In short
Dick Costolo discusses the likely IPO “run” for SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic, what public-market expectations will do to each company’s quarterly performance, and how narrative/communication matters as much as numbers. He also comments on Meta’s current AI/social strategy and internal morale during repeated layoffs.
Guests
Dick Costolo (former Twitter CEO; partner at O1 Advisors; co-host on The Nick, Dick, and Paul Show). The episode also references ServiceNow executives from a separate segment: Amit Zaveri (President and CPO), Jackie Canney (Chief People and AI Enablement Officer), and Kelly Romack (Chief Digital Information Officer), plus Ulta Beauty deployment context.
Key claims
Public companies face stock-price turbulence tied to metrics (e.g., Twitter’s MAU); IPO hype can be far greater than reality, creating a rough earnings cycle. SpaceX’s Elon narrative and small float may sustain extreme valuations. OpenAI’s IPO will be scrutinized more because of large, specific compute/training commitments versus current revenue/profitability. Anthropic may be “most middle of the road” due to enterprise focus and consistent Claude Code perception.
Notable examples
Twitter’s MAU sensitivity; Figma’s post-IPO valuation whiplash; SpaceX “Starlink” and “data centers in space” timeline skepticism (cooling/launch constraints); OpenAI’s Codex/agentic coding momentum; Utah data-center backlash and potential moratorium politics; Meta layoffs “death by a thousand cuts”; Twitter’s text resilience and product leadership attributed to Nikita Beyer.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe Financial Landscape of IPOs
1:49 to 2:16
Discussion on the upcoming IPOs and their implications for the market.
“Just to clear things up from the beginning.”
Understanding IPO Preparation
2:17 to 4:49
Insights on how to prepare a company for going public and managing investor expectations.
“And in fact, I showed up to San Francisco in May 2015.”
The Role of Messaging in IPO Success
4:50 to 7:39
How effective communication during an IPO affects company longevity and investor confidence.
“The early days are really important in terms of the way that that turbulence actually lives out in your time on the public markets.”
The Expectations Game: SpaceX and Beyond
7:40 to 12:09
Analyzing the public perception and expectations surrounding SpaceX and its future.
“This seems like they have obviously the potential to change software.”
Comparing Elon Musk and Sam Altman
12:10 to 14:00
Contrasting the narrative styles of Elon Musk and Sam Altman regarding company visions.
“You know, he was just like 11, 12, 13 years off.”
Elon vs. Sam: Vision and Commitments
14:00 to 15:40
Explore the contrasting leadership styles and financial commitments of Elon Musk and Sam Altman.
“The retail in particular will move their money to SpaceX.”
Public Market Challenges for OpenAI
15:40 to 18:10
Understand the challenges OpenAI faces in translating commitments into revenue amidst public scrutiny.
“Here's how much so-and-so is going to put into the company.”
OpenAI, Anthropic, and the AI Landscape
18:10 to 21:50
Learn about the competitive dynamics and strategic focus of OpenAI and Anthropic.
“Help me map how you get from here to here.”
The Role of Capital in AI Valuations
21:50 to 25:50
Discover how market capital and investor behavior influence the valuations of AI companies.
“And Sam will be put up much more against the help me understand how this maps to this over here.”
Potential Risks in the AI Market
25:50 to 28:00
Discuss the potential pitfalls and challenges facing AI companies regarding pricing strategy and public perception.
“The interesting other thing that will happen is there's been so much illiquidity in the private markets.”
Show all 23 chapters
Public Backlash on Data Centers
28:00 to 30:15
Explore the growing public resistance to data centers and their environmental impact.
“I actually think there's a bigger challenge for them.”
The Politics of AI and Infrastructure
30:16 to 33:14
Discuss the political landscape regarding AI infrastructure and its implications for society.
“Yeah, a recent Gallup poll said seven out of ten Americans don't want them.”
Economic Benefits of AI
33:14 to 35:28
Evaluate the potential economic benefits and challenges posed by AI technologies.
“So another place this could go wrong is, are these companies going to create enough benefit for others using them?”
Corporate Strategies in AI
35:28 to 37:44
Analyze the strategic decisions made by major tech companies regarding AI.
“This is – we had one of our commenters talk about the fact that, like, Microsoft has pulled back a little bit from OpenAI and Apple has not participated in this moment.”
Meta's Current Challenges
41:05 to 42:00
Examine the difficulties Meta faces in the current tech landscape.
“So let's talk a little bit about Meta, which was your number one competitor when you were working on Twitter.”
Employee Sentiment at Meta
42:00 to 43:19
Exploration of employee feelings and sacrifices at Meta amidst layoffs.
“And employees are starting to question whether it's worth working there anymore.”
Management Challenges During Layoffs
43:20 to 45:23
Discussion on how repeated layoffs create anxiety and distrust among employees.
“And then that starts to be like massively anxiety inducing across the company.”
The Role of Transparency in Leadership
45:24 to 46:42
The importance of honest communication from leaders during tough times.
“You think people are fooled and they're not fooled.”
The Evolution of Social Media
46:43 to 48:54
Examining the shifts in social media platforms and their usage.
“Okay, so here's where I was going with my windup.”
The Resilience of Twitter as a Platform
48:55 to 52:29
Analysis of Twitter's enduring appeal despite ongoing criticism.
“initial instinct for Snapchat stories are comparable.”
Silicon Valley's Economic Divide
52:30 to 54:48
Discussion on the wealth gap in Silicon Valley and its impact on workers.
“I just went up to the head of comms, Gabriel, and was like, hey, your goal for the next year is no dead birds on any of the major media platforms.”
The Dangers of Living in Comparison
54:49 to 56:03
Insights on how comparing oneself to others leads to dissatisfaction.
“You get, I'm going to, that guy's a bad guy and I'm going to, you know, go get this person.”
The Comparisons of Success
56:03 to 57:54
Explore the impact of comparisons on personal and professional fulfillment.
“They can be just as horrible for that guy.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Big Technology Podcast Host:We are headed towards the most epic run of IPOs of all time with SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI all coming out within the next calendar year. What's going to happen? Let's ask the man that took Twitter public right after this. I'm just back from ServiceNow's Knowledge 2026 in Las Vegas, and the conversations I had there are ones you're going to want to hear. I sat down with their president and CPO, Amit Zaveri, on the platform strategy powering enterprise AI, Chief People and AI Enablement Officer Jackie Canney, and Chief Digital Information Officer Kelly Romack on what AI really means for the workforce, the technical leaders behind ServiceNow's NVIDIA partnership on shipping AI at scale, and Ulta Beauty on deploying ServiceNow's technology across 1 ,300 stores.
