In short
The Fed’s “pivot” from quantitative tightening to reserve management/buybacks, argued to be the start of a larger “big print” that will drive debasement. The episode compares Bitcoin vs gold/silver, claims precious metals are signaling monetary instability, and predicts Bitcoin’s upside after gold leads.
Guest
Lawrence Lepard (macro investor/analyst; runs or is associated with a macro investment shop and publishes letters; appears to be a long-time Bitcoin and precious-metals investor). Host is Peter (not the guest).
Key claims
- Debt requires ongoing money creation; without it, debt would “collapse.”
- Fed actions: stopped QT, floated reserve management ($25B, starting 2026), then increased to $40B/month starting immediately.
- No crisis is needed; liquidity is a “mathematical requirement.”
- “Tail risk” includes yield-curve control if the 10-year yield breaks above ~4%.
- Gold/silver are “smelling” the coming debasement; Bitcoin will follow with large upside.
Notable examples
- Silver up ~157% last year; gold up 50%+.
- Repo blowout in 2019; QE responses in 2008 and COVID.
- Silver paper vs physical “musical chairs” (derivatives vs delivery constraints).
- Nation-state and central-bank gold accumulation; China’s Shanghai Gold Exchange and Saudi-China gold conversion.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOUnderstanding Money Creation and Debt Growth
0:00 to 0:56
Learn why continuous money creation is necessary due to growing debt.
“The reason they have to continue to create money is that the debt continues to grow and if we don't create money the debt will collapse.”
Introduction to Lawrence Lepard
0:56 to 2:10
Meet Lawrence Lepard and hear about his insights on macroeconomic events.
“The last time we spoke was in September last year, and so much stuff has happened since then.”
The Fed's Reserve Management and Market Responses
2:10 to 4:20
Discussion on the Fed's gradual print and its implications for the economy.
“So when we were speaking last time, I think I titled the episode The Big Print is Coming, something like that.”
The Mathematical Certainty of Money Printing
4:20 to 6:40
Explore the necessity of money printing in the current economic landscape.
“And then with COVID, it was in response to a crisis.”
Signals Indicating a Need for More Money Printing
6:40 to 8:30
Identify macro signals that suggest an increasing need for money creation.
“So you think this gradual print could turn into the big print?”
Potential Triggers for Future Money Printing
8:30 to 13:00
Discuss potential events that could lead to significant increases in money printing.
“the next big print will be the 10-year, the U.S.”
The Exponential Growth of Money Supply
15:52 to 23:04
Explore the implications of the exponential growth in the Federal Reserve's balance sheet and its impact on inflation.
“And as you can see, compounds are getting 7%.”
Driving Factors Behind Gold and Silver Prices
23:06 to 28:00
Understand the key factors driving the rise in gold and silver prices, including geopolitical dynamics and market manipulations.
“I think it had just gone over like$3 ,000 or something.”
Investment Strategies in Silver
28:00 to 28:40
Explore how companies secure silver supply through investment.
“And to that point, one of those companies, I believe it was Samsung, went to one of the companies I'm invested in and said, we're going to invest$10 million in you on very preferential terms, slightly above market.”
Silver Price Predictions
28:40 to 29:50
Discuss predictions for silver prices and their implications.
“And, you know, in Bitcoin land, others have seen people say, well, silver, you know, look at the chart of silver.”
Show all 31 chapters
Government Fiscal Responsibility
29:50 to 30:50
Analyze the likelihood of responsible fiscal policies in the U.S.
“I've got investors saying, God, we've got all these profits.”
The Debasement Trade Phenomenon
30:50 to 31:50
Understand the concept of the 'debasement trade' and its impact.
“I mean, safety noise used to say the biggest threat to Bitcoin was responsible fiscal policy by governments, which really means there's no threat to Bitcoin.”
Balancing Gold and Bitcoin Investments
31:50 to 33:40
Learn how to balance investments between gold and Bitcoin.
“They've come out and they've called it the debasement trade.”
Balancing Gold and Bitcoin Investments
35:41 to 36:23
Learn how to balance investments between gold and Bitcoin.
“They're the global leader in Bitcoin backed lending.”
Market Sentiments on Bitcoin
37:19 to 42:00
Discuss market reactions and sentiments surrounding Bitcoin's value.
“But he sold at least a portion of his Bitcoin a couple of months ago.”
Investment Strategies: Buying and Selling
42:00 to 43:40
Learn about investment strategies focusing on timing and minimizing regret.
“Cause I know that at 170, you know, I mean, if, if Bitcoin goes to 50 or 60 strategies going to 110, but you know, you can't, I mean, that's the thing.”
Political Influences on the Economy
43:40 to 45:20
Explore the impact of political events on economic conditions and asset prices.
“He needs to have an incredible year, which means he needs the economy to be running absolutely blazing.”
Inflation and Federal Reserve Dynamics
45:20 to 47:00
Understand the relationship between money printing and inflation timelines.
“And they're probably trying to time it well.”
The Cost of Capital and Market Distortions
47:00 to 48:40
Discuss the implications of artificially low interest rates on the economy.
“Surely that shouldn't be the cost of capital.”
The Future of Money: A Potential Reset
48:40 to 50:20
Consider the prospects for a monetary reset and its potential consequences.
“and it was a free subsidy to everyone who could borrow money, and that's why all these cotillionaires got rich.”
Political Will for Monetary Change
50:20 to 52:00
Evaluate the likelihood of political leaders pursuing a sound money strategy.
“And, you know, I don't know if they have the political space.”
Proposals for Gold-Backed Bonds
52:00 to 56:00
Examine innovative proposals for gold-backed financial instruments and their implications.
“Maybe the currency even fails with all their actions.”
The Case for Sound Money
56:00 to 57:55
Discussing the necessity for politicians to adopt sound monetary policies and potential gold-backed securities.
“Maybe we do that in July of 26 when we have the 250th anniversary of the country.”
The Challenges of Financial Reform
57:55 to 59:53
Exploring the difficulties in reforming the current financial system and the potential role of Bitcoin.
“And the only real issue is on what time scale.”
Comparing Gold and Bitcoin Manipulation
59:53 to 1:01:54
Examining the manipulation of gold prices and contrasting it with Bitcoin's volatility and potential.
“James Check, check me, one of your country mates has done a really good job of this.”
The Future of Bitcoin Ownership and Regulation
1:01:54 to 1:05:01
Discussing risks associated with Bitcoin ownership and potential future government regulations.
“I mean, because there will be so much, you know, there'll be two things happening.”
Economic Predictions and the Role of the Fed
1:05:01 to 1:10:00
Speculating on future economic scenarios involving the Federal Reserve and the implications for money supply.
“It's going to be horrible, which is also another reason why, and I'm not suggesting anybody don't pay their taxes or cheat or any of that kind of crap.”
The Necessity of Yield Curve Control
1:10:00 to 1:10:25
Learn about the mathematical inevitability of yield curve control and its implications.
“You know, we got to take interest rates down.”
The Urgency of Understanding Money Supply
1:10:25 to 1:11:19
Explore why understanding the impending money supply changes is crucial for individuals.
“And so it just, you know, I mean, it's interesting to me.”
The Future of Economic Conversations
1:11:19 to 1:12:07
Discuss the evolving nature of conversations surrounding late-stage fiat and economic surprises.
“So I think I would end it on that note unless there's someplace else you want to go.”
The Impact of Lawrence Lepard's Book
1:12:43 to 1:14:18
Understand the narrative approach of Lepard's book and its effectiveness in educating readers.
“If you've got a functioning brain, you can read it and go, oh, I get it.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:02The reason they have to continue to create money is that the debt continues to grow and if we don't create money the debt will collapse. The debasement will come, gold will keep running, Bitcoin is going to wake up and go from 90 to 270 or 3x easily. Everybody is saying we realize that this is a house of cards and the way to think of it is like a game of musical chairs. It's not a trade, it's a trend. I do think that big print's on deck. And I do think that when it comes, Bitcoin will respond and it will respond ferociously. You know, at some point, the thing is so asymmetric, it's just going to explode to the upside.
0:39Bitcoin's going to smash the system, whether they like it or not. Few people understand is how when this thing does hit, when this next wave does hit, it's not going to 140, guys. It's going to 250 or 300 or 350.
0:55Lawrence Lepard:Larry Lippard, welcome back on the show. The last time we spoke was in September last year, and so much stuff has happened since then. I was kind of going back through all the macro events since then, and we've got a lot to talk about today, Larry. Yeah, we sure do, yeah. But how are you doing? How was your Christmas break? Well, it was great. It's nice to be with you. And as I think I've told you, I'm trying to kind of reduce my podcast a lot, but yours is always, Peter had me on in the early days, and you guys have always been one of my favorites, so I'm never going to cut out WBD. But I'm doing great.
1:31My vacation was good. I'm now in Florida. As you know, I'm kind of in that old guy camp where I guess in America they call us snowbirds, which means I spend the summer in Boston and the winter in Florida. And it's also tax advantage because Florida doesn't have state income tax. So I will be here into May and June. And, you know, it's pretty nice and sunny outside, whereas I just talked to somebody in Massachusetts and they just got six inches of snow last night.
