The Perfect Neighbor

22 Oct 2025 · 38 min · 14 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The Netflix documentary The Perfect Neighbor examines a Florida neighborhood dispute that escalated into the shooting death of Ajaka Owens, told largely through police body-cam and other surveillance footage. It focuses on alleged racialized “nuisance” complaints by Susan Lorenz against Black neighbors, the police response, and whether Lorenz tried to use Florida’s “stand your ground” self-defense framework to justify lethal force.

Guests

Director Geeta Ganbare (has a personal connection through Ajaka Owens as a family friend; also describes her role as an editor who assembled and synchronized footage). Producer Nakan Kwantu (Geeta’s life partner; discusses community impacts and police bias).

Key claims

Lorenz weaponized privilege and police calls; officers treated the conflict as a nuisance rather than a threat to the Black community; Lorenz researched stand-your-ground and used access to guns to cause harm; detectives concluded stand-your-ground didn’t apply.

Notable examples

deputies repeatedly responding to noise complaints; Lorenz ramming a tow-pound gate and claiming a panic attack; Lorenz calling police saying she feared for her life from children; the community surrounding Ajaka during the shooting aftermath; Lorenz’s interrogation and a letter/pad used to elicit a confession (“I’m sorry I shot your mom”); the film’s ending credits include trial/sentencing updates.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Overview of The Perfect Neighbor

0:45 to 1:52

Discussion of the documentary's premise and the societal tensions it explores.

“Authorities found it was just kids being kids, but tensions mounted as parents grew frustrated that Susan Lorenz kept calling the police on their children.”

Personal Connections and Background

1:52 to 6:11

Geeta and Nakan share their personal ties to the story and their involvement in raising awareness.

“Geeta and Nakan, welcome to You Can't Make This Up.”

Crafting the Narrative from Footage

6:11 to 8:02

The filmmakers discuss their unique choice to use police body camera footage as the main narrative element.

“These days, so much is captured on that footage and also captured by bystanders who take their own footage, upload them to social media or you see it on the news.”

The Implications of Race and Bias

8:02 to 11:23

Exploration of racial dynamics and how they influenced the police's perception of the conflict.

“And I'm able to infer right away that the police kind of feel like they know what's going on here.”

Grief and Community Resilience

11:23 to 14:00

The emotional impact of the events on the filmmakers and the community's resilience amidst tragedy.

“And Susan basically is to spend the rest of her life in prison.”

The Tragedy and Its Context

14:00 to 17:08

Discussion on the tragic events and implications for community safety.

“And we hope that people take away from this movie, not just the sadness of the tragedy, but also, you know, the sense that the best of America does still exist and needs to be protected.”

Erratic Behavior and Consequences

17:08 to 21:05

Exploration of Susan's behavior and its escalation leading to violence.

“that she had a panic attack, et cetera, et cetera.”

The Aftermath of Violence

21:05 to 23:08

Discussion on the emotional impact on families and communities after the shooting.

“The idea of losing a child is unthinkable.”

Interrogation Insights

23:08 to 25:50

Analysis of Susan's interrogation and her psychological state during questioning.

“difficult the material might be to watch.”

Stand Your Ground Law Implications

25:50 to 28:01

Examination of the stand your ground law and its racial disparities in application.

“I'm curious about what you see when you watch that, whether it's someone trying to hide their true motives from the cops or someone who's actually revealing themselves through this interview?”
Show all 14 chapters

Analyzing the Stand Your Ground Case

28:01 to 29:32

Explore the complexities of the stand your ground legal defense in this case.

“Because honestly, again, she was behind a locked metal door.”

The Confession Letter Tactic

29:33 to 31:57

Discover the tactics used by detectives to elicit a confession from the suspect.

“She was emboldened by it, but it did not apply.”

Trial Highlights and Film Decisions

31:58 to 33:43

Learn about the decision-making process behind the film's trial highlights.

“The trial happened in August of 2024, but the sentencing was in, I believe, November.”

Impact and Visibility of the Film

33:44 to 35:06

Understand the importance of global reach and audience conversations for the film's impact.

