In short
Whether Bitcoin has “lost its narrative,” using Michael Saylor/Strategy’s messaging shifts and a data-driven look at how narrative changes affected market reactions; broader discussion of Bitcoin culture fragmentation and the death of monoculture online.
Guest backgrounds
Fernando Nikolic runs Perception, which tracks thousands of digital-asset sources (tweets, filings, conference transcripts, podcasts) to analyze discourse and narrative changes in real time. The other speaker is a long-time Bitcoin podcaster/Bitcoiner (mentions prior episodes with Fong Lee and “Perception MCP,” but no name given in transcript).
Key claims
Saylor’s repeated language and “narrative engineering” can move markets; narrative shifts are detectable before price reactions. Strategy’s 2022 sale of 700+ BTC didn’t move markets, but the 32 BTC sale did because the narrative had already been destabilized. Bitcoin culture is fragmenting post-ETF mainstreaming, reducing shared memes/identity and making adoption feel “boring” and niche.
Notable examples
Strategy sold 32 BTC (triggering backlash and MSTR crash); Strategy sold 700+ BTC in 2022 with little reaction; STRC/“credit” language shift (2024-2025) and later derivatives talk (2026). Mentions Fong Lee (said they’d sell Bitcoin; later bought back shares after the 32 BTC sale).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe State of Bitcoin Narratives
0:56 to 2:45
Exploration of the current confusion in Bitcoin narratives and the impact of Michael Saylor's actions.
“And yesterday, you just dropped a big piece on this.”
Analyzing Saylor's Messaging Changes
2:45 to 6:13
Discussion on how Michael Saylor's narrative around Bitcoin has evolved over the years.
“I was like, okay, I just let my agents run through the Perception MCP.”
Market Reactions to Bitcoin Sales
6:13 to 8:08
Analysis of contrasting market reactions to Saylor selling Bitcoin and the influence of narrative.
“And I was like, this whole upheaval happened, which also had this market correction, this market reaction as well.”
Market Reactions to Bitcoin Sales
8:46 to 9:41
Analysis of contrasting market reactions to Saylor selling Bitcoin and the influence of narrative.
“Spot Bitcoin ETFs provide price exposure to Bitcoin, not direct ownership.”
Market Reactions to Bitcoin Sales
9:47 to 10:36
Analysis of contrasting market reactions to Saylor selling Bitcoin and the influence of narrative.
“If you're already self-custody Bitcoin, you know the deal with hardware wallets, complex setups, clumsy interfaces, and a seed phrase that can be lost, stolen, or forgotten.”
The Impact of Saylor's Narratives
11:26 to 14:00
Exploration of the powerful narratives driven by Saylor and their effects on Bitcoin's perception.
“One of the most interesting things about the narratives that Saylor drives, because they've been incredibly powerful, is it started like the first one I remember is the sort of melting ice cube.”
Shifting Narratives in Bitcoin
14:00 to 18:02
Explore how Bitcoin's narrative has evolved and the impact of mainstream acceptance.
“And obviously he changed his mind on that as well.”
Fragmentation of Bitcoin Culture
18:02 to 24:27
Discuss the fragmentation within Bitcoin communities and its effects on adoption.
“I don't know if it's a problem, but it's definitely different this cycle than before.”
Personalization and Adoption
24:27 to 28:00
Analyze how personalized experiences influence Bitcoin adoption across different user groups.
“We're seeing this now in AI on the business side of things.”
Bitcoin Boredom and Adoption
28:00 to 28:58
Discussing perceptions of Bitcoin's current state and future adoption changes.
“Maybe this is just the way adoption is changing and mutating into something else that we're just not used to.”
Show all 20 chapters
The Death of Monoculture
30:58 to 37:49
Exploring the impact of social media on societal monoculture and cultural fragmentation.
“which is when I think Bitcoin monoculture comes back.”
Facts vs. Truth in Information
37:49 to 42:00
Examining the difference between facts and truth in the digital age and its societal implications.
“I try to find like-minded people that speak the same language.”
Understanding the Chaos Era
42:00 to 45:20
Explore the concept of the 'chaos gap' in relation to Bitcoin and its implications for society.
“Now extrapolate that to like literally everything that happens that gets recorded and shared online.”
The Fragmentation of Bitcoin Adoption
45:20 to 48:20
Discuss the potential fragmentation of Bitcoin adoption and its implications for the future.
“But if we and other people who share our thoughts expect this to resolve within this decade, I mean, then we don't really understand the scale of the game.”
The Evolution of Bitcoin's Purpose
48:20 to 52:20
Examine how Bitcoin's original vision might change as it adapts to a changing market.
“I do think adoption is going to just be fragmented and very boring and slow grinding.”
The State of Modern Music and Art
52:20 to 55:20
Analyze the impact of algorithms on modern music and art, questioning if true creativity can emerge.
“I think, well, Amy Winehouse was not like, was not an artist that really created an original sound for the time that she was living in.”
Challenges in the Music Industry
55:20 to 56:00
Reflect on the challenges faced by the music industry in the wake of technological disruption.
“And all the executives were like screeching and like saying like, we need to stop the Pirate Bay.”
The Coexistence of Torrenting and Mainstream Media
56:00 to 59:52
Explore how torrenting has adapted alongside mainstream media and the implications for user experience.
“We need to like confiscate their servers.”
Bitcoin's Relationship with State and Consumer Agency
59:52 to 1:02:18
Discuss the separation of money and state through Bitcoin and the varying levels of agency among consumers.
“They're just passive consumers of content.”
Perception: Understanding the Digital Asset Industry
1:02:18 to 1:04:08
Learn about Fernando's company Perception and its role in gathering digital asset discourse.
“Right now, we just got to be content with where we are right now and just keep focused and keep building and just chipping away at it.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:03Maybe it's time to kill your heroes again and Saylor is now the hero to slay in this cycle. Why did the market react in terms of just emotions but also price action for 32 Bitcoin sold? And why didn't anything happen when he sold 700? It was because, in my opinion, because of the narrative engineering that Saylor was doing. Somebody like Sailor or anybody who chooses to engineer their narrative in a way can actually control markets. Bitcoin is so many different things that you can literally have a great argument for Bitcoin to somebody who is on the extreme far right and also the extreme far left.
0:44So the customization of Bitcoin is actually pretty cool. And that will lead to a lot of people from different walks of life to understand Bitcoin in a very deep way and be completely convinced about it. So that's great. that's that's like bullish good to see you man um we're going to talk all about bitcoin narratives across the board breaking down no one knowing which way is up with it anymore like it's funny just before we started recording i was scrolling through twitter and like i've seen three posts like is bitcoin dead is bitcoin over like i feel like we've lost the narrative but i think there's nothing more apparent as of right now as to where a narrative has either been broken or lost in everything that's happened with Michael Saylor.
