The $240 Million Ad Campaign That Helped Get Kristi Noem Fired

7 Mar 2026 · 24 min · 10 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: The $240 Million Ad Campaign That Helped Get Kristi Noem Fired

Podcast Title

Big Take Description: The Big Take from Bloomberg News provides in-depth analysis of global economic stories and events that could impact the markets.

Episode Details

  • Episode Title: The $240 Million Ad Campaign That Helped Get Kristi Noem Fired
  • Episode Description: This episode discusses the firing of Kristi Noem from her position as head of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) by President Donald Trump, focusing on her controversial $240 million ad campaign which featured herself prominently.

Key Participants

  • Host: Sarah Holder
  • Guests: Eric Fan and Irene Casado Sanchez (Bloomberg Investigative Reporters)

Main Points Discussed

  1. Overview of Kristi Noem's Firing
  2. Announcement: Trump announced Noem's removal on Truth Social, surprising many, including her replacement, Oklahoma Senator Mark Wayne Mullen.
  3. Context: The decision followed intense scrutiny of Noem's tenure, particularly regarding an ad campaign and her oversight.
  1. The $240 Million Ad Campaign
  2. Campaign Goals:
  3. Promotion of self-deportation among undocumented immigrants.
  4. Recruitment of new ICE agents.
  • Ad Content:
  • Ads targeted at immigrants with a threatening message to leave the country.
  • Recruitment ads emphasizing the need for ICE agents and offering bonuses.
  1. Spending and Comparison
  2. Budget: The $240 million budget was the largest ad campaign in DHS history, behind only military and COVID-related advertising.
  3. Contracting Process:
  4. Companies were handpicked rather than going through a competitive bidding process.
  5. Several companies involved had connections to Trump campaign officials.
  1. Analysis of the Companies Involved
  2. Safe American Media:
  3. Received over $142 million; formed just eight days before receiving the contract.
  4. Subcontracted work to established firms.
  • People Who Think LLC:
  • Linked to Corey Lewandowski, a key Trump campaign figure.
  • Focused on creating international versions of the deportation ads.
  1. Impact and Effectiveness of Ads
  2. Ad Targeting:
  3. Over 92,000 ads placed across 50 states, focusing on border states and sanctuary cities.
  4. Discrepancies in targeting based on undocumented immigrant populations.
  • Effectiveness:
  • Reports from police departments indicated minimal impact on recruitment efforts.
  • DHS claimed success in campaigns, but metrics were unclear and questioned by experts.
  1. Public and Political Response
  2. Congressional Hearings:
  3. Lawmakers questioned Noem’s decisions and the ad campaign’s funding.
  4. Noem emphasized that Trump supported her initiative; however, Trump later denied directing her actions.
  • Public Sentiment:
  • The ads bred fear and anxiety among immigrant communities, with reports of harassment and stress among families.

Key Takeaways

  • The ad campaign was not only a marketing effort but also heavily linked to political maneuvers and personal branding of Noem and Trump.
  • The decision-making process for the ad campaign raises ethical questions regarding transparency and political influence.
  • The outcomes of the ads suggest a complex impact on immigrant communities, with a mix of fear and resilience evident.

Conclusion This episode of The Big Take delves deeply into the intertwining of politics and public messaging, revealing how significant funding and strategic advertising can play pivotal roles in political careers—and the real-life consequences for communities affected by these campaigns.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Context of Kristi Noem's Firing

2:33 to 5:35

Explore the events leading to Noem's dismissal from DHS.

“President Trump announced on Truth Social yesterday that Kristi Noem, the head of the Department of Homeland Security, wasn't going to be running DHS anymore.”

Details of the Ad Campaign

5:35 to 7:30

Learn about the $240 million ad campaign and its goals.

“So I want to go back in time to about a year ago when this ad campaign actually kicked off.”

Contractor Selection Process

7:30 to 11:01

Examine how contractors were selected for the ad campaign.

“And I want to break this down into two parts.”

Response from Contractors

11:01 to 13:15

Find out how contractors responded to inquiries about the campaign.

“What seems very problematic here is like the agency bypass a full competitive bid process, right?”

Impact of the Ad Campaign

13:15 to 13:34

Assess the effects of the expensive DHS ad campaign.

“we sent an email, we called them multiple times, and we never got the response.”

Failures of Law Enforcement

14:03 to 14:25

Examining the repeated failures of law enforcement over decades concerning victims.