“because the credits are part of the film, you cannot fast forward through them.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Rebecca Lavoie:I'm Rebecca Lavoie, and this is You Can't Make This Up.

0:14Rebecca Lavoie:You Can't Make This Up is the podcast where we uncover the true stories behind your favorite Netflix documentaries and films. On today's episode, we take a closer look at the Netflix documentary film The Perfect Neighbor. They shouldn't be screaming and, you know, running around either. I mean, the parents aren't attending. I understand it's a nuisance, but I'd rather kids be screaming because they're out here playing and have a good time than stealing cars and robbing people. Today, we're talking to director Geeta Ganbare and producer Nakan Kwantu. In 2022, sheriff's deputies kept responding to the same Florida neighborhood for complaints from a woman about the noisy children playing near her home.

0:53Rebecca Lavoie:Authorities found it was just kids being kids, but tensions mounted as parents grew frustrated that Susan Lorenz kept calling the police on their children. When one fed-up mom banged on Susan's door to confront her about her behavior, gunshots rang out. It left a family shattered and a neighborhood shaken. Told largely through police body cam footage, the Netflix documentary film The Perfect Neighbor offers a real-time look at the simmering dispute between a white woman and her black neighbors. It reveals the petty complaints that started the conflict and the heart-wrenching grief when it ended.

1:27Rebecca Lavoie:It also explores whether Lorenz tried to weaponize police against those living around her and whether she tried to exploit self-defense laws to commit murder. Have you ever heard of the term stand your ground? Yes. Have you ever done any kind of research on that?

1:52Rebecca Lavoie:Geeta and Nakan, welcome to You Can't Make This Up. Thank you for having us. Thank you. Geeta, you have a personal connection with the story of Ajaka Owens. Can you tell me about that? Sure. So Ajaka Owens was a family friend. She was very close to two of our relatives. Nakan is my life partner, so we are a married couple. And she was very close to two of our family members and one whom actually lived in Ocala, Florida and was a part of her community. So the night that Ajaka was murdered, we got a phone call, like almost immediately. And that's when we sprung into action as sort of a media team for the family.

2:32And Nakan went down immediately. We got a call from my cousin, Takema Robinson, and her younger sister was one of Ajaka's best friends. And Takema came to New York because she wanted to go to Florida. And the quickest way to get to Florida at that time, ironically, was to come through New York from Jamaica, where she lived. And she and I went down to Ocala together and we wanted to raise awareness to what was happening. We wanted to raise awareness in the media and get it out there. A few months later, we got a bunch of footage from Anthony Thomas, who is the family's attorney. And he requested from the sheriff's department in Marion County all of the footage, all of the audio and media files surrounding Susan and this case every time she called the police, every time she made a call about the neighborhood kids.

3:30And that happened over the course of two years. So we got all of this footage and looked at it and realized that there was a story here that we didn't expect.

3:43Rebecca Lavoie:The craft of the film. I mean, the first thing that people will know about it, will notice immediately, is that it's, you know, the story is told through police body-worn camera footage. Can you talk about that choice to not have, you know, talking heads, narrators, all of the things that a documentary like this might sometimes include? So when we saw the footage, it all came to us in a jumble, honestly. It wasn't necessarily well organized. It was just on a thumb drive. I used to be an editor, so I took a couple of weeks to basically piece it together. Things had to be synchronized, audio, video, et cetera.

4:19There were multiple police on scene, depending on the night or the day that Susan was called, the number varied. And there was cell phone camera footage. There was detective interviews. There was ring camera footage. There was dash cam footage. There was a ton of material. And there were all the calls Susan made, like audio recordings. So I took two weeks and strung it all out. And that's when it really hit us that, as Nakan said, there was a bigger story. She will come outside, yell at them. Like, I have yelled at her before because these are children. I mean, everyone down this whole block has yelled at this lady because of how she talks to kids.

4:58And then when an adult says something, now she wants to call the police. The body camera footage was, one, undeniable. I think there was no reporter on the ground. We were not on the ground, no journalists, no one directing what was happening. So it was unbiased. I mean, obviously you have the police, so it is their perspective and the community interacting with them. But again, we felt that for an audience, they would see this as fact. And right now there's so much, again, in this current climate, there's often a lot of doubt around the media. That's purposefully the powers that be have created that.

