Bonus Episode: Vaccinations and Exercise, Deadlifts For Hypertrophy, and Recovery from Disc Herniations

18 Sep 2025 · 33 min · 14 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Flu/COVID vaccine questions (symptoms, painkillers/fever reducers, and whether to train around shots); deadlifts for hypertrophy (why “don’t do deadlifts” is contentious); recovery from non-traumatic disc herniations/sciatica and whether incorrect posture can cause permanent damage.

Guests

Dr. Jordan Baraki and Jordan (Barbell Medicine). No external guests named.

Key claims

Vaccine symptoms (joint pain, headaches, sweats, muscle aches) reflect a normal immune response; ibuprofen/antipyretics are not shown to blunt vaccine response. There’s no reason to avoid training before/after vaccination; evidence for improved short-term markers is plausible, but no confidence it changes infection/hospitalization risk. Deadlift vs RDL: injury-risk and fatigue concerns are overstated; main difference is controlled eccentric loading. Most disc herniations and sciatica resolve (e.g., ~70% full resolution by 4 weeks; ~90% by 3 months with non-surgical care); permanent “hardware” damage from posture is unlikely without severe trauma/structural change.

Notable examples

Cytokine-driven vaccine malaise; myocarditis/pericarditis risk used to argue against irrational “never drive” comparisons; golf/bowling/cricket/tennis asymmetrical adaptations as non-permanent “features.”

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Vaccination Symptoms and Training

0:34 to 2:22

Discussion on common symptoms after COVID vaccinations and advice on training.

“Welcome back to the Barbell Medicine Plus podcast where we bring modern medicine to strength, conditioning, and other items depending on what you asked us.”

Responses to Vaccine and Training Effects

2:22 to 4:36

Exploration of the immune response to vaccines and the impact of exercise.

“I mean, granted, that was podcast episode 96, which is almost 300 episodes ago.”

Understanding Vaccine Outcomes

4:36 to 7:20

Analysis of different outcomes related to vaccinations and exercise.

“But what I don't recall off the top of my head, as it was several hundred episodes ago, was the outcome that was being measured.”

Public Message on Exercise Post-Vaccination

7:20 to 10:00

Discussion on the public health message regarding exercise after vaccination.

“Now, how much of a relationship there is between those, you know, near nearer term outcomes and like the more significant ones we care about of like symptomatic infection or hospitalization death that is unknown.”

Deadlifts for Hypertrophy

10:00 to 11:15

Debate on the effectiveness and controversies surrounding deadlifts for muscle growth.

“And however, I can interface with you and recommend that.”

Concerns About Deadlift Safety and Effectiveness

11:15 to 14:00

Exploration of injury risks and effectiveness of deadlifts compared to other lifts.

“Obviously, there are differences in the movements, but surely not enough for these to be at opposite ends of the gains spectrum.”

Exploring Deadlift Variations and Fatigue

14:00 to 20:50

Learn how different deadlift variations impact muscle fatigue and hypertrophy.

“Like people are like, I feel my hamstrings more when I'm doing RDLs than when I'm doing regular deadlifts.”

Exploring Deadlift Variations and Fatigue

21:50 to 22:00

Learn how different deadlift variations impact muscle fatigue and hypertrophy.

“If that's something you're into, That's with new subscription only while supplies last until September 27, 2026.”

Understanding Non-Traumatic Injuries

23:25 to 28:00

Discuss the misconceptions around chronic back pain and injury management.

“Recovery chances in terms of a non-traumatic injury.”

Understanding Chronic Pain and Pathology

28:00 to 29:51

Learn about how specific conditions affect chronic pain and the clinician's role in treatment.

“and these folks are destined for lives of debility.”
Show all 14 chapters

The Role of Clinicians in Pain Management

29:51 to 31:39

Discover the importance of skilled clinicians in addressing patient misconceptions about pain.

“through these issues requires clinicians who are educated, who are informed, who are experienced, who are good at having these conversations, who are good at listening and interacting.”

Permanency of Non-Traumatic Injuries

31:39 to 32:19

Examine the common misconceptions regarding the permanence of conditions like disc herniations.

“I wanted to do a brief chat about the idea that maybe non-traumatic injuries like disc herniations or sciatica would be permanent, and then also talk about this like incorrect posture thing just briefly and move on.”

Posture and Movement Patterns in Sports

32:19 to 34:35

Learn about the effects of asymmetrical movement patterns in sports on long-term health.

“injuries like disc herniations or sciatica?”

Engaging Conversations About Pain

34:35 to 35:39

Understand how to approach discussions about pain with empathy and knowledge.