1:59Lawrence Lepard:Yeah, that's the move. I was obviously just in Miami to do the sailor interview and the weather at this time of year is so nice there. That's the place you want to be doing winter. Yeah, it's really great. But let's get into it, Larry. So when we were speaking last time, I think I titled the episode The Big Print is Coming, something like that. a classic Larry Lippard title. And we've not had the big print, but there has been the start of a little something. They've been doing the, what are they calling it? The buyback. The gradual print. Well, they call it reserve management, you know? Yeah. Right.
2:32And so, yeah, and it's really, it's notable what happened in the last two Fed meetings. One, they stopped the quantitative tightening. And then two, they started saying that they were going to potentially do some reserve management because things were getting too tight. And they floated the trial balloon of$25 billion and maybe starting in 2026. And then at the Fed meeting in December, they came out and they said, no, it's not 25, it's 40, and it starts in two days, which kind of told me that they really were under pressure to do it. And just to summarize for the audience, most people know this, the reason they have to continue to create money is that the debt continues to grow.
3:12And if we don't create money, the debt will collapse. So they have to service it. And they've tried to be responsible and to reduce inflation. And I think it's an important point that they did not want to do this, Danny. I mean, they, you know, Chairman Powell wants to be Paul Volcker. He wants to tame inflation. And inflation has not been tamed. Even by their crummy broken measure, it's 2.7 to 3%. And we all know it's actually higher than that. So So they haven't solved the inflation problem, but they've turned the money printer back on. And that's a big deal. I'm writing my fourth quarter letter, which will be out soon.
3:49It's free. I'll put it on Twitter and we talk about that. And it's a very big deal. And so it's$40 billion of purchases a month, which adds up to$480 a year, which is not the$3 trillion that Bernanke printed or the$5 trillion that Powell printed. but you know my sense is that's the start and it's they've pivoted and it's going to grow and lynn and i have had kind of a nice back and forth on twitter where she says well it's the gradual print not the big print and i said yeah you're right but it's it could morph into the big print and i think it will and uh i've actually got a chart on that i don't know if nals want to go into it but we could we could talk a little bit about that if you like yeah well we can pull the
4:28Lawrence Lepard:chart up but the thing that i thought was really interesting about this is that in 2008 when they did the big QE event then, it was in response to a crisis. And then with COVID, it was in response to a crisis. And then even with the BTFP thing, that was in response to a small crisis within the regional banks. But then this time, I don't know if it's the first time it's been like this, but nothing seems to be happening, but they are still turning the money printer back on. And I don't know if it kind of signifies that the system just needs this now. It's not a response something, it just needs it all the time.
5:01I think that's a great insight on your point. And I had the same thought myself personally, that, you know, yes, the system does need it. It's almost a mathematical requirement or certainty. And you're right. There is no crisis. And yet, you know, they're trying to be preemptive. They know that if reserves get too tight, they'll have something like the repo blowout in 2019. And, you know, they can't have that. And they don't want to have that. They're trying to fight off a crisis by kind of gradually leaking more money in there. I think the problem they're going to have, though, is that the math is just compelling.
5:33And I think there are a couple, there are probably three macro signals that I see that say that they're really running out of time, and I'll point them out. Probably macro signal number one is the price of silver. Silver was up 157 % last year and just continues to go straight up. And there's a lot to unpack there but we'll just say leave it at that the other point is the price of gold which is very similar it hasn't gone up as much but it's up you know 50 plus last year and then the third item is and i kind of continually retweet this every morning um is the japanese 10-year bond you know japan has been a source of a lot of liquidity in the united states and really all over the world as a result of their carry trade which was driven by their low interest rates and interest rates in Japan kind of look like a chart of the price of silver.
6:22The 10-year just kind of goes, it's up and to the right in a very steep fashion. So to me, there's some clues, not certainties, but clues that things are breaking and they need to print more money. And as we see, they just started printing more money. I think that number will grow. I said that earlier.
6:43Lawrence Lepard:So you think this gradual print could turn into the big print? Do you think it needs an event, a COVID type, obviously not global pandemic, but like a black swan event to turn into a big print? Yeah, that's a great question. I don't know. I really don't know. Yes. I mean, obviously a COVID black swan type event will clearly do it. You know, we're so leveraged that any kind of a serious downturn in the stock market or a blow up in the bond market would be. The question is, can we have the big print under just kind of normal circumstances? And, you know, it took two big events to create those prior big prints.
7:19And so you would think, okay, it's going to take a big event this time. But there's one other thing that's in the mix that I think makes it very an interesting question. And that is, what's going on with the Federal Reserve and the Federal Reserve management? And the subtext here is we've got Trump at war with Powell. And it's very unusual for a Fed president to come out on a Sunday night and say that he's going to fight back against, you know, this group within the government that are asking him a lot of questions about the overruns on the building. And Trump kind of claims that's not him doing it, but that's a little bit hard to believe.
7:59And, you know, the fact of the matter is that, you know, Trump has really kind of got the Fed under siege. And as we all know, he has the ability to appoint a new Fed chairman in May. And a couple of names have been bounced around for that. The original name was Hassett, Kevin Hassett, who's very, very dovish, said, you know, he thinks interest rates should be one or two percent. And I think what happened is Trump might have gotten a tap on the shoulder from a combination of percent and the bond market. I said, nah, sir, if you do that, you know, you're going to lose the bond market. And, you know, I've often thought that the trigger for the next big print will be the 10-year, the U.S.
8:3510-year yield, which has kind of been locked in plus or minus around 4%. And they've been able to do that because the carry, the basis trade has just grown enormously basis trade is three times larger than it was in 2019 which is shocking to me um yeah and that's the basis trade is just they get you know hedge funds to to buy and sell you know treasury bonds in order to keep deals locked into a certain place and they make you know they lever them up heavily and they you know they make a spread on the fact that nothing blows up but when something does blow up then they have to issue swap lines and that was part of what happened in COVID, they had to bail out Ken Griffin and Citadel and a big participant in the basis trade.
9:14So if the 10-year were to start to move aggressively through 4-4, 4-5 to 5%, which I think is a very real possibility, that would lead to yield curve control. I mean, basically, I think what's going on is gold and silver smell what's coming. It hasn't happened yet, but they think mathematically it has to, and so they kind of smell it. And we've even seen things that are very, it's very notable to me. Stephen Moran is Trump's Council of Economic Advisers guy, and he got put on the Fed board when the woman got accused of insider trading. And so she resigned. That was like the fourth instance of that.
9:51And when he was getting vetted to be a member on the Fed board, he made a testimony that more or less said something along the lines of, you know, the Fed may have to at some point, you know, be in a position where they set policy on long-term interest rates. Well, that's code for yield curve control. And yield curve control says the Fed buys the bonds to keep the rates low. This is what third world and emerging market countries do. What do they buy the bonds with? they buy it with newly printed paper that, you know, grows their balance sheet. And, you know, and the Fed bought the bond. And so once that starts, this has a little bit of the gradually then suddenly kind of component to it.
10:32And so, you know, if the Fed just starts yield curve control and says, let's say we're going to lock like they did after World War II or during World War II, they locked in yields, long bonds at 2.5%. Let's say the Fed says we're going to hold bond yields at 4%. We're not going to let the 10-year go above 4%. And let's say, you know, Trump keeps talking the way he's been talking about, you know, occupying countries and growing the defense budget from$1 trillion to$5 trillion. Well, then the next step is going to be, all right, you know, you're telling me I can only get 4 % and we're spending like crazy.
11:05You know, there's $37 trillion, almost$38 trillion of U.S. federal treasury debt. The bond market is going to look at the Fed and say, sold to you. Great. You'll pay me for my bond at the 4%. Good. I'll give it to you. And 38, I mean, their balance sheet right now is about 6.5 trillion down from nine. So I think on the next big print, the Fed balance sheet goes from that 6.5 to, I don't know, 10, 15, 20. I mean, some big number, right? And if the entire 38 trillion came at it, it would really go to a big number and we'd be off on the road to hyperinflation. So that's not my base case, by the way.
11:42I think we're just going to have high inflation. But, you know, all of these things, to me, you know, the markets are telling us, the silver market and gold market are telling us, these things are in the works. I mean, gold and silver are really great at smelling this stuff. And there's a chart I put out as well in the past, and it's all over my Twitter feed and others that it showed and i this this time reminds me very much of 2020 so so the covet event occurred the fed pivoted um they started printing a lot of money quickly gold went from 1200 to 2000 quite quickly and bitcoin just sat there you know for for months it was kind of locked between like seven and ten thousand dollars and you know it just kind of went sideways and then suddenly it woke up that fall in october and it just went on a tear and in the next six months it went from 10 to 60.
12:32That's 6x. And so there was, you know, it was kind of like gold moved first, gold smelled it first, and then Bitcoin followed the flag. And I kind of expect the same thing this time. Gold's doing its thing. It's moving. It says the debasement is coming. The debasement will come. Gold will keep running. And then at some point, as the debasement comes and the money flows in, Bitcoin is going to wake up and go from 90 to 270 or 3x easily, in my view. So is it tomorrow? No. I mean, I have that as within 6 to 12 months, I guess. But I could be wrong. I mean, maybe they hold it all together, Danny. It's entirely possible that they hold it together.