5:36So it was important to us that it be undeniable. And two, you really got to see in this footage what the community was like beforehand, before this big tragedy. Oftentimes, unfortunately, there's gun violence every week in this country, and you always see the aftermath. And I believe we have become somewhat numb to that. But here, because the body camera footage stretched back two years, we're able to recreate what this community was like. And you see a beautiful close-knit community, living together, loving each other, raising children together, a diverse community. And Susan, this one outlier with a gun, what a threat she became and ultimately how she was able, because of her access to a gun, because she was emboldened by standing her ground laws, she was able to impact great harm on this community.

6:25Yeah.

6:25Rebecca Lavoie:These days, so much is captured on that footage and also captured by bystanders who take their own footage, upload them to social media or you see it on the news. You know, we often hear in journalism this show don't tell adage, right? So I'm wondering if you see this as a new form for documentary, like a cinema verite style thing where people are actually showing their own stories. This was such a unique way to make a film. One of the things that I started saying was after seeing this, you know, watched this film probably 100, 200 times. And the thing that comes to mind is that oftentimes when the police would come out, they would come in pairs at the very least, and sometimes more, up to 15 times, especially like the night of.

7:15Our editor, Angita, took this footage and made it seem like it was one camera. And that's such a great task to take on and then to make it work. And that body camera footage is so expressive because people are just themselves and you're just seeing this community as itself. So it's a very interesting way and new way to tell stories. I'm concerned about it because, you know, now that we've done this and we talk about this within the team, is that what will this do moving forward? You know, will it change policies? Will it make the police decide that they want to pull back? Will it? Who knows what will happen?

7:57I think it's a great tool at this point. I think it's a very I think it's a great tool.

8:02Rebecca Lavoie:You mentioned that much of this is through the police's point of view because it is their cameras. Right. And I'm able to infer right away that the police kind of feel like they know what's going on here. You know, we have this one neighbor who's the source of all of these complaints. And they seem to feel like they have a handle on it. And they're sort of treating everybody as if, yeah, we're all in this together. We know it's her. Do you feel, Nakan, when you look at the raw footage, you get a sense early on that maybe they should have known or that somebody should have thought that something was happening?

8:36Rebecca Lavoie:Or was it truly, did it truly just seem like a nuisance for a long time? Well, I think what happens is for the police, there's some bias there, right? Or maybe not some bias, there's just a general bias, right? And so there's an assumption that Susan is just a nuisance. Maybe they can see her as an auntie, you know, or crazy old family member. But for the Black community, they didn't look at the Black community as people being harmed. Right. They looked at the black community and some of these people weren't necessarily black, but they didn't see them as people who needed protecting and therefore they didn't treat them.

9:12They didn't give them the tools to be protected. They just like, as you said, we're all in this together. She's a nuisance to all of us. And they didn't see Susan as the threat that she actually was. I think what becomes clear is that they failed in their jobs with that. So, yeah.

9:29Rebecca Lavoie:Yeah. Kita, can you talk a little bit more about that? Because I think it's easy to watch this and say, oh, well, the police are being really kind to these kids. They're, you know, they want them to play outside. They're giving them advice to avoid this woman. But the kids are largely, you know, they're people of color, right? And this woman is white. I mean, do you think they understand that it lands different, it hits different, it means something different in this neighborhood than it might mean in a different neighborhood? We deliberately made a choice to let the footage speak for itself using the materials that we had.

10:03Again, we wanted an immersive and undeniable film. And I think what you see is that Susan again and again tries to weaponize her race and privilege against the community. And she tries to weaponize the police. Her children were walking their dog on the property. Clearly says no trespassing. And they're always walking their dog. The dog's always taking a call. There was poop on the sidewalk. There was all kinds of stuff. I said, can you please keep the dog over there? I was going to take a picture of her dog. And I said, can you take a picture of my child? I'm like, no. And then she just got in my face.