“It sounds like in your situation, you know, maybe you're asking like what to do about this.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Jordan Feigenbaum:Hey, it's Jordan from Barbell Medicine. Now this episode preview is from exclusive content that regularly goes out to our Barbell Medicine Plus subscribers. In addition to exclusive content, Barbell Medicine Plus subscribers get early access to episodes and products, ad-free listening, discounts on products and services, and the ability to ask Dr. Baraki and I questions, all for about the cost of a cup of coffee each month. And in case you were wondering, the first month is free. To join, head over to barbellmedicine.com slash plus and sign up to be a Barbell Medicine Plus member today. That's barbellmedicine.com slash plus.

0:32Jordan Feigenbaum:All right. Thanks for your consideration. On to the show.

0:40Jordan Feigenbaum:Welcome back to the Barbell Medicine Plus podcast where we bring modern medicine to strength, conditioning, and other items depending on what you asked us. So let's just get into it. The first one is on flu slash COVID vaccine questions. Good thing is because it's only going out on Supercast, Barbell Medicine Plus podcast. We're not going to get flagged and just get, you know, a bunch of hate messages. So this question says, I did a quick search on the forum and found some things from about 2021. So apologies if this has been asked slash answered before, but tis the season to get these. This individual says, I, without fail, have the same symptoms after the COVID booster every single year, Moderna in my case.

1:24Jordan Feigenbaum:My joints hurt. I have headaches, sweats, muscle aches like delayed onset muscle soreness and generally feel like hot garbage. These are all things that in my day-to-day life of training four to six days a week I do not have. What's that about? Is my immune system doing its thing in the least pleasant way possible? I remember that there was some guidance when these rolled out to avoid painkillers slash fever reducers like ibuprofen. Is that still the case? Would really love to have some of these medications next year. This year, I scheduled my shots after my Friday session, which is my last session of the week.

1:57Jordan Feigenbaum:But are there any reasons to not train after the shots? I've generally pushed through if I happen to have a training session the day of or after the shot. I remember there being some weird guidance to avoid activity for a week or some such nonsense from the early vaccine rollouts. So likely outdated. Long question. But, yeah, adequate, adequate, especially because it is the season. So we did cover some of this. I mean, granted, that was podcast episode 96, which is almost 300 episodes ago. Yeah, 300. So – and it is interesting, maybe just an aside, like people will bring up topics that we've covered before, for example, and be like, any new thoughts, which is a reasonable question, especially if some years have passed.

2:41Jordan Feigenbaum:But we try our best if something is like practice changing, which is the fancy doctor speak for like, hey, look, we thought this before. Now based on new evidence, we think this. We try our best to update that. And if there's like no news is kind of good news with respect to most of our material, I won't say all because there's some stuff floating around out there. I'm sure that's over a decade old that I wish I could update. In any case, symptoms like joint pain, headaches, sweats, these muscle aches, they are certainly signs of your immune system mounting a response to, in this case, the vaccine.

3:13Jordan Feigenbaum:Your body is basically learning how to fight the potential viral infection without you having to get sick from an actual infection. So it's more controlled. But this is well characterized. So this is not like that one weird thing that happens to you and you alone. It happens to a significant proportion of folks, not all folks, obviously. And so, yeah, you can feel like you have delayed onset muscle soreness, general feeling not so hot. Your immune system is doing its thing, releasing cytokines. They cause inflammation, signal other molecules to come and play. You get these systematic effects. But, again, this is more of a controlled type of experience than what we would predict from an active viral infection.

3:52Jordan Feigenbaum:I did some digging on this as far as, you know, should you avoid ibuprofen or antipyretics, anti fever medications? Yeah, you can take these. Like I'm not giving you medical advice. This is not medical advice. But yeah, there was maybe some concern that that would blunt like the response of an individual to the vaccine. But that hasn't panned out. So carry on. Should you want to do something like that? And last thing, and this is probably where we'll spend the bulk of our time on this question, is like there's no reason to avoid training after or before a vaccine. And in fact, we covered this on our previous discussion of immunizations and training.

4:27Jordan Feigenbaum:There's maybe some like potential benefit there with like not only blood flow, but stimulation in the immune system, better surveillance or whatever. So I don't know. How confident do you feel that that is something that occurs? Meaning that if you took a thousand people, right, and you put half of them in a group that trained immediately after they got a vaccination and the other half did not, do you think there would be a significant difference in like immunologic response and potential like infection risk down the road? Yeah. Yeah. I was wondering, as you were laying that out, knowing where you were headed, I was waiting for the pause that happened, because the key element of that question is right where you paused to think about what outcome am I paying attention to here, right?