13:15I mean, they're good can kickers. I'll give them that.
13:19Lawrence Lepard:If you're already self-custody of Bitcoin, you know the deal with hardware wallets. complex setups, clumsy interfaces, and a seed phrase that can be lost, stolen, or forgotten. Well, BitKey fixes that. BitKey is a multi-sig hardware wallet built by the team behind Square and Cash App. It packs a cryptographic recovery system and built-in inheritance feature into an intuitive, easy-to-use wallet with no seed phrase to sweat over. It's simple, secure self-custody without the stress. And Time named BitKey one of the best inventions of 2024. Get 20 % off at bitkey.world when you use the code WBD? That's B-I-T-K-E-Y.world and use the code WBD.
13:58Lawrence Lepard:What if you could lower your tax bill and stack Bitcoin at the same time? Well, by mining Bitcoin with blockware, you can. New tax guidelines from the Big Beautiful Bill allow American miners to write off 100 % of the cost of their mining hardware in a single tax year. That's right, 100 % write-off. So if you have$100 ,000 in capital gains or income, you can purchase$100 ,000 of miners and offset it entirely. Blockware's mining as a service enables you to start mining Bitcoin right now without lifting a finger. Blockware handles everything from securing the miners to sourcing low-cost power to configuring the pool, they do it all.
14:33Lawrence Lepard:You get to stack Bitcoin at a discount every single day while also saving big come tax season. Get started today by going to mining.blockwaresolutions.com forward slash WBD. Of course, none of this is tax advice. Speak to accountant or tax advisor to understand how these rules apply to you and then head over to mining.blockwaresolutions.com forward slash wbd and you'll get one week of free hosting and electricity with each hosted miner purchased. With fiat money constantly debasing, wealth preservation isn't optional. That's why I recommend Swan Bitcoin, a team of dedicated Bitcoiners who work with families and businesses to build and secure generational wealth with Bitcoin.
15:11Lawrence Lepard:Strong relationships with clients are at the center of everything Swan does. A dedicated Swan private wealth representative, which is a real person that you can text and call, will help you build a Bitcoin wealth strategy using Swan's comprehensive platform of Bitcoin services, including tax advantage retirement accounts, advanced Bitcoin cold storage using collaborative self -custody, inheritance planning with both trust and entity accounts, tax loss harvesting, asset-backed loans, and more. Swan have helped over 100 ,000 clients since 2020. And if you're serious about acquiring and securing Bitcoin, I recommend Swan.
15:43Lawrence Lepard:meet the team at swan.com forward slash wbd which is swan.com forward slash wbd yeah i'm not betting on them holding it together and i do want to get into the gold and silver trade because i think that's been like probably the most interesting thing over the last six or 12 months right but just before we do do you want to bring that chart up that you sent me because i think that shows how the balance sheet goes exponential yeah this is a really i love this chart because this was done by mike oliver um who's a really great macro analyst and um let me just show this to you so what you have here dan oliver runs myr mccann capital all credit to him this is his chart not mine but i i read it and saw this is really this nails it so and his title is american money printing goes exponential and the chart starts in 1960 The lighter gray sloped line, that's kind of a growth curve, pretty much tied to the growth of money.
16:40It's kind of 7 % compound growth. And as you can see, compounds are getting 7%. Eventually, it starts to go straight up. It's kind of exponential. And the black line is the Federal Reserve liabilities or the Federal Reserve balance sheet, which really is a measure of the reserves that they put into the system, which the banks then take and lend out. And that lending is what creates growth in M2. Okay. Okay. So what you can see is that they tracked from 60 to 80, they were together, all the way up to 2000, a little blip. But basically in 2008, you can see that, you know, the debt kept growing at an exponential pace.
17:14And one thing that's not on here, I kind of wish it was, is the overall level of debt in society, because it would, the debt level in society would kind of track the exponential growth curve. And, you know, the debt kind of got ahead of the balance sheet in 08, and we had a panic, and boom, they printed. And you can see it went up quite a bit from, you know, I think the Fed balance sheet was 850 pre-08, and it topped around 3-something, 3-5, I think, at the top. And then, of course, Yellen and Powell tried to reduce it, and they did start reducing it. But you can see the second arrow right there, the repo COVID panic was 2019, you know, New York repo rates blew out, went up to 10 % overnight.
17:55And that was the first Powell pivot. And so Powell at that point in time basically said, hey, you know, we can't keep tightening. We've got to loosen. In fact, we've got to do QE. And then, of course, COVID hit and then all hell broke loose and it went straight up. And, of course, that's what created the 9 % inflation peak that we had. And so eventually he figured out, and he said it was transitory, it was wrong. I mean, this is what happens when a lawyer is your central banker. I mean, you can blame a lawyer for not understanding it. I mean, the one who should have understood it is yelling. Anybody, I mean, we grew, when they did this thing, basically they grew M2 by 40%.
18:30So you can't grow M2 by 40 % and think you're not going to have inflation. I mean, I was just, you know, what were they smoking? So, right. But then he started tightening it. But here, notice this. So they tightened, and they came from the peak of nine. Now the balance sheet is, say, six, five. Okay. But look at how the interesting point is every time the money in the system, the black line, dipped below kind of the growth in debt line, the exponential growth in debt line, you know, a problem occurred. Well, look at where we are right now. Right. So so what do you think is going to happen next?
18:59Right. I mean, the black line is about and the black line is turning up. This doesn't reflect the December change policy. So, you know, you just know what's going to happen next. Right. This black line's got to go north of$10 trillion, and it will, in my opinion. This isn't just my opinion. This is kind of a mathematical fact. I mean, they could not do it, and in which case, you know, the debt would start to default and everything would start to collapse, and we'd have a, you know, a deleveraging, cascading cycle that would look like 1929, and, you know, that would be extremely unpleasant. And, you know, if they choose to go in that direction, so be it.
19:38I'm making a strong bet that they will not choose to go in that direction. And I think it's a logical conclusion that they won't. But I suppose they could, right? That's a tail risk to the debasement trade that we're all in.
19:52Lawrence Lepard:But this chart is basically why you think a gradual print isn't sustainable, because at some point, it just needs to keep up with the debt. That's exactly right. It's just not going to cut it. But so is there, like when you say the tail risk, is the tail risk that instead of printing money, they start defaulting on debt and things like that. Yeah. Yeah. It's a possibility that they, you know, they try and maintain discipline. I mean, I don't, I don't think it's particularly likely given, you know, what we know about what Trump has said and his policy. I mean, we've got Basant saying, you know, that the Fed and the treasury need to coordinate policy.
20:28We've got Trump saying, you know, that we've got to be more of, I mean, it's becoming clear that this administration and a lot of people in government are kind of starting to view this as, you know, we're going to make up the rules as we go along. We're in a great power competition with China and Russia and whatever it takes to keep America in the position we want to be in, we're going to do it. And, you know, it's existential. They're using words like, you know, we've got to go to a wartime footing. And, you know, they did it in World War II, right? I mean, we had to fight fascism. We took on all kinds of debt.
20:59We suppressed yields. Bondholders got killed. Inflation was high. um you know i i think that's that's kind of where we're heading and they're telling you that i mean it's not this is not some secret i mean trump had a tweet on truth social where he said he wanted to see 20 to 25 percent gdp growth well you can get that but only if you have 15 percent inflation because you can't get real gdp growth i mean it's not like we're going to increase our productive capacity 25 percent one year that's that's physically impossible is that impossible even
21:29Lawrence Lepard:Even with massive breakthroughs in AI robotics. Those things will help. There's no doubt that all of the great technology we've got going on will help, and it fights against the argument that I'm making. But I'm of the belief that it's too little too late, that the problem is bigger than can be solved with the AI and the productivity boom. I mean, we are really in the later stages of this monetary decay. And, you know, things like the silver price. I mean, the silver price and the gold price have done things they've never really ever done before. You know, just they're kind of relentless. You know, they did this a little bit in the 80s with the end of that.
22:13And Volcker solved that by taking rates at 20%. But, you know, he had the space to do it. At that time, debt to GDP was 35%. Right now, debt to GDP is 125%. So they just, you know, the Fed really is kind of trapped. And in my view, they have to run it hot. And what's going to be interesting, and they can do that. And that will keep the economy going, by the way. But there's just no way that's not inflationary. I mean, that's the bottom line. It has to mathematically be inflationary. And Trump and Vicent have said that their best bet at solving this problem is to grow their way out of it. And so that's what I think they're going to try their best to do.
22:55Lawrence Lepard:We should talk a little bit about the gold and the silver trade. Because I remember when you were in Bedford in March last year, we did a show and gold had already been ripping. I think it had just gone over like$3 ,000 or something. And you were saying then you could see it having a run at sort of$5 ,000. And here we are like not even a year later and we're not far off that at all. What's been driving the gold and silver trade? Because I imagine this isn't just hedge funds. Do you think nation states are a big part of this? Oh, yeah, absolutely. So a lot of things are driving it. But I would say that the two biggest drivers are the dollar losing its status as the world's reserve asset.