10:35And ultimately, because she is able to use her status to get them to think that she constantly tries to get them to believe she is the victim, they ultimately don't. But at the same time, they don't see her as a threat. And what made her a threat was her access to weapons, her access specifically to a gun. She would have maybe just been the nuisance, crazy old lady if she, again, if she hadn't been emboldened by stand your ground. And if she couldn't buy a gun the way she could buy like a toaster oven or a microwave. It's interesting in a review from Europe, that was a question like, is this really what people can do no matter what their state of mind might be in the US?

11:18And it's unfortunately, that's true. They failed the community and they failed Susan. Right. They didn't protect Susan from herself. The worst outcomes happened. Ajika, we lost Ajika. She was murdered. And Susan basically is to spend the rest of her life in prison. So the community and Susan were both failed by the system.

11:39Rebecca Lavoie:Gita, you had presumably hours, hundreds of hours of footage to go through, right? You feel as a viewer when you're watching this, I mean, obviously there's a sense of dread that you know something bad is going to happen, but there's also some very natural suspense here because you see all the tensions at play from the very beginning. How did you feel when you saw some of these early scenes? How did you feel watching them? This process was really grief work for us in many ways. We were, again, we felt really compelled to tell this story because we couldn't understand how this could happen. How does someone pick up a gun to resolve such a trivial dispute with your neighbor, right?

12:22Or with a neighbor. We couldn't believe that this would be someone's choice. And we, again, felt compelled to go through all the material and glean from it all the information we could. It was our process in a way of coming to terms with what had happened. So there was heartbreak in it, but we also saw in this beautiful little community, so much joy. Again, this material shows us both the best and worst of our society. It shows us this idyllic street where children play freely. They're clearly very comfortable. One of our IPs, Soledad O 'Brien, has said, these are the kiddiest kids you've ever seen.

13:05And I think what is so important about that is that often after a crime happens, particularly a community of color, we are often criminalized. And you see with these children that they were indeed children, right? Like we are oftentimes children are adultified and you cannot think of these children as anything other than kids just being themselves playing in the street. But I also see the beauty in the neighbors. Like for example, the mother who says, you know, when the cops ask her, she's a, which kid is yours? She said, oh, they're all mine. You know, the father comes out and says, you know, I look after these kids like they're my own.

13:43I get it. I understand. It's like, I agree. It's like the kids. That's why we don't, we don't somehow act at all crazy about it. You know, we all, all the parents are cool. So I look after them just like I look out from home. So I think that gave me hope and that gives us inspiration. And we hope that people take away from this movie, not just the sadness of the tragedy, but also, you know, the sense that the best of America does still exist and needs to be protected.

14:15Rebecca Lavoie:You know, I think one of the best moments in the film happens when the girl explains to the police that Susan is accusing them of trying to steal her truck and she yells out, we're 11, right? I can't help but wonder, you know, there is this ideal picture of all these young kids playing and it is so lovely, but I couldn't help but wonder in that moment how the interaction would have changed if the neighborhood kids had been 18 instead of 11, how their interactions with law enforcement may have changed. Nakhan, what do you think about that? Yeah, I think it would have changed, but I think it's also very important to keep in mind that they were mostly 12 and under, right?

14:54And I think that this idea of of adultifying these children and they were playing. I was a kid once. Everyone was a kid once. We're all loud as kids. We like to yell and scream and fight. And so I get it. But when it's close to someone's house, sure, it gets a little annoying sometimes. I won't lie. OK. But if you guys have permission to be over there, then, you know, I can't really get on you guys too much. Yeah, possibly if they were 18, if they were older teenagers, this might have gone in a different direction. But this wasn't 18 year olds. These weren't 18 year olds. These were these were children.

15:30And as Geeta said, they were the kiddiest kids. Did they do things that possibly they shouldn't have done? As one of the police officers says, yeah, they made ding dong ditch. OK, fine. But that should not escalate to a deadly weapon.

15:43Rebecca Lavoie:No, it should be delightful behavior in this era of screen time, right? Right. We usually get very, very positive feedback. Maybe a couple of times we've had people question whether the kids were to blame. And I said to the person, you must remember that the children were playing and Susan found it necessary to bring out a gun. This was not a gunfight. This wasn't two different sides of this argument shooting at each other. There were children playing and Susan brought a gun and shot through a door. She was just completely reckless about it. Geeta, this mostly plays out in the neighborhood, but there's one scene that doesn't involve the neighbors and that's an incident with Susan's truck.