5:14So I remember when we did that original podcast, number 96, and we talked about this, I found that evidence reasonably convincing as it related to the effects of activity around the time of administration of an immunization. But what I don't recall off the top of my head, as it was several hundred episodes ago, was the outcome that was being measured. For example, we can measure antibody titer levels, so how, like, your blood, circulating blood levels of antibodies, that can be measured in the short term. There's obviously going to be a significant increase in the short term, no matter what, if you are responding to an immunization.

5:55You can measure it long term, how much of it persists versus how much of that circulating antibody wanes, which tends to happen with a lot of immunizations. And that's not necessarily a bad thing, or it doesn't even necessarily mean that you have lost your, you know, your immunity to something because memory cells can wake back up and restore, you know, higher levels when needed with some things better than others. That's why boosters are only needed for some conditions and not necessarily others. Or is your outcome not going to be some serologic measurement like this, but rather what's your risk of infection at all?

6:31or is it going to be what's your risk of symptomatic infection or is it going to be what's your risk of hospitalization or is it going to be what's your risk of death right so we have all these different tiers and obviously death is the one that we care about the most followed by like critical illness and hospitalization and disability as a result followed by symptomatic infection followed by any infection followed by like what are your blood levels that's like the tiers of importance uh if you're a patient right and so am i confident that like exercising after a vaccine versus not exercising after a vaccine is going to have a large impact on your ultimate risk of death from the infection, pretty tough for me to feel confident in that.

7:12You know, in general, much less because we don't actually have that kind of direct evidence, that would be exceedingly difficult to prove. But on the other hand, at the opposite end of the spectrum, do I feel more comfortable if the idea is like, hey, if you're able to do some vigorous activity around that time, it maybe it boosts your short term immunologic response and you might get some higher antibody titers or something. I'm like, yep, maybe slash probably. Now, how much of a relationship there is between those, you know, near nearer term outcomes and like the more significant ones we care about of like symptomatic infection or hospitalization death that is unknown.

7:51Yeah. All this is to say it's an interesting thing to point out, like all the different outcomes that you could look at. But more importantly, I have no concerns about you exercising around the time of a vaccine. I think that people in general are overly cautious about this sort of thing, including after an actual infection. We've talked about this before, too, this risk of be it pericarditis or myocarditis or something. It's like, yeah, there's probably a non-zero risk. And everybody gets to weigh this risk and benefit for themselves. But, you know, I think that if you are somebody who is of such risk intolerance that you're going to say, because of this minuscule risk of getting myocarditis after a flu or a COVID infection because I exercised, there is no way that you should ever be getting in your car to go anywhere.

8:42Don't drive.

8:42Jordan Feigenbaum:Yeah. Like, you know, that's that's it's an incoherent kind of risk benefit calculation there to hold those two things, you know, at the same time. So, yeah, those are some of my thoughts. I have two additions. They're not additions. It's more just like, hey, you said this and I kind of want to add on. I guess you can't call that an addition. I feel very confident that exercising around or directly after vaccination does not impair the response to that. I feel very confident about that. I feel minimally, perhaps moderately confident that exercising after a vaccine may improve short term markers of the immunization working as far as like serologic levels go.

9:27Jordan Feigenbaum:And I have no confidence that it's actually going to like affect somebody's chance of not only getting a symptomatic infection, but also like subsequent outcomes from that. The second thing is about this like concern over exercising either after a vaccination or after an infection. And I'm of the opinion that generally speaking, our public facing message should be do you do not need to be restricted from exercise after you're feeling well to go exercise after an infection or after a vaccination. That should be the public facing message. And my caveat like would be if you're very well trained, you exercise regularly.

10:05Jordan Feigenbaum:I don't care. Like if you want to take a little bit of time off because you don't feel your best and whatever, I'm more accepting of that than people who do not currently participate, regularly participate in exercise because those people, I just want you to get started. And however, I can interface with you and recommend that. So it would be interesting to me as like a quality improvement project for people, healthcare professionals administering vaccinations if they were like, hey, by the way, you should exercise after this. Oh, yeah. Just something like that because people are like, wait, what?

10:33Jordan Feigenbaum:Or like if you saw a physician after an infection and you were just like your follow-up and they were like, and by the way, you should exercise today. Just to sort of like nudge people in that direction. Sure, sure. That would be an interesting thing to link it together as like a necessary – not even though it's not strictly necessary, but like if there's stronger evidence that it would boost or protect somebody, if we could get that evidence, then you could make a more compelling case that that ought to be introduced. Sure. I just feel like every time you interface with a healthcare professional, if somebody's not currently exercising, just maybe, hey, you should exercise.