Read the full transcript
23:36Not necessarily currency, but asset. People used to save. I mean, since 2014, net treasury bills held by foreigners have been flat to down. People just don't trust the dollar anymore. They can see what we all can see. So that's part of it. And then, you know, the Chinese and others, they've stood up the Shanghai Gold Exchange and the volumes there are huge. And, you know, you've now got China trading with Saudi Arabia. And if Saudi Arabia ends up with too many yuan and they don't want it, they can't buy goods from China for it. They just converted it gold. In the old days, with the petrodollar, they would have converted that excess into U.S.
24:08dollars. And so, you know, so you've got nation states going for gold as a neutral reserve asset. That's part number one. You've also got central banks realizing the problem. And central bank purchases have been growing and they're large and steadily growing. And you've got a third issue that kind of falls into a little bit of the conspiracy theory world. But, you know, I would consider we all know that a lot of conspiracy theories have kind of become conspiracy facts. and that is kind of the paper markets that have manipulated these things. I mean, the United States and others for years and years, and I know this, I believe this, there's absolutely conclusive evidence if you go to the Gav site or a lot of other places to show it that they've suppressed the precious metals prices because they know that doing so helps their inflation numbers look better.
24:58And they've done it by selling paper gold and paper silver. And you can do that as long as buyers are willing to accept paper gold and paper silver. And up until more recently, that's been the case. But what's happened, and you see it this year in the data, and it's really kind of stunning data, Danny. I don't have it right in front of me, but trust me on this, that people are starting to say, yeah, yeah, yeah, that's nice. I've got a derivative contract. I've got a CME contract for, you know, one CME contract is 5 ,000 silver ounces. It's five bars at 1 ,000 ounces a piece. I know because I took delivery of one once.
25:29It bottomed out the trunk of my car when I put them in the trunk. And, you know, they're saying, you know, give me the silver. You know, yeah, I bought the contract. And it's funny, when I said I want the silver delivered, they were like, no, you don't. I was like, yeah, I do. And they were like, well, there are going to be charges. And, you know, we're willing to pay you a small premium to not take delivery. I said, no, that's not what I want. I want you to give me the damn bars. And eventually they did, but it took a lot to do it. And that's happening everywhere. Everybody is saying, you know, we realize that this is a house of cards.
26:00And the way to think of it is like a game of musical chairs, right? I mean, a real silver bar is a chair, and a paper silver claim, that's not a chair. And so if you take the paper claim and say, I want the real bar, there are only so many bars. I mean, the silver market is so financialized and so paper over that we mine 850 million ounces of silver every year. We trade that in half a day. So I mean, think about that. I mean, there are days when we trade two times the annual mining volume on one of the silver paper exchanges. Isn't that crazy? That's crazy. What that tells you is there's just a lot of paper claims against what's really being produced.
26:43And, you know, we're moving from a world where paper, you know, we've had 50 years of, you know, the U.S. had the leading form of paper and paper could be used to buy everything. And, you know, you didn't need to really have the stuff. And, you know, the bricks and others in the world are now kind of saying, well, That's all really nice that you got that paper, but show me the stuff. You know, I can't build a solar panel with a silver paper contract. I can't, you know, build my Tesla with a silver paper contract. And you've seen it. I mean, you've seen it. It's reached even down to the company level.
27:15I thought this was very interesting. A company I'm involved with, Samsung. So silver, and that's the other thing about silver. Silver demand is really growing. Silver demand, silver is used heavily in solar now. It used to be used in photography. That's gone away because of digital. but it's also being used in these new batteries that Toshiba and Samsung have developed. And they're not commercial yet, but they use a lot of silver. But the solar demand alone, I've read that the solar demand in China could consume over half of, right now it's about 20 % of world silver supply. And that will grow to over a half in the next five years if it continues at the current slope, right?
27:48And then you bring these Japanese companies who have these new solid state batteries that require a lot of silver. They're going to have enormous demand too. And so if you took a lot of electric cars with a lot of electric batteries with these silver component, there's going to be demand getting added there. And to that point, one of those companies, I believe it was Samsung, went to one of the companies I'm invested in and said, we're going to invest$10 million in you on very preferential terms, slightly above market. But in exchange for that, you're going to agree to sell all your production to us.
28:19Now, why does a user of silver do that? And not at some fixed price. They're not trying to arb the price. I say, whatever the market price is, they are worried about their supply. They know supply is tight and they want to have a guaranteed source of supply. So they're willing to make an investment in the company to help them and lock in that supply. So that's the kind of thing that's going on. So this is very real. And, you know, in Bitcoin land, others have seen people say, well, silver, you know, look at the chart of silver. It's a parabola. This is a short. It's going to collapse like it did with the Hunt brothers, like it did in 2011.
28:52I'm not so sure. I mean, you asked me my target price on silver. I mean, we'll be at 100 in days. And, you know, I mean, how high up is up? I just don't know. But it's been suppressed for so long, and 50 was a ceiling for so long. We broke through that ceiling. 200 could be possible. I've seen 500. It's not nuts. I mean, it's interesting that the precious metals, I say this a lot when people kind of laugh, but the precious metals have no top because fiat has no bottom. Right. And I'm not predicting hyperinflation yet. It's not my base case. I just think high inflation is very likely built into the system.
29:33And there's really no way to avoid it. I mean, other than letting everything collapse, which I don't think they'll do. So you think this sort of commodity bull run is nowhere near over yet? Absolutely. I've said, and I'm going to say it in my letter, I think we're in the second inning. I really do. And it's very hard. I mean, my fund's up a lot. I've got investors saying, God, we've got all these profits. should we take them? And I'm like, yeah, let's take a little bit. And we actually distributed 10 % of the fund this year to our investors. Just said, yeah, let's, you know, it's prudent in case we're wrong to take a little bit of the profit off the table.
30:03But no, I think that, you know, this is a case of we're in early days of this kind of a problem. Unless we see sudden, and when I say this, people always chuckle because it's not like, if we see sudden responsible behavior out of the United States government, you know, balanced budget, et cetera, that, you know, it's, well, look, it's, it's not, you know, stranger things have happened, right? I mean, you know, if they got, if they, if they started behaving in a responsible fashion, um, you know, then we'd have to reevaluate our thesis. But, you know, I mean, I, I see them going the other way. Like I said, Trump said, you know, I was, I was shocked when he said it.
30:41He said, you know, the defense, our defense budget is about just under a trillion dollars. And he said, we should take it to one five. I'm like, sir, where the hell is that going to come from? Do you know what I mean?
30:50Lawrence Lepard:I mean, it's just, it's nuts. It's nuts. I mean, safety noise used to say the biggest threat to Bitcoin was responsible fiscal policy by governments, which really means there's no threat to Bitcoin. I mean, I think that's what most of us see. I mean, but look, I've got my eyes open. I mean, I, you know, I'm, I've been burnt before and I don't want to, you know, I'm not believing my own bullshit here. I mean, if I see, if there's evidence and the price starts to show me that we're wrong, then I'll react to that. But it feels to me like we are, I mean, I know a lot of people, I have investors, I've talked to people, and I mean, in my cohort, and I know a lot of wealthy people, most of whom don't own gold or silver or Bitcoin, they own stocks.
31:30And they're all talking to me, and they're just like, God damn, Larry, I'm just too late. And I'm like, no, you're really not. As you and I both know and agree, I mean, Bitcoin will be at a million someday and then some higher number than that. And I think gold 10 ,000 is very doable. So buying it at four is not nuts. I mean, four and a half. I mean, so it's, you know, to me, it's interesting because, you know, remember this year, one of the things I pointed out is that they've labeled this now. They've come out and they've called it the debasement trade. I mean, it really started in a big way in September, right after the fall came in.
32:04And at that point in time, Doge was dead. And it became very clear. And the big, beautiful bill had passed. and so they're going to spend another three four hundred million dollars more than they thought and it became and elon had given up on it all because you know he's a smart guy and he realized he couldn't fix it so he walked away from it and um yeah so you know at that point in time you know gold and silver just woke up and said okay we know what comes next guys you know we're um let's go and you know the i think that these people who ask me am i too late i just i say to them you know It's not a trade.
32:40I mean, they call it the basement trade. It's not a trade. It's a trend. It's a multi-year trend. And I don't know what the top is. And will there be corrections? Sure. There'll be corrections in all of these assets. But I think the trend in all sound money assets, silver, gold, Bitcoin, is up and to the right strongly. Yeah, the idea of a trade implies that at some point
33:01Lawrence Lepard:you're going to want to sell it back for dollars. Well, that's right. And I thought about that. I thought, should I sell some of my gold and silver? I think, well, where would I put it? Now, it's interesting in my case, because I've got assets in both of these camps, as you know, one of the hardest things I've had to do in this whole goddamn sound money world is, and I got the Bitcoiners, you know, criticizing me for being a boomer with rocks. And I got the rocks guys, you know, criticizing me for believing in magic internet money. And I get all these trolls on Twitter, trust me, fucking nuts.