“These victims have been let down time and time again for decades and decades and decades by local law enforcement, by federal law enforcement, by administration, after administration.”

Analysis of DHS Ad Campaign

15:44 to 17:48

Investigating the ad campaign by DHS and its targeting strategies.

“you also looked at where these ads were running and who might have been seeing them.”

Impact of Recruitment Ads on Police

17:48 to 21:35

Discussing the effects of ICE recruitment ads on local police forces.

“proclaiming, quote, you took an oath to protect and serve, but in sanctuary cities, your order to stand down where dangerous illegals walk free.”

Self-Deportation Ads and Their Effects

21:35 to 23:09

Exploring the impact of self-deportation ads on immigrant communities.

“visas to come in or cross the border because they were discouraged under the administration policies.”

Congressional Response to Ad Campaign

23:09 to 27:02

The response of lawmakers to the DHS ad campaign and Kristi Noem's involvement.

“When did these ads get on the radar of lawmakers?”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Sarah Holder:So there's a lot of noise about AI, but time's too tight for more promises. So let's talk about results. At IBM, we work with our employees to integrate technology right into the systems they need. Now, a global workforce of 300 ,000 can use AI to fill their HR questions, resolving 94 % of common questions. Not noise. Proof of how we can help companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business. IBM.

0:30Irene Casado Sanchez:I'm Anna Navarro, and on my new podcast, Bleep with Anna Navarro, I'm talking to the people closest to the biggest issues happening in your community and around the world. Because I know deep down inside right now, we are all cursing and asking what the bleep is going on. Every week, I'm breaking down the biggest issues happening in our communities and around the world. I'm talking to people like Julie K. Brown, who broke the explosive story on Jeffrey Epstein in 2018. The Justice Department, through we counted four presidential administrations, failed these victims. Listen to Bleep with Adam Navarro on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

1:12This is Special Agent Regal, Special Agent Bradley Hall. The time is approximately 11.15 a.m.

1:21Irene Casado Sanchez:about to start a consensual telephone call with Dr. Daiwa Zhang. China's Ministry of State Security is one of the most mysterious and powerful spy agencies in the world. But in 2017, the FBI got inside.

1:45Hello? Hello?

1:53Sarah Holder:I've never seen that much evidence in my entire career, and I don't think we'll ever see that much evidence again. I now have several terabytes of an MSS officer, no doubt, no question, of his life. And that's a unicorn. This is a story of the inner workings of the MSS

2:10Irene Casado Sanchez:and how one man's ambition and mistakes opened its vault of secrets.

2:17Sarah Holder:Listen to The Sixth Bureau from Bloomberg Podcasts starting on February 13th on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

2:32Sarah Holder:Bloomberg Audio Studios.

2:35Irene Casado Sanchez:Podcasts. Radio. News.

2:38Eric Fan:President Trump announced on Truth Social yesterday that Kristi Noem, the head of the Department of Homeland Security, wasn't going to be running DHS anymore. President Trump has just announced that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is out of a job. The news seemed to catch many by surprise, including Trump's pick to replace Noem, Oklahoma Senator Mark Wayne Mullen.

2:59Sarah Holder:I've got to be honest with you, I wasn't expecting the call today.

3:01Eric Fan:At the time of The Post, Noam was at a law enforcement event in Nashville to deliver a keynote address. Good afternoon, everybody. How are you? Her presentation came and went without a single mention of the news that she had been fired and was getting another role as special envoy for a new security initiative. God bless you and may God continue to bless our great country. The shakeup didn't come entirely out of the blue. Earlier in the week, Noam faced two intense days of grilling before the House and Senate Judiciary Committees about alleged misconduct during her tenure at DHS. There was a lot that lawmakers from both parties wanted to discuss, including the killing of two American citizens by immigration enforcement in Minnesota.

3:43Eric Fan:But there was one issue that really got Trump's attention. An ad campaign.

3:48Irene Casado Sanchez:I'm Kristi Noem, the United States Secretary of Homeland Security. Thank you, President Donald J. Trump, for securing our border, for deporting criminal illegal immigrants, and for putting America first. I mean, Trump didn't explain why he fired her, but we know that she was all over the news about how he was handling the agency. And both sides were not happy with her answers.

4:18Sarah Holder:Senator John Kennedy from Louisiana singled this ad campaign out, grilled her about why she initiated the campaign, how the contracts were awarded, whether she actually received consent and approval from the president before she heavily featured herself.