16:26Rebecca Lavoie:How does that fit into the larger story? So I think what we see in the footage, in the trajectory of the footage, which we chose to keep chronological so that people could see the build, is that Susan with, you know, again, this is not an interaction with the neighborhood, but she shows erratic behavior. She shows that she is possibly unstable. She gets trapped in a tow pound. We don't see that, but we see the aftermath where the police come to her because apparently after being locked into a tow pound, instead of calling the number that she should have called so the guy could open the door, she rammed her truck repeatedly into the gate of the tow pound and damaged the gate.

17:07and then claimed during the interaction with the police that she had a panic attack, et cetera, et cetera. And so I panicked. I mean, I really panicked. And I thought I was in trouble. Like, I thought someone was going to harm me. Okay. So here's the issue that we're going to have, all right? He wants somebody to pay for his gate because you severely damaged his gate. I was severely damaged her. I mean, I'm okay. I just freaked out. Okay. This really begs the question, should someone like Susan, given those circumstances, have access to two guns? Again, I think what we see in that scene is she is spiraling.

17:48She has been continuously trying to criminalize the community and weaponize her privilege, but also she dehumanizes the kids in the community. And in the process, honestly, when we dehumanize others, we actually dehumanize ourselves and we become the monster. And I think you see that happening through the film. And that scene is so important because it's one of the last ones before the actual shooting takes place. And we see in that the cops don't flag her still. How does she have a gun? How does she have two guns?

18:29Rebecca Lavoie:Nikon, I'm wondering if you can remind me about the night of the shooting itself. Was this a typical incident with Susan? Was it a different kind of incident with Susan? How did Ajika end up being killed by Susan that particular day? If you remember in the way the film goes, she goes to the police precinct and she complains about the children. And the police officer says to her, do you want something to happen? Do you want them to be arrested or something else? And she says, yes, I want something to happen. Do you want to see them go to jail or do some sort of recourse for it. Yeah, absolutely.

19:05I like being honest with you, right? So they know what exactly they're having done for them. This is basically just going to be an official case document because the people have video proof. I know. I think at that point, and probably prior to that, she had made up her mind that if the police don't do something, I'm going to take matters into my own hands. I think that that became her mindset when there was this dispute over the iPad. And then she tells Ajaka's second oldest son to go get your mother. They do just that. But when she calls the police after that interaction, so this is the first call she makes on the night of the incident, she says that she fears for her life from the children, not Ajaka.

19:53Is he out there right now? Yeah, there are several kids out there right now and I'm hearing from her life. I'm very scared. Were there any weapons involved? No. Again, she's adultifying and she's creating this hostile situation with children because why is she calling the police about fear for her life?

20:15Rebecca Lavoie:Right. Right. What could they have possibly said or done over an iPad interaction that made her afraid for her life? Right. So she had already decided she was going to take an action. There are a handful of just emotionally devastating moments in this film. One is when an officer asks if Ajika's son is hurt. Are you hurt? No. Oh, my heart is broken. I know.

20:46Rebecca Lavoie:Did that break your heart watching that? I mean, it broke mine. No, the whole thing has broken my heart. Absolutely. I think what actually, though, I will say this. The children finding out that their mother is gone is one of the most heart-rending things that I think none of us have recovered from. But I will say personally, listening to Pam, Pamela Dias on the phone, when she is on the phone and she's understood that her daughter is gone is probably, for me personally, I have children. The idea of losing a child is unthinkable.

21:24Relax, ma 'am. At this point, there's nothing we can do.

21:31It's a parent's worst nightmare. And Pamela has become family to us. So that, to me, is actually personally the most devastating moment of the film. I think, though, what is so interesting that you see on that night is you see the community come out and try to protect the children and protect this family. And at possible risk of their own life, they surround Ajaka and they, you know, Susan is in the house still with the gun. Who knows if she's coming out, but they, you see also this beautiful community spring into action in a way that I think is profound and just tells you about the bond that they had and what, again, the damage that Susan was able to do because of her access to a gun.

