Is Threads The Next Twitter Or Clubhouse 2.0? — With Zach Coelius

12 Jul 2023 · 59 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Big Technology Podcast Episode Notes

Episode Title

Is Threads The Next Twitter Or Clubhouse 2.0? — With Zach Coelius

Episode Summary In this episode of the Big Technology Podcast, host Alex Kantrowitz interviews Zach Coelius, managing partner at Coelius Capital. The discussion focuses on Threads, Meta's new app, exploring its potential as either a viable competitor to Twitter or another fleeting social media trend reminiscent of Clubhouse. Coelius shares insights on the app's user growth, its impact on Facebook's ecosystem, and the broader venture capital landscape, including challenges faced by investments during economic downturns.

Key Topics Covered

  1. Threads: Potential and User Growth
  2. User Growth: Threads reached over 100 million users rapidly but must be approached with skepticism. Coelius highlights that Facebook could easily inflate numbers through its existing user base.
  3. Comparison to Clubhouse: Both apps started with organic excitement but faced challenges with user retention and community quality. The concern is whether Threads can maintain its initial appeal or will be polluted by problematic content as it scales.
  4. Cannibalization of Facebook: The conversation raises the possibility that Threads could divert user engagement from Facebook and Instagram, thus affecting their overall performance.
  1. Implications for Twitter
  2. Threat to Twitter: Coelius suggests that Threads presents a significant threat to Twitter, especially if it attracts influential users away from the platform.
  3. User Engagement: The potential decrease in Twitter's audience could lead to greater impacts beyond mere numbers, decreasing engagement and overall value of the platform.
  1. Venture Capital Landscape
  2. Market Changes: Coelius discusses the shift in venture capital, noting increased difficulty in securing funding and the need for companies to show profitability.
  3. Performance of Investments: Coelius shares personal experiences with investments made during the boom, noting that many companies are now struggling to survive in the bear market.
  1. Challenges in Ad Tech
  2. MediaMath Bankruptcy: The episode touches on the recent bankruptcy of MediaMath, highlighting the competitive landscape of ad tech and the struggles of companies not aligning with the closed ecosystems of major players like Google and Facebook.

Key Takeaways

  • Cautious Optimism for Threads: While Threads has shown impressive growth initially, its long-term success relies on user engagement and maintaining a healthy community.
  • Impacts of a Bear Market: The venture capital environment has significantly changed, leading to more scrutiny of investments and a focus on profitability.
  • Evolving Ad Ecosystem: The challenges faced by MediaMath reflect the broader difficulties within the ad tech space, as the dominance of major tech companies creates barriers for smaller players.

Conclusion The podcast episode provides a nuanced view of the current landscape for social media apps, venture capital, and ad tech. With the rapid evolution of platforms like Threads and the economic challenges facing many startups, the discussion emphasizes the importance of sustainable growth and the potential consequences of market disruptions.

Additional Resources

  • For more insights, sign up for the pod newsletter on LinkedIn: [Big Technology Podcast Newsletter](https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6901970121829801984/)
  • Suggestions and feedback can be sent to: bigtechnologypodcast@gmail.com

Ratings & Reviews If you enjoyed this episode, please rate the Big Technology Podcast five stars in your podcast app of choice! ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00We've got so much news to talk about threads, the state of investing with someone who actually spends the money, and chaos in the ad tech ecosystem. my conversation with one of the best investors in the world coming up right after this. Capital One's tech team isn't just talking about multi-agentic AI. They already deployed one. It's called Chat Concierge, and it's simplifying car shopping. Using self-reflection and layered reasoning with live API checks, it doesn't just help buyers find a car they love. It helps schedule a test drive, get pre-approved for financing, and estimate trade and value.

0:38Advanced, intuitive, and deployed. That's how they stack. That's technology at Capital One. The truth is AI security is identity security. An AI agent isn't just a piece of code. It's a first-class citizen in your digital ecosystem, and it needs to be treated like one. That's why Okta is taking the lead to secure these AI agents. the key to unlocking this new layer of protection, and identity security fabric. Organizations need a unified, comprehensive approach that protects every identity, human or machine, with consistent policies and oversight. Don't wait for a security incident to realize your AI agents are a massive blind spot.

1:14Learn how Okta's identity security fabric can help you secure the next generation of identities, including your AI agents. Visit Okta.com. That's O-K-T-A dot com. LinkedIn presents.

1:31Welcome to Big Technology Podcast, a show for cool-headed, nuanced conversation of the tech world and beyond. Zach Coleus is our guest today. He's the managing partner at Coleus Capital. He is the friend of the podcast we've had him on in the past. Last time he told us he'd lost money on just one investment that he had made. Well, we're going to get an update on that and plenty more today. But first, we're going to talk about Threads. Zach, welcome to the show. Yeah, great to be back. Good to see you again. Great to see you too. Likewise. So are you on thread? You are on threads. I found your account.

2:02Of course. Yeah. Yeah. I think it's Z Coleus or Zach Coleus. I'm not used to promoting myself on Mark Zuckerberg property. Zuckerberg property. So what do we got here? Let's look it up because you know, got to get that out there. As you look it up, I want to definitely start with something that you said on threads, which I thought was pretty insightful and actually kind of picks up on what we were talking about last week with Alex Heath on the show. You wrote, I wonder how much this app cannibalizes Facebook Blue versus Twitter. It seems like it will be a material amount. So basically your thought is that, look, this is going to take energy away from flagship Facebook.

2:45I think it will take energy away from Instagram almost or as much or as much as it will take energy away from Twitter. Now I'm actually even more convinced that it's going to take energy away from Twitter. The thing is booming. I mean, 100 million users as of Monday, we're recording this Monday. Who knows what it'll be on Wednesday morning when we publish. Zach, what do you think? Yeah, I mean, I think there's a couple of parts there. One, the 100 million thing, everyone is excited about it and they're talking about it. But I think we have to be careful because Facebook could create 100 million users on a poop app if they wanted to.

3:21If they were like, we want to make this big, they could basically, because of their control of such a gigantic user base, they could move those people onto anything. So the question is, is how much of this is viral, organic, natural? People are excited. They're telling other people it's the movement of people to value in the product. And how much of this is just distribution? And we don't know, right? I have no idea. But I take the$100 million with a grain of salt when it comes to it being a Facebook property. Now, okay, I'll take it a grain of salt also, what Zuckerberg said, which is that they've done very little outside promotion.