1:28And yesterday, you just dropped a big piece on this. And it has been really interesting to see his messaging change over time. So do you want to start? I'll just leave it open for you. You pick where you want to jump in. What you notice when you kind of dug through all of the data around the things that Michael Saylor has been saying? well you know first of all i think you know when um when strategy sold 32 bitcoin and uh you know the reaction that everybody had not only in like the market and the price action but just like on twitter and on socials and everybody has kind of like come to this realization that okay maybe it's time to kill your heroes again and sailor is now the hero to to slay in this uh in this cycle and And I was like, it's interesting that people react like that after the fact.
2:17Obviously, there are people who have been critical of Sailor and strategy. There's this section or this cohort of Bitcoiners who are anti-Suite Coiner. That has always been part of this. But then there's a lot of other people as well that really had a problem with what was happening. And they were kind of freaking out. And I was like, what's up with that? Why do people always react after something has happened? And are there any indicators, some signals before anything happened that might have given us a clue in terms of whether Saylor has changed his mind or if he had started saying something that was an indicator of something else?
3:00I was like, okay, I just let my agents run through the Perception MCP. For people who don't know, Perception is my company. So essentially what we do is we track thousands of sources when it comes to discourse in the entire digital asset industry. So tweets, LinkedIn posts, filings, white papers, transcripts from conferences, podcasts, everything, you name it. And I was like, okay, let me just run my agents through the MCP and just track all of Saylor's tweets, interviews, conference panels, whatever he was talking about and say, hey, were there any clues before the 32 Bitcoin sell or anything else might have been some kind of a leading indicator of where things were going to go instead of reacting on something that's already happened.
3:50So I essentially told my agents to just go back to 2020 up until today and just give me a whole analysis on everything that Saylor has said And whether there's a word or two words or three words that keeps repeating or like, has he actually had a narrative that was planned and structured and kind of like on purpose throughout these years? And, you know, it was kind of clear when the analysis came back that, okay, there's like three faces from 2020 till today. That was like, okay, the first four years after strategy first announced that they were buying Bitcoin in 2020 up until 2024. There was just like this, I don't know, there's like Bitcoin maxi, anti-fiat maxi type of narrative and kind of like propaganda.
4:42And I say propaganda because the way that Saylor was saying things was in a very kind of like, I don't want to say calculated mode, but it was like very, it seems very on purpose. He kept repeating the same talking points and also used the same type of words over and over again. So I was like, that is pretty interesting. And then after 2024, entering 2025, things started to change with the kind of like the introduction of the term credit. And credit in the first cycle of 2020 to 2024 was mentioned, but it was mentioned in a very negative way. It was mentioned as like, okay, this is fiat shit. This is like not good.
5:27Credit is bad. You should just hold Bitcoin. So obviously he was trying to appeal or maybe pander to like the Bitcoin, you know, mentality, trying to get them on board during these whole four years. And then started to like slowly switch over a little bit, like not as hardcore as the first four years. But in 2025, there was like this little like transitional period where he started like switching things a little bit, like subtly, but it started. And then obviously you take a look at like what happened in terms of like product development or just like the offerings that strategy started to offer to the market around that time in 2024, 2025.
6:09And that's obviously, you know, when Stretch, when STRC got introduced and all of a sudden the credit language or the credit discourse started to switch into something more positive. and then 2026 came and he started talking about derivatives and just like completely went to the other side right and i know that at this at this time there was some people that started to question this uh but it wasn't really it wasn't really noticeable there was some people that was like against this like what is this whole credit you know paper bitcoin anti-suit coiners they were speaking up, but the overall market wasn't really paying attention until Saylor or Strategy sold the 32 Bitcoin.
6:54And I was like, this whole upheaval happened, which also had this market correction, this market reaction as well. And I'm saying this because in this whole 2020 to 2026 cycle, where these three phases happen, there was a time in 2022 where Strategy sold 700 plus Bitcoin and the market didn't react. Nobody said anything and the price didn't do anything. It's 700 plus Bitcoin. I forget exactly how much Bitcoin exactly, but it was definitely way more than 32. Now, why did the market react in terms of just emotions, but also price action for 32 Bitcoin sold? And why didn't anything happen when he sold 700?
7:39It was because, in my opinion, because of the narrative engineering that Saylor was doing. So 2022, the 700 Bitcoin was just like, okay, he's like tax harvesting. There's just some other, people had like other, not excuses, but like they were rationalizing it. Whereas when he, when Saylor or Strategy sold 32, it was already a problem with the narrative that Saylor had done when he started to change a year before. And that to me is extremely interesting. To me, that's like proof that narratives is one factor that drives markets. It all has to do with the emotion of people, how they react to certain actions unfolding.
8:22and somebody like Saylor or anybody who chooses to engineer their narrative in a way can actually control markets, subconsciously or not. But narratives has a very important part when it comes to how people react and how people feel about something. So I thought that was pretty interesting. And I think that's kind of the biggest takeaway from the report. If you own a Bitcoin ETF, especially if it's GBTC, you need to listen up. Spot Bitcoin ETFs provide price exposure to Bitcoin, not direct ownership. You can't withdraw it, you can't self-custody it, and they charge you a management fee every year to hold it.
8:59Well, Swan recently announced Swan Real Bitcoin Exchange, and it's ready to use right now. RBX is a structured in-kind exchange that converts your Spot Bitcoin ETF shares into real on-chain Bitcoin. It does that without selling on the open market, and it's designed to support a tax-efficient outcome. So, for example, if you hold GBTC, you're paying 1.5 % a year in management fees for Bitcoin price exposure. But by swapping GBTC for real Bitcoin with RBX, you can drop that figure as low as 0 % by just holding it in self-custody. This is designed in a way that maintains your cost basis and in a manner that supports the deferral of capital gains tax.
9:35So if you own a Bitcoin ETF, especially if it's GBTC, you need to talk to Swan Private about RBX today. Head over to swan.com forward slash WBD and book in a call with one of their team. That's swan.com forward slash wbd. If you're already self-custody Bitcoin, you know the deal with hardware wallets, complex setups, clumsy interfaces, and a seed phrase that can be lost, stolen, or forgotten. BitKey fixes that. BitKey is self-custody built for real life. It gives you an intuitive, easy-to-use wallet with no seed phrase to sweat over. And it has a strong recovery system and built-in inheritance for long-term peace of mind.
10:10And BitKey's just had a massive upgrade. The new device now has a screen. So before you approve something, you can check it on the BitKey itself. The transaction, the address, or any account changes. It's a big difference. You're not just trusting what's on your phone, you're seeing it for yourself on the device. It's simple, secure self-custody without the stress. Go to bitkey.world today and use the code WBD to get 10 % off the new BitKey. That's bitkey.world and use the code WBD. Do you want to pay less in taxes and stack more Bitcoin? Of course you do. Well, by mining Bitcoin with Blockware, you can.