Read the full transcript

22:19And as Nakan said, we, you know, we believe this was something that even in her later, as you see in the interrogation, she says, you know, I would call sometimes and you all wouldn't come. The fact that she had researched stand your ground and she kept sticking to the concept that even though she was behind a locked metal door and had another layer of protection, she kept sticking to the tenets of stand your ground, which are, I was afraid for my life. I was afraid for my life, you know? And, and I think, you know, all of those elements play in. And we wanted, we wanted to make this film play like a thriller.

22:53Yeah. Because to me it were a thriller or a horror film because that's what it was for this community. So we really wanted to immerse everyone in, in what happened. The material that night is particularly difficult to watch. I had a conversation with Pamela Dias about this, but there were conversations with her about how difficult the material might be to watch. And she said, no, put it in. She wanted people to see. And in the sort of the spirit of a Mamie Till, Emmett Till's mother, who had an open casket funeral when her son was lynched and called in reporters to take pictures because she wanted the world to know what happened to her baby.

23:28This is where she feels, as do I, that it's necessary for people to bear witness to these kinds of terrible things when they happen to these kinds crimes, because if not, they will continue to be perpetrated in the dark. And the video of George Floyd sparked a global movement. Like if we don't see these things, if we don't bear witness and have, as I've heard this phrase from Viet Thanh again, the writer of capacious grief, is like, if we don't have shared grief and outrage around these issues, they'll continue to be perpetrated. And the question is, what else will we tolerate? What other atrocities might we tolerate too?

24:07Rebecca Lavoie:Right. And I think that's why it's so important that you showed the father telling the kids. It wasn't just the violence. It's the immediate aftermath, the grief. It must have been a very difficult decision, even with a blessing to include that, right? Because that's the most horrible moment in their lives. It's the worst possible day of this family's life ever. I'm at, I hope, you know, I hope there's nothing more, but, but it is the worst moment of a family's life. but it is the true impact of gun violence. And we don't often see it. You know, we may see in the news people crying, but we don't see the immediate impact.

24:42And it plays out in real time before your eyes. Y 'all seen it? Y 'all understand it? Y 'all experienced it, right? Okay. Y 'all love me? Okay. Y 'all love mom? All right. Well, I got some bad news to tell you. mom's not coming back here. Come on. Come on. No, no, no. That is the horror. And I think we were hoping again, if we can reach the right, the right people with this and the right hearts and minds that maybe we can make some progress with gun reform and also repealing laws like stand your ground.

25:23Rebecca Lavoie:Nikon, you also have footage here from the interrogation room. And we hear Susan, in this very kind of distant, and it can be interpreted, I think, as calculating way, distanced herself from the magnitude of what's happened, tried to explain it. Is there any reason why anybody would have any video or anything like that of you saying, like, the N-word? Is there any reason why someone would have that? I have no idea. And if I did let it go, I'm sorry. It slipped out. I'm curious about what you see when you watch that, whether it's someone trying to hide their true motives from the cops or someone who's actually revealing themselves through this interview?

26:00So it's so interesting. Susan's so is an interesting study because on one hand, she totally believed whatever she was convincing herself of. Right. She never got a lawyer. She just walks in. She tries to at times convince herself of one emotion and then to move into another. When Gita was talking about when she rams the truck into that gate and she has that interaction with the police, it's kind of foretelling as to what happens in these interviews, right? Because she says when the police says, you know, we want to get information from you and they start to question her and she just outright says, no, I'm not going to cooperate.

26:41Then when she realizes that there's going to be a greater consequence for it, she now starts to show you she starts to try to pretend that she's vulnerable and she gives you some history of herself right well then she does that in this in these interrogations right when they say okay now we're gonna arrest you she says no i just can't do this okay well come on susan stand up i can't do this okay but do you understand you're under arrest and you're gonna be taken to the jail one way or another okay i don't care susan i i just can't do this i'm sorry then she tells you oh, I'm going to have a heart attack.