3:58It's been mostly organic. So, okay, we're taking it. We also know he has personal animus with Elon Musk. So that's an important factor to consider. But that's it. Here's the counterpoint, right? Which is that Facebook has tried to create lots of standalone apps in the past. Many of them have failed. It tried basically a direct Snapchat competitor, and that didn't go anywhere. or it had an app called threads in the past, which was a direct message app and that didn't work. So like this, something is obviously working when you're in the app, you feel there is an energy there. Yeah. No, no, no, no questions.

4:28I just, I always like to like, to it's easy to basically look at a headline number and then just assume, assume things. And I think, you know, as we've learned in the past, those assumptions are not always correct. I think the other thing that I'm, I'm particularly interested in is like, you know, remember the early days of clubhouse and how unbelievably amazing it was and how the community was just like just astonishingly good and then very very quickly basically the grifters the information entrepreneurs the people who are hacking human biases the angry political voices came in and they destroyed that community.

5:11And so I think what's interesting is how long will the magic that is threads right now, like when I open threads, I don't see a lot of that garbage. Like I'm seeing my friends and I'm seeing interesting things and like it's valuable. There's not a lot of garbage in it. What happens when those folks show up en masse and start polluting the water? I don't know. I'll be very interested to see how it all plays out. So thinking it through, like the argument with Threads would be that Threads was, sorry, the argument with Clubhouse was that it was really a feature, right? This wasn't a standalone app, right?

5:52This was something that might exist within a Twitter. But now you have Threads. That's a proven format, right? It's a text-based app like Twitter.

6:03The thing is, though. I mean, I'm not a consumer pro. like I don't invest in consumer really so like you know take this with a fistful of salt like I'm not claiming to be an expert here but like I think if Clubhouse could have maintained the magic that was the early days that's not a feature that's magic that's that's that's a special thing that like at the end of the day I think what I think the thing that the mistake that a lot of people made including all the investors who dumped a shitload of money into it was that they thought the magic that was clubhouse was a function of the product that had been built and what instead that magic was the very careful audience curation that happened in the beginning and that's what made it magical and threads is magical right well i don't know if it's magical it's not clubhouse magical but it was like it's it's bad it's not polluted yet so like the question is is that lack of pollution is that sustainable uh or is it going to go away and i don't know and there's i think there's interesting questions around if there's algorithmic sort of tools that Facebook has developed to help keep it from becoming polluted, which makes sense.

7:12Like with AI now, you can do some really interesting stuff that you didn't use to be able to do before. It would make sense to me that Threads is basically largely build a next generation AI for filtering the feed that works. But I don't know. Yeah, I would assume the same thing as well. And one of the things that we saw in the early days of Clubhouse was that in any new social app, now people understand that there's kind of a land grab for audience at the beginning, which is why you would end up getting, you know, so many interesting people showing up at Clubhouse because, you know, they wanted to see what the experience was and they liked the experience, but also they were like, wait, I go on one of these, you know, conversations or one of these live Clubhouses.

7:51And next thing I know, I have 10 ,000 followers on this. And what's that worth? And it seems like the same thing is happening on threads where it's like, oh, there are large audiences up for grabs. So people are investing more than they necessarily should just to see if they can build that audience in the land grab. And I think you're totally right, Zach. The real question is what happens once, you know, that land grab starts to peter out and people say, is the audience that I have here worth the energy that I'm putting into versus the audience that I have on Twitter and LinkedIn or wherever it is?

8:23Yeah. Like, I mean, so like for instance, on LinkedIn, I have 140 ,000 followers on LinkedIn. like, you know, theoretically, that makes me a big shot. In reality, it's not really all that impactful. And my Twitter following is, you know, a fifth of that. And it's substantially more impactful in terms of like the value that I get out of it. And so we'll see what happens with threads. I assume what will happen is it just further dilutes the audiences across all the different platforms and further segments them. And so the value of threads will not be anywhere near as valuable as Twitter. Because that's my guess.

9:05But we'll see. Yeah, I didn't want to end this conversation or this side of the conversation without talking about that original thread that you posted, which is that you said basically that there's going to be cannibalization that will happen to Facebook properties. And you look at it. And by the way, I don't know if you've had this experience, but every time I open threads, it's an image or video. And every time I open And Instagram is the same thing. So, I mean, what are we trying now? They're compelling. I mean, obviously with Instagram, it's just images. Let's see what the... I mean, look, I moved it from the back of my apps to the front of my apps.

9:39Oh, actually, I have a text post at the top and then a link. So maybe this is not completely holding up. Yeah, I got one from three hours ago that's... Oh, it's a long text thing with an image. and then the next one is an image that looks very Instagrammy. Right. That's the theory here is that it's just going to look more and more like Instagram. And then does it sort of dilute the growth of Instagram? I mean, we spoke about it on Friday, but I'm curious what you think about it. Because you pointed that out right away as soon as you got on the app. Oh, yeah. I think there's the question I have, and I'm not an expert at this, and my friends who work at these big companies are a thousand times smarter than I am, is when you have sort of like large scale, like when you're really big, does the incremental cannibalization have larger than incremental consequences to the network effects of the property?

10:33So like, does losing 10 % of Facebook equal just 10%, Facebook's 10 % smaller and threads is 10 % bigger. And it's just like, it's just moving the sort of chairs around or is 10 % actually have a 15, 20, 30 % impact because of the lowered subsequent engagement for everybody and the lower value of the property because you've got 10 % is gone. So now it just starts to shrink as a result. The product becomes less useful. I mean, I think we all noticed that with Facebook Blue when they made the algorithm changes to allow politics and news And then it became this crazy fucking fucking Republican uncle thing.

11:16And then everyone was like, fuck this. And everyone left. And now my feed is a fraction of as interesting on Facebook as it used to be, you know, before they started to do that. You know, everyone moved to Twitter and Instagram. So I don't know. Maybe I don't. It's an interesting question. They have the data. I don't. Right. And it does seem, you know, it's like that if you lose 10 percent and you lose greater than that 10 percent on your network, It seems like Twitter is probably the most risk of that happening to it here. Yeah, I think this is a direct blow to Twitter and it will be. I mean, the thing is that even if it only carves off a portion of the Twitter audience and Twitter keeps a bunch of these other, like I'm assuming they're going to keep the sort of right wing folks will stay on Twitter.