10:42Under section 168K of the US tax code, Bitcoin mining servers qualify for 100 % bonus depreciation. This means every dollar you spend on miners can directly offset your income in a single year. And it's true for both business owners and W2 earners. So if you have$100 ,000 in ordinary income, you can purchase$100 ,000 in miners and potentially offset your tax liability entirely. Blockware's mining as a service does all the heavy lifting. They secure the rigs, they source the low-cost power, and they handle all the day-to-day maintenance. So you get to stack Bitcoin every single day while drastically shrinking your tax bill.
11:14Get started today at blockwaresolutions.com forward slash WBD and use code WBD for$100 off your first miner. That's blockwaresolutions.com forward slash WBD. One of the most interesting things about the narratives that Saylor drives, because they've been incredibly powerful, is it started like the first one I remember is the sort of melting ice cube. The melting ice cube of fiat money he was sat on, so he turned his treasure into Bitcoin. and then there was the sort of manhattan real estate there was digital energy and it felt like all of the initial narratives were kind of very positive for bitcoin and then the reason i've never liked the digital credit one is it's always been like bitcoin's not enough on its own without me giving this other product and so i feel like there's a bit of a disconnect on the narrative there and then the other interesting thing about this is i remember i had fong lee on the podcast I think it was about October-ish time last year.
12:11And he said on the show, I asked him if they would sell Bitcoin. And he said, yes, they would. And when he said that, I thought that was just like a fiduciary duty thing that he had to say he would. Because at some point, like he may have to and he has to say that that is an option. But the more I think about it, the more I wonder if it was just like it was sowing the seeds of this new narrative. I don't know. Like, and it's just been interesting to see it go from being, in my opinion, very, very pro Bitcoin to being like pro strategy and sometimes like saying Bitcoin is not enough. Like we need to add these new layers on top of it for it to become money like.
12:46And that's kind of, I think, where I've fallen out with this whole thing. And I think there's a lot of Bitcoiners in the same boat. Yeah, and I think, you know, I mentioned Feng Li as well in the report, because, you know, when the 32 Bitcoin got sold, you know, he bought back a lot of shares as well. And these things are filed publicly as well. And that is, even though it's not necessarily a verbal message, it is still a message that is publicly filed that should be kind of like a thing that people pick up on. That kind of went unnoticed. It didn't help at all. Like MSTR still crashed. And it was like nobody cared that this actual CEO bought back a significant amount of shares while the price was crashing.
13:34So that means that, you know, when a certain narrative has been solid and has, you know, over time, in this case, you know, from 2020 to 2024, four year cycle of like having a very hard narrative, kind of like rooting, when that gets uprooted, like nothing helps. nothing you say afterwards will help and that's like how how big narratives actually is and you know you can speculate i mean obviously there's there's a lot of like you can reason your way out of this and say hey you know business is business things change uh times change and you want to adapt you want to you know try out new things and also for sailor it's kind of like a learning curve as well right like even before 2020 he had tweets where he said okay bitcoin is is dead or has no future.
14:21And obviously he changed his mind on that as well. So, I mean, all of those things are allowed, obviously, but it's just interesting to have data on that right now that is quantitative. And you can actually, you can pinpoint to a place where like, okay, he's changing his narrative right now. And you can speculate on like, okay, why is this happening right now? What has happened before he spoke up about it that is changing his mind or is changing his mind in real time. And obviously we don't know, but I think it's extremely interesting to just have data on it. Like that's why I created perception in the first place, because I don't feel that we don't, we don't have this service where we can actually catch a narrative changing in real time.
15:00If you bother to look to come, like the consensus here is just to check the narrative after it's already been said and done. Like, like everybody has with this, with the reaction to the 32 Bitcoin being sold. So that's, that's the cool part. It's language. It's not binary as code, so it's not black and white. You can only speculate and talk about it on the podcast um but i think uh it's just incredibly interesting narratives really move markets sometimes a hundred percent and and obviously like we've focused there on the strategy side but on the bitcoin side the narrative has changed a lot as well like when i came into bitcoin i don't get me wrong like i came for number go up but i stayed for freedom money and and bitcoin was like it was freedom money like this was a counterculture thing that was cool it was like end the fed it was punk rock like it was everything that like i wanted to find at the time that i found it and it's part of the reason i fell completely in love with it and like never focused on anything since then essentially but like now i think because bitcoin's won so hard we and we've got everything that we talked about in 2016 2017 i feel like people aren't sure what the narrative is anymore because like and and to me like a real turning point is like the etf approval it's kind of that was something that bitcoin has been fighting for since 2014 when the wink of us first applied for an etf and it was like the thing that kind of knighted them and allowed them to come on with the wall street like finance bros and be a real big boy asset like they it got everything and then it's like now what we've won what what who are we anymore and i feel like that's something bitcoin's battling with right now 100 man and if there's so much to say about this uh let me try to just synthesize it and not have too long of a rant because i i i really really geek out about these things so yes i agree like i'm class of 2017 and the things that convicted me back then was just not what's being talked about right now definitely and we definitely have a situation right now like where the punk rock band you know from you know bushwick brooklyn all of a sudden uh is now playing at stadiums in in wembley london you know like we totally went mainstream and a lot of people don't like that you know like me too you've made the really shit third album exactly like the first album is like everything your whole life experience and it's amazing and then after that then what you know so we have already gone through that like first album where everything is fucking beautiful and it's packaged right and so many more people people come along and then are we fizzling out right now?
17:37Because right now there's really no solid narratives to cling on. And bear markets are for building narratives, not only for building products. It's for us to kind of like regroup and be like, okay, what do we talk about now that can live on during the next bull? I don't see any new narratives happening right now. I don't see any memes happening right now. And like the narratives and the meme culture, I mean talk to any like real quote-unquote bitcoiner they will tell you like memes is so important for us to convince outsiders because it's a memetic culture is visual it cuts through a lot of the noise and you get it instantly you don't need to read any academic papers or white papers or any of that bullshit and if we don't have that then what are we what do we hold on to when we are ready for the next phase of adoption and more outsiders and normies are going to come into the realm.
18:32So that's a... I don't know if it's a problem, but it's definitely different this cycle than before. And I see a lot of other Bitcoiners who have been around for a while during this cycle, kind of like, first of all, killing your heroes. That's always a thing. And that is also always based on narratives because your hero became a hero because of things that he said. And then since... Where am I going with this? The cypherpunk ethos is also kind of like dwindling out as well. And we see like, we are kind of like in an environment right now where there is no Bitcoin culture or Bitcoin community neither.