0:43Big Technology Podcast Host:If you want to know where enterprise AI is actually headed, not the hype, but the real story, you can find these videos on my YouTube channel. Search Alex Kantrowitz on YouTube. Depending on who you ask, between 80 and 95 % of enterprise AI projects fail. To get AI to work for you, you don't need more tokens. You need better people. Aboard pairs powerful proprietary tools with senior engineers who've seen it all. That combination means your project doesn't stall, doesn't drift, and doesn't fall. It ships. Whether you're a startup that needs to get to market or an enterprise with complex legacy challenges, Aboard delivers exactly what your business needs fast.
1:18Big Technology Podcast Host:Aboard is your partner for AI transformation. Visit aboard.com and let's build something together. Welcome to Big Technology Podcast, a show for cool-headed and nuanced conversation of the tech world and beyond. Today, we're joined by Dick Costolo. He is the former CEO of Twitter who took the company public in 2013. He's also a partner at O1 Advisors and one of the members of a new podcast, The Nick, Dick, and Paul Show. Dick, Great to see you. Welcome to the show. It's great to see you. For clarity, I'm Dick in the Nick, Dick and Paul show. Oh, it's good to know that. It's good to have that clarity.
1:53Just to clear things up from the beginning.
1:54Big Technology Podcast Host:Thank you for establishing that. It's a very interesting time that we're about to head into. We are in, right? But in terms of the financial markets, three major IPOs are on the way. SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic could all come within, who knows, maybe even the next six months, which is crazy to think of. You were the CEO that brought Twitter public. And in fact, I showed up to San Francisco in May 2015. I got one week in and then week two, you stepped down as Twitter CEO. That's right. That's right. And then away we went. So it's good to be – we actually spoke the morning after. We're going to talk about Twitter in a bit.
2:37Big Technology Podcast Host:But you're somebody who knows not only about the going public process, but how important I think the message is when you go public, how important that message is for what the rest of your company lifetime is going to look like. And how you're communicating with your own team and company about it inside the company. Because interesting thing about an IPO for any company, but particularly for tech companies and particularly in a bull market, is there's the time before the IPO where you raise your Series B and you are valued at a billion dollars. and that's what the stock price is and what the valuation of the company is until 18 months later, whenever, and you raise your Series C and now you're valued at$2 billion.
3:23And so there's not really any concern about, you know, the stock price. If you're in a fast-growing company before the IPO, you're like, oh, my options are priced at$1 and now the stock's$2. My options are priced at$2 and now the stock's$3. It's just kind of this, it's all kind of fine, you know? And then you go and think about not just Twitter in 2013 but more recent examples like what Dylan Field had to deal with, I'm sure, at Figma, and Cerebris now dealing with as well. You know, it took us, you know, seven years, six years, seven years to get the price of, you know,$30 a share. And then in one day, it went to$110 a share.
4:01And then, you know, two months later, it's back down to$40. So there's— It's a roller coaster. —becomes this. You go from, yeah, whatever. It's not something you think about having to reinforce with the team or talk about with the team regularly to whiplash and what happened and why is the – So my advice to people who haven't taken a company public before and are about to do it is you need to prep the team for, hey, we're about to go into a world where the price of the stock can change even though nothing particularly happened today. Like the stock can go up by 15, 20 percent in value based on nothing or down 15, 20 percent.
4:44Big Technology Podcast Host:I think the public underrates how turbulent that could be inside the company. And this is kind of what I was getting at. The early days are really important in terms of the way that that turbulence actually lives out in your time on the public markets. So let me just make the distinction between the private markets where, you know, the numbers matter to a degree. Of course. but they're not the ground truth, right? A lot of it is feeling and potential. You go public, those numbers matter a lot. You have to report quarterly. For now, we'll see if that SEC rule changes. So there's conversations that it might be once a half, but you have to report quarterly.
5:25Big Technology Podcast Host:And ultimately, even if you're not showing profitability in the early years, investors who - You need to show a path toward it. And investors who bought in on the IPO promise, they need to see that promise of course what our future cash flow is going to look like exactly i remember before a year but year before we went public i was at a summit at ge general electric and i was on stage with jeffrey umelt the ceo and he asked me you know how do you think about how you're going to manage your investors once you're a public company i said well we're just going to continue to focus on the long term like we have now and everyone in the audience laughed you know like yeah good luck you know let us know how that goes once you're a public company when And all the, you know, sell side analysts are asking you every two days what the next quarter numbers look like.
6:06Big Technology Podcast Host:No, you're right. And so, look, I'll tell you what I remember covering because I was a Twitter beat reporter for a while. And what I remember covering because I would go on CNBC and talk about Twitter earnings. And I would always look back to the sort of the messaging at the Twitter IPO. Yeah. And now I'll caveat it. Well, no, I won't even caveat it. I'll talk about it. What you said was, look, we see a path that this is a global service. We'll get a billion users. And what's the thing that dogged Twitter every quarter? It's like 200, 250, 300 million monthly active users. But I bought in at this promise that there's going to be a billion users.
6:43Big Technology Podcast Host:We're going to get to a billion. Now, this is what I was going to caveat. But now I'm going to sort of talk about the fact. We could even have beat Topline and EBITDA and grown bottom line more than we said we were going to grow it. But if we missed an MAU number, this dollar would be down. Exactly. And we could miss top line – I mean we only missed top line one quarter by like 1 percent. But that quarter, MAU were up over consensus and the stock went up and by a little amount. Yeah. And so here's – this is the point that I was going to bring to it, which is the hype that you came out of the door with at Twitter.
7:20Yeah.
7:21Big Technology Podcast Host:It is basically going to be nothing compared to the hype that we're going to see SpaceX open AI and Anthropic come out with. I mean talk a little bit about what it's going to look like when these companies hit the public markets and then start reporting these quarterly earnings. And SpaceX might come out 1.5, 2 trillion, OpenAI, Anthropics certainly, trillion each at least. This seems like they have obviously the potential to change software. We talk about that all the time, change tech. But until they do, they're going to be sort of measured against the expectations they set. And that could be a very rough road on the public markets for a while.
8:02100 percent. However, I think you've got three very different personalities and stories associated with each company. And let me just say what I mean by that. Elon has the benefit of already knowing what this is like. And like him or, you know, like the way he runs his companies or not like the way he runs his companies, He does a great job of the narrative of, yeah, yeah, yeah, this is what's going on right now, but let me tell you what's coming. I mean, look at Tesla. They can hit or miss delivery numbers and they can have 37, 63 robo-taxis on the road in Austin versus the year ago number of a million, estimated a million.