12:01I'm assuming there'll be like certain groups that will stay on Twitter, but if they carve off a portion of that, then, you know, then it's the same, the same question is like, does 10 % equal a more than 10 % decline in the value? And for Twitter, I think, yes. Like if, if, if the interesting tech people gravitate over to threads and that's where they all go, I think Twitter is going to see a pretty significant hit from that. Monetization. So Facebook can make$40 per person on its platform. Snapchat makes$13 in a year. Now, Twitter's always struggled. I mean, we both come from the ad world, so we know what the story is.

12:43You need to have performance advertising, basically ads that compute to sales. And Twitter has always struggled to do that because its ad system has just been inferior, while Facebook's ad system has been much better in terms of optimization. Now, Mark Zuckerberg has said, okay, we're not going to turn on monetization until we're on the path to a billion users. I've heard from folks that, and this isn't, I don't really want to get too deep into the sourcing, but take this for what it's worth, that we could potentially see something like in Q4. That's when people are expecting it because that's when, you know, it's holiday season, advertisers are expecting, you know, or need places to put their money.

13:23And, you know, Facebook can now say we're a hundred million users in, there'll probably be 200 million users in at that point, it's time to turn this on. I mean, they could make a serious... So Twitter in its best year in 2021 made$5 billion. With Facebook's ad tooling and a similar user number, I mean, could you see four times that much? I mean, let's see why not. At the end of the day, this is exactly what Facebook is very, very good at monetizing, which is feed-based attention modality. And they've got the advertisers. They've got the ad formats. I mean, it's a one-for-one replacement for advertising on blue, for sure.

14:07Like identical, effectively. And very similar to a lot of Instagram elements. So I don't think they would have any problem making comparable revenues. I mean, at the end of the day, you have to remember these businesses, they're very strategic about when they want to utilize revenue opportunities like this to fill holes in other parts of the business. So if, you know, if they were still, if they're strong right now, which I don't know if they are, obviously they've gone through some really struggles since ATT. But if they're feeling strong, they want to hold this back to have it as, you know, a lever they can turn when they need it.

14:49When something else comes short and they can turn this lever to fill a hole. They're not feeling as strong, they'll monetize sooner. I don't know. I have no inside information. Yeah, it's very interesting. And of course, Twitter just hires Linda Yaccarino, who comes from NBC and is trying. Her whole thing is, I'm going to convince advertisers that this is a place where they can feel comfortable spending their money. And meanwhile, Elon is challenging Mark Zuckerberg to a, quote, literal dick measuring contest. And someone goes, at Linda Yaccarino, can you please help? And I'm like looking at that.

15:23I'm like, no, she can't. like she's not going to be able to it's almost like you know so i think aaron levy who's going to come on the show in a couple weeks he put the list of all the mistakes that elon's made and it's like this does seem to be the exact list of things that you'd want to do if you were like literally trying to destroy the platform you just bought but push back on me yeah i'm curious what you think I mean, look, I generally have felt like there's like the social media, by definition, creates this weird echo chamber feedback loop that causes humans to lose their goddamn minds. So like with Trump, we saw that like we'd see that over and over again.

16:08And I think with Elon, that's happening, right? I think in most circumstances, if we knew all the details of what was happening inside these companies and we paid as close of attention as we do to Elon and Trump, we would think the same things we think about Elon, regardless of the companies that are succeeding or failing. I just think that like the incentives are for the individuals as an ax to grind to push information out. And the individuals who have good information, you know, they don't really have the same incentive to like go out there and try to spread the word that things are actually good.

16:46And so you end up with a whole bunch of fucking losers spreading a whole bunch of crap to make the world seem horrible. And so and then the feedback loop is depressed. Just they eat that shit up. They love it. They're just suckers for it. And so like any individual with an axe to grind, they like they spread that shit. And I think it just leads to this really nasty feedback loop. And then the audience becomes very, very sort of convinced that that's the reality. Like, like, for instance, like you and I know, like when you think about ad tech, right? Like when we read what the press writes about ad tech, it's just like it's hot garbage.

17:24It's total garbage. They have no idea what they're talking about. They don't understand it technically. They don't understand it. They don't even understand the most basic concepts. Like they're just fucking wrong. And so then you're like, okay, this is like, these people are fucking stupid. And then you're like, you have to remember, okay, we know this is true for this. What level of relative insight do we think they have for everything else they write about? And the reality is probably not very much because they have to cover everything, right? Their job is to literally write about everything and to become experts in everything, which nobody is.

17:58And so then you have to just assume that they're effectively playing to their incentives. And their incentives are to get clicks. And the things that get clicks are outrage and playing into the human psyche and biases. And so so so therefore, to bring this all back, I think Elon has got a lot of bad press because everyone loves to hate on the guy. I think he also enjoys playing into that. I don't know why, but he does, it seems. But if I had to if I had to underwrite the whole thing, put money on it, I think the the the perception of Elon versus a reality is very far apart, almost by definition, I'm sure.

18:40and i bet you the perception is skewed dramatically worse than the reality is and i think that then i think we'll be surprised i i'm not i don't i'm not i don't have enough information to know if what's going to happen but like i think on average people are usually surprised in these instances when things work out better than they thought they would yeah okay well now i'm gonna say my thing because you know i i think that first of all with i don't want to spend the whole podcast talking about this. We have so much good stuff to get to, but I feel like we should, we should at least like take a moment to talk about it.

19:12So first of all, I think that, that yes, like when you work in a industry and you read press reports about it almost all the time, you're rolling your eyes. And I think that's, that's certainly bad and true. I think that there are some reporters that are good and they, and we know them from in the ad tech world. And I think when people specialize, then they can actually get stuff right as opposed to, but what we're talking, what we were talking about in this past bit of conversation, which is like, you have like, and I'm not going to, well, I'm going to pick on the guardian. Like you'll have like a journalist from the guardian who tries to explain like real-time bidding and like talks about how it's evil.