19:14There's no, and I know we want to talk about monoculture, but like there used to be a monoculture within Bitcoin like a decade ago, perhaps. obviously with infighting still prevalent it has always been a thing because we are like decentralized we are kind of like chaotic in the way we organize so that's kind of part of the dna but there was like always a thing that made this a movement that a lot of people felt part of and now i think on a broader sense with just the internet being fragmented and the way we communicate with each other and taking information and educate ourselves is also fragmented because of just the internet has created thousands of voices thousands of channels and the incentives for a thought leader or an influencer or a podcaster is pretty much to just stay within one very niche subject and just double triple down on that so once you get caught in one of these niches you kind of like you get caught because you understand it like let's say there's a podcast that is only about i don't know self-sovereignty freedom and all of those things you're going to tune into that podcast if you share some of those beliefs before and then you're going to continue listening to that podcast and you know continue to go deeper into that rabbit hole and be completely convinced about the freedom aspect of bitcoin self-sovereignty self-custody all that but the same that same phenomenon is also going to happen on a separate like pocket of the internet where somebody who just wants non-number go up all of a sudden is starting to discover adam livingston's of the world, right?
20:46The True North podcast, whatever. And they're going to be convinced because they have some preconceived beliefs about financial stuff. And they're going to understand Bitcoin from that perspective. And they're going to double and triple down and kind of go down that rabbit hole. And the way the internet is right now is like these two pockets of the internet are not really talking to each other that much. And extrapolate that with like hundreds of pockets of the internet. So I think this is interesting right now because to me, this is affecting Bitcoin adoption. This is kind of like setting the stage for the next wave of adoption where there's no like one movement that's going to bring in a lot of people understanding Bitcoin in one way.
21:26There's going to be a lot of people coming in, but there's going to be fragmented groups understanding Bitcoin in very different ways. And a lot of those ways are going to be extremely contradiction and they're going to be like opposite of each other is that good is that bad i don't know it is kind of like decentralized and cool right it's kind of like the same chaoticness of bitcoin which is part of our culture but at the same time it's a little bit weird because we're continuing to kind of go away from those those things that convinced a lot of people in the very beginning so i don't know if a lot of people are gonna like rage quit before because of that or if bitcoin is going to be very different because of how many different people are going to come in and not really get the 360 degree view of all the awesome things that bitcoin represents i don't know if this is good or bad i don't know what do you think i i don't like i find this really hard because when i came into bitcoin 2016 like i was really only ever on bitcoin twitter um a little bit on sort of the reddit but i think really most of the people who were on the reddit were also on bitcoin twitter and it did feel like a monoculture in a lot of ways like it felt like this sort of inside group that knew a secret that no one else knew and everyone just wanted to meme and talk all day and bullshit and during this whole time like don't get me wrong i was really new so i i didn't understand the full complexity of like the block size walls everything that was going on but there was still infighting it's just like but it still happened in one place it felt like a sort of clubhouse that everyone went to to talk about this thing that we knew we knew existed and no one else did and then like you say that's fragmented so much i think the sort of orange tie suit coin of bitcoiners are entirely different they represent like a different subset of bitcoiners they don't really talk to the sort of the freedom maximalist bitcoiners who don't really talk to like the bit 110 people who might not talk like talk to the ordinal guys like it has been totally fragmented and i don't know if that's a good thing or a bad thing but what i do worry about is like how without a sort of monoculture within bitcoin how you push bitcoin adoption as wide as we need to push it that that's my big open question yeah man and it's like it's kind of like the the way that i i i i've been kind of like saying bitcoin is not for everyone for a while uh and that's that's pretty much my reasoning behind it it's just like it's not it's not for everyone i mean it is for anyone like everyone anyone is welcome if you kind of like understand it your way um but it's just like a lot of people are not going to get it and um i think another another another reality like in in this internet age that we are living in like the last 20 years i would say not only did everything started to fragment 20 years ago and is as fragmented as ever today But that has also changed our habits a little bit in terms of personalization.
24:16So it's like you can now personalize your feed. You can now personalize. If you buy a car, you can personalize the color, the wheels. Everything is personalized. So that leads to a change in consumer behavior where everybody expects things to be customized. We're seeing this now in AI on the business side of things. We're like, hey, if you are selling a dashboard these days, you're dead. Like everybody's creating their own dashboards because everybody wants like a highly customized solution for whatever they're doing, right? And it's possible. So people are just going to expect that. Now, the cool thing about Bitcoin is that I've always said that Bitcoin is so many different things that you can literally have a great argument for Bitcoin to somebody who is on the extreme far right and also the extreme far left.
25:03There are arguments for both extremes and everything in between. so the customization of bitcoin is actually pretty cool and that will lead to a lot of people from different walks of life to understand bitcoin in a very deep way and be completely convinced about it so that's great that's that's like bullish but that's actually really interesting because like one of the things that i think i've said before on the podcast is that i think bitcoin covers such a broad array of things that it's very hard to know how to orange pill someone if you don't know them Like if you know that someone cares deeply about like human rights, you tell them the story of like Roya Mabu giving women education in Afghanistan by like using Bitcoin.
25:44Like that's going to always hit. But the same story of like fiat, like money printing and fiat inflation is not going to necessarily hit that same person who might have more those like left wing biases. But maybe that's where the complete fragmentation of culture actually works in Bitcoin's favor. Like you have people in each of these camps and everyone's pushing Bitcoin from every different angle. It's exactly right. But that's going to create a reality for a lot of people that will make them think, ah, nothing is happening in Bitcoin, man. Like there's nothing, there's no narratives, there's no movement.
26:17But maybe not to you in your view of the world, but like something here is happening that is really cool that you have absolutely no clue about. like so many times i i like go to lunch and i talk about something that i care about like i don't know i read a book and that book i know sold millions and then i talk to somebody like hey do you know about this book or do you know about this author and they're like nope never heard about this guy what the hell the guy has sold millions of books you have no idea who that is and this goes with like i don't know films that you see bands that you hear people are just like there's there's such a disconnect between people like you go to your neighbor and that your neighbor is just going to have wildly different tastes and things that they're interested in compared to you.
27:01There's absolutely no, it doesn't matter anymore if you live in the same street, doesn't matter if you live in the same city, like everything is fragmented and people just customize their own like worldview. So Bitcoin will win in that way because it's adaptive enough to, you know, create arguments and be convincing for a lot of different people. And the thing with the fragmented media is like, okay, you're going to create these like pockets of internet that are kind of like insulated, but it's going to be super effective because these people are going to be super niche. They're going to cut down to one very specific thing.
27:35And the way that we also like ingest information these days, we don't have the mental capacity to like register everything. So we need things like packaged in a, you know, bite-sized way. So adoption is going to be good, but it's not going to feel like, oh my god we're taking over the world because you know this one narrative is like totally dominating it's going to be like boring fragmented you're going to not know what the hell is happening but it's going to still happen but you're going to have a view of like bitcoin is boring and i think that is also what's happening right now i think a lot of people are like like like i said like literally 10 minutes ago there's no memes there's no dominating narrative i'm bored bitcoin has no future, but maybe we shouldn't think like that.