8:51But the narrative is, yeah, but this is where we're really going. And he's just out ahead of it with the public market and the retail investors and his fans and even the analysts and the sell-side analysts and the people who run hedge funds. So I think with Elon, even though the initial valuation of SpaceX as a public company, if you mapped it to the amount of stuff they have to launch into space and make productive is going to be like, wait a minute, that math doesn't flip. I mean, forget Mars. They're going to have to get to Neptune. Yeah, and build it and build it. He just does such an expert job of, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
9:34But if you play this out 10 years and I think he'll be, I think that, so I think he'll be actually fine, even though there will be the people that are like, look, these numbers just don't make any sense compared to, you know, Starlink has to grow up this crazy amount over the next 10 years for this to make any sense. Right. Okay. Before we move to OpenAI. Okay.
9:53Big Technology Podcast Host:How much money in the market is there in this belief that Elon will figure it out? Because – so you have Tesla, right? So you have Tesla and there's this belief that he'll figure out robotics. And then you have SpaceX with this belief that – I don't know. He'll figure out space. I think SpaceX – I am one of the people that believes SpaceX will buy Tesla. Right. And so Tesla is$1.29 trillion. Yeah. I get – I don't know. Maybe I'm misreading the market. But I get like a trillion-dollar company on belief of Elon. But then if he buys Tesla, we're talking about a$3 trillion company. Fair. In the belief that Elon will figure it out.
10:34Big Technology Podcast Host:Is that possible? I think based – so again, when SpaceX goes public and I think it will actually – it could end up being worth over$2 trillion on day one. Whether that's a fake price or not and three days later it's something else, people are going to – there's so little float. My understanding is there's so little float and the float is how many shares are being issued, et cetera, as a percentage of the overall number of shares of SpaceX. And there's going to be so much demand that the day one price is going to go to some insane number. And where it fits out, I don't think is – I don't know. I just think that his ability to frame a narrative on a small float, he doesn't need, for example, a bunch of sovereigns to come in and put$400 billion each into the company.
11:30He just does$300 billion each into the company. He just doesn't. So he's been able to sustain that retail narrative with Tesla, and I think it will continue for some time with SpaceX. We'll see how long that lasts, but I do think he'll be able to do it. OK.
11:45Big Technology Podcast Host:What is the narrative before we move to OpenAI? What is the narrative? I mean it's just going to – Starlink is going to be power all internet connectivity. So it's a Starlink story. It's a Starlink story and then I'm sure it will be – Data centers in space. Data centers in space which Sam has – on our podcast we have talked about. It's a long, long way off from being true. I think data centers in space is actually like full self-driving. If you remember, Elon in 2013 said, you know, maybe it's 2014, by next year, your Tesla will be able to back out of the garage, drive you to work, pull into the garage at work, navigate downtown, all without you ever touching the steering wheel.
12:28He eventually was kind of right. You know, he was just like 11, 12, 13 years off. The data centers in space thing is the same thing. The amount of the acreage of cooling systems you would need to launch into space right now. Well, the argument is you don't need cooling because it's space. Well, you actually do, but that's a longer conversation. OK. The amount of stuff you have to launch into space right now to even power a one gigawatt data center is something like – foots out to something like 16 acres of stuff in space. So you can't – the capacity to launch that right now is nonexistent.
13:07Big Technology Podcast Host:I don't see it as ever possible. I mean a piece of space junk hits your thing. You have to send not just an astronaut, a fleet of astronauts. You think a data center never has a plug come undone because it wasn't like properly plugged in. It's like, oh, shit, we have to send an astronaut. That's crazy. Let's at least agree that it's at least 10 or 12 years away. OK. But the story will be here's what's coming. And I just think – look, if you would ask me 10 years ago how long are people going to buy their Tesla story where, yeah, they didn't miss this but this is what's coming, I would have said it would have fallen apart a little while ago and it just doesn't.
13:42So I think the same will be true of SpaceX for a while.
13:45Big Technology Podcast Host:I have this theory that the Tesla stock will – or the Tesla shareholders who have been through this bumpy ride with Tesla, like they've been told a couple of stories. Tesla, the electric car, the self-driving car, the optimist robot, they will move their money. The retail in particular will move their money to SpaceX. I think that's probably true. Yeah. I agree. And then SpaceX will buy Tesla. Probably. Yeah. OK. So if Elon is somebody that can sell a vision, Sam Altman is not? No. I don't think it's that he can sell the vision and Sam can't. I think it's that the narrative around open AI is already Sam has gone out and written checks that Sarah Fryer and team – not to put – Sarah is the CFO.
14:36So it's not just her. So Sam has gone out and written checks that the rest of the organization can't cash, if you will. The compute commitments, the public commentary about, yes, we're going to spend this much on compute, but we're going to spend three times as much on training the models. And, you know, when you go – I mean there have been plenty of podcasts with OpenAI investors on all these topics, et cetera. But when you go and run on the numbers, it adds up to crazy over a trillion dollars worth of commitments that don't have the – and you don't see the revenue model or growth yet to back it up.
15:17So he's kind of mortgaged a bunch of the company, if you will, that now Sarah and the rest of the executives have to go out there with an S1 behind them and answer questions. It's one thing for the CEO to be out there and again, Elon's got this history of – I'm talking about things that are four or five years out. Sam has made monetary commitments, right? Here's how much so-and-so is going to put into the company. This is the deal for this particular data center. This is the deal for this kind of compute. Actual dollar figures attached to them and commitments. So Sarah and the team now have to go explain to the public markets and get out there during the roadshow and, hey, help me.
16:00I'm not getting how the bill adds up here, right? I'm not seeing how the dollar commits over here are mapping to revenue over here and when we're going to see profitability. So I just think they're going to have a much, much tougher time. It will still do really, really well on day one because people are going to be like, it's the next stigma. It's the next cerebris. I haven't been able to buy secondary before. I want to be an investor. You have to own one of these things. But I think they'll I think they'll be under a much bigger microscope quarter to quarter than Elon will. Is that fair? No.
16:33Is it probably what will happen? Yes.
16:35Big Technology Podcast Host:So when I spoke with Sam about this, his perspective was basically like it's tough for people to grasp exponentials. And we are in the middle of an exponential. So you might see our revenue today and you might see our planned expenditures. But what you don't fully grasp potentially is that we see it going that direction. And that argument is a lot of people don't buy it. The counter on it, the counter to that counter, and I'll let you answer is – No, you keep doing the arguments yourself and then we'll end up somewhere. This is typically what happens. I just debate myself. All right, but let's just talk about it.