33:30but you know it is the one nice part about having that balance of these two assets is like right now i am trimming some silver mining some silver and gold positions and i'm buying micro strategy because to me micro strategy at one seven is just money laying on the floor it's like go pick it up i mean you know the m nav has gotten completely compressed there's nothing broken with the thesis you know i i sincerely believe that sailor is a genius and he will continue to you know do what he's doing and that this will be a thousand dollar stock so you know on a relative basis um you know bitcoin and strategy are cheaper to me right now than gold and silver in the debasement trade it's interesting too danny i'll point something out you know three years ago bitcoin was flying and gold and silver stocks were in the sewer and everyone hated them and and that was when a lot of bitcoin said why don't you just dump that shit do you know what i mean it's like yeah i don't know i think we got a couple more puffs in the cigar i'm not going to give up you know and and here we are and it's kind of worked and right now i got a lot of you know shift and all these other gold guys are like hey see the bitcoin thesis is broken it's all over you know it hasn't correlated we got five years of flat performance i mean luke groman who i love and think is brilliant i've learned a ton from you know even he kind of backed away from i don't know you know maybe you know he lightened up and i'm just like gosh guys i you know to me that just feels like you know this new york times piece right the totally attack total cheap shot hit piece on sailor i mean to me that's going to be like the magazine indicator you know inflation is dead or you know i mean a gold is a pet rock i mean they they the you know the journal published an article gold is a pet rock right at the bottom in 2015 i mean they almost nailed the low price of gold at a thousand and here we are at four thousand five hundred and so you know they're attacking sailor and i think in two years sailor is going to have the last laugh.
35:20And, and I, you know, like Bitcoin is going to wake up and, you know, it's like the Christopher Walken's lion. It's going to wake up and just show everybody who's boss. So, so I'm very, I'm very sanguine about it, but that's, that's because I've been at this for a long, long time. And I've seen these, you know, these psychological swings occur and it's just like same old, same old.
35:40Lawrence Lepard:Do you wish you could access cash without selling your Bitcoin? Well, Letter makes that possible. They're the global leader in Bitcoin backed lending. And And since 2018, they've issued over$9 billion in loans with a perfect record of protecting client assets. With Ledin, you get full-costal loans with no credit checks or monthly repayments, just easy access to dollars without selling a single SAT. As of July 1st, Ledin is Bitcoin only, meaning they exclusively offer Bitcoin-backed loans with all collateral held by Ledin directly or their funding partners. Your Bitcoin is never lent out to generate interest.
36:13Lawrence Lepard:I recently took out a loan with Ledin. The whole process was super easy. The application took me less than 15 minutes and in a few hours I had the dollars in my account. It was really smooth. So if you need cash but you don't want to sell Bitcoin, head over to leaden.io forward slash WBD and you'll get 0.25 % off your first loan. That's leaden.io forward slash WBD. This episode is brought to you by Anchor Watch. The thing that keeps me up at night is the idea of a critical error with my Bitcoin cold storage. And this is where Anchor Watch comes in. With AnchorWatch your Bitcoin is insured with your own A-plus rated Lloyds of London insurance policy and all Bitcoin is held in their time-locked multi-sig vaults.
36:53Lawrence Lepard:So you have the peace of mind knowing your Bitcoin is insured while not giving up custody. So whether you're worried about inheritance planning, wrench attacks, natural disasters or just your own silly mistakes you're protected by AnchorWatch. Rates for fully insured custody start as low as 0.55 % and are available for individual and commercial customers located in the US. Speak to Anchor Watch for a quote and for more details about your security options and coverage. Visit anchorwatch.com today. That is anchorwatch.com. The Luke Groman one, I'm with you. I think Luke's brilliant. I've learned an absolute ton from him.
37:26Lawrence Lepard:I love his newsletter. I really enjoy having him on the show. But he sold at least a portion of his Bitcoin a couple of months ago. And the reason being was that he thought the four-year cycle was still a thing, which I just think that's out the window. I'm more and more coming around to the fact that maybe it never really existed. Maybe it was just sort of the quiddity cycles. I don't really know. I'm not sure that's his reasoning. When I heard him talk about it, I think his reasoning was a little bit more that it was still trading like an equity. It wasn't trading like a neutral reserve asset.
37:54Which is true. There's some of that. I mean, it started to detach from the triple Qs. And it's clearly risk on versus gold, which is more risk off. But, you know, the thing about selling an asset with this much asymmetry to it, I mean, you know, so he sold it in the 90s, got to pay tax. So now he's, you know, he's got to it's got to drop into the 60s or 70s to just get the same amount of Bitcoin after he pays his taxes on what he sold. Right. And so to me, you're picking up nickels in front of a steamroller. Right. So you're hoping it'll go to 50. And by the way, it might go to 50. It might go to 60.
38:29I mean, I have that in my model. I my partner and I talk about this a lot. We have about a 30 % chance that we're not done with this Bitcoin correction. And there's one more cleansing flush sometime in the next three months before the real big print comes. But I think that, you know, as I mapped out earlier, I do think that big print's on deck. And I do think that when it comes, Bitcoin will respond and it will respond ferociously. And so, you know, I mean, Fred Kruger wrote a really good book, which I recommend a lot, called Bitcoin One Million. And in that book, he had a very interesting statistic, which is that from 18 to 24, when the coin went up 7 or 8x, you missed the 10 best days.
39:12You didn't make any money. I mean, so how do you time this asset? And so it's a classic to me because as you're, you know, I thought your last interview with Saylor was really great. And I, you know, my take is he was just having a bad day. And I think he was a little hard on me unnecessarily. I'm not sure he really, I think you guys were kind of talking past each other because he's right that anyone buying Bitcoin, we should support. But you are right that not all of these, you know, Bitcoin treasury companies are going to make it. Some of them are pretty poor to run, to be fair. So, but, you know, it's a situation where, you know, at some point the thing is so asymmetric, it's just going to explode to the upside.
39:52So I don't get it. I mean, you know, like I say, Kruger said that, you know, 10 days, you missed 10 days and you lost the money. You lost money. I mean, I don't want to know when those I don't want to not be there, I guess, is the point I'm making. Right. A hundred percent.
40:07Lawrence Lepard:And like, I'm not someone who can predict the price of Bitcoin, but I would be surprised if it went back down to 50, 60 K. And like it could, it could. And if it does, I'll buy more Bitcoin. It's not it's not my sort of base case. So like the question I'd want to ask Luke is when does he sort of, if it doesn't go down there, when does he capitulate and buy back? I listen to him carefully and he said he thinks it'll go down there. You know, he expects, I think the other reason, and to be fair, he may be right about this. He does expect some kind of something breaking and a real deflationary flush that I think then leads to the big print.
40:42I think that's more his model that it's going to look like COVID or it's going to look like 2008. And that in that environment, you might see 60, 50, whatever it might be. and he would buy it he also in a more recent interview i listened because i listened to everything he says like i said he's brilliant um you know he said look if it you know if it if it turns around and they start printing like crazy and the print comes and it goes to 110 or 115 and i gotta buy it back slightly higher fine you know i'll do that um you know look everybody manages their own money in their own way and you know it's it's not a religion it's not like you know this All you're doing is you're making probability-based bets.
41:20And he's been so damn right about so many things. He may be right about this one, too. Another really good guy I respect is Michael Oliver. He's not a Bitcoin fan, but he's a very good technical analyst. And his technical models show it going to 60 ,000 as well. If you kind of look at it in Elliott Wave terms, the first wave down was an A round, then to 80, it bounced back up here into the 90s. That's a B. And then the C should take it below the 80. I'm not sure we get to 60. I could 70s probably seems likely, but you know, I bought some micro strategy yesterday. I mean, I just, I mean, I want to own a lot of micro strategy.
41:54I've got some cash from having sold some silver stocks. And so I'm going to just kind of dollar cost average micro strategy for the next six months. Cause I know that at 170, you know, I mean, if, if Bitcoin goes to 50 or 60 strategies going to 110, but you know, you can't, I mean, that's the thing. You can't get the absolute tops and the absolute bottoms. That's what Rothschild said. You can't be a pig, right? I mean, when things are on the cheap side of the board, you buy them. And when things are on the expensive side of the board, you sell them. And by the way, that's why I've been selling a little bit of silver.
42:25I mean, I think silver's still got quite a ways to run, but I could be wrong about that. So I've sold some. I mean, I've got silver that I bought in the 80s and 90s for$6 an ounce. I mean, what is it today? I mean, it's like 80 something. It's nuts, right? Right. Yeah. That's not bad. Yeah. I've got silver right now at 94. I mean, this is crazy. So, you know, if, if I didn't sell some, I mean, one of the things, when I look at investing, one of the things I try and do is, because I've done this for so long and I've made so many mistakes is you try to minimize regret. Right. And you think when you're sitting there and looking at something and saying, well, if you know, okay, so silver's at 94 and I think it's going to 300.
43:05Okay. But guess what? It can also go down to 40 again. And if it's a 94 and I didn't sell any, What were you, some kind of an idiot? Do you know what I mean? So am I going to sell all my silver? Hell no. Am I going to peel off 5 %? Yeah. And then what's cheap right now? Oh, MicroStrategy is pretty cheap. Well, maybe I'll sell 5 % of my silver and I'll buy some MicroStrategy, right? So it's just, you know, that's, I mean, I'm a, you know, I'm a professional investment manager. That's what I do. And so to me, it's all about kind of probability and odds. None of us know anything with certainty, but you can kind of lean, you know, you can lean into things when you think you're on the right side of stuff, right?