28:20Maybe this is just the way adoption is changing and mutating into something else that we're just not used to. The thing that keeps me up at night with Bitcoin cold storage isn't Bitcoin failing, it's my setup failing. And this is where AnchorWatch comes in. With AnchorWatch, your Bitcoin's insured with your own A-plus rated Lloyds of London insurance policy and all Bitcoins held in their time-locked multi-sig vaults. So you have the peace of mind knowing your Bitcoin's insured while not giving up custody. So whether you're worried about inheritance planning, wrench attacks, natural disasters, or just your own silly mistakes, you're protected by AnchorWatch.
28:52Rates for fully insured custody start as low as 0.55 % and are available for individual and commercial customers in the US. You can speak to AnchorWatch for a quote and for more details about your security options and coverage, visit anchorwatch.com today. That's anchorwatch.com. You wouldn't reuse a Bitcoin address, so why does your phone broadcast the same identifier for life? Every sim has a static ID and carriers, ad networks and bad actors all use it to track you. The big carriers have been caught selling that data over and over again. CAPE is America's privacy first mobile carrier. Their identifier rotation feature changes your ID every 24 hours so you look like a different subscriber every single day.
29:30And sim swaps are off the table. Your number can't move without a 24-word phrase that only you hold. There's also no name at sign up, no social security number, and there's no profile to build on you. If you're a Bitcoiner in America, I honestly don't know why you'd use any other network. You can head over to cape.co forward slash WBD and use the code WBD for 33 % off your first six months. That's C-A-P-E dot co forward slash WBD. If you hold Bitcoin long enough, there's going to come a time when you need some dollars. It might be a tax bill, a business expense, life getting in the way, but whatever it is, it might come at a time when you don't want to sell your Bitcoin.
30:06That's where Ledin comes in. Ledin lets you borrow against your Bitcoin instead, with tiered rates that go as low as 9.25%. So you don't have to sell your stack if you don't want to. Ledin have operated through every market cycle since 2018 and have originated over$11 billion in loans. But the important part for me is the way Ledin handles these loans. Your collateral is held in custody and never lent out to generate interest. And Ledin's more than just loans. Tether Gold is now live alongside your Bitcoin, with instant trading across 10 pairs. And later this year, you'll be able to borrow against gold in the same way that you do with Bitcoin.
30:39Ledin really is an awesome company. I've used them multiple times. The applications have taken me less than 15 minutes and you have the dollars in your account within hours. If you want to check out Ledin, go to ledn.io and use the code WBD for 0.25 % off your first loan. That's ledn.io and use the code WBD. So I do have my ace on my sleeve, which is when I think Bitcoin monoculture comes back. But can we talk more broadly about the the death of monoculture in society because this is a topic that i find really interesting and i don't always find people that also find it interesting and there's there's a time i brought this up on a show maybe six months ago and you reached out to me um and so i've been excited to talk to you about this because i don't know when the death of monoculture happened but i know that it has happened and and the problem with it is it to me looks like the shittification of everything like music has got worse film has got worse tv's got worse like culture is fragmented and so there's there's no real shared values amongst people that you might be in like a local geography with maybe there is in all different like different parts of the world who you have you're connected to through the internet but like i feel like it's a societal breakdown that i don't love to see and one of the cool things though about recently is the world cup has been like a shining light of what monoculture can be like i feel like it's a very small glimpse of the life in the late 90s early 2000s when i was a kid when everyone cared about the same thing at the same time and i think there's something really special about that but i want to start like just a really open question about like when do you think the death of monoculture happened oh man you're saying so many things and i'm afraid of going to like crazy around because i have so many thoughts and opinions about this but let's do it um i think uh the death of monoculture probably happened around late aughts uh early 2010s because of social media and internet and i think this is something that everybody intuitively know and but it's easy to look back and say that now but i think uh you know the world cup is a great example of uh why we why we need monocultures in different like geographical locations because it's really beautiful to see you know all the all the fans and the stands representing each country kind like dressing up and like the stereotypical garments you know like that it's totally yes totally stereotypical but it's really beautiful because you really you're shining you know your culture what you represent and and all the values and the traditions of it right like i love to see you know i grew up in norway my fellow norwegians they they they just post up with like viking helmets and then they do the the row thing and it's really it's really wonderful because you know when i travel i want to go to a place and feel like i'm in this in that in that country i don't want to see the same type of coffee shops or the same type of people like being present in every single city.
33:41And I think we see that on, you know, physically, like a lot of cities, big cities in Europe, for example, kind of like starting to look the same. They're losing their like flair and originality. And we are also seeing it now on the internet with what I like to call the homogenization of the internet, which AI is really pushing forward because we have all these tools that are trying to appease everyone because they want to grow fast. So they kind of like homogenize the entire web and giving you results or answers to questions that are like they sound confident but it gives you like 40 of the actual truth so you we kind of like get like lobotomized slowly over time thinking that we're really making decisions and we're making opinions based on facts but we're not and when the monoculture did exist there was at least a feeling even though yes it was super centralized and your only choice was like five hosts of five different shows in one channel it still was something that brought people together and there was some sense of like okay a consensus a consensus of culture that at least if you felt identified or not it was kind of like the thing like mainstream was a thing and yeah i don't know there was stuff like grunge bands like obscure music from seattle that just managed to kind of like hit the zeitgeist to the mainstream and if they did that it was literally a global thing i remember like in the 90s growing up as a kid as well like basketball was like insane they hit the zeitgeist and it became like an all like all sucking thing that everybody could relate to and and embraced and that was because of yeah there wasn't the customization again of content wasn't there we were kind of like reduced to the TV, the radio.
35:32And that was like a thing that happened from, I think, 1930s when, you know, more people at their households began getting radios and TVs and channels started to appear and content started to create. And then that kind of like from the 1930s, it became a growing business, a growing industry. We saw advertising kind of like get invented and like more money, more money were made so more channels were made and then when the internet came that kind of like metastasized into the internet and continued to fragment and spread everybody had their own channels everybody had their own opinions everybody wanted to make money so i think around that 2010 is is kind of like where things really starting to accelerate and just like we are now 15 years in and there's like very crazy period where i honestly think and sorry for the rant again we're kind of like going back to our like human biology of like dude societies for hundreds and hundreds of years millennia even were mostly reduced to like your local physical place and the the culture that grew in those places were just like local high trust same language same way of speaking everybody kind of like understood each other because they had evolved in the same place for hundreds of years.
Read the full transcript
36:53Then the 1930s came, fucked us up. And now we're kind of like, we're not even like, we're not biologically wired to handle all this information that we're getting fed every single day. Like you're not - That's 100 % true. Right. You're not supposed to know that there's an earthquake in Venezuela. You're not supposed to know that there's a train derailing in Karachi. You're supposed to know what's happening around you with your family, with your friends, and like the Dunbar number of like 150 persons max. And then that's it. And we're kind of like, we crashed through that. And now we're feeding ourselves with so much information that we have absolutely no clue.