17:19Big Technology Podcast Host:If you've seen this play out over the past few months, you've seen AnthropaKit capacity limits, and OpenAI is starting to look wiser because it planned for that exponential. So? First of all, I think Sam is right. I think people are... I'll just insult all your audience right now and say, I think people are generally innumerate and don't understand exponentials. And it's true. If you look back even six months ago with the actual committed data center build out, people were saying there's way too – there can be way too many data centers. We're not going to ever use all these things. And six months later with Agenda coding and CodeX and Cloud Code and et cetera, they're like, oh, yeah, we actually need more because these things do both do forward and backward work and the token usage has grown exponentially.
18:09And so he's proven to be correct. And yet the size of the commitments, the debt load that some of these people are taking on to fulfill some of these commitments and the gap between those commitments and current open revenue growth is – he's just got a hard – Sarah and the rest of the executives in the company are going to have a harder time. Help me map how you get from here to here. I just think they will. They've got hard numbers associated with them that Elon doesn't necessarily have. Aveline kind of does a lot of here's where we're going to go and this is what's going to happen next. And people are like, great, I get it.
18:44Big Technology Podcast Host:Well, SpaceX has basically given up on the AI project. And I know that might sound extreme, but when you're renting data centers to Anthropik, you've given up. Yeah. Yeah. So is it possible with OpenAI's case that OpenAI really delivers on the product because it has more of these data centers but still doesn't get it right economically? I think – so this is my admittedly opinion from the last couple of weeks. But one of the things that I see happening that works in OpenAI's favor is Codex is getting more and more popular. I think if you asked people a month ago – if you actually looked at Google Trends a month ago for Cloud Code, like what Google Trends is.
19:26Show me what the search results – the volume of search results for this term over the last – over time. Cloud Code looked like one of these inflection points. And Codex is kind of bumbling along. In the last couple of weeks, I've heard more and more folks say we're – we were 95 percent Cloud Code and a couple like Codex fans. and now there's a rapid growth in the number of people moving to codex. So that works in Sam's favor, and should that continue and you see a sort of balance of, I don't know, 50-50, 60-40, whatever, with the growth in agentic coding across the board that's going to continue, that could be one of the things that saves OpenAI.
20:20Anthropic? I just think, I mean... Same thing? No. I think Dario... I mean, that's why I think there are three different things. I think Anthropic has just been maybe as a result of just not being the lead horse so they don't have the spotlight on them. They were just more focused on, we're going to go attack the Enterprise. We're going to focus on the Enterprise. otherwise, you know, they weren't even initially going to release Claude Code. I mean, they initially – my understanding from folks inside Anthropica is we were just going to be like, wait, this is like a huge competitive advantage to be able to increase the rate of speed with which we can accelerate our own work.
21:06And then decided, well, actually, we should release it because people will find problems with it out in the wild that we didn't find internally and that will make everything better, et cetera. There are probably other narratives internally, but that's my understanding. Anyway, I just think their focus on the enterprise, their consistency of story and the public's perception that Claude Code is like the – irrespective of what I just said about Codex two minutes ago. So that Claude Code is like this is the great unlock and going to be the real game changer. Makes their story maybe the most middle of the road of the three where I think SpaceX will be.
21:49Elon will build castles in the sky and people will buy it. And Sam will be put up much more against the help me understand how this maps to this over here. And Dario is threading the needle between the two. And we'll probably get a little bit more of a this is the most consistent one of the three I can bet on for long term growth and focus.
22:07Big Technology Podcast Host:But the finances aren't going to look that different. I think that my loss is from all of them. I get it. My experience as a public company executive is that the narrative and the story and your ability to help the market think about the way you want to tell the story is just as important as the specific numbers in the quarter. And I think that's more true now than it ever was. It doesn't matter then who goes first because you get a chance to set the narrative as opposed to – Yeah, I think it would be great for Anthropoc if they can go first. Because? For this reason. Like we can tell our story.
22:50It's not going to be compared to – but Sam says and we just saw in the opening bell on CNBC that they have this – they had to spend this much in compute. Why don't you have to spend this much in compute? You want to go first. I mean I actually think part of the Elon lawsuit that we now all know the verdict of was – when the verdict was announced, some people were like, oh, I'm surprised he pursued that. if it was going to be that kind of obvious that he was going to lose. I think part of it was just, you know, throw some wrenches in the works over there and slow them down, and I can get out first before any of these things, and I'll be first out to work it, and I can suck a little bit of the air out of the room, and that'll be great.
23:44Big Technology Podcast Host:Now, you mentioned that most people are enumerate, so let's keep running with that. Yeah. This is going to be the—unfortunately, this is going to be the— I can already see the clip. this unfortunately many most people are innumerate and then someone will go find somewhere I made a simple math error and then they'll oh our team will do yeah okay perfect we're very generous with that excellent just kidding we won't do that too so but but let's talk a little bit then about the money in the market that can I mean we're going to talk about one and a half two trillion for SpaceX a trillion for open ad trillion for Anthropik Like, is there – I mean obviously that is just the market cap, not the money going in.
Read the full transcript
24:26Big Technology Podcast Host:But there's a lot – But the money has to come from somewhere. Where is it going to come from? Again, another advantage to going first or going second and not going third is there's not infinite capital out there. You're going to want to be in one or two of these things and then probably not all three, although we'll see. and they're going to require a lot of capital. And I think the advantage of going first is you have access to everybody's liquidity. And then you go second, you have access to some of that liquidity. And then when you go third, like, well, we're – we put this much into SpaceX and this much into Anthropik.
25:08And we're – I'm sort of capped out on my public – the percentage of money I devote to public equities, et cetera, et cetera.
25:17Big Technology Podcast Host:Do you think though – Well, let me ask you. Go ahead. The investors, the public market investors – There are all sorts of secondary effects on here though. Right, but they must be making contingencies, right? They go through these planning cycles where they're like, I'm going to want a piece of all these companies. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So I'm going to have much more money available than previously, but maybe not. We'll see. Because if you don't do that and somebody else comes in and gets OpenAI for cheap, you just messed up in a big way. We'll see. We'll see. There's such – as you already said, even though those market caps are not the amount of money that's sloshing around and on the supply-demand side of the shares that are floated, it's still – there's still big numbers and there's not infinite capital out there.
25:59The interesting other thing that will happen is there's been so much illiquidity in the private markets. You've got all these university endowments and venture LPs, et cetera, that haven't had their big liquidity events that are now going to be flush with distributions of SpaceX and Anthropic and OpenAI that are going to be able to turn around and pour a bunch more money into the early stage venture capital again. that have been maybe people who, hey, like I'm already, you know, SpaceX is marked up to this. It's on a markup basis. It's now this percentage of my portfolio. It's only supposed to be 7 or 8 percent.
26:43It's now 15 percent. Can't invest in new venture funds. That becomes liquid. You get your big SpaceX distribution. You've got a lot of money to go invest in venture capital again. And so there will probably be six to 12 months down the road a great time to go raise venture capital from LPs.