11:06Jordan Feigenbaum:Yeah, you should exercise and maybe eat a vegetable today. Something, something. Next question, we're talking about deadlifts for hypertrophy. Of the big three, why do you think the deadlift is so contentious in regards for being a good exercise for hypertrophy when the Romanian deadlift is often regarded as a staple for hamstrings in a hypertrophy-focused program? Obviously, there are differences in the movements, but surely not enough for these to be at opposite ends of the gains spectrum. I agree. Okay, next question. yeah as far as why this is so contentious i i think there are like four major like areas of concern that are all lumped into one when people just say i don't don't don't do deadlifts for hypertrophy one is this concern over injury risk the second is this lack of eccentric focus within most deadlifts how people perform them right it's mostly focused on the concentric the way up and down it's like well set the bar down don't drop it third is maybe a more global or systemic muscle loading kind of nature of the regular deadlift compared to the RDL, which is more like focused on the posterior chain.

12:13Jordan Feigenbaum:You could make maybe that argument, not strong argument, but an argument. And then concerns over fatigue. And so I think between injury risk and concerns over fatigue, that's what most like, quote, science-based lifters might refer to. So let's go through each one of these. I think the concern over injury risk, I'll get your take on this, Dr. Baraki. I think this is misplaced because it assumes within this context that an RDL has a significantly lower risk of injury than the regular deadlift. And I don't know that to be true. In fact, I would say, again, if you took a thousand people who are untrained, you gave them the same program.

12:47Jordan Feigenbaum:One group did the RDL and the other group did the regular deadlift. I would predict they would have the same injury risk at the end of a year. Does that sound reasonable to you? Sounds like a reasonable starting hypothesis. Yeah, I'm not convinced that there would be likely. No. The lack of eccentric focus, that is real, the way that most people perform their deadlifts. So, yeah, most people with a regular deadlift, whether it's sumo, conventional, whatever, the up, you're just trying to get the weight up. And then when you set it down, it's not really under much control other than you keep your hands on the bar.

13:21Jordan Feigenbaum:Whereas the RDL and a stiff-legged deadlift, for example, both have a more controlled eccentric, which you would predict is probably better for hypertrophy. Just you're getting a paired, you know, eccentric and concentric movement. I would predict that to work a slightly better for hypertrophy than no eccentric, for example. And to test that, so you would have to test it. That's my starting hypothesis. But to test it, you would have to have people do like a conventional deadlift for the same rep sets, proximity to failure, et cetera, and then drop every rep compared to the RDL, which would be performed with like a 2-1-0 tempo or something like that.

13:58Jordan Feigenbaum:Yeah, the more global versus local muscle group loading, I think that's made up entirely. Like people are like, I feel my hamstrings more when I'm doing RDLs than when I'm doing regular deadlifts. I'm like, well, yeah, because the eccentric component is slower. Not because the lift itself is like loading different muscles. It's the same muscles, just more eccentric focus. I think that's more of the second. But this fatigue concern thing, this to me is the most – it's just annoying, mainly because people are like, oh, deadlifts are uniquely fatiguing. And I'm like, well, yeah, compared to like a biceps curl, right?

14:33Jordan Feigenbaum:And if we think about things that generally would increase fatigue, heavier weight, more volume, more muscle mass being activated or loaded, sure. But like there's a limit to how far you can get with that. So for example, if you would predict that fatigue levels would be lower from the squat compared to the deadlift, they both work a similar amount of total muscle mass. The deadlifts, though, use more weight, right? And so you would predict that any marker of fatigue that is validated or we think is reasonable to track, it would be higher after squats. And multiple studies, at least two that I've linked here in the show notes, show that's not the case.

15:12Jordan Feigenbaum:And you're like, okay, well, those are both a lot of muscle mass. Let's give a more extreme example. How about the bench press versus the deadlift? And so one way to track fatigue would be like, look, if you do a session of deadlifts compared to a session of bench press, how quickly does your force production potential come back afterwards? You would predict a less fatiguing exercise for force production to return more quickly and a more fatiguing exercise for force production to take longer to come back. And when that's tested, that doesn't show up either. So I don't think these fatigue concerns are particularly useful when picking a hinge variation because you're not picking between a biceps curl and a deadlift.

15:55Jordan Feigenbaum:You're picking between a deadlift and a Romanian deadlift or a deadlift and a stiff-legged deadlift or a deadlift and a hip thrust. And I'm like, I predict these all to globally cause about the same amount of fatigue if they're programmed the same. The focused eccentric component, though, may be more useful for hypertrophy with an RDL or a stiff-legged deadlift over the way that people mostly perform deadlifts. But ultimately, it's a silly premise to me because you've got to pick one exercise. And I'm like, why aren't you doing more exercises? Because that's what I would generally pick for hypertrophy.