37:29And I can see now people are kind of slowly going back to that, like the tribal, the local, only online, right? So people are like rage quitting X and they go to Noster or they go to Blue Sky or, you know, they all now make their little tribe, their local tribes online. That's the only difference that is done online. But we're kind of like reverting back to that by the human kind of like status quo of just like, hey, I know my people. I know what I like. I try to find like-minded people that speak the same language. We agree on some fundamentals. And then my worldview is like restored and I feel good about it.
38:09But that is crazy because you have so much information accessible. you literally have the library of alexandria at your disposal and you can learn so many great new things but i think humans just like default back to that state of like ah at least i can i can feel good about myself and i'm like blissfully ignorant about other stuff that is happening because i'm not really meant to know absolutely everything if that makes sense it totally makes sense and it gets interesting because so when i was growing up until i was maybe 10 or 11 we had five tv channels and then we got sky tv which is essentially like cable tv um and there's there's two sides of this there's one which is like the information that you're being fed through the news services and like sure they can be propaganda they can be driving a narrative but everyone was getting getting given the same information and so people that were close by like in a literal like geographical sense would be getting the same information as you sure they might be processing it differently but everyone was like on the same playing field and everyone was kind of dealing with the same hand of cards whereas now like on that side the information that i'm getting when i'm scrolling x or whatever is so different to my neighbor that like we can be living next door to each other but essentially living in an entirely different existence and it's like what i see as truth they don't see as truth and it makes it very hard to kind of go to the coffee shop and have a conversation with someone that's not just surface level bullshit like small talk um and and i don't know what that does to society and then like on a cultural side even more so it's even more dispersed in that like the stuff that i'm watching for entertainment is totally different like i'm not watching you know married at first sight or love island or whatever that someone else might be watching and i just feel like the the sort of medium that you communicate to other humans that you don't properly know through has changed and i don't know what it is anymore and i just see that as being a really scary thing for society yeah no it is it is and it's like um an analogy that i had one more thing in there sorry go ahead i totally interrupt you but because this is something i've been thinking about a lot as well is i think it's bad for everyone but there's also a huge age divide which i think is really bad like so when i grew up again like anyone who grew up in the same era as me like you talk to respect your elders like the these are like i look up to my my grandparents fucking amazing people they live in a different world entirely because they still live in the 90s and so like i don't know what it does to society both in people like my own age that live in a different world of truth to me and also like different generations that are just i they may as well be like an alien race at this point they don't have the same context i mean there is a point to be said about like boomers getting totally sucked into apps and their phones more than young people but that's kind of like a different topic but like they are like literally getting their brain fried through whatsapp and telegram it's just that's that's an entirely different discussion but yeah it's crazy but uh i think it's just like i don't i don't think people know the difference between facts and truth right that's that's kind of like the the biggest issue right now because we all agree on the facts like okay if somebody um records on their phone somebody robbing somebody else right that's the fact like you see the the crime happening this person killed that person end of that that's the fact but the truth around that fact depends a lot on like your ideas already so if you're or your ideology depending on how extreme you are but you can say somebody on both extremes can say well the guy who killed that guy comes from the slums and there's majority of a certain race that live in that slum so it's a racist thing and that's why i hate that race then the other extreme can say but this guy is poor he lives in poverty he has to resort to crime because he doesn't have any other opportunity so that's two truths for just one very simple fact that happened.
42:24Now extrapolate that to like literally everything that happens that gets recorded and shared online. And you have this like insane chaos of nobody agreeing on simple things that should be simple things to agree around. Right. And, and then you have people who, who capitalize on these things and, you know, politicians are always the first ones to do, but this is also for influencers, thought leaders, people who just want to grow their accounts they just leverage that as well just to get more followers and like the incentives for spreading information and building a followership and and creating content that actually educates and gets gets through is highly highly perverse and that is definitely breaking a lot of people's brains but and this is an analogy that a lot of bitcoiners like to compare bitcoin with is gutenberg's printing press right what we're seeing right now with all this like distribution mechanics uh and all distribution channels like completely getting you know uh disrupted can be compared to that right and the thing is is like well a lot of people don't know about because when you look back and do like revisionist history it's very easy to just pinpoint to one point in history and then another like a result and think this happened in a very small vacuum but if you really take a look at like the printing press let's say and i and i do want compare the printing press with bitcoin with ai and like the internet as a whole because like let me explain so the printing press now everybody looks back and said okay yeah it dissolved the catholic church monopoly on god uh you know there was these like institutions that had this information asymmetry and they made you know they they grew they grew in power they they they grew in influence and uh and they they got a lot of money right and you would think like okay the printing press disrupted that and it was over but if you really take a look at history from the invention of the printing press what really followed was like 300 years of like complete chaos starting with the reformation but then like the enlightenment the 30 years war then the collapse of feudalism and the rise of nation states right that was like a crazy chaotic transitional period because of this one invention that made essentially information free Now, nobody who used the early printing press, they didn't live to see the world that that invention eventually created.
44:54What they did, they just spent their entire lives in that transition chaos era. And I think we are in the exact same spot today with both the internet, Bitcoin, and AI. So if you expect all of these... We're in the chaos era. We're in the chaos. Yeah, I like to call it the chaos gap. I don't know if I can maybe coin that term and it becomes a thing, but it's the chaos gap. So if we obviously talk about this right now on this podcast because we have questions, we want to know what the fuck is going on. But if we and other people who share our thoughts expect this to resolve within this decade, I mean, then we don't really understand the scale of the game.
45:36You know, so, yeah, you might get blackpilled because you see regulators banning a wallet or, you know, the authorities arrest the samurai devs or you get blackpilled when, you know, Bitcoin crashes to 70%. But if you do that, you're kind of like looking at this civilizational transition through a very short lens. and we're kind of like in the middle of a very crazy transitional era in human history that i don't think we're going to live to see through the actual results um you know and this this goes for everything yeah you hope not yeah yeah i want to see the end of this um but i i do think when you when you bring all this back to bitcoin it does make more sense why things like the bit 110 civil war is happening right now i think one of the interesting things on the bit 110 side is that that most of the people who are supportive of it also don't like this sort of financialization treasury company side of it.
46:37And I think that's people completely understandably wanting to push back against this becoming like a homogenized, boring version of what we thought Bitcoin was. But my kind of strong take on this is I think Bitcoin might go through this period now where it does fragment a little it goes into its niches like bitcoin adoption happens at the edges rather than like straight through the middle it's not it's not the coolest thing in the world like ai is here now and that's what everyone wants to talk about but i think it comes back when we realized that this was a trojan horse like i i think if if bitcoin is the trojan horse and if we've now been sort of let into the gates and wall street are accepting us the the the changing point will be when it becomes clear that bitcoin's a threat to the u.s dollar and what leads to that i don't know whether it's like you know financial crisis huge money printing and bitcoin then poses a realistic threat to the u.s dollar but i think there will come a time when bitcoin does get its monoculture back yeah i think so i mean usually when a crisis happened That's when humans get together super quickly in defense of that crisis.