27:02Big Technology Podcast Host:Right. And the sort of question is, well, what can you invest in that doesn't get eaten by these companies? Yeah. Well, I mean that is something you have to be thinking about if you're a venture investor for sure. Yeah. All right. Let's talk a little bit about where this story can sort of unravel, where it could go wrong. Let me give you one scenario here, which is I was speaking with an investor recently about the margins that these companies, these big AI companies are getting. And I thought, well, they can easily raise the price because the economic value that they're creating is so great that you could double the price and most people would pay that price.
27:40Big Technology Podcast Host:This investor said, no, they're so close to parity that you're much more likely to see a price war than you are to see a across the board price raise. And then I had to agree with him. I think that's – I agree with that. And so if that happens, then how do you justify these massive valuations for the open AI and anthropics of the world? I agree with that sentiment. I actually think there's a bigger challenge for them. And it's something that is growing in the news, which is the public backlash against where's all the compute going to come from and are these data centers that have been already committed to and approved by the county commissioners and blah, blah, blah.
28:26Are they really going to keep happening? I mean, you know, the one that's been in the news a lot is the Utah data center, just north of Salt Lake, that Kevin O 'Leary, the Shark Tank investor from the Canadian Shark Tank. Whoever's in charge, who's ever actually the money behind this thing, and I actually don't know who it is. Why they picked Kevin O 'Leary, a Canadian Shark Tank guy, as the face of this is anybody's guess.
28:56Big Technology Podcast Host:But it's funny when we talked about this before, you mentioned these Canadians are like, why are you in a U.S. infrastructure project? Fine. But I would say the bigger problem is he was the face of FTX. Not the guy. Right. Somebody picked this guy and he's going out and doing big public interviews on both the right – he was on the Tucker Carlson thing. You've got the right that really doesn't want this thing to be built. Progressives and others who are like, you know, it's going to do this to the environment and it's really not going to create a bunch of jobs. It's going to be just this huge problem in Utah.
29:34He's getting smushed in these interviews. And he's not prepared for these interviews. I mean, the Tucker Carlson interview was like not dissimilar to the Ted Cruz Tucker Carlson interview. He just got crushed. So I think there's actually going to be a growing – there is a growing backlash against, hey, not in my backyard on these data centers. And we'll – I mean the computer has to come from somewhere and these things have to get built. And that's going to be – that's a real problem for these companies should that become a – this is like the only thing I can think of that unites the right and the left in the country right now is I don't want you to build one of these things in my backyard.
30:16Big Technology Podcast Host:Yeah, a recent Gallup poll said seven out of ten Americans don't want them. The other three people don't know what – yeah. The other three people aren't – haven't seen what one looks like. It's probably the other three got a check in the mail or something like that because they're widely unpopular. If you give a commencement speech and you say anything about AI, they'll boo you out of the stadium like we've seen recently with Eric Schmidt. So that could be a real – it's the idea that there could be moratoriums. There was one that was proposed in Maine that got vetoed by the governor. But it's being brought up by national politicians.
30:50Big Technology Podcast Host:The idea that moratoriums could happen, maybe not tomorrow, but like it's going to be on the ballot in 2028. There are going to be pro-moratorium candidates. Yeah. So the interesting thing about all this is because, you know, you've got – I mean what has Silicon Valley spent, you know, the last two weeks gossiping about the Elan, Sam, Brockman, you know, Brockman diaries? I'm sure he regrets having a diary, but – You don't have a diary, do you? I don't have a diary. I had one in Bern. I had one in Bern. No, I don't have a diary. While these guys have been like, you know, I know you are, but what am I in court?
31:33The real challenge is they should be helping Americans understand this is why it's important we win. Here's what happens if we don't build these data. It's not a hard – it's challenging. It's not the most difficult challenge in the world. If we don't do these things, you know, it's a fairly straightforward story. We don't do these things. China wins. If China wins, we lose. If we're the follower, we don't get to vote on a lot of things happening or not happening. They're going to tell us whether that happens or doesn't happen. And they're not telling that story right now to people.
32:09Big Technology Podcast Host:The China thing can be too abstract for, let's say, a college student who's like, I don't know if I'm going to have a job. I get it. And if I was sitting at Arizona, University of Arizona, and Eric Schmidt told me about AI, and I didn't have a job lined up coming out of college, I would be booing. I mean, I didn't have a job coming out of school as it was when I graduated. And if I heard anything like that, oh, man, I'd be ready to boo. Yeah. Yeah. They're just – you better start telling the story. Right. And there's no time like the present. Like you haven't been telling it in the past. And again, Americans' perception of these guys is they're like bickering about who's going to be the more rich in court and, you know, I know you're name-calling and et cetera.
32:53And that coupled with now you want to go build this thing next to my house is a bad look. And so they just need to be a lot more focused on the external narrative about this is why this is important to the future of our society. and it's not happening at all right now.
33:13Big Technology Podcast Host:So let me challenge the economic benefit part of this and see what you think. So another place this could go wrong is, are these companies going to create enough benefit for others using them? This is, Chamath had an interesting tweet. He said - Wait, Chamath had an interesting tweet? Yeah, I like this one. Well, I guess he does that often. They're all super interesting. So let me read this. In an early meeting at Facebook when I was describing the goals of Facebook platform, an area I oversaw, Bill Gates yelled at me. Wait a minute. You got to love, comma, an area I oversaw. That's right. Yeah.
33:50Big Technology Podcast Host:Okay. He said his quote has stuck with me to this day. This isn't a platform. A platform is where the collective sum of revenues of the participants exceeds those of the platform itself. So the platform is something that's so useful that the companies that use you make more money than you make. I think that's a good definition. Yeah. There's an article in the information, Anthropic and OpenAI's share of AI startup revenue rises to 89%. Yeah. That's not a platform according to that definition. Yeah, correct. I agree. I mean, not wrong. But that doesn't mean they won't be able to be wildly successful.
34:30If you're increasing the productivity of every Fortune 500 company and beyond by not just 10%, 20%, but orders of magnitude, that's an extraordinary amount of value. Wouldn't we have seen a corresponding increase in earnings? Well, we'll see. I mean, again, if you look at six months ago and you tried to foot out, hey, we're not going to need all this compute. And, hey, these companies are never going to be able to be profitable. You would have been right if that continued to be the trajectory. Trajectory. And then along comes agentic coding and up everything goes. So we'll see. One can easily imagine there are two or three or four more of those unlocks that we haven't seen yet that are coming.
