. If you look at the incentives, that is the result they're going to get. So for you and I, it's harder because reincorporating somewhere is a whole lift. Everything can be done. Reincorporating is a different animal to, hey, I want to start a business. Start a business somewhere else.

1:19:15So my, and this is why the memes of sticking elbows head in your business and saying, welcome, Mr. 47 % shareholder. imagine seeing that from thousands of young people memes are powerful memes are very powerful and it distills it it's and there's you know you get the lefties who show up and say it's not really 47 it's like okay it's 46.5 the truth is it's 45 right because you pay yourself a salary of 150 160 and then you sell your business for half a million well okay the 30 grand was at the marginal tax rate of 37 then everything else is 45 plus medicare so it's like okay it's 40 45.75 marginal 47%, right?

1:19:54The whole meme is you're taking the whole pie. So memes work. So if you do see Australians posting some ugly looking bloke in their business photo saying 47%, give it a retweet because it's meaningful. It gets around the world. Yeah, it's sad to see. Very sad to see. And it's one thing to think about these things. It's another thing to get punched in the face. And again, I think there's a lot of folks who would say, just leave. It's like, that's fine. The vast majority of people are not going to leave their families and friends. So therefore, and frankly, that's really the majority. If you're a 24-year-old single person, makes sense.

1:20:34Go nuts. But once your obligations build and your life changes, that is a lifestyle for some people. Picking up and moving to Thailand is a lifestyle for some people. It might be the correct decision, but that's not the decision most people are going to make. So my perspective is I want to talk to those people because that's the majority. I have the means to move. I'm probably not going to move because where else are you going to go? You know what I mean? You can move somewhere else and they'll also change the rules. You move to Europe and they run out of energy. You move to Thailand, you move somewhere in the third world and suddenly we have a food crisis.

1:21:05Australia's not going to be... There are trade-offs everywhere you go. So yeah, people shouldn't be kicked out of their home. They can be, but there's a chapter between here and there where you just don't say okay and, you know, push back as a first port of call.

1:21:21Checkmate:Despite the government, Australia is a pretty good place to live. It's a great place to live. And the problem is we are the lucky country. We're just run by absolute buffoons, which much of the Western world is, but this is a particularly egregious example of you have to understand the mechanics and you did it anyway, which, I mean, I don't know what the conditions are for treason, but it's got to be close. I'm going to send a letter to politicians for the first time in my life over this. I think most Australians should be. If you're a Bitcoiner and you're affected, you should do it. If you've got kids, you should do it.

1:21:52If you're thinking about having kids, you should do it. If you're a kid, you should do it. Everybody should do it because every email they receive is noise until they get 1 ,000 of them. Because every email represents 100 people who didn't say anything or 1 ,000 people who didn't say something. You get 5 ,000 emails, 2 ,000 emails. That's a voter base. That's now an issue that people are going, oh, hang on a second. this is now a problem. And it's very, very simple. You must climb the asset ladder to get on the first rung in the housing market. They've just doubled the tax on that. No way this helps young people.

1:22:23Kick it back.

1:22:24Checkmate:Yeah. What a depressing way to end the podcast. It's unfortunate. But Bitcoin's back in a bull market. Well, that's the theory anyway. That's my theory. But look, and truthfully, I know there's a lot of... This event blocked my whole creative process last week. And to this week, I'm still working my own way through it. There's a lot of Australians out there who feel much the same way. It sucks. It sucks. And the best way to think about it, for savers, it's a 20 % to 30 % currency devaluation. And they did it via a very insidious method, which they housing young people washed. And it's just pure evil.

1:23:01Checkmate:Housing young people is the Australian equivalent of patriot in America. Oh, absolutely. No, it is. It is. It's the equivalent. And housing is a religion. So it's interesting that they would also know that they're going to give the housing market a bit of a shakeup. And that's the thing because negative gearing, just not to carry this on, but negative gearing, most properties, they're 2%, 3 % growth at the moment. They've slowed down a lot since the boom after COVID. 2%, 3 % growth capital. I've done the run on some yields that you'll see. Like you can just go on websites and see what it's sold for, what it's rented out for.

1:23:37Yields are 1 % to 2.5 % from rent. If you're not getting, and you're paying a 6.5 % mortgage and yields are going up on a variable rate mortgage, there's going to be a lot of people looking at this and going, hey, no negative gearing, no bueno. And 45 % of mortgages are currently being investors.

1:23:56Checkmate:So you've just kind of removed half the investors. It's funny because we often talk about like the big button where they can print the money. has massive negative consequences on society. Yep. Is that actually a better solution here than this? It's a good question. I mean, we don't know. This is a movie that you may watch or didn't watch. You can't tell what the counterfactual is because you have to live it. The correct, and again, to be very fair, the correct model here is something to do with austerity. The problem is this is not the right setup for that austerity. The correct austerity is not a, if you're already asset rich, you're in a much better position.

1:24:37And if you're trying to grow any wealth whatsoever, you get twice as bad of a deal. That's not austerity. That's a scam. That's not an equal. It isn't equalizing because it makes everyone poorer. It's a very communist approach to things. So it is an equalizer. But the better way to do it would be austerity. I don't know what the model is. And some people said, hey, you should have come up with a better solution in my write-up. It's like, bro, it's not my job to come up with a solution. But I can tell you that the solution they came up with is dog shit. So I think it's about just understanding the boundaries of the problem, saying austerity is the thing we should do.

1:25:09Going through the deflationary bust is the thing we should do. We won't do it. They will revert back to the printing. This is why I think Australia is an interesting test case. We were also a test case of yield curve control in COVID. I think they were trying to manage the three-year yield or the seven-year yield or some weird bloody esoteric vehicle, and they got blown out, right? The market just took them to task. So that was the trial balloon for the yield curve control. Now, eventually they're all going to have to go there, but it's this journey of we know the long picture. We know the macro trend.

1:25:43People then compress all that macro trend into the next daily candle. It's the journey between here and there that's, yeah, trial balloons, see how it works in Australia, see how it works in the UK. What's the appetite for austerity? What's the appetite for taxes? What's the appetite for inflation? You know, like it's hard to tell which one's worse.

1:26:00Checkmate:They're all bad. Fuck. Yep. Welcome to the fourth turning, mate. I can't wait for the first turning. I know. Surely we don't have long left. And that's the thing. The first turning is greener shoots, right? And it's the thing that you and I, right? Millennials, generally speaking, we're the ones who are going to have to cop the price. I mean, how many hundred year crises have we gone through since we left school, right? Every six weeks we've got one coming on. So it's one of those things where like, it's our job to kind of go through the ringer and you're supposed to craft a better story for your kids.

1:26:30We are the first generation who's worse off than their parents, just mathematically. Make that the last time that happens. Have some grit. Do the right thing. Push back. Get your parents to push back. Get your parents' friends to push back. Write the damn letter, because it'll take you 10 minutes, and you just never know, it might just kick in the nuts that they need. And then you vote the bastards out anyway.

1:26:53Checkmate:Fuck yeah. Fire it up. There you go. That's what we need to end the podcast. All right. Thank you, man. That's been awesome.

1:27:07You