19:47And you like read that and you know anything about real-time bidding and you're like, just burn it, just burn, you know, print this out on a paper and burn it. You should not be writing about this stuff. So yeah, those generalists, they definitely bring the whole profession down now in terms of like the way that the press is um handling elon like yeah definitely i think the press is telling a story of elon that's worse than what it is but this is the thing that gets lost and it often is like as a user you can tell like you can tell sometimes that the product is when you're using a product for a decade no doubt it was a hot mess but it's it's almost unusable now and i'll just point to some of the decisions oh really it's dramatically worse what is it what's worse in your opinion i think that all right i'll just go back to the um the coup with uh in russia with progosian or the insurrection mutiny whatever you want to call it yeah yeah i just wanted to know who the reporters were on the ground in russia on the ground there there are no reporters on the ground in russia there i mean good reporter in russia they put in jail yeah yeah no i know we spoke about him on last last wednesday show yeah um okay but let me say like the people who are like you know the reporters on the ground in ukraine or the people who are actually reporting on this in the living i i wanted to see that blue check next to them yeah but it was much harder to figure out who they were it took longer it did it was less useful why do you think that's twitter's fault because they removed the blue check mark from the all every reporter and it's like blue check sorry did you used to be blue check yeah i don't it doesn't matter about me i'm talking i don't care i think i think i think what's interesting is i think it's i think it's always interesting to call out to try to identify our own biases even if we don't think that they impact us right because the thing that's that's um they're real i think they're very real so our biases yeah yeah yeah you have a bias so all right let's all right let's say even if that's the case given that's playing in here like yeah you do twitter is a news and information source so i just want to know who's reporting and i'm not going to say if i see a blue check mark next to them i'm not saying i trust them look i agree with you the argument is a good argument i don't disagree with the argument the but the counter argument right which is twitter needs to figure out how to separate who is a real person from above they have to do that that's the only way to basically take twitter to the next level.

22:13Otherwise, the fucking Anons and doing it with the legacy blue check system was not working. It was not working. And so the idea, the big idea was, great, let's get the users to pay a little bit of money and then use that money to fund making more money from the platform. And if we get all the users to do that, it will work. And that's an idea. That idea didn't work. I assume and and and by the way in the process we can kill all these fucking blue checks that that elon thinks is a bunch of stuck up little bitches which you know whatever uh so like i assume that they're going they tried it they failed they're gonna go try it again i mean if elon is good at anything it's trying it failing and doing it again he's done that over and over and over and again he's good at that like he's he's learned how to do that better than almost anyone in the world so like i assume that's what's happening now we'll see i mean maybe not but he's also got a you know a workforce that massively destabilized and i don't know how well they can execute relative to his needs and now he has zuck with his you know fucking beating about the face that he's got he's got a real hard road yes he does challenging yeah but i think the blue check thing was a risk potentially, you know, that they, they, they, they, they took unclear if that will work.

23:36There's so much better ways to have done it though. If they were trying to get to what your aim is, just connect a credit card, pay a cent. That's it. Sure. Look, the$8 thing and the same blue check mark and the execution of it. This is the thing. The, the, the reality that we're discussing right now versus the reality of actually building the product. So if we were at the company and we had access to all the data and we had access to all the things that's ever been tried and we had the team and we made the decisions that we made, I guarantee you the difference between what we're talking about right now and what they have is the same difference between the Guardian writing about RTB and what we actually know the difference is.

24:18So we are morons relative to the person in the seat making the decision. And so when we have the conversation about, well, they could have just done it this way. Generally, I have to take that with a huge fistful of salt. Yes. We are the guardian. No, I disagree with that. I really do. I know you do, but you're wrong. We are the guardian. I've been inside a tech company also. So I understand the constraints that exist, but you can also see like at the end of the day, like you, you are what you do, right? Like you're, you are. And that's the product that they produce. Like these are early to judge.

24:52yes anyone based on the consequences the outcomes that they have at twitter you mean like elon blew up four rockets three or four rockets on the pad before he built like the most valuable company in the fucking world like like the failures in the process are just part of the process and so like for the fucking people in the stands to sit up there being like me look at him fail like fuck that that's bullshit like like in in like a few years we can look back and we can say oh he's a failure great in a few years i'm happy to do that but until then i my belief is like it it's just a bunch of fucking people in the stands yelling about shit they don't actually know about okay i think that like saying elon no no no it's okay by the way like zach like this is why we're here like you're on the show because i know we're gonna have a good conversation and on this show, I don't want any, like we shouldn't hold back.

25:49Like we should have a real discussion about it when it comes to this. I don't know how to hold back. No, it's good. It's good. As much as I probably should learn how to do it. No, no. I mean, I'll do it in places other than this forum because this is good. No, I'm enjoying this, right? This shouldn't be a conversation that's held behind closed door or being polite. Like let's actually get to the heart of the matter. There's no other way to address it. So that's a fun part. I'm just going to say one last thing about this. Then we go to the next thing or then I'll give you the last word. Then we go to the next thing, which is that like, if you're a user of a product and the product gets worse, you're totally within your rights to say, I wish the product was not bad.

26:23Absolutely. Cool. I'm point of agreement. If you're on that first SpaceX rocket, the company that put the satellite on, I think there's a company that put the satellite in the third one. Yeah. The third or fourth, I don't remember which one it was that blew up. They were very unhappy. Oh, you know who it was? It was Meta. Mark Zuckerberg was. furious about it this is so meta this is beautiful it was it was it was it was it was and maybe this all comes back to like zuck was mad and elon was like suck it bitch that's how rockets work and zuck's held that grudge ever since maybe that's it sometimes it's the simplest explanation that makes that occam's razor exactly that's fair yes you're right it was meta beautiful Zach Coleus is with us.

27:11He's the managing partner at Coleus Capital. First half, all about threads in Twitter. Second half, promise you'll be equally as good. We're going to talk a little bit about investing, a bit about what's real and what's not in AI, and then craziness in the ad tech world, which we know and love and we'll talk about. Back right after this. Shape the future of enterprise AI with Agency. A-G-N-T-C-Y. Now an open source Linux Foundation project, Agency is leading the way in establishing trusted identity and access management for the Internet of Agents, a collaboration layer that ensures AI agents can securely discover, connect, and work across any framework.