47:54And I don't know what that crisis is going to be, but definitely a lot of people agree. And it's kind of like a meme that Bitcoin thrives in crises. So, but it's kind of like a black pill way of growing adoption, right? Like you don't want the world to become a worse place just so that Bitcoin can win. So I think Bitcoin will win in a very boring and slowly way. I do think adoption is going to just be fragmented and very boring and slow grinding. And we will, like the same way the price is not really making crazy moves, but just slowly grinds upwards. That's kind of what's going to happen in the future even more because it's just very hard to organize ourselves and get a lot of people behind one movement on one narrative.
48:43but i'm repeating myself that's boring on the 110 on the bit 110 guys i think it's just like um i i feel like you know bitcoin if you really look at it from first principles it's technology man and technology adapts changes and 99 of things that gets built for one very specific purpose once adoption happens, that purpose kind of like, it's not really what it ends being, right? Like take my company, for example, I was totally, I'm not comparing precision with Bitcoin, but you know, any startup, any founder, any people working in tech can tell you, hey, you start off with an idea and you think you build a product a certain way.
49:29Then people come and like, oh shit, you got to pivot. And the things that you thought was true is actually not true because the market is telling you a very different truth. So you adapt to that and you build around that. And obviously Bitcoin is not as flexible as a startup, as a regular SaaS, but it's kind of like the same thing. Like, yeah, you have a white paper with like some fundamentals, but that was written in a time and place where maybe these things become less relevant over time just because the type of people who ends up adopting Bitcoin and builders that are building on top of Bitcoin, changing Bitcoin in a way because they just build different things like ordinals or whatever that you just don't see as like hey this is not the original bitcoin idea but how how much does that really matter it doesn't really matter what you thought of something in the beginning what matters is the outcome so i think a lot of these people are like screeching uh as a result of that because hey this is not what i thought this was but it's like that's a very hard pill to swallow because again it's it's it's it's akin to orange pilling in itself in order to understand bitcoin is a highly spiritual individual journey that part of that process is to unlearn a lot of things that you thought was true about the world and you got to come to that realization of like fuck like damn i need to like humble myself here because it's just not the world is not what i thought it was and that why is bitcoin very different than that i think bitcoin is exactly the same it's like a lot of people they understand bitcoin and they get you know convinced about bitcoin and they love bitcoin because of two three four different arguments but then more arguments are going to come later in the future as this thing grows and more different people comes into the ring and then like you got to be accepting of that and then it seems like these people are not and then And the way that they go about it is also extremely cringe.
51:26I just want to say it. The scare tactics, this kind of like, hey, I'm the sole holder of truth. And if you don't agree with me, you're an idiot. That's kind of the same thing we have been criticizing each other about when it comes to Orange Peeling Norm. This way, this tactic is just not good. You're not going to get a lot of people. And it seems to me like the people that they manage to gather around are people who share the same views. And so they're not really, they're not really being successful in getting other type of different people to believe that BIP 110 is relevant and important. So it's like the same, the same type of people are just gathering together here.
52:04And that's, yeah, I don't know. It's, I don't know. It's been interesting to see, but like, I totally agree. I think there's going to be a lot of people realize that Bitcoin doesn't care what you think it should be. But I don't know, it's a mess. I'm excited for this all to be over. like this is such peak bear market things like i i just want i want to get past this we need to build a new narrative we need to build more memes um but fernando before we close out i need you to i need you to give me some light on an argument that i had with pete for years on the podcast i don't so we recorded a podcast with pete when he first pivoted um i don't think it came up but he held this he held this opinion very strongly in that he thought that amy winehouse's album was the last great album and i think he might have been directionally right although i so i always said kendrick lamar to pimple butterfly was a great album that came out after after the amy winehouse one but i think what he actually spotted was the homogenization of music through things like Spotify algorithms.
53:17Do you think we've lost art forever? Oh man, that's a great question. I think, well, Amy Winehouse was not like, was not an artist that really created an original sound for the time that she was living in. She was like all retro, like her music was like old soul. So her music was like the 70s wrapped in a modern package. So if you strip that away and you only look at original music, maybe the last album is like from the 80s or 90s um and a lot of like new bands that really that i like that are new are like kind of like sounding like old school throwbacks throwbacks and the new sound that i see that kind of is hitting the the mainstream cultures like in terms of like you know hip-hop music and rap music fucking sucks man and uh messaging is kind of like crazy and i always i've been i grew up on rap music to be honest i i love rap music and i always felt like part of the part of the reason why i love rap music is because it's a reflection of society because there's so much talking so much lyrics so much verbal communication so if you listen you get like a nice reflection of like the reality that is being lived and if you listen to the lyrics today of rap it's just like whoa we are living in a nihilistic world that just like nobody has any hopes and it's all about drugs and fucking all kind of like demon-like things so if that's a reflection of the society that we're in yeah we're not going to create good music and maybe we need to look back at like older older stuff but what was your original question sorry i kind of got derailed i wonder if the the fact that we've kind of become slaves to the algorithm for finding new music new art new film like does that how do you break out of that and and will we break out of that because like it leads to everything being beige because it never the algorithm never wants to offend so it always gives you stuff that it thinks you're gonna like enough to stay not enough to love and i i just wonder if we can break out of that yeah i don't think the majority of people will break out of that and i i can explain why so I started my career in the music business right and I started I was working at Universal Music in Norway where I grew up between Norway and Argentina I was in the Oslo office in Universal Music and the and then you know neighboring countries Sweden the Pirate Bay guys were doing their thing right and torrenting had like a very you know I had a moment uh in the in the early aughts mid aughts so by the time I started my career back in 2007 and I was working there I was I remember to this day and I've been tweeting about this a lot like I remember sitting in the in the boardrooms on the phone with the London office.