4:39Eric Fan:Irana Sanchez-Casado and Eric Phan worked together to report new details of this ad campaign.

4:45Sarah Holder:And I remember her answer at the time was, the campaign has been very effective. We did everything by the books. And President Trump asked me to do this. And after that, there were reports that Trump denied having instructed her to conduct the campaign this way. And that seemed to be one of the core reasons that she was fired.

5:14Eric Fan:I'm Sarah Holder, and this is The Big Take from Bloomberg News. Today on the show, Bloomberg's investigation into the$240 million ad campaign that helped cost Kristi Noem her job at DHS. And what impacts the ads actually had.

5:35Eric Fan:So I want to go back in time to about a year ago when this ad campaign actually kicked off. What did these ads look and sound like? Can you describe them for me? Sure.

5:44Irene Casado Sanchez:We have two types of ads, right? Like ones that are actually pushing people to self-deport. President Trump has a clear message for those that are in our country illegally. Leave now. If you don't, we will find you and we will deport you. These ads are saying, it's like, if you leave this country, we're going to give you this statement that is going to help you to relocate. If not, we're going to chase you. You're not going to be able to come back. And the images show mostly Latino immigrants. And then we have another set of ads that are focused on ICE recruitment. In too many cities, dangerous illegals walk free as police are forced to stand down.

6:28Irene Casado Sanchez:Join ICE and help us catch the worst of the worst with bonuses up to$50 ,000 and generous benefits. So we have two very distinct ads, self-deportation and ads recruitment.

6:41Eric Fan:And there's been a lot of talk about how much DHS was committing to spend on that ad campaign,$240 million, though not all of that has been spent yet. How does that amount of funding compare to other ad campaigns that have been run by the federal government?

6:58Sarah Holder:It is by far the largest ad marketing campaign in DHS history and among the largest across all federal agencies. If you look at the numbers, it's only behind the DOD, so the military and the COVID ads.

7:16Eric Fan:And so the government was spending a massive amount of money on these ads that were pushing immigrants in the U.S. to leave the country, that were trying to get new ICE agents to join the agency. I want to talk about how these ads ended up on the air. And I want to break this down into two parts. First, how a government ad campaign would normally work. And next, how this campaign worked. So, of course, DHS doesn't make these ads in-house. They work with private companies. how do they pick which companies they work with? What processes do they have to go through?

7:51Sarah Holder:So usually when you have a federal contract, you have a standard procurement process where you open up the bid. You have some requirements, you have some project to do, and you welcome the private contractors come in and submit their proposals. And whoever can do the job the cheapest and the best will receive the work. So that's a full and open competitive process. That was not what happened in this case, because the DHS under Christine Noem handpicked four companies that this is according to their own document to bid on this process.

8:28Eric Fan:This is a public document released by DHS, which used this border emergency declared by Trump to justify the agency's move to bypass full and open competition.

8:39Sarah Holder:And only three of them actually made the bid and two of them were selected. But according to public records, all three companies are very tightly connected to either DHS officials or Trump campaign advisors. So the entire process also happened very, very quickly. The first ad was aired just about a month after Trump's inauguration. And everything was justified because Trump declared a national emergency at the southern border, which allows these contracts to bypass full competitive bidding.

9:18Irene Casado Sanchez:Tell us a little bit about the companies that they chose. So we have two main companies that appear on federal procurement records. One is People Who Think, and the other is Safe American Media. Safe American Media got more than$142 million. And what is very interesting is like this company didn't exist eight days before getting this huge contract.

9:42Sarah Holder:And what we, our investigation reviews, is they then subcontract most of the work to other more established companies.

9:52Eric Fan:Right. Safe American Media subcontracts with these media buyers who then place the TV ads. Let's talk about the other main company that was contracting with DHS, People Who Think LLC. What did you find out about them?

10:08Sarah Holder:So People Who Think received a slightly smaller contract compared to Save American Media to execute an international version of the deportation ads campaign. This company is linked to Corey Lawandowski, Kristi Noem's top eight. It was co-founded by a former Trump campaign media advisor who worked on his 2016 campaign.