27:52With Agency, your organization gains open, standardized tools and seamless integration, including robust identity management to be able to identify, authenticate, and interact across any platform, empowering you to deploy multi-agent systems with confidence, join industry leaders like Cisco, Dell Technologies, Google Cloud, Oracle, Red Hat, and 75-plus supporting companies to set the standard for secure, scalable AI infrastructure. Is your enterprise ready for the future of Vigentic AI? Visit agency.org to explore use cases now. That's A-G-N-T-C-Y dot O-R-G. Capital One's tech team isn't just talking about multi-agentic AI.

Read the full transcript

28:36They already deployed one. It's called Chat Concierge, and it's simplifying car shopping. Using self-reflection and layered reasoning with live API checks, it doesn't just help buyers find a car they love. It helps schedule a test drive, get pre-approved for financing, and estimate trade in value. Advanced, intuitive, and deployed. That's how they stack. That's technology at Capital One.

29:08And we're back here on Big Technology Podcast with Zach Colias. He's the managing partner at Colias Capital. And in 2020, mid-2020, he tweeted this. The traditional J-curve and early-stage venture is currently non-existent. Usually companies without traction die early and winners take times. Over the last five years, I have invested in 63 companies. So far, only one has been a loss. One, even the lowest performers get funded. There is so much money chasing companies right now. Literally everything is getting funding. Any idiot with a checkbook, myself included in our sector, looks like a genius right now.

29:45We can argue about the cause and the potential outcome, but we can't argue that the beta only has one direction up. So here we are in 2023. The world has changed a little bit. so give us an update yeah it's that we were we were oh man it's so good it was so easy i raised my last fund in 2021 and um like literally it had been like it had been six years of 50 compounding rr every year i mean and i mean i looked like a genius we all looked so smart i wrote my fund it took three weeks to raise in zoom only and never only in zoom no in-person meetings three weeks people were committing on the first call uh it was like i was it was beautiful ah so good yeah we all looked so smart yeah it was great uh yeah it's like wild coyote you know it's like you know it's running running running running running and then just ran off the cliff and now while the coyote is like hanging in midair and we're all like oh how far do we have to fall yeah so uh we had one other company go out of business since then so now i've got two two dead two dead bodies to my record um but we i mean god we're dodging bullets left and right uh i had a company that i was convinced was going to fail last fall that somehow managed to scrape together around and now they're they're doing okay but it was like It was a slog.

31:17I have another company right now that is fighting tooth and nail to stay alive. And it's challenging. And yeah, I mean, literally before the bear market began a year and a half ago, I mean, I would have multiple exits a year and every company would effectively mark up every year. And now it's, I haven't seen a carry check, new carry check in a year and a half. Okay. Being a VC right now in a bear market is a much harder job. It's still a fraction as hard as being an entrepreneur. Like being an entrepreneur is 10 times harder or more. It's so much harder. Your job's harder than being a VC. Like this job is not that hard.

32:09You can make it as hard as you want to. Like you can, like if you want to work 80 hours a week, you can, but you don't have to. Um, uh, and there's diminishing returns, which a lot of people don't talk about in BC, but like, it's still an easy job relative, but it's much harder than it was. Yeah. Back when everything went up. I mean, literally everything, every, yeah. Yeah. It's crazy. What do you mean there's diminishing returns? Oh, so what happens in BC is that, um, about 80 % of that value in the job comes from about 20 % of the work. And then anything you do beyond that, it's kind of like you're pushing a rope.

32:46And that's why you see so many VCs on Twitter and so many VCs writing thought pieces, which are actually garbage and doing stuff that like they're kind of trying to get out in the ecosystem to like raise their name recognition. but it's the value of it is de minimis because the real value comes from people who you've built relationships with over a long period of time that they trust you and they come to you first before they come to anyone else. They're like, Hey, I got this thing. And you're like, great. Um, uh, like, so I'll give you an example. Uh, it'll play into our next segment. Um, so there's an entrepreneur, uh, I had funded, uh, 2017, 16, 2017, 2017, probably.

33:30Uh, and he He built AI for drive-thru restaurants. So, you know, you go to McDonald's and you're like, hey, I want hamburger and fries. And McDonald's bought the company. And it was a great outcome for everyone. We're all super happy. And then so in 2021, he's like, he gets free and he calls me up. He's like, I'm free. And I'm like, I'm in. I mean, my check is here. You just tell me what the price is going to work out to be. And then in November of 21, he comes back to me. He's like, well, I've got good news about this. the good news is we raise a shit ton of money the bad news is the price is crazy high and i'm like you're you're a pro i'm in like i said it was in i'm in um and so then during 2022 i was like god i'm an idiot like i top ticked the market like my the first check from my new fund my lps are like god he's an idiot um and then then the product came out in um 20 uh this this last 2020 the end of 2022 so like you know six months ago and um it's so good it's it's literally lm's generative ai for call centers so you know you call the airline you call hotel and it's better than a human demonstrably better than a human it literally like it speaks whatever language you speak it speaks at whatever speed you speak at it speaks whatever accent you need to speak in and it answers on the first ring so it can go from one to a million agents concurrently so literally you call an airline you're never going to wait on hold ever again waiting on hold will be like dialing a phone like we talk about dialing a phone like most kids don't even understand what that dialing a phone means but like but literally like they're waiting on hold will be in the english language will be just as antiquated as dialing a phone in within a few years um you'll never wait on hold again.

35:19And so it's like, and then the great part is, is like, like that entrepreneur is so good. That company is going to be such a big outcome that like, you know, I didn't have to do a lot of work to get that, just have this relationship that I've had with that guy for over a decade and do the work in that process, um, to be in that position. Um, so it's like one of the great things about VC is that you just, you're, you're effectively harvesting the, the, the labor that's been put in, in the previous years. So one of the, so in the good times, right, you invested in these companies and they kind of, you know, they kept going and now it seems like, tell us a little bit about like what's going on now, like the companies that you funded during the good times, like, are they like, you know, kind of at the end of their runway and trying to raise again and struggling or are they like if they batten down the hatches and laid off a bunch of people to get profitable and survive what's the sort of state of startups right now i mean all of the above the good news is is that like the majority of my portfolio generates a lot of cash we do i think we do north of i think it's 800 million in revenue across all the companies in the portfolio now like it's just like it's a lot of money coming through those companies so like But the vast majority of them, at least from a revenue perspective, are doing fine.