43:40Lawrence Lepard:Yeah, I mean, this might be a bit of a mid-curr take on what's going to happen this year, but with the midterms coming up, Trump is obviously worried that if he doesn't do well in the midterms, he's going to get impeached, all sorts of stuff. He needs to have an incredible year, which means he needs the economy to be running absolutely blazing. So he's going to do everything in his power, which is obviously why he's doing the stuff he's doing with the Fed, to just make the economy the best economy the US has ever seen, essentially. You got it. And so like, I don't know how you bet against Bitcoin in that environment.
44:13Lawrence Lepard:Like, I don't know how you can sell Bitcoin now with that coming. I completely agree with you. I mean, it's just, yeah, the politics of it all. I mean, what he said, you know, the aggressiveness of Venezuela and Greenland, I mean, all of it. I mean, it's just, you know, the one five on the, on the defense budget. I mean, you know, the money is, you know, they will find the money. They will spend the money. They will have, and, and, you So the tell, the thing to watch, I think it's kind of surprising to me, but I guess it's the basis trade that's held it together, is that the U.S. 10-year is hung in there at 4%.
44:45I mean, I just can't imagine who would want to own a U.S. 10-year bond paying 4 % when you've got a government that's out of control. It makes no sense to me, but it is what it is. But at some point, I think that will break, and that'll be the tell. That is what I watch most carefully.
45:02Lawrence Lepard:So do you think if that's true and Trump tries to run this incredibly hot going through the rest of this year, asset prices will do really well. Do you think he'll be able to do that without inflation coming back in a serious way? Well, yes and no. So as you know, there's a lag between the time when you print and the time when the inflation shows up, right? And they're probably trying to time it well. you know that the sense i mean um pals out in may you know hopefully they get a new fed share they let's let's say hypothetically they can get the rates down to two or one i don't know if they can i mean there is a board and they all vote but i think they're going to really bully the shit out of the people at the fed try and get them that would lead to a whole round of refis that would lead to a lot of you know real estate transactions that would lead to a lot of borrowing and locking in those low rates and by the way it would bring down the u.s interest cost because we've we've financed everything short term, you know, and our average interest cost right now is about 3.3%.
46:00I mean, if bills got down to 1.5%, you know, that trillion dollars we're spending on interest would get cut and that would make the deficit smaller. So that's another consideration that they're facing. And, you know, all of those things will lead to rapid, in my opinion, M2 growth, but that doesn't necessarily happen immediately. If you'll recall with COVID, you know, they printed a lot of money very quickly starting in 2020, but the peak inflation was kind of 12 to 18 months. I'd have to go back and look at the numbers, but it takes a little while to show up, you know? So, so, you know, they might, you know, print the money, get the high, feel good, you know, and the inflation prints are still okay, you know?
46:40And so they, they cruise through November and they get the seats, but guess what? You know, inflation in 2027 goes back and heads towards double digits. You know what I mean? So just more kicking the can down the road. Yeah, I could see that scenario. That's my best guess as to how it plays, right?
46:58Lawrence Lepard:Larry, you're like a free markets guy. And one thing that I've never really understood, like Trump said that he wants to get the rates down to like 1%. Surely that shouldn't be the cost of capital. That seems too low. Like, What do you think the cost of capital should be? Oh, it's way too low. Well, so none of us really know because we're living in a Potemkin artificial world. I mean, the real cost of capital is set by, you know, the balance of savings and investment demand. And, you know, and that would only occur if we didn't have a Federal Reserve and we had a true free market for interest rates.
47:34But we're so far away from that to be ridiculous. I mean, if you look at the level of inflation we have, the, you know, across the capital should be higher. I can't answer the question because I just, I don't even begin to know. And things are just so crazy distorted. But I mean, one thing I do know is true though, if you look at the chart of what the federal funds rate has done since Volcker, I mean, you know, they jack it up, they drop it down, they jack it up, they drop it down. We'd almost be better off if it had just been set on autopilot at 4 % or something. Do you know what I mean? I mean, it's because we've got these enormous swings.
48:08I mean, you know, Volcker quote rates up to 20%. I mean, and part of what created this mess and has us where we are now, Danny, that's so screwed up, and I talk about this a lot in the book, I mean, zer, the whole notion that capital is free, it's just insane. That's like a tautology. That's like a crime. It's like a chart crime against capitalism. You can't have free capital. Okay, if you say interest rates are zero, you're implying that money has no value, which one could argue that's true when it comes to fiat. But, you know, I mean, Zerk was just a, it was ridiculous, you know, and it was a free subsidy to everyone who could borrow money, and that's why all these cotillionaires got rich.
48:48And so, you know, it's, this is no way to run a railroad. It's just no way to run a railroad. And, you know, that's all pretty depressing, and it's tearing the country apart, and you see all the bad social things that are happening in Minneapolis, everywhere. And, you know, it all just comes back down to the money being broken, which, again, is why I wrote the book. I just I wish the country understood that, you know, and I think most Bitcoiners understand it. It's the base layer that's broken. And it's not unsolvable, folks. I mean, if we if we go back to a sound base layer, you know, we've got all this great technology.
49:24And we don't we don't get into a world war. We don't all kill each other. You know, everything will reorganize. Now, there will be winners and losers. You know, people who hold debt will get wiped out, and there'll be a lot of inflation in the transition. But, you know, things will be good again. I mean, it's, you know, we are all productive actors who will, with the right incentives, do the right things and make the world a much better place. And so, you know, all I'm waiting for is to get through this fourth turning and return to that sound money. The problem is that, you know, it's going to take, it's probably going to take crisis or semi-crisis conditions to get us there.
50:02because, you know, the average boobus americanus and certainly all the politicians aren't going to take us there on their own. Although one interesting possibility, and I've talked about this on other pods, is that Trump and or Bessette, you know, do something really, really bold, which is to try and do a monetary reset. And, you know, I don't know if they have the political space. I don't know if they have the guts. But, you know, we could theoretically skip the, you know, let's go to super high inflation. The country tears itself apart and currency fails. by, you know, Besant waking up one morning and saying, and Trump's and saying, we're going to revalue gold at$30 ,000.
50:39We're going to revalue Bitcoin at a million dollar coin. And, you know, the government will now exchange your dollars for either of those two things. Bring us a million dollars. We'll give you a Bitcoin. Bring us your ounce of gold. We'll give you 25 ,000 or, you know, give us 25 ,000. We'll give you an ounce of gold. And we are now on a sound money standard period. And, you know, 1971 gone done. Oh, and by the way, we're going to balance the budget by basically cutting expenses here and there. And the TGA would be revalued and that markup of the TGA would be used to pay down the government debt.
51:12I mean, if they did that, it would be enormously painful for bondholders. It would be enormously one-time inflationary. So it's like ripping off the bandaid. It would hurt like shit. But on a go-forward basis, we would actually have a sound money solution. um now you know that's my 10 case because i just i don't know that they'll have the guts to do it i mean and and even even i may be wrong about it i mean it's a scary step i mean i i could be wrong about the way that it plays out um so you know will they do it i don't know but i do know this i do know that until we get back to sound money i think inflation is going to be the problem of our age.
51:53And, you know, the more likely path on the whole thing is I think inflation just gets worse and worse and worse. You know, the blue team wins in 2028 and inflation really gets bad. Maybe the currency even fails with all their actions. And then, you know, I've said this in other pods, I really do believe there's some chance that we get, you know, Michael Saylor stands up and says, hey, you know what? You know, I've studied history. I went to MIT. I'm an engineer. I understand how this all got broken. I've got the receipts. I'm the richest man in the world because bitcoin's at 10 million dollars a coin i'm gonna burn my keys i don't give a shit about any of that i want to be the thomas edison slash um you know thomas jefferson of our age and uh you know elect me as president we're going to reform the constitution and reset this whole goddamn system and that's my that's my hope for my kids because you know the other going the other direction you know it could be decades of pain you know um you know trying all these other solutions that won't work.
52:51You know what I mean?
52:53Lawrence Lepard:I'm surprised you put the idea of Basant and Trump doing a monetary reset at 10%. Like that seems very, very high to me. 10 seems high or 10 seems low? No, 10 seems high. Like I think that would be the most ballsy move by any president ever probably. I think that's right. But think about it. Think about it. I mean, it's going to come down to Basant. And Basant basically said, you know, we need a new Bretton Woods and I want to be at the table when it happens. They understand it. Moran understands it. I mean, Trump might realize that, you know, if he lets, I mean, let's say it's 2028 and inflation's raging and it looks like Vance is going to lose and blue team's going to win.
53:33You know, why not throw a Hail Mary pass and just say, screw it. You know, let's try and reset this whole goddamn thing. And, you know, he'd get challenged in the courts and everything else. But, you know, Nixon did it. FDR did it. Lincoln did it. But, you know, I mean, the monetary stuff is supposed to be controlled by the Constitution, you know, Article 1, Section 8 in Congress. But, you know, that's not what's happened. It's a practical matter. The chief executive has done it. And, you know, I think it's 10. I think there is some possibility. I think they, you know, you have to remember these guys, I mean, in my opinion, for all their, and there's some good things about them.