16:28Jordan Feigenbaum:Use multiple exercises to work the muscle groups of interest from different angles, relatively large range of motions for all of them, and get somewhat close to failure and go from there. But picking the one exercise to rule them all, should it be an RDL or regular deadlift? I'm like, por qué no los dos? Why wouldn't you do both? or because of you know the fact that they involve so much muscle mass that can also be broken apart such that if you had no interest in performance of a particular lift if you had no interest in function in your daily life but you were purely of the interest of hypertrophying particular muscle groups um you also don't even have to deadlift you know yeah like you could become a exceptionally competitive bodybuilder, I'm sure, uh, without training the deadlift very much by, uh, training a lot of these muscle groups more, more individually.

17:23Neither of us would claim to be bodybuilders. Um, we have experienced some hypertrophy over the course of our training career, but that's not been like the, the, the primary focus. Uh, but you know, you could also, why not snatch grip RDL? Why not snatch grip deadlift? You can get even more range of motion about, you know, the hamstrings and the low back. Why not, you know, do deficit snatch grip already like you could take this to an extreme, right? Or you could do, you know, prone hamstring, you know, leg curls or all sorts of other single leg things. There's the thing is with respect to hypertrophy, you have enormous options.

17:57That's the nice thing about bodybuilding and hypertrophy oriented training. There is absolutely nothing that you have to do or that you can't do. You can do absolutely anything. What sucks more about competitive powerlifting is you have no choice but to squat, bench press, and deadlift within certain arbitrary rules. And if you don't like that, too bad. If you can't tolerate that, too bad. If an injury limits you from doing those movements to the competitive standards, too bad. But in bodybuilding, none of that matters. You can achieve a lot of hypertrophy in all sorts of ways without any consideration of rules of how I got there or which exercises I did and didn't do.

18:38And so, yeah, similar, similar to your thoughts on, on the premise here. I'm just like, this is not something that I concern myself with at all, because you can hypertrophy in tons of other ways. And I don't even really think of them as building that particular outcome in a unique way.

18:53Jordan Feigenbaum:Yeah. Yeah. It's one of the interesting, maybe pushbacks against that is, you know, some guy, the talking face over somebody else's video, it'd be your video, this video of you saying you don't have to deadlift. And then somebody's head pops up, stitch incoming. And they're like, well, why is it then that all like top level bodybuilders started out, you know, doing heavy deadlifts and squats and bench press and whatever. And I'm like, I have a perfectly rational and likely true response to that. When you get bit by this resistance training bug, whether you end up as a bodybuilder, a powerlifter, strength enthusiast, whatever, it's just, we all kind of enter in the same funnel.

19:30Jordan Feigenbaum:It's like, get big, get strong, get jacked, all this other sort of stuff. And you kind of get led into these movements, which have this arbitrary importance across most enthusiasts for the gym for some relatively long period of their life. Whether or not that's better or worse, we don't know. It just seems to be that like the track from untrained to like gym rat is pretty much the same. You start with the interest in the big compound lifts and then you specify later on perhaps or you burn out and you never lift again. Like whatever. Those are the two kind of pathways there. Yeah. I mean, they're generally appealing things.

20:06They are easy to compare one to another, both within person and across people. They generally can enjoy pretty rapid progress, you know, just in terms of plates over plates over plates at the beginning. Whereas assessing your hypertrophy progress as a beginner or something, especially if you start out with like an excess body fat, it's like, man, it's going to take a long time before we can totally feel confident that you're making tons of progress. And so, yeah, I get the appeal of like, yeah, your deadlift went up 350 pounds in the first, you know, three months of your training or something like that.

20:34Uh, neat. Uh, that's a very, that's a very appealing thing. Whether, you know, a decade later when you step onto a bodybuilding stage, whether that was, you know, heavily influenced by your first few months of training the deadlift, probably not, you know, by the, by that point in your training career. So yeah.

20:50Jordan Feigenbaum:I agree. I agree. This podcast is brought to you by Factor. Eating well, isn't a willpower problem for me and it's probably not for you either. It's a setup problem. There's something healthy in the fridge that I should be making, and then it's 8 p.m. I've been at the track all weekend, or the workout went too long, and then the gap between should cook and will cook is roughly the size of the Grand Canyon. So if left to my own devices, I'll order something for delivery and feel great about it for approximately 11 minutes. That's the gap that Factor closes. Fully prepared meals designed by dieticians, made by chefs, delivered to your door, and they're ready in two minutes.