36:43They've just had to batten down the hashes. And they've found that the growth has slowed. And as their growth has slowed, they've had to cut back and stop spending as much. So then their growth has slowed more. So that feedback loop and then all the other companies in the ecosystem are doing the same thing. And a lot of I invest in B2B software companies. And so they largely will often sell to other startups. And so you've seen this sort of like sort of like feedback loops on feedback loops, which is that like companies stop spending on growth. So they stop growing and then they stop spending on software from other people.

37:17So then they stop buying and then vice versa. And so the whole ecosystem has basically deflated as a result of no more free money in the ecosystem. Growth has slowed down. That's, you know, that's normal. That's part of what a bear market is. It weeds out a lot of the companies that were playing company and pretending to be real things. And then it weeds out a lot of these companies, a shit ton of these companies that the VCs were funding with a bunch of dumb money and that were all just fueled by dumb money. And those companies are going out of business. Thankfully, I don't invest in that shit.

37:50So, like, I'm not getting hit yet with that. But the whole ecosystem is getting hit. And so everything is going down. And so, you know, the companies of mine that are, that have not yet found revenue at scale, they're in a tough spot. Like they have to find product market fit or they die. And what about the markdowns? Like, is that also becoming a thing that a lot of the companies that you're working on are doing? We have a company that did a markdown recently. you know that's at the end of the day there's a couple different ways it can work out one way is is you can have what's called a pay-to-play situation the way a pay-to-play works is they go to all the investors and they're like hey guess what you need to invest at this price usually it's a reasonable price you need to invest x amount of money or your holdings will be diluted by 90%.

38:48So before you own 1 % of the business, if you don't invest now in this round, pay to play, you're going to lose 90 % of your investments. So now you're going to own one 10th of 1 % of the business, massive dilution unless you invest. So there's pay to play. I haven't had a pay to play happen yet in my portfolio. Thankfully, they're in good shape, but like I, it could happen. It's possible. Um, and then, then you just have to re underwrite the company. You have to go in, you look at how they're doing. You talk to the, you talk to the customers, you talk to the team, you're like, okay, do I want to re underwrite this company at this price?

39:26Yes or no. It's just a decision that gets made on the spot. Um, and then you have down rounds, which are company goes out and they try to raise money and the money that they're trying to raise is, um, uh, at a lower price than they would have raised before. And the problem with down rounds is that you end up with this situation where the existing investors have an incentive to play chicken with the new investors. So I'll give you an example. We had a down round right at the beginning, actually, of 2022. So right at the beginning of the bear market. And the founder had gone out and tried to raise money and tried to raise money and failed, failed, failed, failed, failed.

40:05And he was on bad terms with his existing investors. It was a weird, weird, weird dynamic. And the new investor comes in. It's like, I want to invest in the company. But as soon as you have bad terms with your existing investors, fuck them. I want them to take a 90 % write down. So a total cram down of existing investors. And the existing investors were like, fuck it. Shut it down. Just shut down the whole business. They're playing chicken because they knew that they could get a better deal than that. that the, and, but, but their leverage was to just shut down the whole business. And so the entrepreneur calls me up and it's like literally crying, like, oh, this is bad.

40:43What the fuck? Like, I'm trying to save the company here. And I'm like, dude, this is a negotiating posture. This is how it's going to work. And then the new investor is like, why am I even bothering with this? Like, what are you doing? And I'm, I'm a reasonably big size shareholder in this company. I, I mean, I had maybe like 500 invested in this company. and so like it's enough that i care so and i call the existing investor how much invested what's that how much did you have invested in 500k okay yeah um so like it's enough that like you don't want to lose that yeah well i mean this is my job right like right so you know the current the current portfolio is about 100 million of deployed capital um so like i have to spend my time accordingly and you you want to spend it on the winners not the losers and so you you know When there's a write-off occurring, that is what it is.

41:32So in this instance, I go to the existing investor. I'm like, hey, there's got to be a way we can work this out. And so this ends up being six weeks of phone calls between these three parties with me being the mediator trying to get this thing sorted out. And of course, it's sorted out exactly where you thought it would, like at a middle ground that's fair that everyone was happy with. And we all took some dilution and the new investor got to dilute us and everything got sorted out. And now the company seems to be doing okay. But like these down rounds are like just incredibly time consuming. Like it's just a real, because this chicken that gets played between the existing investor and the new investor, the leverage that they both have is simply to be a stick in the mud.

42:18And so then you end up with this very complicated dynamic that's very time consuming. and so when that happens, it's painful, very painful. Now, I wonder a little bit about AI because like there's been this moment and we spoke about this with Elliot Brown last week, but there's been this moment where like people say AI and all of a sudden it seems like it's brought back like the roaring, you know, 2020, right? And now it's like, well, how much of this is actually investable? There's been reports that like actually interest in chat GPT is going down. I had it on Google Trends. Some people had it on like the actual web traffic to this stuff.

42:53So I'm kind of curious, like, are you seeing, so you mentioned the call center application. That's very interesting. Are you seeing like real and practical uses of this latest wave of generative AI? And can you share a few examples? Yeah, yeah, no, I mean, I've seen quite a few. I'm a real believer in what I'm seeing. It's not perfect. It's not magic. It It doesn't solve all the world's problems and it won't invent, you know, an endless tub of ice cream that we can always have just sitting in front of us. It just automatically replenishes. Not yet anyway. But it doesn't, it is powerful. So, for instance, I have another company in the business process outsourcing space.

43:35So they basically, they take things that were done by humans in the Philippines and in India before and they automate them. And it's like, it's better. It's demonstrably better than what they were getting before. It's cheaper. What type of processes do they automate? Um, they're not very public, so I'm not gonna, okay. I'm not gonna talk about what. Like I used to report on this company. Oh, what's it called? Names escaping me right now, but it's, uh, they, they, yeah, they did robotic process automation. Is it similar to that type of stuff? Similar in a way. It's different. This is, this is different in its own way, but they're, but yeah, there's, there's some similarities, but, but the end, the end result is, is that AI makes that better.

44:14You know, for the call center thing, AI makes that better. um for i have another company called fireflies you might know they do um uh they do your zoom calls they basically transcribe your zoom calls and they turn them into action items and and i mean fireflies is i mean ai has made they got early access to gbt4 and i mean god that product got it was already good and it got really good like people are if you're not using fireflies right now for your zoom calls you're making a mistake so wait what does it do it just transcribes and then gives you like some notes and action items? Yeah, so it transcribes the entire call, figures out what you discussed and then creates all of your follow-ups and action items and it can push information into your CRM.