27:19And then she tries to play on sympathy. So I think when I watched her and, you know, when the whole team watches her, we're like, this is an act. She's using different methods. So sometimes she, I think she believes this story that she's telling herself. And other times I think she's trying to pivot when she's wondering, are they actually believing this thing? So let me give them something else.

27:42Rebecca Lavoie:Right. You know. Gita, you remind the audience that Florida has its stand your ground law. And you also point out the racial disparity in the way that it's applied. And here you have a white woman claiming a black woman was trying to break into her house and that she was terrified. Yet the detectives don't seem to be open to the idea that this was a stand your ground case. Did that surprise you? It did not. Because honestly, again, she was behind a locked metal door. I think that the case was so egregious. Again, they didn't arrest her for four days. It took four days to arrest her because they had to still conduct the investigation.

28:20But I think the idea that it was a stand your ground case, that she was in mortal danger of, you know, losing her life was very hard to believe and to prove. If we were to look through everything in your phone or your home desktop computer, is there any, anything kind of research on your internet history that would show that you've done research on like self-defense or have you ever heard of the term stand your ground? Have you ever done any kind of research on that? Ajaka could not break down that door, you know, nor did she even get a chance to try really, even if she had tried, there wasn't the time to do so, you know, because Susan acted so quickly.

28:59I think that, again, the detectives are actually quite clear and right that that standing ground doesn't apply here. If you are safe in your home, you can go into another room, a bedroom and lock the door. And you're supposed to, you've already called the police and they said they're on their way. Right. What need do you have to shoot through a door at a woman who is unarmed and her child is standing next to her?

29:26Rebecca Lavoie:Right. That is, she could have hit the child. That again, so egregious. So I think the detectives, like I said, they had to, they were required to do the investigation, but they, you know, it couldn't, it was not able to, to stand your ground did not apply. She was emboldened by it, but it did not apply. the detective gives Susan the opportunity to write the children a letter ostensibly of condolence but I think it's also a tactic to elicit potentially a confession right I was really taken by this letter um not by what it said but what it didn't say and the way in which it said what it said Nikon what did you think about what she wrote down there I thought it was very cold I just thought that whole process was bizarre I don't know what I expected her to say.

30:16I am so sorry for your loss. I never meant to kill your mother. I was terrified your mom was going to kill me. I shot out of fear. I will say that recently after a screening, we were approached by a fairly well-known criminal lawyer who's also been a television personality. And he said that that was the most brilliant thing he'd seen, that he'd never seen that done. Actually, before that tactic of giving the perpetrator a pad and saying, maybe you want to say something to the family and basically trying to lure her into writing her own confession, which she wrote, I'm sorry I shot your mom. So, you know, I think there it is.

31:02And for me, that part of the film where he, again, they remove Susan finally after begging her to get up for five minutes. They finally get her out of the chair and take her out of the room and we're just left with the chair and the pad on the floor and not knowing what she's written. And he comes back and reads it to the camera. And that to me is the most, again, just cinematic gripping part of the film. And we let it play. We purposely cut that scene to play long. Right. So you see the entirety of her interaction with the police when she refuses to get up and then what she wrote on the pad. But he again, I feel like it was very clever.

31:47You know, it's very clever. It's getting someone defenses down to to write a confession.

31:58Rebecca Lavoie:the viewer obviously wants to know what happens to Susan and whether Ajika's family gets any kind of justice and I'm curious about your decision to include highlights of the trial but place them in the credits you know in the post role of the story so can you talk about that choice were you trying to make a statement about where the story actually ends or doesn't end So for us, to be honest, the sentencing had not happened. The trial happened in August of 2024, but the sentencing was in, I believe, November. It was after we had sent the film off to the Sundance Film Festival. So we didn't have the sentencing.

32:34We didn't know what was going to happen with her. And so there was the trial, but we felt like we had felt that the end of the film was really with the children, you know, on the funeral and that we would just put a card at the end that maybe said something, you know, about where the trial was and where the sentence was, because these things take forever. Then, you know, basically everything happened in its entirety. And we were like, okay, we need to put this in somehow. It will give closure. So basically we ended up deciding. At one point we talked about should we weave it through, but we didn't want to disrupt the material.