10:32Eric Fan:Lewandowski had overlaps with both of these companies, right? You reported that in the past, Lewandowski had worked on the same political ad campaigns as people who think. And he'd worked on political ad campaigns with media buyers that were hired by Safe America Media. And there's also been reporting about this other company involved in the DHS ad campaign, which was run by Ben Yoho, the husband of former DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. Why do all these linkages matter? What's significant about all these ties?

11:03Irene Casado Sanchez:What seems very problematic here is like the agency bypass a full competitive bid process, right? It was the HHS who decided the companies that will be able to work on this, all without any kind of transparency of why they choose those companies, why they were better than others.

11:23Eric Fan:Was there anything that they said that explained what went into their choice of contractors?

11:27Irene Casado Sanchez:They didn't really explain why they choose those contractors, but they seemed very happy with their results. In one of the phrases that we got from them, it's like, it's pretty clear that we have made a good selection because this campaign has been widely successful. That's how they somehow justify the companies working on this campaign.

11:52Sarah Holder:They also said they did everything by the book. They said career officials managed the process. But when we asked them, did Kristi Noem personally approve those contracts? Because they had a press release last year that Noem personally approves everything about$100 ,000 to save taxpayer money. They confirmed that Noem and the White House Budget Office approved the contracts. Of course, when we asked them about the connections to Lewandowski, to other Trump advisors, they didn't respond.

12:30Eric Fan:And how did the companies involved respond to your reporting?

12:34Sarah Holder:Save American Media, the lead winner of the contract, we couldn't find them. A lot of our colleagues have tried, other news outlets have tried, but it appears that they don't have an office, don't have a website, don't have an email address, don't have a phone number. The only clue we had was this residential home owned by this Republican media consultant. And we went to that home. You knocked on the door? We knocked on the door. We slipped our letters, you know, in.

13:05Irene Casado Sanchez:We got actually finally a phone number and an email for this consultant. We sent our questions. He never answered. And same for people who think. We sent a letter. we sent an email, we called them multiple times, and we never got the response.

Read the full transcript

13:28Eric Fan:So what kind of impact did this pricey DHS ad campaign have? That's next.

13:39Irene Casado Sanchez:I'm Anna Navarro, and on my new podcast, Bleep with Anna Navarro, I'm talking to the people closest to the biggest issues happening in your community and around the world. Because I know deep down inside right now, we are all cursing and asking, what the bleep is going on? I'm talking to people like Julie K. Brown, who broke the explosive story on Jeffrey Epstein in 2018. These victims have been let down time and time again for decades and decades and decades by local law enforcement, by federal law enforcement, by administration, after administration. The Justice Department, through I think we counted four presidential administrations, failed these victims.

14:24Irene Casado Sanchez:Listen to Bleep with Ana Navarro as part of the My Cultura podcast network, available on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

14:39Irene Casado Sanchez:I'm June Grosso, inviting you to join me for the Bloomberg Law Podcast. Every weekday, we help you make sense of the legal stories that shape the nation and the world. Listen for complete analysis of the biggest court cases, the latest actions from Congress and regulators, and the legal moves driving the markets. From corporate law to constitutional law, and from state courts to the Supreme Court. At Bloomberg Law, we go beyond the day's headlines. We speak with top attorneys, judges, scholars, and policy experts to break down what the rulings really mean. We do this every weekday, then bring you the best conversations in our daily podcast.

15:19Irene Casado Sanchez:Search for Bloomberg Law on YouTube, Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else you listen. On the East Coast, listen as you start your day. And on the West Coast, catch up in the evening. That's the Bloomberg Law Podcast with me, June Grosso. Subscribe today wherever you get your podcasts.

15:43Eric Fan:Irana, Eric, in addition to looking at which companies were being paid to make and place these ads for the Department of Homeland Security, you also looked at where these ads were running and who might have been seeing them. So, Eric, what data did you look at to figure this out?

16:00Sarah Holder:So to figure out where the ads are running, how they're being targeted at different populations and audiences, we used Ad Impact Data, which is an ad tracking company. In total, we found over 92 ,000 ads across the country in all 50 states, over 1 ,000 TV stations. And this is only broadcast. There are also digital TV. There's cable TV. There are other formats. And these ads are absolutely everywhere. And the deportation ads, they are mostly targeted at the border states in the south and sanctuary cities in the north. And what we found was the targeting was not always consistent. For example, Georgia has a lot more undocumented immigrants compared to Nevada and Arizona.

16:58Sarah Holder:This is according to the DHS own estimates. However, the two Western states were bombarded by deportation ads where Georgia was largely ignored.