55:57And all the executives were like screeching and like saying like, we need to stop the Pirate Bay. We need to like confiscate their servers. We need to put those people in jail. We need to shut down the website. And I was the youngest guy there. And I was like to myself, I'm like, what the fuck is, what is going on right now? What are these people talking about? Like they obviously don't understand the technology. They don't understand the decentralization of torrenting and that is literally unstoppable. you can put them in jail but you're not gonna you're not gonna make a dent uh they just didn't didn't understand it and i was like hey why don't we embrace this technology and we try to like uh create like low bit rate uh versions of singles and and distribute that and get people excited and then they will buy the real shit later and they were like no absolutely not like i'm like that was a thing that made me rage quit the uh the industry what happened later though is that the music business as they got disrupted and they were like trying to scramble to stay relevant and just to stay solvent is that they did mergers and acquisitions and then they got like those mergers and acquisitions made them to like a one global entity that was powerful enough to say to spotify like hey if you want to enter the u.s market if you want to ipo in this market we need a we need a cut pure mafia shit like if you want to like have a shop here in the street and you don't want us to like come and destroy your shop give us a give us a piece so i think if i remember correctly when they ipo'd uh in the us the this conglomerate had like 20 25 of the of the initial shares during the ipo and that was the way that they allowed spotify to exist and then they obviously pushed that solution to a lot of other people but the torrenting has always managed to coexist torrenting is not dead and you can still go today and you can torrent you can download any files and and movies and media that you want but it is definitely an user experience that is less smooth than just like paying 10 bucks to amazon prime 25 bucks to netflix and just like go there and stream so convenience when they wrapped the mp3s and the mp4 files that torrenting were just giving to you directly real mp4s now you get the wrapped mp4 versions on these platforms that people are just like yeah these are great businesses so things coexist but the real torrenting is a minority and the normies are just embracing that right and they're a slave to that algorithm and you got these self-sovereign people who get their taste buds from other way and they know what to go for and they they download very specific things because they know that they like it bitcoin I kind of feel like it's the same.
58:38Like we have managed to separate money and state. It's definitely the state. The state is not controlling anything. It's not letting you download a wallet and receive Bitcoin. You can do that today. You don't need any permission. Still possible. And self-custody is still possible. Great products are out there. And there's a plethora of products and companies fighting for the customers there, making these products better over time. but the wrapped bitcoin the normies are loving that now right if it's etf if it's paper if it's like custodial even that they hold bitcoin but together with a custodian i think the majority are going in that direction as well the same thing is going to happen when it comes to taste music design ai is kind of like giving you a wrapped version of like hey this is what good web design is and now you see a lot of people creating websites and they all have that like annoying little like border color on the left and just like man this is ai and then with language it's the same like ai is giving you the homogenized wrapped version of like what cool what good writing is supposed to be and people are so dumb and they're so bad at writing and designing that that version is way better than they could produce themselves so they're just going to go with that and now we have ai slopification of the of the internet through sloppy design and sloppy language so are we going to escape it yeah it is still possible there is a escape hatch but how many people are actually going to actually be high agency enough to realize what's happening and actually take action one two three five percent that's like odell said this to me a couple of times when i've had him on the podcast he's like the percentage number is going to drop but the real number is going to grow it and like maybe that is two three four five percent but it's going to be a small number of people that actually do have agency and the scary thing on the ai side is like i can't see how they break out of the same incentives that the netflix and spotify's have in the world where they want to give you safe beige information and i i think that just means censorship in a different form like they're going to give you such bland takes on everything and people are going to rely on it so heavily that's their only take they're going to have and i don't know man i just worry about society i mean listen i think there's always been equality in this world there's always been people that are high agency people that are low agency i think the majority of people are low agency that's also the reason why bitcoin adoption is maybe not as big as we wish it to be but that's because we are all high agency people who know our shit and we are humbled enough to change our worldview and to be adaptable.
1:01:22Majority of people aren't like that. They're just passive consumers of content. We are on the other side. And I don't want to sound like elitist or anything like that, but there are just differences in people. There are people that will take the opportunity that they have, even though they have to do Uber Eats all day, and they will put on this headphone and listen to a podcast about finance and Bitcoin as they deliver Uber Eats. and there's going to be people who are ordering Uber Eats and just sitting on their couch watching Slop all day. And I think we can be as altruistic as we want to be and try to help as many people as possible, but at the same time, lead a horse to the water and all of that stuff, right?
1:01:59We just got to keep working hard, understand that there's still a lot of things to grow. Bitcoin has still a lot of more adoption, this cake is going to get bigger. I don't think like the hyper-boliconization of the world, like us taking over the US dollar is going to happen anytime soon. But that's like, that's the end game. Right now, we just got to be content with where we are right now and just keep focused and keep building and just chipping away at it. And I think even though I'm not like a huge circular economy fan, I do respect the people who chose that path and want to, you know, deliver that message while other people are choosing different paths and they still deliver the Bitcoin message.
1:02:41everybody wins if Bitcoin just grows and I don't care how you can be an ordinal maxi for all I care if that's the only understanding of Bitcoin that you have good for you man at least you're doing something in Bitcoin I don't care about my personal opinion I care about freedom and I want people to be free to do whatever stupid shit that they want to do but I think Bitcoin wins no matter what and we just need more people through the door so you know that's it I love it man Fernando this has been awesome we've got to do it again at some point This is a very different show than the type I normally make.
1:03:11And I really enjoyed it. But tell people where they can find out about the work you're doing before we close out. Yeah, so my company is Perception. The website is perception.to. What it essentially is, is just I gather all the discourse that happens around the digital asset industry. So I include Bitcoin, but I don't want to have that. I don't want to study Bitcoin in isolation. It's important to know where Bitcoin stands, where everything else is going on. So it's compute, AI, mining, payments, you name it, stable coins, all of that. I gather thousands of sources every single day, thousands of data points about the discourse, about the filings, documentation, everything that happens.
1:03:50And then I give it to you. And a lot of people, this is more for businesses that take that and they get a feel of what's happening in the industry and they can do product strategy and they do marketing and communication strategy for it. it's delivered through an MCP and you can go to perception.to for that. And for me, you know, just Google my name, you'll find me everywhere. I love it, man. I should use this, by the way. I want to try it out and see what it gives me on Bitcoin. Yeah, do it. By the way, the MCP is free for forever for five requests a day. So you just like plug it into your agents and you get five requests a day and you can take a peek and see how it feels like.
1:04:29So go ahead and do that. I'm going to try it out. Fernando, this has been awesome, man. Thank you for coming on the show. I will speak to you soon. We've got to do it again at some point. Yeah, thanks for having me on, man. Good combo.
From the publisher
“Maybe it’s time to kill your heroes again, and Saylor is now the hero to slay in this cycle.”
Fernando Nikolic is the founder of Perception. In this episode, we get into whether Bitcoin has lost its narrative, why Michael Saylor’s messaging has changed, and how narratives can move markets. Fernando breaks down the shift from Saylor’s early Bitcoin maximalist language to the more recent focus on credit, derivatives and Strategy as a financial product.
We also get into whether Bitcoin’s rebel era is over, why the ETF approval may have marked the end of Bitcoin as a countercultural movement, and whether Bitcoin adoption is now becoming more fragmented, boring and inevitable.
We also get into the death of monoculture, the way the internet has broken shared reality, and how AI, Spotify and algorithmic feeds are creating a more homogenised culture.
THANKS TO OUR SPONSORS:
FOLLOW:
Danny Knowles: https://x.com/\_DannyKnowles or https://primal.net/danny
Fernando Nikolic: https://x.com/basedlayer