54:11There are a lot of flaws about them. I mean, don't, you know, don't get me started on the Epstein files. But, you know, or Trump coin, Trump and Melania coin, right? But, you know, I think they are thinking, you know, about what's truly best for America and maintaining our sovereignty and our leading position in the world versus, you know, a couple. I mean, look, I don't love our government, but I think I love it more than I love the Russian government and the Chinese government. And so, you know, and I think they do too. And I think they basically want to try to maintain our position of leadership and, you know, returning to sound money in this way would be, you know, in my view, would keep us in a leading position.
54:51And particularly if they have Bitcoin in the picture, I mean, because I don't think I don't think China has made any kind of a bet on Bitcoin. And and I think China has a lot more gold than they say they have. so leapfrogging China with a Bitcoin piece of the whole solution would be a big positive in my view
55:08Lawrence Lepard:yeah I mean the risk I'm sure they would have to calculate is whether it's worth it to give up being like the global hegemon but I mean I think it would be an amazing thing to happen I don't know you may be right it may be high I mean maybe I'm a dreamer I don't know it's probably sadly we probably just keep stumbling along down this road until it gets so painful that everyone demands a solution. I mean, if we get kind of South America-style inflation in the double digits, I mean, this country has been through so much and people are hurting so badly, and you can already see it in so many different measures of the social fabric being torn.
55:53I pray that at some point in time, the large remnant within this country will stand up and say, god damn it give us politics give us politicians who are willing to you know to balance the budget and return to a sound monetary unit i mean you know i mean another data point you may not be aware of judy sheldon is a sound money person she's a gold person she's proposed the treasury bond with a gold piece a gold back into it or gold exchange clause in it so that you would be protected in terms of the purchasing power of your principal and you know andy sheckman says Sheldon told him that she was in a meeting with Trump and Trump said, that's a great idea.
56:30Maybe we do that in July of 26 when we have the 250th anniversary of the country. We introduced that bond. So, I mean, these, these ideas are not, they're not completely, you know, alien or far fetched, you know, to, to the people who are in office today. Now that doesn't mean they're going to do them.
56:49Lawrence Lepard:I mean, the, the idea of like a goldback bond or a bit back or a bit bond is, seems like a no-brainer to me. That kind of thing I could see happening. Absolutely. And I guess that would be a step in the right direction towards returning to a sound money standard. Absolutely. Yeah, no, absolutely. And they should do both of those things tomorrow. Yeah. I mean, it's not that painful or that hard to do. I mean, that's a step. It doesn't fully solve it, but it gets you thinking. And I mean, they tried to kind of do it. I mean, they were, you know, what they were hoping, what Basant was hoping was that these stablecoins were going to solve the problem that there'd be enough stablecoin demand for all those treasuries but if you actually run the math you look at the size of the stablecoin market versus the size of the treasury bill market stablecoins are just too small still and they're not growing fast enough to absorb it so that's that's not going to bail them out i mean they've been they've been kind of throwing hail marys right i mean or they've been you know doge was a hail merit you know elon we're going to save two trillion oh no well we'll save a trillion well maybe this kind of doesn't work oh shit i'm fed up i'm smart i'm not wasting my time here i'm gone so i mean it's it's sadly sadly it's a very very broken system and reforming it is just no piece of cake um so you know but i mean i i believe in a higher power so i think this higher power sent us bitcoin and i think that you know we're basically bitcoin's going to smash the system whether they like it or not.
58:14And the only real issue is on what time scale. And, you know, I kind of think that all this, I mean, fourth turnings tend to last between 20 and 30 years. This one started in 08. So 2028 is the short end of the line and 2038 is the long end. This will get resolved probably in the early 30s, in my opinion. We're not too far away. Not that far away, actually, if we're, you know, talking, you know, five, six, seven, eight years. So, I mean, we're getting to the point where it's you know we're serious now right i mean these metals moves are serious i i said on twitter and a lot of people laughed at me but i said on twitter you know wouldn't it be ironic if silver was the lehman brothers of this cycle i mean there's somebody you know if some big banks are short silver you know they're going to go they could go bk and if they do their governments will have to bail them out and then that will lead to you know all the leverage in the system could come cascading down and you know there's your big print right so so one of the
59:13Lawrence Lepard:questions i've always had for you larry and i've never actually properly asked you so since the first time i think i ever spoke to you you've been talking about how gold price was suppressed for decades um do you i guess this is a two-part question do you think that suppression is ending and also on the the second question being how do we avoid that for bitcoin that's a great question yeah so so yes i do think it's ending because people are demanding the physical and it's you know you're at the stage where the you know that we can see the man behind the curtain and we don't believe him so it's like give me the goal so yes i think the answer your first question yes i think it's it's happening for um it's having for gold bitcoin thing is interesting there's a lot there is paper bitcoin i mean if you go to the binance perpetual futures you know it has grown a lot you can go and you can buy paper bitcoin and somebody can sell you paper bitcoin and you've got to put a contract on the Bitcoin price and no Bitcoin ever, you know, it was demand that you had, but no Bitcoin ever got purchased.
1:00:09So that market has grown a lot. James Check, check me, one of your country mates has done a really good job of this. He's got some great charts. You're going to subscribe to a service to get them, but we do. And that whole market has grown quite a bit. I've often said that they had 50 years to perfect the gold manipulation scheme. And, you know, they had Cayman Islands entities, they had central banks that owned it. They had the BIS, They had all these different things. Bitcoin's a different animal. It's a lot harder. One, it's not as old. Two, the suppression mechanisms aren't as developed. And three, one of the things that Bitcoin can do that gold never has done, Bitcoin can go up 6x in six months, right?
1:00:48And so, you know, when they had a problem with gold, I mean, a bad year for them in gold was a 20 % or 30%. Well, they'd sell into it, create a narrative, drive it back down. And even if they needed to print the money to cover the 20 % or 30%, that wasn't a lot of money on a relative to keeping the whole system going basis. When you're short something and it goes up 6x, that's a come to Jesus moment, right? I mean, you know, so if you're suppressing it with paper Bitcoin and the price does that. In fact, that's part of what drives it to go up the 6x is the fact that, you know, when we break through this 26, you're going to see people scramble that are on the wrong side of that trade.
1:01:27I mean, there's a big pair on Wall Street that said, you know, they had a pair trade where they're long with triple Qs and short Bitcoin. And that pair trade has actually worked because the triple Qs have hung in there and Bitcoin has failed. I think it's a stupid trade because the triple Qs are overvalued. I think Bitcoin is undervalued. But as long as it works, it works until, you know, they get too far out over their skis and then it reverses. And that's what causes Bitcoin to trade like the wild animal it trades at. And so what I think few people understand is how when this thing does hit, when this next wave does hit, it's not going to 140, guys.
1:02:02It's going to 250 or 300 or 350. I mean, because there will be so much, you know, there'll be two things happening. There'll be all the shorts who have to cover or else they're going to get their faces ripped off. And then there'll be a whole new category of long D-gens who'll come in and who'll lever it and go long it, right? And that's what'll shove it to 400. And then from 400, by the way, it'll correct back to 150. But I mean, it's the nature of a speculative asset that's being adopted. You know, this is, if you go look at a very long-term price chart of Amazon, which is a similar network-based business that had multiple, you know, one had one 90 % correction, multiple 60, 70, a lot of 40, 50 % corrections.
1:02:43I mean, either it's going to take over the world or it's going to die. And right now, Bitcoin's in the, you know, right now we're kind of hearing, oh, it's not, I mean, I just saw a tweet this morning from a gold guy. well not really looking like digital gold is it and i was just calling you wait you know okay you know just just wait you just you just relax you know it's it's not a straight line but you know i i'll take the other side of that bet in two years we'll see who looks right so so you don't
1:03:10Lawrence Lepard:think it's an issue that um so much bitcoin is now being owned in like a non-self custodial way through sort of IBIT, the options on IBIT, strategy or treasury companies? I don't. Yeah, that goes to the issue of are they going to grab it all? And I suppose that's a possibility and it's always a risk. But let's be honest, Denny. I mean, we had to have the ETF. We had to have corporate adoption. We had to have nation state adoption, sovereign wealth fund adoption. And all of those things had to happen or this asset wouldn't become what we thought it was going to become. So they're all net good. I mean, as you know, I'm a real self-sovereignty nut.
1:03:46And I think, you know, having control of your coins is critical. But that, you know, for people who don't want to do that or can't do that, you know, the 6102 risk, I don't view it as being that large yet. I mean, I think it's one of those things we got to watch, you know, how dystopian does our government get? I mean, you know, let's, I mean, let's map it out. So let's say it's now 2028 and sadly red team loses, blue team wins, you know, and we've got, I don't know, Stephanie Kelton's the treasury secretary and the narrative develops that this great Keynesian monetary system that we've had going for all these years, that's being ruined by these gold and silver and Bitcoin people.
1:04:26And we need to tax that shit at 90%. In fact, we need to go further than that. We need to just seize it because they're ruining this country. They're ruining the financial system. And so we're going to seize it. And here you go. Here's your cash. Send us, you know, send us your Bitcoin. Well, if you're in an ETF, you know, Fidelity and BlackRock, they're going to comply with the law and send the Bitcoin in and give you the cash. The cash will buy less the next day, but that's just the way it's going to go down. Same is true with the gold and silver. So, and that's, that's one of the possibilities.