21:22Jordan Feigenbaum:No planning, no grocery run, no cooking. They've got meals built around whatever you're after, whether it's weight loss, more protein, overall healthy nutrition, GLP-1 support, and a muscle pro collection if you're training hard and you care about recovery. The food's fresh, never frozen, with over 100 meals rotated weekly, so you're not eating the same chicken and rice until you hate it. Lean proteins, whole foods, only the stuff you want, and it's pretty good too. Head over to factormeals.com slash BBM50OFF and use code BBM50OFF to get 50 % off and a free daily greens box. If that's something you're into, That's with new subscription only while supplies last until September 27, 2026.

22:00Jordan Feigenbaum:See the website for more details. Every few episodes, someone asks if eating more protein is going to wreck their kidneys. Now for most people, the data on that is very reassuring, but lead in your drinking water is a different conversation. The EPA and CDC agree. There is no known safe level of lead exposure. The EPA is health-based goal for lead and drinking water is zero. And we're nowhere close to that. The problem is that there are millions of lead service lines still in the ground across the country. So the pipes, the solder, and the plumbing between the treatment plant and your faucet break down over time, and that's how lead gets into the tap water.

22:33Jordan Feigenbaum:There's a federal mandate to replace them, but it's on a 10-year timeline, and most of that work hasn't started yet. In adults, chronic low-level lead exposure has been linked to all sorts of things like kidney damage, high blood pressure, and cardiovascular disease. And these are claims from the WHO and CDC's position. The thing is, you'd never know from looking at your water or tasting it. That's why I've started filtering my water with Cove Pure. It's a countertop reverse osmosis system. There's no plumber, no installation needed. You plug it in, it sits on your counter, and reverse osmosis is one of the most effective filtration methods for removing lead, PFAS, arsenic, and nitrates.

23:06Jordan Feigenbaum:The first thing in the morning when I'm filling up my kettle to make coffee, I use Cove Pure. It's got a touchscreen where you pick the temperature you want, hot, cold, or warm, and it dispenses instantly. It also has preset cup sizes, so you can keep track of how much you're taking in. For America's 250th birthday, CovePure is giving you$250 off at covepure.com slash BBM. That's C-O-V-E-P-U-R-E dot com slash BBM. Moving on. Recovery chances in terms of a non-traumatic injury. Hey, were you ever on Student Doctor Network when you were, probably not because you got direct admit, so you're like, didn't have to.

Read the full transcript

23:42I was aware that it existed, but I never needed it as a resource for myself.

23:45Jordan Feigenbaum:So if you're not in the healthcare, if you never went to medical school, whatever, that means you're well-adjusted and hats off to you. If you were and you are familiar with Student Doctor Network, I'm not about to tell you anything you don't know, but this is for the people who don't know what I'm talking about. This was a forum. I think it's still an active forum where people applying to either medical schools or residency programs would basically be able to interface with other folks doing the same thing or people who have previously done it. And there was just these laundry list of threads every single fall.

24:13Jordan Feigenbaum:That's the prime interview season. And the title would be Chance Me for Getting into Medical School. And you'd post your MCAT, your science GPA, your extracurriculars and whatever. And then people would say, no chance, no chance. For the record, I undertook this in 2011. And everyone said, no chance. You got no chance of getting accepted to a med school. Would you say they said you had no chance? I showed them. That's right. They said I had no chance. They said I was done. anyway so that's that when i saw this question i go oh interesting callback so this question says what's your take on the permanency of non-traumatic injuries like disc herniations or sciatica the context here is that uh this person says i have colleagues at my it job dealing with chronic back pain and their doctors are pushing the classic narratives of degenerative disc disease pinched nerves and bad posture being the root cause of irreversible damage.

25:09Jordan Feigenbaum:Now, I know that this wear and tear or body as a fragile machine model is outdated and generally unhelpful, but I'm just curious if there would be some extreme scenarios where incorrect posture or very asymmetrical movement patterns would cause permanent issues. Outside of a severe traumatic event, can a person truly cause permanent structural breakdown just by moving, quote, incorrectly over time? Or is it more that the damage seen on imaging is often just a normal, poorly correlated part of aging, and the pain experience is largely driven by factors like load management, fear to avoidance beliefs, or other biopsychosocial stressors.

25:46Jordan Feigenbaum:Basically, when people talk about being permanently broken, are they describing a busted piece of hardware, the spine, or a software issue, the nervous system's threat detection, that can be rehabbed with graded exposure and education? I think this person already knows the answer to this question, and we could just ask them. What do you say? This is complicated. It is, but I'm just saying, like, with the nomenclature, the verbiage being used here. Oh, they've clearly listened to us before. Yeah, yeah. So my initial take when I read all this a couple times, I was like, just ask the people what they mean.