44:57Like it does, it's, I mean, if you're a professional and you're doing calls that have anything that you need to keep track of and you're not using Fireflies, you are literally making a mistake. Yeah, the company that I was thinking of again is UiPath. Yeah, UiPath, of course, yeah. Romanian company, amazing company. Great, yeah. yeah, no, no, UiPath is great. But AI has taken that whole market and really dramatically increased the performance of the products. And so if you think about that, at the end of the day, all software products are, they're like tools to help people do their jobs better.

45:32And when you make those tools better, then people can basically get better outcomes and they become more efficient and the world becomes a better place. And so broadly, I think AI is, it's a big, big monster, awesome trend. And we're seeing a lot of consequences. When it comes to the consumer use case, like ChatGPT as a consumer use case, I still prefer to search and read the source materials versus go just ask the question of ChatGPT. I find the answers are kind of weak. They're just sort of soft and they don't have an edge to them that I find interesting. and I don't understand the conflicts between the various different positions on a subject.

46:19It's just like, oh, here's the answer. And then you go read the source material and you're like, well, it might be the answer, but it just seems like it's sort of the mismatch center. Like it's just like, take all this, mash it together and come up with the most probabilistically sort of vanilla answer we can get. So I have not found, ChatTPT has not become like one of my main go-to sources, but that's just me personally. And I'm not a consumer investor, so I don't have a good sense of like where consumers are thinking about it from a personal use case. Yeah. And it's just one of those stories where the data is also just like very instructive, I think, in terms of like, all right, well, less people visiting.

46:53I mean, I know they did release an app, but I don't see it very high in the app store. So where are you on product? I mean, you're doing AI business software. Where are you in terms of productivity and jobs? Do you think that this is going to be something that helps create jobs? or well i mean take the call center one right good example um when that happens the pace that it will happen at will be so fast i i think it will be massively destabilizing like so think about if you're an airline and when when you know when united rolls out you know this company's solution um any other airline that doesn't have it within 12 months is going to be like they're screwed.

47:37I mean, I'm not going to do business with an airline that doesn't answer on the first ring. Like, and like, I get that now because of status. And like, when I have to deal with that airline that doesn't have that, I'm like, ah, I can't handle this. And so now every airline will be able to provide first ring better than a human AI call center. So they're all going to change very rapidly, right? They're all going to switch. And all those jobs are going to disappear overnight. Like, I mean, you're 90 % of those jobs, give or take, will be eliminated. And when you do that across all the call centers in the world, it's very destabilizing.

48:15So what happens to society in that case? I mean, look, long-term, I think the, oh, these tools make us more productive and increases economic benefit and everyone's going to be happy. Short-term, that's the problem, is that like technology now is speeding up the rate of disruption and destabilization. And I don't think people handle that. Humans don't handle these things well. They go fucking crazy. And so like when you take all the call centers in the Philippines and you lay them all off all at once, that's going to be a big problem. Yeah. So when you read Mark Entry since, will AI save the world, I say?

48:53Well, he's got to... At the end of the day, do I want a world where we create things like AI to make us more productive and smarter? Yes. Do I think most of the doomers are idiots? Yes. So I largely align with Marc Andreessen. But at the end of the day, like. There's nuance in the middle. Am I afraid of the consequences of AI in terms of destabilizing human systems? Absolutely. am I afraid of AGI in the long term? Yeah. It's not a zero. Like there's a real risk of like long-term, long-term AI cataclysm. That's, that's, that's not zero. And like two or three years ago, before, you know, we came out with LLMs and generative AI, the number was a fraction of what it is now in terms of like that risk number.

49:47And, you know, on the other hand, humans are just so stupid that like if you leave us to our own devices, like we i'm more scared of humans and nuclear war and global catastrophe as a result of the way that we treat this planet than i am that much more scared of that than i am of of of of agi destroying all the humans so therefore we either we have to we have to become smarter or we're going to destroy ourselves because we're so stupid yeah i'm in the same camp um okay so let's talk about media math media math is one of the most important ad tech companies i think of the last 10 years and they just completely went bankrupt and they're shutting down.

50:25And it's just an interesting story to me because like the way I think about it, if MediaMath can't make it, then nobody can make it. Well, that's not true. TradeDesk is a large public company. But they are the only survivor really from that. Well, there's TradeDesk. I mean, at the end of the day, what happened to my company, Trigit, was the very beginning of the emergence of this sort of like duopoly or triopoly, which is Facebook, Google, and I guess Amazon, they just crushed the open ecosystem. And if you're an advertiser, you have to work with them. And if you were a supplier of tools for advertising on the open ecosystem, you got your ass handed to you.

51:16Trade Desk has done very well to navigate that and they built a big business. but otherwise everyone else is dead so what do you think unless you do you play in the sort of gray areas there's lots of money to be made in the gray areas like if you're if you're comfortable with ethically and morally unclear things and there's plenty of money to be made in those areas yeah so what are the um morally unclear things oh well i mean if you want to advertise products that google won't let you advertise google won't take your money there's people who will take your money. And so if you're willing to use tactics and strategies that Google or Facebook is uncomfortable with to get users to engage with ads, and there's lots of ways to do that.

51:59In the old days, it was pop-ups and pop-owners and it was spam. And there's lots of ways to advertise in ways that are ethically and morally dubious, but that make a lot of money. There's advertisers who will be more than happy to fund those ads. There's lots of ways to make money in the ad ecosystem um just you know are you building equity value in those businesses no but you can put a lot of cash in your pockets yeah i have friends who have big yachts from that shit right what do you think happened with media math in particular was it just that there was only room for one or were there strategic mistakes there uh i i think the um it's it was a challenging it look if the ecosystem had stayed open i think a lot of us would have succeeded and done well and had great outcomes When the ecosystem became closed, the number of chairs in the game of musical chairs evaporated and it became very challenging.