35:16Big Technology Podcast Host:Yeah. It could just be that that is – that's simply been applied to coding work and it can start working for all different types of work. Sure. Which is what they want. So, OK. One last thing to run by you, and then we're going to take a break. This is – we had one of our commenters talk about the fact that, like, Microsoft has pulled back a little bit from OpenAI and Apple has not participated in this moment. They said Microsoft and Apple come from real innovations and use cases. Executing LLMs is expensive, risky trash for grifters, and they know it. There is no paradigm shift without Apple and Microsoft on board.
35:53Big Technology Podcast Host:So why should they take the risks of building these models driven by stolen data? This stuff is toxic and they know. Could you find someone who has a stronger opinion and is less equivocal in their commentary? Let's see. It's unclear whether that was a choice Apple made or an inability to do whatever they needed to be doing. I found it. It's surprising how Siri or iMessage, for example, have been so impossibly slow to keep pace with what appear to be things that AI startups with 10 or 12 people have been extraordinarily successful at, like text-to-speech or speech-to-text. Granola, for example, does a 100 times better job of interpreting what I'm saying than Siri does, which seems – I would imagine has orders of magnitude, more people and resources focused on it.
36:54So I don't think it's that Apple has seen that what OpenAI and Anthropoc are doing is, you know, grifting. I don't think that's the case at all. And I think Microsoft pulling back from the OpenAI relationship probably has more to do with Satya's understanding of the dynamics that are going on inside OpenAI and with the relationship between him and OpenAI and maybe his perception of what he believed to be true and what is actually true and his understanding of where he wants to take Microsoft.
37:28Big Technology Podcast Host:Yeah, no, I think that's a good perspective. Hey, I love our listeners. I'd love to give you guys an opportunity to come in and come. Of course. I have nothing against that listener. I was just making a joke about the clear opinion he had. That came through. All right. Let's take a break. When we come back, you ran Twitter. I want to talk about Meta. And then there's also this really interesting thing that's going on, this concept of a permanent underclass that's emerging because there is going to be this sort of distinction between those that have won from AI and those that haven't. So let's cover that right after this.
38:05Big Technology Podcast Host:This episode is brought to you by True Diagnostic. I've been trying to get more intentional about my health lately, not just how I feel day to day, but what's actually going on under the hood. That's why I checked out True Diagnostic. They offer at-home tests that measure your biological age, not just how old you are, but how your body is aging on a cellular level. Their True Age test looks at things like your pace of aging, organ system health, and even risk factors tied to lifestyle, giving you real data to act on. What I like is that it's not guesswork. You can track changes over time and see how things like sleep, diet, or exercise are actually impacting your body.
38:40Big Technology Podcast Host:And taking the test at home was so easy. If you're serious about optimizing your health and longevity, this is a really powerful tool. Right now, Big Technology podcast listeners can get 20 % off at truediagnostic.com using code Big Tech at checkout. That's truediagnostic.com and use Big Tech for 20 % off today. Choose True Age, True Health, or the combo kit as a one-time purchase or a subscription. Look, if you have a kid in school right now, you know the drill. What should take 20 minutes of homework ends up taking two hours and usually ends in tears. And every good tutor, well, they're fully booked for months.
39:15Big Technology Podcast Host:This episode is brought to you by Brainly. Brainly is an AI-powered personal tutor built by educators, not a general purpose chatbot. It doesn't just give your kid the answer. It walks them through step-by-step explanations so they actually understand the material. It learns how your child learns, diagnoses when they're struggling, and builds a personalized learning path in under three minutes. Available 24-7, there's no scheduling headaches, and it's just a fraction of the cost of a private tutor. Finals are coming. Build your teen's study plan now. It only takes minutes. Go to brainly.com slash big tech to get 50 % off your first Brainly subscription with my code big tech.
39:57Big Technology Podcast Host:That's B-R-A-I-N-L-Y dot com slash big tech. Bitcoin has been part of the conversation for years now, but actually doing something with it has always felt more complicated than it should be. Where do you even start? If you've been curious about using Bitcoin but haven't made the jump yet, Cash App makes it easy. When you buy Bitcoin on Cash App, they hold real Bitcoin for you, one-to-one, and you can withdraw it anytime. No extra steps or restrictions, you just access and control it when you need it. For a limited time, new customers can get$10 added to their balance. Just use code CASHAPP10 when you sign up, and don't forget this part, send at least$5 to a friend in the first two weeks.
40:43Big Technology Podcast Host:Terms apply. Cash App is a financial services platform, not a bank. Banking services provided by Cash App's banking partners. Bitcoin services provided by Block Inc. Brand. For additional information, see the disclosures at cash.app. slash legal slash podcast. And we're back here on Big Technology Podcast with former Twitter CEO, Dick Costolo. So let's talk a little bit about Meta, which was your number one competitor when you were working on Twitter. Number one, number two, and number three competitor. I remember Meta and Twitter didn't like each other so much that when Meta built a trending tab, a short-lived trending tab on its news feed, whenever there was a story they picked up from Twitter, they would write social media.
41:36Big Technology Podcast Host:People are talking about this on social media. I didn't know that. Oh, I didn't know that. That's very good. So because they clearly saw you as a competitor. But right now, it's kind of a rough moment at Meta. They just went through or they're in the process of going through some large layoffs. Their AI models are not state-of-the-art. They don't have a cloud code or codex equivalent. In fact, the consumer use case for AI hasn't really been correct. And employees are starting to question whether it's worth working there anymore. I'm just going to read one employee's comments in the SF standards.
42:08Big Technology Podcast Host:From the outside, there's massive negative sentiment and there's certainly something there. But the pain of working here is not very well understood. It's this grand calculus of what it costs to live in the Bay Area and what personal sacrifices you're willing to make and what you're willing to do for money. On the one hand, I feel massively privileged and lucky to work at a place like this. On the other hand, I'm like, where is my line? What do you make of those comments? I mean, there are always people who are – there are always people inside the company who are – it's fine, but I like it. I don't love it.
42:46You know, Bob, my manager is mean to me. I don't know. There's one person's sentiment. So it's hard to know what to make about that comment. What I would say specifically about Meta is Mark is extraordinarily sharp and a strategic thinker. And the thing that I've been surprised about is the little bit of the death by a thousand cuts on the layoffs. Like there's a riff and now there's another riff and now there's another riff. Sorry, reduction in force. Yeah. Layoffs. And that's like – that's what – if you do it once and then you get up in front of the company, like here's why this is happening you know and we're going here and so now we're going to all you know wish our you know colleagues the best but and the rest of us have to you know buckle down and focus on people will like okay i get it you know they might be sad that jim is leaving but then they kind of like okay like i get it we had to do that fine the doing it you know a second and then a third and then a fourth time it's like okay you start to be like okay this is obviously not the last time.