17:11Irene Casado Sanchez:I think what those numbers show is like there is a disconnection between where those ads were are and where DHS own estimates said that they're more illegal or undocumented immigrants, right?

17:29Sarah Holder:If you look at the media market that they target the recruitment versus deportation, Georgia is a prime example. That they are under-targeted by deportation ads, but over-targeted by ICE recruitment commercials. One commercial that specifically called out Atlanta police officers ran over a thousand times between September 29 and October 13, proclaiming, quote, you took an oath to protect and serve, but in sanctuary cities, your order to stand down where dangerous illegals walk free. And it's worth noting that there is a Georgia law that mandates local police officers to cooperate with ICE. And in fact, Trump's own Justice Department removed Atlanta from their list of sanctuary cities.

18:21Sarah Holder:So it's unclear to us why this ad that's super targeted at recruiting Atlanta police officers still said Atlanta was a sanctuary city, even after the administration's own Justice Department had removed the city from the list.

18:40Eric Fan:What does your analysis say about how effective they've been according to the metrics that the administration laid out? Let's start by talking about the ICE recruitment ads.

18:49Irene Casado Sanchez:So in order to better understand what was the impact of this campaign that is specifically targeting local police officers, we asked every police department at the top of our list. And what we heard from Miami, for instance, like they haven't been affected. Denver said the same to us, like we are not losing officers that are living to join ICE. And then the three other police agencies didn't respond. Or they said, we don't know if our officers that are actually leaving are leaving to join ICE forces. So it's unclear how effective is this campaign that is trying to convince local officers to join ICE.

19:37Sarah Holder:The department does put out a press release saying that the recruitment campaign went above expectation. They doubled the ICE officers' workforce, that it's been wildly successful. They did not respond to our question how much of that success can be attributed to the ICE campaign. What's interesting about the ICE recruitment ads is it seems to have avoided all the Spanish-speaking TV stations. And what former police chiefs and other experts have told us was historically, both ICE and CBP had made intentional efforts to recruit Spanish-speaking officers, given their work and the need to interact with undocumented immigrants, along whom speak Spanish.

20:25Eric Fan:I want to talk about the self-deportation ads as well. What impact have these ads had on immigrants who might be considering leaving the country and on their communities who are seeing these ads?

20:38Sarah Holder:The DHS claims over 2 million quote-unquote illegal aliens had left the country last year. But experts said that that number is likely a misinterpretation of survey data, that the real figures likely sit between 200 ,000 to 400 ,000. So we're talking about undocumented immigrants who are leaving as a result of this marketing campaign. And it's actually very hard to estimate the precise number. What the experts are saying is there are two factors at work here. It is possible that a lot of immigrants get scared and they hear this message and they are persuaded to leave. It's equally likely that a lot of them are persuaded to stay because they figure it will be harder to return once they leave under the current environment.

21:34Sarah Holder:What the experts told us was the vast majority of reduction in immigration that took place last year was the result of reduced inflow, meaning that much fewer people received visas to come in or cross the border because they were discouraged under the administration policies.

21:57Irene Casado Sanchez:We have done a lot of reporting, talking with immigration counselors, organizations, but also immigrants, both like documented and undocumented. And what we have here is like this campaign has created a lot of fear, a lot of anxiety. They have been feeling targeted. They thought that this is racist, the way that, you know, this is framed. And what we have heard is that this is especially problematic for kids that have been exposed to this kind of content. And they ask their parents, are you illegal? Are you a criminal? We have heard also about instances where children have been harassed because of this campaign.

22:47Irene Casado Sanchez:So we know that it's creating fear, anxiety, not sure, you know, if many people are combined to live. But what we know is like at least they're really suffering from the content of this campaign.

23:04Eric Fan:So in that way, these ads could have had a profound impact on some families. When did these ads get on the radar of lawmakers? And in what context did this issue come up in the congressional hearings? Back in March 2025, Benny Thompson, ranking member on the House Committee on Homeland Security, asked Christine Noem's office to provide all documentation and exchanges

23:35Irene Casado Sanchez:about this campaign. DHS never replied to Benny Thompson who sent another request back in November asking for the same documents any kind of communication related to the campaign DHS didn't reply in November also we saw a couple of letters from senators we have like a set of different congress people lawmakers asking about the campaign multiple times And DHS never responded to their questions about how this campaign started, how DHS picked the companies, how effective it was, and what was the involvement of some of Trump administration officials on picking the companies running those campaigns.