33:12Also, we got into Sundance with the film as was. So that was a big thing for us. We were very independent. We were a little independent film. It was just us. We didn't, you know, make this with a distributor. So I think my editor, Viri, was like, what if we just put it in the credits? What if we let it be over the credit rule? I also didn't want to make the film longer because I was an editor at one point in my life. And I was like, this is the right length. So we took a shot at that. And I felt that it worked. The other thing that we realized very cleverly is after Netflix bought the film is that now, because the credits are part of the film, you cannot fast forward through them.

33:48That's right. People have to watch the credits. Yeah. So that is to our benefit. We didn't intend that, but it's happened.

33:55Rebecca Lavoie:Well, years past, a documentary like this might get the festival treatment. Obviously, Sundance is a very big deal, but often you'd find it in art houses, independent theaters, small venues. So what does it mean to both of you to have the perfect neighbor on this global platform that millions of people will watch? So I'll just start by saying for us, it's phenomenal. honestly to start because our bigger goal around this film is to raise awareness we want to raise awareness but there's also change we want to make in the world. Takima Robinson who's our relative of ours and she's an executive producer on this film and Pamela Dias have started a fund called standinginthegap.org for families that are impacted by racial violence and they provide support for families impacted.

34:46And they also are working on policy change. There's an impact campaign that goes along with this film, but you need a groundswell. So the more people that see this film, the better. And Netflix has that reach being global and they can reach audiences that we otherwise couldn't. So that was really important to us.

35:05Rebecca Lavoie:Yeah. Nikon, people obviously also talk about the thing that they've just watched on Netflix, right? Is that conversation just as important as exposure? It so is. You know, what's so funny is when the trailer came out, we didn't know what to expect. We didn't know how the reaction would be to the trailer. We've, we were so surprised at how many people watched the trailer. But then what I started going into rabbit holes of seeing how many people watched. And I looked at some of the comments, What surprised me in a very good way was how many comments were had and that the comments seemed to all be positive.

35:47And the other thing was how often it was shared, how often someone saw the trailer and thought, oh, somebody needs to somebody I know needs to see this. Somebody else that I know needs to see this. And that was so surprising in such a wonderful way for me.

36:05Rebecca Lavoie:Well, the film is called The Perfect Neighbor. It is absolutely riveting. Thank you so much for making it. And Gita Ganbeer and Nikan Kwantu, thank you so much for coming on the podcast to talk to me about it. So happy to do so. Thank you. That's it for this week's episode. Thanks again to Gita Ganbeer and Nikan Kwantu. Dig deeper into all your favorite Netflix documentaries and films at Tudum.com. Right now, you can read more about the fallout from the case. And browse our new True Crime Hub at tadoom.com slash true crime. For more of my takes, check out my other podcast, Crime Writers On. Each week on that show, we break down the latest in true crime documentaries, TV shows, podcasts, and pop culture.

36:43Rebecca Lavoie:If you like You Can't Make This Up, please rate and review this show and share it with friends. Find us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever else you get your podcasts. And make sure to follow the show to stay tuned for all new episodes. You Can't Make This Up is a co-production of Netflix and Partners in Crime Media. I'm Rebecca Lavoie. Thanks so much for listening.

37:26Thank you.

From the publisher

The Netflix documentary film The Perfect Neighbor offers a real-time look at the simmering dispute between a white woman and her Black neighbors. Told largely through police body cam footage, it reveals the petty complaints that started the conflict - and the heart-wrenching grief when it ended. It also explores whether Susan Lorincz tried to weaponize police against those living around her and whether she tried to exploit self-defense laws to commit murder.

In this episode of You Can't Make This Up, host Rebecca Lavoie interviews director Geeta Gandbhir and producer Nikon Kwantu.

SPOILER ALERT! If you haven't watched The Perfect Neighbor yet, make sure to add it to your watch-list before listening on. 

Dig deeper into all of your favorite Netflix documentaries and films at tudum.com! Right now you can read more about the fallout from the case. 

Check our true crime hub at tudum.com/truecrime. Listen to more from Netflix Podcasts.

More from You Can’t Make This Up

All 36 episodes
The Perfect NeighborYou Can’t Make This Up · 38 min
Listen in VO