52:54Like, remember, the beginning days of those of us who were the sort of original DSPs. So there was MediaMath, there was Churn, there was DataZoo, there was TradeDesk. And for those who are listening, that's the systems that you would buy ads with. Yeah. So MediaMath is what's known as a demand side platform. It's a tool for advertisers to buy ads out across the ecosystem. And when it first came out back when... So we all kind of built on this concept of real-time bidding being sort of a way to buy and sell advertising. And we all... Some came before that and pivoted into it. Some of us kind of pivoted into that once we saw that.

53:36But that was sort of the gun, the starting gun going off to become sort of the future of the open advertising ecosystem. And we all kind of bet on that. And so in the beginning, there was this group of us who were there. Invite, they were smart, super smart. They got bought right away for a nice outcome. And then they went to go build a multi-billion dollar business. So those guys are great. Awesome. And then of the bunch of us, MediaMath was really the only one left besides TradeDesk. Now, a bunch of new entrants have come in subsequently. And that market has remained a very hot mess in a lot of different ways.

54:14But yeah. So it's largely the, when you say open and close, so it's largely just the big tech companies that came in and closed the ecosystem effectively. We went apps and they figured out how to do the monetization there. And that's what happened. Well, so for instance, with Facebook, before Facebook went public, they missed their Q4 because their ad platform was complete garbage. Like they had, they had designed it wrong. and they, at that point in time, and there's a great book by this, Antonio Garcia Martinez wrote this book, Chaos Monkeys, about this whole journey. And he wrote about, we were in that, about part of this whole process.

54:51He wrote the book. It's a good book. And, but what happened was, is they missed their Q4 because they had built their ad platform wrong. They just didn't, just didn't understand how to build it the way it should have been. And then they, Zuck goes to the ads team and he's like, guys, what are we going to do? And he's like, give me your 10 best ideas. And one of the ideas was to open up the Facebook ecosystem to allow independent companies to manage the advertising and target the advertising on Facebook for advertisers. And so Zuck said to the ad team, great, do all your ideas. And that was one of them.

55:26And so then the ad team came to companies like us and were like, hey, you guys want to buy ads on Facebook? So it's an open ecosystem. Like we were allowed to participate in that ecosystem. And we were like, absolutely. We're there with Bellson. And, you know, my business went, we made it work. Like literally the click-through rates when we were first advertising on Facebook. So before we got in there, they were lucky to get one click for every 3 ,000 ads. So you run 3 ,000 ads, you get one click. and they were making pennies per thousand ads as a result. We were able to 100X that, literally 100 times more efficient and effective.

56:08And so instead of getting one click for every 3 ,000 ads, we were getting 30 clicks for every ad. Like we crushed it because we had built good tools that targeted the right ads, the right people at the right time for things that they wanted. So you go to booking.com and you're looking for a hotel in Sao Paulo. And we were like, hey, here's a hotel in Sao Paulo. Here's the price. Here's the dates you're looking for. And people clicked on those and they bought those. And so the ad prices that we were able to pay Facebook went up by a dramatic number. So now Facebook sees this and their ads start to take off.

56:43Their business starts to take off. And they're like, holy shit, this is how we do it. And so then there's this big meeting that happened between Cheryl and the ads team. I don't think Zuck was there, but there's a big group of them that get together and they're like, okay, do we stay open and let all these independent providers buy media for the advertisers? Or do we fuck all those guys, build the tools ourselves, and close and go direct so the advertisers have to buy from us directly? They chose to go direct and to become a closed ecosystem. So I have a scar across my belly from one side to the other from getting gutted by Facebook as a result of that decision.

57:20And my business, I mean, we literally went from a million in revenue to 30 million in revenue in 12 months. And we had 300 million in revenue on the books. Like we were like, we would have blown it out if they had stayed open, but they went the other direction. They killed it. How was that? And so the whole ecosystem has largely done that. So Google has done that. Facebook has done that. Amazon has done that. They've all kind of become very closed. Okay. Last question for you. Still living in San Francisco. I am currently still in San Francisco. No, Miami plans on the books. Oh no, no. Miami's never been my jam.

57:53um i mean i'm i'm deeply deeply deeply frustrated with this city i'm deeply frustrated by the idiocy that they have driven the city into the ground um it's choppy right now there's there's there's there's hints of of goodness again and it's they're cleaning up they're doing a good job cleaning up parts of it but like i mean they they literally destroyed this city and it's going to take years years to grind our way through this um the big the big question for me is what happens in the next election like if the voters of san francisco are like oh we want more of this i've become very depressed and dispirited if the voters of san francisco are like okay enough of this let's get rid of these idiots that like are just like i mean these these these these there's ideologues run the city and they just do stupid things after stupid thing after stupid thing and And it's like the voters, they put up with more of this.

58:48It's going to be bad. Well, I'll be there in 10 days. So maybe you and I can have a coffee. It would be nice to see you in person. Come have coffee in my hood and I'll show you around. That'd be great. Zach, thanks so much for joining. Great to see you. Oh, my pleasure. Great to see you too. Awesome. Thanks everybody for listening. Thank you, Nate Gwatney, for handling the audio LinkedIn, for having me as part of your podcast network. And once again, to all of you, the listeners, if you've been listening for a while, want to give us a rating on Spotify or Apple podcast, that would be awesome. If you're a new listener and want to hit subscribe, we do these flagship interviews every Wednesday.

59:18And then we break down the news on Friday. On Friday, Ranjan Roy is back with us. We're going to cover everything that's happened this week. You don't want to miss it. All right. Thanks again for listening. We'll see you next time on Big Technology Podcast.

From the publisher

Zach Coelius is the managing partner at Coelius Capital. He joins Big Technology Podcast for a conversation about Threads' real potential, asking whether it's a redux of Clubhouse — destined to fizzle — or a real threat to replace Twitter. In this conversation, we cover Threads' potential, Elon's effort at Twitter, and whether we can really make assessments from the outside. Stay tuned for the second half where we discuss the venture capital environment and how Coelius' investments are performing. We also look at the demise of MediaMath, a once-leading ad-tech company that just went bankrupt.
---
Enjoying Big Technology Podcast? Please rate us five stars ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ in your podcast app of choice.
For weekly updates on the show, sign up for the pod newsletter on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6901970121829801984/
Questions? Feedback? Write to: bigtechnologypodcast@gmail.com

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More from Big Technology Podcast

All 399 episodes
Is Threads The Next Twitter Or Clubhouse 2.0? — With Zach Coelius Big Technology Podcast · 59 min
Listen in VO