26:18Jordan Feigenbaum:In this case, your colleagues, hey, you're telling me about your back pain and your doctor said that you have degenerative disc disease or whatever from these movement patterns. What does that mean to you? Because that's kind of how I would start this conversation with a patient. I'd be like, what's your understanding of this condition? and just let them go? And they may, in fact, reflect that right back to you and say, look, I've been moving wrong my whole life. I've been sitting wrong, standing wrong my whole life, and I've caused this irreparable, irreversible damage in my spine, which is causing me this pain.

26:47Jordan Feigenbaum:And the follow-up question would be, so what do you think that means for your prospects for moving pain-free in the future? And they may say, well, look, if it's irreversible, I can't do anything about it. I'm likely to be in pain the rest of my life. I'm like, oh, shit. That's the worst possible outcome there. Does that kind of make sense to you? Yeah, I mean, these things always end up being very individual and super unique and almost always interesting conversations that I have with people when I get a sense of upfront, what are their beliefs? Where did they come from? What are they basing that level of confidence on if they have a confident self-assessment on these things?

27:24and then trying to find ways to get my foot in the door to gently, they call it, what do they call it? Like a compassionate confrontation, I think is the phrase that is sometimes used in this literature, where it's not like I'm coming at you and attacking you and telling you that your beliefs are bullshit, but rather trying to identify ways that I can kind of, like I said, get my foot in the door and maybe challenge some aspects of your thinking. I mean, my initial thoughts on this question is like, by and large, for the majority of situations, Yes, I'm in agreement with the kind of implied understanding in this question because it reflects a lot of what we've talked about before, right, where a lot of this is not necessarily the primary pathology that is permanent and irreversible, and these folks are destined for lives of debility.

28:12But that is not universal, right? So there are situations where somebody might be uniquely predisposed to some sort of pathology. So just to give some examples, people, we know that people with certain forms of connective tissue disorders, they are at higher risk of various chronic pain syndromes. There's probably some biology there, right, that might not be something that we can easily modify or control at this time. That doesn't mean we don't try to rehab them using a comprehensive biopsychosocial approach. But there might be something unique about that situation that basically is an additional challenge for us.

28:47or somebody has osteoporosis and they end up experiencing as a result, multi-level vertebral compression fractures or something like that. Like, okay, you know, sometimes those are asymptomatic, interestingly enough, but sometimes they're not and they might need to be addressed. Or somebody is, you know, due to their history or due to some genetic variables or something like that, uniquely predisposed to develop like accelerated osteoarthritis. Right. Again, these are some things. Turbo-osteo?

29:14Jordan Feigenbaum:Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And so these are all things that the clinician has to try to suss out is like, how likely is it that this finding this thing that I'm seeing is correlated with their experience? And what other levers can I modify to try to impact their experience? And if I am like maximally pulling on all those other levers, and I'm not making progress, then maybe that's a period where we do need to entertain that much more direct pathology directed treatment of like, yeah, a joint replacement or something like that might be the way to go. Like that can change the course of people's lives to get a hip replacement or a knee replacement for like severe symptomatic osteoarthritis.

29:48So it's just quite complex. And that's why I think that working through these issues requires clinicians who are educated, who are informed, who are experienced, who are good at having these conversations, who are good at listening and interacting. And it sounds like the types of clinicians that these folks are working with are generally failing one or more of those criteria. It's just hard to find somebody who's very good at having these conversations and helping people work through these types of things. I'm a shill for big physiatry or PM &R doctors. Historically, although, as with everywhere else, I've worked with some who are not awesome, but by and large, the PM &Rs who I have interacted with over the years, I've enjoyed quite a lot.

30:33One who is aware of us and in our sphere, if somebody is, I think he's at MUSC, is Dr. Dr. Jim Eubanks, fantastic. He's been on the podcast before. Rather than, you know, I think you have a worse chance of getting exceptionally good non-interventional advice from a surgeon, for example. There are some surgeons who are very good, like Dr. Howard Lux. I've come across him on the Twitters, and he has some good material in this space. So ultimately, if I want to just address this question, I think that most of these folks' understanding of their condition is inaccurate and unhelpful. And it is the job of a competent, skilled, empathic clinician to help assess that understanding and gently massage it in a more favorable direction to generate more optimistic kind of views on their prognosis and getting them moving and things like that, while also entertaining the possibility that, yeah, there might actually be some tissue level pathology that actually might need to be addressed more directly, like, say a joint replacement or something like that so there are some like i don't want to overgeneralize and say like most of these persistent pain things are in your head because that's not a good way to frame this or to think about it um there are certainly situations where it's like nah this person's got cancer in their spine or they got uh compression fractures or they have like real advanced osteoarthritis that is not just like you know expected age-related changes for whatever reason and and that deserves some consideration and shouldn't be prematurely dismissed just because they listened to a lecture on the biopsychosocial model or something like that.