43:54It's going to happen again. It might be me. And then that starts to be like massively anxiety inducing across the company. And people just start to look around and like, you know, who's next. So that's just been we and it's and and each time in these layoffs, it's been a slightly different version of the, you know, because of blah, we need to X, Y, Z. And it's point you just start to realize like yeah we already you said that one that was the same reason as the second riff and then the third riff was a third layoff was a little bit different narrative now we're going back to the second layoff narrative and people just start to go okay like this we're just being you know we're just being spun yeah i mean i worked in newsrooms for eight
44:41Big Technology Podcast Host:years so every january there was a difficult decisions subject line the difficult decisions yeah and i was like i can't deal with this anymore that's why i just decided to go out on my own There's nothing people hate more in an organization than feeling like they're being spun. And that's when they start to kind of turn on management. Like, you know, you can get up to – you can make mistakes and get up in front of them and go, man, I really screwed this up. Or we really screwed this up and we should have done X and we didn't. It's my fault. I'm, you know, blah, blah, blah. I'm fessing up. And they'll kind of be, OK, you can do that a few – you can do that a couple times a year and be like – people are like, OK, I get it.
45:19We all make mistakes. But when you start to spin people, and the reason for this is because of our, like, and you said that, you know, same thing nine months ago, whatever, then they're like, it drives people crazy. You think people are fooled and they're not fooled.
45:33Big Technology Podcast Host:And I'm so glad to have you here because, man, Dick, I feel like we could speak every week because there's so much that, you know, I covered social media. I cover AI. You worked. You're in a social media company. You're investing in AI. So, you know, it's unfortunate we only have like 12 minutes left. I feel like we have to do this again. Ben Horowitz has this great – shout out to Ben Horowitz. He ran this management class when he was running his LoudCloud. And he had this great – and I asked him for his outline of it because I wrote a management class and I did it at Twitter. And I remember he was like, your job as a leader is not to be – is not to have all the answers.
46:15If you try to spin people and you think that I just said this, if you try to spin your team and they know you're like spinning them like there's that's like the most demoralizing thing you can do. Like, don't try to con me. And so there's got to be that. That's the problem with these layoffs and then layoffs and then layoffs. And now, you know, we're doing it again. But but this is the reason why. And people just are like, OK, I like they turn off.
46:42Big Technology Podcast Host:No, I'm with you. Okay, so here's where I was going with my windup. The interesting thing about Meta is that is it really like a social network anymore? Or is it like Reels and an AI project? And is Twitter and a social network anymore? Or is it like, I mean, it does still have text posts, but it's kind of like Reels. And it's combined with that side AI project. project. I think Twitter's text posts are have been extraordinarily resilient. It's like it's like this you know its ability to survive the changes in the way people use TikTok and reels and social media. I do think I do think meta is reels in an AI project.
47:31Big Technology Podcast Host:Let me just tell you though. Twitter, I've just went to my home feed. First post, image. Second post, video. Third post, video. Fourth post, text only. Fifth post, video. Some guy beating the shit out of someone who tried to take his bike. Six posts. Alex, you've got a weird, you've got a, the algorithm wants you to look at, it's the algorithm. Don't algorithm me. I'm not the only one that gets the fight videos. All right. Next text post, next image. All right. Anyway, I just think, I'll say this about, I'll say that I think you're asking me about Twitter. I think Twitter's usefulness as a text-based medium, despite what you're seeing in your home feed, has been extraordinary.
48:17And I think I would actually credit, knowing a little bit about, you know, knowing a little bit, a tiny little bit, about what goes on inside the company, I would credit a lot of the recent success. And I hope I'm actually hurting this person by crediting him instead of, you know, the ownership. But I think Nikita Beyer as the head of – and he's the product. I think he's the only product manager there now. And then loads and loads of engineers or – sorry, some engineers and a designer. Sorry. Don't mean to insult Elon by saying loads of engineers. Some engineers. I mean, yeah. But Nikita has an extraordinary instinct for product that I think only – I would say Kevin Systrom and maybe Evan Spiegel with his initial instinct for Snapchat stories are comparable.
49:14I just think Nikita's got an almost remarkable instinct for, no, no, no, this is going to be what helps grow the product even though nobody else is talking about that right now. We're going to go do this. And he's right more often than he's not, and it's impressive.
49:30Big Technology Podcast Host:Yeah. No, it's – I mean I just remember – I sort of foreshadowed this at the beginning of the episode. But so I moved to San Francisco in May 2015. And I think I had my first week on the job, second week on the job. You stepped down. Yeah. June 10th. And this was, yeah. And this was my second week there. And this was Twitter and Facebook. That was basically my big. And the whole newsroom stopped. We're like, this is big, big news. Holy shit. And my editor looked around and he's like, who's writing this? I guess I will. And then the next day we spoke about the fact that you were leaving and Jack was going to become the interim CEO.
50:14Big Technology Podcast Host:My favorite. Full-time CEO. And that was like – it was a definite like welcome to Silicon Valley moment. It's like, oh, things haven't really slowed since then. Yeah. Go ahead. Your favorite. Not favorite. A moment I remember vividly from that is we have all these alerts on our devices internally around the platform obviously. and I got off stage after telling the company, hey, I'm stepping down. Jack's going to just take over his interim CEO. I've told this story before. I get off stage and my phone, you know, and, you know, it's super emotional. And my phone bings. Elon Musk has unfollowed you on Twitter.
50:53I was like, wow, man. Yeah. Four seconds. You might, I don't know. You might have dodged a bullet there.
51:00Big Technology Podcast Host:You never know. Anyway. Yeah. No, that was, well, look. I think it was more like looks and sees the news like, don't need to follow this idiot anymore. Well, he should – does he follow you now? I don't believe so, but I haven't looked. No, I always – I mean I always liked looking at your tweets. So, I mean I think we could do another full episode talking about the Twitter era and the transformation of that product. And I actually thought maybe we should have even started there, but I'm glad we went with AIIP. But it has been a fascinating – I mean I – when I was covering – I covered like every little tweak to the feed.
51:37Big Technology Podcast Host:I broke the news that it was going to be algorithmic. And that was a very intense time because Jack initially denied it. My DMs were like, you're a liar. Your credibility is gone ever, forever. And then on Tuesday, like I broke it on Friday. On Tuesday, they're like, we're going algorithmic. And clearly it's algorithmic. But I've forgiven Jack for that. I hope we're all good at this point. But not just a crazy, crazy product. and clearly like, you know, this whole Twitter's dead thing. I mean, when you were CEO, you saw it after you left. Every journalist writes a Twitter's dead story. I never wrote it and I never will because for whatever reason, the format works.