1:04:56I mean, I, it's one of the reasons why I sincerely feel like we got to make a lot of, and by the way, the other thing that's going to happen with absolute certainty if you study history is taxes are going to go up and just you know it just it's um we've been lucky to have such a low tax rate environment i mean you got to remember when reagan came in in 80 you know top marginal tax rate in the united states like 70 percent you know i mean right i mean it's i mean there's been and you know with all this wealth inequality i mean you think a blue team in in 2028 isn't going to jack taxes on everybody Of course they are.
1:05:29It's going to be horrible, which is also another reason why, and I'm not suggesting anybody don't pay their taxes or cheat or any of that kind of crap. I'm just saying that if you own money that's got no counterparty in your own possession and you lose it in a boating accident, I don't know, how are they going to tax it? I mean, good luck with that, right? But it's a real consideration, right?
1:05:56Lawrence Lepard:yeah i mean i think that's definitely true like the 6102 is a sort of tail risk i think it's obviously possible i don't think it's likely but i could 100 see them taxing bitcoin and oh absolutely absolutely and using us as like scapegoats for the system oh absolutely those damn sound money people jesus christ look at what they've done to our beautiful how dare they want to save their money yeah yeah exactly we we i can't believe that they've done they pulled this off, right? And so, yeah, it's, you really are seeing these camps dividing, you know, between the socialist communist side of the world and those of us who believe in liberty and freedom and all the things that are in the constitution.
1:06:35And, you know, we've got to fight like hell to make sure that our side wins, you know. And I think our side will win. You know, we're heavily armed. That's a positive, right?
1:06:48Lawrence Lepard:Not here in Australia. Well, I know you guys aren't. Yeah, but you got brave guys that'll go tackle guys with rifles. That guy was a stud. Yeah, that was insane. That was absolutely insane. While the police were terrified. Is that right? Larry, I always love talking to you. Is there anything that's happening in sort of macro world at the moment that we've not talked about that you want to? Well, let's see. I don't know. No, I mean, I think we've kind of hit most of the high points. I mean, I guess the big thing we didn't really talk about was what happens with the Fed becoming less or completely non-independent.
1:07:27Yeah, well, I think, yeah, we haven't talked about that. I think that in general, it'll be interesting to see because in general, the history of the Fed has been that the chairman kind of pushes whatever the direction is and he beats everybody else into accepting his decisions. I mean, that's kind of behind the scenes what occurs. But as a practical matter, they actually really can vote and do vote. And so, you know, I don't think I've ever been, you know, and occasionally they'll have a few dissents. But, you know, it's never like gets down to a split vote where one person swings it. You know, it could become a very, very political organization.
1:08:03And Trump has made it very clear that he wants to get as many seats and he wants people who see it the way he sees it. And he wants lower interest rates. And so, you know, I think you've got to believe he's going to kind of get them. I don't know how far, how much, how quick, but I think he's going to get them. And honestly, you know, you kind of need them. I mean, if you look at all the budget deficit, I mean, the interest expense is about$1.2 trillion at the current run rate. I mean, you know, if interest rates go up, I mean, it gets worse, right? I mean, that's your death spiral. And so, but if you could take the average interest rate down to 1.5%, that would seriously help in terms of balancing the budget, right?
1:08:52Now, you know, it would also create massive growth in M2, which is inflationary. So, you know, pick your poison, right? But I think, you know, this administration, I mean, it's interesting to me. I mean, another thing we haven't talked about, we haven't talked about the Supreme Court, right? Because the Supreme Court's going to rule on these tariffs. I mean, and it's become very clear. I read the journal. I read everything very carefully. It's become very clear to me that, you know, the court wants to say, no, these tariffs really should be part of Congress, not the executive branch. But Trump has drawn it so, you know, he said, well, how are we going to give the money back?
1:09:27And it's a national security. I mean, everything's being framed in terms of existential national security, fighting China, winning the overall war, you know, for being maintaining, quote unquote, our empire, our position in the world. And in that, if you use that argument, it's kind of like, what's the counter argument? You know, you can do anything. Right. And so, you know, I mean, if they say, look, this is an existential threat, you know, the budget's going to blow up the country. You know, we got to take interest rates down. Fine. Well, then the bond market blows up and they say, well, that's an existential threat.
1:10:07We can't pay big money on our bonds, so we're going to start buying them. I mean, that's going to yield curve control. Yield curve control. I mean, Danny, that's going to happen. Okay. I mean, that is going to happen. That has to happen. mathematically that literally has to happen and i know it i believe it most sound money people know it and believe it but i think the average person doesn't believe it and won't believe it until it actually happens but when it happens they'll wake up and they'll believe and they go holy shit this guy was right you know it it'll happen and and at that point in time you know money supply is going to explode again and and we're we're right back to you know where we are so i mean i laid this all out in the book.
1:10:48And so it just, you know, I mean, it's interesting to me. The book's done pretty well. It's sold 50 ,000 copies, but people tell me that's great. I think it sucks. Why do I think it sucks? Because there are hundreds of millions of people out there. And it's kind of like, hey, you guys, you all need to know this. And so, you know, we really got this, you know, we really got to get it to go viral because if you want to protect yourself from this thing, which seems to be a very high mathematical probability, you know, the only way to do it is to fully understand it. But I think it's coming. So I think I would end it on that note unless there's someplace else you want to go.
1:11:25No, that's perfect. I mean, I think 50 ,000
1:11:29Lawrence Lepard:bucks is pretty impressive, Larry. Well, I appreciate that. Thank you. Thanks. But I always love talking to you. Maybe yield curve control is the big print. We'll see what happens. I think One of the most interesting things about late-stage fiat is that these conversations just get more and more interesting. Well, they do. And something will surprise us, too. Something will happen that we couldn't even foresee, and we'll get there that way. I mean, who could have foreseen COVID, right? Exactly. The math is, you know, I keep coming back to, you know, the math is what it is. And so how are you going to resolve it with this mathematical problem?
1:12:07It's just too hard to solve any other way. Yeah.
1:12:11Lawrence Lepard:Well, let's close out. We'll sell a few more copies of the book. Where do people go and buy the big? Yeah. So I'll just show the cover. So the book is available on Amazon. It's interesting. I can't get a publisher. And the reason I can't get is too edgy. So it's fine. But it's there. It's hardcover paperback, ebook, and then also Walker read an audiobook. It's about 12 hours if you listen to it. um so um yeah and you know i my i wrote it because i wanted to orange pill the world i wrote it because i want to try and protect the average person i tried to write it with enough detail to support my argument you know and the facts but in a simple enough way that you know um you didn't need an economic background and you you shouldn't be intimidated by it an average person can read it you know i mean that could be a nurse or um you know karma can i mean it doesn't matter who you are.
1:13:04If you've got a functioning brain, you can read it and go, oh, I get it. Here's how they're screwing me and here's what I got to do. And they are screwing you and there is something you can do. So those are both good things to understand. Yeah.
1:13:18Lawrence Lepard:It's an awesome book. I love that it's not like a textbook. A lot of the Bitcoin books end up being like you're reading a dense textbook. Oh, 100%. I look at Lynn's book, I look at Sage's book and I'm jealous. Those are fantastic books. And honestly, I borrowed heavily from all these people. I borrowed heavily from Luke Groman. I mean, you know, I think what I've done and what people have told me I'm decent at, and I'll accept the compliment, is that I can take these complicated things and I can put them in words and everyone can understand and indense it in a crisp way so that people can, quote, unquote, get it.
1:13:51And so I thought, you know, I'm 68 years old. I've seen how this country's deteriorated. I know how broken it is. It really pisses me off. I want my kids to live in a better world. And so, you know, I thought I've got to tell the story of how we got here because it's a fascinating story. And once you see it, you know, you can't, as you know, you can't unsee it. And then, you know, I challenge it. I challenge anybody to read this book and not become a Bitcoiner. I mean, I've had some very, very skeptical friends who've read it and go, oh, shit, I get it. I'm in. There you go. There you go. Right.
1:14:26Yeah.
1:14:27Lawrence Lepard:So, thanks. I mean, I do. Those other books are great, but it's nice to have one that's like a narrative. It's a bit easier to read. It's easy to understand. But go buy Larry's book. Thank you, Larry. Always love talking to you, man. I hope I'll see you soon at some event. I'm sure I will. We'll be at an event for sure. Thanks, man. Take care. All right. Thank you.
1:15:00Thank you.
From the publisher
Lawrence Lepard is an investment manager and author of The Big Print. In this episode, he explains why the Federal Reserve has already pivoted back to money printing and why inflation is now structurally embedded in the system. We discuss the growing inevitability of yield curve control, what gold and silver are signaling and why Bitcoin is the most asymmetric response to policy failure and monetary decay.
THANKS TO OUR SPONSORS:
FOLLOW:
Danny Knowles: https://x.com/\_DannyKnowles or https://primal.net/danny
Lawrence Lepard: https://x.com/LawrenceLepard