24:25Irene Casado Sanchez:We know that for the last couple of days, she was really being the center of attention during those hearings. I think her leadership was being questioned. I think she didn't provide the answers that confines, you know, even Trump. Especially Senator John Kennedy from Louisiana, that exchange where he singled this ad campaign out. How do you square that concern for waste, which I share, with the fact that you have spent$220 million

25:07Sarah Holder:running television advertisements that feature you prominently? Sir, the president tasked me with getting the message out to the country and to other countries where we were seeing the invasion come from, with putting commercials out that told them... He quibbled that the campaign was effective in promoting your own image. Chrissy Noam personally, she was heavily featured. All the deportation ads were narrated by Noam herself. She was very prominent. She was in front of camera most of the ad. At Mount Rushmore. One of them at Mount Rushmore. She was on a horse. And in almost all the deportation ads, she thanked Trump or complimented the president's immigration policy.

25:57Sarah Holder:And so you have Christine Noem personally very prominent in them. You have TV footage of aggressive ice tactics on the street. And you have President Trump signing bills, walking to meetings, saluting to officers, with Noam complimenting and thanking the president for his leadership.

26:20Eric Fan:So, Eric, what you're saying is, you know, these ads were not only effective in raising Kristi Noam's profile, but perhaps they were effective in raising Trump's as well.

26:29Sarah Holder:Yes, I mean, that was Noam's argument at the hearing. She said the president wanted me to do these ads and thank him in these ads. And that's exactly what she did. She thanked the president in pretty much every one of the deportation ads.

26:47Eric Fan:What do we know about how the president reacted to her claim that he had signed off?

26:53Irene Casado Sanchez:What we know is apparently he denied, or at least he didn't recall that happening in the same way that Kristi Noem described it.

27:02Sarah Holder:You know, allegedly Senator Kennedy had this conversation with the president, after which he said Noem is dead as a fried chicken.

27:14Eric Fan:This is The Big Take from Bloomberg News. I'm Sarah Holder. The show is hosted by me, David Gurra, and Wan Ha. The show is made by Aaron Edwards, David Fox, Eleanor Harrison Dengate, Patty Hirsch, Rachel Lewis-Kriske, Naomi Ng, Julia Press, Tracy Samuelson, Naomi Shaven, Alex Sugiura, Julia Weaver, Yang Yang, and Taka Yasuzawa. To get more from The Big Take and unlimited access to all of Bloomberg.com, subscribe today at Bloomberg.com slash podcast offer. Thanks for listening. We'll be back on Monday.

28:01Irene Casado Sanchez:I'm Anna Navarro, and on my new podcast, Bleep with Anna Navarro, I'm talking to the people closest to the biggest issues happening in your community and around the world. Because I know deep down inside right now, we are all cursing and asking what the bleep is going on. Every week, I'm breaking down the biggest issues happening in our communities and around the world. I'm talking to people like Julie K. Brown, who broke the explosive story on Jeffrey Epstein in 2018. The Justice Department, through we counted four presidential administrations, failed these victims. Listen to Bleep with Adam Navarro on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

28:43Sarah Holder:April 29th and 30th, Bloomberg House arrives in Miami at the Formula One Grand Prix.

28:49Irene Casado Sanchez:Set against one of the world's most electrifying sporting events, Bloomberg House brings business, investment, and culture together, powered by Bloomberg journalism, real-time data, and forward-looking conversations. From onstage discussions to exclusive networking with global leaders, this is where ideas connect. Bloomberg House Miami. Learn more at BloombergLive.com slash Bloomberg House Miami.

From the publisher

President Donald Trump fired Kristi Noem from her role as head of the Department of Homeland Security on Thursday. One of the reasons for Noem’s removal involved her oversight of a $240 million DHS ad campaign, starring herself. 

On today’s Big Take podcast, Bloomberg investigative reporters Eric Fan and Irene Casado Sanchez join host Sarah Holder to reveal the inside story of that ad blitz — and the ties between people in Trump’s orbit and the companies that were given millions to spend on it. 

Read more: Noem Ad Blitz Benefits Media Firms Linked to Trump Campaigns

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Big Take

All 364 episodes
The $240 Million Ad Campaign That Helped Get Kristi Noem FiredBig Take · 24 min
Listen in VO