32:07Jordan Feigenbaum:Yeah, yeah. I wanted to do a brief chat about the idea that maybe non-traumatic injuries like disc herniations or sciatica would be permanent, and then also talk about this like incorrect posture thing just briefly and move on. So with the first question, you know, what's your take on the permanency of non-traumatic injuries like disc herniations or sciatica? I think the overwhelming evidence from both our clinical experience and the scientific literature suggests that for the vast majority of people, the answer is no, these things are not permanent. Most intervertebral disc herniations show both symptom and radiographic evidence of resolution at some time interval, weeks, months, sometimes longer, depending on the presentation and what's going on.

32:47Jordan Feigenbaum:Most sciatica, 70 % that's presenting with a disc herniation, well, non-surgical management leads to full resolution in four weeks, increasing to 90 % of patients within three months. And so, again, it just speaks against the idea that this is permanent. You're always going to have it. It can never get better. It's probably not the case for these two specific examples. And then this idea that are there extreme scenarios where incorrect posture or very asymmetrical movement patterns could cause permanent issues? And I think to maybe get at the crux of this question, it seems like we would need to start with a generally healthy, generally like full unrestricted movement that a person had.

33:34Jordan Feigenbaum:And then over time, by the way of them exercising, moving, sitting, standing, whatever, they've somehow developed into this decrepit individual who can no longer move correctly. And I cannot think of any way or mechanism that may be true short of some severe like anatomical changes either from a surgery and – but again, that's not really what we're talking about. Some sort of trauma that required surgery or immobilization for a long period of time, which is not really what we're talking about here. And so I think about some classic examples of asymmetrical movements like golf, bowling in cricket, tennis, et cetera.

34:08Jordan Feigenbaum:They all show adaptations to the spine but also other aspects of the body that are not symmetrical, not symmetrical. Whether these persist indefinitely after cessation of that sport or training for that sport is unknown. own, but they don't really appear to cause pain while people have the, you know, these asymmetrical adaptations that make them better at their sport. It's like a, it's not a bug. It's a feature of participating in this sort of training. So I would push back against both of those things compassionately, but I don't know. It sounds like in your situation, you know, maybe you're asking like what to do about this.

34:44Jordan Feigenbaum:Do I interject? And if so, how? I think if they ask you about it, right? It seems like they're telling you about this. And so I think where I would maybe flip the switch is if they said, what do you think? And that would be a good way to get your foot in the door to say something like, well, tell me how – what do you understand about this? That's probably how I'd start. Rather than leading over – beating somebody over the head with educational materials, that's really not going to be well-received most of the time unless somebody is opening the door for you, I think. Yeah, reasonable take. Reasonable take.

35:16Jordan Feigenbaum:Who am I? What the heck is going on here?

35:23Jordan Feigenbaum:All right, that is a wrap on this free sample of our bonus content that regularly goes out to our Barbell Medicine Plus subscribers. Again, to join, head over to barbellmedicine.com slash plus and sign up to be a Barbell Medicine Plus member today. That's barbellmedicine.com slash plus. Thank you so much for listening. We'll catch you guys next time.

From the publisher

In this episode of the Barbell Medicine Plus podcast, the hosts discuss various topics related to strength training, such as: vaccination effects on training, the role of deadlifts in hypertrophy, and recovery from non-traumatic injuries.

Become a Barbell Medicine Plus Member Today


New Stuff:



Resources Page: https://www.barbellmedicine.com/resources/

Template Quiz: https://www.barbellmedicine.com/template-quiz/

Got pain and need a professional who understands you lift? Or, do you need an experienced coach to help you get the most out of your training? Contact us at support@barbellmedicine.com



Our Sponsors:
* Check out FIGS and use my code FIGSRX for a great deal: https://wearfigs.com
* Check out Factor: https://factormeals.com/bbm50off
* Check out Quince: https://quince.com/BBM
* Check out Quince: https://quince.com/BBM


Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/barbell-medicine-podcast/donations

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

More from Barbell Medicine Podcast

All 79 episodes
Bonus Episode: Vaccinations and Exercise, Deadlifts For Hypertrophy, and Recovery from Disc HerniationsBarbell Medicine Podcast · 33 min
Listen in VO