52:17That's what I was saying. It's remarkably resilient. The day I became CEO, I walked up to the head of communications, Gabriel Stricker, And I said, hey, at the time, back in the day, there were business magazines, Business 2.0 and like Bloomberg, I think, had had dead birds, dead Twitter birds on their cover the past year. You know, the death of Twitter. This is 2010. Death of Twitter across media. I just went up to the head of comms, Gabriel, and was like, hey, your goal for the next year is no dead birds on any of the major media platforms. Low bar. Like the company is not dying. It just is – it's a constant.
53:02And it never goes away. It's crazy.
53:04Big Technology Podcast Host:Well, I would say that – so the business of Twitter has died to a degree. But the product remains vital. I mean I was – people can – Crazy. It's a SpaceX company to bring it full circle. Yeah. People can dish on advertising, dish and dish on advertising all they want. But advertising is undefeated as a business model. What you end up finding is that the average revenue per user is just much, much higher than you can get from a premium subscription. Well, yeah. So maybe going to premium subscription and telling advertisers to F themselves isn't the best business strategy. I mean it never worked for me telling my customers to go F themselves.
53:42But, you know, again.
53:43Big Technology Podcast Host:Teach their own. Yeah, teach their own. Okay, let's end here. You know, we were texting. You sent me this post. The vibes in SF feel pretty frantic right now. The divide in outcomes is the worst I've ever seen. Over the last five years, a group of 10 ,000 people about at Anthropic, OpenAI, XAI, NVIDIA, Meta, TBD have hit retirement wealth above$20 million. Everyone else outside the group feels like they can work their well-paying but less than$500 ,000 job for their whole life and never get there. Worse yet, layouts are in full swing. Many software engineers feel like their life skill is no longer useful.
54:17Big Technology Podcast Host:The day-to-day role of most jobs has changed overnight with AI. Sort of pointing at this permanent underclass meme. I mean, I guess it's tough to feel bad for someone who's making less than$500 ,000 if it's like$499. But it is interesting what you're seeing in Silicon Valley today with like these lottery ticket winners at the big AI labs and everyone else. I don't know, man. I'll say two things about it. Living a life of comparison, it doesn't matter where you are in that stack. It's a losing strategy. It's just a life of misery. and I guess because you're comparing or you can't buy a house no just like I'm here and this person there's no winning that ever by the way you can be look Elon has got more money Elon's going to be the first trillionaire is he talking about like what's he talking about on Twitter you know like Sam's a bad guy you know like you don't get like man if I were a trillionaire, life would be great too.
55:27You get, I'm going to, that guy's a bad guy and I'm going to, you know, go get this person. I just like, there's a great old Winston Churchill quote that I'm going to botch, but it's something like functional expertise, while great, is no match for a broad appreciation of the, for the humanities and the human condition in all its joy and suffering, because you just developed this immense understanding of it looks like things are great for that guy. They can be just as horrible for that guy. It looks like things are horrible for her. Actually, some things about her life are better than anything about yours.
56:10And literature is filled with these, hey, man, stop chasing ghosts. Stop looking. Stop living a life of comparison and chasing ghosts. and this phantom thing you think you're supposed to have. Virginia Woolf's to the lighthouse, great expectations at Dickens. And I just think there are too many people in Silicon Valley who have functional expertise and not a broad appreciation for the joys and sorrows that you grow to appreciate in the humanities and therefore live in this vortex of this tunnel vision of they got that and I would have that if I went to Anthropic and I didn't go to Anthropic and that sucks.
56:53The person Anthropic is like, I was going to get this house, but this jerk paid$15 million for the$8 million house, and now I don't have it, and that sucks. It's just there's no winning. That's right. Yeah.
57:05Big Technology Podcast Host:Yeah. I mean, I would say, I would say, okay. I get that it's worse for the guy that didn't go to Anthropic and now doesn't have a billion dollars. I get that. I'm not taking the side of someone saying life is miserable on that front. I do get the person who's like – it's crazy like making a couple hundred thousand dollars and because these opening ion anthropic folks have gotten this windfall, they've taken the housing supply. Rent has gone up here in New York. Rent is like the craziest it's ever been. But that being said, you can still have a pretty nice life with that type of money. Again, writ large across the country, it goes back to the Darios and the Sams, et cetera, et cetera, need to start painting a picture.
57:47to the country about why this is great for us or a lot of these data centers aren't going to get built. Yeah.
57:54Big Technology Podcast Host:All right, Dick, you have to come back. This was so great. Yeah, thanks for having me. That's the fastest move an hour I've ever done on the show. So thank you. Thank you for being here. Yeah, happy to do it. All right. All right. Check out, let's plug the show. Check out the Nick, Dick and Paul show. Please. On your podcast app of choice. And we always thank you for being here with us. We'll see you next time on Big Technology Podcast.
58:17Thank you.
58:47and why ads seem to follow you everywhere. That's where Aura comes in. Aura actively removes your data from broker sites and keeps it off. They also instantly alert you if your information shows up in a breach or on the dark web. But Aura goes beyond data protection. With one app, you get a VPN, antivirus, password manager, spam call protection, dark web monitoring, and even up to$5 million in identity theft insurance, all backed by 24-7 US-based fraud support. Other companies might sell just credit monitoring or just a VPN. Aura gives you all of it, together, at the same price competitors charge for just one service.
59:22Start your free trial today at aura.com slash remove. Protect yourself now at aura.com slash remove. Most people don't realize how much their personal information is being bought and sold every day. Data brokers are making billions, pulling details about you from public records and the internet, and then packaging and selling it, usually without your consent. That's how your information lands in the hands of scammers, spammers, even stalkers. It's why you get endless robocalls and why ads seem to follow you everywhere. That's where Aura comes in. Aura actively removes your data from broker sites and keeps it off.
59:55They also instantly alert you if your information shows up in a breach or on the dark web. But Aura goes beyond data protection. With one app, you get a VPN, antivirus, password manager, spam call protection, dark web monitoring, and even up to$5 million in identity theft insurance, all backed by 24-7 U.S.-based fraud support. Other companies might sell just credit monitoring or just a VPN. Aura gives you all of it, together, at the same price competitors charge for just one service. Start your free trial today at Aura.com slash remove. Protect yourself now at Aura.com slash remove.
From the publisher
Dick Costolo is the ex-CEO of Twitter and managing partner at 01 Advisors. Costolo joins Big Technology Podcast to look ahead to the SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic IPOs, looking at whether the offerings will be successful, who should go first, how the companies differ, and where the capital will come from. Tune in for the second half where we discuss the state of Meta, Costolo's Twitter memories, and Silicon Valley's 'Permanent Underclass.' Tune in for a fun, in-depth discussion of the most important pending business event in decades.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices



